LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum

LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1)
...

 FAQFAQ   RechercherRechercher   MembresMembres   GroupesGroupes   S’enregistrerS’enregistrer 
 ProfilProfil   Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés   ConnexionConnexion 

DÉSARMEMENT ET ÉCONOMIE (PARTIE 2)
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 335, 36, 3747, 48, 49  >
 
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> ORGANISATION DES NATIONS-UNIES/UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION -> DÉSARMEMENT ET ÉCONOMIE (PARTIE 2)
Sujet précédent :: Sujet suivant  
Auteur Message
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 21 Mar - 02:15 (2015)    Sujet du message: THE DEA IS SEIZING CASH WITHOUT WARRANTS IN ITS VERSION OF STOP-AND-FRISK Répondre en citant

THE DEA IS SEIZING CASH WITHOUT WARRANTS IN ITS VERSION OF STOP-AND-FRISK



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lini0udM2FU


Nick Sibilla , Contributor

Federal drug agents may be racially profiling and unjustly seizing cash from travelers in the nation’s airports, bus stations and train stations. A new report released by the Office of the Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Justice examined the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)’s controversial use of “cold consent.”

In a cold consent encounter, a person is stopped if an agent thinks that person’s behavior fits a drug courier profile. Or an agent can stop a person cold “based on no particular behavior,” according to the Inspector General report. The agent then asks people they have stopped for consent to question them and sometimes to search their possessions as well. By gaining consent, law enforcement officers can bypass the need for a warrant.

But after reviewing the DEA’s policies, the Inspector General concluded, “cold consent encounters and searches can raise civil rights concerns.” In one incident, DEA agents cold-stopped an African-American woman at an airport and allegedly subjected her to “aggressive and humiliating questioning”; the woman was a Pentagon lawyer and travelling on government business.

Little wonder research by the U.S. Department of Justice found that cold consent encounters are “more often associated with racial profiling than contacts based on previously acquired information.” Cold consent has even been compared to stop-and-frisk.

Moreover, agents can seize cash they find during a cold consent encounter. According to data analysis conducted by the Institute for Justice, half of all DEA cash seizures from 2009 to 2013 were under $10,000. Thanks to civil forfeiture laws, law enforcement can take cash and other valuable property, based on an officer’s often subjective determination of probable cause, even from those who have not been charged with a crime.

Also on Forbes:

Disturbingly, the Inspector General found that DEA interdiction task force groups have been seizing cash from travelers and then urging them to sign forms disclaiming their own cash and “waiving their rights.” In one cold consent encounter, DEA agents stopped another African-American woman in part because she was “pacing nervously” before boarding her flight. After gaining her consent, the agents searched her luggage and found $8,000.
A drug dog then alerted to the cash, and the DEA seized it. However, the Inspector General report did not state if any drugs were actually found or if the woman was ever charged with or convicted of a crime in connection with the seizure. Not to mention that most U.S. currency in circulation has been exposed to drugs.

During the stop, DEA agents urged the woman to “sign a disclaimer of ownership form abandoning her money, but she declined to do so.” Ultimately, the DEA settled her case. But she kept only $3,600—the government took the rest.

Nor was she alone. From 2009 to 2013, DEA interdiction task force groups seized $163 million in cash from 4,138 seizures. Among these seizures, only 21% were contested, while a portion or all of the cash was returned in 41% of the contested cases. In other words, the government returned only $8.3 million, a mere 5% of what was seized. (Since the DEA does not specifically track which seizures came from cold consent searches, these figures may also include cash seized through other tactics.)

These cash seizures also echo concerns that civil forfeiture can detrimentally affect minorities. Appearing on Fox News in February, Sen. Rand Paul argued that civil forfeiture “predominantly has targeted black individuals, poor individuals, Hispanic individuals.” Down in Tenaha, Tex., police pulled over African-American and Latino drivers and then threatened to hand their children over to Child Protective Services unless the drivers signed over their cash. In Philadelphia, law enforcement has seized millions from people never charged with a crime. As investigative journalist Isaiah Thompson reported, the victims are “generally black or Hispanic, working-class and poor.” The Orlando Sentinel even won a Pulitzer Prize “for exposing the unjust seizure of millions of dollars from motorists—most of them minorities—by a sheriff’s drug squad.”



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hytkAaoF2k

While the Inspector General review did not examine how often criminal indictments accompanied cash seized through cold consent, other sources indicate that many law-abiding people routinely lose their property to the government as a result of civil forfeiture. Last year, a blockbuster investigative report by The Washington Post into a federal forfeiture program called “equitable sharing” found that 81% of cash and other properties taken were from people never charged with a crime.

Likewise, according to a 2012 OIG audit, of all property seized by the DEA and other federal agencies from fiscal 2001 to 2011, only 14% of such seizures proceeded as criminal forfeiture cases. In other words, criminal convictions accompanied federal forfeiture cases about one-seventh of the time.

Moreover, federal law has created a perverse incentive for law enforcement to pursue forfeiture aggressively. As the Institute for Justice revealed in its report, “Policing for Profit,” the DEA and other federal agencies can keep 100% of the proceeds from forfeited property. Local and state agencies can get a cut too if they participate in “equitable sharing.” Under this program, a local or state agency collaborates with a federal agency and then moves to forfeit the property under federal law. The agency can reap up to 80% of the proceeds of the forfeited property, while the feds take at least 20%. DEA interdiction task force groups have routinely participated in equitable sharing.

Lawmakers are starting to take action. Last month, Congress held a hearing scrutinizing both civil forfeiture and cold consent. To reform federal civil forfeiture laws, Sen. Rand Paul and Rep. Tim Walberg have reintroduced the Fifth Amendment Integrity Restoration (FAIR) Act. If enacted, the FAIR Act would eliminate the profit incentive for many federal agencies and require the federal government to present more compelling evidence before taking someone’s property with civil forfeiture. Violating the Constitution should not give the government a payday.

Follow the Institute for Justice on Facebook and Twitter.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/instituteforjustice/2015/03/19/the-dea-is-seizi…

Loading...


Revenir en haut
Publicité






MessagePosté le: Sam 21 Mar - 02:15 (2015)    Sujet du message: Publicité

PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?
Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 21 Mar - 02:27 (2015)    Sujet du message: TWO RETIRED COPS TALK CANDIDLY ABOUT CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE Répondre en citant

TWO RETIRED COPS TALK CANDIDLY ABOUT CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPeED78xOZs


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 24 Mar - 04:24 (2015)    Sujet du message: JUSTICE DEPT ORDERS BANKS TO CALL THE POLICE IF YOU ATTEMPT TO WITHDRAW TOO MUCH OF YOUR OWN CASH Répondre en citant

JUSTICE DEPT ORDERS BANKS TO CALL THE POLICE IF YOU ATTEMPT TO WITHDRAW TOO MUCH OF YOUR OWN CASH



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NaYwTpjrOTA

March 21, 2015 ~ Breaking News

(ZH)  Something stunning took place earlier this week, and it quietly snuck by, unnoticed by anyone as the “all important” FOMC meeting was looming. That something could have been taken straight out of the playbook of either Cyprus, or Greece, or the USSR “evil empire”, or all three.

This is how the WSJ explained it:

The U.S. Justice Department’s criminal head said banks may need to go beyond filing suspicious activity reports when they encounter a risky customer.

“The vast majority of financial institutions file suspicious activity reports when they suspect that an account is connected to nefarious activity,” said assistant attorney general Leslie Caldwell in a Monday speech, according to prepared remarks. “But, in appropriate cases, we encourage those institutions to consider whether to take more action: specifically, to alert law enforcement authorities about the problem.”

The remarks indicate that banks may be expected to do more than just file SARs, a responsibility that itself can be expensive and time-consuming.

Some banks already have close relationships with law enforcement, said Kevin Rosenberg, chair of Goldberg Lowenstein & Weatherwax LLP’s government investigation and white collar litigation group. Ms. Caldwell’s remarks “speak to moving forward in a more collaborative way,” said Mr. Rosenberg.

A tip-off from a bank about a suspicious customer could lead law enforcement to seize funds or start an investigation, Ms. Caldwell said.

What does this mean, and why is it so critical? Simon Black of International Man explains:

Justice Department rolls out an early form of capital controls in America

Imagine going to the bank to withdraw some cash.

Having some cash on hand is always a prudent strategy, and especially today when more and more bank deposits are creeping into negative territory, meaning that you have to pay the banks for the privilege that they gamble with your money.

You tell the teller that you’d like to withdraw $5,000 from your account. She hesitates nervously and wants to know why.

You try to politely let her know that that’s none of the bank’s business as it’s your money.

The teller disappears for a few minutes, leaving you waiting.

When she returns she tells you that you can collect your money in a few days as they don’t have it on hand at the moment.

Slightly irritated because of the inconvenience, you head home.http://b74e092gzrq32a48szqcu--y23.hop.clickbank.net/?tid=GSDIABMIDDLE

But as you pull into your driveway later there’s an unexpected surprise waiting for you: two police officers would like to have a word with you about your intended withdrawal earlier…

If this sounds far-fetched, think again. Because it could very well become a reality in the Land of the Free if the Justice Department gets its way.

Earlier this week, a senior official from the Justice Department spoke to a group of bankers about the need for them to rat out their customers to the police.

What a lot of people don’t realize is that banks are already unpaid government spies.

Federal regulations in the Land of the Free REQUIRE banks to file ‘suspicious activity reports’ or SARs on their customers. And it’s not optional.

Banks have minimum quotas of SARs they need to fill out and submit to the federal government.

If they don’t file enough SARs, they can be fined. They can lose their banking charter. And yes, bank executives and directors can even be imprisoned for noncompliance.

This is the nature of the financial system in the Land of the Free.

And chances are, your banker has filled one out on you—they submitted 1.6 MILLION SARs in 2013 alone.

But now the Justice Department is saying that SARs aren’t enough.

Now, whenever banks suspect something ‘suspicious’ is going on, they want them to pick up the phone and call the cops:

“[W]e encourage those institutions to consider whether to take more action: specifically, to alert law enforcement authorities about the problem, who may be able to seize the funds, initiate an investigation, or take other proactive steps.”

So what exactly constitutes ‘suspicious activity’? Basically anything.

According to the handbook for the Federal Financial Institution Examination Council, banks are required to file a SAR with respect to:

“Transactions conducted or attempted by, at, or through the bank (or an affiliate) and aggregating $5,000 or more…”

It’s utterly obscene. According to the Justice Department, going to the bank and withdrawing $5,000 should potentially prompt a banker to rat you out to the police.

