LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum

LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1)
...

 FAQFAQ   RechercherRechercher   MembresMembres   GroupesGroupes   S’enregistrerS’enregistrer 
 ProfilProfil   Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés   ConnexionConnexion 

CAMPAGNE DE VACCINATION (PARTIE 2)
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  >
 
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> LA RELIGION MONDIALE ET L'ONU : SES VUES ET AGENDA SUR LE TRANSHUMANISME, CLONAGE, AGENDA DE DÉPOPULATION -> CAMPAGNE DE VACCINATION -VACCINATION CAMPAIGN (PARTIE 2)
Sujet précédent :: Sujet suivant  
Auteur Message
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 29 Oct - 02:20 (2014)    Sujet du message: VACCINATION COVERAGE AMONG CHILDREN IN KINDERGARTEN — UNITED STATES, 2013–14 SCHOOL YEAR Répondre en citant

Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR)

VACCINATION COVERAGE AMONG CHILDREN IN KINDERGARTEN — UNITED STATES, 2013–14 SCHOOL YEAR (1)

Weekly


October 17, 2014 / 63(41);913-920

Ranee Seither, MPH1, Svetlana Masalovich, MS2, Cynthia L Knighton1, Jenelle Mellerson, MPH2, James A. Singleton, PhD1, Stacie M. Greby, DVM1 (Author affiliations at end of text)

State and local vaccination requirements for school entry are implemented to maintain high vaccination coverage and protect schoolchildren from vaccine-preventable diseases (1). Each year, to assess state and national vaccination coverage and exemption levels among kindergartners, CDC analyzes school vaccination data collected by federally funded state, local, and territorial immunization programs. This report describes vaccination coverage in 49 states and the District of Columbia (DC) and vaccination exemption rates in 46 states and DC for children enrolled in kindergarten during the 2013–14 school year. Median vaccination coverage was 94.7% for 2 doses of measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine; 95.0% for varying local requirements for diphtheria, tetanus toxoid, and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine; and 93.3% for 2 doses of varicella vaccine among those states with a 2-dose requirement. The median total exemption rate was 1.8%. High exemption levels and suboptimal vaccination coverage leave children vulnerable to vaccine-preventable diseases. Although vaccination coverage among kindergartners for the majority of reporting states was at or near the 95% national Healthy People 2020 targets for 4 doses of DTaP, 2 doses of MMR, and 2 doses of varicella vaccine (2), low vaccination coverage and high exemption levels can cluster within communities.* Immunization programs might have access to school vaccination coverage and exemption rates at a local level for counties, school districts, or schools that can identify areas where children are more vulnerable to vaccine-preventable diseases. Health promotion efforts in these local areas can be used to help parents understand the risks for vaccine-preventable diseases and the protection that vaccinations provide to their children.

Federally funded immunization programs assess vaccination coverage among children entering kindergarten each school year. Health departments, school nurses, or school personnel assess the vaccination and exemption status, as defined by state and local school requirements, of a census or sample of kindergartners enrolled in public and private schools. Among the 49 states and DC reporting vaccination coverage data, 42 used their immunization information system (IIS) as at least one source of data for their school assessment. The type of school survey varied among the 49 states and DC reporting either vaccination coverage or exemption: 38 reported using a census of kindergartners; nine a sample of schools, kindergartners, or both; one a voluntary response of schools; and two a mix of methods. Two states used a sample to collect vaccination coverage data and a census to collect exemption data. Four states changed their type of survey from the previous school year.† Data from the public and private school vaccination assessments were aggregated by state and DC immunization programs and sent to CDC.§ Vaccination coverage data were provided for 4,252,368 kindergartners included in reports from 49 states and DC, and exemption data were provided for 3,902,571 kindergartners included in reports from 46 states and DC.

All estimates of coverage and exemption rates were adjusted based on the type of survey conducted and response rates, using data aggregated at school or county level as appropriate and available, unless otherwise noted.¶ Vaccination requirements for school entry, as reported to CDC by the federally funded immunization programs, varied.** Kindergartners were considered up-to-date for any single vaccine if they had received all of the doses of that vaccine required for school entry in their jurisdiction. Nine states considered kindergartners up-to-date only if they had received all of the doses for all vaccines required for school entry in their jurisdiction.†† Of the 49 states and DC reporting vaccination coverage, 13 met CDC standards for school assessment methods in 2013–14.§§

Among the 49 states and DC that reported 2013–14 school vaccination coverage, median 2-dose MMR vaccination coverage was 94.7% (range = 81.7% in Colorado to ≥99.7% in Mississippi); 23 reported coverage ≥95% (Table 1), and eight reported coverage <90% (Table 1, Figure). Median local requirement for DTaP vaccination coverage was 95.0% (range = 80.9% in Colorado to ≥99.7% in Mississippi); 25 reported coverage ≥95%. Median 2-dose varicella vaccination coverage among the 36 states and DC requiring and reporting 2 doses was 93.3% (range = 81.7% in Colorado to ≥99.7% in Mississippi); nine reported coverage ≥95%.

Among the 46 states plus DC reporting 2013–14 school vaccination exemption data, the percentage of kindergartners with an exemption was <1% for eight states and ≥4% for 11 states (range = <0.1% in Mississippi to 7.1% in Oregon), with a median of 1.8% (Figure; Table 2). Two states reported increases over the previous school year of ≥1.0 percentage point: Kansas (1.5 percentage points) and Maine (1.2 percentage points). One state reported a decrease of ≥1.0 percentage points: West Virginia (1.0 percentage point). Where reported separately, the median rate of medical exemptions was 0.2% (range = <0.1% in eight states [Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Mississippi, and Nevada] to 1.2% [Alaska and Washington]). Where allowed and reported separately, the median rate of nonmedical exemptions was 1.7% (range = 0.4% in Virginia and DC to 7.0% in Oregon).
Discussion
Most federally funded immunization programs continued to report high vaccination coverage and stable exemption rates among kindergartners during the 2013–14 school year compared with the 2012–13 school year, although 26 states and DC did not report meeting the Healthy People 2020 target of 95% coverage for 2 doses of MMR vaccine. Although high levels of vaccination coverage by state are reassuring, vaccination exemptions have been shown to cluster geographically (3,4), so vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks can still occur where unvaccinated persons cluster in schools and communities (5).

School vaccination coverage assessment is used to assess state or local-level school vaccination requirements. Eighteen states provide local-level data online, helping to strengthen immunization programs, guide vaccination policies, and inform the public.¶¶ Local-level school vaccination and exemption data can be used by health departments and schools to focus vaccine-specific interventions and health communication efforts in a school or local area with documented low vaccination coverage or high exemption rates. Where expanded health communication strategies or other interventions are implemented, continued assessment and reporting can be used to facilitate program improvement.

To be most effective, accurate and reliable estimates of vaccination coverage and exemptions are needed. Use of appropriate sampling and survey methods can improve the usefulness of data for local use and comparability of estimates across school, local area, state, and national levels to accurately assess vaccination coverage and track progress toward Healthy People 2020 targets.

School vaccination coverage reporting can be labor intensive, involving education systems at the start of the school year, when they are busiest. School vaccination assessment systems can be linked to an IIS, allowing schools to review the vaccination status of individual children. During the 2013–14 school year, 36 of the 50 states and DC reported that they allowed schools to obtain provider-reported vaccination data from their IIS, and 14 reported using an IIS algorithm to determine vaccination status for at least some of the students in their school vaccination assessment. An example of how an IIS can be used to simplify school vaccination assessment is Tennessee's Immunization Certificate Validation Tool, which compares a child's record in the state IIS against Tennessee vaccination requirements for pre-school or school attendance, allowing vaccination providers and school nurses to quickly assess a schoolchild's vaccination status. It produces an official Tennessee Immunization Certificate or a detailed failure report. Tools linking school vaccination assessment systems to IIS data provide access to provider-reported information, reduce the documentation burden on parents and vaccination providers, and lessen the workload required by the assessment process on schools and health departments.

The findings in this report are subject to at least six limitations. First, not every state reported vaccination and exemption data. Second, vaccination and exemption status reflected the child's status at the time of assessment. Reports might not be updated when parents submit amended school vaccination records after the required vaccines are received or an exemption is claimed. Third, a child with an exemption is not necessarily unvaccinated. More than 99% of the 2008–2009 birth cohorts who became kindergartners in 2013–14 received at least one vaccine in early childhood (6). An exemption might be provided for all vaccines even if a child missed a single vaccine dose or vaccine, or different exemptions might be provided for different vaccinations. A parent or guardian might choose to complete the required exemption paperwork if that is more convenient than having a child vaccinated or documenting a kindergartner's vaccination history at school enrollment, which might be the reason for up to 25% of nonmedical exemptions (7–9).*** Fourth, methodology varied by reporting program or between school years for the same program. Methods and times for data collection differed, as did requirements for vaccinations and exemptions. Fifth, some programs (Delaware, Houston, Virginia, and Puerto Rico) were unable to provide detailed information needed to weight and analyze their data in the most statistically appropriate way, limiting the validity of their reported estimates. Finally, in adjusting data collected using school or student census methods to account for nonresponse, it was assumed that nonresponders and responders of the same school type had similar vaccination coverage and exemption rates.

State and local school vaccination assessments might detect local areas of undervaccination where disease transmission is more likely to occur. These data are most useful when the assessment is accurate and reliable. Use of statistically appropriate sampling methods and access to provider-reported vaccination data in an IIS can streamline the data collection process while providing accurate local-level data, allowing health departments to appropriately direct vaccination efforts during outbreaks of vaccine-preventable disease and identify schools and communities potentially at higher risk for vaccine-preventable disease transmission. Accurate local-level data can also be used by health departments and schools to focus health communication and other interventions that protect children and the community at large against vaccine-preventable diseases.
Acknowledgments
Seth A. Meador, Leidos; Amanda R. Bryant, Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC.


1Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC; 2Carter Consulting, Inc. (Corresponding author: Ranee Seither, rseither@cdc.gov, 404-639-8693)
References
  1. Orenstein W, Hinman A. The immunization system in the United States: the role of school immunization laws. Vaccine 1999;17(Suppl 3):S19–24.
  2. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2020: immunization and infectious diseases. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2010. Available at http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/overview.aspx?topici…
    .
  3. Sugerman D, Barskey AE, Delea MG, et al. Measles outbreak in a highly vaccinated population, San Diego, 2008: role of the intentionally undervaccinated. Pediatrics 2010;125:747–55.
  4. Omer SB, Enger KS, Moulton LH, Halsey NA, Stokley S, Salmon DA. Geographic clustering of nonmedical exemptions to school immunization requirements and associations with geographic clustering of pertussis. Am J Epidemiol 2008;168:1389–96.
  5. Gay N. The theory of measles elimination: implications for the design of elimination strategies. J Infect Dis 2004;189(Suppl 1):S27–35.
  6. CDC. National, state, and local area vaccination coverage among children aged 19–35 months—United States, 2012. MMWR 2013;62:733–40.
  7. Rota JS, Salmon DA, Rodewald LE, Chen RT, Hibbs BF, Gangarosa EJ. Processes for obtaining nonmedical exemptions to state immunization laws. Am J Public Health 2001;91:645–8.
  8. Blank N, Caplan A, Constable C. Exempting schoolchildren from immunizations: states with few barriers had highest rates of nonmedical exemptions. Health Aff 2013;32:1282–90.
  9. Luthy KE, Beskstrand RL, Callister LC, Cahoon S. Reasons parents exempt children from receiving immunizations. J Sch Nurs 2012;28:153–60.



* Healthy People 2020 objective IID-10.1 is based on 4 doses of DTaP vaccine. This report describes compliance with state regulations of 3, 4, or 5 doses of DTaP vaccine. Of the 49 states and DC, only Nebraska, New York, and Pennsylvania report <4 doses of DTaP vaccine. IID-10.2 sets a target of 95% of kindergartners receiving ≥2 doses of MMR vaccine. IID-10.5 sets a target of 95% of kindergartners receiving ≥2 doses of varicella vaccine.
† Alaska, Georgia, Missouri, and North Dakota.
§ Data from one local area (Houston) were reported separately and included in the data for the state of Texas. Oregon estimates included vaccination coverage and exemption data for children enrolled in public online homeschools. Pennsylvania included homeschool students in their public school data.
¶ Most of the programs that used complex sample surveys provided CDC with data aggregated at the school or county level for weighted analysis. Coverage and exemption data based on a reported census were adjusted for nonresponse using the inverse of the response rate, stratified by school type. For data collected using a complex sample design and with sufficient data provided, weights were calculated to account for sample design and adjusted for nonresponse. Where sufficient data were not available to account for the use of a stratified two-stage cluster sample design, data were analyzed as a stratified simple random sample (Delaware, Houston, Virginia, and Puerto Rico).
** Among the 49 reporting states and DC, all programs required 2 doses of a measles-containing vaccine, of which MMR is the only one available in the United States. For local requirements for DTaP vaccine, two required 3 doses, 27 required 4 doses, 20 required 5 doses, and one state did not require pertussis. For varicella vaccine, 13 required 1 dose, 36 required 2 doses, and 1 did not require varicella vaccination.
†† States reporting estimates based on receiving all doses of all vaccines required for school entry might have actual antigen-specific coverage estimates at least as high as the coverage for all required vaccines.
§§ CDC standards include use of a census or random sample of public and private schools or students, assessment using number of doses recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, assessment of vaccination status before December 31, collection of data by health department personnel or school nurses, validation if data are collected by school administrative staff, and documentation of vaccination from a health-care provider.
¶¶ Information available, by state, at the following websites: Alabama, http://www.adph.org/immunization/index.asp?id=761
; Arizona, http://www.azdhs.gov/phs/immunization/statistics-reports.htm
; California, http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/immunize/pages/immunizationlevels.aspx
; Florida, http://www.floridahealth.gov/reports-and-data/immunization-coverage-surveys…
; Illinois, http://www.isbe.state.il.us/research/htmls/immunization.htm#immu
; Iowa, http://www.idph.state.ia.us/immtb/immunization.aspx?prog=imm&pg=audits
; Kansas, http://www.kdheks.gov/immunize/kindergarten_coverage.htm
; Kentucky, http://chfs.ky.gov/dph/epi/annual immunization school and childcare survey.…
; Michigan, http://www.michigan.gov/mdch/0,4612,7-132-2942_4911_4914_68361-321114–,00.html
; Minnesota, http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/idepc/immunize/stats/school/index.html
; New Jersey, http://www.state.nj.us/health/cd/stats.shtml
; North Dakota, www.ndhealth.gov/immunize/rates; Oregon, http://public.health.oregon.gov/preventionwellness/vaccinesimmunization/get…
; Texas, https://www.dshs.state.tx.us/immunize/coverage/default.shtm
; Utah, http://www.immunize-utah.org/statistics/utah statistics/immunization covera…
; Vermont, http://www.healthvermont.gov/hc/imm/immsurv.aspx
; Virginia, http://www.vdh.state.va.us/epidemiology/immunization/datamanagement/sisrepo…
; Washington, http://www.doh.wa.gov/dataandstatisticalreports/schoolimmunization/datarepo…
.

*** Tools are available to help parents manage vaccination records for their family; additional information available at http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/parents/record-reqs/immuniz-records-child.html.

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6341a1.htm


Revenir en haut
Publicité






MessagePosté le: Mer 29 Oct - 02:20 (2014)    Sujet du message: Publicité

PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?
Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 29 Oct - 02:24 (2014)    Sujet du message: VACCINATION COVERAGE AMONG CHILDREN IN KINDERGARTEN — UNITED STATES, 2013–14 SCHOOL YEAR (2) Répondre en citant

VACCINATION COVERAGE AMONG CHILDREN IN KINDERGARTEN — UNITED STATES, 2013–14 SCHOOL YEAR (2)

What is already known on this topic?

To protect school children from vaccine-preventable disease, annual school vaccination assessments indicate vaccination coverage and exemptions from state vaccination requirements. Although state vaccination coverage is high and exemptions are low, undervaccination and exemptions cluster at a local level, where vaccine-preventable diseases might be easily transmitted.

What is added by this report?

In 49 states and the District of Columbia (DC), median vaccination coverage for three vaccines was 94.7% for the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine, 95.0% for varying local requirements for the diphtheria, tetanus toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine, and 93.3% for varicella vaccine among states with a 2-dose requirement. Of the 49 states and DC reporting vaccination coverage estimates, 27 did not report meeting the Healthy People 2020 target of 95% coverage for 2 doses of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine. Median exemption levels continue to be low overall (1.8%).
What are the implications for public health practice?

Local data are essential to controlling the spread of vaccine-preventable disease. Accurate and reliable school vaccination assessments can provide a unique opportunity for school and health departments to identify local areas of undervaccination, even at a school or classroom level, where the potential for disease transmission is higher. Health departments can use these data to identify schools and communities at higher risk for outbreaks and provide health communication interventions to protect school children and the community at large against vaccine-preventable diseases.

FIGURE. Estimated percentage of children enrolled in kindergarten who have been exempted from receiving one or more vaccines* and with <90% coverage with 2 doses of measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine — United States, 2013–14 school year


* Exemptions might not reflect a child's vaccination status. Children with an exemption who did not receive any vaccines are indistinguishable from those who have an exemption but are up-to-date for one or more vaccines.

Alternate Text: The figure above is a map of the United States showing the estimated percentage of children enrolled in kindergarten who have been exempted from receiving one or more vaccines and with <90% coverage with 2 doses of measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine in the United States during the 2013–14 school year. Among the 49 states and DC that reported 2013–14 school vaccination coverage, median 2-dose MMR vaccination coverage was 94.7% (range = 81.7% in Colorado to ≥99.7% in Mississippi); 23 reported coverage ≥95%, and eight reported coverage <90%. The percentage of kindergartners with an exemption was <1% for eight states and ≥4% for 11 states (range = <0.1% in Mississippi to 7.1% in Oregon), with a median of 1.8%.


TABLE 1. Estimated vaccination coverage,* by state/area and vaccination among children enrolled in kindergarten — United States, 2013–14 school year
State/Area
Kindergarten population†
Total surveyed
Proportion surveyed (%)
Type of survey conducted§
MMR¶ 
DTaP** 
Varicella
1 dose
2 doses
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
Alabama††
76,927
76,927
100.0
Census
≥92.0
≥92.0
≥92.0
NReq
Alaska§§
10,222
946
9.3
Stratified 2-stage cluster sample
94.4
96.0

92.5
Arizona
89,606
85,861
95.8
Census
93.9
94.3
96.4
NReq
Arkansas
42,649
41,068
96.3
Census
86.5
83.3
 
85.4
California¶¶
548,606
533,680
97.3
Census
92.3
92.2
95.3
NReq
Colorado
69,904
350
0.5
Random sample
81.7
80.9
 
81.7
Connecticut††
40,978
40,978
100.0
Census
96.9
97.0
 
96.7
Delaware
11,997
1458
12.2
Stratified 2-stage cluster sample
≥96.4
≥96.4
 
≥96.4
District of Columbia††
7,856
7,856
100.0
Census
89.0
88.7
 
88.8
Florida††***
233,797
233,797
100.0
Census
≥93.2
≥93.2
 
≥93.2
Georgia††
143,988
143,988
100.0
Census
≥94.0
≥94.0
 
≥94.0
Hawaii
20,056
1,074
5.4
Stratified 2-stage cluster sample
98.7
99.0
99.2
NReq
Idaho††
23,934
23,934
100.0
Census
88.2
88.0

86.5
Illinois††
163,316
163,316
100.0
Census
94.7
95.0
96.6
NReq
Indiana††
87,193
61,336
70.3
Census
92.9
81.8

90.2
Iowa
43,728
41,349
94.6
Census
≥91.0
≥91.0
 
≥91.0
Kansas§§¶¶
41,107
11,931
29.0
Stratified 1-stage sample (Public), Census (Private)
86.9
87.6
 
85.5
Kentucky††
57,857
57,857
100.0
Census
92.6
93.9
 
91.9
Louisiana††
63,976
63,976
100.0
Census
96.8
98.3
 
96.1
Maine
15,441
12,716
82.4
Census
89.9
94.4
93.8
NReq
Maryland¶¶
75,659
73,349
96.9
Census
97.6
99.0
99.0
NReq
Massachusetts
79,894
78,188
97.9
Census
95.1
93.0
 
93.9
Michigan††
120,297
120,297
100.0
Census
97.5
94.8
 
93.0
Minnesota¶¶
72,087
70,972
98.5
Census
93.4
96.6
 
92.6
Mississippi††
45,719
45,719
100.0
Census
≥99.7
≥99.7
 
≥99.7
Missouri††
78,140
78,140
100.0
Census
95.5
96.0
 
94.6
Montana
12,855
12,259
95.4
Census
93.7
94.8
 
NReq
Nebraska¶¶
27,000
26,282
97.3
Census
96.6
96.8
 
94.9
Nevada
35,782
1,114
3.1
Stratified 2-stage cluster sample
95.6
94.4
 
93.6
New Hampshire††
13,240
13,240
100.0
Census
≥94.7
≥94.7
 
≥94.7
New Jersey
123,085
117,477
95.4
Census
≥96.8
≥96.8
≥96.8
NReq
New Mexico¶¶
30,725
830
2.7
Stratified 2-stage cluster sample
95.9
97.4
 
93.4
New York¶¶
240,318
240,318
100.0
Census
96.8
98.1
98.2
NReq
North Carolina
126,084
123,192
97.7
Census
98.8
98.7
99.7
NReq
North Dakota
9,780
9,397
96.1
Census (public)
Stratified 2-stage cluster sample (private)

90.0
90.2
 
89.4
Ohio
150,000
138,820
92.5
Census
96.2
96.1
 
95.7
Oklahoma
57,377
40,929
71.3
Voluntary response
96.4
96.1
 
98.0
Oregon††
47,649
47,649
100.0
Census
93.2
93.3
94.3
NReq
Pennsylvania††¶¶
151,253
151,253
100.0
Census
85.3
NReq†††
 
84.0
Rhode Island
11,521
11,421
99.1
Census
95.1
96.0
 
94.7
South Carolina
61,661
6,771
11.0
1-stage stratified sample
96.8
97.3
94.4
NReq
South Dakota††
12,566
12,566
100.0
Census
96.6
96.7
 
95.3
Tennessee
80,212
80,079
99.8
Census
≥94.9
≥94.9
 
≥94.9
Texas§§ (including Houston)
409,255
397,262
97.1
Census
97.5
97.2

97.2
Houston, Texas
36,254
1,856
5.1
2-stage cluster sample, nonrandom schools selection
91.9
90.4
 
90.4


TABLE 1. (Continued) Estimated vaccination coverage,* by state/area and vaccination among children enrolled in kindergarten — United States, 2013–14 school year
State/Area
Kindergarten population†
Total surveyed
Proportion surveyed (%)
Type of survey conducted§
MMR¶ 
DTaP** 
Varicella
1 dose
2 doses
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
Utah††
54,779
54,779
100.0
Census
98.5
98.1
99.6
NReq
Vermont††
6,771
6,771
100.0
Census
91.2
92.0
 
89.4
Virginia
105,692
4,287
4.1
2-stage cluster sample
93.1
98.3

91.3
Washington
89,165
78,924
88.5
Census
89.7
90.3
 
88.4
West Virginia
22,814
19,313
84.7
Census
96.1
96.5
 
95.5
Wisconsin¶¶
71,363
1,990
2.8
Stratified 2-stage cluster sample
92.6
96.3
 
91.2
Wyoming
NA
NA
NA
Not conducted
 
 
 
 
Median§§§
94.7
95.0
96.6
93.3
American Samoa
NA
NA
NA
Not conducted
 
 
 
 
Guam
2,935
1,235
42.1
Stratified 2-stage cluster sample
88.4
92.8
 
NReq
Marshall Islands
NA
NA
NA
Not conducted
 
 
 
 
Micronesia
NA
NA
NA
Not conducted
 
 
 
 
N. Mariana Islands
725
725
100.0
Census
96.0
94.3
 
92.3
Palau
402
NA
NA
Not conducted
 
 
 
NReq
Puerto Rico
39,170
6,789
17.3
Stratified 2-stage cluster sample
94.3
91.3
 
91.4
U.S. Virgin Islands
1,612
731
45.3
Stratified 2-stage cluster sample
90.5
91.0
 
87.9
Abbreviations: MMR = measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine; DTaP = diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine; NA = not available;
NReq = not required for school entry.

