LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum


 FAQFAQ   RechercherRechercher   MembresMembres   GroupesGroupes   S’enregistrerS’enregistrer 
 ProfilProfil   Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés   ConnexionConnexion 

Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 37, 8, 912, 13, 14  >
Sujet précédent :: Sujet suivant  
Auteur Message

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Sam 1 Nov - 01:45 (2014)    Sujet du message: LE CREATEUR DU VACCIN EXPERIMENTAL CONTRE EBOLA PLAISANTE SUR L'EXTERMINATION DE L'HUMANITE Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fBnXD2uOa0

Revenir en haut

MessagePosté le: Sam 1 Nov - 01:45 (2014)    Sujet du message: Publicité

PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?
Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Sam 1 Nov - 01:59 (2014)    Sujet du message: PR. FRANCIS BOYLE : UNE CAMPAGNE DE VACCINATION EST A L'ORIGINE DE L'EPIDEMIE EBOLA Répondre en citant


vendredi 31 octobre 2014

Vous devez probablement être soûlé du virus Ebola à force (et c'est compréhensible) mais cette interview vaut vraiment le coup d'être lu. Elle confirme une fois encore que les américains sont mouillés jusqu'au cou dans ce qui se passe actuellement. Comme ce genre d'article ne passera jamais dans les médias de masse, (le professeur confirme d'ailleurs ce point), n'hésitez pas à relayer l'info autour de vous malgré tout car cela change de la langue de bois usuelle sur le sujet et que le bonhomme connait son sujet.

Malheureusement, le seul impact qu'aura eu cette épidémie aura été de doper le nombre de téléchargements du jeu Plague, un jeu de stratégie consistant à "éradiquer l'humanité en faisant évoluer un virus mortel sur la planète tout en l'adaptant pour contrer tout ce que les êtres humains feront pour se défendre." Voilà ce que le virus Ebola aura inspiré comme réaction à des millions de gens jusque là. ça se passe de commentaire... Fawkes

La suite sur : http://fawkes-news.blogspot.fr/2014/10/pr-francis-boyle-une-campagne-de.htm…

Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Mar 4 Nov - 04:06 (2014)    Sujet du message: HOLY SEE TO UN: ERADICATION OF EXTREME POVERTY IS MOST IMPORTANT DEVELOPMENT GOAL Répondre en citant



Calls Nations to Work Together in Post-2015 Agenda

New York, October 20, 2014 (Zenit.org

Here is the text of a statement made by Archbishop Bernardito Auza, Apostolic Nuncio, Permanent Observer of the Holy See to the United Nations at the General Debate of the 69th Session of the United Nations General Assembly Second Committee: Delivering and Implementing a Transformative Post-2015 Developments Agenda:

* * *

Mr. Chair:

As this is my delegation’s first time to address the Second Committee during the current session, allow me to congratulate you and the other members of the bureau for your election. My delegation wishes you all the best!

The Holy See believes that the 17 Sustainable Development Goals are apt to deliver and help implement a transformative post-2015 Development Agenda.

The Holy See notes with satisfaction that significant progress has been made in reducing global poverty, child mortality and maternal deaths. But it is also aware that more remains to be done, and that it can only be done if we all work together. As Pope Francis affirmed in his May 2014 address to the Secretary General of the United Nations and the UN System Chief Executives, the future objectives for sustainable development should be formulated "with generosity and courage so that they can have real impact on the structural causes of poverty and hunger". 

Mr. Chair,

No development goal is more important for the Holy See than the eradication of extreme poverty. This moral imperative has always underlain the social commitment of the Catholic Church. Thus, the Holy See notes with concern that however encouraging recent progress may have been in reducing global poverty, extreme poverty still remains widespread in many regions of the developing world. More than one billion people, or 15% of the world’s population, continue to live on less than $1.25 a day. To fight the structural causes of extreme poverty, every economic and political policy and activity must set about providing each person with the minimum wherewithal to live in dignity and freedom from want. Without this vision, economic and political policy and activity would be selfish and mere profiteering, and would not contribute towards attacking the structural causes of extreme poverty.

Within the post-2015 development framework, the Holy See wishes to highlight the importance of the sustainable development goals that address the pressing issues of climate change, rising inequality, productive employment for all, and the promotion of peaceful societies. These realities must be part of any sustainable development framework, especially because they tend to affect more severely people living in extreme poverty. They are also important in an ethical context, since they highlight the global obligations of developed countries toward less developed ones.

The challenges related to climate change should inform future development policy to a much greater extent than until today. The world has become a village, a neighborhood. The decisions and behaviors of one have profound consequences for others.  Thus a collective response to this phenomenon is essential if we have to succeed, a global action that is based on a culture of solidarity and on conscious individual and communitarian decisions to change lifestyles and practices that provoke the worsening conditions of our planet. The Catholic Church, through its vast network of schools and social institutions throughout the world, is committed to promoting education in environmental responsibility and to fighting both extreme want and a throwaway culture in rich societies. Also, we must not put the blame on poor people and countries who cut trees in order to survive, and who are most vulnerable to the negative effects of climate change mainly caused by the high consumption and high carbon emissions in other countries. Instead, they must be helped to overcome or mitigate such effects.

Rising inequality indicates that certain economic models and policies are not working towards promoting equitable development. Indeed, some data show that the wealth of the world’s 67 richest individuals is equivalent to that of the bottom half of the world’s population, and that the world’s richest individual is worth the same as the 156 million people from the bottom. While recognizing that there are many causes of income inequality, we cannot be indifferent to the structural causes of this exponentially increasing gap of the haves and the have-nots, if we are to defeat extreme poverty and achieve sustainable development. This imbalance results in no small measure from policies and practices which uphold the absolute autonomy of markets and financial speculation, denying State authorities the right – indeed, the duty - to regulate the blind market forces which, left alone, would only heighten uneven development and work against the common good. Any development model that does not allow all to equitably share prosperity will not be sustainable in the long run.

Moreover, we must address vigorously the challenge of finding productive employment for all as something integral to sustainable development. The Holy See has always emphasized the special dignity that gainful employment can provide. Today, we do not need reminding of the consequences of high levels of unemployment in the developing world and its impact on international migration. Within developed countries, too, we need to strengthen our efforts to integrate immigrant families into our societies to avoid the consequences of social alienation and radicalization.

Finally, Mr. Chair, the most serious setbacks to the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals have been most alarming in countries ravaged by conflicts. My delegation is convinced that unless peace and reconciliation are re-established in those countries or regions, the post-2015 sustainable development goals will never be reached. As Pope Paul VI already affirmed way back in 1967, the new name of development is PEACE. War destroys; PEACE builds. With war everything is lost; with PEACE everything is gained. = The New World Order will be perpetual war.

In closing, Mr. Chair, let me reiterate the Holy See’s assurance that the development of peoples is in the heart of its concerns, particularly the development of those who are striving to escape from hunger, misery, endemic diseases and ignorance; of those who are working for a fairer share in the benefits of civilization and development. My delegation looks forward to working closely with you and with all in helping implement a "Transformative post-2015 Development Agenda".

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

[Original text: English]

(October 20, 2014) © Innovative Media Inc.


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYh1jpa-kiY

By Michael Snyder, on June 10th, 2010


Most Americans have absolutely no idea, but a very dark philosophy is spreading like wildfire among the global elite.  This philosophy is an obsessive belief that humanity has become a cancer that is destroying the earth.  There are now large numbers of global leaders that are convinced that the exploding population of the world has become like a virus or a plague, and that it must be combated as such.  In fact, it would be very difficult to understate just how obsessed many members of the global elite are with population control.  The United Nations puts out position papers about it, universities have entire courses dedicated to it, radical population control advocates have been appointed to some of the highest political positions in the world, and some of the wealthiest people on the planet get together just to talk about it.  Those who believe in this philosophy are constantly talking about the need for “increased access” to abortion, contraception and other “family planning” services.  But even with all of their efforts, the population of the world is still expanding and those who believe in this population control philosophy are getting nervous.

So just who are these people among the global elite who believe so fervently in population control?  Some of the names you are about to read below might totally shock you.  Many of them are some of the biggest names in the world.  For example, Prince Charles gave a major speech just the other day in which he bemoaned the rapidly expanding world population: “I could have chosen Mumbai, Cairo or Mexico City; wherever you look, the world’s population is increasing fast. It goes up by the equivalent of the entire population of the United Kingdom every year. Which means that this poor planet of ours, which already struggles to sustain 6.8 billion people, will somehow have to support over 9 billion people within 50 years.”

Many among the global elite believe that the growing world population is the number one problem facing the world.  Many of them are absolutely convinced that overpopulation is the primary cause of “climate change”, is ruining our environment, and threatens to turn the entire globe into one gigantic third world slum.

Of course all of that is nonsense, but this is what they actually believe, and the scary thing is that most of them are in positions of power and influence where they can actually do quite a bit to advance their insidious agenda. 

The following are 22 shocking population control quotes from the global elite that will make you want to lose your lunch….

#1) The March 2009 U.N. Population Division policy brief….

“What would it take to accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries?”

#2) Microsoft’s Bill Gates….

“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”

#3) Barack Obama’s top science advisor, John P. Holdren….

“A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.

The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”

#4) George W. Bush’s science advisor Paul Ehrlich….

“Each person we add now disproportionately impacts on the environment and life-support systems of the planet.”

#5) U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg….

“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”

#6) A United Nations Population Fund report entitled “Facing a Changing World: Women, Population and Climate”….

“No human is genuinely ‘carbon neutral,’ especially when all greenhouse gases are figured into the equation.”

#7) David Rockefeller….

“The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident.”

#8) Jacques Cousteau….

“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day.”

#9) CNN Founder Ted Turner….

“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”

#10) Dave Foreman, Earth First Co-Founder….

“My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the world.”

#11) Prince Phillip, the Duke of Edinburgh….

“If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.”

#12) David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club….

“Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license … All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”

#13) Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger….

“The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

#14) Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger. Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12….

“Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.”

#15) Princeton philosopher Peter Singer….

“So why don’t we make ourselves the last generation on earth? If we would all agree to have ourselves sterilized then no sacrifices would be required — we could party our way into extinction!”

#16) Thomas Ferguson, former official in the U.S. State Department Office of Population Affairs….

“There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it….”

#17) Mikhail Gorbachev….

“We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”

#18) John Guillebaud, professor of family planning at University College London….

“The effect on the planet of having one child less is an order of magnitude greater than all these other things we might do, such as switching off lights. An extra child is the equivalent of a lot of flights across the planet.”

#19) Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka….

“This planet might be able to support perhaps as many as half a billion people who could live a sustainable life in relative comfort. Human populations must be greatly diminished, and as quickly as possible to limit further environmental damage.”

#20) U.S. Secretary Of State Hillary Clinton….

“This year, the United States renewed funding of reproductive healthcare through the United Nations Population Fund, and more funding is on the way.  The U.S. Congress recently appropriated more than $648 million in foreign assistance to family planning and reproductive health programs worldwide. That’s the largest allocation in more than a decade – since we last had a Democratic president, I might add.”

#21) Clinton adviser Nina Fedoroff….

“We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can’t support many more people.”

#22) The first of the “new 10 commandments” on the Georgia Guidestones….

“Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.”


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Lun 24 Nov - 02:07 (2014)    Sujet du message: INDUSTRIE DU MEDICAMENT : "J'AI VENDU MON ÂME AU DIABLE" Répondre en citant


Par Anne Crignon

Publié le 21-04-2014 à 19h03

John Virapen, 64 ans, livre le récit de son parcours dans l'industrie pharmaceutique. Une confession professionnelle peu ordinaire.

  Du Prozac (Jeff Blackler/REX/REX/SIPA)

Dans la famille "Les Repentis de Big Pharma", voici John Virapen, ancien directeur de la firme Eli Lilly en Suède, qui a rédigé dans sa soixante-quatrième année une confession professionnelle peu ordinaire. Par une ironie du destin, son livre est sorti en France jeudi 17 avril, au lendemain  de la mort de Jacques Servier.

"Depuis des années parfois aux premières heures du jour des silhouettes fantomatiques m’apparaissent en rêve, écrit-il en préambule. Elles se tapent la tête contre les murs ou s’entaillent les bras et la gorge a coups de rasoir. J’ai maintenant compris que j’avais indirectement contribué a la mort de personnes dont les ombres me hantent.

Je n’ai évidemment tué personne directement, mais aujourd'hui je ne peux pas ne pas me sentir responsable en partie de ces morts. J’ai été un instrument, un exécutant, mais consentant, aux mains de l’industrie. […] J’ai été certes manipulé, mais sans me poser de questions. J’ai vendu mon âme au diable."

Le cas du Prozac

D’origine indoue et fils de pêcheur illettré de la Guyane britannique, l’auteur de ce mea culpa glaçant est entré dans l’industrie pharmaceutique, en 1968, par la toute petite porte. En acteur habile de ce qui ne s’appelle pas encore marketing, John Virapen est déjà en 1981 directeur des ventes de la firme Eli Lilly pour la Suède.

Il raconte les petits pactes inavouables qui se scellent dans ce milieu feutré, et la main mise des firmes sur les leaders d’opinion, ces grands professeurs renommés et gardiens de la doxa. Ainsi l’entre eux, spécialiste du traitement de la douleur et expert au ministère de la santé, recevait-il de Lilly un salaire fixe, moyennant conseil, relecture de brochures et autres conférences.

On faisait surtout appel à lui en cas d’attaque contre nos produits dans les médias, souvent à propos d’effets secondaires. Il écrivait immédiatement des articles en notre faveur dans les journaux médicaux. Le microcosme médical était rassuré, la grande presse n’en parlait plus."

En 1986, pour le lancement de la fluoxétine d’Eli Lily, molécule d’or baptisée Prozac qui sera jusqu’à expiration du brevet en 2001 l’antidépresseur le plus prescrit au monde, John Virapen va commettre ce qui le hante au petit matin : avoir aidé à promouvoir un médicament dont il connaissait –déjà- l’impact suicidaire (pour les effets secondaires réels des psychotropes, voir le site de veille sanitaire indépendant de David Healy, chercheur à l’université de Cardiff RxiSK.org) et dont la supériorité sur le placébo n’est toujours pas établie en 2014.