This may be a very early form of capital controls in the Land of the Free. This is the subject of today’s Podcast. You can listen in here.

http://govtslaves.info/justice-dept-orders-banks-to-call-the-police-if-you-…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 24 Mar - 04:39 (2015)    Sujet du message: GERMAN GLS BANK TO INVEST 22 MLN EUROS IN GREEN GROWTH FUND Répondre en citant

GERMAN GLS BANK TO INVEST 22 MLN EUROS IN GREEN GROWTH FUND 

in FINANCE March 23, 2015

The German GLS Bank is investing EUR 22 million in the Green for Growth Fund, Southeast Europe (GGF) as part of its impact investment strategy, especifically in sustainable energy, said the bank.

The investment will leverage existing investments from donors and international financial institutions, and provide additional funding for energy efficiency (EE) and renewable energy (RE) projects in the Fund’s target region.

The funding will be used to finance EE and small-scale RE projects for businesses and households within the Southeast Europe and European Neighbourhood regions.

The investment brings the total private capital in GGF to EUR 28.5 million, accounting for almost 10% of total funding. Of the EUR 22 million invested, GLS Bank will retain EUR 5 million on its own books. GLS is the first social and ecological bank in Germany and focuses on business in agriculture, development, education, health care and social welfare. Hence, the partnership between GGF and GLS is a perfect fit.

“The GGF is very pleased to have GLS as an investor. GLS Bank’s strong reputation in sustainable investments makes them a perfect and natural partner for the GGF,” said Christopher Knowles, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Green for Growth Fund, Southeast Europe.

The GGF’s target countries are characterized by rising energy demand and a mostly obsolete energy infrastructure; in most countries energy is produced primarily from coal and gas-fired power plants. During the past five years the Fund was able to support more than 26 partner institutions in Southeast Europe and the Caucasus region with funding and/or technical assistance.

To date an estimated 218 thousand tons of CO2, and over 850 thousand MWh of electrical power have been saved annually through energy efficiency and renewable energy investments financed by the GGF.

“We are delighted at this opportunity to offer investors a sustainable financial product that, on one hand, addresses their risk profile, and on the other reflects their values,” added Thomas Goldfuss, head of GLS Wealth Management.

GLS stands for “Gemeinschaftsbank für Leihen und Schenken”, meaning “community bank for loans and donations.” Founded in 1974, GLS Bank currently finances around 23,000 projects and businesses. The Bank focuses on cultural, social and ecological projects which try to tackle challenges in our society by developing creative solutions.

GLS Bank is directing this investment to its client group of ‘Well Informed Investors’. The subscription was closed on March 11th. The minimum investment for the bearer bond was set at EUR 200,000. The term maturity was set at 5 years and the interest rate at 1.8% plus 6 months EURIBOR

http://www.microfinancemonitor.com/2015/03/23/german-gls-bank-to-invest-22-…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 24 Mar - 04:46 (2015)    Sujet du message: LA REVUE DE PRESSE DE PIERRE JOVANOVIC DU 19 AU 23 JANVIER 2015 Répondre en citant

LA REVUE DE PRESSE DE PIERRE JOVANOVIC DU 23 AU 27 MARS 2015

http://jovanovic.com/blog.htm





Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 25 Mar - 07:21 (2015)    Sujet du message: THEY ARE SLOWLY MAKING CASH ILLEGAL Répondre en citant

THEY ARE SLOWLY MAKING CASH ILLEGAL 

By Michael Snyder, on March 23rd, 2015




The move to a cashless society won’t happen overnight.  Instead, it is being implemented very slowly and systematically in a series of incremental steps.  All over the planet, governments are starting to place restrictions on the use of cash for security reasons.  As citizens, we are being told that this is being done to thwart criminals, terrorists, drug runners, money launderers and tax evaders.  Other forms of payment are much easier for governments to track, and so they very much prefer them.  But we are rapidly getting to the point where the use of cash is considered to be a “suspicious activity” all by itself.  These days, if you pay a hotel bill with cash or if you pay for several hundred dollars worth of goods at a store with cash you are probably going to get looked at funny.  You see, the truth is that we have already been trained to regard the use of large amounts of cash to be unusual.  The next step will be to formally ban large cash transactions like France and other countries in Europe are already doing.
Starting in September, cash transactions of more than 1,000 euros will be banned in France.  The following comes from a recent Zero Hedge article which detailed what these new restrictions will do…
Citation:

Prohibiting  French residents from making cash payments of more than 1,000 euros, down from the current limit of  3,000 euros.

Given the parlous state of the stagnating French economy the limit for foreign tourists on currency payments will remain higher, at 10,000 euros down from the current limit of 15,000 euros.

The threshold below which a French resident is  free to convert euros into other currencies without having to show an identity card will be slashed from the current level of 8,000 euros to 1,000 euros.

In addition any cash deposit or withdrawal of more than 10,000 euros during a single month will be reported to the French anti-fraud and money laundering agency Tracfin.

French authorities will also have to be notified of any freight transfers within the EU exceeding 10,000 euros, including checks, pre-paid cards, or gold.



Of course Spain has already banned cash transactions of more than 2,500 euros and Italy has already banned cash transactions of more than 1,000 euros.

We don’t have these kinds of outright bans in the United States just yet, but what we do have are some very strict reporting requirements.

For example, if you regularly deposit large amounts of cash, there is a very good chance that you have been the subject of a “suspicious activity report”.  In 2013, approximately 1.6 million suspicious activity reports were submitted to the federal government.

The following guidelines for when a suspicious activity report should be filed come from a government website

*****
Banks, bank holding companies, and their subsidiaries are required by federal regulations53 to file a SAR with respect to:
  • Criminal violations involving insider abuse in any amount.
  • Criminal violations aggregating $5,000 or more when a suspect can be identified.
  • Criminal violations aggregating $25,000 or more regardless of a potential suspect.
  • Transactions conducted or attempted by, at, or through the bank (or an affiliate) and aggregating $5,000 or more, if the bank or affiliate knows, suspects, or has reason to suspect that the transaction:
    • May involve potential money laundering or other illegal activity (e.g., terrorism financing).54
    • Is designed to evade the BSA or its implementing regulations.55
    • Has no business or apparent lawful purpose or is not the type of transaction that the particular customer would normally be expected to engage in, and the bank knows of no reasonable explanation for the transaction after examining the available facts, including the background and possible purpose of the transaction.

*****

Most people don’t realize this, but there are minimum quotas for suspicious activity reports that banks must meet.  If they do not submit enough suspicious activity reports, they can be fined (or worse).

And now the Obama administration is saying that just filling out suspicious activity reports may not be good enough.

According to the Wall Street Journal, banks are actually being encouraged to directly contact law enforcement if they see something that does not look right…
Citation:

The U.S. Justice Department’s criminal head said banks may need to go beyond filing suspicious activity reports when they encounter a risky customer.

“The vast majority of financial institutions file suspicious activity reports when they suspect that an account is connected to nefarious activity,” said assistant attorney general Leslie Caldwell in a Monday speech, according to prepared remarks. “But, in appropriate cases, we encourage those institutions to consider whether to take more action: specifically, to alert law enforcement authorities about the problem.”

The remarks indicate that banks may be expected to do more than just file SARs, a responsibility that itself can be expensive and time-consuming.



That should send a chill up your spine.

In a recent piece, Simon Black imagined a future scenario in which some unsuspecting American citizen goes to the bank to withdraw a large amount of cash…
Citation:

Imagine going to the bank to withdraw some cash.

Having some cash on hand is always a prudent strategy, and especially today when more and more bank deposits are creeping into negative territory, meaning that you have to pay the banks for the privilege that they gamble with your money.

You tell the teller that you’d like to withdraw $5,000 from your account. She hesitates nervously and wants to know why.

You try to politely let her know that that’s none of the bank’s business as it’s your money.

The teller disappears for a few minutes, leaving you waiting.

When she returns she tells you that you can collect your money in a few days as they don’t have it on hand at the moment.

Slightly irritated because of the inconvenience, you head home.

But as you pull into your driveway later there’s an unexpected surprise waiting for you: two police officers would like to have a word with you about your intended withdrawal earlier…


Perhaps you don’t think that anything like that could ever happen to you.

Well, consider what the feds are doing to one widow in Iowa
Citation:

A widow’s bank account was seized by the IRS and she now faces criminal charges for depositing her legal inheritance money in lumps instead of all together.

Janet Malone, 68, had $18,775 seized from her — money that was legally earned and was legally bestowed to her by her late husband, Ronald Malone. The problem, according to the government, was the fact that she deposited it in several lumps instead of all at once.

According to the Associated Press, Mrs. Malone deposited the cash in increments between $5,800 and $9,000. The widow’s private financial affairs evidently set off red flags under the watchful gaze of the federal government.



Remember, she was not guilty of committing any crime other than depositing cash in lumps instead of all at once.

If this is how ruthless the feds will be with an elderly widow, how would they treat you under similar circumstances?

So why are they doing this?

The truth is that they want to discourage the public from using cash.  Our government, just like governments all over the planet, is not being shy about the fact that it does not like cash.  If they can make people afraid to use cash, that suits their purposes very well.

And with each passing year the restrictions on the use of cash globally will just get tighter and tighter and the role that cash plays in our lives will just become smaller and smaller.

In the end, a transition to an almost entirely cashless society will seem almost natural.  Cash is being killed off one slow step at a time, and at this point hardly anyone is objecting.

March 23rd, 2015 http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/category/commentary

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/they-are-slowly-making-cash-ill…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 29 Mar - 03:38 (2015)    Sujet du message: LE SYSTEME DE PAIEMENT INTERNATIONAL CHINOIS (CIPS) ENFIN PRÊT, BIEN QU'EN RETARD Répondre en citant

LE SYSTEME DE PAIEMENT INTERNATIONAL CHINOIS (CIPS) ENFIN PRÊT, BIEN QU'EN RETARD 

Ce programme ne sera pas pour les petites gens, mais pour les grands de ce monde. Les petites gens, elles seront soit exterminées et/ou micro-pucés et serviront d'esclaves à l'élite.



Les évènements s’accélèrent et tout devrait être plié au 1 er Janvier 2016, l’Amérique perdant son hégémonie à cette date. La Chine vient de procéder aux derniers préparatifs de son moyen de paiement international du Yuan, mettant un clou d’envergure dans le cercueil du dollar US, le CIPS, le China International Payment Platform. Le CIPS sera lancé cette année vers Octobre.