* Estimates are adjusted for nonresponse and weighted for sampling where appropriate, except where complete data were unavailable. Percentages for Delaware, Houston, Virginia, and Puerto Rico are approximations. Estimates based on a completed vaccine series (i.e., not antigen-specific) are designated by use of the ≥ symbol.
† The kindergarten population is an approximation provided by each state/area.
§ Sample designs varied by state/area: census = all schools (public and private) and all children within schools were included in the assessment; simple random = a simple random sample design was used; mixed design = a census was conducted among public schools, and a random sample of children within the schools were selected; 1-stage or 2-stage cluster sample = schools were randomly selected, and all children in the selected schools were assessed (1-stage) or a random sample of children within the schools were selected (2-stage); voluntary response = a census among those schools that submitted assessment data.
¶ Most states require 2 doses; Alaska, California, New York, and Oregon require 2 doses of measles, 1 dose of mumps, and 1 dose of rubella vaccine.
** Pertussis vaccination coverage might include some DTP (diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine) vaccinations if administered in another country or if a vaccination provider continued to use DTP after 2000. Most states require 4 doses of DTaP vaccine; 5 doses are required for school entry in Colorado, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and U.S. Virgin Islands; 3 doses are required by Nebraska and New York. Pertussis vaccine is not required in Pennsylvania.
†† The proportion surveyed is probably <100%, but is shown as 100% based on incomplete information about the actual current enrollment.
§§ Kindergarten coverage data were collected from a sample, and exemption data were collected from a census of kindergartners.
¶¶ Counts the vaccine doses received regardless of Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended age and time interval; vaccination coverage rates shown might be higher than those for valid doses.
*** Does not include nondistrict-specific, virtual, and college laboratory schools, or private schools with fewer than 10 students.
††† Pertussis is not required in Pennsylvania; coverage for diphtheria and tetanus was 88.3%.
§§§ The median is the center of the estimates in the distribution. The median does not include Houston, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.



TABLE 2. Estimated number and percentage* of children enrolled in kindergarten with exemption(s) from vaccination, by state/area and type of exemption — United States, 2013–14 school year
State/Area
Medical exemptions†
Nonmedical exemptions†
Total exemptions†
No. of religious exemptions
No. of philosophic exemptions
Total
no.

%
Total
no.

2013–14
(%)

2012–13
(%)

Percentage point difference
No.
%
Alabama
70
<0.1
447
§
447
0.6
517
0.7
0.7
0.0
Alaska
119
1.2
421
§
421
4.1
539
5.3
5.6
-0.3
Arizona
175
0.2

4,195
4,195
4.7
4,370
4.9
4.2
0.7
Arkansas
24
<0.1
135
333
468
1.1
493
1.2
1.1
0.1
California
1017
0.2
††
17,253
17,253
3.1
18,270
3.3
3.0
0.3
Colorado
0
<0.1
195
3,097
3,292
4.6
3,291
4.6
4.3
0.3
Connecticut
128
0.3
670
§
670
1.6
725
1.9
1.7
0.2
Delaware
9
<0.1
83
§
83
0.7
92
0.8
0.7
0.1
District of Columbia
85
1.1
33
§
33
0.4
118
1.5
1.6
-0.1
Florida
772
0.3
3,991
§
3,991
1.7
4,763
2.0
1.8
0.2
Georgia
143
<0.1
2,420
§
2,420
1.7
2,563
1.8
2.3
-0.5
Hawaii
0
<0.1
634
§
634
3.2
634
3.2
2.5
0.7
Idaho
89
0.4
147
1,304
1,451
6.1
1,540
6.4
5.9
0.5
Illinois**
NA
 
 
 
NA
 
NA
NA
6.1
NA
Indiana
348
0.4
727
§
727
0.8
1,075
1.2
1.3
-0.1
Iowa
205
0.5
521
§
521
1.2
726
1.7
1.7
0.0
Kansas
213
0.8
527
§
527
1.9
739
2.6
1.1
1.5
Kentucky
148
0.3
357
§
357
0.6
505
0.9
0.7
0.2
Louisiana
83
0.1
28
394
422
0.7
505
0.8
0.7
0.1
Maine
56
0.4
30
766
796
5.2
852
5.5
4.3
1.2
Maryland
244
0.3
513
§
513
0.7
758
1.0
1.0
0.0
Massachusetts
332
0.4
860
§
860
1.1
1,192
1.5
1.5
0.0
Michigan
573
0.5
1,250
5,226
6,476
5.4
7,049
5.9
5.9
0.0
Minnesota**
NA
 
 
 
NA
 
NA
NA
1.6
NA
Mississippi
17
<0.1

§
NA

17
<0.1
<0.1
0.0
Missouri**
NA
 
 
 
NA
 
NA
NA
1.8
NA
Montana
36
0.3
426
§
426
3.3
463
3.6
3.5
0.1
Nebraska
158
0.6
307
§
307
1.1
465
1.7
1.7
0.0
Nevada
7
<0.1
724
§
724
2.0
731
2.0
2.5
-0.5
New Hampshire
49
0.4
328
§
328
2.5
377
2.8
2.5
0.3
New Jersey
262
0.2
1,741
§
1,741
1.4
2,003
1.6
1.4
0.2
New Mexico
72
0.2
277
§
277
0.9
349
1.1
0.4
0.7
New York
302
0.1
1,547
§
1,547
0.6
1,849
0.8
0.7
0.1
North Carolina
161
0.1
1,105
§
1,105
0.9
1,266
1.0
0.8
0.2
North Dakota
32
0.3
45
185
230
2.3
262
2.7
1.8
0.9
Ohio
369
0.2
††
††
2,681
1.8
3,050
2.0
2.0
0.0
Oklahoma
73
0.1
221
586
808
1.4
880
1.5
1.3
0.2
Oregon
62
0.1
3,331
††
3,331
7.0
3,393
7.1
6.5
0.6
Pennsylvania
510
0.3
1,133
1,419
2,552
1.7
3,062
2.0
2.0
0.0
Rhode Island
33
0.3
81
§
81
0.7
114
1.0
1.1
-0.1
South Carolina§§
83
0.1
772
§
772
1.2
855
1.4
NA
NA
South Dakota§§
21
0.2
199
§
199
1.6
220
1.8
1.8
0.0
Tennessee
132
0.2
773
§
773
1.0
906
1.1
1.2
-0.1
Texas (including Houston)
2,266
0.6
††
††
5,536
1.4
7,803
1.9
1.7
0.2
Houston
979
0.3
NA
NA
NA
 
979
0.3
0.9
-0.6


TABLE 2. (Continued) Estimated number and percentage* of children enrolled in kindergarten with exemption(s) from vaccination, by state/area and type of exemption — United States, 2013–14 school year
State/Area
Medical exemptions†
Nonmedical exemptions†
Total exemptions†
No. of religious exemptions
No. of philosophic exemptions
Total
no.

%
Total
no.

2013–14
(%)

2012–13
(%)

Percentage point difference
No.
%
Utah
94
0.2
16
2,296
2,312
4.2
2,406
4.4
3.8
0.6
Vermont
11
0.2
13
399
412
6.1
423
6.2
6.1
0.1
Virginia
173
0.2
446
§
446
0.4
619
0.6
0.5
-0.5
Washington§§
1,035
1.2
311
2,866
3,177
3.6
4,212
4.7
4.6
0.1
West Virginia
35
0.2

§
 
 
35
0.2
1.2
-1.0
Wisconsin
103
0.1
373
3,042
3,415
4.8
3,519
4.9
4.5
0.4
Wyoming
NA
 
 
 
NA
 
NA
NA
2.3
NA
Median¶¶
 
0.2
 
 
 
1.7
 
1.8
1.8
0.0
American Samoa
NA
 
 
 
NA
 
NA
 NA
 NA
 NA
Guam
0
<0.1
1
§
1
<0.1
1
<0.1
<0.1
0.0
Marshall Islands
NA
 
 
 
NA
 
NA
 NA
 NA
 NA
Micronesia
NA
 
 
 
NA
 
NA
 NA
 NA
 NA
N. Mariana Islands
0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0.1
-0.1
Palau
NA
 
 
 
NA
 
NA
 NA
0.6
NA
Puerto Rico
0
<0.1
0
§
 0
<0.1
0
<0.1
<0.1
0.0
U.S. Virgin Islands
0
0.0
17
§
17
1.1
17
1.1
0.6
0.5
Abbreviation: NA = not available (i.e., not collected or reported to CDC).
* Estimates are adjusted for nonresponse and sampling design where appropriate, except where complete data were unavailable. Percentages for Delaware, Houston, Virginia, and Puerto Rico are approximations.
† Medical and nonmedical exemptions might not be mutually exclusive. Some children might have both medical and nonmedical exemptions. Total exemptions is the number of children with an exemption. Temporary exemptions are included in the total for South Carolina, South Dakota, and Washington.
§ Exemptions because of philosophic reasons are not allowed.
¶ Exemptions because of religious reasons are not allowed.
** Lower bounds of the percentage of children with any exemptions, estimated using the individual vaccines with the highest number of exemptions are, for Illinois, 0.3% with medical exemptions, 1.0% with religious exemptions, and 1.3% for total exemptions, and for Missouri, 0.2% with medical exemptions, 1.6% with religious exemptions, and 1.8% for total exemptions. For Minnesota, the lower bounds of the percentage of children with any exemptions, estimated using the number of children exempt for all vaccines, are <0.1% with medical exemptions, 1.7% with religious exemptions, and 1.7% for total exemptions.
†† Religious and philosophic exemptions are not reported separately.
§§ Includes both temporary and permanent medical exemptions.
¶¶ The median is the center of the estimates in the distribution. The median does not include Houston, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.


All MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from typeset documents. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables. An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800. Contact GPO for current prices.

**Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.


http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6341a1.htm


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 16 Nov - 01:21 (2014)    Sujet du message: PHOENIX CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL SEIZES 8 YEAR OLD BOY BECAUSE MOTHER SEEKS SECOND OPINION Répondre en citant

PHOENIX CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL SEIZES 8 YEAR OLD BOY BECAUSE MOTHER SEEKS SECOND OPINION  


Tonya Brown with Adopted Son Christopher

Health Impact News Editor Comments

Medical professionals taking children away from parents over disagreements on conventional cancer treatments are, sadly, not new stories in the U.S. Last we reported on the case of 10-year-old Sarah Hershberger in Ohio who was suffering from leukemia. She was getting worse on chemotherapy, and begged her parents to take her off of the drugs that she and her parents believed were killing her. When the state awarded custody of her to a nurse who was an employee of the hospital, the parents took her out of the country where she received alternative treatments, and recovered.

The cancer industry in the U.S. is one of the most lucrative medical markets, with one out of every three people in the U.S. expected to have a cancer diagnosis within their lifetime. It is a multi-billion dollar industry, and one that just cannot afford a “cure for cancer” to exist and put hundreds of thousands of people out of work. Hence, any alternative to the “approved” FDA drugs is vigorously attacked and opposed, driving many of the best non-toxic cancer therapies south of the border into Mexico.

To read more about how the cancer industry does not allow cures, and find a list of effective “unapproved” alternative cancer therapies, see our exposes (also available as free eBooks):
The Cancer Industry is Too Prosperous to Allow a Cure Unapproved but Effective Cancer Cures  Phoenix Children’s Hospital Seizes 8 Year Old Boy Because Mother Seeks Second Opinion on Dangerous Cancer Treatment

by Terri LaPoint
Health Impact News

Tonya Brown is “just a mom who is in love with her kid,” adorable 8-year-old Christopher Reign Brown. Because Tonya questioned a very risky, painful procedure for her son, Tonya reports that his doctor at Phoenix Children’s Hospital enlisted Child Protective Services to take him away from her custody.

If the doctor has her way, Tonya could lose her beloved child forever in the upcoming hearings to permanently sever her parental rights later this month – all because a mother wanted to try less invasive options for her son before going to a treatment that carries sizable risks.

Tonya and Christopher’s Story: Rare Leukemia Diagnosis

On September 23, 2011, Tonya received the devastating news that no parent ever wants to hear – her child has leukemia. Specifically, he was diagnosed with CML, chronic myeloid leukemia, a cancer that is extremely rare in children.

Chronic myeloid leukemia is considered an older person’s disease. It was reportedly in stage 2, the accelerated phase. Christopher’s doctor, Dr. Jessica Boklan, recommended 12 weeks of oral chemotherapy, followed by a bone marrow transplant. Tonya agreed to the chemo, which began immediately, but had reservations from the start about the bone marrow transplant.

Research and Questioning Risky Procedure

Tonya is the former HR director for Sky Mall, the magazine in the seat backs on airplanes. She is no stranger to researching information that she needs to find. What she learned about the only treatment option the hospital was prescribing was not reassuring.

Besides being a very painful procedure, there was no guarantee with the bone marrow procedure. Even with a matched donor from a close relative, there is risk of the body rejecting the bone marrow. But in this case, the transplant would require an unrelated, mismatched donor. There are no blood relatives available, because Christopher was born and orphaned in Guatemala. Tonya adopted him when he was a toddler. According to medical research discovered by Tonya, with no family matching donor, Christopher only had a 20% chance at success with this type of bone marrow transplant.

Treating a Sick Adopted Child, and Seeing Healing


Tonya says she fell in love with Christopher from the moment she laid eyes on him, and she knew that she was destined to be his mommy. When she first learned about him, his development was severely delayed, and there was brain damage. As she made preparations for his adoption, Tonya sought the best medical treatment options available in the United States.

Besides lining up some of the best medical care available, she enlisted friends and family to pray for a miracle.

And it happened! A brain scan later showed the damage was no longer present. Christopher began catching up and walking. His countenance changed. He was whole.
Disagreeing with Doctors

With that kind of miracle in his background, it was only logical for Tonya and Christopher to turn to their faith when hearing the diagnosis of leukemia, expecting the same kind of healing again. Like millions of other parents, Tonya Brown researched options, followed the doctor’s directions, and prayed.

Christopher responded better than many to the chemo treatments, but still they made him very sick. He begged his mother to stop making him take the chemo.
As the time approached for the bone marrow transplant, Tonya made the decision to have Christopher delay with going through the risk, and what others had described as agonizing pain associated with the procedure, until they tried other, less invasive options first. She wanted the perilous bone marrow transplant to be the last resort.

After 10 weeks of chemo, Tonya stopped the treatment. At home, she began juicing, and treating him with a strict diet that has been recommended for cancer. She used nutritional treatments, and they prayed and believed God for healing.

Christopher Improved with Alternative Treatments for 18 Months

Shortly after that, Tonya reports that Child Protective Services called her and they played phone tag for a couple of weeks. Then, the calls stopped. Tonya and Christopher went on with their lives.

He reportedly got better. During the next 18 months, they went on vacations; he went to school; they went to birthday parties. They did missions outreaches. Pictures from that period show a happy little boy who obviously loves his family and friends. They lived life, and Tonya continued the dietary and nutritional treatments, and prayer.

CPS Visits and Finds a Well Boy at Home



After a year and a half, Tonya explains that Arizona CPS suddenly showed up at her home. Dr. Boklan had allegedly told them that there was a child whose mother took him out of treatment, and they would likely find either a dead child or a boy on his deathbed.

They found neither. Christopher happily bounced around to show the worker his room and his stuff. They showed her around the house. All in all, the visit seemed to go well.

Nine days later, in June of 2013, Tonya took him back in to Phoenix Children’s. She reports that he was just beginning to show signs of a relapse – losing his appetite and bloating of his abdomen. Those were the same signs that had appeared before. Tonya knew that she had done everything she could do, and it was time to seek help.

A Return to the Hospital – Cancer Now Only Stage 1

When she took him in, Dr. Boklan expressed her displeasure at Tonya removing Christopher from treatment the year before. A bone marrow aspiration test was ordered. At the time of the original diagnosis, that test showed that 16% of his cells had cancer. This time, without the medical treatment that the doctors wanted, the new test showed that only 6% of his cells had leukemia. The tests showed that his leukemia was in the chronic phase, or stage 1.

Dr. Boklan insisted that treatment must begin that night. CPS was at the hospital when she came, saying they were there to ensure that Christopher got any necessary treatment. They assured Tonya that they were not there to take her son. When Tonya asked for a second opinion about the treatment, which she considered to be her due diligence as a concerned parent, she was denied. She agreed to allow him to be treated, because the cancer was back.

Hospital and CPS Seize Custody – Mother Denied Visitation

CPS was allegedly prepared to close the case when she agreed to chemo. However, Dr. Boklan insisted that they keep the case open. At her request, CPS put an anklet on Christopher to keep him on the floor of the hospital. After 20 days, Tonya says she was ordered to leave the hospital.  Christopher was taken from her custody on June 25, 2013, in spite of the fact that his mother says she had agreed to all his treatments.

The alleged charges against Tonya were:
  1. Medical abuse/neglect, because she kept him out of treatment for 18 months.
  2. She is psychologically unable to make the right medical decisions because of her delusional religious beliefs (she believes in prayer and healing).

Christopher has been placed in a foster home, where they plan to adopt him, despite the fact that he has a mother who loves him and wants him back. CPS and the hospital have petitioned to sever all of Tonya’s parental rights. She has not been permitted to see him since January 31, and the last time she spoke to her son was May 5.

Since the time that he was taken away from his mother, Dr. Boklan scheduled a bone marrow transplant, which took place in March. Tonya credits God with the fact that Christopher’s body has not rejected the marrow from an unrelated, mismatched donor. She says that she learned that there is an 80% chance that, given those circumstances, his body could have rejected the transplant and he could have been very ill as a result. She is thankful that he overcame those odds.

Doctor has Research Ties to Rare Leukemia

Dr. Jessica Boklan considers herself, per her testimony in court, to be the world’s leading authority on CML leukemia. She has an impressive resume of research studies that she has co-authored or is participating in at present, most involving children, cancer, and drugs.

Tonya Brown reports that, from the beginning of her son’s diagnosis, Dr. Boklan has pushed for her to enter Christopher into a research study. Children with his disease are allegedly extremely rare, and much prized for their value in research.

Tonya refused to give her consent for experimental research. She told Health Impact News that during every doctor’s visit, Boklan would demand that she allow Christopher to participate in studies, asking, “Have you signed those papers yet?”