Mais pour l’heure, tandis qu’au siège on organise le plan com’ qui fera de la dépression une maladie couramment diagnostiquée dans tous les pays riches, les satrapes de Lilly s’affairent dans les capitales afin d’obtenir pour le Prozac une autorisation de mise sur le marché.

Comment des suicidés ont disparu

A Stockholm, John Virapen sait qu’un expert indépendant a été officiellement désigné pour émettre un avis. Le nom du professeur est confidentiel, pour tenir éloignés les lobbies justement. John Virapen veut savoir. Il n’y a dans toute la Suède que cinq experts psychiatres suffisamment qualifiés pour avoir été sollicité par l’Etat.

L’un fait partie des autorités de santé ; ça ne peut être lui. Pour les quatre autres, il va agir en profiler et demander à ses visiteurs médicaux de se renseigner, discrètement. Après quelques semaines de ce maillage discret, l’expert est repéré : c’est Pr Z., à Göteborg. "J’entrepris d’étudier le Pr Z. de plus près. Il aimait la voile. Je m’achetai un livre sur la voile." Virapen l’appelle, et parvient à l’inviter à dîner.

Un facteur a joué en ma faveur, je n’aimais pas le Pr Z, poursuit-il. Une réelle sympathie rend les manipulations plus difficiles. On n’aime pas piéger une personne qu’on apprécie. On ne veut pas obliger quelqu’un qu’on aime à franchir les frontières de la légalité. Le fait de ne pas aimer était donc un atout."

Un deuxième dîner va sceller leur entente. "L’argent est toujours utile", répond l’expert indépendant quand son hôte lui demande ce qui ferait accélérer son affaire. Le lendemain, Virapen appelle le bureau de Lilly à Copenhague, qui supervise les pays du Nord, explique qu’il faut 100.000 couronnes pour obtenir une autorisation rapide, soit 20.000 dollars. "Le bureau de Copenhague consulta celui de Genève. Cela prit 24 heures. Puis je reçus un appel :'John, faites tout ce qui vous semble nécessaire.'"

L’expertise du Dr Z. en fut quelque peu orientée. Dans le dossier initial, voici un exemple de ce qu’on pouvait lire : "Sur dix personnes ayant pris le principe actif, 5 eurent des hallucinations et firent une tentative de suicide dont 4 avec succès." A la place on lisait désormais : "Les 5 derniers ont présentés divers effets secondaires." Escamotés, les suicidés sous Prozac, au cours de la phase d’expérimentation.

Au dessus des lois ? Au dessus des Etats ?

Ce témoignage paraît un mois après celui de Bernard Dalbergue,(1) ancien cadre de chez Merck ; un an après l’ouvrage de Julie Wasselin qui fut pendant trente ans visiteuse médicale (2); et dix ans après que Philippe Pignarre, ancien de chez Synthelabo et lanceur d’alerte avant l’heure, a publié "Le Grand secret de l’industrie pharmaceutique" (3). Tous démontrent que la santé est depuis trente ans une affaire de business et de marketing sur fonds de désinformation aux conséquences criminelles.

La confession de John Virapen a été traduite par Philippe Even, qui poursuit ainsi un travail de recadrage entrepris en 2005, soit cinq ans avant le scandale Servier, avec sa traduction du livre Marcia Angell, rédactrice en chef démissionnaire du prestigieux "New England Journal of Medecine" (NEJM), "La vérité sur les compagnies pharmaceutiques" (4).

Etrangement, ces révélations ne suscitent pas l’effroi et les révolutions qu’elles devraient. Comme si la pharmaco-délinquance était une fatalité, et l’industrie du médicament une organisation impossible à contrôler, au dessus des lois, au dessus des Etats.
Anne Crignon - Le Nouvel Observateur

(1) "Omerta dans les labos pharmaceutiques", Avec Anne-Laure Barret, Flammarion
(2) "Le quotidien d’une visiteuse médicale", L’Harmattan.
(3) Editions La Découverte
(4) Editions du Mieux Etre


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Mer 3 Déc - 01:27 (2014)    Sujet du message: SCIENTIST DISCOVERS US POPULATION INFECTED WITH “ALIEN” BACTERIA Répondre en citant


November 26, 2014

Carnicom Institute, Chemtrail, Morgellons • Tags: alien bacteria, alien life forms, chemtrails, Cliff Carnicom, geoengineering, Morgellons

The Department of Defense invented and published the term “Chemtrails” in 1990 as title to a US Air Force Academy pilot training manual  (Download the PDF)

The word “chemtrails” was published by the US government again in 2000 in House Resolution, HR-2977,  sponsored by Ohio Congressman, Dennis Kucinich where the term [chemtrails] is defined as an exotic weapon”.

Far from being an internet rumor by so-called, conspiracy theorists, the term chemtrails is a military invention, bought and paid for by the American taxpayer who has earned the right to use the term to describe unusual jet contrail emissions released into the atmosphere by military aircraft as a possible “exotic weapon”.

Since documentation and dictionary definitions available in 2014 are more than sufficient to define the term “Chemtrail”, there is no longer a rational reason that an unusual aircraft emission cannot be called a “chemtrail” to facilitate the distinction between the appearance of a normal vs. abnormal aircraft emission.

Impromtu rule-making by a few prominent activists to stop using the term “chemtrails”, and replace it with “geoengineering” are misguided attempts to replace a “description” with a “process” that offers no appropriate substitute term for describing the unusual emissions (chemtrails). The effect of an edict to outlaw “chemtrails” serves more as a “gag order” to silence open discussion in multiple languages where “chemtrails” is a standard and accepted parlance.

More importantly the confusion is multiplied when the term geongineering also applies to deliberate emissions of water vapor “contrails” from aircraft engines known to increase surface temperatures by virtue of trapping long-wave radiation (IPCC, Page 7)

“Contrails tend to warm the Earth’s surface, similar to thin high clouds”
Finally there is no evidence in 2015, that internet filters have succeeded in scrubbing the term “chemtrails” from Google or other search engine requests.

This video is one of hundreds that demonstrate the sober reality of covert aerosol spraying.  The use of a high quality camera capable of astronomical magnification reveals too much to be denied.  This video was submitted
to Climatologist, Tim Ball – author of the book: The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science following Dr. Ball’s visit to ChemtrailsPlanet.net to suggest I review his book. The stunning revelations in Ball’s book indicates his interest in climate corruption that extends into the highly trolled and covert operation of aerosol geoengineering.

The issue of chemtrails vs. contrails is explained in this simple demonstration that compares the emissions from two similar aircraft traveling at approximately the same altitude. The normal water vapor conversion to ice crystals creates a contrail that keeps up with the speed of the aircraft while the chemical aerosol trail (chemtrail) exhibits an unnatural “persistence” that stretches out towards the horizon.

Former USDA inspector, Rosalind Peterson speaks to an audience at a 2007 United Nations Global Warming session. Peterson’s information is solid for covert aerosol engineering but completely ignored by the IPCC and their corrupt scientific process as Dr. Tim Ball reveals in his book (above).
Aerospace Engineer, Coen Vermeeren evaluated
extensive documentation to conclude that aerosol geoengineering, aka chemtrails is a fact.  The 300 page report (Available in PDF) was commissioned by the Belfort Group in well attended conference that included several speakers from the EU.  Dr. Vermeeren’s complete 1 hour  presentation is posted in the article

Retired government scientist, Cliff Carnicom began publishing technical reports of unusual aerosol emissions over the area of Santa Fe New Mexico in 1999.  In 2005, Cliff produced what continues to be the most important video documentary, “Aerosol Crimes”, The content is exhaustive and covers all aspects of chemtrails including implications of electromagnetic, atmospheric conduction, weather modification and discovery of bio-engineered “filaments” associated with chemtrail aerosols sprayed from aircraft..

Cliff’s website at CarnicomInstitute contains many reports on aerosol observations and analysis through May 17, 2007, after which Cliff’s focus turned almost exclusively to research on the cross-domain bacteria (CDB), dessicated red blood cells and Morgellons syndrome – all associated with the covert aerosol geoengineering operation – aka “Chemtrails”.

Carnicom’s list of publications begins with the 1994 Senate testimony from Dr. Leaonard Cole who testified to the long history of uncontrolled, open-air military experiments using biological and chemical warfare agents sprayed across the United States where millions of people were exposed to toxins and weaponized microbes. Much of the testimony is included in Dr. Cole’s book: “Clouds of Secrecy: The Army’s Germ Warfare Tests Over Populated Areas”, published in 1989 – just as the “Chemtrails” manual was being readied for printing for the Air Force Academy pilot training program in 1990.

In what appears to be more than mere coincidence, the year 1990 was also a hallmark year for Global Warming/Climate change with the IPCC’s release of the CLIMATE CHANGE – The IPCC Scientific Assessment, (PDF).
Ben Davidson, Space weather expert and polymath
at Suspicious 0bervers dissects the IPCC report to reveal a blatently biased approach that continues to ignore fluctuations in solar cycles, space energies, geological changes and “unknown-unknowns” [chemtrails], to un-scientifically restrict analysis of climate change, exclusively to man-made causes centered around geenhouse gas releases during the so-called “industrial revolution”.

“The impetus to create this page was the assertion that Maurice Strong wrote the terms of reference for the IPCC Climate Assessments to cover only man-made causes of climate change. (Continue)


ALIEN BIOLOGY:  Activists Must Swallow the RED PILL

It must be considered that continued aerosol spraying of alien biology could result in mass extinctions – including homo sapiens.

Let’s be clear – Cross-domain bacteria (CDB) engineered by man or extra-terrestrial is an “Alien Biology” of mass destruction capable of simultaneously contaminating many terrestrial plant and animal species with threat of extinction.

We only need to review the history of Monsanto and the related demise of BEE colonies and other species to realize how the natural world is no longer sustainable to the profit satisfaction of the psychopathic Oligarchy.  Spraying the skies with chemicals and alien biology is merely another way of increasing profits in a Ponzi economy.

Despite Carnicom’s 2007 published work establishing bio-engineered, cross-domain life forms are a product of chemtrails, today’s most prominent geoengneering activist websites rarely make reference to the mammoth public health issues that are arguably more dire than the current hysteria over heavy metals, ozone depletion, climate modification, floods, droughts, and concerns of arctic methane releases.

Dane Wigington, self-described, “lead researcher” at
Geoengineering Watch has elected to ignore Carnicom’s decade of research on aerosols in addition to Cliff’s mountain of work on the more frightening discovery of bio-engineered, alien biology associated with “Chemtrails”.

A recognized propaganda technique for desperate perpetrators is to confess to a lesser crime in hopes of throwing the public and media off the trail. 

Referred to as “Limited Hangout”, this disinformation ploy is used when investigations are getting too close to the truth and threaten to expose the ultimate draconian New World Order agenda to include mind-control, depopulation, transhumanism, planetary terraforming, or a combination of all forms of enslavement.

Although no evidence exists that Geoengineering Watch is operating as a “limited hangout” we are driven to wonder why Carnicom’s discovery of planetary infection by synthetic life forms delivered by geoengineering aerosols is not a priority issue on a prominent English language geoengineering activist website.

Fibers manufactured inside the body – Click to Enlarge

GEOENGINEERING and BIOENGINEERING: The Unmistakeable Link – Cliff Carnicom’s presentation at the 2011 Consciousness Beyond Chemtrails Conference.

Former government scientist, Cliff Carnicom’s
2005 documentary, AEROSOL CRIMES continues to provide the most complete description of the destructive assault and terrorism of aerosol bioengineering and geoengineering now contaminating the global environment with increasing consequences to public health and planetary sustainability.

In 2006, Dr. Randy Wymore’s research into “Morgellons Syndrome” revealed unusual
fibers and skin lesions could not have been delusional parasitosis The CDC was involved for a while but ultimately engineered a coverup when Dr. Wymore’s research began to agree with Cliff Carnicom’s findings on cross-domain, bio-engineered microbes.

Cross-domain bacteria (CDB) are “alien” pathogens deliberately bio-engineered and introduced into the global environment as a New Biology not found in nature.  bio-engineered CDB exhibit properties of all three basic domains of life on earth: bacteria, archaea, and eukaryote.

Sofia Smallstorm’s excellent presentation of cross-domain life forms, motives and
consequences – From Chemtrails to Pseudo Life –  The Dark Agenda of Synthetic Biology.

Sofia’s second VIDEO explains the effects of HAARP and covert applications of Electromagnetic technology in “The Dark Agenda of Chemtrails to Pseudo-Life” 

Overview of the Three Domains in the “Natural” World:
1)  The archaea domain CDB features exhibit extreme resistance to destruction by heat and acidic compounds. Pyrolobus fumarii, which holds the upper temperature limit for life at 113 °C (235 °F) and was found living in hydrothermal vents; species of Picrophilus, which were isolated from acidic soils in Japan and are the most acid-tolerant organisms known—capable of growth at around pH 0; and the methanogens, which produce methane gas as a metabolic by-product and are found in anaerobic environments, such as in marshes, hot springs, and the guts of animals, including humans.
2)  The eukaryote domain. CDB features are fungal organisms that includes microorganisms such as yeasts and molds as well as the more familiar mushrooms. These organisms are classified as a kingdom, Fungi, which is separate from plants, animals, protists, and bacteria.
3)  The Bacterium domain CDB features include any of a group of microscopic single-celled organisms that live in enormous numbers in almost every environment on Earth, from deep-sea vents to deep below Earth’s surface to the digestive tracts of humans.
♦  “ALIEN” BACTERIA:  SELF-REPLICATING, SUB-MICRON, LIFE FORMS: A May 17, 2014 description of Cross-Domain Bacteria (CDB) Isolation, by Clifford E. Carnicom
♦  IS EVERYONE ON EARTH INFECTED?Wine/Peroxide Test For Presence of CDB Pathogens: 
“I state clearly again that the pathogenic forms under investigation are repeatedly showing up in the general population, regardless of whether certain “skin anomalies” [Morgellons] are present or not.” .

”  the general population is involved whether they would like to know of it or not.  The pathogens found have now been discovered repeatedly across all major body systems and functions, including skin, blood, hair, saliva, dental(gum), digestive, ear and urinary samples.”    – Cliff Carnicom
These sub-micron sized filaments are engineered, synthetic life-forms most famously associated with “Morgellons syndrome.” – an insidious systemic disease that manifests in a small percentage of victims as bizarre skin lesions where fibers are mysteriously manufactured inside the body before erupting through the skin.

