LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum


 FAQFAQ   RechercherRechercher   MembresMembres   GroupesGroupes   S’enregistrerS’enregistrer 
 ProfilProfil   Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés   ConnexionConnexion 

Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Sujet précédent :: Sujet suivant  
Auteur Message

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 722

MessagePosté le: Dim 19 Nov - 06:32 (2017)    Sujet du message: NEW CDC GUIDELINES : 5 YEAR-OLD CAN RECEIVE UP TO 19 VACCINATIONS IN ONE MONTH Répondre en citant


Mandatory vaccines are only there to force parents under threats to kill their kids.

by Christina England
Health Impact News

On November 2, 2017, Neil Z. Miller made an online announcement that was guaranteed to shock thousands of parents worldwide.

In a post, written on the popular social media platform Facebook, Miller exposed that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had recently hatched a plan to ensure that ALL children were up to date with their scheduled vaccinations, whether they were vaccinated or unvaccinated.

He revealed that the CDC had launched a catch-up program which could cause an unvaccinated 5-year-old to receive as many as 19 vaccinations in one month.

He wrote that:

“The CDC has just launched a program that will calculate a catch-up schedule for children who were not vaccinated on schedule. A 5-year-old child who was not previously vaccinated would be required to receive 19 vaccines in one month, including 6 doses of aluminum-containing injections! This catch-up schedule was NOT tested for safety to determine the immediate or long-term risk of neurological or immunological damage.” (own emphasis)

Following the links provided by Miller, it appears that the CDC table of vaccinations required in their catch-up program had been approved by the following organizations:

Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices – (www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip)

American Academy of Pediatrics – (www.aap.org)

 American Academy of Family Physicians – (www.aafp.org)

 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists – (www.acog.org)

See tables here.

Could their latest step be yet another one of the many underhanded tactics used by the CDC to implement mandatory vaccination?

Higher Number of Vaccinations Equals Higher Number of Infant Deaths
That number of vaccinations administered in such a short time frame could potentially kill a young child, and if anyone would know how dangerous administering 19 vaccinations in one month could be, it would be Neil Z. Miller.

According to his bio, Miller has devoted the past 30 years of his life to not only educating parents and health practitioners about the dangers of vaccines, but also encouraging informed consent and non-mandatory laws.

In 2011, Miller and his co-author Gary S. Goldman published an extremely well-written paper titled Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?

Their paper highlighted the fact that the countries with the highest number of vaccinations on their schedule were the same countries that had the highest number of infant mortalities.

Using a number of tables, the researchers were able to determine that the number of infant deaths appeared to coincide with the number of vaccinations being administered in each country.

Through rigorous research, they discovered that the lower the number of vaccines being recommended, the lower the number of infant deaths.

They wrote:

“The infant mortality rate is expressed as the number of infant deaths per 1000 live births. According to the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), which keeps accurate, up-to-date infant mortality statistics throughout the world, in 2009 there were 33 nations with better infant mortality rates than the United States.”

They determined that in 2009, a total of 26 vaccine doses were recommended for children under the age of one in the U.S. The team then compared the number of vaccine doses being recommended in each country against the number of infant deaths.

From their calculations, they were able to determine that not only did the U.S. recommend the highest number of vaccinations, but that they also had the highest number of infant deaths.

Since 2009, the number of vaccinations being recommended to infants has significantly increased. According to recent reports, the U.S. vaccination schedule currently recommends that children receive a total of 56 injections of 73 doses of 30 different vaccines beginning on day one of their life.

It would be interesting to know if the infant mortality rate has continued to rise, just as Miller had predicted.

Miller’s 2011 paper was not the only paper in which he made it abundantly clear that multiple vaccinations could endanger the life of a young child.

Combining Childhood Vaccinations in One Visit is Potentially Life-Threatening
In September 2016, Miller and his co-author Goldman published a paper titled Combining Childhood Vaccines at One Visit Is Not Safe.

Using data taken from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) website, Miller was able to prove that the more vaccines a child received at any given time, the more likely an adverse reaction could occur.

They wrote that:

 “… Of the 38,801 VAERS reports that we analyzed, 969 infants received two vaccine doses prior to the adverse event and 107 of those infants were hospitalized: a hospitalization rate of 11%. Of 1,959 infants who received three vaccine doses prior to the adverse event, 243 of them required hospitalization: 12.4%. For four doses, 561 of 3,909 infants were hospitalized: 14.4%.

Notice the emerging pattern: Infants who had an adverse event reported to VAERS were more likely to require hospitalization when they received three vaccine doses instead of two, or four vaccine doses instead of three.”

The researchers continued:

“… Of 10,114 infants who received five vaccine doses prior to the adverse event, 1,463 of them required hospitalization: 14.5%. For six doses, 1,365 of 8,454 infants were hospitalized: 16.1%. For seven doses, 1,051 of 5,489 infants were hospitalized: 19.1%. And for eight doses, 661 of 2,817 infants were hospitalized: 23.5%. The hospitalization rate increased linearly from 11.0% for two doses to 23.5% for eight doses.”

In other words, the more vaccines that an infant received, the more likely they were to suffer an adverse reaction.

Miller and Goldman explained that:

“Of the 38,801 VAERS reports that we analyzed, 11,927 infants received one, two, three, or four vaccine doses prior to having an adverse event, and 423 of those infants died: a mortality rate of 3.6%. The remaining 26,874 infants received five, six, seven, or eight vaccine doses prior to the adverse event and 1,458 of them died: 5.4%.

The mortality rate for infants who received five to eight vaccine doses (5.4%) is significantly higher than the mortality rate for infants who received one to four doses (3.6%), with a rate ratio(RR) of 1.5 (95% CI, 1.4-1.7).

Of infants reported to VAERS, those who had received more vaccines had a statistically significant 50% higher mortality rate compared with those who had received fewer.”

To read more on Miller’s paper, see my article: New Study Warns of the Dangers of Multiple Vaccinations.

Unvaccinated Baby Died When Doctor Guessed Number of Vaccines He Should Receive


Sadly, Miller was correct, because in 2015, I wrote the tragic story of six month-old Bently, who died after his doctor made an “educated” guess and administered 13 vaccinations in one day. I wrote:

“Imagine being emotionally blackmailed by your doctor to have your baby vaccinated with a lethal cocktail of 13 vaccines, which included two doses of the DTaP, three doses of the oral rotavirus vaccine and two doses of the polio vaccination. It sounds impossible, doesn’t it?”

However, this is exactly what happened to Alisa Neathery when she took her six month-old unvaccinated baby to the doctor for the first time.

She told VacTruth:

“Prior to the shots being given, when the doctor was discussing the pros of getting vaccinated with me, he explained how he was from a village in Africa.

That we were lucky in America to have the opportunity to receive vaccines because where he was from, the mothers had to have like 11 kids each, since most would die off from disease because they were not as fortunate to receive vaccines like we are here in America.

He really pushed them on me hard. He spent a lot of time convincing me to give Bently the vaccines, but when it was done, we never saw the doctor again.”

According to Alisa, the doctor spent a long time deciding exactly which vaccinations Bently should receive and told Alisa that they shouldn’t give him too many. The doctor eventually decided on a total of 13 vaccinations, which Alisa now believes led to Bently’s death just five days later.

You can listen to Alisa’s tragic story in full, as she explained to Richie Allen exactly what happened on the day she decided to have her child vaccinated.

With Alisa’s story in mind, we asked Miller if he could comment on the CD

Alisa Neathery: "A GP Gave My Baby 13 Vaccines At Once. He Died In My Arms 5 Days Later!"

VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3a4AUPB5ZUs


Revenir en haut

MessagePosté le: Dim 19 Nov - 06:32 (2017)    Sujet du message: Publicité

PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?
Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 722

MessagePosté le: Jeu 23 Nov - 20:56 (2017)    Sujet du message: ITALIE : FEU VERT DE LA COUR CONSTITUTIONNELLE AUX VACCINS OBLIGATOIRES Répondre en citant


Agence France-Presse
| Publié le 22 novembre 2017 à 11:42 - Mis à jour le 22 novembre 2017 à 11:49


La Cour constitutionnelle italienne a validé mercredi une loi votée cet été rendant 10 vaccins obligatoires pour l'entrée à l'école, rejetant un recours formé par la région Vénétie (nord).

Les vaccins contre la diphtérie, le tétanos, la poliomyélite ou encore la rougeole sont obligatoires pour inscrire un enfant de moins de 6 ans à la crèche ou à la maternelle. De 6 à 16 ans, les parents des enfants non vaccinés risquent des amendes de 100 à 500 euros (de 150 à 750 dollars canadiens).

Pour la Vénétie, cela constitue une atteinte au droit individuel à la santé. La région, depuis longtemps agitée par des poussées autonomistes, applique depuis dix ans un modèle fondé sur la liberté de choix après une information apportée aux familles.

Mais les juges constitutionnels ont estimé que l'obligation était «légitime», les mesures préconisées par le gouvernement relevant «du législateur national».

«Ce choix n'est pas déraisonnable, puisqu'il vise à protéger la santé individuelle et collective», ont-ils précisé dans leur décision.

L'Organisation mondiale de la santé (OMS) fixe à 95% de la population le taux de couverture vaccinale nécessaire pour atteindre «le seuil d'immunité de groupe» pour une maladie. Un niveau que l'Italie n'atteint pas pour les principaux vaccins.

Le pays connaît ainsi une recrudescence des cas de rougeole depuis le début de l'année, dont plusieurs mortels. Dans 88% des cas, les personnes n'étaient pas vaccinées.

«Nous prenons acte de la décision, que nous respectons. Comme président de région, j'ai fait mon devoir, en défendant un modèle basé sur la liberté. Désormais, nous passons à la coercition», a déploré mercredi le président de la région Vénétie Luca Zaia.

«Le texte protège la santé de nos enfants et de toute la population», s'est en revanche réjouie la ministre de la Santé, Beatrice Lorenzin, qui a plusieurs fois posté sur les réseaux sociaux des photos des séances de vaccination de ses jumeaux nés en 2015.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 722

MessagePosté le: Ven 22 Déc - 00:37 (2017)    Sujet du message: UNICEF AIRLIFTS SIX MILLION DOSES OF VACCINES TO CHILDREN IN YEMEN Répondre en citant


On 25 November 2017, a shipment of vaccines is delivered to the Sana’a International airport, bringing in15 tonnes of BCG, Penta and PCV vaccine supplies to protect Yemeni children from diseases such as diphtheria and tetanus. UNICEF/UN0147212/Madhok

21 December 2017 – A plane charted by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) landed in Sana’a, Yemen, on Thursday, delivering nearly 6 million doses of essential vaccines to protect millions of children at risk of preventable diseases, including the current diphtheria outbreak that has reportedly infected over 300 people and killed 35.

“Vaccinating children in Yemen now is critical to protect them from preventable diseases and death. It is vital that vaccines and other lifesaving supplies for children continue to flow into Yemen and across the country unimpeded. They are a lifeline for millions of children,” said Meritxell Relaño, UNICEF Representative in Yemen.
Most diphtheria cases and deaths are among children.

Since 2015, the southern Arabian nation has been in a conflict between forces loyal to President Abdrabbuh Mansour Hadi and those allied to the Houthi rebel movement.

The country is in the grips of the world’s worst humanitarian crisis, with restrictions on fuel and food imports further complicating emergency response.

The restrictions add to the misery of children in Yemen who already face the triple threat of diseases, malnutrition and violence.

UNICEF reiterates its call on all parties to allow unhindered humanitarian access to all of Yemen’s land, sea and air ports and to facilitate the distribution of lifesaving assistance for children inside the country.

News Tracker: past stories on this issue

UN envoy urges support for efforts to resume political process in Yemen


1 Month later



Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 722

MessagePosté le: Jeu 11 Jan - 00:53 (2018)    Sujet du message: DEATH FROM FLU SHOTS INCREASE DRAMATICALLY Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HDnWQaFUK0

If you are over 65, the CDC does not count deaths from flu shots.

This year, deaths from flu shots have increased dramatically. Doctors are completely willfully ignorant as to the deaths from vaccines or even what ingredients are in vaccines, yet they all prescribe it because they too profit from giving vaccines to all. Educate yourself. Protect your children.

My Child. My Choice. Period!



https://avvi.info/2017/12/30/critical... https://www.nature.com/news/us-govern...

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/austra... http://www.thecablevine.com/forum/f36...

The Future of Mandatory Forced Vaccinations For All https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GomwE...

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 722

MessagePosté le: Lun 15 Jan - 16:39 (2018)    Sujet du message: WHO SUPPORTS THE IMMUNIZATION OF 1 MILLION PEOPLE AGAINST CHOLERA IN ZAMBIA Répondre en citant


11 Jan 2018

from World Health Organization
Published on 10 Jan 2018 

© WHO/Lorenzo Pezzoli

The Government of Zambia has launched a campaign on Wednesday (January 10) to vaccinate residents of Lusaka against cholera with support from the World Health Organization and partners.

Two million doses of the oral cholera vaccine from the Gavi-funded global stockpile were delivered to the southern African country in January, enough to immunize 1 million people. = Bill Gates foundation

According to Health Minister Dr Chitalu Chilufya, the campaign will bring the life-saving oral cholera vaccine to the people who need it most. He also highlighted the role that communities can play in preventing the spread of the disease. “Communities should not ignore basic preventative measures because the key drivers of this epidemic include consumption of contaminated water and food, poor waste management, and poor personal hygiene practices which have to change,” said Dr Chilufya.

Cholera is an acute diarrhoeal disease that can kill within hours if left untreated. Since the start of the current outbreak on 4 October 2017, the Ministry of Health reports that there have been a total of 2,672 cases, with Lusaka alone accounting for 2,558 cases. There have been 63 deaths countrywide, 58 of which in Lusaka.

WHO is working with the Zambia National Public Health Institute (ZNPHI) to address the underlying causes of the cholera outbreak: clean water provision, sanitation and health education on personal hygiene. WHO is also helping authorities to track down cases, treat cholera patients and provide community health education.

Selected vaccination sites in central areas of Lusaka will be targeted under the campaign. WHO has provided training to medical personnel in how to administer the vaccine, as well as on other preventive measures and cholera treatment.

“Zambia is experiencing one of the worst outbreaks of cholera in years,” said Dr. Nathan Bakyaita, WHO Representative to Zambia. “With this campaign, we can stop cholera in its tracks and prevent an even more devastating epidemic.”

While sporadic cases of cholera are regular occurrences in Zambia during the five-month rainy season, the number of cases this year has exceeded the average annual caseload.

WHO recommends that vaccination against cholera be considered in emergencies and other high-risk scenarios where there are increased threats of outbreaks, when combined with standard prevention and control measures for the disease. These measures include readiness to provide adequate testing and treatment, steps to ensure access to safe water and sanitation, and community mobilization to engage the public in preventing infection.

