LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum


 FAQFAQ   RechercherRechercher   MembresMembres   GroupesGroupes   S’enregistrerS’enregistrer 
 ProfilProfil   Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés   ConnexionConnexion 

Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 3 … , 14, 15, 16  >
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> CONSEIL MONDIAL DES ÉGLISES/WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES - voir les sous-groupes dans cette section -> ISLAMISATION DU MONDE ENTIER (PARTIE 2)
Sujet précédent :: Sujet suivant  
Auteur Message

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238



systemofadown 3 days ago Uncategorized


The Director of the Dallas Council on American- Islamic Relations (CAIR), Mustafa Carroll, made a surprising and shocking statement during a Muslim rally in Austin, Texas. He firmly believes that the message of the Qur’an is supreme over the United States constitution. The statement would be shocking to most citizens of the United States, unless they had some perspective on who CAIR really is.

He said, “If we are practicing Muslims, we are above the law of the land.”

CAIR is the nation’s largest Muslim civil liberties and advocacy organization. Their headquarters is located in Washington D.C. They use lobbyists, the media, and action alerts to promote a positive image of Islam in America during a time when Radical Muslims (ISIS) in other parts of the world are crucifying children in the name of Allah, and quoting the Koran (Though the Obama Administration has a hard time calling it ‘Radical Islam’ for fear of offending regular Muslims).

In 2007 the Holy Land Foundation trial found the Holy Land Foundation Charity guilty of funneling millions of dollars back to the terrorist organization Hamas.
Interestingly enough, CAIR was among the organizations named during the trial as unindicted co-conspirators. To put that into perspective, the 37th president of the United States, Richard Nixon, was named an unindicted co-conspirator during the Watergate Trial.

In 2011 and 2012, during an event that The Blaze covered extensively, Islamic institutes coordinated with the White House to target the counter terrorism training within the FBI. The event was called ‘The Purge,’ and the result was the removal of more than 700 documents and 300 presentations. Some of the presentations removed included information about Al Qaeda and the trainers within the FBI were allegedly not given the opportunity to appeal when their presentations were rejected. They were not even allowed to know who it was that was objecting to their work. CAIR was one of the institutes that pushed for this event.

 In 2014, the United Arab Emirates placed CAIR, along with 81 other groups, on its list of terrorist organizations. Some believe the action was to done to show a stand against the Terrorist Organization, the Muslim Brotherhood, who seized power in Egypt during the Arab Spring. It should be noted that members of the Obama Administration openly endorsed the events in Egypt that led to the Muslim Brotherhood taking power, likening it to the Civil Rights Movement in America. It has been suspected that CAIR has had ties with the Muslim Brotherhood, and currently, the Obama administration is working to get CAIR removed from the list of terrorist groups.

 The world has seen many movements that believe they are above the law of the land. Everything from religion (ISIS) to atheism (Church burnings), from Nationalism (Nazis) to Communism (Stalin), and from Judges who do not follow the Constitution (Roberts) to members of Congress who openly admit to not reading the bills they sign into law (Pelosi). The world has seen unimaginable horrors when these ideas take root, and if Mustafa Caroll is expressing the unofficial and hidden beliefs of his organization, that practicing Muslims are above the law, it would only make sense that CAIR is meeting with and advising a man in the White House who also believes he is above the law of the land.



Revenir en haut

MessagePosté le: Ven 27 Jan - 06:26 (2017)    Sujet du message: Publicité

PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?
Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Dim 5 Fév - 07:05 (2017)    Sujet du message: MPs WEAR ISLAMIC VEILS IN PARLIAMENT TO PROMOTE ‘WORLD HIJAB DAY’ Répondre en citant



by Liam Deacon3 Feb 2017

A number of MPs donned hijabs in Westminster Hall to celebrate World Hijab Day (WHD), which normalises Islamic veiling and promotes “modest” dress.

The group, led by the SNP’s Tasmina Ahmed-Sheikh, included SNP MPs Anne McLaughlin and Patrick Grady, as well as Labour’s former shadow equalities minister Dawn Butler and MP Naseem Shah.

Organisers of WHD ask for donations on February 1st each year and encourage women of different faiths to wear a hijab in “solidarity” with Muslims under the slogan: “I stand for her right to COVER!”

The WHD website quotes conservative Islamic scholar Dr. Yasir Qadhi, who has been accused of anti-Semitism. He says “the concept of bringing attention to the modest attire that Islam encourages women to wear is something extremely positive…”

“Projects such as ‘Word Hijab Day’ help us spread these values and showcase our religion in a positive light,” he adds.

Neither the hijab or Islamic face veil, such as the burka, are mentioned in the Quran, and many liberal and progressive Muslims argue that the garments are sexist and even Islamist tools used to control women.

In countries such as Iran and Saudi Arabia, women are required by law to cover their heads and face punishment if they show their hair.

The organiser of WHD says they aim “to create a more peaceful world where global citizens respect each other”.

The also claim that “with the recent rise in Islamophobia, such as the hijab and other religious clothing being banned in countries like France, Muslim women who wear hijab are disproportionately targeted by hate crimes”.
During Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday, Ms. Ahmed-Sheikh used a question to call for the acceptance of Islamic veiling in British society and for the continued admittance of migrants and asylum seekers.

“Today is ‘World Hijab Day’ and I wonder if the Prime Minister would join with me in recognising the right of Muslim women to wear hijab if they wish without fear…” she said.



From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not to be confused with Global Pink Hijab Day or International Purple Hijab Day.

The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (March 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
World Hijab Day

World Hijab Day poster
Official nameInzamamul Haque
Observed byVarious Islamic countries
SignificanceIslamic fundamentalism
DateFebruary 1

World Hijab Day is an annual event founded by Nazma Khan in 2013.[1] The event takes place on February 1 each year in 140 countries worldwide.[2] Its stated purpose is to encourage women of all religions and backgrounds to wear and experience the hijab. Event organizers describe it as an opportunity for non-Muslim women to experience the hijab.[3]


Criticism of the Event

Feminist activist and Muslim reformer Asra Nomani says "as Muslim women, we actually ask you not to wear the hijab in the name of interfaith solidarity," going on to say, "This modern-day movement spreads an ideology of political Islam."

Muslim reformer Maajid Nawaz accuses the day as being a "well-financed effort by conservative Muslims to dominate modern Muslim societies," and says that the event spreads the "misleading interpretation" that the head covering is always worn voluntarily, and that "hijab" purely means headscarf.[4] He also described the event as "worse than passe," suggesting that the name be changed to "Hijab is a Choice Day".[5]

Read more : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Hijab_Day

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Mar 14 Fév - 08:43 (2017)    Sujet du message: SUEDE : LE « PREMIER GOUVERNEMENT FEMINISTE DU MONDE » DEFILE VOILE EN IRAN Répondre en citant


Par Koba le 13/02/2017

La ministre du Commerce suédoise Ann Linde et plusieurs femmes du gouvernement suédois ont suscité l’indignation en défilant voilées devant le président Rohani. Le gouvernement suédois prétend pourtant pratiquer « une politique étrangère féministe ».

La photo a ému les réseaux sociaux. On y voit la ministre du Commerce et des relations avec l’UE suédoise Ann Linde et d’autres femmes membres du gouvernement défiler en hijab à Téhéran devant le président iranien Rohani samedi. Il s’agissait d’une délégation emmenée par le premier ministre suédois, Stefan Löfven, qui avait pour objet des transactions commerciales avec l’Iran.
twitter-tweet a écrit:

Walk of shame: Women of Sweden’s « first feminist government in the world » don hijab as they walk past Iran’s Rouhani https://t.co/aeEFgibVhV pic.twitter.com/urHrtObkYv
— Hillel Neuer (@HillelNeuer) February 12, 2017

UN Watch, une ONG basée à Genève qui se donne pour mission de surveiller la protection des droits de l’homme mise en œuvre par l’ONU, a fait un communiqué dénonçant «une marche de la honte» et ce «en dépit de la promesse de Stockholm de promouvoir internationalement «l’égalité de genre» et d’adopter une politique étrangère féministe ».

D’ailleurs, la numéro 2 du gouvernement suédois, Isabella Lövin avait récemment «fait le buzz» en postant sur Twitter une photo d’elle et son équipe après l’élection de Trump, posant en train de signer un accord sur le climat. Une image qui n’était pas sans rappeler le cliché montrant Trump signant un décret contre l’IVG entourés d’hommes, ce qui avait suscité l’ire des féministes. De nombreux internautes ont moqué le deux-poids deux mesures du gouvernement et le décalage entre ces deux images.
twitter-tweet a écrit:

Just signed referral of Swedish #climate law, binding all future governments to net zero emissions by 2045. For a safer and better future. pic.twitter.com/OqOO2y8BU6
— Isabella Lövin (@IsabellaLovin) February 3, 2017


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Dim 5 Mar - 02:57 (2017)    Sujet du message: ONTARIO'S ISLAMOPHOBIA MOTION PASSES - ISLAM NOW SUPERIOR TO OTHER RELIGIONS Répondre en citant


February 26, 2017/in Fitnaphobic Organizations /by Dr.Rich Swier

Human rights activist Shabnam Assadollahi writes:

Ontario officially accepts Islam as a superior religion.

Muslim brotherhood will next table a law to implement Sharia law in Ontario’s Parliament and judiciary.