The vast majority of victims infected with CDB may manifest no skin lesions or apparent symptoms.  The Carnicom group, however, has devised a simple test to determine if victims who have not yet exhibited Morgellons skin lesions have actually been infected with CDB without knowing it.  The shocking results indicate that every asymptomatic volunteer who submitted to the astringent “wine test” was found to be infected with the CDB when expectorant samples were examined under microscopy.
  • Is this Alien Biology engineered by humans, extra-terrestrials or a synthesis of humans and extra-terrestrials?
  • Is the covert agenda to infect the Global population and other natural Earth systems with Alien Biology?
  • Is the Alien Biology an agenda of “Control”, Extermination or both?
  • Is an undisclosed vaccine available to protect the perpetrators from being infected with the Alien Biology?

Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Mer 14 Jan - 03:00 (2015)    Sujet du message: EXCLUSIF : LE RAPPORT CLASSE "TOP SECRET" DE LA DERNIERE REUNION DES BILDERBERG… Répondre en citant


28 octobre 2014

C’est une édition spéciale, très spéciale que je vous propose aujourd’hui. Je vous emmène comprendre la marche réelle du monde, du monde dans lequel nous vivons mais vraisemblablement plus pour très longtemps.

Je reproduis dans les lignes ci-dessous le compte rendu exclusif de la dernière réunion des Bilderberg, cette réunion qui se tient tous les ans et à laquelle assistent des personnalités de très haut niveau de tous les pays du monde. C’est dans ce genre de cénacle que, depuis des décennies, se façonne le monde de demain.

Avant d’aborder l’essentiel de ce document qui a fuité, je vous propose de visionner cette vidéo du JT de 20 heures. Elle date de 40 ans ! Enfin presque, de 1977 très exactement, et pourtant…

VIDEO : http://rutube.ru/video/16d8a0a2526584d9c7ae56a8e51fc603/

Compte rendu rencontre annuelle. Classé Top Secret. À usage exclusif des membres

Discours de clôture du président de séance

« Au-delà du capitalisme. Franchir la nouvelle frontière »

« Si nous poursuivons le maintien du contrôle des masses par le travail salarié classique dans le cadre d’un système bâti sur la production de masse et la consommation de masse avec la solvabilisation des consommateurs par la répartition d’une partie de la richesse créée via le travail, nous avons tous désormais acquis la certitude que la survie à long terme de l’espèce humaine, la sauvegarde et la pérennité d’une biosphère viable et en harmonie avec les activités humaines nécessitaient une réorganisation totale de nos modes de pensée, d’organisation et de production.

Comme nous le savons tous, en réalité l’objectif que nous poursuivons n’est ni l’accumulation totalement vaine de nouvelles richesses ni même le sauvetage d’un système économique, fut-il utilisé depuis plus de 3 siècles et devenu incompatible avec notre vision du futur.

L’objectif que nous poursuivons est évidemment celui de la vie éternelle ou en tout cas le passage à l’homme vivant deux siècles et nous rejoignons ici les idées ambitieuses de transhumanisme que nous souhaitons développer, installer afin de favoriser l’émergence d’un nouvel être humain. D’un surhomme. De même que nos technologies nous permettent désormais de posséder des outils dits de « réalité augmentée », nos recherches ont parfaitement abouti en ce qui concerne « l’homme augmenté ». Nos technologies sont parfaitement au point. Nous sommes prêts pour vivre deux siècles. Nos nano-technologies nous permettent de réparer les corps de l’intérieur, le décodage du génome humain nous a permis de comprendre le fonctionnement du vieillissement cellulaire que nous sommes en mesure non pas de stopper totalement mais de ralentir considérablement. Notre maîtrise des cellules souches nous permet de refabriquer à la demande n’importe quel tissu cellulaire ou encore évidemment n’importe quel organe qui deviendrait défaillant.

Enfin, notre maîtrise du génome humain nous permet aussi bien de sélectionner les patrimoines génétiques les plus adaptés et les plus efficaces, sans oublier le fait qu’en en modifiant certains nous pouvons enfin augmenter aussi bien nos capacités physiques que mentales.

Nos illustres prédécesseurs des années 30 pensaient naïvement que nous pouvions transposer, pour l’amélioration de l’espèce humaine, les méthodes utilisées pour l’optimisation des races canines par des croisements savamment organisés. Pourtant, ces échecs du « nazisme » nous ont permis d’explorer de nouvelles voies et d’atteindre le succès que nous célébrons aujourd’hui. Nous avons enfin percé les secrets de la vie éternelle, ultime conquête de l’homme devenu enfin son propre dieu et son propre maître. Nous sommes, nous tous ici réunis, les Alpha et les Oméga de ce nouveau monde qui s’ouvre à nous et qu’il nous convient donc de façonner.

Évidemment, comme vous le savez, cela pose des problèmes de mise en œuvre absolument colossaux et c’était tout l’enjeu des travaux des différentes commissions auxquelles vous avez participé tout au long de ces jours intenses de séminaire.

Nous avons tous une conscience aiguë du fait que la planète et notre environnement ne peuvent évidemment pas supporter la vie éternelle de dizaines de milliards d’êtres humains qui consommeraient de la même façon qu’aujourd’hui. Nous savons tous qu’une croissance infinie y compris démographique dans un monde fini est une aberration intellectuelle. Nous avons tous compris que diviser le monde en deux castes, celle des mortels et des immortels, serait tout simplement impossible puisque dans un cas nous proposons de vivre et aux autres de mourir, mettant ainsi les masses laborieuses et populaires dans une situation où elles n’auraient plus rien à perdre, hors je vous rappelle que l’outil principal du contrôle des peuples passe par le fait d’octroyer des avantages calculés permettant de donner l’illusion d’une perte en cas de rébellion.
L’ensemble de ces données rendent le déploiement des technologies d’immortalité et d’amélioration de l’homme tout simplement impossible pour le moment.

Les groupes de travail ont donc soumis un certain nombre de propositions qui ont été discutées par le grand comité. Je vais donc vous livrer ici les mesures les plus importantes qui ont été votées à l’unanimité conformément aux usages de notre charte par nos Grands Maîtres. Il vous reviendra d’appliquer et de mettre en œuvre chacun, dans vos pays respectifs et zone géographique d’influence, les décisions suivantes.

L’objectif initial est donc la dépopulation massive en protégeant au mieux l’environnement, ce qui revient à exclure du champs de nos possibles tout usage des armes nucléaires qui reviendrait à infliger certains dommages irréparables à notre si petite planète. Les moyens dont nous disposons sont peu nombreux mais leur efficacité cumulée est certaine puisque en rentrant en résonance nous obtiendrons ce que les militaires appellent un « effet multiplicateur de force ». Il s’agit du triptyque effondrement économique, guerre civile et épidémies massives. L’utilisation de ces trois outils devrait nous permettre à terme de réduire la population mondiale de 7 à 10 milliards d’habitants. Nous pensons qu’atteindre notre objectif de 500 millions d’êtres humains en vie est illusoire et que malgré tous nos efforts de réduction, des poches de survivants subsisteront un peu partout à travers la planète. Néanmoins, ces poches ne devraient pas nous poser de problèmes majeurs, en tout cas dans un premier temps puisque leur désorganisation, leur isolement et leur incapacité à maîtriser l’ensemble des techniques ne serait-ce qu’actuelles en raison de leur faible nombre devraient limiter considérablement leur pouvoir de nuisance. Nous pensons qu’en quelques années beaucoup disparaîtront et que le peu qui subsisteront retourneront plus ou moins rapidement à l’état sauvage en quelques générations. Tout regroupement qui nous menacerait serait, dans tous les cas, traité de façon rapide.

Notre principal ennemi historique à la mise en œuvre de notre plan était évidemment les États nationaux. La mondialisation, la globalisation, les instances européennes, l’immigration massive ont été autant d’outils que nous avons utilisés avec un immense succès depuis 30 ans et désormais les identités nationales ou les sentiments d’appartenance ont été considérablement réduits, de même que les sentiments patriotiques. L’argent et la possession sont devenus les valeurs cardinales du plus grand nombre. La politisation des masses s’est considérablement réduite, les nations, comme nous le souhaitions, sont devenues fragiles et peuvent désormais être déstabilisées de l’intérieur.

Nous devons donc poursuivre avec constance la politique immigrationniste permettant de faire venir des masses considérables de pauvres du Sud dans des pays du Nord appauvris. Nous devons avec constance faire monter l’islam le plus radical afin d’attiser au maximum les haines et la désunion des peuples. Lorsque nous provoquerons l’effondrement économique, alors le communautarisme le plus absurde que nous avons développé dans chaque pays conduira la plus grande partie de ces pays vers des guerres civiles de grande ampleur où chaque communauté se chargera pour notre compte de tuer le plus grand nombre des membres de la communauté adverse. Noirs contre blancs aux USA, musulmans contre chrétiens en Europe, ces guerres civiles auront l’immense avantage de détruire les hommes sans que des affrontements entre pays dégénèrent en guerre nucléaire mondiale. Enfin, lorsque les guerres dévasteront les pays, nous en profiterons pour amplifier la diffusion de virus comme notre projet de e-bola 2.0 modifié génétiquement que nous testons actuellement avec efficacité puisque nous obtenons de précieuses données épidémiologiques, sociologiques (comportement des individus face à la maladie) mais nous visualisons également notre capacité à saturer des systèmes de soins qui seront, dans tous les cas, déjà considérablement dégradés par les guerres civiles que nous aurons créées sur l’exemple de la guerre entre les deux Ukraines.

L’ensemble de ces éléments, l’impréparation des peuples, leur dépendance vis-à-vis de tous les systèmes supports les rendront particulièrement vulnérables à nos différentes actions. L’effondrement économique devrait rapidement se propager à l’ensemble de la planète. La Chine s’effondrera sous le poids des troubles sociaux et la Russie, qui nous pose encore des problèmes à l’heure actuelle, devrait voir son problème réglé en 2015 comme nous l’espérons, mais disons que pour le moment c’est l’axe Russo-chinois qui oppose la plus grande résistance à notre vision de futur. Nous n’excluons pas, si nous n’arrivions pas à convaincre, à utiliser l’arme de l’assassinat ciblé à l’égard de personnalités refusant notre programme de dépopulation et l’adhésion à notre idéologie de la vie éternelle. »

Évidemment, pour tous ceux qui ne l’auraient pas compris, ce que vous venez de lire n’a aucun rapport avec la réalité et toute ressemblance avec un ou plusieurs personnages existants serait purement fortuite (ou pas…). Il s’agit bien sûr de science-fiction (ou pas tout à fait…). C’était juste une petite histoire, sortie de mon esprit fertile (ou d’ailleurs…), que je souhaitais vous raconter. Vous pouvez évidemment vous rendormir tranquillement.
Disons qu’il s’agit juste du point de départ de ce que pourrait être un roman (ou pas…) mais il n’en demeure pas moins que, comme toute histoire, cela pose de véritables questions.

La vie éternelle, qui est au cœur de la stratégie d’une société comme Google (dont les liens avec les instances les plus secrètes des USA comme la NSA ou la CIA ne sont plus à démontrer), pose la question de la possibilité de l’accessibilité de tous à la vie éternelle. Peut-on être 10, 20 ou 30 milliards d’humains à peupler la planète et à consommer ? La réponse est bien évidemment négative, alors dans un tel cas forcément hypothétique, que ferions-nous des hommes et des femmes en trop ? Lire ici un excellent article du JDD sur le dernier livre de Laurent Alexandre « la mort de la mort » détaillant la stratégie de Google.

Le transhumanisme n’est pas une vue de l’esprit, c’est même une idéologie fondamentalement profondément répugnante qui a toujours existé même si elle portait d’autres noms en d’autres temps. Le transhumanisme se développe même de façon relativement transparente à visage presque découvert et finalement, personne n’y trouve tellement rien à y redire, mais que restera-t-il de l’homme lorsque l’homme sera scientifiquement amélioré pour devenir un surhomme, et cela ne vous rappelle-t-il toujours rien ?

Autre question, on commence enfin à parler quelque peu du ravage que va provoquer l’arrivée de la robotique, et France 2 a même consacré un reportage à ce sujet au JT de 20 heures d’hier sur cette étude qui annonce la disparition de 3 millions de postes en France d’ici 2025 – mais je peux vous assurer que ce sera beaucoup plus et beaucoup plus vite – et qui nous donne vite une raison d’espérer en allant nous montrer une entreprise de aéronautique qui a même embauché en même temps qu’elle installait… un robot !

Tout cela nous amène à deux questions de fond. La première c’est que factuellement, en supprimant tous les postes et le maximum de travail pour optimiser les gains, les entreprises finalement se tirent toutes une balle dans le pied à terme puisque évidemment, il n’y aura plus de consommateur solvable et donc de profit alors pourquoi poursuivre cette politique, d’où l’idée qu’en réalité le système ne cherche pas à se sauver mais à se « dépasser » et, désormais, la frontière de partage entre les riches et les pauvres n’est plus tant l’argent que l’accès à la vie éternelle.

Autre grande question, corollaire des premiers éléments, vous ne pouvez pas ne pas voir que l’homme voit son « utilité marginale » s’effondrer. Mao disait qu’un homme c’était une bouche à nourrir mais deux bras (pour travailler). Calcul économique simple mais fondé. L’homme avec ses deux bras c’est une « force de travail ». D’ailleurs, toute notre économie est basée sur ce type de postulat. Pourtant l’on voit bien que l’homme devient inutile et le deviendra d’autant plus que les nouvelles machines qui arrivent permettront de tout faire ou presque sans intervention humaine. Les humanoïdes pourront nous remplacer pour 95 % des tâches, alors que restera-t-il à l’homme ?

Si j’aimerais croire à la capacité de l’humanité de partager et de dépasser tous ses défauts, soyons raisonnables, l’histoire humaine prouve qu’il y a assez peu de chance que nous vivions dans un monde de Bisounours où tout le monde serait gentil et où personne ne manquerait de rien… Alors que faire de tous ces bras en trop devenus parfaitement inutiles, je dirais même obsolètes. Comment régler le problème pourrions-nous dire pudiquement.

