LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum

LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1)
...

 FAQFAQ   RechercherRechercher   MembresMembres   GroupesGroupes   S’enregistrerS’enregistrer 
 ProfilProfil   Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés   ConnexionConnexion 

RÉFORME DES SOINS DE SANTÉ - PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE - HEALTH CARE REFORM - (PARTIE 2)
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  >
 
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> LA RELIGION MONDIALE ET L'ONU : SES VUES ET AGENDA SUR LE TRANSHUMANISME, CLONAGE, AGENDA DE DÉPOPULATION -> OBAMACARE : RÉFORME DES SOINS DE SANTÉ - PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE - HEALTH CARE REFORM (PARTIE 2)
Sujet précédent :: Sujet suivant  
Auteur Message
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 4 Oct - 00:15 (2013)    Sujet du message: OBAMACARE FINES TO BE SEIZED FROM BANK ACCOUNTS? Répondre en citant

OBAMACARE FINES TO BE SEIZED FROM BANK ACCOUNTS?

October 02, 2013



(PAUL JOSEPH WATSON) -- A man who attempted to sign up for Obamacare online was told that a fine of over $4,000 dollars a year for refusing to take out mandatory health insurance could be taken directly from his bank account, and that his drivers license would be suspended and a federal tax lien placed against his home, according to an entry on the HealthCare.gov Facebook page.


Will Sheehan claims that when he tried to sign up for Obamacare and then register to opt out, he received an ominous warning. Sheehan’s full Facebook post reads;If true, the implementation of Obamacare is going to be a whole lot more draconian than Americans have been led to believe.
Citation:

“I actually made it through this morning at 8:00 A.M. I have a preexisting condition (Type 1 Diabetes) and my income base was 45K-55K annually I chose tier 2 “Silver Plan” and my monthly premiums came out to $597.00 with $13,988 yearly deductible!!! There is NO POSSIBLE way that I can afford this so I “opt-out” and chose to continue along with no insurance.

I received an email tonight at 5:00 P.M. informing me that my fine would be $4,037 and could be attached to my yearly income tax return. Then you make it to the “REPERCUSSIONS PORTION” for “non-payment” of yearly fine. First, your drivers license will be suspended until paid, and if you go 24 consecutive months with “Non-Payment” and you happen to be a home owner, you will have a federal tax lien placed on your home. You can agree to give your bank information so that they can easy “Automatically withdraw” your “penalties” weekly, bi-weekly or monthly! This by no means is “Free” or even “Affordable.”



Sheehan went on to point out that the site makes you input all your personal information before giving you an indication of the costs, meaning a database of the “uninsured” is being built. He added that he could not afford to pay the premium so would have to break the law and pay the fine, leaving him with no health care coverage.

The federal government has consistently denied that any fines pertaining to Obamacare non-compliance could be seized from bank accounts.

“There’s no criminal sanctions for not paying this, and there’s no ability to levy a bank account or do seizures,” then-IRS commissioner Douglas Shulman said in April 2010.
In addition, Americans who refuse to pay for mandatory health insurance “shall not be subject to any criminal prosecution,” according to the law itself.
Section 1501(g)(2) of the Affordable Care Act also states that the IRS cannot “file notice of lien with respect to any property of a taxpayer by reason of any failure to pay the penalty imposed by this section.”

EIther Sheehan’s claim that he received this notice is a lie, or the feds have been dishonest with the American people all along, and the revolt against Obamacare is about to take “don’t tread on me” to a whole new level.

Read a copy of the full exchange on Facebook below. Read more via Infowars...

http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines/disturbing-report-obamacare-fines-to-be-seized-from-bank-accounts


Revenir en haut
Publicité






MessagePosté le: Ven 4 Oct - 00:15 (2013)    Sujet du message: Publicité

PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?
Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 6 Oct - 04:06 (2013)    Sujet du message: ALERT NEWS EXCLUSIVE! BUSTED! PPsimmons OPERATIVE CALLS OBAMA CARE! LISTEN IN! Répondre en citant

ALERT NEWS EXCLUSIVE! BUSTED! PPsimmons OPERATIVE CALLS OBAMA CARE! LISTEN IN!



VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtWzbSQGsVg


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 9 Oct - 23:59 (2013)    Sujet du message: LE MONTANT DE L'ASSURANCE MINIMALE OBAMACARE POUR UNE FAMILLE DE CINQ PERSONNES EST DE 20.000 US$ OU UNE PENALITE MENSUEL D4IMPÖTS DE 2.085 US$ Répondre en citant

LE MONTANT DE L'ASSURANCE MINIMALE OBAMACARE POUR UNE FAMILLE DE CINQ PERSONNES EST DE 20.000 US$ OU UNE PENALITE MENSUEL D'IMPÔTS DE 2.085 US$ 

Catégorie parente: International Catégorie : Ça s'est dit par là... Créé le 3 février 2013 Mis à jour le 12 mars 2013 Publié le 3 février 2013 Écrit par folamour Affichages : 270

Ils ne pourront pas y échapper... C'est beau le socialisme américain en action, de plus je suppose que, dans la pratique, ceux qui payeront l'amende ne seront pas plus assurés...



(CNSNews.com) - dans un règlement final a publié mercredi, le service des recettes fiscales a supposé que sous Obamacare le plan le meilleur marché d'assurance médicale maladie disponible en 2016 pour une famille coûtera $20.000 pendant l'année.

 (IRS) Sous Obamacare, les Américains seront obligés de souscrire à l'assurance médicale maladie ou de payer une pénalité à l'IRS (impôts).

L'hypothèse de l'IRS que le plan le meilleur marché pour une famille coûtera $20.000 par an est trouvée dans les exemples que l'IRS donne pour aider des personnes à comprendre comment calculer la pénalité qu’ils devront payer au gouvernement, si elles n'achètent pas un plan de santé mandaté.

Les exemples indiquent que l’IRS s’attend à ce que les familles de quatre et cinq personnes, payent un minimum de $20.000 par an pour un plan en bronze.

« La moyenne nationale annuelle de la prime en bronze pour une famille de 5 (2 adultes, 3 enfants) est de $20.000, » indique le règlement.

Le bronze sera le plan d’assurance de santé le plus bas sous Obamacare disponible après l’argent, l’or, et le platine. En vertu de la loi, la pénalité pour ne pas avoir souscrit d'assurance médicale maladie est censée être couverte à la prime en bronze moyenne annuelle, à 2,5 pour cent de revenu imposable, ou à $2.085,00 par famille en 2016.

Dans le règlement final publié mercredi, l’IRS a légalement définit les règles pour mettre en application les pénalités que les Américains doivent payer s'ils n'obéissent au mandat d'Obamacare pour s'assurer.

Pour aider à illustrer ces règles, les exemples présentés par IRS sont de différentes situations de familles afin qu’ils puissent se retrouver dedans.

Dans les exemples, l'IRS suppose que les familles de cinq personnes qui sont non assurées devraient payer une moyenne de $20.000 par an pour acheter un plan en bronze en 2016.

Utilisant les conditions présentées dans les règlements, l'IRS calcule qu'une famille gagnant $120.000 par an, qui n’est pas assurée, devrait payer une « pénalité » (un mot que l'IRS emploie toujours en dépit de l'arrêt de la Cour Suprême que c'est en fait un « impôt ») de $2.400 en 2016.

Pour ceux qui se demandent à quel niveau de clarté se trouvent les clarifications de l'IRS en ce qui concerne cette nouvelle règle de « pénalité » , voici l'un des exemples réels que l'IRS donne :

« Exemple 3. Famille sans couverture essentielle minimum.

« (i) en 2016, les contribuables H et J se sont mariés et classent un rapport collectif. H et J ont trois enfants : K, âge 21, L, âge 15, et M, âge 10. Aucun membre de la famille n'a la couverture essentielle minimum pour n'importe quel mois en 2016. Le revenu domestique de H et de J est $120.000. Le seuil applicable de classement de H et J est de $24.000. La prime en bronze annuelle moyenne nationale de plan pour une famille de 5 (2 adultes, 3 enfants) est $20.000.

« (ii) pour chaque mois en 2016, dans les paragraphes (b) (2) (ii) et (b) (2) (iii) de cette section, la quantité applicable de montant en dollar est $2.780 (($695 x 3 adultes) + (($695/2) x 2 enfants)). Dans le paragraphe (b) (2) (i) de cette section, la quantité plate du dollar est $2.085 (le plus petit entre $2.780 et $2.085 ($695 x 3)). Dans le paragraphe (b) (3) de cette section, la quantité de revenu excédentaire est de $2.400 (($120.000 - $24.000) x 0,025). Par conséquent, dans le paragraphe (b) (1) de cette section, la quantité mensuelle de pénalité est $200 (le plus grand de $173,75 ($2,085/12) ou de $200 ($2,400/12)).

« (iii) la somme des montants mensuels de pénalité est $2.400 (X12 $200). La somme des primes du plan bronze moyen mensuelles nationales est de $20.000 ($20,000/12 X12). Par conséquent, dans le paragraphe (a) de cette section, le paiement de responsabilité partagée imposé à H et J pour 2016 est de $2.400 (le moins entre $2.400 et $20.000). » 

http://www.crashdebug.fr/index.php/international/6030-le-montant-de-l-assurance-minimal-obamacare-pour-une-famille-de-cinq-personnes-est-de-20-000-us-ou-une-penalite-d-impots-de-2-085-us


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 10 Oct - 00:13 (2013)    Sujet du message: UPDATED : TRICARE STATEMENT ABOUT GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN Répondre en citant

UPDATED : TRICARE STATEMENT ABOUT GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN

October 9, 2013

On October 9, 2013, the Defense Health Agency updated their statement about the government shutdown:

"We know that those who rely on the Military Health System (MHS) are concerned about how the government shutdown might impact their health care and are taking appropriate actions to assure that our beneficiaries are cared for. TRICARE beneficiaries using providers in the private sector should feel no effects at this time."

To read the rest of the updated statement, go to: www.tricare.mil/Welcome/MediaCenter/News/Archives/10_9_13_Shutdown.

Sign up for TRICARE e-mail updates at www.tricare.mil/subscriptions.

Connect with TRICARE on Facebook and Twitter at www.facebook.com/tricare and www.twitter.com/tricare.

The TRICARE Management Activity administers the worldwide health care plan for 9.6 million eligible beneficiaries of the uniformed services, retirees and their families.


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 12 Oct - 10:52 (2013)    Sujet du message: BEN CARSON: OBAMACARE WORSE THAN SLAVERY Répondre en citant

BEN CARSON: OBAMACARE WORSE THAN SLAVERY

'It was never about health care, it was about control' Published: 16 hours ago

(POLITICO) Dr. Ben Carson, a conservative commentator and neurosurgeon, on Friday likened the health care law to slavery.

“Obamacare is really, I think, the worst thing to happen to the nation since slavery,” Carson said, speaking at the Values Voter Summit. “And it is slavery, in a way.”
Carson, who is African American, added to applause, “It was never about health care. It was about control.”

http://www.wnd.com/2013/10/ben-carson-obamacare-worse-than-slavery/#dJVBxoP…

http://www.wnd.com/2013/10/ben-carson-obamacare-worse-than-slavery/#FxsG9pd…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 14 Oct - 18:58 (2013)    Sujet du message: A JOB ENGINE SPUTTERS AS HOSPITALS CUT STAFF Répondre en citant

A JOB ENGINE SPUTTERS AS HOSPITALS CUT STAFF
Paul Davidson and Barbara Hansen, USA TODAY 7:34 p.m. EDT October 13, 2013

Hospitals are cutting thousands of jobs, undercutting a sector that was a reliable source of job growth, even through the recession.