Planning is underway to vaccinate a further 1 million people living in known cholera hotspots across the country later this year.

For Additional Information or to Request Interviews, Please contact:
Nora Mweemba

Health Information and Promotion Officer
Tel: 255322 /255336, 255398, Cell: 097873976
Email: mweemban@who.int


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 722

MessagePosté le: Jeu 8 Fév - 04:52 (2018)    Sujet du message: FORCED VACCINE STERILIZED 500,000 WOMEN & CHILDREN! NWO 'STERILIZATION EXERCISE' EXPOSED Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yBycwm3xHE

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 722

MessagePosté le: Jeu 8 Fév - 05:12 (2018)    Sujet du message: ABOUT GAVI - GAVI'S STRATEGY / A PROPOS DE GAVI, L'ALLIANCE DU VACCIN Répondre en citant

You are here:
Our 2016–2020 mission, to save children’s lives and protect people’s health by increasing equitable use of vaccines in lower-income countries, is guided by four strategic goals Twisted Evil

  • In June 2014, the Gavi Board approved a new five-year strategy to ensure we deliver on our overall mission for 2016–2020. Full implementation of the strategy will see developing countries immunise 300 million children, saving 5–6 million lives in the long term.
    Coverage and equity are at the core of our strategy. While we continue to support countries to introduce new vaccines, our focus is expanding to reach every child with these vaccines. With as many as 20 countries transitioning out of our financial support in this period, ensuring that programmes are sustainable in the long term is essential.

The vaccine goal
  • Accelerate equitable uptake and coverage of vaccines.
The systems goal
    Increase effectiveness and efficiency of immunisation delivery as an integrated part of strengthened health systems.
The sustainability goal
  • Improve sustainability of national immunisation programmes.
The market shaping goal
  • Shape markets for vaccines and other immunisation products.
Gavi's strategy is a roadmap designed to help us respond to changes in the vaccine landscape and set five-year milestones en route to fulfilling our mission. The 2016-2020 strategy is the latest in four distinct phases since our inception:
This section details the strategic objectives and operating principles for the current phase (2016-2020) as well as providing an overview of previous strategies.

You can also learn more about our vaccine investment strategy, which we use to determine which vaccines are made available to countries through our vaccine support programmes. A new strategy is developed every five years, when we take stock of available and expected vaccines and set new priorities through in-depth analysis and widespread consultations. The latest vaccine investment strategy was developed in 2013 and covers the period 2014-2018.

Read more : http://www.gavi.org/about/strategy/

  • Gavi de A à Z: sa mission, sa stratégie, et les modèles uniques de partenariat et de fonctionnement ont transformé l'immunisation mondiale.
Comment fonctionne Gavi

  • Mission

  • http://www.gavi.org/a-propos/mission/

  • http://www.gavi.org/a-propos/mission/
    Sauver la vie des enfants, protéger la santé des populations en élargissant l’accès à la vaccination dans les pays pauvres. Twisted Evil

Le modèle de fonctionnement

Grâce à son modèle de fonctionnement innovant, Gavi entend financer l’introduction de nouveaux vaccins dans les pays en développement.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 722

MessagePosté le: Jeu 8 Fév - 05:31 (2018)    Sujet du message: ORANGE, GAVI ET LE MINISTERE DE LA SANTE DE CÔTE D'IVOIRE S'ALLIENT POUR RENFORCER LA VACCINATION DES ENFANTS DU PAYS / Orange, Gavi and Côte d'Ivoire Ministry of Health join forces to boost child immunisation Répondre en citant


Orange, Gavi and Côte d'Ivoire Ministry of Health join forces to boost child immunisation

  Le projet de téléphonie mobile « M-Vaccin Côte d’Ivoire » permettra de sensibiliser les parents et communautés à la vaccination afin de renforcer la couverture vaccinale des régions aux taux les plus faibles.

Le projet « M-Vaccin Côte d’Ivoire » informera les parents de Côte d’Ivoire sur l’importance de la vaccination par l’envoi de SMS et de messages vocaux, notamment en langue locale. Crédit : Gavi/2013/Jiro Ose.

Davos, 25 janvier 2018 – Lors du Forum économique mondial, l’opérateur de télécommunication, Orange et Gavi, l’Alliance du Vaccin ont annoncé vouloir conclure un partenariat avec le ministère de la Santé de la Côte d’Ivoire afin de renforcer les taux de vaccination dans les régions et districts où la couverture vaccinale est la plus faible.

Intitulé « M-Vaccin Côte d’Ivoire » ce projet utilisant la technologie mobile d’Orange est destiné à informer les parents sur l’importance de la vaccination par l’envoi de SMS et de messages vocaux, notamment en langue locale. Des messages ciblés doivent également permettre aux parents de ne pas manquer de séances de vaccinations en leur rappelant le calendrier vaccinal ainsi que les dates de vaccination de leurs enfants.

« Ce nouveau partenariat est extrêmement innovant  et important pour les enfants de Côte d’Ivoire, » a expliqué le Dr Seth Berkley, Directeur exécutif de Gavi, l’Alliance du Vaccin. « Souvent les parents ne reçoivent pas assez d’information sur l’importance de la vaccination parce qu’ils sont éloignés des centres de santé ou situés dans des endroits difficiles d’accès. Ces messages vocaux et ces SMS devraient avoir un impact important et entraîner une augmentation des taux de couverture. »

Outre l’envoi de messages vocaux et de SMS, Orange mettra à disposition des agents de santé une application mobile portant le même nom : M-Vaccin. Elle leur permettra de saisir avec précision les données vaccinales des communautés et populations avec qui ils sont en contact. Ils pourront ainsi créer le calendrier vaccinal personnalisé de chaque famille ce qui permettra d’améliorer le suivi des enfants et de réduire le nombre d’enfants qui ne reçoivent pas de vaccins.

« Le groupe Orange est heureux de s’associer à Gavi et au Ministère de la Santé Ivoirien afin de contribuer concrètement à ce programme de vaccination de grande envergure. Orange est convaincue de la puissance des outils numériques pour soutenir les populations les plus isolées en Afrique à la fois dans le domaine de la santé mais aussi dans d’autres secteurs comme l’éducation ou les services financiers », a ajouté Bruno Mettling, Directeur Général Adjoint du Groupe Orange en charge de Zone Afrique et Moyen-Orient. La santé étant un axe prioritaire pour Orange, le Groupe joue un rôle actif dans le développement des dernières innovations digitales et dans l’accompagnement des acteurs de la santé dans leur transformation numérique. »

Le partenariat est prévu sur cinq ans et sera déployé dans les 29 districts de Côte d’Ivoire où les taux de couverture vaccinale sont inférieurs à la moyenne nationale et où les taux d'abandon sont très élevés (>10 %). Selon une enquête réalisée en 2015 par le Programme élargi de vaccination (PEV) en Côte d'Ivoire, 23 % des mères ignorent le besoin de revenir pour la dose suivante de vaccin de leur nourrisson. Le programme « M-Vaccin » devraient atteindre plus de 800 000 enfants. Il pourrait être étendu à d’autres pays de l’Afrique de l’Ouest après une évaluation d’impact.