Mme Des Rosiers moved, Mme Des Rosiers propose, Private Members’ Notice of Motion No. 37:

Avis de motion émanant des députés no 37 :

That, in the opinion of this House, the Legislative Assembly of Ontario should reaffirm that diversity has always played an important part in Ontario’s culture and heritage; recognize the significant contributions Muslims have made, and continue to make, to Ontario’s cultural and social fabric and prosperity; stand against all forms of hatred, hostility, prejudice, racism and intolerance; rebuke the notable growing tide of anti-Muslim rhetoric and sentiments; denounce hate-attacks, threats of violence and hate crimes against people of the Muslim faith; condemn all forms of Islamophobia and reaffirm its support for government’s efforts, through the Anti-Racism Directorate, to address and prevent systemic racism across government policy, programs and services, and increase anti-racism education and awareness, including Islamophobia, in all parts of the province.

Debate arose. Il s’élève un débat.
Carried on the following division:

Adoptée par le vote suivant :

Des Rosiers
Miller (Hamilton East-Stoney Creek)
Miller (Parry Sound-Muskoka)
AYES / POUR – 81


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Mar 28 Mar - 21:08 (2017)    Sujet du message: LA CAPITALE DU MONDE MUSULMAN SE TROUVE EN IRAN Répondre en citant


Une nouvelle importante dans le contexte que l'Iran veut s'unir avec Israël afin de rebâtir le 3e Temple de Jérusalem, et que selon les prophéties de la Bible, Jérusalem deviendra la capitale internationale du monde entier sous la bannière de l'ONU. On voit donc directement vers quoi nous allons.

© AP Photo/ Hasan Sarbakhshian

18:50 26.03.2017

Devenue «capitale culturelle du monde musulman», la ville iranienne de Mashhad insiste sur l’importance de la préservation de la culture pour les générations futures face aux terroristes, a déclaré à Sputnik le président de l’Organisation pour la culture et l’art de la province de Téhéran, Mahmood Sallahi.

En 2017, l'Organisation islamique pour l'Éducation, les Sciences et la Culture (ISESCO) a accordé le statut de « capitale du monde musulman » (parmi les pays non arabes d'Asie) à la ville de Mashhad, dans le nord-est de l'Iran, choix tout à fait justifié, a estimé dans un entretien avec Sputnik Mahmood Sallahi, qui avait dirigé le projet de nomination.

« Deuxième plus grande ville d'Iran avec une population de plus de trois millions d'habitants, Mashhad abrite le tombeau de l'imam Reza (l'un des douze imams du chiisme, ndlr) que plus de 30 millions de pèlerins viennent visiter chaque année. […] Grâce à la nomination de Mashhad comme capitale culturelle du monde islamique, nous pouvons mieux montrer au monde l'Iran lui-même », a estimé l'interlocuteur de l'agence.

Et d'ajouter qu'à l'heure où le terrorisme menaçait l'humanité, il importait de montrer au monde entier la vraie valeur de la culture islamique.

« Nous devons montrer que l'islam, c'est une religion de paix, de calme et de coexistence pacifique, une religion d'unité, de compassion mutuelle », a souligné M. Sallahi.

L'ISESCO a été fondée par l'Organisation de la coopération islamique (OCI) en mai 1979 à Rabat, au Maroc. Avec 52 États membres, elle est l'une des plus grandes organisations internationales musulmanes. Son objectif principal consiste à renforcer la culture et la civilisation dans les pays musulmans. = Comme tous les pays sont en train de se transformer en pays islamique, cela nous montre la domination qui vient de ses soldats d'Allah.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Sam 8 Avr - 18:36 (2017)    Sujet du message: EUROPEAN GOVERNMENTS' APPROACH TO TACKLING EXTREMISM COUNTER-PRODUCTIVE Répondre en citant

8:59 - March 06, 2016
News ID: 3459192

TEHRAN (IQNA) – What European governments are doing in the face of extremism is putting more pressure and suspicion on Muslim communities, which will alienate more young Muslims and lead to more radicalization. = The lie of radicalization is not coming from the peoples but by these elites. Again, we are the problem!

This is according to Dr. Oliver Scharbrodt, Professor of Islamic Studies at the University of Chester, Britain, who paid a visit to Iran a few weeks ago to deliver a number of lectures on Islamic studies, Shia Islam in particular, and other relevant subjects from an academic perspective.


IQNA conducted an interview with the British scholar on certain challenges and issues facing the Islamic world, notably European Muslims.
What follows is the second and final part of the interview.

IQNA: In your lecture delivered at the International Conference Hall of Tehran’s Shahid Beheshti University with the theme of "Shia Studies in Britain”, you put emphasis on seeking ways to build up an institutional platform to develop partnerships in favor of dialogue in the academic framework of Islamic, and especially Shia, studies. Considering the present situation of Islamic community, and the widening gap between different Islamic denominations, do you think such a partnership would be realistic or feasible?

Prof. Scharbrodt: I think they are two separate things. I mean obviously there is a need for some sort of inner Islamic intrafaith dialogue between different Islamic nations. This kind of dialogue is now more urgent and more difficult than it ever was. But what I was referring was about possible ways to bridge the gap between academic scholarship and the needs and perspectives of the Muslim communities.

I am moderately optimistic because I think this is the way forward but it would be very difficult because some of the concerns from Muslims themselves and how they want to see Islam is represented are not necessarily shared by academic researchers. Muslim scholarship would need to establish true and pure Islam and to show what Islam is, which is not necessarily concerned of academic scholarship of Islam.

But one of the things that make me optimistic is the growing number of second and third generation of Muslim immigrants in Europe who were educated and brought up in the west to enter universities to follow academic studies on Islam, and who want their voice and particular perspectives heard within the public sphere and academic context.

I think these demographic changes can change the way how Islamic studies are approached academically. But it would be difficult and challenging.
IQNA: According to some documents and surveys released by security agencies and authorities, and which have been covered by the media, a considerable number of European citizens are joining Daesh (ISIL) to fight in Syria, Iraq, or carry out terrorist attacks in different parts of the world, and the number is on the rise. This is while the majority of them are young and somehow educated. I was wondering if this fact could be in contradiction to or, at least, not in accordance with your optimism. Could factors such as Islamophobia, alienation, isolation, and stigmatization of European Muslims be involved in ISIL recruiting of extremists from the West?

Prof. Scharbrodt: There are different things coming together. On the one hand, it certainly is a matter of radicalization while a small minority of young Muslims are radicalized and join ISIS or ISIL in this sort of movement and this is certainly a response to the experience of Islamophobia, a sense of social exclusion, and the idea that Islam is not seen as a recognized identity in the strict sense of the term in contemporary Europe. That certainly plays a role as well.

The other problem is obviously the rise of Salafism and again it has appeal to certain young Sunni Muslims because it promises to sort of restore pure Islam as it has claimed to be pure and authentic Islam by going back to the scripture Sunnis refer to. But this is not the case because Salafism has a particular approach to and interpretation of Islam as such. So there is a strong appeal among young Sunni Muslims of Salafism because of the sense of unity and also because of the kind of isolationist approach of Salafism which again reflects perhaps their lived experience. = But well paid by their government and full support from the O.T.O and other masonic lodges to achieve their goals.

In this regard, I am actually a bit pessimistic because the way how current European governments tackle the issue is by putting more pressure and more suspicion on Muslim communities. That obviously will alienate more young Muslims.

IQNA: With reference to your last word, one example of exerting pressure on European Muslims by some European politicians would be the recent so called anti-terrorism bill presented by the British Prime Minister to the parliament. However, the bill was not welcome by the British Muslim community since only less than 10 percent of them expressed their agreement to the bill, deeming it discriminatory and politically motivated. How do you assess the issue and its possible outcomes?

Prof. Scharbrodt: There are many floors in the approach taken by the British government in terms of the bill. Many assumptions are made. In fact, it is putting the whole responsibility on the shoulder of the Muslim community, not recognizing that the whole society has a role to play as well.

Unfortunately, in order to justify these policies, the government also reverted to very outdated orientalist and Islamophobic stereotypes, putting particular sort of attention to Muslim women again such as the need to educate them as their representation has been traditionally submissive. That has alienated many communities because the discourse around it has referred to very old orientalist and Islamophobic stereotypes. I do not think this kind of discourse has been helpful.

There is also another problem that is increasing not only in Britain, but also all over Europe. The governments prefer to talk to so called representatives of Muslim communities that do not really represent Muslim communities, but just respond to the political expectations of the governments. This behavior is increasingly growing in the UK context where money is channeled into organizations that sort of copy and paste this discourses coming from the government. So I think the approach is entirely floored and, as a result, completely counterproductive, making the situation probably even worse.

In one of my recent lectures in Iran, I gave the audience an example concerning the Cultural Revolution in China in the 1960s. There was in a particular region in China a plague of flies. The teachers of a particular school asked the pupils to catch and kill flies to combat the plague. What actually happened, pupils began to breed flies in the dormitory. I think many of the policies that European governments are adopting in order to fight radicalism is exactly like that. They seem to address such a combat but, in essence, it provided new breeding ground for further radicalization.

Oliver Scharbrodt is the Professor of Islamic Studies at the University of Chester, UK. He studied Comparative Religion, Islamic Studies and Philosophy at the University of Bonn in Germany and completed his graduate studies and research in London, obtaining his MA and PhD from the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS). After teaching in London, the US and Ireland, he joined the Department of Theology and Religious Studies in September 2014.

The same year he was appointed the first Professor of Islamic Studies in the University of Chester as one of the prime centers for the academic study of Islam in the UK. Responsible for teaching courses on Islam, his research interests lie in the intellectual history of modern Islam, the historical and contemporary presence of Islam in Europe and the role of mystical, esoteric and millenarian traditions of Islam in the modern world.

