LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum

LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1)
...

 FAQFAQ   RechercherRechercher   MembresMembres   GroupesGroupes   S’enregistrerS’enregistrer 
 ProfilProfil   Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés   ConnexionConnexion 

RÉFORME DES SOINS DE SANTÉ - PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE - HEALTH CARE REFORM - (PARTIE 2)
Aller à la page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  >
 
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> LA RELIGION MONDIALE ET L'ONU : SES VUES ET AGENDA SUR LE TRANSHUMANISME, CLONAGE, AGENDA DE DÉPOPULATION -> OBAMACARE : RÉFORME DES SOINS DE SANTÉ - PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE - HEALTH CARE REFORM (PARTIE 2)
Sujet précédent :: Sujet suivant  
Auteur Message
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 15 Mai - 15:24 (2012)    Sujet du message: RÉFORME DES SOINS DE SANTÉ - PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE - HEALTH CARE REFORM - (PARTIE 2) Répondre en citant



MICROCHIPPING TO BEGIN IN 36 MONTHS UNDER NEW HEALTH BILL

VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hq3vtjXEGy8&feature=player_embedded

Microchipping To Begin In 36 Months
Under New Health Bill
The new Health Care Bill, H.R. 3200, just passed by Congress has within it the requirement that all people thereunder shall be microchiped. The plans for this microchipping has been in the hooper going back to December of 2004.

Witness the actual FDA (Food and Drug Administration) document dated December 10, 2004 entitled “Class II Special Guidance Document: Implantable Radiofrequency Transponder System for Patient Identification and Health Information". This ten page document may be read on the FDA website at
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuid...

Now witness the wording within H.R. 3200, “America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009” found on Congresses’ House Ways and Means website,
http://waysandmeans.house.gov/media/pdf/111/AAHCA09001xml.pdf
On page 1001 is “Subtitle C – National Medical Device Registry” which states,

“The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that … is or has been used in or on a patient…”

In other words, everyone microchipped pursuant to the new Health Care Bill must be registered with the Secretary. The “Secretary” is defined as the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

The date by which this registry is to begin is mandated on page 1006, which is 36 months after the Health Bill becomes law.

(2) EFFECTIVE DATE. – The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall establish and begin implementation of the registry under section 519(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as added by paragraph (1) by not later than the date that is 36 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, without regard to whether of not final regulations to establish and operate the registry have been promulgated by such date.

Therefore, under the law of H.R. 3200 recently passed by Congress, microchipping of Americans must begin by the year 2013.

I cite to my often quoted Biblical scrïpture in Revelation 13:16 and 17, “And he [the AntiChrist] causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.”

Numerous times I have stated that our current Income Tax system shall be replaced with a tax upon all trade, and that everyone will have automatically deducted from every transaction of buying and selling a tax. But this tax is not the significant part. Along with this government-granted “privilege” of buying and selling, will be the required worship of the Man of Sin, that every knee shall bow and that every tongue shall confess that he is god to the glory of himself. Those refusing shall be certainly executed post haste!

Now you know what is behind the new Health Bill, H.R. 3200.


http://fightingforliberty.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=2881777:BlogPost:3…


Dernière édition par maria le Mer 25 Juil - 00:25 (2012); édité 1 fois
Revenir en haut
Publicité






MessagePosté le: Mar 15 Mai - 15:24 (2012)    Sujet du message: Publicité

PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?
Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 15 Mai - 15:26 (2012)    Sujet du message: VA LAUNCHES A HEALTHCARE DATA MAPPING PROJECT Répondre en citant

VA LAUNCHES A HEALTHCARE DATA MAPPING PROJECT


The VA's Salt Lake City hospital will host the pilot program. // Veterans Affairs


By Bob Brewin May 14, 2012


The Veterans Affairs Department has kicked off a pilot project to map the data in its Veterans Health Information Systems and Technology Architecture (VistA) to a new open healthcare data dictionary developed by 3M Company.

VA Chief Information Officer Roger Baker told reporters in March that VA and the Defense Department plan to use a common data dictionary as a key component of the integrated electronic health record the two departments will share. Initial deployment of the iEHR is scheduled for 2014.

In a request for information posted on the Federal Business Opportunities website last week, VA said it was looking for a contractor to help it map or convert VistA data elements at its Salt Lake City hospital to 3M Company’s open-source Health Data Dictionary.

VistA includes a computerized patient record system and 130 other clinical, financial, and administrative packages, of which approximately 80 contain variable numbers of clinical VistA data elements. VA said some of the packages contain standardized data elements, but most contain data that is either locally customized or completely created at local sites.

VA said it will provide the contractor selected for the Salt Lake City work with an extract of that hospital’s VistA data elements. The contractor is expected to determine which VistA files, fields and data elements in the extract are clinical in nature and eligible for mapping to the open source dictionary and describe those findings in a report.

The VistA Mapping Analysis Report will explain, for example, which files should be mapped, such as a hemoglobin test report in a clinical file, as well as those that should not be mapped.

The contractor is expected to map 6,000 clinical files to standard medical databases contained in the open source Health Data Dictionary. The department wants a complete analysis within 40 days of contract award.

3M said its Health Data Dictionary contains over 36 million clinical terms, concepts and elements.

http://www.nextgov.com/health/2012/05/va-launches-healthcare-data-mapping-project/55727/


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 15 Mai - 17:43 (2012)    Sujet du message: TeamSTEPPS Répondre en citant



TeamSTEPPS®


Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) is a teamwork system designed to improve the quality, safety and efficiency of health care. The goal of TeamSTEPPS is to produce highly effective medical teams that optimize the use of information, people, and resources to achieve the best clinical outcomes for our patients. This system can be implemented in various healthcare settings and is designed to improve communication and other crucial teamwork skills among health care professionals.

TeamSTEPPS was developed by the Department of Defense (DoD) Patient Safety Program (PSP), in collaboration with the Department of Health & Human Services’ Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), and is scientifically rooted in over 20 years of research and lessons learned from the application of teamwork principles identified in Crew Resource Management (CRM) and within High Reliability Organizations (HROs).

Click below to view a brief VIDEO on TeamSTEPPS.

For health care organizations that are interested in implementing TeamSTEPPS, numerous training curricula and ready-to-use materials are available.

Shown below is a process flow chart that depicts the various phases of planning, training, implementing and sustaining the principles and methods of TeamSTEPPS. Move your cursor over each clickable section (yellow box) of this chart to instantly access multiple resources that can be used to implement TeamSTEPPS at your health care organization.




http://www.health.mil/dodpatientsafety/ProductsandServices/TeamSTEPPS.aspx?

DoD PATIENT SAFETY PROGRAM DEVELOPERS NAMED FINALISTS FOR SERVICE TO AMERICA MEDALS

Posted by: Health.mil Staff
Monday, May 14, 2012

Heidi King, deputy director of the Department of Defense Patient Safety Program, and Dr. James Battles, social science analyst for patient safety at the Health and Human Services Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, were recently recognized as finalists for the Citizen Services Medal for their work developing and implementing the innovative team training system, TeamSTEPPS®.

Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety, or TeamSTEPPS®, is designed to improve the quality, safety and efficiency of health care to achieve the best clinical outcomes for patients.

King and Battles developed the program to improve communication and patient safety in health care facilities nearly a decade ago. Today, TeamSTEPPS® has reached more than 80 percent of DoD military treatment facilities across Army, Navy and Air Force.


The Samuel J. Heyman Service to America Medals, sponsored by the Partnership for Public Service, are awarded annually to outstanding federal employees whose accomplishments have made a significant difference in the lives of Americans.

Read more about this achievement and King and Battles’ accomplishments.

To share TeamSTEPPS® success stories, visit the Facebook page.

http://www.health.mil/blog/12-05-14/DoD_Patient_Safety_Program_Developers_N…




Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 20 Mai - 17:27 (2012)    Sujet du message: INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD (IEHR) - THE MARK OF THE BEAST Répondre en citant








On the Web:
http://www.defense.gov/today/index.aspx?showdate=05/21/2012
Media contact: +1 (703) 697-5131/697-5132


Public contact:
http://www.defense.gov/landing/comment.aspx
or +1 (703) 571-3343



Today in the Department of Defense, Monday, May 21, 2012
Secretary of Defense Leon E. Panetta and Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric Shinseki will conduct a joint press briefing to discuss implementation of the Integrated Electronic Health Record (iEHR) to create a single, joint electronic record system for all DoD and VA medical facilities at 4:25 p.m. EDT (3:25 p.m. CDT) at the James Lovell Federal Health Care Center, Chicago, Ill.
Deputy Secretary of Defense Ashton B. Carter has no public or media events on his schedule.

Under Secretary of the Navy Robert Work will participate in a policy forum at noon EDT to discuss the future of the surface fleet at the Cato Institute, Washington, D.C.

Secretary of the Army John M. McHugh will conduct a press briefing at 2:30 p.m. EDT (11:30 a.m. PDT) at the Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center, Monterey, Calif.

Use Pick a Day to go to a different day. Check Other Events for additional listings, including air shows, band concerts, Congressional hearings, reunions and much more.
http://www.defense.gov/today/?showdate=05/21/2012


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 31 Mai - 16:20 (2012)    Sujet du message: OBAMA GIVES MEDAL OF FREEDOM TO JUSTICE WHO CALLED PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION EXERCISE OF 'LIBERTY' Répondre en citant


OBAMA GIVES MEDAL OF FREEDOM TO JUSTICE WHO CALLED PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION EXERCISE OF 'LIBERTY'

The hypocrisy of the Catholic church who control all US departments.

Catholic Dioceses, Organizations Taking Obama Administration to Court

http://www.zenit.org/article-34813?l=english


Abortion does not improve women's reproductive health

http://www.zenit.org/article-34871?l=english


Contraceptives and the Environment

http://www.zenit.org/article-34791?l=english


By Terence P. Jeffrey
May 30, 2012
Subscribe to Terence P. Jeffrey's posts







President Barack Obama awarding the Medal of Freedom to retired Justice John Paul Stevens. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)



(CNSNews.com) - President Barack Obama on Tuesday awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom—which he described as “the highest civilian honor this country can bestow"--on retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, who wrote a Supreme Court opinion arguing that a woman was exercising her right to "liberty" when she hired a doctor to kill her child through the procedure known as partial-birth abortion.

"That holding--that the word 'liberty' in the Fourteenth Amendment includes a woman’s right to make this difficult and extremely personal decision--makes it impossible for me to understand how a State has any legitimate interest in requiring a doctor to follow any procedure other than the one that he or she reasonably believes will best protect the woman in her exercise of this constitutional liberty," Justice Stevens wrote in his concurring opinion in Stenberg v. Carhart.

During his time on the court, Stevens joined in two Supreme Court opinions specifically arguing that partial-birth abortion was a constitutional right. The first was the majority opinion in Stenberg, the second was the minority opinion in Gonzales v. Carhart.
“At his vacation home in Florida, he was John from Arlington, better known for his world-class bridge game than his world-changing judicial opinions,” Obama said at a White House ceremony on Tuesday as he awarded Stevens the Medal of Freedom.

“Even in his final days on the bench, Justice Stevens insisted he was still ‘learning on the job,’" Obama said. "But in the end, we are the ones who have learned from him.”
The official citation for Steven’s Medal of Freedom lauds him for his commitment to “the noble vision of our nation’s founders.”

“And as a Supreme Court Justice, he dedicated his long and distinguished tenure to applying our Constitution with fidelity and independence,” says the citation. “His integrity, humility, and steadfast commitment to the rule of law have fortified the noble vision of our nation’s founders.”

On April 25, 2000, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Stenberg v. Carhart. The question was whether the state of Nebraska could prohibit the practice of “deliberately and intentionally delivering into the vagina a living unborn child, or a substantial portion thereof, for the purpose of performing a procedure that the person performing such procedure knows will kill the unborn child and does kill the unborn child.”

On June 28, 2000, the court delivered a 5-4 decision in Stenberg, with the majority ruling that the U.S. Constitution protected the right of woman to hire a doctor to partially deliver her child and then kill that child.

Justice Stevens was one of the five justices in the majority. Justice Stephen Breyer wrote the majority opinion, but to make his own views plain Stevens wrote a concurrence in which Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined.

In the majority opinion, Justice Breyer argued that a partial-birth abortion (or dilation and extraction, D&X) was too similar in practice to a dilation and evacuation abortion (D&E) for Nebraska’s law to stand. A doctor's fear of being prosecuted for a D&X while in fact he was performing a D&E placed an “undue burden” on the constitutional right of the women to have her child aborted.

“Our earlier discussion of the D&E procedure … shows that it falls within the statutory prohibition,” wrote Breyer. “The statute forbids ‘deliberately and intentionally delivering into the vagina a living unborn child, or a substantial portion thereof, for the purpose of performing a procedure that the person performing such procedure knows will kill the unborn child.’ We do not understand how one could distinguish, using this language, between D&E (where a foot or arm is drawn through the cervix) and D&X (where the body up to the head is drawn through the cervix). Evidence before the trial court makes clear that D&E will often involve a physician pulling a “substantial portion” of a still living fetus, say, an arm or leg, into the vagina prior to the death of the fetus. Indeed D&E involves dismemberment that commonly occurs only when the fetus meets resistance that restricts the motion of the fetus: ‘The dismemberment occurs between the traction of . . . [the] instrument and the counter-traction of the internal os of the cervix.’ And these events often do not occur until after a portion of a living fetus has been pulled into the vagina.”

