LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum


 FAQFAQ   RechercherRechercher   MembresMembres   GroupesGroupes   S’enregistrerS’enregistrer 
 ProfilProfil   Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés   ConnexionConnexion 

Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 38, 9, 1014, 15, 16  >
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> CONSEIL MONDIAL DES ÉGLISES/WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES - voir les sous-groupes dans cette section -> ISLAMISATION DU MONDE ENTIER (PARTIE 2)
Sujet précédent :: Sujet suivant  
Auteur Message

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Jeu 6 Nov - 01:42 (2014)    Sujet du message: CAIR DIRECTOR : PRACTICING MUSLIMS ARE ABOVE THE LAW OF THE LAND Répondre en citant


But if you're a real christian, you're considered as a terrorist by the law of the land. This is the how the muslim brotherhood conquer the world for the Pope to bring their new satanic world order. They have to destroy the old world and "the laws of the jungle"-- (the laws of the Most High), like George Walker Bush told on Sept. 11, 1991

Posted on July 30, 2013 by Tim Brown

According to the leader of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, Muslims living in America should not be bound by U.S. law. “If we are practicing Muslims, we are above the law of the land,” said Herman Mustafa Carroll, executive director of the Dallas-Fort Worth CAIR branch.

I suppose at the very least, Carroll is being honest about what practicing Muslims believe. This is what we’ve been telling people all along. Now CAIR is becoming a bit more vocal about what they are really about.

Carroll made the statement at a rally in Austin, Texas as part of a nationwide effort to hold “Muslim Capitol Day” events. According to the event website Muslims came to the Texas capitol to “promote civic and political activism throughout the wider Muslim community.”

It appears to me that they are promoting jihad and lawlessness. “We tried to downplay Sharia, because we didn’t want to give the other side any excitement for being here,” he said.

He then attempted to dismiss his critics as “anti-foreign.” I wonder if we should just out him now as “anti-American,” since he thinks he is above the laws of America.

“When you even say the word Sharia, people get nervous. We are not advocating for Sharia. We are not trying to make Sharia the law of the land,” he said.

While saying that Muslims only want the right to practice their faith, Carroll also included this little tidbit. “If you understand Sharia, the foundation of our faith … how we treat our neighbor, how we treat our parents … how we participate in society, all of that is part of Sharia.”

He must have intentionally left out the parts about jihad, honor killings and treating women and infidels as chattel, while seemingly speaking about harmless treatment of neighbors and parents.

They discussed “the recent House and Senate bill proposals involving the implementation of ‘anti-Sharia’ legislation, where the First Amendment rights and freedoms of Muslims would ultimately be hindered.”

Carroll attempted to downplay Sharia law, despite joining with the ACLU to oppose the anti-Sharia legislation in Texas.

I told you about how the federal government was seeking to close the mouths of free speech in regards to Islam back in June. I don’t recall Mr. Carroll standing up and opposing that. In fact, his organization didn’t make a peep about that, which simply means they are complicit in it.

The event even included a speech by a representative of Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam, who declared that Texas was an awful place and that Islam was the answer.

“Why did Muhammad say that he would not rest until the Koran was the law of the land?”

“Islam does not have Texas in the current condition, the current socio-political condition that Texas is in. What is this condition that Texas is in? Why is Texas on the brink, when you look at Texas in comparison to 50 states, education, percent of population graduating from high school is 46, high school completion rate is 46, the scholastic assessment rate, the SAT score in Texas is 47, the percentage of population with no health insurance in Texas is first, those without health insurance Texas is first. When you look at the state of a child in Texas, the percentage of uninsured children, Texas is first… etc etc

You shouldn’t be filing legislation against Islam, when you look at Texas, Islam is not the problem. Islam is the solution. Allah Akbar.”

Well I suppose if you consider a means to illiteracy and poverty as your goals, then perhaps Islam is the answer. If you consider the merciless killing and degradation of women as what you are out to achieve, then yes, I suppose Islam is the answer. If you are considering an eternity in Hell, then yes Islam would provide that answer.

However, Carroll has also defended terrorists on the same grounds as his statement above; Muslims are above the law of the land.

“I think you can only blame Hamas for so long. It takes two to tango. And I think, you know, that what we’ve heard for a number of years is this terrorist, terrorist, terrorist, terrorist, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, was not just Hamas.”

“Look at the true cause of the terrorism. It’s not somebody is reading a book, reading a Qur’an, and then go out and say, ‘Well, the Qur’an told me to blow this up. I’m gonna blow it up.’ The cause, the root cause of terrorism is oppression. The root cause of terrorism is oppression.”

Now ask yourself, those that read the Qur’an believe they are above the law of the land and some even go so far as to obey the words of the Qur’an and murder infidels. They both share a common core: The teachings of a demon-possessed pedophile, murdering thief named Mohammed.

Back in 2003, CAIR founder Omar Ahmad sought to bully a newspaper that quoted him saying:

 “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith but to become dominant.”

For my friends who think Islam is not a threat to our society, let that one sink in.

For years Ahmad has been trying to seek a retraction from the newspaper, but to no avail as the paper stands by the article. I applaud their courage to do so and expose the attempts at taqiyya being put forth by Ahmad and his Muslim Brotherhood front group.

Tim Brown is the Editor of Freedom Outpost and a regular contributor to The D.C. Clothesline.

Don't forget to follow the D.C. Clothesline on Facebook and Twitter. PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.


Dernière édition par maria le Jeu 29 Jan - 03:18 (2015); édité 1 fois
Revenir en haut

MessagePosté le: Jeu 6 Nov - 01:42 (2014)    Sujet du message: Publicité

PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?
Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Dim 9 Nov - 15:54 (2014)    Sujet du message: FBI EVIDENCE : CAIR LEADERS ARE HAMAS USA Répondre en citant




VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdtNgYvI4Fo

And HAMAS according to their own covenant, is a wing of the Muslim Brotherhood and was recently revealed that ISIS Leader Originally from Muslim Brotherhood.

VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m99Ft-bkALs


Same thing with CAIR CANADA who's run by Hamas muslim brotherhood, who change their name by the "National Council of Canadian muslims"

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Sam 15 Nov - 04:09 (2014)    Sujet du message: ALLAH PRAISED ON HOUSE FLOOR 11-13-14 Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SS5KXaZs9PY

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Mer 3 Déc - 04:13 (2014)    Sujet du message: MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS WANT SWITZERLAND TO CHANGE NATIONAL FLAG Répondre en citant


Posted by: Bill Wallace in Islam, Uncategorized December 1, 2014

The Case for Changing Switzerland’s National Flag in the Name of Political Correctness

A group of Muslim immigrants wants to force Switzerland to abandon the current flag – a white cross on the red background. They say that it violates the rights of the representatives of non-Christian confessions. [1] They seem to have been hurt by the recent ban on minarets construction. However, unfortunately for them, their proposal is unlikely to be welcomed by the native Swiss and will only increase the number of votes in favor of the treasury of the local far-right People’s Party. [2]  The first suggestion to remove the cross from the Swiss flag was made not by a Muslim, but (judging by the name) an ethnic Croat and Catholic vice-president of the association of immigrants Secondos Plus Ivica Petrushich. “The cross does not fit today’s multicultural Switzerland,” he said. The organization of the Turkish, Albanian and other immigrants from Muslim countries followed with a similar initiative. Instead, they suggested using a green-yellow-red flag of Helvetic Republic that existed at the turn of the 18th-19th centuries. It has no cross on it.  It is hardly coincidental that the issue of replacing the flag was raised by the representatives of immigrant organizations. Today, over 20 percent of seven million-strong Swiss population is immigrants. Naturally, the Muslims will be more than others insistent on replacing the flag.

There are nearly 400,000 of them (more than five percent of the population). The largest “ethnic Muslim” community is Albanian, followed by the Turkish one. Arabs and Bosnian Muslims also reside in Switzerland. Many of them certainly do not like the cross.  The vast majority of Swiss Muslims virtually broke off with the religion of their ancestors. No more than 50 thousand of the faithful pray five times a day. However, women in headscarves have become an integral part of the cityscape of Zurich or Geneva. Furthermore, the birthrate in religious Muslim families is much higher than among the other population. Finally, all Swiss followers of Islam are not natives, but immigrants and their descendants. Their support of changing the appearance of the flag is, to say the least, ambiguous.

Apparently, this circumstance was taken into account by the head of the Federation of Islamic Organizations in Switzerland Mayzar Hisham, who called the idea of ​​changing the flag “counterproductive.” He said that they did not demand anyone to change the ancient traditions of their countries. It is hard not to agree with his words. The relations of the indigenous Swiss and immigrants have already passed a difficult strength test. The desire to change the flag will only add fuel to the fire.
Two years ago the Muslim community wanted to attach minarets to the existing mosques. However, Switzerland is different from all other countries in a way that each more or less relevant issue is solved by holding a referendum. Negotiations with the government officials were not sufficient, and they had to ask the opinion of the population. This opinion was not in favor of the Muslim immigrants.  The initiator of the referendum two years ago was the ultra-right Swiss People’s Party that called to stop the “creeping Islamization”. A deputy of the Swiss Parliament Ulrich Shlyuer said that minarets were a political symbol of the implementation of Islam. Step by step, Sharia was conquering Switzerland, acting in parallel with the Swiss law. Statistics show that the degree of religiosity of the local Muslim population is exaggerated, but for the ordinary Swiss even a hint of a violation of their habitual way of living was sufficient.

Major Swiss Compagnies Capitulated over “Muslim Sensitivities” and Banned the Cross from their Products and Advertisements

Prostituting themselves and bowing to muslim sensitivities, Switzerland’s leading companies have already removed Switzerland’s cross-shaped flag from their products for the Islamic market. Swatch, Tissot and Victorinox logos, as iconic of their brand as NIKE”s check or McDonald’s golden arches, are voluntarily censored, removed, in a breathtaking act of submission to a radical racist ideology that oppressses and subjugates all non-believers and women. [&&] Tissot, maker of Swiss watches since 1853, yes 1853, is removing its 158-year-old identity.