L’Amérique est catastrophée de cette nouvelle attendue. Elle a eu une chance incroyable, puisque le CIPS était prévu en 2014, et elle a gagné un an et demi. Comment ? La chance, tout simplement. À deux reprises, une veine monumentale. D’abord 20 experts Chinois de Freescale Semiconductor qui travaillaient à plein temps sur le lancement du CIPS pour 2014 sont disparus puisqu’ils étaient sur le vol Malaysia Airline. Coup de bol pour l’Amérique. Mais surtout les quelques centaines de banquiers décédés dont certaines mauvaises langues ont dit qu’ils avaient été liquidés, ‘suicidés ‘, bref éliminés, travaillaient tous sans exception sur le CIPS.

C’est pas du bol, ça ? Allons, allons, pas de théorie fumeuse de complot, de la chance tout simplement, des coïncidences qui auront fait gagner un an et demi au dollar US.

Tsipras est en visite à Moscou aujourd’hui et pourrait résoudre ses problèmes de trésorerie avec la Russie et la Chine, sortir de l’UE et rentrer dans l’alliance et donc faire jouer son droit de veto pour bloquer l’Otan, ce que Brzezinski vient de dire en Pologne à un journal, en pleurant, sur le risque d’une Grèce alliée des Russes.

Comme on fait son lit, on se couche. Et puis, tant va la cruche à l’eau…Citons Pepe Escobar : “L’inquiétude que la tournure des événements suscite à Washington fait ressortir l’absence flagrante de la moindre vision Made in the USA afin de charmer l’opinion publique pan eurasiatique à ses vues.

Tout ce qu’il propose, c’est une posture militaire brumeuse qui pivote parallèlement à une expansion effrénée de l’Otan, ainsi que le racket corporatiste connu sous le nom de Partenariat transatlantique de commerce et d’investissement (PTCI), qu’on appelle communément en Asie la version commerciale de l’Otan”.


Il est clair que les postures hégémoniques de l’Amérique, ça ne prend plus, maintenant que les pays ont le choix d’aller voir ailleurs. C’est encore plus beau que si nous le rêvions. Pourtant, c’est une réalité pour les Etats-Unis qui se réveilleront, parions-le, après avoir encore semé le chaos. Ce qui devra malheureusement tempérer notre enthousiasme, du moins pour encore quelque temps.
 
Source: Oulala.info


Source: Sites web   
26-03-2015 - 17:22 Dernière mise à jour 26-03-2015 - 17:22

http://www.almanar.com.lb/french/adetails.php?fromval=1&cid=20&frid…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 31 Mar - 05:26 (2015)    Sujet du message: PROPOSAL FOR WORLD FEDERATION HAS NOW BEEN PASSED ON THE KEY POWER CENTERS Répondre en citant

PROPOSAL FOR WORLD FEDERATION HAS NOW BEEN PASSED ON THE KEY POWER CENTERS

From an other side of the satanic kabbale.



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpi7iH2bxbw&feature=youtube_gdata_playe…

Posted by benjamin

March 31, 2015

The White Dragon Society has proposed the creation of a world federation (not a fascist New World Order) in order to achieve permanent world peace and start a golden age of unprecedented progress and prosperity. The proposal was made, during ongoing secret negotiations, to the Pentagon, the Vatican, the Chinese, the British Commonwealth and other power centers.

Under this proposal, the United Nations Security council would be replaced by people representing the political consensus of seven major regional groupings. These would be Africa, China, East Asia excluding China, Europe including Russia, India, the Muslim world and North plus South America. Decisions would be made by a majority and each region would have a veto only for its own region. Each region would also have its own meritocratically staffed future planning agency and people owned central bank.

In addition, a meritocratic future planning agency would be established for planning mega-projects that transcend regions. Technocrats with good track records at existing international institutions like the World Bank and the IMF would be invited to join either this or one of the regional agencies.

The Pentagon, the Chinese armed forces and the Russian armed forces would gradually integrate to form a planetary protection force.

So far the Pentagon plus the agencies, the P2 lodge (the Vatican), the Chinese, the Russians, the Germans and the British have all given initial signs they support this plan.

The creation of such a structure would make it possible to resolve all international disputes through arbitration, court cases or sporting events instead of war.

It would also allow the release of equivalent of tens of trillions of dollars to spend on an unprecedented campaign to end poverty, stop environmental destruction, create new eco-systems and explore the universe among other things.

In the public sphere we can find strong evidence that a new system has been agreed upon in principle. When China announced its Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, the cabalists in Washington told their allies not to join. Since then, Australia, Brazil, Canada, England, France, Germany, South Korea, Russia etc have all announced they would join. This forced the IMF and the World Bank to also announce their support. In other words, the secret controllers of the Federal Reserve Board have lost control.

What is left of the old financial system is a combination of a functional retail system and a dysfunctional institutional system. In other words, salaries, electricity bills and the like are still being handled in a realistic basis at the street level but stock markets, bond markets, hedge funds and the like have left the real world a long time ago. Super computers, algorithms and their handlers are duking it out with each other using quadrillions or decadecillions (look it up, there is such a number) of dollars in complete detachment from a real world where one year of world GDB is only $100 trillion. The plug is about to be pulled on all that.

The Satan worshipping Khazarian (Hyksos) families that controlled the old system are now

http://benjaminfulford.net/


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 31 Mar - 05:32 (2015)    Sujet du message: LA REVUE DE PRESSE DE PIERRE JOVANOVIC DU 30 MARS AU 2 AVRIL 2015 Répondre en citant

LA REVUE DE PRESSE DE PIERRE JOVANOVIC DU 30 MARS AU 2 AVRIL 2015

http://jovanovic.com/blog.htm


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 1 Avr - 01:58 (2015)    Sujet du message: CANADA - QUEBEC : POURQUOI TANT DE FONCTIONNAIRES PARTENT-ILS A LA RETRAITE? Répondre en citant

CANADA - QUEBEC : POURQUOI TANT DE FONCTIONNAIRES PARTENT-ILS A LA RETRAITE?

-----

Informez-vous auprès de votre gouvernement et/ou CARRA, car bientôt, il deviendra difficile d'avoir du service, et/ou vous perdrez des $$$. 55 ans et plus, informez-vous.
Je vous donne l'adresse et les numéros pour CARRA
475 St-Amable, Québec, QC, G1R 5X3
1-800-463-5533, 418-643-4881, 418-644-8659
Enregistrez vos conversations tout en le leur mentionnant. Moi, cela m'a aidé avec CARRA, car ils tentaient de m'en passer une vite.
CARRA ! Pension du gouvernment - Commission de Retraite et d'assurances

-----


Hausse des départs à la retraite

Exclusif - Un nombre grandissant de fonctionnaires québécois choisissent de devancer leur départ à la retraite, notamment par crainte de subir les contrecoups des changements que propose d'apporter le gouvernement du Québec au régime de retraite de ses employés.

Un texte de Jean-Philippe Robillard

En décembre dernier, le président du Conseil du Trésor, Martin Coiteux, annonçait que Québec souhaitait :
  • faire passer l'âge de la retraite de 60 à 62 ans à compter de 2017;
  • changer la façon dont la rente est calculée, en tenant compte du salaire moyen des huit dernières années plutôt que des cinq, comme c'est le cas présentement;
  • augmenter la pénalité pour une retraite anticipée de 4 à 7,2 % par année.
Depuis cette annonce, à la mi-mars 2015, les départs à la retraite dans la fonction publique québécoise ont augmenté de 14 % par rapport à la même période l'an dernier, selon la Commission administrative des régimes de retraite et d'assurances (CARRA).

Ce sont donc 765 personnes de plus que l'an dernier qui ont décidé de quitter l'appareil gouvernemental. La CARRA n'est toutefois pas en mesure de quantifier l'impact de la proposition gouvernementale sur les départs à la retraite.

Après avoir travaillé 30 ans à Revenu Québec, Claudette Breton, 61 ans, a quitté son poste la semaine dernière. « C'est le ministre Coiteux qui m'a poussée à la retraite », lance-t-elle.


  Photo :  ICI Radio-Canada

Mme Breton a pris cette décision après avoir calculé que les changements que propose d'apporter le gouvernement au régime de retraite des employés de l'État seraient désavantageux pour elle.

« Après avoir fait les calculs de mes cinq meilleures années, si le gouvernement fait le calcul sur huit ans plutôt que sur cinq ans, ça me donne 70 $ de moins par mois sur mon montant de retraite. Alors j'ai décidé que ça suffit. Je ne ferai pas rire de moi. J'ai décidé de prendre ma retraite à cause expressément de l'épée de Damoclès qui nous pend sur notre tête. » — Claudette Breton

Après avoir passé 35 ans dans le réseau de la santé, Michelle Chrétien a elle aussi décidé de quitter son poste, tant par crainte que l'on augmente l'âge de la retraite que par peur de se voir imposer une pénalité pour un départ anticipé.

« J'ai 56 ans. Je ne voulais pas prendre ma retraite tout de suite. J'aurais aimé continuer encore jusqu'à 60 ans, et quitter à 60 ans. [...] Mais lorsqu'il a annoncé ça, je me suis dit : "Non, je vais prendre ma retraite avant janvier 2017." Après 35 ans, c'est décevant, très, très décevant », dit-elle.


  Photo :  ICI Radio-Canada

Climat d'inquiétude

La CARRA note également une hausse de près de 10 % des demandes d'information concernant les régimes de retraite. Selon certains, un climat de panique et d'inquiétude régnerait dans les bureaux du gouvernement. Dans certains bureaux syndicaux, tout comme dans certains services des ressources humaines, les téléphones ne cessent de sonner.

« On a remarqué une hausse d'à peu près 200 % du nombre de questions en ce qui a trait à [quelle serait] leur prestation salariale advenant un départ à la retraite avant que le projet du gouvernement soit mis en place. » — Cynthia Pothier, présidente du syndicat des professionnels en soins de l'hôpital Pierre-Boucher

Pas de panique!

Le président du Syndicat des professionnels du gouvernement du Québec, Richard Perron, affirme que son organisation tente de dissuader les fonctionnaires qui veulent partir en raison des changements proposés par le gouvernement Couillard, en rappelant qu'il ne s'agit que d'une stratégie de négociation qui a déjà été utilisée dans le passé.

« On sent qu'il y a plusieurs gens qui paniquent. Plusieurs accélèrent leur projet de retraite. Mais on tente de les convaincre de rester à bord avec nous. La décision leur appartient, il n'y a personne à blâmer là-dedans autre que le gouvernement de vouloir dresser un épouvantail en stratégie de négociation », explique-t-il.

Avec ces changements, le gouvernement du Québec souhaite assurer la pérennité du régime de retraite de ses employés, un régime qui est pourtant en bonne santé financière.