Si nous poussons au bout les raisonnements « environnementalistes » et « transhumanistes », il apparaît logiquement que seule une politique drastique de dépopulation viendrait à bout des problèmes auxquels nous sommes confrontés et ces raisonnements, aussi odieux soient-ils, sont intellectuellement imparables. Nous sommes devenus trop nombreux, la planète ne peut pas supporter le nombre d’humains actuel dans le système économique actuel, notre empreinte écologique est insupportable et nous n’avons plus du tout besoin de main-d’œuvre. Enfin, nous pourrions presque vivre éternellement, or la quête de l’éternité est évidemment une tentation humaine depuis la nuit des temps.

Alors bien entendu, tout cela est de la fiction pure… et pourtant… Si Mao disait qu’une bouche à nourrir c’était deux bras utiles, aujourd’hui il dirait qu’une bouche… c’est toujours une bouche de trop, surtout quand il y en a 7 milliards et que leurs bras, bientôt, ne serviront plus à rien. Et Mao, ce grand humaniste, qu’aurait-il fait dans un tel contexte ?

Il est déjà trop tard. Préparez-vous et restez à l’écoute.

À demain… si vous le voulez bien !!

Charles SANNAT


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212



January 13, 2015

A new federal executive order expands the list of illnesses for which you could be detained, isolated, and treated against your will if you are entering the US or traveling between states—even if you are completely healthy. Some states have similar or worse laws that would even allow entry into your home.

President Obama has signed an executive order expanding the list of illnesses that could result in forced detention, isolation, and quarantine for anyone exposed, even if they are not sick. It updates a Bush-era executive order, adding “severe acute respiratory syndromes” except for influenza to the list of detainable communicable diseases.

The Public Health Service Act allows the government to apprehend and detain individuals based on communicable diseases named in the Act, or named by presidential executive orders. Executive orders do not have to get congressional approval.

Not only can people with the disease be forcibly isolated, but the CDC also has the power to quarantine anyone who may have been exposed. The new executive order allows detentions for “diseases that are associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory illness…capable of being transmitted from person to person, and that either are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic, or, upon infection, are highly likely to cause mortality or serious morbidity if not properly controlled” [italics ours]. In other words, if you have been exposed to one of the listed communicable diseases—even if you do not show symptoms—you may be forcibly detained and quarantined.

This is broad authority, as the CDC notes: “In addition to serving as medical functions, isolation and quarantine also are ‘police power’ functions, derived from the right of the state to take action affecting individuals for the benefit of society.” And since this is federal law, it covers people entering into the United States and people traveling between states as well.

Even worse, because of various draconian state laws, individuals can also be detained against their will within their state—which includes being forced from their home. Once in quarantine, a potentially toxic drug regimen is generally enforced. While detention authority and scope differs from state to state, some have excessively broad powers. For example
  • In Alabama, the governor or state board of health may proclaim a quarantine whenever it is deemed necessary. The board of health has full powers of enforcement, and may formulate any rules it believes necessary.
  • In Idaho, the state reserves the right to enter an individual’s home by force if an occupant may have been exposed.
  • Maine reserves the right to impose emergency regulations at the mere threat of an outbreak.
  • New York can also detain patients in a locked ward at Bellevue hospital.
  • In 2009 the Massachusetts Senate considered a bill allowing the police, during a declared public health emergency, to arrest people without a warrant if they have “probable cause” to think they’re not complying with orders (including verbal orders from the public health commissioner or local public health authority). Under this bill, citizens could have been detained for as long as necessary for the public authorities to “convey information to you regarding the disease.” Happily, because of grassroots activists like you and opposition from the Massachusetts House, the bill did not pass and was never reintroduced.
Of deep concern is that, in most instances, natural treatments will be denied in favor of state-mandated treatments. In New York, for example, a patient with tuberculosis was placed in mandatory isolation for two weeks—and now, even after being released from isolation, he still must take three powerful antibiotics every day and is monitored by health officials via smartphone from his home. In Arkansas, for those under mandated treatment for tuberculosis, “disorderly conduct” can be punished with confinement of up to six months. Does disorderly conduct include not accepting the state-mandated treatment? We don’t know for certain, but it seems likely.

Keep yourself healthy! Vitamin D is an excellent preventive treatment for influenza and other viral diseases, and is being studied as a powerful tool to treat and prevent tuberculosis and other communicable diseases and potential pandemics. For other viral treatments, see our recent article on the Ebola virus.


For Immediate Release
July 31, 2014


- - - - - - -

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 264(b) of title 42, United States Code, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1.  Amendment to Executive Order 13295.  Based upon the recommendation of the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with the Acting Surgeon General, and for the purposes set forth in section 1 of Executive Order 13295 of April 4, 2003, as amended by Executive Order 13375 of April 1, 2005, section 1 of Executive Order 13295 shall be further amended by replacing subsection (b) with the following:
"(b)  Severe acute respiratory syndromes, which are diseases that are associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory illness, are capable of being transmitted from person to person, and that either are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic, or, upon infection, are highly likely to cause mortality or serious morbidity if not properly controlled.  This subsection does not apply to influenza."
Sec. 2.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.



Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Sam 31 Jan - 02:18 (2015)    Sujet du message: JAIL 'ANTI-VAX' PARENTS : COLUMN Alex Berezow 10:29 a.m. EST January 28, 2015 Your family's right to be sick ends where public health begins. (Photo: Justin Sullivan, Getty Images) The entirely preventable California measles outbreak has now sickened Répondre en citant


Alex Berezow 10:29 a.m. EST January 28, 2015

Your family's right to be sick ends where public health begins.

(Photo: Justin Sullivan, Getty Images)

The entirely preventable California measles outbreak has now sickened more than 70 people. With perhaps hundreds more exposed, the outbreak will likely continue.

As the disease spreads, experts will debate how we respond and what to do about the anti-vaccine movement that's partly to blame for this mess. Likely, all we'll agree on is better outreach to parents.

That's not enough. Parents who do not vaccinate their children should go to jail.

Anti-vaccine parents boost measles comeback: Our view

In the year 2015, it is amazing that anyone in the United States contracts measles. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that the U.S. eliminated all native cases of measles in the year 2000. New cases generally occurred only among unvaccinated foreigners. Today, however, because of ignorant "anti-vaxxers," the disease is staging a comeback.

Anti-vaxxers often claim the right not to put "poison" in their children's bodies. That is ludicrous. A mountain of data has demonstrated that vaccines are safe and effective. Insisting otherwise is akin to believing that the moon landing was faked.

A more serious objection is that, like birth control, those with religious objections should be exempted. But, let's remember that civil rights go both ways.
Prohibitionist John Finch once said, "Your right to swing your arm leaves off where my right not to have my nose struck begins." For infectious disease, we could reformulate that to: "Your right to be sick ends where my right to be healthy begins."

Measles is perhaps the most infectious human disease. Virus particles can remain in the air for up to two hours after an infected person leaves. And measles is not a minor infection. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that before widespread vaccination began in 1980, 2.6 million people a year died from measles. About 400 people a day still do.

Put simply, no person has the right to threaten the safety of his community. Like drunken drivers, the unvaccinated pose an imminent danger to others. They pose a lethal threat to the most vulnerable: the immunocompromised, such as HIV or cancer patients, and infants who have yet to receive their vaccines.

Anti-vaccine parents are turning their children into little walking time bombs. They ought to be charged for endangering their children and others.

Because humans are the only natural host for the virus, the WHO hopes to eradicate the disease from the planet, just like smallpox. This noble mission has been greatly complicated by such medical luminaries as Bill Maher and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who have spread anti-vaccine propaganda to millions. They have blood on their hands.

It is time to end this insanity. Though jail sounds drastic, it could be the only way to send a strong message about the deadly consequences of failing to vaccinate children.

Alex Berezow, founding editor of RealClearScience, is a member of USA TODAY's Board of Contributors and co-author of Science Left Behind.

In addition to its own editorials, USA TODAY publishes diverse opinions from outside writers, including our Board of Contributors. To read more columns like this, go to the Opinion front page or sign up for the daily Opinion e-mail newsletter.


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Jeu 5 Fév - 04:06 (2015)    Sujet du message: SCIENTIST CREATES NEW FLU VIRUS THAT CAN KILL ALL OF HUMANITY Répondre en citant


Working at a lab with a relatively low level-two bio-safety rating, University of Wisconsin-Madison professor Yoshihiro Kawaoka has created a strain of flu that can completely escape the human immune system. The new genetically-engineered virus is based on H1N1, which may have killed 500,000 people just five years ago.

Most people today have a level of immunity to the H1N1 flu, which is now regarded as a relatively low threat. Kawaoka genetically manipulated H1N1 so it can “escape” our neutralising antibodies. This would make the human immune system—and population—unable to resist an outbreak.

Kawaoka wanted to convert H1N1 to its pre-pandemic state to analyze the genetic changes involved. He told The Independent that he has now finished his study and will submit his findings to a scientific journal. He also told the newspaper that his experiment was to monitor changes to the H1N1 strain that would improve vaccines:

Through selection of immune escape viruses in the laboratory under appropriate containment conditions, we were able to identify the key regions [that] would enable 2009 H1N1 viruses to escape immunity.

Viruses in clinical isolates have been identified that have these same changes in the [viral protein]. This shows that escape viruses emerge in nature and laboratory studies like ours have relevance to what occurs in nature.

We are confident our study will contribute to the field, particularly given the number of mutant viruses we generated and the sophisticated analysis applied.

There are risks in all research. However, there are ways to mitigate the risks. As for all the research on influenza viruses in my laboratory, this work is performed by experienced researchers under appropriate containment and with full review and prior approval by the [biosafety committee]

The venue for the research was the Institute for Influenza Virus Research in Madison. The institute has a level three agriculture biosafety rating, one level beneath institutes that carry out Ebola research. However, Kawaoka’s work was carried out at a level two biosafety lab. The University claims there was no risk of escape from the lab. For reference, the recent Anthrax contamination scare at Atlanta’s Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had a level-three biosafety rating.



Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Ven 6 Fév - 04:27 (2015)    Sujet du message: DEPOPULATION - THE Nssm 200 DIRECTIVES AND THE STUDY REQUESTED Répondre en citant


Pdf document : https://fr.scribd.com/doc/254872039/DEPOPULATION-THE-Nssm-200-DIRECTIVES-AN…

Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Ven 6 Fév - 07:13 (2015)    Sujet du message: CDC OFFICIAL : “PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY IN THE US” ... Répondre en citant


Published: November 26th, 2014 at 10:14 pm ET

By ENENews
 Email Article

The Fukushima radiological emergency and challenges identified for future public health responses, Charles W. Miller, Chief of CDC’s Radiation Studies Branch, 2012: On 11 March 2011… a cascade of events was initiated that led to radionuclide releases causing widespread radioactive contamination… Radioactive material from Japan was subsequently transmitted to locations around the globe, including the U.S. The levels of radioactive material that arrived in the U.S. were never large enough to be a concern for health effects, but the presence of this material in the environment was enough to create a public health emergency in the U.S. The radiation safety and public health communities in the U.S. are identifying challenges they faced in responding to this incident…

Report on the 48th Annual Meeting of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) – Presentation by Charles W. Miller, Chief of CDC’s Radiation Studies Branch: The CDC activated its Emergency Operations Center (EOC) for the first time ever for a real world radiation incident. EOC activities were even more intense than for the swine flu pandemic in 2009. Cargo and passengers from Japan headed to the U.S. were screened, and there were contaminated passengers (and cargo). However CDC (nor anyone else) has authority to quarantine passengers contaminated with radiation… Communication was a problem. At first [the “A-Team”, an advisory team for environment, food, and health comprised of personnel from EPA, CDC, USDA, and FDA] had to speak “off the record”. Also noted was that… Early PAGs were guidelines, not rules… The final point was that Fukushima was a great tragedy for Japan; it also became a public health emergency for the U.S.

See also: CDC launches "zombie apocalypse" preparedness campaign based on Fukushima

Published: November 26th, 2014 at 10:14 pm ET


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Mar 10 Fév - 06:49 (2015)    Sujet du message: CALIFORNIA LAWMAKERS AIM TO LIMIT VACCINE EXEMPTIONS (AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes). In this Thursday, Jan. 29, 2015 photo, pediatrician Charles Goodman holds a dose of the measles-mumps-rubella, or MMR, vaccine at his practice in Northridge, Calif. The v Répondre en citant


(AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes). In this Thursday, Jan. 29, 2015 photo, pediatrician Charles Goodman holds a dose of the measles-mumps-rubella, or MMR, vaccine at his practice in Northridge, Calif. The vaccine is 99 percent effective at preventing measles...

Associated Press

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) - California lawmakers proposed legislation Wednesday that would require parents to vaccinate all school children unless a child's health is in danger, joining only two other states with such stringent restrictions.

Parents could no longer cite personal beliefs or religious reasons to send unvaccinated children to private and public schools under a proposal introduced after dozens of people have fallen ill from a measles outbreak that started at Disneyland. Mississippi and West Virginia are the only other states with such strict vaccine rules, though the California bill's chief author said he would consider including a religious exemption.

"People are starting to realize, 'I'm vulnerable, my children are vulnerable,'" said Sen. Richard Pan, a Democratic pediatrician from Sacramento. "We should not wait for more children to sicken or die before we act."

Childhood vaccine has become an emotionally charged topic amid a measles outbreak that has sickened more than 100 people across the U.S. and in Mexico. No deaths have been reported.

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, California is among 20 states that allow for personal belief exemptions and 48 that allow for religious exemptions.

A Washington state lawmaker introduced a bill Wednesday that would remove the personal belief allowance for an exemption in that state.

Public health officials believe an immunization rate of at least 90 percent is critical to minimizing the potential for a disease outbreak. California's kindergarteners met that threshold at the start of this school year, according to state statistics: 2 percent were exempted because of their parents' personal beliefs and another half a percent were exempted because of their parent's religion.

Less than one-fifth of a percent of all students - about 1,000 - had a medical vaccine exemption that would be preserved under the bill.

Pan, who previously served in the Assembly, was the author of another vaccination bill that took effect last year. It requires parents who don't have their children vaccinated for non-religious reasons to get a note from the doctor's office before enrolling their children in school.

A spokesman for Gov. Jerry Brown, who signed that bill, did not say if the governor would oppose efforts to end exemptions.

"The Governor believes that vaccinations are profoundly important and a major public health benefit and any bill that reaches his desk will be closely considered," spokesman Evan Westrup wrote in an email.