At the moment, professor Scharbrodt is the principal investigator of a research project on Shia communities in Britain and their links to the Middle East. He is also the executive editor of the Yearbook of Muslims in Europe.

"Modern Readings of the Qur’an”, "From Hafiz: Irish Orientalism, Persian Poetry and W. B. Yeats”, "Shaping the Public of Image of Islam: the Shiis of Ireland as moderate Muslims”, and "Erin and Iran: Cultural Encounters between the Irish and the Iranians, constitute, among others, some of his works published by globally well known centers of publications.  = Modern reading of the Qur'an : If you are a true muslim, you have to become a jihadist and to fight and kill for Allah... if not, you are an infidel.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Sam 8 Avr - 18:39 (2017)    Sujet du message: RUSSIA : DAGESTAN PRISON INMATES TO TAKE QURAN LESSONS Répondre en citant


What will happen to the ones who refuses to join the club? Islamophobia laws and persecution?

8:51 - July 24, 2016
News ID: 3460475

TEHRAN (IQNA) – In Dagestan, prison inmates may start studying the Quran, a source in the republican Committee on Freedom of Conscience and Cooperation with Religious Organizations said.
The Committee executives have conducted negotiations with the top officers of the republican branch of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia.

It was agreed that prison inmates would be granted a possibility to attend special lectures organized by the representatives of Muslim religious board of Dagestan once a month.

The lectures will contain information related to the spiritual and moral upbringing of a personality.

According to a representative of the Federal Penitentiary Service, the spiritual assistance is expected to positively affect the behavior of prisoners, as well as to help them to socialize before exit to freedom.

Source: Republican Information Agency


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Lun 10 Avr - 04:01 (2017)    Sujet du message: SHARIA LAW HAS COMPLETELY TAKEN OVER DEARBORN, MICHIGAN Répondre en citant


To late. Muslims are everywhere and it's an international agenda. Muslims will go in war against americans and will impose by force and death their Sharia laws

VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSeN6WLoBZo


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMBESTJPdo4

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Jeu 27 Avr - 01:45 (2017)    Sujet du message: AUSTRIAN PRESIDENT SAYS : "...WOMEN MUST WEAR A HIJAB" Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cx5FjNHGzYs

Ajoutée le 26 avr. 2017

The Austrian President recently stated that: "...with all the Islamophobia, a day will come that all women must wear a
hijab, not just for religious reasons, but out of solidarity"

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Mar 30 Mai - 10:52 (2017)    Sujet du message: GRECE. LE GOUVERNEMENT TSIPRAS VALIDE LA CONSTRUCTION D'UNE MOSQUEE A ATHENES Répondre en citant


il y a 3 heures

30/05/2017 – 07H15 Athènes (Breizh-info.com) – Ce 25 mai 2017, les députés grecs ont définitivement validé une « ordonnance » prise en catimini en août 2016, sur la construction d’une mosquée entre Athènes et Le Pirée, dans le quartier du jardin Botanique. Les médias n’ont pas relayé l’information pour éviter de raviver la colère d’une majorité de Grecs.

Dans les faits, la construction a commencé depuis quelques mois et se trouve en cours d’achèvement, mais la règle tacite « Construisons d’abord, ils nous légaliseront après» connaît ici une stricte application.

Au reste, cette mosquée n’est que la 1ère officielle à Athènes où fonctionnent environ 70 lieux de prières musulmans répertoriés mais illicites. Cela tient au grand nombre de musulmans (entre 130.000 et 200.000) dans la capitale grecque et à la diversité des croyances (rivalités sunnites chiites) et des appartenances ethno-raciales. Cinq d’entre eux, les plus connus, sont révélateurs de la situation : dans le quartier de Moschato la mosquée anonyme (financée par un Saoudien) et celle de « Hamza » accueillent essentiellement les immigrés du Bangladesh, celle du Pirée des « Musulmans Grecs »,  à l’ouest d’Athènes une autre est fréquentée par des « Pakistanais » et enfin « Al Tzabar » (demande de légalisation en cours) et plus cosmopolite dans le centre.

S’agissant de la nouvelle mosquée (sans minaret) du Jardin Botanique, prévue pour 300 hommes et 50 femmes – ses 850 m2, plus les bureaux des imams, compte, non tenu du don par la municipalité d’un terrain de 1 hectare, et l’aménagement de l’environnement – zone de jeux pour les enfants, fontaine, pelouses, arbres, vont coûter (officiellement) environ 900 000 euros au contribuable grec. En effet, «le Comité de direction de la mosquée d’Athènes », personne morale de droit privé, verra cette somme et les dépenses connexes financées par le ministère de l’Éducation, et ce, sous prétexte d’éviter les financements étrangers qui imposeraient leurs principes extrémistes…

Pour le gouvernement grec, l’ouverture ce lieu de culte à Athènes contribue donc « au renforcement de la présence et de l’envergure internationale du pays dans le respect des droits de l’homme » (?) ainsi qu’ « à la consolidation de la vigilance de l’État envers les citoyens grecs et autres ressortissants de l’UE de religion musulmane afin qu’ils puissent exercer sans heurts leurs devoirs de culte ».

Dans la pratique, outre s’être soumis au diktat de Bruxelles, le gouvernement Tsipras vient d’ouvrir la « boite de Pandore » avec une communauté musulmane qui va demander la légalisation massive des lieux de cultes illégaux en Grèce. Or, vu l’impossibilité de contrôler ce qui s’y dit et ce qui s’y fait (formations religieuses extrémistes), et contrairement aux bonnes intentions affichées, nous avons là un excellent terreau pour djihadistes…

(source  : Ministère des Affaires étrangères grec)

Crédit photo : DR

[cc] Breizh-info.com, 2017 dépêches libres de copie et diffusion sous réserve de mention de la source d’origine


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Ven 2 Juin - 00:44 (2017)    Sujet du message: TRUMP DOJ FORCES NJ TOWN THAT DENIED MOSQUE TO PAY MUSLIMS $3.25 MILLION, BUILD MOSQUE, GET “DIVERSITY TRAININT” Répondre en citant


June 1, 2017 8:52 am By Robert Spencer 54 Comments

It looks as if the Justice Department swamp not only has not been drained, but is full of more voracious crocodiles than ever before. This case started during the Obama administration, but it is the Trump administration’s Justice Department that is handing down this ruling. President Trump needs to repudiate it, or else he owns it.

In battles over mosques all over the country, the elephant in the room is not allowed to be discussed: the connections of the mosque leaders to the Muslim Brotherhood and other jihad groups. People don’t oppose these mosques because of “racism” or “bigotry,” but because they’re concerned about jihad terror.

With most of the mosques in the U.S. getting funding from Saudi Arabia and surveys having shown that most mosques in the U.S. preach hatred of Jews and Christians and the necessity ultimately to replace the U.S. Constitution with Islamic law, these are legitimate concerns, but discussion of them is foreclosed as “Islamophobic.”

“Diversity and inclusion training,” meanwhile, means having to listen to a lot of lies about how Islam is a religion of peace and Muslims are victimized by “Islamophobia.” The object of the “training” is to intimidate the “trainees” into fearing to oppose Islamic supremacism, jihad terror, Sharia, and the mosques in which such things are preached.

“’Municipalities around the country should pay close attention to what happened in Bernards Township,’ Adeel A. Mangi, lead counsel for the mosque, told My Central Jersey. ‘The American Muslim community has the legal resources, the allies and the determination to stand up for its constitutional rights in court and will do so.’”

Threat noted. It should also be noted that there is no constitutional right to break American laws under the guise of freedom of religion. This principle has been obscured, and needs to be reasserted, or we are in for a world of hurt.

The Trump administration Justice Department should be allowing for such discussion, not strong-arming and extorting communities to support what will likely be a Muslim Brotherhood installation in their midst. Is Sessions even aware of this ruling? Is Trump? If they’re not, it’s criminal negligence, and if they are, it’s something even worse.

“A New Jersey town denied Muslims a mosque. Now it must pay them $3.25 million,” by Katie Mettler, Washington Post, May 31, 2017:

The worshipers waited four years and 39 public hearings for the official denial: Muslims in their small New Jersey town would not be allowed to build a mosque.

The 2015 decision made by the planning board in Bernards Township, N.J., a majority-white suburb of 26,000 people, came after significant public opposition to the mosque that thrust the community into the national spotlight and spurred religious discrimination lawsuits from the Islamic Society of Basking Ridge and the Department of Justice.

On Tuesday, the township learned the cost of its six-year-old decision: $3.25 million.

As part of a settlement of the suits, the township must allow construction of the mosque to begin at its original proposed location, according to the Justice Department. Bernards Township will pay the Islamic Society $1.5 million in damages and $1.75 million in attorney fees and require town officials to submit to diversity and inclusion training.

“Municipalities around the country should pay close attention to what happened in Bernards Township,” Adeel A. Mangi, lead counsel for the mosque, told My Central Jersey. “The American Muslim community has the legal resources, the allies and the determination to stand up for its constitutional rights in court and will do so.”…


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Sam 3 Juin - 22:35 (2017)    Sujet du message: SOUTHERN BAPTISTS BACK AWAY FROM BACKING MOSQUES Répondre en citant


Trustee scuffle over ‘unholy alliance’ leads IMB to leave ERLC’s side on religious freedom fights.