« Grâce à ce partenariat entre Orange, Gavi et le ministère de la Santé, nous espérons avoir un réel impact sur la couverture nationale de ces districts en envoyant des messages vocaux et sms ciblés en langue locale, » a souligné le Dr Raymonde Goudou Coffie, Ministre de la Santé et de l’Hygiène Publique de la Côte d’Ivoire. « Le ministère de la santé travaille avec des partenaires comme Gavi pour mieux informer les populations cibles sur l’importance de la vaccination. La solution qui sera mise à disposition des agents de santé communautaire va également permettre un suivi rapproché des femmes enceintes et des enfants et une réduction du nombre de perdus de vue. »

Orange et Gavi s’associeront dans le projet « M-Vaccin » à hauteur de 5,47 millions US$ sur une durée de cinq ans. La moitié de ce financement proviendra du Gavi Matching Fund, un mécanisme financé par la Fondation Bill & Melinda Gates qui incite les investissements du secteur privé dans l’immunisation.

Depuis 2001, Gavi soutient la Côte d’Ivoire qui a introduit 11 vaccins et finance le renforcement des services de santé qui ont permis d’améliorer les performances de couverture vaccinale réalisées par le PEV. 

Gavi est soutenue par des gouvernements [Australie, Brésil, Canada, Danemark, France, Allemagne, Inde, Irlande, Italie, Japon, Royaume d’Arabie Saoudite, Luxembourg, Pays-Bas, Norvège, République populaire de Chine, République de Corée, Russie, Afrique du Sud, Espagne, Qatar, Sultanat d’Oman, Suède, Royaume-Uni et Etats-Unis d’Amérique], la Commission européenne, la Fondation Alwaleed Philanthropies, le Fonds de l’OPEP pour le développement international (OFID), la Fondation Bill & Melinda Gates, Son Altesse Cheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, ainsi que des partenaires privés et institutionnels (Absolute Return for Kids, Anglo American plc., la Fondation Children’s Investment Fund, China Merchants Group, Comic Relief, Deutsche Post DHL, la Fondation ELMA pour les vaccins et la vaccination, Girl Effect, The International Federation of Pharmaceutical Wholesalers (IFPW), L’Alliance de la Jeunesse du Golfe, JP Morgan, la Fondation « la Caixa », LDS Charities, la Fondation Lions Clubs International, Majid Al Futtaim, Philips, Unilever, UPS et Vodafone).

Cliquer pour consulter la liste complète des donateurs (anglais)


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 722

MessagePosté le: Mar 13 Fév - 01:36 (2018)    Sujet du message: MASSIVE OUTBREAKS OCCURING NATIONWIDE! COULD THIS BE THE PRECURSOR TO OPERATION DEPOPULATION?! Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npvh1MuB68o

Ajoutée le 12 févr. 2018



According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), this year’s flu season is now as bad as the 2009-2010 “Swine Flu Epidemic” that affected more than 60 million Americans... With some reports noting how this current "record flu season" has resulted up to 4,000 American deaths per week.

There were 40,414 deaths in the U.S. during the third week of 2018, the most recent data available, and 4,064 were from pneumonia or influenza, according to the CDC data… In Jan. 2018, Florida has now recently announced a bill that would make it mandatory for children to receive the HPV vaccine. Of course, Florida is not the only state — as there are multiple school districts and companies that are also striving to make vaccines mandatory for schooling and for employment.

But what is the REAL Cause behind the flu, and much of these diseases?

Could all of the Governmental Alphabet Soups such as the CDC, Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), World Health Organization (WHO), and also the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ALSO play a role in such a grand scheme worldwide?

How does this apply to the United Nations (U.N.) Agenda 21/Agenda 2030 when it comes to Operation Depopulation?

Could mandatory vaccinations also play a role in Walmart, FEMA, quarantines, martial law, and even in the end times to come?!?!



LEARN MORE! “Record” Flu 2017-2018 Season TIME: http://time.com/5143232/cdc-flu-epide...
Fortune: http://fortune.com/2018/02/10/america...
Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/t...
CDC Report: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/usmap.htm

Florida Mandatory HPV Vaccine: http://weartv.com/news/local/florida-...

Diphtheria, Tetanus Report (DAPTACEL, FDA): https://www.fda.gov/downloads/biologi...
Tripedia Vaccine Report (FDA): http://www.whale.to/vaccine/DTap.pdf
Vaccine Side Effects (CDC): https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/...
NPR Report: https://www.npr.org/sections/health-s...

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 722

MessagePosté le: Sam 17 Mar - 05:21 (2018)    Sujet du message: VACCINS : UN RAPPORT PARLEMENTAIRE ITALIEN EXPLOSIF Répondre en citant


Publié par wikistrike.com sur 16 Mars 2018, 19:31pm

Catégories : #Santé - psychologie

Vaccinations: Les militaires italiens meurent les uns après les autres

Au moment où la Commission à l’Environnement, la Santé publique et la Sécurité alimentaire du Parlement européen s’apprête à soumettre au vote une résolution sur « les réticences à la vaccination et la baisse du taux de vaccination en Europe », un pavé tombe dans la mare des certitudes vaccinolâtres.

Ce pavé, c’est le rapport officiel d’une Commission d’enquête parlementaire italienne rendu public le 7 février 2018. L’objet du rapport : comprendre les raisons de milliers de décès et de maladies graves chez les personnels militaires italiens affectés à des missions à l’étranger. Les experts ont pris en compte tous les facteurs de risques auxquels ils ont été exposés, au premier rang desquels l’uranium appauvri présent dans les bombes et d’autres agents liés à l’armement. Mais ils ont également analysé d’autres facteurs de risque, notamment pour les soldats jamais partis en mission, et l’un d’entre eux retiendra en particulier notre attention en ce moment : les vaccins.

Après 18 années d’enquête pour déterminer les causes de milliers de décès, cette Commission parlementaire a identifié un risque significatif de développer des cancers et des maladies auto-immunes après l’administration de vaccins combinés et multi-doses, tels que recommandés dans le calendrier de prévention militaire (p. 156 du rapport). Rappelons ici que les vaccins pour les militaires sont identiques aux vaccins pour les enfants (pp. 156-157).

Les résultats de l’examen de la Commission – dont les intérêts ne sont ni en faveur, ni opposés aux vaccins et qui ne peut être considérée comme « appartenant à des mouvements réticents à la vaccination », – sont un sérieux signal d’alarme dans le contexte actuel de l’extension des obligations vaccinales en Europe. Les éléments qui suivent devraient donc faire réfléchir à deux fois les autorités européennes :
• La Commission n’a pas pu trouver une seule étude démontrant la sûreté des vaccins combinés (p. 154).

• La Commission a estimé que « la quantité cumulée des différents composants des vaccins dépasse les quantités autorisées pour les autorisations de mise sur le marché des vaccins monovalents » . Cela signifie que dans les vaccins combinés, la somme des adjuvants (par exemple, aluminium ou mercure), conservants et contaminants biologiques – virus, bactéries, mycoplasmes et mycobactéries, ainsi que l’ADN fœtal humain ou d’ADN animal, provenant des tissus organiques de culture pour la fabrication des vaccins – n’a pas été testée.

• « Les vaccins qui ont un nombre important de composants en termes quantitatifs, mais aussi en variété des composants étrangers, déterminent un nombre plus élevé d’effets secondaires. » (p. 139)

• Entre autres, la Commission s’inquiète de l’usage et de la sécurité des vaccins à base d’adjuvants aluminiques (p. 160) (type vaccins « polio » hexavalents recommandés aussi chez les enfants), des quantités élevées d’ADN humain et animal retrouvées dans certains vaccins (ROR) et de la présence de nanoparticules inflammatoires polluant tous les vaccins. (pp. 157, 159, 165)

Les recommandations de la Commission parlementaire pour l’immunisation incluent :
• L’utilisation de vaccins et de doses isolés plutôt que de vaccins combinés(p. 186)

• Ne pas administrer plus de 5 vaccins (souches vaccinales différentes) lors d’une seule visite.

