LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum

LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1)
...

 FAQFAQ   RechercherRechercher   MembresMembres   GroupesGroupes   S’enregistrerS’enregistrer 
 ProfilProfil   Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés   ConnexionConnexion 

OBAMA - SON AGENDA - SON ÉQUIPE -- OBAMA - HIS AGENDA - HIS TEAM (PARTIE 2)
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  >
 
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> ORGANISATION DES NATIONS-UNIES/UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION -> OBAMA- SON AGENDA - SON ÉQUIPE -- OBAMA - HIS AGENDA - HIS TEAM (PARTIE 2)
Sujet précédent :: Sujet suivant  
Auteur Message
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 26 Sep - 20:08 (2014)    Sujet du message: OBAMA PROMEUT A L'ONU UN CHEIKH DES FRERES MUSULMANS Répondre en citant

OBAMA PROMEUT A L'ONU UN CHEIKH DES FRERES MUSULMANS



25/09/2014

Dans son discours devant l'Assemblée générale de l'ONU le 24 septembre, Obama a recommandé le cheikh Bin Bayyah, l'ex vice-président de l'Union internationale des oulémas, fondée par Qaradawi, la plus haute autorité des Frères musulmans en matière de charia.


  

Obama:

L'idéologie de l’État islamique en Irak et au Levant, d’al-Qaïda ou du Boko Haram passera et s’éteindra si elle est constamment exposée au grand jour, confrontée, et réfutée. Regardez, à titre d’exemple, le nouveau Forum pour la promotion de la paix dans les sociétés islamiques, dont l'objectif a été décrit par le cheikh Bin Bayyah : «Nous devons déclarer la guerre à la guerre, pour aboutir à la paix sur la paix

Or, le cheikh Bin Bayyah a été vice-président de l'Union internationale des oulémas, fondée par Youssef Qaradawi, la plus haute autorité de la Confrérie des Frères musulmans en matière de charia. 
 

Qaradawi et le cheikh Bin Bayyah, lors d'une réunion de l'Union internationale des oulémas des Frères musulmans (source)


Ironiquement, Qaradawi s'oppose à la coalition militaire contre le Califat dirigée par les États-Unis.






Tweet de Qaradawi: https://archive.today/s6hyE
Traduction: https://archive.today/R79Pi

 
Youssef Qaradawi: «Je suis en désaccord total avec l'État islamique, que ce soit dans la pensée ou dans les méthodes. Mais je n'accepterai jamais que ceux qui les combattent soient les États-Unis qui ne sont motivés que par la défense de leurs intérêts, quitte à faire couler le sang.»

Qaradawi est basé au Qatar, où siège aussi l'Union internationale des oulémas qu'il a fondée et dont le cheikh Bin Bayyah a été vice-président pendant de nombreuses années.

En outre, «la Confrérie entretient des liens avec des dizaines de factions combattantes en Syrie, dont le rôle a été quasi-inexistant dans la lutte contre l'État islamique», écrit Hasssan Hassan, un expert du Delma Institute à Abu Dhabi. Il ajoute que la Confrérie est loin d'être un antidote contre l'extrémisme ; au contraire, elle a «souvent contribué à créer un environnement où l'extrémisme opère et s'épanouit, comme le démontrent avant tant de force les évènements des dernières années en Syrie».


(source)

 
Lire aussi: 
Des documents déclassifiés révèlent les liens étroits entre Washington et les Frères musulmans





Obama arme le Qatar


http://www.postedeveille.ca/2014/09/obama-fait-leloge-dun-cheikh-des-freres-musulmans.html


Revenir en haut
Publicité






MessagePosté le: Ven 26 Sep - 20:08 (2014)    Sujet du message: Publicité

PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?
Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 6 Nov - 02:12 (2014)    Sujet du message: EARNEST : OBAMA ‘WILL CONTINUE TO AGGRESSIVELY USE HIS EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY’ REGARDLESS OF ELECTION OUTCOME Répondre en citant

EARNEST : OBAMA ‘WILL CONTINUE TO AGGRESSIVELY USE HIS EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY’ REGARDLESS OF ELECTION OUTCOME

Immigration reform will 'benefit middle class families'

BY: Washington Free Beacon Staff

November 4, 2014 4:15 pm




VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQ5mFgt_uew

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said regardless of the outcome of Tuesday’s election, President Obama “will continue to act aggressively” to use his executive authority, including on immigration reform.

“He is bound and determined to do everything that he can, using his power in the executive branch, to make progress on behalf of middle class families in this country,” Earnest said. “The president, regardless of the outcome of the election, will continue to act aggressively to use his executive authority to help middle class families.”

According to Earnest, utilizing his executive privilege on immigration reform is the best way Obama can “help middle class families.”

“The best example of something like this would be on immigration reform,” Earnest said.

“Republicans have not demonstrated, at this point, any willingness to consider the bipartisan proposal that passed through the Senate. The president has indicated that before the end of the year that he is prepared to use his executive authority to try to fix those elements of the immigration system that he can fix using his executive authority.”

Earnest said that no matter what happens over the last two years of Obama’s presidency, the president will use executive action to “benefit middle class families.”

Critics have pointed out that the proposed immigration reform bill will allow a massive influx of immigrant workers who will compete with unemployed middle-class workers for remaining jobs.

So much for helping middle class families.

http://freebeacon.com/politics/earnest-obama-will-continue-to-aggressively-use-his-executive-authority-regardless-of-election-outcome/


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 9 Nov - 02:12 (2014)    Sujet du message: OBAMA NOMME UNE FEMME NOIRE MINISTRE DE LA JUSTICE Répondre en citant

OBAMA NOMME UNE FEMME NOIRE MINISTRE DE LA JUSTICE

Voyez comment on nous présente la nouvelle ministre de la Justice : une noire, alors que l'on devrait plutôt lire : qui embrasse les valeurs de l'islam. Par ce petit jeu de mot, tous ceux qui parleront contre cette nouvelle nomination seront traités de raciste.

...

Citation:

Lynch said in a statement that [Ibrahim], a Shiite imam from Trinidad, “abandoned the true tenants [[i]sic[/i]] of his religion” by participating in the plot.



As Robert Spencer grimly quips at Jihad Watch:
Citation:

Yes, I am sure that Loretta Lynch knows so much more about the true “tenants” of Islam than does a 66-year-old Shi’ite imam.



Lynch’s presumptions about Islam’s true nature are compatible with those of the president and members of his administration, who have said variously:

Lynch seems to be a perfect fit — which makes her a less than perfect fit for the role of the nation’s top cop.

http://libertyunyielding.com/2014/11/08/obama-attorney-general-nominee-lore…

-----

Le président Barack Obama a loué samedi 8 novembre les qualités de Loretta Lynch, première femme noire à devenir ministre de la Justice, lors d'une cérémonie à la Maison Blanche.



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZgZdMC4I4Y


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 9 Nov - 18:12 (2014)    Sujet du message: OBAMA'S APPOINTED ANTI-ISIS GENERAL IS DEFENDING ISLAM Répondre en citant

OBAMA'S APPOINTED ANTI-ISIS GENERAL IS DEFENDING ISLAM

Posted on November 8, 2014 by Walid Shoebat



General John Allen (Ret.) was selected as Barack Obama’s envoy for the coalition to combat ISIS. While in Kuwait, Allen echoed Obama’s sentiment that the group is “not Islamic” (despite its leader having a PhD in Islamic studies). In so doing, Allen is being dishonest.

