LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum


 FAQFAQ   RechercherRechercher   MembresMembres   GroupesGroupes   S’enregistrerS’enregistrer 
 ProfilProfil   Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés   ConnexionConnexion 

Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 310, 11, 12, 13, 14  >
Sujet précédent :: Sujet suivant  
Auteur Message

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Jeu 4 Fév - 04:02 (2016)    Sujet du message: "MATra" WEAPONS - MAGNETIC ASSISTED TRANSFECTION Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sE0AFsFK97E

Perhaps the scariest story of the year...

Drug-loaded nano-microcapsules delivery system mediated by ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction: A promising therapy method

Government report on the fundamentalist vaccine: Quarterly FunVax Review, June 1, 2007

Magnetic Assisted Transfection


Methods and compositions for targeted delivery of gene therapeutic vectors

Revenir en haut

MessagePosté le: Jeu 4 Fév - 04:02 (2016)    Sujet du message: Publicité

PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?
Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Jeu 4 Fév - 06:57 (2016)    Sujet du message: ZIKA VIRUS - VR 84 - ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION / ZIKA VIRUS: DIRTY ELITE SCUMBAG PROJECTS, MOSQUITO'S AND TDAP VACCINE Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0eKf2uYzfk


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dayCnMG1WPY


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Ven 5 Fév - 04:58 (2016)    Sujet du message: UN NUCLEAR AGENCY SUGGESTS USING RADIATION TO FIGHT ZIKA MOSQUITOS Répondre en citant


Can you imagine what's mean to the human population? Evil, just pure evil!!!

And add to their global evil project that Planned Parenthood and Women on Waves are pushing for more contraception and abortion "
Planned Parenthood Capitalizes on Zika Tragedy to Promote Abortion in Latin America" http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/29/planned-parenthood-capit… ,"Pregnant Zika Victims Will Be Given Access to Abortions At Sea" http://www.vocativ.com/news/279293/pregnant-zika-victims-will-be-given-acce…

Published time: 2 Feb, 216 21:29

© Paulo Whitaker / Reuters

Aiming to prevent the further spread of the dangerous mosquito-borne Zika virus in Brazil, male insects might be exposed to X- or Gamma rays to irradiate their sperm, the UN’s nuclear agency announced on Tuesday.
TrendsZika virus

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said the so-called Sterile Insect Technology (SIT) can help tackle the outbreak which has been declared a global health emergency by the World Health Organization (WHO). IAEA experts are set to meet with Brazilian officials on February, 16, Reuters reported.

WHO declares Zika virus global health emergency

Mexico, Guatemala and El Salvador are among other states that have also requested the technology from the UN atomic agency.

"If Brazil released a huge number of sterile males, it would take a few months to reduce the population,” IAEA Deputy Director General Aldo Malavasi told reporters on Tuesday, adding that other methods of fighting the dangerous insects should not be off the table.

The method involves exposing laboratory-bred male mosquitoes to nuclear radiation, and making their sperm sterile before their release into the wild to mate with the females. Mosquito eggs from such copulation never hatch, helping reduce populations of the insect.

"It's family planning for insects," Jorge Hendrichs, head of the Insect Pest Control Section at the IAEA, said.

SIT has already been tested in several countries. According to Konstantinos Bourtzis of the IAEA's insect pest control laboratory, in Italy it helped to reduce mosquito populations by around 80 percent in several months; in China mosquitoes have been defeated 100 percent.

READ MORE: Zika virus no pregnancy advice ‘offensive’ - women’s rights activists

Cases of infants born with brain abnormalities with suspected link to Zika have been registered in over 20 Latin American countries, as well as in the US, starting from late December last year. Nearly 4,000 babies have been born with a congenital condition associated with incomplete brain development in Brazil only.
On Monday, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared Zika to be a global public health emergency, with the move aimed at fast-tracking international action and research priorities.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Ven 5 Fév - 05:11 (2016)    Sujet du message: THE DEADLY ZIKA VIRUS IS AVAILABLE FOR SALE ONLINE, COURTESY OF THE ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION Répondre en citant


By John Vibes on February 2, 2016

Recent outbreaks of a sickness known as the Zika virus have sparked hysteria across the globe, and many reports have actually indicated that this is likely a man-made disaster, as the origin of Zika itself is somewhat strange.

The virus was “discovered” in 1947, however, it was not discovered in the wild nor did it spontaneously arise. In fact, it was discovered by Rockefeller Foundation scientists in a monkey that they had in captivity, leading many to believe that this was the result of some type of experiment. Since then, cases of Zika have been extremely rare, but in the past few years, outbreaks of Zika have been on the rise, especially in South America and specifically Brazil.

Oddly, the recent outbreak in Brazil coincides with the release of genetically modified mosquitoes in 2012, by the British biotech company Oxitec. Not only did the new outbreak occur just after the release, but it also occurred in the same area.
twitter-tweet a écrit:

Zika Outbreak Epicenter in Same Area Where GM Mosquitoes Were Released in 2015 https://t.co/PqLZQtgik2pic.twitter.com/lUd6kEjXeI
— The Anti Media (@TheAntiMedia1) January 31, 2016

Ironically enough, the GM mosquitos were actually proposed as a solution to infectious disease, but many experts warned that there was not enough research and that a release of such an organism into the wild could have disastrous consequences.

As news of Zika spread this week, rumors also reached the internet that the virus was available for purchase online. Sure enough, there is actually a sale listing for Zika online through a website called atcc.org, where a number of different viruses and biological agents are sold to research teams. For the sake of investigation, the Free Thought Project tried to go through the application process that was required to buy the virus, just to see if anyone with $516 to spend would be able to get their hands on it.

In case there are people out there who think this may be a ‘conspiracy theory,’ you can plainly see that the source for the Zika virus is, in fact, from J. Casals, Rockefeller Foundation, and sourced from Blood from experimental forest sentinel rhesus monkey, Uganda, 1947.

After initially trying to buy the virus, we were prompted to create a user account on the website. After that, we were led through a dozen pages of forms, where we were asked information about our organization, tax ID # and the biosafety level of our lab. While this seems to be tight security, we were able to input false information and fudge the requirements to complete the application process. We are still waiting for our application to be approved, but we did not have to upload any type of proof that we are a legitimate facility.

It seems that while the virus is available online, it is not extremely easy to get, and would likely require some extremely creative fraud in order to make it happen. However, it definitely does seem that it would be possible for a group or individual that is determined enough to make their way through the website’s security measures.

John Vibes is an author and researcher who organizes a number of large events including the Free Your Mind Conference. He also has a publishing company where he offers a censorship free platform for both fiction and non-fiction writers. You can contact him and stay connected to his work at his Facebook page. You can purchase his books, or get your own book published at his website www.JohnVibes.com.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Jeu 11 Fév - 02:17 (2016)    Sujet du message: ZIKA, MOUSTIQUE OGM : PETITES EXPERIMENTATIONS ENTRE AMIS? Répondre en citant


Publié par wikistrike.com sur 10 Février 2016, 11:52am

Catégories : #Santé - psychologie


Le Brésil, comme beaucoup de pays tropicaux, est en proie à la maladie de la Dengue, causée par le moustique Aedes aegypti. Malheureusement, ce pays, si perméable à la corruption, a opté pour la peste et le choléra en se prêtant à une campagne de vaccination tout juste sortie des laboratoires Sanofi-Pasteur, ainsi qu'à une expérience de moustiques OGM : la société de biotech Oxitec qui a le monopole de ce marché, a expérimenté directement sur les populations une technologie qu'elle ne maîtrisait pas. La proximité des Jeux Olympiques de 2016 et ses nombreux enjeux financiers, ne sont certainement pas étrangers à cette soudaine frénésie sanitaire. 

Le moustique Aedes aegypti OGM, répondant au nom de code Ox513A, premier en son genre, est capable de se reproduire et doit empêcher les femelles, responsable des piqûres, d'avoir des œufs viables au-delà de 3-4 jours. Le gène qu'on lui avait ajouté devait permettre d'éliminer son alter ego sauvage et donc d'endiguer l'épidémie. Malheureusement, la tétracycline, un antibiotique présent dans les eaux usées et dans certaines viandes industrielles, permettent à ces indésirables de survivre. 

Oxitec avait mis au point cette technologie et avait procédé à des tests aux îles Caïmans dans la quasi clandestinité en 2009. 

Du ministère de la Santé aux sociétés Oxitec et à son usine Moscamed, implantée à Juazeiro (banlieue pauvre du Brésil), les propos sont unanimes : les lâchers de moustiques mâles génétiquement modifiés réduisent drastiquement - de 79% à 90% - la population de moustiques sauvages au bout de six mois. Comme cette usine de production est co-dirigée par le gouvernement brésilien, il va de soi que les profits seront privatisés alors que les responsabilités seront nationalisées. 

Les Brésiliens les plus pauvres servent de cobayes 

Après le premier test grandeur nature à Juazeiro en 2011, la commission brésilienne en charge des OGM, CNTBio, a tout de même approuvé le 10 avril 2014 (selon Bastamag), la dissémination de ces moustiques transgéniques dans l'environnement, sans aucun test en laboratoire ni aucune donnée. 

Chaque semaine, 600 000 insectes ont été lâchés à Jacobina, ville de 79 000 habitants de l'État de la Bahia, car ces moustiques OGM sont censés fonctionner comme des insecticides : pour qu'ils soient efficaces, il faut inonder les zones à traiter en permanence, ce qui implique une production continue de millions de moustiques transgéniques. Selon Libération, « pour venir à bout d'Aedes aegypti, il a fallu plonger les habitants dans une nuée d'Ox513A. Au départ, quelques imbéciles ont protesté, puis ils se sont calmés quand ils ont vu les résultats, lâche Sonia, une femme un peu sèche qui tient une épicerie à Mandacaru ». 

Selon un document confidentiel rendu public par l'ONG anglaise GeneWatch - qu'elle a pu obtenir grâce aux lois britanniques sur la liberté d'information - , les moustiques génétiquement modifiés par Oxitec ne sont pas aussi stériles que prévu. La tétracycline, le fameux antibiotique dont dépendent ces insectes, est très largement présente dans les eaux usées et dans la viande issue d'élevage industriel, toujours selon Bastamag

Corrélation entre le Aedes aegypti et l'apparition du virus Zika ? 

Pire encore, une autre maladie de la même famille que la Dengue et le Chikungunya a fait son apparition sur le continent : le virus Zika, issu de la même famille que la Dengue (virus arboricole). Celui-ci transmis par le même moustique, Aedes aegypti, a été détecté au Brésil au cours du premier semestre 2015, selon les autorités brésiliennes. En effet, le virus Zika était localisé jusqu'à lors en Afrique et en Asie mais aucunement en Amérique du sud. Une question se pose : s'agit-il d'un virus mutant dû aux modifications génétiques effectuées sur le moustique ? Ce virus, en augmentation exponentielle, est responsable d'un grand nombre de naissances de bébés microcéphales (malformation de la boîte crânienne) dans le nord-est du Brésil. 