• Une évaluation individuelle des risques avant la vaccination (pp. 126, 186) à partir des tests sanguins et des antécédents médicaux du patient. Ces tests ont pour objectif de déterminer les changements du système immunitaire et notamment son hyper-activation. La Commission a identifié 81 éléments à tester, en plus des composants actifs des vaccins (pp. 170). Les notices des vaccins recommandent d’ailleurs la vérification de l’état de santé de la personne à vacciner au moment de l’administration du vaccin (pp. 143, 148). Se basant sur ces notices, la Commission a énuméré une série de maladies qui contre-indiquent la vaccination. Le nombre cumulé des effets secondaires repris dans les notices examinées pour les militaires, s’élève à 240. (p. 174) (Précisons que la Commission a uniquement analysé les notices des fabricants, mais que le nombre des effets secondaires mentionné dans les rapports de suivi est nettement plus élevé.)

• Un suivi à long terme de chaque vaccin individuel (1, p. 154).
• De ne pas revacciner pour une maladie pour laquelle l’immunité est déjà existante, comme pour les personnes ayant fait des maladies d’enfance.

Les recommandations de la Commission parlementaire pour une politique vaccinale plus sûre incluent :
• Le développement de vaccins « purifiés » pour limiter l’accumulation de composants toxiques. (p. 155)

• Des études permettant d’évaluer les effets et la sûreté de la vaccination à moyen et long termes. La plupart des vaccins ne sont évalués que sur une très brève période, quelques jours parfois ou semaines et généralement moins d’un mois. (pp. 155, 185)

• De meilleures études sur les composants des vaccins, notamment les adjuvants et contaminants.

« Erreur en deçà des Alpes, vérité au-delà » ?

À la lecture de ce rapport, tout ce qu’il y a de plus officiel, plusieurs questions se posent :

• Si un militaire court un risque avec plus de 5 vaccins, nos enfants sont-ils vraiment en sécurité avec 9, 11 ou 21 (par ex. hexavalent 8 souches + Prevenar 13) ?

• Que dira notre ministre de la Santé Agnès Buzyn des conclusions de ce rapport, elle qui déclarait encore il y a peu : « Nous avons la certitude que ces vaccins sont inoffensifs » ?

• Les autorités européennes peuvent-elles en conscience ignorer les conclusions de ce rapport et s’engager résolument dans la fuite en avant que constitue la proposition de résolution du Parlement européen sur les réticences à la vaccination ?

En effet, l’Article 3 de la proposition de résolution du Parlement européen « souligne que les vaccins sont sûrs selon l’OMS, puisqu’un vaccin autorisé est rigoureusement testé lors de multiples essais cliniques, avant que son utilisation ne soit approuvée, et ensuite régulièrement réévalué après sa mise sur le marché » .

Nous vous reparlerons prochainement des avancées de ce projet européen, et comment vous pouvez vous mobiliser, mais sachez d’ores et déjà qu’une copie du rapport a été transmise au Parlement européen, et les quelques éléments qui précèdent aux députés européens. Ils ne pourront plus dire qu’ils ne savaient pas.
Références :

Rapport entier de la commission parlementaire italienne ici
Traduction en anglais validée par la cour de Gènes ici.

Ces conseils ne vous dispensent pas de consulter en premier lieu un médecin pour établir un diagnostic. Vous pouvez également vous faire accompagner par un thérapeute en médecine complémentaire. Pour en trouver un près de chez vous, rendez-vous sur annuaire-therapeutes.com


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 722

MessagePosté le: Sam 17 Mar - 05:27 (2018)    Sujet du message: MURDER BY INJECTION / YOU WON'T BELIEVE WHATS INSIDE THIS VACCINE! Répondre en citant


Pdf document :


Flu Vaccine

VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clPnbjYehls

You Won't Belive Whats Inside This Vaccine! http://www.kiro7.com/news/local/new-v...
Exclusive Content @ http://www.leakproject.com
YouTube Channel @ http://www.youtube.com/clandestinetim...

Pdf document : http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/nasa-thefutureof-war.pdf

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 722




VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PA_ZV6SSKo

Publié par wikistrike.com sur 22 Mars 2018, 09:57am

Catégories : #Santé - psychologie


Récemment, l’ancienne PM kenyane, Raila Odinga, a fait une déclaration télévisée publique concernant un vaccin contre le tétanos donné entre 2014 et 2015 à environ 500 000 femmes dont il a été confirmé qu’elles contenaient une hormone de stérilisation:
“Aujourd’hui, nous pouvons confirmer au pays que l’Église catholique avait raison. Des centaines de milliers de filles et de femmes âgées de 14 à 49 ans, issues des populations les plus dynamiques du pays, n’auront pas d’enfants, en raison de la stérilisation parrainée par l’État qui a été vendue au pays comme vaccin contre le tétanos ».

Cette histoire a commencé il y a plusieurs années grâce au travail de Christina England, journaliste de recherche, qui a été contactée par les commissions catholiques de la santé au Kenya, où un Dr Ngare lui a dit qu’elle soupçonnait le vaccin contre le tétanos d’infertilité. Après beaucoup de déni de la part des fabricants de vaccins, il a maintenant été prouvé que le vaccin en question contenait effectivement l’hormone HCG. Dr Ngare et son équipe ont reçu 6 vaccins contre le tétanos envoyés au laboratoire et ils ont été trouvés contenir tous un antigène HCG.

Ce qui est sinistre à propos de ce problème, c’est que ce vaccin particulier a été administré uniquement aux femmes âgées de 14 à 49 ans. L’âge idéal pour devenir enceinte.
Dr Ngare et quelques-uns de ses collègues ont été amenés devant les médecins du Kenya et le Conseil des dentistes et ont dû faire face à un examen minutieux de leurs réclamations avec la possibilité de révocation du permis d’exercice en tant que médecin. Ils se sont défendus avec des découvertes scientifiques (voir la preuve ici) et le conseil d’administration a été apparemment «choqué» par ce qu’ils ont entendu. Dr Ngare et d’autres personnes impliquées dans cette «dénonciation» n’ont pas été radiées, mais on leur a dit d’arrêter de parler de cela en public.

Toujours au Kenya, un autre vaccin, cette fois pour la poliomyélite, contenait également des agents de stérilisation. Il devait être administré aux enfants de moins de 5 ans. Deux des six vaccins antipoliomyélitiques testés, contenant de l’œstradiol, une hormone sexuelle féminine, et qui donnent de l’estradiol aux hommes peuvent les rendre infertiles.

Sommes-nous dans les pays du premier monde également en cours?

Cela soulève la question suivante: les vaccins que nous recevons dans d’autres pays, par exemple au Royaume-Uni ou aux États-Unis, pourraient-ils contenir des ingrédients non étiquetés comme un antigène HCG? J’ai posé cette question à Christina England et sa réponse était la suivante:

La Kenyan Catholic Doctors Association a prouvé par des tests indépendants que le vaccin antipoliomyélitique et le vaccin contre le tétanos actuellement utilisés au Kenya contiennent des hormones anti-fertilité, rendant stérile nombre de leurs citoyens.

Ayant moi-même lu leurs rapports, je me demande si les mêmes vaccins utilisés sur nos enfants contiennent également des hormones anti-fertilité. À ma connaissance, ces vaccins n’ont pas été testés au Royaume-Uni ou aux États-Unis pour déterminer s’ils sont contaminés ou non. Je crois qu’ils devraient être analysés parce que, selon mes recherches, les taux d’infertilité n’ont jamais été aussi élevés qu’ils le sont aujourd’hui.