CNS News reported:
Citation:


A global effort to counter claims by the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS/ISIL) that it is acting in the name of Islam must include a counter-narrative that highlights “our profound respect” for the religion, the administration’s point man in the anti-ISIS coalition said this week.
Retired Marine Corps Gen. John Allen was speaking in Kuwait, where representatives of more than a dozen Islamic and Western met to discuss using public communications to combat ISIS (also known as Da’esh – an acronym for the Arabic rendering of the group’s name, ad-Dawlah al-Islamiyah fil-Iraq wa ash-Sham).
“As we seek to expose Da’esh’s true nature,” Allen told the gathering on Monday, “we must also tell a positive story, one that highlights our respect – our profound respect for Islam’s proud traditions, its rich history, and celebration of scholarship and family and community.”
“We must work with clerics and scholars and teachers and parents to tell the story of how we celebrate Islam, even as we show that Da’esh perverts it.”




It’s patently obvious that Allen is taking orders as the mouthpiece of Obama. The extent to which he actually believes the words coming out of his own mouth notwithstanding, Allen has a history of being somewhat of an apologist for Islam. When he served as Commander of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in 2012, Allen took to YouTube and apologized for the “improper” way U.S. soldiers disposed of “Islamic materials” (Qur’ans) in Afghanistan:



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8F7nyYMB27g


Allen’s predecessor of ISAF was David Petraeus. In 2011, Petraeus also took to YouTube and condemned the burning of a Qur’an by Florida Pastor Terry Jones: = Terry Jones very controversal evangelical man who only provoke islam to discredit the real christianity



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2xZLuXFaeQ

VIDEO : Go to the link down below

We now know that the Obama administration knew about an affair David Petraeus was having with his biographer Paula Broadwell and – in the words of Charles Krauthammer – “lowered the sword on election day” (2012):

Source

Walid Shoebat is a former member of the Muslim Brotherhood who was converted to Christianity, and author of the book, God’s War on Terror.

*Article by Ben Barrack

Courtesy of Freedom Outpost.

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/11/08/obamas-appointed-anti-isis-general-defending-islam/


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 11 Nov - 05:25 (2014)    Sujet du message: WOW! OBAMA AT APEC NEW WORLD ORDER HUNGER GAMES SUMMET! MUST SEE! Répondre en citant

WOW! OBAMA AT APEC NEW WORLD ORDER HUNGER GAMES SUMMET! MUST SEE!



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OAMfMlZXUc


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 15 Nov - 04:11 (2014)    Sujet du message: ALLAH PRAISED ON HOUSE FLOOR 11-13-14 Répondre en citant

ALLAH PRAISED ON HOUSE FLOOR 11-13-14



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SS5KXaZs9PY


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 24 Nov - 04:41 (2014)    Sujet du message: OBAMA - I DON'T HAVE AUTHORITY FOR THIS - BUT COURT CAN'T STOP ME - Goads GOP Répondre en citant

OBAMA - I DON'T HAVE AUTHORITY FOR THIS - BUT COURT CAN'T STOP ME - Goads GOP



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oYUTBAnP54


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 10 Déc - 01:36 (2014)    Sujet du message: IN ASHTON CARTER, NOMINEE FOR DEFENSE SECRETARY, A CHANGE IN DIRECTION Répondre en citant

IN ASHTON CARTER, NOMINEE FOR DEFENSE SECRETARY, A CHANGE IN DIRECTION

A graduate of Harvard Law School, Kaine worked with Jesuit missionaries in the early 1980s
http://www.defenseone.com/politics/2014/11/who-will-be-next-secretary-defense/99854/

By HELENE COOPER, DAVID E. SANGER and MARK LANDLERDEC. 5, 2014


Obama Nominates Carter for Defense

President Obama on Friday announced his nomination of Ashton B. Carter, a physicist and former deputy defense secretary, to replace Chuck Hagel as defense secretary.
Video by Reuters on Publish Date December 5, 2014. Photo by Doug Mills/The New York Times.

WASHINGTON — Ashton B. Carter, the physicist nominated by President Obama on Friday to lead the Pentagon, is in the mold of past cabinet secretaries who have tangled with the White House and may advocate a stronger use of American power overseas.

Assertive and intellectual, Mr. Carter, 60, is in many ways the flip side of Chuck Hagel, the current defense secretary, who was seen as passive and who submitted his resignation under pressure last week. Mr. Carter is more like Robert M. Gates, Mr. Obama’s first defense secretary, who stood up to the White House. The two men are in close touch, and both have a jaundiced view of Washington.

While Mr. Carter very much wanted the top Pentagon job — he was passed over for it two years ago — he once compared working in Washington to “being a Christian in the Coliseum. You never know when they are going to release the lions and have you torn apart for the amusement of onlookers.”

Mr. Hagel had been expected to appear alongside Mr. Carter, his former deputy, at the White House announcement on Friday, but he was a surprise no-show and instead issued a statement that it was Mr. Carter’s day. His absence reflected his chilly relations with members of Mr. Obama’s national security staff, who described him as largely silent during cabinet meetings, although he also irritated them when he sent a memo to Susan E. Rice, the national security adviser, questioning the administration’s Syria policy.


Ashton B. Carter, President Obama’s choice to lead the Pentagon, at the White House announcement ceremony on Friday. Credit Doug Mills/The New York Times

“Ash is rightly regarded as one of our nation’s foremost national security leaders,” Mr. Obama said in announcing Mr. Carter’s nomination in the Roosevelt Room, which was filled with the mandarins of Washington’s foreign policy establishment. “He was at the table in the Situation Room, he was by my side in navigating complex security challenges.”

Mr. Obama paid tribute to Mr. Carter’s record of innovation as a previous top Pentagon official, notably his role in developing and accelerating the shipment of mine-resistant vehicles to American troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. “It’s no exaggeration to say there are countless Americans who are alive today, in part because of Ash’s efforts,” Mr. Obama said. Mr. Carter, who stood next to Mr. Obama, pledged to “keep faith” with what he called “the greatest fighting force the world has ever known.”

After the ceremony, Mr. Carter and Ms. Rice shared a lengthy bear hug.

Despite the display of affection, managing his relationship with Ms. Rice may well be the toughest part of Mr. Carter’s new job. Unlike Mr. Hagel, a former Nebraska senator, Mr. Carter comes to the job with a deep knowledge of a department with a $600 billion annual budget and more than two million uniformed and civilian employees. He worked in the Pentagon in the Clinton administration, returned as the chief weapons buyer under Mr. Gates and then rose to deputy defense secretary, the No. 2 position. He would face virtually no learning curve.

Less certain is whether Mr. Carter, a longtime policy expert and sometime academic, would bring the political skills necessary both for penetrating Mr. Obama’s insular inner circle and for balancing the president’s national security agenda against that of a Republican-led Congress.