Victorinox, which sells the famous Swiss army knives, replaced the cross symbol on its product with a letter ‘V’. In the past, Victorinox had problems selling its products in Saudi Arabia: deliveries were blocked; cargo was seized at customs. It decided to switch to the ‘V’ symbol for an easier life. This has provoked complaints from some customers that the knives on sale in Saudi Arabia are not authentic because they lack the original cross logo. [5]

Swatch justified its action claiming that “Saudi Arabia is a Muslim country. It does not allow the cross to be shown in public. …We respect the laws of the countries we are active in.” Some members of the Saudi religious police were interviewed for a Swiss television programme, however, and said they weren’t bothered by the Swiss cross symbols at all and were mystified about why Swatch was doing this. [5]

It goes without saying that any company (or individual) that cannot stand up for what they are or does not know who and what they are, will inevitably disappear. Worse, capitualting to an ideology that lashes women, covers them in cloth coffins, cuts off clitorises, and denies non-Muslims basic human rights, is beneath contempt. I, for one, will never buy from these cowards.  As for the Saudis demanding (under the sharia) that the cross not be shown in public, like Pamella Geller said on her blog:

The West should respond in kind. No crescents and stars anywhere.  Everywhere the sharia is imposed on the West, freedom lovers should respond in kind. Tolerance when applied to evil is a crime. [3]

[1]  Muslim immigrants want Switzerland to change national flag, Pravda, 12.10.2011
[2] Muslim immigrants want Switzerland to change national flag, Pravda, 12.10.2011; Muslim immigrants want Switzerland to change national flag, Creeping Sharia, October 14, 2011
[3] Major Swiss Companies Submit to Islam: Remove Cross-Shaped Swiss Flag from Their Products, Pamella Geller, October 10, 2011
[4] Haro sur la croix suisse, RTS, Emission du 03 octobre 2011
[5] Cheradenine Zakalwe, Swiss Companies Removing Cross-Shaped Swiss Flag from Their Products to Appease Muslims, Islam Versus Europe, Sunday, 9 October 2011
[&&]Cheradenine Zakalwe, Swiss Companies Removing Cross-Shaped Swiss Flag from Their Products to Appease Muslims, Islam Versus Europe, Sunday, 9 October 2011;  Major Swiss Companies Submit to Islam: Remove Cross-Shaped Swiss Flag from Their Products, Pamella Geller, October 10, 2011
Sponsors of this article


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Jeu 4 Déc - 03:53 (2014)    Sujet du message: EUROPE LARGEST MOSQUE ROME MOSQUE ITALY : ISLAM AND MOSQUE IN EUROPE Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKQjRRH1y2Q

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Lun 8 Déc - 01:05 (2014)    Sujet du message: ISMAMIC SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY TOWN HALL, SHARIA LAW AND THE CONSTITUTION - WATERS Répondre en citant


On February 19, 2012 a public townhall meeting took place at the Islamic Society of Orange County, California. Present were several dignitaries. Here are the comments of Congresswoman Maxine Waters. She vilifies Rep. Peter King and others who would have the audacity to suggest that 1,400 years of Islamic expansion through jihad might come to the shores of the USA.

VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xiKudoZhXc

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Mar 9 Déc - 01:03 (2014)    Sujet du message: NEW JERSEY TOWN FORCED TO PAY $7.75 MILLION TO MUSLIMS TO BUILD MEGA-MOSQUE Répondre en citant


Posted on December 8, 2014 by creeping

via Atlas Shrugs who writes:

In a striking violation of the establishment clause, Obama’s lawless administration is imposing the sharia nationwide, allowing the rampant construction of rabats and jihad recruitment centers at a time when we should be monitoring the mosques and restricting construction of  Muslim Brotherhood beachheads and Islamic State madrassas.

 Many churches and synagogues and Wal-Marts and what have you have been unable to build because of zoning laws. So why is Muslim supremacism enshrined in DOJ policy? And why are they given special rights? The United States of America is based on individual rights — no special rights for special classes.

 These proposed  giant mosques in small residential neighborhoods with even smaller Muslim populations are “rabats,” a beachhead to spread Islam. The first rabat appeared at the time of Muhammad.

 The Prophet imposed his rule on parts of Arabia through a series of ghazvas, or razzias (the origin of the English word “raid”). The ghazva was designed to terrorize the infidels, convince them that their civilization was doomed and force them to submit to Islamic rule. Those who participated in the ghazva were known as the ghazis, or raiders.

After each ghazva, the Prophet ordered the creation of a rabat—or a point of contact at the heart of the infidel territory raided. The rabat consisted of an area for prayer, a section for the raiders to eat and rest and facilities to train and prepare for future razzias [raids].

Unfortunately for many in the rural central New Jersey neighborhood, the mosque will be built by a luxury apartment complex. Details via Bridgewater, mosque settlement reaches $7.75 million

BRIDGEWATER – There will be no mosque on Mountaintop Road.

Instead, under the terms of a settlement between the township and the Al Falah Center, a mosque will be built between Routes 202-206 and 287 on a 15-acre lot the township will buy for $2.75 million.

The township will exchange that lot for the former Redwood Inn property on Mountaintop Road where the mosque originally was proposed.

In addition, the township’s insurance carrier will pay the Al Falah Center $5 million for alleged damages, costs and attorney fees in exchange for dropping its lawsuit against the township.

The township will use $815,000 from its open space trust fund and a $1.935 million bond ordinance to buy the property between Harding and West Foothill roads, south of the 80-unit Woodmont Square at Bridgewater apartment complex.

Members of the Al Falah Center were satisfied with the settlement.

“I think it’s a just result,” said Omar T. Mohammedi, a member of Al Falah’s board. “We’re just excited we will have a place of worship.”

Mohammedi said that because plans have to be developed for the property, no timeline has been drawn for the submission of plans and construction.

“It’s a great site,” he said.

The settlement, approved unanimously Monday by the township council, ends a bitter three-year dispute that landed in federal court and already has cost the township hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees.

But Council President Matthew Moench said the settlement could potentially save the township “an enormous amount of money” if the municipality lost the lawsuit.

Mayor Dan Hayes said the settlement prevents Al Falah from seeking attorney fees allowed by federal law that would have exceeded the township’s insurance coverage.

Without a settlement, the mayor said, the costs would have been paid by taxpayers.

Al Falah Center will have 20 months to gain the necessary approvals to build the mosque, said Kevin Coakley, the attorney representing the township in the litigation.

Coakley said the township has agreed to “cooperate” with the Al Falah Center in the approval process.

Because the site is zoned for houses of worship and has access to a highway, the lot meets the criteria in the township’s zoning ordinance. That zoning ordinance, adopted after the Al Falah Center applied to build the mosque on Mountaintop Road, was at the center of the legal dispute

The settlement leaves that ordinance in effect.

“The preservation of our residential uses and the ability to zone uses appropriate for their locations is a critical right the township fought to preserve,” Hayes said. “This settlement leaves our ordinance intact, ends our exposure to the almost unlimited costs of further litigation and allows all parties to move forward.”

Hayes said the township has not decided what to do with the 7-acre Mountaintop Road property.

The Route 202-206 property has a $803,600 assessment and the 2013 property taxes were $16,634. In 2012, the township approved a 39-unit townhouse development for the property that was never built.

The settlement also calls for the suspension of the planning board hearings that started in January on Al Falah’s proposal to build the mosque on the former Redwood Inn property.

The hearings often featured contentious exchanges between neighbors and witnesses testifying for the Al Falah Center on issues such as the size of prayer mats used to determine the number of worshipers the proposed mosque could accommodate, a number that would determine the required number of parking spaces.

Neighbors to the proposed mosque on Mountaintop Road hired lawyers to represent them before the board.

The legal battle between the township and the Al Falah Center began after the congregation applied in January 2011 to construct the mosque on the site of the former catering hall.

Two months later, the council adopted an ordinance that limited sites for a house of worship to certain roads because of traffic-volume concerns. That ordinance would have shifted the mosque proposal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment, where requirements for granting a use variance are more stringent.

After the dismissal, the Al Falah Center filed suit in federal court, alleging that the township violated federal law by enacting a land-use ordinance that treats religious institutions on less than equal terms than nonreligious institutions. The accelerated passage of the ordinance was “strong circumstantial evidence” of the township’s intent to discriminate against the mosque, according to court papers.

“The case speaks for itself,” Mohammedi said.

But Moench emphasized that the settlement concluded that the township has “done nothing wrong.”

In September 2013, federal Judge Michael Shipp sided with the Al Falah Center and ruled that the mosque application must be heard by the Planning Board without applying the standards in the ordinance.

Shipp issued an injunction preventing the township from enforcing the ordinance. The judge also ordered the planning board to reopen the hearings on the mosque proposal.

Though the township appealed the ruling, the second round of hearings began. As part of the settlement, the township’s appeal will be dropped.

In June, retired federal judge Stephen Orlofsky was named as mediator in the dispute. Hayes said he participated in hours of negotiations over several months to settle the dispute.

“It’s been a long and arduous journey,” Township Attorney William Savo said.

For the rest of New Jersey, the long arduous journey (to ruin) is just beginning.

The mosque must certainly have foreign backers, if you recall the Al Falah Center had four high-powered law firms and the Feds working on its behalf.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Sam 13 Déc - 04:08 (2014)    Sujet du message: "LE DRAPEAU DE L'EI FLOTTERA SUR JERUSALEM MÊME SI CA NE PLAIT PAS AUX JUIFS" Répondre en citant


Le groupe islamiste menace d'élargir son Califat d'Est en Ouest, mettant fin à l'Etat juif


L'Etat islamique a assuré qu'il fera flotter son drapeau sur Jérusalem "même si ça ne plait pas aux Juifs et aux croisés", dans la préface de la cinquième édition de son magazine officiel, Dabiq, paru cette semaine.

Dans cette préface, l’Etat islamique annonce également qu'il envisage d'élargir son Califat à la péninsule arabique, au Sinaï, au Yémen, à la Libye et à l'Algérie.

Il y aura une grande guerre entre les Musulmans et l'Occident quand la Syrie sera totalement conquise (...) notre drapeau flottera sur Jérusalem ainsi que sur la Mecque et Médine, même si ça ne plait pas aux Juifs et aux croisés, peut-on lire dans ce magazine.

Alors que les yeux du monde sont aveuglés et fascinés par les médias sorciers couvrant la bataille pour Ayn al-Islam (Kobane, ndlr), nos yeux scrutent attentivement l'Est et l'Ouest en préparation à l'expansion qui - avec la permission d'Allah - mettrait fin à l'Etat juif, annonce encore le texte.

"Notre chemin nous mènera jusqu'à Rome, même si les apostats et les hypocrites nous méprisent".

"L'ombre de notre drapeau béni s'étendra jusqu'à ce qu'il couvre la Terre d'Est en Ouest, en remplissant le monde de la vérité et de la justice de l'Islam, mettant un terme à la fausseté et la tyrannie de Jahiliyyah (l'Etat antérieur à l'Islam, ndlr), en dépit de l'Amérique et de sa coalition de mécréants", précise cette préface.

Dans l'édition précédente de Dabiq, Etat islamique avait admis l'enlèvement de femmes et d'enfants Yazidi, dont ils avaient fait des esclaves "parce que selon les sages il sont des infidèles".


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Dim 14 Déc - 03:59 (2014)    Sujet du message: BRITAIN'S UNREQUITED LOVE Répondre en citant


by Douglas Murray
December 8, 2014 at 5:00 am

content_preface a écrit:

Willing to be endlessly open and hospitable, Britain finds itself at a loss when that hospitality is neither respected nor returned.

It is worth asking why British Muslims should have their scripture represented in the coronation of the new monarch, when many will not even pray in their mosques for the well-being of that monarch. Including passages from the Quran in the coronation is a mistake because of the old problem of reciprocity — and at the same time as no Christian (let alone a Jew) can even set foot in Mecca. Then what about also representing Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, and atheists?

In synagogues in the UK, British Jews every week in their service have a prayer for the long life and happiness of the Queen. It is a moving and heartfelt moment, not to mention a clear signal that Jews in Britain are utterly loyal to the state. So why should British mosques not have a similar prayer? Because many Muslims in Britain simply do not share the good Lord Harries's kindness, tolerance, inclusivity or indeed liberalism.

What is the answer? Perhaps bit more kindness, a bit more generosity, the offering up of a few more of our treasured traditions. That will do it, we think, surely?

The tradition of liberal tolerance, fostered in Britain, was one of the greatest gifts this country gave to the world. That inclusive tradition of John Locke and John Stuart Mill, however, always leaves itself open to abuse by people willing to use liberalism's flaws — not least its tolerance of intolerance — to end liberalism.