Aucune agence indépendante en place pour enquêter sur les fabricants de vaccins

Il n’y a pas d’organisation de «chien de garde» en matière de vaccins, et si nous avions vraiment la «sécurité vaccinale», il y en aurait en place.

Fait troublant, le vaccin contre la poliomyélite en question a également été fabriqué par le Serum Institute, et vous vous souvenez peut-être d’en avoir lu dans la première partie de cet article, où il a été associé au faux vaccin contre l’hépatite en Ouganda.

Qui va demander des comptes à ces entreprises ou examiner la façon dont elles sont produites? L’Institut du sérum, par exemple, devrait faire l’objet d’une enquête pour son implication dans un scandale de «faux» vaccins et pour la production d’un vaccin contenant des ingrédients anti-fertilité.

La vérité est que personne ne sait vraiment ce qu’il y a dans un vaccin. Les étiquettes peuvent clairement mentir et si elles mentent effectivement, alors rien n’est fait sur ces mensonges.

Source : http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=167439


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 722



By: Jay Greenberg |@NeonNettle on 10th February 2018 @ 1.11pm

The deadly flu epidemic was caused by vaccines that mutated the virus © press The deadly flu epidemic was caused by vaccines that mutated the virus As thousands continue to die from the deadly flu outbreak, health officials have now come forward to confirm that the influenza epidemic was actually caused by the vaccine itself.

According to CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), this year's dominant strain is H3N2, which is far more severe than other previous strains, leading to more extreme, and often fatal, symptoms. = Their reasons :
less than 20 percent effective, mutation. My question : What do they put in the H3N2 vaccine who now kill thousands of peoples?

According to Anna Treague, a health official for Public Health, the severity of H3N2 has been caused by mutations in the virus that are triggered by influenza vaccinations. In a statement to ABC news, Treague confirmed that this year's flu strain, that has left thousands of citizens dead, was caused by the vaccines itself, saying: "I believe that the low effective rate of the vaccine this year is due to the mutations that the virus made in the processing of the vaccine itself.

"That is at LEAST part of the reason that influenza cases are so widespread this year." vaccine have been found to mutate the flu virus © press Vaccine have been found to mutate the flu virus.

Treague clearly states that the vaccination is at "LEAST" part of the problem, if not the WHOLE problem. Other health experts agree with Teague statement, including Dr. Mercola, who is one of the world's leading authorities on the dangers of vaccines. Speaking about the mutations caused by the vaccines, Mercola says, "it’s no surprise at all." Dr. Mercola isn't alone with his prognosis, as countless other medical professionals, MDs, and PhDs all agree.

Demand for Vaccines is Increasing The problem is though, as more people get sick, more people are queuing up to get their flu shots, and the situation is snowballing from bad to worse. dr mercola says he s not surprised the outbreak was caused by the vaccine itself © press Dr. Mercola says he's 'not surprised' the outbreak was caused by the vaccine itself According to Treague, the immune system is weaker at the beginning and the end of a person's life. This causes the body of a child or elderly to have to fight much harder to fend off viruses than a person in their 20s or 30s.

Even though the flu shot has only be found to be 10% effective against this year's strain, the government still insists that it's imperative that every citizen is vaccinated, despite the clear dangers. How would the families of those already killed after receiving the shot respond to that news?

The answer?

According to allopathic medicine, we should rush to see our doctor as soon as we experience so they can treat us with antiviral medication.

The dangers of Tamiflu are no secret though, and it can only shorten the duration by 12 hours. The recommended course of action is to stay home and not spread the virus. Symptoms usually appear after 1-3 days of being infected, and most people usually recover in under a week. Just don’t ignore your symptoms though, which include chills, fever, headache, dry cough and aching of joints and muscles.

Read more at: http://www.neonnettle.com/news/3753-expert-confirms-flu-shot-behind-deadly-…
© Neon Nettle


Article :

The Canine Influenza Virus - H3N2

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 722

MessagePosté le: Sam 31 Mar - 22:33 (2018)    Sujet du message: CDC SAYS THE SECOND WAVE OF FLU.. IS HERE 2018 Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4IzowymU-0

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 722



April 29, 2018 Sean Adl-Tabatabai News, US 10

Bill Gates has put up $12 million of his own cash for Big Pharma companies to create a universal flu vaccine that he says should be “mandatory” for everybody

Speaking at the Massachusetts Medical Society, Gates warned of a “coming pandemic” that world governments aren’t prepared for.

“The world needs to prepare for pandemics in the same serious way it prepares for war,” Gates warned the audience.

Futurism.com reports: Each year, the Massachusetts Medical Society and the New England Journal of Medicine present an event featuring panelists and speakers focused on a specific health-related topic. This year, that topic was epidemics. What better speaker than Bill Gates, whose foundation strives to combat some of the biggest threats to public health, such as HIV and malaria? During his presentation, Gates looked to the past, present, and future of our outbreak preparedness.

The short version: We’ve come a long way, but still have a long way to go.

Back in 1889, the Russian flu became the first flu pandemic to spread across continents. A few decades later, the 1918 flu pandemic killed 675,000 people in just five weeks.
Luckily for those of us alive now, today we have vaccines, drugs, and diagnostic tools that help us address outbreaks far more effectively than when those illnesses first took hold.

But we still fall short in so many respect, according to Gates.

He noted the “wake up calls” of the 2009 H1N1 virus and West Africa’s more recent Ebola outbreak. The world didn’t respond quickly enough in either situation. We couldn’t effectively track the diseases as they spread. Our local health systems simply collapsed. People kept dying because we weren’t ready.

“The world needs to prepare for pandemics in the same serious way it prepares for war,” Gates told the audience.

One way to be better prepared for the inevitable next pandemic: to develop better weapons to fight outbreaks. To that end, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has teamed up with the family of Google co-founder and Alphabet CEO Larry Page to launch the Universal Influenza Vaccine Development Grand Challenge.

According to the challenge website, the goal is to find a “game changing, universal solution” to address both pandemic and seasonal influenza. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates 290,000 to 650,000 people die from the latter each year, and while less common, pandemic influenza can be even more deadly.

The Grand Challenge will award $250,000 to $2 million in funding over two years to the most promising proposals for a universal flu vaccine. Then, those projects that “demonstrate promising proof-of-concept data,” such as success in animal models, can apply for a full award of $10 million for additional studies.

The Gates Foundation is thinking big and fast with this challenge. They’re only interested in a universal flu vaccine — not one that might work to address certain strains of the flu or in certain populations — and they want it to be ready for clinical trials by 2021.

We may not meet the Hollywood standard for outbreak preparedness today, but if Bill Gates has anything to say about it, we might in the very near future.


By Bill Gates 
| April 27, 2018

Four years ago, the world was stunned by the Ebola outbreak in West Africa. Panic broke out all over the globe. Governments scrambled to contain the infection. By the time the last patient tested negative for the disease, the outbreak claimed thousands of lives and caused billions of dollars in economic losses.

The 2014 Ebola outbreak was a stark reminder of how vulnerable our society is to epidemics of infectious diseases. We weren’t ready then, and we’re still not ready now—but we can be. We don’t know when the next epidemic will strike, but I believe we can protect ourselves if we invest in better tools, a more effective early detection system, and a more robust global response system.

