LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum

LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1)
...

 FAQFAQ   RechercherRechercher   MembresMembres   GroupesGroupes   S’enregistrerS’enregistrer 
 ProfilProfil   Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés   ConnexionConnexion 

RÉFORME DES SOINS DE SANTÉ - PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE - HEALTH CARE REFORM - P.1

 
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> LA RELIGION MONDIALE ET L'ONU : SES VUES ET AGENDA SUR LE TRANSHUMANISME, CLONAGE, AGENDA DE DÉPOPULATION -> RÉFORME DES SOINS DE SANTÉ - PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE - HEALTH CARE REFORM
Sujet précédent :: Sujet suivant  
Auteur Message
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 686
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 15 Mai - 15:08 (2012)    Sujet du message: RÉFORME DES SOINS DE SANTÉ - PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE - HEALTH CARE REFORM - P.1 Répondre en citant

Administrateurs :maria
Forum LE VOILE DÉCHIRÉConnecté sous maria | Se déconnecter
en ligne : Il y a 16 connectés. Cliquez pour voir la liste
Inscription
|
Profil
|
Messages Privés
|
Recherche
|
Online
|
Aide
| Créer un blog gratuit



Index du forum
DEPOPULATION DE LA TERRE/DEPOPULATION OF THE EARTH
RÉFORME DES SOINS DE SANTÉ - PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE - HEALTH CARE REFORM


Notification par email
|
Prévenir les modérateurs

Pages : 1

2 3 4 5 Suiv.
Auteur :Sujet: RÉFORME DES SOINS DE SANTÉ - PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE - HEALTH CARE REFORM Bas
maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 24/08/2009 02:04:54 (24/08/2009 11:04:54)

OBAMA DEPOPULATION POLICY EXPOSED! RED ALERT!!!!!!

VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ho-0SHFEgGo&NR=1



HR 3200 - THE HEALTH CARE THAT YOU WILL GET ... LIKE IT OR NOT!

The government prepared a legalese nightmare designed to make it difficult for the general voting population to understand what is being proposed. It is by design to make it confusing and deter you from reading it. It is 1,017 pages long.

However, here we have made a list of items for you to read as items of importance so that you may have some undertaking of what is being proposed for us.

Open the bill by clicking on this link …


http://www.defendyourhealthcare.us/images/BILLS-111hr3200IH.pdf

--Message edité par maria le 2009-08-26 14:40:53--

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 24/08/2009 02:06:56 (24/08/2009 11:06:56)

RED ALERT!!! - ALERTE ROUGE!!! - DESTRUCTION OF HEALTH CARE - FASCIST SYSTEM - DEPOPULATION

PAGE 425 OF HEALTH CARE BILL

From: Carol Ann Philippians 1-21 <raggedyann62@ hotmail.com>
Subject: Page 425 of Health Care Bill
To:
Date: Saturday, July 25, 2009, 8:36 PM

From: katiemckean064
Subject: RE: Page 425 of Health Care Bill
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 16:23:32 -0500

Fred Thompson: Interviews audio : http://fredthompsonshow.com/premiumstream?dispid=320&headerDest=L3BnL2p…

I'm taking names of every republican that votes for this insane health bill.

THIS IS UNBELIEVABLE FOLKS. YOU MUST LISTEN TO THIS INTERVIEW ABOUT WHAT IS ACTUALY IN THE HEALTH CARE PLAN OBAMA IS TRYING TO RUSH THROUGH.

CLICK ON THE INTERVIEW LISTED BELOW

WILMA

It's TIME to contact our representatives, folks!! Is this not ridiculous??

(If this doesn't make your blood boil........ ... nothing will!!)

Page 425 of Health Care Bill - Listen to this interview Fred Thompson's Radio Show interviewing Betsy McCaughey (pronounced Mc Coy). Or look it up on www.fredthompsonsho w.com, under interviews.

On page 425 it says in black and white that EVERYONE on Social Security, (will include all Senior Citizens and SSI people) will go to MANDATORY counseling every 5 years to learn and to choose from ways to end your suffering (and your life). Health care will be denied based on age. 500 Billion will be cut from Seniors healthcare. The only way for that to happen is to drastically cut health care, the oldest and the sickest will be cut first. Paying for your own care will not be an option.

Now, CALL YOUR PEOPLE IN WASHINGTON!! !!!!!!!!! !!!!!!! Tell them to read page 425 if they don't read anything else. Surely some of them have parents.

CF

"ON PAGE 425 OF OBAMA’S HEALTH CARE BILL, the Federal Government will require EVERYONE who is on Social Security to undergo a counseling session every 5 years with the objective being that they will explain to them just how to end their own life earlier. Yes...They are going to push SUICIDE to cut medicare spending!"


Public Defenders <hq.publicdefenders@yahoo.com>

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 24/08/2009 02:08:24 (24/08/2009 11:08:24)

DESTRUCTION OF HEALTH CARE SYSTEM - WELCOME IN THE BEAST SYSTEM

NATIONAL HEALTH SCARE



Posted by RJ on July 31, 2009 at 6:46pm

SPECIAL BULLETIN

NATIONAL HEALTH SCARE

By Rick Joyner

When I read the brief on what was contained in the National Health Care bill that is now being presented before Congress, I could not believe I was reading something that was actually being considered in the United States of America. This is not about money or government mismanagement—this is about something far more diabolical than that. As incomprehensible as it may seem, this is about euthanasia, the power to determine who lives or dies in America. Hitler and Stalin would have loved to have had a means such as this for dispatching the millions they killed—it would have made their job much easier, and probably given them the ability to kill many more than they did. THIS BILL IS THAT SINISTER. This is not a joke—this is actually the nature of what is being proposed in the National Health Care legislation, and it is the obvious reason why the Obama Administration wants to ram it through Congress before anyone gets a chance to read it.

I have resolved to always be as generous as I can toward people with opposing views of my own. I do this because I believe it is the mandate of I Corinthians 13 to always believe the best about people, rather than the worst. I know this opens me up to be misled by some, but I consider that a small price to pay to not become cynical. I also do it because I think it is wise to always try and understand the position of my opponents—to be open to consider their positions and not be too rigid or inflexible to change because we all “see in part,” and “know in part.” Because of this, I have been chided for being too generous by giving those I do challenge grace by believing that they had not thought through the consequences of their proposals, or had other good intentioned reasons for doing what they were doing. However, after reading the brief on this health care bill, I don’t see how anyone could not see that there is profound evil and evil intent at work here. I just do not see any way to be any more generous with those who proposed this bill than that. It is that bad.

This bill is obviously designed to put the authority to determine who lives and dies in America into the hands of government bureaucrats. As outrageous as that seems, it is true—you can read it yourself. It even gives the government access to all of your accounts, and the authority to make withdrawals. I know this is hard to believe, but you can read it yourself.

Do you want a government bureaucrat to determine if your mother or father can receive treatment, even in life and death cases? Would you want a government bureaucrat to determine if your child, or you, could receive treatment, even when it means life or death? Think of the best experience that you ever had working with a government bureaucrat, and then think about them having the power to make a potentially life or death choice for your child, your parents, or for you. This is actually what is being proposed.

Add to that chilling thought the fact that this bureaucrat does not have to know one thing about medicine to be in that position. In fact, this bill proposes letting the government define what quality health care is and impose that definition on health care workers. Nowhere does it even specify what training, expertise, or qualifications this all-powerful government bureaucrat has to have to be placed in the position to make such ultimate decisions for the health, well-being, and even the lives of Americans.

Am I being too hard on bureaucrats, or the Obama Administration’s intentions? Certainly there are many bureaucrats who are sincere and true public servants. I agree that such are deserving of our appreciation and respect. The modern world could not exist without them. Think of the most noble and conscientious there are. What kind of position would we be putting them in to have to go to work every day and decide who is going to get treatment, who is going to have to go on a waiting list and for how long, and who are they going to have to just let die?

Who could live with such a job? There are many who could, who would just see it as paperwork, and those are the ones who would be in that position because the truly noble ones could not endure it. Hitler found many who could dispatch thousands each day, and then go home and enjoy their own families at night. There are people with that kind of moral disconnect. These jobs will be filled and by the very ones we would never want in such positions.

It is beyond anything I thought I would ever see in my lifetime that such a bill could ever be seriously considered in the U.S. Congress. This bill has the potential for totalitarian control to be imposed on America to a degree that Hitler and Stalin could not have even imagined. With the technology available now, totalitarian control can very quickly be imposed to a degree far beyond what was attained by either the Nazis or the Communists, and this bill has provisions in it for just that. It mandates the sharing of all of your personal information, from just about every conceivable source, with the new health care bureaucracy being set up to implement this national health care system. The penalties for trying to escape this web are serious. This would actually make America into a national concentration camp, and we can be sure that ultimately it will be a national death camp. You do not have to take my word for it—read it for yourself. Below I will include a brief on this bill so that you can look it up, chapter and verse.

I am a pastor and a watchman, and I therefore have a mandate to watch out for the people, and to sound the alarm when I see a threat. I have never seen one like this before. Even so, I have prayed for restraint and calm as I address this, and do not want to exaggerate anything. In spite of this terrible evil that is manifesting itself through the Obama Administration, I am resolved to pray for our government leaders, and I try to pray for the President every day. My sincere hope is for a spiritual awakening for him and for those in every government position, and for the Lord to give them wisdom and help for the most difficult task they have. However, with all due respect (and I mean this), what is coming out of the Obama Administration is evil, more evil than anything I thought I would ever see in America. It is time to call it what it is.

In the early 1990s, myself and a few other prophetic friends were all shown separately, but at the same general time, that the same evil that gained access to Germany in the 1930s was going to seek access to America. I have shared this often since then, and have made many trips to Germany to seek to understand what happened there. Col. Eugene Bird became one of my dearest friends, and I spent many days with him listening to what he had learned about this, which was considerable. Col. Bird was the U.S. Commandant of the Spandau Prison that held the Nazi war criminals, and ultimately became the one many considered to be the foremost authority on Nazi Germany. Bird’s insight into how evil can gain entry into the human soul and into governments was remarkable, but I always had trouble seeing a connection that would allow what happened there to actually happen in America. Bird often chastised me for this, warning that it could easily happen in America (Col. Bird lived most of his life in Germany, where he became loved and esteemed by that nation, but he remained a patriotic American to the end). Bird often explained how the evil spirit of death that took over Germany gained entry through its health care system. Now it is easy to see what he was talking about in what is being proposed by the Obama Administration.

In Germany, the National Socialists (Nazis) gradually desensitized the nation to death beginning with abortion. Then they quietly, seemingly with the most noble intentions, rounded up the retarded and insane, claiming that the state could take much better care of them, but no one ever saw or heard from them again. Then they did the same with the elderly. As word slipped out that they were being euthanized, it was explained that war made it necessary to eliminate all of the “useless eaters” so that the troops could be fed, as well as those who worked for the war machine. By that time, the grip of control was too strong for anyone to protest or they would also be sent to the camps. Life became cheaper and cheaper, people became more and more depraved, and millions were slaughtered in the death camps.

America is following a parallel course. If Hitler had a tool such as the health care bill that is being proposed by Congress, along with the technology of control now available, it would have made his task much easier and more effective, and probably resulted in many millions more having been easily murdered.

I have had Presidents, candidates, senators, and congressmen and congresswomen from both parties tell me they have read and appreciated my writings. I have maintained for many years that an eagle needs both a left wing and a right wing to fly, and believe that there are excellent men and women of true conviction in both parties. I realize that by writing with this tenor, I risk being considered an extremist, and maybe risk many relationships, but I cannot be concerned about that. With such an extreme evil threatening our country, I would have a difficult time standing before the Lord on that great judgment day if I did not speak up as boldly, as clearly, and as loudly as I can. Call me an alarmist and I will agree with you—I am going to do my best to sound the alarm against evil in every way that I can, and I don’t think I have ever seen anything with the potential for evil like this national health care bill.

I pray that senators and congressmen from both parties who have courage and conviction will stand up against this terrible impending holocaust and stop this bill. I expect that it will be hard for many who read and understand what this Democratic Administration has proposed not to refer to the Democratic Party as the Death Party from now on, but let’s wait and see how the Democrats in Congress respond to this before condemning them, too. This bill is criminal—it opens the door for a crime against humanity on a level that could easily surpass what happened in the last century. We must hold accountable all who have written, proposed, and sided with this bill—and determine that with all the resources we are given, they will never be elected again for anything.

I pray that every Christian will wake up and rise up to take their stand against what is happening in our country now. If we do, we can stop this. If we don’t, we will have to stand before the Judge having let this happen on our watch. We can expect persecution and even death for standing against such a bold and obvious attack of the spirit of death, but no Christian should fear death, and no Christian will want to live in the world that is now taking shape if we do not become the salt and light we are called to be.

We are in need of the courage and resolve of Gandalf in the Lord of the Rings, who stood before the huge and terrible Balrog demon and declared—“YOU SHALL NOT PASS!” The demon was stopped, and even though it was able to grab and drag Gandalf down with it, Gandalf returned with a new level of authority. It does not matter what the consequences are for standing for truth, as Christians we must stand because it is our basic duty. As the first apostles demonstrated, to be persecuted and to suffer shame for our God and His truth is one of the greatest honors. However, we must do it for more than honor—we must also do it for our children and their children.

Last night on Fox News, a former Clinton Administration council to the President stated courageously that this bill was not just about money, it was about euthanasia. The money part does not make any sense at all, but now that the real evil that is driving this can be clearly seen, we can understand that the Administration really does not care about saving money or providing health care for everyone; rather it is about control. There is already talk about this being about saving money by being able to euthanize the baby boomers so they will not have to be paid social security, or weigh down the health care system with their needs. I’m not ready to go that far, but that is obviously why the Florida congressman declared that this bill was a death sentence for the elderly. That is true.

The only commandment with a promise that it will go well with us, and that we may live long, is the commandment to honor our fathers and mothers. This commandment is found in both the Old and New Testaments (see Ephesians 6:2-3). Killing them when they can no longer be productive, as Hitler and Stalin resolved to do, is the most dishonorable thing we could ever do, and we can be sure will bring the opposite to the blessing promised. As you read the bill, and see how excessively long they stay on the point of being able to determine what and if any care is given to the elderly, you will see it really is chilling. It is obvious this is a primary purpose of those who wrote this bill. I know this sounds far-fetched, and I would not have believed it myself a few days ago, but just read it for yourself.


The following is a brief outline of this bill put together by Mat Staver of the Freedom Foundation and Liberty Counsel (contact info is at the end). The comments by the brief are Mat’s, except where I have noted my own by putting them in italics. The bold is also mine.

After reading, please do not wait to contact your representatives to protest this. If you don’t get through, keep calling, send emails, but do not stop until you know your voice has been heard.

Obama Health Care Plan Details

HR 3200 currently under consideration in the House of Representatives


Pg 22 of the HC Bill MANDATES the Govt will audit the books of ALL EMPLOYERS that self insure!!

Pg 30 Sec 123 of HC bill - THERE WILL BE A GOVT COMMITTEE that decides what treatments/benefits you get

Pg 29 lines 4-16 in the HC bill - YOUR HEALTHCARE IS RATIONED!!!

Pg 42 of HC Bill - The Health Choices Commissioner will choose your benefits for you. You have no choice!

Pg 50 Section 152 in HC bill - HC will be provided to ALL non US citizens, illegal or otherwise

Pg 58HC Bill – Gov’t will have real-time access to individual’s finances & a National ID Health care card will be issued!

Pg 59 HC Bill lines 21-24 Govt will have direct access to your banks accts for electronic funds transfer.

Pg 65 Sec 164 is a payoff subsidized plan for retirees and their families in Unions & community orgs (ACORN).

Pg 72 Lines 8-14 Govt is creating an HC Exchange to bring priv HC plans under Govt control.

Pg 84 Sec 203 HC bill - Govt mandates ALL benefit packages for private Health Care plans in the Exchange

Pg 85 Line 7 HC Bill - Specs for of Benefit Levels for Plans = The Govt will ration your Healthcare!

Pg 91 Lines 4-7 HC Bill - Govt mandates linguistic appropriate services.

Example - Translation for illegal aliens.

Pg 95 HC Bill Lines 8-18 The Govt will use groups i.e., ACORN & Americorps to sign up individuals for Govt HC plan

Pg 85 Line 7 HC Bill - Specs of Ben Levels 4 Plans. #AARP members - Your Health Care WILL be rationed

Pg 102 Lines 12-18 HC Bill - Medicaid Eligible Individual will be automat.enrolled in Medicaid. No choice.

Pg 124 lines 24-25 HC No company can sue Govt on price fixing. No “judicial review” against Govt Monopoly.

Pg 127 Lines 1-16 HC Bill - Doctors/ #AMA - The Govt will tell YOU what you can make.

Pg 145 Line 15-17 An Employer MUST auto enroll employees into public opt plan. NO CHOICE

Pg 126 Lines 22-25 Employers MUST pay for HC for part time employees AND their families.

Pg 149 Lines 16-24 ANY Employer w/ payroll 400k & above who does not prov. pub opt. pays 8% tax on all payroll

Pg 150 Lines 9-13 Biz w payroll btw 251k & 400k who doesnt provide public opt pays 2-6% tax on all payroll Pg 167 Lines 18-23 ANY individual who doesnt have acceptable HC according to Govt will be taxed 2.5% of income.

Pg 170 Lines 1-3 Any NONRESIDENT Alien is exempt from individual taxes. (Americans will pay).

Pg 195 Officers & employees of HC Admin (GOVT) will have access to ALL Americans financial and personal records.

Pg 203 Line 14-15 HC - “The tax imposed under this section shall not be treated as tax” Yes, it says that. Pg 239 Line 14-24 HC Bill Govt will reduce physician services for Medicaid. Seniors, low income, poor affected.

Pg 241 Line 6-8 HC Bill - Doctors, it does not matter what specialty you have, you’ll all be paid the same.

Pg 253 Line 10-18 Govt sets value of Dr’s time, prof judg, etc. Literally value of humans.

Pg 265 Sec 1131Govt mandates & controls productivity for private HC industries.

Pg 268 Sec 1141 Fed Govt regulates rental & purchase of power driven wheelchairs.

Pg 272 SEC. 1145. Treatment of certain cancer hospitals – Cancer patients - welcome to rationing!

Page 280 Sec 1151 The Govt will penalize hospitals for what Govt deems preventable readmissions. (Incentives for hospital to not treat and release.)

Pg 298 Lines 9-11 Drs, treat a patient during initial admission that results in a readmission-Govt will penalize you.

Pg 317 L 13-20 PROHIBITION on ownership/investment. Govt tells Drs. what/how much they can own.

Pg 317-318 lines 21-25,1-3 PROHIBITION on expansion- Govt is mandating hospitals cannot expand.

pg 321 2-13 Hospitals have opportunity to apply for exception BUT community input required. Can you say ACORN?!!

Pg335 L 16-25 Pg 336-339 - Govt mandates established of outcome based measures. HC the way they want. Rationing.

Pg 341 Lines 3-9 Govt has authority to disqualify Medicare Advantage Plans (Part B), HMOs, etc. Forcing people into Govt plan.

Pg 354 Sec 1177 - Govt will RESTRICT enrollment of Special needs people!

Pg 379 Sec 1191 Govt creates more bureaucracy - Telehealth Advisory Committee. HC by phone/Internet?

Pg 425 Lines 4-12 Govt mandates Advance [Death] Care Planning Consult. Think Senior Citizens end of life.

Pg 425 Lines 17-19 Govt will instruct & consult regarding living wills, durable powers of atty. Mandatory!

Pg 425 Lines 22-25, 426 Lines 1-3 Gov’t provides approved list of end of life resources, guiding you in death.

Pg 427 Lines 15-24 Govt mandates program for orders for end of life. The Gov’t has a say in how your life ends.

Pg 429 Lines 1-9 An “adv. care planning consult” will be used frequently as patients health deteriorates.

Pg 429 Lines 10-12 “adv. care consultation” may incl an ORDER for end of life plans. AN ORDER from GOV

Pg 429 Lines 13-25 - The govt will specify which Doctors can write an end of life order.

PG 430 Lines 11-15 The Govt will decide what level of treatment you will have at end of life


(NOTE FROM RJ: The above really does give the government the authority to determine who lives and dies, and when. A government bureaucrat really will be making this decision for you and your loved ones.)

Pg 469 - Community Based Home Medical Services=Non profit orgs. Hello, ACORN Medical Svcs here!!?

Pg 472 Lines 14-17 PAYMENT TO COMMUNITY-BASED ORG. 1 monthly payment to a community-based org. Like ACORN?

Pg 489 Sec 1308 The Govt will cover Marriage & Family therapy. They will insert Government into your marriage. Pg 494-498 Govt will cover Mental Health Svcs including defining, creating, rationing those svcs

PG 502 Sec 1181 Center for Comparative Effectiveness Research Established. – Hello Big Brother – Literally.