In concurring in Breyer’s opinion, future Medal of Freedom winner Stevens said that preserving the right to dismember what he called a “potential life” partially removed from his or her mother’s womb was really a question about the “liberty” protected by the 14th Amendment as recognized in the 1973 case of Roe v. Wade.

“Although much ink is spilled today describing the gruesome nature of late-term abortion procedures, that rhetoric does not provide me a reason to believe that the procedure Nebraska here claims it seeks to ban is more brutal, more gruesome, or less respectful of 'potential life' than the equally gruesome procedure Nebraska claims it still allows,” said Stevens.

“The rhetoric is almost, but not quite, loud enough to obscure the quiet fact that during the past 27 years, the central holding of Roe v. Wade, has been endorsed by all but 4 of the 17 Justices who have addressed the issue. That holding— that the word 'liberty' in the Fourteenth Amendment includes a woman’s right to make this difficult and extremely personal decision—makes it impossible for me to understand how a State has any legitimate interest in requiring a doctor to follow any procedure other than the one that he or she reasonably believes will best protect the woman in her exercise of this constitutional liberty.

“But one need not even approach this view today to conclude that Nebraska’s law must fall," Stevens continued. "For the notion that either of these two equally gruesome procedures performed at this late stage of gestation is more akin to infanticide than the other, or that the State furthers any legitimate interest by banning one but not the other, is simply irrational.”

Six years later, partial-birth abortion returned to the Supreme Court in the case of Gonzales v. Carhart. This time the issue was a federal ban enacted by Congress in 2003. In crafting the federal ban, members of Congress were careful to define a partial-birth abortion—i.e. a D&X abortion—in a way the distinguished it from a D&E abortion.

Specifically, Congress prohibited when a health-care practitioner “deliberately and intentionally vaginally delivers a living fetus until, in the case of a head-first presentation,the entire fetal head is outside the body of the mother, or, in the case of breech presentation, any part of the fetal trunk past the navel is outside the body of the mother, for the purpose of performing an overt act that the person knows will kill the partially delivered living fetus; and performs the overt act, other than completion of delivery, that kills the partially delivered living fetus.”

On April 18, 2007, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Gonzales v. Carhart. It again decided the issue 5-4. But this time it ruled in favor of the ban on partial-birth abortion.
Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Antonin Scalia.

This time it was Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg he wrote a dissenting opinion for the minority in which Justices Stevens, Souter and Breyer joined.

In this dissent in which Stevens joined, Ginsburg quoted Stevens concurrence in Stenberg and echoed his conclusion by calling "irrational" the majority's determination that the state had in interest in protecting a child against a partial-birth abortion.

“In sum, the notion that the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act furthers any legitimate governmental interest is, quite simply, irrational," Ginsburg wrote.

"The court's defense of the statute provides no saving explanation," she said. "In candor, the Act, and the Court’s defense of it, cannot be understood as anything other than an effort to chip away at a right declared again and again by this Court and with increasing comprehension of its centrality to women's lives.”

According to the White House blog, the Medal of Freedom was established by President John F. Kennedy in 1963 and is awarded to people who have made “an especially meritorious contribution to the security or national interests of the United States, world peace, cultural or other significant public or private endeavors.”

In addition to what it says about his judicial career, the Medal of Freedom citation for retired Justice John Paul Stevens notes that he won a Bronze Star for his service in the Navy during World War II, before he became a lawyer.

Republican President Gerald Ford appointed Stevens to the Supreme Court in 1975, two years after the court had issued its Roe v. Wade decision. No member of the U.S. Senate voted against Stevens’ confirmation.

“Justice Stevens applied, throughout his career, his clear and graceful manner to the defense of individual rights and the rule of law, always favoring a pragmatic solution over an ideological one,” President Obama said on Monday as he bestowed the Medal of Freedom on the justice.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-gives-medal-freedom-justice-who-called-partial-birth-abortion-exercise-liberty


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 11 Juin - 16:36 (2012)    Sujet du message: AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT CULTIVATES RURAL HEALTH IT Répondre en citant

AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT CULTIVATES RURAL HEALTH IT

By John Pulley June 8, 20120 Comments



The U.S. Department of Agriculture announced another round of funding earlier this week TO DEVELOP TELEMEDICINE NETWORKS ACROSS RURAL AMERICA.

In a June 6
announcement, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said the department would offer $14 million in rural-development financing for 32 telemedicine projects, 19 distance-learning projects and one combined project, with 45 percent of funds going to counties that have minority populations of at least 30 percent.Projects include:
  • $447,000 for Dean Health Systems in Madison, Wis. The project will create 12 telemedicine sites in seven Wisconsin counties. Providing remote access to cardiology, pharmacy and dermatology services will reduce patient travel time by an estimated 13,000 hours.
  • $314,000 to Michigan’s Upper Peninsula Health Care Network for specialized electrocardiogram equipment and software to create an eight-state telemedicine network. The project will eliminate the need to fax ECG studies to specialists.
  • $359,000 to North Carolina’s Ocracoke Health Center Inc. for cart-based video-conferencing units that will allow for 12 simultaneous HD video connections. The project will also provide digital stethoscopes and laptops for accessing and filling out patient records.
  • $415,000 to Samaritan Health Services Inc. for delivery, via videoconferencing, of mental-health care at 13 rural hospitals and clinics in three western Oregon counties.


PREVIOUS POST // Health IT Is Driving Healthcare Consolidation

John Pulley

John Pulley has written the Health IT Update blog since May 2011. Prior to becoming a regular contributor to Nextgov, he covered technology for Federal Computer Week and Government Health IT magazines. He has written about government for Federal Times and Air Force Times, as well. Pulley has worked in journalism for more than 20 years. He began his career covering local government for regional newspapers. In addition, he served as a writer and senior editor at The Chronicle of Higher Education for seven years. In 2006, he founded The Pulley Group, an editorial services agency.

http://www.nextgov.com/health/health-it/2012/06/agriculture-department-cultivates-rural-health-it/56184/


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 13 Juin - 14:19 (2012)    Sujet du message: ALERTE ROUGE ! UN NOUVEAU REGISTRE INTEGRE DE SANTE ELECTRONIQUE DONT LE BUT EST D’ETRE MONDIALISE D’ICI 2017 !!! Répondre en citant



ALERTE ROUGE ! UN NOUVEAU REGISTRE INTEGRE DE SANTE ELECTRONIQUE DONT LE BUT EST D’ETRE MONDIALISE D’ICI 2017 !!!







Chers amis,

CE QUI SUIT NE CONCERNE PAS UNIQUEMENT LES ETATS-UNIS, CAR IL EST BIEN PRECISE DANS L’ARTICLE QUE LE BUT EST UNE MONDIALISATION DE CE SYSTEME D’ICI 2017 !

EN CE MOMENT MEME, LES USA NAZIS SONT EN TRAIN DE METTRE EN PLACE TOUTE UNE INFRASTRUCTURE PSEUDO-MEDICALE DE SOINS DE SANTE ELECTRONIQUES !

CETTE INFRASTRUCTURE SE BASE LARGEMENT SUR UNE DANGEREUSE BASE DE DONNEES AINSI QUE SUR UN REGISTRE (DOSSIER) INTEGRE DE SANTE ELECTRONIQUE.

Je vous rappelle aimablement que LE REGISTRE DE SANTE ELECTRONIQUE CONSTITUE LA CONDITION SINE QUA NON AVANT DE POUVOIR METTRE EN PLACE LES PUCES IMPLANTABLES. EN EFFET, LES DONNEES DES PUCES IMPLANTABLES DOIVENT ETRE REPRISES ET STOCKEES SUR UNE BASE DE DONNEES CENTRALISEE AFIN DE POUVOIR PERMETTRE UN CONTROLE PERMANENT ET UBIQUITAIRE !

L’ARTICLE TRADUIT CI-DESSOUS NOUS FOURNIT DONC LA DATE APPROXIMATIVE DE L’ETAPE INTERMEDIAIRE QUI NOUS MANQUAIT : LES PROJETS INFAMES DES MONDIALISTES CONSISTENT A METTRE UN DOSSIER ELECTRONIQUE DE « SANTE » EN PLACE D’ICI 2017, CE QUI PERMETTRA EGALEMENT DE METTRE EN PLACE LES BASES DE DONNEES REQUISES POUR L’UTILISATION DES PUCES IMPLANTABLES POUR HUMAINS QUI, ELLES, SONT PREVUES AUX ALENTOURS DES ANNEES 2020 !

Les militaires malfaisants et le gouvernement nazi des Etats –Unis participent à cet effort atroce, supervisés bien sûr par les instances mondialistes (Bilderberg, CFR, Commission Trilatérale, Club de Rome, OTAN, FMI, OMS etc.), et évidemment avec la précieuse collaboration des traîtres qui dirigent nos pays !

On OSE encore prétendre que cet effort pseudo-médical « bénéficiera » aux patients (EN REALITE, IL BENEFICIERA SURTOUT AUX ASSUREURS DU SECTEUR DES SOINS DE SANTE, AINSI QU’A L’INDUSTRIE PHARMACEUTIQUE, ET IL PERMETTRA AUSSI DE REPERER LES FAIBLESSES MEDICALES POTENTIELLES DES INDIVIDUS AFIN DE MENER UNE POLITIQUE DE SOINS DE SANTE PREVENTIFS, CE QUI REPRESENTE UN DANGER HISTORIQUE PUISQU’ON DONNERA A DES PATIENTS ENCORE SAINS MAIS « A RISQUE » LES VACCINS EMPOISONNES ET LES MEDICAMENTS CHIMIQUES ET TOXIQUES DE L’INDUSTRIE « A TITRE PREVENTIF », ET PUISQUE LES ASSUREURS POURRONT AINSI FAIRE PAYER DAVANTAGE OU LARGUER CES INDIVIDUS CONSIDERES COMME ETANT « A RISQUE » !).

De plus, à côté du prétexte pseudo-médical utilisé afin de justifier tout ceci, il y aura aussi un aspect financier et commercial (société sans argent cash) qui, nous l’avons vu, permettra d’amener progressivement les puces implantables, mais au niveau de leurs applications de paiement et d’achat.

Le terrible article, traduit pour vous en français, ci-dessous.

BONNE REVOLUTION… OU BON ESCLAVAGE, BONNE TYRANNIE ET BONNE DAMNATION ! Vic.




Source:
http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=67590


LE NMCP SERA LE SITE INITIAL POUR LE NOUVEAU REGISTRE INTÉGRÉ DE SANTÉ ÉLECTRONIQUE


Numéro de cette histoire : NNS120604-28 Date de publication : le 04/06/2012 à 19:18:00

Par Rebecca A. Perron, Centre médical naval de Portsmouth Affaires publiques

PORTSMOUTH, Virginie (NNS) - Sur les talons de l’annonce des ministères de la Défense et des Anciens Combattants selon laquelle LE NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER PORTSMOUTH (CENTRE MEDICAL NAVAL DE PORTSMOUTH OU NMCP) SERAIT PARMI LES PREMIERES INSTALLATIONS DE TRAITEMENT MILITAIRES A DEPLOYER LE DOSSIER DE SANTE ELECTRONIQUE INTEGRE (INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD), le directeur du Bureau du Programme inter institutions du ministère de la Défense de Virginie, a visité la MNCP le 1er juin.

IL S’AGIT DE LA PROCHAINE ETAPE DANS LE FAIT DE RENDRE LES DOSSIERS MEDICAUX DES PATIENTS ACCESSIBLES PAR VOIE ELECTRONIQUE ET A TOUT MOMENT, N'IMPORTE OU, afin que les médecins puissent VOIR LES ANTECEDENTS COMPLETS D'UN PATIENT EN UN COUP D'ŒIL. Mais d'abord, beaucoup de préparation doit être effectuée.

Durant cette visite axée sur le programme pilote, le Dr Barclay P. Butler a rencontré le Conseil exécutif de Commandement du NMCP, débattant avec la direction du Commandement des étapes nécessaires au cours des deux prochaines années pour mettre en application ce registre, qui sera accessible par n'importe quelle infrastructure médicale du département de la Défense ou de Virginie.

"Cette réunion a constitué le coup d'envoi en termes d'ouverture des débats, d’engagement et de préparation à cela", a déclaré le Commandant Rick McCarthy, officier en chef de l’information du NMCP. "Cette initiative conjointe du DoD (ministère de la Défense) et de la Virginie représente l'avenir pour ces deux organisations, et être l'un des premiers à en réaliser la phase pilote en 2014 constitue une grande opportunité pour nous."

Le registre comprendrait des données de santé provenant de ce que le bureau du programme inter-agences appelle le "premier salut aux derniers honneurs" des membres de services, et fait partie de l’initiative présidentielle « VIRTUAL LIFETIME ELECTRONIC RECORD » (Registre électronique virtuel A VIE). Une fois terminé, l’initiative de Registre Electronique de Santé du ministère de la Défense et de la Virginie constituera le PLUS GRAND RESEAU INTEGRE DU MONDE, et COMBINERA 254 SYSTEMES DE REGISTRE ELECTRONIQUE DE SANTE (Electronic Health Record ou EHR), dont 153 proviendront de la Virginie et 101 proviendront du ministère de la Défense.