The Church of England, in its time, has often been far from liberal. In the nineteenth century, it ended the careers and livelihoods of liberal theologians as adamantly as did the Church of Rome. But in the twentieth century, the story changed. Partly spurred by the loss of confidence caused by diminishing church attendance, by the late twentieth century the Church of England had dropped its reputation as "the Conservative party at prayer," and became something more like "the Liberal party at prayer." No accommodation seemed too extreme. No public expression of doubt seemed too disconcerting. For some years now, the Church of England has been led by its members — not thanks to, but in spite of, the embarrassing public doubts of its leadership.

And here is the liberal dilemma expressed in just one story this week. The former Bishop of Oxford, Lord Harries — a kindly and learned man — used a debate in the House of Lords to suggest that the coronation of the next monarch in Britain should perhaps include some verses from the Quran.

It would be a demonstration of "inclusive hospitality," he said, should Muslims in Britain have some of their holy scripture read at the crowning of the next head of the Church of England. Cue a certain degree of pandemonium. For courtesies like this have become expected of the Bishops even as, in my experience, they cause despair among their erstwhile flock.

British coronations, then and ... now? Left: The coronation of Queen Elizabeth II in 1953. Right: Prince Charles, son of Elizabeth and heir to the throne, demonstrating his inclusivity and multicultural credentials during a recent visit to Saudi Arabia -- a country not known for "inclusive hospitality," especially in the realm of religious freedom.

Because of course, the whole gesture is deeply demoralizing for your average British Christian. And of course, it is fraught with errors that must be pointed out.

First, it is true that there are many Muslims in Britain. It is also true that it might make some of them feel happy if, on the big day, verses of the Quran were recited in Westminster Abbey. But then we have a lot of Hindus and Sikhs in Britain, too. True, none of their community has distinguished himself or caused any wider public notice by, for instance, blowing up a tube train at rush hour. But surely, some reading from their scriptures should be squeezed in anyway? And how about the largest growing faith in Britain: atheism. Why should not doubters or disbelievers in any faith find themselves represented with a reading? Not to mention Jews, Buddhists, animists and the remaining followers of the Druid faith. Britain is going to have to prepare for the longest coronation service in a very long time.

Second, there is the matter of which passages from the Quran should be read at the next King's coronation. I assume we shall not hear "slay the infidel wherever you find them," and not the passages that read, "Cast terror into the heart of the unbeliever... Smite at their neck." I suspect these passages will not make the cut, so to speak; the families of the decapitated soldier Lee Rigby, not to mention the aid workers from Britain recently beheaded in Syria, might take exception were this to happen, even if no one else did.

Third, of course, including passages from the Quran in the next coronation of a monarch is a mistake because of the old problem of reciprocity. I will not dwell on the obscenity of having readings from the Quran in one of the holiest shrines of Anglican Christianity at the same time as no Christian (let alone Jew) can even set foot in Mecca. That point somehow seems just so 2000s. But it is worth asking why British Muslims should have their scripture represented in the coronation of the new monarch, when many, in their mosques, will not even pray for the well-being of that monarch. In synagogues in the UK, British Jews every week have a prayer in their services for the long life and happiness of the Queen. It is a moving and heartfelt moment, not to mention a clear signal given to any doubters that Jews in Britain are utterly loyal to the state.

So why should British mosques not have some similar prayer? Whenever I have mooted this to Muslim friends in Britain, they have always dismissed the idea as if it were an example of a willful provocation on my part even to raise the issue. The underlying theme is that everyone knows this would be impossible.

But why not? If Muslims in Britain want to show that they are loyal to Britain, why not take a leaf out of the Jews' book and have a prayer in every Friday service up and down the land for the Queen as head of state, head of the Church of England and head of the armed forces. It would be a wonderful sign.

It is also, of course, a million miles away from happening. Many British imams, if they even suggested this, would have a riot on their hands. And that is where Lord Harries's liberal "inclusive hospitality" hits its utterly foreseeable buffers. Because many Muslims in Britain simply do not share the good Lord Harries's kindness, tolerance, inclusivity or indeed liberalism. In fact, they much more admire another faith, which seems confident and strong, than they admire a religion led by people who appear not to even have very much faith in their own Faith.

This, then, is another chapter in another part of Britain's contemporary tragedy. Willing to be endlessly open and hospitable, the country finds itself at a loss when that hospitality is neither respected nor returned. What is the answer? Perhaps a bit more kindness, a bit more generosity, the offering up of a few more of our own treasured traditions? That will do it, we think, surely?

Well perhaps there will be verses from the Quran at the next coronation. But the king who will be crowned there will no longer preside over an even nominally Christian nation.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Dim 14 Déc - 04:08 (2014)    Sujet du message: PENNSYLVANIA : TERROR-LINKED CAIR FILES FED LAWSUIT TO FORCE MEGA MOSQUE ON BENSALEM Répondre en citant


Posted on December 13, 2014 by creeping

Another classic example of Islamic zoning jihad (aka legal terrorism). via Bensalem Mosque Battle: Federal Lawsuit FIled | News | Philadelphia Magazine.

The Bensalem Masjid says that it tried to buy existing houses of worship, which would already be zoned correctly, but none were interested in selling. It put in bids on other properly zoned parcels, but those bids were rejected or went unanswered. Finally, the group found a 4.58-acre, three-parcel stretch of property on Hulmeville Road that would be perfect for its needs — big enough for a cafeteria, a school, and all of the other facilities they wanted to bring to the Muslims in the area — but the group of properties weren’t zoned for house-of-worship use. And so, the Bensalem Masjid went before the zoning board to try to get a variance.

In February, the board expressed certain concerns about the project, and so the group changed its physical plans, eliminating a proposed basement and cafeteria. Another hearing was held. And another. And another. In total, six hearings were held, making the process one of the longest — if not the longest zoning hearing process — in Bensalem’s history.

Board members questioned the Masjid about parking and traffic. One board member expressed concern that the mosque would bring in Muslims from New Jersey and nearby Philadelphia.

Community members were invited to air their concerns about the project. One suggested that unlike a church or synagogue, the mosque wouldn’t bring the same kind of benefit to the overall community that a synagogue or church would bring.

The fears of another community member who spoke were a little more clear:

…mosques have patterns and the pattern of mosques has been that when they — when the congregants outgrow the mosque, they spill out on to the streets. And what they do is they — they block — pull up blockades and they bring out their rugs, and they put them down on the street, and they do their prayers out on the streets. I have a video of this if you would like to see to back it up, in several cities around the world … What they do is they put up their barricades and they lay their carpets down on the street and they pray. And it takes them 45 minutes. It draws a lot of people, and it creates problems for the businesses on that street because they cannot do commerce because nobody can get in or out of their stores.

So is this Islamophobia at work?

“We can’t see into their hearts, so we judge them by their conduct,” says Ryan Tack-Hooper, the Masjid’s attorney from the Philadelphia chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, who suggests that the board’s concerns over traffic and parking were unfounded and that the board didn’t make an issue out of traffic and parking for others houses of worship in the area. “It’s very clear that they treated this case differently than they treated other faith centers. There’s definitely some prejudice at work here.”

In its lawsuit, the Masjid accuses Bensalem and the board of violating laws regarding religious land use, Pennsylvania’s Municipal Planning Code and Religious Freedom Protection Act, and the group’s First and Fourteenth Amendment rights.

Americans are starting to wake up, albeit late in the game. If anyone should be filing a lawsuit it should be the people against CAIR and the U.S. government for violating the 14th Amendment:

Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

CAIR and Muslims are waging an aggressive insurrection and must be stopped.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Jeu 18 Déc - 05:17 (2014)    Sujet du message: GEORGIA : LEGAL JIHAD TERRORIZES COUNCIL MEMBERS TO APPROVE MOSQUE IN RETAIL SHOPPING CENTER Répondre en citant


Posted on December 17, 2014 by creeping

Islam means submission. And the Kennesaw City Council submitted to Islam in a cowardly display, selling out citizens and essentially converting a shopping mall into a mosque. Back stories here.

Mayor Mark Mathews: The Dhimmi Behind the Mosque Approval

via The Marietta Daily Journal – Mosque approved in 5 0 Kennesaw City Council vote.

With a unanimous 5-0 vote Monday, the Kennesaw City Council approved a permit allowing an Islamic prayer center to open in a retail center, reversing its decision earlier this month to deny the request.

The controversial vote came despite protests from a crowd of about 20 people outside City Hall holding signs with the words “Ban Islam” and “No Mosque” and waving American flags before and after the meeting.

Monday’s vote, which was approved with a list of other items on the consent agenda without discussion, allows the applicant for the mosque, Kennesaw resident Mufti Islam, to use a 2,200-square-foot space in a retail shopping center off Jiles Road near Cobb Parkway as a Muslim prayer center.

Kashif Islam, the applicant’s brother, said he had no ill feelings toward the protesters.

“They have the right to protest,” Kashif Islam said.

Kashif Islam said he was happy he was given the freedom to practice his religion in the retail center and that the vote ended peacefully.

“This is not life and death. We’ve been living in this neighborhood for 15 years. Have you ever seen us getting into trouble? No,” Kashif Islam said.

When Mayor Mark Mathews adjourned the meeting, all the council members left the room quickly through a back door. Mathews remained but said none of the other council members would comment on the change of vote.

Mathews said Monday’s vote will allow the mosque to operate in the retail center without stipulations for 24 months.

“It was a fairly unusual experience for us, but I think we’ve taken action,” Mathews said.

The permit for the prayer center was denied with a 4-1 vote by the City Council at its Dec. 1 meeting.

Councilwoman Cris Eaton-Welsh, the sole vote in favor of the permit at that meeting, said Monday she was “glad we can move forward and focus on all the great things happening in Kennesaw.”

Councilwoman Debra Williams said in a statement to the MDJ after the meeting that all she could say about changing her vote on the issue was “RLUIPA trumps.”

Williams is referencing the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, a federal law protecting religious institutions from discriminatory zoning laws the applicant threatened to use as a basis to sue the city if the permit was denied.

Protesters outside City Hall were peaceful but vocal about their opinions of the mosque.

Karen Untz, a protester from Cumming, said she was scared of what would happen to the community now that the mosque was allowed in and predicted it would bring Sharia law with it.

“They get a bunch of people in an area, and then they institute Sharia law, and then they beat their wives, et cetera, et cetera. I don’t want to go into all the other terrible things they do,” Untz said. “This is going to start happening all over the state.”

The temporary land use permit approved by the council Monday night gives the applicant 24 months to use the space before Mufti Islam will have to reapply, but Untz said she thinks the mosque will never relocate.

“Everyone knows there’s no such thing as a temporary mosque. Once they establish a mosque, they keep it. They own it for Allah,” Untz said.

The City Council first voted to deny the mosque inside a retail center with a 4-1 vote Dec. 1, with council members Leonard Church, Tim Killingsworth, Jim Sebastian and Williams voting down the application.

Doug Dillard, the applicant’s attorney, threatened the city with a lawsuit after the council’s decision to deny the application. Dillard said he could file a $1 million claim invoking Religious Land Use Act in Cobb Superior Court, according to a letter included in the application presented to the council at its Dec. 1 meeting.

After this warning, Mathews said all four council members who voted to deny the mosque individually asked the mayor in private to change their previous vote at the council’s Dec. 10 meeting.

Monday night, the council voted 5-0 to approve the four council members’ requests to change their votes. Now, the city’s record will show that the application for the mosque was approved 5-0.

 More via WND:

The city council’s flip-flop angered residents who had come out against the mosque. But residents were not allowed to speak for or against the mosque until after the vote was taken.

One Kennesaw woman, Carlene Fregeolle, addressed the council after the vote. She said she met with the Muslims and found they had not disclosed all of their plans for the building on their application.