Children who are Wards of the State May be Used in Drug Trials

Now that Christopher is a ward of the state, the doctor is free to do medical research on him without his mother’s knowledge or consent. Like Justina Pelletier, Isaiah Rider, the Deigel sisters, baby Kathryn, and countless other children who have been allegedly medically kidnapped, doctors are legally permitted to use little Christopher as a research subject, which many parents compare to using “lab rats” in scientific studies.

A recent bipartisan bill in Congress seeks to stop these medical experimentations on children who are wards of the state (See: “Justina’s Law” Seeks to End Experimental Medical Research on Children Seized by Child Protection Services.)

Despite Tonya’s efforts to get her son back, the system seems determined to defeat her. She reports there are documents that have been left out of the records, and there are medical records that have been changed. Although CPS has reportedly submitted the “full case file,” the record is allegedly missing the favorable CPS visit made to Tonya’s home nine days before his relapse.

Medical Records Allegedly Changed to Justify Taking Custody Away from Mother

Though medical records are not supposed to be changed, the records from Christopher’s hospital visit on June 6, 2013, have allegedly been altered. Health Impact News has obtained two allegedly different copies of the records from that day from the mother. The records have the time and date stamp of when they were faxed.

The first copy was faxed on June 10 by a Phoenix Children’s Hospital caseworker to CPS. Apparently, that fact was missed, and the same documents were faxed by the records department of the hospital on July 18. Both bear the same date of entry. However, a number of changes were made. The following is just one of the changes.

On the June 10 version, a statement reads, “S/p Bone Marrow on 6/7 which demonstrated Christopher is in Chronic phase.”

The July 18 version states, “S/p Bone Marrow aspirate and biopsy on 6/7 which demonstrated Christopher is in RELAPSE after partially treated Accelerated Phase.”

The Chronic phase is phase 1 of CML leukemia, and the Accelerated phase is phase 2. The original report allegedly shows that Christopher’s leukemia improved after the 18 months without conventional treatment, because he was in the Accelerated phase when he was first diagnosed. According to testimony by Dr. Boklan that she reportedly gave to court, that cannot happen. It is impossible, she told the judge, for leukemia to go from stage 2 to stage 1 without standard treatment. It appears that the records have been altered to substantiate the doctors’ claims.

Are Constitutional Religious Freedom Rights Being Violated in some Medical Kidnapping Cases?

Tonya is accused of medical neglect for removing her son from traditional treatment. Health Impact News reported last year that a young Ohio girl’s parents acted similarly to Tonya Brown, stopping Sarah Hershberger’s chemo treatment for her cancer in favor of more natural treatments. Doctors at Akron Children’s Hospital alleged medical neglect by her Amish parents and filed for the state to take custody of the child. The parents fled the U.S. to avoid having their young daughter taken away. Doctors reported the girl would soon die without treatment. However, many months later the girl was doing fine, and reportedly had tested cancer-free.

Another similarity between the Hershberger case and Tonya’s is that their faith was called into question. Freedom of religion is one of the most cherished of American values, yet there seems to be an unconstitutional addendum added in recent years, specifying that freedom of religion may only exist as long as it does not interfere with medical dogma. Any religious belief that challenges the doctrine of “the doctor knows best” is thrown out as heresy, and violators are now subject to their children being seized by the state.

Psychologists Hostile to Religious Beliefs

A common denominator that has been noted in a number of medical kidnap cases at Phoenix Children’s Hospital is the use of a psychologist to come in and review cases in which children are removed from parents. In Tonya’s case, the psychologist allegedly trampled her traditional Christian beliefs and used them against her, reportedly saying that she “continues to cling steadfastly to her bizarre religious beliefs,” calling her faith “delusional,” and questioning her ability to make right decisions in the future.

However, in these cases the parents had been following prescribed medical treatment, and were simply asking for second opinions, while incorporating prayer and their faith as part of the overall treatment protocol.

Based on this alleged psychological assessment that religious beliefs preclude someone from making sound treatment decisions for their child, every parent in the country who prays to God to heal their sick child is at risk of having their child taken away by medical authorities simply for practicing their religion. However, no law or government gives any doctor or psychologist the right to demand that parents not believe in God or pray for their child. The demand would be met with mass non-compliance if it were enacted.

That psychological assessment should have no bearing on Tonya’s case, if the judge in Arizona decides to show the good sense demonstrated by Judge John Lohn in the case of Sarah Hershberger:
Citation:

“The court cannot deprive these parents of their right to make medical decisions for their daughter because there is not a scintilla of evidence showing the parents are unfit.” (Source.)


Mother in Danger of Losing Permanent Custody

Tonya is a mom who wants desperately to be reunited with the little boy that she sacrificed everything for to go rescue from a group home in Guatemala. He is reportedly a well-loved little boy, who was very happy when he lived with his mother.


Tonya Brown and her son Christopher.
 
Christopher Brown’s situation is very perilous at this point. A family stands ready to adopt him if Tonya’s parental rights are severed. There are two final hearings, on November 14 and 21, during which a judge could return her son back to Tonya, or she could lose him forever. Everything is reportedly riding on those two hearings.
An advocacy group has put up a Facebook Page to share news on Tonya and Christopher’s plight: FreeChristopher

UPDATE: The family has called for a Press Conference and Rally at the Courthouse this Friday:

http://medicalkidnap.com/2014/11/09/phoenix-childrens-hospital-seizes-8-yea…
http://medicalkidnap.com/2014/11/09/phoenix-childrens-hospital-seizes-8-yea…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 30 Nov - 03:28 (2014)    Sujet du message: ITALY BANS FLU SHOT 9 DEAD Répondre en citant

ITALY BANS FLU SHOT 9 DEAD



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MiW75hQKWdI


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 10 Déc - 23:52 (2014)    Sujet du message: CFR: UNVACCINATED ARE HEALTHIER THAN VACCINATED POPULATIONS Répondre en citant

CFR: UNVACCINATED ARE HEALTHIER THAN VACCINATED POPULATIONS

The Pope love so much the little children.


Vatican Jesuits Rule The Council On Foreign Relations (CFR)
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Illuminati/vatican_jesuits_rule_cfr.htm

March 30, 2014 

 
(REFUSERS) – (Comment) The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) recently published a disease map purporting to show that disease outbreaks are the fault of the unvaccinated.  While the mainstream media like PBS ran the story, they missed the fact that the CFR map shows the highest disease outbreaks in the most-vaccinated populations.



Those countries where vaccines are given routinely or forced upon children and their parents, often under threat of law, experience the lion’s share of communicable diseases. Why? What’s happened with “herd immunity”?

by Catherine J. Frompovich

Right off, and at the very beginning, I say this article will cause rumblings and a stir amongst many, if not all, on both sides of the vaccine safety issue, especially with vaccine apologists. My reason for saying that is because what I discuss is strictly my evaluation of the interactive data map showing communicable infectious diseases globally, as prepared by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), which points out some grave problems regarding vaccine statistics, in my opinion. Please study the map before reading on.

The only request I make is that every reader consider the information with an open mind, not one influenced or prejudiced by pseudo-science. One statistic that the data show is this: the most vaccinated population countries have the most outbreaks of those same diseases for which vaccines are pushed on populations supposedly to engender what’s called “herd immunity.”

First, let’s see how many vaccinations were mandated for children in several countries of the western meme according to data available in 2009.
Sweden and Japan had 11 vaccines, Finland 12, Norway 13, Switzerland 16, Australia 27, Canada 28, and USA 36. It is safe to say that, if anything, more vaccines have been added to those schedules since 2009, especially the HPV vaccine for both girls and boys. But, for the sake of ‘argument’ and graphics available, I will use the chart below as a reference alongside the CFR’s map.

Graphic Source in Notes

One readily can see that the USA had/has the most number of mandated vaccines, which has increased dramatically in numbers since 2009 for children birth to 18 years of age as confirmed by the CDC’s “Recommended Immunization Schedule for Persons Age 0 Through 18 Years United States, 2014.”

Before I go further in my interpretation of the map and data, let’s consider what the map offers:
  1. Disease color-coded dots designating Measles, Mumps, Rubella, Polio, Whooping cough, and Other
  2. Countries with an inordinate amount of dots are: the USA, the European Union (EU), Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Canada to some extent, plus Equatorial Africa and India where GAVI [Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation] has implemented vaccination campaigns.
  3. The South American continent is almost void of any communicable disease dots. Interesting? Wait until some vaccination campaign strategy takes off there. It’s only a matter of time, I’d say.
  4. Several countries have no dots representing diseases.
  5. China, which often is touted as a growing hotbed of communicable diseases, shows Measles and Other, if I’ve interpreted the color code correctly as Polio and Other are too closely related in colors. Is that color scheme a favorable coincidence?
  6. The predominant diseases globally, according to dots on the map, are: Measles and Whooping cough, which are the vaccines children everywhere are vaccinated with.


Now, I’d like to discuss my interpretation of what the map represents:
Those countries where vaccines are given routinely or forced upon children and their parents, often under threat of law, experience the lion’s share of communicable diseases. Why? What’s happened with “herd immunity”? It just doesn’t add up, especially since in the USA there is over 90% childhood vaccination compliance! According to the U.S. CDC’s MMWR (Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report) 2012—13 School Year for Kindergarten, for example,
Citation:

This report summarizes vaccination coverage from 48 states and DC and exemption rates from 49 states and DC for children entering kindergarten for the 2012–13 school year. Forty-eight states and DC reported vaccination coverage, with medians of 94.5% for 2 doses of measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine; 95.1% for local requirements for diphtheria, tetanus toxoid, and acellular pertussis (DtaP) vaccination; and 93.8% for 2 doses of varicella vaccine among awardees with a 2-dose requirement. Forty-nine states and DC reported exemption rates, with the median total of 1.8%. Although school entry coverage for most awardees was at or near national Healthy People 2020 targets of maintaining 95% vaccination coverage levels for 2 doses of MMR vaccine, 4 doses of DtaP† vaccine, and 2 doses of varicella vaccine (2), low vaccination and high exemption levels can cluster within communities, increasing the risk for disease. [CJF emphasis added]



Take a look at those vaccination percentage rates: 94.5% for MMR, 95.1% for DtaP and 93.8% for chickenpox (varicella), and still there are outbreaks of measles and pertussis. There IS something dramatically wrong with vaccines and their effectiveness, I contend, if that number of children is an example of vaccination rates in the USA that can be interpolated for comparisons of vaccinated versus non-vaccinated. Furthermore, only a medium total of 1.8% was exempt from vaccinations.

Question: Is 1.8% a high exemption level? I don’t think so, as it falls well within the 5% target range of exemptions for non-vaccinated as found in Healthy People 2020.

The CDC/FDA, medicine, pharmacology, and vaccinology, in particular, are dead wrong regarding vaccines, I do believe. The more children receive vaccines and boosters, undoubtedly, the more communicable infectious diseases are surfacing. What does the CFR map tell?

In my opinion, one of several physiological occurrences, or all, may be happening:
1. Vaccines aren’t working and cause immune dysfunction.
2. Vaccines are damaging the immune system so much that it cannot function as Nature intended and designed due to vaccine antigen responses that undoubtedly are reprogramming it.
3. Disease microorganisms are becoming sophisticated – similar to bacteria due to too many antibiotics prescribed for just about every malady plus those in the food chain – so that microorganisms are morphing into new strains for which vaccinology either hasn’t realized what’s going on or can’t keep up with various or newer strains and antigens. See this:
Citation:

“There are currently eight species in the Bordetella genus. Three species in this genus are known to be pathogenic to humans. B. pertussis and B. parapertussis are very similar species. Both species cause pertussis (whooping cough) in humans and are separated merely by the toxins they release during infection. B. parapertussis releases toxins that seem to cause a milder form of pertussis (whooping cough). B. bronchiseptica causes respiratory disease in various mammals and occasionally in humans. The species is further separated from B. pertussis and B. parapertussis by being motile. The human pathology of the remaining five species is relatively unknown. B. avium and B. hinzii, are known to cause respiratory disease in poultry. [2] [CJF emphasis added]”



4. A large percentage of vaccinated children in the USA now experience some form of illness or disease that is NOT a communicable disease, which manifests either as chronic or neurological. Something authorities want to deny is that since numerous vaccines have been mandated for children since the 1980s, so have autism [neurological] rates skyrocketed from one in 10,000 [1970s] to 1 in 50 children in the USA as of March 2013 reporting! [1]

While writing this article I received this information:
Citation:

The new ‘official autism’ numbers were released minutes ago by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1 in 68 among all eight-year olds evaluated in 2010, 1 in 42 boys, and 1 in 189 girls, more than a million children. The last time the CDC released these numbers in 2010 the numbers were 1 in 88, and 1 in 54 boys. Undoubtedly the real numbers today are much higher than this 4-year old data.



Along with that information, a request came to call the White House&nbsp; (202) 456-1111&nbsp; and ask President Obama what is he going to do about it.

Special Notation should be made of the variances in the CDC report as referenced in the article Notes below (1) [3/20/13] and the information I just received. Isn’t it a hornet’s nest to figure out? In the Reference section of that report (pg.2) it states: “This prevalence estimate (1 in 50) is significantly higher than the estimate.” Somehow to me, their figures don’t seem to be coherent. Don’t they know what they are doing, or is it on purpose to add confusion to the issue?

Autism is not the only health problem since vaccines took off like greased lightning. The USA Today reported this: “More than half of children ages 8 to 14 have had a long-term health problem at some point, such as obesity, asthma, a learning disability or other ailment, a study shows.” [3]

The sad part, though, is that no one is investigating correlation and causation with regard to the inordinate number of vaccines prescribed during the first two years of life starting at birth!

In the USA alone, measles and whooping cough outbreaks occur in 90% or more of those contracting the diseases and fully vaccinated. See my blog “Mumps Breakout in Ohio May Prove Something.”

B. Even if non-vaccinated children were responsible for spreading those diseases, how come fully-vaccinated children and other vaccinees are contracting the very diseases for which they have been vaccinated IF vaccines were efficacious? Current disease-contracting statistics prove just how false the vaccine paradigm truly is! Scare tactics are employed to vaccinate, whereas vaccines fail those vaccinated! How does that make sense?

C. As an example, the charts below indicate the factual reality of vaccinated versus non-vaccinated health status of children in the first five years of life in the Netherlands (2004), one of the countries that make up the European Union. You can see on the CFR map that measles is a dot in that EU geographical location.

In the charts we see dramatic contrasts for ear infections, inflammations of the throat, aggressive behavior, convulsions/collapse, antibiotics administered, sickly, eczema, asthma/chronic lung disease, allergic reactions, and difficulty sleeping. The charts indicate that vaccinated children are twice as likely – or more – as non-vaccinated children to experience the health problems enumerated in the charts.

Graphic Source in Notes

The information offered by the CFR map is rather significant and I think speaks for itself, i.e., the more vaccinated the population, the more likely to contract the very diseases for which they are vaccinated. How in the name of non-vested-interest-science are they still getting away with such sleight of pseudo-science, together with ruining the human immune system?

Just because they say so dogmatically, doesn’t mean it’s factually and scientifically so! Do your research and learn the real science behind vaccines in order to educate everyone: pediatricians, nurses, schools, health agency personnel at all levels of government, and even Congress, who I contend gave us this vaccine mess by passing The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 (42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 300aa-34).

The NCVIA is in desperate need of being revisited, if not repealed, in my opinion. NCVIA gives vaccine makers what some call a “get out of jail free card” that exonerates them of all liability, something no other industry has.

Furthermore, with all the health damages and problems vaccines have been causing for now going on two or three generations – see the VAERS reports in the hundreds of thousands – Congress needs to seriously investigate the autism problem, neurotoxic and other toxic vaccine ingredients, and stop taking those handsome monetary gifts from Big Pharma lobbyists that apparently influence their observable lack of oversight, I contend. In 2013, pharmaceutical manufacturers paid out $227.5 Million lobbying on behalf of their products and corporate interests. [4] What does that tell you?
Lastly, an incredible story about how pseudo-science is pulled off is reported in “Academia hoaxed by fake scientific papers auto-generated by gobbledygook text generators.”

Personally, I’d like to see shakeups at all federal and state health agencies regarding vaccinations, their ‘science’ and, most of all, their toxic ingredients. It’s long overdue.

Notes:
[1] CDC Report 65. Changes in Prevalence of Parent-reported Autism Spectrum Disorder in School-aged U.S. Children: 2007 to 2011–2012. Adobe PDF file [PDF – 163 KB] March 2013. [2] http://bioweb.uwlax.edu/bio203/s2007/wolf_bri2/ [3] http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/health/2010-02-17-chronic17_st_N.htm [4] http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=H04
Graphics Source:
The charts were produced by Raymond Obomsawin, PhD National Aboriginal Health Organization, October 2009 http://preventdisease.com/news/09/111009_infectious_disease_decline_vs_vacc…

Thank you for sharing this information, Dr. Obomsawin.

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.
Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.
Read the article

More from my site
http://www.omsj.org/corruption/cfrmap


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 12 Déc - 02:25 (2014)    Sujet du message: US TROOPS REFUSE DEADLY MANDATORY ANTHRAX VACCINE Répondre en citant

US TROOPS REFUSE DEADLY MANDATORY ANTHRAX VACCINE

2007



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJiynvYCEn4

"DIRECT ORDER" DOCUMENTARY (Full) - SOLDIERS ORDERED TO TAKE ANTHRAX VACCINE & GOT BRAIN DAMAGED

2013



VIDEO :  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJiynvYCEn4


BIOLOGICAL WARFARE 
 
  

   Biological warfare is not a new phenomenon. History is full of examples of warring factions trying to weaken each other’s troops or civilian populations by making them sick. From the ancient Greeks and Romans, who polluted the water supplies of their enemies with dead animals, to warriors in medieval times who catapulted corpses of people infected with bubonic plague into the castles of their enemies, to European conquerors who came to the New World and used smallpox contaminated blankets to kill native Indians with no natural immunity to smallpox, there is a long history of man using disease as a weapon. 

  Modern biological weapons using lethal microorganisms were developed in the 1930s by Japanese scientists, including an aerosolized anthrax that was designed to be used in a specially designed fragmentation bomb. Both the U.S. and Britain developed biological weapons during World War II using anthrax, botulinum toxin, encephalitis virus, staph enterotoxin and other deadly organisms.  Even though the U.S. has had biological weapons capability, the U.S. has never used biological weapons on any nation.

ANTHRAX DISEASE      

    Anthrax is a serious bacterial infection caused by Bacillus anthracis and most commonly occurs in animals such as cattle, sheep, horses and goats after they graze in areas contaminated with spores of B. anthracis. The body wastes and carcasses of infected animals, or flies that eat infected carcasses, and contaminated hides and meat are all sources of anthrax. Individuals who work with animals or animal by-products or are exposed to contaminated soil are at highest risk of contracting anthrax. 

    The bacteria, which must be in the presence of oxygen to survive, produce spores that can survive for years in dry soil but are destroyed by boiling or by treatment with hydrogen peroxide or dilute formaldehyde. Most common strains of B. anthracis are susceptible to penicillin and certain other antibiotics. However, a genetically engineered strain of anthrax that has been chemically treated and designed specifically as a biological weapon may be lethal enough to evade the protection that current antibiotics provide. 

    B. anthracis can invade the human bloodstream, multiply and spread to lymph nodes and many organs and kill quickly. The bacteria, which produce virulent toxin, can enter the bloodstream through a cut in the skin; by inhaling the anthrax spores through the nose; or by swallowing the spores into the gastrointestinal system.  The cutaneous (skin) route is much less deadly than inhaling or swallowing the organism.  

   Anthrax is not a contagious disease. Someone who is directly exposed to anthrax spores and becomes sick cannot pass the disease along to someone else by coughing or sneezing as most infectious diseases can be spread.  Each individual who gets sick with anthrax must have come into direct contact with the bacteria through a cut in the skin, through inhaling the spores into the lungs or through swallowing the spores, such as by eating contaminated meat. 

   Symptoms of Cutaneous (Skin) Anthrax:  If the anthrax exposure route is through the skin, symptoms include a formation of a small, red skin lesion(s) that becomes swollen, larger and blackened over a week’s time. There may or may not be fever and swollen lymph nodes. Spontaneous healing occurs in 80 to 90 percent of cases. In 10 to 20 percent of cases that go on to develop bacteremia (massive bacterial infection of the blood), high fever and rapid death follows. 

   Symptoms of Inhalation (Lungs) Anthrax:  Within one to three days of breathing in the anthrax spores, there is headache, fever, muscle aches, extreme fatigue, shortness of breath, coughing, low blood pressure and respiratory failure that can lead to death within 24 hours even with treatment. 

   Symptoms of gastrointestinal Anthrax : After swallowing anthrax spores, fever, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, bloody diarrhea develops and can lead to death. If the tonsils are affected, symptoms can include fever, sore throat, swollen lymph nodes, and respiratory distress. 

   Laboratory Diagnosis: A blood test that uses fluorescent antibody staining or culture can confirm anthrax infection, unless the patient has been treated with antibiotics. More sensitive lab tests can be performed for anthrax disease confirmation. 

   Treatment: For skin anthrax, treatments have included a penicillin shot used to destroy viable B. anthracis in skin lesions within 5 hours, followed by a 10 day oral course of penicillin. Other antibiotics, including doxycycline, ciprofloxacin, and chloramphenicol have also been used.  Skin lesions are frequently cleaned and covered and used dressings disinfected before disposal. Antibiotic treatment has also been used with inhalation and gastrointestinal anthrax but with less success. 