When the Massachusetts Medical Society asked me to deliver this year’s Shattuck Lecture, I knew I wanted to talk about epidemic preparedness. I was honored to address their annual meeting earlier today. Here is the full text of my prepared remarks:

Remarks as delivered
Shattuck Lecture
April 27, 2018
Boston, MA


Thank you, Dr. Drazen, for that kind introduction. It’s an honor to be invited to deliver the Shattuck Lecture.

Most of the speeches I give on global health are about the incredible progress and exciting new tools that are helping the world reduce child mortality and tackle infectious diseases. Thanks to better immunization and other interventions, child mortality has been reduced by more than 50 percent since 1990. We are on the verge of eradicating polio. HIV is no longer a certain death sentence. And half the world is now malaria-free.

So usually, I’m the super-optimist, pointing out that life keeps getting better for most people in the world.

There is one area, though, where the world isn’t making much progress, and that’s pandemic preparedness. This should concern us all, because if history has taught us anything, it’s that there will be another deadly global pandemic.

We can’t predict when. But given the continual emergence of new pathogens, the increasing risk of a bioterror attack, and how connected our world is through air travel, there is a significant probability of a large and lethal, modern-day pandemic occurring in our lifetimes.

Watching Hollywood thrillers, you’d think the world was pretty good at protecting the public from deadly microorganisms. We like to believe that somewhere out there, there is a team ready to spring into action – equipped with the latest and best technologies.

Government agents like Jack Bauer in 24. Harvard professors like Robert Langdon in Inferno. And WHO epidemiologists like Dr. Leonora Orantes in Contagion – who even risked getting kidnapped as she pursued “Patient Zero.”

In the real world, though, the health infrastructure we have for normal times breaks down very rapidly during major infectious disease outbreaks. This is especially true in poor countries. But even in the U.S., our response to a pandemic or widespread bioterror attack would be insufficient.
Several things in the last decade have made me pay closer attention to the risk of future pandemics. One was the outbreak of Swine Flu in 2009. While H1N1 wasn’t as lethal as people initially feared, it showed our inability to track the spread of disease and develop new tools for public health emergencies.

The Ebola epidemic in West Africa four years ago was another wake-up call. As confirmed cases climbed, the death toll mounted, and local health systems collapsed. Again, the world was much too slow to respond.

And, as biological weapons of mass destruction become easier to create in the lab, there is an increasing risk of a bioterror attack.

What the world needs – and what our safety, if not survival, demands – is a coordinated global approach. Specifically, we need better tools, an early detection system, and a global response system.

Today, I’d like to speak with you about some of the advances in tools – vaccines, drugs, and diagnostics – that make me optimistic we can get a leg up on the next pandemic. And I’ll talk about some of the gaps we must address in preparedness and response. 

Interestingly, the first Shattuck Lecture – given back in 1890 – focused on a pandemic . . . the Russian flu that struck Massachusetts the previous year. The Russian flu was not especially deadly. But it was the first flu pandemic to spread across continents connected by rail travel – and between continents connected by fast ocean liners. The virus circled the globe in just four months.

But the world was soon in for much worse. Less than 30 years later, the Boston area was one of the first places in the U.S. to feel the deadly effects of the 1918 flu. Military personnel getting off and on ships at the Commonwealth Pier – near where we are meeting today – helped carry the pathogen across the U.S. and back to the battlefields of World War I.

This animation shows how quickly the virus spread across the United States. It took five weeks and killed 675,000 people.

The death toll was so great that average life expectancy in the U.S. for that period dropped by 12 years.

Worldwide, the 1918 flu killed an estimated 50 million people, perhaps more. 

We have better tools today than we did a century ago. We have a seasonal flu vaccine, although it’s not always effective, you have to get one every year, and most people in the world never get the shot. We also have antibiotics for secondary infections of bacterial pneumonia.

Despite these advances, this animated simulation by the Institute for Disease Modeling shows what would happen if a highly contagious and lethal airborne pathogen – like the 1918 flu – were to occur today.

Nearly 33 million people worldwide would die in just six months.

That’s the sobering news. The good news is that scientific advances and growing interest on the federal level, in the private sector, and among philanthropic funders makes development of a universal flu vaccine more feasible now than 10 or 20 years ago.

Our foundation is involved in a variety of research partnerships, including a collaboration between the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, GlaxoSmithKline, and PATH.

Their work focuses on several vaccine candidates that did well in animal trials and which are now in human trials.

We are also supporting efforts by others, including the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, whose vaccine candidate is expected to advance to human safety trials in about a year.

To broaden efforts even further, today we are launching a $12 million Grand Challenge in partnership with the Page family to accelerate the development of a universal flu vaccine. The goal is to encourage bold thinking by the world’s best scientists across disciplines, including those new to the field.

Lucy and Larry Page are also supporting efforts by the Sabin Vaccine Institute to encourage innovative approaches that eliminate the threat of a deadly flu pandemic.

However, the next threat may not be a flu at all. More than likely, it will be an unknown pathogen that we see for the first time during an outbreak, as was the case with SARS, MERS, and other recently-discovered infectious diseases.

The world took an important step last year to begin addressing this risk with the launch of a public-private partnership called the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI).

With funding commitments of more than $630 million, CEPI’s first order of business is advancing the development of vaccines for three of the priority diseases on the WHO list for public health R&D: Lassa fever, Nipah virus, and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome.

CEPI is also working on rapid-response platforms to produce safe, effective vaccines for a range of infectious diseases – almost as quickly as new threats emerge. Later this year, CEPI will announce grants to several companies working with a variety of technologies – including nucleic acid vaccines, viral vectors, and other innovative approaches. The goal is to be able to develop, test, and release new vaccines in a matter of weeks or months, rather than years.

I’m a big fan of vaccines, but they may not be the answer when we have to respond immediately to rapidly spreading infectious disease pandemics. Not only do vaccines take time to develop and deploy; they also take at least a couple of weeks after the vaccination to generate protective immunity. So, we need to invest in other approaches like antiviral drugs and antibody therapies that can be stockpiled or rapidly manufactured to stop the spread of pandemic diseases or treat people who have been exposed.

Earlier this year, the Shionogi pharmaceutical company received approval in Japan for a new influenza anti-viral, Xofluza This single-dose drug stops flu in its tracks by inhibiting an enzyme that the virus needs to multiply.

And PrEP Biopharm, a development stage biopharmaceutical company, has demonstrated in human challenge studies that pre-activating the innate immune response through intranasal delivery of a double-stranded viral RNA “mimic” can prevent both influenza and rhinovirus.

Since the host’s innate immune response is non-virus specific, such an approach has the potential to offer protection against other types of respiratory viruses as well.

Monoclonal antibody therapies have also made incredible advances in the last couple of decades, leading to several products for cancer and autoimmune diseases. During the Ebola outbreak in West Africa several years ago, researchers were able to identify and test a promising combination of monoclonal antibodies to treat infected patients.

And a growing pipeline of broadly neutralizing antibodies are being discovered in some individuals exposed to infectious diseases. For example, a small percentage of people infected with HIV develop antibodies with high potency and breadth of coverage sufficient to protect against many strains of the virus. The same is true for some people infected with the flu.
Different sets or cocktails of these exceptional antibodies may protect against a pandemic strain of a virus even if it has genetically evolved. It is conceivable that we could create libraries of these antibodies, produce manufacturable seed stocks, and have them ready for immediate use in an outbreak—or ready to scale up manufacturing if a pandemic ensues. If we can learn how to use RNA or DNA gene delivery effectively, we may not need to make the antibodies at all.