The mosque will be open for prayer five times a day, for the weekly call to prayer on Fridays and also for an educational program for children on Sundays. The city restricted the mosque to 80 worshipers at a time and 40 parking spaces.

“They said they’re expecting about 80 children on Sundays. So, again, no worries about traffic and parking issues? Really? We’re now talking kids and lots of them,” Fregeolle said.

Everything was done behind the scenes,” Fregeolle continued. “If they don’t get their way they sue. Our city council is afraid to stand behind their own zoning laws.”

Local media were reporting a federal complaint had been filed with the U.S. Department of Justice and that the DOJ had threatened a lawsuit.

Fregeolle asked the council if that were indeed the case.

“I can answer that. No, the DOJ has not come in and has not threatened a lawsuit,” said city attorney Randall Bentley.

As a neighbor who lives closest to the mosque, Fregeolle said the Muslims lied to the city about her attitudes toward the new house of worship.

“They told the council I wouldn’t mind,” she said. “Again, that is false information. … By your flip-flopping you have made the city even more vulnerable.”

Fregeolle said that if any other applicant had applied for the same space using the same tactics they would have been denied.

“But with this group you have to be PC,” she said.

Council member Debra Williams, who voted against the mosque the first time, changed her vote, as did council members Leonard Church, Tim Killingsworth and Jim Sebastian. Cris Eaton Welsh was the only member who voted in favor of the mosque both times.

The decision came down to costs, Williams said, and the threat of an expensive lawsuit in federal court.

“We denied a nightclub there a few months ago and we argued the same thing – traffic, noise and parking,” she told WND. “And it would have operated at night when all the other businesses were closed and they were willing to put in sound-proof walls. They should sue our pants off.”

Williams told WND that even if the Justice Department hadn’t yet threatened a lawsuit the attorneys for the Islamic congregation were keeping the DOJ abreast of the situation with the city.

Once a mosque is approved in a residential or commercial area, it often expands into uses that were never spelled out upfront at the time of application, Lugo said, causing friction with nearby residents. This can be handled with clear ordinances drawn up ahead of time, but otherwise it’s difficult to rein in a mosque after it gets approved under vague or poorly written ordinances.

“This type of use is different. It’s not just Sunday morning and Wednesday night service, this is 24/7 prayer services,” she said. “So this is difficult when cities are not willing to enforce their special-use terms or if they are not clearly written and interpreted. This is when it becomes really difficult to come back later and say ‘oh we did not anticipate this and you misrepresented yourself.’ They will often complain that it’s restricting something core to their religion.”

If the parameters are set clearly, upfront, the city is in better position later should any complaints arise from residents about traffic, noise or parking issues.

“If there are examples of restrictions due to the nature of the property, like no daycare due to traffic, no schools, no meetings other than on certain specified days of the week, etc., the city will be better off,” she said. “The courts still allow religious uses but if they’re shared in a conditional use with something that is not a designated multi-use then the courts allow terms for reasonable restrictions.

“For years cities didn’t think they had to pay attention to RLUIPA,” Lugo said. “They have neglected to build in proper, reasonably based restrictions that can be enforced. That’s what I have been trying to help council members understand.”

But most cities are ill prepared for dealing with mosques, because they assume they will operate just like churches.

For example, in Bloomington, Minnesota, a mosque was approved under the pretense of accommodating a maximum of 200 people, but now residents are seeing events that bring in excess of 700 people and the accompanying traffic problems.

“To date there has not been enough express language in the permits saying if you go over this number then you need to hire your own traffic guides, etc.,” Lugo said.

Mosques are geared towards recreation, communal meals and five prayer times starting at dawn and going to dusk, “and including all facets of family life,” she said. “It’s a different kind of use, more active, more frequent, and that’s what cities need to know going in. They need to understand RLUIPA will prevail and it’s so ambiguous, so short of Congress clarifying it the courts are all over the map in how they’re interpreting this law.”

She said the law was the brainchild or Sens. Orin Hatch, R-Utah, and the late Ted Kennedy, D-Mass.

“Some of these Islamic organizations have gotten what looks like preferential treatment because they have been able to threaten and not give all the facts,” she said. “Cities need to make it clear that they expect applicants to be honest and everyone to go through the same process no matter who you are.

“Back up, ask for clear and complete answers. How many cars? Are the existing lanes able to handle the traffic?  And once they set a precedent saying a religious group can have five to seven services per day then they have to keep saying yes to that kind of request in the future.”

In other words, Pandora’s box has been opened.

“They’re creating a whole new level of use,” Lugo said. “It has to be done deliberately and with the understanding that they’re creating an example that will be referenced in the future.

“Cool heads need to prevail and do this in a real measured process.”

In other words, Muslims have been lying for centuries and come with millions in foreign backers. So bring your A-game or you will be Islamized.

Prediction: Expect the Muslims to complain that shoppers at the mall are disturbing them and local residents to be further restricted in how they are allowed in/around the mosque. At which point retailers will either go out of business or relocate.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Ven 19 Déc - 20:34 (2014)    Sujet du message: ISLAMIC STATE (ISIS) PUBLISHES SHARIA-COMPLIANT PENAL CODE, SAYS IT WILL BE VIGILANTLY ENFORCED Répondre en citant



MEMRI  On December 15, 2014, a document detailing the Islamic State (ISIS) penal code was released on the Jihadi Media Platform forum (alplatformmedia.com). The document, which was titled “Clarification [regarding] the Hudud [Koranic punishments],” included a list of crimes and their respective punishment according to the shari’a. ISIS said it published the document as a warning and a reminder to the people living under its rule. It also reaffirmed its commitment to enforce it vigilantly. The document begins with various Koranic verses emphasizing the need for Muslims to adhere to the shari’a, while noting that those who do not follow it are considered unbelievers.


The punishment is based on Koran 5:33: “Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive after corruption in the land is that they be killed or crucified, or have their hands and feet be cut off on opposite sides, or that they be exiled from the land…”

Below are the crimes listed in this document along with their respective punishment under sharia law: BLASPHEMY AGAINST ALLAH: DEATH BLASPHEMY AGAINST PROPHET MOHAMMED: DEATH– even if the accuser repents BLASPHEMY AGAINST ISLAM: DEATH ADULTERY: STONING TO DEATH  iF the adulterer is married and 100 LASHES and EXILE if he or she were unmarried. SODOMY/HOMOSEXUALITY: DEATH whether you are the recipient or the depositor THEFT: CUTTING OFF THE HAND DRINKING ALCOHOL: 80 LASHES SLANDERING: 80 LASHES SPYING FOR THE UNBELIEVERS: DEATH APOSTASY FROM ISLAM: DEATH COMBINED MURDER & STEALING: DEATH & CRUCIFIXION MURDER ONLY: DEATH (except if the murder victim is an infidel) STEALING ONLY: CUTTING OFF RIGHT HAND & LEFT LEG TERRORIZING MUSLIMS: EXILE

By BareNakedIslam • Posted in Religion of Hate


Dernière édition par maria le Sam 3 Jan - 08:48 (2015); édité 1 fois
Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Sam 3 Jan - 08:44 (2015)    Sujet du message: UNE COMPAGNIE SAOUDIENNE VEUT SEPARER FEMMES ET HOMMES A BORD DE SES VOLS Répondre en citant


Le Point - Publié le 02/01/2015 à 17:08

Saudia Airlines répond ainsi aux plaintes de certains hommes qui n'acceptaient pas que leurs femmes et leurs filles soient assises à côté de passagers mâles.


En appliquant la non-mixité des vols, la compagnie respecte ainsi une stricte interprétation de la charia. © William West / AFP

Par Olivier Pérou

Voilà une pratique digne du Moyen-Âge. La compagnie aérienne saoudienne Saudia Airlines veut interdire aux femmes et aux hommes de s'asseoir côte à côte à bord de ses avions. Pour répondre aux plaintes de passagers hommes qui étaient "choqués" que leurs épouses, filles, soeurs ou mères soient assises à côté de voyageurs mâles "étrangers", la société a ainsi décidé d'établir une ségrégation sexuelle, indique le site d'information Emirates247. Le directeur adjoint du marketing, Abdul Rahman Al Fahd, s'est félicité dans les colonnes du journal saoudien Ajel d'avoir trouvé "une solution à ces problèmes". "Nous allons bientôt introduire de nouvelles règles qui satisferont tout le monde", a-t-il ajouté. En appliquant la non-mixité des vols, la compagnie respecte ainsi une stricte interprétation de la charia - la loi islamique - et harmonise ses règles avec les prescriptions religieuses établies par les autorités du royaume wahhabite.
"Interdit aux femmes"

Le personnel de bord devra ainsi veiller à la séparation des sexes, sauf si les passagers sont de la même famille. La religion est déjà très présente à bord. Ainsi, avant chaque décollage, un verset du Coran ou une prière est récité. Les hommes peuvent se rendre dans un espace qui leur est dédié pour les cinq prières quotidiennes. On ne trouve dans les avions ni alcool ni porc et encore moins d'hôtesses de nationalités étrangères, y compris sur les vols internationaux. Une compagnie de l'interdit où il fait décidément bon voyager...

En Arabie saoudite, les femmes sont placées sous l'autorité légale de tuteurs masculins. Des restaurants affichent parfois des panneaux "Interdit aux femmes". Les Saoudiennes ne peuvent étudier que dans les universités 100 % féminines où on ne trouve pas de professeurs ou d'étudiants de sexe masculin. Des gardiens empêchent d'ailleurs l'entrée d'homme au sein de ces universités non mixtes. Une étudiante est décédée des suites d'un malaise cardiaque en février 2014 alors que la direction de l'université - au nom de la non-mixité - a refusé de faire entrer un ambulancier sur le campus pour la secourir, car aucun responsable masculin de la jeune fille n'était présent. L'Arabie saoudite est également le seul pays au monde où les femmes n'ont pas le droit de conduire. Des militantes avaient bravé cette interdiction en prenant le volant en octobre dernier défiant le pouvoir de Riyad et provoquant la colère des extrémistes religieux. Deux d'entre elles ont été renvoyées devant un tribunal spécialisé en affaire... de terrorisme !

Femmes et religions

Le sexisme n'est pas l'apanage de la compagnie Saudia Airlines ou des Saoudiens. En septembre 2014, refusant de s'asseoir à côté de femmes, des passagers juifs ultra-orthodoxes d'un vol New York-Tel-Aviv avaient provoqué un véritable scandale et avaient causé un retard de près de onze heures. En 2011 déjà, des heurts avaient éclaté dans la ville de Beït Shemesh, près de Jérusalem, entre des policiers israéliens et plusieurs centaines d'ultra-orthodoxes qui réclamaient une séparation stricte entre hommes et femmes.

La religion catholique n'est pas non plus en reste. Exercer un ministère sacré est une des rares occupations auxquelles les femmes ne peuvent toujours pas accéder. Si la société civile et les catholiques s'expriment en faveur de l'amélioration de la condition féminine depuis plusieurs années, l'Église n'a toujours pas entamé de réelle réforme à ce sujet. Le texte du dernier synode limite la question féminine à la sphère de la famille.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Mar 13 Jan - 18:30 (2015)    Sujet du message: FRANCE : LE DEPUTE PUEYO VEUT PLUS D'AUMÔNIERS MUSULMANS Répondre en citant


Ca, c'est en plus des 130 environ, qu'ils ont fait entrer en France, l'an dernier et qui évangéliseront de force les non-musulmans, à l'intérieur des murs des prisons. La persuasion et les salles de tortures seront là pour tenter de nous "convaincre". Merci monsieur le député Pueyo, nous voyons combien vous avez à coeur le peuple français.