Sarah Eekhoff Zylstra
February 08, 2017 10:42 AM

Image: Islamic Society of Basking Ridge

The proposed mosque

The trouble started last May, when several arms of the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) reached out a legal hand to a Muslim community in New Jersey, publicly supporting their right to build a mosque.

Current Issue June 2017Subscribe

The International Mission Board (IMB) and Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC) were 2 of 18 religious groups that filed an amicus brief decrying the Township of Bernards’ zoning board decision that required the proposed mosque to have more parking spaces than Christian or Jewish places of worship.

The town’s reasoning: since Muslim services are held on Fridays, people would be coming after work instead of together as families, and therefore more spots would be needed. But when the Muslim community offered to split the services, or use ride-sharing or overflow arrangements, the board still denied their application.

The amicus brief, which was also signed by the National Association of Evangelicals and the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, argued that “such unequal treatment of the mosque in this case represents a potential threat to the free exercise rights of each of the amici represented here and is a affront to our nation’s commitment to religious liberty for all.”

On New Year’s Eve, a judge agreed.

Less than a month later, IMB trustee and Tennessee megachurch pastor Dean Haun resigned with a year left on his term.

“I love our IMB leadership and our missionaries and their work across the globe. I am not a rabble rouser and my heart is not to take down the IMB,” Haun told the Baptist and Reflector, the newspaper of the Tennessee Baptist Convention and one of the SBC’s oldest state papers.

“[But] if we defend the rights of people to construct places of false worship, are we not helping them speed down the highway to hell?” he said. “I want no part in supporting a false religion, even if it is in the name of religious freedom.”

He called the amicus brief an “unholy alliance” with a false religion, and accused the SBC agencies of overstepping their bounds, reported Baptist Press. He wasn’t the only one to object; the IMB came under enough fire to defend itself on the Frequently Asked Questions portion of its website.

The IMB explained:
text a écrit:

[Our] specific interest in the brief arises out of our belief that all peoples of the world have the right to religious liberty, including the freedom to embrace the gospel. This is what we believe and why we take the gospel to them, despite situations that pose great risk. A public record by IMB of supporting freedom of religion for all people in the United States—regardless of their beliefs—gives IMB workers overseas a credible foundation from which to advocate for freedom of religious exercise in countries that are hostile to Christianity, penalize those who convert, or make it difficult for a new church to own or rent property for worship. … IMB’s call on the government of these other countries to support the religious freedom of their citizens will ring hollow if, in the USA, we only support freedom of religion for Christians.

 Haun’s 2,800-member church also voted to hold on to funds that were earmarked for the SBC’s Cooperative Program (CP), which finances state and national missions, including the IMB, the ERLC, the North American Mission Board, and the SBC’s six seminaries.

The congregation is “praying about their long-term response,” Baptist Press reported. (Amid debate over the merits of using CP funds as a political bargaining chip, giving so far this fiscal year is about 3 percent above budget, but slightly lower than what was given to the CP by this time last year.)

Haun’s congregation may be pacified by the IMB’s latest move, which was to tweak its policy.

"As a result of discussions among IMB trustees and staff over recent months, we have revised our processes for our legal department filing any future amicus briefs,” IMB president David Platt told Baptist Press. “IMB leaders are committed in the days ahead to speak only into situations that are directly tied to our mission.”

No such concession has come from the ERLC, where president Russell Moore fielded a similar question on supporting mosques at the denomination’s annual meeting last summer.

“Sometimes we have really hard decisions to make,” he said to applause. “This isn’t one of those things. What it means to be a Baptist is to support soul freedom for everybody.”

Moore’s predecessor at the ERLC, Richard Land, faced similar concerns in 2011 that led him to withdraw from an interfaith coalition that supported the right of Muslims to build mosques in the United States. As CT reported:
text a écrit:

Land said he did not quit the ICOM because of a change in his convictions but out of a need to represent the views of the SBC. In a letter to the ADL, Land wrote, “While many Southern Baptists share my deep commitment to religious freedom and the right of Muslims to have places of worship, they also feel that a Southern Baptist denominational leader filing suit to allow individual mosques to be built is ‘a bridge too far.’”

Land said that his involvement with ICOM was not a promotion of Islam, but he said this was the perception of many in the convention.

“Southern Baptists have the oft-expressed right to form their own perceptions as well as the right to expect their denominational servant to be cognizant of them and to respect them,” Land said in a statement. “I serve Southern Baptists.”

The mosque issue isn’t Moore’s largest public relations problem within the SBC. He’s been hearing louder criticism for his condemnation of then-candidate Donald Trump and his frustration with Trump’s supporters during the presidential campaign.

“There was a disrespectfulness towards Southern Baptists and other evangelical leaders, past and present,” megachurch pastor Jack Graham toldThe Wall Street Journal. His 40,000-member Texas congregation is “considering making major changes in our support of the Southern Baptist Convention.”

Moore apologized for offending Trump voters in a Christmas blog, writing that “there’s a massive difference between someone who enthusiastically excused immorality and someone who felt conflicted, weighed the options based on biblical convictions, and voted their conscience.”

The larger issue debated by SBC faithful was whether Moore’s job at the ERLC was to represent Southern Baptists or to lead them. (CT covered those arguments in December.)
The most public divide so far has occurred in Louisiana, where the Louisiana Baptist Convention has proposed studying the recent actions of the ERLC. A month later, the New Orleans Baptist Association (NOBA) responded, stating that past SBC president Fred Luter and other signatories were “pulling for Dr. Moore.”

“Dr. Moore speaks with a prophetic voice to our faith community about how to live for Christ and his kingdom in our culture,” stated the 10 NOBA signatories. “We don’t expect him to gauge our opinions on social, political, and economic issues and then promote our consensus position. He’s a leader raised up by God to help guide us in this new day.”

Others have spoken up for Moore, warning that attempts to fire him give Trump too much power and reverse progress made on race relations.

One SBC pastor parsed why the desire of critics to fire Moore isn’t as easy as it sounds—it would require electing a like-minded president at the next annual meeting, who would appoint a committee that would nominate another committee to present alternative options which would then be voted on by trustees, wrote Dave Miller for SBC Voices.

“It will only take most of a decade to get it done,” he said. “Should it be easy?”

“We can do this,” he continued. “The Moore supporters and critics can find rapprochement. The ghost of election 2016 doesn’t have to haunt us forever—not for those of good will and godly desire. Obviously, not everyone is going to come along, but most will.”

CT previously looked at the theological limits of evangelicals loving their Muslim neighbors, including sharing sacred spaces.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Lun 26 Juin - 05:15 (2017)    Sujet du message: MAKING AMERICA MUSLIM ALL AMERICA MUSLIM Répondre en citant


VIDEO : http://www.sendspace.com/file/a2gt8l

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Mar 4 Juil - 00:14 (2017)    Sujet du message: CANADA - QUEBEC : PRIERE ISLAMIQUE ET HAUT-PARLEUR AU PARC SAFARI D'EMMINGFORD Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAY9FoHHjYY&sns=fb&app=desktop

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Sam 8 Juil - 23:36 (2017)    Sujet du message: FRANCE : NO SLEEP FOR PARIS RESIDENTS AS MOSQUE BLARES THROUGH THE NIGHT Répondre en citant


July 7, 2017 / creeping

Source: Paris Residents Unable to Sleep Through ‘Intense’ Overnight Mosque Loudspeaker Sessions – Breitbart

The loudspeakers of a Mée-sur-Seine mosque blasting out prayers and songs in the early hours of the morning through Ramadan caused chaos with the sleep patterns of Parisians living in the French capital’s south-eastern suburb, locals have said.

As well as operating year-round on Friday afternoons, the loudspeakers were in action from 11.30 pm each night until past 1 am during the Islamic holy month so as to allow Muslims praying on the streets outside, due to lack of space in the mosque, to hear.

“The loudspeaker is so intense,” a resident told Le Parisien. “We hear prayers, songs and readings delivered in a fashion that is completely disrespectful of people who follow other religions, and atheists.

“Some nights it is impossible to get more than four hours sleep because even after the prayers end, the faithful then engage in discussions which can last for another two hours.”

The French newspaper reports that frustrated locals said neither Mée-sur-Seine’s mayor, Franck Vernin, nor the police responded to their complaints.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Jeu 13 Juil - 01:47 (2017)    Sujet du message: GERMANY WILL BECOME AN ISLAMIC STATE, SAYS MERKEL – AND ADDS THEY'LL HAVE TO COME TO TERMS WITH IT Répondre en citant


May 07, 2017 by admin in DIASPORA

Chancellor Angela Merkel said that Germans have failed to grasp how Muslim immigration has transformed their country and will have to come to terms with more mosques than churches throughout the countryside, according to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung daily.

“Our country is going to carry on changing, and integration is also a task for the society taking up the task of dealing with immigrants,” Ms. Merkel told the daily newspaper. “For years we’ve been deceiving ourselves about this. Mosques, for example, are going to be a more prominent part of our cities than they were before.”

Germany, with a population of 4-5 million Muslims, has been divided in recent weeks by a debate over remarks by the Bundesbank’s Thilo Sarrazin, who argued Turkish and Arab immigrants were failing to integrate and were swamping Germany with a higher birth rate.

The Chancellor’s remarks represent the first official acknowledgement that Germany, like other European countries, is destined to become a stronghold of Islam. She has admitted that the country will soon become a stronghold.

In France, 30% of children age 20 years and below are Muslims. The ratio in Paris and Marseille has soared to 45%. In southern France, there are more mosques than churches.