(Photo: Kyle Grillot, AP)
Story Highlights
  • Hospitals face lower insurance reimbursement
  • New health care law encourages fewer hospital stays
  • Twenty-six states rejected expanding Medicaid, a revenue source for hospitals


SHARE 10128 CONNECT 1306 TWEET 380 COMMENTEMAILMORE

Hospitals, a reliable source of employment growth in the recession and its aftermath, are starting to cut thousands of jobs amid falling insurance payments and inpatient visits.
The payroll cuts are surprising because the Affordable Care Act (ACA), whose implementation took a big step forward this month, is eventually expected to provide health coverage to as many as 30 million additional Americans.
"While the rest of the U.S. economy is stabilizing or improving, health care is entering into a recession," says John Howser, assistant vice chancellor of Vanderbilt University Medical Center.
Health care providers announced more layoffs than any other industry last month — 8,128 — largely because of reductions by hospitals, according to outplacement firm Challenger Gray and Christmas. So far this year, the health care sector has announced 41,085 layoffs, the third-most behind financial and industrial companies.
Total private hospital employment is still up by 36,000 in the past 12 months, but it's down by 8,000 since April, and more staff reductions are expected into next year.
This month, Indiana University Health laid off about 900 workers as part of a move to trim its budget by $1 billion over five years. Vanderbilt plans to eliminate 1,000 jobs by the end of the year to help shave operating costs 8% a year. The Cleveland Clinic is offering buyouts to 3,000 employees as it shaves its annual operating costs by $330 million.
"This is a challenging time for the health care industry," says Jim Terwilliger, president of two of Indiana health's hospitals. "The pace of change is far greater than any time in recent history."
There are myriad reasons for the cuts, which are affecting administrative staff as well as nurses and doctors:
• Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance companies are all reducing reimbursement to hospitals. The federal budget cuts known as sequestration have cut Medicare reimbursement by 2%, the American Hospital Association says.
• The health care law has further reduced the Medicare payments to hospitals that provide lower-quality service or have high readmission rates.
• The National Institutes of Health reduced funding to hospitals by 5% as part of sequestration, forcing hospitals to trim research staff.
• The number of inpatient hospital days fell 4% from 2007 to 2011, in part because of the economic downturn, the hospital association says.
• As more Baby Boomers turn 65, their services will be reimbursed at Medicare rates that are lower than those of private payers, putting further pressure on hospital revenue.
The new health care law was supposed to ease the burden on hospitals by expanding Medicaid coverage to more low-income Americans, who often use hospital services in emergencies, then don't pay their bills. But 26 states, including Tennessee, rejected the ACA's offer of federal funding to expand Medicaid. That decision led to about a third of the job cuts by Nashville-based Vanderbilt, Howser says.
Still, J.P. Fingado, CEO of API Healthcare, a consulting firm for hospitals, says the layoffs are shortsighted because the providers likely will have to add staff as soon as next year to handle increased patient volumes resulting from the health care law.
"The cuts are a particularly short-term reaction," he says.


http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/10/13/hospital-job-cuts/2947929/



Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 14 Oct - 19:00 (2013)    Sujet du message: A JOB ENGINE SPUTTERS AS HOSPITALS CUT STAFF Répondre en citant

A JOB ENGINE SPUTTERS AS HOSPITALS CUT STAFF

Paul Davidson and Barbara Hansen, USA TODAY 7:34 p.m. EDT October 13, 2013

Hospitals are cutting thousands of jobs, undercutting a sector that was a reliable source of job growth, even through the recession.


(Photo: Kyle Grillot, AP)

Story Highlights
  • Hospitals face lower insurance reimbursement
  • New health care law encourages fewer hospital stays
  • Twenty-six states rejected expanding Medicaid, a revenue source for hospitals
Hospitals, a reliable source of employment growth in the recession and its aftermath, are starting to cut thousands of jobs amid falling insurance payments and inpatient visits.

The payroll cuts are surprising because the Affordable Care Act (ACA), whose implementation took a big step forward this month, is eventually expected to provide health coverage to as many as 30 million additional Americans.


"While the rest of the U.S. economy is stabilizing or improving, health care is entering into a recession," says John Howser, assistant vice chancellor of Vanderbilt University Medical Center.

Health care providers announced more layoffs than any other industry last month — 8,128 — largely because of reductions by hospitals, according to outplacement firm Challenger Gray and Christmas. So far this year, the health care sector has announced 41,085 layoffs, the third-most behind financial and industrial companies.

Total private hospital employment is still up by 36,000 in the past 12 months, but it's down by 8,000 since April, and more staff reductions are expected into next year.

This month, Indiana University Health laid off about 900 workers as part of a move to trim its budget by $1 billion over five years. Vanderbilt plans to eliminate 1,000 jobs by the end of the year to help shave operating costs 8% a year. The Cleveland Clinic is offering buyouts to 3,000 employees as it shaves its annual operating costs by $330 million.

"This is a challenging time for the health care industry," says Jim Terwilliger, president of two of Indiana health's hospitals. "The pace of change is far greater than any time in recent history."

There are myriad reasons for the cuts, which are affecting administrative staff as well as nurses and doctors:

• Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance companies are all reducing reimbursement to hospitals. The federal budget cuts known as sequestration have cut Medicare reimbursement by 2%, the American Hospital Association says.
• The health care law has further reduced the Medicare payments to hospitals that provide lower-quality service or have high readmission rates.
• The National Institutes of Health reduced funding to hospitals by 5% as part of sequestration, forcing hospitals to trim research staff.
• The number of inpatient hospital days fell 4% from 2007 to 2011, in part because of the economic downturn, the hospital association says.
• As more Baby Boomers turn 65, their services will be reimbursed at Medicare rates that are lower than those of private payers, putting further pressure on hospital revenue.

The new health care law was supposed to ease the burden on hospitals by expanding Medicaid coverage to more low-income Americans, who often use hospital services in emergencies, then don't pay their bills. But 26 states, including Tennessee, rejected the ACA's offer of federal funding to expand Medicaid. That decision led to about a third of the job cuts by Nashville-based Vanderbilt, Howser says.

Still, J.P. Fingado, CEO of API Healthcare, a consulting firm for hospitals, says the layoffs are shortsighted because the providers likely will have to add staff as soon as next year to handle increased patient volumes resulting from the health care law.

"The cuts are a particularly short-term reaction," he says.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/10/13/hospital-job-cuts/2947929/


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 17 Oct - 19:48 (2013)    Sujet du message: OBAMA SAYS HE'LL VETO BILL THAT MANDATES OBAMACARE FOR HIMSELF, CONGRESS Répondre en citant

OBAMA SAYS HE'LL VETO BILL THAT MANDATES OBAMACARE FOR HIMSELF, CONGRESS



President Barack Obama is reportedly telling congressional officials he will veto any debt-ceiling bill from Congress that includes the so-called Vitter amendment, which would make the Affordable Care Act applicable to senior executive branch officials, including the president and vice president.

The amendment, offered by U.S. Sen. David Vitter, R-La., and supported by House Republican leaders, would also apply to Congress, according to Politico.

You might call the Vitter amendment the “eat the food you cooked, sleep in the bed you made” proposal.

“This is really about fairness, making sure that Washington is forced to live under the same train wreck of Obamacare that is forced on the rest of America,” Vitter said in a statement on his website. “It will take the policy makers in Washington walking in the same shoes as the millions of Americans to actually make real policy changes, and clean up the train wreck.”

Politico reported:
Citation:


Obama brought up the issue of the so-called Vitter language unprompted, according to one of the sources. The president and congressional Democrats also discussed how to set caps for discretionary spending for next year given the possibility that a short-term spending bill could fund the government for only a few months, and their shared perception of a need to come up with a larger budgeting plan to avoid governing, as Obama often says, “from crisis to crisis,” the sources said.

While Obama said he would veto the Vitter language, he was “more irate” one of the sources said, over the Republican proposal to limit his ability to use tools referred to as extraordinary measures to avoid a default.



Perhaps Obama is happy with the insurance plan he already has and wants to continue seeing his doctors.

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2013/10/16/obama-says-hell-veto-bill-that-mandates-obamacare-for-himself-congress-85333


Revenir en haut
vicflame


Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 07 Mai 2012
Messages: 206

MessagePosté le: Sam 26 Oct - 12:33 (2013)    Sujet du message: PUCE: COUPS DE SONDE DOUTEUX DE LA PRESSE SATIRIQUE U.S Répondre en citant

-



FAUX ARTICLE ! PUCE IMPLANTABLE : LES « COUPS DE SONDE » DOUTEUX DE LA PRESSE SATIRIQUE AMERICAINE !


Et elle faisait que tous, petits et grands, riches et pauvres, libres et esclaves, prenaient une marque en leur main droite, ou en leurs fronts ;  et qu'aucun ne pouvait acheter, ni vendre, s'il n'avait la marque ou le nom de la bête, ou le nombre de son nom. Ici est la sagesse : que celui qui a de l'intelligence, compte le nombre de la bête ; car c'est un nombre d'homme, et son nombre [est] six cent soixante-six. (La Bible, Apocalypse, chapitre 13, versets 16 à 18 )

Le premier (ange) s’en alla et versa sa coupe sur la terre. Un ULCERE MALIN ET DOULOUREUX frappa les hommes qui portaient la marque de la bête et qui adoraient son image. (La Bible, Apocalypse, chapitre 16, verset 2)

Et un troisième Ange suivit ceux-là, disant à haute voix : Si quelqu'un adore la bête et son image, et qu'il en prenne la marque sur son front, ou en sa main, celui-là aussi boira du vin de la colère de Dieu, du vin pur versé dans la coupe de sa colère, et il sera tourmenté de feu et de soufre devant les saints Anges, et devant l'Agneau. Et la fumée de leur tourment montera aux siècles des siècles, et ceux-là n'auront nul repos ni jour ni nuit qui adorent la bête et son image, et quiconque prend la marque de son nom. Ici est la patience des Saints ; ici [sont] ceux qui gardent les commandements de Dieu, et la foi de Jésus. (La Bible, Apocalypse, chapitre14, versets 9 à 12)

« Je vis aussi les âmes de ceux qu’on avait DECAPITES à cause de la vérité dont Jésus est le témoin et à cause de la Parole de Dieu. Je vis encore tous ceux qui n’avaient pas adoré la bête ni son image et qui n’avaient pas reçu sa marque sur leur front et leur main. Ils revinrent à la vie et régnèrent avec le Christ pendant mille ans ». (La Bible, Apocalypse, chapitre 20, verset 4)









Chers amis,


La « bête-média » est en pleine action de tromperie, aux USA, et effectue une propagande infecte afin de mettre en place l’ultime piège pour l’humanité : la puce implantable, qui constitue le POINT DE NON-RETOUR !

J’en veux pour preuve l’article qui suit, publié dans le torchon satirique « The National Report »…

Avant toute chose, JE RAPPELLE QUE LE PATRIARCAT CATHOLIQUE BYZANTIN D’UKRAINE A RECONNU LES PUCES RFID ET PUCES IMPLANTABLES COMME ETANT LA MARQUE DE LA BETE BIBLIQUE (cf. http://vkpatriarhat.org.ua/fr/?p=7101 ; http://vkpatriarhat.org.ua/fr/?p=7067 et http://vkpatriarhat.org.ua/fr/?p=7467  , tout en français).