Départ massif sous Lucien Bouchard

En 1997, un programme de retraites accélérées mis en place sous le premier ministre péquiste Lucien Bouchard pour équilibrer les finances avait déclenché une vague de départs à la retraite. Quelque 37 000 personnes avaient alors quitté la fonction publique québécoise.

http://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelles/economie/2015/03/31/002-fonctionnaires…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 1 Avr - 05:15 (2015)    Sujet du message: THE ECONOMIC COLLAPSE IS GETTING CLOSER AND THE U.S. GOV. IS GETTING READY - EPISODE 630 Répondre en citant

THE ECONOMIC COLLAPSE IS GETTING CLOSER AND THE U.S. GOV. IS GETTING READY - EPISODE 630



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KnZFEoiPk0
..


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 2 Avr - 06:10 (2015)    Sujet du message: THE ECONOMIC COLLAPSE IS HAPPENING NOW, IT JUST WASN'T ANNOUNCED YET - EPISODE 631 Répondre en citant

THE ECONOMIC COLLAPSE IS HAPPENING NOW, IT JUST WASN'T ANNOUNCED YET - EPISODE 631



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBUyuGAsmp0


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 3 Avr - 02:33 (2015)    Sujet du message: TREMBLEMENT DE TERRE FINANCIER Répondre en citant

TREMBLEMENT DE TERRE FINANCIER

Vers une destruction complète du dollar américain, de l'euro, etc... Ce que je vois, est une nette transition vers une nouvelle forme de monnaie pour les riches et plus rien pour la classe moyenne et les pauvres. Combien accepteront alors la marque de la bête pour pouvoir survivre? Cela vaut-il la peine de donner son âme au diable, quand on voit le sort qui leur sera réservé, dans ce monde, comme dans le nouveau monde à venir?



Loïc Tassé

Mercredi, 1 avril 2015 15:56 MISE à JOUR Mercredi, 1 avril 2015 15:56

Un petit tremblement de terre secoue les salons feutrés de la finance internationale. La Chine vient de fonder sa propre banque mondiale de développement. Une gifle au pouvoir financier des États-Unis.

Dans le langage de la diplomatie, personne n’utilisera de tels termes. Mais le geste est clair. La nouvelle banque, appelée la Banque asiatique d’infrastructures et d’investissements, devrait bientôt posséder un capital de 100 milliards de dollars et avoir autour de 46 pays membres fondateurs. Les pays qui voulaient y participer avaient jusqu’à mardi pour poser leur candidature.

Des votes très contrôlés

La banque fondée par la Chine entre en compétition avec deux autres banques internationales: la Banque mondiale et la Banque asiatique de développement. Officiellement, les dirigeants américains accueillent avec bienveillance la nouvelle banque. Mais, dans les faits, ils sont inquiets.

La nouvelle Banque asiatique d’infrastructures et d’investissements devrait bientôt posséder un capital de 100 milliards de dollars

Pour bien comprendre, il suffit de jeter un coup d’œil sur les droits de vote dans ces banques. Par exemple, les États-Unis et le Japon disposent chacun d’environ 16 % des votes de la Banque asiatique de développement. La Chine, qui est la plus grande économie du monde, parvient à en contrôler un maigre 7 %. Au total, les États-Unis et leurs alliés détiennent de près de 70 % des votes de la Banque asiatique de développement, pourtant consacrée à l’Asie.

La répartition des votes est particulièrement importante. La Banque asiatique de développement prête à tous les pays asiatiques, dans des secteurs tels que les ressources naturelles, la santé, l’environnement, etc. Or, à travers leurs droits de vote, les États-Unis et leurs alliés imposent diverses conditions de prêt qui peuvent favoriser leurs propres entreprises. Souvent, ces prêts impliquent des privatisations et la promotion des droits de la personne.

Une banque dominée par la Chine

La répartition des droits de vote dans la nouvelle banque, la Banque asiatique d’infrastructures et d’investissements, sera favorable à la Chine et à ses alliés, donc aux entreprises de ces pays. Les droits de la personne ne devraient pas y constituer une priorité. La nouvelle banque devrait puissamment aider la Chine à financer son projet de «route de la soie». Cette route prévoit la construction d’infrastructures de toutes sortes partout dans le monde pour favoriser le commerce chinois.

Ni les États-Unis ni le Japon n’ont posé leur candidature pour se joindre à cette banque. Jusqu’à ces dernières semaines, elle semblait destinée à demeurer très régionale. Or, surprise, dans les derniers jours, la Grande-Bretagne, la France, l’Allemagne, l’Italie, Israël, la Corée du Sud, l’Australie et quelques autres pays ont officiellement demandé à en devenir membres fondateurs.

D’une certaine manière, ces alliés proches des États-Unis sont en train de les lâcher. Et le Canada? Il a raté, volontairement ou non, la date limite de mardi pour soumettre sa candidature.

http://www.journaldemontreal.com/2015/04/01/tremblement-de-terre-financier


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 3 Avr - 03:50 (2015)    Sujet du message: BRICS LEADERSHIP PASSES TO RUSSIA, $100bn DEVELOPMENT BANK ‘MAIN PRIORITY’ Répondre en citant

BRICS LEADERSHIP PASSES TO RUSSIA, $100bn DEVELOPMENT BANK ‘MAIN PRIORITY’

Published time: April 01, 2015 13:21
Edited time: April 02, 2015 09:42


Reuters/Nacho Doce

Tags
BRICS, Banking, Brazil, China, Currencies, Economy, Finance, India, Markets, Putin, Robert Bridge, Russia, Russia and the global economy, Russian economy, South Africa


As Russia assumes the chairmanship of the BRICS business council, the launch of the New Development Bank for its members will begin as an alternative to the US-dominated International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Sergey Katyrin, President of the Russian Chamber of Commerce, took over the chairmanship of a business council of BRICS, an economic association made up of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, on Wednesday.

The seventh summit of BRICS will be held in the southern Russian city of Ufa in July.




Putin signs law on ratification of $100 billion BRICS New Development Bank deal

Last month, Katyrin emphasized that Russia would concentrate its energy on the launch of the BRICS New Development Bank (NDB) in an effort to generate greater cooperation among the five emerging markets.

"The main priority for Russia will definitely be the launch of the BRICS bank. We will do our best to facilitate this process," Katyrin told RIA Novosti in an interview last month.

The bank will finance infrastructure projects in the BRICS countries and across other developing countries, and is expected to start functioning by the end of 2015.

“We hope that the Bank’s head – an Indian citizen - will be approved before the Ufa meeting and the main organizational and personnel decisions will also be taken during our presidency in the second half of 2015,” said Katyrin.

In July 2014, BRICS members gathered for the 6th summit in Fortaleza, Brazil, where they signed an agreement to forge ahead with the $100 billion NDB, which will also possess a reserve currency pool worth over another $100 billion.



Read more
BRICS establish $100bn bank and currency pool to cut out Western dominance

“BRICS Bank will be one of the major multilateral development finance institutions in the world,” Russian President Vladimir Putin predicted at the time of the signing.

Indeed, judging by the proportion of the planet that now falls under the BRICS fold, the economic alliance seems destined to be a powerful force on the global stage.

BRICS represents 42 percent of the world’s population and about 20 percent of the world’s economy based on GDP (30 percent of the world’s GDP based on PPP, a more accurate reading of the real economy). Total trade between the countries stands at around $6.14 trillion, or nearly 17 percent of the world’s total.

According to Russian experts, economic turnover within the BRICS in the last five years has doubled. And, despite the crisis, any serious depreciation is not expected: The growth rate is anticipated to be 5-10 per cent per year.

The creation of the NDB will not be the only major project on the agenda during Russia’s one-year BRICS presidency. Katyrin says there are some 40 projects set for consideration by the five-member group, the most important at present being “in the field of infrastructure."

http://rt.com/business/245905-brics-russia-bank-economy/


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 3 Avr - 04:15 (2015)    Sujet du message: BEIJING WELCOMES TAIPEI'S AIIB APPLICATION; US SIGNALS FLEXIBILITY Répondre en citant

BEIJING WELCOMES TAIPEI'S AIIB APPLICATION; US SIGNALS FLEXIBILITY 


by Staff Writers
Beijing (AFP) April 1, 2015


US ready to accept China-led infrastructure bank: Lew

Washington (AFP) April 1, 2015 - US Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew said Tuesday that Washington was "ready to welcome" the China-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, easing toward the new development institution after the US expressed early concerns.

Lew said in a San Francisco speech just after a trip to Beijing that the United States would embrace any new international development bank providing it "complements" existing institutions like the World Bank and International Monetary Fund.

He also stressed that new institutions needed to "share the international community's strong commitment to genuine multilateral governance and decision making, and ever-improving lending standards and safeguards," according to his prepared speech.

China and 20 other countries signed a memorandum of understanding to establish the Beijing-headquartered bank in October.

Washington, worried about a China-dominated AIIB cutting into the work of the World Bank and Asian Development Bank -- where the US is the leading voice -- at first sought to persuade its allies to hold off from joining the banks.

But in recent weeks most European powers and other leading economies have signed on to the new institution, guaranteeing it a strong capital base and isolating the US position.

That has left washington appearing isolated in not wholeheartedly welcoming Beijing's creation.

Speaking at the northern California chapter of the Asia Society, Lew said he was encouraged that Chinese leaders "made clear that they aspire to meet high standards and welcome partnership."

"Our consistent focus on standards has already had an impact and, as lending begins, the test will be the character of the projects funded and their impact on the people and countries they serve."

If the AIIB works with existing institutions to finance infrastructure projects around Asia, Lew said, it "will help demonstrate a commitment to the highest standards of governance, environmental and social safeguards, and debt-sustainability."

Lew still did not let on if the United States would join the AIIB.

He made clear Washington still supports the mission of the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and other older regional development banks, and is concerned about how Beijing will proceed with a new institution poised somewhat as a rival to those.

"With China's economic growth and emerging focus on driving international development, there is considerable interest in how China will integrate into the framework for international economic relations sustained since World War II, how it will use its new influence, and what ideas and ideals it will promote," Lew said.

"As we engage with China about the right approach to high standards for the international financial system, neither the United States nor China can afford to walk away from the institutions that make up the international economic architecture."


Taiwan is welcome to participate in the Beijing-led Asian Infrastructure Bank (AIIB) if it does so "under an appropriate name", Chinese state media quoted officials as saying Wednesday.

Beijing regards Taiwan as part of its territory and opposes international recognition for the island, often curtailing its involvement in global agreements. The two split in 1949 at the end of the Chinese civil war.