Parents cite a variety of reasons for not immunizing their children: religious values, concerns the shots could cause illness and a belief that allowing children to get sick helps them to build a stronger immune system.

The American Academy of Pediatrics says doctors should bring up the importance of vaccinations during visits but should respect a parent's wishes unless there's a significant risk to the child.

The California bill is also backed by Democratic Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez and Democratic Sen. Ben Allen, a former Santa Monica school board member.

Separately on Wednesday, U.S. Sens. Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein called on California's top health official to reconsider the state's policy on vaccine exemptions in light of the measles outbreak.

"We believe there should be no such thing as a philosophical or personal belief exemption, since everyone uses public spaces," the Democratic senators wrote in an open letter.

Associated Press writer Judy Lin contributed to this report. Follow Fenit Nirappil at http://www.twitter.com/FenitN .


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Dim 15 Fév - 07:25 (2015)    Sujet du message: ITALIAN COURT RULES AUTISM CAUSED BY VACCINES [flash width=425 height=350 loop=true flashvars=]http://www.youtube.com/v/LPgRTT_fcVg[/flash] VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPgRTT_fcVg Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPgRTT_fcVg

Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Sam 21 Fév - 11:13 (2015)    Sujet du message: DAVID NABARRO ON EBOLA - THE UN AT 70: A YEAR FOR BOLD ACTION Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbl7aQpVpGc

Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Mer 25 Fév - 10:12 (2015)    Sujet du message: L'ACADEMIE POUR LA VIE SE PENCHE SUR L'ASSISTANCE AUX PERSONNES ÂGEES Répondre en citant


Une autre preuve de qui contrôle vraiment tout le système de santé : les jésuites et le Vatican, qui sont aussi en contrôle de tout le système psychiatrique. Si vous allez dans la section "Programme de rééducation", vous verrez clairement leur agenda qu'ils ont changé et adapté selon les besoins conformistes du Nouvel Ordre Mondial : implant cérébral, ré-éducation des gens qui s'opposent à l'agenda global, yoga, etc. Sans compter les nombreuses tortures que doivent subir les opposants et les nombreux cas de disparitions suspectes. Cela n'a rien à voir avec aider ceux qui souffrent de maladies mentales. Ces hôpitaux sont du style des hôpitaux que l'on retrouvaient au temps de la 2e guerre mondiale, du style Mengele et associés... Rappelez-vous également ce qui arrivait aux personnes âgées lorsqu'elles arrivaient dans les camps de concentration. Les a-t-on pris en charge? Oui, mais pour les envoyer tous vers les chambres à gaz, tout en les humiliants, en leur ordonnant de se mettre à nu, avant d'entrer dans les "supposés" chambre de décontamination. C'est le même Empire qui a fait tout cela, et aujourd'hui, on fait encore confiance à ce système?

Ici, il est question de l'assistance aux personnes âgées, mais c'est le même état pour tout le domaine médical, bio-médical et ses liens divers avec la Défense Américaine via tous ses agents biologiques, tous ces poisons qu'on nous balance sur la tête, ces vaccins que l'on veut maintenant nous imposer de force, etc. Comme leur volonté est de faire disparaître toute cette classe de gens ayants des pensées judéo-chrétiennes, gageons qu'ils arriveront avec des projets qui poussera le suicide assisté, sous le couvert de la liberté des droits de la personne et de la compassion. Déjà, ces choses se font dans plusieurs hôpitaux, quant ils ne tuent pas tout simplement sans le dire à quiconque, mais que l'académie nous arrive maintenant avec cette intention, c'est qu'elle veut l'étendre au niveau global.

Vous enfants, s'il vous reste un peu de lucidité, gardez vos vieux parents près de vous et prenez soin d'eux, au lieu de courir après des bonheurs éphémères. Si vous les laissez entre les mains de ces criminels, vous pouvez être sûr qu'entre leurs mains, leur vie sera abrégée. Si vous ne faites rien, eux ne feront rien pour vous non plus, sinon poussez le génocide global de nos vieux parents, qui n'ont besoin que d'amour, de tendresse et d'attention spéciale dans les derniers moments de leur vie. Déjà, nous voyons qu'on ne veut plus opérer les personnes d'un certain âge, jugeant qu'ils sont un fardeau pour la société, autant du côté social que financier. Si eux, ces bandits en sont rendus là, nous ne sommes pas obligés de devenir des barbares comme eux.

XXIe Assemblée générale du 5 au 7 mars

Rome, 24 février 2015 (Zenit.org) Anne Kurian 

La XXIe Assemblée générale de l'Académie pontificale pour la vie sera consacrée au thème « Assistance aux personnes âgées et soins palliatifs » ("Assisting the elderly and palliative care").

Organisée du 5 au 7 mars 2015 au Vatican, elle sera ouverte au public à mi-parcours, le 6 mars : chercheurs, étudiants et personnes impliquées dans le domaine de la santé plancheront notamment sur « les soins cliniques à apporter aux personnes âgées en fin de vie », dans les cas de maladies dégénératives chroniques et en phase terminale.

Ils réfléchiront également sur « l'usage et l'abus d'analgésiques en soins palliatifs » et sur « le rôle central des relations entre les personnes âgées, les soignants, la famille et la société », y compris « au-delà de la communication verbale ».

Enfin, les directives éthiques pour un « bon accompagnement » seront évoquées dans l'après-midi, à travers les aspects spirituels et les questions juridiques liés à la fin de vie, ainsi que le rôle de la pastorale et de la famille.

Parmi les intervenants : Mgr Ignacio Carrasco de Paula, président de l'Académie, M. Pierre Boitte, professeur d'éthique médicale à l'Université catholique de Lille (France), M. Chris Gastmans, du « Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law » de l'Université catholique de Louvain (Belgique) et M. David Roy, directeur du laboratoire de recherche en éthique et vieillissement de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal (Canada).

L'an dernier, l'Académie fondée par saint Jean Paul II avec son Motu Proprio Vitae Mysterium (11 février 1994), a fêté ses vingt ans. Sa dernière Assemblée générale, en février 2014, était intitulée « Vieillissement et handicap ».

(24 février 2015) © Innovative Media Inc.


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212



Wednesday, February 25, 2015
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

(NaturalNews) Oregonians are about to find themselves living in a bona fide medical police state if State Sen. Elizabeth Steiner Hayward gets her way. She's spearheading changes to state law that would eliminate philosophical and religious exemptions for vaccines, thereby forcing all parents to have their children physically violated with extremely toxic substances still used in vaccines: mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde and monosodium glutamate -- all still used in vaccines as openly admitted by the CDC.

Nazi fascism is deeply rooted in the belief that the state owns your body -- a belief now shared by Sen. Steiner Hayward. Under the banner of "science," Nazi scientists readily endorsed all the following "medical science" policies while claiming they were all necessary for the "greater good of society."

• Forced killings of the physically handicapped
• Forced euthanasia of the elderly
• Mass killings of people suffering from chronic disease
• Forced sterilization of the mentally retarded
• Forced gassing to death of those deemed "genetically inferior" by scientists

See Nazi public health propaganda posters here.

Nazi science is alive and well in America today, thanks to people like Steiner Hayward

All of these wildly unethical, human-rights-violating programs were spearhead by people who invoked the exact same logic and abandonment of morality now demonstrated by Sen. Elizabeth Steiner Hayward. She is not just willing to skirt the boundaries of medical ethics and human rights, she is thrilled to obliterate that line in her zeal to achieve a government-enforced medical dictatorship over your private body.

Once that line is destroyed, there's no stopping where it goes: mandatory organ harvesting "for the greater good." Mandatory abortions of genetically "inferior" babies (with forced government DNA testing of your baby required by law). Government revocation of your reproductive "rights" if your own health does not meet the government's strict standards. (GATTACA) Oregon state death panels that demand everyone be euthanized at age 65 to save the state money on Medicaid... there's no end to the horrors of a government that has zero respect for human dignity and medical freedom.

If you've ever wondered how a group of the world's most brilliant scientists once marched the world's most scientifically advanced nation (Germany) down the path of genocide and mass death, look no further than the schemes and words of Oregon state Sen. Elizabeth Steiner Hayward. She is the poster child for the kind of medical tyranny that has already lead straight to genocide once before in human history. Who will take a stand and stop Steiner Hayward from repeating that dark chapter of history with the citizens of the state of Oregon?

What's most astonishing to me is to think back about how many courageous American men and women lost their lives in World War II in order to defeat Nazi tyranny and bring down a government regime that has spiraled out of control, placing everyone's liberty and safety at risk. Now people like Steiner Hayward are frantically trying to bring back that same tyranny -- and she's in a position of power to make it happen unless the People of Oregon stop her.

Click here to see my recent comparison of America's modern-day vaccine propaganda with Nazi-era eugenics propaganda. The similarities are beyond eerie...

Not only should Steiner Hayward's medical police state actions be utterly rejected by the public; she should be recalled from public office by the People of Oregon for daring to pursue the agenda of quack science vaccine lunatics who are nothing short of mentally ill for wanting to physically violate the bodies of children with the toxic chemicals still used in vaccines today.



Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Jeu 26 Fév - 03:55 (2015)    Sujet du message: FORCED ADULT VACCINATIONS AT FEDERAL LEVELS COMMENT PERIOD NOW Répondre en citant


Friday, February 20, 2015

U.S. HHS is Going for More Vaccinations during Pregnancy, Employer-enforced adult vaccination requirements, and, probably, Faith-based groups to uptake vaccinations

Anthony Freda Art

Catherine J. Frompovich
Activist Post

The U.S. Health and Human Services published a 46-page draft proposal and notice in the Federal Register recently regarding more mandated vaccines for adults, and especially pregnant females; employer-enforced adult vaccinations; and probably for getting faith-based groups to uptake and not oppose vaccines/vaccinations.

There is an open public comment period that ends March 9, 2015, for consumers to register their comments, etc. per instructions at this website

How to file your comments

tr_bq a écrit:

Electronic responses are preferred and may be addressed to: Rebecca.Fish@hhs.gov

tr_bq a écrit:


tr_bq a écrit:

Written responses should be addressed to: National Vaccine Program Office, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Avenue SW., Room 733G, Washington, DC 20201. Attn: HHS Adult Immunization c/o Rebecca Fish.

The opening paragraph of the Executive Summary of the “National Adult Immunization Plan” draft dated February 5, 2015 says,
tr_bq a écrit:

Vaccination is considered one of the most important public health achievements of the 20th century and continues to offer great promise in the 21st century. Vaccines save lives and improve the quality of life by preventing serious infectious diseases and their consequences. However, the benefits of vaccination are not realized equally across the U.S. population. Adult vaccination rates remain low in the United States, and significant racial and ethnic disparities also exist. [1]

Probably, nothing is more blatantly ridiculous and scientifically incorrect than the very first sentence. Infectious disease after disease waned to extremely low levels of almost no infection and contraction rates numerous years before 20th century vaccines were even invented. This website contains more than two dozen charts and graphs indicating those documented historical facts.

However, vaccine makers unabashedly take credit for something that has become more of a health problem than a scientific advancement, in my opinion. All vaccines are super-saturated with horrendous neurotoxins and other toxic chemicals, non-human animal-source DNA, unknown viruses, fetal cell lines—aka diploid cells, and mycoplasmas, plus other ‘ingredients’—probably genetically-engineered-nanoparticles, which I discuss in detail in my 2013 book Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines

Readers may want to know/have the peer-review published science papers cited in the book in order to corroborate damage vaccines and their ingredients cause, as part of their comments to the above HHS request.

Apparently and according to the HHS’s National Vaccine Plan (NVP),
tr_bq a écrit:

While the NVP provides a vision for improving protection from vaccine-preventable diseases across the lifespan, vaccination coverage levels among adults are not on track to meet Healthy People 2020 targets. The National Vaccine Advisory Committee and numerous stakeholder groups have emphasized the need for focused attention on adult vaccines and vaccination.

That’s what the new Federal Register publication is all about! Apparently, the feds want adults to get as many vaccines as MDs are pumping into children.

tr_bq a écrit:

The NAIP [National Adult Immunization Plan] is a five-year national plan. As a national plan, it will require engagement from a wide range of stakeholders to achieve its full vision. The plan emphasizes collaboration and prioritization of efforts that will have the greatest impact. The NAIP also aims to leverage the unique opportunity presented by the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. [Also known as “ObamaCare”]

There are four key goals they want to establish by 2020 with the NAIP:
tr_bq a écrit:

Goal 1: Strengthen [obviously mandate and enforce] the adult immunization infrastructure. 

tr_bq a écrit:

Goal 2: Improve access to adult vaccines. [Have MDs hound adults to take vaccines like they do parents about kids’ vaccines.] 

tr_bq a écrit:

Goal 3: Increase community demand for adult immunizations. [An interesting remark?] 

tr_bq a écrit:

Goal 4: Foster innovation [What does that mean and can innovation include more toxins in vaccines than there are now? Could that mean nanoparticles or GMOs?] in adult vaccine development and vaccination-related technologies. [Technologies like getting vaccine patches or embedded RFID chips containing vaccines?]

According to the draft report, the following vaccines probably are being mandated for adults:
tr_bq a écrit:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that among US adults each year there are roughly 40,000 cases and 4,000 deaths attributable to invasive pneumococcal disease, between 3,000 and 50,000 deaths [see facts below] due to seasonal influenza, 9,000 cases of pertussis, approximately 3,000 cases of acute hepatitis B, and about one million cases of herpes zoster. Adults have also been affected in recent outbreaks of other vaccine-preventable diseases such as measles. With the aging of the U.S. population, the public health impact of vaccine-preventable diseases and their complications in adults is likely to grow. The diminishing function of the aging immune system reduces the immune response to vaccination and underscores the need to develop more effective products for older adults. [CJF emphasis added]

Facts about seasonal influenza:
tr_bq a écrit:

On their own website, the CDC states that flu deaths between 1976 and 2006 ranged from a low of 3,000 people to a high of 49,000. But they also reported on their website that only 500 people died from flu in 2010. "The fact is, the outrageous claims of 3,000 to 49,000 deaths are inaccurate numbers," says holistic family physician Dr. David Brownstein. "They are just guesswork." [12] [CJF emphasis added]

Is that a case of “Liar, liar—pants on fire?” So, how can anyone believe the CDC’s hyper- inflated statistics? So, in the draft flu deaths are up to 50,000—a nice round figure!