La nature semble avoir repris ses droits : la prolifération du moustique OGM, censée éradiquer le moustique sauvage, a échoué car ce dernier continue de se multiplier dans le nord-est du Brésil et que le nombre de cas de Dengue a augmenté de 550 % en 2015 par rapport à 2014. 

Espérons que cette espèce ne rejoigne pas l'Europe, à l'image du moustique Tigre qui n'en finit pas de remonter vers la partie nord du continent. On est donc très peu rassuré quand les responsables d'Oxitec affirment que le processus est « réversible ». 

Course aux profits chez Big pharma 

Mieux encore, cette société a des accointances, pour ne pas dire des intérêts communs avec le géant Suisse de l'agrochimie Syngenta. Il faut savoir que notre champion national de la pharmaceutique, Sanofi-Pasteur, vient de commercialiser de son côté son vaccin contre la Dengue, et a annoncé le 28 décembre 2015 que le Brésil a accordé l'autorisation de mise sur le marché de son vaccin, le Dengvaxia. Il s'agit de la troisième autorisation de ce vaccin successivement enregistrée au Mexique et aux Philippines, depuis le début du mois de décembre 2015. 

Comment ne pas faire le rapport entre cette information et la précipitation avec laquelle l'épandage du moustique OGM anti Dengue s'est opéré au Brésil ? 

Les populations pauvres du Brésil ont été les cobayes de l'expérimentation à haut risque de la société de biotech Oxitec, dans le but de prendre de vitesse son concurrent français, wagon de piécettes sonnantes et trébuchantes à la clé ; selon l'OMS, la moitié de la population mondiale serait exposée au risque de la Dengue. Dans un rapport publié en 2012 par plusieurs ONG,Oxitech ne cache pas sa volonté de gagner rapidement le marché mondial. Même si son remède, son moustique transgénique, se propage contre toutes prédictions et devient pire que le mal. 

L'échéance des jeux Olympiques de Rio de 2016 a poussé les autorités brésiliennes à trouver des solutions rapides face à une menace de pandémie. Malheureusement, cette dernière se répand rapidement en Amérique du Sud, en Europe et semble être hors de contrôle. Il serait mal vu que cette maladie face la Une des journaux du monde entier durant la grande fête du tittytainment. Les Dieux du stade, c'est bien connu, ne se piquent pas. Parole de moustique dans ce monde de Dengue.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Ven 12 Fév - 05:43 (2016)    Sujet du message: WORLD WARNING/MASS DEPOPULATION/ZIKA LIE Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5e3vDNUOEsc

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Ven 12 Fév - 06:28 (2016)    Sujet du message: NAVY MEDICINE ISSUES ZIKA VIRUS INFECTION GUIDANCE Répondre en citant


Obligation to abort
under the children's rights - ruse the Zika virus - child policy for the coming future (now) ?

Story Number: NNS160211-04Release Date: 2/11/2016 10:17:00 AM

From U.S. Navy Bureau of Medicine and Surgery Public Affairs

The aedes albopictus mosquito is the primary carrier for the chikungunya virus, also known as CHIK, in the temperate climates of the United States. While Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall officials test regularly for the presence of West Nile Virus in local mosquitoes, joint base residents can take a number of preventative steps to help stem mosquito breeding and activity near residences on the joint base. (U.S. Army photo)

FALLS CHURCH, Va. (NNS) -- Navy Medicine released Zika Virus Infection guidance in NAVADMIN 032/16, Feb. 10, communicating force health protection measures and travel precautions to Navy and Marine Corps personnel

"Our first priority is to ensure we offer the best possible care to any Navy Medicine patient in the safest way possible," said Cmdr. Eric Deussing, head, U.S. Navy Bureau of Medicine and Surgery (BUMED) public health, emergency preparedness and response.

BUMED has instructed Navy Medicine providers to follow guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). In addition, Navy Marine Corps Public Health Center issued an information sheet and trifold pamphlet on their public website for Navy and Marine Corps personnel.

"We are closely monitoring the situation and collaborating with our public health partners to protect our patients and our communities," said Deussing.

Zika is a viral infection spread by mosquito bites. The virus is spread by a bite from an infected mosquito or possibly by a mother to her fetus during pregnancy. According to the CDC, spread of the virus through blood transfusion and sexual contact has also been reported. Typical symptoms include fever, conjunctivitis, muscle pain, rash, headache, and joint pain.

Recently, Zika virus infections in pregnant women have been linked to infants born with birth defects. Zika virus transmission is predominantly occurring in South and Central America, Mexico, and the Caribbean.

Navy and Marine Corps personnel are at risk when travelling to areas experiencing ongoing Zika virus transmission. Infection risk is reduced by taking measures to avoid mosquito bites.

"Prevention amongst the Navy and Marine Corps personnel is paramount," Deussing said. "The most effective way to prevent infection is avoiding unnecessary travel to Zika affected areas. If traveling to Zika affected areas, avoid mosquito bites."

No vaccine or drug is currently available to prevent Zika virus infection, and there is currently no specific anti-viral treatment for the disease. The best way to prevent infection is to avoid mosquito bites while in areas of ongoing transmission. Mosquitoes that spread Zika virus bite mostly during the daytime, but bites should be avoided day and night.

Until more is known, and out of an abundance of caution, the CDC recommends pregnant women consider postponing travel to any area where Zika virus transmission is occurring -- currently in the Western Hemisphere. Pregnant women, or women trying to become pregnant, who do travel to these areas should talk to their health care provider first, and they should take strict steps to avoid mosquito bites during the trip.

The following steps are recommended for those traveling to an area with ongoing Zika virus transmission:
* Choose a hotel or lodging with air conditioning or with screens on windows and doors.
* Sleep under a mosquito bed net if you are outside or in a room that is not well screened.
* Cover exposed skin by wearing long-sleeved shirts and long pants.
* Use EPA-registered insect repellents containing DEET, picaridin, or IR3535. These are safe for pregnant women when used as directed.
* Use permethrin-treated clothing and equipment.

"If you or someone you know develops sudden fever, rash, joint aches, or red, irritated eyes within two weeks of travelling to an area of ongoing Zika virus transmission, see your Navy Medicine health care provider immediately, and report your symptoms and travel history," Deussing said.

Navy Medicine is a global health care network of 63,000 personnel that provide health care support to the U.S. Navy, Marine Corps, their families and veterans in high operational tempo environments, at expeditionary medical facilities, medical treatment facilities, hospitals, clinics, hospital ships and research units around the world.

For more news from Navy Medicine, visit http://www.navy.mil/local/mednews/.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Jeu 18 Fév - 06:38 (2016)    Sujet du message: MESSAGE FROM THE NAVY SURGEON GENERAL : THE ZIKA VIRUS Répondre en citant


February 17, 2016

Vice Adm. C Forrest Faison III, Navy surgeon general and chief, U.S. Navy Bureau of Medicine and Surgery, shares Zika virus information for Sailors, Marines and their families. (U.S. Navy video/released)

VIDEO : http://www.navy.mil/media/multimedia/zika/ZikaMessage.mp4

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Sam 20 Fév - 07:14 (2016)    Sujet du message: L'OMS DEVOILE A NEW YORK SON PLAN DE LUTTE MONDIALE CONTRE LE VIRUS ZIKA Répondre en citant


Voyez comment l'ONU va utiliser le virus Zika afin de permettre aux femmes de se faire avorter dans tous les pays. Plan génocidaire de dépopulation par le meurtre de milliers d'enfants. Un autre rite satanique, à grande échelle, déguisé par une situation d'
urgence de santé publique de portée internationale. Zika : l'ONU encourage l'abrogation des lois restreignant l'accès à la contraception et à l'avortement http://www.un.org/apps/newsFr/storyF.asp?NewsID=36572 . Verra-t-on, dans un avenir rapproché, les services de santé assister par les services de police, obliger toutes les femmes enceintes à se faire avorter sous la contrainte pour finalement mettre en place des lois qui obligerait les femmes à obtenir une permission ainsi qu'un permis pour pouvoir avoir un enfant et avoir le droit d'être parent? Un autre domaine que le gouvernement est en train de prendre le contrôle. Nous assistons, en direct, à la chute des Etats-Nations et la prise du pouvoir International par les Nations-Unies... Vers le 25 septembre 2015, un nouveau programme mondial audacieux pour éradiquer la pauvreté d'ici à 2030 et poursuivre un avenir durable a été adopté à l'unanimité par les 193 Etats membres des Nations Unies.  http://www.un.org/apps/newsFr/storyF.asp?NewsID=35642#.Vgpay31OKSo .

Ce programme est donc global et complètement opérationnel. 

Un moustique femelle de type Aedes aegypti en train de se nourrir du sang d’un être humain. Photo : CDC / James Gathany

16 février 2016 – L'Organisation mondiale de la Santé (OMS) et sa branche dans la région Amérique, ont détaillé mardi au siège de l'ONU un plan de lutte contre le virus Zika, qui a été déclaré, le 1er février, 'situation d'urgence de santé publique de portée mondiale'.

Selon l'OMS, l'existence d'un lien entre ce virus, transmis par un moustique, et une multiplication de cas de microcéphalie chez des nouveau-nés observés dans plusieurs pays, notamment au Brésil, est fortement soupçonnée, bien que pas encore prouvée scientifiquement.

Actuellement, 34 pays ont signalé la présence du virus Zika, la plupart dans les Amériques et Caraïbes, et sept ont signalé une augmentation de cas de microcéphalies, a précisé la Directrice exécutive du bureau de l'OMS à New York, Dr. Natela Menabde, lors d'une séance d'information devant le Conseil économique et social des Nations Unies (ECOSOC).

La représentante de l'OMS a ajouté que le Brésil a enregistré plus de 4.700 cas suspects de microcéphalie, dont un quart seulement ont été pour l'instant étudiés, alors que le nombre moyen de microcéphalies chaque année était jusque-là de 163 cas.

« L'augmentation que nous observons actuellement est définitivement une source de grave préoccupation », a dit Dr Menabde, qui a détaillé le plan de lutte contre la propagation du virus Zika et les malformations congénitales y sont associées.

Ce plan se concentre sur la mobilisation et la coordination des partenaires, des experts et des ressources pour aider les pays à renforcer la surveillance du virus et des troubles qui pourraient y être liés, pour améliorer la lutte contre le moustique vecteur du virus, pour communiquer efficacement sur les risques et les mesures de protection, pour fournir des soins médicaux aux personnes affectées et accélérer la recherche et le développement de vaccins, de diagnostics et de traitements.

Selon l'OMS, 56 millions de dollars sont nécessaires pour mettre en œuvre ce plan.

Le Président du Conseil économique et social des Nations Unies (ECOSOC), Oh Joon, a souligné que la communauté internationale était confrontée à un énorme défi. « Nous devons nous unir pour coordonner les efforts internationaux afin d'arrêter la propagation de ce virus. Le renforcement des systèmes de santé doit être une priorité si l'on veut se prémunir contre de futures éruptions », a-t-il dit.