But Taipei on Tuesday issued a letter of intent to join the AIIB, a Beijing initiative seen as a counterweight to the Washington-backed World Bank and the Japanese-led Asian Development Bank (ADB).

"The AIIB is open and inclusive," said Ma Xiaoguang, a spokesman for China's Taiwan Affairs Office, according to Beijing's official Xinhua news agency.

"We welcome Taiwan to participate in the AIIB under an appropriate name," he was quoted as saying.

On Tuesday, Beijing's foreign ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying had appeared to rebuff the application, saying: "As for Taiwan joining, we maintain that we should avoid the 'two Chinas' and 'one China, one Taiwan' situation."

On Wednesday, Premier Mao Chih-kuo told a group of foreign media reporters that Taiwan would like to join the bank if it was not "belittled".

"The caucuses of the ruling and opposition parties in parliament reached an agreement yesterday saying Taiwan would like to apply to join AIIB if Taiwan is not belittled," he said.

"They demanded that the letter of intent be sent straight by the finance ministry to the AIIB preparatory committee, and the next developments would still require supervision of parliament," he added.
Taiwan is not a member of the United Nations, World Bank or International Monetary Fund but it has joined some international organisations under different names.

The International Olympic Committee refers to it as "Chinese Taipei", and it is known as the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu at the World Trade Organization.

It is a member of the ADB under the name "Taipei, China", while officially the government refers to itself as the Republic of China.

Tuesday was the deadline to apply to become one of the $50 billion bank's founding members and 48 countries sought to do so, including Britain, Germany, France and Italy, despite scepticism about the AIIB in Washington and Tokyo.

Last week Beijing's vice finance minister Shi Yaobin said it "welcomes all countries" to join the bank, which it has touted as a tool for financing regional development alongside other lenders such as the World Bank and ADB.

Taipei's plans to join the bank have faced opposition at home. Nearly 300 people gathered outside the Presidential Office late Tuesday to protest against the proposal.

Around 40 protesters linked hands and sat near the entrance to the presidential office, which is a restricted area, and refused to leave. They scuffled with police who tried to remove them and were eventually carried away one by one. No arrests were made.

"The Ma government is completely unwilling to communicate with the people and resolve their concerns, and continues to... sell out Taiwanese people's interests," protest group Black Island Youth Nation Front said.

The group was one of the leaders of the Sunflower Movement that occupied parliament for more than three weeks last year over a trade pact with China.

http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Beijing_welcomes_Taipeis_AIIB_application_X…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 5 Avr - 03:38 (2015)    Sujet du message: GUN RIGHTS VICTORY : KANSAS TO ALLOW CONCEALED CARRY WITHOUT PERMIT OR TRAINING Répondre en citant

GUN RIGHTS VICTORY : KANSAS TO ALLOW CONCEALED CARRY WITHOUT PERMIT OR TRAINING



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RU1uxTljIc

KANSAS TO ALLOW CONCEALED CARRY WITHOUT PERMIT OR TRAINING 

Published time: April 03, 2015 23:11


image from Governor Sam Brownback Facebook page

Kansas Governor Sam Brownback (R) signed a law authorizing the carrying of concealed handguns in the state without a license or a training requirement. When it goes into effect, Kansas will become the fifth state with such a concealed carry law.

“I am pleased to sign Senate Bill 45 bill today. I have been – and continue to be – a strong supporter of Second Amendment rights,” Brownback said Thursday as he signed the bill, flanked by Republican lawmakers and representatives from the National Rifle Association (NRA) and the Kansas State Rifle Association (KSRA).

The bill, known as constitutional carry, was introduced into the state Senate with 26 co-sponsors – five more legislators than necessary to pass the bill, the Wichita Eagle reported. It passed the GOP-led Senate 31-7 in February. One Republican voted against the bill, and two Democrats voted for it. In the state House of Representatives, the bill passed 85-39 at the end of March, with four Democrats supporting it, and 16 Republicans voting against it.

“Responsible gun ownership – for protection and sport – is a right inherent in our Constitution,” he said in a statement. “It is a right that Kansans hold dear and have repeatedly and overwhelmingly reaffirmed a commitment to protecting.”

Four other states have some version of permit-less concealed carry laws on their books – Alaska, Arizona, Vermont and Wyoming – and nine other state legislatures are currently considering similar bills. Montana and Arkansas have concealed carry without a permit, but not everywhere in their states.

In the three states that have adopted permit-less carry laws most similar to that of Kansas, murder rates have gone down, declining by 23 percent in Alaska, 16 percent in Arizona and eight percent in Wyoming, according to the NRA.

Brownback touted the importance of training, explaining that his youngest son took a hunter safety course this past week, the Kansas City Star reported.

“It was an excellent course. He got a lot out of it. I got a lot out of it. And I want to urge people to take advantage of that,” said Brownback.
Training, however, is no longer a requirement to carry a concealed weapon.

“We’re saying that if you want to do that in this state, then you don’t have to get the permission slip from the government,” Brownback said. “It is a constitutional right, and we’re removing a barrier to that right.”

Loren Stanton, president of the Kansas chapter of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, questioned the wisdom of making training voluntary for carrying a concealed weapon.

“There is no way that taking away training can make guns safer,” Stanton told Reuters.

Eight hours of firearms training will still be required for anyone who wants to carry a concealed gun in the 36 states that accept Kansas permits.

Over 90,000 Kansans applied for concealed carry permits under the previous law, which went into effect in January 2007, according to the attorney general’s website.

The new law “does not eliminate our existing concealed carry permit process,” Brownback said in the statement. “It simply removes an administrative process for those Kansans who want a firearm for use within the state.”

The NRA praised the signing of the bill.

"On behalf of the NRA's five-million members, we want to thank Governor Brownback and Senate Majority Leader Terry Bruce for their leadership on this critical issue,” Chris W. Cox, executive director of the National Rifle Association's Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA), said in a statement.

“This new law is a common sense measure that allows law-abiding Kansans to exercise their fundamental right to self-protection in the manner that best suits their needs.”

But not all gun owners in Kansas are happy about the state’s new law. Bill Warren, a movie-theater owner in Wichita who has a concealed-carry permit, told the Kansas City Star he is concerned about the safety impact of people bringing guns who haven’t gone through training.

“My number one priority is the safety of our customers, and after we talk to our security we will make a decision before it’s enacted,” said Warren, who donated and hosted events for Brownback’s gubernatorial campaign. “It makes things for the general population less safe.”

Businesses can still post signs that say concealed weapons are not allowed on their property. Warren said he is likely to prohibit guns in his theaters.

The KSRA spent 10 years lobbying for such a law. The group’s president, Patricia Stoneking, told the Kansas City Star that the inclusion of the previous training requirement encoded in the 2006 law was a result of “political horse trading” to get the bill passed at the time. She said lowering the concealed carry age to 18 from 21 is the next step.

“Eighteen-year-olds are allowed to open carry, and they go to war and put their lives on the line to protect this country,” Stoneking said. “I believe we can lower the age to 18 at some point in the future. I think after everybody sees that there are not going to be any of the dire predictions coming true, and they relax a little bit, then we can talk about that.”

The new concealed carry law will go into effect on July 1.

http://rt.com/usa/246645-kansas-concealed-carry-law-signed/


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 5 Avr - 04:59 (2015)    Sujet du message: TOP SECRET LAW VATICAN JESUITS BANKSTERS TAXES ADMIRALTY COMMON ECCLESIASTICAL LAW ETC 1 of 12 Répondre en citant

TOP SECRET LAW VATICAN JESUITS BANKSTERS TAXES ADMIRALTY COMMON ECCLESIASTICAL LAW ETC 1 of 12

Under phenomenal attacks against the only court in the world that is not controlled by the New World Order. Join the ITCCS.org and fight for your inalienable lawful rights.
http://www.itccs.org/
http://www.iclcj.com/
http://www.hiddennolonger.com/
http://www.kevinannett.com/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvhfX...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPKFk...
http://george-worlddominationconspira...



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8FUov58lG8


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 6 Avr - 03:19 (2015)    Sujet du message: GABBY GIFFORDS’ GUN CONTROL GROUP : FIGHT TERRORISM WITH GUN CONTROL Répondre en citant

GABBY GIFFORDS’ GUN CONTROL GROUP : FIGHT TERRORISM WITH GUN CONTROL



REUTERS/HANS PENNINK

by AWR Hawkins5 Apr 2015

In their ceaseless search for new reasons to push gun control, Gabby Giffords’ gun control group–Americans for Responsible Solutions (ARS)–is now pushing gun control as a way to fight terrorism.

While this is only one of the 10 proposals ARS is currently advocating, it is certainly one of the most egregious inasmuch as it demonstrates Giffords and her husband Mark Kelly will stoop to anything–to include pushing already failed measures–just to get some kind of gun legislation passed.

We have seen this with background checks, which Giffords is actively pushing as way of “stopping violence,” although her attacker–Jared Loughner–passed a background check to acquire the handgun with which he shot her.

And now we see it in the push to fight terrorism with gun control, which is taking place in the wake of recent terror attacks in Europe where Islamists were not hindered in the least by background checks that included not only a criminal checks, but also in-depth psychological checks.

Breitbart News previously reported that the simple act of obtaining a gun in Copenhagen requires a “squeaky-clean background” and extensive knowledge of everything from “gun safety to the mating habits of Denmark’s wildlife.” And in Paris, France where the original psychological check for gun ownership must be followed by yearly check-ins with a doctor in order to keep the gun, terrorists had no problem acquiring the weapons needed to carry out a violent attack against Charlie Hebdo headquarters.

The ease with which terrorists in Copenhagen and Paris acquired firearms caused The Washington Post to report that the example of Europe proved the uselessness of expanded background checks.

Yet Giffords’ group is pushing gun control as way to “make it harder for suspected terrorists to get guns.” They also want new laws on “gun trafficking”–although we already have laws against gun trafficking–and they continue their war on gun shows and internet classified ads for firearms.

As Breitbart News reported when Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) was pushing background checks for internet-based classified ads in 2013, it is a small jump from background checks for internet classified ads to background checks for newspaper-based classified ads.

Remember–gun control does not control criminals or terrorists, it only controls law-abiding citizens who, ironically, are not a threat to begin with.

