LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum

LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1)
...

 FAQFAQ   RechercherRechercher   MembresMembres   GroupesGroupes   S’enregistrerS’enregistrer 
 ProfilProfil   Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés   ConnexionConnexion 

CAMPAGNE DE VACCINATION (PARTIE 2)
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  >
 
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> LA RELIGION MONDIALE ET L'ONU : SES VUES ET AGENDA SUR LE TRANSHUMANISME, CLONAGE, AGENDA DE DÉPOPULATION -> CAMPAGNE DE VACCINATION -VACCINATION CAMPAIGN (PARTIE 2)
Sujet précédent :: Sujet suivant  
Auteur Message
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 2 Avr - 03:39 (2015)    Sujet du message: PM HARPER AND BILL GATES RENEW CALL TO ADVANCE GLOBAL MATERNAL, NEWBORN AND CHILD HEALTH PRIORITY Répondre en citant

PM HARPER AND BILL GATES RENEW CALL TO ADVANCE GLOBAL MATERNAL, NEWBORN AND CHILD HEALTH PRIORITY
 

Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Bill Gates renew the call for focused global political leadership and sustained financial commitments to ensure that maternal, newborn and child health remains a global development priority as the world moves beyond 2015 during a moderated discussion.

Ottawa, Ontario

25 February 2015

Introduction

Prime Minister Stephen Harper today met with Bill Gates in Ottawa to discuss how to further leverage the strong leadership that Canada has demonstrated in promoting  maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) in order to ensure that it remains a global development priority and a prominent feature of the global post-2015 development agenda. They were joined by Christian Paradis, Minister of International Development and Minister for La Francophonie, as well as global health leaders representing Canadian and international organizations that are committed to advancing significant progress and achieving results on MNCH.

While tremendous progress has been made to save the lives of the world’s most vulnerable citizens – women and children – much work remains to be done. To this end, the Prime Minister and Mr. Gates together renewed the call for focused global political leadership and sustained financial commitments to ensure that MNCH remains a central development priority as the world moves beyond 2015.

The Prime Minister also reaffirmed Canada’s commitment to support immunization as a key pillar of Canada’s MNCH strategy by announcing new investments toward improving access to vaccines for mothers and children. These investments are aimed at eradicating polio and eliminating tetanus, as well as providing support to 20 implementation research teams, made up of African and Canadian researchers, who will contribute to improving maternal and child health in Africa.

During a moderated discussion, the Prime Minister and Mr. Gates discussed the unprecedented global progress that has taken place since the establishment of the United Nations’ Millennium Development Goals in 2000. Fifteen years later, the world stands on the verge of ending the preventable deaths of mothers and children under five within a generation, in large part due to the leadership and commitment of international partners such as the Government of Canada and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Quick Facts
  • Canada and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation have a long history of successful collaboration in support of international development. In June 2010, under Prime Minister Harper’s leadership, world leaders launched the Muskoka Initiative on Maternal, Newborn and Child Health, which focused on saving the lives of mothers, newborns and children under the age of five in developing countries.
  • During the Saving Every Woman, Every Child: Within Arm’s Reach Summit in May 2014, Canada committed to support MNCH between 2015 and 2020, creating renewed global momentum to advance MNCH as a global priority and prioritized Canada’s commitment to three areas: strengthening of health systems, improving nutrition, and reducing the burden of leading diseases.
  • Canada’s commitment aims to tackle emerging challenges, by providing greater emphasis on nutrition and better reaching children in the fragile first month of life, stepping up immunization efforts and building civil registration and vital statistics systems.
  • Canada is a proud supporter of immunization programming to ensure that every child has access to important life-saving vaccines. This includes commitments made at the 2013 Global Vaccine Summit towards the eradication of polio, which the polio “endgame strategy” expects to achieve by 2018.
  • In May 2014, the Government of Canada also launched the Innovating for Maternal and Child Health in Africa program, a partnership between Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada, the International Development Research Centre and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
  • The lives of more than five million mothers and children have been saved in developing countries since 2010 due in large part to the global effort to improve maternal, newborn and child health.
Quote

“Canada’s top development priority remains eliminating the preventable deaths of mothers, newborns and children in developing countries. While significant progress has been made, more can and must be done to sustain the momentum and end these preventable deaths within our lifetime. Our Government and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation have been steadfast partners in championing this cause, and remain committed to ensuring that all women and children can live healthy and productive lives. Together, we will continue to call on the international community to renew their commitment and support to ensure our global efforts remain focused on eliminating preventable maternal and child deaths.” – Prime Minister Stephen Harper

Related Product

Associated Links

http://pm.gc.ca/node/38249


Revenir en haut
Publicité






MessagePosté le: Jeu 2 Avr - 03:39 (2015)    Sujet du message: Publicité

PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?
Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 13 Avr - 05:30 (2015)    Sujet du message: BIENTÔT PLUS D'ALLOCATIONS SANS VACCINATION EN AUSTRALIE Répondre en citant

BIENTÔT PLUS D'ALLOCATIONS SANS VACCINATION EN AUSTRALIE 

Le Monde | 12.04.2015 à 07h58



Le premier ministre (conservateur) australien, Tony Abbott, a prévenu dimanche 12 avril que les parents qui refuseraient de faire vacciner leurs enfants seraient privés de certaines allocations familiales : « Pas de piqûre, pas d'argent », a-t-il déclaré.


Dans certains pays européens et aux Etats-Unis, des maladies qui avaient disparu comme la rougeole ont fait leur réapparition, notamment en raison des parents de plus en plus nombreux qui s'opposent à la vaccination, la jugeant dangereuse pour leurs enfants. Actuellement, ces-derniers peuvent faire valoir une clause « d'objection de conscience » tout en continuant de percevoir une série d'allocations qui pèsent jusqu'à 15 000 dollars australiens (10 800 euros) par an et par enfant.

Si le projet du gouvernement australien est adopté par le parlement, où il est soutenu par l'opposition travailliste, ces parents ne toucheront plus ces allocations à partir de 2016. Toutefois, ceux qui refuseront d'immuniser leurs enfants pour des raisons médicales ou religieuses continueront d'avoir le droit de percevoir certaines allocations même si les conditions d'accès seront restreintes.

Un choix « sans fondement médical »


« C'est une importante mesure de santé publique, a expliqué M. Abbott. Il est très important que nos familles et nos enfants soient le plus en sécurité possible ». Plus de 39 000 enfants australiens de moins de sept ans ne sont pas vaccinés, soit une augmentation de 24 000 cas au cours des dix dernières années. « Ce choix de ne pas immuniser ses enfants n'a aucun fondement médical et ne devrait pas être soutenu par les contribuables », a ajouté le premier ministre dans un communiqué.

Les parents en question craignent que la vaccination ROR (rougeole, oreillons et rubéole) ne provoque l'autisme, ce qui a été démenti par de nombreuses études. La controverse date de 1998, lorsqu'une étude publiée dans la revue médicale britannique The Lancet avait semé la panique dans le monde anglo-saxon en faisant un lien entre vaccin ROR et autisme. Cet article avait été retiré par la suite en raison « d'irrégularités » mais les craintes ont persisté.

Lire : Rougeole, vaccination et autisme : la dispute qui enflamme l'Amérique

http://www.lemonde.fr/asie-pacifique/article/2015/04/12/bientot-plus-d-allo…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 19 Avr - 02:50 (2015)    Sujet du message: HOSPITAL THREATS TO SEIZE CUSTODY OF UNVACCINATED NEWBORN Répondre en citant


VACCINAL WAR AGAINST PARENTS AND CHILDREN

HOSPITAL THREATS TO SEIZE CUSTODY OF UNVACCINATED NEWBORN



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_swA9fp7xw


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 19 Avr - 03:01 (2015)    Sujet du message: FORMER NURSING STUDENT SUES BAKER COLLEGE, ALLEGES INSTRUCTOR SAID TO LIE ABOUT VACCINATIONS Répondre en citant

FORMER NURSING STUDENT SUES BAKER COLLEGE, ALLEGES INSTRUCTOR SAID TO LIE ABOUT VACCINATIONS



A former nursing student is suing Baker College, alleging that she was removed from the nursing program, because she questioned an instructor’s lesson about vaccinations. Nichole Rolfe filed a lawsuit in Genesee Circuit Court that alleged that an instructor at Baker College’s Owosso campus instructed nursing students to threaten and lie to patients in order to get them to consent to vaccination.

Rolfe was just 20-weeks away from graduation when she was kicked out of the program. She alleges that Baker College removed her from the program, because she was questioning the medical ethics behind alleged lessons regarding vaccinations. Rolfe says that the students were instructed to panic and coerce patients into receiving vaccinations, according to an MLIVE report.

“She stated that we would go in there if they declined, and then we would use threats to coerce them,” Rolfe explained, according to MLIVE. The former Baker College nursing student alleged that the class was told to tell patients untrue statements like, “You’re going to lose your Medicaid, and if you lose your Medicaid, because you refuse the vaccine you will have to pay for your entire hospital stay.” Rolfe said that another instructor at Baker College said that nurses should tell new fathers attempting to access their newborn babies to receive vaccinations if they wanted to be allowed on the hospital floor. The CDC suggests that people get their pertussis vaccinations two weeks before any contact with newborns. Rolfe claimed that she argued to the instructor that if new fathers get their vaccinations on the day they wish to see their babies, like the Baker College instructor allegedly stated, the vaccines would not have had enough time to provide any protection to the babies.

“I was asking questions that a nursing student should ask,” Rolfe stated of her interactions with the Baker College teachers. This is contrary to what Baker College stated happened. The dismissal contract from Baker College said that Rolfe was continuously arguing with an instructor about personal vaccination beliefs, and that she kept bringing up the same arguments. The contract for dismissal called her behavior “oppositional.” The former nursing student also denied Baker College’s claims that she was anti-vaccination.

“This goes against the patient’s right to informed consent,” Rolfe explained. “Our job is to build trust with the family and patient. We are to educate this patient.”

The school stated that the former nursing student had already been placed on a behavior contract after another student told the Baker College administration that she felt harassed by Rolfe over her views on homosexuality. Rolfe was allegedly arguing with the other student, and saying that it isn’t a nursing student’s place to judge homosexuals. The other student allegedly asserted that she believed that homosexuality was a learned behavior, while Rolfe allegedly argued that future nurses had no right to judge a person’s sexual orientation. Rolfe denied the other student’s harassment accusations.

The news of the lawsuit is making waves in Michigan’s social media circuit. Rolfe is getting both support and opposition. Rolfe claims she does not oppose vaccinations., but many believe that the former nursing student actually opposes vaccination. One apparent vaccination supporter responded on Facebook.
Citation:



“I hope everyone of you anti science morons have to hold the hand of the child that dies because of your stupidity. Fear is a good reason to vaccinate. It’s a dumb reason not to.”




One of Rolfe’s peers at Baker College alleged that the dismissed nursing student did not have an anti-vaccination stance at all, but that she “felt that lying and coercion went against ANA guidelines and violated the patients right to refuse any medical intervention.” The peer added, “She wasn’t disruptive… She sat and recorded the class where this was taught.”

Rolfe said the dismissal record makes it impossible for her to finish her degree at another school. The former Baker College nursing student is seeking over $25,000 and the removal of her dismissal record from her transcripts, because she claims that her questions over vaccination protocol was appropriate discourse for nursing students.Baker%20College/YouTube]

[/url]http://www.inquisitr.com/1992739/former-nursing-student-sues-baker-college-…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 25 Avr - 06:58 (2015)    Sujet du message: VACCINATE YOUR CHILDREN Répondre en citant

VACCINATE YOUR CHILDREN

April 24, 2015

Immunizing children is the best way to protect them from serious diseases.