Mr. Carter is a Democrat but not one of the core Obama loyalists, a group that includes Ms. Rice and Denis R. McDonough, the White House chief of staff. Like Mr. Gates, Mr. Carter is widely viewed as being to the right of the president on issues like American policy in Syria and the pace of releasing prisoners from the military prison at Guantánamo Bay. Both are issues in which he could come into conflict with Ms. Rice.

Mr. Carter is methodical and sharp, but not necessarily patient. Mr. Obama’s apparent willingness to wait years for the Syrian civil war to play out may frustrate Mr. Carter, who former colleagues say often pushed for clarity in policy goals — and then moved swiftly to pursue those goals.

“I would not call him a hawk,” said William J. Perry, a defense secretary under President Bill Clinton and one of Mr. Carter’s mentors. “But he is pretty hard-nosed about what can be done with American power, and he is willing to use it when appropriate.”

Vikram J. Singh, who worked under Mr. Carter when the latter was deputy defense secretary, agreed with that assessment. “Ash Carter will probably be very cleareyed about looking at the risk of a set of options, and accepting a certain amount of risk, and moving forward to implement as efficiently and quickly as possible.”


Play Video|1:33 From Particle Physics to the Pentagon

Ashton B. Carter, a theoretical physicist and former deputy defense secretary, is President Obama’s choice to be the next defense secretary.
Video by Natalia V. Osipova on Publish Date December 2, 2014. Photo by Philip Scott Andrews/The New York Times.

If Mr. Carter ends up to the right of Mr. Obama on Syria and the fight against the Islamic State, it will not be the first time. Former aides and administration officials say that Mr. Carter — like Mr. Hagel and Secretary of State John Kerry — was shocked last year when Mr. Obama, after a walk and talk on the South Lawn of the White House with Mr. McDonough, decided at the last moment to call off military strikes against the Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad, who had charged across Mr. Obama’s own “red line” on the use of chemical weapons.

Now, Mr. Carter will inherit a military strategy that has made some progress in reversing the gains of the Islamic State in Iraq, but has made dealing with Mr. Assad a less important issue. Despite public shows of solidarity, the United States and its partners cannot agree whether their primary enemy in Syria is the Sunni militant group or Mr. Assad.

Mr. Carter must also deal with an era of mandatory across-the-board cuts in military spending. “The biggest issue right now is the budget,” said Jeremy B. Bash, a former chief of staff to Leon Panetta, another Obama defense secretary, who is advising Mr. Carter on his nomination.

Mr. Carter is expected to have smooth confirmation hearings from Senate Republicans, who say they foresee no opposition to him.

Born in Philadelphia, Mr. Carter studied medieval history at Yale and earned a doctorate in theoretical physics at Oxford, where he was a Rhodes scholar. In a 2013 interview, he recalled spending time on “charmed quarks and also the Higgs boson” elementary particle. But then he developed a fascination with defense policy so strong he never pursued a career as a physicist.

“In Ash you have a poster child for the guy who discovers that science and technology are the major drivers for some of the most important events in international affairs, and sometimes are the sources of the solutions,” said Graham Allison, who recruited Mr. Carter in the early 1980s to come to the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard’s Kennedy School. “Here was a guy with a physics background who was fascinated by ballistic missile defense.

Mr. Carter spent the better part of the next quarter-century at the Belfer Center, though he took a leave during the Clinton administration to work for Mr. Perry, a like-minded mathematician and engineer who became defense secretary at a critical moment, after the collapse of the Soviet Union. He quickly became a central player in the 1994 nuclear crisis with North Korea, when the country threw out international inspectors and began what turned out to be a long and successful drive to develop a small nuclear arsenal.

“It may have been the closest we came to conflict with North Korea since the end of the Korean War,” Mr. Carter once said.

When Mr. Carter was deputy defense secretary, congressional aides recall numerous hearings when Mr. Carter, testifying alongside military commanders and even his bosses, inserted his own answers to questions not directed at him, to make sure he got his point across.

“He is not somebody who can simply be counted on,” said Anthony H. Cordesman, a national security expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “He will say what he thinks."

+ VIDEOS : http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/06/us/ashton-carter-obamas-pentagon-choice-i…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 5 Jan - 05:37 (2015)    Sujet du message: DEVELOPING: COURT RULING AGAINST OBAMA SENDS SHOCK WAVES ACROSS THE COUNTRY Répondre en citant

DEVELOPING: COURT RULING AGAINST OBAMA SENDS SHOCK WAVES ACROSS THE COUNTRY 

Nothing will change, the president is well protect by the International Community and the Vatican

JOHN THUNE: REPUBLICANS WON'T SHUT DOWN HOMELAND SECURITY OVER OBAMA'S AMNESTY





VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y--mmu3x-Sw


-----


Saturday, January 3rd, 2015


As a country, we all knew that President Barack Obama’s amnesty plan was about as unconstitutional as appointing Hugo Chavez’s corpse dictator for life. However, the general consensus was that it might take a while for the courts to recognize what everyone else did, at which point it might be too late to stop major damage being done.

However, a major ruling in a Pennsylvania court sent shock waves throughout the political establishment, as it became clear the legal system was catching up with Obama’s very illegal executive action.

Suddenly, it seemed as if amnesty by fiat could disappear just as quickly as it came about.

Judge Arthur J. Schwab, a federal judge representing western Pennsylvania, described parts of the plan as unconstitutional in a test case involving a single illegal immigrant facing a drunk driving charge.

“President Obama’s unilateral legislative action violates the separation of powers provided for in the United States Constitution as well as the Take Care Clause, and therefore is unconstitutional,” Judge Schwab’s decision read in part.

Joyce R. Branda, the assistant attorney general who filed briefs in the case, had argued that “Federal courts sit to decide cases and controversies, not to resolve disagreements about policy or politics.”

However, Schwab disagreed, and while his ruling didn’t strike down amnesty in full, he did enjoin it from being applied to the illegal alien referenced in the case, according to The Washington Times.

Legal opponents of amnesty, including Texas governor-elect Greg Abbott, were quick to file briefs mentioning the Pennsylvania case in their judicial challenges to the order.

Abbott’s lawsuit — which over 20 other states have joined — is considered one of the strongest challenges to the executive order currently making their way through the court system.

“Given that one federal court already has concluded that the DHS director is unconstitutional, plaintiffs respectfully request that this court preserve the status quo and the full panoply of remedial options by scheduling a preliminary injunction hearing and enjoining the directive,” Abbott’s brief to the court read.

In addition, Sheriff Joe Arpaio entered the ruling as a “supplemental authority” in his case against the immigration order.

Obama may think that his ownership of a pen and a phone are all it takes for him to enact his agenda, regardless of the wishes of the American people and their elected representatives in Congress.

He may soon find out how wrong he is about that.

http://conservativetribune.com/court-ruling-obama-shock-waves/


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 14 Jan - 03:32 (2015)    Sujet du message: OBAMA DECLARES ANTI EXTREMISM SUMMIT Répondre en citant



OBAMA DECLARES ANTI EXTREMISM SUMMIT




VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70MMJZ3opXM&feature=em-uploademail

ANTI-EXTREMISM SUMMIT



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkW4Er8zmoE


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 15 Jan - 01:02 (2015)    Sujet du message: PELOSI PICK : MAKE U.S. SCHOOLS LIKE MADRASSAS Répondre en citant

PELOSI PICK : MAKE U.S. SCHOOLS LIKE MADRASSAS

Muslim accused tea partiers of wanting blacks 'hanging on trees'

Published: 1 day ago


Bob Unruh

Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after nearly three decades with the Associated Press, as well as several Upper Midwest newspapers, where he covered everything from legislative battles and sports to tornadoes and homicidal survivalists. He is also a photographer whose scenic work has been used commercially.