« L'initiative principale est la continuité capable des soins cliniques que le patient reçoit, non seulement lorsqu’il lève la main pour la première fois, mais tout au long de son service et lorsqu’il nous quitte », a expliqué Butler. "C'est une façon de constituer ce dossier unique et de fournir les meilleurs soins, une proposition basée sur la valeur et qui est due au bénéficiaire."

Selon Butler, le NMCP et les autres infrastructures militaires proches et de traitement ont été sélectionnés pour le programme pilote pour deux raisons.

« Cette région est l'un des deux sites sélectionnés, San Antonio est l'autre (site sélectionné) », a dit Butler. "La principale raison pour laquelle nous avons choisi la région, est qu’elle possède une concentration importante de la marine et de l’armée, de la force aérienne et des anciens combattants également. Nous serons en mesure de répondre à toutes les parties prenantes parce qu'elles sont toutes représentées dans cette région. Le centre de réadaptation poly-traumatique de Richmond est inclus aussi ».

Le NMCP a également été choisi en raison de son personnel ambitieux et de ses capacités cliniques.

« Nous avons fait le bon choix parce que le climat de commandement est extrêmement orienté vers le futur », a dit Butler. « Le personnel est engagé et enthousiaste, et c'est un commandement qui est non seulement capable d'un degré supérieur de capacités cliniques, mais qui est techniquement capable. Quand nous rapprochons ces deux (caractéristiques), nous pouvons améliorer les soins prodigués aux patients ».

LA PREMIERE PHASE DE LA MISE EN APPLICATION consiste à déterminer l'infrastructure qui doit être ajoutée afin de tenir compte des nouvelles capacités cliniques.

« Dès que nous le pourrons, nous amènerons les produits et solutions auxquels les cliniciens feront face », a dit Butler. « IL A ETE DECIDE QUE LES PREMIERS UTILISATEURS SERONT LE LABORATOIRE ET LA PHARMACIE, AINSI QUE LES VACCINATIONS. Il s'agit d'une procédure exclusive pour les entreprises gouvernementales. AU COURS DES DEUX PROCHAINES ANNEES, NOUS METTRONS EN APPLICATION CE SYSTEME AVEC UNE SERIE DE COMMUNIQUES, CE QUI SE TERMINERA PAR LE FAIT QUE L'ENSEMBLE DES CLINIQUES Y AURONT ACCES ».

« Ce que cela signifie, c'est que nous devons développer un système complet », a dit McCarthy. « Ils sont très concentrés sur le fait que ceci sera un produit pour notre personnel, en particulier pour notre personnel clinique et les prestataires qui fournissent les soins de santé. Cela signifie qu'il faut développer ceci en gardant les cliniciens à l'esprit. Le personnel clinique, des techniciens aux infirmières, en passant par l les médecins, tous ceux qui constituent les parties prenantes, auront un rôle dans son développement ».

En testant et en mettant en application ce système dans les MTF du sud-est de la Virginie et de San Antonio, l'agence aura le temps de le tester et d’effectuer des ajustements basés sur l'expérience dans ce domaine AVANT QU'IL SOIT PRET A DEVENIR MONDIAL D'ICI 2017.

"Le système complet sera plus que ce que la personne voit simplement à l'écran, mais (il sera) aussi l'interopérabilité et l'architecture générale qui prennent en charge non seulement la documentation des soins cliniques, ainsi que les capacités analytiques et l'analyse de ces précieuses informations afin d’améliorer les soins de santé contre les soins de santé simples », a dit McCarthy.

Les patients bénéficieront (de tout ceci) parce que le personnel médical sera capable d'extraire des données à partir du nouveau système AFIN D’AIDER A PREDIRE QUI POSSEDE DES RISQUES DE DEVELOPPER DES MALADIES CHRONIQUES, COMME LES MALADIES CARDIAQUES OU LE DIABETE. Davantage de santé pour la population et un spectre d’analyse plus large seront mis en place afin de relever les principaux indicateurs et de fournir des SOINS DE SANTE PREVENTIFS, plutôt que d'être simplement réactif.

«La prochaine étape dans ce processus consiste à S'ENGAGER DAVANTAGE AVEC CEUX QUI SONT IMPLIQUES DANS LE SYSTEME et de METTRE AU POINT LES DETAILS QUI SERONT NECESSAIRES POUR UN DEPLOIEMENT REUSSI DE CE PROGRAMME», a dit McCarthy. « Lors de la discussion du Dr Butler, il a dit qu'ils REALISERAIENT BIENTOT L’ESQUISSE DU CALENDRIER ET LES DETAILS DE CE QUI SERA FAIT A TEL OU TEL POINT AFIN DE FRANCHIR DES ETAPES SPECIFIQUES."

A la fin de la visite, Butler a dit que ses visites seraient trimestrielles à l'avenir, et il A SOULIGNE L'IMPORTANCE DE LA REUSSITE DU PROGRAMME.

« Quant aux secrétaires des deux ministères, ils soutiennent fermement ces efforts », a dit Butler. « Ils ont mis au point une charte spécifique aux capacités opérationnelles initiales, et sont le point de responsabilité unique pour le DEPLOIEMENT DU REGISTRE INTEGRE DE SANTE ELECTRONIQUE ».

« Cette amélioration significative de nos soins de santé au ministère de la Défense et en Virginie les amènent au niveau suivant », a ajouté McCarthy. « Le thème plus large, c'est que nous sommes la moitié de la tarte, mais nous servirons afin d’améliorer notre capacité à fournir de meilleurs soins de à nos bénéficiaires. C'est un nouveau départ ».

Pour plus d'informations, visitez les sites www.navy.mil , www.facebook.com/usnavy , ou
www.twitter.com/usnavy .

Pour de plus amples informations provenant du Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, visitez
www.navy.mil/local/NMCP/ .


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 22 Juin - 14:22 (2012)    Sujet du message: BELGIQUE DE BIG BROTHER : LES DANGERS LIBERTICIDES ET TOTALITAIRES DE LA PLATEFORME E-HEALTH CONFIRMES PAR DES MÉDECINS ! Répondre en citant

BELGIQUE DE BIG BROTHER : LES DANGERS LIBERTICIDES ET TOTALITAIRES DE LA PLATEFORME E-HEALTH CONFIRMES PAR DES MÉDECINS !

 




À la fin de l'article, on nous dit que eHealth, lancée en 2005 est une INSTITUTION PUBLIQUE mais ce que l'on ne vous dit pas c'est que toute la réforme des soins de santé est sous le contrôle des militaires, sous TRICARE, sous la gouverne du gouvernement américain. La destruction des soins de santé telle qu'elle l'était jusqu'à ces dernières années a pour but d'amener le contrôle médical directement sous leur contrôle. Que ce soit au niveau des soins dentaires, médicals, psychologiques et psychiatriques, tout sera sous leur contrôle. Les hôpitaux, les centres de ré-habilitation et les déploiements "humanitaires" médicals ont pour but d'amener un parfait contrôle sur les populations et ainsi pouvoir les soumettre à leur volonté, de gré ou de force. - Maria

Chers amis,

L’article qui suit se passe de commentaires, et détaille bien les APPLICATIONS MALFAISANTES, FAUSSEMENT « MÉDICALES » ET DANGEREUSES – AUSSI BIEN POUR LA VIE PRIVÉE QUE POUR LE SECRET MÉDICAL – DE LA PLATEFORME « E-HEALTH » (santé électronique).

DES MÉDECINS S’INSURGENT MÊME CONTRE LES PROJETS TOTALITAIRES EN COURS ! Car il est clair que LA CIRCULATION IMMODÉRÉE DES DONNÉES ET SES CONSÉQUENCES FÂCHEUSES SONT D’ORES ET DÉJÀ AU PROGRAMME !

Si déjà cette plateforme liée aux dossiers de « santé » électroniques représente un danger pour les libertés, la vie privée et le secret médical, imaginez donc ce que cela pourrait donner en cas d’implantations de puces sous-cutanées ou cérébrales…

L’article, ci-dessous.

BONNE RÉVOLUTION… OU BON ESCLAVAGE, BONNE TYRANNIE ET BONNE MORT ! Vic.

P.S. : un immense merci à la personne qui m’a signalé cet article !


Source : journal belge « Le Soir » du mercredi 20 juin 2012, p. 6.


LES MÉDECINS DÉNONCENT : VOS DONNÉES NON PROTÉGÉES


L’ESSENTIEL

° La confidentialité de vos données de santé sera-t-elle préservée dans la future plate forme électronique d’échange E-Health ?

° LES GÉNÉRALISTES ET LES ASSOCIATIONS DE PATIENTS ONT DES DOUTES, SUITE À DE RÉCENTES MODIFICATIONS DES RÈGLES.

° La députée fédérale Ecolo, Muriel Gerkens interpelle la ministre de la santé.

Un tir de barrage nourri… ASSOCIATIONS DE MÉDECINS ET DE PATIENTS DÉNONCENT L’ÉVOLUTION RÉCENTE DU PROJET eHealth, vaste plate-forme numérique censée faciliter l’échange de données médicales privées entre les multiples acteurs de soins de santé.

Dans leur ligne de mire : la santé publique, l’Institut national d’assurances maladie invalidité (INAMI) , les mutuelles, les responsables des réseaux télématiques flamand,wallon et bruxellois, mais surtout ceux de eHealth DONT LES MÉDECINS DÉNONCENT « L’ARROGANCE TOTALITAIRE » ET LE « REFUS DU DIALOGUE ».

Depuis le lancement du projet « eHealth », pas toujours mené dans la transparence, milieux académiques, médecins et patients ferraillent pour que ce « BIG BROTHER » MÉDICAL préserve la vie privée des citoyens, la confidentialité de leurs données de santé. Un combat permanent qui se solde ces derniers jours par une bataille perdue aux yeux du FORUM DES ASSOCIATIONS DE GÉNÉRALISTES (FAG) : SON ASSEMBLÉE GÉNÉRALE SE DÉCLARE « PROFONDÉMENT SCANDALISÉE » par le revirement du groupe de concertation de la plateforme eHealth (le G19) sur les garanties offertes aux patients…

Concrètement, le recours aux services d’eHealth et le partage de données médicales supposent un « consentement éclairé du patient ». Alors que le G19 s’était accordé, en mars, sur une formule « conforme à la déontologie, au droit du patient et à la protection de la vie privée », LES RESPONSABLES D’EHEALTH ONT EXIGÉ UN ASSOUPLISSEMENT DE LA FORMULE DANS UN SENS NETTEMENT MOINS FAVORABLE À LA PROTECTION DES DONNÉES PRIVÉES…

1° Qui peut consulter vos données de santé ?

La première version des dispositions sur le consentement du patient évoquait la possibilité de consulter ses données de santé « dans le cadre de la continuité des soins ». Le texte amendé n’évoque plus qu’un objectif plus large « afin que je puisse recevoir une prestation de soins optimale ». « Cette nuance subtile mais importante OUVRE LA PORTE À UN PARTAGE DES DONNÉES DE SANTÉ AVEC DES PERSONNES OU ORGANISATIONS N’AYANT AUCUN LIEN THÉRAPEUTIQUE AVEC LA PERSONNE CONCERNÉE », s’insurge le Dr Soupart , président du FAG.


2° Comment pouvez-vous contrôler qui a consulté vos données de santé ?

Autre amendement de taille : alors que le texte initial précisait que « je peux contrôler quel prestataire de soins a déjà eu accès à mes données de santé », la disposition amendée prévoit un contrôle moins direct : « Je peux demander de contrôler quel prestataire de soins a déjà eu accès à mes données de santé ».

Interpellé par la Ligue des usagers des services de santé (Luss), fédération indépendante des associations de patients , le patron d’eHealth, FrankRobben, prétend qu’IL N’EST PAS PRÉVU POUR L’INSTANT D’OCTROYER AUX CITOYENS UN ACCÈS DIRECT PAR VOIE INFORMATIQUE À LA LISTE DES PERSONNES OU ORGANISMES QUI ONT CONSULTÉ LEUR DOSSIER. Seul un contrôle indirect serait permis, par le biais notamment de la commission pour la protection de la vie privée.

« Une fois de plus, Monsieur Robben veut placer ses interlocuteurs devant le fait accompli » ,réagit le Docteur Roland Lemye à l’association belge des syndicats médicaux (Absym).

La députée Ecolo Muriel Gerkens s’interroge sur l’éthique des responsables d’eHealth, dans la question orale qu’elle a soumis mardi à la ministre fédérale de la santé, Laurette Onkelinx (PS).Elle exige des explications sur le « rôle excessivement dominant et les conflits d’intérêts de M. ROBBEN », À LA FOIS PATRON D’EHEALTH ET MEMBRE DE LA COMMISSION DE PROTECTION DE LA VIE PRIVÉE.