« Les personnes les plus vulnérables dans le monde comptent sur notre soutien pour renforcer leur capacité de résistance au virus Zika et aux autres menaces mondiales de santé publique. La collaboration internationale par le biais d'un système multilatéral solide et efficace sera indispensable. Le Conseil économique et social jouera son rôle pour mobiliser le système des Nations Unies afin à aider les pays touchés dans leurs efforts pour répondre à ce virus », a-t-il ajouté.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Mer 24 Fév - 03:29 (2016)    Sujet du message: FRANCE : UN HAUT CADRE DU MINISTERE DE LA SANTE DEMISSIONNE ET DENONCE UNE MASCARADE Répondre en citant


Publié par wikistrike.com sur 23 Février 2016, 07:41am

Catégories : #Politique intérieure, #Santé - psychologie

« Permettez-moi, Monsieur le directeur général, l'ultime honneur de ne pas vous saluer » ! Ce propos peu commun conclut une lettre de démission pour le moins explosive, datée de vendredi et signée « Thomas Dietrich, ex-responsable du secrétariat général de la Conférence nationale de santé, de mars 2015 à février 2016 ». 

Adressée au Directeur général de la Santé, Benoît Vallet, son supérieur hiérarchique, cette courte missive s'accompagne surtout d'une « contribution » destinée à l'Inspection générale des affaires sociales, dans laquelle ce diplômé de Sciences Po et romancier* n'y va pas de main morte. Ce document de 28 pages que nous avons pu consulter est un véritable brûlot contre le ministère de la Santé. Ce dernier ne porterait en fait que très peu d'intérêt à ce que pense le public sur des grands sujets de santé comme la vaccination, la fin de vie ou encore l'e-santé. Selon Thomas Dietrich, « la démocratie dans le domaine de la santé n'est qu'une vaste mascarade montée par les politiques». 

Des pressions sur des sujets sensibles 

Il sait de quoi il parle puisque durant un an, il a dirigé le secrétariat général de la Conférence nationale de santé. Créé par une loi de 2004, cet organisme (à ne pas confondre avec la Grande conférence de santé qui s'est tenue jeudi dernier), est constitué de 120 membres, représentants l'ensemble du paysage de la santé : usagers, professionnels du soin, élus, chercheurs, assureurs, laboratoires... Sa mission est simple : rendre des avis indépendants pour éclairer, notamment les parlementaires et le ministère. 

Cette instance est assujettie à la Direction générale de la Santé, elle-même dépendant de la ministre, Marisol Touraine. Or, selon Dietrich, le ministère ne supporterait pas certaines prises de positions. Son avis sur la « Loi fin de vie », qui n'allait pas assez loin, fut le début de l'entrée en disgrâce de la CNA. Le coup de grâce vint lorsque sa présidente, Bernadette Devictor, afficha sa volonté de piloter un débat national sur la vaccination. 

Des pressions commencèrent alors à s'exercer. Lors d'une réunion avec Benoit Vallet, rapporte Thomas Dietrich, « il fut exigé que je fasse relire les avis ou contributions de la CNA par le cabinet de la ministre ». Une première. Plus tard, le fonctionnaire fut convoqué par sa hiérarchie qui s'opposait à la diffusion d'une lettre d'information de la CNS. « La volonté affichée d'organiser un grand débat sur la vaccination avait effrayé », écrit le démissionnaire. 

Finalement, la ministre demandera un rapport sur la vaccination à une député socialiste, Sandrine Hurel, et lancé un débat national dont l'organisation a été confiée au Pr Alain Fisher, « membre éminent du comité de campagne de Martine Aubry, lors des primaires de 2011 », rappelle encore l'auteur. 

Une importante baisse de budget 

Pendant ce temps, la source financière de la CNA s'est tarie. La part servant à indemniser ses membres bénévoles est tombée de 80000€ en 2012 à 59600€ en 2015. La part servant à organiser les débats publics est tombée de 141000€ à 96000€. De même, les promesses du Directeur général de la Santé de renforcer les rares effectifs n'ont finalement pas été tenues. 

Une évolution qui n'a rien d'économique, si l'on en croit Thomas Dietrich, car le ministère a pu trouver 400 000€ pour financer une nouvelle structure, « l'institut pour la démocratie en Santé », dont la secrétaire générale était jusque-là conseillère de Marisol Touraine. « Il lui fallait s'assurer que la démocratie en santé serait à sa botte ». 

Interrogé samedi, Thomas Dietrich « assume » sa lettre. « Je démissionne parce que je n'ai rien à perdre, je suis libre. Je sais que je risque des sanctions en tant que fonctionnaire, mais je ne pouvais pas continuer comme ça ». 

*Thomas Dietrich vient de publier chez Albin-Michel « Les enfants de Toumaï ».



Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Sam 27 Fév - 06:01 (2016)    Sujet du message: MIAMI HEALTH DEPT OFFICIALS CAUGHT LYING ABOUT SWINE FLU Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SaX7lPIrxo

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Lun 7 Mar - 08:06 (2016)    Sujet du message: GOOGLE ET L'UNICEF S'ALLIENT CONTRE LE VIRUS ZIKA Répondre en citant


Une équipe de Google va prêter main-forte à l'UNICEF pour créer une plateforme informatique permettant d'analyser des données pour prévoir d'éventuelles épidémies.

Agence France-Presse

Le géant américain d'internet Google a annoncé jeudi qu'il alliait ses forces avec l'UNICEF pour jauger l'expansion du virus Zika, offrant également un million de dollars pour soutenir le travail de terrain du Fonds des Nations unies pour l'enfance.

Une équipe composée d'ingénieurs, de designers et de scientifiques de Google va prêter main-forte à l'UNICEF pour créer une plateforme informatique permettant d'analyser les données provenant de multiples sources, afin de prévoir d'éventuelles épidémies, a expliqué la directrice de la branche caritative du groupe dans un post de blogue.

«À terme, l'objectif de cette plateforme collaborative est d'identifier le risque de transmission du (virus) Zika dans différentes régions et d'aider l'UNICEF, les gouvernements et les ONG à décider comment et où concentrer leur temps et leurs efforts», a précisé la directrice de Google.org, Jacquelline Fuller.

«Cet ensemble d'outils est pensé pour apporter une réponse au Zika, mais pourra également s'appliquer à de futures urgences», a-t-elle ajouté.

Le million de dollars donné à l'UNICEF doit permettre de lutter contre l'l'Aedes Aegypti, le moustique tigré responsable de la transmission du virus qui sévit en Amérique du Sud et qui est fortement soupçonné de provoquer des malformations chez les bébés nés de mères infectées.

Il s'agit également de développer des éléments de diagnostic, des vaccins et la prévention, selon Mme Fuller.

Le géant californien a en parallèle lancé une campagne de levée de fonds parmi ses employés, espérant rassembler 500 000 dollars supplémentaires, qui seraient destinés à l'UNICEF ainsi qu'à l'Organisation panaméricaine de la santé.

Le virus qui croît rapidement et a désormais affecté des personnes dans plus de 20 pays d'Amérique latine, principalement le Brésil, pourrait également déclencher un trouble neurologique grave, le syndrome de Guillain-Barré, selon des chercheurs.

Les pays les plus touchés dans la région - le premier étant le Brésil, avec plus de 1,5 million de cas - ont lancé des opérations pour se débarrasser des eaux stagnantes où les moustiques vecteurs du virus Zika prolifèrent.

Cuba a fait état mercredi de son premier cas. Il s'agit d'une médecin vénézuélienne venue sur l'île pour des études, a indiqué la ministre de la Santé.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Dim 13 Mar - 05:08 (2016)    Sujet du message: ARAB PRINCE DONATES $440 MILLION TO VACCINE INDUSTRY Répondre en citant


March 12, 2016
by Gary TruthKings

While Mohammed bin Zayed isn’t exactly Bill Gates, since 2013, his donation to the vaccine industry of almost a half a billion dollars is by no means a drop in the proverbial bucket. His contribution, which focuses on children in Afganistan and Pakistan, will be used to give 10.673 million children polio vaccines (source).

UAE PAP has announced the launch of the programme, under the slogan ‘Health for All – Better Future”, which is in implementation of the directives of the President His Highness Shaikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan for providing humanitarian and developmental assistance to the friendly people of Pakistan, and as part of an initiative launched by His Highness Shaikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces, to eradicate polio in the world.

About 25 million vaccination doses will be administered as part of the programme which seeks to support health awareness in Pakistan, reduce the spread of epidemics, and prevent the suffering of children in affected areas from poor health.

The campaign includes the geographical coverage of 66 areas, 15 of them in the region’s tribal areas, 25 districts in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and 12 regions in the province of Balochistan, as well as the Karachi district in Sindh province.

Efforts of the vaccination teams will include the administration of three consecutive vaccination doses to 10.673 million children from March to May 2016.

The polio vaccine has been proven to cause polio. This is due to giving children live polio vaccines which then end up in the sewage and drinking water of impoverished regions.

The interesting thing now, however, is that polio isn’t gone. And that might not have as much to do with the unvaccinated and unsanitary as it does with the vaccinated themselves. We are consistently led to believe that polio’s near eradication is only ‘near’ due to limited vaccine availability. But now mainstream researchers are beginning to see a trend: that the polio cases which are occurring are being spawned from the polio vaccines themselves. The vaccines pitched as a way to stop polio are merely fueling it’s existence. Look at what the head of virology at National Institute for Biological Standards and Control in the United Kingdom, Phillip Minor, told Vox.com.

“Sooner or later you get to the point — in theory you get to the point — where all the [polio] cases in the world are caused by the vaccine,” Philip Minor, the head of virology at National Institute for Biological Standards and Control in the United Kingdom, tells me. “So you are basically using the vaccine to protect against the vaccine. And that is just ludicrous, isn’t it?”

Substantial donations would only cause an even worse situation with polio because the regions which are being donated to don’t have clean water. Why not give all this money to better irrigation systems that could prevent flooding?  The money could be used to create clean water projects. Maybe even reconstruct sewage lines, so they are safer from acting as contaminants to clean water. But really, there is no money in the cure. The polio vaccines could end up spreading more polio, which means more donations to pharmaceutical companies. Do you think the pharmaceutical companies are doing this purely out of philanthropy?

Nope, they are doing it to increase revenues. This is all about the bottom line. With people such as Gates and Al-Nahyan in our world who have endless amounts of cash, the proposition of pharma ever going broke is not likely at all.

Photo by Michel Temer – Fotos livres, com o crédito.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Ven 18 Mar - 10:05 (2016)    Sujet du message: HUMAN RIGHTS STANDARDS MUST GUIDE GLOBAL RESPONSE TO HIV, WCC URGES Répondre en citant


11 March 2016

Policymakers, programme managers, and service providers — including faith communities — must use more human rights norms and standards to guide a global response to HIV, said a statement submitted by the Ecumenical Advocacy Alliance, an ecumenical initiative of the World Council of Churches (WCC), to the Human Rights Council on 11 March in Geneva.