   Antibiotic Side Effects:  All drugs, including antibiotics, like all vaccines carry an inherent risk of injury or death for some individuals.  Overuse of antibiotics and use of antibiotics in the absence of bacterial infection has contributed to the development of antibiotic-resistant strains of organisms that can cause life threatening illness.  This has made it necessary to develop more powerful antibiotics, some of which carry serious side effects.  

   In addition to killing unwanted toxic bacteria, such as anthrax, antibiotics also kill the normal flora of the gastrointestinal tract and can cause nausea, diarrhea, vomiting and yeast infections.  Rashes, hives, and other allergic reactions, including anaphylactic shock leading to death, can occur. Some antibiotics can cause central nervous system problems, including severe headaches, drowsiness, dizziness, irritability and restlessness, nerve paralysis and seizures.  Other antibiotic reactions include blood disorders, such as anemia and thrombocytopenia (which can lead to uncontrolled bleeding); kidney and liver dysfunction and serum sickness that causes fatigue, muscle weakness and painful joints. 

   Prognosis: The mortality rate for skin anthrax that is untreated is 10 to 20 percent but very low with antibiotic therapy. The mortality rate for inhalation anthrax is 50 to 90 percent even with antibiotic therapy.  The mortality rate for gastrointestinal anthrax is about 50 percent with antibiotic therapy. If meningitis is a complication of anthrax infection, it is usually fatal. 

NORMAL EXPOSURE TO ANTHRAX: The most common way to get anthrax is to come into contact with an infected animal or animal waste and by-products. Veterinarians, farmers, or researchers working with animals are at higher risk, as are those working in industries that handle animal by-products like meat and animal skins.  As already discussed, the cutaneous (skin) form of anthrax has a very low death rate with appropriate antibiotic therapy after exposure. 

BIOTERRORISM EXPOSURE TO ANTHRAX: If the anthrax bacteria is used as a biological weapon to kill large numbers of people, it will most likely be used in the deadly aerosol form so that large numbers of people will inhale it.  This will mean that the anthrax strain and size of spores will have to be specifically designed for weapons purposes and will require an effective delivery system. So far, there has never been a successful delivery of inhalation anthrax to any large population through a bomb, missile, crop duster or any other means. 

  However, even though inhalation anthrax has never been successfully delivered to large numbers of people, it has become evident that whoever sent the anthrax through the U.S. mail system had access to a strain of weaponized anthrax that had been processed into a high grade powder form. Genetic tests on the anthrax-contaminated letters, which resulted in the deaths of five Americans, have confirmed that it was the variant Ames strain of anthrax developed during experimental research originating at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Disease (USAMRIID) at Fort Detrick, Maryland. Reportedly, the Ames strain was provided to other labs doing anthrax research, including Porton Down, a British military lab; Louisiana State University; Northern Arizona University, as well as Dugway Proving Ground military research facility in Utah, where anthrax spores were reportedly processed into the powder form that can be inhaled easily. 

   The fact that the genetically engineered and weaponized anthrax strain used in the contaminated mail can be traced back to a U.S. military research facility suggests that there are internal lab security issues that need to be addressed before it can be assumed that the best solution to preventing bioterrorism is to implement prophylactic mass vaccination or medication programs.

...

References: 

Isselbacher KJ, Braunwald E et al, eds. 1994. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. Thirteenth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. 

The Department of Defense. Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program: About the Vaccine. www.anthrax.osd.mil/ 

Centers for Disease Control.  Anthrax (Bacillus anthracis): Frequently asked questions. www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dbmd/anthrx.htm

Bioport Corporation. March 1999. Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed. Manufacturer Product Insert. (www.bioport.com) 

Physicians’ Desk Reference. 2001. Montvale: Medical Economics Co., Inc. 

Committee on Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives. Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs and International Relations. Series of congressional hearings on anthrax vaccine held in 1999. (www.house.gov/reform/ns/past_hearings/anthrax.htm

Committee on Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives. Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs and International Relations.

Subcommittee Report: The Department of Defense Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program: Unproven Force Protection. House Report 106-556

(www.house.gov/reform; www.access.gpo.gov/congress/cog005.html

U.S. General Accounting Office. September 1999. GAO Report: Combating Terrorism: Need for Comprehensive Threat and Risk Assessments of Chemical and Biological Attacks. GAO/NSIAD-99-163. 

Hafemeister R. February 6, 1998. British avoiding vaccines for troops in Gulf. Belleville News-Democrat

Riechmann D. March 4, 1998. Anthrax vaccine works on monkeys. The Associated Press. 

Fukuda K, Nisenbaum R, Stewart G et al. September 16, 1998. Chronic multisymptom illness affecting Air Force veterans of the Gulf War. Journal of the American Medical Association. 

Graham B. October 30, 1998. Dose of explanation comes with anthrax shots. The Washington Post

Unwin C, Blatchley N, Coker W et al. January 16, 1999. Health of UK servicemen who served in Persian Gulf War. The Lancet

Jackson PJ, Hugh-Jones ME et al. February 3, 1998. PCR analysis of tissuesamples from the 1979 Sverdlovsk anthrax victims: the presence of multiple Bacillus anthracis strains in different victims. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Funk D. June 28, 1999. Marine refuses vaccines, gets jail, discharge. Air Force Times. 

Daniels D. June 29, 1999. Anthrax shots bad medicine?: vaccine’s possible perils listed in military papers.  The San Diego Union-Tribune. (www.uniontrib.com

Kreisher O. July 22, 1999. Military personnel assail anthrax shots’ side effects. The San Diego Union-Tribune

Manning A. October 19, 1999. Anthrax vaccine injects anger into military: fearing reactions, troops quit the service. USA Today

Crawley JW. December 4, 1999. Pentagon postpones its anthrax inoculations. The San Diego Union-Tribune

Graham B. December 14, 1999. Pentagon anthrax program suffers setback: new manufacturing plant fails FDA inspection; inoculation expansion delayed. The Washington Post. 

Hudson A. October 10, 2001. Anthrax, smallpox vaccines called for. The Washington Times. 

Hoffman KB. October 10, 2001. Company working on anthrax vaccine. Associated Press

Spencer J., Scardaville M. October 11, 2001. Understanding the bioterrorist threat: facts and figures. The Heritage Foundation Backgrounder (www.heritage.org/library/backgrounder)

Dyer G., Cookson C. October 11, 2001. Spreading calm in small doses. Financial Times

Pear R. October 20, 2001. Government talks with drug companies about buying anthrax antibiotics. The New York Times

Jackson RL. October 22, 2001. Lansing-based anthrax vaccine maker hit by major lawsuit: suit claims shots caused adverse reactions in soldiers. Los Angeles Times.  

Fleischer-Black M., Van Voris B. October 23, 2001. Anthrax Vaccine’s Liability Issue. The National Law Journal

Hanchette J. October 27, 2001. Why can’t we immunize Americans against anthrax? Gannett News Service

Johannes L. October 29, 2001. CDC to make anthrax vaccine available to workers put at risk in the line of duty. The Wall Street Journal. 

Walsh E. December 11, 2001. VA links Gulf War, Lou Gehrig’s Disease. The Washington Post

Weiss R., Schmidt S. December 16, 2001. Capitol Hill anthrax matches Army’s stocks. The Washington Post

Vedantam S., Connolly C.  December 18, 2001. Anthrax vaccine urged for Hill staff. The Washington Post.

Williams TD. June 02, 2001. Anthrax vaccine complaints on rise. The Hartford Courant.

Garrett L. 2000. Betrayal of Trust. New York: Hyperion.

 ABOUT THE EDITOR:  Barbara Loe Fisher is co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center. She is co-author of DPT: A Shot in the Dark; author of The Consumer’s Guide to Childhood Vaccines; and editor of THE VACCINE REACTION and The Vaccine Hotline newsletters.  She served on the National Vaccine Advisory Committee and the Institute of Medicine Vaccine Safety Forum and is the consumer voting member of the FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee.

 The following statement is authored by Meryl Nass, M.D., A.B.I.M., a biowarfare epidemiologist who is an expert on anthrax vaccine. She has assisted Gulf War veterans suffering from neuroimmune dysfunction and has provided expert testimony to Congress on the safety and efficacy of the anthrax vaccine. Dr. Nass is a member of the Medical Advisory Board of the National Vaccine Information Center.

http://www.nvic.org/vaccines-and-diseases/anthrax/specialreport.aspx

...


Cutaneous Anthrax. Source: CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

“Less than one millionth of a gram [1/30,000,000 of an ounce of inhaled anthrax] is invariably fatal within five days to a week after exposure.” [2]

Anthrax spores occur naturally around the world in soil and in certain animals, and they can be produced for biological warfare.  When dispersed by exploded devices, the spores will survive the explosion and retain their ability to infect people.  Anthrax can remain viable in soil for decades.

[1]“Botulinum Toxin as a Biological Weapon,” JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association), Vol. 285, No. 8, February 28, 2001, http://www.fas.org/biosecurity/resource/agents.htm. March 27, 2005.

[2] FAS (Federation of American Scientists), "Biological Warfare Agents (Partial List)," www.fas.org/nuke/intro/bw/agent.htm, (28 March 2005).

http://www.notimetokill.org/ch4.htm


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 23 Déc - 06:42 (2014)    Sujet du message: RUST CONTAMINATED VACCINES WORLD WIDE RECALL Répondre en citant

RUST CONTAMINATED VACCINES WORLD WIDE RECALL



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EzhAh-I1mU


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 31 Déc - 11:56 (2014)    Sujet du message: NAVAL HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER CONCLUDES SIX-YEAR VACCINE STUDY WITH FDA Répondre en citant

NAVAL HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER CONCLUDES SIX-YEAR VACCINE STUDY WITH FDA

The Smallpox Vaccine
http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/smallpox/vaccination/facts.asp

...No studies of their usefulness, or safety, have been conducted on humans exposed to smallpox...
http://www.who.int/csr/disease/smallpox/faq/en/


Story Number: NNS141230-08Release Date: 12/30/2014 1:04:00 PM 

By Anna Hancock, Naval Health Research Center Public Affairs

San Diego (NNS) -- The Naval Health Research Center (NHRC) recently concluded one of the largest vaccine safety studies in the command's history, contributing to the fourth and final phase of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) smallpox vaccine safety trials.

For more than six years, NHRC led the six military facilities across the nation taking part in this effort. About 16,000 samples were collected when the FDA decided NHRC's team had enough data to support the study.

"Even though the smallpox vaccine is an FDA approved vaccine, many vaccines undergo this post-marketing vaccine safety study [phase four]," said Lt. Cmdr. Lori Perry, a preventive medicine physician with NHRC and the study's principal investigator. "It's an extra measure to track all potential adverse effects."

The smallpox vaccine, according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, is safe and effective and given to people determined to be at high risk for smallpox infection. Routine vaccination against smallpox stopped in 1972 after the disease was eradicated in the United States.

"Military service members still receive the vaccine if they are deploying to an area where the threat of smallpox is present," noted Perry.

In collaboration with the FDA and the vaccine manufacturer Sanofi Pasteur, NHRC established vaccine surveillance sites at Marine Corps Base Twentynine Palms, California, Fort Campbell, Kentucky, Fort Bliss, Texas, Fort Hood, Texas, Fort Stewart, Georgia and Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington, in 2008. Since then, NHRC's teams diligently collected data each time a vaccine was administered and closely monitored the health and well-being of the person who received it.

The data was then reported to the manufacturer and ultimately the FDA who has the final authority on the vaccine's safety.

"When we closed the surveillance sites down, it took the expertise from our quality assurance specialist and clinical trial program manager to ensure each applicable standard operating procedure was followed," said Perry. "Every detail to safeguard personally identifiable information and ensure patient privacy was accounted for."

This month, NHRC's team is carrying out the administrative details in the turnover to its collaborative partners. This work will continue until the summer of 2015 but for now, NHRC's Commanding Officer Capt. Jacqueline Rychnovsky lauds the team responsible for executing the study.

"This study directly contributed to the safety and readiness of our service men and women," explained Rychnovsky. "We appreciate the collaborative efforts from our Army, Marine Corps and Air Force counterparts at the surveillance sites. Their roles were integral to the success of the study."

As the DoD's premier deployment health research center, NHRC's cutting-edge research and development is used to optimize the operational health and readiness of the nation's armed forces. Within close proximity to more than 95,000 uniformed service members, world-class universities, and industry partners, NHRC's expert team sets the standards in joint ventures, innovation, and practical application.

http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=85032


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 8 Jan - 12:21 (2015)    Sujet du message: BIG PHARMA FLU SHOT KILLS RECORD NUMBER OF KIDS THIS SEASON Répondre en citant

BIG PHARMA FLU SHOT KILLS RECORD NUMBER OF KIDS THIS SEASON



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zw70I_810X8


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 31 Jan - 02:13 (2015)    Sujet du message: JAIL 'ANTI-VAX' PARENTS : COLUMN Répondre en citant

JAIL 'ANTI-VAX' PARENTS : COLUMN

Alex Berezow 10:29 a.m. EST January 28, 2015

Your family's right to be sick ends where public health begins.



(Photo: Justin Sullivan, Getty Images)

The entirely preventable California measles outbreak has now sickened more than 70 people. With perhaps hundreds more exposed, the outbreak will likely continue.

As the disease spreads, experts will debate how we respond and what to do about the anti-vaccine movement that's partly to blame for this mess. Likely, all we'll agree on is better outreach to parents.

That's not enough. Parents who do not vaccinate their children should go to jail.

USA TODAY
Anti-vaccine parents boost measles comeback: Our view

In the year 2015, it is amazing that anyone in the United States contracts measles. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that the U.S. eliminated all native cases of measles in the year 2000. New cases generally occurred only among unvaccinated foreigners. Today, however, because of ignorant "anti-vaxxers," the disease is staging a comeback.

Anti-vaxxers often claim the right not to put "poison" in their children's bodies. That is ludicrous. A mountain of data has demonstrated that vaccines are safe and effective. Insisting otherwise is akin to believing that the moon landing was faked.

A more serious objection is that, like birth control, those with religious objections should be exempted. But, let's remember that civil rights go both ways.
Prohibitionist John Finch once said, "Your right to swing your arm leaves off where my right not to have my nose struck begins." For infectious disease, we could reformulate that to: "Your right to be sick ends where my right to be healthy begins."

Measles is perhaps the most infectious human disease. Virus particles can remain in the air for up to two hours after an infected person leaves. And measles is not a minor infection. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that before widespread vaccination began in 1980, 2.6 million people a year died from measles. About 400 people a day still do.

Put simply, no person has the right to threaten the safety of his community. Like drunken drivers, the unvaccinated pose an imminent danger to others. They pose a lethal threat to the most vulnerable: the immunocompromised, such as HIV or cancer patients, and infants who have yet to receive their vaccines.

Anti-vaccine parents are turning their children into little walking time bombs. They ought to be charged for endangering their children and others.

Because humans are the only natural host for the virus, the WHO hopes to eradicate the disease from the planet, just like smallpox. This noble mission has been greatly complicated by such medical luminaries as Bill Maher and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who have spread anti-vaccine propaganda to millions. They have blood on their hands.

It is time to end this insanity. Though jail sounds drastic, it could be the only way to send a strong message about the deadly consequences of failing to vaccinate children.

Alex Berezow, founding editor of RealClearScience, is a member of USA TODAY's Board of Contributors and co-author of Science Left Behind.

In addition to its own editorials, USA TODAY publishes diverse opinions from outside writers, including our Board of Contributors. To read more columns like this, go to the Opinion front page or sign up for the daily Opinion e-mail newsletter.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/01/27/jail-anti-vax-parents-vacc…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 31 Jan - 02:30 (2015)    Sujet du message: FIVE-YEAR-OLD GIRL DIES OF VERY SAME FLU STRAIN SHE WAS VACCINATED AGAINST Répondre en citant

FIVE-YEAR-OLD GIRL DIES OF VERY SAME FLU STRAIN SHE WAS VACCINATED AGAINST 

Friday, January 30, 2015 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer(NaturalNews)

Another youngster has been reported dead after getting a flu shot, the latest victim of an ongoing genocide campaign masquerading as m
edicine. Five-year-old Kiera Driscoll allegedly developed a cough and fever not long after getting jabbed, claim reports, and just hours later collapsed, was put on life support, suffered cardiac arrest and died.

Oddly similar to some of the reported deaths at Sandy Hook, young Kiera's interests, favorite color, favorite restaurant and other personal details made it into news reports following her untimely fate. Kiera, who is said to have lived with her parents in Las Vegas, Nevada, reportedly contracted influenza A, the same strain of flu virus contained in the vaccine she received.

According to the Daily Mail Online, Kiera was taken to a local Quick Care clinic and put on steroids and a nebulizer after she started to feel sick following the shot. A few hours later, after she allegedly collapsed, Kiera's mother Tiffany attempted to perform CPR on her, which ultimately failed, resulting in the young girl having to be placed on life support at the hospital.

A student at the American Heritage Academy (AHA), a private school that the media made a point of emphasizing is located on South Sandhill Road in Las Vegas, Kiera's parents decided to take their daughter off life support the day after she was placed on it. They apparently believed that she didn't have a chance, and she is reported as having died of cardiac arrest before the machine was turned off anyway.

"She was the first one to come up and give somebody a hug," stated AHA's principal Laurel Beckstead, who is also Kiera's aunt, to Fox 5 News about Kiera's character. "She liked everyone," Beckstead added, noting that Keira was "a happy girl" who was "always curious and loved learning."

The story, as reported by the Daily Mail Online, includes strange photos in a hospital room with Kiera's parents, a closeup photo of larger hands holding a smaller one with an IV tube attached, details about the child's wake, which is reported to have taken place at Kiera's favorite restaurant -- a buffet place known as Sweet Tomatoes -- and other details about Kiera's classmates all wearing purple to school the following day -- because it was Kiera's favorite color.

Dozens of children dead following uptick in flu vaccination rates

Despite this unusual account, which may seem familiar if you've been following national news stories the past few years, the media is reporting that Kiera's death is one of dozens that have occurred in recent months. Even though more people have been vaccinated for the flu this year than last, flu deaths continue to rise, suggesting further that the flu shot is incapable of providing real protection.

According to data published by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 56 children have died so far in the U.S. during this current flu season. In the first week of the year alone, 19 children have reportedly died, and 8,000 in total have been hospitalized for flu complications since the start of last October.

The CDC has also admitted that as many as 75 percent of all people who were vaccinated for the flu this season will still get the flu anyway, the result of viral mutations and circulating strains that differ from the ones included in the vaccine.

"Even though Kiera has been taken from us unexpectedly, we believe that her time here, her mission was fulfilled and that she is in a better place," added Kiera's mother in yet another strange eulogic soundbite to the media.

http://www.naturalnews.com/048457_flu_vaccine_Kiera_Driscoll_CDC.html


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 4 Fév - 01:57 (2015)    Sujet du message: DISNEY MEASLES HOAX = PSYOP TO GET EVERYONE VACCINATED! EBOLIE CONTINUES! / HEALTH OFFICIALS URGE MEASLES VACCINATIONS / CDC FORCING PEOPLE TO GET VACCINATED, QUARANTINED OR ARRESTED FOR MEASLES IF NOT VACCINATED Répondre en citant

1. Brainswash the masses

DISNEY MEASLES HOAX = PSYOP TO GET EVERYONE VACCINATED! EBOLIE CONTINUES!




VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P34lG67ZCog

2. Get the vaccine

HEALTH OFFICIALS URGE MEASLES VACCINATIONS




VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DeJqUmnWTos

3. Force vaccination or be punish by the medical mafia
 
CDC FORCING PEOPLE TO GET VACCINATED, QUARANTINED OR ARRESTED FOR MEASLES IF NOT VACCINATED 



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4APVpBU2kA


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 5 Fév - 03:24 (2015)    Sujet du message: MEASLES OUTBREAK HOAX : CANADA AMPS UP CAMPAIGN TO GET EVERYONE VACCINATED! Répondre en citant

MEASLES OUTBREAK HOAX : CANADA AMPS UP CAMPAIGN TO GET EVERYONE VACCINATED!



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuCFGXD-tUU


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 9 Fév - 03:51 (2015)    Sujet du message: UN JOURNALISTE DE « USA Today » DEMANDE L'ARRESTATION ET L'EMPRISONNEMENT DES SCEPTIQUES Répondre en citant

UN JOURNALISTE DE « USA Today » DEMANDE L'ARRESTATION ET L'EMPRISONNEMENT DES SCEPTIQUES  

Par Mike Adams, 29 janvier 2015


 
« Quand l’industrie du vaccin ne parvient plus à obtenir la soumission par la propagande et la censure, elle se tourne inévitablement vers la coercition, les menaces et la violence. Les sceptiques (par rapport aux vaccins) devront être réduits au silence sous la menace des armes, car la meilleure façon d’avoir le dernier mot est de mettre en prison ceux qui ont des raisons de ne pas être d’accord. Bienvenue à la montée d’une véritable tyrannie médicale en Amérique ». – Mike ADAMS  

(Natural News) Nous découvrons enfin le véritable programme de l’industrie du vaccin. Après qu’il ait, à de nombreuses reprises, été documenté par le laboratoire de Natural News que les vaccins contenaient des produits chimiques neurotoxiques comme le mercure, le formaldéhyde et le glutamate monodique (MSG), après qu’il ait été régulièrement montré que les vaccins tuaient des personnes qui se faisaient vacciner ; après qu’il ait été clairement démontré que les vaccins contre la grippe ne reposaient sur aucune science digne de ce nom ; après que les fabricants de vaccins aient ouvertement admis qu’aucun essai clinique n’avait pu démontrer qu’ils marchaient vraiment – les promoteurs enragés des vaccins révèlent la phase finale de leur jeu : jeter les objecteurs en prison.
 