The situation within the United Kingdom is not much.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Jeu 20 Juil - 02:55 (2017)    Sujet du message: CANADA-QUEBEC : DES COURS SUR LA CHARIA RECONNUS PAR LE BARREAU DU QUEBEC Répondre en citant



La présidente du groupe Pour les droits des femmes au Québec, Michèle Sirois, a révélé, lors de son témoignage devant la commission d'étude du projet de loi 59, que l'Association canadienne des avocats musulmans (ACAM) offre des cours sur la charia...

(vidéo intégrale ici)

L'ACAM donne des formations sur le thème suivant: La reconnaissance de la «Kafala» musulmane en droit civil québécois et en droit de l’immigration canadien: état des lieux et pistes de solutions.

Cette formation est reconnue par le Barreau du Québec.

Selon le site de l'ACAM : «la Kafala musulmane, que l’on retrouve dans plusieurs pays de droit musulman ne constitue pas une adoption au sens du droit civil québécois mais plutôt une prise en charge de l’enfant, similaire à une tutelle.»

Mme Sirois a indiqué que les enfants pris en charge en vertu de la Kafala ne jouissent pas des mêmes droits que les enfants biologiques ou adoptifs.

Elle a également fait état de cours sur la charia donnés à l'Université de Montréal, et de notaires offrant des testaments et des contrats de mariage conformes à la charia.


Au Royaume-Uni, le Barreau avait adopté des directives sur la rédaction de testaments conformes à la charia qui ont soulevé un tollé en raison des dispositions discriminatoires envers les veuves, certains orphelins et les non-musulmans. Elles ont été retirées, et le Barreau a offert ses excuses.

Lire aussi:

Québec : Du droit fiscal à la charia

GB : Le Barreau retire ses directives sur les testaments conformes à la charia et s'excuse

GB : les règles discriminatoires de la charia en matière d'héritage incorporées dans le droit anglais

La charia s'incruste de plus en plus dans le droit britannique


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Ven 11 Aoû - 12:19 (2017)    Sujet du message: ENGLAND : OLDHAM'S MUSLIM MAYOR CALLS FOR PRAYER Répondre en citant


The imam quotes the peaceful verse Sura 5:32 which is actually Mosaic law for Jews only. This subterfuge is standard procedure that Muslim apologists use to fool non-Muslims.

The next verse Sura 5:33 that is Muhammad's orders to his faithful followers, and is the basis for Islamic blasphemy laws for which the penalty for simply questioning or insulting Islam is death.

Later in Sura 5 Jews and Christians are explicitly cursed as ‘wicked’ people with ‘diseased hearts’ and as hateful blasphemers.


VIDEO : http://www.sendspace.com/file/rd8vwb

9 août, 13:50

Angleterre : le nouveau maire musulman de Oldham (Manchester) impose la prière musulmane en début de conseil municipal.

Le verset suivant, Sourate 5:33, qui est les ordres de Muhammad à ses disciples fidèles, est la base des lois du blasphème islamique pour lesquelles la peine d'avoir simplement interrogé ou insulté l'islam est la mort.

Plus tard dans la Sourate 5, les juifs et les chrétiens sont explicitement maudits comme des gens «méchants» avec des «cœurs malades» et des blasphémateurs haineux.

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238


Plaque placed on the store in 1957 by U.S.-based United Daughters of the Confederacy

By Sarah Leavitt, CBC News Posted: Aug 15, 2017 4:19 PM ET Last Updated: Aug 15, 2017 6:17 PM ET

Andrew Papenheim first noticed the plaque commemorating Jefferson Davis online and was shocked. The plaque hangs outside the Hudson's Bay Company flagship store in downtown Montreal. (Sarah Leavitt/CBC)

Sarah Leavitt
Sarah Leavitt is a journalist with CBC Montreal.

The Hudson's Bay Company is removing a plaque from the company's flagship store in downtown Montreal that commemorates Jefferson Davis, who was president of the Confederate States during the U.S. Civil War.

"We are working this evening to have the plaque removed," wrote Tiffany Bourré, a spokesperson for HBC, in an email to CBC News Tuesday afternoon.

Calls to have the plaque removed emerged after a 32-year-old woman was killed in a deadly car attack on anti-racism protesters who were demonstrating against a white nationalist rally in Charlottesville, Va., on Saturday. The man charged in the attack idolized Nazis, according to a former teacher.
The aftermath of the Charlottesville clashes have prompted many to look closer at Confederate monuments in their own neighbourhoods.

The Montreal plaque hangs on a wall of the HBC store on Union Avenue. Written in French, it says: "To the memory of Jefferson Davis, president of the Confederate States, who lived in 1867 in the home of John Lovell, which was once here."

It goes on to say it was first placed there in 1957 by the United Daughters of the Confederacy, a non-profit women's group dedicated to celebrating Confederate history.
Andrew Papenheim first saw the plaque posted online.

"I walk down Union Avenue every day, now I just see it every time and it irks me," he said.

"I'm not sure why we would go out of our way to commemorate this dark and horrible thing. Jefferson Davis was not an honourable man, he committed treason in defence of chattel slavery."

The plaque, attached to The Bay's wall along Union Avenue, is 'to the memory of Jefferson Davis,' and commissioned by the United Daughters of the Confederacy. (Sarah Leavitt/CBC)

Calls for plaque to be removed
Papenheim says he got tired of being upset and decided to find out why the plaque was still on display.

"I wanted to figure out how it was being funded. It was really important to me that we were not spending public funds commemorating this disgusting thing," he said.
He got in touch with The Bay's heritage department in May to ask for more information.

In a reply, the department said it would have a member review and research the plaque and get back to him once that was completed. He has yet to receive any more information.

Papenheim is not alone in his calls to have the plaque removed.

Mark Warner has repeatedly made requests to Mayor Denis Coderre via Twitter to do something.
twitter-tweet a écrit:

.@DenisCoderre I bet you can match this eloquence when you move to remove the plaque to Jefferson Davis in Phillips Square in Montreal. https://t.co/FndAdZXzQk

"A plaque that's donated by the United Daughters of the Confederacy, without any context, to the honour of the president of the Confederacy who defended slavery is an offence to me as a black Canadian," Warner told CBC News.

He says his tweets to Coderre have gone unanswered.

Gabrielle Fontaine-Giroux, a spokesperson for the City of Montreal, wrote in an email to CBC on Tuesday that it is a "private plaque on a private building. It's up to the owner of the building to evaluate it."

HBC declined to give an on-camera interview earlier Tuesday. Instead a spokesperson for the company emailed a statement to CBC News.

"The plaque was mounted on the Morgan's department store building before Hudson's Bay occupied the space. We are looking into it further," wrote Tiffany Bourrè.
Why a plaque for Davis in Montreal?
Davis was president of the Confederate States from 1861 to 1865, when the Confederacy was defeated by the Union army under Ulysses S. Grant in May of that year. A few weeks after the Confederates surrendered, Davis was arrested, charged with treason and put in jail.

After he was released on bail, Davis spent some time in Montreal.

In a letter to his brother written in 1867, Davis wrote that he was staying with John Lovell, a prominent Montrealer who owned a printing company.

The Lovell Litho & Publications Inc.'s company website makes note of the fact.

"In 1867 John Lovell gave refuge in his home, where the Hudson's Bay Company at [Phillips Square] presently stands, to Jefferson Davis, exiled President of the Confederated Southern States, at the end of the Civil War," says the website.



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6qTitg4uw4

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Sam 19 Aoû - 23:08 (2017)    Sujet du message: BALTIMORE QUETLY RELOCATES 4 CONFEDERATE STATUES OVERNIGHT Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3eH-Lrh52Cc 

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Sam 19 Aoû - 23:42 (2017)    Sujet du message: RENAME US ARMY BASES FOR HEROES, NOT CONFEDERATES Répondre en citant


  •   By Mark R. Jacobson Adjunct Professor at The George Washington University Read bio

August 17, 2017
U.S. Army / Sgt. Michael J. MacLeod

Our soldiers should walk through gates that honor those who fought for the United States, not against it.

The tragic events in Charlottesville, Va., have re-opened the national debate over Confederate monuments and icons that stand in public spaces — and that includes the appropriateness of keeping ten U.S. Army installations named for Confederate officers. The question of renaming the bases was also raised after 2015’s Charleston church massacre, and military leaders declined to do so. This time, there should be no equivocation.

The Department of the Army must find alternatives to naming its installations after Confederate generals who took up arms against their nation and played significant roles in a rebellion that killed more Americans than the Second World War. While understanding and memorializing the Civil War itself is integral to U.S. military history as well as the history of the Army and its institutions, the lionizing and mythologizing of these individuals as standard-bearers of Army heritage must come to an end.

The ten installations — Camp Beauregard, La.; Fort Benning, Ga.; Fort Bragg, N.C.; Fort Gordon, Ga.; Fort A.P. Hill, Va.; Fort Hood, Texas; Fort Lee, Va.; Fort Pickett, Va.; Fort Polk, La.; and Fort Rucker, La. — were named for Confederate generals (plus Rucker, a colonel), including the military head of the armed rebellion (Lee) and the alleged head of the Ku Klux Klan in Georgia (Gordon). Beauregard’s forces shelled Fort Sumter on April 12, 1861, beginning the war that would claim over 600,000 American lives. In other words, not only did these individuals take up arms against the United States, they were instrumental in driving the rebellion, and some also worked to perpetuate the hatred that long outlasted the military conflict.