The statement, delivered to a Thematic Panel Discussion on HIV/AIDS and Human Rights, will be part of significant input brought to the United Nations General Assembly in preparation for the 2016 HIV/AIDS High-level Meeting in New York in June. At that meeting, a Political Declaration will be approved.

“We call attention to the fact that, while the importance of bringing HIV and AIDS policies and programmes in line with international human rights law is generally acknowledged, in reality this is rarely carried out,” said the statement. Francesca Merico, HIV campaign coordinator for the WCC-Ecumenical Advocacy Alliance, helped lead the development of the statement.

To ensure “Fast Track” and Sustainable Development Goals targets are met by 2030 — to guarantee zero new HIV infections in babies; zero deaths among children and adults; and zero stigma and discrimination — the WCC urged a commitment within the UN’s new Political Declaration to four human rights-related areas.

The declaration should:
Address the root causes of vulnerability to HIV. A global response to HIV should place the leadership of people living with and most affected by HIV at the centre of the global response. Key to this response is “partnering with civil society organizations, including faith-based organizations, to understand and address all barriers (legal, economic, social and cultural) that sustain and enforce injustices that contribute to the spread of HIV, including stigma, discrimination, homophobia and gender inequality,” reads the WCC statement.

Achieve universal access to HIV prevention, treatment, care and support. No one should be left behind in achieving the “Fast Track” targets: 95% of people living with HIV knowing their status; 95% of people who know their status on treatment; and 95% of people on treatment with suppressed viral load; with fewer than 200 000 people newly infected with HIV; fewer than 200,000 people dying from AIDS-related causes; and elimination of HIV-related stigma and discrimination.

Eliminate stigma and discrimination. The declaration should commit to eliminating HIV-related stigma and discrimination among service providers in healthcare, workplace and educational settings, including through trainings and evidence-based effective interventions.

Ensure an independent accountability mechanism to monitor the implementation of the Political Declaration. The declaration should commit to a clear accountability mechanism that builds on previous monitoring systems.

The panel, comprised of experts and representatives of affected populations, reviewed the progress achieved in addressing human rights issues in the context of efforts to end the epidemic of AIDS by 2030, including successes, best practices and lessons learned. The thematic panel, held for three hours, was opened and presided by the president of the Human Rights Council. The High Commissioner for Human Rights delivered an opening statement.

More information on the Ecumenical Advocacy Alliance
Full text of statement from the WCC-EAA at the Human Rights Council (11 March 2016)


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Ven 18 Mar - 10:16 (2016)    Sujet du message: LE COE SE PREPARE A METTRE LA FOI EN ACTION A LA CONFERENCE INTERNATIONALE SUR LE SIDA Répondre en citant


“Fast Track” et Développement Durable pour 2030

© Paul Jeffrey/COE

10 mars 2016

Version française publiée le: 15 mars 2016
Alors que l’été approche, l’Alliance œcuménique «agir ensemble» du Conseil œcuménique des Églises (COE-EAA) se prépare activement à la 21e Conférence internationale sur le sida (AIDS 2016) qui aura lieu à Durban du 18 au 22 juillet 2016.

Tous les deux ans, cet événement réunit plus de 20'000 chercheurs, responsables politiques, militants et personnes atteintes du VIH, entre autres, qui partagent les dernières avancées, tentent d’identifier les obstacles à l’éradication de la pandémie, et de s’y attaquer.

Mais pourquoi la participation des organisations religieuses est-elle importante?

Francesca Merico, coordinatrice de la campagne de lutte contre le VIH pour le COE-EAA explique:
«La participation à la Conférence internationale sur le sida constitue un élément essentiel de la campagne Tenir sa promesse à travers laquelle le COE-EAA milite pour l’accès au traitement, pour la fin de la stigmatisation et des discriminations, et surtout pour l’élimination des causes profondes de vulnérabilité à l’infection par le VIH

Mme Merico poursuit: «quand je pense à cette conférence internationale, de nombreuses questions me viennent à l’esprit. Les communautés et les responsables religieux peuvent-ils faire plus face à la pandémie de sida? Les communautés religieuses peuvent-elles agir plus efficacement contre la stigmatisation et la discrimination des personnes atteintes du VIH? Peuvent-elles s’impliquer davantage pour obtenir un accès universel à la prévention et au traitement du VIH, ainsi qu’aux soins et au soutien pour les malades?»

«Pour moi, il n’existe qu’une seule réponse à toutes ces questions: oui, nous pouvons et nous devons faire plus.»

Pour stimuler la participation et encourager la mobilisation dans le monde entier, le COE-EAA a rouvert le site web www.iacfaith.org qui recense les informations sur les activités d’inspiration religieuse organisées lors de la Conférence internationale sur le sida 2016. Les actualités et les informations seront également communiquées via les pages du COE-EAA sur les médias sociaux comme Facebook et Twitter.

Sara Speicher, chargée de la communication du COE et responsable d’une équipe média œcuménique formée pour la conférence, explique: «ensemble, nous pouvons augmenter la visibilité et l’impact positif de l’action religieuse contre le VIH en participant activement à la conférence AIDS 2016, sur place à Durban et virtuellement grâce à tous nos canaux de communication».

«Cette conférence internationale promet d’être une intense expérience de mise en réseau, d’apprentissage et d’action pour tous», conclut-elle.

Pour préparer l’événement, une conférence interreligieuse devrait avoir lieu les 16 et 17 juillet afin d’inciter les participants à se pencher sur les difficultés que posent le VIH et le sida pour les croyants. Il s’agira également d’évaluer les mesures et les stratégies de planification requises afin de mettre la foi en action pour obtenir un droit à l’accès équitable aux soins dès aujourd’hui.

Le COE-EAA joue un rôle clé pour coordonner l’action religieuse à la conférence et offrir un espace de participation. Parmi les participants de la sphère religieuse, on trouve les Initiatives et plaidoyer œcuméniques pour la lutte contre le VIH et le sida (EHAIA), ainsi que des organisations sœurs et partenaires du COE, dont l’Alliance mondiale des Unions chrétiennes féminines (World YWCA), et la Fédération luthérienne mondiale (FLM).

Actions d’inspiration religieuse à la Conférence internationale sur le sida AIDS 2016 (en anglais)
Tenir sa promesse: campagne sur le VIH (en anglais)
La foi en action: pour un droit à l’accès équitable aux soins dès aujourd’hui (en anglais)
Alliance œcuménique «agir ensemble» du Conseil œcuménique des Églises


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Lun 28 Mar - 07:19 (2016)    Sujet du message: CENSORED! ANTI-VAX DOCUMENTARY PULLED FROM TRIBECA FILM FESTIVAL! Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtNuO8ncfT0

Robert De Niro Pulls Anti-Vaccine Documentary From Tribeca Film Festival http://nyti.ms/22DPOjB

VAXXED film pulled from Robert De Niro's Tribeca Film Festival following totalitarian censorship demands from pharma-linked vaccine pushers and media science trolls - http://www.naturalnews.com/053445_VAX...

100% Proof Vaccines Cause Autism (PLEASE SHARE THIS VIDEO) https://youtu.be/XpSZNBJ-zNc

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Mar 5 Avr - 05:46 (2016)    Sujet du message: SECRET EVIL TRUTH BEHIND THE MEDICAL OATH DOCTORS TAKE Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PcRCMOJeSyE

Bert Seelman discusses the Hippocratic Oaths with the secret evil truth behind the medical oath that doctors or nurses take or are sworn to, in the medical or health field, and how it is actually evil, documented lies.

This is the facts, lies or deceptions, and the documented truths! This is about power and money behind medicine or Big Pharma and how people are duped. This information is the proof yet most people do not know this let alone the physicians!

For more info go to:
bert seelman

Bert Seelman discusses the Hippocratic Oaths sworn by every medical doctor, this video reveals an actual quiet, secret, evil truth behind them !

Bert Seelman discusses the Hippocratic Oaths and the secret evil truth behind the medical oath that doctors or nurses of health take and have sworn to, how it is actually documented lies.

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Mar 12 Avr - 03:47 (2016)    Sujet du message: ZIKA VIRUS IN U.S. - U.S. GOV LAY OUT PLANS FOR AMERICAN PEOPLE & TALK VACCINES Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HG2__NOVd4A

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Sam 23 Avr - 04:36 (2016)    Sujet du message: L'OMS APPELLE A COMBLER LES LACUNES EN MATIERE DE VACCINATION DANS LE MONDE / Two thirds of unimmunized children live in conflict-affected countries – UNICEF Répondre en citant


Two thirds of unimmunized children live in conflict-affected countries – UNICEF

A Sao Paulo, au Brésil, une jeune fille reçoit un vaccin contre le cancer du col de l’utérus. Photo PAHO/OMS

21 avril 2016 – Alors que la Semaine mondiale de la vaccination se tiendra du 24 au 30 avril 2016 dans le monde entier, l'Organisation mondiale de la Santé (OMS) a encouragé jeudi les pays à prendre de nouvelles mesures pour combler leurs lacunes en matière de vaccination.

« L'an dernier, la vaccination a remporté des victoires remarquables contre la poliomyélite, la rubéole et le tétanos maternel et néonatal », a souligné la Directrice générale de l'OMS, Dr Margaret Chan dans un communiqué de presse. « Mais c'étaient des victoires isolées. La poliomyélite a été éliminée dans 1 pays, le tétanos dans 3 pays et la rubéole dans 1 région géographique. Le défi consiste à ce que les victoires comme celles-ci deviennent la norme ».

La vaccination permet d'éviter 2 à 3 millions de décès par an, mais on pourrait sauver 1,5 million de vies supplémentaires en améliorant la couverture vaccinale dans le monde. On estime aujourd'hui que 18,7 millions d'enfants, soit près d'1 sur 5 dans le monde, ne bénéficient pas encore de certaines vaccinations systématiques pour des maladies évitables, comme la diphtérie, la coqueluche ou le tétanos.

En 2012, l'Assemblée mondiale de la Santé a approuvé le Plan d'action mondial pour les vaccins (GVAP), un engagement pour que personne ne passe à côté des vaccinations essentielles.

« Bien qu'on ait assisté à des progrès de la vaccination dans le monde, la couverture vaccinale mondiale a marqué le pas ces dernières années », déplore la Sous-Directrice générale à l'OMS pour la santé de la famille, de la femme et de l'enfant et Vice-Présidente du Conseil de Gavi, l'Alliance du vaccin, le Dr Flavia Bustreo. « Bien trop d'occasions sont manquées chaque jour pour atteindre les enfants non vaccinés et combler les lacunes en matière de vaccination ».

Pour améliorer la couverture vaccinale, l'OMS demande aux pays de couvrir davantage d'enfants qui échappent aux systèmes de vaccination systématique, en particulier ceux qui vivent dans des pays, des districts ou des zones où moins de 80% d'entre eux reçoivent ces vaccins ou ceux qui vivent dans des pays en proie à des conflits ou affectés par des situations d'urgence.