  • Home ACTUALITE Flash Actu
    • Par LeFigaro.fr avec AFP
    • Mis à jour le 13/01/2015 à 15:59
    • Publié le 13/01/2015 à 15:55
Le député PS Joaquim Pueyo, qui a été directeur des maisons d'arrêt de Fresnes (Val-de-Marne) puis de Fleury-Mérogis (Essonne), a plaidé aujourd'hui pour une augmentation du nombre d'aumôniers musulmans dans les prisons françaises.

"Pour éviter aux personnes détenues d'être prises en main par certains radicaux, des +imams+ autoproclamés sur les cours de promenade avec une propagande de haine (...), il est absolument nécessaire de renforcer l'organisation de l'aumônerie musulmane" dans les prisons françaises, a déclaré Joaquim Pueyo. "Il est nécessaire de diffuser un islam éclairé dans les prisons à travers l'aumônerie", a-t-il ajouté.

Selon le député-maire d'Alençon, "pour l'instant il y a 182 aumôniers musulmans qui interviennent dans les prisons" après une augmentation de 15 en 2013 et de 15 autres en 2014. "Il faut encore augmenter (leur nombre), aller au delà en 2015 et 2016", a-t-il estimé sans pouvoir donner de chiffre dans l'immédiat.

Pour l'élu cela devrait être "possible" budgétairement, d'autant que les aumôniers ne sont "pas des fonctionnaires. Ils sont payés en fonction de leurs vacations". "Permettre aux personnes détenues de suivre leur culte, c'est dans la laïcité", a en outre souligné l'ex-inspecteur des services pénitentiaires.

Le député est aussi favorable à "l'isolement des islamistes" les plus radicaux dont le Premier ministre Manuel Valls a souhaité la généralisation. "C'est ce que j'ai proposé depuis plusieurs semaines", a précisé cet ancien chargé de cours à l'Ecole nationale de l'administration pénitentiaire.

"Ca me paraît indispensable pour permettre au personnel pénitentiaire de mieux maîtriser la détention", a conclu le député qui a aussi été directeur régional des services pénitentiaires de l'administration centrale.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Jeu 15 Jan - 02:40 (2015)    Sujet du message: DUKE UNIVERSITY TO BROADCAST MUSLIM CALL TO PRAYER FROM CHAPEL BELL TOWER Répondre en citant


January 14, 2015 by Joe Saunders

Duke University, an institution founded by Methodists and Quakers in the 19th century, will be broadcasting weekly calls to prayer for Muslims in the 21st.
And from the Duke Chapel bell tower, no less.

According to WRAL, members of the Duke Muslim Students Association will chant the call at 1 p.m. Fridays.

The call, known as “adhan” or “azan,” will be “moderately amplified” and last about 3 minutes, WRAL reported.

Duke’s Muslim chaplain, Imam Adeel Zeb, sounded delighted.

“The adhan is the call to prayer that brings Muslims back to their purpose in life, which is to worship God, and serves as a reminder to serve our brothers and sisters in humanity,” Zeb said, according to WRAL.

“The collective Muslim community is truly grateful and excited about Duke’s intentionality toward religious and cultural diversity.”

The collective Muslim community might be excited, but the collective community in general isn’t.

First of all, what exactly is the point? If the call to prayer at one point served as a reminder of what time Muslims should kneel for their required five prayers daily, the wristwatch (in civilized countries) took care of that problem a long time ago.

And this is the iPhone era. If there’s a student on Duke’s campus – Muslim or otherwise – who doesn’t have a cell phone that could go off all on its lonesome at 1 p.m. (with any message from history of mankind), he’s not graduating anyway.

Second, did anyone remember that Duke’s mascot is the Blue Devil? How long is that going to last when Sharia law comes to the Durham campus?

On the bright side, Duke finally found something to make its craven, disgraceful behavior during that lacrosse team hoax look good.

There were some fellow travelers on Twitter who liked the idea, there always are, but a good many thought it was an outrage.

Read more: http://www.bizpacreview.com/2015/01/14/duke-university-to-broadcast-muslim-…

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Ven 16 Jan - 02:53 (2015)    Sujet du message: DUKE UNIVERSITY CANCELS MUSLIM CALL TO PRAYER AFTER MASSIVE NATIONWIDE REACTION AGAINST IT Répondre en citant


NTEB News Desk | January 15, 2015 | 24 Comments

Duke University has canceled its plans to have a Muslim prayer announcement broadcast from Duke Chapel’s belltower on Friday afternoons

“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” Ephesians 6:12 (KJV)

Yesterday. NTEB was one of the very first news outlets to break the story of Duke University forcing their entire campus to listen to the Muslim azam, or call to prayer. Instantly the news spread and was picked up by every news agency out there, leading the fine folks at Duke to cancel their plans to broadcast the azan on campus.

It’s rare, but it happens, we are putting this one in the “victory” column in the fight against creeping Sharia in America. Keep fighting the “good fight”, people, it’s almost time to go Home.

WNCN reports that the university announced its plans to facilitate a weekly call to prayer; but on Thursday, Duke officials acknowledged the decision resulted in unintended backlash.

“Duke remains committed to fostering an inclusive, tolerant and welcoming campus for all of its students,” said Michael Schoenfeld, vice president for public affairs and government relations. “However, it was clear that what was conceived as an effort to unify was not having the intended effect.”

The initial plan was to broadcast a weekly call to prayer from the chapel’s bell tower starting Jan. 16. The prayer service would then take place in the chapel basement.

The university said it will instead welcome members of the Muslim community to gather on the quadrangle outside the chapel, before moving to its regular location in the chapel basement.

“It’s a slap in the face to Muslims,” said Khalilah Sabra, with the Muslim American Society.

The chant was intended to announce the start of the Duke Muslim Student Association’s prayer service, which the Muslim chaplain at Duke said “brings Muslims back to their purpose in life.” However after the school announced the weekly broadcast, the university’s Facebook page was flooded with angry comments.

One commenter said they had “totally lost respect for Duke University.” Another said that the university is a “… center for political correctness,” and that it’s “just plain bizarre that [they are] going to do an Islamic call to prayer.”

The plan also drew the ire of evangelist Franklin Graham, who urged Duke alumni to withhold support because of violence against Christians that he attributed to Muslims.

In a statement posted on Facebook, Graham, the head of Samaritan’s Purse and the son of Billy Graham, said, “As Christianity is being excluded from the public square and followers of Islam are raping, butchering and beheading Christians, Jews, and anyone who doesn’t submit to their Sharia Islamic law, Duke is promoting this in the name of religious pluralism. “I call on the donors and alumni to withhold their support from Duke until this policy is reversed.”

Duke, a private school, was founded by Methodists and Quakers and has a divinity school historically connected to the United Methodist Church. Duke has roughly 15,000 students, including 6,500 undergraduates. The school said about 700 students are Muslim. source – WNCN


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Dim 18 Jan - 03:22 (2015)    Sujet du message: L’UE OFFRE JUSQU'A 150 000 EUROS AUX ALGERIENS QUI VEULENT "JOUER AUX OPPOSANTS" Répondre en citant


L’initiative de la délégation de l’Union européenne en Algérie qui veut subventionner des associations algériennes, jusqu’à 150 000 euros, pour mener des actions liées à la «défense des droits de l’Homme» est-elle innocente ?

La question se pose quant à l’objectif qui pourrait se cacher derrière une telle initiative qui, sous couvert d’aide aux actions pacifiques, pourrait être interprétée comme un encouragement évident aux actions de «subversion» aidées par des financements conséquents.

La délégation de l’UE fait en tous les cas mine de jouer la «transparence» en publiant son offre sur son site internet et se cache derrière le terme «pacifique» comme pour mieux dégager sa responsabilité quant à de probables débordements ou déviation des actions qui seront menées grâce à son financement.

La délégation de l’Union européenne en Algérie vient, en effet, de lancer un appel à propositions avec l’objectif déclaré de soutenir les organisations de la société civile afin de «consolider et renforcer leur rôle et leurs stratégies propres dans la promotion des droits de l’Homme et des réformes démocratiques», peut-on lire sur son site internet.

«La subvention octroyée à chaque action retenue sera comprise entre 50 000 et 150 000 euros» et les actions éligibles au financement devront répondre au moins à une des priorités retenues, précise l’UE qui cite notamment «l’appui à la liberté d’expression et à la promotion des valeurs démocratiques, la promotion de la liberté de réunion et de rassemblement pacifique et la prise de mesures pour lutter contre les obstacles à l’exercice de ces libertés.

Le soutien au développement d’espaces de débat démocratiques, promouvoir la liberté d’expression, en particulier par la formation professionnelle et éthique des défenseurs des droits de l’Homme et des journalistes, prévenir et lutter contre la corruption et sensibiliser et promouvoir la citoyenneté active des jeunes».

La délégation de l’Union européenne en Algérie prévoit aussi des financements pour des actions en liaison avec la «protection et la promotion des droits et de la place des femmes, des jeunes et des enfants dans la société, dont des actions concernant l’intégration sociale, le dialogue et la lutte contre les violences». La délégation de l’Union européenne précise que lors du processus d’évaluation, la priorité sera accordée aux actions «visant ou menées par des jeunes comme population cible ou partie prenante».

Elle met en évidence aussi des actions envisageant un programme de «subvention en cascades, permettant, par exemple, à des organisations constituées récemment ou des organisations n’ayant pas les capacités de gestion de projets de grande ampleur ou des organisations n’étant pas familiarisées avec les procédures de l’Union européenne, de bénéficier de l’accès aux financements européens, de renforcer leurs capacités et/ou de mettre en œuvre des activités ciblées et à valeur ajoutée forte, permettant par là même d’amplifier la portée et la qualité de l’action».

L’UE avise que les actions seront choisies, notamment «sur la base de leur pertinence, des résultats prévus et de leur efficacité potentielle».

Source: Algérie patriotique

Source: Médias  
05-12-2014 - 11:38 Dernière mise à jour 05-12-2014 - 11:38


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Dim 18 Jan - 03:27 (2015)    Sujet du message: SWEDEN TO REWARD RETURNING ISIS JIHADISTS Répondre en citant

SWEDEN TO REWARD RETURNING ISIS JIHADISTS  Jihadists returning to Örebro Municipality will get psychological help.

And not only that: Tvärsnytt now reveals that the municipality council are discussing giving them jobs.

- It gives a very inverted signal, Peter Santesson, opinion Director at Demoskop, says to the Swedish newspaper Expressen.

ISIS Jihadists returning to Örebro will be offered help by a psychologist, the municipal leaders have decided. Jihadists are likely to have traumatic experiences and this is where the municipality wants to help.

- We have discussed how we should work for these guys who have come back, and to prevent them from returning to the fighting, and that they should be helped to process the traumatic experiences they have been through, Councilor Rasmus Persson (C), said to SVT "Tvärsnytt".

They also wants to offer the jihadists jobs in the municipality. The initiative is to prevent alienation, which the Örebro Politicians believe is the reason to take part in the fighting in Iraq and Syria. (!)

Terror expert Magnus Ranstorp, a researcher at the National Defence University and head of EU's work on the subject, thinks that Örebro is doing the right thing.