Follow AWR Hawkins on Twitter @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/04/05/gabby-giffords-gun-contr…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 6 Avr - 06:54 (2015)    Sujet du message: UNION EUROPEENNE : DES LE 1er JANVIER 2016, LE PLUS GROS BRAQUAGE DE L'HISTOIRE POURRA AVOIR LIEU, ET EN TOUTE LEGALITE! (SURTOUT QUE CELA SERA VOS SOUS!!!) Répondre en citant

UNION EUROPEENNE : DES LE 1er JANVIER 2016, LE PLUS GROS BRAQUAGE DE L'HISTOIRE POURRA AVOIR LIEU, ET EN TOUTE LEGALITE! (SURTOUT QUE CELA SERA VOS SOUS!!!)

dimanche 5 avril 2015







Les représentants de l’Union européenne ont décidé de mettre à contribution les épargnants à partir du 1er janvier 2016.

Après la ponction des épargnants chypriotes dans le courant de l’année 2013 et l’idée émise par le FMI d’une supertaxe de 10% sur le patrimoine, l’Europe avait entériné cette même année, la participation des déposants au renflouement des banques en cas de crise grave. L’accord, scellé mercredi 11 décembre 2013 était passé relativement inaperçu, alors qu’il pourrait être d’une importance capitale pour les épargnants.

Ci dessous un extrait de: l’accord conclu sur la directive « renflouement interne des banques » applicable dès le 1er janvier 2016

Bases du renflouement interne

La directive établit un système de renflouement interne garantissant que les contribuables soient les derniers à entrer en ligne de compte pour payer les factures d’une banque en difficulté. Lors d’un renflouement interne, les créanciers, selon une hiérarchie prédéfinie, abandonnent une partie ou l’ensemble de leurs avoirs pour garder la banque à flot. Ce système s’appliquera à partir du 1er janvier 2016.

L’instrument de renflouement interne prévu par la directive contraindrait les actionnaires et les détenteurs d’obligations à encaisser les premiers coups. Les dépôts non garantis (plus de 100 000 euros) seraient touchés en dernier et dans de nombreux cas après l’intervention du fonds de résolution financé par la banque et du système national de garantie de dépôt du pays où se trouve la banque, dans le but de stabiliser la banque. Les plus petits déposants seraient dans tous les cas explicitement exclus du renflouement interne.

Ne soyez pas naïf: Le fait dans un premier temps d’émettre l’idée puis de le décider……C’est l’autoriser !

– Vous trouverez en bas de l’article l’accord complet

Philippe Herlin:  » Je ne crois pas que les patrimoines de moins de 100 000 € soient exemptés  »

http://spread-the-truth777.blogspot.fr/2015/04/des-le-1er-janvier-2016-le-p…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 6 Avr - 08:11 (2015)    Sujet du message: CARDINAL PIETRO PAROLIN ON POPE'S VISION ON ECONOMY, CORRUPTION, SUMMIT OF AMERICAS Répondre en citant

CARDINAL PIETRO PAROLIN ON POPE'S VISION ON ECONOMY, CORRUPTION, SUMMIT OF AMERICAS

 
In ZENIT Interview, Discusses Mexican Migration Into US, an 'Approaching' of US-Cuban Relations

Vatican City, April 01, 2015 (Zenit.org) Deborah Castellano Lubov 

The Vatican Secretary of State says the Holy See has been attentive to the issue of many Mexicans immigrating into the United States, and has underscored that this is likely one of the key topics to be discussed at next month's Summit of the Americas.

Answering several questions by ZENIT and other journalists, Cardinal Pietro Parolin not only speaks on the significance of the Summit of Americas, in which US President Barack Obama, the political leaders of Cuba, Venezuela, other American nations, and--marking a first--the Vatican's highest political official, Cardinal Parolin, will participate, but also what this means for relations among these nations.

The Holy See's top diplomat also explains what the Pope really means when he speaks about an economy 'at the service of man,' what institutions must do to live up to Francis' standard, and what the Holy See is doing to address the challenge of Mexican migration into the United States, especially the affected children.

Moreover, Cardinal Parolin addresses the Pope's criticism of corruption and reveals what this means on a practical level for those trying to live honest lives in the workplace or at home.

***

ZENIT: For the first time in history the Holy See will be present at the Summit of Americas. Could you speak about your hopes and expectations for this hemispheric gathering and why it’s important, especially in light of participation with the nations of Cuba, Venezuela?

Cardinal Parolin: Of course. The summit of the Americas is important because for the first time all the nations and countries of America are participating. This movement of approaching between the United States and Cuba is significant. It is an occasion for the continents to grow and to form a greater basis for having greater roles and collaboration.

ZENIT: On a different, but somewhat connected note, at what point would the Holy See consider getting involved with the issue of migrants coming into the United States from Mexico?

Cardinal Parolin: We are participating in this. I was in Mexico last year to attend a seminar on migration in Mexico. I really think that from that time, we are really thinking about this topic, especially migration of children.

I think it was a very important moment, or achievement rather, because all the nations, the participants, were equally interested in establishing an economic collaboration among themselves, just to present to us this problem.

I think this was very promising. It really was a rather promising seminar. Well, granted I don’t exactly know the agenda, the program, of the upcoming [[color=#ff0000]Summit of the Americas[/color]], but I believe or would imagine migration would be one of the subjects. I believe the work of the summit would focus on this.

Q: The Pope always speaks about an economy at the service of man. What does that mean?

Cardinal Parolin: It is exactly this. For the Pope, also economic activity should be put at the service of human dignity and of the growth of man. This, therefore, implies the great need to give particular attention to man, especially for those who are the most weak and vulnerable, for the poor. Therefore, an economy 'at the service,' not an economy that dominates, that imposes itself, but an economy that becomes really an instrument of growth personally and for the community. [This] is what he is referring to.

Q: What must the institutions do or do more of to combat this economy of exclusion?

Cardinal Parolin: The institutions must have an ethical approach to the economy, not merely economic and financial, where the criteria of profits prevail, but rather must have an ethical approach. I return to my discourse from before. There's an approach in which in finance and economy that one admits a helping or being oriented toward the people.

And eventually also the Pope will underline that the poor must have a good commitment, in this sense, to collaborate, because the economy can become truly an economy for man.

Q: It is common knowledge that in Italy, including in politics, there has been some corruption. The Pope has said this, most recently in his visit to Napoli on March 21, in condemning a corruption "that stinks." In the Italian Senate and Parliament there has been discussion over a law against corruption. With such possible appeals to responsibility, can they be of value for trying to fight against today’s corruption?

Cardinal Parolin: I think the president of the Senate, Pietro Grasso [president of the Italian Senate, also speaking at the Lime’s sponsored panel on ‘[color=#ff0000]Money and Empire’ in Rome[/color]][/color] spoke exactly to the point of the necessity of being responsible. And therefore this invitation from the Pope was directed at all and directed also to these phenomenons, to the people, the phenomenons that interest Italy. So, yes, ‘Yes,’ is the response.

(April 01, 2015) © Innovative Media Inc.

http://www.zenit.org/en/articles/cardinal-pietro-parolin-on-pope-s-vision-o…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 7 Avr - 01:15 (2015)    Sujet du message: LA GRECE N'OBTIENT AUCUNE INDULGENCE DU FMI Répondre en citant

LA GRECE N'OBTIENT AUCUNE INDULGENCE DU FMI 

VIDÉO - Après la rencontre entre Yanis Varoufakis et Christine Lagarde, à Washington, la Grèce promet de rembourser les 450 millions d'euros dus au FMI, jeudi 9 avril.

De notre correspondant à Washington

La Grèce remboursera bien sa dette au FMI, de 494 millions de dollars - 450 millions d'euros - en temps et en heure, jeudi 9 avril, en numéraire et non sous forme d'obligations comme le laissaient croire certains à Athènes. Au terme d'une visite de dernière minute à Washington au Fonds Monétaire International (FMI) le jour de Pâques, Yanis Varoufakis a proclamé que la Grèce «a l'intention d'honorer tous ses engagements ad infinitum».

Son entretien extraordinaire avec Christine Lagarde lui a peut-être ouvert les yeux sur l'extrême urgence d'aboutir à un accord sur des réformes économiques radicales avec le FMI, les pays de la zone euro et la Banque Centrale Européenne. On pouvait conclure du chaud et froid sans cesse soufflé par le gouvernement grec que l'option d'un défaut partiel de paiement au FMI faisait partie des options qu'il envisageait.

L'institution monétaire tient à préserver son statut de créancier privilégié, clé de voute du système monétaire international. À ce titre elle ne saurait renoncer à ses créances. Les rares cas d'arriérés de paiement avec le FMI concernent des pays devenus immédiatement parias du monde de la finance, car déchirés par des crises gravissimes, comme l'Afghanistan, le Zimbabwe et Haiti.

Ambiguïtés dissipées

La Directrice générale du FMI a publié un communiqué visant également à dissiper les ambiguïtés distillées par Athènes: «Le ministre Varoufakis et moi-même avons échangé nos vues sur les développements actuels et nous sommes tombés d'accord sur le fait que la coopération est dans l'intérêt de tous. Nous avons noté que la poursuite de l'incertitude n'est pas dans l'intérêt de la Grèce et j'ai bien accueilli la confirmation par le ministre que le paiement dû au Fonds serait effectué le 9 avril».

Christine Lagarde espère avoir convaincu son interlocuteur de la nécessité de ne plus perdre de temps dans ses négociations avec le FMI, l'Eurogroupe et la BCE: «J'ai exprimé mes remerciements au ministre pour son engagement à améliorer la capacité des équipes techniques à travailler avec les autorités (...) à Athènes et à renforcer les discussions politiques avec les équipes à Bruxelles qui doivent reprendre promptement lundi» a précisé la Directrice générale.

Yanis Varoufakis a promis on gouvernement entendait «réformer la Grèce profondément» et chercherait à améliorer «l'efficacité des négociations» avec ses créanciers. Ces derniers continuent de conditionner toute nouvelle aide à la Grèce à un accord dans les prochains jours sur un paquet de réformes économiques difficiles à accepter par le gouvernement d'extrême gauche en place depuis janvier à Athènes. Le ministre des finances sera par ailleurs reçu tout à l'heure à Washington au Trésor, par son homologue américain, Jack Lew.

http://www.lefigaro.fr/conjoncture/2015/04/06/20002-20150406ARTFIG00026-la-…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 7 Avr - 01:19 (2015)    Sujet du message: ATHENES RECLAME 279 MILLIARDS D'EUROS A L'ALLEMAGNE Répondre en citant

ATHENES RECLAME 279 MILLIARDS D'EUROS A L'ALLEMAGNE


AFP
Reuters

Lundi, 6 avril 2015 16:34 MISE à JOUR Lundi, 6 avril 2015 16:42

ATHÈNES | L'Allemagne doit près de 279 milliards d'euros à la Grèce en réparations de guerre à la suite de l'occupation du pays par l'armée allemande entre 1941 et 1944, a déclaré lundi le vice-ministre grec des Finances, Dimitris Mardas.