Pg 503 Lines 13-19 Gov’t will build registries and data networks from YOUR electronic med records.

Pg 503 lines 21-25 Gov’t may secure data directly from any depart or agency of the US including your data.

Pg 504 Lines 6-10 The “Center” will collect data both published & unpublished (that means public & your private info)

PG 506 Lines 19-21 The Center will recommend policies that would allow for public access of data.

PG 518 Lines 21-25 The Commission will have input from HC consumer reps – Can you say unions & ACORN?

PG 524 18-22 Comparative Effectiveness Research Trust Fund set up. More taxes for ALL.

PG 621 Lines 20-25 Gov’t will define what Quality means in HC. Since when does Gov’t know about quality?

Pg 622 Lines 2-9 To pay for the Quality Standards, Govt will transfer $$ from to other Govt Trust Funds. More Taxes.

PG 624 “Quality” measures shall be designed to assess outcomes & functional status of patients.

PG 624 “Quality” measures shall be designed to profile you including race, age, gender, place of residence, etc

Pg 628 Sec 1443 Gov’t will give “Multi-Stake Holders” Pre-Rule Making input into Selection of “Quality” Measures.

Pg 630 9-24/631 1-9 Those Multi-stake holder groups incl. Unions & groups like ACORN deciding HC quality.

Pg 632 Lines 14-25 The Gov’t may implement any “Quality measure” of HC Services as they see fit.

PG 633 14-25/ 634 1-9 The Secretary may issue non-endorsed “Quality Measures” for Physician Services & Dialysis Services.

Pg 635 to 653 Physicians Payments Sunshine Provision – Gov’t wants to shine sunlight on Docs but not Govt.

Pg 654-659 Public Reporting on Health Care-Associated Infections – Looks okay.

PG 660-671 Doctors in Residency – Gov’t will tell you where your residency will be, thus where you’ll live.

Pg 676-686 Gov’t will regulate hospitals in EVERY aspect of residency programs, incl. teaching hospitals.

Pg 686-700 Increased Funding to Fight Waste, Fraud, and Abuse. You mean like the Gov’t with an $18 million website?

PGs 701-704 Sec 1619 If your part of HC plan isn’t in Gov’t HC Exchange but you qualify for Fed aid, no payment.

PG 705-709 SEC. 1128 If Secr gets complaints (ACORN) on HC provider or supplier, Gov’t can do background check.

PG 711 Lines 8-14 The Secretary has broad powers to deny HC providers/ suppliers admittance into HC Exchange. Your doctor could be thrown out of business.

Pg 719-720 Sec 1637 ANY Doctor who orders durable med equip or home med services MUST be enrolled in Medicare.

PG 722 Sec 1639 Gov’t MANDATES Doctors must have face to face with patient to certify patient for Home Health Svcs.

PG 724 23-25 PG 725 1-5 The same Gov’t certifications will apply to Medicaid & CHIP (your kids)

PG 724 Lines 16-22 Gov’t reserves rt to apply face to face certification for patient to ANY other HC service.

Pg 735 lines 16-25 For law enforce. proposes the Secretary-HHS will give Atty General access to ALL data.

PG 740-757 Gov’t sets guidelines for subsidizing the uninsured (Thats your tax dollars people)

Pg 757-762 Fed gov’t will shift burden of payments to Disproportionate Share Hospitals (DSH) to States. (Taxes)

Pg 763 1-8 No DS/EA hospitals will be paid unless they provide services without regard to national origin

Pg 765 Sec 1711 Gov’t will require Preventative Services including vaccines. (Choice?)

Pg 768 Sec 1713 Gov’t – Nurse Home Visitation Svcs (Hello union paybacks)

Pg 769 11-14 Nurse Home Visit Svcs include-economic self-sufficiency, employ adv, school-readiness.

Pg 769 3-5 Nurse Home Visit Services - “increasing birth intervals between pregnancies.” Govt ABORTIONS anyone

Pg 770 SEC 1714 Fed Gov’t mandates eligibility for State Family Planning Services. Abortion & State Sovereign.

Pg 789-797 Gov’t will set, mandate drug prices, controlling which drugs brought to market. Bye innovation.

Pgs 797-800 SEC. 1744 PAYMENTS for graduate medical education. The government will now control Drs’ education.

PG 801 Sec 1751 The Govt will decide which Health care conditions will be paid. Say RATION!

Pg 810 SEC. 1759. Billing Agents, clearinghouses, etc req. to register. Gov’t takes over private payment sys.

Pg 820-824 Sec 1801 Govt will identify individ. ineligible for subsidies. Will access all personal financial information.

Pg 824-829 SEC. 1802. Govt Sets up Comparative Effectiveness Research Trust Fund. Another tax black hole.

PG 829-833 Gov’t will impose a fee on ALL private health ins. plans incl. self insured to pay for Trust Fund!

PG 835 11-13 fees imposed by Gov’t for Trust Fund shall be treated as if they were taxes.

Pg 838-840 Gov’t will design & implement Home Visitation Program for families with young kids & families expect kids.

PG 844-845 This Home Visitation Prog. includes Gov’t coming into your house & telling you how to parent!!!

Pg 859 Gov’t will establish a Public Health Fund at a cost of $88,800,000,000. Yes that’s Billion.

Pg 865 The Gov’t will MANDATE the establishment of a National Health Service Corps.

PG 865 to 876 The NHS Corps is a program where Drs. perform mandatory HC for 2yrs for part loan repayment.

PG 876-892 The govt takes over the education of our Med students and Drs.

PG 898 The Govt will establish a Public Health Workforce Corps to ensure supply of public health prof.

PG 898 The Public health workforce corps shall consist of civilian employees of the U.S. as Secretary deems.

PG 898 The Public health workforce corps shall consist of officers of Regular & Reserve Corps of Service.

PG 900 The Public Health Workforce Corps includes veterinarians.

PG 901 The Public Health Workforce Corps WILL include commissioned Regular & Reserve Officers. HC Draft?

PG 910 The Govt will develop, build & run Public Health Training Centers.

PG 913-914 Govt starts a HC affirmative action program thru guise of diversity scholarships.

PG 915 SEC. 2251. Govt MANDDATES Cultural & linguistic competency training for HC professionals.

Pg 932 The Govt will estab Preventative & Wellness Trust fund- initial cost of $30,800,000,000-Billion.

PG 935 21-22 Govt will identify specific goals & objectives for prevention & wellness activities. Control YOU!!

PG 936 Govt will develop “Healthy People & National Public Health Perform. Standards” Tell me what to eat?

PG 942 Lines 22-25 More Gov’t? Offices of Surgeon General -Public Health Svc, Minority Health, Women’s Health

PG 950- 980 BIG GOV’T core pub health infrastructure including workforce capacity, lab systems; health info sys, etc

PG 993 Gov’t will establish school based health clinics. Your kids won’t have a chance.

PG 994 School Based Health Clinic will be integrated into the school environment. Say GOVT Brainwash!

PG 1001 The Govt will establish a National Medical Device Registry. Will you be tracked?

Mathew D. Staver*
Founder and Chairman Dean and Professor of Law
Liberty Counsel Liberty University School of Law
Offices in Florida, Virginia and the District of Columbia, Lynchburg, Virginia
(800) 671-1776 - Telephone (434) 592-5300 - Telephone
http://www.lc.org/
http://www.law.liberty.edu/

*Licensed in Florida and the District of Columbia

Now do you understand why we have to stand up today against this bill and declare with all of the courageous souls who are sounding the alarm and let us say to the bill—


http://paul-reveres-riders.ning.com/profiles/blogs/national-health-scare?xg…

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 24/08/2009 02:13:32 (24/08/2009 11:13:32)

OBAMA CAUGHT ON TAPE PLANNING DEMISE OF PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE. WHITE HOUSE: "DON'T BELIEVE YOUR LYING EYES!"

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

Yesterday I wrote a post regarding some older footage of Obama planning the demise of private insurers: (Obama In His Own Words Saying Single-Payer Health Care Will Eliminate Private Insurance)

VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-bY92mcOdk&feature=player_embedded

VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0XCl6OHgiM&feature=player_embedded

VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfOWnZ82Pm4&feature=player_embedded

Ed Morrissey comments:

Douglass seems to have taken to her role as a propagandist rather well for someone who worked as a supposedly objective reporter for so long. How difficult is it to look through the first 64 seconds of the video Douglass attempts to rebut to find what Obama really had to say about single payer in 2003, while Obama prepared to run for the US Senate?

“I happen to be a proponent of single-payer, universal health care plans.”

Or perhaps this at 50 seconds, from 2007 while Obama was running for President:

“But I don’t think we’re going to be able to eliminate employer coverage immediately. There’s going to be potentially some transition process. I can envision a decade out, or 15 years out, or 20 years out.”

What did Obama say here? He says that he wants to eliminate employer coverage over a transition period, and that he favors a single-payer system. If Obama has ever walked back either of those two statements made as a candidate for two national political offices, I’ve yet to hear it. Instead of explaining some sort of evolution in Obama’s thinking on these points, Douglass attempts to propagandize by claiming that people who saw these clips didn’t hear Obama say exactly what he did. It’s the equivalent of a Jedi mind trick, only it’s the weak-minded trying to conduct the trick.

And from Gateway Pundit:

In other words, don't believe the promises Dear Leader made during the campaign, believe what he said last month while pushing Obamacare legislation.

Remember: Obama also claimed he was a moderate during the campaign.

More... The comments on YouTube are priceless including this one:

you seriously make me sick. Lies and more spending. This video only makes americans see how scared your adminstration really is. I can smell the blood in the water. Lets make it very clear that this is just another way for the goverment to control us this has nothing to do with health care reform. And if you think this is such a great idea all goverment officials including yourself should be one.

Still More... No surprise, The Politico is spinning for Dear Leader.

Nope. No surprise there. Anyone keeping count of just how many campaign promises Obama has broken already???


http://theblogprof.blogspot.com/2009/08/obama-caught-on-tape-planning-demis…

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 24/08/2009 02:15:53 (24/08/2009 11:15:53)

PAID RENT A MOB

Letter Written by: Lori Smith
Date of Letter: 2009-08-10
Subject: Obama Administration

In yet another case of the Looney Liberal Left who tried to claim that people voicing their Outrage against the obamanazi's health care plans were "organized protestors" the truth is emerging. See for yourself WHO in reality is doing the "Community Organizing" and has the funds to pay to force this down your throat. From Craiglist New York...

**TALENTED LEADERS needed to work for health care reform $11-16/hour** (Downtown) Date: 2009-08-03, 11:37AM EDT Reply to: see below Job opportunites working on urgent grassroots campaigns This summer we have the opportunity to make huge gains on critical issues, from repowering America with clean, renewable energy and reducing our dependence on oil, to fixing the high cost of health care, to winning the battle for equal rights. America’s leading advocacy groups are gearing up to meet these challenges this summer. In order to win, they need citizen support and grassroots action.

That’s where we come in. At the Fund for the Public Interest, we’ve been organizing campaigns to protect the environment, stand up for the public interest, and defend human rights for more than 25 years. We've helped cut global warming pollution with Environment America. We've helped pass laws that require drug companies to disclose more of the dangerous side-effects of their drugs with NJPIRG. And working with the Human Rights Campaign, we helped organize the grassroots opposition needed to defeat the discriminatory Federal Marriage Amendment.

Now is the time to work for change We need people like you—lots of people like you—to go out in communities around the country this summer and help make change happen. And you can earn money doing it. Earn $4,000-$6,000 this summer. Get skills. Learn vital campaign skills including how to fundraise, run a news conference and mobilize activists.

Know the issues. Learn about the issues from some of the nation's top advocates, organizers and experts. Be part of a winning team. Work alongside other motivated staff who share your passion for change. Make lasting friendships. Leadership Opportunities: We also have opportunities for additional responsibility as a Field Manager or Campaign Coordinator. Gain great experience—like an internship, but you get paid. Field Managers work with the director to meet the office goals and increase the impact of our campaigns.

Field Managers make an additional $500-$1,000 over the summer. Campaign Coordinators work closely with the directors to develop and implement winning campaign tactics, such as organizing the media, building coalitions, and writing letters-to-the-editor. To apply for a job this summer, visit our website—www.JobsThatMatter.org—or call Chris at 646-473-0905

Compensation: $11-16/hour This is at a non-profit organization. Principals only. Recruiters, please don't contact this job poster. Phone calls about this job are ok. Please do not contact job poster about other services, products or commercial interests. PostingID: 1303066561 No contact info? if the poster didn't include a phone number, email, or other contact info, craigslist can notify them via email. Copyright © 2009 craigslist, inc. terms of use privacy policy feedback forum http://newyork.craigslist.org/mnh/etc/1303066561.html .


http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Letter-to-Editor.htm?EdNo=001&Info=00667…

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 24/08/2009 02:17:18 (24/08/2009 11:17:18)

AMID RAUCOUS PROTESTS ON HEALTH CARE, SOME WORRY ABOUT OBAMA'S SAFETY

Tue Aug 11, 6:20 PM

By Lee-Anne Goodman, The Canadian Press

WASHINGTON - Death threats are part of the job for any American president, but Barack Obama has reportedly had more levelled against him than any commander-in-chief in history.

Concerns about his safety are mounting in the midst of a tense summer that has seen mobs of angry demonstrators showing up to protest Obama's health-care reform plans - including a man openly carrying a pistol on Tuesday in New Hampshire, where the president held a town hall meeting on health care.

It's legal to carry holstered weapons in the state, so long as they're not concealed. The man was also waving a sign that read "It Is Time To Water The Tree of Liberty," a reference to the Thomas Jefferson quote: "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

Footage of the protester with his gun in a leg holster rapidly made its way to various news websites in the hours before Obama appeared, alarming video in a country that has seen four presidents gunned down in public and attempts made on the lives of 11 others.

"There is, and rightly so, a growing concern about the tone in American politics right now," Cal Jillson, a political scientist at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, said Tuesday.

"It started with Sarah Palin and the way the crowds responded to her last year, and continued with the tea party gatherings and now the town hall meetings on health care - there is an arc of rhetorical excess that I think is rightly worrying to people."

A new book, "In The President's Secret Service," says Obama receives as many as 30 death threats a day, 400 per cent more than those made against his predecessor, George W. Bush.

Its author, Ronald Kessler, has sent shockwaves through Washington with his allegations that the cash-strapped Secret Service is cutting corners, leaving the first African-American president in U.S. history particularly vulnerable.

"There's no question his life is in danger," Kessler, a veteran investigative journalist, said in a recent television interview. "Tomorrow, Obama could be assassinated ... simply because the Secret Service was not doing what it used to do."

The Secret Service has vehemently denied those allegations, but images of the armed New Hampshire protester amid suggestions Obama isn't being adequately protected are unsettling to many Americans.

"It's a matter of time until someone is shot. And if it's Obama, the country is going to explode in violence," wrote a commenter on the Washington Post's website on Tuesday.

Even Congress representatives have faced death threats this summer over health-care reform.

A Democratic lawmaker from Washington state received a faxed death threat a day after he described enraged town hall demonstrators as "a lynch mob." Representative Brian Baird says he's also received threatening phone calls, and was forced to cancel the rest of the town halls he'd scheduled.

The likeness of a Maryland congressman was hanged in effigy at a recent town hall, and protesters carried the fake tombstone of another Texas politician at a similar event.

Jillson says top Republicans are stoking some of the anger by making statements about Obama's health-care reform plans that are "demonstrably untrue."He pointed to Sarah Palin's recent Facebook message that alleged White House "death squads" would endanger the life of her disabled infant son.

"Any time you whip up people's emotions in a political setting, the result of that is uncertain and uncontrollable," he said.

"The Republican party is on a knife's edge here - they have certainly bloodied the Democrats politically on health-care reform, but they risk going too far."

But one former Republican aide says death threats are always part of the political landscape in the U.S., adding Americans shouldn't be overly concerned right now.

Stephen Hess of the Washington-based Brookings Institution once monitored the mail of Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1961, shortly after the president left office.

"Here is a man who is a retired two-term president, revered, a five-star general in the last just war, and he's getting dozens of dozens of death threats," Hess recalled with a laugh.

"We're a large country in which there's a certain percentage of nuts, often sick people. I don't think these threats have to do with the times in any special way. Most of these people frankly are just crazy, and they've always been around."

If anything, Hess said, the advent of information technology - e-mail, in particular - means threats are much easier to make now, and the mentally unhinged can level more of them despite having little chance of ever carrying them out.

"It's anonymous and it's instant," Hess said.


http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/090811/world/us_obama_death_threats

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 24/08/2009 02:18:09 (24/08/2009 11:18:09)

"NE TOUCHE PAS À MA SANTÉ"

NOUS VOYONS QUE LA GROGNE AUGMENTE DE PLUS EN PLUS CHEZ NOS VOISINS DES ÉTATS-UNIS. ILS COMMENCENT À RÉALISER QU'ILS QUE LE CHANGEMENT PROMIS PAR LEUR PRÉSIDENT PREND UNE TOUT AUTRE DIRECTION QU'ILS N'AVAIENT PAS VU VENIR.

ARLEN SPECTER TENTE DE CONVAINCRE LA SALLE QU'ELLE POURRA GARDER SON RÉGIME PRIVÉ D'ASSURANCE-MALADIE. POURTANT, LE PRÉSIDENT OBAMA A LUI-MÊME DIT QUE CE RÉGIME SERAIT ÉLIMINÉ D'ICI QUELQUES ANNÉES.


Journal de Montréal
Mercredi 12 août 2009

La réforme proposée par le président Obama suscite la colère de certains Américains

LEBANON, Pennsylvanie - (AFP) Des voix s'étranglent de colère, les investices fusent... et Dieu est pris à témoin pour justifier des arguments-chocs. La réunion publique organisée hier dans une petite ville des États-Unis sur la réforme du système de santé du président Obama a viré au pugilas verbal.

Le sénateur démocrate Arlen Specter chargé, à l'égal de ses pairs, d'expliquer la réforme visant à étendre la couverture maladie aux quelque 50 millions d'Américains qui en sont dépourvus, a eu fort à faire face aux 500 personnes venues assister à la réunion à Lebanon (Pennsylvanie, est).

"Un jour Dieu sera devant vous et vous jugera!", lui lance un homme, la voix tremblante, avant de quitter la salle municipale prévue au départ pour 250 personnes.

Le sénateur doit affronter la grogne de ses administrés. Des républicains. Des inquiets. Et beaucoup de sceptiques.

"Je suis républicaine", s'exclame une femme. "Le problème, ça n'est pas la réforme de la santé. Le problème, c'est la transformation de ce pays en une Russie, en un pays socialiste", s'enflamme-t-elle, ovationnée par toute la salle.

"Avec cette loi, le gouvernement a le droit de nous contrôler depuis le ventre de notre mère jusqu'à la tombe" tonne un autre participant, très applaudi lui aussi.

...

Calmement, Arlen Specter tente de réfuter les criantes de plus inquiets en assurant qu'ils pourront garder leur régime privé d'assurance-maladie, au contraire de ce que certains élus et chantres ont affirmé ces derniers jours.

...


maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 24/08/2009 02:21:02 (24/08/2009 11:21:02)

RÉFORME DE LA SANTÉ - DES PROTESTANTS ARMÉS À UN ÉVÉNEMENT D'OBAMA

VEUX-T-ON FAIRE PASSER LES PERSONNES QUI SONT CONTRE CETTE RÉFORME POUR DES EXTRÉMISTES? IL EST À PARIER QUE CE SOIT DES AGENTS INFILTRATEURS, QUI ENCORE UNE FOIS, TENTENT DE FAIRE PASSER LES CITOYENS POUR DES CRIMINELS.



Mise à jour : 18/08/2009 08h17

Une scène pour le moins inusitée s'est déroulée hier en Arizona lors d'une réunion où participait le président Barack Obama pour promouvoir son plan sur la santé.

Au moins une douzaine de personnes dans la foule venue protester contre le projet de réforme se promenaient avec des armes à feu bien en vue.

Un homme, notamment, portait en bandoulière un fusil d'assault de type AR-15 en plus d'un révolver à la ceinture. Il aurait répondu à un journaliste qu'il était armé parce qu'il en avait le droit.

L'Arizona permet le port d'armes dans des endroits publics pourvu que les personnes soient titulaires d'un permis et que les armes soient visibles.