Plus de 60% des enfants non vaccinés vivent dans 10 pays : l'Afrique du Sud, l'Éthiopie, l'Inde, l'Indonésie, l'Iraq, le Nigéria, l'Ouganda, le Pakistan, les Philippines et la République démocratique du Congo.

De même, lorsqu'un enfant ou un adulte, qui n'est pas vacciné ou pas complètement vacciné, va dans un établissement de soins pour quelque raison que ce soit, les agents de santé doivent vérifier son dossier de vaccination et il faut alors lui administrer tous les vaccins qui lui manquent.

Or, des évaluations récentes sur le terrain dans la Région des Amériques et la Région africaine ont montré qu'entre 23% et 96% des enfants qui remplissent les conditions requises et sont venus dans un établissement de soins pour la vaccination ou un traitement médical, ont quitté cet établissement sans avoir reçu les doses vaccinales dont ils avaient besoin.

« Ce ne sont pas des enfants que l'on considèrerait comme étant 'difficiles à atteindre' ou appartenant à des populations mal desservies », reconnaît le Directeur de l'immunisation et des vaccins à l'OMS, Dr Jean-Marie Okwo-Bele. « Il est facile de faire progresser la couverture vaccinale rien qu'en s'occupant des enfants venant déjà dans les établissements de santé ».

News Tracker: autres dépêches sur la question

Un monde sans polio est en vue, selon l'UNICEF


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Mer 27 Avr - 07:19 (2016)    Sujet du message: FOOD BEING CONTAMINATED TO PROMOTE VACCINATIONS? Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIakt6TCKDs

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Dim 1 Mai - 04:58 (2016)    Sujet du message: POPE LOOKS AT 3 KEYS FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE Répondre en citant

The real secret agenda, not secret anymore of this global initiatives of the globalization agenda.

Profit can’t prevail over human life, he said in advocating access to care

April 29, 2016 ZENIT Staff Pope and Holy See

L'osservatore Romano

From Vatican Radio:
Pope Francis on Friday addressed participants of an International Conference on the Progress of Regenerative Medicine and its Cultural Impact. The Conference is being sponsored by the Pontifical Council for Culture, the Stem for Life Foundation, and the STOQ Foundation.

The 2016 conference focused on pediatric cancers and rare diseases, as well as diseases that occur with aging. It featured talks and discussions with leading cell therapy scientists, physicians, patient advocates, ethicists, philanthropists, leaders of faith and government officials.

In his address, Pope Francis focused on three aspects of the commitment of the Pontifical Council for Culture, and the institutions working with it.

“It is fundamentally important that we promote greater empathy in society,” the Pope said, “and not remain indifferent to our neighbour’s cry for help, including when he or she is suffering from a rare disease.” Pope Francis described this aspect of their work as “increasing sensitivity.”

The Holy Father also emphasized the importance of research, in terms of “education and genuine scientific study.” Education, he said, is necessary not only to develop students’ intellectual abilities, but also to ensure “human formation and a professionalism of the highest degree.” Research, meanwhile, “requires unwavering attention to moral issues if it is to be an instrument which safeguards human life and the dignity of the person.”

The third aspect highlighted by Pope Francis was “ensuring access to care.” A desire for profit should never prevail over the value of human life. This, the Pope said, “is why the globalization of indifference must be countered by the globalization of empathy.” By drawing attention to and educating people about rare diseases, by increasing funds for research, and by promoting “necessary legislation as well as an economic paradigm shift,” he continued, “the centrality of the human person will be rediscovered.”

Pope Francis concluded his address with a word of encouragement for those participating in the Conference. “During this Jubilee Year, may you be capable and generous co-operators with the Father’s mercy.”


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Ven 6 Mai - 07:20 (2016)    Sujet du message: OBAMA’S SCIENCE CZAR : WE NEED FORCED ABORTIONS AND MASS STERILIZATION OVERSEEN BY PLANETARY REGIME Répondre en citant


What kind of people does President Obama have in his administration to help lead our nation?

Take a look at John Holdren, Obama’s science czar, who once wrote a book that advocated such things as force abortions, adding contaminants to the water to mass sterilize the population, single mothers who have their kids taken by the State, etc.

The book is called Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment and the suggestions made by Holdren are completely chilling, like something only a Hitler-like madman could dream up.

Although authored in 1977 and now denounced by Holdren, one can only think that ‘once a madman always a madman’. Overpopulation is a myth propagaged by those who seek to control the Earth. While it might seem self-evident that our population is indeed growning and there is only so much space around, the reality is that by 2030 the world population will start dropping.

Take a look at the excerpts from Holdren’s book below.

Page 837
Compulsory abortions would be legal

Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.

As noted in the FrontPage article cited above, Holdren “hides behind the passive voice” in this passage, by saying “it has been concluded.” Really? By whom? By the authors of the book, that’s whom. What Holdren’s really saying here is, “Ihave determined that there’s nothing unconstitutional about laws which would force women to abort their babies.” And as we will see later, although Holdren bemoans the fact that most people think there’s no need for such laws, he and his co-authors believe that the population crisis is so severe that the time has indeed come for “compulsory population-control laws.” In fact, they spend the entire book arguing that “the population crisis” has already become “sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”

Page 786Single mothers should have their babies taken away by the government; or they could be forced to have abortions 

One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.

Holdren and his co-authors once again speculate about unbelievably draconian solutions to what they feel is an overpopulation crisis. Rolling Eyes But what’s especially disturbing is not that Holdren has merely made these proposals — wrenching babies from their mothers’ arms and giving them away; compelling single mothers to prove in court that they would be good parents; and forcing women to have abortions, whether they wanted to or not — but that he does so in such a dispassionate, bureaucratic way. Don’t be fooled by the innocuous and “level-headed” tone he takes: the proposals are nightmarish, however euphemistically they are expressed. 

Holdren seems to have no grasp of the emotional bond between mother and child, and the soul-crushing trauma many women have felt throughout history when their babies were taken away from them involuntarily. 

This kind of clinical, almost robotic discussion of laws that would affect millions of people at the most personal possible level is deeply unsettling, and the kind of attitude that gives scientists a bad name. I’m reminded of the phrase “banality of evil.” 

Not that it matters, but I myself am “pro-choice” — i.e. I think that abortion should not be illegal. But that doesn’t mean I’m pro-abortion — I don’t particularly like abortions, but I do believe women should be allowed the choice to have them Evil or Very Mad . But John Holdren here proposes to take away that choice — to force women to have abortions. One doesn’t need to be a “pro-life” activist to see the horror of this proposal — people on all sides of the political spectrum should be outraged. My objection to forced abortion is not so much to protect the embryo, but rather to protect the mother from undergoing a medical procedure against her will. And not just any medical procedure, but one which she herself (regardless of my views) may find particularly immoral or traumatic. 

There’s a bumper sticker that’s popular in liberal areas which says: “Against abortion? Then don’t have one.” Well, John Holdren wants to MAKE you have one, whether you’re against it or not.

Page 787-8Mass sterilization of humans though drugs in the water supply is OK as long as it doesn’t harm livestock 

Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.

OK, John, now you’re really starting to scare me. Putting sterilants in the water supply? While you correctly surmise that this suggestion “seems to horrify people more than most proposals,” you apparently are not among those people it horrifies. Because in your extensive list of problems with this possible scheme, there is no mention whatsoever of any ethical concerns or moral issues. In your view, the only impediment to involuntary mass sterlization of the population is that it ought to affect everyone equally and not have any unintended side effects or hurt animals. But hey, if we could sterilize all the humans safely without hurting the livestock, that’d be peachy! The fact that Holdren has no moral qualms about such a deeply invasive and unethical scheme (aside from the fact that it would be difficult to implement) is extremely unsettling and in a sane world all by itself would disqualify him from holding a position of power in the government.

Page 786-7The government could control women’s reproduction by either sterilizing them or implanting mandatory long-term birth control 

Involuntary fertility control

A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.

The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.

Note well the phrase “with official permission” in the above quote. Johh Holdren envisions a society in which the government implants a long-term sterilization capsule in all girls as soon as they reach puberty, who then must apply for official permission to temporarily remove the capsule and be allowed to get pregnant at some later date. Alternately, he wants a society that sterilizes all women once they have two children. Do you want to live in such a society? Because I sure as hell don’t.

Page 838The kind of people who cause “social deterioration” can be compelled to not have children 

If some individuals contribute to general social deterioration by overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility—just as they can be required to exercise responsibility in their resource-consumption patterns—providing they are not denied equal protection.

To me, this is in some ways the most horrifying sentence in the entire book — and it had a lot of competition. Because here Holdren reveals that moral judgments would be involved in determining who gets sterilized or is forced to abort their babies. Proper, decent people will be left alone — but those who “contribute to social deterioration” could be “forced to exercise reproductive responsibility” which could only mean one thing — compulsory abortion or involuntary sterilization. What other alternative would there be to “force” people to not have children? Will government monitors be stationed in irresponsible people’s bedrooms to ensure they use condoms? Will we bring back the chastity belt? No — the only way to “force” people to not become or remain pregnant is to sterilize them or make them have abortions

But what manner of insanity is this? “Social deterioration”? Is Holdren seriously suggesting that “some” people contribute to social deterioriation more than others, and thus should be sterilized or forced to have abortions, to prevent them from propagating their kind? Isn’t that eugenics, plain and simple? And isn’t eugenics universally condemned as a grotesquely evil practice

We’ve already been down this road before. In one of the most shameful episodes in the history of U.S. jurisprudence, the Supreme Court ruled in the infamous 1927 Buck v. Bell case that the State of Virginia had had the right to sterilize a woman named Carrie Buck against her will, based solely on the (spurious) criteria that she was “feeble-minded” and promiscuous, with Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes concluding, “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” Nowadays, of course, we look back on that ruling in horror, as eugenics as a concept has been forever discredited. In fact, the United Nations now regards forced sterilization as a crime against humanity

The italicized phrase at the end (“providing they are not denied equal protection“), which Holdren seems to think gets him off the eugenics hook, refers to the 14th Amendment (as you will see in the more complete version of this passage quoted below), meaning that the eugenics program wouldn’t be racially based or discriminatory — merely based on the whim and assessments of government bureaucrats deciding who and who is not an undesirable. If some civil servant in Holdren’s America determines that you are “contributing to social deterioration” by being promiscuous or pregnant or both, will government agents break down your door and and haul you off kicking and screaming to the abortion clinic? In fact, the Supreme Court case Skinner v. Oklahoma already determined that the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment distinctly prohibits state-sanctioned sterilization being applied unequally to only certain types of people. 

No no, you say, Holdren isn’t claiming that some kind of people contribute to social deterioration more than others; rather, he’s stating that anyone who overproduces children thereby contributes to social deterioration and needs to be stopped from having more. If so — how is that more palatable? It seems Holdren and his co-authors have not really thought this through, because what they are suggesting is a nightmarish totalitarian society. What does he envision: All women who commit the crime of having more than two children be dragged away by police to the government-run sterilization centers? Or — most disturbingly of all — perhaps Holdren has thought it through, and is perfectly OK with the kind of dystopian society he envisions in this book. 