Rep. Andre Carson, D-Ind., has declared that tea partiers on Capitol Hill would like “to see African-Americans hanging from trees.”

And he suggested that U.S. schools should be modeled after Islamic madrassas, where education is based on the Quran.

Now, he’s going to be privy to some of the nation’s most sensitive intelligence.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi announced she will appoint him as the first Muslim lawmaker on the body’s Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Politico reported Tuesday.

A senior Democratic aide said Pelosi announced the move during a weekly caucus of minority Democrats.

It would make Carson the first Muslim to serve on the committee that receives intelligence on the threat of Islamic militants in the Middle East.

In a National Review column about Carson just weeks ago, Islam analyst Daniel Pipes, director of the Middle East Forum, wrote that Carson represents the “Islamists’ choice for the House of Representatives.”

Pipes described Islamists as Muslims “who seek to replace the Constitution with the Quran and apply Islamic law in its entirety and severity.”

“Until now, their campaign contributions have been unknown,” he explained.

But now a Middle East Forum Islamist Watch project has provided a first look at the dimensions of thelobby. It revealed that the Council on American-Islamic Relations, Islamic Circle of North America, Islamic Society of North America, Muslim Alliance in North America, Muslim American Society and the Muslim Public Affairs Council contributed about $700,000 to federal candidates in recent years.

The contributions include, he said, $430,000 from CAIR, an “unindicted co-conspirator” in a terror-financing trial in which the federal judge found “ample evidence” of CAIR’s links to Hamas.

“In Indiana, Democratic representative Andre Carson has received almost $34,000 from Islamist sources for his congressional runs since 2008. … That’s the same Carson who appeared at the 2012 annual ICNA-MAS convention, where he encouraged American schools to look ‘at the model we have in our madrasses … where the foundation is the Quran,’” Pipes wrote.

Politico reported in 2011 that Carson, identified as a top lawmaker in the Congressional Black Caucus, said at a CBC event in Miami that some in Congress would “love to see us as second-class citizens” and “some of them in Congress right now of this tea party movement would love to see you and me … hanging on a tree.”

At the time, the report said Carson’s spokesman, Jason Tomcsi, stood by the comments, which were on tape.

The comments were “in response to frustration voiced by many in Miami and in his home district in Indianapolis regarding Congress’s inability to bolster the economy.”

The spokesman said, “The congressman used strong language because the tea party agenda jeopardizes our most vulnerable and leaves them without the ability to improve their economic standing.

“We are talking about child nutrition, job creation, job training, housing assistance, and Head Start, and that is just the beginning,” Tomcsi claimed. “A child without basic nutrition, secure housing and quality education has no real chance at a meaningful and productive life.”

At the American Thinker, M. Catharine Evans wrote about Carson’s family ties.

“Andre Carson was raised by his grandmother Julia Carson. A state legislator for 18 years and a congresswoman for a decade, Ms. Carson had a friendly relationship with the hateful Louis Farrakhan throughout Andre’s childhood. In fact, Julia and Louis went ‘way back’ according to a 2008 Indianapolis Star report. Andre’s wife stated that Farrakhan was with Julia the night her grandson was born in 1974. The anti-Semitic Nation of Islam leader who called white people ‘devils’ told mourners at her funeral in 2007 ‘I was with her in her discipleship.’”

Carson’s suggestion that American schools being based on the Quran came in his address to the ICNA convention.

“American will never tap into educational innovation and ingenuity without looking at the model that we have in our madrassas, in our schools, where innovation is encouraged, where the foundation is the Quran,” Carson said. “And that model that we are pushing in some of our schools meets the multiple needs of students.”

He also said America “must understand that she needs Muslims.”

The full speech:

+ VIDEO : http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/pelosi-to-appoint-islamists-choice-for-intel-pos…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 22 Jan - 04:10 (2015)    Sujet du message: OBAMA’S STATE OF THE UNION 2015 TRANSCRIPT (FULL TEXT) AND VIDEO Répondre en citant

OBAMA’S STATE OF THE UNION 2015 TRANSCRIPT  (FULL TEXT) AND VIDEO



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cse5cCGuHmE

JAN. 20, 2015



Obama’s Full State of the Union Address

The president delivered his State of the Union speech on Tuesday, addressing a wide range of issues, including the economy, immigration and national security.
Video by Associated Press on Publish Date January 21, 2015. Photo by Jabin Botsford/The New York Times.

Following is the transcript of President Obama’s State of the Union address, as transcribed by the Federal News Service.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you so much, please. Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, members of Congress, my fellow Americans.

We are 15 years into this new century, 15 years that dawned with terror touching our shores; that unfolded with a new generation fighting two long and costly wars; that saw a vicious recession spread across our nation and the world. It has been, and still is, a hard time for many. But tonight, we turn thepage.

Tonight, for the first time since 9/11, our combat mission in Afghanistan is over. Six years ago, nearly 180,000 American troops served in Iraq and Afghanistan. Today, fewer than 15,000 remain. And we salute the courage and sacrifice of every man and woman in this 9/11 Generation who has served to keep us safe. We are humbled and grateful for your service. (Applause.)

America, for all that we’ve endured, for all the grit and hard work required to come back, for all thetasks that lie ahead, know this: The shadow of crisis has passed, and the State of the Union is strong. (Applause.)

At this moment, with a growing economy, shrinking deficits, bustling industry, booming energy production, we have risen from recession freer to write our own future than any other nation on Earth. It’s now up to us to choose who we want to be over the next fifteen years, and for decades to come.



Obama: The State of the Union Is Strong

During his State of the Union address, the president said the economy was growing and “it’s now up to us” to choose where we go from here.

Video by Associated Press on Publish Date January 20, 2015. Photo by Doug Mills/The New York Times.

Will we accept an economy where only a few of us do spectacularly well? Or will we commit ourselves to an economy that generates rising incomes and chances for everyone who makes theeffort? (Applause.)

Will we approach the world fearful and reactive, dragged into costly conflicts that strain our military and set back our standing? Or will we lead wisely, using all elements of our power to defeat new threats and protect our planet?

Will we allow ourselves to be sorted into factions and turned against one another, or will we recapturethe sense of common purpose that has always propelled America forward?

In two weeks, I will send this Congress a budget filled with ideas that are practical, not partisan. And in the months ahead, I’ll crisscross the country making a case for those ideas.

So tonight, I want to focus less on a checklist of proposals, and focus more on the values at stake inthe choices before us.
It begins with our economy.

Seven years ago, Rebekah and Ben Erler of Minneapolis were newlyweds. She waited tables. He worked construction. Their first child, Jack, was on the way. They were young and in love in America, and it doesn’t get much better than that.

“If only we had known,” Rebekah wrote to me last spring, “what was about to happen to the housing and construction market.”