The Army has not seen this celebration of the Confederacy as problematic, arguing that the base names memorialize locally connected individuals, “not their causes or ideologies,” in the “spirit of reconciliation, not division.” An Army spokesperson repeated this excuse earlier this year in response to complaints about streets at Fort Hamilton, N.Y., named after Generals Lee and “Stonewall” Jackson. While technically correct about how the names came about, the Army’s answer is nonsensical with regards to the implications. Indeed, in the aftermath of the Civil War, even Robert E. Lee objected to calls for memorialization and monuments, believing they would foster not reconciliation but resentment. Likewise, it is as wrong to separate the placement of Confederate statues in public squares from the battle over segregation as it is to think that naming installations was just about locals wanting their base named after a finding a hometown hero. As the American Historical Association’s Jim Grossman has put it, “Confederate iconography has long been a way to clothe white supremacy in [the] garb of regional heritage.”

Renaming the bases may be bureaucratically arduous and politically uncomfortable, but there is no shortage of deserving and inspiring names. From the Second World War and Korean War era alone there are a host of generals who demonstrated selfless service and sacrifice. Why is there no Fort named after the legendary Gen. George Marshall, a five-star Chief of Staff who later served as Secretary of State and of Defense? What about Gen. Omar Bradley, the “soldiers’ soldier,” or the grenade-toting Matthew Ridgway? Either of these former commanders of the 82nd Airborne Division could easily replace the traitorous Braxton Bragg, who was also a pretty poor general. Gen. “Jumpin Jim” Gavin would make a fine replacement for Benning, one of the most vocal proponents of secession. Perhaps Hood, Lee, and Pickett could be replaced by Gens. Maxwell Taylor, James Van Fleet, or Anthony McAuliffe, famous for his response to the German request for surrender at the Battle of the Bulge: “Nuts.” Perhaps it is time for an installation named after Benjamin O. Davis, Sr. the Army’s first African-American general or in memory of Gen. William DePuy, who helped transform the modern Army. Bases named for Jack Galvin, the last SACEUR of the Cold War, or Colin Powell might be in order. What about a Fort (Anna Mae) Hays, after the first female general, or Fort (Ann) Dunwoody, the first woman to earn 4 stars? Perhaps we should look at our recent and continuing wars for heroes that represent exactly what our young men and women should take away from the names of the bases on which we serve. There are a dozen Army recipients of the Medal of Honor from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan who could be honored by having installations named after them: Fort Groberg or Romesha would work quite well, as would Fort Hester, in honor of Sgt. Leigh Ann Hester, the first woman to have earned the Silver Star since World War II.

The point is that there are plenty of worthy heroes deserving of public memorialization who fought for the United States and its flag, not against it. It is time for the Army to correctly honor the legacy of those who fought before, during, and after the Civil War and accept that the images and icons of the Confederacy, while of historical value, are meant for graveyards and museums, not in public places of honor or bases where men and women defend the Constitution and stand prepared to make, if needed, the ultimate sacrifice.

  • Mark R. Jacobson is a military historian and an associate professor at Georgetown University. From 2014-16, he served at the Pentagon as a Senior Advisor to the Secretary of Defense and a Special Assistant to the Secretary of the Navy. A veteran of the war in Afghanistan, he spent the first ... Full bio

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Mer 30 Aoû - 02:02 (2017)    Sujet du message: BIRMINGHAM : NEW MUSLIM MEGA MOSQUE HAS SPEAKERS THAT CAN BE HEARD UP TO 15 MILES AWAY...LOCALS ARE ABSOLUTELY LIVID Répondre en citant


August 29, 2017

A new Muslim Mega Mosque to be built in the centre of Birmingham will have a speaker system that can be heard 15 miles away, and will broadcast the call to prayer across the city 5 times a day.


The mega mosque has been granted special permission by Labour led Birmingham City Council to have the giant speaker system installed due to a special provision of the Local Communities Act 2008 which allows religious groups to break noise abatement laws.

The speakers will be louder than a jet engine and will be heard up to 15 miles away in Solihull and the Black Country. The speaker system will primarily be used to announce the call to prayer in Arabic 5 times a day, starting at 5 o’clock in the morning, angering some local residents that they will be woken up even though they aren’t Muslim.

VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWpjyotRvEI

Ajoutée le 25 sept. 2016

Britain First activists from the West Midlands were joined by Britain First leaders Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen in Dudley to oppose a mega mosque that is strongly opposed by local residents.

Our team tried to gain entry to the council meeting discussing the issue but were turned away as the public gallery was already dominated by Muslims.

When the victorious Muslim crowd came out of the building, to shouts of “allahu akbar” and “takbir”, they were confronted by our team and several locals.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238



20 Minutes

Publié le 10/08/17 à 17h35 — Mis à jour le 10/08/17 à 17h35

Le maire d'Oldham, une ville anglaise, n'a pas "imposé" une "prière musulmane" pendant un conseil municipal. — Capture d'écran YouTube
  • Un blogueur accuse un « maire musulman » d' «imposer la prière musulmane » lors d'un conseil municipal en Angleterre.
  • Les prières en début de conseil municipal sont légales Outre-Manche.
  • Le terme de « maire » n'a pas la même signification en France qu'en Grande-Bretagne.
En à peine 24 heures, une vidéo montrant, à première vue, un imam récitant une prière lors du conseil municipal d’Oldham, une ville dans le nord de l’Angleterre, est devenue virale sur Facebook et sur Twitter. Elle a été visionnée près de 355.000 fois sur Facebook et retweetée plus de 1.500 fois sur Twitter.
twitter-tweet a écrit:

#Angleterre : le nouveau maire musulman de #Oldham (Manchester) impose la prière musulmane en début de conseil municipal pic.twitter.com/lbkQfhh9zO
— 🐸 Boris Le Lay 🐸 (@boris_lay) August 9, 2017

Le blogueur Boris Le Lay, qui l’a publiée, explique que « le nouveau maire musulman de Oldham (Manchester) impose la prière musulmane en début de conseil municipal. »


Que montre la vidéo ? On y voit effectivement Shadab Qumer, le maire de Oldham, vêtu du collier cérémonial, et un imam qui prononce une prière dans la salle du conseil municipal de la ville, avant le début des débats.

L’extrait vidéo posté sur les réseaux sociaux provient d’une séance du conseil municipal d’Oldham, qui s’est déroulée le 12 juillet. Dans la vidéo complète, qui est disponible sur le site de la ville, on entend la prière de l’imam, qui prie pour « se souvenir de ceux qui ne sont plus avec nous ». Une allusion aux victimes de l’attentat de Manchester, mais aussi à celles de l’attentat survenu au London Bridge et à celles de l’immense incendie de la tour Grenfell à Londres. Après la prière, Shadab Qumer invite à respecter une minute de silence en leur mémoire.

Les prières ouvrent-elles les conseils municipaux en Grande-Bretagne ?
Selon la BBC, dans un article publié le 23 juillet, des prières chrétiennes ouvrent la moitié des conseils municipaux au Pays de Galles. En Angleterre, la loi prévoit que des prières ou « d’autres signes d’observance religieuse », ou encore des « rites connectés avec une croyance religieuse ou philosophique », peuvent être inclus dans les réunions des autorités locales. Il est donc légal qu’un imam ou un prêtre viennent prononcer une prière ou une bénédiction devant des élus.

Shadab Qumer est-il vraiment maire ?
Le terme de « maire » recouvre des acceptations différentes des deux côtés de la Manche : le « maire » britannique n’a pas du tout les mêmes pouvoirs ni les mêmes compétences que son homologue français. A Oldham, il y a même deux « maires » : Shadab Qumer, que l’on voit dans la vidéo, et Jean Stretton. Le premier a un rôle de représentation : son rôle est d’être un « ambassadeur pour Oldham » et de représenter la ville lors d’évenements. Il dirige aussi les réunions du conseil municipal. Jean Stretton détient, elle, le pouvoir exécutif. Une organisation bicéphale, bien différente de la France.

20 Minutes est partenaire de Facebook pour lutter contre les fake news. Grâce à ce dispositif, les utilisateurs du réseau social peuvent signaler une information qui leur paraît fausse. Vous pouvez contacter l’équipe en écrivant à contribution@20minutes.fr.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Jeu 7 Sep - 19:18 (2017)    Sujet du message: NATIONAL CATHEDRAL REMOVES CONFEDERATE WINDOWS Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRJDCPW2kAw&t=4s

Ajoutée le 6 sept. 2017

The Washington National Cathedral is removing two stained glass windows depicting the lives of Confederate generals Robert E. Lee and Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson. In a statement, the cathedral said the images are "inconsistent" with its mission. (Sept. 6)

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Mer 13 Sep - 01:54 (2017)    Sujet du message: GERMANY : THE RISE OF ISLAM Répondre en citant


by Giulio Meotti
September 12, 2017 at 5:00 am

  • Turkey controls 900 mosques in Germany and feels free to say that a "liberal mosque" in Germany is "incompatible" with Islam.
  • Can you imagine Germany offering Iraq, Syria and Egypt to build "200 new churches" to reconstruct the derelict and dispossessed Christian communities there? No, because in the Middle East, Christians have been eradicated in a forced de-Christianization.
  • Christians in Germany will become a minority in the next 20 years, according to Die Welt.
  • We risk losing not only our churches, but more importantly, our cultural strength and even confidence in the values of our own civilization.
Jan Fleischhauer, a journalist of the weekly magazine Der Spiegel, coined an expression to define the free fall of German Christianity: Selbstsäkularisierung ("self-secularization"). It is the Church being liquidated?