VIDEO : http://www.navy.mil/viewVideo.asp?id=20400


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 27 Avr - 02:20 (2015)    Sujet du message: A SILENT SCANDAL : CATHOLIC SCHOOLS PROMOTING MORALLY UNACCEPTABLE VACCINES Répondre en citant

A SILENT SCANDAL : CATHOLIC SCHOOLS PROMOTING MORALLY UNACCEPTABLE VACCINES 

By Phil Lawler  | Apr 24, 2015

In at least two American dioceses, the parents of children attending Catholic schools are being told that they must have their children vaccinated, regardless of their moral qualms about vaccines derived from the cells of aborted children. This is an injustice to parents who are determined to bear witness to their pro-life convictions, and a serious misreading of an important Vatican document.

In Birmingham, Alabama, for instance, a diocesan school informed families:
Citation:


Diocesan policy has changed for the 2015-2016 school year. Due to the fact that the Catholic Church does not object to any of these required immunizations, religious exemptions will no longer be accepted in lieu of the certificate of immunization.


That statement is simply wrong. The Catholic Church does object to the required immunizations, insofar as the vaccines are derived from fetal tissue. In a statement released in 2005, the Pontifical Academy for Life said that Catholics have “a moral duty to continue to fight and to employ every lawful means in order to make life difficult for the pharmaceutical industries which act unscrupulously and unethically.”

It is true that the Pontifical Academy went on to say that parents could be justified in allowing vaccinations “on a temporary basis” if there was no other way to protect their children from serious disease. However, the Vatican document said that parents who chose vaccination would have a moral duty “to make a conscientious objection with regard to those which have moral problems.”

The 2005 Vatican document concludes that parents may vaccinate their children. Nowhere does it suggest that they must vaccinate their children. Church officials who now invoke the authority of the Vatican to justify compulsory vaccination are ignoring the central thrust of that document.

When parents are forced to inoculate their children with vaccines derived from morally unacceptable sources, the Pontifical Academy argued, the result is “moral coercion of the parents, who are forced to act against their conscience or otherwise to put the health of their children and of the population as a whole at risk.” Now Catholic schools are participating in that “moral coercion.”

”This is an unjust alternative choice, which must be eliminated as soon as possible,” the Vatican document concluded. By ordering parents to accept vaccination—and saying nothing about the moral obligation to protest and to press for development of alternative vaccines—diocesan officials are working against the Vatican instructions, encouraging passive acceptance of what should be recognized as unacceptable. 

https://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/the-city-gates.cfm?id=1032


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 1 Mai - 04:08 (2015)    Sujet du message: FLASHBACK: UNVACCINATED CHILDREN APPEAR TO BE IMMUNE TO THE MYSTERIOUS VIRUS CURRENTLY SPREADING IN THE MIDWEST Répondre en citant

FLASHBACK: UNVACCINATED CHILDREN APPEAR TO BE IMMUNE TO THE MYSTERIOUS VIRUS CURRENTLY SPREADING IN THE MIDWEST 

by Sheep Media · October 1, 2014

The mysterious virus known as EV-D68 had spread across the Midwest at a rapid rate.

Many children had been hospitalized with the virus, about 475 in Kansas City alone, and there is no known vaccine to lessen the effects of the virus or protect those that had yet to acquire it.


EV-D68 had created an outbreak in Colorado, Missouri, Utah, Kansas, Illinois, Ohio, and four more states in the Midwest.

The symptoms can mimic those of the influenza virus, but can have a much more dire impact on those that fall ill. Dr. Mary Anne Jackson, the hospital’s division director for infectious disease shared her concern with CNN.
Citation:


“It’s worse in terms of scope of critically ill children who require intensive care. I would call it unprecedented. I’ve practiced for 30 years in pediatrics, and I’ve never seen anything quite like this,”


Although there is no known vaccine for the virus, and the scope which it will reach is also unknown, those that BECAME INFECTED are following a COMMON THEME. They have ALL BEEN VACCINATED with the MMR vaccines, influenza vaccines, and polio vaccines.

Of course, many children in the United States have been vaccinated, and most are required to be vaccinated in order to enter school. However, it is interesting to note that the illness is not occurring, yet, in children that have not been vaccinated.

William Shaffner, head of Department of Preventive Medicine at Vanderbilt University, has not shared that EV-D68 has only infected vaccinated children, but does share his concern about the virus.
Citation:


“Most enteroviruses cause either a little bit of a cold or a diarrheal illness — a few cause meningitis. This one is the, if you will, odd cousin. It causes prominent respiratory symptoms. Why it does that, we’re really not sure.”



There is no doubt that the outbreak of EV-D68 quite scary, and may be more dangerous that the RSV virus outbreak of the late 1990’s.


IMPORTANT PLEASE SEE:  CA SB277 MANDATORY VACCINES Pass Senate as Votes Rigged & Public Silenced

http://asheepnomore.net/2015/04/24/medical-police-state-ca-sb277-mandatory-…
Many parents are wondering what they can do to keep their children protected and shield them from contracting the virus. CNN shared the following information to help keep your kids safe.
Citation:


“To reduce the risk of infection, individuals should wash hands often with soap and water for 20 seconds, especially after changing diapers; avoid touching eyes, nose and mouth with unwashed hands; avoid kissing, hugging and sharing cups or eating utensils with people who are sick; disinfect frequently touched surfaces such as toys and doorknobs; and stay home when feeling sick…”


Some reporting agencies are also recommending the use of Vitamin D, a natural immune system booster, to help strengthen the immune system prior to the virus reaching individuals.

So far, states that are surrounded by the virus, such as Indiana and Michigan, seem to be safe from the outbreak. Only time will tell if it will continue to spread, or eventually die off like the avian flu did.

[Photo Courtesy:

Source: INQUISITR

http://asheepnomore.net/2014/10/01/unvaccinated-children-appear-immune-myst…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 1 Mai - 12:09 (2015)    Sujet du message: STATE OF COLORADO - VACCINE OBLIGATORY Répondre en citant

STATE OF COLORADO - VACCINE OBLIGATORY



https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpa1/v/t34.0-12/21284_343…

 


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 1 Mai - 12:16 (2015)    Sujet du message: ADULTS TARGETED AS FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PREPARES TO TRACK THE UNVACCINATED Répondre en citant

ADULTS TARGETED AS FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PREPARES TO TRACK THE UNVACCINATED 

Posted: 3/18/2015 12:19:08 PM

By Theresa Wrangham, NVIC Executive Director

During the National Vaccine Advisory Committee’s (NVAC) February meeting, American adults were put on notice by Big Brother that non-compliance with federal vaccine recommendations will not be tolerated. Public health officials have unveiled a new plan to launch a massive nationwide vaccination promotion campaign involving private business and non-profit organizations to pressure all adults to comply with the adult vaccination schedule approved by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).1
 



NVAC has authored the National Adult Immunization Plan (NAIP) and, once finalized, the plan will be turned over to the Interagency Adult Immunization Task Force (AIFT) to create an implementation plan. Notably, this task force is composed of “vested interest” stakeholders and no consumer representation for those groups concerned with vaccine safety and informed consent.


NVIC has submitted our public comments and recommendations for the NVAC’s draft National Adult Immunization Plan.2 Your opportunity to submit your comments and concerns about this plan has been extended to March 23rd. We encourage all of our readers to participate in the public comment process and submit comments to the NVAC on the NAIP. Please forward this article to family and friends and encourage them to submit public comments, too.

What you need to know – the nutshell. 

The basis of the NAIP rests on Healthy People 2020 Goals,3 many of which are arbitrary.4 The key fact the plan seems to lose sight of in using these goals as its foundation is ...THEY ARE GOALS. These goals have no legal authority over your healthcare decisions and are being used by government officials to shape public health policy, which in turn is spurring legal mandates to force you to comply with them.5


The adult immunization plan also “incentivizes” doctors and other vaccine providers to convert patient data into Electronic Health Record (EHR) formats that can then be shared across state and federal electronic databases to track national vaccine coverage rates and also track and identify who is and is not vaccinated. Many states already have electronic vaccine tracking registries (Immunization Information Systems - IIS) in place, but do not share this information due to laws preventing the sharing of personal medical information and/or limited vaccination data on adults. This is where financial and other types of incentives come in to convince vaccine providers and state legislators to participate in the gathering of this private medical information on all adults. 

Big Government is Partnering with Your Employer, Community & Religious Organizations
 



The NAIP states that it will take more than providers raising awareness about the adult schedule and encouraging compliance to meet Healthy People 2020 goals. So the NAIP contains objectives that foster partnerships with your employer and your community and religious organizations to make you and all adults get every federally recommended vaccine according to the government-approved schedule.


The NAIP makes it clear that in the future, all American adults will be informed of the recommended adult schedule at every possible opportunity outside the healthcare provider domain. You will be encouraged to comply with the adult schedule not only by your healthcare provider, but also via community-based partnerships to ensure that you have the opportunity to roll up your sleeve at work, school, church and other community gatherings.

 

NVIC has always supported awareness and access to preventative healthcare options, including access to vaccines for everyone who wants to use them. However, there is a difference between awareness, access, recommendations and mandates. In the past, these types of government vaccine use plans do not just seek to increase awareness and access but also make recommendations that foster vaccine mandates without flexible medical, religious and conscientious belief exemptions that  align with the informed consent ethic.

Tracking Vaccination Status Raises Privacy Concerns 




Adults should examine this plan carefully because the U.S. Constitution guarantees American citizens the right to privacy.6 In that context, it is important to understand that the NAIP objectives include electronically harnessing your personal medical information and that of all adults for the purpose of increasing adult vaccine uptake in the U.S. by tracking your vaccination status, with little regard for your privacy.7


There is no language in the plan that provides for consumer privacy protections. This is a glaring omission given the acknowledged and known risks for patient data being hacked (security breaches) by malicious outside entities.8 The plan does not include provisions for raising consumer awareness of their ability to opt out of electronic tracking and patient data sharing schemes.9 10

Closing Vaccine Safety Research Gaps Not Included in Plan 

While the NAIP also supports increased reporting to the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and ongoing analysis of claims submitted to the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), it is hollow support. For this to be meaningful, stronger language is needed to support closing vaccine safety research gaps highlighted by the Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) series of vaccine safety reports 11 to lessen the number of VICP off-the-table compensation claims.
 
These off-the-table claims are a direct result of the continued expansion of the numbers of government recommended adult (and childhood) vaccines without the accompanying identification of vaccine side effects and injury outcomes to expand the federal Vaccine Injury Table (VIT) that governs the awarding of vaccine injury compensation. Off-the-table adult vaccine injury claims now represent the majority of claims12 filed with the VICP and the compensation process has become  highly adversarial and costly.

As NVIC President Barbara Loe Fisher stated at the U.S. Health Freedom Congress last year when pointing out that responses to vaccines and infectious diseases are individual: 
Citation:


“We do not all respond the same way to infectious diseases13 and we do not all respond the same way to pharmaceutical products like vaccines.14 15 16 17 Public health laws that fail to respect biodiversity and force everyone to be treated the same are unethical and dangerous.”  


The NAIP fails to acknowledge these facts.

Compliance at the Expense of Bodily Autonomy 



Vaccine mandates are made at a state level and the NAIP is a federal vaccine use promotion plan that is has no legal authority to turn government vaccine use recommendations into vaccine use mandates.  


However, much like the recommendations made by NVAC a few years ago for healthcare workers to receive annual flu shots,18 these recommendations are likely to result in future de facto vaccine mandates for adults, whether through employer requirements,19 or actual state laws. Given the introduction of legislation20 this year in many states to remove non-medical vaccine exemptions and restrict medical exemptions for school age children in an effort to force parents to comply with the CDC’s recommended childhood vaccine schedule, there is little doubt that that the NVAC’s latest plan will result in similar actions to force adults to use all federally recommended vaccines.