As the crisis worsened, Ben’s business dried up, so he took what jobs he could find, even if they kept him on the road for long stretches of time.

Rebekah took out student loans and enrolled in community college and retrained for a new career.

They sacrificed for each other, and slowly, it paid off. They bought their first home. They had a second son, Henry. Rebekah got a better job, and then a raise. Ben’s back in construction and home for dinner every night.

“It is amazing,” Rebekah wrote, “what you can bounce back from when you have to. We are a strong, tight-knit family who has made it through some very, hard times.”

“We are a strong, tight-knit family who has made it through some very, hard times.”

America, Rebekah and Ben’s story is our story. They represent the millions who’ve worked hard and scrimped and sacrificed and retooled.

You are the reason that I ran for this office. You are the people I was thinking of six years ago today in the darkest months of the crisis when I stood on the steps of this Capitol and promised we would rebuild our economy on a new foundation. And it has been your resilience, your effort that has made it possible for our country to emerge stronger.

We believed we could reverse the tide of outsourcing, and draw new jobs to our shores. And over thepast five years, our businesses have created more than 11 million new jobs. (Applause.)

We believed we could reduce our dependence on foreign oil and protect our planet. And today, America is number one in oil and gas. America is number one in wind power. Every three weeks, we bring online as much solar power as we did in all of 2008. (Applause.)

And thanks to lower gas prices and higher fuel standards, the typical family this year should save about $750 at the pump. (Applause.)

We believed we could prepare our kids for a more competitive world. And today, our younger students have earned the highest math and reading scores on record. Our high school graduation rate has hit an all-time high. More Americans finish college than ever before. (Applause.)

Today, we have new tools to stop taxpayer-funded bailouts, and a new consumer watchdog to protect us from predatory lending and abusive credit card practices. And in the past year alone, about ten million uninsured Americans finally gained the security of health coverage. (Applause.)

At every step, we were told our goals were misguided or too ambitious, that we would crush jobs and explode deficits. Instead, we’ve seen the fastest economic growth in over a decade, our deficits cut by two thirds, a stock market that has doubled and health care inflation at its lowest rate in 50 years. (Applause.)

This is good news, people. (Laughter.) So – (applause) -- so the verdict is clear. Middle-class economics works, expanding opportunity works, and these policies will continue to work as long as politics don’t get in the way.

We can’t slow down businesses or put our economy at risk with government shutdowns or fiscal showdowns. We can’t put the security of families at risk by taking away their health insurance or unraveling the new rules on Wall Street or refighting past battles on immigration when we’ve got to fix a broken system.
And if a bill comes to my desk that tries to do any of these things, it will veto it. It will have earned my veto. (Applause.)

Today, thanks to a growing economy, the recovery is touching more and more lives. Wages are finally starting to rise again. We know that more small-business owners plan to raise their employees’ pay than at any time since 2007.

But here’s the thing. Those of us here tonight, we need to set our sights higher than just making sure government doesn’t screw things up, the government doesn’t halt the progress we’re making. We need to do more than just do no harm.

Tonight, together, let’s do more to restore the link between hard work and growing opportunity for every American. (Applause.)

Because families like Rebekah’s still need our help. She and Ben are working as hard as ever, but they’ve had to forego vacations and a new car so that they can pay off student loans and save for retirement. Friday night pizza, that’s a big splurge. Basic child care for Jack and Henry costs more than their mortgage, and almost as much as a year at the University of Minnesota.

Like millions of hardworking Americans, Rebekah isn’t asking for a handout, but she is asking that we look for more ways to help families get ahead.
And in fact, at every moment of economic change throughout our history, this country has taken bold action to adapt to new circumstances and to make sure everyone gets a fair shot.

We set up worker protections, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid to protect ourselves from theharshest adversity. We gave our citizens schools and colleges, infrastructure and the Internet, tools they needed to go as far as their efforts and their dreams will take them.

That’s what middle-class economics is: the idea that this country does best when everyone gets their fair shot, everyone does their fair share, everyone plays by the same set of rules. (Applause.) We don’t just want everyone to share in America’s success; we want everyone to contribute to our success. (Applause.)
So -- so what does middle-class economics require in our time?

First, middle-class economics means helping working families feel more secure in a world of constant change. That means helping folks afford child care, college, health care, a home, retirement, and my budget will address each of these issues, lowering the taxes of working families and putting thousands of dollars back into their pockets each year. (Applause.)

Here’s one example: During World War II, when men like my grandfather went off to war, having women like my grandmother in the workforce was a national security priority. So this country provided universal child care.

In today’s economy, when having both parents in the workforce is an economic necessity for many families, we need affordable, high-quality child care more than ever. (Applause.)

It’s not a nice-to-have: it’s a must-have. So it’s time we stop treating childcare as a side issue, or a women’s issue, and treat it like the national economic priority that it is for all of us. (Applause.)

And that’s why my plan will make quality childcare more available, and more affordable, for every middle-class and low-income family with young children in America, by creating more slots and a new tax cut of up to $3,000 per child, per year. (Applause.)

Here’s another example. Today, we are the only advanced country on Earth that doesn’t guarantee paid sick leave or paid maternity leave to our workers. 43 million workers have no paid sick leave. 43 million. Think about that.

And that forces too many parents to make the gut-wrenching choice between a paycheck and a sick kid at home. So I’ll be taking new action to help states adopt paid leave laws of their own. And since paid sick leave won where it was on the ballot last November, let’s put it to a vote right here in Washington. (Applause.) Send me a bill that gives every worker in America the opportunity to earn seven days of paid sick leave.

It’s the right thing to do. (Applause.)

Of course, nothing helps families make ends meet like higher wages. That’s why this Congress still needs to pass a law that makes sure a woman is paid the same as a man for doing the same work. (Applause.) It’s 2015. It’s time. We still need to make sure employees get the overtime they’ve earned -- (applause) -- and everyone in this Congress who still refuses to raise the minimum wage, I say this: If you truly believe you could work full-time and support a family on less than $15,000 a year, try it. (Laughter.) If not, vote to give millions of the hardest-working people in America a raise. (Applause.)

These ideas won’t make everybody rich, won’t relieve every hardship. That’s not the job ofgovernment.

To give working families a fair shot, we still need more employers to see beyond next quarter’s earnings and recognize that investing in their workforce is in their company’s long-term interest.

We still need laws that strengthen rather than weaken unions, and give American workers a voice. (Applause.)

But -- but you know, things like child care and sick leave and equal pay, things like lower mortgage premiums and a higher minimum wage, these ideas will make a meaningful difference in the lives ofmillions of families. That’s a fact. And that’s what all of us, Republicans and Democrats alike, were sent here to do.

Second, to make sure folks keep earning higher wages down the road, we have to do more to help Americans upgrade their skills. (Applause.)

Now America thrived in the 20th century because we made high school free, sent a generation ofG.I.s to college, trained the best workforce in the world. We were ahead of the curve. But other countries caught on. And in a 21st century economy that rewards knowledge like never before, we need to up our game. We need to do more.

By the end of this decade, two in three job openings will require some higher education. Two in three. And yet, we still live in a country where too many bright, striving Americans are priced out of theeducation they need. It’s not fair to them, and it’s sure not smart for our future. That’s why I am sending this Congress a bold new plan to lower the cost of community college to zero. (Applause.)