Les services secrets se sont dits au courant de la situation et prêts à agir en cas de besoin.


http://lcn.canoe.ca/lcn/infos/lemonde/archives/2009/08/20090818-081758.html

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 24/08/2009 02:21:57 (24/08/2009 11:21:57)

ÉTATS-UNIS - RÉFORME DU SYSTÈME DE SANTÉ - LES DÉMOCRATES RÉPLIQUENT AUX RÉPUBLICAINS

LES DEUX PARTIS QUI SERVENT LA MÊME ÉLITE SECRÈTE VONT, DURANT LE TEMPS DE L'IMPLANTATION DE CE PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE ET DE CONTRÔLE TOTAL, S'OBSTINER PENDANT UN TEMPS, AFIN DE DÉTOURNER L'ATTENTION DU GRAND PUBLIC. C'EST CE QU'ON APPELLE UN SIMULACRE DE DÉMOCRATIE.


© LA PRESSE CANADIENNE/Darren Calabrese

Associated Press (AP)
19/08/2009 21h53

Les Démocrates ont semblé sortir de leur réserve aujourd'hui pour rétorquer aux attaques impitoyables des Républicains visant le projet de réforme du président Barack Obama.

On a entendu dire, par exemple, que la Maison-Blanche et les principaux dirigeants démocrates auraient décidé d'aller de l'avant et de présenter leur programme au Congrès sans le soutien bi-partisan promis par M. Obama. L'attaché de presse de la Maison-Blanche, Robert Gibbs, a cependant indiqué que le président souhaitait toujours en venir à un accord.

Deux influents Démocrates à la Chambre des représentants ont par ailleurs demandé à des dizaines de compagnies d'assurances de fournir leurs rapports financiers détaillés d'ici le début de septembre. La Chambre reprendra ses travaux le 8 septembre et la réforme de l'assurance-santé sera certainement parmi les principaux points abordés.

Pas moins de 52 lettres ont été transmises à des assureurs qui touchent deux milliards $ et plus en primes annuellement. Cela donne encore plus de poids aux arguments de ceux qui croient que la Maison Blanche se prépare à diaboliser cette industrie.


http://www.canoe.com/infos/international/archives/2009/08/20090819-215343.h…

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 26/08/2009 07:26:43 (26/08/2009 16:26:43)

TED KENNEDY ON HEALTH CARE

VIDEO :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrJVbCzJH6c

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 28/08/2009 11:52:46 (28/08/2009 20:52:46)

ABC'S JOHN STOSSEL DESTROYS/PULVERIZES/CRUSHES OBAMA'S ANTI-AMERICAN 'HEALTH CARE' PLAN

VIDEO :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9GMKK_fWKg

--Message edité par maria le 2009-08-28 20:55:40--

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 09/09/2009 02:53:35 (09/09/2009 11:53:35)

EXCLUSIVE: OBAMA NOMINEE OMITTED TIES TO BIOTECH


http://www.upmc-biosecurity.org/website/center/staff/otoole.html

By Jim McElhatton (Contact)

President Obama's nominee at the Department of Homeland Security overseeing bioterrorism defense has served as a key adviser for a lobbying group funded by the pharmaceutical industry that has asked the government to spend more money for anthrax vaccines and biodefense research.

But Dr. Tara O'Toole, whose confirmation as undersecretary of science and technology is pending, never reported her involvement with the lobbying group called the Alliance for Biosecurity in a recent government ethics filing.

The alliance has spent more than $500,000 lobbying Congress and federal agencies -- including Homeland Security -- since 2005, congressional records show.

However, Homeland Security officials said Dr. O'Toole need not disclose her ties to the group on her government ethics form because the alliance is not incorporated: "There's no legal existence so she wouldn't have to disclose it," said Robert Coyle, an ethics official for the Department of Homeland Security.

Analysts say the lack of disclosure reflects a potential loophole in the policies for the Obama administration, which has boasted about its efforts to make government more transparent. They also question lobbying laws that allow such a group to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars without the public knowing exactly how much money each of the companies that belongs to the group contributes, though such arrangements are permitted under the law.

"You're not allowing the public to know the full background of this nominee," said Judy Nadler, a senior fellow at the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University in California. "It shouldn't matter whether it's incorporated or not."

Craig Holman, legislative director of the nonpartisan watchdog group Public Citizen, said the lack of disclosure "definitely and clearly runs counter to the intent of the law."

Ethics rules require nominees to report any paid or unpaid positions held outside of government, including but not limited to those of "officer, trustee, general partner, representative, employee or any consultant of any corporation, firm, partnership or other business enterprise ...." Dr. O'Toole signed a letter on behalf of the group sent to the White House as recently as March.

Dr. O'Toole declined to comment for this article. Her office referred questions to Mr. Coyle at Homeland Security and to officials for the Alliance for Biosecurity, who said the group is in "full compliance" with lobbying rules and noted that there were no financial ties between the Center for Biosecurity, where Dr. O'Toole is chief executive, and the lobbying group she help found.

In written testimony to Congress, Dr. O'Toole said the alliance was "created to protect the Center for Biosecurity's status as an honest broker between the biopharma companies and the U.S. government."

As undersecretary of science and technology, one of Dr. O'Toole's responsibilities would involve overseeing the department's chemical and biological division, which is in charge of making sure the nation is prepared to defend itself against chemical and biological attacks.


Dr. O'Toole was nominated less than four years after the alliance was formed in 2005. She has served as the group's unpaid strategic director and has signed her name on more than a dozen letters sent to Congress and federal agencies.

The group's letters to policymakers often seek more money for research and vaccines. She signed the letters as the group's strategic director, in addition to listing her full-time paid job as director of the Center for Biosecurity, which is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh.

The letters, including one that Dr. O'Toole sent to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, last fall, describe the Alliance for Biosecurity as a "collaboration" among the Center for Biosecurity of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies "working to develop vaccines, medicines and other medical countermeasures for the nation's Strategic National Stockpile."

Members include companies such as Pfizer Inc., Sig Technologies and PharmAthene Inc. The group discloses the letters and list of members on a Web site.

But for all its lobbying and letters to Congress, the alliance isn't incorporated, it doesn't have a bank account and its day-to-day operations are overseen by the K Street lobbying arm of Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, which also lobbies on behalf of the alliance, according to records and interviews.

The alliance's legal counsel, Anita Cicero, is also a Drinker Biddle lawyer who serves as a lobbyist for the group. In an e-mail response to questions about the alliance, Ms. Cicero said the group was formed to work "in the public interest to improve prevention and treatment of severe infectious diseases - particularly those diseases that present global security challenges in the 21st century."

Ms. Cicero described the lobbying activities as focusing on broad issues. "The overarching advocacy issues we address run across the industry, and we do not conduct lobbying activities to advance the commercial interests of any individual member company," she said.

Still, a review of the group's correspondence to federal lawmakers along with member companies' public disclosures to investors show that the lines between advocacy and commercial interests aren't always clear.

In an Oct. 31 letter to Mrs. Pelosi signed by Dr. O'Toole and two other alliance officials, the group called on Congress to include more than $900 million for the "ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL COUNTERMEASURES" to be administered by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority.

The letter also was signed by the chief executive officer of member company PharmAthene, David Wright, who was one of the two first co-chairmen for the alliance after its creation in 2005.

Mr. Wright's company has a big financial interest in securing work from the authority, according to investor filings. A Securities and Exchange Commission filing last summer disclosed that PharmAthene has been trying to win a contract administered by the authority to supply 25 million doses of an anthrax vaccine to the national stockpile, which is overseen by the Department of Health and Human Services.

As undersecretary, Dr. O'Toole wouldn't be directly responsible for decisions on which vaccines to develop or buy. Still, she would oversee the government's threat assessments on the risks of bioagents.

Dr. O'Toole has told the Senate in written testimony that she would adhere to all ethics rule on conflicts of interests, but that because she has no financial interest in PharmAthene, she's not aware of any recusal requirements if she were to become involved in decisions concerning government funding for anthrax vaccine development.

Ethics groups say the alliance's setup is an example of what critics call "stealth lobbying," in which like-minded companies form a loosely knit compact and spend lots of money lobbying the government. The arrangement is legal, but it exposes loopholes that prevent the public from finding out how much money each company pays and whether one business exerts more control over the others.

Ms. Cicero said the group is complying with all applicable federal laws and that the alliance discloses on a Web site its membership list and correspondence to the White House, Congress and federal agencies. She said the companies pay a "pro rata" share to the Drinker Biddle & Reath firm.

"The alliance does not generate income, does not have a bank account and does not owe taxes," she said.

Ms. Cicero said the law firm "regularly convenes consortia of biopharma companies that share common goals or interests and provides secretarial and legal support for the groups." She said the alliance was formed so companies, academic institutions and the government could work together to "accelerate the development of therapeutic and vaccine countermeasures."

Ms. Cicero said Dr. O'Toole no longer has an active role as the strategic director for the alliance.

Another lobbying client of the firm, the International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium, appears structured similarly. There are no records of any incorporation papers for that group, either. The group has a Web site listing several pharmaceutical companies as members, and Senate records show it has paid more than $250,000 to Drinker, Biddle & Reath since 2007.

Government watchdog groups acknowledge that the arrangement is legal but say it seems at odds with lobbying reform laws that were intended to shed more light on who bankrolls and controls special interest groups.

"At the end of the day, companies that form coalitions like this are being able to get around having to disclose the full breadth of who they are and what they're doing and what they're doing," said Dave Levinthal, a spokesman for the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. "Does that cut against an open and transparent government? It appears that it does.

"Stealth lobbying has been taking place for years and despite the focus on the influence of lobbying, what's happening is that organizations are finding, if not loopholes, then ways around the spirit of the law," he said. "Companies that are lobbying Congress are not necessarily disclosing the full strength of their lobbying."


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/sep/08/obama-nominee-omitted-ties-…

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 10/09/2009 01:44:55 (10/09/2009 10:44:55)

TEXT OF OBAMA'S HEALTH CARE SPEECH TONIGHT

A Bipartisan Plan to Wreck the System

The health-care address President Obama should really give to Congress.

By HOLMAN W. JENKINS, JR.

What follows is a leaked first draft of President Obama's speech on health care tonight, complete with instructions for Democrats in the audience.



Members of Congress, Ladies and Gentlemen, Children of the Obama Youth Corps — I come to you tonight to speak frankly about our nation's health-care crisis and how we in Washington can make it worse.

Salami tactics on health care have long involved slicing the salami from both ends.

On one hand, we enlarge the government's role in providing health care, making more and more voters dependent on Washington.

On the other, we enact regulations and restrictions to keep driving the private insurance system off a cliff.

To the American people I promise tonight, whatever compromises lay ahead, whatever the arduous negotiations, Democrats and Republicans will work together to continue to drive the current system off a cliff. (Applause from Democrats in the audience; Nancy Pelosi beams.)

Even if we cannot enact my administration' s "public option," we will extend the great work of previous generations, making sure private health care continues to be unaffordable to more and more Americans, and piling up fresh mandates on employers so fewer and fewer of our citizens will have either jobs or health insurance.

At the same time, with tax dollars, we will continue to subsidize ever more consumption of that which everyone agrees we already consume too much.

We may not get there right away. But by taking these steps, we will bring closer the day when the only form of health care for most Americans will be government-provided health care, and the dream will never die. (Pandemonium among Democrats. Nancy Pelosi daubs her eye.)

I want to give a shout-out to our Republican friends, who have been with us every step of the way, who have been an important part of our salami progress so far—by pushing various "patient's bills of rights," defending the tax giveaways that encourage spending regardless of cost or benefit; by expanding Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans benefits and subsidized health care for middle-class children.

I say tonight, without Republican help, we could never have brought the system to its current dysfunction and I thank you.

Now, much has been said about our "public option" that's been confusing and misinformed. It's in that spirit that I speak to you tonight.

Critics wonder: How can a new "public option" bring meaningful competition to the health-insurance marketplace and drive down costs?

They miss the point. The great work done so far has tended to squash competition, and we would continue this work—by restricting the ability of insurance companies to design and market their policies; by regulating what coverage they can offer; by using tax distortions to keep consumers in the dark about what their health care really costs, so they will continue to treat it as a "free lunch" when it actually gobbles up more and more of their disposable incomes.

People, this is why insurance rates keep going up and up, and why a competitive marketplace, in which consumers reward those who provide high-quality care at low cost, hardly exists. And I say again, with all humility, this is a great bipartisan achievement.

So the purpose of our public option is not to change any of this, but merely to scoop up the growing number of Americans who won't be able to get private coverage because we've made private coverage so expensive and uneconomic.

Some say the public plan would be unfairly subsidized with tax dollars. No, no, no—the public option would be self-sustaining, just like the Post Office, just like Medicare, just like the federal government, which carefully lives within the tax revenues it receives each year.*

Now, my administration is not wedded to the "public option." I know my Republican friends say families should not have health care. They believe we can save money by lying down before rapacious insurance CEOs. They say the indigent should be encouraged to practice self-surgery (I'm sure some Republican somewhere thinks this is a good idea).

But let's put aside our differences and recognize how much we have already accomplished together. I say to Republicans and Democrats alike, if we can just keep working together to inflate the burden of public and private health-care spending as we have the past 30 years, we will push the system to the breaking point. Yes, we can. Yes, we can. (Democrats chant, "Yes we can." Nancy Pelosi levitates above the audience, flies around the chamber three times and bursts into flame. . . .)

. . . Together we can push our current health-care system over a cliff, and then—well, then [STRONG ENDING HERE]


--Message edité par maria le 2009-09-10 10:45:35--

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 10/09/2009 04:02:56 (10/09/2009 13:02:56)

ALL MEMBERS AND STAFFS TO ENROLL IN ANY NEW GOVERNMENT-RUN HEALTH PLAN

On Tuesday, the Senate health committee voted 12-11 in favor of a two-page amendment courtesy of Republican Tom Coburn that would require all Members and their staffs to enroll in any new government-run health plan. It took me less than a minute to sign up to require our congressmen and senators to drink at the same trough! Three cheers for Congressman John Fleming of Louisiana!

Congressman John Fleming ( Louisiana physician) has proposed an amendment that would require congressmen and senators to take the same healthcare plan they force on us (under proposed legislation they are curiously exempt).

Congressman Fleming is encouraging people to go on his Website and sign his petition (very simple - just first, last and email). I have immediately done just that at: http://fleming.house.gov/index.html . http://fleming.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=55&sectiontree=29,55

Please urge as many people as you can to do the same!

If Congress forces this on the American people, the Congressmen should have to accept the same level of health care for themselves and their families


maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 10/09/2009 12:16:34 (10/09/2009 21:16:34)

OBAMACARE WILL PUT PLANNED PARENTHOOD INSIDE YOUR CHILD'S SCHOOL

Date: 8/28/2009 9:07:02 AM

by Bryan Fischer

According to my good friend David Ripley, Executive Director of Idaho Chooses Life, the Pelosi/Obama health care plan will establish school-based “health clinics” in or near schools all across the nation.

These clinics would not answer to any sort of local authority, including parents and school boards. The ObamaCare bill would contract the running of these clinics to something called a “sponsoring facility,” which would be responsible for their “administration, operations and oversight.”

Well, just who might a “sponsoring facility” be? Can you say “Planned Parenthood?”

The president promised Planned Parenthood on the campaign trail that abortion care would be at the center of his health care reform plan. He clearly meant what he said, and now we find out he wants to stick the nation’s largest death merchant inside the walls of neighborhood schools with instant access to children of all ages.

If we ever needed yet another reason to oppose the fascist takeover of our entire health care industry, this is it. We do not want the nation’s largest abortion provider and most ardent proponent of sexual promiscuity anywhere near any of our schools, period.

As the marine vet famously said last week to Rep. Brian Baird of Washington, so we say to President Obama and Planned Parenthood: “Stay away from our kids.”


http://action.afa.net/Blogs/BlogPost.aspx?id=2147486521

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 16/09/2009 03:49:58 (16/09/2009 12:49:58)

ÉTATS-UNIS - CONFIANT, OBAMA ATTEND «UNE BONNE LOI SUR LA SANTÉ»

Associated Press (AP)
13/09/2009 20h09


Barack Obama n'acceptera «pas le statu quo. Pas cette fois».
© AP Photo

Le président américain Barack Obama a exprimé dans l'émission 60 Minutes sa confiance que le Congrès ferait passer «une bonne loi sur les soins de santé».

La rancoeur accumulée contre ce texte majeur paraissait s'apaiser aujourd'hui, après que la Maison Blanche ait réduit l'intervention du gouvernement sur la question des assurances.

Pour autant, le président américain n'a pas manqué de critiquer les opposants républicains à sa réforme qui tentent de bloquer la transformation de la couverture de santé des Américains, de tuer la réforme, pour en tirer un gain politique, selon lui.

«Je crois qu'il y aura assez de votes pour faire passer pas simplement un texte quelconque sur les soins, mais un bon texte qui aidera la population américaine, réduira les coûts, et assurera un contrôle à long terme de notre déficit. J'ai confiance, nous avons cela», a déclaré le chef de la Maison Blanche sur la chaîne de télévision CBS dans un entretien enregistré à l'avance.

«Je ne vois pas l'intérêt de faire passer une loi qui échoue, a-t-il souligné lors de l'émission. Vous savez, j'ai l'intention d'être président pendant un bon bout de temps, et quand cette loi sera passée, elle sera mienne», a-t-il poursuivi.

Le président tente aussi de donner un espace aux Républicains en se disant ouvert à leurs idées. Il accepterait par exemple de prendre en compte le risque pour les médecins, qui doivent s'assurer pour des montants considérables au cas où ils seraient condamnés pour des actes de leur responsabilité.

Le système actuel augmente inutilement le prix de la médecine du fait de son versant juridique, les médecins prescrivant des actes à seule fin de se protéger de poursuites potentielles.

«Je suis prêt à prendre en considération toute idée qui marche pour réduire les coûts, améliorer les soins que reçoivent les malades», affirme Obama dans son entretien, enregistré vendredi.

Dans la foulée de son intervention mercredi devant le Congrès, le chef de la Maison Blanche a souligné hier à Minneapolis qu'il ne se laisserait pas intimider par les divers groupes de pressions et représentants d'intérêts particuliers, eux et leurs «mêmes vieilles tactiques pour laisser les choses exactement en l'état».

Barack Obama a expliqué lors de son rassemblement devant 15 000 personnes que sa «porte est toujours ouverte» pour ceux qui viennent le «voir avec un ensemble de propositions sérieuses». Le nombre de personnes dépourvues de couverture médicale est passé de 45,7 millions en 2007 à 46,3 millions en 2008, a-t-il rappelé en citant de récentes études du Département du Travail et de l'Office national des statistiques.

C'est pourquoi Barack Obama n'acceptera «pas le statu quo. Pas cette fois». Et, a-t-il averti, il ne perdra pas de temps avec des gens qui préfèrent «tuer ce plan plutôt que l'améliorer».


http://www.canoe.com/infos/international/archives/2009/09/20090913-200916.h…

--Message edité par maria le 2009-09-16 12:53:02--

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 17/09/2009 04:54:06 (17/09/2009 13:54:06)

AVORTEMENT : L'ÉGLISE FÉLICITE LE PRÉSIDENT AMÉRICAIN

RELISEZ L'ARTICLE "OBAMACARE WILL PUT PLANNED PARENTHOOD INSIDE YOUR CHILD'S SCHOOL"
http://action.afa.net/Blogs/BlogPost.aspx?id=2147486521 . VOUS VERREZ QUE SOUS LA NOUVELLE RÉFORME DES SOINS DE SANTÉ, LA PROTECTION DES BÉBÉS À NAÎTRE N'EST AUCUNEMENT PROTÉGÉE, AU CONTRAIRE. DES CENTRES DE PLANIFICATION FAMILIALE SERONT MIS EN PLACE DANS LES DIFFÉRENTES INSTITUTIONS SCOLAIRES FRÉQUENTÉES PAR LES ENFANTS. CE PROGRAMME DÉJÀ EXISTANT AU CANADA ET QUI AIDENT LES JEUNES FILLES À SE FAIRE AVORTER SANS LE CONSENTEMENT DES PARENTS, SI ELLES ONT PLUS DE 14 ANS POURRAIT AUSSI DEVENIR RÉALITÉ CHEZ NOS VOISINS AMÉRICAINS.

IL EST DEMANDÉ, PAR LES PORTE-PAROLES DE LA CONFÉRENCE DES ÉVÊQUES CATHOLIQUES DES ÉTATS-UNIS (USCCB), DE MAINTENIR LES LOIS FÉDÉRALES EXISTANTES QUI DÉFENDENT LA LIBERTÉ DE CONSCIENCE DANS L'EXERCICE DE L'ACTIVITÉ SANITAIRE. AUX ÉTATS-UNIS, LA PLUPART DES ÉTATS ONT DES LOIS FAISANTS LA PROMOTION DE L'AVORTEMENT, QUE FAUT-IL DONC EN DÉDUIRE DE PAR LEURS PAROLES, QUI EN FIN DE COMPTE SE CONTREDISENT COMPLÈTEMENT?