C’est là le sens de l’appel lancé par le journaliste, Alex Berezow de « USA Today » : « Les parents qui ne font pas vacciner leurs enfants doivent aller en prison », écrit-il dans l’article de USA Today    

Et pour être vraiment très clair, ce que Berezow veut dire c’est que les parents qui ne vaccinent pas leurs enfants, quelle que soit la toxicité du vaccin, devraient être jetés en prison. On ne parle d’aucune exemption qui pourrait être discutée ou recommandée qui permettrait aux parents de s’abstenir de vacciner leurs enfants en raison des produits chimiques neurotoxiques qu’ils contiennent (comme le mercure, un métal lourd que l’on retrouve encore dans des vaccins contre la grippe administrés aux enfants en Amérique). Il n’y a non plus aucune discussion sur le fait que des parents informés pourraient s’opposer aux vaccins en raison de la récente confession d’un lanceur d’alerte, haut responsable du CDC qui a révélé comment le CDC a commis une fraude scientifique en dissimulant les preuves scientifiques établissant un lien entre les vaccins et l’autisme.  

Mais si nous réfléchissons à la proposition d’emprisonnement proposée avec insistance par « USA Today », il nous faut nous poser la question suivante : que devrait-il se produire après que les parents aient été jetés en prison ? Eh bien évidemment, c’est l’Etat qui va prendre la garde des enfants du fait qu’ils sont désormais qualifiés d’orphelins.  

Donc, le fait de suggérer que les parents qui cherchent à protéger leurs enfants des ingrédients toxiques des vaccins soient jetés en prison est en même temps une sorte d’appel du pied à l’Etat pour qu’il prenne la garde de tous les enfants qui n’ont pas reçu les vaccins toxiques de Big Pharma.  

Le scepticisme par rapport aux vaccins va-t-il être criminalisé en Amérique ? 

Soyons vraiment parfaitement clairs par rapport à l’essentiel de cet argument publié par « USA Today ». Etant donné que les ressources de la police dans les villes américaines sont forcément limitées, ne serait-on pas en droit de penser que Berezow soutiendrait  essentiellement l’idée que les policiers chargés de l’application de la loi (et dont les effectifs sont trop minces un peu partout) devraient être détournés de l’arrestation des vrais criminels comme les  violeurs, les braqueurs ou les agresseurs d’enfants, pour être déployés à travers les villes américaines et passer de porte en porte pour menotter et arrêter les sceptiques des vaccins, tout en demandant aux services de protection de la jeunesse  de prendre leurs enfants ?
 
Cet argument, consciencieusement repris par les médias grand public aveuglément dociles, représente l’abandon total du raisonnement scientifique, comme l’invocation désespérée des mêmes politiques qui ont été défendues par Mao, Pol Pot, Mussolini et Adolphe Hitler : si, par la raison, vous ne parvenez pas à faire faire aux gens ce que vous voulez, alors, il faut les forcer à le faire par la force des armes.

Ce serait ainsi que les objectifs pourraient être atteints !  

Ceci est par définition l’essence même d’un état policier médical.

Le fait que pareille politique soit audacieusement réclamée dans les pages de « USA Today » démontre à quel point nous nous sommes traîtreusement aventurés dans des territoires qui nous sont devenus presque familiers de régimes dictatoriaux dans le monde où les droits de l’homme sont systématiquement violés au nom de la conformité.  

Et pourtant, cet article de « USA Today » est en fait une grande victoire pour tous les sceptiques des vaccins. Il n’y a, en fait, pas de reconnaissance plus importante de l’échec de la « science » vaccinale que cet appel pour que les vaccins soient administrés sous le menace d’une arme. C’est là l’abandon complet de toute philosophie qui prône le respect de la liberté humaine, de la dignité et de la possibilité de choisir. Au lieu de cela, cet appel  semble ravaler les sceptiques des vaccins intelligents et bien informés au rang  d’assassins et de violeurs, ce qui implique qu’ils devraient partager le même sort, si ce n’est pas la même cellule de prison.  

Tout ceci représente finalement l’aveu même que les acharnés des vaccins sont à court d’idées raisonnables et, utilisant leur dernière arme, doivent recourir à la force contre tout bon sens.  

La tyrannie médicale est instaurée en Amérique 

Berezow, comme la plupart des acharnés des vaccins est un tyran. Il en appelle ouvertement au gouvernement pour qu’il utilise la menace de la violence pour détruire des familles, les déchirer par la force, s’emparer de leurs enfants pour atteindre un niveau de conformité aux normes vaccinales que Berezow prétend basées sur des preuves irréfutables de sécurité et d’efficacité.  

Ces preuves sont évidemment imaginées par l’industrie elle-même – cette même industrie qui inclut des notices imprimées dans ses propres vaccins. Ces notices admettent des choses du genre : «… il n’y a pas eu d’étude contrôlée démontrant adéquatement une diminution de la grippe après la vaccination avec le FLULAVAL ».  

Ci-dessous, une photo de la notice du vaccin pour que vous puissiez vous rendre compte :



  Comme Natural News l’a montré de manière exhaustive , plusieurs notices de vaccins admettent ouvertement qu’ils ne marchent pas. Des virologues travaillant pour Merck auraient même admis publiquement que Merck aurait truqué des essais cliniques de vaccins et aurait commis une fraude scientifique . En outre, toutes les notices de vaccins admettent ouvertement une longue liste scandaleuse d’effets secondaires qui vont des convulsions, des troubles de la peau aux problèmes neurologiques et autres comme par exemple ceux repris ci-dessous :

 

Si vous clamez haut et fort que les vaccins sont « sûrs et efficaces », vous vous qualifiez vous-même automatiquement d’ignorant de la réalité médicale et clairement non qualifié pour faire le moindre commentaire sur la sécurité des vaccins. Dire que « les vaccins sont universellement sûrs et efficaces » fait preuve d’une incompétence cognitive comme de dire aujourd’hui que « la terre est plate » ou que le mercure est aussi bon pour les enfants quand on leur place des amalgames. (C’est là la position officielle de l’Association des Dentistes Américains, un groupe qui soutient l’industrie chimique et qui reste coincé dans les dénis des années 1950).  

Et du point de vue d’un tyran médical, cet énorme appel à la coercition possède l’avantage de ne plus nécessiter de consentement. Ce « miracle de la conformité aux exigences » est évidemment la méthode scientifique de choix de la Corée du Nord, de la Chine Communiste et de l’ancienne URSS. La base de cette idée de contrainte est que « les gens doivent être libres de faire leurs propres choix, mais seulement aussi longtemps que ces choix correspondent à ceux qu’on exige qu’ils fassent.»  

Lorsque les médias américains commencent à imprimer des textes d’opinion qui ressemblent à la logique de Kim Jong-Un, on peut se douter que quelque chose a terriblement mal tourné.  

Personne ne doit pouvoir menacer notre sécurité ! 

Dans sa chronique de USA-Today, Berezow fait valoir que « personne n’a le droit de menacer sa communauté », mais il menace personnellement des millions d’Américains d’arrestation et d’emprisonnement dans ce même article. Lui seul a le droit de faire de telles menaces, voyez-vous, parce que les menaces qu’il brandit d’emporter vos enfants et de vous emprisonner en tant que parents, sont brandies sous l’étiquette fallacieuse de « science ».
 
Ses menaces ne sont pas considérées comme des menaces exactement comme ce fut le cas avec le meurtre de 3.000 civils au cours d'attaques de drones. La dette nationale de 18 trillions de dollars – dont la plus grande partie s’est accrue au cours de la présidence d’Obama – ne compte pas non plus parce que « le budget fédéral est en équilibre » (avec une nuance, c’est qu’il ne l’est pas).  

En parlant de victimes civiles au nom de la « science », Berezow souhaite manifestement voir une Gestapo médicale armée allant de maison en maison, arrachant les enfants à leurs parents pour les remettre à l’Etat tandis que les parents sont jetés dans un système carcéral qui est déjà plein à craquer.
 
La photo qui suit peut permettre d’imaginer à quoi pourrait ressembler une équipe de police chargée de faire appliquer une loi sur les vaccins :


 
Le même gouvernement que Berezow aimerait voir utiliser une police armée pour assurer le respect du vaccin a, évidemment déjà accordé l’immunité juridique absolue aux fabricants de vaccins. C’est comme cela que beaucoup d’enfants dont la santé a été endommagée par les vaccins n’ont aucune possibilité de recours légitime.  

Cette situation apparemment sans issue est évidemment accablante pour l’industrie : voilà, vous faites ces vaccins sous la contrainte et si la santé de vos enfants est endommagée, ou même si votre enfant est tué par ces vaccins que l’on vous a obligé de faire, c’est votre problème, pas le nôtre !
 
Même l’Associated Press a récemment mené une enquête sur le système judiciaire concernant le système de tribunal spécial (en réalité bidon) pour les vaccins aux Etats-Unis, et a conclu qu’il s’agissait d’une parodie de justice qui refusait de dédommager les parents pendant des durées allant de dix ans à plus.

  Cet argument de prison de Berezow pose aussi la question suivante : est-ce que M. Berezow soutient  le principe de coercition du gouvernement, ainsi que les menaces de violence contre les citoyens américains uniquement dans le domaine des vaccins ? Ou pense-t-il aussi que le gouvernement devrait arrêter et emprisonner les gens qui ne se conforment pas aux souhaits du gouvernement dans tous les autres domaines ?
 
Selon la propre logique de Berezow, les gens qui refusent de rentrer dans le système d’assurance santé « Obamacare » devraient également être arrêtés et emprisonnés. Il est même probable que les personnes  qui écrivent des articles sur les dangers des vaccinations devraient aussi être arrêtées et emprisonnées… Et pourquoi s’arrêter là ? […]

 
« Nous avons reçu le signalement que vous hébergiez un enfant non vacciné. Dites-nous maintenant ce qu’il en est et on vous laissera la paix… »  

« USA Today » favorise un état policier médical 

Le fait que « USA Today » s’est autorisé à publier un article de ce genre montre qu’il est déjà fort tard et que c’est l’apathie des Américains eux-mêmes qui a permis l’émergence d’un état médical policier. A une époque où le gouvernement américain espionne ouvertement tous nos appels téléphoniques, tous nos courriels. A une époque où l’administration Obama a poursuivi plus de lanceurs d’alerte que n’importe quelle autre administration dans l’histoire américaine – les systèmes d’oppression, de propagande et de contrôle ont atteint un point de basculement où la révolte du peuple n’est plus loin.  

La militarisation massive des forces de police locales à travers tout le pays constitue une alerte rouge par rapport à nos libertés de plus en plus écrasées alors que le gouvernement lui-même semble s’armer pour une guerre contre le peuple américain. Les services de police locaux possèdent maintenant des voitures blindées résistantes aux mines, des armes militaires automatiques, des drones de surveillance, des dispositifs futuristes qui permettent de voir à travers les murs.

  Si le scepticisme à propos des vaccins est criminalisé, toutes ces armes de guerre – dont beaucoup ont été transférées aux forces de police après leur retour de la ligne de front du Moyen-Orient – seront tournées contre les citoyens qui refusent d’injecter les poisons chimiques toxiques des vaccins à leurs enfants.
 
L’étape suivante serait de déclarer que les sceptiques des vaccins sont des « terroristes nationaux ». A partir de là, toutes les formes de coercition du gouvernement, pourraient facilement être « éthiquement justifiées » selon les acharnés des vaccins.  

Plutôt que de retirer les produits chimiques toxiques, l’industrie du vaccin veut vous forcer à les prendre sous la contrainte des armes 

La confiance du public dans le gouvernement est à son niveau historique le plus bas. La confiance du public dans les grands médias menteurs continue à chuter de jour en jour. La confiance du public dans les vaccins toxiques continue également de dégringoler, et cette tendance ne sera jamais plus inversée jusqu’à ce que l’industrie du vaccin décide d’éliminer les métaux lourds et les produits chimiques toxiques de ses vaccins (si jamais elle le fait).
 
Plutôt que de nettoyer ses propres produits, l’industrie du vaccin se tourne vers les gens qui en appellent à la violence du gouvernement contre ses propres citoyens dans le but d’assurer le respect (involontaire) de la politique exigée.

Nous avons bien sûr déjà vu ce genre de personnages. Il s’agit du même genre de personnes qui nous ont fourgué l’Obamacare, avec de lourdes amendes à la clé si nous refusons d’acheter un produit d’assurance au sujet duquel le gouvernement  a totalement menti, tout en prétendant qu’il serait « abordable ». N’oubliez pas ce qu’on vous a dit : «Si vous aimez votre médecin, vous pourrez garder votre médecin ? » C’est le même genre de mensonge malveillant que prononcent les empoisonneurs vaccinaux qui n’arrêtent pas de prétendre que les vaccins sont « totalement sûrs et efficaces.»
 
Mais dans son article de « USA Today », Berezow ne se contente pas de demander des amendes pour les sceptiques. Cette tactique de coercition financière est apparemment trop douce pour un homme qui est à 100% certain de ce qu’il dit, au point qu’il serait prêt à parier la véracité de ses croyances sur VOTRE famille.  Non, Berezow demande que les sceptiques des vaccins soient arrêtés et emprisonnés. Si vous ne faites pas vacciner vos enfants, affirme-t-il sans vergogne, vous êtes un ennemi de l’Etat.  

Il est sûr de lui. Il sait mieux que vous ce que l’on peut injecter dans le corps de vos enfants. En ce qui vous concerne, vous êtes trop stupides pour connaître les bonnes réponses. Selon ses propos, vous devez donc laisser aux compagnies pharmaceutiques qui effectuent des expériences de médicaments meurtriers sur les enfants vous dire ce que vous devez faire avec vos propres enfants.

  Informez-vous sur les faits au sujet de la maltraitance chimique d’enfants qui est toujours en cours.  

Je tiens à remercier Berezow pour avoir finalement dissipé tout doute concernant le véritable ordre du jour des vaccinalistes enragés. Arrivera-t-on à obliger les enfants non vaccinés et les adultes à porter des insignes de la honte comme on l’a fait avec les juifs en 1939 ?
 
La liberté médicale a failli être inscrite dans la Constitution des Etats-Unis

Malgré tout, Berezow nous a quand même rendu service. Il a fait tout ce qu’il fallait pour qu’un amendement sur la «liberté médicale» soit finalement inscrit dans la Constitution des Etats-Unis. C’est à cause d’esprits tyranniques du style de Berezow que les fondateurs des Etats-Unis ont créé un premier amendement, un deuxième amendement, un troisième amendement, un quatrième amendement, un cinquième amendement et ainsi de suite. Toutes ces modifications constitutionnelles sont nées de violations gouvernementales systématiques des libertés civiles. 

Il est intéressant de noter  qu’un amendement sur la «liberté médicale» ait aussi été, à l’époque, envisagé par le Dr Benjamin Rush, signataire de la Déclaration d’Indépendance. 

Il y a plus de 230 ans, il a mis en garde :  

« Si nous n’inscrivons pas la liberté médicale dans la Constitution, le temps viendra où la médecine s’organisera en une dictature camouflée pour restreindre l’art de guérir à une seule classe d’hommes, et refusera ce privilège aux autres. La constitution de la République doit accorder un privilège spécial pour les libertés médicales comme pour la liberté religieuse.» = Ca ne change plus grand chose, puisqu'en 2015, la Constitution américaine a été détruite et remplacée par une Constitution qui ne supporte que les criminels.

En d’autres termes, le Dr Rush prévoyait précisément le genre de tyrannie médicale dont a parlé « USA Today ». «La médecine s’organisera en une dictature camouflée» ces paroles décrivent exactement ce que nous voyons arriver aujourd’hui. Cette dictature par la force des armes, devrait, soutient Berezow, être appliquée par le gouvernement lui-même. Nous avons ici affaire à la définition même du fascisme : un partenariat entreprises-gouvernement pour forcer l’obéissance de la population par la coercition sous la menace de la violence et de l’incarcération.  

« USA Today » devrait avoir honte d’avoir publié une pièce de propagande pour la dictature médicale qui aurait fait la fierté du Ministre Nazi de la propagande, Joseph Goebbels !  

Lorsque les faits ne vont plus dans le sens de l’ordre du jour, il faut avoir recours aux armes du gouvernement 

L’appel lancé pour faire emprisonner les résistants aux vaccins est en réalité l’aveu même que la pseudoscience qui est derrière les vaccins n’est plus suffisamment convaincante pour qu’il soit nécessaire de la remplacer par des fusils.  

Sinon, comment serait-il possible d’arrêter des gens, de prendre leurs enfants et de les emprisonner sans personnels armés envoyés vers les familles «coupables» ? Là où la science de pacotille échoue, les fusils du gouvernement sont clairement la réponse.  

En substance, l’argument de l’article paru dans « USA Today » est qu’il faut employer les armes pour forcer les gens à respecter le programme vaccinal.

  Cliquez pour découvrir la liste des enlèvements médicaux parrainés par le gouvernement et qui se déroulent pour le moment en Amérique.
 
Cette liste ne sera, bien entendu jamais publiée par « USA Today » pour la simple raison que ces faits médicaux réels ne s’accordent pas très bien avec l’ordre du jour de la propagande pour les vaccins que véhiculent les médias traditionnels.  

Pourquoi s’arrêter aux vaccins ? Pourquoi ne pas arrêter tout qui est en désaccord avec un médecin sur quelque sujet que ce soit ?
 
Le fait d’être engagé sur la route de la tyrannie médicale, ne peut pas bien se terminer pour l’humanité. Il suffit d’interroger les victimes du conglomérat chimique nazi IG Farben qui s’est, dans la suite, subdivisé en plusieurs société chimiques, dont l’une bien connue est Bayer.
 
L’ancien président de Bayer qui, pour mémoire, a été reconnu coupable de crimes de guerre Nazis par le Tribunal de Nuremberg a été condamné à la prison. Aujourd’hui, les cadres pharmaceutiques commettent régulièrement des crimes et actes délictueux graves, et tout ce beau monde se maintient en liberté, même quand « USA Today » demande que les parents soient jetés en prison  pour avoir dit non aux produits chimiques meurtriers de Big Pharma.

  Nul doute que les promoteurs de vaccins d’aujourd’hui qui exigent l’arrestation et l’emprisonnement des résistants américains aux vaccins ne se gêneraient sûrement pas d’approuver l’utilisation de ces prisonniers pour leurs expériences médicales. VoirIci, Ici, Ici.
 
La plupart  de ces expériences médicales inhumaines ont été menées sur des prisonniers, des minorités ou des soldats.
 
Il est assez clair que le même système médical, éthiquement pervers, qui en ce moment même réclame l’emprisonnement des sceptiques des vaccins, n’hésiterait pas à utiliser ces personnes pour «une importante recherche médicale dans l’intérêt du bien public.»
 
C’est ainsi que sont nés les crimes contre l’humanité. Vous êtes aujourd’hui même en train de les voir se dérouler en Amérique sous vos yeux dans les pages d’ « USA Today ». Il s’agit ici de l’histoire en marche, cette histoire qui nous conduira sur la route du terrorisme médical parrainé par l’état qui est ouvertement soutenu par les médias traditionnels. 

Certaines personnes tirent les leçons des erreurs de l’histoire. Mais Berezow, lui, semble déterminé à les répéter.

  Source : NaturalNews 

Voir aussi: "Vaccinez tous vos enfants contre la grippe ou nous prendrons votre bébé de deux semaines "

http://www.alterinfo.net/Vaccins-un-journaliste-de-USA-Today-demande-l-arrestation-et-l-emprisonnement-des-sceptiques_a110617.html


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 10 Fév - 06:46 (2015)    Sujet du message: CALIFORNIA LAWMAKERS AIM TO LIMIT VACCINE EXEMPTIONS Répondre en citant

CALIFORNIA LAWMAKERS AIM TO LIMIT VACCINE EXEMPTIONS


(AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes). In this Thursday, Jan. 29, 2015 photo, pediatrician Charles Goodman holds a dose of the measles-mumps-rubella, or MMR, vaccine at his practice in Northridge, Calif. The vaccine is 99 percent effective at preventing measles...

By FENIT NIRAPPIL
Associated Press

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) - California lawmakers proposed legislation Wednesday that would require parents to vaccinate all school children unless a child's health is in danger, joining only two other states with such stringent restrictions.

Parents could no longer cite personal beliefs or religious reasons to send unvaccinated children to private and public schools under a proposal introduced after dozens of people have fallen ill from a measles outbreak that started at Disneyland. Mississippi and West Virginia are the only other states with such strict vaccine rules, though the California bill's chief author said he would consider including a religious exemption.

"People are starting to realize, 'I'm vulnerable, my children are vulnerable,'" said Sen. Richard Pan, a Democratic pediatrician from Sacramento. "We should not wait for more children to sicken or die before we act."

Childhood vaccine has become an emotionally charged topic amid a measles outbreak that has sickened more than 100 people across the U.S. and in Mexico. No deaths have been reported.