Sure, I could imagine a bunch of drunken guys sitting around shooting the breeze, expressing these kinds of forbidden thoughts; who among us hasn’t looked in exasperation at a harried mother buying candy bars and soda for her immense brood of unruly children and thought: Lady, why don’t you just get your tubes tied already? But it’s a different matter when the Science Czar of the United States suggests the very same thing officially in print. It ceases being a harmless fantasy, and suddenly the possibility looms that it could become government policy. And then it’s not so funny anymore.

Page 838Nothing is wrong or illegal about the government dictating family size 

In today’s world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?

Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children? 


I’ll tell you why, John. Because the the principle of habeas corpus upon which our nation rests automatically renders any compulsory abortion scheme to be unconstitutional, since it guarantees the freedom of each individual’s body from detention or interference, until that person has been convicted of a crime. Or are you seriously suggesting that, should bureaucrats decide that the country is overpopulated, the mere act of pregnancy be made a crime? 

I am no legal scholar, but it seems that John Holgren is even less of a legal scholar than I am. Many of the bizarre schemes suggested in Ecoscience rely on seriously flawed legal reasoning. The book is not so much about science, but instead is about reinterpreting the Constitution to allow totalitarian population-control measures.

Page 942-3: A “Planetary Regime” should control the global economy and dictate by force the number of children allowed to be born


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Mar 17 Mai - 05:15 (2016)    Sujet du message: IBM CLAIMS CREATION OF ZIKA VIRUS VACCINE: BIOENGINEERING AND NANOTECHNOLOGY Répondre en citant


IBM during World War II


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxntgIRiu-w

Headline reads, "IBM Announces Magic Bullet To Zap All Kinds of Killer Viruses." The claim is that the macromolecule can resists things like #Zika and #ebola. It is currently in the lab, but making its way into society through various institutional and corporate channels. Expect to see these products hit the market soon.


Zika Olympics


Armageddon Strain

Dead Biologists

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Jeu 19 Mai - 03:03 (2016)    Sujet du message: GENETIC JIHAD Répondre en citant



Read more : https://books.google.fr/books?id=IgpAVw2Ybw4C&pg=PP1&lpg=PP1&dq…

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Ven 20 Mai - 03:49 (2016)    Sujet du message: GOVT. ADMITS NEW CLASS OF VACCINES DESIGNED TO MUTATE HUMAN DNA, CREATE NEW SPECIES Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWmom905eSA

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Sam 21 Mai - 03:23 (2016)    Sujet du message: DoD ADDS FUNDING TO ENHANCE ZIKA SURVEILLANCE BY MILITARY LABS Répondre en citant


By Cheryl Pellerin DoD News, Defense Media Activity

The Defense Department is providing $1.76 million in extra funding to military laboratories to expand Zika virus surveillance worldwide and assess the virus’s impact on deployed service members’ health and readiness. DoD graphic by Regina Ali

WASHINGTON, May 16, 2016 — The Defense Department is providing $1.76 million in extra funding to military laboratories to expand Zika virus surveillance worldwide and assess the virus’s impact on deployed service members’ health and readiness, Navy Cmdr. Franca Jones said in a recent interview.

Jones, who holds a doctorate, is chief of the Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response, or GEIS, section of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch in the Defense Health Agency’s Public Health Division.

The enhanced Zika virus surveillance will involve 10 projects in 18 countries and territories by four lab partners based in the United States and five located overseas.

Jones said the labs receiving more Zika virus funds are part of the GEIS integrated worldwide emerging infectious disease surveillance network that includes core Army or Navy medical research labs in Egypt, Georgia, Kenya, Peru, Thailand, Cambodia and Singapore, and Army, Navy and Air Force labs in the United States, working in more than 60 countries around the world.


A representation of the surface of the Zika virus with protruding envelope glycoproteins (red) shown. Photo courtesy of Kuhn and Rossmann research groups, Purdue University, research funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease

In the current fiscal year, she added, GEIS already has provided its network partners with more than $51 million to support a range of emerging infectious disease surveillance programs.

Mosquito-Borne Zika

Zika virus disease spread to people through the bites of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, usually shows mild symptoms -- fever, rash, joint pain and red eyes -- that last several days or a week, according to the CDC. But Zika virus infection during pregnancy can cause a serious birth defect called microcephaly and other severe fetal brain defects, the CDC says.

In May 2015, the Pan American Health Organization issued an alert about the first confirmed Zika virus infection in Brazil. Three months ago, the WHO declared Zika virus a public health emergency of international concern. Local transmission has been reported in many other countries and territories.

Zika virus likely will continue to spread to new areas, CDC says. Some 4,905 confirmed and 194,633 suspected cases had been reported in 33 countries and territories in the Western Hemisphere, according to an April 6 Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch summary.

Jones said the DoD labs will use the Zika money provided by the branch’s GEIS section for three kinds of surveillance studies. One will look retrospectively for Zika virus exposure among DoD personnel through serum repository samples. A retrospective study looks backward in time, in this case using serum samples of patients who had been deployed in areas with high rates of Zika virus infection.

The other surveillance studies will leverage existing work in the GEIS lab network in different parts of the world to expand clinic-based surveillance for Zika virus disease among DoD and civilian populations, and expand testing for Zika virus in mosquitoes.

DoD Serum Repository

The Defense Department collects a range of blood serum samples from all service members before, during and after their military service, and maintains the samples in the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch’s Department of Defense Serum Repository. Serum is a clear fluid that’s part of a person’s blood. It’s used in many medical diagnostic tests and in blood typing. The repository is the world’s largest of its kind, with more than 60 million serial serum samples from more than 10 million service members.

For the retrospective Zika virus surveillance study, military virologists -- scientists who study viruses -- and public health officials will check the serum samples of service members stationed in the United States and in high-risk regions in the Caribbean and other places overseas. The scientists will be looking for prior exposure to Zika, dengue and chikungunya viruses, all of which are transmitted by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. In recent years, according to CDC, dengue and chikungunya cases have begun to appear in the United States, most of them brought in from tropical urban areas of the world.

Understanding Risk

“For the service members, I can talk from personal experience,” Jones said. “Our blood is drawn when we enter active duty, prior to and following all deployments, and occasionally during acute illness for the purpose of storing in the serum repository, allowing for [later] analyses of a service member's serum over his or her time in service.  So the serum repository keeps a history of a service member's serum on tap.”

She added, “When looking to understand exposure to our service members, the repository provides a unique resource for helping to determine if, when and where there was any exposure to a variety of pathogens.”

This serum surveillance effort will examine 500 samples from service members stationed in Puerto Rico during a time when some of the viruses were transmitted, and 500 from service members deployed to West Africa, Jones said.

“We’re trying to understand the baseline risk for service members,” she added.

Lines of Effort

Other lines of effort for surveillance for the labs include looking for Zika virus in mosquitoes in the Caribbean, East Africa and Southeast Asia, Jones said, and also looking for Zika virus in service members and in military beneficiary and civilian populations who go to medical facilities with a fever, medically known as a febrile illness.

A female Aedes aegypti mosquito. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases photo

The febrile surveillance will be done in the southwestern United States -- California, Arizona and Texas -- and in the Caribbean, Central and South America, East and West Africa and Southeast Asia, she said.

In mosquito surveillance, scientists capture mosquitoes in traps and take them to the DoD labs to be processed to get their genetic material for testing.

“By testing the genetic material, we can understand where mosquitoes are carrying the virus,” Jones explained. “We won't necessarily be able to tell quantitatively the percentage of mosquitoes carrying the virus, but in relative terms we’ll learn about the population that's carrying the virus, in what parts of the world, and the risk to DoD populations.”

Febrile Illnesses

Human surveillance focuses on service members and military beneficiary and civilian populations who go to the hospital with febrile illnesses.

“Most of these are efforts where we are already conducting surveillance for other febrile pathogens,” Jones said.

“For example we have a study in Peru, where they’re already doing clinic-based febrile surveillance activities in South America. These are people in the population who come to the clinic with a febrile illness. Their blood will be drawn and sent to the [Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6 in Lima] for testing for Zika virus, along with other pathogens the scientists there have been looking for,” she added.

Protecting the Global Force

Jones said officials don’t know what they’re going to find in the GEIS-funded effort. “It's very possible that the actual [number] of mosquitoes that are carrying the virus or the number of patients that we get is so small that the chance of finding something could be small,” she acknowledged. But she said GEIS still wants to do the work, because the lack of Zika virus in the samples is also valuable information and helps to determine the risk to service members.

“For us in GEIS, because [infectious diseases can emerge anywhere], it's very important to us to understand what diseases are currently in what geographic locations in the world, and understand what disease may emerge and spread rapidly,” Jones explained. “Our forces are present globally, and we need to make sure that they are able to complete their mission. Infectious diseases are one of the things that can impede their ability to do their mission.”
(Follow Cheryl Pellerin on Twitter: @PellerinDoDNews)


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Ven 27 Mai - 04:46 (2016)    Sujet du message: UN HEALTH AGENCY LAUNCHES PROGRAMME FOR OUTBREAKS AND HUMANITARIAN EMERGENCIES Répondre en citant


L'Assemblée mondiale de la Santé approuve un nouveau programme de gestion des urgences sanitaires

WHO Director-General, Dr Margaret Chan. Photo: WHO/L. Cipriani

26 May 2016 – At the World Health Assembly taking place in Geneva this week, Member States of the World Health Organization (WHO) have agreed to establish a new Health Emergencies Programme that will add operational capabilities for outbreaks and humanitarian emergencies that complement the health agency’s traditional technical and normative roles.

The new programme is designed to deliver rapid, predictable and comprehensive support to countries and communities as they prepare for, face or recover from emergencies caused by any type of hazard to human health, whether disease outbreaks, natural or human-made disasters or conflicts, WHO said in a news release.

With 130 million people in need of humanitarian assistance worldwide and health emergencies at an all-time high, WHO is “encouraged by our member States’ agreement to our new Health Emergencies Programme. This is an important step towards WHO becoming a truly operational agency – as requested by our member States – to complement our technical and normative role,” said Dr. Margaret Chan, WHO Director-General.

The World Health Assembly, which meets every May, is attended by delegations from all WHO member States. As the agency’s decision-making body, its main functions are to determine the policies of the health agency, supervise financial policies, and review and approve the proposed programme budget.

WHO noted that member States including Australia, Germany, Japan and Sweden, stepped forward with financial support for the new programme. The Government of Japan committed $50 million to support WHO’s emergencies work.
“I particularly welcome the contribution of $50 million from the Government of Japan, a sign of confidence in our new Health Emergencies Programme from a long-standing supporter of WHO’s work in emergencies,” Dr. Chan said.

The funds from Japan will include $20 million for 2016 and $10 million for each of the following three years. The $50 million is in addition to Japan’s recent contribution of $18.6 million for WHO’s work in emergencies for 2016.

WHO is already working with partners to support countries in several emergency settings with its new approach, including the global response to the Zika virus, as well as the response to the yellow fever outbreak in Angola and the health consequences of drought in Ethiopia.