The German Bishops' Conference just released the data on the decline of Catholicism in Germany for 2016. In one year, the German Catholic Church lost 162,093 faithful and closed 537 parishes. From 1996 to today, one quarter of the Catholic communities have been closed. "The faith has evaporated," said Cardinal Friedrich Wetter, the Archbishop of Munich and Freising from 1982 to 2007.

Christians in Germany will become a minority in the next 20 years, according to Die Welt. Around 60% of the country is currently Christian, with 24 million Catholics and 23 million Protestants. But that number is falling by 500,000 a year through deaths alone. "Those statistics are embodied by what visitors observe in German cities on Sunday: largely empty churches", the Catholic theologian George Weigel wrote.

German Protestantism is facing the same crisis. Die Zeit revealed that in 2016, 340,000 Protestants passed away, and there were just 180,000 baptisms. Some 190,000 people left the church and just 25,000 people chose to join it.

In his most famous lecture, Pope Benedict XVI famously said that the West, including those who do not accept transcendence, should act "etsi Deus daretur", as if God does exist. The old-fashioned Christian society will never come back, but it is critical for even a secular West to stay based on -- and profoundly inspired by -- its Judeo-Christian values.

The next stage seems to be a German cultural and religious landscape dominated by atheists and two minority religions: Islam and Christianity. If the secularists do not take Western Christian heritage -- or at least the Judeo-Christian values from which it sprang -- more seriously and start defending it, both atheists and Christians will soon be dominated by the rising political and supremacist religion, Islam. A prominent Muslim fundamentalist organization in Germany, banned by the federal government, calls itself "The True Religion" ("Die Wahre Religion"). They apparently think they are overtaking Judeo-Christian values.

There are dramatic instances of Christian decay in Germany. In the diocese of Trier, for example, site of the oldest Catholic community and the birthplace of Karl Marx, the number of parishes will drop from 903 to 35 by 2020, according to bishop Stephan Ackermann -- a decrease of more than 90%. In the diocese of Essen, more than 200 parishes have been closed; their number has fallen from 259 to 43.

A demographic decline is also involved in this religious crisis. "Christianity is literally dying in Europe," said Conrad Hackett, head of the researchers who drafted a Pew Forum report a few months ago. In Europe, between 2010 and 2015, Christian deaths outnumbered births by nearly 6 million. In Germany alone, there were about 1.4 million more Christian deaths.

This decline also apparent from the recruitment crisis for the priesthood. The official website of the German Catholic Church, noted in May that the dioceses of Osnabrück and Mainz did not receive any new priests this year. The archdiocese of Munich last year drew only one candidate. Throughout the Archdiocese of Munich today, there are only 37 seminarians in the various training stages, for about 1.7 million Catholics. In comparison, the American diocese of Lincoln, Nebraska, currently has 49 seminarians for about 96,000 Catholics. In the U.S., Christianity is strong; in Germany it is literally dying.

A German architect, Joaquim Reinig, told Die Tageszeitung that to integrate Muslim immigrants better, churches should be demolished and replaced with "highly visible mosques". It might sound a bit crazy, but it contains a dramatic truth. In his book The Last Days of Europe, the historian Walter Laqueur wrote that "Germany had some 700 little mosques and prayer rooms in the 1980s, but there are more than 2,500 at the present time". If, in Germany, Christianity is evaporating, Islam is proliferating.

The Turkish-Islamic Union for Religious Affairs (DITIB) just opened a new mega-mosque for worship in the German city of Cologne. The new German mega-mosque has a 1,200-person capacity and the tallest minaret of Europe. According to Deutsche Welle, "Christian leaders bristled at the idea of Cologne's famed Dom cathedral sharing the skyline with minarets". When the mosque was planned in 2007, a citizens' initiative was launched to say that "we want the cathedral here, not minarets". The Muslim authorities then announced the plan to "double" the number of mosques.

The new mega-mosque in Cologne, Germany has a 1,200-person capacity and the tallest minaret of Europe. (Image source: Raimond Spekking/Wikimedia Commons)

The Turkish authorities not only wanted to build a mega-mosque in the city hosting the largest cathedral of Germany, but these also had the sense of irony to commission architect Paul Böhm to design the mosque. Böhm's father and grandfather were in fact the two most radical and admired church architects of their generations. In the "new Germany", nobody had asked Böhm to design a new cathedral. Since he took power in Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan has built 17,000 Islamic prayer sites there. The Turkish president is committed to the construction of mosques in European capitals as well. Turkey controls 900 mosques in Germany and feels free to say that a "liberal mosque" in Germany is "incompatible" with Islam, according to the daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. That is why the 57 percent of Germans fear the rise of Islam in their country.

When Chancellor Angela Merkel opened her country to mass migration in 2014, she apparently did not see any cultural problem in accepting more than another million Muslims.

In the words of Erdogan, however, "Our minarets are our bayonets, our domes are our helmets, our mosques are our barracks". Islamic regimes are, in fact, offering to fill the empty spaces in Germany's religious landscape. Saudi Arabia proposed building 200 new mosques in Germany, "one for every 100 refugees".

Can you imagine Germany offering Iraq, Syria and Egypt to build "200 new churches" to reconstruct the derelict and dispossessed Christian communities there? No, because in the Middle East, Christians have been eradicated in a forced de-Christianization. In Europe, Christians are also becoming extinct by a process of "self-secularization". We risk losing not only our churches, but more importantly, our cultural strength and even confidence in the values of our own civilization.

Giulio Meotti, Cultural Editor for Il Foglio, is an Italian journalist and author.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Mar 26 Sep - 02:12 (2017)    Sujet du message: OPERATION DECEPTION - WEAPONIZED PATRIOTISM Répondre en citant


Nathan Leal a ajouté 2 photos — avec Elizabeth Nebenfuhr et 12 autres personnes.
11 h ·

Operation Deception is very powerful and most Americans cannot see it. It is taking place RIGHT NOW at the hand of Trump.

Trump has successfully "weaponized patriotism," and used it to instigate another assault on America. His goal is division and civil war. The aftermath will be his dictatorship where freedom of speech is monitored by the thought police.

The Operation is moving forward according to a script. The victim will be the Constitution.

Folks, it is taking place and it should concern every freedom loving citizen. For those who can see it, they are terrified for this country.

In his short tenure, Trump has already weakened several amendments of the Constitution.

Step 1 - He has attacked "Freedom of the Press," and has successfully refashioned public perception about the press, where now according to Trump, the press is "FAKE NEWS." Sadly, most evangelicals and those on the right have bought into this.

Step 2 - Trump's alternative Press - the State Run Press - his Tweets. This is propaganda for the 21st century. Why read a report from a journalist or reporter, when we can hear the news directly from Trump himself?

This is backdoor censorship, but most Americans have no clue.

Step 3 - Attack "Freedom of Speech" - How? Weaponize patriotism and turn Americans into bloodthirsty nationalistic lemmings. In the past, freedom of speech included allowing peaceful protesting by those who were unhappy with the direction of the government.

Granted, not all citizens appreciate peaceful protests, because at times rhetoric is shared that goes against the norm of society, (even when it was oppressive and unjust.)

For example, blacks who protested their second class status and being forced to sit at the back of the bus. But our African American brethren sought to capsize that norm of society, and God sent Rev. Martin Luther King.

A few days ago, Trump purposely chiseled away at "Freedom of Speech" and simultaneously "weaponized patriotism."

The result is what you are all witnessing over the last day, division and a fomenting of civil war and clash of society.

Trump purposely made the comment about NFL players not kneeling because he knew that it would stir division, but most folks do not get it! Instead, Joe Citizen is following Trump's lead and crying foul against those SOB's who refuse to kneel during the National Anthem

Some players took the bait and decided to protest during the Anthem and take a knee.

But here is where Joe Citizen is missing it, the NFL players who took a knee were not protesting...

...or the National Anthem
...or the military
...or fallen soldiers

Instead, the kneeling players were protesting Trump's bullying toward them. They were protesting that Trump has no business policing the patriotism of the NFL, or Americans citizens in general.

And this is what was missing from the angry citizens, DISCERNMENT!

Discernment to see that this was all a ploy to activate the spirit of Nationalism in America. Instead, angry fans are willing to obey Trump and burn their football jerseys and dispatch those horrible players.

Ladies and gentlemen, Operation Deception is underway in America.

Trump is following a textbook script to turn America into a dictatorship. Nationalism is needed to corral society because with "weaponized patriotism and nationalism," the citizens of America will police each other and become a hive that is loyal to the State.

If this continues, your future will be about the State. And your loyalty must not question the state, or Trump's crown.

Look at North Korea, Hitler's Germany, the Soviet Union, they all followed Trump's present script. They annulled freedom of the press, and freedom of the speech and they also weaponized patriotism

Folks, the end time Beast will do the same thing.If America is Babylon, we should expect this to happen.

So what are we to do? How do we stay vigilant?

First of all, don't fall for it. Getting mad at an NFL player for kneeling is a trap. I read many comments and posts over the past day where Americans are comparing the NFL kneelers to an abomination against everything patriotic including: the military, fallen soldiers, the US flag, our freedom, etc.
But they knelt to show solidarity against a Trump's edict.

If folks could see that Trump is purposely molding society into his own image, they would be horrified.

Several years ago, Trump tweeted that flag burning is an effective tool and very powerful. But does Joe citizen care?