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, California is among 20 states that allow for personal belief exemptions and 48 that allow for religious exemptions.

A Washington state lawmaker introduced a bill Wednesday that would remove the personal belief allowance for an exemption in that state.

Public health officials believe an immunization rate of at least 90 percent is critical to minimizing the potential for a disease outbreak. California's kindergarteners met that threshold at the start of this school year, according to state statistics: 2 percent were exempted because of their parents' personal beliefs and another half a percent were exempted because of their parent's religion.

Less than one-fifth of a percent of all students - about 1,000 - had a medical vaccine exemption that would be preserved under the bill.

Pan, who previously served in the Assembly, was the author of another vaccination bill that took effect last year. It requires parents who don't have their children vaccinated for non-religious reasons to get a note from the doctor's office before enrolling their children in school.

A spokesman for Gov. Jerry Brown, who signed that bill, did not say if the governor would oppose efforts to end exemptions.

"The Governor believes that vaccinations are profoundly important and a major public health benefit and any bill that reaches his desk will be closely considered," spokesman Evan Westrup wrote in an email.

Parents cite a variety of reasons for not immunizing their children: religious values, concerns the shots could cause illness and a belief that allowing children to get sick helps them to build a stronger immune system.

The American Academy of Pediatrics says doctors should bring up the importance of vaccinations during visits but should respect a parent's wishes unless there's a significant risk to the child.

The California bill is also backed by Democratic Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez and Democratic Sen. Ben Allen, a former Santa Monica school board member.

Separately on Wednesday, U.S. Sens. Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein called on California's top health official to reconsider the state's policy on vaccine exemptions in light of the measles outbreak.

"We believe there should be no such thing as a philosophical or personal belief exemption, since everyone uses public spaces," the Democratic senators wrote in an open letter.

___
Associated Press writer Judy Lin contributed to this report. Follow Fenit Nirappil at http://www.twitter.com/FenitN .

http://www.13abc.com/story/28025530/california-lawmakers-aim-to-limit-vacci…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 12 Fév - 04:35 (2015)    Sujet du message: NEW OBAMA EXECUTIVE ORDER SAYS GOVERNMENT CAN DETAIN AND FORCIBLY TREAT YOU FOR “SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROMES” Répondre en citant

NEW OBAMA EXECUTIVE ORDER SAYS GOVERNMENT CAN DETAIN AND FORCIBLY TREAT YOU FOR “SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROMES”



  February 11, 2015 8:33 am EST

By Jonathan Benson | Natural News

An executive order recently signed by Barack Obama expands the list of illnesses, confirmed or suspected, that the federal government can use as an excuse to illegally detain and quarantine you against your will.

As reported by the Alliance for Natural Health USA (ANH-USA), individuals confirmed or suspected of having “severe acute respiratory syndromes” that may be transmissible to others can now be detained, isolated or quarantined, and possibly even forced to take drugs or vaccines deemed effective treatments by the government.

The new order, which merely amends an existing one signed by George W. Bush after 9/11, describes severe acute respiratory syndromes as “diseases that are associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory illness.” Anything in this category that is deemed to have the potential to cause a pandemic, it states, is open game for government intervention.

Specifically excluded from the provision is influenza, which often develops into pneumonia, but with so many mutated strains of the flu circulating these days, it is unclear how government officials will determine which syndromes warrant detention and which ones don’t.

“Not only can people with the disease be forcibly isolated, but the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] also has the power to quarantine anyone who may have been exposed,” explains ANH-USA.

f you have been exposed to one of the listed communicable diseases–even if you do not show symptoms–you may be forcibly detained and quarantined.”

Los Angeles woman threatened with quarantine if she doesn’t get MMR vaccine

A 26-year-old woman from Los Angeles is already dealing with the ramifications of this new executive order after her younger sister was declared to have contracted the measles during a recent outbreak at Disneyland. Ylsa Tellez has not shown any signs of measles herself, according to reports, but health authorities are insisting that she be quarantined anyway.

Ylsa’s only way out of the mandate is to agree to be vaccinated with the MMR vaccine, a three-in-one combination vaccine that also treats mumps and rubella. Ylsa has never gotten the MMR shot, and she’s refusing to get it now.

“(They were) saying I need to get vaccinated and I need to be quarantined, otherwise I’m going to go to jail or something, or I’m going to get a misdemeanor,” stated Ylsa to L.A.’s ABC 7 Eyewitness News.

Mind you, the MMR vaccine has been implicated in actually causing disease outbreaks, particularly with the mumps component of the jab. Back in February 2014, for example, a mumps outbreak occurred at Fordham University in New York, and the only students affected by it were those who had already been vaccinated for mumps.

Vaccines are a total failure: They inhibit the formation of lifelong immunity and trigger outbreaks

What health authorities routinely fail to explain to the public is that vaccines aren’t always effective, and sometimes cause serious and permanent harm. Vaccines can also act as vectors in disease transmission, with vaccinated individuals “shedding” viruses for a period of time and putting others at risk of infection.

This is the most likely cause of all the disease outbreaks that are typically blamed on the unvaccinated, and yet not a peep of any of this is ever mentioned in the mainstream media. Another oft-ignored fact is that people who are exposed to generally non-lethal conditions like measles and mumps during childhood attain lifelong immunity, while vaccinated individuals don’t.

“There are concerns that what was once a common non-lethal childhood disease that offered lifetime immunity, has now been traded for modern ‘vaccine antibodies’ that can wear off over time, and cause the virus to mutate making the vaccine ineffective,”explains Vaccine Impact about measles in particular.

These facts alone reiterate that individuals have a God-given right to refuse vaccines in all instances, no matter what the government says. Your body is your body, and anyone who tries to forcibly inject you with foreign DNA, preservatives, viral waste and other toxins is a violent aggressor and an enemy of freedom.
CDC has assumed “police power” to enforce government mandates

It’s important to remember that the private corporate beast that has assumed the title of the federal government does not have your best interests in mind
. These new quarantine powers, which the CDC says it has the authority to enforce with “police power,” usurp the Constitution and make people slaves to the medical-industrial complex.

“In addition to serving as medical functions, isolation and quarantine also are ‘police power’ functions, derived from the right of the state to take action affecting individuals for the benefit of society,” explains the CDC.

Let that sink in for a moment as you consider the supposed freedoms we possess as Americans to choose what’s best for the health of ourselves and our children.

Sources:

http://www.anh-usa.org

http://www.whitehouse.gov

http://vaccineimpact.com

http://7online.com

http://7online.com/archive/9438450/ This article originally appeared on Natural News.

https://www.intellihub.com/new-obama-executive-order-says-government-can-de…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 13 Fév - 06:19 (2015)    Sujet du message: THE DISNEY MEASLES Répondre en citant

THE DISNEY MEASLES

The medical mafia propaganda. Vaccines should be voluntary part of the scenario game. The reals questions about the danger of vaccines and the ones who are behind this global genocide are completly ignore and peoples who refuse the vaccination of their children look to be the "bad guy". This new war game is to push the legislation to the obligation to be vaccinate. They love so much humanity that these occult satanics worshippers want to destroy all humans on earth.

The Disney Measles - this year (early 2015) we are having an outbreak of measles that has been tracked to an origination site of the Disney California Parks. In this video we discuss this highly infectious illness, diagnosis, characteristics, complications, and health provider education.



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJS9x_6vxdE


ALERT: MEASELS HOAX IN FULL SWING..

There's not proves that vaccines are no good...



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lk5t_d2AWaA

HPV VACCINE NOT LINKED TO RISKIER SEXUAL BEHAVIOR



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NP0q-N37eVA

RAND PAUL INJECTED WITH DEADLY VIRUS TO SAVE HIS ASS

Even Rand Paul from the "control" Patriotic movement is coming out to push the vaccine.



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5UneoEdVdQ  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5UneoEdVdQRAND PAUL TEARS INTO CNBC ANCHOR FOR ‘MISLEADING’ QUESTIONS ON VACCINES, TAXES


Vaccines are good...



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlWcDDZ1w38


Dernière édition par maria le Dim 15 Fév - 07:24 (2015); édité 1 fois
Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 15 Fév - 07:22 (2015)    Sujet du message: ITALIAN COURT RULES AUTISM CAUSED BY VACCINES Répondre en citant

ITALIAN COURT RULES AUTISM CAUSED BY VACCINES



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPgRTT_fcVg


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 15 Fév - 08:06 (2015)    Sujet du message: AIRLINES CONSIDER REQUIRING PROOF OF VACCINATION FOR DOMESTIC AIR TRAVEL Répondre en citant

AIRLINES CONSIDER REQUIRING PROOF OF VACCINATION FOR DOMESTIC AIR TRAVEL 

Posted about 1 day ago


(AP Photo/Reed Saxon)

Traveling by air may get even more complicated if a reported plan by major carrier airlines requiring passengers to be vaccinated comes to fruition. After the increasing problem of unvaccinated individuals contracting and spreading communicable diseases, airlines hope to be a stopgap solution to preventing larger outbreaks. An inside source with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) suggests that, “Multiple major carriers have begun discussing requiring vaccination records for all passengers before allowing them to board a flight.”

The FAA source, speaking on condition of anonymity explains that many of the airlines have, “had it with the anti-vaccination arguments and don’t want to be left with the guilt and partial responsibility when a preventable disease spreads by way of air travel.” It is assumed that a valid vaccination record will be required upon check in before travelers embark on their journey. “It’ll add another step to the flight process, but the airlines, so far, are willing to absorb any costs associated with it,” said the FAA source. It is not expected to impact the already beleaguered Transportation Security Administration as this would be an elective requirement and not a federally mandated change.

The 2014 – 2015 U.S. measles outbreak spread to seven states and is widely believed to have been tied to vacationers at the Disneyland amusement park in Anaheim, California. Many speculate the spread of the disease outside of California was exacerbated due to vacationing families traveling by air. By requiring a valid vaccination record, the airlines would hope to minimize the wanton spread of infectious disease by keeping potential disease carrying individuals off all flights originating and terminating in the United States.

“The airlines are using the term ‘at risk individual’ up to this point to describe who they are targeting,” explains the FAA source. “I take that to mean individuals who are unvaccinated themselves or those who refuse to vaccinate their children. They (the airlines) realize this is a hot button issue at the moment, however, they allegedly feel this is the only way they can do their part to help keep their customers and employees safe and healthy. One ‘higher up’ with a major carrier said something to the effect of ‘this is the responsible thing to do’.”

Speculation is that the airlines would consider an option for frequent fliers to pre-register their vaccination status to avoid any further delays. The FAA source wants to make it clear that, “Again, this isn’t a federal mandate so the FAA is just paying attention to the discussion and giving our views when asked.”
The source at the FAA wouldn’t commit to a statement on whether other mass transit carriers, such as railroads or bus lines, would follow suit if this new tactic is implemented by the airlines.

http://nationalreport.net/airlines-consider-requiring-proof-vaccination-dom…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 21 Fév - 08:32 (2015)    Sujet du message: OREGON MULLS BANNING PERSONAL BELIEF EXEMPTION FOR VACCINES Répondre en citant



OREGON MULLS BANNING PERSONAL BELIEF EXEMPTION FOR VACCINES

ByBen TracyCBS NewsFebruary 17, 2015, 7:22 PM

PORTLAND, Ore. -- The measles outbreak is of particular concern in Oregon, home to the highest rate of unvaccinated children in the country. Parents have been warned to get their children vaccinated by Wednesday or face expulsion from school.


Jolynn Reynolds

CBS News

The state of Oregon is making Jolynn Reynolds watch an educational video before she can opt out of having her child vaccinated. Reynolds is claiming a philosophical exemption, allowing her kids to go to school without their required vaccinations.

"I'm their parent, I'm in charge of that decision and I sure would hate to inject them with something that has a potential high risk of hurting them," said Reynolds.

Watching the video, she told me, won't change her mind.

In 2000 about one percent of Oregon kindergartners were not fully vaccinated for philosophical or religious reasons. Last year it jumped to seven percent - the highest rate in the country. At some Oregon schools more than half the kids lack protection from diseases such as measles, mumps and rubella.


"Scares the living daylights out of me," said Elizabeth Steiner Hayward, a doctor who's also an Oregon state senator.


Oregon State Senator Elizabeth Steiner Hayward

CBS News

Hayward is proposing legislation to eliminate all non-medical exemptions. She says she doesn't buy the argument that there's a personal belief.

"A belief has to be based on something," said Hayward. "You don't have to demonstrate that you really understand the issue, that you've really done valid research on this. You just have to say, 'nah, I don't think it's the right idea for my kid.'"

Wednesday is the deadline for Oregon's school age kids to get their required vaccinations or claim an exemption. Jolynn Reynolds is furious that she may soon be forced to get her kids their shots.

"You can try to teach my child, you can educate my child, but you can't force my child and you can't force me," Reynolds told me.



VIDEO : http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/new-surgeon-general-dr-vivek-murthy-measles-v…

New Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy: Measles vaccine is safe and effective


Oregon could become the first state to revoke these so-called personal belief exemptions in the wake of this year's measles outbreak. Lawmakers in California and Washington state are also considering similar changes to their laws.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/oregon-mulls-banning-religious-belief-exemption…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 23 Fév - 03:32 (2015)    Sujet du message: FORCED ADULT VACCINATIONS AT FEDERAL LEVELS COMMENT PERIOD NOW Répondre en citant

FORCED ADULT VACCINATIONS AT FEDERAL LEVELS COMMENT PERIOD NOW

Friday, February 20, 2015

U.S. HHS is Going for More Vaccinations during Pregnancy, Employer-enforced adult vaccination requirements, and, probably, Faith-based groups to uptake vaccinations



Anthony Freda Art

Catherine J. Frompovich
Activist Post

The U.S. Health and Human Services published a 46-page draft proposal and notice in the Federal Register recently regarding more mandated vaccines for adults, and especially pregnant females; employer-enforced adult vaccinations; and probably for getting faith-based groups to uptake and not oppose vaccines/vaccinations.

There is an open public comment period that ends March 9, 2015, for consumers to register their comments, etc. per instructions at this website

How to file your comments

tr_bq a écrit:



Electronic responses are preferred and may be addressed to: Rebecca.Fish@hhs.gov



tr_bq a écrit:


or 



tr_bq a écrit:


Written responses should be addressed to: National Vaccine Program Office, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Avenue SW., Room 733G, Washington, DC 20201. Attn: HHS Adult Immunization c/o Rebecca Fish.


The opening paragraph of the Executive Summary of the “National Adult Immunization Plan” draft dated February 5, 2015 says,
tr_bq a écrit:



Vaccination is considered one of the most important public health achievements of the 20th century and continues to offer great promise in the 21st century. Vaccines save lives and improve the quality of life by preventing serious infectious diseases and their consequences. However, the benefits of vaccination are not realized equally across the U.S. population. Adult vaccination rates remain low in the United States, and significant racial and ethnic disparities also exist. [1]
 



Probably, nothing is more blatantly ridiculous and scientifically incorrect than the very first sentence. Infectious disease after disease waned to extremely low levels of almost no infection and contraction rates numerous years before 20th century vaccines were even invented. This website contains more than two dozen charts and graphs indicating those documented historical facts.

However, vaccine makers unabashedly take credit for something that has become more of a health problem than a scientific advancement, in my opinion. All vaccines are super-saturated with horrendous neurotoxins and other toxic chemicals, non-human animal-source DNA, unknown viruses, fetal cell lines—aka diploid cells, and mycoplasmas, plus other ‘ingredients’—probably genetically-engineered-nanoparticles, which I discuss in detail in my 2013 book Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines

Readers may want to know/have the peer-review published science papers cited in the book in order to corroborate damage vaccines and their ingredients cause, as part of their comments to the above HHS request.

Apparently and according to the HHS’s National Vaccine Plan (NVP),
tr_bq a écrit:



While the NVP provides a vision for improving protection from vaccine-preventable diseases across the lifespan, vaccination coverage levels among adults are not on track to meet Healthy People 2020 targets. The National Vaccine Advisory Committee and numerous stakeholder groups have emphasized the need for focused attention on adult vaccines and vaccination.


That’s what the new Federal Register publication is all about! Apparently, the feds want adults to get as many vaccines as MDs are pumping into children.

Furthermore,
tr_bq a écrit:



The NAIP [National Adult Immunization Plan] is a five-year national plan. As a national plan, it will require engagement from a wide range of stakeholders to achieve its full vision. The plan emphasizes collaboration and prioritization of efforts that will have the greatest impact. The NAIP also aims to leverage the unique opportunity presented by the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. [Also known as “ObamaCare”]


There are four key goals they want to establish by 2020 with the NAIP:
tr_bq a écrit:



Goal 1: Strengthen [obviously mandate and enforce] the adult immunization infrastructure. 


tr_bq a écrit:



Goal 2: Improve access to adult vaccines. [Have MDs hound adults to take vaccines like they do parents about kids’ vaccines.] 


tr_bq a écrit:



Goal 3: Increase community demand for adult immunizations. [An interesting remark?] 


tr_bq a écrit:



Goal 4: Foster innovation [What does that mean and can innovation include more toxins in vaccines than there are now? Could that mean nanoparticles or GMOs?] in adult vaccine development and vaccination-related technologies. [Technologies like getting vaccine patches or embedded RFID chips containing vaccines?]


According to the draft report, the following vaccines probably are being mandated for adults:
tr_bq a écrit:



The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that among US adults each year there are roughly 40,000 cases and 4,000 deaths attributable to invasive pneumococcal disease, between 3,000 and 50,000 deaths [see facts below] due to seasonal influenza, 9,000 cases of pertussis, approximately 3,000 cases of acute hepatitis B, and about one million cases of herpes zoster. Adults have also been affected in recent outbreaks of other vaccine-preventable diseases such as measles. With the aging of the U.S. population, the public health impact of vaccine-preventable diseases and their complications in adults is likely to grow. The diminishing function of the aging immune system reduces the immune response to vaccination and underscores the need to develop more effective products for older adults. [CJF emphasis added]


Facts about seasonal influenza:
tr_bq a écrit:



On their own website, the CDC states that flu deaths between 1976 and 2006 ranged from a low of 3,000 people to a high of 49,000. But they also reported on their website that only 500 people died from flu in 2010. "The fact is, the outrageous claims of 3,000 to 49,000 deaths are inaccurate numbers," says holistic family physician Dr. David Brownstein. "They are just guesswork." [12] [CJF emphasis added]


Is that a case of “Liar, liar—pants on fire?” So, how can anyone believe the CDC’s hyper- inflated statistics? So, in the draft flu deaths are up to 50,000—a nice round figure!

What neither HHS, the CDC/FDA, nor anyone associated with the vaccine industry will admit to, I contend, is this: With all the vaccines they have mandated for children since the middle 1980s—supposedly for entry into schools—they have – either accidentally or deliberately – created reduced-functioning immune systems that cannot perform in the manner Nature and life intends and genetically programs.

Vaccine makers, in effect, have created what they think is ‘immunity’, which actually is an antigen response that, consequently, can produce inflammatory processes in the body, including the brain. An apparent end result is deficient immune systems as children grow into adulthood and older. Chronic “old-age diseases” now are plaguing young children! See “Coping with Chronic Illnesses in Childhood and Adolescence” (2012) .

“Diminishing function of the aging immune system” clearly will result in—and federally require—periodic re-vaccination in order to effectuate Big Pharma’s vaccination-produced acquired immune system, which apparently malfunctions, in my opinion. How many fully-vaccinated individuals contract the very diseases for which they are vaccinated? [11] How many children have allergies, asthma, and other immune problems? See allergy stats here. Wow!

The diminishing function of the aging immune system is an unfortunate health status that results, I think, from decades of HHS, CDC, FDA, Congress, and the media apparently believing—plus promoting—‘tobacco-science’ produced by Big Pharma, that’s propagated by corporate money and lobbyists, in my opinion.

By injecting toxins into newborn infants, then babies at 2, 4, and 6 months of age, and toddlers during the timeline when the human immune system is not fully developed—that happens for a child between two and three years of age—federal health agencies basically have ‘castrated’ almost two generations of individuals’ immune systems, thereby leaving them susceptible to diminishing functions of the immune system and contracting infectious communicable diseases—even when vaccinated—as current statistics are proving. A good percentage of those contracting communicable diseases are fully vaccinated! Now, the feds are going after “catch-up” vaccinations for adults, thinking that will help, as discussed in the Introduction of the report on page 1.

Nevertheless, this information needs to be ‘digested’:
tr_bq a écrit:



As shown in Table 1, despite the health benefits that result from implementation of ACIP recommendations, adults continue to be vaccinated at low and variable rates. In contrast, childhood vaccination rates in the United States typically exceed 90 percent. [As a result, we have sicker kids than ever before, plus the Autism rate is 1 in 50, whereas in the late 1970s, that rate was 1 in 10,000! Furthermore, more vaccinees are contracting vaccinated-against diseases that the feds want to blame either on unvaccinated children or now, adults!] The success of childhood vaccination [Can one call so much Autism success?] can be attributed to many factors unique to pediatric vaccination, such as state laws requiring vaccination for school entry and the coordinated public health infrastructure established by the Vaccines for Children Program (VFC), a federally funded program to provide free vaccines to children who are Medicaid eligible, uninsured, underinsured, or American Indian or Alaskan Native.


tr_bq a écrit:



Another reason for the high rates of vaccination among children is that pediatricians and family physicians, the primary providers of health care and preventive health services for children, have long been committed to making immunization a core part of well-child care. [Probably, those ‘well baby’ visits after birth should be called something else because so many children become damaged after receiving vaccines. Check the VAERS reports!]