Under the new programme, WHO will provide leadership within the context of the international health regulations and health, in relation to the broader humanitarian and disaster-management system. As health cluster lead, it will draw on the respective strengths and expertise of a wide range of partners and Member States.

In order to fulfil these new responsibilities, delegates agreed to a budget of $494 million for the new programme for 2016-2017. This is an increase of $160 million to the existing programme budget for WHO’s work in emergencies.

An Independent Oversight and Advisory Committee for the new programme was also established. At the World Health Assembly, Member States requested Dr. Chan to report to next year’s session on progress made in establishing and operationalizing the programme.

News Tracker: past stories on this issue

UN health agency spotlights role of health in sustainable development as governing body begins session


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Dim 29 Mai - 02:56 (2016)    Sujet du message: CDC FORCES TO REVEAL DOCUMENTS PROVING THIMEROSAL VACCINE PRESERVATIVE CAUSES AUTISM Répondre en citant


Thursday, May 26, 2016
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Tags: thimerosal, autism, CDC documents

(NaturalNews) Factually speaking, the CDC is a malicious, criminally-run anti-science quackery front group for the vaccine industry. As part of its criminal activity, it has long insisted that the vaccine preservative thimerosal is not tied to autism. But once-secret documents, now forced to be revealed by the CDC, prove the agency knew that thimerosal causes autism but deliberately hid that evidence from the public in exactly the same way the EPA hid the truth about lead poisoning of the public water supply in Flint, Michigan.

"A vaccine industry watchdog has now obtained CDC documents that show statistically significant risks of autism associated with the vaccine preservative," reports Health Advice, which also reports:

Dr. Hooker, a PhD scientist, worked with two members of Congress to craft the letter to the CDC that recently resulted in his obtaining long-awaited data from the CDC, the significance of which is historic. According to Hooker, the data on over 400,000 infants born between 1991 and 1997, which was analyzed by CDC epidemiologist Thomas Verstraeten, MD, "proves unequivocally that in 2000, CDC officials were informed internally of the very high risk of autism, non-organic sleep disorder and speech disorder associated with Thimerosal exposure."

While the mainstream media -- largely funded by pharmaceutical corporations -- ridiculously continues to claim any link between autism and vaccines is a "conspiracy theory," the link actually turns out to be evidence-based FACT

From the Health Advice story linked above:

When the results of the Verstraeten study were first reported outside the CDC in 2005, there was no evidence that anyone but Dr. Verstraeten within the CDC had known of the very high 7.6-fold elevated relative risk of autism from exposure to Thimerosal during infancy. But now, clear evidence exists. A newly-acquired abstract from 1999 titled, "Increased risk of developmental neurologic impairment after high exposure to Thimerosal containing vaccine in first month of life" required the approval of top CDC officials prior to its presentation at the Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) conference.

Thimerosal, which is 50% mercury by weight, was used in most childhood vaccines and in the RhoGAM shot for pregnant women prior to the early 2000s.The CDC maintains there is "no relationship between Thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism rates in children," even though the data from the CDC's own Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) database shows a very high risk. There are a number of public records to back this up, including this Congressional Record from May 1, 2003. The CDC's refusal to acknowledge thimerosal's risks is exemplified by a leaked statement from Dr. Marie McCormick, chair of the CDC/NIH-sponsored Immunization Safety Review at IOM. Regarding vaccination, she said in 2001, "…we are not ever going to come down that it [autism] is a true side effect…" Also of note, the former director of the CDC, which purchases $4 billion worth of vaccines annually, is now president of Merck's vaccine division.

Flu vaccines given to children found to contain over 50,000 ppb mercuryAs you read all this, remember that I personally acquired and tested flu shots for mercury in my laboratory -- now called CWC Labs -- via ICP-MS instrumentation.

Those tests revealed that flu shots contain over 50,000 ppb mercury -- more than 25,000 times the EPA's mercury limit in drinking water.

Any person believing that injecting children with mercury has no biological consequences is either delusional or scientifically illiterate. Mercury is one of the most toxic elements known to modern science, and it causes neurological damage in all its forms (ethyl, methyl, organic, inorganic and elemental).

As explained in Health Advice:

Thimerosal-Derived Ethylmercury in vaccines is now well established as a mitochondrial toxin in human brain cells.

There are dozens of scientific inquiries and studies on the adverse effects of thimerosal, including gastrointestinal abnormalities and immune system irregularities.

Thimerosal, is metabolized (converted) into the toxic and "harmful" methylmercury. And then in turn, the harmful methylmercury is metabolized (converted) into the most harmful, long-term-toxic, "inorganic" mercury that is retained in bodily tissue.

"Inorganic" mercury is the end product of mercury metabolism. Methylmercury subject groups confirm that the metabolic pathway for mercury in the human and animal body consists in the reduction/conversion of the harmful methylmercury into a more harmful "inorganic" mercury which is tissue-bound, and long-term-toxic. Hence, both the originating substance (methylmercury) and its conversion/reduction, inorganic mercury are found.

Based on published findings by Dr. Paul King, the metabolic pathway for organic mercury involves the conversion of Ethylmercury (Thimerosal) into "methylmercury" and then the further reduction of "methylmercury" into inorganic mercury.

Watch my interview with mercury expert Chris Shade to learn even more about mercury toxicity.

The CDC knew all along that mercury-laced vaccines have been destroying the lives of children... and it did NOTHING to stop it!The upshot of all this is that the CDC knowingly allowed the lives of countless children to be destroyed by deliberately covering up the links between mercury in vaccines and autism.

This is why I correctly describe the CDC as a "criminal organization." It is an active, modern-day medical mafia engaged in criminal-scale medical negligence and the mass maiming of innocent children. The CDC, in effect, is run by mass murderers pretending to be scientists

It's part of a pattern of medical murder by government agencies, including the EPA (which covered up the horrific lead poisoning of black children in Flint), the FDA (which refuses to remove deadly prescription drugs from the market until huge numbers of people are already dead), the USDA (which openly conspires with Monsanto to poison our food with unsafe GMOs) and the CDC.

It also makes you wonder... what else is the federal government covering up that's killing, injuring or maiming children today?


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Ven 3 Juin - 05:36 (2016)    Sujet du message: WHO LOOKS TO NON-STATE PLAYERS, INCLUDING FAITH AND CHURCH GROUPS, IN THE FUTURE Répondre en citant


Karen Sichinga during the panel held in Geneva on 25 May. ©Peter Kenny/WCC

02 June 2016

The agreement was announced on 28 May, the last day of the WHA, which engaged a variety of church and faith-based organizations among many non-state actors during its week of meetings in Geneva as it grappled with the new arrangement.

“The framework on engagement with non-state actors was arguably the most difficult item to negotiate,” WHO director general, Dr Margaret Chan said in her closing remarks, referring to the effort in reaching a consensus between state actors, corporate interests and non-governmental organizations.

Members of the United Nations, international groups and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) came together at a panel discussion entitled “Global Public Health: The future role of faith-based organizations” held 25 May in the Ecumenical Centre at the World Council of Churches (WCC).

WCC general secretary Rev. Dr Olav Fykse Tveit said, “It is not a discussion of whether faith-based organizations belong to big discourse, but it is one of how shall we do it, and how shall we do it in a decent way.”

Tveit said in seeking a holistic solution to medical health, use can be made of the “commitment, capacity and networks” along with the “real faith, faith in God and faith in the gifts God has given to the church to participate” in the “healing of the world and bringing just communities together.”

During the meeting, representatives of UN groups and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria said it was easier to deal with representative groups such as the WCC and ACHAP (African Christian Health Associations Platform).

“It is clear that therefore our national governments cannot work alone. They will require strong partnerships and from non-state actors such as Christian health associations,” said Karen Sichinga, ACHAP chairperson noting, “it is estimated that 20 to 60 percent of health care in sub-Saharan Africa is provided by FBOs mainly from the Christian faith.”

Sichinga said the future role of FBOs cannot be underestimated as non-state players are engaged in health services.

“Governments need to transform the way they operate and need to be more cognizant of the role of our association or FBOs. FBOs’ unique role has to be strengthened by national governments and by our international community.

“We have been relied upon by our national government to deliver services at low cost, high efficiency and reduced bureaucracy. We bring to the table value for money serving poor and vulnerable communities for more than 100 years. We have to ensure they are not left out.”

Dr Sam Mwenda, general secretary of the Christian Health Association of Kenya (CHAK) and vice chair of ACHAP said, “FBOs’ engagement with health is a long-term commitment. Even in times of conflict in our nations we continue being there working through our extensive networks.

“We provide a wide range of health services and with compassion to those who are really disadvantaged. We have a lot of investment in infrastructure at parish, national and global levels.”

Mwenda said Christian health associations embrace partnerships and in Kenya they are training doctors and nurses and are responsible for about 40 percent of medical services in the country.

The moderator of the panel, Dr Manoj Kurian, coordinator of the WCC’s Ecumenical Advocacy Alliance (WCC-EAA) noted that the transition from the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) has shown an unfinished agenda in global public health.

Speakers from Europe, Africa and Asia looked at the transformation from the Millennium Development Goals to the Sustainable Development Goals in which medical services are clearly mapped out.

Dr Cherian Varghese, coordinator for the management of Non Communicable Diseases for the WHO from India noted that civil society along with FBOs are powerful in the medical health services sector.

“At the national level, FBOs can be role models, helping churches to promote good health in their work as providers of health care and with their community participation can influence health literacy,” said Varghese.

“In the international context, the WCC is engaged in global advocacy for highlighting health needs as it participates in global dialogue and policy making.”

Dr Mwai Makoka, executive director of the Christian Health Association of Malawi said that church health groups represent a structure complementary to governments for service delivery.

“They have the same goals but different mandates. The one is constitutional while the other is biblical,” said Makoka.

He noted that medical institutions run by FBOs “are resilient, especially where governments are weak or nonexistent, and in emergencies and epidemics,” while citing the combatting of HIV and AIDS and Ebola. = all genocide weapons created in laboratories.

Dr Bimal Charles, general secretary of the Christian Medical Association of India (CMAI) explained how this group punches above its weight in its operations in many of the Indian states, serving not only minority Christians but all others in the country.

In Allied Health Science, the CMAI runs 25 Allied Health Professional (paramedical) courses through 57 training centres under the Central Education Board of CMAI and also supports many government health ventures in different aspects of health care.

Dr Margaret Chan's closing remarks ate the Sixty-ninth World Health Assembly
Learn more about WCC's work on health and healing
WCC's Ecumenical Advocacy Alliance


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 240

MessagePosté le: Mar 7 Juin - 20:47 (2016)    Sujet du message: THE PRICE WE PAY FOR FIGHTING PESTS WITH CHEMICALS AND GENETIC ENGINEERING - JUNE 4, 2016 Répondre en citant


Visit the Mercola Video Library

By Dr. Mercola

As noted in a recent article by The Atlantic,1 history is rife with pest control experiments gone terribly wrong. Today the stakes are higher than ever, as scientists are increasingly turning to genetic engineering to affect environmental change.