Riccardo Gutiérez

En encadré

Repères : UN BIG BROTHER MÉDICAL

La plateforme eHealth, lancée en 2005 est une INSTITUTION PUBLIQUE CHARGÉE DE METTRE EN PLACE LES DISPOSITIFS ÉLECTRONIQUES QUI PERMETTRONT AUX ACTEURS DES SOINS DE SANTÉ (MÉDECINS, PHARMACIENS, HÔPITAUX, MUTUELLES…) D’ÉCHANGER ET DE CONSULTER LES DONNÉES PERSONNELLES DE SANTÉ DES PATIENTS.

Concrètement, le professionnel de la santé, après identification, pourra consulter le dossier médical d’un patient, stocké par exemple dans les archives électroniques d’un hôpital. L’accès au système est sécurisé : le numéro de registre national permettra d’authentifier le demandeur d’informations.

DE MULTIPLES OPÉRATIONS SERONT POSSIBLES : GESTION DES DOSSIERS ÉLECTRONIQUES DES PATIENTS, ENREGISTREMENT DE DONNÉES DANS LE REGISTRE DES CANCERS OU CELUI DES VACCINS, ÉCHANGE DE DONNÉES ENTRE PRESTATAIRES DE SOINS ET MUTUELLES…

RG


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 29 Juin - 16:08 (2012)    Sujet du message: SUPREME COURT JULY 28 ~ BREAKING NEWS ~ OBAMACARE SHOVED DOWN OUR THROATS! (2012) Répondre en citant

SUPREME COURT JULY 28 ~ BREAKING NEWS ~ OBAMACARE SHOVED DOWN OUR THROATS! (2012)



VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNcW4wjbI1g

HEALTH IT'S SMALL, BUT SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN HEALTH REFORM




Thinkstock


By Josh Smith National JournalJune 28, 2012

Proponents of government health IT programs may be breathing a little easier after the U.S. Supreme Court upheld almost all of President Obama's landmark healthcare reform law.



Most efforts to give hospitals and doctors the latest IT tools are rooted in 2009 stimulus laws that predate Obama's Affordable Care Act, and had the law been overturned, it would likely have been no more than a speed bump for health IT.

Supporters of the wide range of health IT, from digital records to electronic information exchanges,say the reforms in the ACA are critical to creating a health care system where the latest technology flourished.

"In addition to health insurance reforms, expansion of Medicaid eligibility, and the creation of health insurance exchanges, the ACA includes a number of improvements dependent on or related to health IT capabilities including, electronic health information exchange (HIE); new methods to reimburse expenses based on quality of care, operating rules and standards; and health IT workforce development," all of which would have been lost if the law had been overturned, according to the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., released a report in March noting that the ACA included provisions that expanded some earlier health IT programs to encourage adoption of the latest technology.

Health IT, Whitehouse observed in the report, is an integral part of the broader healthcare system. "These areas are not separate silos; progress in each area will influence, and be influenced by, progress in others," he wrote.

That was a sentiment echoed by National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Farzad Mostashari, who told reporters earlier this month he wasn't worried about what effect the Supreme Court's ruling could have on health IT. "What worries me is people not having health insurance," he said.

http://www.nextgov.com/health/2012/06/health-it-small-significant-part-health-reform/56522/?oref=nextgov_today_nl


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 29 Juin - 16:11 (2012)    Sujet du message: OBAMACARE ALERTS: 6-28-12 Répondre en citant

OBAMACARE ALERTS: 6-28-12

The U.S. Supreme Court has rendered its Obamacare decision today, upholding the "individual mandate" portion of Obamacare by calling it a TAX

With this decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has granted the federal government unlimited power over your take-home paycheck. The government can now FORCE you to buy things you may not even want or need, and there is no limit to what the government can now force you to buy.

Even worse, the Obamacare system excludes natural medicine. There is no freedom to choose nutritional therapies, herbal remedies, naturopathic medicine or the Healing Arts. The entire system is focused on drugs, surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. It's a Big Pharma monopoly that we are now forced to buy into. Here's my breaking news report on this subject:
 http://www.naturalnews.com/036329_Obamacare_Supreme_Court_economic_freedom.html

Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Obamacare
In a victory for the New Deal bastardization of the Constitution, the Supreme Court has ruled that the government can mandate at gunpoint that Americans buy monopolized health care insurance.

ObamaCare Decision Means Feds Will Continue to Cull Gun Owner Information--GOA's John Velleco was at the U.S. Supreme Court today to speak with media about how the ObamaCare decision negatively impacts gun owners.
Click here to read the complete article at gunowners.org

The Supreme Court has made a shocking ruling to uphold ObamaCare—one of the most expensive, intrusive, and liberty stifling pieces of legislation in American history. As we told you before,the media played a role in deceiving Americans about the impact of this horrific law, regurgitating verbatim every lie told by the Obama Administration. Every promise the media and the Obama Administration made about ObamaCare—that it would make healthcare cheaper without increasing taxes or deficits, that you could keep your doctor, that businesses would not be hit with crippling regulations and taxes—has been broken. That is why it is so critical that we keep up pressure on the national “news” media to Tell The Truth about ObamaCare.

RUSH LIMBAUGH: 'WE NOW HAVE THE BIGGEST 'TAX' INCREASE IN HISTORY OF THE WORLD'...


MARK LEVIN: OBAMACARE DECISION 'ABSOLUTELY LAWLESS'...

Supreme Court: Obamacare Mandate is supposedly Covered by Congress ‘Power to Tax’


Flashback: Neurosurgeon Told Death Panels Will Decide Who Deserves Surgery

Elderly To Be Euthanized Under Obamacare?

Obamacare Hidden Panel of Unelected Officials Beyond Congressional Control

Obama’s Own Doctor Slams ObamaCare as ‘Failure’?

The Whole Truth – Obamacare

Massive $17 Trillion Hole Found In Obamacare

Justice Kagan and Obamacare: She Needs to Recuse Herself Immediately

Ten years of Obamacare would cost 1.76 trillon dollars – far more than originally claimed

The True Reason For Obamacare

Gingrich Adviser Urges States to Implement ObamaCare

Here are 7 more things the Obama administration may soon require everyone to purchase

ObamaCare’s Threat to Free Speech

Obamacare Advocate: Make Refuseniks Wear Gold Stickers

Washington Post poll: Ninety-six percent of public says Obamacare is unconstitutional

Obamacare: Culling the Baby Boomers

Obamacare To Cost Middle Class Families $15,000 A Year

Senator: Supreme Court would allow ‘an all powerful government’ by upholding Obamacare

Obamacare is even worse than critics thought

Obamacare is a Eugenics Program

20 Ways ObamaCare Will Take Away Our Freedoms

Obamacare To Be Enforced By Armed Thugs

Obamacare: Taxing The American People Into Oblivion

Andy of Mayberry Shills for Obamacare

Obamacare Not Such a Good Deal for Kids and Young Adults

Judge Napolitano On Alex Jones TV: Obamacare is Unconstitutional

Obamacare Supporter Stark: Feds Can Do Anything

Judge Napolitano: Why State Efforts Against Obamacare Are Doomed

Pelosi Readies “Self-executing” Fascism to Force Obamacare on Americans

Obama Administration admits rationing panels exist in ObamaCare

Obamacare: A Health Care Rationing Scheme to Enrich Insurers, Drug Companies and Large Hospital Chains

The Cost Of Defying Obamacare: $2,250 a Month And IRS Goons Pointing Guns At Your Family

The K Street Hustlin’ of Obamacare


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 30 Juin - 20:40 (2012)    Sujet du message: SUPREME COURT RULING! RFID MICRO CHIP 666 Répondre en citant



OBAMACARE : SUPREME COURT RULING! RFID MICRO CHIP 666



VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCeIjYKT6M0


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 2 Juil - 13:58 (2012)    Sujet du message: "THE IDEA THAT THE FEDERAL GOVT CAN MANDATE EVERY AMERICAN BUY A PRODUCT Répondre en citant

 OBAMACARE : THE IDEA THAT THE FEDERAL GOVT CAN MANDATE EVERY AMERICAN BUY A PRODUCT



VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lo5v1weTM0c


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 7 Juil - 16:14 (2012)    Sujet du message: IRS WILL HAVE TERRIFYING NEW POWERS TO INVESTIGATE YOU UNDER OBAMACARE Répondre en citant



IRS WILL HAVE TERRIFYING NEW POWERS TO INVESTIGATE YOU UNDER OBAMACARE


July 02, 2012





 BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: From Fox Business: "SCOTUS Ruling Means Bigger, More Intrusive IRS." This is a very long story. I am not going to by any means share it all with you, but I have enough salient excerpts here. "IRS officials on background tell FOX Business the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on health reform gives the IRS even more powers than previously understood." Yeah, guess we had to pass it to find out what was in it. Are you ready, folks? "The IRS now gets to know about a small business's entire payroll, the level of their insurance coverage -- and it gets to know the income of not just the primary breadwinner in your house, but your entire family’s income, in order to assess/collect the mandated tax."

Now, this won't start until 2014 or 2015. So from now 'til November we're gonna have stories like this, this is headed your way, but if people look at us as just a bunch of shouting, doubting Thomases, nobody's gonna believe us, 'cause it isn't going to happen until 2014 or 2015. I tell you, once this thing gets fully implemented, folks, the IRS is gonna have a free look at not just the breadwinner's tax return, but everybody in the house so that they can accurately assess and collect the mandated tax. They don't have the right to know all this now. Your tax return's what it is, and they audit you if they do, and you have to prove and confirm what's on the return, but they can't ask you to turn over your kid, your 25-year-old still living with you, for example.



In addition to being able now to learn all about every penny involved in a small business, the IRS will then, because of this law, be able to share all of that information "with all sorts of government agencies, insurance companies and employers. And that's just the tip of the iceberg. 'We expect even more lien and levy powers,' an IRS official says. Even the Taxpayer Advocate is deeply concerned. The IRS army will inexorably increase in size, too. The IRS will now add new agents to hunt down tax cheats, as it has been budgeted to spend $303.5 million building a new system," 4,000, 5,000 new agents and so forth. (interuption)

Yeah, they have the authority. Well, I don't know if you don't pay the fine, they have the authority put a lien on your business. He just says even more lien and levy powers. They're not specified here in the whole story. Maybe put a lien on your business if you don't pay the fine. But I don't know that you're gonna even have a choice to pay it.

If you're an employee, it might just be deducted. If you're self-employed you of course will have to pay it. I don't know. For example, will the self-employed small business types be double charged, one for not buying insurance, and two for not providing insurance for your employee, you. If you're self-employed, if you don't buy insurance, you're in trouble, and you're also in trouble for not providing insurance for your employee, which is you. I don't know. I have to think that any question we have that has in any part of question, "Can the IRS do X," the answer is gonna be yes. That's the point of the story here.



"Nina E. Olson, who runs the Taxpayer Advocate Office [TAO], a federal IRS overseer, has warned the new health law may require more IRS intrusions on taxpayer privacy, to determine whether individuals got appropriate health coverage, and whether small businesses provide 'affordable' coverage, all of which is defined by the government." I don't know why you're so surprised in there is. What do you think this bill is? The IRS, there are 16,000 new agents.

What are they for? You don't have to buy insurance, folks, you have to buy the right kind. The government will determine how much you need based on your situation. And then they'll determine what that costs. Oh, you're under the impression you get to keep your coverage if you like it? Oh, no, maybe 20% of the people will. If you like your coverage and doctor, no, no, no. That's "the secretary shall determine." Obama lied about that.

Let's say you like your plan. Don't you understand that the whole point of this is to get your company to give up the plan? How can you keep what your employer no longer provides? That's just one instance of how you will not be able to keep your plan if you like it.

The Taxpayer Advocate Office, which I guess is a government institution that oversees the IRS, "has noted Americans must now tell the IRS under the new law: Insurance plan information, including who is covered under the plan and the dates of coverage; The costs of your family’s health insurance plans; Whether a taxpayer had an offer of employer-sponsored health insurance; The cost of employer-sponsored insurance; Whether a taxpayer received a premium tax credit; and whether a taxpayer has an exemption from the individual responsibility requirement. The TAO has warned: 'This is different from the type of information the IRS typically deals with, and some taxpayers may feel uncomfortable about sharing it with the IRS.' ... But the TAO has warned that the IRS may not have the necessary skill sets, budget, or staffing to adequately enforce the new health reform law. Olson notes that the federal tax code is already so complex that even the IRS makes numerous mistakes in administering it."

What that all adds up to is that they're gonna have the leeway of being wrong in assessing, and you're gonna have no recourse. The final authority. Look, Snerdley, nobody knows better than I if you're under 30, and you're listening to me, even if you're under 40 and you're listening to me say all this, I know exactly what you're doing. You're pooh-poohing it, and you're thinking that I'm just some hell-bent right-wing partisan trying to scare you. I assure you, I have no desire for you to doubt me. I have no desire to be wrong. There nothing in it for me to mislead anybody about anything, particularly this. If you're under 30 or under 40, you might not even be cognizant of the concept of a big and growing government as a problem. You might think it's cool. You might think it's gonna level the playing field for everybody, it's fair, everyone is gonna get insurance and treatment.



The whole concept of the impact of all this on your freedom you might think is a joke. You might think people who worry about losing their freedom or their liberty are just a bunch of outlier fringe cooks. You might think that. I mean that's what you've been taught. It's how you've been educated. You've been raised and educated to believe that the only word that adequately describes government is benevolent. So, as far as you're concerned, I may be from the Florida militia, some little kook here trying to scare you. "None of that stuff can ever happen, Rush, this is America. You're just so eager to get rid of Obama. You just don't like Democrats."