What neither HHS, the CDC/FDA, nor anyone associated with the vaccine industry will admit to, I contend, is this: With all the vaccines they have mandated for children since the middle 1980s—supposedly for entry into schools—they have – either accidentally or deliberately – created reduced-functioning immune systems that cannot perform in the manner Nature and life intends and genetically programs.

Vaccine makers, in effect, have created what they think is ‘immunity’, which actually is an antigen response that, consequently, can produce inflammatory processes in the body, including the brain. An apparent end result is deficient immune systems as children grow into adulthood and older. Chronic “old-age diseases” now are plaguing young children! See “Coping with Chronic Illnesses in Childhood and Adolescence” (2012) .

“Diminishing function of the aging immune system” clearly will result in—and federally require—periodic re-vaccination in order to effectuate Big Pharma’s vaccination-produced acquired immune system, which apparently malfunctions, in my opinion. How many fully-vaccinated individuals contract the very diseases for which they are vaccinated? [11] How many children have allergies, asthma, and other immune problems? See allergy stats here. Wow!

The diminishing function of the aging immune system is an unfortunate health status that results, I think, from decades of HHS, CDC, FDA, Congress, and the media apparently believing—plus promoting—‘tobacco-science’ produced by Big Pharma, that’s propagated by corporate money and lobbyists, in my opinion.

By injecting toxins into newborn infants, then babies at 2, 4, and 6 months of age, and toddlers during the timeline when the human immune system is not fully developed—that happens for a child between two and three years of age—federal health agencies basically have ‘castrated’ almost two generations of individuals’ immune systems, thereby leaving them susceptible to diminishing functions of the immune system and contracting infectious communicable diseases—even when vaccinated—as current statistics are proving. A good percentage of those contracting communicable diseases are fully vaccinated! Now, the feds are going after “catch-up” vaccinations for adults, thinking that will help, as discussed in the Introduction of the report on page 1.

Nevertheless, this information needs to be ‘digested’:
tr_bq a écrit:

As shown in Table 1, despite the health benefits that result from implementation of ACIP recommendations, adults continue to be vaccinated at low and variable rates. In contrast, childhood vaccination rates in the United States typically exceed 90 percent. [As a result, we have sicker kids than ever before, plus the Autism rate is 1 in 50, whereas in the late 1970s, that rate was 1 in 10,000! Furthermore, more vaccinees are contracting vaccinated-against diseases that the feds want to blame either on unvaccinated children or now, adults!] The success of childhood vaccination [Can one call so much Autism success?] can be attributed to many factors unique to pediatric vaccination, such as state laws requiring vaccination for school entry and the coordinated public health infrastructure established by the Vaccines for Children Program (VFC), a federally funded program to provide free vaccines to children who are Medicaid eligible, uninsured, underinsured, or American Indian or Alaskan Native.

tr_bq a écrit:

Another reason for the high rates of vaccination among children is that pediatricians and family physicians, the primary providers of health care and preventive health services for children, have long been committed to making immunization a core part of well-child care. [Probably, those ‘well baby’ visits after birth should be called something else because so many children become damaged after receiving vaccines. Check the VAERS reports!]

On page 3 of the HHS draft, and throughout, reference is made to “stakeholder groups”. Just who are they? Furthermore, aren’t the largest “stakeholders” involved, all adults in the USA? Furthermore, I’m questioning the effect citizens’ comments and input will have, since the draft is written as something that’s a given—fait accompli! In reading the draft, readers can learn what “barriers” those stakeholder groups and researchers discuss.

It seems the Affordable Care Act [aka “ObamaCare”] has been more than influential regarding mandatory adult vaccinations. “In addition, passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010 was an important milestone for adult vaccination in the United States. …. Furthermore, more than 71 million individuals in private plans have gained expanded access to vaccinations and other preventive services coverage without cost-sharing under the Affordable Care Act.23” [Pg.4]

This, on page 4, is rather interesting:
tr_bq a écrit:

In 2014, NVAC published updated Standards for Adult Immunization Practice to emphasize that all providers who care for adults are responsible for assessing immunization needs at every clinical encounter, strongly recommending needed vaccines, administering recommended vaccines, and documenting receipt in a state immunization information system. The standards also instruct providers who do not vaccinate to refer adult patients to a vaccinating provider. [CJF emphasis added]

And this:
tr_bq a écrit:

Medicare beneficiaries may encounter financial barriers when accessing vaccines covered by Medicare Part D (e.g., herpes zoster vaccine and tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis [Tdap] vaccine). Medicare Part B covers select vaccines without cost-sharing; however, cost-sharing for vaccines covered under Medicare Part D varies widely from plan to plan and may be cost-prohibitive for some patients. [Pg.4] [CJF emphasis added]

However, following is an area/arena where the plan probably will encounter resistance:
tr_bq a écrit:

The success of this plan will depend on the synergies between state, local, territorial, and tribal governments; health care providers; advocacy groups; vaccine manufacturers; academia and research organizations; payers and health plans; employers; and the general public to work together to overcome barriers and improve access to adult vaccinations. [Pp.5-6]

tr_bq a écrit:

RAND Corporation [8] was enlisted to review historic literature, interview stakeholders, and collect data to identify plan priorities and key indicators. [Pg.8]

The feds apparently expect this plan to produce Healthy People by 2020. Well, if I can offer a forecast, I think it will be this: The USA will have such an overabundance of dreadfully seriously sick citizens, from all age groups, that no one will know what to do. However, senior citizens—75 and older—probably will be mandated by law to be subject to compulsory and legal euthanasia. Do you think that’s in ObamaCare too?

Pregnant females are being targeted very prominently.
tr_bq a écrit:

In addition, NVAC provides forward-looking analyses to identify barriers and challenges to research and development of new vaccines specifically for pregnant women. [Pg.10]

Interestingly, HHS submits this under Goal 1 on page 11:
tr_bq a écrit:

Objective 1.3 Continue to analyze claims filed as part of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) to identify potential causal links between vaccines and adverse events.

That is nothing short of a ‘sham’, in this writer’s opinion. Causal links between vaccines have been identified in the past by CDC epidemiologists and researchers, viz.: the Simpsonwood Meeting in June of 2000—a clandestine meeting to figure out what to do with the Verstraeten study that showed the link between thimersol (ethylmercury) in vaccines and Autism.

US Media Blackout: 
Italian Court Rules Vaccines Cause Autism
Recent Italian Court Decisions on Vaccines and Autism

Then, as recently as 2014, William Thompson, PhD, blew the whistle on how he fudged vaccine study papers regarding the link between vaccines and Autism.

So, can the CDC be trusted to identify causal links between vaccines and adverse events and correct them since, apparently, past history has proven they conspire to hide them?

On Page 12 under Objective 1.2, this appears:
tr_bq a écrit:

Vaccines have a long track record of safety and effectiveness in adults…

Are they kidding—seriously? Furthermore, safety tests are not performed by the FDA on vaccines! Back in 1976, the flu vaccine was involved in a memorable number of adverse events:
tr_bq a écrit:

However, side-effects from the vaccine are thought to have caused five hundred cases of Guillain–Barré syndrome and 25 deaths. [2]

According to the authors of the book The Swine Flu Affair, contracting paralyzing Guillain-Barré syndrome is 11 times greater with vaccination than without. [2]

However, there just may be a perfect example of how the CDC/FDA licenses supposedly ‘safe’ vaccines. What happened with the Rotavirus RotaShield vaccine should never have happened IF the FDA did its own safety testing with outside independent scientists, and not take manufacturers’ ‘tobacco science’, in my opinion. So how safe was that Rotavirus vaccine for children?
tr_bq a écrit:


Rotavirus: First Vaccine Withdrawn

The first vaccine for rotavirus, a common cause of severe childhood diarrheal illness, RotaShield, was licensed and recommended for routine childhood immunization in 1998. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, however, withdrew the vaccine in 1999 due to safety concerns. Scientists associated the vaccine with a rare intestinal problem called intussusception, a potentially fatal telescoping of part of the bowel. [3]

tr_bq a écrit:

According to the CDC in 1999, rotavirus was causing 20 to 40 infant deaths annually in the US when the first rotavirus vaccine, RotaShield, was introduced. It was estimated that about 50,000 hospitalizations occurred in the US because of severe diarrhea and dehydration. [9] [CJF emphasis added]

Vaccine safety is not a given truth nor a fact! See the VAERS adverse events reports, which statistically represent between 1 and 10 percent of adverse reactions reported, since doctors apparently are lax to report vaccine damage. It's considered "coincidental". Many vaccinees are harmed by mandatory vaccinations, as numerous photographs at the end of this article graphically verifies. Be prepared for upsetting photos of children damaged very badly.

No one -- babies, toddlers, teens, adults or senior citizens -- should be mandated to receive toxins injected into their bodies that can create such horrendous health conditions or even the paralyzing Guillain–Barré–Strohl syndrome.

Constitutional attorney Jonathan Emord tells how the FDA approved one drug in this video.  Do you believe how that drug was approved? No real studies were done!

On Page 13, we find this,
tr_bq a écrit:

Determine the data needs to evaluate vaccine safety and monitor efficacy in pregnant women and newborns and the ability of these systems to capture relevant data, …

which I think is most disconcerting insofar as, when I studied nutrition and consumer health, pregnant women were told not to take any types of medication at all—not even aspirin! [10]

Again, I’d like to make a prediction: Newborns will have more health problems than at any time in medical history! Between vaccines given to pregnant mothers, which probably will cross the placental wall, and all the ultrasound frequencies from as early as 6 to 7 weeks in pregnancy, babies surely are going to birth with more ‘fried’ brains than ever. Ultrasound/sonograms can cause cavitation in brain cells.
tr_bq a écrit:

A rise in temperature of fetal tissue—especially since the expectant mother cannot even feel it—might not seem alarming, but temperature increases can cause significant damage to a developing fetus's central nervous system, according to research. [4] [CJF emphasis added]

Then, inject Hepatitis B vaccines within 24 hours after infants are born…OMG! Personally, as a retired healthcare professional, I’m compelled to ask, “Do they really know what they are doing?”

In the draft they talk about resolving vaccine injury claims and VEARS in several places. However, the track record at the “Vaccine Court” is less than admirable or equitable, I’d say. As of the end of fiscal 2014, there were 3,540 claims paid but 9,734 were dismissed—almost a 3 to 1 ratio of vaccine adverse events claims NOT paid. And, when that happens to you or your child, you are saddled for life with medical bills that are unimaginable! [5]

On Page 15, we read where employers will be involved in making certain adults are vaccinated.
tr_bq a écrit:

1.6.2. Encourage employers to offer and promote adult immunization using evidence on economic impact.


The most immediate impact from an employer perspective may be with seasonal influenza immunization campaigns, but efforts here offer the possibility of expanding to other vaccines recommended for adults.


Encourage on-site, occupational health vaccination clinics and involvement of employers to increase employee vaccination rates. [Your place of employment may become a nightmare of prodding proselytization and probable jabbing with needles.]

Under the topic “Increase Community Demand for Adult Immunizations,” we find that there apparently will be constant ‘badgering’ campaigns to receive vaccinations. Numerous pages about “how to” indicate that it’s going to be unavoidable, plus probably “in-your-face” too, and everywhere!

Probably, the most frightening statement, in my opinion, is found on Page 24:
tr_bq a écrit:

One of the five goals of the NVP is to develop new and improved vaccines.

First of all, there are too many vaccines now that are harmful. Furthermore, what will Pharma produce in the future when everyone will have to receive vaccines for which Big Pharma have no legal liability to produce safe vaccines or vaccines that are tested for their abilities to produce cancer, interfere with fertility/cause infertility, or cause birth defects? Currently, NO vaccines are tested for those health adverse events. Every vaccine package insert states that those tests have not been done! So, how are vaccines proven to be safe, if we don’t know if they can cause cancer, especially since they contain numerous toxic chemicals? Good question?

Here’s another prediction I’m offering: Everyone in the USA will have to get a vaccination a day! Maybe two, since there are hundreds of new vaccines in developmental pipelines from what I know.
tr_bq a écrit:

Implementing the NAIP will require not just federal action, but also national action. [Pg.26]

By 2020, the feds want 100 percent of all pharmacists administering vaccines! [Pg.29]

In the draft’s base year of 2012, only 45 percent of adults received a provider-recommended flu shot; whereas by 2020, they want 90 percent compliance! Flu vaccines apparently don’t fare very high in efficacy ratings or safety for children or adults. (Source)

When I read this on Page 31, I shouted, “WHAT?”
tr_bq a écrit:

*Note that the published immunization schedule does not include 2014 ACIP recommendations related to the use of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine among adults aged ≥65 years.

Additionally, valents in a vaccine refer to an antigen or organism for a specific disease. So, a 13-valent vaccine means 13 antigens, while the 23-valent vaccine means 23 antigens! Antigens usually are associated with aluminum in order to produce/acquire ‘an adaptive immune response’ [6]—in any combination of four formulations: Aluminum hydroxide, Aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate, Aluminum phosphate, and Aluminum potassium sulfate.
tr_bq a écrit:

Vaccines may be monovalent (also called univalent) or multivalent (also called polyvalent). A monovalent vaccine is designed to immunize against a single antigen or single microorganism.[16] A multivalent or polyvalent vaccine is designed to immunize against two or more strains of the same microorganism, or against two or more microorganisms. [7]

There is a lot at stake in the HHS draft regarding vaccines that needs to be considered very carefully from all angles and by everyone, I think. Many adults have acquired immunity from having contracted infectious childhood diseases and should not be vaccinated, if that’s the case. There are blood tests that can establish one’s immunity to infectious diseases—rather than risk toxic vaccine ingredients, which everyone ought to know about. I’ve listed them here:

There also are tests for polio and yellow fever.

Source of above test information is http://www.sfcdcp.org/aitcbizservices.html

Additional information about Vaccine Titer Tests appears here. http://drtenpenny.com/titer-tests/

Please don’t forget to send in your comments before March 9, 2015 to the CDC about their draft proposal for mandatory adult vaccinations. Refer to the third paragraph at the beginning of this article for submission instructions.