QUANT À LA LIBERTÉ DE CONSCIENCE, IL NE PEUT Y EN AVOIR CAR LES VRAIES RAISONS DE CE PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE SONT D'OFFRIR DU SANG INNOCENT À LUCIFER ET NON PAS DE DONNER À LA FEMME LE LIBRE ARBITRE SUR SON CORPS. BIEN QUE CETTE RAISON SOIT UTILISÉE DEPUIS LONGTEMPS PAR NOS CHERS EXPERTS POLITIQUES, RELIGIEUX, SCIENTIFIQUES ET PSYCHIATRIQUES POUR ÉGARER LES BONNES GENS, IL N'EN RESTE PAS MOINS QUE DES MILLIERS D'INNOCENTS SONT SACRIFIÉS CHAQUE ANNÉE, DE PAR LE MONDE, SUR L'AUTEL DU GRAND SATAN POUR AVOIR CRU EN CE GROS MENSONGE.


AVORTEMENT : L'ÉGLISE FÉLICITE LE PRÉSIDENT AMÉRICAIN

La réforme de la santé en débat au Congrès

ROME, Mardi 15 septembre 2009 (ZENIT.org) - Des porte-paroles de la conférence des évêques catholiques des Etats-Unis (USCCB) ont félicité le président américain Barack Obama pour les propos qu'il a tenus, le 9 septembre dernier, sur l'avortement et la situation des personnes sans assistance sanitaire, lors de débats au Congrès relatifs au plan de réforme de la santé.

« Nous avons en particulier apprécié l'engagement du président à exclure l'utilisation de fonds fédéraux pour l'avortement et à maintenir les lois fédérales existantes qui défendent la liberté de conscience dans l'exercice de l'activité sanitaire », a déclaré Richard Doerflinger, directeur adjoint pour les activités pro-vie de l'USCCB.

« Nous travaillerons avec le Congrès et avec l'administration pour nous assurer que ces formes de protection apparaissent clairement dans une nouvelle loi, pour que personne ne soit obligé à payer ou à participer à l'avortement comme résultat de la réforme du système de santé », a-t-il ajouté.

Pour sa part, Kathy Saile, directrice pour le Développement social national de la conférence épiscopale, a souligné : « Nous sommes d'accord sur le fait que personne n'ait à subir une faillite uniquement parce qu'il est tombé malade ».

« C'est à cela que les évêques travaillent d'ailleurs depuis des décennies : obtenir une assistance sanitaire digne pur tous », a-t-elle déclaré.

« L'Eglise catholique fournit des soins médicaux à des millions de patients, obligée souvent de recoller les morceaux d'un système sanitaire avec de graves lacunes, et possède une longue tradition d'enseignements sur l'éthique et l'assistance médicale. Une réforme qui respecte la vie et la dignité de tous est un impératif moral et une priorité nationale urgente », a-t-elle poursuivi.

C'est pourquoi, souligne-t-elle, « nous accueillons le discours du président comme une importante contribution à ce débat essentiel et à ce devoir national ».

« Nous sommes d'accord avec le président sur le fait qu'il y a encore des détails à préciser », a conclu Kathy Saile. « Après son discours, nous voyons l'opportunité de travailler pour une politique sanitaire universelle qui respecte la vie et la dignité humaine, dont l'accès est ouvert à tous, avec une attentions spéciale pour les pauvres, et qui inclut les immigrés en situation régulière ».

ZÉNIT


maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 21/09/2009 03:47:53 (21/09/2009 12:47:53)

OBAMA TO MAKE ILLEGAL ALIENS LEGAL AND THEN FREE HEALTH INSURANCE

Obama Won’t Give Federal Insurance Benefits to Illegal Aliens, He’ll Make Them Legal First

Thursday, September 10, 2009
By Terence P. Jeffrey, Editor-in-Chief

(CNSNews.com) - In his speech to a joint session of Congress last night, President Obama said that his health care reform plan will not insure “illegal immigrants.” The statement instantly became a matter of controversy when Rep. Joe Wilson (R.-S.C.) yelled out in the House chamber, “You lie.”

Wilson has since apologized for his outburst.

But President Obama’s statement about illegal aliens and health care reform deserves further scrutiny.

“There are also those who claim that our reform efforts would insure illegal immigrants,” said Obama. “This, too, is false. The reforms I'm proposing would not apply to those who are here illegally.”

It is true that both the House and Senate health care bills as they are now drafted would make illegal aliens ineligible for federally funded health care. But President Obama has stated as recently as last month at a press conference in Mexico that he will seek “comprehensive immigration reform” legislation that will put illegal aliens on a “pathway to citizenship.”

Viewed in combination, the president’s health care and immigration reform plans would in fact let people who are illegal immigrants in the United States today receive federally funded health care benefits when the plan comes on line. In his speech last night, the president said that the health insurance exchanges where people would buy federally subsidized insurance would not begin operating until four years from now. If Obama follows through on his agenda as planned, immigration reform will be enacted in the intervening time.

Section 246 of the health care reform bill that has been approved by three House committees is titled, “No Federal Payment for Undocumented Aliens.” It says, “Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States.”

The bill passed by the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, defines an “eligible individual” under the bill as “a citizen or national of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence or an alien lawfully present in the United States.”

At an August 10 press conference in Guadalajara, Mexico, President Obama was asked this question: “I wonder if you can tell us what you think the prospects are for immigration reform, for comprehensive immigration reform, which you've said is your goal; and whether you think that the blows you're taking now on health care and that the Democrats are likely to take around the midterm elections will make it hard, if not impossible, to achieve comprehensive immigration reform in this term.”

Obama responded that he was “confident” he would get immigration reform that created a “pathway to citizenship” for illegal aliens.

“Now, am I going to be able to snap my fingers and get this done? No,” said Obama. “This is going to be difficult; it's going to require bipartisan cooperation. There are going to be demagogues out there who try to suggest that any form of pathway for legalization for those who are already in the United States is unacceptable. And those are fights that I'd have to have if my poll numbers are at 70 or if my poll numbers are at 40. That's just the nature of the U.S. immigration debate.

“But ultimately, I think the American people want fairness,” Obama continued. “And we can create a system in which you have strong border security, we have an orderly process for people to come in, but we're also giving an opportunity for those who are already in the United States to be able to achieve a pathway to citizenship so that they don't have to live in the shadows, and their children and their grandchildren can have a full participation in the United States. So I'm confident we can get it done.”

So, the bottom line is this: Obama intends to enact health-care reform legislation that expressly prohibits giving federal health insurance benefits to illegal aliens. He then intends to enact “comprehensive immigration reform” that will make illegal aliens into legal residents of the United States thus making them eligible for the new federal health insurance benefits created by his health-care reform bill.

Illegal immigrants won’t get federal health insurance benefits under Obama’s plan because they won’t be illegal immigrants anymore, they will be legal immigrants.


http://minutemanproject.com/newsmanager/templates/mmp.asp?articleid=1096&am…

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 25/09/2009 02:39:49 (25/09/2009 11:39:49)

FREE SPEECH IS BEING ASSAULTED

THE FOURTH REICH IS UPON US

Aaron Cantor Bio
Shop CFP
By Aaron Cantor Thursday, September 24, 2009

Free speech is being assaulted right in front of all of ‘We The People’, that is to say us Americans.

Investigation against Humana Inc.

Obama has told his Health and Human Services Department to begin an investigation against Humana Inc. a health services corporation based in Louisville, KY.

Teresa DeCaro an official of Health and Human services, sent a letter to ALL companies that sell private Medicare coverage and/or stand alone drug plans to seniors.

Acting on a complaint by Max Baucus (D-Mont)who is the chair of the finance committee (gang of six), concerning a mailer that was sent out by Humana Inc. to it’s customers, he said “it is not acceptable for insurance companies to mislead seniors regarding ANY subject, particularly on a subject as important to them and to the nation as health care reform”.

So, I guess according to “Der Fuehrer”, Humana Inc., (which entity is the same as a person under law), does not have the right of free speech to express an opinion?

ACHTUNG, ACHTUNG, ACHTUNG!: You will immediately cease and desist, you will say nothing that is not first cleared by “Der Fuehrer” or one of his appointed deputies (read that Czars).

At this rate it wont be too long before “Der Fuehrer” and all of his Czars will begin wearing uniforms with Sam Brown Belts, high boots, and lightning bolts on their lapels.

After that speech he gave at the U.N., it has become abundantly clear that he has not only sold out Poland and the Czech Republic, but Israel as well, and has made our remaining allies very nervous, and wondering if they can trust anything this man says.

There doesn’t seem to be any way to remove this usurper from office, unless it can be proven beyond a doubt, that he is not eligible to sit in the White House.

O’reilly can call me a birther if he wants, but I dont believe Obama is a natural born citizen of this country. If he were, why has he spent so much time and money resisting showing his documents?

Let us have a look at your supposed birth certificate and while you’re at it, let us see your Occidental college records, which I hear listed you as a foreign student in order to get Fulbright tuition money. I guess you like lieing in order to have other people pay your freight.

“Der Fuehrer” is a fake, a fraud, and charlatan, and he is ruining our country. He needs to get his behind out of our White House while we still have a country left!!!


http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/15064

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 29/09/2009 07:17:00 (29/09/2009 16:17:00)

SENATE PANEL REJECTS PUBLIC HEALTHCARE OPTION



The panel voted 16-8 against a government-run insurance plan in the first of several battles expected in Congress over the issue.

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Senate Finance Committee on Tuesday easily rejected the inclusion of a government-run "public" insurance option, backed by President Barack Obama, in its sweeping healthcare reform bill.

The panel voted 16-8 against a government-run insurance plan in the first of several battles expected in Congress over the issue, one of the most contentious in the raging U.S. debate over healthcare reform.


http://myflanews.com/cc-common/news/sections/newsarticle.html?feed=104668&a…


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 Suiv.

Index du forum
DEPOPULATION DE LA TERRE/DEPOPULATION OF THE EARTH
RÉFORME DES SOINS DE SANTÉ - PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE - HEALTH CARE REFORM

Haut
Aller à : Les favorisPAROLE DU SEIGNEUR POUR CES TEMPS DE LA FIN/WORD OF GOD IN THE END TIMESSITES RECOMMANDÉSCONFÉRENCE ET/OU MOBILISATION + NASAPRENDRE NOTE QUE :ORGANISATION DES NATIONS-UNIES/UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATIONCONSEIL MONDIAL DES ÉGLISES/WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHESRÉSUMÉ DE LA SITUATION MONDIALE PAR VICLA MARQUE DE LA BÊTE/THE MARK OF THE BEASTTERREUR SUR LA TERRE/TERROR ON EARTHLES CAMPS DE CONCENTRATION/CONCENTRATION CAMPSFASCISTE ENVIRONNEMENTAL/ENVIRONMENTAL FASCISTNOUVELLES LOIS ANTITERRORISTES/NEW ANTITERRORIST LAWSPROJET FUTUR POUR LES ENFANTS/FUTUR PROJECTS FOR KIDSDEPOPULATION DE LA TERRE/DEPOPULATION OF THE EARTHCANADAISRAËL et le MOYEN-ORIENTTRAITÉ DE L'AMERIQUE DU NORD/NORTH AMERICAN UNION (CANADA-USA-MEXICO)SECTION DE GAÉTANVIDÉOS/VIDEOS

Membre: Ajouter ce sujet à mes favoris | Envoyer ce sujet à un(e) ami(e) | Imprimer ce sujet
Modérateurs : Déplacer ce sujet | Fermer ce sujet | /!\ Supprimer le sujet
Ajouter une réponse rapide
Ajouter une réponse rapide


Administration
Modération
Ce forum pour votre site ?
AceBoard Forum Gratuit v 5.3
Download Premium Web Templates! - blog gratuit
audit et mesure d'audience visiteurs internet par


Revenir en haut
Publicité






MessagePosté le: Mar 15 Mai - 15:08 (2012)    Sujet du message: Publicité

PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?
Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 686
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 15 Mai - 15:10 (2012)    Sujet du message: RÉFORME DES SOINS DE SANTÉ - PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE - HEALTH CARE REFORM - P.2 Répondre en citant

Administrateurs :maria
Forum LE VOILE DÉCHIRÉConnecté sous maria | Se déconnecter
en ligne : Il y a 9 connectés. Cliquez pour voir la liste
Inscription
|
Profil
|
Messages Privés
|
Recherche
|
Online
|
Aide
| Créer un blog gratuit



Index du forum
DEPOPULATION DE LA TERRE/DEPOPULATION OF THE EARTH
RÉFORME DES SOINS DE SANTÉ - PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE - HEALTH CARE REFORM


Notification par email
|
Prévenir les modérateurs

Pages :

Prec. 1 2 3 4 5 Suiv.
Auteur :Sujet: RÉFORME DES SOINS DE SANTÉ - PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE - HEALTH CARE REFORM Bas
maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 30/09/2009 03:47:45 (30/09/2009 12:47:45)

OBAMACARE IS 21st CENTURY EUGENICS (Part 6)



Bob Kemp September 28, 2009
By Bob Kemp

January 30, 1933, Adolf Hitler becomes Chancellor of Germany. Once in power, Hitler set about to establish a dictatorship. On March 7, 1933, the Enabling Bill was passed which gave full powers to Adolf Hitler. Within months all non-Nazi parties, labor unions and organizations did not exist. Hitler used his powers of persuasion to win many over to his political ideologies and beliefs. If you opposed him, you did so at your own risk. When Germany's President Paul von Hindenburg died on August 2, 1934, the armed forces leaders and others assented to the merging of powers of the chancellorship and the presidency. Adolf Hitler now possessed full and complete power in Germany, including supreme command of the armed forces of the Reich. From that moment on, until the end of World War II some eleven years later, everyone in the armed forces of Germany, as well as the Hitler Youth swore an oath to Adolf Hitler himself. They did not take an oath the nation or its Constitution, but to a man.

Read more :
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/kemp/090928

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 30/09/2009 06:21:12 (30/09/2009 15:21:12)

DEM. Rep: GOP WANTS SICK TO 'DIE QUICKLY'

Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:57 AM

A Democratic congressman from Florida is refusing to apologize for saying that Republicans want Americans who get sick to just "die quickly." Republicans on Wednesday were planning an effort to scold him just as Democrats chastised a Republican lawmaker earlier this month.

Rep. Alan Grayson made his comments on the House floor Tuesday night while criticizing Republican healthcare proposals as a "blank piece of paper."

"If you get sick, America, the Republican healthcare plan is this: die quickly," he said. "That's right. The Republicans want you to die quickly if you get sick."

His remarks weren't spontaneous: He reinforced the point with signs saying the same thing.

Republicans are likening Grayson's remark to South Carolina Republican Rep. Joe Wilson's widely criticized shout of "You lie!" during President Barack Obama's address to Congress earlier this month. They say Democrats should insist that Grayson apologize just as they insisted Wilson should.

Rep. Tom Price of Georgia, who heads the party's conservative Republican Study Committee, was planning to introduce a "resolution of disapproval" over Grayson's behavior that mirrors one Democrats approved against Wilson. Michael Steel, a spokesman for House Republican leader John Boehner, said Boehner supports the resolution.

Grayson, a first-term Democrat known for being provocative, represents a Republican-leaning district around Orlando and was already among the GOP's top targets for the 2010 elections.

Ken Spain, spokesman for the House Republican campaign arm, said Democrats should be "lining up to call on him to apologize."

"House Speaker Nancy Pelosi now has an opportunity to condemn the very behavior and tone of this healthcare debate that she claims will 'incite violence,'" he said, referring to Democratic concerns that the bitter tone of the healthcare debate could lead to attacks.


http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/gop_healthcare_die_quick/2009/09/30/2666…

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 02/10/2009 00:32:55 (02/10/2009 09:32:55)

GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATES OBAMACARE OPPONENTS

The words is out... the game is played... the man behind the curtain has been exposed... and it's now as plain as the nose on your face. Obama and the leftists in Congress don't want you to know what's in ObamaCare... they just made it clear that they just may try to hide all the sordid details from you.

But what's even worse, Obama and the leftists in Congress may even be trying to muzzle, and intimidate, those who dare to speak out against ObamaCare.

It's becoming more and more apparent that Obama and the leftists in Congress don't want the American people to know... or read... or hear anything negative about ObamaCare... and that they may be willing to shut-down debate by any means necessary.

One thing is certain, Obama and the leftists in Congress are leaving the door wide open to enact ObamaCare in the dead of night... under the cover of darkness... shove it down our throats before any of us are any the wiser.

When Senator Jim Bunning offered an amendment that would have required that the language of the bill be made available to the American people 72 hours prior to a vote, Democrats on the Senate Finance Committee squashed it.

Michael Franc, writing for the Heritage Foundation's blog, The Foundry gives us the sordid and sickening details:

"During the Senate Finance Committee mark up of the Baucus health bill ... Senator Bunning of Kentucky put forth an innovative amendment. This amendment stipulated that before voting on the measure in Committee, legislative language would have to be accessible to the public for 72 hours and that the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) would need to publish an official tally of how much this bill will cost the American people and what the real impact will be on health costs."

Franc continued:

"The amendment failed 11-12 on nearly a party line vote. Senator Blanche Lincoln (AR) was the sole Democrat to support this attempt at transparency. The bottom line: when the committee completes its work on this re-make of one-sixth of our economy, Senators will have voted on a phantom - a bill that does not exist with costs that are unknowable until, that is, the unelected legislative draftsmen write the real bill in some back room on Capitol Hill."

If nothing else that has transpired up to this point has convinced you that ObamaCare must be rejected... thrown aside... taken off the table... these shenanigans should.

It's time to tell our elected officials that no good can come from ObamaCare... that's it's rotten to the core... and that it must be scrapped.

...


http://www.c4strategies.com/exposeobamaobamacareixbe.html

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 05/10/2009 00:56:24 (05/10/2009 09:56:24)

NAZI AMERICA

AMERICANS THREATENED WITH JAIL TIME, HUGE FINES FOR REFUSING TO BUY HEALTH INSURANCE

FRANÇAIS : USA : SI LES AMÉRICAINS NE SOUSCRIVENT PAS À UNE ASSURANCE MALADIE, ILS SERONT JETÉS EN PRISON!
http://www.spreadthetruth.fr/wordpress27/?p=3873

Tuesday, September 29, 2009 by: Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor

(NaturalNews) There's a popular video circulating on the 'net right now about how to escape handcuffs without using a key. Americans are watching the video to bone up on essential skills that will soon be needed for health care reform, it seems, since the new laws that are about to be put in place call for Americans to be arrested and thrown in jail if they refuse to buy health insurance.

This has now been confirmed by Tom Barthold, the Chief of Staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation, in a hand-written note to a Republican Senator (http://www.politico.com/livepulse/0...). And it's not merely about jail time; it's also about the $25,000 fine that could be levied by the IRS against individuals who refuse to buy health insurance.

That this is even being considered just boggles the mind. If a person is too broke to afford health insurance right now, how are they supposed to be able to buy it after paying a $25,000 fine and spending a year in prison?

As Paul Craig Roberts brilliantly pointed out in a recent essay, this is like trying to solve the homeless problem by forcing homeless people to buy a home, then throwing them in prison when they can't afford to. Up to twelve U.S. states are now considering legislation to override the federal government's intent to require mandatory health insurance (http://slatest.slate.com/id/2230521...) and (http://www.timesoftheinternet.com/1...).

There's even a growing argument that requiring Americans to buy health insurance is unconstitutional (http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/0...). And there's no question that imposing a penalty on Americans who refuse to buy health insurance is, indeed, a new tax (http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/e...).

There's never enough money to pay for a nation full of sick people

The current health care disaster in America is not simply a problem of people refusing to buy health insurance; it's an issue of people not being able to afford to buy health insurance. When the annual insurance premium for a family of four is something above $13,000, that's a terrible financial burden that many Americans simply can't afford to pay -- especially when so many people have lost their jobs due to the faltering economy.

The brutal facts of the matter are inescapable: The American people are too broke to buy their own health insurance, and the American government is too broke to buy it for them. The whole nation is going bankrupt over runaway health care costs. And why? I hate to invoke the "I told you so" phrase in a crisis like this, but the reasons for all this have been apparent for many years, and we've been regularly reporting them on NaturalNews: Our national "health care" system is really a "sick care" system that pushes deadly chemicals and medically-unjustified surgical procedures instead of teaching people how to stay well.

As long as junk food companies and pharmaceutical companies are allowed to run advertisements on television, and as long as the FDA and FTC continue their campaigns of censorship against nutritional cures and natural remedies, we will always have a health care crisis. You know why? Because no nation in the world can afford to foot the bill for a country full of sick people.

Why I don't carry health insurance

I don't have health insurance. Well, not the kind people normally think of as health insurance. As a result of not paying premiums for over five years now, I've saved a small fortune in premiums.

Why don't I need health insurance? Because I don't visit doctors and I don't get sick. If you don't get sick, you don't need health insurance.