Keep in mind, 40 percent of our college students choose community college. Some are young and starting out. Some are older and looking for a better job. Some are veterans and single parents trying to transition back into the job market.

Whoever you are, this plan is your chance to graduate ready for the new economy, without a load ofdebt. Understand, you’ve got to earn it. You’ve got to keep your grades up and graduate on time.

Tennessee, a state with Republican leadership, and Chicago, a city with Democratic leadership, are showing that free community college is possible. I want to spread that idea all across America so that two years of college becomes as free and universal in America as high school is today. (Applause.) Let’s stay ahead of the curve.

And -- and I want to work with this Congress to make sure Americans already burdened with student loans can reduce their monthly payments so that student debt doesn’t derail anyone’s dreams. (Applause.)

Thanks to Vice President Biden’s great work to update our job training system, we’re connecting community colleges with local employers to train workers to fill high-paying jobs like coding and nursing and robotics.

Tonight, I’m also asking more businesses to follow the lead of companies like CVS and UPS and offer more educational benefits and paid apprenticeships, opportunities that give workers the chance to earn higher-paying jobs, even if they don’t have a higher education.

And as a new generation of veterans comes home, we owe them every opportunity to live theAmerican Dream they helped defend.

Already, we’ve made strides towards ensuring that every veteran has access to the highest quality care, we’re slashing the backlog that had too many veterans waiting years to get the benefits they need, and we’re making it easier for vets to translate their training and experience into civilian jobs.

And joining forces, the national campaign launched by Michelle and Jill Biden -- (applause) -- thank you, Michelle, thank you, Jill -- has helped nearly 700,000 veterans and military spouses get a new job. (Applause.)

So to every CEO in America, let me repeat: If you want somebody who’s going to get the job done, and done right, hire a veteran. (Applause.)

Finally, as we better train our workers, we need the new economy to keep churning out high-wage jobs for our workers to fill. Since 2010, America has put more people back to work than Europe, Japan, and all advanced economies combined. (Applause.)

Our manufacturers have added almost 800,000 new jobs. Some of our bedrock sectors, like our auto industry, are booming. But there are also millions of Americans who work in jobs that didn’t even exist 10 or 20 years ago: jobs at companies like Google, and eBay, and Tesla.

So no one knows for certain which industries will generate the jobs of the future. But we do know we want them here in America. (Applause.) We know that.

That’s why the third part of middle-class economics is all about building the most competitive economy anywhere, the place where businesses want to locate and hire.

Twenty-first st century businesses need 21st century infrastructure: modern ports, and stronger bridges, faster trains and the fastest Internet. (Applause.)

Democrats and Republicans used to agree on this. So let’s set our sights higher than a single oil pipeline; let’s pass a bipartisan -- (applause) -- infrastructure plan that could create more than 30 times as many jobs per year and make this country stronger for decades to come.

Let’s do it. Let’s get it done. (Applause.) Let’s get it done.

21st century businesses, including small businesses, need to sell more American products overseas. Today, our businesses export more than ever, and exporters tend to pay their workers higher wages.

But as we speak, China wants to write the rules for the world’s fastest-growing region. That would put our workers and our businesses at a disadvantage.
Why would we let that happen? We should write those rules. We should level the playing field.

That’s why I’m asking both parties to give me trade promotion authority to protect American workers with strong new trade deals from Asia to Europe --(applause) -- that aren’t just free but are also fair. It’s the right thing to do.

Look, I’m -- I’m the first one to admit -- I’m the first one to admit that past trade deals haven’t always lived up to the hype, and that’s why we’ve gone after countries –- (applause) -- that break the rules at our expense. But 95 percent of the world’s customers live outside our borders. We can’t close ourselves off from those opportunities. More than half of manufacturing executives have said they’re actively looking to bring jobs back from China. So let’s give them one more reason to get it done.

21st century businesses will rely on American science and technology, research and development. I want the country that eliminated polio and mapped the human genome to lead a new era of medicine: one that delivers the right treatment at the right time. (Applause.)

In some patients with cystic fibrosis, this approach has reversed a disease once thought unstoppable. Tonight, I’m launching a new Precision Medicine Initiative to bring us closer to curing diseases like cancer and diabetes and to give all of us access to the personalized information we need to keep ourselves and our families healthier. We can do this. (Applause.)

I intend to protect a free and open Internet, to extend its reach to every classroom, and every community -- (applause) -- and help folks build the fastest networks, so that the next generation ofdigital innovators and entrepreneurs have the platform to keep reshaping our world.

I want Americans to win the race for the kinds of discoveries that unleash new jobs: converting sunlight into liquid fuel; creating revolutionary prosthetics, so that a veteran who gave his arms for his country can play catch with his kids again. (Applause.)

Pushing out into the solar system not just to visit, but to stay. Last month, we launched a new spacecraft as part of a re-energized space program that will send American astronauts to Mars. And in two months, to prepare us for those missions, Scott Kelly will begin a year-long stay in space. So good luck, Captain. (Applause.) Make sure to Instagram it. We’re proud of you.

Now, the truth is when it comes to issues like infrastructure and basic research, I know there’s bipartisan support in this chamber. Members of both parties have told me so.

Where we too often run onto the rocks is how to pay for these investments. As Americans, we don’t mind paying our fair share of taxes, as long as everybody else does too.

But for far too long, lobbyists have rigged the tax code with loopholes that let some corporations pay nothing while others pay full freight. They’ve riddled it with giveaways that the super rich don’t need, while denying a break to middle-class families who do.

This year, we have an opportunity to change that. Let’s close loopholes so we stop rewarding companies that keep profits abroad, and reward those that invest in America. (Applause.) Let’s use those savings to rebuild our infrastructure and make it more attractive for companies to bring jobs home. Let’s simplify the system and let a small-business owner file based on her actual bank statement instead of the number of accountants she can afford. (Applause.)



Obama Defends New Taxes on the Wealthy


The president discussed tax increases on high-income earners and large financial institutions that would fund new initiatives during his State of the Union address.

Video by Associated Press on Publish Date January 20, 2015. Photo by Stephen Crowley/The New York Times.

And let’s close the loopholes that lead to inequality by allowing the top one percent to avoid paying taxes on their accumulated wealth. We can use that money to help more families pay for childcare and send their kids to college. We need a tax code that truly helps working Americans trying to get a leg up in the new economy, and we can achieve that together. (Applause.) We can achieve it together.

Helping hardworking families make ends meet. Giving them the tools they need for good-paying jobs in this new economy. Maintaining the conditions of growth and competitiveness. This is where America needs to go. I believe it’s where the American people want to go. It will make our economy stronger a year from now, 15 years from now, and deep into the century ahead.

Of course, if there’s one thing this new century has taught us, it’s that we cannot separate our work at home from challenges beyond our shores.
My first duty as Commander-in-Chief is to defend the United States of America. In doing so, thequestion is not -- in doing so the question is not whether America leads in the world, but how.

When we make rash decisions, reacting to the headlines instead of using our heads; when the first response to a challenge is to send in our military, then we risk getting drawn into unnecessary conflicts, and neglect the broader strategy we need for a safer, more prosperous world. That’s what our enemies want us to do.