I'm just telling you what the IRS has told Fox News, pure and simple. That's what the IRS is saying. I don't have the ability to make this up because I don't think of controlling people this way. I couldn't write this script. I don't think this way. I don't even for a second of any day ponder how I can exert power over people. I have no desire to, I don't know how. It's not something I want to do. And nor is it something I want to have happen to me, either. But it is.

"If the IRS finds that you've fallen short of the law --" remember, we just heard that they're understaffed and a lot of people there don't even know what they're doing, and don't understand the tax code. There's probably not a single person alive who does, from cover to cover understand it. "If the IRS finds you have fallen short of the law, it would hit you with a penalty tied to your household income (which may be that of an individual or several family members)." In order to determine what your household income is, they're gonna have to know about every dime of income in your family to properly assess what you owe. This is just on the health care. In the process of finding all this stuff out, what if they think that you've lied to 'em in previous years? 'Cause you know what? We're gonna have to audit you here based on what we've just learned. We've gone back and we've looked at your tax returns and you're not reflecting any of this.

I don't know if you've ever been audited, folks, but you're always guilty on day one, and you have to prove that they're wrong. The assumption is you're lying to them. The assumption is your returned is filled with untruths and you have to go about proving to them, in my case, 14 different ways I have to show them where I was or wasn't every day of the year. New York state. Fourteen different ways, credit cards, computer IP addresses. It's cockeyed, crazy.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: It's not it's a rhetorical question. I still want to ask, why are there 16,000 new IRS agents if Obamacare's not a tax? I know, I'm just being difficult.

By the way, there is noncourt news. The Wall Street Journal is reporting manufacturing has slowed in America for the first time in three years, and in fact is at as low a point as it's ever been during the recession. It's in bad shape.

Manufacturing and prices are plummeting. Now, on the consumer side prices plummeting to an extent is good, but it's not good, it's deflationary if people can't sell what they're manufacturing for a profit. They're not gonna make it. It makes no sense to make something if you can't sell it for a profit. If you can sell it for what it costs you there's no reason to stay in business. Now, the left thinks that would be ideal. "That's right, Mr. Limbaugh, I think Apple should make an iPhone and sell it to us for exactly what it cost them to make it. That would be fair."

"Why would they do that, Mr. New Castrati?"

"To be fair, so that everybody would be able to enjoy the benefits of the iPhone, Mr. Limbaugh. Why should they have to make any profit doing it? It's gouging people. It's screwing people."

"Well, it's how they... I don't even want to waste my time with you, Mr. New Castrati." Anyway, prices plummeting is okay to a point, but if they get to the manufacturing cost, then they're gonna stop being made altogether and we got nothing. Anyway, it's just more bad economic news. The private sector we're being told is doing great, everything's fine there. It isn't.
 

END TRANSCRIPT

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/07/02/irs_will_have_terrifying_new_powers_to_investigate_you_under_obamacare


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 10 Juil - 15:37 (2012)    Sujet du message: HEALTH DEVICES IN HOMES STIMULATE GLOBAL TELEMEDICINE MARKET Répondre en citant

HEALTH DEVICES IN HOMES STIMULATE GLOBAL TELEMEDICINE MARKET

3, 2012

Growing acceptance of home patient monitoring technology will help to enlarge the global telemedicine market to $2.5 billion by 2018, more than triple the 2011 market of $736 million, according to the British market research firm Companies & Markets.

“Home patient monitoring means two things: the imminent rise of the expert patient whom the health authorities anticipate would self-manage his long-term medical conditions, and the prominence of mobile devices as the go-between for clinicians and patients,” the firm
reports.

Advanced telemedicine devices and software will monitor patients’ vital signs from their homes, providing early warning if intervention is needed, according to the report. Clinicians also can monitor certain lifestyle choices and use telemedicine connections to promote healthier behavior, potentially averting health crises, the market researchers say.

And as the market grows, home patient monitoring could also reduce hospitalizations and emergency room visits, researchers predict.


http://www.nextgov.com/health/health-it/2012/07/health-devices-homes-stimulate-global-telemedicine-market/56605/?oref=nextgov_healthit_nl


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 13 Juil - 15:34 (2012)    Sujet du message: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES REPEAL OF OBAMACARE DEBATE DAY 2 PT.1 Répondre en citant


HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES REPEAL OF OBAMACARE DEBATE DAY 2 PT.1




VIDÉO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93aPvsAjQ6w






Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 18 Juil - 15:24 (2012)    Sujet du message: ÉTATS-UNIS - LA COUR SUPRÊME VALIDE LA RÉFORME SANTÉ D'OBAMA Répondre en citant

ÉTATS-UNIS - LA COUR SUPRÊME VALIDE LA RÉFORME SANTÉ D'OBAMA

Les républicains ne feront rien sinon que de donner un faux espoir aux populations. Ces deux parties travaillent main dans la main.

Aux Etats-Unis, la Cour suprême a validé ce jeudi la réforme du système de santé voulue par Barack Obama. Une réforme qui obligera la plupart des Américains à contracter une assurance maladie à partir de 2014.

La Rédaction | RMC.fr | 28/06/2012








© Reuters
Barack Obama, en juillet 2011.




La Cour suprême des Etats-Unis a validé ce jeudi la disposition phare de la réforme du système de santé voulue par Barack Obama, qui obligera la plupart des Américains à contracter une assurance maladie à partir de 2014. Promulguée en mars 2010, la loi sur la Protection des patients et les soins abordables (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act), qui organise une réforme du système américain de santé sans précédent en un demi-siècle, est considérée comme la principale réalisation sur le plan intérieur de Barack Obama.

Les républicains promettent de l'abolir

L'arrêt de la Cour suprême, à quelques mois de l'élection présidentielle du 6 novembre où le président démocrate briguera un nouveau mandat, était particulièrement attendu.

Le républicain Mitt Romney, lui, promet d'abroger cette loi s'il est élu. Mais même si la chambre basse, dominée par les républicains, abolit le texte, l'abrogation n'a aucune chance de passer le cap du Sénat, qui reste aux mains des démocrates.

http://www.rmc.fr/editorial/272196/la-cour-supreme-valide-la-reforme-sante-d-obama/


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 24 Juil - 15:18 (2012)    Sujet du message: ALL AMERICANS WILL RECEIVE A MICROCHIP IMPLANT IN 2013 PER OBAMACARE Répondre en citant

 ALL AMERICANS WILL RECEIVE A MICROCHIP IMPLANT IN 2013 PER OBAMACARE

By Paul McGuire
July 23, 2012
NewsWithViews.com

A major news story broke on AOL and countless other mainstream news media outlets, this past week, that the Obama Health Care Bill will require all U.S. citizens and babies to receive a microchip or Medchip by March 23, 2013. Whether or not the microchip requirement in the bill is implemented by 2013, remains to be seen.

In 2010, my book “Are You Ready for the Microchip?” was released, and I asked the question, “Is the microchip implant hidden in the Healthcare Bill? Are newborn children starting in 2013 going to receive a microchip shortly after birth?” Then in the book, I wrote, “ In the massive US HEALTHCARE BILL, which your elected representatives voted for without reading, there is a section titled: Subtitle C-11 Sec. 2521 – National Medical Device Registry which states:

“The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that—‘‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; and ‘‘(B) is a class III device; or ‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable.”

The language is deliberately vague, but it provides the structure for making America the first nation in the world that would require every U.S. citizen to receive an implanted radio-frequency (RFID) microchip for the purpose of controlling medical care.

A number of states like Virginia, have passed “stop the mark of the beast legislation” in an effort to stop this kind of legislation.

As with numerous other things that I have written and spoken about based on solid documentation, I am regularly challenged by some, and especially those in the Christian community, who are clueless about what is going on. Their criticism has never prevented me from presenting the facts, because I never take a poll about what I write or speak on. A Christian is called to speak the truth in love, whether or not it is accepted. I am not trying to disparage any ministry, but I don’t determine what I say based on whether or not it is “seeker friendly,” or popular. The only issue is, is it true and is it wise to communicate it at that particular time?

There are many things that I could say, but don’t, because there many people in our nation who, when confronted with a truth that is outside the box of their socially engineered consciousness, go into cognitive dissonance. As the microchip implant moves closer day by day, along with the “manufactured crisis” of illegal immigration, the problems of states like Arizona are creating an environment where Senators Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) are moving legislation forward that would require all U.S. workers, citizens and resident alike, to obtain and carry a National Biometric ID Card in order to work within the United States. It does not matter where you stand on the issue of amnesty or immigration, everyone is going to have to have a National Biometric ID Card that will eventually contain an RFID transmitter which will allow Big Brother electronic data bases to track all of your personal information. It is a simply a national ID card under another name. The national ID card will transition into a microchip implant, because that is technically more efficient. All of this which is about to happen very soon, is just the tip of the iceberg.

President Ronald Reagan refused to pass what he called this “Mark of the Beast” legislation. In my book, “Are You Ready for the Microchip?,” I examine the careful wording in the Health Care Bill which calls for a Med-Chip and a microchip implant. It was never hidden, it is simply Republican and Democrat, along with our corporate-controlled and Orwellian media, who deliberately chose to ignore it. The Bilderberg Group gave orders to microchip the entire U.S. population and then the world. Before the Health Care Bill was passed, the target date was set for the year 2013, when every baby born in the U.S. will receive a microchip at birth. Many are attacking President Obama for this, but although it is the Obama Health Care Bill, the microchip plan was created decades ago and put onto the fast track by the Republican Administration of President George Bush and his allegedly “born-again” Attorney General, John Ashcroft, after 911. It seems Ashcroft was more concerned about covering up the breasts of a Lady Liberty statue in the hallway of the Department of Justice, than he was about protecting our Constitutional liberties, which include the freedom of religion.

Unfortunately, Evangelical Christians make excellent political pawns because they focus on secondary issues, rather than the important issues. This is because Evangelical Christianity in America today does not have a truly Biblical worldview. I truly do not want to sound unkind, but the historical reality is that Evangelical Christians have played the part of what Lenin called “useful idiots.” Obviously, this is not what God planned for His people. But, by rejecting a Biblical worldview, the Scripture, “My people perish for lack of knowledge,” is fulfilled. The majority of Evangelical Christians in America have a very superficial faith as a result of what they are being taught in many of their churches and seminaries.

The new microchip technology with an RFID chip is so advanced it sounds like science fiction. The Apostle Paul (not Paul but apostle John) explains how this fits into Revelation 13, where the False Prophet will head a one world religion and force people to accept the mark of the beast. A microchip implant, biochip implant or med chip, in and of itself, is not necessarily the mark of the beast. The mark of the beast under the direction of the False Prophet, requires the conscious rejection of Jesus Christ as Lord and a commitment to worship the Antichrist as God.

The challenge for Christians and others will be the very act of taking a microchip implant, biochip implant or med chip, simply because of its parallel to the Biblical mark of the beast. Will people of faith be exempted for religious reasons or will they be forced to take it or imprisoned. In addition, any microchip technology could be activated with enhanced controls after it is implanted. So what starts out as a simple microchip implant could become a technology where at some future time, you must worship the Antichrist as God, and reject Jesus Christ as Lord in order to participate in the economic system. The built-in and evolving capacity of microchip technology makes this a dangerous possibility.

In the final analysis, the simple act of accepting the implantation of a microchip for medical reasons appears harmless on the surface. However, there is no guarantee that once it is implanted, that it will not be activated for mark of the beast technology. This is the danger and challenge that lies before us.

http://www.newswithviews.com/McGuire/paul135.htm


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 24 Juil - 16:14 (2012)    Sujet du message: MetLife BEGINS TRICARE DENTAL PROGRAM PARTNERSHIP Répondre en citant

MetLife BEGINS TRICARE DENTAL PROGRAM PARTNERSHIP

April 30, 2012

FALLS CHURCH, Va. – Starting May 1, 2012, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Inc. (MetLife) is the new TRICARE Dental Program (TDP) contractor, providing dental benefits for more than 2 million TRICARE beneficiaries worldwide.

“MetLife is a very welcome new partner to the TDP,” TRICARE Deputy Director Brig. Gen. W. Bryan Gamble said. “The company shares in our commitment to provide top quality health care to our service members and their families.”

Beneficiaries purchasing TDP will see expanded dental benefits beginning May 1 with lower monthly premium rates than last year. More details about premiums costs can be found on the MetLife TDP website at https://mybenefits.metlife.com/tricare .

Some TDP enhancements include an increased annual benefit maximum of $1,300, and a lifetime orthodontic maximum of $1,750. New expanded coverage includes an additional annual maximum of $1200 for dental accident coverage and no cost shares for deep cleaning for diabetic patients.

TDP information is available by calling 1-855-638-8371 in the U.S., 1-855-638-8372 outside the United States or online through the MetLife TDP website, https://mybenefits.metlife.com/tricare . The website has more information about costs, coverage details and finding a provider. Beneficiaries can use the “Find a Dentist” feature to locate one of the 168,000 MetLife dental access points.