Devant une commission parlementaire, il a avancé le chiffre de 278,7 milliards d'euros, en se fondant sur les calculs de la cour des comptes grecque.

Une commission parlementaire mise en place par le premier ministre Alexis Tsipras pour s'occuper de ce dossier a commencé ses travaux mercredi dernier.

Berlin a rejeté à plusieurs reprises ces dernières semaines les demandes du nouveau gouvernement grec dirigé par le parti de la gauche radicale Syriza, affirmant que la question des réparations avait été réglée une fois pour toutes.

La commission parlementaire travaille aussi sur le remboursement d'un «prêt d'occupation» que la Banque de Grèce avait été forcée d'accorder à l'Allemagne pendant la guerre et sur la restitution de trésors archéologiques.

A la mi-mars, le ministre grec de la Justice Nikos Paraskevopoulos s'était déclaré prêt à appliquer une décision de la Cour suprême datant d'il y a 15 ans, autorisant la Grèce à confisquer des biens allemands pour verser des indemnités aux descendants des victimes d'un massacre commis par des Waffen SS en juin 1944 dans le village de Distomo.

Lors de sa visite à Berlin le 23 mars, Alexis Tsipras a adopté un ton plus modéré mais la hache de guerre n'a pas été enterrée.

Alexis Tsipras accuse l'Allemagne d'avoir eu recours à des artifices juridiques afin de ne pas verser de réparations de guerre à Athènes.

«Après la réunification de l'Allemagne en 1990, les conditions juridiques et politiques étaient réunies pour régler cette question. Mais, depuis, tous les gouvernements allemands ont choisi le silence et les artifices juridiques, et traîné les pieds», a affirmé le Premier ministre le mois dernier lors d'un débat au Parlement.

Le chef de la diplomatie allemande, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, a déclaré que son pays était tout à fait conscient de sa responsabilité morale et politique dans les «terribles événements» survenus en Grèce pendant la guerre mais a affirmé que le dossier des réparations était définitivement réglé, l'Allemagne ayant versé 115 millions de Deutsche Mark (60 millions d'euros) en 1960 à la Grèce.

http://www.journaldemontreal.com/2015/04/06/athenes-reclame-279-milliards-d…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 7 Avr - 02:07 (2015)    Sujet du message: OBAMA SIGNS ONTO 20% MILITARY RETIREMENT PAY CUT Répondre en citant

OBAMA SIGNS ONTO 20% MILITARY RETIREMENT PAY CUT



President Obama stated Monday that he would support a 20% pay reduction for retiring military personnel as well as redefining benefits for those that leave before achieving 20 year of service. So it’s only a matter of time before these recommendations are realized.

Obama has been greatly cutting down our military personnel for natural born citizens while simultaneously hiring illegal immigrants. He has also been ending highly successful military programs and allowing different compnents the military to simply degrade, prompting the Washington Times to state that Obama has our decimated our military, leaving the US only ‘marginally able’ to defend itself.

Citation:

In a letter to congressional leaders, Mr. Obama said the proposals are “an important step forward in protecting the long-term viability of the all-volunteer force, improving quality-of-life for service members and their families, and ensuring the fiscal sustainability of the military compensation and retirement systems.”

Mr. Obama said he has directed his advisers to refine some recommendations, and that the White House will report to Congress on any proposed changes by April 30.

Under the recommendations, the plan would continue to offer full retirement benefits to anyone who has served 20 years or more.

The Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission issued a report in January report calling for shrinking the size of traditional military retirement pay by about 20 percent and offering a defined-contribution benefit for troops who separate before 20 years of service. Lawmakers of both parties raised sharp questions about the panel’s stated belief that the changes will satisfy service members while also saving money for the Treasury.

The commission’s proposal include decreasing the “multiplier” that the Pentagon uses to calculate traditional retirement pensions from 2.5 to 2.0, lowering the initial value of retirement checks by 20 percent.

Under the new plan, the Defense Department also would contribute up to 6 percent of basic pay into individual troops’ retirement savings accounts. The Pentagon already contributes 1 percent automatically, and the added contribution would go to all troops who serve more than two years, whether or not they chose to separate before 20 years of service.


Source: washingtontimes.com Photo: DVIDSHUB

https://flic.kr/p/8YR5Wrhttp://www.truthandaction.org/obama-signs-onto-20-military-retirement-pay-cut/comment-page-66/#comment-1129810


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 12 Avr - 05:58 (2015)    Sujet du message: UNION EUROPEENNE : CRISE : MON EPARGNE EN DANGER ! DELAMARCHE-BERRUYER-HERLIN-LECOQ VALLON-FERON POLONI Répondre en citant

UNION EUROPEENNE : CRISE : MON EPARGNE EN DANGER ! DELAMARCHE-BERRUYER-HERLIN-LECOQ VALLON-FERON POLONI



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXruQqAOgWA#t=1305

UNION EUROPEENNE : CRISE : MON EPARGNE EN DANGER ! DEBAT : DELAMARCHE-HERLIN-LECOQ VALLON-FERON POLONI



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aK34rjRCU-o#t=2512


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 17 Avr - 01:40 (2015)    Sujet du message: SHOCKING DECLARATION BY OBAMA AND WORLD LEADERS / YOUR BANK ACCOUNT ISN'T YOURS Répondre en citant

SHOCKING DECLARATION BY OBAMA AND WORLD LEADERS / YOUR BANK ACCOUNT ISN'T YOURS 




Get ready in the near future to pay the bank a fee, and the government a tax, just for the honor of having a high-risk bank account that pays you nothing.

Craig R. Smith and Lowell Ponte April 14, 2015 at 11:41am

This article is sponsored by one of our valued partners, Swiss America.

4.14.15 – Last November in Brisbane, Australia, President Obama agreed with G-20 global economic leaders that you no longer own your bank accounts. The United States now regards your bank account as an asset that, in effect, belongs to your bank and can be seized by the government to pay bank debts and obligations.

As we document in Don’t Bank On It! The Unsafe World of 21st Century Banking, the bank we used to trust to safeguard our money has become one of the riskiest places to put it.

A precedent was set for seizing bank accounts under the “bail in” doctrine in Cyprus, where people awoke one March 2013 morning to find their banks locked and ATM access to their accounts shut down. President Obama has embraced such bail ins.

Now, we have a similar new legal precedent being set in Australia for taxing your bank accounts….for your protection, of course. America might quickly adopt this, too.

A circular cage is being built through which you will be taxed when you earn your money, spend your money, invest your money, and possibly (very soon) save your money.

You are already losing money every day that you have a bank account paying less in interest than you are losing to inflation, a deceptive form of taxation.

Get ready in the near future to pay the bank a fee, and the government a tax, just for the honor of having a high-risk bank account that pays you nothing.

Taxing Bank Deposits

Near-zero bank interest has meant near-zero taxes on our savings – until now.

A new political scheme to tax bank accounts, according to the Australian Financial Review, might be locked in place in Australian banks as soon as January 1, 2016. [1-4] This could quickly be copied by other tax-hungry welfare states, including ours.

This bank deposit tax will likely begin at a low percentage, to create a legal precedent; but it is expected to grow rapidly, as the income tax did in the United States.

Like many modern taxes, this planned tax on bank accounts is being framed as a tax on the banks, not on individual customers. Its cost, however, will be passed on to depositors in the form of higher fees or lower interest paid on their accounts.

This tax on bank deposits is projected from its start to raise around $500 million each year, purportedly for a “Financial Stabilization Fund” to help protect banks from collapse in future financial crises.

In the United States, such designated taxes are often diverted to fund other politician wishes. Hundreds of billions in gasoline taxes went to the Highway Trust Fund, then was shifted elsewhere by the same politicians who complain that “our highway infrastructure urgently needs more spending.” Such politicians even looted $2.66 trillion from the Social Security trust fund, leaving behind only I.O.U.s that must be paid for with ever-heavier taxes on future generations or the denial of benefits to today’s older generations.

Truth be told, our spendaholic politicians loot whatever pools of public or private money they can grab to pay for their out-of-control spending addiction.

Escaping the Cage

In Washington, D.C., politicians now talk enthusiastically about imposing a national European-style sales tax, an easily-increased Value-Added Tax (VAT) to soak both companies and consumers.

If you invest what little money you have left after paying all your other taxes, get ready to pay capital gains taxes, which the current Administration aims to increase.

One thing Americans could do tax-free was to save their remaining money in the bank….but not for much longer, as we explain in our latest book, Don’t Bank On It!.

We owe taxes on interest the bank pays us, of course; but nowadays, banks pay almost zero – the result of a deliberate Federal Reserve policy that economists call “financial repression,” being used to herd Americans into riskier investments such as stocks.

Our banks may soon be imitating Europe, where savers are beginning to be paid less than zero – “negative interest rates” – on their accounts. Depositors instead have to pay their bank for the honor of lending it their money, interest-free.

On November 16, 2014, President Barack Obama at the Brisbane, Australia meeting of the G-20 global economic powers agreed to a new financial doctrine called the “bail in.” We explained and documented in detail what happened there in a free After The G20 White Paper.

In October 2014, Americans were shocked to read The New York Times investigation “Law Lets I.R.S. Seize Accounts on Suspicion, No Crime Required,” using a law that lets government confiscate the bank accounts of those who deposit or withdraw even relatively small amounts of cash.

This is enough under today’s law for the Internal Revenue Service to expropriate someone’s bank account, based merely on their using cash as criminals might do, even if no actual crime has been committed. This is just another sinister way government could confiscate your bank accounts in the future.

Is it any wonder why so many people are turning to smarter, safer, and more secure ways of protecting their money?

We were taught that thrift is good, but real thrift now means freeing your savings from today’s banks. Don’t Bank On It! and our newest free White Paper The Biggest Bank Heist In History will show you how to escape the tax cage being built by politicians to snare you and your hard-earned money.