- Critics are completely way off, he says to Expressen and continues:

- They do not know how prevention works. This is about giving these people a structure. Get them back into normality, instead of them recruiting and radicalizing other young people. Preventive work so that they do not relapse into their violent activities. If you do not have preventive work, that's when it could be disastrous consequences.

Others are critical.

"Tvärsnytt" reports that several people have chosen to move from the district Vivalla after it became known that two individuals from it was fighting in northern Iraq. Residents are simply afraid to have a neighbor who sympathize with IS.

Peter Santesson, Survey Manager at Demoskop, is critical of Örebro Municipality ways of using the municipal money.

- The thoughts goes to the old "monster trips" and similar municipal programs. The problem is that it creates reverse incentives. The question that the municipality should ask is: If you can afford to create this kind of jobs, why do people who goes to Syria get them? And who possibly comes back with serious war crimes in the luggage? Instead of investing in young people who didn't take this step, who didn't go to fight, he says.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Lun 19 Jan - 04:09 (2015)    Sujet du message: WASHINGTON : TERROR-NAMED MUSLIM GROUP HIJACKING MLK DAY TO PUSH ISLAM ON STATE LAWMAKERS Répondre en citant


Posted on January 18, 2015 by creeping

As Arab and Muslim countries across the world enslave black Africans, the terror-listed CAIR will once again hijack MLK Jr. Day to influence American lawmakers into accepting more sharia.

via 500 Washington State Muslims from 35 Districts to Lobby Lawmakers on MLK Day – CAIR.

On Monday, January 19, 2015, an estimated 500 Washington state Muslims from more than 35 state legislative districts are scheduled to meet with some 100 state lawmakers in Olympia as part of the annual “Washington State Muslim Lobby Day” organized by that state’s chapter of theCouncil on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-WA), the nation’s leading Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization.

Those taking part in the lobby day will seek to honor the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. by advocating passage of legislation that helps the most vulnerable in the state by urging legislators to invest $100 million in the ‘Housing Trust Fund’ for funding of low income housing as part of the biennial budget.

WHAT: 6th Annual Washington State Muslim Lobby Day

WHERE: Morning assembly at Olympia Center, 222 Columbia St. NW, Olympia, WA. March to capitol, rally on capitol steps and legislative visits on capitol campus

WHEN: Monday, January 19, 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. Detailed schedule available on request.

CONTACT: CAIR-WA Executive Director Arsalan Bukhari, 206-367-4081 or 206-931-3655, abukhari@cair.com

PHOTO OPPORTUNITIES: Some 500 Washington State Muslims of all ages attend breakfast/training in Olympia Center 9:30-10:30 a.m., march with banners and signs from Olympia Center to the capitol 10:45-11 a.m.; Muslims rally at capitol steps 11-11:15 a.m.; Legislative appointments 11:30 a.m.-1:15 p.m. (Media are welcome to accompany select groups to meetings, shadow groups, and/or to interview attendees. Meeting schedules available by Jan. 15 on request.)

Muslim voters attending the event will represent more than 35 of the 49 state’s legislative districts. In addition to urging the full funding of the Housing Trust Fund with an investment of $100 million, they will also provide information about recent anti-Muslim incidents and will urge their legislators to speak out against Islamophobic rhetoric and hate crimes when they happen in their districts.

“This event will provide an opportunity for Muslims from the majority of our state’s legislative districts to benefit society by urging lawmakers to champion issues that affect millions of our state’s residents of all faiths,” said CAIR-WA Executive Director Arsalan Bukhari. “This year’s attendees will likely represent more districts than were covered last year, so elected representatives will learn that their local Muslim communities are becoming increasingly knowledgeable about state politics, better organized, well-connected with other allied groups in their regions, and Muslim communities are utilizing these assets to give back to society and promoting the common good.”

Those meeting their elected representatives represent one of the largest groups to have a lobby day at the Washington state capitol. This event is also the second largest Muslim lobby day in the country (Illinois Muslims have held lobby days in Springfield that have brought more than 1,000 Muslims from across their state).

CAIR has been banned by the FBI, is an unindicted co-conspirator to the largest terror financing conviction in U.S. history, and been named a terrorist organization by at least one Islamic country. Furthermore, a U.S. federal judge ruled that CAIR is a Hamas organization in the U.S.

History proves that Muslim immigration destroys a nations peace, civility, history and culture. It’s happening in America too.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Mar 20 Jan - 18:08 (2015)    Sujet du message: WATCH: PROTESTERS SURROUND CONFERENCE PUT ON BY TEXAS MUSLIMS : ‘YOU ARE NOT AMERICANS’ Répondre en citant


Tom Boggioni
18 Jan 2015 at 16:41 ET     
Protester at "Stand With the Prophet Against Terror and Hate" conference in Garland, Texas (NBC-DFW)

Don't miss stories. Follow Raw Story!

Protesters, upset that a Muslim group was holding a conference at a Texas conference center owned by the local school district, showed up last night waving flags and signs telling attendees, “Go home and take Obama with you.”

The conference, titled “Stand With the Prophet Against Terror and Hate,” was being being put on as a fundraiser for a Chicago-based Islamic group, Sound Vision, and approximately about 500 attendees were expected, reports NBC-DFW.

Holding signs saying “You are not Americans. Don’t fly our flag,” protesters complained about the Garland Independent School District allowing the group to use the facility.

“We pay our taxes to that school, and I don’t want them here,” one woman, Lavona Martindale said.

Another protester, identified as Greg McKinley, said, “We’re here to stand up for the American way of life from a faction of people who are trying to destroy us.”

McKinley added, “If they want to live their life like the middle east, they can go back to the middle east.”

“I want for people to see that we are kind peaceful people,” explained conference attendee Page Spence. “We’re not here to fight, we’re not here to argue. We’re just here to show that we’re Americans too.”

A young woman, part of a group of counter-protesters, explained, “People are here to stand up with the Prophet against hate and intolerance.”

Police authorities beefed up their presence at the event following earlier protests at a Garland School Board meeting, where board members were told by one man,”I certainly don’t think you need people there who want to destroy this country.”

A  spokesman for the school district said they do not discriminate against facility renters based upon religion.

+ VIDEO : http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/01/watch-protesters-surround-conference-put…

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Ven 23 Jan - 02:59 (2015)    Sujet du message: BIENTÔT UN GROUPE D'AMITIE FRANCE-QATAR AU SENAT Répondre en citant


Quand je regarde de plus près toutes les infrastructures immobilières qui ont été vendues, ces dernières années aux riches musulmans, je serais portée à croire que ses ententes existent déjà depuis bien longtemps dans l'ombre. Il semble que maintenant on veuille les inviter à faire parti du gouvernement, ce qui dans les faits, est une étape importante dans cette islamisation de la France.

21 janvier, 2015 Posté par Benji sous Argent et politique, Géopolitique, Manipulation

Suivant un de nos ministres, Monsieur Fabius, le Qatar ne finance pas le terrorisme, c’est pas vrai et très méchant de dire cela! C’est bien connu que les qataris sont nos amis, à tel point qu‘ils ont aidé les djihadistes en difficultés au Mali lorsque ceux-ci étaient en difficulté alors qu’ils tuaient sans hésitation, mitraillaient nos soldats, et qu’ils prenaient pour cibles femmes et enfants sans scrupules, entre autres abominations… Mais comme Fabius nous dit que les services de renseignements ont prouvé cela via deux enquêtes, il faut le croire. Le souci, c’est que ce que dit Fabius est facilement démontable, puisque les articles et rapports démontrant le contraire sont disponibles à un clic de souris, sur le Courrier International par exemple, ou encore sur RLT.

Le sénateur UMP Pierre Charon et l’ex-premier ministre Jean-Pierre Raffarin sont à la manœuvre pour lancer cette structure déjà existante à l’Assemblée nationale.

Le Qatar renforce son influence dans la sphère politique française. Selon Le Canard enchaîné, le Sénat doit examiner le 27 janvier prochain la création en son sein d’un groupe d’amitié entre l’Hexagone et le petit mais richissime pays du Golfe. De tels groupes existent déjà à l’Assemblée nationale et au Sénat pour la plupart des pays. Le Qatar a déjà le sien au palais Bourbon, présidé par l’ex-ministre UDI Maurice Leroy.

Au Sénat, Jean-Pierre Raffarin, actuel président de la commission des Affaires étrangères, et Pierre Charon, un sénateur UMP de Paris proche de Nicolas Sarkozy, ont initié cette démarche. «Avant, le Qatar était rattaché au groupe d’amitié Arabie Saoudite – pays du Golfe. On veut maintenant un groupe cohérent», confirme Pierre Charon au Scan. Le but? «Excercer une diplomatie parallèle et réparatrice», dit-il, soucieux d’éviter d’éventuelles crises diplomatiques avec l’émirat.

Source et article complet sur Le Figaro

C’est ce qu’on appelle la géopolitique, nier l’évidence pour des intérêts qui nous dépassent, quitte à laisser le pire se produire sur le territoire national. N’oubliez pas que si le gouvernement veut lutter contre le terrorisme et les djihadistes, ils continuent également de laisser le Qatar financer l’Islam de France. Quand à Sarkozy, on le sait depuis longtemps, c’est plus que de l’amour entre lui et eux


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Mar 27 Jan - 01:30 (2015)    Sujet du message: LA CHINE VIENT D'INTERDIRE LE PORT DE LA BURQA, DE LA BARBE, ET MÊME LE JEÛNE LE JOUR DU RAMADAN Répondre en citant


Article publié le 25.01.2015

La Chine vient d’interdire le port de la burqa, de la barbe, et même le jeûne le jour du ramadan dans la région du Xinjiang, où vit l’importante communauté musulmane ouïghour.

Pour justifier ces récentes interdictions, les autorités chinoises ont déclaré que : «cette règlementation est destinée à freiner l’augmentation de l’extrémisme qui a forcé les femmes ouïghours à abandonner leur costume traditionnel et coloré pour le remplacer par une burqa noire. »

«La Burqa n’est pas le vêtement traditionnelle des femmes ouïghour, et son port dans les lieux publics est d’ailleurs interdit dans des pays tels que la Belgique et la France. »

Les autorités chinoises ont également interdit les longues barbes et le jeûne pendant le Ramadan. Ils tiennent également les mosquées sous une stricte surveillance.

Les Chinois ont la même approche que le maire de New York, Rudy Giuliani, connue sous le nom de théorie du carreau cassé* pour mater l’islamisme et le terrorisme.

Ils ont compris que la burqa et les longues barbes sont des actes politiques de rejet de la société et des déclarations religieuses. Que ces déclarations religieuses mène à la radicalisation, et que la radicalisation mène au terrorisme.

En interdisant et en réprimant durement des actes mineurs, en les traitant comme des crimes politiques, tout en autorisant la pratique privée de la religion, ils traitent le mal à la source. Du moins le pensent-ils après avoir épuisé les méthodes communistes contre les musulmans.

Et si cette méthode ne fonctionne pas et que les attentats terroristes se poursuivent…

© Jean-Patrick Grumberg pour Dreuz.info.

* Giuliani, qui avait décidé – avec succès- à rendre les rues de New York plus sûres, avait imposé de lourdes amendes à tout propriétaire d’un logement dont une fenêtre était cassée. Il avait expliqué que « si vous voyez une fenêtre cassée, c’est que l’immeuble est abandonné ou mal entretenu. S’il est abandonné, il est probable qu’un jour ou l’autre il y aura du trafic de drogue. Et s’il y a du trafic de drogue, un jour ou l’autre il s’y produira un crime. En mettant de lourdes amendes aux propriétaires qui laissent des carreaux cassés, je les oblige à entretenir leurs bien, donc à le louer, ce qui dérange les dealers et fera baisser la criminalité. »

Source (merci Eric Le Goy): NightWatch


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Mar 27 Jan - 01:38 (2015)    Sujet du message: PARIS : DISTRIBUTION GRATUITE DE CORAN PLACE D'ITALIE Répondre en citant


Article publié le 26.01.2015

Cet article Paris : distribution gratuite de coran place d’Italie est apparu en premier sur Fdesouche.