For more information about TRICARE's dental programs, go to
www.tricare.mil/dental .

http://www.tricare.mil/mediacenter/news.aspx?fid=743


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 24 Aoû - 14:49 (2012)    Sujet du message: NEW 'MEANINFUL USE' RULES ARE OUT FOR E-HEALTH RECORD INCENTIVES Répondre en citant

NEW 'MEANINFUL USE' RULES ARE OUT FOR E-HEALTH RECORD INCENTIVES

By John Pulley August 23, 2012

Stage 2 meaningful use rules for electronic health record incentives are out, released Thursday afternoon by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT.

The CMS rule and the ONC standards and certification criteria let health-care providers know what’s expected of them as they build and expand their health IT capabilities. Providers’ EHRs must meet meaningful use requirements to qualify for substantial financial incentives under Medicare and Medicaid.

The new rules give providers until 2014 to show they have met the Stage 2 criteria, instead of 2013 as originally proposed, according to a CMS fact sheet.

Changes include:
  • Substituting “transitions of care” for “exchange of key clinical information” as a core objective, and providing patients electric and online access to their health records instead of providing electronic copies of the information.
  • Adding two new core objectives: using secure electronic messaging to communicate with patients, and automatically tracking medications from order to administration using assistive technologies in conjunction with an electronic medication administration record (eMAR.)
  • Allowing a batch reporting process for attesting to meaningful use, allowing information to be submitted in one file.
  • Reducing the patient engagement thresholds from 10 percent to 5 percent.
  • Reducing the threshold for sending summary-of-care records for care transitions and referrals from 65 percent to 50 percent, and requiring at least one exchange with a provider using EHR technology from a different vendor.

An ONC fact sheet describes standards and certification criteria changes, including:
  • Adopting certification criteria for transitions of care ensuring EHR technology supports standards-based electronic health information exchange.
  • Requiring that test reports for EHR certification be publicly available, with developers following specific price transparency practices.
  • Allowing “gap certification” for certain criteria, which ONC says will make the process more efficient.

http://www.nextgov.com/health/health-it/2012/08/new-meaninful-use-rules-are-out-e-health-record-incentives/57627/?oref=nextgov_today_nl


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 8 Sep - 22:24 (2012)    Sujet du message: NEW STEPS ADVANCE TRICARE, VA INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD Répondre en citant


HOW AND BY WHO, THE ANTICHRIST WILL IMPOSE THE MARK OF THE BEAST TO THE ENTIRE WORLD



NEW STEPS ADVANCE TRICARE, VA INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD

I can't open the document but I'm trying to find it. I will post soon but as you can see, they're ready.

New Steps Advance TRICARE, VA Integrated Electronic Health Record

07/12/2012 11:43 AM EDT

Throughout the last year, any time our senior leaders have spoken about the integrated electronic health record for the Department ...
http://content.govdelivery.com/bulletins/gd/USMHS-492a57


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 24 Sep - 14:43 (2012)    Sujet du message: ALERTE ROUGE ! PUCE : BELGIQUE : LA MINISTRE DES AFFAIRES « SOCIALES » ET DE LA « SANTE », LAURETTE ONKELINX, LIVRE SON PLAN CONCERNANT LE CONTRÔLE ET LA TRACABILITE DES « DISPOSITIFS MEDICAUX IMPLANTABLES » !!! Répondre en citant



ALERTE ROUGE ! PUCE : BELGIQUE : LA MINISTRE DES AFFAIRES « SOCIALES » ET DE LA « SANTE », LAURETTE ONKELINX, LIVRE SON PLAN CONCERNANT LE CONTRÔLE ET LA TRACABILITE DES « DISPOSITIFS MEDICAUX IMPLANTABLES » !!!







Chers amis,

Voici ci-dessous le début du plan des odieuses autorités belges pour l’implantation (le puçage) progressif des populations, en commençant par les « soins de santé », bien entendu…

Nous avons vu qu’aux USA, la « réforme » des « soins » de « santé » d’Obama a mis en place les puces implantables dans le secteur hospitalier, préparant ainsi le puçage à grande échelle de la population américaine…

BIEN ENTENDU, CE PLAN N’EST PAS QU’AMÉRICAIN ; IL EST MONDIAL, PUISQUE LES DIABOLIQUES MEMBRES DE L’ÉLITE GLOBALE SOUHAITENT LE PUÇAGE D’UN MAXIMUM D’INDIVIDUS AFIN D’OBTENIR LE CONTRÔLE BIOLOGIQUE TOTAL DES PERSONNES ET DES POPULATIONS !

ALORS, DANS NOS PAYS EUROPÉENS, QUE VA-T-IL SE PASSER ?

NOUS APPRENONS CI-DESSOUS, SELON UNE INFORMATION PROVENANT DE LA MINISTRE DES AFFAIRES « SOCIALES » ET DE LA « SANTÉ », J’AI NOMMÉ LAURETTE ONKELINX LA MALFAISANTE, QU’UN PLAN EUROPÉEN EST EN COURS CONCERNANT LES IMPLANTS !

MAIS ÉVIDEMMENT, LA BELGIQUE – QUI S’ÉTAIT DÉJÀ TRISTEMENT ILLUSTRÉE PAR L’IMPOSITION DES CARTES D’IDENTITÉ ÉLECTRONIQUES LIBERTICIDES – A ÉGALEMENT MIS AU POINT UN PLAN DÉTAILLÉ POUR « LE CONTRÔLE ET LA TRAÇABILITÉ DES DISPOSITIFS MÉDICAUX IMPLANTABLES » !

Le plan présenté ci-dessous ne cite pas exactement les puces sous-cutanées, neurales ou cérébrales… Néanmoins, la liste présentée ci-dessous n’est « pas exhaustive », c’est-à-dire que tous les implants n’y sont pas cités nommément. AUTREMENT DIT, LES TRÈS DANGEREUSES PUCES SOUS-CUTANÉES, NEURALES ET CÉRÉBRALES POURRONT ÊTRE AJOUTÉES SANS AUCUN PROBLÈME À CETTE LISTE.

Le but de ce plan consiste surtout à METTRE EN PLACE UN CONTRÔLE ET UNE TRAÇABILITÉ DES IMPLANTS, afin qu’aucun implant frauduleux ne puisse être placé dans une personne.

Le but consiste aussi (et peut-être surtout) à essayer de RASSURER LA POPULATION concernant ces implants, et en leur vendant l’illusion d’une « garantie » selon laquelle l’implant qui leur sera posé sera efficace et « sûr »…

CEPENDANT, IL EXISTE UN GROS « HIC » (qui a été DELIBEREMENT voulu, bien sûr) : C’EST LE SECTEUR DES DISPOSITIFS MÉDICAUX (AUTREMENT DIT, L’INDUSTRIE) QUI FINANCERA ENTIÈREMENT CETTE RÉFORME !

AUTANT DIRE QUE LA CRÉDIBILITÉ DE CETTE RÉFORME VIENT DE PRENDRE, IMMÉDIATEMENT ET DES SA CONCEPTION, DU PLOMB DANS L’AILE…

Bien sûr, afin de tenter de rassurer au maximum les gens, le partenariat entre les autorités gouvernementales belges, les autorités européennes, les gens de l’industrie et les autorités « sanitaires » est invoqué. LE PROBLÈME ÉTANT, BIEN ENTENDU, QUE TOUS CES PARTENAIRES SONT HAUTEMENT CORROMPUS, ET L’ONT PROUVÉ À MAINTES REPRISES DANS DIVERS DOSSIERS !

VOUS NOTEREZ QUE CES IMPLANTS, EXACTEMENT COMME AUX USA, SONT PRÉSENTÉS COMME DES « DISPOSITIFS MÉDICAUX ». POURTANT, NOUS AVONS VU EN LONG ET EN LARGE QUE LES PUCES RFID IMPLANTABLES SONT… CANCÉRIGÈNES !

BREF, L’ARTICLE QUI SUIT SIGNALE QU’ENTRE 2012 ET 2016, LE PLAN MONDIALISTE POUR LA RÉGLEMENTATION DES IMPLANTS SERA BIEN SUIVI EN BELGIQUE !

Ce que ceci signifie est clair : nos autorités belges auront un peu d’avance sur le projet mondialiste d’implantation de la population, projet fixé aux alentours de 2020.

BONNE RÉVOLUTION… OU BON PUÇAGE, BONNE ESCLAVAGE, BONNE TYRANNIE, BONNE AGONIE, BONNE MORT ET « BONNE » DAMNATION !

Vic.

P.S. : un immense merci à la personne qui m’a signalé cet article ! 


Source  : http://www.laurette-onkelinx.be/production/content.php?ArticleId=90&PressReleaseId=452

 



2012
Communiqué du 14-09-2012

CONSEIL DES MINISTRES - CONTRÔLE ET TRAÇABILITÉ DES DISPOSITIFS MÉDICAUX IMPLANTABLES : LAURETTE ONKELINX PRÉSENTE LES GRANDES LIGNES DU « PLAN IMPLANTS » À SES COLLÈGUES DE GOUVERNEMENT


Le scandale des prothèses mammaires PIP a suscité bon nombre de questions pertinentes et légitimes.

POUR LA MINISTRE DES AFFAIRES SOCIALES ET DE LA SANTÉ PUBLIQUE, LAURETTE ONKELINX, IL ÉTAIT URGENT DE REVOIR ET RENFORCER LA RÈGLEMENTATION RELATIVE AU CONTRÔLE ET AU SUIVI DES DISPOSITIFS MÉDICAUX IMPLANTABLES.

LA PRÉSIDENCE BELGE AVAIT DÉJÀ MIS CE POINT À L’ORDRE DU JOUR DES DISCUSSIONS EUROPÉENNES : LES AGENCES DU MÉDICAMENT ET ORGANISMES ASSIMILÉS AU NIVEAU EUROPÉEN ONT DEPUIS LORS DÉJÀ RENFORCÉ LEUR COLLABORATION. LA COMMISSION EUROPÉENNE A RÉCEMMENT ANNONCÉ VOULOIR AVANCER SUR CE DOSSIER, AVEC LE DÉPÔT D’UNE PROPOSITION DE DIRECTIVE : VU LE CARACTÈRE INTERNATIONAL DU MARCHÉ DES IMPLANTS, C’EST À L’ÉCHELON EUROPÉEN QUE DE TELLES MESURES SERONT ENCORE PLUS EFFICACES, comme on le voit par exemple en matière de pharmacovigilance pour les médicaments.

LAURETTE ONKELINX n’a néanmoins pas souhaité attendre l’aboutissement de ces travaux pour prendre des mesures en Belgique et A PRÉPARÉ UN PLAN D’ACTION GLOBAL, EN COLLABORATION AVEC L’AGENCE BELGE DES MÉDICAMENTS (AFMPS), LE SPF SANTÉ PUBLIQUE, L’INAMI, ET LES REPRÉSENTANTS DU SECTEUR DES DISPOSITIFS MÉDICAUX IMPLANTABLES.

Les premières actions démarreront dès septembre de cette année et LE PLAN D’ACTION IMPLANTS SERA COMPLÈTEMENT OPÉRATIONNEL EN 2016.

UNE RÉFORME GLOBALE QUI VA BIEN AU-DELÀ DES IMPLANTS MAMMAIRES…

Le Plan Implants est non seulement une réponse aux failles qui sont apparues à l’occasion du scandale PIP, mais aussi un Plan qui apporte une réponse GLOBALE, adaptée et efficace, face aux nombreux défis que le développement de ce secteur pose et posera. Il s’agit d’un Plan ambitieux qui prévoit, parmi d’autres mesures, le recrutement de 54 agents supplémentaires et le DÉVELOPPEMENT D’UN SYSTÈME DE TRAÇABILITÉ QUI FERA DE LA BELGIQUE L’UN DES PAYS LES PLUS AVANCÉS EN LA MATIÈRE.

Une réforme largement concertée

La réforme a été élaborée en collaboration avec toutes les administrations concernées (SPF Santé Publique, INAMI, ISP, SPF Economie, etc.) et avec le secteur des dispositifs médicaux. Plusieurs groupes de travail mettront en œuvre le Plan, au sein desquels seront impliqués tous les acteurs de terrain, les associations de patients et les professionnels de la santé.

Quels sont les implants concernés ?

TOUS LES IMPLANTS et prioritairement (LISTE NON EXHAUSTIVE) :

- prothèses (hanche, genoux, cheville, disque, etc.)
- implants mammaires
- implants cochléaires (surdité)
- tuteurs coronaires
- pacemakers
- valves cardiaques
- défibrillateurs
- endoprothèses (stents)
- cœurs artificiels
- moniteurs cardiaques

Les 3 piliers de la réforme :

1. IDENTIFICATION ET TRAÇABILITÉ
2. CONTRÔLE
3. MATÉRIOVIGILANCE

I. IDENTIFICATION ET TRAÇABILITÉ

Un véritable système de traçabilité de tous les implants sera mis en place en Belgique, depuis leur mise sur le marché jusqu’à leur implantation :

1. Un ENREGISTREMENT OBLIGATOIRE DES IMPLANTS, dès leur mise sur le marché.

Lorsqu’un implant entrera dans le circuit de distribution belge, toutes les données relatives à la qualité, la sécurité et l’efficacité devront être mises à la disposition de l’AFMPS, du SPF Economie et de l’INAMI, de telle sorte que ceux-ci disposent d’informations identiques pour exercer leurs compétences respectives.