[1] http://www.hhs.gov/nvpo/national_adult_immunization_plan_final.pdf
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1976_swine_flu_outbreak
[3] http://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/timelines/others#EVT_100774
[4] Miller, M.W., et al. 2002. Hyperthermic teratogenicity, thermal dose and diagnostic ultrasound during pregnancy: implications of new standards on tissue heating. Int J Hyperthermia 18(5): 361–84.
[5] http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/statisticsreports.html
[6] http://www.biology.arizona.edu/immunology/tutorials/immunology/page3.html
[7] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine
[8] http://www.globalresearch.ca/new-world-order-insider-reveals-diabolical-sec…
[9] http://www.nvic.org/vaccines-and-diseases/Rotavirus.aspx
[10] http://www.drugs.com/pregnancy/aspirin.html
[11] http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/whos-risk-measles-maybe-think/
[12] http://www.newsmaxhealth.com/Headline/flu-shot-vaccine-dangers/2015/02/17/i…


Immunization Graphs: Natural Infectious Disease Declines; Immunization Effectiveness; and Immunization Dangers

National Vaccine Advisory Committee. A Pathway to Leadership for Adult Immunization: Recommendations of the National Vaccine Advisory Committee. Public Health Reports. 2012;127.

Acquired Immunity

Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule—United States—2015

Catherine retired from researching and writing, but felt compelled to write this article. 

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212



Take action now but not in the way proposes by Mike Adams. We can't stop their evil agenda. The only thing we have to do is to stand for the principles of the Most High and try to protect our family against these evil peoples. 

Yes, we will be persecute, they will send us in prison or re-education, they will remove our children from us, and many of us will be kill, because they hate the truth, they hate peace, they hate all humans. These little gods who oppress and try to destroy all the seed of God to bring their communist system under Zeus, Appolyon, Abbadon, will have a short time.

The day will come that these evil agents of Satan, who play both side to trap us, will be punish for ever for their dirty work. Peoples who stand for the truth will be persecute. We are now under the rules of very evil men who, likes in the time of Egypt and other Babylonian systems, but be patient and stay strong in your faith. Will come a day, we will live in the new kingdom with the Lord Yeschoua as the global master who will reign with real Peace and Justice. The Lord, again, will stand and destroy their luciferian millenium they're to build.
Our Lord and Savior will come back in the 120th Year of Jubilee.

"...the Lord said, My Spirit shall not forever dwell and strive with man, for he also is flesh; but his days shall yet be 120 [[i]Jubilee[/i]] years." [Gen.6:3]."

Monday, March 02, 2015

by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Tags: vaccine database, Texas, legislation

(NaturalNews) The National Vaccine Information Center has issued an alert for Texans to help stop forced vaccination and government coercion in their home state. A total of nine bills are currently pending in the Texas state legislature that threaten medical choice and fundamental human rights.

These laws are the extension of the current wave of vaccine hysteria sweeping America thanks to an aggressive new push toward medical fascism by the mainstream media.

These bills blatantly violate the American Medical Association's published Code of Ethics which require informed consent for all medical interventions. But medical extremism in America today is not bound by anything resembling medical ethics, and if these Texas lawmakers get their way, every person living in Texas will be tracked like dogs with a government-run vaccine status database that will almost certainly be used to conduct house-to-house SWAT raids and arrests of those who refuse to be vaccinated.

From the National Vaccine Information Center:
Nine bills in Texas that threaten total medical tyranny against your bodyHere is the list of the current proposed NINE bills that should be OPPOSED:

HB 2006
Introduced on 2/26/2015
Eliminates Conscientious Exemptions to Vaccination

HB 1674
Introduced on 2/19/2015
Requires physician counseling for conscientious and religious belief exemption

HB 1593
Filed on 2/18/2015
Requires all public schools provide parents the number of students enrolled not fully vaccinated

SB 547
Referred to Senate Health and Human Services on 2/18/15
Requires posting of exemption numbers on the Internet by schools and the Dept. of Health

HB 212
Referred to Juvenile Justice & Family Issues Committee
Allows minors 14 and older in the Texas Juvenile Justice System to consent to vaccination

SB 29/ HB 465
HB 465 scheduled for a hearing in Public Health Committee for 3/3/2015
Makes inclusion into vaccine tracking system automatic & REMOVES current opt-in consent requirement

SB 538
Introduced on Feb. 10, 2015
Expands police powers to detain individuals suspected of exposure to communicable diseases

SB 298
Referred to Senate Education Committee
Adds new meningitis vaccine mandate for public school students



Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Lun 2 Mar - 16:20 (2015)    Sujet du message: WELCOME TO THE NVIC ADVOCACY PORTAL (NVICAP) Répondre en citant


Do you think you can fight against all this evil health military system program, who's runs by Tricare and the UN/WHO http://www.who.int/en/ and using military forces in many countries to submit the populations to the UN global vaccination?

Achieving and protecting the right to informed consent to vaccination is more important now than ever before, and we need your help to make that happen. NVIC wants to help you, our members, to organize and make a difference in your home state right where you live to protect and expand vaccine exemptions.  It is at the state level that mass vaccination policies are made, and it is at the state level where your action to protect your rights can have the greatest impact.  Also, when national vaccine issues occur, you will be plugged in to the information and action items necessary to make sure your voice is heard. 

Register to be an NVIC Advocacy Team Member:  Just minutes of your time on letters, emails, and phone calls to your state legislators and the media can make the difference.  NVIC will send you advocacy alert emails when action is needed to support efforts in your own state and nationally on important legislation and policy to protect and expand vaccination exemption laws.  We will provide you with the steps, tools and connection to leaders and organizations to help you make a positive impact on your rights to exercise informed consent in the vaccination decision making process.   With your registration information, we are able to calculate exactly who your elected officials are and display direct links to connect you to them on your personal view of your state team page.  Registration information is kept confidential within NVIC.
To Enter:


Dernière édition par maria le Ven 13 Mar - 04:40 (2015); édité 1 fois
Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Ven 6 Mar - 06:29 (2015)    Sujet du message: THE REAL REASON WHY JOHN BAIRD IS EXITING POLITICS EXPOSED: UN, CFR & MULTILATERALISM Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sP65ZNbBJhE&list=LL0aav0Ov6NVK6R3rmIWO1…

Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Lun 16 Mar - 03:06 (2015)    Sujet du message: CLIMAT : L'ATTENTION DU SAINT-SIEGE POUR LES PLUS PAUVRES Répondre en citant


Mgr Tomasi à la 28e session du Conseil des droits de l'homme

Rome, 14 mars 2015 (Zenit.org) Anne Kurian 

Dans la lutte contre les conséquences du changement climatique, le Saint-Siège demande à la communauté internationale « une attention particulière pour les plus vulnérables », qui sont « les plus pauvres » des pays en développement.

Mgr Silvano M. Tomasi, représentant permanent du Saint-Siège aux Nations-Unies à Genève, a pris la parole au cours de la 28e session du Conseil des droits de l’homme (2-27 mars 2015), sur le thème des droits des l'homme et du changement climatique, le 6 mars.

Durant son intervention, il a encouragé « des efforts qui favorisent le bien, le respect de la dignité humaine et une attention particulière pour les plus vulnérables ».

L'archevêque a en effet exprimé la préoccupation du Saint-Siège pour « les personnes les plus pauvres des pays les plus vulnérables », qui paieront « le plus lourd tribut » des conséquences du changement climatique alors qu'elles n'ont « presque aucun rôle » dans ce changement.

Il a appelé les nations du monde à prendre deux décisions éthiques : tout d'abord, « s'engager à réduire les émissions de dioxyde carbone à un niveau minimum ». Cette décision est guidée par la « prudence » et la conscience de la « responsabilité » de tous pour « réduire les dommages potentiels ».

La communauté internationale a aussi le devoir de « financer les mesures d'adaptation aux impacts du changement climatique nécessaires aux peuples vulnérables », a-t-il ajouté. Cette « solidarité » est indispensable car les plus pauvres des pays en développement dépendent de ressources « sensibles au climat » pour leurs moyens de subsistance.

Le Saint-Siège souhaite en ce sens que les contributions au Fonds vert pour le climat « augmentent » afin de « permettre aux pays les plus vulnérables d’atténuer et de s'adapter de façon plus efficace aux effets du changement climatique ».

Mgr Tomasi a fait observer que les événements climatiques extrêmes menaçaient de plus en plus la sécurité alimentaire dans le monde : selon des estimations, 600 millions de personnes seront confrontées à la malnutrition en raison du changement climatique ; et un milliard de personnes sont aujourd'hui « extrêmement vulnérables » face à la prolifération des tempêtes et la montée du niveau de la mer.

Insistant sur « l'interdépendance » entre l'homme et la nature et entre les peuples, il a souligné que « personne n'est exempt des impacts du changement climatique ou de la responsabilité morale d'agir en solidarité avec l'autre pour répondre à cette préoccupation mondiale ».

Les pays développés et les pays en développement partagent une responsabilité commune envers l'environnement : « ils constituent l'unique famille humaine de cette terre avec la mission commune de gérer et protéger la création pour les générations futures », a-t-il conclu.
(14 mars 2015) © Innovative Media Inc.


Que veut dire cette phrase de Mgr Tomasi? Jugez par vous-même et dites-moi s'il n'est pas en train d'appeler à une éradication des pauvres dans son message biaisé. Nous sommes maintenant entrés dans une phase importante de ces rituels de la mort qui sont offerts à la déesse de la mort Hail Maria qui n'est autre que l'androgine de Lucifer, vers lequel, malheureusement, des milliers d'idolâtres vont se prosterner pour chercher réconfort en temps de paix mais surtout en temps de grands troubles.

Nous n'avons qu'à écouter certains discours de nos grands scientifiques de la médecine, des autorités gouvernementales qui marchent avec l'occulte ONU et le Vatican, des hauts dirigeants militaires et cléricaux dont les projets ne manquent plus pour offrir la mort sous des couverts humanitaires et/ou sécuritaires.

Le 1er commandement de Lucifer, qui est de réduire les populations à 550 millions d'individus, nous le voyons est complètement opérationnel dans tous les pays. Alors, quand un émissaire nazi de Rome nous arrive avec un supposé plan pour sauver les plus pauvres, alors qu'ils contrôlent tout sur cette planète, nous pouvons nous poser bien des questions sur leur véritable amour pour l'humanité. Cet article est carrément un signal pour les agents sur le terrain d'aller de l'avant dans ce programme eugénique, utilisant le programme environnemental, comme écran de fond, pour mieux berner les populaces.  

... Dès qu’il fut décidé par les globalistes qu’un matraquage médiatique au réchauffement climatique servirait plus aisément leurs intérêts qu’une tendance de refroidissement global, ils accélérèrent leur programme avec une grande célérité. En 1996, la Fondation mentionna dans son rapport annuel que:

«La Fondation Rockefeller a créé le programme LEAD (Leadership for Environment and Development) afin de cultiver un réseau de professionnels talentueux, en milieu de carrière, provenant de diverses disciplines et divers domaines d’activités, et impliqués dans le développement durable».

Eu égard aux nombreuses activités de LEAD, le rapport mentionne:

«L’évolution économique et le développement humain sont fondés sur des approvisionnements énergétiques suffisants. Néanmoins, les sous-produits de la production de combustibles fossiles posent à l’humanité certaines des menaces les plus grandes. Le dioxyde de carbone libéré par les combustibles fossiles, laissé à un accroissement de sa teneur dans l’atmosphère de la terre, a le potentiel de piéger un excès de chaleur qui pourrait induire un réchauffement global».

Qu’en est-il donc de tout ce programme complexe de “riz magique” et de “blé magique”, qui se déroule sur de nombreuses décennies en une progression lente mais stratégique? Et pourquoi le “réchauffement global” entre-t-il dans l’équation? C’est dans le rapport annuel de 1968 de la Fondation que la raison véritable de ce processus laborieux, et déterminé, est explicitée au grand jour:

«De grandes organisations, telles que le “Population Council” et les “National and International Planned Parenthood Federations”, ont été soutenues (lisez, par la Fondation) de façons diverses. Ces organisations et d’autres qui existent, tout autant que celles qui vont émerger, représentent des outils excessivement importants pour le développement des méthodes contraceptives et des programmes d’information relatifs au planning familial».

Dans des mots qui glacent le sang, les étapes et les objectifs futurs de la Fondation sont déclinés à la page 54:

«Cela va explorer les possibilités de programmes de formation, de séminaires, de forums publics, de symposiums et autres modalités afin de transmettre des informations, quant à l’impact de la croissance démographique sur le développement économique et social, aux officiels des gouvernements dans les ministères de la santé, dans les commissions de planification, et autres agences adéquates, dans le but d’activer une implication plus conséquente pour tout ce qui concerne les politiques démographiques et les programmes de contrôle de la population.»

Comme nous le savons, l’appel à une intensification du planning familial au nom de l’environnement a été promu de façon croissante par l’élite Malthusienne. Il est évident que l’une des autres modalités mentionnées par le rapport a été découverte et exploitée, de fond en comble: le grand mythe du Réchauffement Global Anthropique fut créé et recouvert d’une sauce subtile de science afin de donner à tout le ragoût un air de crédibilité. Et le programme eugénique suit son chemin.


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Ven 20 Mar - 05:05 (2015)    Sujet du message: WE ARE LOOKING AT THE FIRST HUMAN-MADE EXTINCTION - ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST Répondre en citant


Agenda 21 

VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vxygt5zZBe4

Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Mer 25 Mar - 04:18 (2015)    Sujet du message: N.J. SENATE COMMITTEE APPROVES RESTRICTIONS ON RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION FOR VACCINES Répondre en citant


Susan K. Livio | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com By Susan K. Livio | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com

on March 09, 2015 at 7:20 PM, updated March 16, 2015 at 2:11 PM

TRENTON — Over the tearful objections of parents who accused lawmakers of religious persecution, a state Senate panel voted today to make it harder for school children to skip vaccinations because of religious beliefs.

Since 2008, parents in New Jersey have needed only to submit a letter stating vaccines violate their religion in order for their kids to be exempt, without explaining how or why. Vaccines for nearly 9,000 students in the 2013-14 academic year were waived for religious reasons, compared to 1,641 in the 2005-06 school year.

With the outbreak in January of measles at Disneyland in California still fresh in people's minds, state Sen. Joseph Vitale (D-Middlesex), said he sponsored the legislation because "it is too easy" for parents to cloak their philosophical grounds behind religious beliefs. The Senate Health, Human Services and Senior Citizens Committee, which Vitale chairs, voted 5-2 to pass the bill.