JUSTE AU MOMENT OU LES LOIS SUR L’OBAMACARE ONT ETE VOTEES, CONTENANT EN LEUR SEIN LES « DISPOSITIFS MEDICAUX DE CLASSE II » DONT FONT PARTIE LES PUCES IMPLANTABLES, CETTE PRESSE DE MERDE N’A RIEN TROUVE DE MIEUX QUE DE PUBLIER NON PAS UN, MAIS PLUSIEURS ARTICLES PROVOCATEURS SUR LA PUCE DE L’OBAMACARE… (voir aussi http://nationalreport.net/rfid-mascot-chippie-nationwide-tour/ et http://nationalreport.net/rfid-chip-now-being-issued-in-hanna-wyoming-as-pa… ).

QUE RACONTE L’ARTICLE QUI SUIT ? IL PRESENTE UNE POPULATION QUI A ACCEPTE LA PUCE RFID ET QUI EST TELLEMENT CONTENTE DES APPLICATIONS DE CETTE PUCE QU’ELLE « NE SAIT PLUS S’EN PASSER » (SIC) ! MAIS L’ARTICLE VA BIEN PLUS LOIN, STIGMATISANT DEJA LES « CHRETIENS MARGINAUX » (souvenez-vous que l’Apocalypse nous signale que certains témoins du Christ qui refusent la marque de la bête seront décapités). La prétendue journaliste qui a écrit cet article putride, elle, présente la puce comme un merveilleux « PROGRES »…


BIEN ENTENDU, CET ARTICLE EST FAUX, CAR SATIRIQUE, MAIS IL S’AGIT D’UN COUP DE SONDE DE TRES MAUVAIS GOÛT QUI CHERCHE A PREPARER LES ESPRITS ET A SAVOIR A QUEL POINT LA POPULATION REAGIT OU RESTE APATHIQUE FACE A LA MENACE DE LA PUCE !

Nous pouvons donc voir que le nouvel ordre mondial avance à pas feutrés et avec beaucoup de précautions afin de réussir l’asservissement ultime de l’humanité via la puce implantable… ainsi qu’une moisson d’âmes pour Satan, puisque ceux qui prendront cette marque seront damnés !

L’article dégueulasse, traduit spécialement pour vous en français, ci-dessous.

BONNE REVOLUTION… OU BON ESCLAVAGE, BONNE TYRANNIE, BONNE MORT… ET « BONNE » DAMNATION ! Vic.






Source: http://nationalreport.net/wyoming-school-implant-rfid/


PLUSIEURS DISTRICTS SCOLAIRES DU WYOMING IMPLANTENT LA TECHNOLOGIE DE LA PUCE RFID DANS LES ETUDIANTS SANS CONSENTEMENT PARENTAL






Posté il y a environ 1 jour (dimanche 20 octobre 2013)



Cela faisait trois longs mois depuis ma dernière visite à la paisible ville minière de Hanna, dans le Wyoming, alors que j’avais la tâche de couvrir le tir d'essai d'inauguration de la puce RFID de l’Obamacare (cf. http://nationalreport.net/rfid-chip-now-being-issued-in-hanna-wyoming-as-pa… ). J'ai finalement décidé qu'il était temps de rattraper les temps perdu avec les merveilleux citoyens du comté de Carbon et de voir comment ils se portaient avec leurs implants RFID.

L'opinion publique globale sur la RFID semble être positive parmi la population de Hanna, dans le Wyoming. J'ai parlé avec Earl Gentry, un mineur retraité, résident de longue date de Hanna, Wyoming, et l'un des premiers bénéficiaires de la puce RFID dans sa ville. Il m'a dit ce qui suit:

« Bon sang, je ne sais pas comment j'ai vécu sans. J'UTILISE LA PUCE RFID AU CABINET DU MEDECIN, JE SUIS CAPABLE D'ACHETER DE LA NOURRITURE ET DES VETEMENTS DANS TOUS MES MAGASINS PREFERES, AVEC ELLE. Je crois fermement que notre pays bénéficierait d'une LOI QUI IMPOSE LA RFID AU NIVEAU FEDERAL ».

J'étais heureuse d'entendre parler de la réussite de ce projet qui a conduit récemment à des avancées majeures dans la technologie RFID. Faisant la moitié de la taille de son prédécesseur, la dernière « MINI RFID » est capable de contenir plus de 100 Go de données qui peuvent être facilement mis à jour afin d’inclure les dossiers médicaux, les informations sur les assurances, les chauffeurs numéro de permis de conduire ainsi que le casier judiciaire et certaines dettes de crédit impayé.


« Je crois fermement que notre pays bénéficierait d'une loi qui impose la RFID au niveau fédéral ».

Le Wyoming a récemment vu plusieurs centaines d'enfants des écoles élémentaires et moyennes être implantés avec la nouvelle MINI RFID. Au cours de son examen physique et vaccination annuels le mois dernier, chaque enfant a en outre reçu l'implant entre leur index et le pouce.

Certains parents ont contesté l'approche de l'école, prétendant que les écoles faisaient cela à leur insu et sans leur consentement. Le surintendant Gerald Morgan, du district scolaire du comté de Carbon, dit à National Report que la plupart de ces plaintes proviennent de familles ayant des antécédents religieux fortement enracinés.

La xénophobie et les superstitions constituent une affliction courante dans les communautés rurales. Beaucoup de sectes marginales chrétiennes croient qu’Obama est l'Antéchrist et que la puce RFID est la Marque de la Bête dont on parle dans le Livre de l’Apocalypse. Au cours de la Seconde Venue (du Christ) et de l'arrivée de "l’Antéchrist", toute l'humanité sera prétendument obligée d'accepter la marque, ou de périr. Cependant, tous ceux qui reçoivent la marque de l'Antéchrist seront punis de damnation éternelle par le Dieu chrétien.

Le reste des habitants du Wyoming étaient ravis d'accueillir les enfants de leur ville dans le giron. Les citoyens disent qu'ils ne se sont jamais sentis mieux depuis qu’ils ont accepté l’implant RFID de l’Obamacare (cf. http://www.therightplanet.com/2012/07/obamacare-page-1004-you-must-have-rfi… ) et qu’ils sont fiers d'être les porteurs de torche d’un avenir plus sûr et plus lumineux.


Beaucoup de sectes marginales chrétiennes croient qu’Obama est l'Antéchrist

Janice Willowbrook, dont l'enfant va au collège Saint-Paul à Rawlins, dans le Wyoming, dit qu'elle n'est pas gênée par ce que l'école a fait. « Cela ne me dérange pas qu'ils soient allés de l'avant et qu’ils aient implanté mon enfant. J'allais le faire, de toute façon. Tout ce qu'ils ont fait, c’est de m’épargner une visite stressante chez les médecins ».

Lorsqu'on lui a demandé pourquoi elle pensait que certains des autres parents étaient fâchés avec les actions des écoles, elle nous a dit : « Malheureusement, nous avons encore quelques habitants locaux qui sont très démodés. Ils aiment croire à toutes ces théories du complot à la noix et que sais-je. Ils croient tout ce que leurs pasteurs disent, ou les bêtises qu'ils lisent sur Internet. J'espère qu’à la fin, nous pourrons tous abandonner notre peur du changement et accepter que ceci est la chose responsable à faire en tant que pays ».

J’ai dit adieu à la paisible ville et à ses habitants merveilleux avant de me diriger vers l'ouest, dans le coucher de soleil qui approchait. J'ai apprécié le temps que j’ai passé seule au volant sur les longs tronçons d’autoroute éclairés seulement par les phares de voiture et les occasionnels panneaux d'affichage. Je conduisis et méditai sur les progrès de la race humaine et sur tous les progrès que nous avons effectués depuis notre évolution à partir des chimpanzés. Cela me laissa passionnée et pleine d'espoir pour toutes les grandes et nouvelles possibilités que notre avenir contient.


Jane M. Agni

Jane M. Agni est une journaliste professionnelle résidant dans la ville détrempée par la pluie de Portland, dans l’Oregon. Elle a écrit pour ces sites aussi raffinés que  « The Bitch Opinion » (« L’opinion de la salope ») et « Sin- Eater Productions » (« les Productions Bouffeurs de Péchés »). Son livre intitulé "The States Of Shame: Living As A Liberated Womyn In America" (« Les États de la honte : vivre en tant que Femme libérée en Amérique ») a fait une apparition sur le Club des Livres d'Oprah Winfrey et est rapidement devenu un best-seller peu après. Elle travaille actuellement sur la suite provisoirement intitulée "Sisters Of Shame: The Why In Womyn". Jane M. Agni écrit à présent à plein temps pour le National Report, donnant son point de vue unique sur les derniers événements mondiaux.


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 29 Oct - 09:57 (2013)    Sujet du message: OBAMA ADMINISTRATION ORDERS BLUE CROSS TO KEEP OBAMACARE ENROLLMENT NUMBERS SECRET Répondre en citant

OBAMA ADMINISTRATION ORDERS BLUE CROSS TO KEEP OBAMACARE ENROLLMENT NUMBERS SECRET

Friday, October 25, 2013 by: J. D. Heyes
Tags: Obama administration, Obamacare enrollment, Blue Cross




  


(NaturalNews) In the past week, there has been a smattering of reports that some Americans - finally - have managed to actually sign up for healthcare insurance using the government's Obamacare exchange (Healthcare.gov). But what is equally clear by now is that the Obama administration, for some reason, has been very quiet about the actual number of people who have signed up.

The only explanation for that is this: the numbers must be pitifully low.

Already, most Americans know the roll-out of the Obamacare online exchange was a disaster. It was - and remains - prone to glitches, hang-ups and unacceptable delays, and that's if you can make any progress on the site at all.

'Don't publicize the numbers'

Now comes a report that the White House has asked North Dakota's largest health insurer "not to publicize the number of people who have enrolled for health insurance through a new online exchange," according to the state's principle news website, Inforum:

During [an Oct. 21] forum in Fargo for people interested in signing up for coverage via the exchange, James Nichol of Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota told the crowd his company received the request from the federal government earlier... Nichol is a consumer sales manager for the company.

Still, a spokeswoman from Blue Cross Blue Shield says about 14 North Dakotans have signed up for coverage since the federal exchange went live Oct. 1. That brings total statewide enrollment to 20 - less than one a day.


Andrea Dinneen, a company spokeswoman, told the news site that, though Blue Cross generally does not release internal sales numbers, it has done so this time because of the problems encountered during the fiasco of the federal Obamacare roll-out, labeling it a "unique situation."

Dinneen further stated that she did not have any information regarding the directive referenced by Nichol.

None of the figures are huge

More from Inforum:

An official from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, one of the main... federal agencies handling the federal marketplace, would not directly address questions about the request made of Blue Cross Blue Shield, including whether other insurers were also asked to keep quiet about enrollment.

Representatives from the two other North Dakota companies offering coverage on the federal exchange - Medica and Sanford Health - said they had not received similar directions.


Officials in a number of the 14 states that set up their own health insurance exchanges under provisions of Obamacare have also released some initial numbers, and they are not huge by any count. Minnesota officials, for example, have said that just 3,700 people in that state had begun the enrollment process through that state's exchange, called MNsure.