Rapid diagnosis is also critical, especially at the beginning of an outbreak when quarantine, treatment, and other public health measures are most effective. To that end, researchers at the Broad Institute and at UC-Berkeley have developed a highly-sensitive point-of-care diagnostic test that harnesses the powerful genetic engineering technology known as CRISPR.

But instead of using CRISPR to edit DNA, they have programmed an associated protein called Cas13 to hunt for specific pieces of RNA. When Cas13 locates the relevant genetic sequence, it releases a signal molecule that indicates the presence or absence of the target.

In a paper published yesterday in the journal, Science, the Broad researchers highlighted the field-use potential of this new diagnostic. Using paper strips similar to a pregnancy test – and with minimal sample processing – the diagnostic can check a patient’s blood, saliva, or urine for evidence of a pathogen.

What’s more, it can test for multiple pathogens at once. It could, for example, identify if someone is infected with Zika or dengue virus, which have similar symptoms.

There are also some interesting advances that leverage the power of computing to help predict where pandemics are likely to emerge and model different approaches to preventing or containing them.

Over the last few years, researchers at the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington have developed a sophisticated computer model that combines data from dozens of sources with geospatial mapping to predict the pandemic risk of infectious diseases.

They recently looked at the pandemic potential of four viral hemorrhagic fevers in Africa – including Ebola. Their analysis confirmed that Guéckédou prefecture in Guinea – where the West African Ebola outbreak originated – was indeed one of the most likely places where an individual Ebola case could lead to a widespread epidemic.

The research also pinpointed dozens of other African communities that are at high risk of outbreaks of hemorrhagic fevers.

Meanwhile, researchers at the Institute for Disease Modeling are pushing the boundaries of computational epidemiology to provide a deeper understanding of both the spread of infectious diseases and the effectiveness of different control and eradication strategies.

In the effort to eliminate malaria, for example, IDM is combining surveillance data with computational modeling to tailor antimalarial efforts to unique local conditions. They are also using quantitative analysis and modeling to evaluate various control strategies for HIV, TB, and to eradicate polio. This kind of research could provide valuable information to help predict disease transmission and identify prevention measures and intervention tactics for epidemics and pandemics.

At the Munich Security Conference last year, I asked world leaders to imagine that somewhere in the world, there is a weapon that exists – or that could emerge – that is capable of killing millions of people, bringing economies to a standstill, and casting nations into chaos.

If this were a military threat, the response – of course – would be that we should do everything possible to develop countermeasures. In the case of biological threats, that sense of urgency is lacking.

The world needs to prepare for pandemics the way the military prepares for war. This includes simulations and other preparedness exercises so we can better understand how diseases will spread and how to deal with things like quarantine and communications to minimize panic.

We need better coordination with military forces to ensure we can draw on their mobilization capacity to transport people, equipment, and supplies on a mass scale.

We need a reserve corps of trained personnel and volunteers, ready to go at a moment’s notice. And we need manufacturing and indemnification agreements in place with pharmaceutical companies –with expedited review processes for government approval of new treatments.

Last month, Congress directed the administration to come up with a comprehensive plan to strengthen global health security – here and abroad. This could be an important first step if the White House and Congress use the opportunity to articulate and embrace a leadership role for the U.S. in global health security.

No other country has the depth of scientific or technical expertise that we do – drawing on the resources of institutions like the NIH, the CDC, and advanced research organizations like DARPA and BARDA.

Our biopharmaceutical industry is the global leader in biomedical innovation. And, on the world stage, the U.S. is an influential member of international forums like the UN, the WHO, the G7, and the G20.

The point is that the U.S. can and should play a leadership role in creating the kind of pandemic preparedness and response system the world needs.

As I said at the start, I’m fundamentally an optimist, and that gives me hope that we can get prepared for the next big pandemic.

The global community eradicated smallpox, a disease that killed an estimated 300 million people in the 20th century alone.

We are on the verge of eradicating polio, a disease that 30 years ago was endemic in 125 countries and that paralyzed or killed 350,000 people a year.

And today, nearly 21 million people are receiving life-saving HIV treatment, thanks primarily to the support of the world community.

America’s global HIV initiative, PEPFAR, was the catalyst for world action on the AIDS crisis. It’s an example of the kind of leadership we need from the U.S. on a broader effort to make the world safer from other infectious disease threats. With strong bipartisan support, PEPFAR has saved millions of lives and shown that national governments can work together to address pandemics.

Somewhere in the history of these collective efforts is a roadmap to create a comprehensive pandemic preparedness and response system.

We must find it and follow it because lives – in numbers too great to comprehend – depend on it.

Thank you for the opportunity to address you today.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 722

MessagePosté le: Lun 30 Avr - 07:03 (2018)    Sujet du message: BILL GATES’ FORMER DOCTOR SAYS BILLIONAIRE ‘REFUSED TO VACCINATE HIS CHILDREN’ Répondre en citant


February 7, 2018 Baxter Dmitry News, US 449

The physician who served as Bill Gates’ private doctor in Seattle in the 1990s says the Microsoft founder and vaccine proponent “refused to vaccinate his own children” when they were young.

I don’t know if he had them vaccinated as adults, but I can tell you he point blank refused to vaccinate them as children,” the physician said at a behind closed doors medical symposium in Seattle, adding “They were gorgeous kids, really smart and vivacious, and he said they would be OK as it was, they didn’t need any shots.

The comments caused a stir among physicians at the symposium with claims he was breaking doctor-patient confidentiality, according to reports. However as he was speaking to other physicians, he was not breaking the industry code of conduct.

Gates has three children with his wife Melinda – Jennifer, Rory and Phoebe – born between 1996 and 2002, and according to his former doctor, they are all unvaccinated and healthy.

The news that Bill Gates does not vaccinate his own children, despite being the world’s most active campaigner for mandatory vaccinations, should come as no surprise. Studies prove that the elite do not vaccinate their children. But at the same time they expect the masses to have their children vaccinated.

The elite do not vaccinate

In California, the children most likely to be unvaccinated are white and come from the wealthiest families in Los Angeles, according to a recent study.

The percentage of kindergartners with state-issued personal belief exemptions doubled from 2007 to 2013, from 1.54% to 3.06%. That’s about 17,000 of the wealthiest children, out of more than half a million, opting out of receiving vaccinations.

Vaccine exemption percentages were highest in mostly white, high-income neighborhoods such as Orange County, Santa Barbara and parts of the Bay Area, according to CNN.

The study, which was published in the American Journal of Public Heath, looked at more than 6,200 California schools and found vaccine exemptions were twice as common among kindergartners attending private institutions.

Very rich and privileged parents like the idea of herd immunity, but they don’t want to take the risks associated with vaccinations when it comes to their own children. They are worried about adverse reactions including autism.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 30 722

MessagePosté le: Lun 14 Mai - 02:56 (2018)    Sujet du message: VACCINATION !!! CE QUE NE VOUS DIRONS JAMAIS VOS CHERS MERDIAS NI DIRIGEANTS !!! Répondre en citant



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5R42QHjDPEg

Petite vidéo instructive concernant les "obligations" vaccinales que nous subissons en ce moment, et cela pas seulement en France.....

Revenir en haut
Contenu Sponsorisé

MessagePosté le: Aujourd’hui à 06:31 (2018)    Sujet du message: CAMPAGNE DE VACCINATION (PARTIE 2)

Revenir en haut
Montrer les messages depuis:   
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Page 8 sur 8

Sauter vers:  

Index | Creer un forum | Forum gratuit d’entraide | Annuaire des forums gratuits | Signaler une violation | Conditions générales d'utilisation
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Traduction par : phpBB-fr.com