Sources:

[1]Tyler Durden, “Australia Wants To Tax Bank Deposits: Will The U.S. Follow?” Zerohedge.com, April 2, 2015. URL: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-02/australia-wants-tax-bank-deposits-…

[2]Phillip Coorey, Lisa Murray and James Eyers, “Tax on Bank Deposits in Federal Budget,” Australian Financial Review, March 28, 2015. URL: http://www.afr.com/news/politics/tax-on-bank-deposits-in-federal-budget-201…

[3]Australian Associated Press, “Tony Abbott Accused of Breaking Pledge Over Report of Bank Deposit Levy,” The Guardian (U.K.), March 28, 2015. URL: http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/mar/28/tony-abbott-accused-o…
[4]Stephen Bartholomeusz, “The Problem with Joe Hockey’s Bank Deposit Tax,” The Australian, March 30, 2015. URL: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/the-problem-with-joe-hocke…

http://www.westernjournalism.com/governments-next-tax-target-your-bank-acco…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 17 Avr - 01:45 (2015)    Sujet du message: REVUE DE PRESSE DE PIERRE JOVANOVIC DU 13 AU 17 AVRIL 2015 Répondre en citant

REVUE DE PRESSE DE PIERRE JOVANOVIC DU 13 AU 17 AVRIL 2015

http://jovanovic.com/blog.htm




Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 17 Avr - 06:00 (2015)    Sujet du message: COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD ARE NOW DUMPING THE PETRODOLLAR - EPISODE 643 Répondre en citant

COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD ARE NOW DUMPING THE PETRODOLLAR - EPISODE 643



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezO1Q3fouIY


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 18 Avr - 03:12 (2015)    Sujet du message: KEVIN ANNETT : POPE BERGOGLIO MEETS SECRETLY AT EU PARLIAMENT CAPITAL WITH RUSSIAN, DUTCH DIPLOMATS ON BRICS BANK & DUTCH QUEEN COVERUP Répondre en citant

KEVIN ANNETT : POPE BERGOGLIO MEETS SECRETLY AT EU PARLIAMENT CAPITAL WITH RUSSIAN, DUTCH DIPLOMATS ON BRICS BANK & DUTCH QUEEN COVERUP 

Sunday, November 30, 2014

Kevin Annett: Pope Bergoglio meets secretly at EU Parliament capital with Russian, Dutch diplomats on BRICS bank & Dutch Queen coverup

By Alfred Lambremont Webre



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ym1YDD9RceU

VANCOUVER, BC – Kevin Annett, North American field secretary of the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS.ORG) has revealed that Pope Francis Bergoglio on Nov. 25, 2014 met secretly in Strasbourg, France, the seat of the European Parliament, with Russian and Dutch diplomats. The Alitalia plane on which the Pope traveled returned to Rome within four hours of its departure.

Vatican funding BRICS; Pope Bergoglio take secret $500,000 payment to certify Argentine crony daughter as future Dutch Queen

According to Kevin Annett, the Pope’s meeting Russian diplomats was in furtherance of arrangements through Deutsche Bank of the Vatican’s financial contribution to the BRICS central bank, of which Russia, under Vladimir Putin, is a central founder. The Pope’s meeting with Dutch diplomats may have been in furtherance of the Pope’s having provided credentials for Dutch Queen Maxima when she was the Argentine Máxima Zorreguieta Cerruti, whose father was a Minister in the military Junta and an associate of then Jesuit Archbishop of Buenos Aires Jorge Bergoglio. According to ITCCS witnesses, Pope Francis Bergoglio was paid a $500,000 secret personal fee in order to certify Maxima as free to marry the heir to the Dutch throne Willem-Alexander.

On July 18, 2014, In the Matter of The People v. Bergoglio et al (Case Docket No. 18072014-002), Pope Francis [Jorge Mario Bergoglio] and other defendants were found guilty by the International Common Law Court of Justice in Brussels “of aiding and abetting Crimes against Humanity, including murder and human trafficking, and of personal involvement in those crimes. Their guilt has been ably presented and proven beyond any reasonable doubt by the Prosecution.”[1]

RCMP issued stand-down order at Kinder-Morgan oil pipeline

In his interview, Kevin Annett stated that Common Law Sheriffs of the ITCCS.ORG would be issuing and enforcing stand-down orders against Royal Canadian Mounted Police deployed at the site of the proposed Kinder-Morgan oil pipeline project to take Alberta tar sands oil to China. The pipeline, opposed by First Nation and community groups on environmental grounds, is now guarded by RCMP detachments.

Today, ITCCS stand-down orders have been issued against RCMP by the Vancouver-based West Coast Common Law Court of Justice “in the wake of illegal arrests and violent ‘gestapo tactics’ by RCMP officers against peaceful protestors opposing the desecration of forests on Burnaby mountain by the Kinder-Morgan corporation.”

Copies of the Stand Down Order were given to RCMP officers today and delivered to the RCMP Superintendent in Ottawa by Court appointed Peace Officers.

Canada: Cabinet Minister Denis Lebel, 12 Mile Club in ritual child sacrifices

Kevin Annett reported that Pope Francis Bergoglio may be shuffling the newly consecrated Cardinal Francois LeCroix of Montreal. The ITCCS.ORG revealed in Oct. 2014 that Canadian Harper government Cabinet minister and Cardinal LeCroix had participated in a February 22, 2014 secret ritual sacrifice of a young boy in a church next to the Jesuit headquarters on Borgio Santi Spiritu in Rome.[2]

Mr. Annett also revealed the identity of British Columbia Judge Paul Leask as involved in concealing ritual sacrifices and sexual activity at Vancouver, BC’s prestigious Vancouver Club and through the so-called “12 Mile Club”. As revealed by ITCCS.ORG last week, whistleblower employees at local yacht basins confirmed that ritual sacrifices of children are now taking place aboard yachts outside the 12-mile territorial limit of Canada.[3]

Citizen’s War Crimes Tribunal to prosecute Transhumanist Agenda

Kevin Annett announced during the interview that he would be joining a Transhumanist Agenda War Crimes Tribunalannounced on Nov. 20, 2014 at the Covert Harassment Conference in Brussels. The mission of the Citizen’s Tribunal is to prosecute, try, adjudicate, sentence, and enforce against perpetrators at all levels in the Transhumanist Agenda including the use of new physics torture and mind control/robotization weapons; the use of mind-control technologies in any and all human settings; and the robotization of humans.

Kevin Annett will be a Judge on the War Crimes Tribunal, along with Alfred Lambremont Webre, former Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal.

Former Belgian Parliament MP Laurent Louis has agreed to serve as Prosecutor for the Tribunal.[4]

Kevin Annett announced the new contact for ITCCS.ORG as itccsoffice@gmail.com ITCCS website is www.itccs.org

Posted by ITCCS Australia at 10:22 AM


http://george-worlddominationconspirators.blogspot.fr/2014/11/kevin-annett-…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 21 Avr - 05:21 (2015)    Sujet du message: LA REVUE DE PRESSE DE PIERRE JOVANOVIC DU 20 AU 24 AVRIL 2015 Répondre en citant

LA REVUE DE PRESSE DE PIERRE JOVANOVIC DU 20 AU 24 AVRIL 2015

http://www.jovanovic.com/blog.htm




Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 22 Avr - 07:23 (2015)    Sujet du message: "CHOKE POINT" HEARINGS YIELD PREDICTABLE RESPONSES FROM FDIC CHAIRMAN Répondre en citant

"CHOKE POINT" HEARINGS YIELD PREDICTABLE RESPONSES FROM FDIC CHAIRMAN
 

3:00pm Tuesday, April 14, 2015

Last year, we began reporting on the Obama administration’s "Operation Choke Point" and the use of federal financial services regulators to harass and intimidate banks and financial service providers who maintain relationships with legal but so-called "high risk" merchants or businesses. By leaning on the banks, the regulators hope to cause them to sever relationships with these businesses, thereby choking off their cash flow and forcing them out of the market.

These businesses include retailers of firearms and ammunition, a number of which have found their banking relationships abruptly severed with little or no explanation and without reference to anything the individual businesses did or did not do.  Earlier this year, a congressional report based on examination of nearly 900 internal DOJ documents found that the operation's adverse effect on legitimate businesses was not merely an unintended side-effect but the outcome of a deliberate attempt to target entire business sectors that, while legal, were deemed objectionable by regulators.

One of the main federal entities being used to "choke" firearm businesses is the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).  The FDIC was created during the New Deal in 1933 to guarantee the security of bank deposits, and has extensive supervisory and examination authority over banks and the many federal laws that banks must follow.

As we reported last October, a coalition of congressional representatives led by Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer  (R-Mo.) had requested internal investigators at the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to conduct formal inquiries into Operation Choke Point, as well as any officials and staff involved in the program.

On March 24, 2015, the Committee on Financial Services’ Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee held a hearing entitled “The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s Role in Operation Choke Point” where the sole witness was the Honorable Martin J. Gruenberg, Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 

U.S. Rep. Sean Duffy (R-Wis.), Chairman of the Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee, asked a series of probing questions and referenced multiple supporting FDIC documents revealing that ammunition and firearm sales and dealers had, in fact, been targeted. 

“The bottom line is, you’re putting innocent people out of business and all of the people at the FDIC who are implementing this program still work there. They haven’t been fired and they haven’t been reprimanded,” Rep. Duffy said.  “These folks have no place in government – and if you allow them to stay - you have no place in government,” Duffy concluded.

Several other members, including Rep. Luetkemeyer, asked questions pertaining to Operation Choke Point as a whole. 

Unfortunately, though predictably, Gruenberg's responses were vague and non-committal, and displayed a disregard for the law-abiding businesses that are being forced out of existence due to their loss of financial support from banking institutions.  The FDIC has clearly exerted pressure on financial institutions to cease relationships with what the FDIC deems as “prohibitive businesses.”

This is another clear example of overreach, by another Obama appointee, intended to curtail the Second Amendment.

In order to fight such abuse, Rep. Luetkemeyer has re-introduced NRA-supported H.R. 766--the “Financial Institution Customer Protection Act”. This legislation would institute numerous reforms to bring more transparency and accountability to federal oversight of banks; all aimed at preventing the sort of unchecked abuse of discretion at the heart of Operation Choke Point.

Please contact your U.S. Representative and ask him or her to SUPPORT H.R. 766

You can contact your U.S. Representative by using our "Write Your Lawmakers" tool, or by phone at (202) 224-3121.

http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/choke-point-hearings-yield-predictable-respo…


Revenir en haut
Contenu Sponsorisé






MessagePosté le: Aujourd’hui à 04:52 (2016)    Sujet du message: DÉSARMEMENT ET ÉCONOMIE (PARTIE 2)

Revenir en haut
Montrer les messages depuis:   
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> ORGANISATION DES NATIONS-UNIES/UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION -> DÉSARMEMENT ET ÉCONOMIE (PARTIE 2) Toutes les heures sont au format GMT + 2 Heures
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 335, 36, 3747, 48, 49  >
Page 36 sur 49

 
Sauter vers:  

Portail | Index | Creer un forum | Forum gratuit d’entraide | Annuaire des forums gratuits | Signaler une violation | Conditions générales d'utilisation
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Traduction par : phpBB-fr.com