But in the other 36 states which have refused to set up their own exchanges and instead deferred to the federal exchange, "releases from individual insurers like Blue Cross Blue Shield are the only avenue to get enrollment figures until federal officials release statistics, likely sometime in mid-November."

Sebelius and the president didn't know? Sure...

Reports say that the online exchanges will route health insurance consumers to the few providers who have elected to participate in the exchanges and who have been blessed by the almighty federal government to have "qualified" under provisions of the massively complex and expensive Affordable Care Act, the formal name for "Obamacare."

Meanwhile, on Capitol Hill and in the mainstream media, finger-pointing and blame are being heaped on the administration for fouling up so badly the Oct. 1 launch of the federal exchange - though the government had years to build it and spent hundreds of millions of dollars.

Some have called for Health and Human Services director Kathleen Sebelius to resign or be fired, but those who want that are conveniently forgetting that the president himself - despite being warned in February by officials tied to the launch that the site wouldn't be ready - pushed to maintain the Oct. 1 deadline [http://www.nytimes.com].

Sebelius, being the good little politico that she is, is attempting to fall on her sword by lying to CNN's Dr. Sanjay Gupta in a recent interview, saying the president (and HHS, for that matter) had no idea the site was so poorly designed and nonfunctional [http://www.cnn.com].

The American people ought to be taking one principle lesson from all of this: the federal government, quite obviously, is incompetent and incapable of "running" your healthcare system.

Sources:

http://www.inforum.com

http://www.nytimes.com

http://www.cnn.com

http://www.naturalnews.com/042662_Obama_administration_Obamacare_enrollment…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 5 Nov - 11:49 (2013)    Sujet du message: OBAMACARE FINES CHARITABLE HOSPITALS Répondre en citant

OBAMACARE FINES CHARITABLE HOSPITALS



Charitable hospitals that treat uninsured children will now be fined and receive harsher scrutiny when applying for non-profit, tax-exempt status.
 
The Internal Revenue Service’s Section 501 goes into effect under Obamacare. The provision stipulates new financial penalties for charitable, tax-exempt hospitals that treat uninsured poor Americans. Currently, 60 percent of American hospitals fall under this category.

 Analysts explained that charity serves as a major deterrent for the uninsured to enroll in Obamacare, so the Obama administration is fining charitable hospitals.
 
“Failure to comply, or to prove this continuing need, could result in the loss of the hospital’s tax-exempt status. The hospital would then become a for-profit venture, paying income tax— hence the positive revenue score” for the federal government, explained John Kartch of Americans for Tax Reform.
 
Kartch added, “Obamacare advocates turned over every rock to find as much tax money as possible.”
 
RELATED: Obama Tells ICE: “Let Illegal Criminals Go”

The Department of Health and Human Services and the IRS will be reviewing the nation’s hospitals for infractions and imposing penalties as necessary to comply with the Affordable Care Act. Bothe departments have experienced major scandals this year, leading Americans to distrust their judgment on this issue.
 
Do you believe charitable hospitals should be fined? Share your thoughts.

http://americanoverlook.com/obamacare-fines-charitable-hospitals/105549?fb_…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 11 Nov - 00:32 (2013)    Sujet du message: OBAMACARE INCLUDES PROVISIONS ALLOWING DEADBEATS TO STIFF DOCTORS, HOSPITALS Répondre en citant

OBAMACARE INCLUDES PROVISIONS ALLOWING DEADBEATS TO STIFF DOCTORS, HOSPITALS



This may be one of the most costly and damaging provisions of the so-called “Affordable” Care Act.  Written into the 12 million words of regulations, Obamacare’s three month “grace period” allows individuals to stiff their doctors, hospitals, and insurance companies with virtually no repercussions. 

from Reason:
Citation:


People who receive the federal subsidy to be part of Obamacare will be allowed to incur a three-month “grace period” if they can’t pay their premiums and then simply cancel their policies, stiffing the doctors and hospitals.

Their only repercussion is that they have to wait until the following year’s open enrollment if they want coverage on the exchange.

“It will help break the system,” said Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, one of a core group of Republicans who oppose Obamacare. “This is a huge piece of evidence to show this can’t work, you will break the system and bankrupt people involved.

“The hospitals, doctors and insurance companies will be left holding the bag. There will be disagreements over who will pay for what. Lawyers will get involved because we are talking about a lot of money,” he said.

Under Section 156.270 of the Affordable Care Act, the insured needs to pay a premium for just one month before qualifying for the three-month grace period. The insurance company must pay the claims during the first month of the grace period; during the second and third month doctors and hospitals are left to collect unpaid bills.



read the rest

This “grace period” will increase the cost of healthcare for all patients for the sake of allowing a handful of deadbeats an easy out.  In much the same way that frivolous lawsuits have raised the price of medical procedures, Obamacare’s “grace period” will make it harder and more expensive to find a doctor. 

Many of the top hospitals in the US have already begun to opt out of taking patients from the Obamacare exchanges altogether. This will only get worse if this grace period rule is kept in tact.

http://poorrichardsnews.com/post/66572518079/obamacare-includes-provisions-allowing-deadbeats-to



Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 6 Déc - 13:12 (2013)    Sujet du message: OBAMA NOT ONLY FUNDS THE MUSLIMS THEY CAN OPT OUT OF THE OBAMACARE WITH NO PENALTIES Répondre en citant

OBAMA NOT ONLY FUNDS THE MUSLIMS THEY CAN OPT OUT OF THE OBAMACARE WITH NO PENALTIES

Posted on 19 October, 2013 by Dylan



Examiner

By Gil Guignat

Isn’t this nice. If you are of the Muslim religion, you don’t have to give all the new Obamacare healthcare reform regulations and penalties another thought. Because the concept of being compelled to participate in such a healthcare program offends Islamic sensibilities, Muslims are specifically exempt.


As a matter of fact if you are Amish, American Indian or a Chistian Scientist you do not need to participate or pay the taxes associated with healthcare reform. That means not having to be forced to buy healthcare insurance, not paying the taxes or the penalties if you don’t get it. Nice!

Here is what the regulations say:

EXEMPTIONS FROM INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS.

—In the case of an individual who is seeking an exemption certificate under section 1311(d)(4)(H) from any requirement or penalty imposed by section 5000A, the following information:

In the case of an individual seeking exemption based on the individual’s status as a
member of an exempt religious sect or division, as a member of a health care sharing ministry, as an Indian,
or as an individual eligible for a hardship exemption, such information as the Secretary shall prescribe.”


Senate Bill, H.R. 3590, pages 273-274

There are several reasons why an individual could claim exemption, being a member of a religion that does not believe in insurance is one of them. Islam is one of those religions. Muslims believe that health insurance is “haraam”, or forbidden; because they liken the ambiguity and probability of insurance to gambling. This belief excludes them from any of the requirements, mandates, or penalties set forth in the bill. More…

http://gopthedailydose.com/2013/10/19/obama-funds-muslims-can-opt-obamacare-penalties/



Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 6 Déc - 13:17 (2013)    Sujet du message: VA PAPERLESS CLAIMS SYSTEM ‘SPONTANEOUSLY’ SHUTS DOWN Répondre en citant

VA PAPERLESS CLAIMS SYSTEM ‘SPONTANEOUSLY’ SHUTS DOWN


pling/Shutterstock.com

By Bob Brewin December 5, 2013

The Veterans Affairs Department’s $491 million paperless claims processing system frustrates examiners with “spontaneous system shutdowns,” Sondra McCauley, VA deputy assistant inspector general for audits and evaluations, told a hearing of the House VA Committee.

McCauley said 25 staffers in the in the Houston, Newark and Milwaukee regional offices of the Veteran Benefits Administration told the IG that the Veterans Benefits Management System, or VBMS, also has latency problems that have slowed downloading of medical documents.

Nextgov reported on Jan. 4 that sluggish response times on VBMS made it difficult for claims examiners to perform simple actions on veteran claims files, such as search, update, save or retrieve.

McCauley told the hearing on Wednesday that VBMS mislabeled electronic evidence in claims files and mixed up evidence in the file of one veteran with that of another veteran. Such malfunctions, she said, force users to rely on older systems to process claims.

VA completed  installation of VBMS in all 56 VBA regional offices in June. However, McCauley said, VBA has only one VBMS pilot site with “the capability to process claims from initial application through review, rating, award, to benefits delivery.”

VBMS, key to VA Secretary Eric Shinseki’s goal to elimination of the massive claims backlog by 2015, is ill-suited to handle complex claims -- those involving multiple medical conditions -- well, due to the limitations of its design, an official of the Paralyzed Veterans of America told the hearing.

VBMS is a rules-based system that lacks the “human interaction to fully understand the circumstances of a specific injury,” Sherman Gillums Jr., associate executive director for Veterans Benefits at the PVA told the hearing.

“Unfortunately, rules-based systems treat all veterans the same and can be flawed by imperfect rulemaking and application,” Gillums said. He said the numerous issues faced by veterans with “with catastrophic injuries create a complex set of outcomes that cannot be easily reconciled by logic-based systems that cannot appreciate nuance in disability assessment.”

Calculators in rules-based systems historically have failed to compute the right ratings for people with multiple issues, Gillums said.  This type of decision analysis uses decision trees that attempt to enable the rater to simplify and resolve complex questions, Gillums said. “This technique, however, can be problematic when the analysis involves highly qualitative assessments that are reduced to binary choices,” he said.

Experienced claims examiners, not algorithms, “best factor in the nuances of special monthly compensation and areas of subjective interpretation that can lead to an incorrect decision,” Gillums said.

(Image via pling/Shutterstock.com)


http://www.nextgov.com/defense/2013/12/va-paperless-claims-system-spontaneo…



Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 6 Déc - 13:23 (2013)    Sujet du message: OBAMACARE’S NEXT STEP: FIXING MEDICARE AND MEDICAID DATA SHARING Répondre en citant

OBAMACARE’S NEXT STEP: FIXING MEDICARE AND MEDICAID DATA SHARING


everything possible/Shutterstock.com

By Joseph Marks December 5, 2013


The agency that fumbled but seems to have repaired HealthCare.gov is preparing to launch a new program authorized under President Obama’s health care reform initiative to better integrate federal Medicare data with data from state Medicaid offices, contracting documents show.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services posted a notice on Tuesday seeking a contractor to align state and federal data sets so the government can better serve the roughly 10 million Americans who receive both Medicare and Medicaid benefits, saving money and reducing the number of benefits that are improperly granted or withheld.

The sources sought notice was posted and then quickly canceled on the government’s Fed Biz Opps contracting site. A CMS official said the post was removed because of a website error, not a change in policy, and that it will be reposted soon.

The notice seeks contractors who can help develop common protocols and guidelines for their Medicaid data, which will make it easier for computer systems to recognize individuals across state and federal data sets. The proposed contract will also include creating common taxonomies between states, which essentially means standardizing the terms states use to describe particular benefits and classifications.

The proposed contract will also include helping states fill gaps or fix inconsistencies in their Medicaid data.

A sources sought notice doesn’t obligate the government to purchase any new technology or services.

Joint Medicare and Medicaid enrollees account for about $300 billion annually, according to the notice. They make up 19 percent of Medicare enrollees and 27 percent of Medicare spending.