One only has to read stories posted NVIC’s Cry For Vaccine Freedom Wall by healthcare workers who have refused flu shots and are being fired from their jobs to understand the threat posed by the NAIP. Is your profession next? The short answer is yes.

Make no mistake about this plan’s intent, if “awareness” efforts and “incentivization” of vaccine policy do not increase adult vaccine uptake, the partnering with your employer and other community groups is meant to lower the hammer and force you to comply. The electronic tracking systems that are enthusiastically being embraced by not only the federal government but also state governments and employers, without regard for your privacy, will be used to identify noncompliers.

Informed Consent Freedom at Risk 



If you haven’t read Dr. Suzanne Humphries’ book Dissolving Illusions,21 you may not realize that history is about to repeat itself. Government enforced vaccination through identification and door-to-door efforts to make everyone comply, like was seen with smallpox vaccination campaigns a century ago, is a real possibility again in America. Only this time it won’t just be about one vaccine – it will be about a lot of vaccines you will be forced to get.


The noose being tightened around the necks of our children is being thrown over the necks of adults as well. The tightening of that noose is growing daily in an attempt to strangle vaccine freedom of choice by eradicating the ethical principle of informed consent.
 
Adults and their children are being asked to accept a one-size-fits-all vaccine schedule that does not allow for the ability to delay or decline one or more vaccines for religious and conscientious beliefs. This is very dangerous when the medical exemption has been narrowed by government so that almost no health condition qualifies for a medical exemption anymore. Families already personally impacted by vaccine reactions, injuries and deaths will be faced with more loss, including their financial stability if they are forced to be revaccinated.
 
The human right to protect bodily integrity and autonomy – the core value of the informed consent ethic – is at stake.
 
This battle is not about an anti- or pro- vaccine position. It is a battle over freedom, values and beliefs.22 What is at risk is your ability as a parent and individual to decide what medical risks you are willing to accept and vaccination is the forefront of this battle.
 
For over three decades NVIC has supported informed consent protections in all U.S. vaccine laws and policies, which means that parents and individuals must receive full and accurate information on vaccine risks and benefits and retain the right to make voluntary decisions to accept, delay or decline one or more vaccines without being sanctioned for they decision they make.



What You Can Do Today - Get Involved! 


Your rights are being eroded and vaccine exemptions are under aggressive attack in many states. NVIC will continue to advocate for your freedom as we have done for over 30 years, but this battle will not be won without your voice and action.

Submit your comments on the NAIP by March 23rd to the National Vaccine Advisory Committee and forward this article to your friends and family. (NVIC NOTE 3/20/15: We have become aware that the NVAC's representative assigned to receive your comments email account is autoresponding that she is out of the office until the 25th. NVIC has contacted the National Vaccine Program Office and has been assured that comments sent by the 23rd are being collected and forwarded to the NVAC for their consideration. Please ignore the autoresponder - your comments are getting through and will be a part of the record. Many thanks to everyone for making us aware of this situation and for sending in comments on the NAIP! Keep sending in those comments!)

Most importantly, register and encourage others to register on NVIC’s Advocacy Portal today and join with other concerned Americans to protect informed consent rights. This resource is free and will keep you informed on legislative actions underway in your state, provide guidance on what action to take, and connect you with your legislators.


There is no time to waste. Please do not wait for someone else to do this…that someone is you and you can make a difference!

http://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/March-2015/adults-targeted-for-vaccin…



Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 12 Mai - 07:24 (2015)    Sujet du message: 75% OF VACCINATED MEXICAN CHILDREN NOW DEAD OR HOSPTIALIZED; 200 REASONS NOT TO VACCINATE Répondre en citant

75% OF VACCINATED MEXICAN CHILDREN NOW DEAD OR HOSPTIALIZED; 200 REASONS NOT TO VACCINATE



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=comj61hlG8g&hd=1

Pdf document : http://www.greenmedinfo.com/sites/default/files/gpub_58635_anti_therapeutic…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 18 Mai - 02:09 (2015)    Sujet du message: MANDATORY VACCINES HAPPENING NOW ALERT CHRISTIANS WILL BE IMPRISONED! Répondre en citant

MANDATORY VACCINES HAPPENING NOW ALERT CHRISTIANS WILL BE IMPRISONED!



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjE5XApygMA&hd=1


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 1 Juin - 11:24 (2015)    Sujet du message: ÉMISSION RADIO SUR LES VACCINS : TOUT CHANGE QUAND LES MEDIAS SONT VRAIMENT LIBRES! Répondre en citant

ÉMISSION RADIO SUR LES VACCINS : TOUT CHANGE QUAND LES MEDIAS SONT VRAIMENT LIBRES!

samedi 30 mai 2015



Citation:


Cette radio (Malherbe Grenoble) s’honore en osant donner la parole librement à un panel varié d’invités. Grand merci également à Prevention-Santé sans qui cette émission n’aurait pas été possible. Quand on a des données claires et des éléments de fond solides, on n’a pas à craindre le débat. Mais c’est aussi là où la vaccinologie révèle toute la fausseté de son caractère scientifique, à la manière d’une coquille vide…




VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWVwZPuwgBI

http://spread-the-truth777.blogspot.fr/2015/05/emission-radio-sur-les-vacci…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 10 Juin - 05:33 (2015)    Sujet du message: FRESNO LAWMAKER INVOKES CONCENTRATION AND INTERNMENT CAMPS AT VACCINE BILL RALLY Répondre en citant



FRESNO LAWMAKER INVOKES CONCENTRATION AND INTERNMENT CAMPS AT VACCINE BILL RALLY



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fzrxznUph0

Debate over Senate Bill 277 again turns provocative

Bill would require vaccinations for California school children



By Jeremy B. White
jwhite@sacbee.com

During a rally against a California bill making vaccines mandatory for school children, a Republican lawmaker from Fresno galvanized the crowd by invoking forced interment camps.

Senate Bill 277 would make vaccination a condition of enrolling in private and public schools, which opponents have castigated for depriving children of an education. That argument temporarily derailed the bill in the Senate Education Committee and was featured prominently in Tuesday’s rally.

“I wouldn’t call it a concentration camp,” said Assemblyman Jim Patterson, R-Fresno, “but they’re suggesting (children) go some place other than public school.”

Later in his speech, Patterson said that he “thought we apologized for internment camps,” an apparent reference to the separation and confinement of Japanese-Americans during World War II.

Asked after the rally to explain his comments, Patterson said it was a “bad choice of words” but reiterated that SB 277 is “excessively punitive.”
“I think the penalty that is in this bill, which is the isolation of these children – this is an expulsion from private and public school. That smacks of the kinds of things that are the beginnings of discrimination that can go very ugly places,” Patterson said.

Incendiary rhetoric has marked the debate over SB 277 before. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a prominent critic of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention who has traveled the country warning about vaccines, apologized after suggesting that injuries linked to vaccines were causing a “holocaust.”

Another speaker at Tuesday’s rally, Minister Tony Muhammed, referenced the biblical tale of the Pharaoh ordering the murder of first-born babies and drew a parallel to the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, in which the U.S. government experimented on African-American men.

Jeremy B. White: (916) 326-5543, @CapitolAlert

Related content

Majority of Californians support mandatory vaccines for schoolchildren
California vaccine bill referred to single Assembly committee
Are chiropractors being punished for opposing vaccination bill?
‘Stalking’ of pro-vaccine lobbyists prompts warning from doctors’ group

http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article2359011…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 26 Juin - 03:40 (2015)    Sujet du message: GRAB YOUR VOMIT BAG: CALIFORNIA PASSES MANDATORY VACCINATIONS FOR CHILDREN. Répondre en citant

GRAB YOUR VOMIT BAG: CALIFORNIA PASSES MANDATORY VACCINATIONS FOR CHILDREN.



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rih7Ov_NAxE


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 3 Juil - 05:09 (2015)    Sujet du message: PARENTS THREATEN TO LEAVE CALIFORNIA OVER STATE'S CHILDHOOD VACCINATION LAW Répondre en citant

PARENTS THREATEN TO LEAVE CALIFORNIA OVER STATE'S CHILDHOOD VACCINATION LAW 

July 1, 2015 6:37 PM


Derek Shore

SACRAMENTO (CBS13) — Nearly all students in California will have to be vaccinated if they want to attend school after a bill was signed into law on Tuesday.

As opponents decide their next step to try and repeal the ban on vaccine personal beliefs exemptions, some are wondering how the new law will be implemented.

Opponents of the new law that removes the personal belief exemption from childhood vaccinations say they aren’t going anywhere.

East Bay mother Kadhi Brott and a few others braved the heat on Wednesday to protest Senate Bill 277 a day after it was signed into law by Gov. Jerry Brown.

“I want somebody to investigate why children are so chronically ill, why children get such severe reactions to vaccines, and why there isn’t an investigation to understand?” she said.

Despite studies showing vaccines are safe and the debunking of a study linking autism to vaccinations, Brott says many parents like her are planning on taking their kids out of school or even out of state while others work to repeal it.

“I, personally, will move out of state because I would like a career for myself,” she said.

Parents willing to follow the new law to keep their kids in school so they can have a career for themselves don’t need to get all vaccines at once, according to vaccine proponent Dr. Dean Blumberg with UC Davis Pediatrics.

“All schools can accept kids provisionally,” he said. “So there are provisional acceptance, which means that they have to demonstrate that they are getting started on their vaccines.”

While there is nothing medically wrong with getting multiple vaccines at once, he says some parents will be apprehensive.

“I believe most doctors will work with parents to get the kids vaccinated, including following alternative schedules, if that’s what they require. I don’t recommend those alternative schedules, but in the end I want the kids immunized,” he said.

The law will apply to students attending school in the 2016-17 school year, meaning most will have just over a year to get the vaccines.

http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2015/07/01/parents-threaten-to-leave-califor…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 6 Juil - 12:36 (2015)    Sujet du message: DEPOPULATION TEST RUN? 75% OF CHILDREN WHO RECEIVED VACCINES IN MEXICAN TOWN NOW DEAD OR HOSPITALIZED Répondre en citant

DEPOPULATION TEST RUN? 75% OF CHILDREN WHO RECEIVED VACCINES IN MEXICAN TOWN NOW DEAD OR HOSPITALIZED

Monday, May 11, 2015
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Tags: vaccine injury, depopulation agenda, deadly side effects


(NaturalNews) Despite the insidious attempts of the corporate-controlled U.S. media to censor the stories about the deadly side effects of vaccines, the truth keeps surfacing. The latest vaccine tragedy to strike has killed two babies in La Pimienta, Mexico and sent 37 more to the hospital with serious reactions to toxic vaccine additives. (Tweet this story)

"...14 children are in serious condition, 22 are stable and one is in critical condition," the Chiapas Health Secretariat said in a statement via Latino.FoxNews.com.

What's especially alarming is that only 52 children were vaccinated in all, meaning that 75% of those receiving the vaccines are now either dead or hospitalized.

The vaccines were administered by the Mexican Social Security Institute, known as IMSS. The IMSS confirmed the deadly reactions occurred after children received injections of vaccines for tuberculosis, rotavirus and hepatitis B -- the same viral strains targeted by vaccines routinely administered to children in the United States.

IMSS suspends vaccination pending further investigation

According to Fox News Latino, the IMSS has suspended the vaccines pending the outcome of an investigation into why so many children have been killed and hospitalized.

According to the entire mainstream media in the United States -- which is 100% controlled by corporate interests -- vaccines never harm anyone and are perfectly safe to inject into children in unlimited quantities. This dangerous, inhumane "Vaccine Injury Denialism" is rampant across the corporate-controlled media, which contributes to the deaths of innocent babies and children by refusing to acknowledge the truth that vaccines kill and injure children on a regular basis.

Just recently, in fact, the UK government agreed to pay $90 million to victims of the swine flu vaccine. That vaccine caused permanent brain damage to over 800 children across Europe. The truth is that vaccines regularly harm and even kill innocent children, most likely because of the toxic chemical adjuvants and preservatives they still contain.