Of course, silly doctors ask, "Well what if you suddenly get sick out of the blue?"

What, you mean through voodoo or something? Sickness without cause? Do doctors really believe in spontaneous sickness that magically appears without reason?

All sickness has a cause. That much should be obvious. And if you eliminate the causes of disease, you won't experience disease. That's why I have a different kind of health "insurance" -- my nutrition.

Yep, my nutrition is the only health insurance I need. In my garden in Ecuador, we grow huge quantities of health-protecting foods and superfoods. Those foods, combined with high-end nutritional supplements (Moxxor, Living Fuel, Boku Superfood, etc.) provides the perfect nutritional environment for outstanding health. That gets further supported with daily sunshine and exercise, plus the complete avoidance of toxic chemicals in consumer products (I don't use conventional shampoos, soaps, deodorants, hair products, skin products, etc.).

Given this level of natural health, why would I bother with conventional health insurance in the first place? Pharmaceuticals are of no use to me. Neither are prostate screening procedures, annual checkups or vaccinations. I have no need for western medicine. So why should I be forced to financially support the health insurance companies that push these poisons onto health consumers?

We're all criminals?

President Barack Obama wants to label me a criminal. He wants to fine me twenty-five thousand dollars and throw me in prison for one year for my refusal to pay money into a corrupt, broken sick care system.

Note that the people who are destroying their own health -- and putting huge cost burdens on the health care system -- are not considered criminals at all. People can destroy their own bodies through junk foods, toxic chemicals and substance abuse... but as long as they pay up, they're considered "good Americans" who are participating in the health care system. Meanwhile, people like me who take care of our own health, who place no burden whatsoever on the health care system, and who refuse to pay mandatory premiums into a corrupt health insurance industry are going to be threatened with arrest and imprisonment.

This disturbing fact tells me that Obama, much like Bush before him, has forgotten what freedom is. America is being turned into a medical police state where parents have their children stolen away by cancer clinics (true story), where chemical injections are enforced at gunpoint (also true), and where unaffordable, inefficient and utterly ineffective "sick care" is forced upon citizens with or without their consent. The whole premise of democracy is being destroyed in this quest to appease the sick care system that preys on upon the American people with each passing year.

"But wait," some people say. "Full participation is all for the greater good."

No, not really. What would be best for the greater good would be the transformation of the FDA and FTC into agencies that actually protect the public instead of Big Pharma. The greater good would be served by legalizing free speech for nutritional supplements and natural remedies, ending the tyranny of attacks against medical marijuana, and sending all the MDs back to medical school so they could learn something about nutrition.

The greater good is in no way served by forcing Americans to funnel yet more money into a corrupt, broken system of dishonest insurance companies and unethical hospitals pumping people full of deadly pharmaceutical chemicals. That system is dead. It has failed, and it has no place in the future of any successful nation.

If we don't soon recognize this fact and seek to advance into a new era of natural medicine and disease prevention, this sick-care medical industry will wring every last dollar from the U.S. economy until the American people find themselves diseased, penniless and medically enslaved. (And we're already half-way there...)

Thanks to the sick-care policies of previous presidential administrations, the American people today have already lost their health. And now, with Obama's reform proposals, they are about to lose their freedoms, too.

Albert Einstein once said, "Problems cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created them." And yet Obama is bringing no genuinely new thinking to the table on health care reform; he's just changing who pays for disease. Now, more than ever, our national leaders need to not just think outside the box; they need to stomp on the box, disassemble the box, throw the box in the recycling bin and forget there ever was a box. They need revolutionary solutions that can help this country overcome its addiction to pharmaceuticals and junk food while unleashing a new era of personal health combined with personal responsibility.

Until that happens, all this talk about health care reform is just the senseless animation of lips and vocal chords without purpose.

Learn more about my position on Obama's health care reform in this article that explains why Obama's health care reform isn't real reform at all:
http://www.naturalnews.com/027125_h...

Additional sources for this story include:
Politico
http://www.politico.com/livepulse/0...

American Thinker
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog...

CBS News
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/0...

Boston Globe

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/e...

http://www.naturalnews.com/027124_health_health_insurance_America.html

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 10/10/2009 08:49:17 (10/10/2009 17:49:17)

CONGRESS’ SECRET PLAN TO PASS OBAMACARE - CONFIRMED

By Heritage Foundation Thursday, October 8, 2009

Leaders in the House and Senate have a plan to pass President Barack Obama’s sweeping health care plan by Thanksgiving without any significant participation by the American public. CNS News has confirmed the details in our September 22nd titled “Passing a Shell of A Bill: Congress’ Secret Plan to Ram Through Health Care Reform.” Nicholas Ballasy reports “a senior aide to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) told CNSNews.com that it is ‘likely’ that Reid will use H.R. 1586—a bill passed by the House in March to impose a 90-percent tax on bonuses paid to employees of certain bailed-out financial institutions—as a ‘shell’ for enacting the final version of the Senate’s health care bill, which Reid is responsible for crafting.”

This story confirms the four part scenario that would railroad the bill through the Senate using a very unusual closed door procedure to craft the bill with no input from the American people.

The four stage plan to pass Obamacare has been publicly confirmed and is ready to be implemented. The following is a comprehensive update:

Step One: “The Senate Finance Committee will finish work on the marking up of Senator Max Baucus’ (D-MT) conceptual framework for legislation by this Friday.” Progress on this had been stalled and the bill was not passed by the end of last week.

Foxnews.com is reporting that the Congressional Budget Office score of the bill will be released later today and a high score may further stall progress on the Committee’s Vapor Bill. Senate Finance Committee’s progress on passing something out of committee – INCOMPLETE.

Step Two: Next, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will take the final product of the Senate Finance Committee and merge it with the product of the Senate Health, Education, Labor & Pensions (HELP) Committee. CNSnews.com has confirmed that “the actual final text of the legislation will be determined by Reid himself, who will consolidate the legislation approved by the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee and the still-unapproved legislation from the Senate Finance Committee.

Reid will be able to draft and insert textual language that was not expressly approved by either committee.” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will write the final version of Obamacare to be considered in the Senate with no input from the American people. This is an extremely complex procedure that will not be done in public, or in the form of a hearing, or a public conference committee, and only Senator Harry Reid, some other Senators chosen by Reid and Obama Administration officials will be allowed to read the bill before the Senate debate starts.

Merger of the bills – IN PROGRESS.

Step Three: Senator Reid will then move to proceed to H.R. 1586, a bill to impose a tax on bonuses received by certain TARP recipients. A senior aid to Senate Majority Leader Ried has confirmed that he will move to proceed to Senate Calendar Number 36, H.R. 1586, or another House passed tax measure, so the Senate can avoid the Constitutional mandate that tax bills originate in the House. Proceed to tax shell of a bill – CONFIRMED.

Step Four: This scenario would most likely be implemented after the Massachusetts state legislature gives Governor Deval Patrick the power to appoint a new Senator and that Senator is seated by the Senate. The Senate swore in new Massachusetts Senator Paul Kirk on September 25th. Change Law of Massachusetts to allow for interim Senator – COMPLETE.

The final step in this plan is for the House to take up Obama care, without amending the legislation, and then sending that bill directly to the President for his signature. Matt Cover at CNSnews.com reports “House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) won’t rule out having the House vote on the Senate health-care bill without making any changes in it, which would allow the bill to go directly to President Barack Obama without having to pass through a House-Senate conference committee and another round of votes in the House and Senate–and a longer period of public scrutiny of what the text of the proposed law actually says.” This scenario is in the process of being implemented and, if successful, it will result in Obamacare being on the President’s desk in time for Thansgiving with minimal participation of the American public.

The San Francisco Examiner published an editorial today that exposed the fact that the American people can’t see the bill. “When then-Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama promised not to sign major legislation until it had been posted on the Internet for public reading at least five days, trusting voters took him at his word. Now they know better. Not only is the actual language of what is likely to become the main legislative vehicle for Obama’s signature health care reform not available on the Internet, it hasn’t been given to members of the key Senate committees or the Congressional Budget Office.”

The procedure being used, in addition to the exclusion of the American people from the process, should be of grave concern to all who want to participate in democracy and have a say in Congress’ health care reforms that will touch 1/6th of the American economy.


http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/15586

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 12/10/2009 05:14:18 (12/10/2009 14:14:18)

THE EXCEEDINGLY UGLY HEAD OF ADULT EUTHANASIA REARED ITS UGLY HEAD WHEN FORMER CLINTON SEC/LABOR ROBERT REICH OPENLY STATED THAT, UNDER OBAMA'S HEALTH CARE, OLD PEOPLE WOULD HAVE TO DIE!

Monday, October 12, 2009

NEWS BRIEF: "Robert Reich On Health Care: Old People Have to Die http://www.prisonplanet.com/robert-reich-on-health-care-old-people-have-to-… , Prison Planet, October 10, 2009

"Robert Reich, Clinton’s Secretary of Labor and avid Obama supporter, wants to deny health care to old folks. They’re too expensive. He also told an audience in 2007 that most people will not live longer than their parents. Again, too expensive. He wants to force medical technology corporations to stop developing new life-saving technology."

While this news story may seem ludicrous to many, people who have been following the Neo-Nazi New World Order plan are not surprised. The old Nazi attitudes which spawned the genocide that murdered 6 million Jews and 12 million other devalued people are back. Our politicians have this attitude, and, most ominously, too many doctors and nurses have this attitude. This latter point is most somber because nurses and doctors were in the leadership role of the genocide all the way to the end of the war, in 1945. (Robert J. Lifton, "The Nazi Doctors")

But, now let us get back to our story, to see how this genocidal attitude is one of the cornerstones of the new Obama Health Care system.

"Reich, of course, supports the so-called 'public option', the government’s take-over of the health care industry ... Mr. Reich’s pronouncement is yet another confirmation that the government wants to kill old people who are after all — according to our eugenicist rulers — nothing if not useless eaters. Democrats and liberals went ballistic when Sarah Palin mentioned the fact that the government wants to use the 'level of productivity in society' as the basis for determining access to medical care. This Darwinian and Malthusian concept is supported by Dr. Ezekial Emanuel, brother of Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and White House health care policy adviser."

Of course, the term that Sarah Palin made most famous was "Death Panels", correctly stating that Obama's Health Care plan would set up panels which would determine if, and when, people would get the care they needed. In the past, these panels have turned into "Death Panels", where certain elderly and/or sick people were denied the life-saving treatment they so desperately needed.

We encourage you to listen to the video provided at this news story, for Reich's words are most somber.

Once again, we reiterate that killing old people either directly as the Nazis did or indirectly through denying them life-saving medical care, is most definitely a significant part of the New Age plan to establish the global system which they call the New World Order.


http://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/newsalert.htm

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 18/10/2009 09:03:27 (18/10/2009 18:03:27)

IDENTIFYING THE ENEMY AND MURDERERS IN THE HEALTH CARE WARS

"Now all the criminals in their suits and ties are free to drink martinis and watch the sunrise"
--Bob Dylan

October 18, 2009 at 12:52:04
By Rob Kall

When I hosted an interview with Wendell Potter, at a town hall, in September, one audience member asked about the possibility of prosecuting health insurance CEOs for murder. Wendell replied, "Good luck."

Well, here's a link to info about a meeting where a lot of health insurance leaders will be attending.

This would be an interesting place for protest and more to occur. I can envision signage about murderers and Real Death Panels.

The battle is intensifying. These people are the enemy.

Are CEOs and employees who take a role in denying health care coverage murderers? I guess you can look at this from different perspectives. There are state and federal laws. Do they shoot or kill or poison? No. But at some level, these people-- the administrators who set policy and the lower level workers who dole out the bad news are literally making decisions, based on profits, that kill people.

Activists are beginning to protest at corporate headquarters. Conferences like the one linked to above seem to also be good targets to get a message out.

If a person works for one of these insurers, they are complicit, helping enable these companies to not only withold healthcare from paying insureds. They are helping the insurers to fight changes in law that would help the un-insured.

There are many ways to kill.


http://www.opednews.com/articles/Identifying-the-Enemy-and-by-Rob-Kall-0910…

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 21/10/2009 05:12:13 (21/10/2009 14:12:13)

DEATH SENTENCE IF YOU REFUSE THE NEW HEALTH CARE INSURANCE?

ON THE OBAMA WEB SITE. SAW BY YOURSELF. IF YOU VOTE NO, IT'S BECAUSE YOU'RE A RACIST. CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT?

VOTE: The uninsured are a drain on the system. These people refuse to go along with what is best for them.
Soon those without health insurance will face mandatory fines, and prison terms for repeat offenders/the Amish. But maybe that is not good enough for these people.
Should people without health insurance automatically receive the death sentence by lethal injection?

CLICK HERE AND PLACE YOUR VOTE


Poll Options

Should people without health insurance automatically receive the death sentence by le
Yes, the death penalty for the uninsured will help get everyone insured.
No, i'm a racist


http://theobamaforum.com/index.php

--Message edité par maria le 2009-10-21 14:13:17--

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 21/10/2009 06:17:42 (21/10/2009 15:17:42)

Re: DEATH PENALITY FOR THE UNINSURED.

Citation:

Citation :



Quote:
Originally Posted by adam
The uninsured are a drain on the system. These people refuse to go along with what is best for them.

Soon those without health insurance will face mandatory fines, and prison terms for repeat offenders/the Amish. But maybe that is not good enough for these people.

Should people without health insurance automatically receive the death sentence by lethal injection?




My answer on : http://theobamaforum.com/showthread.php?p=143072&posted=1#post143072

EXPLAIN ME WY IT IS CRIMINAL TO NOT CHOOSE THE HEALTH INSURANCE PROPOSE BY THE PRESIDENT? WHY MISTER PRESIDENT WANT TO KILL A PERSON IF SHE DOSEN'T WANT TO TAKE THIS HEALTH ASSURANCE? IT IS NOT A CRIME IF A PERSON DOSEN'T WANT THIS ASSURANCE? WHY IS IT NOW CRIMINAL? YOU CHANGE FREEDOM IN TYRANY. THIS IS FOR THIS KIND OF LEADERSHIP, MISTER PRESIDENT RECEIVE THE NOBEL PRIZE OF PEACE?

WITH THE NEW REFORM OF HEALTH CARE, WE WILL HAVE TO PAY BUT NOT TO RECEIVE THE TREATMENT WE NEED. IF YOU SUPPORTE THIS POLITIC, YOU SUPPORTE CRIMINAL AGENDA. YOU WANT JUSTICE AND PEACE, BUT THIS IS NOT. IT'S A TOTALITARIAN DICTATROSHIP. TO WANT TO KILL PEOPLES WHO DON'T SUPPORT YOUR VIEW IT'S JUST AN OTHER WAY FOR ELIMINATE POPULATIONS. IT IS NOT THE AGENDA OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER TO ELIMINATE 80 TO 90 % OF THE POPULATION?

BUT DON'T FORGET. YOUR FAMILY ALSO IS FACING THE SAME THING HAS US IF THEY DON'T SUBMIT TO THE FALSE MESSIAH. LUCIFER UTILIZE YOU FOR NOW, BUT WHEN HE WILL NOT NEED YOU ANYMORE, HE WILL KILL YOU. LOOK ALL AROUND YOU AND SEE HOW THE DEVIL WORK.

SAW WHAT IS HAPPENING IN IRAK, PAKISTAN, AFGHANISTAN? IS IT NOT YOUR BROTHERS AND SISTERS WHO ARE KILLED BY THIS COMMANDER IN CHIEF?

I'M AN NOT RACIST AND EXTREMIST. BUT EVERYBODY WHO DOSEN'T AGREE WITH THE POLITICS OF THE PRESIDENTS ARE NOW A CRIMINAL. THIS IS FASCIST AND TOTALITARISM AND WE HAVE TO STAND AGAINST THAT.

THIS TERMS ARE USE TO PROVOKE WAR, HATE AND DESTRUCTION NOT TO UNITE IN FREEDOM AND PEACE.

SO IF YOU AGREE WITH THE VIEW OF YOUR PRESIDENT, YOU ASSOCIATE YOUR SOUL WITH THE DARK SIDE.

NOBODY CAN CHOOSE AND DECIDE FOR ME AND MY FAMILY.

WHY YOUR PRESIDENT CRIMINALIZE THE REAL CHRISTIANS? BECAUSE HE IS THE ENNEMY OF GOD AND TO THE PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE IN HIM. WHO IS YOUR PRESIDENT TO DECIDE WITH FAITH I HAVE TO BELIEVE?

CHRISTIANS DON'T KILL MUSLIMS BECAUSE THEY BELIEVE DIFFERENTLY. SO WHY MUSLIMS WANT TO KILL CHRISTIANS? WHEN MY KIDS BORN, I DON'T TEACH THEM TO HATE OTHER RELIGION OR PEOPLES. I TEACH THEM TO LOVE AND PRAY FOR OTHER. I TEACH THEM TO RESPECT OTHERS. THIS IS THE LAW OF LOVE OF MY GOD.

WHEN I SAW PEOPLES OF ISLAM AND OTHER NATIONS BE DESTROY BY THE ONES WHO TELL THEY LOVE THEM, MY HEART CRY. YESTERDAY, I JUST SAW WHAT'S HAPPENING TO THE NEW BORN BABIES IN IRAQ AND IT'S SO TERRIBLE. I PRAY FOR THE MOTHER AND FATHER WHO ARE SUFFER TERRIBLY. I HOPE THEY OPEN THEIR EYES.

PEOPLES HAVE TO KNOW THAT ISLAM IS USE BY THE VATICAN TO PUT IN PLACE THE BABYLONIAN GENOCID TO RECREATE A NEW WORLD ORDER.

WHO CARE ABOUT MUSLIM, CHRISTIANS, CATHOLIC, HINDOU, WICCA AND OTHERS? THE MASSIVE VACCINATION OF DEATH WHO ARE SUPPORT BY ALL THE NATIONS (INCLUDING ISLAMIC COUNTRIES) IS NOT A PROOF THAT THEY WANT TO KILL ALL OF US?

YESCHOUA CARE AND WANT THE BEST FOR EACH OF US. HE TOLD US ABOUT THE TIME WE ARE LIVING NOW. WE HAVE NOW TO DEFEND THE RIGHTS GOD'S GIVE US. WE HAVE TO STAND AGAINST THIS AGRESSION OF THE ENNEMY.

THIS OECUMENIC RELIGION IS A BIG LIE. THE POPE BENEDICT XVI WORKS WITH THE LEADERS OF THIS WORLD. DURING TIME HE SPEAK FOR UNITY AND PEACE, HE WORK WITH THE DESTROYER AND THE UNITED NATIONS TO PUT IN PLACE WITH THE HELP OF THE FALSE MESSIAH THE MOST TERRIBLE DICTATORSHIP OF THE TIMES.

PLEASE, NATIONS OF THE EARTH, OPEN YOUR EYES.


maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 26/10/2009 23:27:35 (27/10/2009 08:27:35)

WHEN ASKED WHERE THE CONSTITUTION AUTHORIZES CONGRESS TO ORDER AMERICANS TO BUY HEALTH INSURANCE, PELOSI SAYS: 'ARE YOU SERIOUS?'

Friday, October 23, 2009
By Matt Cover, Staff Writer


House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) (AP Photo/Lauren Victoria Burke)(CNSNews.com)

– When CNSNews.com asked House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Thursday where the Constitution authorized Congress to order Americans to buy health insurance--a mandate included in both the House and Senate versions of the health care bill--Pelosi dismissed the question by saying: “Are you serious? Are you serious?”

Pelosi's press secretary later responded to written follow-up questions from CNSNews.com by emailing CNSNews.com a press release on the “Constitutionality of Health Insurance Reform,” that argues that Congress derives the authority to mandate that people purchase health insurance from its constitutional power to regulate interstate commerce.

The exchange with Speaker Pelosi on Thursday occurred as follows:

CNSNews.com: “Madam Speaker, where specifically does the Constitution grant Congress the authority to enact an individual health insurance mandate?”

Pelosi: “Are you serious? Are you serious?”

CNSNews.com: “Yes, yes I am.”

Pelosi then shook her head before taking a question from another reporter. Her press spokesman, Nadeam Elshami, then told CNSNews.com that asking the speaker of the House where the Constitution authorized Congress to mandated that individual Americans buy health insurance as not a "serious question."

“You can put this on the record,” said Elshami. “That is not a serious question. That is not a serious question.”

VIDEO : http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/checker.aspx?v=GdSU2GZu8z

Currently, each of the five health care overhaul proposals being considered in Congress would command every American adult to buy health insurance. Any person defying this mandate would be required to pay a penalty to the Internal Revenue Service.

In 1994, when the health care reform plan then being advanced by President Clinton called for mandating that all Americans buy health insurance, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office studed the issue and concluded:

“The government has never required people to buy any good or service as a condition of lawful residence in the United States. An individual mandate would have two features that, in combination, would make it unique. First, it would impose a duty on individuals as members of society. Second, it would require people to purchase a specific service that would be heavily regulated by the federal government.”