Extrait de: Source et auteur

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Mar 27 Jan - 03:02 (2015)    Sujet du message: FRANCE : "ON A APPRIS A CONSTRUIRE DES MOSQUEES" AVOUE LE DEPUTE UMP BERNARD BROCHAND Répondre en citant


Ajoutée le 26 janv. 2015

L'UMP assume sa politique d'islamisation: sur un terrain municipal de Cannes mis gratuitement à disposition, le maire UMP David Lisnard se réjouit de l'aboutissement du projet de son prédécesseur à la mairie, le dorénavant député UMP Bernard Brochand. Ce dernier affirmait le jour de l'inauguration "On a appris à faire des mosquées" à la mairie. David Lisnard son bras droit affirmait quant à lui : "il est vrai que la démarche peut paraître en contradiction vis-à-vis de la loi de 1905" (SalamNews, septembre 2009) alors qu'il était adjoint au maire.

La mosquée est financée intégralement par un mécène saoudien, qui n'est autre que le propriétaire de la chaine Wahhabitte IQRA , pire chaine extrémiste d'Arabie Saoudite. La mosquée a donc été baptisée IQRA, et la page Facebook officielle de la mosquée "like" la chaine saoudienne. L'imâm est lui de tendance Frériste…Plus d'infos dans l'enquête Ces Maires qui courtisent l'islamisme (éditions tatamis, 2015).

L'UMP est le parti de l'étranger, et l'assume.

VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxwMUBLrDik

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Mar 27 Jan - 06:38 (2015)    Sujet du message: MAINSTREAM IMAM CHOUDARY COMING TO USA, CALLING ON MUSLIMS TO CREATE AMERICAN STATE Répondre en citant


January 25, 2015 2:33 pm

Mr Americana

Overpasses For America

Mainstream Muslim cleric who sparked anger across the U.S. with his anti-American comments in a television interview this month is to hold a protest outside the White House.

British moderate Muslim Anjem Choudary – who once said ‘the flag of Islam will fly over the White House’ – has announced he will lead a demonstration calling on Muslims to establish the Sharia law across America.

The rally, planned for March 3, is to take place just weeks after his on-screen row with Fox News presenter Sean Hannity.

Mr Choudary, 43, called Americans ‘the biggest criminals in the world today.’

The former leader of outlawed group Islam4UK told the Daily Star ‘we expect thousands to come out and support us.’

Mr Choudary said the March rally was organised by the Islamic Thinkers society, an extremist group based in New York.

Two other British extremists, Abu Izzadeen and Sayful Islam, have also been asked to speak at the demonstration.

Izzadeen is the hate preacher who caused fury last year when he called British soldiers ‘murderers’ the day he was released from jail after a three-and-a-half year sentence for inciting terrorism.

Mr Choudary told the newspaper: ‘The event is a rally, a call for the Sharia, a call for the Muslims to rise up and ­establish the Islamic state in America.’

However, whether the three will be able to enter the U.S., especially Izzadeen, remains to be seen. Even a tourist visa requires applicants to answer questions on whether they have been involved in acts of terrorism or plan to commit crimes in the U.S.

‘This is a unique event taking place in Washington, outside the White House which, Inshallah, (God willing) will garner huge support.’

He hit U.S. headlines just two weeks ago after his furious exchange with Mr Hannity on Fox News. The presenter became so enraged with his anti-American comments he ended the interview by calling him a ‘sick, miserable, evil S.O.B’.

The East London-based cleric’s anti-American stance is well-documented. Last year he led protesters in burning the American flag outside the U.S. embassy in London on September 11.

And in October, he told an ABC chat show that ‘one day the flag of Islam will fly over the White House.’

He told the Daily Star: ‘They have seen our activities in the UK and Europe and have decided they want to challenge the vacuum in ­freedom and democracy and the ­people in the front line of the struggle against Islam and Muslims – the ­American ­government and the ­establishment.

‘They have invited and ­myself and Sayful Islam from Luton to come over to address the crowd and rally support.’

We are going to address ­corruption in the Senate, corrupt foreign ­policy, the mayhem around the ­Muslim world, the drug and ­alcohol culture, ­promiscuity and the pandemic of crime in America.

‘It is only right the call is made in the heart of Western ­civilisation in front of the biggest pharaoh that ­exists today, which is Barack Obama.’
He added: ‘I think the American people’s hearts and minds are open to receive Islam as an alternative way of life. We expect thousands to come out and support us.’


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Jeu 29 Jan - 03:12 (2015)    Sujet du message: SHARIA LAW NOW IN TEXAS Répondre en citant


Posted by Rudy Tirre on January 27, 2015 at 5:32pm in Public Square Unclassified

YOU WERE WARNED! Islamic Sharia Law will now be practiced in the state of Texas, YES, Texas!

(barenakedislam.com) - An Islamic Tribunal using Sharia law in Texas has been confirmed by Breitbart Texas. The tribunal is operating as a non-profit organization in Dallas. One of the attorneys for the tribunal said participation and acceptance of the tribunal’s decisions are “voluntary.”
And this isn’t the first timehey-texas-hows-that-sharia-law-workin-out-for-y-all
“We are above the law of the land,” said Mustafa Carroll, executive director of CAIR-Dallas

Breitbart (h/t Reader)  Breitbart Texas spoke with one of the “judges,” Dr. Taher El-badawi. He said the tribunal operates under Sharia law as a form of “non-binding dispute resolution.” El-badawi said their organization is “a tribunal, not arbitration.” A tribunal is defined by Meriam-Webster’s Dictionary as “a court or forum of justice.” The four Islamic attorneys call themselves “judges” not “arbitrators.”El-badawi said the tribunal follows Sharia law to resolve civil disputes in family and business matters. He said they also resolve workplace disputes.

In matters of divorce, El-badawi said that “while participation in the tribunal is voluntary, a married couple cannot be considered divorced by the Islamic community unless it is granted by the tribunal.” He compared their divorce, known as “Talaq,” as something similar to the Catholic practice of annulment in that the church does not recognize civil divorce proceedings as ending a marriage.He also said there is a difference between how a man and a woman can request a divorce under their system. “The husband can request the divorce directly from the tribunal,” El-badawi stated. “The wife must go to an Imam who will request the divorce for her.” He called it “two paths to the same result.”

The practice of Khula is the process where a wife can initiate a divorce proceeding and where the husband can agree to the divorce in exchange for a financial compensation. It appears the wife must agree to give up any claim to the “dower” that was not already paid or to return it if it has already been paid. Once the financial issues are resolved the husband can then proclaim the Talaq (divorce).Breitbart Texas asked what happens when there is a conflict between Sharia law and Texas law. El-badawi said most of the time, the laws are in agreement. When pushed further he admitted that, “we follow Sharia law.” However, he explained, “If the parties are not satisfied with the tribunal’s decision, they do not have to accept it and they can take the matter to Texas civil courts.” He did not say what the social ramifications of rejecting the “judge’s” decision would be.

Muslim Brotherhood member and Former Obama advisor, Mohamed Elibiary

The website for the Islamic Tribunal states, “The courts of the United States of America are costly and consist of ineffective lawyers.  Discontent with the legal system leads many Muslims in America to postpone justice in this world and opt for an audience on the Day of Judgment.”It goes on to state, “It is with this issue that Muslims here in America are obligated to find a way to solve conflicts and disputes according to the principles of Islamic Law and its legal heritage of fairness and justice in a manner that is reasonable and cost effective.”In explaining Sharia law, the website states, “Stoning adulterers, cutting of the hands, polyandry and the like (all can be traced in the relevant literature and can be explained in their Islamic legal mentality and rational context in fairness and justice), are mainly a part of Islamic Criminal Law.  It is unscholarly and unfair to generalize that type of understanding, that is Criminal Law, to compromise the whole of Islamic law if we stick to speaking in technical terms.”

The website lists four “judges:” Imam Yusuf Z.Kavakci, Imam Moujahed Bakhach, Imam Zia ul Haque Sheikh and Dr. El-badawi. It states the Islamic Tribunal resolves business disputes, divorce (Talaq) cases, community problems, serious family problems, and Khula.El-badawi restated several times that participation in the tribunal is voluntary. However, he would not discuss what happens to someone who did not follow their rulings.“In Texas, Islam is not the problem, Islam is the solution,” says speaker on Texas Muslim Capitol Day 2013 in video below.RELATED STORIES/VIDEOS:

Rick Perry is no longer governor of Texas but his Islamopandering is what allowed sharia law to happen there:



Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Mar 3 Fév - 06:01 (2015)    Sujet du message: UNE LOI QUI REND LA CONSTRUCTION DE MOSQUEES QUASI IMPOSSIBLE VOTEE EN ITALIE (VIDEO) Répondre en citant


Certains pays font de même, mais comme les immigrants musulmans sont déjà sur place et que rien ne sera fait pour les retourner dans leur pays, vous pouvez déjà voir ce qui va arriver très bientôt, en Italie. Une autre stratégie et tragédie à venir, de nos chers globalistes qui n'ont que des plans de destruction en tête.

Par Le JDM sur 2 février 2015

L’hostilité à l’Islam a franchi un pas en Italie. La Ligue du nord a fait voter, en Lombardie, une loi anti-mosquée qui rend leur construction quasi impossible. Dans le pays, ce vote ne suscite « absolument aucune réaction », rapporte le journaliste de France 2 Renaud Bernard, depuis la capitale, Rome.

Cette situation « qui serait impensable en France » est vécue « de façon totalement décomplexée » dans le pays.

« En Lombardie, la Ligue du nord, qui a soutenu cette loi et qu’on pourrait qualifier de formation d’extrême droite, on la range dans le centre-droit », explique le reporter.

Ce parti est d’ailleurs « régulièrement allié aux élus de Silvio Berlusconi ».

+ VIDEO : http://journaldumusulman.fr/une-loi-qui-rend-la-construction-de-mosquees-qu…

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Dim 8 Fév - 06:07 (2015)    Sujet du message: CANADA - QUEBEC : MORATOIRE SUR LES PERMIS «LIEU DE CULTE» ET «CENTRE COMMUNAUTAIRE» Répondre en citant


Juste le fait de devoir obtenir un permis de culte, cela contrevient directement à la liberté de culte et à criminaliser ceux qui font des réunions de prières ou des assemblées bibliques ou autres dans leur demeure où à tout autre endroit, car ne possédants pas de permis les autorisant à pratiquer librement leur foi. Ici, nous sommes dans un contexte très chaud car cela a rapport à l'avancée de l'islam qui est là pour conquérir et nous assujettir tous, ce que tous nos gouvernements se gardent bien de nous dire. Mais gageons, que la ville, pour ne pas brusquer les musulmans et être accusés d'intolérance et d'islamophobie, acquiessera à leur demande d'"accommodement raisonnable".