As the CDC openly admits, vaccines are still intentionally formulated with mercury, aluminum, MSG and formaldehyde. Some vaccines even use ingredients derived from aborted human fetal tissue. Last year, a CDC scientist blew the whistle on the CDC committing scientific fraud to cover up links between vaccines and autism in young African-American males.

Test run for depopulation via vaccines?

As globalists now fully realize, vaccines are by far the best way to cull the human population because most people can be tricked into lining up and asking for them. Thus, there's no need to resort to all the difficulties used by the Nazis to commit genocide in World War II, involving complex logistics of railroad cars, gas chambers, construction of mass graves, prisoner tracking via IBM computing technology, and so on. (Yes, Nazi genocide and prisoner tracking was powered by early IBM computers. See IBM and the Holocaust, the strategic alliance between Nazi Germany and America's most powerful corporation...)

As the vaccine industry has now come to realize, it's so much easier to kill people when they voluntarily comply with the injections. Hence the aggressive media propaganda push to achieve absolute blind obedience to vaccines so that no one will ask questions when sterilization or euthanasia chemicals are used. That's no doubt why vaccines have been routinely tested for depopulation programs via two primary methods:

# 1) Achieve covert sterilizations of targeted populations by combining sterilization chemicals with vaccines. (The "slow kill.")

# 2) Directly kill vaccine recipients by intentionally lacing vaccines with euthanasia chemicals that cause death. (The "fast kill.")

Method #1 has been repeatedly used throughout Africa, Mexico and South America to inflict sterilization upon targeted groups via immunization and vaccination programs. Just last year, in fact, I reported on the discovery of a covert depopulation vaccine program being run in Kenya:

Tetanus vaccines given to millions of young women in Kenya have been confirmed by laboratories to contain a sterilization chemical that causes miscarriages, reports the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, a pro-vaccine organization.

A whopping 2.3 million young girls and women are in the process of being given the vaccine, pushed by UNICEF and the World Health Organization.

"We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They tested positive for the HCG antigen," Dr. Muhame Ngare of the Mercy Medical Centre in Nairobi told LifeSiteNews. "They were all laced with HCG."


Method #2 now appears to be under way in Mexico as 75% of those children injected with vaccines are now either dead or hospitalized.

Vaccine-induced depopulation was attempted in Mexico in 1974

As Truth Stream Media exhaustively documented, a depopulation exercise was run in Mexico in 1974, using vaccines as the cover story.

The scheme was dreamed up after the release of the National Security Study Memorandum 200 which highlighted the global population problem and urged governments to find ways to reduce the global population.

As TruthStreamMedia.com explains:

Concentration on this "problem" of how to reduce the population was planned for 13 key countries, including India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Colombia. Of those, the document singled out Mexico as having one of the highest (and therefore, most worrisome) growth rates of all. The document read, "Perhaps the most significant population trend from the viewpoint of the United States is the prospect that Mexico’s population will increase from 50 million in 1970 to over 130 million by the year 2000."

To combat this problem, "medical spooks" -- who were almost certainly U.S.-funded depopulation vaccine crews -- began injecting women all across Mexico with anti-fertility drugs disguised as vaccines. If you doubt this, read your history. The U.S. government's National Institutes of Health was caught red-handed running human medical experiments on prisoners in Guatemala. President Obama was even forced to publicly apologize in 2011 after the cover-up collapsed! There is nothing the Nazis did in the 1930s and 40s that the pharmaceutical industry wouldn't be willing to repeat today under the label of "science."

But getting back to Mexico, as the covert depopulation vaccination program spread across Mexico City in 1974, locals began to catch on to the deception, and public resistance grew. As these newspaper clippings reveal, parents began hiding their children in their own homes to avoid them being injected with sterilization chemicals at the public schools. (California, by the way, also targets children at schools in order to avoid parents having the opportunity to say "No!")

Mexico City - Associated Press - Rumors that persons disguised as inoculation teams were giving school children shots that sterilized them forced health authorities to suspend all vaccination drives today and to post police outside Mexico City schools. Thousands of parents stormed various schools in the Mexico City area Tuesday and took their children home.



It's also important to note that these sterilization vaccines were being administered essentially at gunpoint, as police were accompanying the vaccine crews:

Callers told newspapers and TV stations that the sterilization crews were protected by police escorts and that they included white-robed men and women "who looked like foreigners."

This same scenario is now about to be replicated in California, by the way, where SB 277 would criminalize parents of children who are not vaccinated, essentially at gunpoint.

What's even more interesting is that the exact same arguments we hear today about vaccine skeptics -- they're punitively labeled "anti-vaxxers" or "anti-science" -- were also being used in Mexico in 1974. As the following newspaper clipping shows:

The Mexican Medical Association issued statements denying that any kind of inoculation could cause sterility... Officials said superstition and ignorance of preventive health were responsible for the widespread belief that the rumors were true.



In other words, even though sterilization teams were running around Mexico, injecting people with chemicals as part of a depopulation agenda, any person who pointed this out was immediately labeled "anti-science" and derided as "ignorant."

Very little has changed in four decades, it seems: the same tactic is still used today, even while children are being killed or injured every single day due to the toxic ingredients used in vaccines.

CDC's intelligence operatives caught running disinfo campaigns

The "science bullying" behind vaccines also allows governments of the world to run sterilization and depopulation programs disguised as public health. Once the population is bullied into accepting vaccines without question -- blind obedience is now demanded almost everywhere -- governments can add any chemicals they want to those vaccines, including chemicals that cause permanent sterilization or even death.

The fact that all vaccine injuries are systematically denied to exist also means that any person harmed or killed by vaccines is immediately wiped from the national memory. Like a criminal mafia, the vaccine industry works hard to hide the bodies and thereby maintain its monopolistic racket on the utterly false premise that vaccines are 100% safe. To further drive home this extraordinary medical propaganda, the CDC uses intelligence operatives like Nurse Hickox who spread disinfo through the mainstream media, which is always happy to comply with the destructive agendas of the vaccine industry.

As Natural News uncovered during the Ebola scare of 2014:

industry.Nurse Kaci Hickox, who has made headlines over the last few days by refusing to quarantine herself after returning from the Ebola front lines in Africa, turns out to have been trained as an "intelligence officer" under a two-year CDC program modeled after the U.S. military.

As you can see from the document below, Hickox graduated from a two-year CDC intelligence officer training program in 2012. This is the same nurse whose LinkedIn page was recently scrubbed to hide her ties to the CDC...

The official intelligence designation granted to Nurse Hickox by the CDC was "Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer," and she is a graduate of the 2012 EIS program according to this CDC document (PDF). (See page 138 - 139 for her name and photo, or view photo below.)

That same year, the CDC graduated 81 such "intelligence officers" whose names and photos are also listed in the public document.

http://www.naturalnews.com/049669_vaccine_injury_depopulation_agenda_deadly…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 6 Juil - 19:41 (2015)    Sujet du message: OVERDOSE OF HEPATITIS A VACCINE GIVEN TO 250 IMMIGRANT KIDS DETAINED IN TEXAS Répondre en citant

OVERDOSE OF HEPATITIS A VACCINE GIVEN TO 250 IMMIGRANT KIDS DETAINED IN TEXAS



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fe3wajW96eM



Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 14 Juil - 01:34 (2015)    Sujet du message: CALIFORNIA NOW WANTS TO MANDATE VACCINES FOR ADULTS, W/ CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR REFUSERS Répondre en citant

CALIFORNIA NOW WANTS TO MANDATE VACCINES FOR ADULTS, W/ CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR REFUSERS



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrWAX7KrvQU

Monday, July 13, 2015

Is California becoming a medical police state?

By Vaccine Impact

Health Impact News Editor Comments

In a brazen act of medical tyranny, California recently became the first state in the U.S. to remove religious exemptions to those opposing vaccines for their children. The bill now signed into law, SB277, faces legal hurdles in court next.

Now, legislators in California want to pass the “first US adult vaccine mandate with NO personal exemptions and CRIMINAL penalties for failure to comply.” SB 792, would eliminate an adult’s right to exempt themselves from one, some, or all vaccines, a risk-laden medical procedure.

Will California soon become a medical police state?

URGENT ACTION ALERT Monday July 13, 2015

  

SB792- The first US adult vaccine mandate with NO personal exemptions (only medical exemptions approved by a doctor and defined by the bill) and CRIMINAL penalties for failure to comply will be heard in the California Assembly Human Services Committee this Tuesday July 14th at 1:30 in Room 437.

SB 792 would eliminate an adult’s right to exempt themselves from one, some, or all vaccines, a risk-laden medical procedure. This bill would make California the first state to require mandated vaccinations for all childcare workers, including all private and public school early childhood education programs (Headstart, Private preK and preschools), family daycares, and daycare centers.
tr_bq a écrit:


Commencing September 1, 2016, a person shall not be employed at a family day care home if he or she has not been immunized against influenza, pertussis, and measles. An employee shall receive an influenza vaccination between August 1 and December 1 of each year.

This bill eliminates medical autonomy, crushes religious freedom, undermines personal freedom, and burdens quality providers with a non-optional series of medical interventions in the form of mandated vaccines that are not even 100% effective.

Bill SB 792 excerpt:
tr_bq a écrit:


This bill, commencing September 1, 2016, would prohibit a day care center or a family day care home from employing any person who has not been immunized in accordance with the schedule for routine adult immunizations, prescribed by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The bill would specify circumstances under which a person would be exempt from the immunization requirement, based on medical safety and current immunity, as specified. The bill would make conforming changes to provisions that set forth qualifications for day care center teachers and applicants for licensure as a family day care center. Because the bill would extend the application of a crime under the act, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

Read the entire bill here.

CALL – FAX – EMAIL – TWEET — URGE a NO VOTE TODAY

Assembly Human Services Committee: http://ahum.assembly.ca.gov/hearings
http://products.naturalblaze.com/vaccineexempt.html(916) 319-2089 – Fax (916) 319-2189

Kansen Chu (Chair) (D) – 25 (Abstain on 277)
P.O. Box 942849, Room 5175, Sacramento, CA 94249-0025
(916) 319-2025 Fax: (916) 319-2125

Chad Mayes (Vice Chair) (R) – 42 (No on 277)
P.O. Box 942849, Room 4144, Sacramento, CA 94249-0042
(916) 319-2042 Fax: (916) 319-2142

Ian C. Calderon (D) – 57 (Yes on 277)
P.O. Box 942849, Room 2148, Sacramento, CA 94249-0057;
(916) 319-2057 Fax: (916) 319-2157

Patty López (D) – 39 (No on 277)
P.O. Box 942849, Room 4126, Sacramento, CA 94249-0039
(916) 319-2039 Fax: (916) 319-2139

Brian Maienschein (R) – 77 (No on 277)
P.O. Box 942849, Room 4139, Sacramento, CA 94249-0077
(916) 319-2077 Fax: (916) 319-2177
Mark Stone (D) – 29 (Yes on 277)
P.O. Box 942849, Room 5155, Sacramento, CA 94249-0029
(916) 319-2029 Fax: (916) 319-2129

Tony Thurmond (D) – 15 (Yes on 277)
P.O. Box 942849, Room 5150, Sacramento, CA 94249-0015
(916) 319-2015 Fax: (916) 319-2115

EMAIL:
Myesha.Jackson@asm.ca.gov,
Assemblymember.Chu@asm.ca.gov,
Assemblymember.Mayes@asm.ca.gov,
Assemblymember.Calderon@asm.ca.gov,
Assemblymember.Lopez@asm.ca.gov, Assemblymember.Maienscheim@asm.ca.gov, Assemblymember.Stone@asm.ca.gov,
Assemblymember.Thurmond@asm.ca.gov,

TWEET:
@MrTonyMendoza
@TonyThurmond
@AsmMarkStone
@BMaienschein
@ChadMayesCA
@kansenchu
@PattyLopez_D_39
@IanCalderon
@IanAD57

Also contact YOUR Assembly Member to urge a NO VOTE! http://findyourrep.legislature.ca.gov/

SB792: Assembly Health Committee Hearing, June 30, 2015



This bill will be heard next in the Assembly Human Services Committee on July 14, 2015.