(Image via everything possible/Shutterstock.com)

http://www.nextgov.com/health/2013/12/obamacares-next-step-fixing-medicare-…



Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 18 Déc - 17:42 (2013)    Sujet du message: FINE PRINT: STATE CAN SEIZE YOUR ASSETS TO PAY FOR CARE AFTER YOU'RE FORCED INTO MEDICAID BY OBAMACARE Répondre en citant

FINE PRINT: STATE CAN SEIZE YOUR ASSETS TO PAY FOR CARE AFTER YOU'RE FORCED INTO MEDICAID BY OBAMACARE

posted at 9:41 pm on December 16, 2013 by Mary Katharine Ham

My, this is an unpleasant consequence of Obamacare. I’m not going to call it unintended because in its current form, it potentially earns a bunch of money for states, so I’m pretty sure that’s intentional. What I think is unintentional is anyone noticing this is what they’re up to.

But the Seattle Times noticed:
Citation:


It wasn’t the moonlight, holiday-season euphoria or family pressure that made Sophia Prins and Gary Balhorn, both 62, suddenly decide to get married.
It was the fine print.

As fine print is wont to do, it had buried itself in a long form — Balhorn’s application for free health insurance through the expanded state Medicaid program. As the paperwork lay on the dining-room table in Port Townsend, Prins began reading.

She was shocked: If you’re 55 or over, Medicaid can come back after you’re dead and bill your estate for ordinary health-care expenses.

The way Prins saw it, that meant health insurance via Medicaid is hardly “free” for Washington residents 55 or older. It’s a loan, one whose payback requirements aren’t well advertised. And it penalizes people who, despite having a low income, have managed to keep a home or some savings they hope to pass to heirs, Prins said.



So, here’s the deal. There used to be a provision whereby the state could recuperate funds spent on a Medicaid patient post-55 years old from whatever assets he owned. So, a low-income individual in nursing home care after age 55 might pass away and his kids would find out the family home or car of whatever he had to his name had to be bought back from the state if they wanted it. It’s called estate recovery, and sounds pretty shady if it’s not boldly advertised as the terms for Medicaid enrollment, which is most definitely is not.

Before the Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion, there weren’t that many people in Medicaid who had much in the way of assets for seizing. But now that Medicaid enrollment requirements have been relaxed, more people with assets but low income are joining the program or being forced into it. For instance, a couple in their 50s who, say, retired early after losing jobs in the bad economy may have assets but show a very low income. Under Obamacare, if their income is low enough to qualify for Medicaid, they must enroll in Medicaid unless they want to buy totally unsubsidized coverage in the now-inflated individual market. As the Times notes, this is no small difference:
Citation:


People cannot receive a tax credit to subsidize their purchase of a private health plan if their income qualifies them for Medicaid, said Bethany Frey, spokeswoman for the Washington Health Benefit Exchange.

But they could buy a health plan without a tax credit, she added.

For someone age 55 to 64 at the Medicaid-income level — below $15,856 a year — it’s quite a jump from free Medicaid health insurance to an unsubsidized individual plan. Premiums in King County for an age 60 non-tobacco user for the most modest plan run from $451 to $859 per month.



The couple in the Times story was able to marry, combine their incomes, and get out of the Medicaid trap. Others will not be so lucky, and may not even read the fine print:
Citation:


Prins, an artist, and Balhorn, a retired fisherman-turned-tango instructor, separately qualified for health insurance through Medicaid based on their sole incomes.

But if they were married, they calculated, they could “just squeak by” with enough income to qualify for a subsidized health plan — and avoid any encumbrance on the home they hope to leave to Prins’ two sons.



For no one else in the world is it a-okay to give low-income people a loan that might endanger their family’s assets and not even clearly inform them they’re getting a loan.

This Daily Kos diarist has a nice write-up (I know) on the toll this could take on lower and middle-class people looking for relief and getting what amounts to a surprise predatory loan instead:
Citation:


We haven’t had lots of people younger than 65 on Medicaid, because in most states simply earning less than the Federal Poverty Level did not qualify one for Medicaid.

And we haven’t had many people with lots of assets on Medicaid, because in most places you have to have less than around $2400 to your name before Medicaid will cover you. You can keep your house and your car, but Medicaid reserves the right to put liens on them and take them when you die.

But now we have the Affordable Care Act, and its expectation that everyone in the lower tier of income will end up in the Medicaid system. To accomplish this, they have dropped the asset test. So now we will have lots of people ages 55-64, who have assets but not a lot of income right now, for whatever reason, on Medicaid.

The kicker of it is, if you make the right amount to qualify for a subsidized health insurance plan, your costs are going to be shared and subsidized by the government. But if you go on Medicaid, you owe the entire amount that Medicaid spends on you from the day you turn 55…

How will this play out? No one knows, as far as I can tell. But it is easy to see how this could become a real problem. If someone is low income and goes on Medicaid, will Medicaid put a lien on their house? If they need to sell their house and move, will they then lose all their equity in paying off the lien? Will people get hit with bills and liens for many thousands of dollars, even if they were healthy and hardly ever went to the doctor?



The fact that this is being treated with seriousness at Kos is an indication of how large a liability it could be for this government program. Washington is scrambling to change the law. No doubt other states will start looking at their implementation of this part of Obamacare. But there will be people caught unaware that their houses effectively belong to the government because the government forced them into Medicaid coverage. You’re welcome!

http://hotair.com/archives/2013/12/16/fine-print-state-can-seize-your-assets-to-pay-for-care-after-youre-forced-into-medicaid-by-obamacare/?fb_action_ids=10153620919810201&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_source=other_multiline&action_object_map=[1432654080298334]&action_type_map=[%22og.likes%22]&action_ref_map=[]



Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 29 Déc - 15:31 (2013)    Sujet du message: OBAMA ADMIN LOSES IN COURT - "DOSEN'T HAVE THE RIGHT" TO IMPOSE HHS MANDATE ON CHRISTIAN COLLEGES Répondre en citant

OBAMA ADMIN LOSES IN COURT - "DOSEN'T HAVE THE RIGHT" TO IMPOSE HHS MANDATE ON CHRISTIAN COLLEGES 

28 Dec 2013
HHS Mandate
by Steven Ertelt



Photo Credit: WND

The Obama administration has lost yet another court case against the controversial HHS mandate that forces companies, colleges, and religious groups to pay for birth control and drugs that may cause abortions under their employee health plans.

Today a Houston federal court delivered a major blow to the controversial HHS mandate ruling in favor of East Texas Baptist University and Houston Baptist University. In a 46-page opinion, the court ruled that the federal mandate requiring employers to provide employees with abortion-causing drugs and devices violates federal civil rights laws, and issued an injunction against the mandate. Religious plaintiffs have now won injunctions in 9 out of 12 such cases involving non-profit entities challenging the mandate.

“The government doesn’t have the right to decide what religious beliefs are legitimate and which ones aren’t,” said Eric Rassbach, Deputy General Counsel at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, and lead attorney for East Texas Baptist and Houston Baptist Universities. “In its careful opinion, the Court recognized that the government was trying to move across that forbidden line, and said “No further!”

n its opinion, the federal court specifically rejected the government’s argument that it evaluate the Universities’ beliefs: “The religious organization plaintiffs have shown a sincerely held religious belief that the court cannot second-guess.”

The decision is part of a recent groundswell of cases decided against the government. In nine of the twelve cases decided thus far, federal district courts across the country have issued injunctions against the mandate.

Read more from this story HERE.

http://joemiller.us/2013/12/court-obama-admin-doesnt-right-impose-hhs-manda…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 3 Jan - 00:44 (2014)    Sujet du message: L’OBAMACARE ENTRE EN VIGUEUR AUX ETATS-UNIS Répondre en citant

L’OBAMACARE ENTRE EN VIGUEUR AUX ETATS-UNIS 

jeudi 2 janvier 2014


L’obamacare entre en vigueur, et c’est, disons-le clairement, un « foutu bordel » qui risque de ne pas aider grand monde tant il est compliqué, surtout que l’intégralité des américains doivent y souscrire sous peine de sanction financière!





L’obamacare résumé en un seul tableau, les sites internet ne sont pas mieux.
Citation:

Les nouveaux droits des Américains en matière de santé sont entrés en vigueur mercredi en vertu de la réforme de la couverture maladie baptisée « Obamacare », pierre angulaire du bilan de Barack Obama dont le succès est encore loin d’être assuré.

La loi, votée en 2010, interdit depuis mercredi aux assureurs de faire varier les primes en fonction des antécédents médicaux ou du sexe, de refuser d’assurer un patient trop coûteux, ou de plafonner le montant des remboursements annuels, des pratiques légales jusqu’à mardi et qui conduisaient certains patients atteints de maladies graves à la ruine. En échange, la loi oblige toute personne installée aux Etats-Unis, Américain et étrangers, à s’assurer sous peine d’une amende de 95 dollars
en 2014, qui montera à 695 dollars en 2016.


Le raisonnement économique est simple: si tout le monde s’assure, les primes payées par les personnes en bonne santé compenseront les surcoûts liés aux assurés qui coûtent cher. Autre nouveauté: la réforme définit les traitements que les assureurs doivent systématiquement couvrir. Désormais toute assurance doit inclure, par exemple, les hospitalisations, notamment aux urgences. Et les soins préventifs, comme le dépistage du diabète ou du cancer, les vaccins ou la contraception, doivent être intégralement remboursés.

Une vraie avancée pour les femmes

« La nouvelle loi va entièrement transformer notre système de santé », a déclaré mardi la secrétaire à la Santé, Kathleen Sebelius. « Désormais, être une femme ne sera pas plus considérée comme un antécédent médical », a-t-elle relevé. Auparavant, les primes d’assurances pour les femmes pouvaient être plus chères que pour les hommes. Pour les quelque 150 millions de personnes assurées via leurs employeurs, la norme aux Etats-Unis, où seuls les plus démunis et les plus de 65 ans sont assurés via l’équivalent de la Sécurité sociale, rien ou presque ne change.


Mais environ 25 millions de personnes sont assurées individuellement auprès d’assureurs privés, sans bénéficier de tarif de groupe, selon le Bureau du budget du Congrès (CBO). C’est pour ces Américains, et les non-assurés, que le gouvernement a lancé en octobre des portails
internet où ils peuvent consulter un catalogue d’assurances privées et souscrire à celle de leur choix, éventuellement subventionnée.


Les plus démunis ciblés

Le site fédéral, Healthcare.gov, est utilisé dans 36 Etats. 14 Etats ont créé leurs propres sites. Sur l’objectif de sept millions de personnes que le gouvernement s’est fixé d’ici à fin mars, 2,1 millions ont souscrit une assurance via ces portails, un chiffre en retard par rapport aux projections initiales, mais qui marque une accélération des inscriptions en décembre, après des mois d’octobre et novembre catastrophiques en raison de centaines de problèmes informatiques. A ces 2,1 millions de personnes s’en ajoutent 3,9 millions admissibles aux programmes public d’assurance maladie destinés aux plus démunis, dont Medicaid
.