Later on Thursday, CNSNews.com followed up on the question, e-mailing written queries for the speaker to her Spokesman Elshami.

“Where specifically does the Constitution authorize Congress to force Americans to purchase a particular good or service such as health insurance?” CNSNews.com asked the speaker's office.

“If it is the Speaker’s belief that there is a provision in the Constitution that does give Congress this power, does she believe the Constitution in any way limits the goods and services Congress can force an individual to purchase?" CNSNews.com asked. "If so, what is that limit?”

Elshami responded by sending CNSNews.com a Sept. 16 press release from the Speaker’s office entitled, “Health Insurance Reform, Daily Mythbuster: ‘Constitutionality of Health Insurance Reform.’” The press release states that Congress has “broad power to regulate activities that have an effect on interstate commerce. Congress has used this authority to regulate many aspects of American life, from labor relations to education to health care to agricultural production.”

The release further states: “On the shared responsibility requirement in the House health insurance reform bill, which operates like auto insurance in most states, individuals must either purchase coverage (and non-exempt employers must purchase coverage for their workers)—or pay a modest penalty for not doing so. The bill uses the tax code to provide a strong incentive for Americans to have insurance coverage and not pass their emergency health costs onto other Americans—but it allows them a way to pay their way out of that obligation. There is no constitutional problem with these provisions.”


http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/55971

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 03/11/2009 06:29:44 (03/11/2009 15:29:44)



WAIVER OR MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENTS UNDER SECTION 1135 OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Office of the Secretary

____________________________________________________________________

WAIVER OR MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENTS

UNDER SECTION 1135 OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT

October 27, 2009

Pursuant to Section 1135(b) of the Social Security Act (the Act) (42 U.S.C. § 1320b-5), I hereby waive or modify the following requirements of titles XVIII, XIX, or XXI of the Act or regulations thereunder, and the following requirements of Title XI of the Act, and regulations thereunder, insofar as they relate to Titles XVIII, XIX, or XXI of the Act, but in each case, only to the extent necessary, as determined by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, to ensure that sufficient health care items and services are available to meet the needs of individuals enrolled in the Medicare, Medicaid and CHIP programs and to ensure that health care providers that furnish such items and services in good faith, but are unable to comply with one or more of these requirements as a result of the 2009-H1N1 influenza pandemic, may be reimbursed for such items and services and exempted from sanctions for such noncompliance, absent any determination of fraud or abuse:

Certain conditions of participation, certification requirements, program participation or similar requirements for individual health care providers or types of health care providers, including as applicable, a hospital or other provider of services, a physician or other health care practitioner or professional, a health care facility, or a supplier of health care items or services, and pre-approval requirements.

Requirements that physicians or other health care professionals hold licenses in the State in which they provide services, if they have an equivalent license from another State (and are not affirmatively barred from practice in that State or any State a part of which is included in the emergency area).

Actions under section 1867 of the Act (the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, or EMTALA) for the direction or relocation of an individual to another location to receive medical screening pursuant to an appropriate state emergency preparedness plan or a state pandemic preparedness plan or for the transfer of an individual who has not been stabilized if the transfer is necessitated by the circumstances of the declared public health emergency for the 2009-H1N1 influenza pandemic.

Sanctions under section 1877(g) (relating to limitations on physician referral) under such conditions and in such circumstances as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services determines appropriate.

Limitations on payments under section 1851(i) of the Act for health care items and services furnished to individuals enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan by health care professionals or facilities not included in the plan’s network.

Pursuant to Section 1135(b)(7) of the Act, I hereby waive sanctions and penalties arising from noncompliance with the following provisions of the HIPAA privacy regulations: (a) the requirements to obtain a patient’s agreement to speak with family members or friends or to honor a patient’s request to opt out of the facility directory (as set forth in 45 C.F.R. § 164.510); (b) the requirement to distribute a notice of privacy practices (as set forth in 45 C.F.R. § 164.520); and (c) the patient’s right to request privacy restrictions or confidential communications (as set forth in 45 C.F.R. § 164.522); but in each case, only with respect to hospitals in the designated geographic area that have hospital disaster protocols in operation during the time the waiver is in effect.

Pursuant to Section 1135(b)(5), I also hereby modify deadlines and timetables and for the performance of required activities, but only to the extent necessary, as determined by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, to ensure that sufficient health care items and services are available to meet the needs of individuals enrolled in the Medicare, Medicaid and CHIP programs and to ensure that health care providers that furnish such items and services in good faith, but are unable to comply with one or more of these requirements as a result of the 2009-H1N1 influenza pandemic, may be reimbursed for such items and services and exempted from sanctions for such noncompliance, absent any determination of fraud or abuse.
These waivers and modifications will become effective at 5:00 P.M. Eastern Standard Time on October 29, 2009, but will have retroactive effect to October 23, 2009, nationwide, and continue through the period described in Section 1135(e). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the waivers described in paragraph 2 above are in effect for a period of time not to exceed 72 hours from implementation of a hospital disaster protocol but not beyond the period described in Section 1135(e). The waivers described in paragraphs 1(c) and 2 above are not effective with respect to any action taken thereunder that discriminates among individuals on the basis of their source of payment or their ability to pay.

The waivers and modifications described herein apply in the geographic area covered by the President’s proclamation, pursuant to the National Emergencies Act, on October 23, 2009, that the 2009-H1N1 influenza pandemic constitutes a national emergency; and former Acting Secretary Charles E. Johnson’s April 26, 2009, determination, pursuant to section 319 of the Public Health Service Act, that a public health emergency exists nationwide involving Swine Influenza A (now called 2009 – H1N1 flu), renewed by me on July 24, 2009 and October 1, 2009.


Date:

____________________________
Kathleen Sebelius
Secretary
Department of Health and Human Services


http://www.flu.gov/professional/federal/h1n1_1135waiver_10272009.html

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 08/11/2009 00:48:31 (08/11/2009 09:48:31)

SWEEPING HEALTH CARE PLAN PASSES HOUSE


Luke Sharrett/The New York Times
Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other members of the Democratic leadership at a Capitol news conference after the health care vote.

By CARL HULSE and ROBERT PEAR
Published: November 7, 2009

WASHINGTON — Handing President Obama a hard-fought victory, the House narrowly approved a sweeping overhaul of the nation’s health care system on Saturday night, advancing legislation that Democrats said could stand as their defining social policy achievement.

After a daylong clash with Republicans over what has been a Democratic goal for decades, lawmakers voted 220 to 215 to approve a plan that would cost $1.1 trillion over 10 years. Democrats said the legislation would provide overdue relief to Americans struggling to buy or hold on to health insurance.

“This is our moment to revolutionize health care in this country,” said Representative George Miller, Democrat of California and one of the chief architects of the bill.

Democrats were forced to make major concessions on insurance coverage for abortions to attract the final votes to secure passage, a wrenching compromise for the numerous abortion-rights advocates in their ranks.

Many of them hope to make changes to the amendment during negotiations with the Senate, which will now become the main battleground in the health care fight as Democrats there ready their own bill for what is likely to be extensive floor debate.

Democrats say the House measure — paid for through new fees and taxes, along with cuts in Medicare — would extend coverage to 36 million people now without insurance while creating a government health insurance program. It would end insurance company practices like not covering pre-existing conditions or dropping people when they become ill.

Republicans condemned the vote and said they would oppose the measure as it proceeds on its legislative route. “This government takeover has got a long way to go before it gets to the president’s desk, and I’ll continue to fight it tooth and nail at every turn,” said Representative Kevin Brady, Republican of Texas. “Health care is too important to get it wrong.”

On the House floor, Democrats exchanged high-fives and cheered wildly — and Republicans sat quietly — when the tally display showed the 218th and decisive vote, after the leadership spent countless hours in recent days wringing commitments out of House members.

“We did what we promised the American people we would do,” said Representative Steny H. Hoyer, Democrat of Maryland and the majority leader, who also warned, “Much work remains.”

The successful vote came on a day when Mr. Obama traveled to Capitol Hill to make a personal appeal for lawmakers to “answer the call of history” and support the bill.

Only one Republican, Representative Anh Cao of Louisiana, voted for the bill, and 39 Democrats opposed it. The House also defeated the Republicans’ more modest plan, whose authors said it was a more common-sense and fiscally responsible approach.

The Democrats who balked at the measure represent mainly conservative swing districts, signaling that those who could be vulnerable in next year’s midterm elections viewed voting for the measure as politically risky.

“Today’s may be a tough vote, but it was in 1935 when we passed Social Security,” Representative John Dingell, Democrat of Michigan and the dean of the House, said as the debate drew to a close late Saturday.

Some Democrats said they voted for the legislation so they could seek improvements in it. “This bill will get better in the Senate,” said Representative Jim Cooper, a Tennessee Democrat who has been outspoken in his criticism of some provisions of the bill but decided to support it. “If we kill it here, it won’t have a chance to get better.”

After the vote, Mr. Obama issued a statement praising the House and calling on the Senate to follow suit. “I am absolutely confident it will,” he said, “and I look forward to signing comprehensive health insurance reform into law by the end of the year.”

Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the majority leader, said he would bring a bill to the floor as soon as possible.

The vote came on the third anniversary of the 2006 Democratic takeover of the House, and the passage moves the bill well beyond the health care overhaul attempted by President Bill Clinton in 1993.

Lawmakers credited Mr. Obama with converting a final few holdouts during his appearance at a closed-door meeting with Democrats just hours before the vote. Democratic officials said that Mr. Obama’s conversation Saturday with Representative Michael H. Michaud, Democrat of Maine, was crucial in winning one final vote.

Many Democrats also credited Speaker Nancy Pelosi for pulling off a victory that proved tougher than many had predicted. “She really threaded the needle on this one,” said Representative Jim McGovern, Democrat of Massachusetts.

A critical turning point was the decision by Ms. Pelosi late Friday night to allow anti-abortion Democrats to try to tighten restrictions on coverage for the procedure under any insurance plan that receives federal money. That concession eased a threat by some Democrats to abandon the bill, but also left Democrats who support abortion rights facing a choice between backing a provision they bitterly opposed or scuttling the bill. The new abortion controls were added to the measure on a vote of 240 to 194.

Mr. Obama made his rare weekend appearance on Capitol Hill as part of an all-out effort to rally Democrats to support the biggest health care legislation since the creation of Medicare for the elderly four decades ago.

During the private meeting with Democrats in the Cannon Caucus Room, the president acknowledged the political difficulty of supporting major legislation in the face of unanimous Republican opposition and tough criticism from conservatives.

But, those present said, he urged them on, saying, “When I sign this in the Rose Garden, each and every one of you will be able to look back and say, ‘This was my finest moment in politics.’ ”

Republicans said the measure was too costly and would end up burdening the nation for decades to come. Some Democrats expressed the same view in explaining their opposition.

“This bill is a wrecking ball to the entire economy,” said Representative Jack Kingston, Republican of Georgia. “We need targeted specific reforms to help people who have fallen through the health care cracks.”

But Democrats said that Republicans were intent on protecting the status quo in health care and that the new Democratic approach would vastly improve the ability of Americans to gain affordable health insurance.

“Now is the chance to fix our health care system and improve the lives of millions of Americans,” Representative Louise M. Slaughter, Democrat of New York and chairwoman of the Rules Committee, said as she opened the daylong proceedings.

The wall of Republican opposition gave Democrats little room to maneuver, and they worked to corral as many party members as they could. But the preliminary approval to clear the way for the debate came on a 242-to-192 vote, suggesting that Democrats had a victory within reach.

The House vote was a significant step in the long-sought Democratic goal of enacting broad changes in the way health care is delivered in the nation. But the Senate has yet to bring its own emerging measure to the floor for debate, and the two chambers will still need to negotiate and approve a final bill in the weeks ahead.

The struggle House Democrats had in lining up the minimum number of votes for the measure was a clear indication of how difficult it would be to get final legislation to the president’s desk.

The House legislation, running almost 2,000 pages, would require most Americans to obtain health insurance or face penalties — an approach Republicans compared to government oppression.

Most employers would have to provide coverage or pay a tax penalty of up to 8 percent of their payroll. The bill would significantly expand Medicaid and would offer subsidies to help moderate-income people buy insurance from private companies or from a government insurance plan. It would also set up a national insurance exchange where people could shop for coverage.

Republicans forced a House vote on their much more modest plan that would expand coverage to just three million of the uninsured. But its authors said it would bring down the costs of private insurance premiums, which they argued was the chief concern of most Americans.

“More taxes, more spending and more government is not the plan for reform the people support,” said Representative Virginia Foxx, Republican of North Carolina and one of the conservatives who relentlessly criticized the Democrats’ plan.

But Democrats said their proposal was long overdue, would relieve the mounting anxiety of Americans struggling to get and retain health insurance, and would ultimately improve the economy by bringing spiraling health care costs under control.

“Our plan is not perfect, but it is a good start toward providing affordable health care to all Americans,” said Representative Peter A. DeFazio of Oregon.


http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/08/health/policy/08health.html?th&emc=th

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 10/11/2009 05:12:05 (10/11/2009 14:12:05)

BARACK OBAMA'S PROVEN DISHONESTY

Posted by RJ on November 8, 2009 at 6:00pm

Noting Barack Obama’s insults to the United Kingdom (return of a bust of Winston Churchill), his withdrawal of missile defenses from Poland and the Czech Republic, his pressure on Israel, and his plans to commit the United States to carbon emission reduction at Copenhagen, it is important for the rest of the world and especially our allies to realize that he does not enjoy what the Chinese call the Mandate of Heaven, or the moral authority to exercise any kind of leadership. His documented falsehoods about his health care “reform” agenda make him totally unworthy of the country’s trust, respect, or support.

Res ipsa loquitur means that the thing speaks from itself. This is what Barack Obama said during his Presidential campaign, from his own Web site. We will then compare it to the bill currently under consideration by Congress.

Barack Obama and Joe Biden’s plan strengthens employer–based coverage, makes insurance companies accountable and ensures patient choice of doctor and care without government interference. Under the plan, if you like your current health insurance, nothing changes, except your costs will go down by as much as $2,500 per year. If you don’t have health insurance, you will have a choice of new, affordable health insurance options.

From the bill currently under consideration by Congress:
Sec. 202 (pp. 91-92 on this site) “Protecting the Choice to Keep Current Insurance” – This section does just the opposite. It says if you get your health plan through your job, your employer will have a “grace period” and then will have to enroll you in the plan the government wants you to have. If you buy your own insurance, you won’t have a grace period. As soon as anything changes in your current contract – co-pay, deductible, term or benefit (the kinds of things often adjusted yearly) you will have to give up your current plan and enroll in the plan the “qualified plan” the government wants you to have.
The Wall Street Journal confirms this:

• Sec. 202 (p. 91-92) of the bill requires you to enroll in a “qualified plan.” If you get your insurance at work, your employer will have a “grace period” to switch you to a “qualified plan,” meaning a plan designed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. If you buy your own insurance, there’s no grace period. You’ll have to enroll in a qualified plan as soon as any term in your contract changes, such as the co-pay, deductible or benefit.

• Sec. 224 (p. 118) provides that 18 months after the bill becomes law, the Secretary of Health and Human Services will decide what a “qualified plan” covers and how much you’ll be legally required to pay for it. That’s like a banker telling you to sign the loan agreement now, then filling in the interest rate and repayment terms 18 months later.
The thing speaks for itself. A deliberate and willful falsehood is commonly known as a LIE, and that is what Barack Obama has told the country.

It is necessary at this point to call for the destruction of Barack Obama’s Presidency through all appropriate electoral and public relations methods. This includes open contempt from the American people to make it clear to Congress that he is effectively a lame duck as of now, legal challenges to his agenda (such as the health care bill), and clear statements from voters that any member of Congress who supports him will be out of a job at the end of next year.

We should in fact clean all but about thirty or so Democrats out of the House of Representatives next November, with Nancy Pelosi being at the top of the list of those to be removed. We are not happy with Pat Toomey (R-PA) for driving Arlen Specter out of the Republican Party, but if Senator Specter supports Obama on either climate change or health care “reform,” we will put a Toomey for Senate bumper sticker on our car right now.

There is a saying, “Respect the office and not the person,” but it is meaningless. Members of our Armed Forces are required by the Uniform Code of Military Justice to respect the office, and to salute this individual and call him “Sir.” We are not, and we can call him what he is: a totally unqualified and, as shown by the above material, dishonest fraud. We can no more respect his office than we can respect the judicial offices held by Luzerne County judges Conahan and Ciavarella, who were just indicted on numerous felony counts for corruption. The individual who currently occupies the White House is a sick joke who surrounds himself with the equivalent of self-made sideshow freaks (Jeremiah Wright, Al Sharpton, Van Jones, and Michael Pfleger are but examples). He bows to foreign monarchs, and he makes “shout outs” before he talks about the mass murder of American soldiers by an alleged militant “Islamic” terrorist. Barack Obama is effectively Groucho Marx as Rufus Firefly in Duck Soup, except Obama is pathetic while Marx was funny. Any position of responsibility and trust is well above Barack Obama’s pay grade. The purpose of the latter discussion is to underscore our total contempt for this individual, and to encourage others to regard him with similar contempt.

The best thing for the United States is to effectively put the Presidency into suspended animation until January 2013, and we encourage our readers to help do this through blogs, letters to the editor, attendance at “tea parties,” calls to their Senators and Representatives, and so on.


http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=18116

--Message edité par maria le 2009-11-10 14:12:42--

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 11/11/2009 02:04:13 (11/11/2009 11:04:13)

INTERVIEW WITH THE PRESIDENT: JAIL TIME FOR THOSE WITHOUT HEALTH CARE INSURANCE?

November 09, 2009 6:30 PM
From Sunlen Miller:

During an exclusive interview with ABC News’ Jake Tapper today, President Obama said that penalties are appropriate for people who try to “free ride” the health care system but stopped short of endorsing the threat of jail time for those who refuse to pay a fine for not having insurance.

“What I think is appropriate is that in the same way that everybody has to get auto insurance and if you don't, you're subject to some penalty, that in this situation, if you have the ability to buy insurance, it's affordable and you choose not to do so, forcing you and me and everybody else to subsidize you, you know, there's a thousand dollar hidden tax that families all across America are -- are burdened by because of the fact that people don't have health insurance, you know, there's nothing wrong with a penalty.”

Under the House bill those who can afford to buy insurance and don’t’ pay a fine. If the refuse to pay that fine there’s a threat – as with a lot of tax fines – of jail time. The Senate removed that provision in the Senate Finance Committee.

Mr. Obama said penalties have to be high enough for people to not game the system, but it’s also important to not be “so punitive” that people who are having a hard time find themselves suddenly worse off, thus why hardship exemptions have been built in the legislation.

“I think the general broad principle is simply that people who are paying for their health insurance aren't subsidizing folks who simply choose not to until they get sick and then suddenly they expect free health insurance. That's -- that's basic concept of responsibility that I think most Americans abide by,” Mr. Obama said, “penalties are appropriate for people who try to free ride the system and force others to pay for their health insurance.”

The President said that he didn’t think the question over the appropriateness of possible jail time is the “biggest question” the House and Senate are facing right now.

Read more from Jake Tapper’s interview with President Obama HERE.

-Sunlen Miller


+ VIDEO : http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/11/interview-with-the-president-jail-time-for-those-without-health-care-insurance.html

--Message edité par maria le 2009-11-11 11:05:34--

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 17/11/2009 01:28:14 (17/11/2009 10:28:14)

THE EMERGING MEDICAL DICTATORSHIP

Adam Murdock, MD
Campaign For Liberty
Tuesday, Nov 17th, 2009

Will it make you an enemy of the state?

As I have written about in a previous article entitled “Stop the Swine Whine,” the public health establishment has used the current swine flu hysteria to try to impose mandatory vaccination laws under the guise of a health crisis. Fortunately, these proposed laws, with the exception of New York’s short-lived mandatory health care worker vaccination mandate, have yet to come to fruition. In the case of New York some courageous doctors and nurses filed suit against the dictatorial law and were successful in getting the state government to back down.

While the constitutional crisis that this represented has been temporarily averted, a dangerous precedent has been set. It may be that in the coming months and years that these same government officials will not so easily relent. It may be as soon as the next flu season or the passage of the Obamacare health bill that our medical rights are lost forever.

We may have been granted a temporary reprieve from forced medical treatments this time around, but have we been spared from the government? As usual, the answer is “no”. While the government may not be forcing a medicine down our throats or corralling uncooperative people in camps, what they are doing should send shivers down our collective spine. They are creating lists of dissidents and “terrorists”. These lists contain detailed information on individuals. And, if ever the laws were changed to permit more coercive action instead of passive data collection then the government would already have the names of the supposed “enemies of the state” on hand.