A parent's notarized letter must explain "the nature of the person's religious tenet or practice that is implicated by the vaccination and how the administration of the vaccine would violate, contradict or otherwise be inconsistent with that tenet or practice," according to the bill (S1147). The statement also most show the tenet "is consistently held by the person," and is not merely "an expression of that person's political, sociological, philosophical or moral views, or concerns related to the safety of efficacy of the vaccination."

They would also have to submit a signed statement by a New Jersey doctor that the person has received counseling about the risks and benefits of vaccinations. Schools would be prohibited from allowing an exemption unless these new requirements are followed.

Hilary Downing of Readington, the mother of a child who suffers from lifelong medical and developmental injuries from a vaccine, called the bill "invasive and offensive" and "a slap in the face" to people who want to exercise their beliefs. "The intent of the bill is to shame people," Downing said.

Meanwhile the measles outbreak in New Jersey this year consists of two cases: one baby in child care too young to get a vaccination and a Princeton University student who developed the illness even after being vaccinated, Downing noted.

Becky Fogarty of Glen Rock explained she did not belong to a specific religion, but the beliefs that informed her and her husband's decision to avoid vaccinating their children are just as important to them.

"This bill has been proposed to weed out the fakers, but it feels like we are guilty of being a faker until proven innocent," Fogarty said. "What is the end goal? What portion of these 9,000 (students) do you think are disingenuous? What is the target and how many applications will you deny until you hit that target?"

After more than a dozen parents accused the committee of legalizing discrimination, state Sen. Fred Madden (D-Gloucester), committee vice-chairman gently objected. "People are reading something into the bill that is not there. No one is going to restrict anyone's practice of religion," Madden said. "I respect the passion of those who oppose the bill but to me, this is a just clarification."

Drew Harris, program director for Health Policy at the Jefferson School of Population Health at Jefferson University in Philadelphia, was one of a handful public health experts who praised the committee for making the exemption harder to get.

"There has been a four-fold increase (in religious exemptions) since the regulations changed. Has there been a four-fold change of religiosity in New Jersey?" Harris said. "This is asking people to be honest, and to assure the honesty of their beliefs."

State Sens. Vitale, Madden, Robert Gordon (D-Bergen) Jim Whelan (D-Atlantic) and Richard Codey (D-Essex) voted yes on the bill; Sens. Dawn Addiego (R-Burlington) and Ronald Rice (D-Essex) voted no.

The bill heads to the full Senate.

Susan K. Livio may be reached at slivio@njadvancemedia.com. Follow her on Twitter @SusanKLivio. Find NJ.com Politics on Facebook.


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Jeu 26 Mar - 06:18 (2015)    Sujet du message: TEXAS 20 VACCINE BILLS THAT REMOVE CONSENT AND INCARCERATE THE INFECTED Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSlwbyF57WM

Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Lun 6 Avr - 06:47 (2015)    Sujet du message: POPULATION CONTROL IN THE NAME OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Répondre en citant



A new study published in the magazine 'Science' claims that humans are pushing the last boundaries the planet has in making life habitable, already speeding past limits for climate change and.

VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzminWjKZQQ


New documentary exposes radical agenda, says Steven Mosher

Contact: Anne Roback Morse, Population Research Institute, 540-660-2733, anne@pop.org 

FRONT ROYAL, Va., March 27, 2015 /Christian Newswire/ -- "It's Easy Being Green When You Have No Choice," a controversial new documentary, exposes how our world today is being influenced to believe that humans are responsible for the assured destruction of the world by "climate change." The proffered solution to such assured destruction is something called "sustainable development."

But "sustainable development" is really nothing more than a tool, inspired by communist ideals, to indoctrinate us to accept a highly-controlled society in which human activity is closely monitored in the name of preserving the planet.

In the documentary, population control expert Steven Mosher explains the lengths to which the environmental movement will go to normalize population control as a means to save the planet. In reality, population control helps the environmentalists achieve their ultimate goal - total control of global resources—including the ultimate source: human beings.

Mosher says, "Ask the population controllers what—in the name of sustainable development or in the name of reducing the emission of greenhouse gasses—are they prepared to do? The answer? They're prepared to do anything: they're prepared to arrest women for the crime of being pregnant, give them Caesarean section abortions and sterilize them for life. This is happening in China as we speak."

"One of the tools that they use very successfully, is sexualizing children—teaching them all about the mechanics of sex and nothing about the higher purpose of the sexual act —taking sex out of the context of marriage, out of the context of having children, and reducing it to an animal act.

"Why do they do this? Because sexualizing children helps to reduce the population because there are lots of young people who grow up thinking, 'I'm really not interested in marrying and if I do, I'm not interested in having children' because the emphasis is entirely on seeking pleasure out of the sexual act and not in having children. Children are a form of pollution, children are carbon-emitters."

About the Author: Steven W. Mosher is an internationally recognized authority on China and population issues, as well as an acclaimed author and speaker. He has worked tirelessly since 1979 to fight coercive population control programs and has helped hundreds of thousands of women and families worldwide over the years. He has appeared numerous times before Congress as an expert in world population, China, and human rights abuses He has also made TV appearances on Good Morning America, 60 Minutes, The Today Show, 20/20, FOX and CNN news, as well as being a regular guest on talk radio shows across the nation.

To schedule interviews with Steven Mosher, contact Anne Morse at (540) 660-2733 or e-mail anne@pop.org Anne Morse to schedule interviews with Steven Mosher, President of Population Research Institute.


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Mar 7 Avr - 01:30 (2015)    Sujet du message: [WATCH] UNITED NATIONS BAGHEAD CLIMATE OFFICIAL: “WE SHOULD MAKE EVERY EFFORT” TO DECREASE WORLD POPULATION. Répondre en citant


By AmyElizabeth -
Apr 6, 2015

Maybe She should start with herself and the United Nations.

Climate One founder Greg Dalton and the Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) Christiana Figueres, held a discussion in 2013 on the role of women in fighting Global Warming.

During the interview Secretary Figueres stated, We should should “make every effort,” to reduce the world’s population in an effort to fight Climate Change:

DALTON: A related issue is fertility rates in population. A lot of people in energy and environmental circles don’t wanna go near that because it’s politically charged. It’s not their issue. But isn’t it true that stopping the rise of the population would be one of the biggest levers and driving the rise of green house gases?

FIGUERES: I mean we all know that we expect nine billion, right, by 2050. So, yes, obviously less people would exert less pressure on the natural resources.

DALTON: So is nine billion a forgone conclusion? That’s like baked in, done, no way to change that?

FIGUERES: Well there again, there is pressure in the system to go toward that; we can definitely change those, right? We can definitely change those numbers and really should make every effort to change those numbers because we are already, today, already exceeding the planet’s planetary carrying capacity, today. To say nothing of adding more population that is really going to overextend our capacity.

So yes we should do everything possible. But we cannot fall into the very simplistic opinion of saying just by curtailing population then we’ve solved the problem. It is not either/or, it is an and/also.

VIDEO : http://www.sendspace.com/file/ckyib2


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Mar 7 Avr - 04:33 (2015)    Sujet du message: PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICIALS KNOW : RECENTLY VACCINATED INDIVIDUALS SPREAD DISEASE Répondre en citant


Tuesday, 3 Mar 2015 | 2:41 PM ETGlobe Newswire

Washington, D.C., March 3, 2015 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Physicians and public health officials know that recently vaccinated individuals can spread disease and that contact with the immunocompromised can be especially dangerous. For example, the Johns Hopkins Patient Guide warns the immunocompromised to "Avoid contact with children who are recently vaccinated," and to "Tell friends and family who are sick, or have recently had a live vaccine (such as chicken pox, measles, rubella, intranasal influenza, polio or smallpox) not to visit."1

A statement on the website of St. Jude's Hospital warns parents not to allow people to visit children undergoing cancer treatment if they have received oral polio or smallpox vaccines within four weeks, have received the nasal flu vaccine within one week, or have rashes after receiving the chickenpox vaccine or MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine.2

"The public health community is blaming unvaccinated children for the outbreak of measles at Disneyland, but the illnesses could just as easily have occurred due to contact with a recently vaccinated individual," says Sally Fallon Morell, president of the Weston A. Price Foundation. The Foundation promotes a healthy diet, non-toxic lifestyle and freedom of medical choice for parents and their children. "Evidence indicates that recently vaccinated individuals should be quarantined in order to protect the public."

Scientific evidence demonstrates that individuals vaccinated with live virus vaccines such as MMR (measles, mumps and rubella), rotavirus, chicken pox, shingles and influenza can shed the virus for many weeks or months afterwards and infect the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike. 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10.11.12

Furthermore, vaccine recipients can carry diseases in the back of their throat and infect others while displaying no symptoms of a disease.13,14,15

Both unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals are at risk from exposure to those recently vaccinated. Vaccine failure is widespread; vaccine-induced immunity is not permanent and recent outbreaks of diseases such as whooping cough, mumps and measles have occurred in fully vaccinated populations.16,17 Flu vaccine recipients become more susceptible to future infection after repeated vaccination.18,19

Adults have contracted polio from recently vaccinated infants. A father from Staten Island ended up in a wheel chair after contracting polio while changing his daughter's diaper. He received a 22.5 million dollar award in 2009. 20,21

"Vaccine failure and failure to acknowledge that live virus vaccines can spread disease have resulted in an increase in outbreaks of infectious disease in both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals," says Leslie Manookian, producer of The Greater Good. "CDC should instruct physicians who administer vaccinations to inform their patients about the risks posed to others by those who've been recently vaccinated."

According to the Weston A. Price Foundation, the best protection against infectious disease is a healthy immune system, supported by adequate vitamin A and vitamin C. Well-nourished children easily recover from infectious disease and rarely suffer complications.

The number of measles deaths declined from 7575 in 1920 (10,000 per year in many years in the 1910s) to an average of 432 each year from 1958-1962.22 The vaccine was introduced in 1963. Between 2005 and 2014, there have been no deaths from measles in the U.S. and 108 deaths reported after the MMR vaccine.23

The Weston A. Price Foundation is a 501(c)(3) nutrition education foundation with the mission of disseminating accurate, science-based information on diet and health. Named after nutrition pioneer Weston A. Price, DDS, author of Nutrition and Physical Degeneration, the Washington, DC-based Foundation publishes a quarterly journal for its 15,000 members, supports 600 local chapters worldwide and hosts a yearly international conference.

The Foundation phone number is (202) 363-4394(202) 363-4394, www.westonaprice.org, info@westonaprice.org.


1. http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/kimmel_cancer_center/patient_information/Pat…

2. http://www.stjude.org/stjude/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=20206f9523e70110VgnVCM10…

3. Outbreak of Measles Among Persons With Prior Evidence of Immunity, New York City, 2011 http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/02/27/cid.ciu105

4. Detection of Measles Virus RNA in Urine Specimens from Vaccine Recipients http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7494055

5. Comparison of the Safety, Vaccine Virus Shedding and Immunogenicity of Influenza Virus Vaccine, Trivalent, Types A and B, Live Cold-Adapted, Administered to Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Infected and Non-HIV Infected Adults http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/181/2/725.full

6. Sibling Transmission of Vaccine-Derived Rotavirus (RotaTeq) Associated with Rotavirus Gastroenteritis http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/125/2/e438

7. Polio vaccination may continue after wild virus fades http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2008/10/polio-vaccination-may-continue-after-wild-virus-fades

8. Engineering attenuated virus vaccines by controlling replication fidelity http://www.nature.com/nm/journal/v14/n2/abs/nm1726.html


10. The Safety Profile of Varicella Vaccine: A 10-Year Review http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/197/Supplement_2/S165.full

11. Comparison of Shedding Characteristics of Seasonal Influenza Virus (Sub)Types and Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09; Germany, 2007-2011 http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051653

12. Epigenetics of Host-Pathogen Interactions: The Road Ahead and the Road Behind http://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1003007

13. Animal Models for Influenza Virus Pathogenesis and Transmission http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3063653/

14. Acellular pertussis vaccines protect against disease but fail to prevent infection and transmission in a nonhuman primate mode http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24277828

15. Study Finds Parents Can Pass Whooping Cough to Babies http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/03/health/03coug.html?_r=0

16. Immunized People Getting Whooping Cough http://www.kpbs.org/news/2014/jun/12/immunized-people-getting-whooping-cough/

17. Vaccine Failure -- Over 1000 Got Mumps in NY in Last Six Months http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/03/06/vaccine-failure-over-1000-get-mumps-in-ny-in-last-six-months.aspx

18. Impact of Repeated Vaccination on Vaccine Effectiveness Against Influenza A(H3N2) and B During 8 Seasons http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/09/29/cid.ciu680.full

19. http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/09/18/flu-shot-increases-flu-illness.aspx

20. http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/staten-island-dad-22-5m-polio-case-lede…

21. http://naturalsociety.com/woman-contracts-polio-virus-vaccinated-infant/

22. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00056803.htm

23. http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/zero-u-s-measles-deaths-in-10-years-but-over-100-measles-vaccine-deaths-reported/

CONTACT: Kim Hartke, 703-860-2711703-860-2711, press@westonaprice.org Leslie Manookian, 208-721-2135208-721-2135, leslie@greatergoodmovie.org

Source:Weston A. Price Foundation


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Lun 20 Avr - 05:01 (2015)    Sujet du message: ARIZONA ATTORNEY CALLS VET THE ENEMY FOR SMOKING POT! Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OGsuUtETGg

Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 212

MessagePosté le: Lun 20 Avr - 05:15 (2015)    Sujet du message: THE ELITE HAVE WAYS TO PROTECT THEMSELVES FROM CHEMTRAILS DESIGNER PROTEINS PROTECT THE BRAIN Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIGZaBXuNLY&feature=youtu.be

Revenir en haut
Contenu Sponsorisé

MessagePosté le: Aujourd’hui à 08:00 (2018)    Sujet du message: A H1N1 - H7N9 - DOCUMENTS OFFICIELS ET + AUTRES PREUVES - DÉPOPULATION AGENDA (PARTIE 2)

Revenir en haut
Montrer les messages depuis:   
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 37, 8, 912, 13, 14  >
Page 8 sur 14

Sauter vers:  

Index | Creer un forum | Forum gratuit d’entraide | Annuaire des forums gratuits | Signaler une violation | Conditions générales d'utilisation
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Traduction par : phpBB-fr.com