On page 3 of the HHS draft, and throughout, reference is made to “stakeholder groups”. Just who are they? Furthermore, aren’t the largest “stakeholders” involved, all adults in the USA? Furthermore, I’m questioning the effect citizens’ comments and input will have, since the draft is written as something that’s a given—fait accompli! In reading the draft, readers can learn what “barriers” those stakeholder groups and researchers discuss.

It seems the Affordable Care Act [aka “ObamaCare”] has been more than influential regarding mandatory adult vaccinations. “In addition, passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010 was an important milestone for adult vaccination in the United States. …. Furthermore, more than 71 million individuals in private plans have gained expanded access to vaccinations and other preventive services coverage without cost-sharing under the Affordable Care Act.23” [Pg.4]

This, on page 4, is rather interesting:
tr_bq a écrit:



In 2014, NVAC published updated Standards for Adult Immunization Practice to emphasize that all providers who care for adults are responsible for assessing immunization needs at every clinical encounter, strongly recommending needed vaccines, administering recommended vaccines, and documenting receipt in a state immunization information system. The standards also instruct providers who do not vaccinate to refer adult patients to a vaccinating provider. [CJF emphasis added]


And this:
tr_bq a écrit:



Medicare beneficiaries may encounter financial barriers when accessing vaccines covered by Medicare Part D (e.g., herpes zoster vaccine and tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis [Tdap] vaccine). Medicare Part B covers select vaccines without cost-sharing; however, cost-sharing for vaccines covered under Medicare Part D varies widely from plan to plan and may be cost-prohibitive for some patients. [Pg.4] [CJF emphasis added]


However, following is an area/arena where the plan probably will encounter resistance:
tr_bq a écrit:



The success of this plan will depend on the synergies between state, local, territorial, and tribal governments; health care providers; advocacy groups; vaccine manufacturers; academia and research organizations; payers and health plans; employers; and the general public to work together to overcome barriers and improve access to adult vaccinations. [Pp.5-6]


tr_bq a écrit:



RAND Corporation [8] was enlisted to review historic literature, interview stakeholders, and collect data to identify plan priorities and key indicators. [Pg.8]


The feds apparently expect this plan to produce Healthy People by 2020. Well, if I can offer a forecast, I think it will be this: The USA will have such an overabundance of dreadfully seriously sick citizens, from all age groups, that no one will know what to do. However, senior citizens—75 and older—probably will be mandated by law to be subject to compulsory and legal euthanasia. Do you think that’s in ObamaCare too?

Pregnant females are being targeted very prominently.
tr_bq a écrit:



In addition, NVAC provides forward-looking analyses to identify barriers and challenges to research and development of new vaccines specifically for pregnant women. [Pg.10]


Interestingly, HHS submits this under Goal 1 on page 11:
tr_bq a écrit:



Objective 1.3 Continue to analyze claims filed as part of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) to identify potential causal links between vaccines and adverse events.




That is nothing short of a ‘sham’, in this writer’s opinion. Causal links between vaccines have been identified in the past by CDC epidemiologists and researchers, viz.: the Simpsonwood Meeting in June of 2000—a clandestine meeting to figure out what to do with the Verstraeten study that showed the link between thimersol (ethylmercury) in vaccines and Autism.

US Media Blackout: 
Italian Court Rules Vaccines Cause Autism
Recent Italian Court Decisions on Vaccines and Autism

Then, as recently as 2014, William Thompson, PhD, blew the whistle on how he fudged vaccine study papers regarding the link between vaccines and Autism.

So, can the CDC be trusted to identify causal links between vaccines and adverse events and correct them since, apparently, past history has proven they conspire to hide them?

On Page 12 under Objective 1.2, this appears:
tr_bq a écrit:



Vaccines have a long track record of safety and effectiveness in adults…


Are they kidding—seriously? Furthermore, safety tests are not performed by the FDA on vaccines! Back in 1976, the flu vaccine was involved in a memorable number of adverse events:
tr_bq a écrit:



However, side-effects from the vaccine are thought to have caused five hundred cases of Guillain–Barré syndrome and 25 deaths. [2]


According to the authors of the book The Swine Flu Affair, contracting paralyzing Guillain-Barré syndrome is 11 times greater with vaccination than without. [2]

However, there just may be a perfect example of how the CDC/FDA licenses supposedly ‘safe’ vaccines. What happened with the Rotavirus RotaShield vaccine should never have happened IF the FDA did its own safety testing with outside independent scientists, and not take manufacturers’ ‘tobacco science’, in my opinion. So how safe was that Rotavirus vaccine for children?
tr_bq a écrit:



10/15/1999

Rotavirus: First Vaccine Withdrawn

The first vaccine for rotavirus, a common cause of severe childhood diarrheal illness, RotaShield, was licensed and recommended for routine childhood immunization in 1998. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, however, withdrew the vaccine in 1999 due to safety concerns. Scientists associated the vaccine with a rare intestinal problem called intussusception, a potentially fatal telescoping of part of the bowel. [3]


Furthermore,
tr_bq a écrit:



According to the CDC in 1999, rotavirus was causing 20 to 40 infant deaths annually in the US when the first rotavirus vaccine, RotaShield, was introduced. It was estimated that about 50,000 hospitalizations occurred in the US because of severe diarrhea and dehydration. [9] [CJF emphasis added]


Vaccine safety is not a given truth nor a fact! See the VAERS adverse events reports, which statistically represent between 1 and 10 percent of adverse reactions reported, since doctors apparently are lax to report vaccine damage. It's considered "coincidental". Many vaccinees are harmed by mandatory vaccinations, as numerous photographs at the end of this article graphically verifies. Be prepared for upsetting photos of children damaged very badly.

No one -- babies, toddlers, teens, adults or senior citizens -- should be mandated to receive toxins injected into their bodies that can create such horrendous health conditions or even the paralyzing Guillain–Barré–Strohl syndrome.

Constitutional attorney Jonathan Emord tells how the FDA approved one drug in this video.  Do you believe how that drug was approved? No real studies were done!

On Page 13, we find this,
tr_bq a écrit:



Determine the data needs to evaluate vaccine safety and monitor efficacy in pregnant women and newborns and the ability of these systems to capture relevant data, …


which I think is most disconcerting insofar as, when I studied nutrition and consumer health, pregnant women were told not to take any types of medication at all—not even aspirin! [10]

Again, I’d like to make a prediction: Newborns will have more health problems than at any time in medical history! Between vaccines given to pregnant mothers, which probably will cross the placental wall, and all the ultrasound frequencies from as early as 6 to 7 weeks in pregnancy, babies surely are going to birth with more ‘fried’ brains than ever. Ultrasound/sonograms can cause cavitation in brain cells.
tr_bq a écrit:



A rise in temperature of fetal tissue—especially since the expectant mother cannot even feel it—might not seem alarming, but temperature increases can cause significant damage to a developing fetus's central nervous system, according to research. [4] [CJF emphasis added]


Then, inject Hepatitis B vaccines within 24 hours after infants are born…OMG! Personally, as a retired healthcare professional, I’m compelled to ask, “Do they really know what they are doing?”

In the draft they talk about resolving vaccine injury claims and VEARS in several places. However, the track record at the “Vaccine Court” is less than admirable or equitable, I’d say. As of the end of fiscal 2014, there were 3,540 claims paid but 9,734 were dismissed—almost a 3 to 1 ratio of vaccine adverse events claims NOT paid. And, when that happens to you or your child, you are saddled for life with medical bills that are unimaginable! [5]

On Page 15, we read where employers will be involved in making certain adults are vaccinated.
tr_bq a écrit:



1.6.2. Encourage employers to offer and promote adult immunization using evidence on economic impact.

[….]

The most immediate impact from an employer perspective may be with seasonal influenza immunization campaigns, but efforts here offer the possibility of expanding to other vaccines recommended for adults.

[….]

Encourage on-site, occupational health vaccination clinics and involvement of employers to increase employee vaccination rates. [Your place of employment may become a nightmare of prodding proselytization and probable jabbing with needles.]


Under the topic “Increase Community Demand for Adult Immunizations,” we find that there apparently will be constant ‘badgering’ campaigns to receive vaccinations. Numerous pages about “how to” indicate that it’s going to be unavoidable, plus probably “in-your-face” too, and everywhere!

Probably, the most frightening statement, in my opinion, is found on Page 24:
tr_bq a écrit:



One of the five goals of the NVP is to develop new and improved vaccines.


First of all, there are too many vaccines now that are harmful. Furthermore, what will Pharma produce in the future when everyone will have to receive vaccines for which Big Pharma have no legal liability to produce safe vaccines or vaccines that are tested for their abilities to produce cancer, interfere with fertility/cause infertility, or cause birth defects? Currently, NO vaccines are tested for those health adverse events. Every vaccine package insert states that those tests have not been done! So, how are vaccines proven to be safe, if we don’t know if they can cause cancer, especially since they contain numerous toxic chemicals? Good question?

Here’s another prediction I’m offering: Everyone in the USA will have to get a vaccination a day! Maybe two, since there are hundreds of new vaccines in developmental pipelines from what I know.
tr_bq a écrit:



Implementing the NAIP will require not just federal action, but also national action. [Pg.26]


By 2020, the feds want 100 percent of all pharmacists administering vaccines! [Pg.29]

In the draft’s base year of 2012, only 45 percent of adults received a provider-recommended flu shot; whereas by 2020, they want 90 percent compliance! Flu vaccines apparently don’t fare very high in efficacy ratings or safety for children or adults. (Source)

When I read this on Page 31, I shouted, “WHAT?”
tr_bq a écrit:



*Note that the published immunization schedule does not include 2014 ACIP recommendations related to the use of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine among adults aged ≥65 years.


Additionally, valents in a vaccine refer to an antigen or organism for a specific disease. So, a 13-valent vaccine means 13 antigens, while the 23-valent vaccine means 23 antigens! Antigens usually are associated with aluminum in order to produce/acquire ‘an adaptive immune response’ [6]—in any combination of four formulations: Aluminum hydroxide, Aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate, Aluminum phosphate, and Aluminum potassium sulfate.
tr_bq a écrit:



Vaccines may be monovalent (also called univalent) or multivalent (also called polyvalent). A monovalent vaccine is designed to immunize against a single antigen or single microorganism.[16] A multivalent or polyvalent vaccine is designed to immunize against two or more strains of the same microorganism, or against two or more microorganisms. [7]


There is a lot at stake in the HHS draft regarding vaccines that needs to be considered very carefully from all angles and by everyone, I think. Many adults have acquired immunity from having contracted infectious childhood diseases and should not be vaccinated, if that’s the case. There are blood tests that can establish one’s immunity to infectious diseases—rather than risk toxic vaccine ingredients, which everyone ought to know about. I’ve listed them here:




There also are tests for polio and yellow fever.

Source of above test information is http://www.sfcdcp.org/aitcbizservices.html

Additional information about Vaccine Titer Tests appears here. http://drtenpenny.com/titer-tests/

Please don’t forget to send in your comments before March 9, 2015 to the CDC about their draft proposal for mandatory adult vaccinations. Refer to the third paragraph at the beginning of this article for submission instructions.

PETITION: PROHIBIT ANY LAWS MANDATING THE FORCE AND REQUIREMENT OF VACCINATIONS OF ANY KIND.

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/prohibit-any-laws-mandating-force…

References:

[1] http://www.hhs.gov/nvpo/national_adult_immunization_plan_final.pdf
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1976_swine_flu_outbreak
[3] http://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/timelines/others#EVT_100774
[4] Miller, M.W., et al. 2002. Hyperthermic teratogenicity, thermal dose and diagnostic ultrasound during pregnancy: implications of new standards on tissue heating. Int J Hyperthermia 18(5): 361–84.
[5] http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/statisticsreports.html
[6] http://www.biology.arizona.edu/immunology/tutorials/immunology/page3.html
[7] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine
[8] http://www.globalresearch.ca/new-world-order-insider-reveals-diabolical-sec…
[9] http://www.nvic.org/vaccines-and-diseases/Rotavirus.aspx
[10] http://www.drugs.com/pregnancy/aspirin.html
[11] http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/whos-risk-measles-maybe-think/
[12] http://www.newsmaxhealth.com/Headline/flu-shot-vaccine-dangers/2015/02/17/i…

Resources:

Immunization Graphs: Natural Infectious Disease Declines; Immunization Effectiveness; and Immunization Dangers
http://drtenpenny.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Decline-of-infectious-dise…

National Vaccine Advisory Committee. A Pathway to Leadership for Adult Immunization: Recommendations of the National Vaccine Advisory Committee. Public Health Reports. 2012;127.

Acquired Immunity
http://www.merckmanuals.com/home/immune_disorders/biology_of_the_immune_sys…

Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule—United States—2015
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2014-10/adult-im…


Catherine retired from researching and writing, but felt compelled to write this article. 

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)


http://www.activistpost.com/2015/02/forced-adult-vaccinations-at-federal.ht…


Dernière édition par maria le Jeu 26 Fév - 03:53 (2015); édité 1 fois
Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 26 Fév - 03:43 (2015)    Sujet du message: OREGON STATE SENATOR ELIZABETH STEINER HAYWARD CALLS FOR GOVERNMENT TO PHYSICALLY VIOLATE CHILDREN BY FORCE WITH VACCINE MANDATE ECHOING NAZI CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY Répondre en citant

OREGON STATE SENATOR ELIZABETH STEINER HAYWARD CALLS FOR GOVERNMENT TO PHYSICALLY VIOLATE CHILDREN BY FORCE WITH VACCINE MANDATE ECHOING NAZI CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY



Wednesday, February 25, 2015
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger


(NaturalNews) Oregonians are about to find themselves living in a bona fide medical police state if State Sen. Elizabeth Steiner Hayward gets her way. She's spearheading changes to state law that would eliminate philosophical and religious exemptions for vaccines, thereby forcing all parents to have their children physically violated with extremely toxic substances still used in vaccines: mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde and monosodium glutamate -- all still used in vaccines as openly admitted by the CDC.

Nazi fascism is deeply rooted in the belief that the state owns your body -- a belief now shared by Sen. Steiner Hayward. Under the banner of "science," Nazi scientists readily endorsed all the following "medical science" policies while claiming they were all necessary for the "greater good of society."

• Forced killings of the physically handicapped
• Forced euthanasia of the elderly
• Mass killings of people suffering from chronic disease
• Forced sterilization of the mentally retarded
• Forced gassing to death of those deemed "genetically inferior" by scientists

See Nazi public health propaganda posters here.

Nazi science is alive and well in America today, thanks to people like Steiner Hayward

All of these wildly unethical, human-rights-violating programs were spearhead by people who invoked the exact same logic and abandonment of morality now demonstrated by Sen. Elizabeth Steiner Hayward. She is not just willing to skirt the boundaries of medical ethics and human rights, she is thrilled to obliterate that line in her zeal to achieve a government-enforced medical dictatorship over your private body.

Once that line is destroyed, there's no stopping where it goes: mandatory organ harvesting "for the greater good." Mandatory abortions of genetically "inferior" babies (with forced government DNA testing of your baby required by law). Government revocation of your reproductive "rights" if your own health does not meet the government's strict standards. (GATTACA) Oregon state death panels that demand everyone be euthanized at age 65 to save the state money on Medicaid... there's no end to the horrors of a government that has zero respect for human dignity and medical freedom.

If you've ever wondered how a group of the world's most brilliant scientists once marched the world's most scientifically advanced nation (Germany) down the path of genocide and mass death, look no further than the schemes and words of Oregon state Sen. Elizabeth Steiner Hayward. She is the poster child for the kind of medical tyranny that has already lead straight to genocide once before in human history. Who will take a stand and stop Steiner Hayward from repeating that dark chapter of history with the citizens of the state of Oregon?

What's most astonishing to me is to think back about how many courageous American men and women lost their lives in World War II in order to defeat Nazi tyranny and bring down a government regime that has spiraled out of control, placing everyone's liberty and safety at risk. Now people like Steiner Hayward are frantically trying to bring back that same tyranny -- and she's in a position of power to make it happen unless the People of Oregon stop her.

Click here to see my recent comparison of America's modern-day vaccine propaganda with Nazi-era eugenics propaganda. The similarities are beyond eerie...

Not only should Steiner Hayward's medical police state actions be utterly rejected by the public; she should be recalled from public office by the People of Oregon for daring to pursue the agenda of quack science vaccine lunatics who are nothing short of mentally ill for wanting to physically violate the bodies of children with the toxic chemicals still used in vaccines today.

...

http://www.naturalnews.com/048760_Elizabeth_Steiner_Hayward_vaccine_mandate…



Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 28 Fév - 01:33 (2015)    Sujet du message: L’OMS ET L’UNICEF VIENNENT DE STERILISER DES POPULATIONS DU TIERS-MONDE SOUS COUVERT DE VACCINATION Répondre en citant

L’OMS ET L’UNICEF VIENNENT DE STERILISER DES POPULATIONS DU TIERS-MONDE SOUS COUVERT DE VACCINATION

Publié par wikistrike.com sur 27 Février 2015, 08:29am
Catégories : #Santé - psychologie





Après les scandales qui ont déjà secoué le Mexique, le Nicaragua et les Philippines, l’OMS et l’Unicef sont à nouveau mis en cause au Kenya pour avoir administré des produits stérilisants à l’insu des patients qu’ils prétendaient vacciner contre le tétanos.

La Conférence épiscopale catholique du Kenya, qui administre de nombreux hôpitaux, a participé à la campagne de vaccination contre le tétanos organisée par l’OMS et l’Unicef en mars et octobre 2014 pour les patients de 14 à 49 ans. Face aux rumeurs qui circulaient, la Conférence épiscopale a demandé au ministre kenyan de la Santé, James Wainaina Macharia, de vérifier la composition des vaccins. Devant son refus, la Commission épiscopale a mandaté le laboratoire AgriQ Quest Ltd pour procéder à des expertises. Les expert ont constaté la présence de 24 à 37,5 % d’hormones beta humaines chorioniques gonadotrophiques (βhCG), une quantité largement suffisante pour provoquer la stérilité des patientes. Le ministre de la Santé a réfuté ces résultats, affirmant qu’il était impossible d’introduire des βhCG dans ces vaccins.

La Commission parlementaire de la Santé a alors invité le ministère d’une part et la Conférence épiscopale d’autre part à lui présenter leurs travaux. Contrairement aux déclarations antérieures du gouvernement, il s’est avéré que celui-ci n’avait pas testé les vaccins avant leur inoculation. Aussi fournit-il alors 10 échantillons du vaccin qui s’avérèrent négatifs, tandis que la Conférence épiscopale en présenta 9, dont 3 s’avérèrent positifs. Le ministère de la Santé se retira du débat.

Mgr Paul Kariuki Njiru, évêque d’Embu et président de la Commission de la Santé de la Conférence épiscopale catholique du Kenya, a alors largement communiqué, accusant l’OMS, l’Unicef et le gouvernement kenyan d’avoir délibérément inoculé à leur insu du βhCG à des patientes afin de les stériliser à leur insu.

Le vaccin du tétanos s’administre en trois prises. Un tiers des doses étaient empoisonnées.

L’Organisation mondiale de la santé n’a pas souhaité communiquer.

http://www.wikistrike.com/2015/02/l-oms-et-l-unicef-viennent-de-steriliser-…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 6 Mar - 06:08 (2015)    Sujet du message: VACCINE WAG THE DOG UNDERWAY TO TAKE AWAY PARENTS' RIGHTS Répondre en citant

VACCINE WAG THE DOG UNDERWAY TO TAKE AWAY PARENTS' RIGHTS



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f24oiDCynYk&list=LL0aav0Ov6NVK6R3rmIWO1…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 6 Mar - 17:40 (2015)    Sujet du message: FLU VACCINE PARADOX SPREADING GLOBALLY AS MORE VACCINATED PEOPLE CATCH THE FLU Répondre en citant

FLU VACCINE PARADOX SPREADING GLOBALLY AS MORE VACCINATED PEOPLE CATCH THE FLU 

Thursday, March 05, 2015 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer
Tags: flu shots, vaccine paradox, immune system

(NaturalNews) The conventional medical system is literally grasping at straws trying to maintain the illusion that vaccines work, with new reports now admitting that flu vaccines are an utter failure while still pushing people to get them. The latest nonsensical narrative, at least from the Canadian government, attributes all the inconsistencies between what authorities have long claimed about the alleged efficacy of the flu shot and its actual dismal success rate to a mysterious "paradox" where previous vaccinations somehow interfere with current ones.

Since health authorities no longer have a leg to stand on -- it is now widespread knowledge that the flu shot is minimally effective at best -- they are resorting to more confusing pseudoscience that, oddly enough, actually affirms what flu shot skeptics have surmised for many years. Vaccines in general, they now reluctantly admit, affect every person differently. And depending on what previous vaccinations a person has had, flu shots may or may not provide any protection at all--and in some cases, they will make a person more prone to illness.

"People who receive flu vaccines year after year can sometimes show reduced protection, an effect that Canadian infectious disease specialists say muddies public health messages for annual flu vaccine campaigns," explains Canada's CBC News about this disturbing phenomenon.