What evidence of these government lists exists? Most people are aware of the government “no-fly” list, which now includes more than a million possible “terrorist” individuals. Additionally, there are government agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that are creating lists of supposed “domestic terrorists” including Ron Paul supporters, constitutionalists, Federal Reserve skeptics, military veterans, and many more as detailed in the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC) and DHS rightwing extremism reports. More recently, the Obama Whitehouse has created its own enemies list composed of individuals that are opponents to Obama’s socialist agenda.

There is also a group of people that range from the upper middle class to the wealthy that are frequently portrayed as “economic terrorists” by the IRS and the media. These people are often depicted as evil, selfish individuals that only acquired their living by parasitically draining it from the public. While there are indeed some individuals that fit this depiction, the vast majority are hard-working, innovative individuals who have accumulated wealth by their own efforts. Unfortunately, the media likes to lump these common Americans in with the likes of Bernie Madoff, who swindled investors out of billions of dollars, thus further engendering the false stereotype of wealthy people as being synonymous with corrupt greedy hucksters. This media and government propaganda garners increased support for forced confiscation of wealth as long as Robin Hood’s (or rather the Federal Government’s) loot is redistributed to those that have been supposedly wronged. Thus the government bribes one group of people, through promised welfare, unemployment, and medical benefits, to support increased IRS efforts to rob the savings from another smaller, but wealthier, group of Americans.

Although most of you are probably familiar with some of these government lists, many are not aware of the latest and potentially most dangerous data collection effort. Not only is the government seeking to monitor foreign, domestic, and economic terrorists but you can now add medical dissidents to the list. These dissidents include people that don’t take the prescribed government treatments, physicians who don’t follow the government protocols, and those that openly oppose any government medical measure. Traditionally, these medical dissidents could be found among the lists of conscientious objectors who refused to vaccinate their children as a prerequisite for public school enrollment. But the conscientious objectors are only the beginning.

Unbeknownst to most people that have received the H1N1 flu vaccine, they not only got a painful shot in the arm but also may have suffered a shot to their liberty. For example, as part of getting the vaccination in Texas, people are provided information about the H1N1 swine flu from the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS). While the information in the packet all seems innocent the catch comes at the end when patients are required to sign a consent to have their name entered into a government database for at least five years, if not forever.

The reason for this extraordinary period of retention seems to be that the H1N1 flu epidemic has been termed a disaster. In fact, the consent section starts with the title “Consent for retention of Disaster-Related Information and Release of Information to Authorized Entities.” Furthermore, as part of the consent patients agree to grant “retention of my (or my child’s) disaster-related information by DSHS beyond the 5 year retention period.” This information will be stored in “the states central immunization registry (’ImmTrac’)” and used for “coordinating communicable disease prevention and control efforts.”

The “disaster” justification for encroaching upon our constitutional rights is nothing new. What is new is that this “disaster” has now been exposed as at most over-blown and at worst a fraud. While many experts were predicting up to hundreds of thousands of deaths in both the UK and the U.S., the reality has been that only a few hundred have unfortunately succumbed to the “swine” flu. In addition, over the past few weeks there has been a dramatic decrease in the number of swine flu cases. It is likely that this “disaster” may be already over. Unfortunately, for the poor unsuspecting public the end of their liberty has only just begun.

What will the government do with all this information?

Because this virus has been relatively mild and vaccine compliance has been so low, the government is not likely to gain much epidemiological information. However, despite the fact that the government will glean very little information about the effects of the vaccine, this will not prevent it from monitoring those that are vaccine compliant and vaccine non-compliant. It is this list of vaccine non-compliant people that I fear will be the focus of future government pandemic vaccine intervention.

Unfortunately, the story doesn’t stop with vaccinations. Ever since the federal government began to tie reimbursement rates of hospitals with preventative medicine or “best practice” measures has come the potential for non-compliance lists of unheard proportions. It all started with Medicare mandating that hospitals “voluntarily” push pneumococcal, tetanus, and flu vaccinations on their patients or else face financial penalties. It didn’t matter if the patient came in for a broken leg, he or she would have a vaccine pushed in their face largely because of the threat of federal financial disincentives. Now the Federal government is beginning to push best practice measures in other areas. These areas include government mandates about supposedly evidence-based best treatment protocols for conditions such as heart attacks, strokes, pneumonia, heart failure, and many others. If hospitals and doctors don’t follow the protocol, they face the prospect of future blacklisting and financial hardship from federal regulators and auditors.

If that isn’t scary enough, soon these measures will affect your local primary care physician as they face the prospect of having their treatments and compliance/non-compliance to protocols for diabetes, heart failure, hypertension, and many other conditions monitored by federal auditors. In anticipation of this many large physician groups and hospital organizations are already putting this monitoring in place on their own physicians in order to help them be good little obedient physicians so that they will be prepared when the eventual mandates from government arrives.

What has made this sort of control possible is the advent of electronic medical records (EMR). With most EMR systems it is possible to data mine and extract patient non-compliance/compliance and monitor physician adherence to best-practice protocols for many conditions and preventative measures. For example, it is possible for these systems to monitor what percentage of a physician’s patients are getting colonoscopies, flu vaccines, mammograms, etc. and with the percentage comes a list of compliant and non-compliant individuals. It is with these lists that non-compliant individuals are beginning to be hounded on a never-ending basis to comply or else. This is because physicians fear economic and even possible professional retribution from state medical boards and the government if their numbers aren’t high enough.

The only saving grace right now is that the entire system is highly fragmented due to the large number of EMR systems. However, if a single-payer system becomes the dominant medical system under the current health care reform proposed by the Obama administration then it would be much easier for federal government to gather and monitor this information. It may be that soon both physicians and patients are put in medical straight-jackets where all the treatments are prescribed in advance and physicians become nothing more than desk-clerks, even more so than they already are. That is why it may be that the Obama administration is pushing EMR and why Medicare has threatened to start decreasing physician reimbursement for physicians that are not using these systems. It may have more to do with making sure that future government rationing, treatment protocols, physician compliance, and patient compliance can be strictly monitored than improving the quality of medical care.

Think that this kind monitoring could never happen in America? Well, you would be wrong. In January of 2006, New York City became the first city to require certain diabetes blood tests to be sent to the public health department where patient and physician compliance to diabetes treatment protocols are monitored. If the numbers are not good enough both the patient and physician are liable to be sent a report.

It is not too late to become anxiously engaged in fighting for your health care freedom. Just be aware that the next time you decide to be non-compliant to the treatment protocol that you may unwittingly have become part of a non-compliant list. As a member of the non-compliant list, physicians will be forced to continue to nag you on a seemingly never-ending basis until you become compliant. This is because they don’t want their name to be published as a bad physician for not getting enough patients to comply nor do they want their livelihood and certification taken away.

If we are unsuccessful in turning the tide then this system of protocols, electronic medical records, and a single-payer system will inevitably be put in place. Your only hope may be to insist that your physician uses paper and not plastic.


http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-emerging-medical-dictatorship.html

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 20/11/2009 04:42:03 (20/11/2009 13:42:03)



The cat is out of the bag... under Pelosi-Care, American citizens who refuse to purchase an Obama-approved health insurance plan will face fines of up to 250,000 dollars and up to five years in jail.



When asked what gave Congress the right to institute such a tyrannical mandate, Democratic Senator Jack Reed actually had the nerve to tell CNS News that it was constitutionally justified.

Why? Because, according to Reed, it was no different than making people “sign up for the draft.”

Got that?

As far as Nancy Pelosi and Barack Hussein Obama and Jack Reed and radical leftists in Congress are concerned, they have every right to force you to purchase a Pelosi-Obama-approved health care plan under penalty of law.

And apparently, like the draft, it's your solemn duty to purchase their so-called health care plan... or else.

If you cross them... if you are not covered by a health care plan that has the Obama-Pelosi Seal Of Approval, the IRS will assess a penalty of up to 2.5 percent of your income and if you resist paying this penalty, you can go to jail for up to five years and/or be fined up to 250,000 dollars.

Congressman Dave Camp, the Ranking Member of the House Ways and Means Committee, put it this way:

“This is the ultimate example of the Democrats’ command-and-control style of governing – buy what we tell you or go to jail.”

Specifically, when asked for the justification, under the Constitution, for Congress to make the draconian requirement, Reed told CNS News:

“Let me see... I would have to check the specific sections, so I’ll have to get back to you on the specific section. But it is not unusual that the Congress has required individuals to do things, like sign up for the draft and do many other things too, which I don’t think are explicitly contained [in the Constitution]."

"Get back to you?" ... on the Constitution? ... Is this man actually a United States Senator? ... it should be obvious, Reed has no idea what's in the Constitution. And it should be equally obvious that leftists like Reed and Pelosi and Barack Hussein Obama have little regard, if any, for the Constitution anyway.

And lastly, it should be painfully obvious exactly why Pelosi-Care (the spawn of ObamaCare) must be stopped.

Oh... one more thing just recently became obvious... it seems Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will try to ram Pelosi- Care down our throats before we even know what hit us after all.

Right after some Senior Democrats claimed last week that so-called "health care reform" would not be resolved in the Senate this year, Reid immediately (and quietly) moved to bring Pelosi-Care to the Senate floor.

Debate will start on Tuesday... even though Reid has not even finalized the Senate version of the legislation.

Whoa... just last week, Reid said, "They want us to do this the right way, not the fast way."

What a turnaround.... Why the rush Harry?

If we're going to stop Pelosi-Care, we must act now, because time is short.


http://www.c4strategies.com/he112009.html


maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 24/11/2009 02:05:48 (24/11/2009 11:05:48)

JESSE JACKSON
: 'YOU CAN'T VOTE AGAINST HEALTHCARE AND CALL YOURSELF A BLACK MAN'




By Mike Soraghan - 11/18/09 05:42 PM ET

The Rev. Jesse Jackson on Wednesday night criticized Rep. Artur Davis (D-Ala.) for voting against the Democrats’ signature healthcare bill.

“We even have blacks voting against the healthcare bill from Alabama,” Jackson said at a reception Wednesday night. “You can’t vote against healthcare and call yourself a black man.”

The remark stirred a murmur at the reception, held by the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) Foundation as part of a series of events revolving around the 25th anniversary of Jackson’s run for president. Several CBC members were in attendance, including Chairwoman Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), who’d introduced Jackson.

Davis, who is running for governor, is the only black member of Congress from Alabama.

He is also the only member of the CBC to have voted against the healthcare bill earlier this month.

Davis referred to Jackson’s 1988 run for president in a statement, issued through his office, that said he would not engage Jackson on his criticism.

“One of the reasons that I like and admire Rev. Jesse Jackson is that 21 years ago he inspired the idea that a black politician would not be judged simply as a black leader,” Davis’s statement said. “The best way to honor Rev. Jackson’s legacy is to decline to engage in an argument with him that begins and ends with race.”

Jackson said later that he "didn't call anybody by name and I won't."

He added that he wasn't saying that black lawmakers must vote a certain way. Instead, they should vote the interests of the people in their districts, and he said the healthcare bill would help Alabama because it's one of the poorest states in the country.

"The poorest people need healthcare protection," Jackson said. "They have the highest infant mortality and the lowest life expectancy. They're dying from lack of access."

Other members of the CBC found no fault in Jackson's words. Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) was in the audience. He called Jackson's criticism of Davis "accurate," but said he did not hear Jackson say "You can’t vote against healthcare and call yourself a black man."

"If it is an issue that disproportionately impacts black folks, race has to be considered," Cleaver said. Jackson, he added, "is expected by his constituency to call balls and strikes."

Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) called the remarks "vintage Jesse Jackson," but said Davis's vote against healthcare was consistent with a voting record more conservative than many CBC members.

"Artur Davis has a more conservative constituency," Waters said. "Since he's running for governor of Alabama, he reflects an even more conservative constituency."

Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-Texas) said each man was doing what he considered the right thing.

"People have a right to vote their constituency, and people have a right to speak their conscience," Jackson-Lee said. "Both happened."

Davis’s Democratic primary opponent, Agriculture Commissioner Ron Sparks, highlighted Davis’s status as the lone African-American vote against the bill.

“He was the only Black Caucus member to vote against it. I don’t get it,” Sparks said last week, according to The Associated Press. Sparks is white.

Davis said he voted against the healthcare bill because "House leadership's approach is not the best we can do." He said he preferred a version passed by the Senate Finance Committee because it reduces subsidization of the healthcare industry, taxes high-value health plans instead of wealthy people, and is more effective in getting employers to help with health coverage.

Davis has countered that Sparks’s position on healthcare has changed over time, saying he’s being “deliberately dishonest.”

The primary will be June 1. All of the GOP candidates for governor have been critical of the healthcare legislation, according to the AP.

This story was updated at 9:55 p.m.


http://thehill.com/homenews/house/68451-jackson-you-cant-vote-against-healt…

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 24/11/2009 03:07:54 (24/11/2009 12:07:54)

A SOCIALIST BLUEPRINT

UNDER THE MILITARY HEALTH CARE



By Cliff Kincaid Sunday, November 22, 2009

The outcome of the health care reform legislation in the House demonstrates that while the Republicans don't have the votes to stop it, the Catholic Church has the votes to pass it.

Could the same thing happen in the Senate?

On Nov. 7, Catholic lobbyists working for the church's bishops finalized a deal with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. An anti-abortion amendment by Rep. Bart Stupak, a Catholic Democrat, was offered and passed. The bishops then came down officially in favor of a bureaucratic plan that could spell the end to freedom of choice in health care.

The turn of events once again demonstrates the left-wing drift of the Catholic Church. But the bishops' role in passing socialized medicine is not the only evidence of such a turn. They poured more than $7.3 million of parishioners' money through the Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD) into the corrupt left-wing organization ACORN before negative publicity forced suspension of the funding.

Government-guaranteed "rights," in the view of the Catholic bishops, don't stop with health care. The papal "Peace on Earth" encyclical says that man has a "right" to "food, clothing, shelter, medical care, rest and, finally, the necessary social services."

This is a blueprint for a socialist state.

Beyond religion, there is a practical reality. The Catholic Church operates 600 Catholic hospitals. A national health care plan is a means by which some of the costs could be dumped on taxpayers.

Another factor is the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), which recently announced a major agreement with the Catholic bishops to make it easier for workers in Catholic hospitals to join unions. These employees would normally be entitled to employer-paid health insurance. But under the national health care bill, they could be transferred to a government plan offered under a health insurance "exchange."

Since it was reported in the press that Pelosi, a Catholic Democrat, sought approval from the Vatican before the critical House vote, it is important to note that L'Osservatore Romano, the Vatican newspaper, published a shocking article by Professor Georg Sans that praised the Marxist theory of alienation under capitalism.

The article said that the church "must be grateful" to Marx for explaining the concept of "alienated labor" and "surplus value."

So-called "surplus value," which is said to amount to exploitation of workers under capitalism, justifies the confiscation of private property for the "common good" and its ultimate abolition.

The notion of surplus value is supposed to reflect the amount of output that exceeds the cost of the workers to produce a commodity. By definition under Marxism, this "surplus value," the source of what is commonly called profit, constitutes exploitation of the workers.

However, as Thomas Sowell points out in his book "Marxism," the analysis ignores the value produced by the capitalists who exercised private property rights in creating the means of production and employing the workers in the first place.

Hence, the Marxist concept of surplus value, Sowell argues, is "plainly arbitrary and unsupported."

Conservative Catholics are fighting the socialist tendencies in their church. In Battle Creek, Mich., for example, they have been exposing a group called JONAH, standing for Joint Religious Organizing Network for Action and Hope. An affiliate of the Gamaliel Foundation, which originally sponsored the work of "community organizer" Barack Obama in Chicago, it works to increase government involvement in the economy to benefit selected minority groups.

Like ACORN, the Gamaliel Foundation has been funded by the Catholic Campaign for Human Development. Unlike ACORN, CCHD money continues to flow to Gamaliel. The bishops call this "social justice."

Curiously, in this mad rush for socialism, some Catholics find themselves in bed with George Soros, an admitted atheist. A review of the records of his Open Society Institute finds that a group calling itself Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good received $200,000 from his foundation over the last several years.

It lobbies for national health care.

Soros money has also gone into the Catholic Legal Immigration Network, an organization established by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops back in 1988. It has received at least $530,000 from the Open Society Institute.

The two issues merge in the fact that the Catholic bishops are demanding that national health care legislation cover illegal aliens. Their Nov. 6 letter to Congress said they "support access for immigrants to the health-insurance exchange, regardless of legal status."

A popular and telegenic priest, Jonathan Morris, who is a Fox News analyst, told Sean Hannity that the Catholic bishops support "a universal right to have access to basic health care" but not "socialized medicine."

In fact, a 1993 bishops' statement urged "concerted action by federal and other levels of government" on the issue and declared that government "has an essential role to play in assuring that the rights of all people to adequate health care are respected."

Father Morris seemed unfamiliar with the teaching of his own church. But if socialized medicine comes to the United States, the Catholic Church will bear much of the responsibility.

Cliff Kincaid is President of America's Survival Inc. (www.usasurvival.org).


http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/s_654258.html

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 03/12/2009 01:14:41 (03/12/2009 10:14:41)

HR 615

Subject : HR 615 - Please forward to everyone you know

On Tuesday, the Senate health committee voted 12-11 in favor of a two-page amendment, courtesy of Republican Tom Coburn which would require all Members of Congress and their staff members to enroll in any new government-run health plan.

Congressman John Fleming has proposed an amendment that would require Congressmen and Senators to take the same health care plan that they would force on us. (Under proposed legislation they are exempt.)

Congressman Fleming is encouraging people to go to his Website and sign his petition. The process is very simple. I have done just that at :

http://fleming.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=55&sectiontree=29,55

Senator Coburn and Congressman Fleming are both physicians.
Regardless of your political beliefs, it sure seems reasonable that Congress should have exactly the same medical coverage that they impose on the rest of us.

Please urge as many people as you can to do the same!

VIDEO :
http://fleming.house.gov/index.html


Pages : Prec. 1 2 3 4 5 Suiv.

Index du forum
DEPOPULATION DE LA TERRE/DEPOPULATION OF THE EARTH
RÉFORME DES SOINS DE SANTÉ - PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE - HEALTH CARE REFORM

Haut
Aller à : Les favorisPAROLE DU SEIGNEUR POUR CES TEMPS DE LA FIN/WORD OF GOD IN THE END TIMESSITES RECOMMANDÉSCONFÉRENCE ET/OU MOBILISATION + NASAPRENDRE NOTE QUE :ORGANISATION DES NATIONS-UNIES/UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATIONCONSEIL MONDIAL DES ÉGLISES/WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHESRÉSUMÉ DE LA SITUATION MONDIALE PAR VICLA MARQUE DE LA BÊTE/THE MARK OF THE BEASTTERREUR SUR LA TERRE/TERROR ON EARTHLES CAMPS DE CONCENTRATION/CONCENTRATION CAMPSFASCISTE ENVIRONNEMENTAL/ENVIRONMENTAL FASCISTNOUVELLES LOIS ANTITERRORISTES/NEW ANTITERRORIST LAWSPROJET FUTUR POUR LES ENFANTS/FUTUR PROJECTS FOR KIDSDEPOPULATION DE LA TERRE/DEPOPULATION OF THE EARTHCANADAISRAËL et le MOYEN-ORIENTTRAITÉ DE L'AMERIQUE DU NORD/NORTH AMERICAN UNION (CANADA-USA-MEXICO)SECTION DE GAÉTANVIDÉOS/VIDEOS

Membre: Ajouter ce sujet à mes favoris | Envoyer ce sujet à un(e) ami(e) | Imprimer ce sujet
Modérateurs : Déplacer ce sujet | Fermer ce sujet | /!\ Supprimer le sujet
Ajouter une réponse rapide
Ajouter une réponse rapide


Administration
Modération
Ce forum pour votre site ?
AceBoard Forum Gratuit v 5.3
Download Premium Web Templates! - blog gratuit
audit et mesure d'audience visiteurs internet par


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 686
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 15 Mai - 15:10 (2012)    Sujet du message: RÉFORME DES SOINS DE SANTÉ - PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE - HEALTH CARE REFORM - P.3 Répondre en citant

Administrateurs :maria
Forum LE VOILE DÉCHIRÉConnecté sous maria | Se déconnecter
en ligne : Il y a 9 connectés. Cliquez pour voir la liste
Inscription
|
Profil
|
Messages Privés
|
Recherche
|
Online
|
Aide
| Créer un blog gratuit



Index du forum
DEPOPULATION DE LA TERRE/DEPOPULATION OF THE EARTH
RÉFORME DES SOINS DE SANTÉ - PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE - HEALTH CARE REFORM


Notification par email
|
Prévenir les modérateurs

Pages :

Prec. 1 2 3 4 5 Suiv.
Auteur :Sujet: RÉFORME DES SOINS DE SANTÉ - PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE - HEALTH CARE REFORM Bas
maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 09/12/2009 02:24:05 (09/12/2009 11:24:05)

SENATE DEFEATS PRO-LIFE HEALTH CARE AMENDMENT

Posted by RJ on December 9, 2009 at 6:49am

Abortion will be funded under Reid bill

WASHINGTON, Dec. 8 /Christian Newswire/ -- The Senate defeated an amendment today that would bar funding of elective abortions in the massive health care bill. By a vote of 54-45, the Senate tabled, effectively killing, the Nelson- Hatch amendment, which is similar to the Stupak-Pitts amendment in the House.