Source et article complet: 7sur7.be

http://spread-the-truth777.blogspot.fr/2014/01/lobamacare-entre-en-vigueur-…




Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 3 Jan - 00:54 (2014)    Sujet du message: WITH OBAMACARE? WE'RE ALL "CRIMINALS" NOW Répondre en citant

WITH OBAMACARE? WE'RE ALL "CRIMINALS" NOW

December 31, 2013

By Gina Miller

Listen to an audio version of this column

The website was never meant to work properly, and I am sick of hearing people, especially on our side, harp on it and gloat over it, as if this were a major blunder by the Obama administration. It wasn't a blunder. It was a slushy, billion-dollar calculated move. The website was only a ruse, a smokescreen, to help further their evil goal of forcing command-and-control socialized medicine into the faces of the formerly free American people. A fully-functioning website would prematurely reveal the grotesquely higher costs of this monstrous poison pill, Obamacare – excuse me; the "Affordable" Care Act – and, they didn't want that to be known just yet, so they bought more time with this website "glitch" diversion.

As I have repeated ad nauseam in this column, America has been taken over by communists. This has been a roughly hundred-year campaign by the enemies of our blessed nation. We have allowed this to happen. We have become complacent and apathetic, taking our unprecedented freedoms for granted, trusting our leaders to do the right thing. We have turned away from God's truth and morality, which has led to the devolution of our society to the point that our culture now stands neck-deep in a cesspool of Godless muck. Our "celebrities" now proudly announce to the world their homosexuality to the applause of their fellows in the seedy, irreverent media. These people would have been shamed by the public just a few short years ago when the moral sensibility of the general public was still on life support.

With the increasing level of immorality comes lawlessness, and where lawlessness grows, tyranny grows. It's not just lawlessness that breeds tyranny, but the shabbiness of moral fiber in our leaders also spawns tyranny. We have seen this no more clearly in recent years than in Barack Obama (or whatever his name is), his administration and the Democrats and RINOs in Congress, the courts and federal bureaucracies. And, if there is anything that defines "tyranny," it is the Obamacare legislation, a distinctly un-American, completely illegal law that not only dares to force Americans to buy a product, but also compels Americans to violate their consciences by forcing them to carry policies that fund abortion.

U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John "Quisling" Roberts' twisted ruling (which was also illegal, because he changed the already-illegal law) does not make this law legitimate, no matter how many leftists declare otherwise. It is a very bad law, and it will have very bad consequences for our nation if it is not somehow undone. We are already starting to see this.

Because of this new, evil law, many Americans will become "criminals" as of January 1st (or whatever arbitrary, new deadline the real criminal Obama has set at his putrid whim), because many will refuse to comply with this wicked mandate. After all, are we supposed to endlessly bow down and submit to lawlessness from our own federal government? Is there a point at which we refuse to comply with their illegal dictates? Whatever the answer, there is a boiling movement to gather support for telling this administration to stick its illegal Obamacare law in its pipe and smoke it, to say, "We will not comply!"

Our federal government has long ago stepped out of its lawful, constitutional bounds and is now functioning in the realm of unconstitutional dictatorship. Since we have seen that the Republicans (who, with mouths full of guile, promised us they would kill Obamacare) have no will to stop this law, many Americans realize that it's up to us to resist this tyranny. We have no representation in our representative Republic.

We have "social media." Many of us are not willing to lie down and accept this atrocious Obamacare law, and while I know Facebook is a jolly treat for NSA types, it can also be a useful tool for networking patriots. The site is awash in anti-Obamacare pages, including an "event" page titled "I will not comply!" that invites Americans to publicly refuse to participate in this illegal law. As of this writing, more than 33,000 people have committed to it. Another page titled, "Majority Against ObamaCare," currently has over 22,000 "likes." I understand that some people may be afraid to associate their names with such pages, and that in itself is a testament to how powerful the tyranny in our nation has become. How could we have imagined that in the early 21st century, Americans would have the same fear of taking a public stand against the government that we have seen in people living under communist dictatorships around the world this past century?

We are between a rock and a hard place with this new law, and that is by devilish design, of course. Because of the outrageous Obamacare requirements for what must be covered by insurance policies, countless millions of Americans are losing the health insurance they already had, and many of them may not be able to afford new policies under the commie-care requirements of this new, legal atrocity.

While it would be nice to have it, I cannot afford health insurance. I'm certainly not alone in this. If I have to seek medical treatment, I must pay for it without insurance coverage. Although my husband and I make enough money to pay our bills and get by, we don't make enough to comply with the Obamacare mandate to purchase health insurance, which would cost us anywhere from $600 to $2000 or more per month (and, no, we don't take a dime of federal taxpayer money handouts of any kind).

The federal government has no legitimate authority to coerce us into buying health insurance – or any other product, for that matter – for the privilege of simply being citizens of the United States. Therefore, we will be "criminals," as of January 1st, and I know we will be far, far from the only ones. We will not "embrace the suck." We will resist the tyranny.

© Gina Miller

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/miller/131231


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 19 Jan - 19:07 (2014)    Sujet du message: LENO: ‘POPE FRANCIS THINKS OBAMACARE CAN BE A SUCCES …' Répondre en citant

LENO: ‘POPE FRANCIS THINKS OBAMACARE CAN BE A SUCCES …'

January 17, 2014 - 8:59 AM

VIDEO : http://www.mrctv.org/videos/leno-pope-francis-thinks-obamacare-can-be-succe…

http://www.cnsnews.com/video/newsbusters/leno-pope-francis-thinks-obamacare…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 13 Fév - 23:10 (2014)    Sujet du message: GREED + CARTELS = U.S. SICKARE/OBAMACARE Répondre en citant



GREED + CARTELS = U.S. SICKARE/OBAMACARE


Submitted by Tyler Durden on 02/13/2014 12:40 -0500


Submitted by Charles Hugh-Smith of OfTwoMinds blog,

Sickcare/ObamaCare is fundamentally broken at every level.

The incremental nature of change makes it difficult for us to notice how systems that once worked well with modest costs have transmogrified into broken systems that cost a fortune. Exhibit # 1 is higher education: 40 years ago, four-year public universities were affordable and two-year community colleges were almost free. Now students have to borrow $1 trillion to pay for the exorbitant privilege of higher education.

And no, the difference isn't that states don't provide the same funding--the difference is costs have soared while the yield on the investment has plummeted. Please read:

The Mafia State of Mind

Our Two Most Onerous Taxes: College Tuition and Healthcare Insurance

Our Middleman-Skimming Economy

America's Make-Work Sectors (Healthcare and Higher Education) Have Run Out of Oxygen

Longtime correspondent Ishabaka (an M.D. with 30+ years experience in primary care and as an emergency room physician) responded to this article with an insider's account of what happens when greed and cartels take over healthcare. After reading What's wrong with American hospitals?, a scathing deconstruction of for-profit healthcare, Ishabaka submitted this commentary:

I could have told you what was wrong with our hospital system by 1989 - nobody would listen to me back then.

Up til the '70's, almost all hospitals in the United States were not for profit COMMUNITY HOSPITALS. They were LOCAL. The Board of Directors was made up of some senior doctors, maybe the head nurse, and various other prominent local businessmen and professionals. Others (mostly Catholic), were run as non-profits by religious orders. A very few, mostly very small hospitals were for profit, usually owned by a group of doctors, or even one doctor.

The mission of these community hospitals was to provide for the LOCAL COMMUNITY - one and all. Payment was various - private insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, self pay - and the idea was to collect just enough money to keep the hospital going, and provide care for the poor who had no money to pay. If your grandma got bad care - you could go - in person - to the local, say, banker, on the Board of Directors, and tell him - and he would CARE.

THIS SYSTEM WORKED, and kept costs DOWN. Remember, the hospital just needed enough money to stay in the black. Often local wealthy people would will money to the hospital in which they had been cared for.

In the '80's - there was the arrival of the for-profit cartels - and I use the world cartels specifically - these were run by people with the sociopathic Goldman Sachs type mentality - their sole goal was to acquire huge sums of money for themselves, their hospital directors, and their SHAREHOLDERS. They used a typical sneaky technique - they'd come into town, and tell the locals they could run the hospital much cheaper, because of their economy of scale. People believed this, and the cartels bought out most of the community hospitals.

I worked at one such for-profit hospital and had a 21-year old indigent man come in who'd been struck by a car while walking, and was rapidly bleeding to death. The hospital administrator refused to open the operating room, even though I had a surgeon right there, willing and able to operate for free to save this young man's life. The surgeon threw a fit, and he was a big wheel at the hospital and the administrator backed down - otherwise I firmly believe the young man would have died. This was LEGAL back then, before the EMTLA law was passed because similar abuses were rampant NATIONWIDE.

Around this time, the administrators of the remaining community hospitals found out the administrators of the for-profit hospitals were making tens of times their salaries - and bonuses based on profits - and started demanding similar salaries and bonuses based on PROFITS - a contradiction of the old concept of community hospitals (the article does touch on this).

How do you increase hospital profits? Number one - avoid any care for the poor you can weasel out of. Number two - cut staff to the bone and beyond (one of hospital's biggest expenses). Most American hospitals now have UNSAFE nurse to patient ratios because of this.

As far as patient care goes, nurses are the most important people in hospitals. I know of one lady who DIED while in a monitored bed, and wasn't found dead until several hours later due to the criminally low nursing staff ratio in a hospital I worked in. I HAD complained about the dearth of nurses, and was threatened with the loss of my job. Another side effect of this is, nursing in hospitals has become unbearable for nurses who really cared about their patients - many good hospital nurses have left hospital work for other fields. The results are appalling.

I saved the life of a patient an unqualified, under-educated nurse gave the wrong medicine to - a medicine that IMMEDIATELY MAKES YOU STOP BREATHING, because it was cheaper for the hospital to hire her than a knowledgeable and experienced nurse. The medicine is pancuronium bromide, if you want to Google it. The nurse didn't know one of the effects was cessation of breathing - this is Pharmacology for Nurses 101, this drug is used all day long in every operating room in America (where doctors WANT patients under anesthesia to stop breathing, and put them on breathing machines during the surgery - which is very safe if done correctly).

I could go on and on. Simple things, like the instruments you use to suture cuts - community hospitals used to buy Swiss or German made ones that were of the finest quality, sterilize and re-use them over and over. This changed to disposable instruments that sometimes literally fell apart in my hands. Bandage tape that didn't stick, instead of quality Johnson and Johnson tape - anything to save a buck.

It is not getting better, it is getting worse. The nurses I know tell me hospitals are cutting staff even MORE now in preparation for Obamacare.

I will end with a story that illustrates the difference between Old School and New School hospital administrators.

I had the pleasure of working five years in a real community hospital. One of the senior administrators (R.I.P.) was a gentleman who'd made his fortune in the grocery business. In his late 80's, he would arrive at the emergency department entrance every morning between seven and eight am, and proceed to walk throughout the hospital. He would ask various and sundry staff how they were getting along - everyone from janitors to senior physicians. If something was amiss - HE RECTIFIED THE SITUATION. Tragically, this hospital was bought out, and is now part of a chain.

I had the displeasure of working in a "community" (really for-profit) hospital with a middle aged administrator who NEVER set foot outside his office or conference rooms - he NEVER appeared in the (very large and busy) emergency department once. This was in the early 90's, and one year it was revealed that his compensation was $600,000 - and a brand new Lexus as a "performance bonus". He was on the golf course by three pm every single day. That was the hospital where the woman who was being "monitored" (alarms and all that) was found very cold and dead after a delay of who knows how many hours.