Read the bill history and current language here: Bill Text - SB-792 Day care facilities: immunizations: exemptions.

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/fa...

Read more of the story at: http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/california-now-wants-to-be-first-state-to-man…

http://www.naturalblaze.com/2015/07/california-now-wants-to-be-first-state.html


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 20 Juil - 02:23 (2015)    Sujet du message: GOV’T MAKES FIERCE MOVE TO FORCE AMERICANS TO DO THIS OUTLANDISH ACT OR ELSE... Répondre en citant

GOV’T MAKES FIERCE MOVE TO FORCE AMERICANS TO DO THIS OUTLANDISH ACT OR ELSE...



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-bW1Av62YA

For More Information See:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-c...
http://www.hhs.gov/nvpo/vacc_plan/ind...
http://www.hhs.gov/nvpo/national_adul...
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules...
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-bW1Av62YA


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 10 Aoû - 09:18 (2015)    Sujet du message: UNE ANCIENNE VISITEUSE MEDICALE DE MERCK EXPLIQUE QUE L'OBLIGATION VACCINALE EST POUR LE PROFIT, PAS POUR LA SANTE PUBLIQUE Répondre en citant

UNE ANCIENNE VISITEUSE MEDICALE DE MERCK EXPLIQUE QUE L'OBLIGATION VACCINALE EST POUR LE PROFIT, PAS POUR LA SANTE PUBLIQUE

dimanche 9 août 2015



Brandy Vaugham est une ancienne représentante de ventes pour le fabricant de vaccins Merck & Co. Elle explique en détails comment les fabricants de vaccins se servent précisément des vaccins pour réaliser d’énormes profits et non pour la Santé publique. Brandy a effectué des recherches sur la sécurité des vaccins. Elle a trouvé que, non seulement les vaccins contenaient des produits toxiques connus qui pouvaient provoquer des dégâts neurologiques, mais aussi que les fabricants de vaccins ne réalisaient pas les mêmes études de sécurité pour les vaccins comme ils le font pour les autres médicaments.

Ce manque de recherches sur la sécurité des vaccins ajouté aux effets secondaires de la vaccination a contribué à faire prendre à Brandy la décision de ne jamais faire vacciner son enfant. Brandy déclare qu’administrer des vaccins à nos enfants, c’est comme jouer à la roulette russe avec eux. Elle ajoute que la vaccination obligatoire est simplement un moyen pour les fabricants de vaccins de faire de plus amples bénéfices encore sur le dos de nos enfants. S’il vous plaît, ne soyez pas dupes : nous n’avons aucun besoin de vaccination obligatoire.



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUduiwgHMQs

Transcript:

Mon premier engagement dans l’industrie pharmaceutique comme représentante pour la firme Merck date de l’époque où le Vioxx était sur le marché. J’étais, en fait, représentante pour le Vioxx de Merck. Quand il est apparu que Merck avait falsifié ses données de sécurité, et que le Vioxx provoquait deux fois plus de crises cardiaques et accidents vasculaires cérébraux chez les personnes qui prenaient le médicament, j’ai commencé à réaliser qu’il y avait beaucoup de corruption dans les coulisses et que ce n’était pas parce qu’un médicament était sur le marché qu’il pouvait être considéré comme sûr.

Après avoir travaillé pour Merck, je fus assez désabusée par l’ensemble du scandale. J’ai vécu à New-York pendant huit ans, et c’est là que j’ai eu mon fils. A six mois, je l’ai ramené avec moi à San Francisco sans qu’il soit vacciné. Quand je me suis rendue à la visite médicale, ils ont essayé de nous fourguer les vaccins. A cette époque, je n’avais pas encore fait énormément de recherches, mais j’en savais déjà assez pour ne pas faire aveuglément confiance aux médicaments.

Au cours de la visite médicale, j’ai demandé à voir la notice du vaccin. Le médecin a éclaté en colère, prétendant que je ne lui faisais pas confiance. Il sortit en claquant la porte et une infirmière me fit savoir que je ne serais désormais plus jamais la bienvenue dans cette clinique. Sachant tout ce que j’avais déjà appris en tant que représentante, ce fut pour moi un fameux et énorme signal. Je poursuivis donc mes recherches sur les vaccins, les ingrédients et les données inexactes de sécurité.

Je découvris beaucoup de choses. L’une d’elles était que l’aluminium était le principal adjuvant des vaccins pour enfants. J’avais déjà fait certaines recherches sur l’aluminium et avais donc déjà une certaine expérience. Ma grand-mère avait eu un cancer du sein. La biopsie avait montré des taux élevés d’aluminium dans ses tissus.  Le médecin nous expliqua que ma grand-mère devait abandonner les déodorants traditionnels parce que l’aluminium qui s’y trouvait était susceptible de provoquer le cancer. C’était un produit cancérogène. Ce fut encore un fameux signal d’avertissement pour moi quand je réalisai que ces produits se trouvaient dans les vaccins pour les enfants. Je parvenais à peine à y croire !

J’ai continué à faire de plus en plus de recherches et je finis par réaliser qu’aux Etats-Unis on administrait deux fois plus de vaccins que dans la plupart des autres pays développés, et que la véritable crise de santé était le fait que nos enfants étaient plus malades que dans n’importe quel autre pays développé, en dépit du fait que plus d’argent était, par habitant, dépensé pour les soins de santé. Aux Etats-Unis, nous avons les taux les plus élevés de mort subite du nourrisson, d’asthme, d’allergies alimentaires, de TDAH, de leucémie infantile, et du type 1 de diabète. Pour moi, c’était cela la véritable crise de santé.

Au plus j’approfondissais le sujet, au plus je réalisais que les vaccins ne concernaient guère la santé publique. Il s’agit surtout des profits de l’industrie pharmaceutique. Ce qui est intéressant avec les vaccins, c’est que les mêmes études rigoureuses de sécurité qui sont réalisées pour la plupart des médicaments ne se font généralement pas pour les vaccins parce que tout simplement les vaccins sont considérés être une mesure de santé publique contrairement aux différents médicaments. Les études des vaccins durent en général peu de temps.

 Ce se sont pas des études en double aveugle avec véritable placebo comme c’est pourtant la norme d’or pour les médicaments. Pour les vaccins,  on n’exige pas les mêmes études rigoureuses que pour les médicaments. Il est aussi très facile de manipuler les données et de les présenter comme étant sans danger. Si on analyse les études en étant particulièrement attentifs à la toxicité des adjuvants et des additifs, on s’aperçoit que les études dites de sécurité ne prouvent pas du tout la sécurité des vaccins. En fait,  il existe pas mal d’études qui montrent que quantités d’additifs des vaccins sont très toxiques, tout spécialement pour les enfants dont le système immunitaire est encore particulièrement immature.

Au plus j’approfondissais les études de sécurité et me rendais compte à quel point elles étaient défectueuses, au plus j’étais en quelque sorte mise en garde. Mon fils a maintenant 4 ans ½, et n’est toujours pas vacciné. Je me suis sentie d’autant plus motivée dans cette lutte que j’ai appris que des projets de loi rendant les vaccinations obligatoires commençaient à émerger un peu partout dans le pays, dans plus de 138 états. Il est clair pour moi maintenant qu’il s’agit d’une question de profit avant d’être une question de santé publique. Je sais que de nombreuses compagnies pharmaceutiques ont perdu leurs médicaments vedettes. Au cours de ces dernières années, elles ont perdu leurs brevets. C’est la raison pour laquelle ces compagnies cherchent à augmenter leurs profits.

Pour les vaccins, les études de sécurité sont moins rigoureuses et donc moins coûteuses, il y a moins d’obstacles pour en obtenir la mise sur le marché. En outre les sociétés pharmaceutiques sont dégagées de toute responsabilité, de toute poursuite possible. En fait, les vaccins sont le seul produit aux Etats-Unis pour lequel vous ne pouvez engager de poursuites judiciaires normales s’il y a dommage ou décès. Si vous réunissez tous ces éléments vous avez alors un produit avec la marge bénéficiaire la plus élevée possible. En rendant les vaccins obligatoires et en n’arrêtant pas d’élargir le calendrier vaccinal, ce sont nos enfants qui sont utilisés dans des buts de profit. C’est là exactement ce qui se cache derrière les projets de loi visant à rendre la vaccination obligatoire.

Une des choses que l’on me demande souvent c’est pourquoi on n’entend pas plus souvent parler de la chose si elle était vraie. Au cours de ma recherche, j’ai découvert que les Etats-Unis étaient l’un des deux seuls pays au monde qui autorisaient les entreprises pharmaceutiques à faire directement de la publicité aux consommateurs. Nous avons tous vu des publicités pour médicaments dans les médias.

 Cela permet aux compagnies pharmaceutiques de dicter essentiellement ce qui est présenté dans les médias. Si vous leur accordez 30 à 40% de leur publicité, vous contrôlez pratiquement tout ce qu’ils annoncent. Combien de journalistes et d’articles n’ont-ils pas été censurés, y compris le lanceur d’alertes du CDC, fin de 2014 qui a révélé que le CDC avait camouflé des données qui montraient que le vaccin ROR provoquait des dommages neurologiques (autisme).

Récemment, il y a eu beaucoup d’histoires de différents pays qui poursuivaient les fabricants de vaccins pour des dommages et des décès. Certains vaccins n’ont plus été conseillés comme le Gardasil au Japonle Prevenar en Chine (voir Livio, handicapé à 80% suite aux vaccins Prevenar & Infanrix Quinta), le Rotavirus en FranceL’Espagne aurait fait un procès à Merck pour le Gardasil. (Fawkes: en France aussi il y a eu des plaintes de déposées de 2013 et 32 nouvelles plaintes en 2014.)

Au travers des médias traditionnels, les compagnies pharmaceutiques dépensent chaque année 18 milliards de dollars en frais de marketing. Pour les médecins, les compagnies dépensent six fois ces sommes en plans d’assurance santé, conférences éducatives, études publiées dans des revues médicales, etc., etc.

Tout cela revient à dire que nous avons des vaccins exemptés de toute responsabilité pour le fabricant, très peu de données montrant que ces vaccins sont sûrs et efficaces, avec d’énormes dépenses de marketing. Aux Etats-Unis notre système vaccinal est délabré. Il n’est pas possible de rendre un produit obligatoire quand tant de questions restent sans réponse et quand tant de choses se passent dans les coulisses dont le public n’est pas conscient, comme par exemple les ingrédients des vaccins.

Suite: Fawkes

http://spread-the-truth777.blogspot.fr/2015/08/une-ancienne-visiteuse-medic…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 13 Aoû - 05:05 (2015)    Sujet du message: RHODE ISLAND MANDATES GARDASIL (HPV) VACCINE FOR ALL 7th GRADERS, BOYS & GIRLS; PLEASE CIRCULATE. Répondre en citant

RHODE ISLAND MANDATES GARDASIL (HPV) VACCINE FOR ALL 7th GRADERS, BOYS & GIRLS; PLEASE CIRCULATE.



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAAU3_zCH4c&feature=share

Gardasil is the most dangerous of all vaccines, numbers of death are over 140. Spain, France, India, Japan have filed criminal lawsuits against Merck due to Gardasil's known dangerous adverse effects.

http://www.turnto10.com/story/2966409...

http://www.nvic.org/Vaccines-and-Dise...

http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/gard...

http://www.tokyotimes.com/side-effect...

https://www.youtube.com/results?searc...



Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 18 Aoû - 08:28 (2015)    Sujet du message: VACCINATION ET OEDEMES CEREBRAUX Répondre en citant

VACCINATION ET OEDEMES CEREBRAUX

dimanche 16 août 2015



© Inconnu

Presque chaque jour, des corps dont la cause du décès est inconnue sont transférés à l'Institut Médico-légal de Münich, et autopsiés sur demande du Ministère public. Au cours des dernières années, des découvertes inhabituelles ont été faites sur les corps de plusieurs nourrissons. En 25 ans de carrière, le professeur Randolph Penning a autopsié plus de 10.000 corps. Il a récemment constaté une multiplication des cas d'oedèmes cérébraux chez les nourrissons comme il n'en avait jamais vus depuis qu'il exerce. 

Le vaccin, un geste anodin? (Extrait du documentaire de Valentin Thurn, sur Arte en 2007) 

En 2002, nous avons été amenés, en l'espace d'un mois, à examiner plusieurs corps d'enfants qui avaient été vaccinés peu de temps auparavant. Nous avons remarqué que leur cerveau était très dur. Et lorsque le cerveau d'un nourrisson est dur, c'est pour nous un signe qu'il est peut-être mort par asphyxie. Ni notre Institut, ni la police criminelle ne pensions qu'il pouvait s'agir d'homicides, mais les résultats que nous obtenions étaient suspects. 

Depuis l'introduction du vaccin hexavalent sur le marché, sur 120 enfants autopsiés, nous avons eu 6 cas de décès survenus le jour ou le lendemain de la vaccination. Cette multiplication des cas nous a alertés. Il y a environ 300 médecins légistes en Allemagne. On se connaît entre nous. J'ai eu l'occasion de discuter avec des collègues qui ont autopsié des enfants dans ce cas, et d'après eux, tout semble indiquer qu'il y a un lien entre le vaccin hexavalent et ces décès qui sont survenus le jour-même ou dans les 48 heures qui ont suivi la vaccination. 


© Inconnu

Certains médecins légistes SAVENT mais...ont-ils seulement le droit de parler? Seront-ils entendus ou bien les rapports d'autopsie resteront-ils volontairement évasifs et incomplets, induisant ainsi en erreur les familles éplorées ?

Le vaccin hexavalent protège contre la poliomyélite, la diphtérie, le tétanos, l'haemophilus influenzae de type B, la coqueluche et l'hépatite B. Un cocktail un peu trop explosif ? Alertés par la multiplication des cas de morts subites inexpliquées l'EMEA, l'Agence Européenne pour l'Evaluation des Médicaments (EMEA) et l'Institut allemand de Recherches, Paul Ehrlich décident de mener l'enquête. Un ancien collaborateur de l'Institut raconte qu'un des deux vaccins hexavalents commercialisés avait retenu l'attention des chercheurs. Je travaillais encore à l'Institut à l'époque où le premier décès survenu suite à l'administration du vaccin hexavalent a été signalé. D'après moi, il n'y avait pas à tergiverser. Le vaccin aurait dû immédiatement être retiré du marché. 

De son côté l'EMEA, a réuni un groupe d'experts qui a jugé qu'on ne disposait pas de données suffisantes pour pouvoir prendre une mesure aussi drastique. A la suite de quoi, l'Institut Paul Ehrlich a décidé de lancer une grande étude épidémiologique qui permettait de recenser tous les cas de mort subite du nourrisson. On a démarré l'étude en 2005, et, une semaine avant que l'on commence à recenser tous les cas de mort subite, l'EMEA a soudain publié un communiqué. 


© Inconnu

Le message de Klaus Hartmann est clair: on a menti au public sur les véritables raisons du retrait du marché du vaccin Hexavac préférant faire croire aux parents à une inefficacité plutôt qu'à une dangerosité du produit

Quand je l'ai lu, j'ai été très surpris. Le communiqué stipulait que la protection à long terme d'un des composants du vaccin hexavac contre l'hépatite B était insuffisante. Sur les recommandations de l'EMEA, le fabricant a donc retiré le vaccin du marché, plus ou moins de sa propre initiative. En fait, la véritable raison pour laquelle ils ont retiré le vaccin, c'est qu'ils ne voulaient pas prendre le risque que d'autres décès surviennent et qu'ils apparaissent dans notre étude. Au final, ces cas de morts subites n'ont jamais été éclaircis. Mais de nombreux indices pouvaient laisser penser qu'ils étaient liés à un problème de vaccins. L'étude qui doit se terminer fin 2007 ne fournira donc aucune explication sur les cas de décès suspectés d'avoir un lien avec le vaccin Hexavac. Puisqu'il a été retiré de la vente. Un autre vaccin hexavalent est actuellement disponible sur le marché. Certains médecins légistes ont déjà signalé des cas de décès

http://spread-the-truth777.blogspot.fr/2015/08/vaccination-et-demes-cerebra…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 19 Aoû - 05:39 (2015)    Sujet du message: BEN CARSON WANTS FORCED VACCINES, WITH SCHOOLS SERVING AS ENFORCEMENT CHECKPOINTS Répondre en citant

BEN CARSON WANTS FORCED VACCINES, WITH SCHOOLS SERVING AS ENFORCEMENT CHECKPOINTS

Published: August 17, 2015

   Source:
Edgy Truth



Retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson is making waves yet again, this time because he announced his pro-mandatory stance on vaccines. Carson, who is second in the GOP polls behind Donald Trump, also wants schools to be set up to enforce the provisions.

“A lot of people are put off when they hear the word ‘government force,’ and perhaps there’s a better way to put these things,” Carson said. “But the fact of the matter is, studies have shown us over the course of time that the benefit-to-risk ratio for vaccination is way in the favor of doing it as opposed to not doing it.” (viacnn)

This would mean no religious or philosophical exemptions. This could also mean proposing stricter checkpoints at schools nationwide if Carson were to be elected. His perspective on the matter runs in contrary to his GOP opponent, Rand Paul, who has said he does not believe vaccinations should be mandatory, although he himself receives vaccines.

http://www.blacklistednews.com/Ben_Carson_wants_forced_vaccines,_with_schoo…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 19 Aoû - 09:35 (2015)    Sujet du message: VACCINATION FORCEE : UN CRIME CONTRE L'HUMANITE Répondre en citant

VACCINATION FORCEE : UN CRIME CONTRE L'HUMANITE

jeudi 9 juillet 2015


http://fr.sott.net/image/s12/254634/full/ob_65820e_vax_banner.jpg

© Inconnu
Prenant une pose maçonnique (bras croisés)


Ralf Fucetola, juriste, s'appuie sur le code de Nuremberg et autres sources juridiques internationales pour conclure que les vaccinations forcées constituent un crime contre l'humanité = Mais que fait "Nuremberg" présentement pour arrêter ce génocide? Rien, car il est sous le contrôle des Jésuites, et en temps de guerre, les armées se foutent bien du code Nuremberg!!!

Nier le principe du consentement libre et éclairé viole le Code de Nuremberg. La vaccination forcée est un crime contre l'humanité. « Le consentement éclairé est vide de sens sans le droit de pouvoir dire : « Non ! » Dr Rima Laibow, M.D.

Après les horreurs de la seconde Guerre Mondiale, l'assassinat, les abus subis par des millions de personnes avec la complicité des autorités de « santé » des différentes parties belligérantes, la communauté internationale a élaboré des déclarations et des conventions dans le but que « Jamais plus ! » les systèmes de santé soient utilisés pour nuire à des individus ou à des populations. Un des éléments clés dans les garanties de protection internationales acquises par la victoire des alliés fut la reconnaissance que plus personne ne devrait être contraint d'accepter quelque intervention médicale que ce soit qui serait contraire à sa conscience. Ceci a constitué la base du droit international depuis des millénaires. Pensons au Serment d'Hippocrate au cours duquel les médecins jurent de ne pas « administrer un poison à qui que ce soit, même si on leur en fait la demande... »

Parmi ces conventions ou traités, on trouve la Déclaration universelle des Droits de l'Homme, la Déclaration de Genève et le Code de Nuremberg. 
typ2 a écrit:


« Toute personne a droit à la vie, à la liberté et à la sécurité de sa personne...Nul ne pourra être soumis à des traitements inhumains ou dégradants... Tout le monde a droit, en toute égalité à un procès équitable et public devant un tribunal indépendant et impartial qui pourra déterminer ses propres droits...Nul ne sera soumis à des immixtions arbitraires que ce soit par rapport à sa vie privée, sa famille, son domicile ou sa correspondance... »

« Je n'utiliserai pas mes connaissances médicales pour violer les Droits humains et les Libertés civiles, même sous la menace... »

« Le consentement volontaire du sujet humain est absolument essentiel. Cela signifie que la personne concernée doit avoir la capacité juridique de donner son consentement, qu'elle doit être à même de pouvoir exercer son libre pouvoir de choix, sans qu'il y ait intervention de quelque autre élément comme la force, la fraude, la tromperie, la contrainte, la démesure ou toute autre forme de contrainte ou de coercition. La personne devrait avoir une connaissance et une compréhension suffisantes des éléments impliqués pour lui permettre de prendre une décision parfaitement éclairée. »


Le Consentement éclairé pourrait être défini comme suit :
typ2 a écrit:


« Le Consentement éclairé est un processus qui permet à la personne de donner sa permission avant toute intervention médicale... Au Royaume-Uni et dans des pays comme la Malaisie et Singapour, le Consentement éclairé dans les procédures médicales nécessite la preuve que les soins soient reconnus comme pratiques standard et acceptables, ce qui peut avoir trait aux risques qu'un professionnel de santé pourrait révéler dans telle ou telle circonstance. » [...]

Le principe du Consentement éclairé fait l'objet d'attaques dans le monde entier

En ce moment, il y a des lois qui sont en préparation dans plusieurs états américains qui visent à abolir ou restreindre notre objection de conscience et nos exemptions religieuses et philosophiques qui, par rapport à la vaccination forcée ont été durement et âprement gagnées. [...]

La vaccination obligatoire qui tend, un peu partout, à se répandre est véritablement une question mondiale de santé. Des preuves scientifiquesmontrent que maintenant les enfants vaccinés sont, en général, en moins bonne santé que les enfants vaccinés.

La vaccination, comme tous les médicaments prescrits par les médecins, constituent des expérimentations médicales (La diffusion dans le public est considérée comme la phase 4 de l'expérimentation. C'est ainsi que la FDA retire ou redéfinit dans les cinq ans environ la moitié des médicaments qu'elle a approuvés à la suite des données qui lui parviennent sur les effets secondaires qui se sont produits après la mise sur le marché. Le Dr Gary Null montre que les médicaments correctement prescrits provoquent, chaque année aux États-Unis, des centaines de milliers de morts.

En attendant, les évêques catholiques du Kenya ont dénoncé la stérilisation de masse par les vaccins. Précédemment une chose pareille s'était produite aux Philippines et au Bangla Desh. L'Inde qui a été déclarée « exempte de poliomyélite » a connu 60.000 cas de « paralysies flasques aigües non-polio » qui ont essentiellement touché les vaccinés.

Mais en Australie, le Premier ministre pro-vaccins (dont les trois filles n'auraient pas reçu le très dangereux vaccin Gardasil) veut contraindre toutes les familles pauvres et qui reçoivent l'aide du gouvernement à recevoir tous les vaccins « requis ». Donner aux parents le choix entre une intervention médicale non assurable, potentiellement dangereuse, et d'autre part recevoir l'aide publique dont ils ont besoin pour survivre représente exactement le type de « force, de fraude, de tromperie, de contrainte, de démesure ou autre forme de coercition » pour lesquelles des médecins nazis ont été pendus.