Be wise my friends, Satan is already at work in this deception. Some of my Facebook family has become angry because I have revealed this disclosure.

Freedom is not only about what we are allowed to express. Freedom is also about having the understanding that from time to time, an opposing view will be expressed. Which includes a kneeling NFL player.

But be warned, in Trump's America the National Anthem has been honed into a weapon, and eventually, it will serve a purpose for the Beast.

God bless,

Nathan Leal


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Sam 30 Sep - 16:13 (2017)    Sujet du message: OUR PRESIDENT Répondre en citant



Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Mer 11 Oct - 10:31 (2017)    Sujet du message: LES CHEVAUX DE TROIE DE L'ISLAMISME EN FRANCE Répondre en citant


il y a 3 heures

11/10/2017 – 07H00 Paris (Breizh-info.com avec TV Libertés) – Défendre l’islam à tout prix. C’est le mot d’ordre que se sont donnés certains acteurs de la scène médiatico-politique. Tracts, livres ou article partisans, tous les moyens sont bons pour diffuser la bonne parole.

Des intellectuels, politiques et journalistes  n’hésitent pas à diffuser ouvertement des messages défendant les musulmans, même les plus radicaux, contre le méchant homme blanc, oppresseur et coupable de toutes les fautes. Ils sont de plus en plus nombreux à intégrer le club de l’islamosphère. Un club qui étend désormais son influence dans le monde intellectuel, politique, dans les médias et les réseaux associatifs. Très proches des organisations musulmanes de France comme le CCIF, le collectif contre l’islamophobie en France ou encore l’UOIF, l’Union des organisations islamiques de France, branche française des Frères musulmans, les soi-disant bien-pensants usent et abusent de leur influence dans le domaine public.

Ceux que l’on appelle les intellectuels tels les historiens Jean Baubérot et Emmanuel Todd ou encore l’islamologue Tariq Ramadan ne sont pas les derniers à s’exprimer sur le sujet. Ce dernier s’est d’ailleurs illustré en déclarant à propos de Mohamed Merah qu’il s’agissait d’un pauvre garçon…

En plus des salons défendant l’islam, certains médias partisans offrent également de larges tribunes dans la presse. Ainsi, Libération et Médiapart ne sont pas les derniers à promouvoir l’islamisme et n’hésitent pas à héberger des blogueurs aux propos tendancieux .

Dernier exemple en date, celui du Bondy Blog de Mehdi Meklat. Considéré par les bien-pensants comme une étoile montante du journalisme, ce dernier s’est avéré être un provocateur haineux. Un provocateur haineux sous la protection de Pascale Clark, éditorialiste sur France Inter, mais également partenaire de… Libération. Et le Bondy Blog regorge de jeunes pépites dans la même lignée que Mehdi Meklat. Badroudine Saïd Abdallah avait notamment tweeté :”Sans les Arabes nous n’aurions pas eu Mohamed Merah et Smaïn. RIP à eux”. Sans doute une touche d’humour dans ce monde de brutes.

De  son côté, Mediapart n’a pas besoin de faire appel à de jeunes pousses du journalisme pour promouvoir l’islam. Le président et cofondateur du site d’information, Edwy Plenel, s’illustre régulièrement pour ses propos défendant l’islam. Notamment en 2014, lors d’une conférence intitulée « l’islam comme bouc émissaire ».

C’était donc en 2014 et le futur lui a semble-t-il donné tort. En effet, s’en sont suivis de nombreux attentats sur le sol français perpétrés au nom d’Allah.

Et cette pratique de défense de l’islam a trouvé sa place au cœur de la campagne électorale.  Le candidat socialiste, Benoît Hamon, a préféré chercher des justifications sociales plutôt que religieuses dans l’affaire du café de Sevran, attribuant le rejet des femmes à une vieille tradition ouvrière. Il a depuis reconnu avoir commis « une maladresse ».

Désormais, c’est le député de la France insoumise, Danièle Obono, qui s’érige en porte parole de l’islamophère. L’élue s’exprime presque tous les jours sur le sujet et a été remarquée récemment lors d’une intervention sur BFM TV où elle commentait le projet de loi sur le terrorisme.

Avec de tels ambassadeurs, pas étonnant que les attentats islamistes se multiplient en France, toujours face à la même incapacité des politiques à nommer clairement l’ennemi…
Crédit photos : DR

[cc] Breizh-info.com, 2017, dépêches libres de copie et diffusion sous réserve de mention de la source d’origine

+ VIDEOS : https://www.breizh-info.com/2017/10/11/79226/chevaux-de-troie-de-lislamisme

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Jeu 12 Oct - 02:52 (2017)    Sujet du message: STATE DEPARTMENT PICKS HIJAB-WEARING SOMALI MUSLIM TO REPRESENT AMERICAN YOUTH AT UN Répondre en citant


October 11, 2017, By Robert Spencer:

Here is yet more evidence that the State Department is a swamp that has yet to be drained, and may never be drained.

Munira Khalif may be a wonderful U.S. Youth Observer to the United Nations, even if her statement here is full of the expected platitudes (“empower,” “diversity,” “globalized world,” etc.). But she was clearly chosen for her symbolic value. She is a living, walking symbol of the State Department’s anxiousness to show that the United States is not “Islamophobic.” = Sure they are not islamophobic and under that, islam advance in is agenda of domination. President Trump was not suppose to fight this ideology and invasion? He again just lie to all the citizens of USA.

She is a demonstration of the State Department’s determination to “empower” Muslims and show our “diversity,” so as to refute the jihadist narrative that the U.S. is at war with Islam, which will keep Muslims in the U.S. from becoming “alienated” and joining the jihad.

The whole idea is based on the assumption that Muslims turn to jihad because of the injustices suffered by Muslims at the hand of the U.S., and so if the U.S. is nice to Muslims, the jihad will end. This is based on completely ignoring the teachings about jihad in the Qur’an and Sunnah, and so is doomed to failure, but that doesn’t keep the deep state State Department wonks from trying and trying, again and again.

VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnDrmZKolhI

“Meet Munira Khalif, the 2017-2018 U.S. Youth Observer to the United Nations,” DipNote, U.S. State Department blog, October 4, 2017 (thanks to Creeping Sharia):

I’m so honored and excited to have been selected as this year’s U.S. Youth Observer to the United Nations. To start off the year, I wanted to officially introduce myself.

My name is Munira Khalif, and I was born and raised in Minnesota. I study Economics and minor in Government at Harvard University (Jesuit and Skull and Bones society) . As a Somali-American, I grew up aware of the reality that not all children have the opportunity to attend school—especially girls. By no fault of their own, millions of children are deprived of the opportunity to advance their own lives and that of their families and communities.

There is an African proverb that exclaims, “If you educate a boy, you educate an individual. If you educate a girl, you educate a nation”. Education has the power to transform — not only individuals — but our world. With this in mind, I co-founded Lighting the Way. The youth-run organization focuses on making education more accessible for young people in East Africa — especially girls. Lighting the Way works to provide scholarships, build libraries, and sponsor teachers. In addition, I served as a Teen Advisor for the United Nations Foundation campaign Girl Up. Girl Up mobilizes American girls to empower and support the world’s hardest-to-reach adolescent girls in developing countries to be safe, healthy, educated, counted, and positioned to be the next generation of leaders. Through Girl Up, I have had the opportunity to speak on the importance of girl’s education at the United Nations Head Quarters on the first inaugural Malala Day and to lobby alongside other youth advocates to pass the Girls Count Act.

I applied to be the next U.S. Youth Observer because I believe in the power of young people to bring forth immeasurable change. Often times, international institutions like the United Nations can seem daunting. In turn, we believe that our voices don’t matter. But the reality is that the United Nations needs a diversity of voices to be able to solve the complex issues of the world. More importantly, when issues that affect young people are being discussed it is intrinsic that we have a seat at the table. As the U.S. Youth Observer, I will work to ensure that young Americans have a seat at the table. I will leverage my platform to amplify the voices, ideas, and concerns of young Americans at global policy discussions.

As the year unfolds, I look forward to connecting with young people from across the country to hear about the global issues that are at the forefront of their minds. I hope that over my tenure I will be able to instill a sense of global citizenship. We live in a globalized world and our futures and lives are more interconnected than ever before. Being a global citizen means caring about not only what is happening within our own borders — but also outside of them. Because the problems of others can quickly become our own. We must speak out where others have been silent.  We must take action where others have stood still. We must shine our own light in the hopes of illuminating the way for others.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 238

MessagePosté le: Dim 22 Oct - 00:19 (2017)    Sujet du message: MORE MONUMENTS REMOVED PEACE CROSS ORDERED BY COURT TAKEN DOWN - COMMUNISTS UNDER GUISE INFILTRATING Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVjnJ32Ktyg

Revenir en haut
Contenu Sponsorisé

MessagePosté le: Aujourd’hui à 02:39 (2018)    Sujet du message: ISLAMISATION DU MONDE ENTIER (PARTIE 2)

Revenir en haut
Montrer les messages depuis:   
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> CONSEIL MONDIAL DES ÉGLISES/WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES - voir les sous-groupes dans cette section -> ISLAMISATION DU MONDE ENTIER (PARTIE 2) Toutes les heures sont au format GMT + 2 Heures
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 3 … , 14, 15, 16  >
Page 15 sur 16

Sauter vers:  

Index | Creer un forum | Forum gratuit d’entraide | Annuaire des forums gratuits | Signaler une violation | Conditions générales d'utilisation
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Traduction par : phpBB-fr.com