Ces données devront être introduites par le distributeur ou le fabricant, qui devra s’être préalablement enregistré dans le système.

• Avril 2014 :

CETTE OBLIGATION NE VISERA QUE LES IMPLANTS POUR LESQUELS LE SYSTÈME DE TRAÇABILITÉ AURA DÉJÀ ÉTÉ DÉVELOPPÉ (prothèses de hanche et de genoux, tuteurs coronaires, pacemakers, valves cardiaques, prothèses mammaires, etc.) = les implants les plus couramment implantés

• AVRIL 2016 : CETTE OBLIGATION VISERA TOUTE IMPLANTATION.

2. Une délivrance contrôlée des implants

Dès octobre 2013, un véritable CIRCUIT LÉGAL DE DÉLIVRANCE sera instauré, QUI PASSERA OBLIGATOIREMENT PAR LES PHARMACIES (OFFICINES OU HOSPITALIÈRES).

La pharmacie, par laquelle l’implant devra obligatoirement transiter[1], lorsqu’elle délivrera un implant, devra sélectionner l’implant qu’elle délivre (il sera déjà préalablement encodé dans le système au moment de la mise sur le marché), indiquer le professionnel auquel il délivre (le professionnel sera déjà dans le système via le cadastre des professionnels), et le distributeur qui l’a fourni (il sera déjà préalablement encodé dans le système).

Aucune carte implant ne pourra être fournie au patient si l’implant n’a pas été acheté via le circuit des pharmacies à sécurité supplémentaire pour éviter la fraude.

3. Un enregistrement OBLIGATOIRE par le prestataire de soins à chaque pose d’implant

AU PLUS TARD DÈS AVRIL 2014, LES PROFESSIONNELS DE LA SANTÉ DEVRONT OBLIGATOIREMENT ENREGISTRER TOUTE POSE D’IMPLANTS DANS LE SYSTÈME.

4. Délivrance obligatoire d’une « CARTE IMPLANT » AU PATIENT

Dès avril 2014, le système traçabilité génèrera une CARTE IMPLANT (OU CERTIFICAT IMPLANT) QUE LE PROFESSIONNEL DEVRA OBLIGATOIREMENT REMETTRE AU PATIENT. Elle fournira au patient toutes les informations utiles : type d’implant, localisation, date d’implantation, durée de vie et date prévue du retrait, numéro de lot, pharmacie ayant délivré le dispositif, etc.

• La carte implant sera la garantie pour le patient que l’implant a respecté le circuit légal. Il s’agit d’un véritable outil au service de l’information du patient et de la transparence et un véritable GAGE DE QUALITÉ.

Il sera en effet impossible de délivrer cette carte si le circuit légal de délivrance n’a pas été respecté (recours à un distributeur enregistré, utilisation d’un implant dont la mise sur le marché à été notifiée à l’Agence, transit via une pharmacie/officine, etc.). L’implant ne pourra provenir d’un circuit de distribution parallèle / frauduleux.

Ce que cela changera concrètement :

• INFORMATION CENTRALISÉE DES IMPLANTS PRÉSENTS SUR NOTRE TERRITOIRE ; en cas de problème, ON SAURA À TOUT MOMENT OÙ SE TROUVENT LES IMPLANTS CONCERNÉS et avertir immédiatement les professionnels et patients concernés

• impossible pour un médecin de poser un implant qui n’a pas de MARQUAGE CE valide et impossible pour un distributeur de vendre directement à un prestataire de soins : la vente en pharmacie est une garantie supplémentaire de CONTRÔLE et de SÉCURITÉ

• avec sa « carte implant » le patient a la garantie que son implant a suivi le circuit légal et sait exactement ce qui lui a été implanté

II. CONTROLE

1. Organisation de CONTRÔLES RENFORCÉS : mise en place DÈS SEPTEMBRE 2012.

Ces contrôles concernent :

• les distributeurs et fabricants : de septembre 2012 à janvier 2013, les distributeurs de dispositifs médicaux implantables seront contrôlés prioritairement.

• les cliniques privées et hôpitaux : des premiers contrôles seront réalisés dès novembre 2012 et seront encore renforcés en 2013.


2. Dès 2013, le service de contrôle - qui sera progressivement (recrutements étalés sur 3 ans) renforcé de 41 ETP supplémentaires (30 inspecteurs, 10 gestionnaires, 1 appui administratif) - travaillera également :

• au CONTRÔLE DU PAIEMENT EFFECTIF DES REDEVANCES,

• à la LUTTE CONTRE LA FRAUDE DANS LE SECTEUR, EN COLLABORATION AVEC LA DOUANE, LA POLICE, etc.

• au CONTRÔLE DES DOSSIERS TECHNIQUES ET DES PROTOCOLES CLINIQUES soumis dans le cadre des études cliniques, avant et après la mise sur le marché,

• au CONTRÔLE DES ORGANISMES NOTIFIÉS (2 en Belgique : SGS et APRAGAZ) QUI DÉLIVRENT LA CERTIFICATION CE,

• un CONTRÔLE SPÉCIFIQUE sera également réalisé sUR LE RESPECT DES RÈGLES RELATIVES À LA PUBLICITÉ DES DISPOSITIFS MÉDICAUX.


Le service juridique sera renforcé pour assurer le suivi des infractions constatées.

III. MATERIOVIGILANCE

1. MISE EN PLACE DE POINTS DE CONTACT « MATÉRIOVIGILANCE » (PCM) et d’une procédure obligatoire pour la notification des risques incidents

Chaque acteur délivrant ou mettant à disposition un dispositif médical devra disposer d’un point de contact responsable de l’information montante et descendante. Le PCM sera responsable de la gestion de tous les aspects relatifs à la matériovigilance.

• DÈS JANVIER 2013 : LES HÔPITAUX ET LES DISTRIBUTEURS, SUR BASE VOLONTAIRE.

• DÈS OCTOBRE 2013 : OBLIGATION POUR TOUS LES ACTEURS DE DÉSIGNER LEUR PM.

Pour assurer la matériovigilance, les PCM disposeront de PROCÉDURES STANDARDISÉES OBLIGATOIRES POUR L’ÉVALUATION ET LA NOTIFICATION DES RISQUES ET INCIDENTS.

2. Optimalisation de la gestion des rapports d’incidents

Dès mars 2013, 3 agents supplémentaires seront recrutés à l’agence des médicaments afin d’améliorer gestion des rapports d’incidents.

INFORMATION – COMMUNICATION - FORMATION

1. Une attention particulière sera apportée à l’information donnée au patient avant implantation

Le contenu précis de cette information sera défini pour mars 2013, en concertation avec les associations de patients. Le but est que le patient dispose d’une information complète, compréhensible et systématique, qui mette en avant les avantages, LES RISQUES, LES indications et CONTRE-INDICATIONS.

2. L’information/formation/sensibilisation des acteurs sera renforcée via :

- des campagnes ciblées,

- des cycles de conférence auprès des associations professionnelles, facultés universitaires, etc.,

- et aussi un renforcement de la communication entre l’Agence et les associations professionnelles, facultés universitaires, etc.,

Un plan de communication pour les années 2013 et 2014, et le cycle de conférences 2013, seront finalisés pour le 31 janvier 2013.

3. Un GUIDE DES DISPOSITIFS MÉDICAUX régulièrement mis à jour sera publié dès mars 2014, afin de garantir que chaque acteur disposera d’une information optimale sur ses obligations.

4. Une plus grande SENSIBILISATION des acteurs à la matériovigilance et aux obligations y relatives sera organisée. Une newsletter matériovigilance trimestrielle sera mise sur pied dès janvier 2013. La première communication thématique portera sur l’obligation de notification d’incidents.

5. Les inspecteurs disposeront d’une formation continue dès mars 2013.

LE PLAN IMPLANTS EN CHIFFRES

À l’horizon 2015, le département « dispositifs médicaux » de l’Agence des Médicaments comptera 54 ETP supplémentaires, dont 41 seront affectés au contrôle.

COÛT DE LA MISE EN PLACE DU SYSTÈME DE TRAÇABILITÉ : 6,3 MILLIONS D’EUR, RÉPARTIS SUR 4 ANS, ENTRE 2013 ET 2016.

COÛT EN ANNÉE PLEINE : 7,5 MILLIONS D’EUR (PERSONNEL ET MAINTENANCE DU SYSTÈME DE TRAÇABILITÉ).

LA RÉFORME EST budgétairement neutre car ENTIÈREMENT FINANCÉE PAR LE SECTEUR DES DISPOSITIFS MÉDICAUX, via une augmentation de la redevance perçue sur leur chiffre d’affaire.

CHIFFRES 2011 en ce qui concerne les Implants remboursés

Orthopédie et traumatologie
(prothèses de hanche, genou, épaule, cheville, matériel d’ostéosynthèse, etc.)

• 832.067 pièces remboursées donc implantées

Parfois on implante toutes les pièces relatives à un implant (la prothèse, une tige, ses vis, etc.), parfois, on remplace une seule pièce dans le corps du patient.

Cas spécifique des prothèses de hanche :

- 24.661 patients ont été implantés

- au total, 178.000 pièces, soit environ 7 pièces par patient

- à nouveau, tantôt on place une prothèse et tous ses éléments, tantôt on en remplace certains éléments.

Chiffres concernant d’autres implants remboursés :

• les stents coronaires : 21.996 implantations

• les pacemakers : 11.441 implantations [nouveau + remplacements],

• les valves cardiaques : 5.093 implantations

• les défibrillateurs : 1.860 implantations

• les endoprothèses : 1.190 implantations

• les cœurs artificiels : 41 implantations

• les moniteurs cardiaques : 230 implantations

• les implants cochléaires : 239 implantations

• les implants mammaires (pour raisons médicales) : 1.604 implantations

________________________________________
[1] Sauf exceptions : implants dentaires, implants ophtalmologiques


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 5 Oct - 01:00 (2012)    Sujet du message: MOVING HEALTHCARE TO YOUR FINGERTIPS: KLAUS PHANARETH AT TEDxCopenhagen 2012 Répondre en citant

MOVING HEALTHCARE TO YOUR FINGERTIPS: KLAUS PHANARETH AT TEDxCopenhagen 2012



VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cGm_wJbyhU


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 5 Oct - 16:57 (2012)    Sujet du message: L'OMS RAPPELLE L'IMPORTANCE DES SYSTÈMES D'ASSURANCE MALADIE SOCIAUX Répondre en citant


 L'OMS RAPPELLE L'IMPORTANCE DES SYSTÈMES D'ASSURANCE MALADIE SOCIAUX

Un autre domaine qui devient sous la complète autorité des Nations Unies. Alors que le système de santé est en nette décadence dans tous les pays, le peuple étant souvent obligé de faire appel au secteur privé pour recevoir des soins rapidement, et que les assurances coupent la couverture de plusieurs soins et de plusieurs médicaments, l'OMS nous arrive avec un programme de couverture universelle qui devrait aider les "participants" à réduire de payer les services de santé au moment où ils sont dispensés. Si nous regardons tous les pays touchés par la crise, nous pouvons constater que des milliers de citoyens n'ont simplement plus les finances pour payer les soins et les médicaments que leur état réclame. La Défense Nationale, via son service médical, a un programme d'aide aux pays sous-développés. Mais sont-ils vraiment là pour aider quand nous considérons que la carte d'identité ou l'implant maudit est exigé si la personne veut recevoir des soins? Le but de toute cette destruction dans le domaine médical et des assurances n'a-t-elle pas plutôt pour but de mettre en place un autre programme d'esclavage?

Est-ce que ce modèle est basé sur la réforme des soins de santé d'Obama? Programme que l'on a transformé en programme de taxation pour OBLIGER tous les citoyens à y adhérer, sous peine d'amendes? Est-ce que sous ce programme, qui a pour but d'amener tous les pays vers une couverture universelle ira dans le même sens?

Le programme de santé d'Obama, qui comprend, via le HR3200, l'obligation d'être micro-pucé est-il en fait le réel agenda de l'OMS, le modèle global qui ferait que "tous, petits et grands, riches et pauvres, libres et esclaves, reçoivent une marque sur leur main droite ou sur leur front" Apoc. 13:16? À suivre de près mais ce que nous voyons c'est que l'OMS demande à tous les pays membres de les soutenir dans leurs efforts visant à atteindre la couverture universelle.

Au Québec, nous avons la première ministre Pauline Marois du Parti Québécois qui veut faire annuler la taxe santé mise en place par le gouvernement Libéral, mais ne joue-t-elle pas simplement le jeu le temps que ne se mette en place cet agenda de l'OMS au Québec? 

   L'OMS RAPPELLE L'IMPORTANCE DES SYSTÈMES D'ASSURANCE MALADIE SOCIAUX



4 September 2012 – Selon une étude publiée mardi par l'Organisation mondiale de la santé (OMS), les systèmes d'assurance maladie détiennent un potentiel inexploité pour parvenir à une couverture universelle des services de santé.

L'étude, menée dans certains pays d'Asie et d'Afrique, montre que les systèmes d'assurance maladie communautaires et sociaux dans ces pays développent la protection financière des participants en réduisant l'obligation de payer les services de santé au moment où ils sont dispensés.