Au Japon, les vaccins pour les nourrissons ont été abandonnés, alors que les États-Unis et l' Australie qui administrent le plus grand nombre de vaccins aux nourrissons, connaissent aussi la plus forte et la pire mortalité infantile. [...] En 1986, le Congrès américain a protégé les compagnies pharmaceutiques contre toute poursuite judiciaire, et la Cour Suprême des États-Unis a reconnu que « le plus important c'est que la loi élimine la responsabilité du fabricant par rapport aux effets secondaires inévitables des vaccins. » [...]

Quels sont les éléments qui peuvent inciter les compagnies pharmaceutiques à développer des vaccins plus sûrs ? Alors que l'on nous dit que « Corrélation ne signifie pas causalité », nous savons malgré tout qu'il y a corrélation que l'on peut facilement déduire des deux graphiques d'une étude publiée par le gouvernement. La seule chose que nous voulons faire est de montrer les deux graphiques pour pouvoir les comparer. Ce que montrent les graphiques c'est, qu'en général, au plus on exige de vaccins pour les nourrissons au plus élevée est aussi la mortalité.





[...] Quand un médecin tel Paul Offit, M.D. de l'Hôpital pour Enfants de Philadelphie, vote, en tant que membre du CDC pour approuver un vaccin pour lequel il est partiellement propriétaire d'un brevet (profit pour la première année : $ 48.000.000) veille-t-il particulièrement à ses propres intérêts, ou utilise-t-il le pouvoir du gouvernement pour ce type de « de fraude, de tromperie, de contrainte, de démesure ou autre forme de coercition » pour lesquelles des médecins nazis ont été pendus ?

Quand un scientifique suggère qu'en 2025 la moitié de tous les enfants américains recevront le diagnostic d'autisme , la survie même de la civilisation semble être en jeu.

Même si le génocide génomique découle simplement d'intérêts particuliers, du copinage-corporatiste, et de la pseudo-science, le droit absolu des individus à la liberté de choix en matière de soins de santé leur est clairement refusé. La suite, c'est que des personnes en meurent... Tout ceci viole non seulement la lettre, mais surtout l'esprit des soins de santé, ainsi que le Code de Nuremberg. Les médecins et les infirmières qui vaccinent des personnes contre leur gré, les politiciens qui permettent cette agression commettent un crime contre l'humanité.


© Inconnu
Un socialiste déguisé en homme de fausse paix

La vaccination est une pratique barbare, ainsi que l’une des plus fatales tromperies de notre temps. Les objecteurs à la vaccination devraient se lever, seuls s’il le fallait, contre le monde entier pour défendre leur conviction.


Source trouver: Sott

Publié par Fabian Gehrig à 18:12:00

http://spread-the-truth777.blogspot.fr/2015/07/vaccination-forcee-un-crime-…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 27 Aoû - 10:14 (2015)    Sujet du message: CP-15 VETERINARIANS TREAT, TRAIN IN THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC Répondre en citant

CP-15 VETERINARIANS TREAT, TRAIN IN THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC

Story Number: NNS150825-05Release Date: 8/25/2015 10:55:00 AM 

By Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Brittney Cannady, Continuing Promise Public Affairs


SANTO DOMINGO, Dominican Republic (NNS) -- U.S. Army veterinarians, technicians, and volunteers with non-governmental organization (NGO) World Vets, partnered with Dominican Republic (D.R.) military members and veterinarians to perform surgeries, vaccinations, treatment and training, Aug. 15-21, during Continuing Promise 2015.

The veterinary team collaborated with the Ministry of Health and the Humane Society of the Dominican Republic to conduct veterinary civil affairs programs (VETCAPs) for local residents at Hospital Clinico Veterinario and multiple locations throughout Santo Domingo, which were selected based on their need for vaccination assistance.

"Being at the local clinic where we can interact with pet owners and their animals, allows us a chance to get immediate feedback and see how our work impacts the people of the Dominican Republic," said U.S. Army Capt. Emily Corbin, a veterinarian assigned to Public Health Command District Fort Meade, Maryland.

During the VETCAPs, vets worked closely with local NGOs to provide in-depth training on surgical procedures, preventative medicine and vaccinations, helping strengthen working relationships between the U.S. and the D.R.

"The vet team was a tremendous help to our veterinarians," said Patricia Valerio, chief veterinary epidemiologist at the Dominican Republic National Anti-rabies Center. "The skills they shared with us are greatly appreciated by everyone. The staff and students were able get more hands-on training with canine surgeries and examinations."

Medications and supplies were donated to the clinic, and more than 30 surgeries were performed side-by-side with local veterinarian staff, allowing both groups to sharpen their skills while treating animals in the community.

"I enjoyed having the team working alongside us, because every procedure was used as an opportunity to teach each other," said Valerio. "They were willing to help as many animals as they could while here in Santo Domingo."

The team also facilitated behavioral training with D.R. military working dogs at Unidad Canina de Operaciones Especial de la Policia Nacional, and Escuela Regional de Entrenamiento. Lessons on diet, nutrition and first aid were presented to help handlers keep their working dogs in top form; something Corbin said she believes will make a difference even after the mission.

"Seeing how the Dominican handlers operated at their facilities helped us identify what techniques could be adapted to fit their specific environment, and that sense of collaboration is really how we strengthen the working relationship in each country we visit," she added.

Comfort's veterinary team has conducted VETCAPs in Belize, Guatemala, Jamaica, Nicaragua, Panama, El Salvador, Colombia, Dominica and the Dominican Republic. More are planned to take place at the final mission stops in Haiti and Honduras.

Continuing Promise is a U.S. Southern Command-sponsored and U.S. Naval Forces Southern Command/U.S. 4th Fleet-conducted deployment to conduct civil-military operations including humanitarian-civil assistance, subject matter expert exchanges, medical, dental, veterinary and engineering support, and disaster response to partner nations and to show the United States' continued support and commitment to Central and South America and the Caribbean.

For more news from Continuing Promise, visit www.navy.mil/local/cp/ .

http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=90768


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 30 Aoû - 03:42 (2015)    Sujet du message: CANADA : MANDATORY VACCINATIONS COMING TO A SCHOOL NEAR YOU Répondre en citant

CANADA : MANDATORY VACCINATIONS COMING TO A SCHOOL NEAR YOU



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlfZ_CK6rFg

"The Canadian Medical Association wants schools to force parents into providing “vaccination histories” of their students....It's a backdoor mandatory vaccination program, because if governments adhere to the CMA's request, schools will have the power to force parents into providing the medical history of their children" - Dan Dicks

Sources:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatc...

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-sc...

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/n...

http://www.news1130.com/2015/08/26/ca...

http://pressfortruth.ca/top-stories/c...

http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_D...


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 3 Sep - 04:23 (2015)    Sujet du message: ENTRE 10 ET 30 MILLIONS D'AMERICAINS ONT RECU UN VACCIN CONTAMINE QUI POURRAIT DONNER DES CANCERS ! Répondre en citant

ENTRE 10 ET 30 MILLIONS D'AMERICAINS ONT RECU UN VACCIN CONTAMINE QUI POURRAIT DONNER DES CANCERS !

C'est sans compter tous les enfants dans le monde qui ont reçu ce vaccin et qui sont morts dans les heures et les jours qui a suivi les campagnes de vaccinations du vaccin contre la polio. N'oublions pas ce qu'a dit Bill Gates, ce grand criminel travaillant à cet agenda global de réduire les populations.



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjj4Iq-rsNg


Publié par wikistrike.com sur 2 Septembre 2015, 09:26am
Catégories : #Santé - psychologie

http://www.wikistrike.com/tag/sante%20-%20psychologie/

Photo: Le SV40

Un document officiel du CDC (agence de sécurité sanitaire US), affirme qu'entre 10 et 30 millions d'américains ont reçu un vaccin contre la polio contaminé par le virus SV40. Ce virus a été détecté dans certains types de cancers chez l'Homme !

Sur le site du CDC, la page a été supprimée (bien sûr), mais heureusement, nous avons pour vous une capture d'écran.
 
Alexander Doyle pour WikiStrike - Lu sur CDP
 
----
En savoir plus sur ce virus ici



http://www.wikistrike.com/2015/09/entre-10-et-30-millions-d-americains-ont-…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 22 Sep - 14:08 (2015)    Sujet du message: NEW SCHOOL YEAR, NEW FLU YEAR Répondre en citant



NEW SCHOOL YEAR, NEW FLU YEAR

9/10/2015

Children have returned to school and as they settle in to new classes and new routines, parents brace themselves for new school year sniffles. Most flu activity occurs from October to May in the United States, and many refer to this time as flu season.

Because children spend most of their time in classrooms, cold and flu germs are more easily spread. Most experts believe that flu viruses spread mainly by droplets made when people with flu cough, sneeze or talk.

The flu can be serious, even for healthy, young people. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend flu vaccines for all children 6 months and older. Flu vaccines not only protect the children who are vaccinated but also those who they come in contact with, especially those with weaker immune systems like very young children or the elderly.

TRICARE covers two forms of the flu vaccine, the flu shot and Flu Mist. The flu shot is recommended for all age groups 6 months to 64 years of age. There is a high dose version for those older than 65. Flu Mist is recommended for those between the ages of 2 and 49 years old but not recommended for pregnant women.

Get the flu vaccine for free by visiting your local military hospital or clinic. Call ahead to find out a good time to go because active duty service members have priority and you want to make sure they have some flu vaccines available.

You can also visit a participating TRICARE network pharmacy or any TRICARE-authorized provider.  Be sure a pharmacist gives you the vaccine so that it is covered by the pharmacy benefit for free. Please note, if you see your doctor, you may have a copayment or cost share for the office visit. Active-duty service members must comply with their Service’s policy for getting flu shots.

Get more information about the flu vaccine and preventing the flu on the TRICARE Flu Resources web page.

Last Updated 9/15/2015

http://www.tricare.mil/fluseason091015


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 23 Sep - 12:47 (2015)    Sujet du message: NE PAS FAIRE VACCINER SON ENFANT PEUT ENVOYER EN PRISON, QUELLE OPTION CHOISIR ALORS? Répondre en citant

NE PAS FAIRE VACCINER SON ENFANT PEUT ENVOYER EN PRISON, QUELLE OPTION CHOISIR ALORS?

mardi 22 septembre 2015


L’équation est simple, nous avons d’un côté une obligation vaccinale pour les enfants avec le DT-Polio, ne pas faire vacciner son enfant est considéré comme étant de la maltraitance, voir « une soustraction à ses obligations légales comportant la santé, la sécurité, la moralité ou l’éducation de son enfant« . Seulement, s’il est important de faire vacciner son enfant avec les vaccins légaux, ceux-ci n’existent plus dans le commerce, ils ne sont plus vendus, les labos pharmaceutiques ayant décidé de ne plus vendre que des doses composées des vaccins obligatoires mélangés à des vaccins peu utiles mais qui rapportent au labo en question. De ce fait, vous pouvez permettre l’injection de 6 voir 7 vaccins alors que la loi n’en imposer que 3. Ce qu’il ne faut pas oublier, c’est que nombre de vaccins contiennent des adjuvants, et des composants peu recommandables, et que les effets secondaires peuvent également être désastreux. Quelle voie suivre alors? Faire vacciner son enfants au risque qu’il y ait des conséquences graves? Ou accepter de passer au tribunal au risque de finir en prison?

Par contre, rien ni personne n’a pensé à obliger les laboratoires pharmaceutiques producteurs de ces vaccins à ressortir le vaccin DT-Polio sans vaccins superflus! Ha si, il y a eu le Professeur Joyeux qui a dénoncé cette dérive, gros scandale à la clé, et l’ensemble des bienfaiteurs de ce pays sont passés à autre chose, il y a des sujets qui sont vites oubliés, dès que cela concerne le profit de certains…. Quand au médecin qui a dénoncé ses parents, nul doute qu’il aurait eu beaucoup de succès durant la seconde guerre mondiale!
http://lesmoutonsenrages.fr/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/69869_vaccin-une3.jp…

Les époux Larère ont comparu devant le tribunal correctionnel d’Auxerre pour ne pas avoir vacciné leur fillette. Une affaire qui dépasse leur cas personnel.