Earlier this year, the Zika virus, which is carried by the Aedes aegypti mosquito, was declared a worldwide public health threat.2,3 Besides calling for increased use of chemical sprays against mosquitoes, focus quickly turned to the idea of releasing genetically engineered (GE) mosquitoes to control populations.

The male transgenic mosquitoes, which are released to mate with females in the wild, carry a "suicide" or "self-destruct gene" that gets transferred to the offspring, killing them before they reach breeding maturity.4
To achieve this, protein fragments from the herpes virus, E. coli bacteria, coral and cabbage looper moth were inserted into the insects. Biotech company Oxitec refers to their GE mosquitoes as a "non-chemical insecticide," and these controversial creatures are now another step closer to being released on U.S. soil.

Florida Keys Community Is Latest Testing Ground for Transgenic Mosquito

VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7CRSpUo1D_I

Meetings for Key Haven residents have already been held to discuss Oxitec's proposed GE mosquito trial in the area.5
In early March, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a draft of its environmental impact study6 of the GE mosquito, declaring it will have "no significant impact" on the health of residents or the environment in this Florida Keys' community.7

As noted by CNN, Zika wasn't the original reason Oxitec's transgenic mosquitoes were considered.

The Aedes aegypti mosquito also carries the dengue, yellow fever and chikungunya virus, and outbreaks of dengue fever in the Florida Keys in 2009 and 2010 prompted local mosquito control officials to look for more effective options to control the non-native insect.

According to Oxitec, field tests in Piracicaba, Brazil, led to an 82 percent decline to the mosquito population over an eight-month period.8 In the Cayman Islands, 96 percent of native mosquitoes were suppressed in a 2010 field trial.

The Cayman Islands recently approved full deployment of the Oxitec mosquito, starting in June, with weekly releases of hundreds of thousands of mosquitoes scheduled to continue for at least nine months.9
However, while the FDA has given the transgenic mosquito the thumbs up, Key Haven residents are not particularly keen on being guinea pigs.

Especially since neither dengue, Zika, or any of the other diseases spread by Aedes aegypti pose a threat to health in the Florida Keys.10 Mila de Mier, who lives in the small community of Key Haven, told CNN:11

"Less than a mile from the release site is a senior center and a local school. That area was not one that was affected by dengue. Not a single case ever. So why does the FDA want to do an experiment here when they can do this all over the world? ...


There has been no acceptance from community members. If the local and federal government fail to protect us and our wishes, our last option will be to trust the judicial system and bring it to the court. A legal battle is an option at this point."

What Could Go Wrong?
While decimating Aedes aegypti populations may sound like a good solution to eliminate transmission of disease, there's always the potential for unforeseen side effects.
A 2011 article in The New York Times12 brought up a number of concerns, including the possibility that these genes might infect human blood, not through insect bites, but by finding entry through skin lesions or inhalation.

According to the Institute of Science in Society,13 such transmission could potentially create "insertion mutations" and other unpredictable types of DNA damage in the host.

Alfred Handler, Ph.D., a geneticist at the Agriculture Department in Hawaii has also pointed out that mosquitoes can develop resistance to the lethal gene. If such mosquitoes were to be released, the resistance could spread to the offspring.

According to Todd Shelly, an entomologist for the Agriculture Department in Hawaii, 3.5 percent of the insects in a laboratory test actually survived to adulthood, despite carrying the lethal gene.14
Another factor that could make the GE mosquito backfire is the fact that Oxitec's mosquitoes were designed to die in the absence of tetracycline (which is introduced in the lab in order to keep them alive long enough to breed).

However, tetracycline and other antibiotics are showing up in the environment, in soil and surface water samples. The mosquitoes were designed with the assumption they would NOT encounter tetracycline in the wild. With tetracycline exposure (for example, in a lake) these insects could potentially thrive.

Last but not least, by employing so-called gene drive technology (which ensures that all offspring end up with the GE gene), concerns arise over the impact on biodiversity and the ecosystem as a whole.

Some argue that the extinction of the Aedes aegypti would hardly result in ecosystem collapse, and this may well be true. However, the Aedes aegypti is certainly not the only insect being genetically altered and released into the wild.

The larger problem lies in the fact that population scale ecosystem engineering is taking place without proper regulatory oversight, transparency, or public discussion. Decades' old regulations are being relied on for these novel technologies, and they are sorely inadequate for the task.

GE Diamondback Moths Being Field Tested

VIDEO : https://vimeo.com/112907966

For example, Oxitec is also currently field testing a GE version of the diamondback moth,15 a known agricultural pest. The diamondback moth was the first crop pest to become resistant to DDT, and they're rapidly developing resistance to other chemical pesticides as well, which is why Oxitec began working on a GE version of the moth.
It's similar to their GE mosquitoes in that they pass on a genetic trait that kills the offspring before reaching maturity. Eventually, the entire species will die out from lack of reproduction.

The GE moths have already been laboratory tested in the U.K. and "caged" field trials took place the summer of 2015 in New York. Open field trials may take place as early as this summer. Many have opposed the field trials, including GeneWatch UK, the Center for Food Safety, Friends of the Earth, Food and Water Watch, and the Northeast Organic Farming Association of New York. According to The Washington Post:16

"We're worried about what the effects of these trials outside of the cages [will be],' said Liana Hoodes, policy adviser at the Northeast Farming Association of New York (NOFA-NY), citing concerns that the GE moths could spread beyond their trial sites and begin appearing on private growers' farms.


Hoodes said NOFA-NY would like to see an impact analysis on the possible effects of GE moths on non-target species — that is, organisms besides diamondback moths — in case they happen to be eaten by birds or other animals or even accidentally consumed by humans."

GE Bollworm Moths and Fruit Flies

Oxitec is also the creator of GE pink bollworm moths, which have already been unleashed over the fields of Arizona in an effort to overtake natural bollworm populations, as well as GE fruit flies. These also contain genes that prevent the species from reproducing. In Australia, where the Mediterranean fruit fly is one of the most common pest species, the Department of Agriculture and Food plans to conduct an indoor trial assessment on the use of GE fruit flies as a means of pest control.

So we're seeing this creeping trend where pests of all kinds are being addressed by altering and eradicating the entire species. Subsequently, you cannot limit the conversation to any one species of insects. The question is, is it wise to eradicate pests by using gene drive technology that more or less assures extinction of the entire species?

Just how many pests can safely be vanished before the ecosystem is altered in some devastating way? There are all sorts of questions that are currently not being addressed in any comprehensive way.

Australia to Address Invasive Carp Problem With Herpes Virus

In related news, southeastern Australia is also planning to address the problem of overpopulation of invasive carp by unleashing the herpes virus on the fish. According to Newsweek:17

"[C]arp are a huge problem in Australia. They were first introduced to fish farms in the country in the 1850s, but escaped en masse into the wild in the 1960s, and their populations have exploded ever since ... The virus they plan on using is specific to carp, and kills up to 80 percent of the animals ... It attacks their skin, kidneys and gills ... killing them in a little over a week ...


[T]he virus appeared in carp farms in Southeast Asia in the 1990s, and hasn't been shown to harm farmers and other people there ... While the plan may sound a bit dodgy at first, research has shown that the carp herpesvirus (cyprinid herpesvirus 318) doesn't harm native fish species, eels, frogs, turtles, chickens, mice or water dragons (a type of lizard) ..."

The irony here is that if it wasn't for fish farms, they wouldn't have this invasive species problem in the first place. Yet today, when concerns are brought forth about the dangers of GE fish escaping from farms and decimating the ecosystem, proponents insist that escapes would be "impossible."

Aerial Application of Mosquito Killer Linked to Higher Rates of Autism

Up to this point, the warfare against pests has involved chemicals, and this too has been shown to have devastating side effects. According to recent research,19 higher rates of autism are found in areas exposed to annual aerial spraying of pyrethroids, a type of larvicide that kills mosquitoes, compared to areas where mosquito control is done primarily through pellets distributed on the ground.

"The authors report that kids living in zip codes where the spraying was done each summer had around a 25 percent higher risk of an autism diagnosis or developmental problem compared to kids living in areas without the aerial spraying," Time Magazine20 writes. 

According to Dr. Steve Hicks, assistant professor of pediatrics at Penn State College of Medicine:"Several studies have previously reported links between pesticide and autism risk. Our data suggests the way in which pesticides are applied might play some role."

Previous research has found that pregnant women who are exposed to pyrethroids in their third trimester are more likely to give birth to autistic children, and animal studies suggest it causes neurological, immune, and reproductive damage. Some pyrethroids also act as endocrine disruptors by mimicking estrogen. Such hormone-disrupting chemicals can raise your levels of estrogen, thereby promoting the growth of estrogen-sensitive cancers such as breast cancer.

Besides the occasional aerial disbursement by your local mosquito control, there are more than 3,500 commercial products containing this insecticide. This includes items like roach sprays, flea bombs, and dog flea or tick collars and medicated shampoos. (Compounds that end in "thrin," such as bifenthrin, permethrin and cypermethrin, are all pyrethroids.)

Biological Warfare Endangers Everyone, Everywhere

All of this begs the question, are we doing the right thing by waging war against pests with toxic chemicals and genetically engineered insects? It needs to be understood that there's a price to pay, and increasingly, that price is human and environmental health. We're poisoning our world, and ourselves, in the name of protecting the environment and public health. There's something inherently wrong with that position.

Some are quick to say we have no other options. But this isn't necessarily true. What's lacking is the political and societal will to make the necessary changes, which involve decimating the chemical industry and fully embracing ecologically sound regenerative methods of agriculture. When nature is in balance, pests fail to gain the upper hand. They still exist, but they're kept in check naturally.

Once the soil microbial population is rebuilt, everything else falls into place much easier. Not only are the plants significantly healthier and more nutrient dense, they're also more resistant to plant diseases and pests. Certain plants, such as marigolds, can also work as pest repellents by giving off a fragrance that bugs do not like.

It may not be as effective as releasing a GE insect designed to decimate the entire species, or a potent toxin, but if we keep going the way we're headed, we're just going to encounter more of the same problems. I have no immediate answers to these dilemmas, but I believe we must begin a more open discussion about what we're doing, and what the options are. We also need to implement more farsighted solutions rather than thinking mere weeks or months ahead. Our children's futures depend on these decisions.


Revenir en haut
Contenu Sponsorisé

MessagePosté le: Aujourd’hui à 14:47 (2018)    Sujet du message: A H1N1 - H7N9 - DOCUMENTS OFFICIELS ET + AUTRES PREUVES - DÉPOPULATION AGENDA (PARTIE 2)

Revenir en haut
Montrer les messages depuis:   
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 310, 11, 12, 13, 14  >
Page 11 sur 14

Sauter vers:  

Index | Creer un forum | Forum gratuit d’entraide | Annuaire des forums gratuits | Signaler une violation | Conditions générales d'utilisation
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Traduction par : phpBB-fr.com