05/02/2015 Mise à jour : 5 février 2015 | 18:11 
Par Audrey Gauthier TC Media

Audrey Gauthier/TC Media Les élus ont adopté un moratoire afin de «faire le ménage» de l'octroi des permis «lieu de culte» et «centre communautaire». Devant la confusion qui règne autour des permis de «centre communautaire» et de «lieu de culte», les élus de Villeray – Saint-Michel – Parc-Extension ont imposé un moratoire afin de se pencher sur la question.

«C’est une mesure d’urgence. Nous faisons un gel de l’octroi de ces permis. Nous voulons voir ce qui se fait ailleurs, notamment à Mercier – Hochelaga-Maisonneuve, et nous déciderons comment nous modifierons le règlement. Nous ne voulons pas brusquer les choses et faire des généralisations. À Montréal, nous sommes en train de faire de l’islamophobie et c’est exactement ce que nous ne voulons pas faire dans l’arrondissement», indique la mairesse, Anie Samson.

À la suite du cas de l’imam Hamza Chaoui dans le quartier Mercier-Est, les élus locaux se sont questionnés sur leur façon de faire sur le territoire. Celui-ci voulait offrir de l’enseignement religieux dans un centre communautaire islamiste. Selon ce permis, seulement des activités communautaires et culturelles peuvent être organisées dans ce type de centre.

«Si le règlement n’est pas clair, nous prendrons le temps de bien le définir et de le clarifier», affirme la mairesse.

Inconfort au conseil

Le moratoire a été voté, lors du dernier conseil d’arrondissement. Pendant la même séance, les élus ont voté sur trois projets de lieux de cultes. Une situation qui a rendu mal à l’aise le conseiller de François-Perrault, Sylvain Ouellet.

«Je me sens mal à l’aise de voter un moratoire et d’octroyer trois permis pour «lieu de culte» dans le même conseil. Ce n’est pas parce que je m’oppose au dossier. C’est simplement une question de principe», explique M. Ouellet qui a signalé sa dissidence aux projets du 7169, 15e Avenue (église Pentecôte le Rocher de Jacob), 8495 à 8557, 8e Avenue (le Centre évangélique universel de Montréal) et au 8691, 9e Avenue (église évangélique Manahaim).

À noter que pour le 7169, 15e Avenue, l’église Pentecôte le Rocher de Jacob a déjà un permis de centre communautaire. Proposant des activités religieuses dans cette enceinte, les administrateurs sont en pourparlers avec l’arrondissement pour régulariser cette situation.

Pas une première

Ce n’est pas la première fois que l’arrondissement modifie une réglementation. En 2014, les élus ont modifié les permis pour des débits d’alcool et de soins personnels.

«Nous sommes forts de l’expérience vécue dans la dernière année, notamment avec les salons de massage et les bars. Nous devons évaluer le tout afin d’harmoniser le secteur. Ça n’a pas de lien avec la religion, mais bien avec le bâtiment. S’il y a un permis pour un centre communautaire, nous ne voulons pas que ce soit une salle de jeux ou une discothèque», fait-elle valoir.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Ven 13 Fév - 08:58 (2015)    Sujet du message: FRANCE : DEPARTEMENTALES : UN PARTI DES MUSULMANS SE PRESENTE AUX ELECTIONS Répondre en citant


La récente Union des démocrates musulmans de France devrait présenter des candidats dans quelques cantons. Une première pour ce parti qui veut promouvoir le halal et autoriser le voile à l'école.

Aurélie Lebelle | 12 Févr. 2015, 11h12 | MAJ : 12 Févr. 2015, 11h15

Bobigny (Seine-Saint-Denis), le 24 janvier. Shérazade Benhaddad et Khalid Majid seront les candidats de l’Union des démocrates musulmans français pour le canton de Bobigny lors des départementales de mars.
(LP/Jean-Baptiste Quentin.)

Lorsqu'on lui demande s'il y pense « tous les matins en se rasant », il éclate de rire et ironise : « Vous savez, nous, les musulmans, on ne se rase pas, c'est bien connu ! » L'oeil malicieux, Khalid Majid a la repartie facile pour mater les clichés. Et une barbe de trois jours subtilement travaillée.

A 36 ans, ce cadre de la SNCF d'origine marocaine, père de 3 enfants, sera le candidat de l'Union des démocrates musulmans français (UDMF) avec Shérazade Benhaddad, 34 ans, pour le canton de Bobigny (Seine-Saint-Denis) aux élections départementales des 22 et 29 mars. Hier, le binôme est allé déposer sa candidature. Sept autres listes devraient être présentées dans les jours qui viennent à Bagneux (Hauts-de-Seine), aux Mureaux (Yvelines), à Marseille, Lyon, Nice, Avion (près de Lens, dans le Pas-de-Calais) et très probablement à Strasbourg.

Sur un peu plus de 2 000 cantons à renouveler, cela reste certes infime. Mais ce parti lancé en 2012 fait de plus en plus d'adeptes. Depuis la parution des livres d'Eric Zemmour et de Michel Houellebecq, et surtout à la suite des récents attentats parisiens contre « Charlie Hebdo » et Hyper Cacher, plus de 200 nouvelles recrues ont frappé à la porte, comme Khalid Majid, pour grossir les rangs de l'UDMF. Aujourd'hui, le parti enregistre près de 900 adhérents et les fondateurs assurent compter 8 000 sympathisants en France, qui se sentent bien souvent stigmatisés.

Donner une voix à une partie de la population qui ne se retrouve pas dans les partis traditionnels

« Aujourd'hui, il existe en France un parti des chrétiens-démocrates, lance Najib Azergui, le fondateur, comme pour devancer les interrogations ou les critiques sur son parti communautaire. L'UDMF tente de donner une voix à une partie de la population qui ne se retrouve pas dans les partis traditionnels et qui a envie d'agir. » Comment ? Pas en « islamisant la société ni en installant la charia en France », précise d'emblée ce Français d'origine marocaine, qui travaille dans la formation informatique. Leur dada : les cours d'éducation civique et de philosophie pour « faire réfléchir et débattre les jeunes », le développement du halal pour créer de l'emploi, le déploiement de la finance islamique pour assainir l'économie. Quant au respect de la laïcité, il signifie, dans leur interprétation de la loi, la tolérance des religions... et donc le droit de porter le voile à l'école. Ce que la loi française interdit justement !

Dans les troupes de l'UDMF, on trouve principalement des quadras actifs, et « autant d'hommes que de femmes », jure Azergui. De quoi muscler les équipes de ce parti totalement novice qui survit uniquement grâce aux 20 € de cotisation annuelle demandée aux militants. « On souhaite garder notre indépendance », assure le fondateur. Pas question d'accepter pour l'instant l'aide d'un autre parti, français ou étranger. Ils le savent, ils ont beaucoup de choses à apprendre. Leur objectif : grandir, faire des émules, se faire connaître.

A Paul-Eluard, une cité de Bobigny, Sofiane n'a ainsi jamais entendu parler d'eux. « Un parti musulman ? Pourquoi pas, lance le jeune de 23 ans. Je me sentirai peut-être plus concerné par la vie politique. » Ali et Michel, deux retraités, tiquent en disant leur peur du repli communautaire, « des musulmans qui ne parleraient qu'aux musulmans ».

Plus loin, on croise une mère de famille, qui connaît le parti. « Je me retrouve dans ce qu'ils proposent, notamment sur le vivre-ensemble, glisse-t-elle. Mais je ne suis pas sûre qu'en France les gens soient prêts à voter largement pour un parti musulman. » L'UDMF veut pourtant croire en ses chances. « Les gens se rendent compte qu'un parti comme le nôtre est une évidence aujourd'hui dans le paysage politique », affirme Najib Azergui. « Soumission », le livre de Houellebecq (où le leadeur d'un parti musulman est élu chef de l'Etat en 2022), qu'il a lu, lui a donné des étoiles dans les yeux. Son rêve : récolter les 500 signatures nécessaires pour faire de Khalid Majid leur premier candidat à la présidentielle en 2017.

Légal ou pas ?

En France, la création de parti est une activité libre. Sur le plan juridique, c'est une association qui dépend de la loi 1901 et qui ne nécessite donc pas d'autorisation particulière pour exister. L'Etat peut en revanche dissoudre (par décret en Conseil des ministres ou décision du tribunal de grande instance) toute association, et donc un parti, si elle a été créée «en vue d'une cause ou d'un objet illicite, contraire aux lois, aux bonnes moeurs, ou qui aurait pour but de porter atteinte à l'intégrité du territoire national et à la forme républicaine du gouvernement». Quant aux candidats, ils doivent remplir un certain nombre de conditions d'éligibilité (être majeur notamment) pour pouvoir se présenter.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 740

MessagePosté le: Sam 14 Fév - 05:13 (2015)    Sujet du message: CANADA - QUEBEC : DES RADICAUX DEBARQUENT A MONTREAL Répondre en citant

Enquête J.E.


Première publication 13 février 2015 à 18h56

Par Pierre-Olivier Zappa | TVA Nouvelles

Le Québec s'apprête à accueillir plusieurs leaders religieux controversés au cours des prochaines semaines.

Malgré leurs idées obscurantistes et radicales, une enquête menée par «J.E.» démontre que ces prédicateurs auront le champ libre pour livrer leurs discours.

Au cours du mois de février, trois imams radicaux, un groupe ultranationaliste juif, et un rabbin fondamentaliste débarqueront dans la grande région de Montréal.

Imams radicaux à Outremont

Ce samedi, l'Académie de la charia nord-américaine, la MISHKA, organise une remise de diplômes au Centre communautaire Outremont, propriété de la Ville de Montréal.

Deux imams au discours intégriste animeront l'évènement : Salah Assawy et Omar Shahin.

L'imam Assawy, d'origine égyptienne, est le secrétaire général de l'Assemblée des musulmans juristes d'Amérique, une organisation connue pour ses avis religieux parmi les plus radicaux.

Salah Assawy (Crédit photo YouTube)

Elle invite notamment au jihad contre l'Occident et elle justifie la mutilation génitale des femmes. Dans un de ses avis publics, elle autorise le viol marital:
«Quant à la question de forcer une épouse à avoir des rapports sexuels, ce ne serait pas un viol. [...] La femme qui refuse commet un grand péché».

À ses côtés figurera l'imam Omar Shahin, un fervent promoteur de la charia, la loi islamique qui prévoit notamment la lapidation en cas d'adultère. Selon lui, les musulmans devraient d'ailleurs refuser d'obéir aux lois occidentales.

Shahin entretiendrait également des liens étroits avec le mouvement des Frères musulmans, une confrérie qui prône une islamisation complète des sociétés occidentales.

Plus de 300 personnes sont invitées au Centre communautaire d'Outremont pour la conférence de ces deux imams.

Un groupe ultranationaliste juif

Un groupe ultranationaliste juif, aujourd'hui classé terroriste par les États-Unis et Israël, va s'implanter dans la métropole.


Revenir en haut
Contenu Sponsorisé

MessagePosté le: Aujourd’hui à 08:56 (2018)    Sujet du message: ISLAMISATION DU MONDE ENTIER (PARTIE 2)

Revenir en haut
Montrer les messages depuis:   
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> CONSEIL MONDIAL DES ÉGLISES/WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES - voir les sous-groupes dans cette section -> ISLAMISATION DU MONDE ENTIER (PARTIE 2) Toutes les heures sont au format GMT + 2 Heures
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 38, 9, 1014, 15, 16  >
Page 9 sur 16

Sauter vers:  

Index | Creer un forum | Forum gratuit d’entraide | Annuaire des forums gratuits | Signaler une violation | Conditions générales d'utilisation
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Traduction par : phpBB-fr.com