Thank you, Ishabaka, for telling it like it really is. Needless to say, ObamaCare (the Orwellian-named Affordable Care Act--ACA) purposefully ignores everything that is fundamentally broken with U.S. sickcare and extends the soaring-cost cartel system, essentially promising to stripmine the taxpayers of however many trillions of dollars are needed to generate outsized profits for the cartels.

Only those with no exposure to the real costs of ObamaCare approve of the current sickcare system. Government employees who have no idea how much their coverage costs, well-paid shills and toadies like Paul Krugman, academics with tenure and lifetime healthcare coverage--all these people swallow the fraud whole and declare it delicious.

Only those of us who are paying the real, unsubsidized cost know how unsustainable the system is, and only those inside the machine know how broken it is at every level. Greed + cartels = Sickcare/ObamaCare. Love your servitude, baby--it's affordable, really, really, really it is.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-02-13/greed-cartels-us-sickcareobamacare



Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 22 Fév - 11:55 (2014)    Sujet du message: HHS ANNOUNCES NEW MEDICARE CUTS! Répondre en citant

HHS ANNOUNCES NEW MEDICARE CUTS!



VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjKkJMoxntA&hd=1


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 24 Fév - 01:14 (2014)    Sujet du message: OBAMACARE LABOR CAMPS UNDER CONSTRUCTION IN MULTIPLE AMERICAN STATES Répondre en citant



OBAMACARE LABOR CAMPS UNDER CONSTRUCTION IN MULTIPLE AMERICAN STATES


Posted about 3 weeks ago |



All People, Young And Old, Will Be Required To Work Off Any Fines Issued For Lack Of Enrollment

Those who are unable to afford the steep Obamacare premiums are going to be faced with a lot more than just extensive fines at the end of every tax year. It has been reported that several Obamacare “labor camps” are being constructed around the nation where those who refuse or are unable to drum up the funds for the new insurance plans will be temporarily detained in order to work off fines.

Sources say that an Amtrack rail car repair facility in Indiana was the first in the country to be converted into an Obamacare detainment and processing center. There have allegedly been multiple facility conversions in Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado and California.

Photographic and video evidence shows facilities to be equipped with large 3-4 inch gas mains that are connected to large furnaces which may function as crematoriums. Also seen are several helicopter landing pads, red-blue-green zones for classifying and processing incoming personnel, one way turnstiles, barracks, towers and electrified fences fitted with razor wire to prevent escape.

Indiana residents were alarmed to hear that their city would be the first to support this sort of systematic imprisonment of people unwilling or unable to conform to the Obamacare health plans. Michelle Seymour of Amboy IN had the following to say in regards to these recent developments, “I have two elderly parents who are having trouble keeping their healthcare benefits since this whole Obamacare thing began, and now they might be forced into labor for something they never wanted? They are retired! You can’t force the elderly to do hard physical labour, it will kill them!”

Others had a more supportive outlook in regards to the plan. Daryl Kingman of Borden IN seemed rather unconcerned. “We got a lot of people on welfare out here and maybe this will be a good way for them to give back to the community since all the hardworking taxpayers are footing the bill for nearly everything that enables them to exist. Most of them never learn how to be self sufficient. Perhaps after a few weeks in a work camp they might change their tune and learn to be responsible citizens.”

Regardless of public opinion either against or in favor of the labor camps, it looks as though the government is delving into their plan full bore. The camps are expected to open their doors in early 2015 to make way for any citizens who refused or were unable to pay their insurance premiums, and/or the fines associated with nonpayment.

http://nationalreport.net/obamacare-labor-camps-construction-multiple-american-states/


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 17 Mar - 15:18 (2014)    Sujet du message: PENTAGON PEGS COST OF NEW ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD AT $1.5 BILLION Répondre en citant

PENTAGON PEGS COST OF NEW ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD AT $1.5 BILLION



By Bob Brewin March 14, 2014

NEXTGOV

The Pentagon plans to spend $1.5 billion procuring a new, commercial electronic health record system from 2017 through 2019, new budget documents disclosed.

The Defense Health Agency said in January that it planned to field the new EHR in phases, starting with a test site at Fort Lewis, Wash., in 2016 and full deployment to 57 hospitals, 364 medical clinics, 282 dental clinics, 225 vet clinics and 321 ships by 2019.

DHA also requested a budget of $723 million -- up $70 million from 2014 -- to operate and maintain its current EHR systems, including the Armed Forces Health Longitudinal Technology Application, or AHLTA, and the Composite Health Care System, or CHCS, which manages clinician order entry. DHA kicked off a procurement last month for a sustainment contract that could be awarded by the end of this month to keep the legacy EHRs -- which serve 9.7 million patients and 230,000 clinical personnel -- in operation through 2018.

The budget documents also show Defense plans to change the focus of its integrated electronic health record program, a decade-old project to develop a joint record with the Veterans Affairs Department that was ditched in February 2013 after costs spiraled to $28 billion.

Congress directed the two departments to develop a plan for EHR data sharing in the 2014 National Defense Authorization Act. DHA said the iEHR program will be renamed the Defense Medical Information Exchange and focus developing information infrastructure and data interoperability capabilities to securely and reliably exchange health information with the VA and all other health care providers.

DHA projected it will spend $16 million to develop the information exchange over the next three years. The agency forecast spending $12.5 million over the five years on the Theater Medical Information Program-Joint which provides EHR systems to deployed units.

Get the Nextgov iPhone app to keep up with government technology news.

(Image via everything possible/Shutterstock.com)

http://www.nextgov.com/defense/2014/03/pentagon-pegs-cost-new-electronic-he…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 22 Mar - 15:02 (2014)    Sujet du message: GEORGIA HEALTH FREEDOM ACT HEADS TO GOVERNOR'S DESK Répondre en citant

GEORGIA HEALTH FREEDOM ACT HEADS TO GOVERNOR'S DESK

Georgia Health Freedom Act Heads to Governor’s Desk

ATLANTA (March 19, 2014) – With some last minute political maneuvering in the twilight of the legislative session, a bill that would begin the process of nullifying Obamacare in Georgia gained final approval in both the House and the Senate Tuesday night, and now moves on to the governor’s desk.

The Georgia Senate passed an amended version of HB707 by tacking it onto another insurance bill (HB943). The measure passed 37-17, moments after the amended version cleared the House 106-48.

Introduced by Rep. Jason Spencer as HB707 http://www.legis.ga.gov/Legislation/en-US/display/20132014/HB/707 , the legislation pushes back against the ACA in four ways and would create serious impediments to the implementation of Obamacare in Georgia. Spencer worked tirelessly through the session to get the bill through the legislative process.

“Many barriers were broken down inside the capitol to convince others that it is possible to stand up to the federal government in a constitutional and pragmatic way,” Spencer said. “While, we did not achieve all that we wanted, we still won the day. We made the comeback of the legislative session.The path for future pro-10th Amendment initiatives has been plowed.”

Specifically, the legislation:

1. Prohibits any state agencies, departments or political subdivisions from using resources or spending funds to advocate for the expansion of Medicaid. This provision works hand-in-hand with HB990 to make it more difficult to expand Medicaid. HB990 http://www.legis.ga.gov/legislation/en-US/Display/20132014/HB/990 would require legislative approval for expansion of the program, barring the governor from doing it by executive order.

2. Prohibits the state of Georgia from running an insurance exchange.

3. Refuses and federal grant money for the purpose of creating or running a state insurance exchange.

4. Ends the University of Georgia Health Navigator Program http://www.legis.ga.gov/legislation/en-US/Display/20132014/HB/990 . It allows the school to complete the functions under the current grant but would prohibit it from getting a new one.

Each of these provisions creates impediments to the implementation and execution of Obamacare in Georgia. We’ve seen the difficulties created by the number of states simply refusing to set up exchanges. The ACA was predicated on state cooperation. By refusing to help, passage of the bill puts the federal government in an almost impossible position. It never intended to run the healthcare system alone, and ultimately, it can’t do it without state help. Judge Andrew Napolitano agreed recently, pointing out that if a number of states were to refuse to participate with the ACA in a wholesale fashion, that multi-state action would “gut Obamacare.”

A fifth provision that would have prohibited the Commissioner of Insurance from investigating or enforcing any alleged violation of federal health insurance requirements mandated by Obamacare was amended out of the final bill. Spencer has already committed to pursuing that issue in the next legislative session.

Tenth Amendment Center national communications director called passage of the bill a huge victory and predicted it would pave the way for future action, not only in Georgia, but across the country.

“Rep. Spencer poured his heart and soul into getting this bill passed. He may not realize it, but it paves the way for action in other states. Now they see that yes, states can take a stand against the implementation of Obamacare. I’m certain other states will follow the lead,” he said. “And the best news is, Jason realizes the fight isn’t over. He has already committed to coming back next session and working toward the next step. This is a big win. A bigger win than most people realize.”

The bill appeared dead after several Republicans joined Democrats to table the HB707 in the Senate Rules Committee. According to the Brookhaven Post, “Republican Senator Cecil Staton made a motion to table the bill, it was seconded by Democrat Senator Steve Henson. State Senator, Fran Millar (R-Dunwoody) also voted along with other Republicans in favor of tabling HB 707.”

Last minute efforts by Spencer and grassroots supporters of the measure resurrected it.

“Without the backing of the people, we could have not won this epic victory under the Gold Dome,” Spencer said.

The bill still needs Gov. Nathan Deal’s signature to become law.

http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2014/03/georgia-health-freedom-act-hea…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 7 Avr - 09:53 (2014)    Sujet du message: GUESS WHO'S EXEMPT FROM OBAMACARE Répondre en citant

GUESS WHO'S EXEMPT FROM OBAMACARE

Remember: under statism only the little people are forced to play by the rules. We are, after all, merely eggs to be broken to make a delicious, compliant omelet for our rulers. Do you have anything to say about that?




Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 10 Avr - 12:21 (2014)    Sujet du message: OBAMA ISSUES EXECUTIVE ORDER GRANTING AMNESTY TO ILLEGALS WHO ENROL IN OBAMACARE Répondre en citant

OBAMA ISSUES EXECUTIVE ORDER GRANTING AMNESTY TO ILLEGALS WHO ENROL IN OBAMACARE

Posted on 9 April, 2014 by Dylan



  Washington, DC–Lacking congressional backing to provide a path to citizenship for the nations 7 to 20 million illegal immigrants, President Obama is imposing his policies directlydirectly
on the people through the use of executive orders. Multiple news outlets are reporting this evening of an Executive Order signed this afternoon by President Obama that grants amnesty to illegal immigrants who enroll in Obamacare.


In a desperate act to save the President’s signaturesignature
piece of legislation and inflate the already exaggerated number of supposed enrollees, Obama pandered to the Latino community in order to secure what would potentially be a large voting block. Since a majority of Obamacare recipients receive state subsidies already the result is essentially free health insurancehealth insurance for undocumented immigrants as well as a path to citizenship.


“This is a huge day for the Latino community. After years of inaction by the President and Congress, President Obama has stepped out a limb and offered an olive branch to the Latino community and we will not forget the efforts of the Democrats through this process,” stated Latinos for Amnesty Coalition (LAC) spokesperson Pablo Horner. “This really is about giving people access to healthcare at the end of the day. These immigrants are already in our country, payingpaying
taxestaxes, sending their children to schools, etc. The President’s order will give these folks the security of knowing they have the world’s greatest healthcare and will not be deported.”