Wendy Wright, President of Concerned Women for America, stated:

"Nelson-Hatch was a reasonable amendment that does one thing: ensures federal funds are not spent on elective abortions. What the government funds, we get more of. Without this amendment, the health care bill will violate two of Pres. Obama's promises: that the bill will not fund abortion and that he will work to reduce abortions.

"Since abortion costs less than delivery of a baby, it is not unlikely that bureaucrats, facing pressure to reduce costs, will sign off on paying for abortion but not for the health care that pregnant women and their babies need. This could lead to women being coerced into abortion by their own government.

"The Senate bill is now at odds with the House version, which prohibits funding of elective abortions.

"Federal funding of abortion will increase the number of abortions and lead to higher health care costs for women who suffer complications, such as hemorrhaging, infection, subsequent premature births, and psychological issues.

"If more children are aborted, who will pay for this massive government entitlement when it balloons in 20 years?"
Concerned Women for America is the nation's largest public policy women's organization.


http://paul-reveres-riders.ning.com/profiles/blogs/senate-defeats-prolife-h…

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 17/12/2009 04:46:19 (17/12/2009 13:46:19)

'CONGRESS JUST SIGNED MILLIONS OF DEATH WARRANTS' SAYS INTERNATIONAL PRO-LIFE LEADER

FRONT ROYAL, VA, Dec. 17 /Christian Newswire/ -- Rev. Thomas J. Euteneuer, president of Human Life International, today responded to the U.S. Senate's passing of a massive $447 billion omnibus spending bill, within which lies almost $700 million for abortion and other population control measures.

"The United States Congress has just signed millions of death warrants," said Rev. Euteneuer. "They have opened up the floodgates for murderous population controllers to use every means necessary to eliminate the weakest and poorest in developing nations."

On Sunday, December 14, the omnibus bill, which had already been approved by the House, passed the Senate by a wide margin, funding a wide variety of federal government initiatives and projects. Among the funds approved were $648.5 million for "international family planning" (including abortion and contraception) and $55 million for the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), which has been exposed as having collaborated with China's destructive and coercive "one child policy". With President Barack Obama's January 2009 reversal of the Mexico City Policy, federal funds are again permitted to be funneled toward groups that perform and promote abortion worldwide--permission that had been denied by the previous Bush administration. The bill is expected to be signed by President Obama soon.

"Our country is broke. We keep having to increase our debt limit so we can borrow more money. And we are now borrowing money so that our government can fund the killing of unborn children. I cannot imagine a scenario more shameful than that which we are now witnessing," said Rev. Euteneuer.

"When ours was a saner nation, we used to decry the exploitation and destruction of God's weakest children around the world. In many cases we would even risk our own lives to defend them. Now we are collaborating with those who think that there are too many Africans, too many Asians and Latinos, too many unwanted human beings," said Rev. Euteneuer. "May God have mercy on us as a nation and our world, and may He defend those who now stand in the crosshairs of the anti-life extremists, including those extremists in our own government."

Human Life International: Creating effective opposition to the culture of death around the world.

Founded in 1981, HLI is the world's largest pro-life organization and has affiliates in over 100 countries on six continents.


http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/9357212491.html

--Message edité par maria le 2009-12-17 13:47:35--

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 18/12/2009 15:49:34 (19/12/2009 00:49:34)

CHECK OUT 'OBAMA'S GULAG ARCHIPELAGO'

December 15, 2009

For those of you who missed the 20th Century, The Gulag Archipelago is the great work of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the Russian historian, novelist, dramatist, World War II veteran of the Red Army, and dissident and political prisoner of the Soviet Union.

Gulag means Chief Directorate of 'Corrective Labor Camps' (read concentration camps), and the word 'archipelago' compares the system of concentration camps spread out across the U.S.S.R. with a vast chain of islands known only to those unfortunates imprisoned in it and the Communist dictatorship responsible for creating and running it.

The Gulag Obama is President Barack Obama's proposed healthcare system which will create a vast federal bureaucracy designed not to improve the quality, availability and affordability of medical care, but to make Americans subservient and beholden to, and enslaved and taxed by, Obama's favored political groups, ACORN and Service Employees International Union (SEIU).

This conclusion is derived from:

The contents of the bill; and
An understanding of who authored it and why.

For convenience, we have attached a copy of the proposed Senate bill, which you can access by clicking here.

Begin on page 693, and note that the Secretary of HHS has been tasked with developing a 'National Strategy For Quality Improvement In Healthcare', and "through a transparent collaborative process, shall establish a national strategy to improve the delivery of health care services, patient health outcomes, and population health".

Excellence in medicine is not a government 'collaborative process'. It's an accomplishment of exceptionally intelligent and highly motivated people, focused on the dispassionate pursuit of science, truth and skill.

Leaving that aside for the moment and the fact that neither the Secretary nor any other bureaucrat has the relevant knowledge, skills, experience or incentive to accomplish such a goal, consider that on page 699, the President is instructed to assemble an Interagency Working Group On Healthcare Quality known as the 'Working Group'.

Click Here to Get Headline Updates and Notifications of New Editorials. It's free, and we'll never sell your information to any other party.

Click here to visit our Store.




The goals of the Working Group shall be to establish "collaboration, cooperation, and consultation between federal departments and agencies with respect to developing and disseminating strategies, goals, models, and timetables that are consistent with the national priorities" for healthcare improvement.

We are loathe to waste space with a recitation of facts, but it's instructive to note which agencies shall be responsible for this effort, and here they are:

The Department of Health and Human Services, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration, the Health Resources and Services Administration, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, the Administration for Children and Families, the Department of Commerce, the Office of Management and Budget, the United States Coast Guard, the Federal Bureau of Prisons, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the Federal Trade Commission, the Social Security Administration, the Department of Labor, the United States Office of Personnel Management, the Department of Defense, the Department of Education, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Veterans Health Administration, and any other federal agencies and departments with activities relating to improving health care quality and safety, as determined by the President (perhaps the U.S. Postal Service).

They couldn't deliver H1N1 vaccines in time for the epidemic, but we're supposed to believe that they'll efficiently and effectively create an entire new, national healthcare system which will improve quality, increase accessibility and reduce costs?

Imagine the expansion of budgets these agencies will experience, and the bureaucrats who will have vast new avenues for career advancement. Now try to conceive of any way that their involvement in your healthcare will improve your health or lower your costs.

If you can bear it, begin reading page 702 to understand the depth of involvement these agencies will have, along with ACORN and SEIU, in determining the types of medical care doctors may provide, and when and to whom they may provide it.

Here's a synopsis:

The Secretary will be empowered to develop measurement standards and tools to determine the quality and cost-effectiveness of care delivered by your doctor. She will grant contracts to outside parties, who may include community organizing groups such as ACORN, and unions such as SEIU, to develop those standards and tools.

They also will be tasked with measuring "equity of health services and health disparities across health disparity populations". 'Multi-Stakeholder Groups' will be nominated by the public to participate in this process.

The quality, availability and delivery of your healthcare will become an exercise in 'fairness', determined by 'stakeholder groups', not medical professionals.

They will have the power to establish "varying payments to doctors who order advanced diagnostic imaging services (such as mammograms) according to the physicians' adherence to appropriateness criteria for ordering such services as determined in consultation with physicians, specialty groups, and other stakeholders".

'Varying payments' means that your doctor will get paid less for providing you with services that don't conform to the dictates of these community groups. In other words, if you're a 'rich, white woman' living in a nice suburb, you're not a member of a 'health disparity population'. ACORN will reallocate resources away from your doctor and your hospital in order to address 'health disparities across health disparity populations'.

This entire process is a scheme for wealth redistribution, and you will be taxed to pay for it.

The healthcare reform plan was written by the President's good friend, Andy Stern, who heads SEIU, which contributed $60 million to the 2008 Obama campaign. SEIU also gave millions to Health Care For America NOW!, which advocates a plan, not surprisingly, that is nearly identical to the President's.

Here's Mr. Stern's opinion about the Senate's version as of December 17, 2009.

SEIU has two million members, and one of its officials admits that a significant percentage of them are illegal aliens. Contrary to the President's claims, the health care reform bill does not prohibit publicly subsidized medical care from going to illegal aliens.

The President's plan does gut Medicare, the entitlement program which pays the medical expenses for elderly Americans. Seniors have paid insurance premiums into Medicare for the past forty years.

Obama wants to cut one-half trillion dollars from it over the next ten years. The money will not be reinvested in Medicare, it will be used to fund this giant redistribution of wealth.

Under the guise of 'Comparative Effectiveness', ACORN and SEIU will determine which medical procedures are effective, which aren't, and which members of the population will be entitled to receive them.

As an example, if a medical surgery to treat colon cancer costs $100,000, a fifty year-old patient with a life expectancy of twenty years will be allowed to have it, as the cost averages $5,000 per year. A seventy year-old with a life expectancy of ten years will be denied the surgery because the cost averages $10,000 per year.

In the jargon of Obamacare, the older patient has less life potential and therefore less right to call on communal resources. That's the problem with Marxism: It treats people as fungible commodities rather than as God's children (see Marxist! Marxist! Marxist!, which we wrote more than a year ago).

The doctor/patient relationship will be replaced by the government/doctor relationship. Doctors will be compensated based upon their adherence to government mandates regarding which procedures may be performed on which patients.

The real kicker is that SEIU will organize and unionize all hospital personnel. Go wait in line at the Post Office, and then contemplate lying in a hospital bed with similarly dedicated union members in charge of your care.

If our wealthy, liberal friends think they won't get caught in Obama's healthcare gulag, they should remember that liberals always get shot first in a Marxist regime.

The future of the Democrat Party is not senior citizens or middle class Americans of any race; it's union members from Mexico and Central America and government-dependent U.S. citizens.

Barack and the Democrats will throw grandma from her scooter and give it to Jose, and they're willing to vote in the dead of night to do it.

Whether the healthcare legislation contains a public option and/or funding for abortion is beside the point.

Obamacare is a Third World healthcare system concocted by our Third World president and the union and community organizing thugs who helped elect him, and who stole the Minnesota U.S. Senate seat for Al Franken.


http://www.thefinancialskinny.com/gulagobama.html


maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 21/12/2009 02:31:53 (21/12/2009 11:31:53)

LE CADEAU DE NOËL D'OBAMA: LA RÉFORME DE LA SANTÉ?

Publié le 21 décembre 2009 à 08h16 | Mis à jour à 10h28


Le président américain Barack Obama pourrait voir son projet de réforme approuvé juste à temps pour Noël.
Photo: AFP

Agence France-Presse

Dans un premier vote crucial au coeur de la nuit de dimanche à lundi, le Sénat américain a ouvert la voie à l'adoption de l'ambitieuse réforme de la couverture santé chère au président Barack Obama, qu'ils pourraient approuver d'ici à Noël.

Après plusieurs mois de discussions entre les deux partis, de négociations avec la Maison-Blanche, et de longues discussions en commission, les sénateurs ont enfin effectué une percée décisive.

Les élus ont approuvé par 60 voix contre 40 la fin des débats sur le texte qui contient le «compromis» négocié ces dernières semaines au sein de la majorité démocrate.

Aucun des 40 sénateurs de l'opposition n'a voté oui lundi matin.

Ce premier vote conclu vers 1H20 HAE montre que le chef de la majorité démocrate du Sénat, Harry Reid, bénéficie bien - en l'absence de soutien des républicains - des 60 voix sur 100 nécessaires à l'adoption du projet de loi.

Le Sénat compte 58 démocrates, deux indépendants et 40 républicains.

Deux autres votes de procédure visant à clore définitivement les débats sur la réforme sont prévus mardi et mercredi. Le vote définitif pourrait avoir lieu jeudi soir, veille de Noël.

Mais, la Chambre des représentants a déjà adopté le 7 novembre sa version de la réforme. Une fois que le Sénat aura adopté son propre texte, il devra donc être fusionné avec celui de la Chambre.

La présidente de la Chambre, Nancy Pelosi, avait annoncé la semaine dernière semaine espérer que le projet de loi soit envoyé au président Obama pour promulgation avant son discours sur «l'état de l'Union» qui a généralement lieu fin janvier.

Les élus de l'opposition sont massivement hostiles à ceplan: Ils estiment qu'il va augmenter les primes d'assurance, mettre en danger l'assurance santé des personnes âgées (Medicare) et coûter trop cher à l'État fédéral. Ils ont tout fait pour retarder l'échéance, jugeant «arbitraire» le délai de Noël imposé par les démocrates.

Le texte de la chambre haute, vise à fournir une couverture à 31 des 36 millions d'Américains qui en sont dépourvus et à faire baisser les coûts de la santé, tout en améliorant la qualité des soins. Au total 94% des Américains de moins de 65 ans seraient couverts.

Selon le bureau du Budget du Congrès (CBO), le projet de loi réduirait le déficit américain de 132 milliards de dollars sur 10 ans, notamment en réalisant des économies sur des dispositifs tels que le Medicare. Le déficit sera également réduit sur la décennie suivante (2020-2029) selon le CBO qui a précisé dimanche que les calculs devenaient plus «incertains» au-delà de 2020.

Parmi les autres dispositions dévoilées par les démocrates samedi matin, figure l'interdiction aux assurances de refuser une couverture dans le cas de problèmes de santé pré-existants.

En revanche, le plan n'instaure pas comme l'aurait voulu le présent Obama et les principaux chefs démocrates une assurance santé publique qui serait mise en concurrence avec des assurances privées, surnommée «option publique».

Par ailleurs, quelques unes des dernières séances de négociations pour un compromis au sein de la majorité ont porté sur l'avortement.

Le démocrate Ben Nelson conditionnait son vote à l'insertion dans la réforme d'une disposition garantissant l'interdiction de l'utilisation de fonds publics pour financer les avortements. Samedi, après avoir obtenu gain de cause, il a annoncé qu'il comptait «voter pour» le projet de loi.


http://www.cyberpresse.ca/international/etats-unis/200912/21/01-932907-le-c…

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 21/12/2009 02:38:37 (21/12/2009 11:38:37)

HEALTH CARE VOTE COMING DOWN THE PIPE


Photo, right: Sens. Baucus, Reid, Dodd, and Harkin are bullish on health care reform (via Daylife).

Congress Links, Sunday eve / Monday morn edition ::

“Cloture vote foreshadows conference tussle over health bill” (The Hill). Kevin Bogardus reports: “With Nelson’s support, the Senate is expected to pass its version of healthcare reform legislation by Christmas Eve at the latest. The House passed its bill earlier this year. Big differences remain between the two bills, such as over how to handle the contentious issue of abortion, how to pay for the reforms or whether or not to include a government-run insurance plan, known as the “public option.”” For quick-handy reference, here again are the Senate and House versions of the health care reform bill, and previous OC Blog coverage of the debate.

Prof. Jacob Hacker, “Why I Still Believe in This Bill” (TNR via Memeorandum plus roundups galore).

“Nelson Pledges Support For Health Care Bill, Making Passage Likely” (FiveThirtyEidght via Google Blog Search).
“Pivotal Senate Health Vote Looms” (WSJ via Memeorandum).



“Thought experiment” (@chrislhayes, The Nation).
Much much more coverage to come tomorrow and all week, subscribe to our RSS Feed or follow us on micro-publishing or a popular social networking service to keep in touch with the latest.

Follow along with OC’s uniquely-aggregated news & blog coverage from around the web on key Senators in the health care wrangling: Lieberman (I-CT), Nelson (D-NE), Snowe (R-ME), Reid (D-NV), McCain (R-AZ), Collins (R-ME), view all.

Senate Locks Votes for Health Care Bill This Week

Photo, right: Sens. Baucus, Reid, Dodd, and Harkin are bullish on health care reform (via Daylife).

Congress Links, Sunday health care reform edition ::

“Final Senate healthcare bill released by Reid in drive for 60” (The Hill). Jeffrey Young reports: “The House passed its version of the healthcare bill last month. If Reid is able to keep his 60 Democrats in hand through a vote to approve the Senate bill scheduled for 7 p.m. on Christmas Eve, he will deliver a major victory to President Barack Obama. House and Senate Democrats would then confer during the holiday break and into January on the version that would go to Obama for a signature.” For quick-handy reference, here again are the Senate and House versions of the health care reform bill, and previous OC Blog coverage of the debate.


http://patrickhenryalliance1776.ning.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 21/12/2009 11:00:23 (21/12/2009 20:00:23)

SENATOR CALLS TWO THIRDS OF AMERICANS OPPOSING HEALTH BILL “RIGHT-WING MILITIA” RACISTS



Establishment left plays phony race card once more

Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Monday, Dec 21, 2009

Rhode Island Democratic Senator Sheldon Whitehouse today called opponents of the Obamacare bill lunatic extremists during a floor speech, failing to account for the fact that in every leading opinion poll almost two thirds of Americans fall into that category.

“They are desperate to break this president. They have ardent supporters who are nearly hysterical at the very election of President Barack Obama.” Whitehouse commented, adding “The birthers, the fanatics, the people running around in right-wing militias and Aryan support groups, it is unbearable to them that President Barack Obama should exist. That is one powerful reason. It is not the only one.”

Whitehouse cited an editorial by The relatively unknown Manchester Journal Inquirer in which the editor described the Republican party as being “dominated by the lunatic fringe”, adding that it “has poisoned itself with hate.”

Watch the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvZCOECt3a8&feature=player_embedded

Clearly, both the Senator and the bastions of journalistic integrity at the Manchester Journal Inquirer have not bothered to look at the latest opinion polls on the healthcare bill.

Had they done so they would have discovered that despite the progression of the legislation through the Senate, it is still highly unpopular with the American people.

The latest Rasmussen Reports weekly tracking update shows that 41% of voters nationwide favor the bill and 55% are opposed. Those figures are essentially unchanged from a week ago. This the fifth straight week with support for the legislation between 38% and 41%.

Almost two thirds of Americans oppose the bill in a poll from CNN eleven days ago, while 51% oppose in a recent Washington Post/ABC News poll.

An NBC/Wall St Journal poll found that just 32% believe the healthcare overhaul is a good idea, while only 36% pledged support in an AP-GFK poll.

When a journalist from the Washington Times approached Whitehouse, he denied that he was intimating that opponents of the healthcare bill were racist, and also denied that he’d even said the word “aryan”.

According to Senator Whitehouse’s logic, this means that 97% of the Washington Times’ readers are virulent racists.

Senator Whitehouse’s unfounded “racist” slur is yet another example of the establishment left playing the phony race card in an attempt to slant the debate.

Injecting the idea of discrimination in an effort to polarize a group of people is no different to actually engaging in the act of discrimination.


http://www.prisonplanet.com/senator-calls-two-thirds-of-americans-opposing-…


maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 22/12/2009 05:27:23 (22/12/2009 14:27:23)

ACORN QUALIFIES FOR FUNDING IN SENATE HEALTH CARE BILLBY PUBLIUS WEEKLY STANDARD REPORTS:



Senator Roland Burris is claiming credit for a provision in Harry Reid’s “manager’s amendment,” unveiled Saturday morning, that could funnel money to ACORN through the health care bill…

The provision he cites, found on pages 240 through 248 of the manager’s amendment, requires that six different agencies each establish an “Office of Minority Health.” The agencies are the “Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Health Resources and Services Administration, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the Food and Drug Administration, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.”…

According to a Senate legislative aide, the scandal-plagued Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now could qualify for grants under this provision. ACORN would also qualify for funding on page 150 of the underlying Reid bill, which says that “community and consumer-focused nonprofit groups” may receive grants to “conduct public education activities to raise awareness of the availability of qualified health plans.”

Earlier this year, Congress passed and the president signed into law a ban on federal funding for ACORN, but a judge ruled that that law was unconstitutional. If a higher court reverses that ruling, ACORN may be prohibited from receiving funds through the Office of Minority Health earmark. But according to the Senate legislative aide, ACORN would still “absolutely” qualify for federal funding through the provision in the underlying Reid bill because the anti-ACORN appropriations amendment would not apply to funds provided through the health care exchanges.

Read more :
http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/12/exclusive_acorn_qualifi…

maria
Administrateur
Messages postés : 14597
Posté le 24/12/2009 01:26:03 (24/12/2009 10:26:03)