"During the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, researchers at the B.C. Centre for Disease Control originally thought seasonal flu shots from 2008 might offer extra protection against the new pandemic strain. They were puzzled to find instead, seasonal flu vaccination almost doubled the risk of infection with pandemic flu."

Did you read that? An untested vaccine that health authorities all around the world urged everyone to get for their own protection against a novel, pandemic flu strain -- and a vaccine that they promised would also protect against seasonal flu -- actually made people who got it more prone to contracting the flu. This is now being openly admitted, affirming what independent news outlets like Natural News have been warning the public about for years.

And yet, despite this admission, these same health authorities are still trying to scare the public into rushing out and getting a flu shot. Huh? The vaccine doesn't work, they now say. And people who get it year after year are more prone to contracting the flu, they also say. But everyone should still rush out and get it, especially if they're in a high-risk category?

Peer-reviewed study reveals that unvaccinated people are most protected against influenza

At least six separate studies conducted by the same people that are still pushing the flu shot have confirmed that seasonal flu shots make people more prone to contracting the flu. The evidence is now overwhelming that, rather than impart immunity as long claimed, flu shots actually destroy the immune system and increase the risk of infection.

One would think that, now that the cat is out of the bag, these peddlers of quackery would quit while they're ahead, admit that they lied about flu shot safety and efficacy, and go out and find a real profession. Instead, they're continuing to push the seasonal flu shot, which as they now put it causes "interference" with people's immune systems, as they hype the soon unveiling of a "universal" flu shot that will be better than ever (fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, well, you know the rest).

The real kicker here is that, in the same CBC News report, a study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases is referenced, revealing that the people who are most protected from the flu are, wait for it -- the unvaccinated. So tell me again, why should anyone get a flu shot?

Sources:

http://www.thedailysheeple.com

http://www.cbc.ca

http://www.naturalnews.com

http://truthwiki.org/Vaccine_Fanaticism

http://truthwiki.org/Medical_Fascism

http://truthwiki.org/Medical_Kidnapping

http://www.naturalnews.com/048871_flu_shots_vaccine_paradox_immune_system.h…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 13 Mar - 04:37 (2015)    Sujet du message: THE FEDS' PLAN TO FORCE VACCINES ON ADULTS Répondre en citant

THE FEDS' PLAN TO FORCE VACCINES ON ADULTS 

Exclusive: Lee Hieb, M.D., declares, 'Public health does not trump individual liberty'

Published: 2 days ago

Lee Hieb, M.D.

Its hard writing this in the dark, under the covers, curled up in a fetal position. I’m trying to deny reality, but my head is about to explode. Liberty has been slipping through our American fingers like sand for the last several decades. But in the last week it began flowing away like the Mississippi River.

In the last several years we have seen nationalizing of all student loans – I even have to fill out a federal financial statement for a no-repay academic scholarship my son receives from a private college. We’ve seen banning of homemade lunches, banning of bake sales and outlawing of Thomas Edison’s light bulb. We are no longer free to sell homegrown produce without state intervention, and in my great agricultural state of Iowa raw milk is illegal. (And it’s a federal offense to bring it in from Nebraska!) We have businessmen in jail for importing the wrong subspecies of crustacean, and doctors in jail for choosing the wrong billing code from the 2-inch-thick book of options.

But in the last several months – indeed in the last weeks – there has been a literal torrent of new assaults on our liberty: In November 2014, the G20 countries redefined your money in the bank as something other than money. Therefore, in a banking collapse, you are not really insured and will be last in line behind the big derivative bailouts. Then, Obama used his pen and phone technique to ban 5.56 ammunition. Of course, he just stuck his toe in the water to see what happened, and since he apparently got away with it, nothing prevents him from banning 45s or SUVs or tanning booths, or anything else he despises. But the one that has me totally exercised is the recent position paper by the Department of Health and Human Services, “National Adult Immunization Plan” published Feb 5, 2015.

March 9, 2015, was the last day for public comment about a “Draft National Adult Immunization Plan” – a proposal by the orchestrators of Obamacare to forcibly vaccinate all adult Americans. It sounds very benign on the surface – they do not use the word force or coercion. They say in the prologue:
Citation:


The NAIP is a five-year national plan. As a national plan, it will require engagement from a wide range of stakeholders to achieve its full vision. The plan emphasizes collaboration and prioritization of efforts that will have the greatest impact. The NAIP also aims to leverage the unique opportunity presented by the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. The NAIP is intended to facilitate coordinated action by federal and nonfederal partners to protect public health and achieve optimal prevention of infectious diseases and their consequences through vaccination of adults.



Is it just my sense of irony or is it a signal to fellow travelers that this is a “Five-year Plan”? Did they hire old Soviet central planners or come up with this all on their own? Anyway, the folks at HHS fully admit this is possible only through the implementation of the ACA, which we are learning is an unaffordable care act but one that allows data collection on every patient of every doctor who accepts federal funding.

Now, I have written several articles outlining my scientific concerns over vaccination. We can have an honest discussion over the science – although so far the critics of my papers have never done so, rather resorting to name-calling and wild pot shots. I still await any actual scientific refutation of my concerns. The closest came with one commentator who cited the falling deaths from childhood diseases, but he failed to examine the entire historical data, which show that over 90 percent of the fall in these diseases occurred before widespread vaccination was adopted. And he fails to note the other factors (Vitamin A and D levels, avoidance of anti-pyretic drugs) that may alter outcomes – it’s not just the vaccination rate.

And I have made the point that the pro-forced vaccination crowd are generally also the pro Roe v. Wade crowd – and you can’t have both. You cannot scream for a “woman’s right to choose” when it applies to abortion but give her no right to choose what gets administered to her in a syringe. The answer I received was this, “Dr. Hieb, you ignoramus” (OK, maybe he didn’t quite say it that way, but I could hear it between the lines), “you know that abortion is a private issue and vaccination is an issue of public health!”

Let me be clear. Public health does not trump individual liberty. End of story.

If you believe the opposite, you can ethically condone forced sterilization, because it improves the health and wholeness of the body politic. Think I’m exaggerating? Between 1897 and 1909 forced sterilization of mentally handicapped was approved into law in Michigan Indiana, Pennsylvania, Washington and, of course, California. And in 1927 such acts were deemed by the Supreme Court “constitutional.” No lesser light than Oliver Wendell Holmes himself justified the decision by saying, “It is better for all the world if, instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind.”

After the atrocities of the Holocaust, Americans briefly got a conscience about such things and reversed the policies of forced sterilization. But with time, creeping socialism and collective amnesia, old habits and human moral frailties resurfaced so that between 1973-1976 thousands of Native American women were sterilized without their consent by government physicians. And as late as 2010, in California, female inmates were sterilized involuntarily. Of course, these things always are done in the name of society or public health. When Ezekiel Emanuel proposes withholding money for medical care of the elderly he does so in the name of fairness – of using the money wisely, yada yada. We’ve heard this all so many times in so many guises.

Now it is vaccination. And the government toadies are banging the tocsin of Big Pharma that it is in the national social interest that every person be vaccinated against virtually everything. In spite of the recent admission by the CDC that this year the influenza vaccine is only 18 percent effective (I think less based on FDA reports), that vaccine is included in the mandatory slurry that will soon be administered to every adult – if the feds have their way. (By the way, I am not discussing the money-to-Big-Pharma motive, which is really driving the vaccination bus, as this is the subject of another column.)

So, to the point. Like everything else that’s truly important, it is very simple: If you Americans do not stand against this, it’s over. What liberty do you have if the federal government can force you to have a medical procedure, can force you to surrender your very body to their control? Answer: none.

Because there is nothing that cannot be justified on the basis of “the good of society.” The Jewish Holocaust, the Great Leap Forward, the killing of the Kulaks, American Eugenics, Tuskegee experimentation, the cold water experiments of Birkenau, Dachau and Auschwitz, all were justified at the time by their respective leaders as for the good of society. Even doctors start believing that they can determine who should die or be sterilized for the good of the whole society. And if you as a doctor have qualms, it is much easier to just throw up your hands and say you have no choice – it’s a government mandate.


The position paper of the Department of Health and Human Services refers repeatedly to consulting the multiple “stakeholders” involved in vaccination decisions: “synergies between state, local, territorial, and tribal governments; health care providers; advocacy groups; vaccine manufacturers; academia and research organizations; payers and health plans; employers; and the general public.” They even cite the military. But, who is the real stakeholder? It is you. There is no “general public” when it comes to decisions about your personal health. No one cares more about the risks versus benefits of vaccination than you do personally. To leave it to a group, to treat you as a member of a group for medical care, is not ethical medicine. It is the stuff of jails and forced labor camps and socialist hellholes – and apparently American academia and bureaucrats. It is time to say no. Although he was probably confused at the time, I’ll quote Al Sharpton: “Resists we much.”

http://www.wnd.com/2015/03/the-feds-plan-to-force-vaccines-on-adults/
http://www.wnd.com/author/lhieb/?archive=true


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 22 Mar - 03:24 (2015)    Sujet du message: ADULTS TARGETED AS FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PREPARES TO TRACK THE UNVACCINATED Répondre en citant

ADULTS TARGETED AS FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PREPARES TO TRACK THE UNVACCINATED

Posted: 3/18/2015 12:19:08 PM
 
By Theresa Wrangham, NVIC Executive Director

During the National Vaccine Advisory Committee’s (NVAC) February meeting, American adults were put on notice by Big Brother that non-compliance with federal vaccine recommendations will not be tolerated. Public health officials have unveiled a new plan to launch a massive nationwide vaccination promotion campaign involving private business and non-profit organizations to pressure all adults to comply with the adult vaccination schedule approved by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).1
 



NVAC has authored the National Adult Immunization Plan (NAIP) and, once finalized, the plan will be turned over to the Interagency Adult Immunization Task Force (AIFT) to create an implementation plan. Notably, this task force is composed of “vested interest” stakeholders and no consumer representation for those groups concerned with vaccine safety and informed consent.


NVIC has submitted our public comments and recommendations for the NVAC’s draft National Adult Immunization Plan.2 Your opportunity to submit your comments and concerns about this plan has been extended to March 23rd. We encourage all of our readers to participate in the public comment process and submit comments to the NVAC on the NAIP. Please forward this article to family and friends and encourage them to submit public comments, too.

What you need to know – the nutshell. 



The basis of the NAIP rests on Healthy People 2020 Goals,3 many of which are arbitrary.4 The key fact the plan seems to lose sight of in using these goals as its foundation is ...THEY ARE GOALS. These goals have no legal authority over your healthcare decisions and are being used by government officials to shape public health policy, which in turn is spurring legal mandates to force you to comply with them.5


The adult immunization plan also “incentivizes” doctors and other vaccine providers to convert patient data into Electronic Health Record (EHR) formats that can then be shared across state and federal electronic databases to track national vaccine coverage rates and also track and identify who is and is not vaccinated. Many states already have electronic vaccine tracking registries (Immunization Information Systems - IIS) in place, but do not share this information due to laws preventing the sharing of personal medical information and/or limited vaccination data on adults. This is where financial and other types of incentives come in to convince vaccine providers and state legislators to participate in the gathering of this private medical information on all adults. 

Big Government is Partnering with Your Employer, Community & Religious Organizations 



The NAIP states that it will take more than providers raising awareness about the adult schedule and encouraging compliance to meet Healthy People 2020 goals. So the NAIP contains objectives that foster partnerships with your employer and your community and religious organizations to make you and all adults get every federally recommended vaccine according to the government-approved schedule.

 
The NAIP makes it clear that in the future, all American adults will be informed of the recommended adult schedule at every possible opportunity outside the healthcare provider domain. You will be encouraged to comply with the adult schedule not only by your healthcare provider, but also via community-based partnerships to ensure that you have the opportunity to roll up your sleeve at work, school, church and other community gatherings.

NVIC has always supported awareness and access to preventative healthcare options, including access to vaccines for everyone who wants to use them. However, there is a difference between awareness, access, recommendations and mandates. In the past, these types of government vaccine use plans do not just seek to increase awareness and access but also make recommendations that foster vaccine mandates without flexible medical, religious and conscientious belief exemptions that  align with the informed consent ethic.

Tracking Vaccination Status Raises Privacy Concerns 




Adults should examine this plan carefully because the U.S. Constitution guarantees American citizens the right to privacy.6 In that context, it is important to understand that the NAIP objectives include electronically harnessing your personal medical information and that of all adults for the purpose of increasing adult vaccine uptake in the U.S. by tracking your vaccination status, with little regard for your privacy.7

 
There is no language in the plan that provides for consumer privacy protections. This is a glaring omission given the acknowledged and known risks for patient data being hacked (security breaches) by malicious outside entities.8 The plan does not include provisions for raising consumer awareness of their ability to opt out of electronic tracking and patient data sharing schemes.9 10

Closing Vaccine Safety Research Gaps Not Included in Plan 


While the NAIP also supports increased reporting to the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and ongoing analysis of claims submitted to the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), it is hollow support. For this to be meaningful, stronger language is needed to support closing vaccine safety research gaps highlighted by the Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) series of vaccine safety reports 11 to lessen the number of VICP off-the-table compensation claims.

These off-the-table claims are a direct result of the continued expansion of the numbers of government recommended adult (and childhood) vaccines without the accompanying identification of vaccine side effects and injury outcomes to expand the federal Vaccine Injury Table (VIT) that governs the awarding of vaccine injury compensation. Off-the-table adult vaccine injury claims now represent the majority of claims12 filed with the VICP and the compensation process has become  highly adversarial and costly.

As NVIC President Barbara Loe Fisher stated at the U.S. Health Freedom Congress last year when pointing out that responses to vaccines and infectious diseases are individual: 
Citation:


“We do not all respond the same way to infectious diseases13 and we do not all respond the same way to pharmaceutical products like vaccines.14 15 16 17 Public health laws that fail to respect biodiversity and force everyone to be treated the same are unethical and dangerous.”  


The NAIP fails to acknowledge these facts.

Compliance at the Expense of Bodily Autonomy 



Vaccine mandates are made at a state level and the NAIP is a federal vaccine use promotion plan that is has no legal authority to turn government vaccine use recommendations into vaccine use mandates.  


However, much like the recommendations made by NVAC a few years ago for healthcare workers to receive annual flu shots,18 these recommendations are likely to result in future de facto vaccine mandates for adults, whether through employer requirements,19 or actual state laws. Given the introduction of legislation20 this year in many states to remove non-medical vaccine exemptions and restrict medical exemptions for school age children in an effort to force parents to comply with the CDC’s recommended childhood vaccine schedule, there is little doubt that that the NVAC’s latest plan will result in similar actions to force adults to use all federally recommended vaccines.
 
One only has to read stories posted NVIC’s Cry For Vaccine Freedom Wall by healthcare workers who have refused flu shots and are being fired from their jobs to understand the threat posed by the NAIP. Is your profession next? The short answer is yes.
 
Make no mistake about this plan’s intent, if “awareness” efforts and “incentivization” of vaccine policy do not increase adult vaccine uptake, the partnering with your employer and other community groups is meant to lower the hammer and force you to comply. The electronic tracking systems that are enthusiastically being embraced by not only the federal government but also state governments and employers, without regard for your privacy, will be used to identify noncompliers.

Informed Consent Freedom at Risk 



If you haven’t read Dr. Suzanne Humphries’ book Dissolving Illusions,21 you may not realize that history is about to repeat itself. Government enforced vaccination through identification and door-to-door efforts to make everyone comply, like was seen with smallpox vaccination campaigns a century ago, is a real possibility again in America. Only this time it won’t just be about one vaccine – it will be about a lot of vaccines you will be forced to get.


 The noose being tightened around the necks of our children is being thrown over the necks of adults as well. The tightening of that noose is growing daily in an attempt to strangle vaccine freedom of choice by eradicating the ethical principle of informed consent.
 
Adults and their children are being asked to accept a one-size-fits-all vaccine schedule that does not allow for the ability to delay or decline one or more vaccines for religious and conscientious beliefs. This is very dangerous when the medical exemption has been narrowed by government so that almost no health condition qualifies for a medical exemption anymore. Families already personally impacted by vaccine reactions, injuries and deaths will be faced with more loss, including their financial stability if they are forced to be revaccinated.
 
The human right to protect bodily integrity and autonomy – the core value of the informed consent ethic – is at stake.
 
This battle is not about an anti- or pro- vaccine position. It is a battle over freedom, values and beliefs.22 What is at risk is your ability as a parent and individual to decide what medical risks you are willing to accept and vaccination is the forefront of this battle.
 
For over three decades NVIC has supported informed consent protections in all U.S. vaccine laws and policies, which means that parents and individuals must receive full and accurate information on vaccine risks and benefits and retain the right to make voluntary decisions to accept, delay or decline one or more vaccines without being sanctioned for they decision they make.

Read more : http://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/March-2015/adults-targeted-for-vaccin…



Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 23 Mar - 03:12 (2015)    Sujet du message: NOUVELLE CAMPAGNE DE VACCINATION CONTRE LA POLIOMYELITE, EN SYRIE Répondre en citant

NOUVELLE CAMPAGNE DE VACCINATION CONTRE LA POLIOMYELITE, EN SYRIE

حملة تلقيح في روضة وكالة سانا



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=738hsFyLjvY


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 25 Mar - 04:13 (2015)    Sujet du message: N.J. SENATE COMMITTEE APPROVES RESTRICTIONS ON RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION FOR VACCINES Répondre en citant

N.J. SENATE COMMITTEE APPROVES RESTRICTIONS ON RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION FOR VACCINES

Susan K. Livio | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com By Susan K. Livio | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com

on March 09, 2015 at 7:20 PM, updated March 16, 2015 at 2:11 PM



TRENTON — Over the tearful objections of parents who accused lawmakers of religious persecution, a state Senate panel voted today to make it harder for school children to skip vaccinations because of religious beliefs.

Since 2008, parents in New Jersey have needed only to submit a letter stating vaccines violate their religion in order for their kids to be exempt, without explaining how or why. Vaccines for nearly 9,000 students in the 2013-14 academic year were waived for religious reasons, compared to 1,641 in the 2005-06 school year.

With the outbreak in January of measles at Disneyland in California still fresh in people's minds, state Sen. Joseph Vitale (D-Middlesex), said he sponsored the legislation because "it is too easy" for parents to cloak their philosophical grounds behind religious beliefs. The Senate Health, Human Services and Senior Citizens Committee, which Vitale chairs, voted 5-2 to pass the bill.

A parent's notarized letter must explain "the nature of the person's religious tenet or practice that is implicated by the vaccination and how the administration of the vaccine would violate, contradict or otherwise be inconsistent with that tenet or practice," according to the bill (S1147). The statement also most show the tenet "is consistently held by the person," and is not merely "an expression of that person's political, sociological, philosophical or moral views, or concerns related to the safety of efficacy of the vaccination."

They would also have to submit a signed statement by a New Jersey doctor that the person has received counseling about the risks and benefits of vaccinations. Schools would be prohibited from allowing an exemption unless these new requirements are followed.

Hilary Downing of Readington, the mother of a child who suffers from lifelong medical and developmental injuries from a vaccine, called the bill "invasive and offensive" and "a slap in the face" to people who want to exercise their beliefs. "The intent of the bill is to shame people," Downing said.

Meanwhile the measles outbreak in New Jersey this year consists of two cases: one baby in child care too young to get a vaccination and a Princeton University student who developed the illness even after being vaccinated, Downing noted.

Becky Fogarty of Glen Rock explained she did not belong to a specific religion, but the beliefs that informed her and her husband's decision to avoid vaccinating their children are just as important to them.

"This bill has been proposed to weed out the fakers, but it feels like we are guilty of being a faker until proven innocent," Fogarty said. "What is the end goal? What portion of these 9,000 (students) do you think are disingenuous? What is the target and how many applications will you deny until you hit that target?"

After more than a dozen parents accused the committee of legalizing discrimination, state Sen. Fred Madden (D-Gloucester), committee vice-chairman gently objected. "People are reading something into the bill that is not there. No one is going to restrict anyone's practice of religion," Madden said. "I respect the passion of those who oppose the bill but to me, this is a just clarification."


Drew Harris, program director for Health Policy at the Jefferson School of Population Health at Jefferson University in Philadelphia, was one of a handful public health experts who praised the committee for making the exemption harder to get.

"There has been a four-fold increase (in religious exemptions) since the regulations changed. Has there been a four-fold change of religiosity in New Jersey?" Harris said. "This is asking people to be honest, and to assure the honesty of their beliefs."

State Sens. Vitale, Madden, Robert Gordon (D-Bergen) Jim Whelan (D-Atlantic) and Richard Codey (D-Essex) voted yes on the bill; Sens. Dawn Addiego (R-Burlington) and Ronald Rice (D-Essex) voted no.

The bill heads to the full Senate.

Susan K. Livio may be reached at slivio@njadvancemedia.com. Follow her on Twitter @SusanKLivio. Find NJ.com Politics on Facebook.

http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2015/03/nj_senate_committee_approves_r…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 26 Mar - 06:20 (2015)    Sujet du message: [url=http://marialeroux1.clicforum.fr/image/3/e/e/2/d2p24x88-867bb3.gif.htm][img]http://img.xooimage.com/files3/e/e/2/d2p24x88-867bb3.gif[/img][/url][url=http://marialeroux1.clicforum.fr/image/3/e/e/2/d2p24x88-867bb3.gif.htm][img]http://img3.xooimage.com Répondre en citant