ObamaObama
signed the Executive Order during an event at the White House this afternoon where he signed two others. Huffington Post describes the others as:


“One would prohibit federal contractors from retaliating against employees who share their salary information with each other. The provision is inspired by Lilly Ledbetter, the namesake of the first bill Obama signed on equal pay in 2009, who worked for nearly 20 years at Goodyear TireTire and Rubber Co. before discovering that men in her same job with equal or lesser experience were earning significantly more money than she was.

The secondsecond
executive order will instruct the Department of Labor to create new regulations requiring federal contractors to report wage-related data to the government, in the hope that it will hold them more accountable for salary differences based on sex or race.”


Republicans maintain that Obama is overstepping his powers through executive order and he should do more with Congress to address the nation’s real concerns.

http://conservativefrontline.com/obama-issues-executive-order-granting-amnesty-illegals-enroll-obamacare/#sthash.YoRH3Oo3.dpuf

http://gopthedailydose.com/2014/04/09/obama-issues-executive-order-granting-amnesty-illegals-enroll-obamacare/



Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 28 Avr - 12:00 (2014)    Sujet du message: COMING SOON : PENTAGON'S MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR HEALTH RECORD CONTRACT Répondre en citant

COMING SOON : PENTAGON'S MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR HEALTH RECORD CONTRACT


Flickr user Michael Baird


By Frank Konkel April 25, 2014

related stories

The Electronic-Medical-Records Email(s) of the Day, No. 2
The Electronic-Medical-Records Email of the Day, No. 1
Pentagon Pegs Cost of New Electronic Health Record at $1.5 Billion 10 Comments
VA Is Competing for the Pentagon’s Electronic Health Record Contract 9 Comments

Sometime in the coming months, the Defense Department will bid out its Healthcare Management Systems Modernization contract, an effort so large in monetary size and game-changing scope that it could significantly influence the future of health care in the United States.

The DHMSM contract’s estimated lifecycle value is approximately $11 billion and would include initial operating capabilities by 2017 and full functionality by 2023, according to Dr. Jonathan Woodson, assistant secretary of Defense for health affairs, who testified in February before the House Appropriations Committee’s defense panel.

Even in Washington, $11 billion is a lot of money, and it would surely rank among the largest IT-related contracts in government. What’s unique about this effort is that the Pentagon wants a single contractor to lead the integration of a commercial electronic health records system to cover its nearly 10 million beneficiaries and large assortment of health care facilities worldwide. Defense is one of the largest health care providers in the country, on par in size with the Veterans Affairs Department and private sector leaders like Kaiser Permanente.

Presumably, big-name Beltway-familiar contractors – the IBMs, Accentures and Northrop Grummans of the world – will partner up with vendors of enterprise electronic health records systems like Epic or Cerner. These and other companies have had a slew of representatives present at several industry days held around DHMSM, and most have already partnered up in preparation for the contract, though they won’t publicly discuss those relationships.

Defense officials want to award the contract by the end of 2014, and the winning contractor would have a chance to advance interoperability within DoD’s health records system, which has continually been one of the biggest faults of its current health records system, the Armed Forces Health Longitudinal Technology Application, or AHLTA.

Major data gaps in patient records occur when health care is delivered to beneficiaries outside the DOD network, and today approximately half of DOD’s 9.8 million beneficiaries receive their health care outside the network. 

An interoperable system has the chance to right many of the wrongs omnipresent in Defense’s health care operations, and could well help the government take a leading role in using technology to improve patient health care. Though the transition in U.S.-based health care systems from paper-based to digital health records is not yet complete, interoperability between electronic health care records is a big piece of the puzzle.

“Health care is a very important undertaking to the nation, not just the DOD, and we are going to be very aggressive about this,” said Andrew Maner, U.S. Federal Leader for IBM’s Global Business Services division.

IBM announced new investments to its growing federal health care team April 24, including Dr.  Keith Salzman as its chief medical information officer. Salzman spent 20 years with the DOD’s military health system. In joining Big Blue, Salzman puts his name behind a company that also wants to lead the way in health care analytics, having developed an assortment of content and natural language processing analytic tools that allow for the extraction of unstructured data in electronic medical records.

It’s likely Defense’s procurement will seek to incorporate various analytic capabilities because structured data – basic information such as a patient’s age or sex – only makes up a small portion of an electronic medical record. Structured data is easier to share between machines using traditional relational databases.
However, most health IT experts say 80 percent of the information in health records is unstructured, but composed of highly valuable data such as physicians’ notes, symptom descriptions and the like. Various pilots have shown analytics of this unstructured data leading to improved patient care.

“The MDs and the CIOs come together in a procurement like this. It’s a business process change and a transformation of health care delivery,” Maner said.
 There are other major ramifications for DHMSM, too.

Last year, efforts to develop a joint VA-DoD electronic health records system were scrapped after estimated costs ballooned to $28 billion. By Congress’ count, the doomed effort – a result of the 2008 Defense Authorization Act – already cost taxpayers more than $1 billion.

Instead, Defense looked to sustain operation through 2018 of its electronic health record, AHLTA, as well as its Composite Health Care System and Clinical Data Repository, which contains 240 million records.

Meanwhile, VA Secretary Eric Shinseki has expressed interest in competing for DOD’s DHMSM procurement. Shinseki told the House Veteran Affairs Committee in March that its next-generation Veterans Health Information Systems and Technology Architecture, or VistA Evolution, will be comparable to commercial options.
Conversely, Shinseki said that if DOD develops a program that meets VA needs, “We will go after that.”

DOD and VA’s recent health care history, as well as the residual effect from the failings of HealthCare.gov’s rollout, are likely to put DHMSM under intense scrutiny. Thus far, the government has written out $319 million in checks to myriad contractors involved with the project and obligated a total of $677 million to fund HealthCare.gov. Accenture, which continues to beef up its federal health care business, was recently charged to run HealthCare.gov after CGI Federal was removed from the project.  Officials from Accenture did not comment to Nextgov when asked about their interest in DHMSM.

While DHMSM and HealthCare.gov have little in common outside the words “health care” – DOD has operated a full, transparent procurement so far and plans to award a single contract – it’s likely they’ll be linked simply because of their size, scope and subject matter.

With DHMSM, however, DoD and the contractor it chooses have a chance to write a new chapter in health care IT, and perhaps more importantly, in general patient health care.

http://www.nextgov.com/defense/2014/04/coming-soon-pentagons-multi-billion-…



Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 24 Mai - 16:46 (2014)    Sujet du message: OBAMACARE'S PENALTIES ON HOSPITAL READMISSIONS WILL KILL OFF THE SICK AND ELDERLY Répondre en citant

OBAMACARE'S PENALTIES ON HOSPITAL READMISSIONS WILL KILL OFF THE SICK AND ELDERLY

By Howard Portnoy on May 18, 2014 at 12:24 pm


Expect hospice care to flourish (Credit: Wikiedia Commons)

If you have an aging parent or other elderly relative who is currently hospitalized with chronic heart or lung disease, the good news is he is coming home. The bad news is that he is likely coming home to die. That’s thanks to a strong disincentive for hospitals to readmit chronically ill Medicare patients under a provision of Obamacare.

Called the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (Section 3025 of the Affordable Care Act added section 1886(q)), the provision took effect on October 1, 2012 and penalizes hospitals for readmitting patients with one of several high-maintenance conditions — heart failure, heart attack and pneumonia — within 30 days of discharge. Two additional expensive-to-manage illnesses, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and follow-up treatment for coronary bypass surgery, are scheduled to be phased in this year.

In the view of the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MPAC), readmission of Medicare patients with any of these illnesses is an admission — of failure on the part of doctors. The government believes that if the correct treatment were administered during an initial hospital stay, these patients wouldn’t need to return. As a corrective measure, the law imposes a hefty fine on hospitals that readmit chronically ill patients. MPAC estimates that the fines collected will ultimately restore $1 billion to Medicare’s depleted coffers.

Currently, one in five elderly patients is readmitted within the 30-day window. Many of the readmissions result from unanticipated changes in the patient’s condition or a planned follow-up treatment. But roughly 12% are caused by patient confusion over new drug regimens, inadequate follow-up with primary care physicians, or a family’s inability to deal with home care. These “avoidable readmissions,” the government insists, are the fault of hospital staffs for not doing a better job of educating patients and/or administering better preventive care.

There are two problems with the approach. One, spelled out in an article at the British medical journal The Lancet, is that some of these chronic diseases in the elderly are tricky to manage. “Frequent readmissions,” the authors note, “might simply reflect the nature of the patient population rather than poor health care.” They add:
Citation:


A 30-day readmission rate might be a suitable measure of health-care delivery for some conditions or surgical procedures, but for patients with COPD a more sophisticated gauge of success that incorporates medical, social, functional, and economic elements is needed.



The other problem is how hospitals and doctors on staff respond to the penalty. The most likely scenario is that they will now become de facto agents for the law’s death panels, urging Medicare patients at their time of discharge to sign do-not-resuscitate orders and seek “comfort care” instead of future medical treatment.

http://libertyunyielding.com/2014/05/18/obamacares-penalties-hospital-readmissions-will-kill-sick-elderly/


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 29 Mai - 23:50 (2014)    Sujet du message: HAGEL ORDERS COMPREHENSIVE MILITARY HEALTH SYSTEM REVIEW Répondre en citant



HAGEL ORDERS COMPREHENSIVE MILITARY HEALTH SYSTEM REVIEW


American Forces Press Service
WASHINGTON, May 28, 2014 – Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel has ordered a comprehensive review of the Military Health System.

Dr. Jonathan Woodson, the assistant secretary of defense for health affairs, will lead the review, Pentagon Press Secretary Navy Rear Adm. John Kirby said in a statement.

The review, Kirby said, will focus on access to care and an assessment of the safety and quality of health care, both in military treatment facilities and in health care that the Defense Department purchases from civilian providers.

Expected to last for 90 days, the review will examine whether current access to care meets the department's standards, Kirby said. It will also examine the safety and quality of the care provided to all DOD beneficiaries, he added.

“Following the review, the secretary will receive recommendations on areas for improvement,” the admiral said, “with a specific focus on those areas where we are not meeting a nationally defined standard or a DOD policy-directed standard.”

Hagel will meet this morning with Deputy Defense Secretary Bob Work and the service secretaries to discuss the review’s parameters and his expectations for it, Kirby said.

The Military Health System provides health care for more than 9.6 million beneficiaries, including active duty service members, retirees and eligible family members.

http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=122345&source=GovDelive…


Revenir en haut
Contenu Sponsorisé






MessagePosté le: Aujourd’hui à 04:52 (2016)    Sujet du message: RÉFORME DES SOINS DE SANTÉ - PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE - HEALTH CARE REFORM - (PARTIE 2)

Revenir en haut
Montrer les messages depuis:   
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> LA RELIGION MONDIALE ET L'ONU : SES VUES ET AGENDA SUR LE TRANSHUMANISME, CLONAGE, AGENDA DE DÉPOPULATION -> OBAMACARE : RÉFORME DES SOINS DE SANTÉ - PROGRAMME EUGÉNIQUE - HEALTH CARE REFORM (PARTIE 2) Toutes les heures sont au format GMT + 2 Heures
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  >
Page 3 sur 5

 
Sauter vers:  

Portail | Index | Creer un forum | Forum gratuit d’entraide | Annuaire des forums gratuits | Signaler une violation | Conditions générales d'utilisation
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Traduction par : phpBB-fr.com