I believe in a smarter kind of American leadership. We lead best when we combine military power with strong diplomacy; when we leverage our power with coalition building; when we don’t let our fears blind us to the opportunities that this new century presents.

That’s exactly what we’re doing right now, and around the globe, it is making a difference.

First, we stand united with people around the world who’ve been targeted by terrorists, from a school in Pakistan to the streets of Paris.

We will continue – (applause) -- to hunt down terrorists and dismantle their networks, and we reservethe right to act unilaterally, as we have done relentlessly since I took office, to take out terrorists who pose a direct threat to us and our allies. (Applause.)

At the same time, we’ve learned some costly lessons over the last 13 years. Instead of Americans patrolling the valleys of Afghanistan, we’ve trained their security forces, who’ve now taken the lead, and we’ve honored our troops’ sacrifice by supporting that country’s first democratic transition.

Instead of sending large ground forces overseas, we’re partnering with nations from South Asia to North Africa to deny safe haven to terrorists who threaten America.



Obama on Progress in the ISIS Fight

The president discussed the military campaign against the Islamic State, and the larger battle against violent extremism, during his State of the Union address.
Video by Associated Press on Publish Date January 20, 2015. Photo by Stephen Crowley/The New York Times.

In Iraq and Syria, American leadership, including our military power, is stopping ISIL’s advance. Instead of getting dragged into another ground war in the Middle East, we are leading a broad coalition, including Arab nations, to degrade and ultimately destroy this terrorist group. (Applause.)

We’re also supporting a moderate opposition in Syria that can help us in this effort and assisting people everywhere who stand up to the bankrupt ideology of violent extremism.

Now, this effort will take time. It will require focus. But we will succeed. And tonight, I call on this Congress to show the world that we are united in this mission by passing a resolution to authorize theuse of force against ISIL. (Applause.) We need that authority.

Second, we are demonstrating the power of American strength and diplomacy. We’re upholding theprinciple that bigger nations can’t bully the small by opposing Russian aggression and supporting Ukraine’s democracy, and reassuring our NATO allies. (Applause.)

Last year, as we were doing the hard work of imposing sanctions along with our allies, as we were reinforcing our presence with the frontline states, Mr. Putin’s aggression, it was suggested, was a masterful display of strategy and strength. That’s what I heard from some folks. Well, today, it is America that stands strong and united with our allies, while Russia is isolated, with its economy in tatters. That’s how America leads: not with bluster, but with persistent, steady resolve. (Applause.)



Obama Discusses Next Steps With Cuba

The president discussed the move to normalize relations with Cuba during his State of the Union address.

In Cuba, we are ending a policy – (applause) -- that was long past its expiration date. When what you’re doing doesn’t work for 50 years, it’s time to try something new. (Applause.) And our shift in Cuba policy has the potential to end a legacy of mistrust in our hemisphere and removes the phony excuse for restrictions in Cuba, stands up for democratic values and extends the hand of friendship tothe Cuban people. And this year, Congress should begin the work of ending the embargo. (Applause.)

As -- as his Holiness, Pope Francis, has said, diplomacy is the work of small steps. These small steps have added up to new hope for the future in Cuba. And after years in prison, we are overjoyed that Alan Gross is back where he belongs. (Applause.) Welcome home, Alan. We’re glad you’re here.

Our diplomacy is at work with respect to Iran, where, for the first time in a decade, we’ve halted theprogress of its nuclear program and reduced its stockpile of nuclear material.



Obama on Diplomacy and Iran

The president discussed the continuing negotiations to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran during his State of the Union address.

Between now and this spring, we have a chance to negotiate a comprehensive agreement that prevents a nuclear-armed Iran, secures America and our allies, including Israel, while avoiding yet another Middle East conflict.

There’re no guarantees that negotiations will succeed, and I keep all options on the table to prevent a nuclear Iran. But new sanctions passed by this Congress at this moment in time will all but guarantee that diplomacy fails, alienating America from its allies, making it harder to maintain sanctions and ensuring that Iran starts up its nuclear program again. It doesn’t make sense. That is why I will veto any new sanctions bill that threatens to undo this progress. (Applause.) The American people expect us to only go to war as a last resort, and I intend to stay true to that wisdom.

Third, we’re looking beyond the issues that have consumed us in the past to shape the coming century.

No foreign nation, no hacker, should be able to shut down our networks, steal our trade secrets, or invade
the privacy of American families, especially our kids. (Applause.)


But we are making sure our government integrates intelligence to combat cyber threats, just as we have done to combat terrorism. And tonight, I urge this Congress to finally pass the legislation we need to better meet the evolving threat of cyber-attacks, combat identity theft, and protect our children’s information. That should be a bipartisan effort. (Applause.)

You know, if we don’t act, we’ll leave our nation and our economy vulnerable. If we do, we can continue to protect the technologies that have unleashed untold opportunities for people around the globe.

In West Africa, our troops, our scientists, our doctors, our nurses and healthcare workers are rolling back Ebola, saving countless lives and stopping the spread of disease. (Applause.) I could not be prouder of them, and I thank this Congress for your bipartisan support of their efforts.

But the job is not yet done, and the world needs to use this lesson to build a more effective global effort to prevent the spread of future pandemics, invest in smart development and eradicate extreme poverty.

In the Asia Pacific, we are modernizing alliances while making sure that other nations play by therules in how they trade, how they resolve maritime disputes, how they participate in meeting common international challenges like nonproliferation and disaster relief. And no challenge, no challenge, poses a greater threat to future generations than climate change. (Applause.) 2014 was the planet’s warmest year on record.



Obama on Actions Against Climate Change

The president discussed his recent landmark deal with China and the need for more action during his State of the Union address.

Now, one year doesn’t make a trend, but this does: 14 of the 15 warmest years on record have all fallen in the first 15 years of this century.

I’ve heard some folks try to dodge the evidence by saying they’re not scientists, that we don’t have enough information to act. Well, I’m not a scientist either.

But you know what? I know a lot of really good scientists at NASA and at NOAA and at our major universities, and the best scientists in theworld are all telling us that our activities are changing the climate, and if we don’t act forcefully, we’ll continue to see rising oceans, longer, hotter heat waves, dangerous droughts and floods, and massive disruptions that can trigger greater migration and conflict and hunger around the globe. ThePentagon says that climate change poses immediate risks to our national security. We should act like it. (Applause.)


That’s why, over the past six years, we’ve done more than ever to combat climate change, from theway we produce energy, to the way we use it. That’s why we’ve set aside more public lands and waters than any administration in history. And that’s why I will not let this Congress endanger thehealth of our children by turning back the clock on our efforts. I am determined to make sure American leadership drives international action. (Applause.)

In Beijing, we made a historic announcement: the United States will double the pace at which we cut carbon pollution, and China committed, for the first time, to limiting their emissions. And because theworld’s two largest economies came together, other nations are now stepping up, and offering hope that, this year, the world will finally reach an agreement to protect the one planet we’ve got.

And There’s one last pillar of our leadership, and that’s the example of our values.