Ils contribuent aussi à améliorer la santé car les bénéficiaires des programmes d'assurance maladie ont plus tendance que ceux qui n'en font pas partie à utiliser les services de santé, qu'il s'agisse d'hospitalisation ou de soins ambulatoires. De nos jours cependant, de nombreux pays à revenu faible ou intermédiaire ne tirent pas au maximum parti de ce type de systèmes.

La couverture universelle des soins de santé signifie que toutes les personnes peuvent utiliser les services de santé dont ils ont besoin tout en étant protégés des difficultés financières qui vont souvent de pair avec les paiements pour ces services. En 2011, les 193 États Membres de l'OMS se sont engagés à réformer les systèmes de financement de la santé pour atteindre la couverture universelle, mais les progrès restent parcellaires.

«De nombreux pays ont toujours des incertitudes quant aux modalités de financement de la couverture universelle », a expliqué l'un des auteurs, le Dr Ernst Spaan du Centre médical de l'université de Nijmegen aux Pays-Bas dans un communiqué de presse. «Notre étude a constaté que certains systèmes d'assurance maladie, notamment au niveau communautaire ou social, détiennent un potentiel inexploité dans les pays à revenu faible ou intermédiaire.»

«En plus d'assurer la protection financière de ceux qui tombent malades, nos observations confirment l'opinion de l'OMS selon laquelle des mécanismes de prépaiement des soins de santé, comme l'assurance maladie, sont une voie essentielle pour atteindre la couverture universelle», a précisé le Dr Spaan, en évoquant les dépenses à la charge des patients qui acculent chaque année des millions de personnes à la pauvreté.

L'étude a examiné les données en provenance de pays d'Afrique (principalement le Ghana, le Kenya, l'Ouganda, la République démocratique du Congo, la République-Unie de Tanzanie, le Rwanda et le Sénégal) et d'Asie (principalement la Chine, l'Inde, les Philippines, la Thaïlande et le Viet Nam).

Joe Kutzin, expert de l'OMS pour le financement de la santé, a convenu que les systèmes d'assurance maladie peuvent favoriser les progrès vers la couverture universelle des soins de santé, «tant que l'on fait soigneusement attention à certaines caractéristiques, comme d'y inclure des subventions gouvernementales pour les pauvres, faute de quoi, ces systèmes peuvent en fait nuire à la progression vers ce but». L'OMS collabore avec les États Membres pour les soutenir dans leurs efforts visant à atteindre la couverture universelle.

http://www.un.org/apps/newsFr/storyF.asp?NewsID=28866&Cr=OMS&Cr1


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 17 Oct - 15:53 (2012)    Sujet du message: THE HEALTH PLAN'S DEVILISH PRINCIPLES Répondre en citant

THE HEALTH PLAN'S DEVILISH PRINCIPLES

AUDIO : http://mises.org/media/7670/Audio-Essays-gtgt-The-Health-Plans-Devilish-Principles


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 23 Oct - 16:06 (2012)    Sujet du message: BIG DATA'S BIG POTENTIAL IN HEALTH CARE Répondre en citant

BIG DATA'S BIG POTENTIAL IN HEALTH CARE

By John Pulley October 17, 2012 
Using “big data” to analyze information gathered by health IT is the key to improving medical outcomes, as well as making health care more efficient and cost-effective, say the authors of an article published online recently by the American Health Information Management Association.

“Today’s episode-oriented discrete data does not allow us to be as prescriptive as we need to be in delivering better health care and empowering consumers,” says Lisa Khorey, vice president of enterprise systems and data management, information technology at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, in the article. “Medicine can get closer to the action when it is prescriptive, predictive, and precise. Big Data allows organizations to focus on wellness and standardize care processes.”


The article, “Big Data, Bigger Outcomes,” by Lorraine Fernandes, Michele O’Connor and Victoria Weaver, argues that integrating big data into their operations lets providers “apply analytics to better understand the clinical and operational states of their business based on historical and current trends, and predict what might occur in the future with a trusted level of reliability.”

To realize the potential of big data on health care, the authors outline a four-step process for implementation:
  • Establish data governance and define data objectives.
  • Identify data and information requirements.
  • Normalize, integrate and organize big-data solutions
  • Protect security and privacy of big data.

“Big data offers [health information management] professionals the chance to play a strategic role in crafting the next level of health-care information management, and act as key stakeholders in advancing the strategic use of big data across the health-care ecosystem,” the authors contend.

“As the industry transforms,” they continue, “it becomes essential for HIM professionals to move beyond the principles of record maintenance and documentation and develop an understanding for data transport, mapping processes, and other big data characteristics.”



John Pulley
John Pulley has written the Health IT Update blog since May 2011. Prior to becoming a regular contributor to Nextgov, he covered technology for Federal Computer Week and Government Health IT magazines. He has written about government for Federal Times and Air Force Times, as well. Pulley has worked in journalism for more than 20 years. He began his career covering local government for regional newspapers. In addition, he served as a writer and senior editor at The Chronicle of Higher Education for seven years. In 2006, he founded The Pulley Group, an editorial services agency.

http://www.nextgov.com/health/health-it/2012/10/big-datas-big-potential-health-care/58850/?oref=nextgov_healthit_nl


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 26 Oct - 03:19 (2012)    Sujet du message: NAVY LAUNCHES HEALTHY LIVING CAMPAIGN Répondre en citant



NAVY LAUNCHES HEALTHY LIVING CAMPAIGN

Posted by: Health.mil Staff

Tuesday, October 09, 2012

Earlier this month, the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center launched a health promotion and wellness campaign during a ceremony aboard the USS Bataan.

"Health does not occur in the doctor's office," U.S. Surgeon General, Vice Adm. Regina Benjamin said at the ceremony. "It happens where we live and where we play."

Joining Benjamin to kick off the campaign were Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Clinical and Program Policy and Chief Medical Officer of the TRICARE Management Activity, Dr. Warren Lockette, and U.S. Navy Deputy Surgeon General, Rear. Adm. Michael Mittelman.

The campaign aligns with the National Prevention Strategy, published in June 2011, which presented a vision, goals, recommendations, and action items to reduce preventable death, disease, and disability in the U.S.

To access and download campaign materials, visit the
Healthy Living page on the Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center website.

Read the complete
article on Navy.mil.

For more information about healthy living visit the Department of Defense campaign, Operation Live Well.Category:

Tags healthy living

http://www.health.mil/blog/12-10-09/Navy_Launches_Healthy_Living_Campaign.aspx


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 14 Nov - 18:42 (2012)    Sujet du message: FEDERAL AGENCIES UNITE TO ISSUE CONSUMER PRODUCT RECALL ALERTS Répondre en citant



FEDERAL AGENCIES UNITE TO ISSUE CONSUMER PRODUCT RECALL ALERTS

Posted by: Health.mil Staff
Tuesday, November 13, 2012

To provide better service in alerting American consumers to unsafe, hazardous or defective products including notices related to food and medicine, federal agencies have joined together to form recalls.gov – a virtual one-stop-shop for U.S. government recalls.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Food and Drug Administration and Department of Agriculture monitor the safety of thousands of products and issue hundreds of recall announcements each year of millions of products. Recall information is both available online and also on-the-go, with a mobile app that provides easy access to vital safety information.

With the mobile app, consumers can type a product’s name and learn immediately whether that product has been recalled because of a safety concern. Recalls.gov provides photos of recalled products along with guidance on how to dispose of unsafe products.

http://www.health.mil/blog/12-11-13/Federal_Agencies_Unite_to_Issue_Consumer_Product_Recall_Alerts.aspx


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 27 Nov - 23:50 (2012)    Sujet du message: HEALTH IT FOCUS FOR FEDS Répondre en citant

HEALTH IT FOCUS FOR FEDS

Tuesday, December 27th, 2011 by Angela Stringfellow

The Feds are about to go on a spending binge. This time, they’re dumping $6.5 billion on health IT, a move which should improve access to and quality of care for Americans over time. Health IT is big business and a federal spend of this magnitude is a sure indication that the healthcare industry is moving forward in terms of technology.


Image by ilco on Stock.xchng

One reason for the rise in government health IT spending: It’s proven ability to reduce healthcare costs, according to FierceHealthIT. Other factors include an aging population and ever-rising healthcare costs. This estimate doesn’t include the Department of Health and Human Services electronic health initiative or state grants for health information exchange.

The $6.5 billion estimate does include health IT systems for the Department of Defense, Department of Veterans Affairs and the Bureau of Indian Affairs. In addition, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will be upgrading its payment systems and the National Institutes of Health and Center for Disease Control will be funding the tracking of medical research and surveillance of disease outbreaks.

Health IT will ease massive health care costs

Health care costs are expected to double between now and 2020. While improvements in health IT carry an initial cost, more efficient systems will help ease the rapid cost increase accompanying an aging population.

Other agencies, such as the Department of Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs, are implementing initiatives that will streamline health care for Veterans and active military personnel by creating a single, lifelong health record for each individual.

According to Healthcare IT News, even though federal agencies overall are facing budget cuts over the next several years, health IT is one area that will continue to receive funding increases thanks to the promise of down-the-road savings.

The article also notes that as health care moves toward a more preventative and patient-centered approach, health IT enables providers to provide services more adequately and efficiently, which improves the overall patient experience. Further, advanced technology aids providers in predicting future health care needs of individuals and provide preventative treatments.

http://www.seniorhomes.com/w/health-it-focus-for-feds/


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 11 Jan - 23:44 (2013)    Sujet du message: OFFICIALS ANNOUNCE TRICARE PRIME SERVICE AREA CHANGES Répondre en citant

Release No. 01-03-13

Jan. 11, 2013


OFFICIALS ANNOUNCE TRICARE PRIME SERVICE AREA CHANGES

By Amaani Lyle

American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON (AFRNS) – Retirees and their dependents will be affected when long-delayed reductions to areas where the TRICARE Prime option is offered take place Oct. 1, TRICARE officials said Jan. 9.

As TRICARE seeks to synchronize service area shifts once staggered by contract delays, some military retirees and their dependents will be moved to TRICARE Standard coverage, S. Dian Lawhon, beneficiary education and support division director, said during a conference call with reporters. Those affected reside more than 40 miles from a military treatment facility or base closure site, she said.

Active-duty service members and their families will be unaffected.

The new contracts limit Prime networks to regions within a 40-mile radius of military treatment facilities and in areas affected by the 2005 base closure and realignment process, she explained. But provisions will allow Prime beneficiaries who see providers outside the 40-mile service area to remain in Prime if they reside within 100 miles of an available primary care manager and sign an access waiver, she added.

"If TRICARE retirees and young adults live less than 100 miles away from a remaining Prime service area, they can re-enroll in Prime by waiving their drive standards and there will be room made for them," Lawhon said, adding that the networks are required to connect providers to those who elect to waive their drive standards.

Contractors such as United HealthCare Military & Veterans, Health Net Federal Services and Humana Military will continue to assist beneficiaries in obtaining providers in their regions, she added.

"Health care is best if it's local," Lawhon said. "We've established the drive standards [to enable] people to access their primary and specialty care within a reasonable period of time."

Austin Camacho, TRICARE's benefit information and outreach branch chief, said the out-of-pocket, fee-for-service cost of TRICARE Standard would cost a bit more, depending on the frequency of health care use and visits. No cost applies for preventive care such as mammograms, vaccines, cancer screening, prostate examinations and routine check-ups, he added.

Officials estimate the changes will lower overall TRICARE costs by $45 million to $56 million a year, depending on the number of beneficiaries who choose to remain in Prime, Camacho said.

Lawhon and Camacho said beneficiaries should speak to their health care providers and families to assess the best course of action.

"We're hoping people will take a careful look at their health care needs," Lawhon said. "We have seen that people using the Standard benefit are very pleased with it, and their customer satisfaction is the highest of all." (Courtesy of TRICARE)

For more retiree news and information, please visit www.retirees.af.mil.


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 671
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 17 Jan - 15:28 (2013)    Sujet du message: OBAMA HEALTH CARE LAW: RFID CHIP, HR 4872 | MARK OF THE BEAST 666? Répondre en citant

OBAMA HEALTH CARE LAW: RFID CHIP, HR 4872 | MARK OF THE BEAST 666?



VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jLOdaXViUI


Revenir en haut
Contenu Sponsorisé






MessagePosté le: Aujourd’hui à 23:52 (2016)    Sujet du message: RÉFORME DES SOINS DE SANTÉ - PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE - HEALTH CARE REFORM - (PARTIE 2)

Revenir en haut
Montrer les messages depuis:   
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> LA RELIGION MONDIALE ET L'ONU : SES VUES ET AGENDA SUR LE TRANSHUMANISME, CLONAGE, AGENDA DE DÉPOPULATION -> OBAMACARE : RÉFORME DES SOINS DE SANTÉ - PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE - HEALTH CARE REFORM (PARTIE 2) Toutes les heures sont au format GMT + 2 Heures
Aller à la page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  >
Page 1 sur 5

 
Sauter vers:  

Portail | Index | Creer un forum | Forum gratuit d’entraide | Annuaire des forums gratuits | Signaler une violation | Conditions générales d'utilisation
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Traduction par : phpBB-fr.com