Les époux Larère ont comparu jeudi 17 septembre devant le tribunal correctionnel d’Auxerre pour ne pas avoir vacciné leur fillette, L. Cette histoire s’inscrit sur fond de défiance grandissante à l’encontre des vaccins, qui touche les pays occidentaux. « L’affaire Larère » est un procès emblématique qui dépasse donc les simples individus, et pourrait n’être qu’une première.

Pourquoi ce procès ?

Marc et Samia Larère étaient poursuivis pour « soustraction par un parent à ses obligations légales comportant la santé, la sécurité, la moralité ou l’éducation de son enfant. » En cause : leur refus de se plier à l’obligation vaccinale. En France, vacciner son enfant contre la diphtérie, la polio et le tétanos est obligatoire (vaccin DT-polio), et ne pas le faire vous fait plonger dans l’illégalité. C’est un délit pénal. Les autres vaccins existants ne sont que « recommandés ».

Ne pas vacciner est considéré comme une forme de « maltraitance », et cela peut nuire à la sociabilisation de l’enfant, puisque l’inscription à l’école lui sera refusée à ses 6 ans (scolarité obligatoire). Les Lalère ont été dénoncés par un médecin.

L’affaire paraît folle puisque leur petite L., aujourd’hui âgée de 3 ans, se porte très bien et n’est pas victime de mauvais traitements. Elle n’est juste pas immunisée contre des maladies potentielles.

Le procureur a requis 4 mois de prison avec sursis et 500 euros d’amende à leur encontre – ils encouraient jusqu’à 2 ans de prison et 30.000 euros d’amende ; leur avocat a demandé leur relaxe. Le jugement sera prononcé le 29 octobre.

Une vraie lacune de notre système vaccinal

L’argumentaire de Marc Lalère est simple. Il affirme ne pas être opposé aux vaccins dans l’absolu. Il ne peut juste pas souscrire à l’obligation vaccinale car il lui est impossible de trouver le vaccin obligatoire sur le marché.

En effet, le DT-Polio seul n’existe plus dans les frigos des pharmacies. Les laboratoires-fabricants lui ajoutent d’autres vaccins, « recommandés » ceux-là. Ainsi, l’enfant subit moins d’injections. C’est du « tout en un ». Sauf qu’en cas d’accident vaccinal, le parent vaccinateur pourra se demander éternellement si c’est le vaccin « non indispensable » (au regard de la loi) qui a provoqué la maladie de son enfant.

J’ai agi en bon père de famille et en citoyen éclairé », a donc insisté Marc Larère, droit dans ses bottes.

Plaidant la « liberté vaccinale », son avocat avait par ailleurs soulevé il y a quelques mois une Question prioritaire de constitutionnalité (QPC) pertinente : contraindre ainsi à la vaccination est-il conforme à la Constitution ? Le Conseil constitutionnel a tranché en mars, répondant que oui. « En imposant ces obligations de vaccination, le législateur a entendu lutter contre trois maladies très graves et contagieuses ou susceptibles d’être éradiquées », ont dit les Sages.

Article en intégralité sur Tempsreel.nouvelobs.com

http://spread-the-truth777.blogspot.fr/2015/09/ne-pas-faire-vacciner-son-en…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 739
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 25 Sep - 00:24 (2015)    Sujet du message: LEAD DEVELOPER OF HPV VACINES COMES CLEAN, WARNS PARENTS & YOUNG GIRLS IT'S ALL A GIANT DEADLY SCAM Répondre en citant

LEAD DEVELOPER OF HPV VACINES COMES CLEAN, WARNS PARENTS & YOUNG GIRLS IT'S ALL A GIANT DEADLY SCAM



Dr. Diane Harper was a leading expert responsible for the Phase II and Phase III safety and effectiveness studies which secured the approval of the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines, Gardasil™ and Cervarix™.  Dr. Harper also authored many of the published, scholarly papers about the vaccines.  She is now the latest in a long string of experts who are pressing the red alert button on the devastating consequences and irrelevancy of these vaccines.  Dr. Harper made her surprising confession at the 4th International Converence on Vaccination which took place in Reston, Virginia.  Her speech, which was originally intended to promote the benefits of the vaccines, took a 180-degree turn when she chose instead to clean her conscience about the deadly vaccines so she “could sleep at night”.  The following is an excerpt from a story by Sarah Cain:

“Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in the U.S. is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any effect upon the rate of cervical cancer in the United States.  In fact, 70% of all HPV infections resolve themselves without treatment in a year, and the number rises to well over 90% in two years.  Harper also mentioned the safety angle.  All trials of the vaccines were done on children aged 15 and above, despite them currently being marketed for 9-year-olds.  So far, 15,037 girls have reported adverse side effects from Gardasil™ alone to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), and this number only reflects parents who underwent the hurdles required for reporting adverse reactions.  At the time of writing, 44 girls are officially known to have died from these vaccines.  The reported side effects include Guillian Barré Syndrome (paralysis lasting for years, or permanently — sometimes eventually causing suffocation), lupus, seizures, blood clots, and brain inflammation.  Parents are usually not made aware of these risks.  Dr. Harper, the vaccine developer, claimed that she was speaking out, so that she might finally be able to sleep at night.  ’About eight in every ten women who have been sexually active will have HPV at some stage of their life,’ Harper says.  ’Normally there are no symptoms, and in 98 per cent of cases it clears itself.  But in those cases where it doesn’t, and isn’t treated, it can lead to pre-cancerous cells which may develop into cervical cancer.’”

Although these two vaccines are marketed as protection against cervical cancer, this claim is purely hypothetical.  Studies have proven “there is no demonstrated relationship between the condition being vaccinated for and the rare cancers that the vaccine might prevent, but it is marketed to do that nonetheless.  In fact, there is no actual evidence that the vaccine can prevent any cancer.  From the manufacturers own admissions, the vaccine only works on 4 strains out of 40 for a specific venereal disease that dies on its own in a relatively short period, so the chance of it actually helping an individual is about about the same as the chance of her being struck by a meteorite.”

UPDATE #1: Since coming forward with the truth about the devastating consequences of the HPV vaccine, Dr. Harper has been victim of a relentless campaign attempting to discredit the validity of her claims.  Harper was even misquoted by British tabloid The Sunday Express which printed a false story loaded with fabricated quotations attributed to Harper.  In an interview with The Guardian, Harper makes it very clear about what exactly she said in order to protect herself from a potential lawsuit.  In an interview with CBS NEWS, Harper clarifies her position, and once again makes it crystal clear just how devastating this vaccine can be: “If we vaccinate 11 year olds and the protection doesn’t last … we’ve put them at harm from side effects, small but real, for no benefit,” says Dr. Harper. “The benefit to public health is nothing, there is no reduction in cervical cancers, they are just postponed, unless the protection lasts for at least 15 years, and over 70% of all sexually active females of all ages are vaccinated.”  She also says that enough serious side effects have been reported after Gardasil use that the vaccine could prove riskier than the cervical cancer it purports to prevent.  Cervical cancer is usually entirely curable when detected early through normal Pap screenings.

“The risks of serious adverse events including death reported after Gardasil use in (the JAMA article by CDC’s Dr. Barbara Slade) were 3.4/100,000 doses distributed,” Harper tells CBS NEWS.  ”The rate of serious adverse events on par with the death rate of cervical cancer.  Gardasil has been associated with at least as many serious adverse events as there are deaths from cervical cancer developing each year.  Indeed, the risks of vaccination are underreported in Slade’s article, as they are based on a denominator of doses distributed from Merck’s warehouse.  Up to a third of those doses may be in refrigerators waiting to be dispensed as the autumn onslaught of vaccine messages is sent home to parents the first day of school.  Should the denominator in Dr. Slade’s work be adjusted to account for this, and then divided by three for the number of women who would receive all three doses, the incidence rate of serious adverse events increases up to five fold. How does a parent value that information,” said Harper.

“Parents and women must know that deaths occurred,” Harper tells CBS NEWS.  “Not all deaths that have been reported were represented in Dr. Slade’s work, one-third of the death reports were unavailable to the CDC, leaving the parents of the deceased teenagers in despair that the CDC is ignoring the very rare but real occurrences that need not have happened if parents were given information stating that there are real, but small risks of death surrounding the administration of Gardasil.”  She also worries that Merck’s aggressive marketing of the vaccine may have given women a false sense of security. “The future expectations women hold because they have received free doses of Gardasil purchased by philanthropic foundations, by public health agencies or covered by insurance is the true threat to cervical cancer in the future.  Should women stop Pap screening after vaccination, the cervical cancer rate will actually increase per year. Should women believe this is preventive for all cancers — something never stated, but often inferred by many in the population — a reduction in all health care will compound our current health crisis.  Should Gardasil not be effective for more than 15 years, the most costly public health experiment in cancer control will have failed miserably.”  Harper notes that her concern for the vaccine’s deadly side effects applies only to women in the Western world.  ”Of course, in developing countries where there is no safety Pap screening for women repeatedly over their lifetimes, the risks of serious adverse events may be acceptable as the incidence rate of cervical cancer is five to 12 times higher than in the US, dwarfing the risk of death reported after Gardasil.”

UPDATE #2: The National Vaccine Information Center HAS CONFIRMED two virologists, Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski have filed a lawsuit against their former employer and vaccine manufacturer Merck.  NVIC writes: “The lawsuit alleges that Merck defrauded the U.S. for over 10 years by overstating the MMR vaccine’s effectivenes.  The virologists claim in their lawsuit that they ‘Witnessed firsthand the improper testing and data falseification in which Merck engaged to artificially inflate the vaccine’s efficacy findings.”  NVIC president and co-founder, Barbara Loe Fisher, warns of the disturbingly cozy relationship and overwhelming conflict of interest between federal agencies charged with vaccine safety oversight (such as the Centers for Disease Control) and vaccine manufacturers.  Merck’s global vaccine sales total more than $20 BILLION A YEAR.

As the world’s pharmaceutical giants continue to be driven less by moral accountability and more by profit and shareholder-driven bottom lines, we are going to see more and more products such as this vaccine which are marketed as “essential to one’s survival.”  While some vaccines are indeed essential, such as vaccines for polio and measles, the HPV vaccine is a new beast entirely.  To learn more about how pharmaceutical giants are putting profits ahead of ethics you need to watch FRONTLINE’s terrifying new documentary “Hunting The Nightmare Bacteria.”



GARDASIL VICTIM SPEAKS OUT AFTER 2 YEARS



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gCVCP8BFrU

Sources: CBS NEWS 1National Vaccine Information CenterCBS NEWS 2Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System

http://worldtruth.tv/lead-developer-of-hpv-vaccines-comes-clean-warns-paren…


Revenir en haut
Contenu Sponsorisé






MessagePosté le: Aujourd’hui à 14:33 (2016)    Sujet du message: CAMPAGNE DE VACCINATION (PARTIE 2)

Revenir en haut
Montrer les messages depuis:   
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> LA RELIGION MONDIALE ET L'ONU : SES VUES ET AGENDA SUR LE TRANSHUMANISME, CLONAGE, AGENDA DE DÉPOPULATION -> CAMPAGNE DE VACCINATION -VACCINATION CAMPAIGN (PARTIE 2) Toutes les heures sont au format GMT + 2 Heures
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  >
Page 5 sur 7

 
Sauter vers:  

Portail | Index | Creer un forum | Forum gratuit d’entraide | Annuaire des forums gratuits | Signaler une violation | Conditions générales d'utilisation
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Traduction par : phpBB-fr.com