As Americans, we respect human dignity, even when we’re threatened, which is why I’ve prohibited torture, and worked to make sure our use of new technology like drones is properly constrained. (Applause.) It’s why we speak out against the deplorable anti-Semitism that has resurfaced in certain parts of the world. (Applause.)

It’s why we continue to reject offensive stereotypes of Muslims, the vast majority of whom share our commitment to peace. That’s why we defend free speech and advocate for political prisoners and condemn the persecution of women or religious minorities or people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender. We do these things not only because they are the right thing to do -- (applause) -- but because ultimately, they make us safer.

As Americans, we have a profound commitment to justice. So it makes no sense to spend $3 million per prisoner to keep open a prison that the world condemns and terrorists use to recruit. (Applause.)

Since I’ve been president, we’ve worked responsibly to cut the population of Gitmo in half. Now it is time to finish the job, and I will not relent in my determination to shut it down. It is not who we are. (Applause.) It’s time to close Gitmo.

As Americans, we cherish our civil liberties, and we need to uphold that commitment if we want maximum cooperation from other countries and industry in our fight against terrorist networks. So while some have moved on from the debates over our surveillance programs, I have not. As promised, our intelligence agencies have worked hard, with the recommendations of privacy advocates to increase transparency and build more safeguards against potential abuse.

And next month, we’ll issue a report on how we’re keeping our promise to keep our country safe while strengthening privacy.

Looking to the future instead of the past, making sure we match our power with diplomacy and use force wisely. Building coalitions to meet new challenges and opportunities. Leading always with theexample of our values. That’s what makes us exceptional. That’s what keeps us strong. And that’s why we have to keep striving to hold ourselves to the highest of standards: our own.

You know, just over a decade ago, I gave a speech in Boston where I said there wasn’t a liberal America, or a conservative America; a black America or a white America, but a United States ofAmerica.

I said this because I had seen it in my own life, in a nation that gave someone like me a chance; because I grew up in Hawaii, a melting pot of races and customs; because I made Illinois my home, astate of small towns, rich farmland, and one of the world’s great cities; a microcosm of the country where Democrats and Republicans and Independents, good people of every ethnicity and every faith, share certain bedrock values.

Over the past six years, the pundits have pointed out more than once that my presidency hasn’t delivered on this vision. How ironic, they say, that our politics seems more divided than ever. It’s held up as proof not just of my own flaws, of which there are many, but also as proof that the vision itself is misguided, naive, that there are too many people in this town who actually benefit from partisanship and gridlock for us to ever do anything about it.

I know how tempting such cynicism may be. But I still think the cynics are wrong. I still believe that we are one people. I still believe that together – (applause) -- we can do great things, even when theodds are long.

I believe this because over and over in my six years in office, I have seen America at its best. I’ve seen the hopeful faces of young graduates from New York to California; and our newest officers at West Point, Annapolis, Colorado Springs, and New London. I’ve mourned with grieving families in Tucson and Newtown; in Boston, and West Texas, and West Virginia. I’ve watched Americans beat back adversity from the Gulf Coast to the Great Plains; from Midwest assembly lines to the Mid-Atlantic seaboard.

I’ve seen something like gay marriage go from a wedge issue used to drive us apart to a story offreedom across our country, a civil right now legal – (applause) -- in states that seven in ten Americans call home.

So I know the good, and optimistic, and big-hearted generosity of the American people who, every day, live the idea that we are our brother’s keeper, and our sister’s keeper. And I know they expect those of us who serve here to set a better example.

So the question for those of us here tonight is how we, all of us, can better reflect America’s hopes. I’ve served in Congress with many of you. I know many of you well. There are a lot of good people here, on both sides of the aisle.

And many of you have told me that this isn’t what you signed up for -- arguing past each other on cable shows, the constant fundraising, always looking over your shoulder at how the base will react to every decision.

Imagine if we broke out of these tired old patterns. Imagine if we did something different.

Understand, a better politics isn’t one where Democrats abandon their agenda or Republicans simply embrace mine; a better politics is one where we appeal to each other’s basic decency instead of our basest fears.

A better politics is one where we debate without demonizing each other, where we talk issues and values and principles and facts, rather than “gotcha” moments or trivial gaffes or fake controversies that have nothing to do with people’s daily lives. (Applause.)

A politics -- a better politics is one where we spend less time drowning in dark money for ads that pull us into the gutter, and spend more time lifting young people up with a sense of purpose and possibility, asking them to join in the great mission of building America.

If we’re going to have arguments, let’s have arguments. But let’s make them debates worthy of this body and worthy of this country.

We still may not agree on a woman’s right to choose, but surely, we can agree it’s a good thing that teen pregnancies and abortions are nearing all-time lows, and that every woman should have access to the health care that she needs. (Applause.)

Yes, passions still fly on immigration, but surely we can all see something of ourselves in the striving young student, and agree that no one benefits when a hardworking mom is snatched from her child, and that it’s possible to shape a law that upholds our tradition as a nation of laws and a nation ofimmigrants. I’ve talked to Republicans and Democrats about that. That’s something that we can share.

We may go at it in campaign season, but surely we can agree that the right to vote is sacred – (applause) -- that it’s being denied to too many; and that, on this 50th anniversary of the great march from Selma to Montgomery and the passage of the Voting Rights Act, we can come together, Democrats and Republicans, to make voting easier for every single American. (Applause.)

We may have different takes on the events of Ferguson and New York. But surely we can understand a father who fears his son can’t walk home without being harassed. And surely we can understandthe wife who won’t rest until the police officer she married walks through the front door at the end ofhis shift. (Applause.)

And surely we can agree it’s a good thing that for the first time in 40 years, the crime rate and theincarceration rate have come down together, and use that as a starting point for Democrats and Republicans, community leaders and law enforcement, to reform America’s criminal justice system so that it protects and serves all of us. (Applause.)

That’s a better politics. That’s how we start rebuilding trust. That’s how we move this country forward. That’s what the American people want. That’s what they deserve. I have no more campaigns to run. My only agenda -- (applause, laughter) -- I know, because I won both of them. (Applause, laughter.) My only agenda for the next two years is the same as the one I’ve had since the day I swore an oath on the steps of this Capitol: to do what I believe is best for America.



Obama’s Zinger in State of Union Address

The president had an off-the-cuff response during his speech after applause broke out when he said, “I have no more campaigns to run.”

If you share the broad vision I outlined tonight, I ask you to join me in the work at hand. If you disagree with parts of it, I hope you’ll at least work with me where you do agree. And I commit to every Republican here tonight that I will not only seek out your ideas, I will seek to work with you to make this country stronger. (Applause.)

Because -- because I want this chamber, I want this city, to reflect the truth that for all our blind spots and shortcomings, we are a people with the strength and generosity of spirit to bridge divides, to unite in common effort, to help our neighbors, whether down the street or on the other side of the world.

I want our actions to tell every child, in every neighborhood: your life matters, and we are as committed to improving your life chances – (applause) -- as committed as we are we are to working on behalf of our own kids.

I want future generations to know that we are a people who see our differences as a great gift, that we are a people who value the dignity and worth of every citizen: man and woman, young and old, black and white, Latino and Asian, immigrant and Native American, gay and straight, Americans with mental illness or physical disability. Everybody matters.

I want them to grow up in a country that shows the world what we still know to be true: that we are still more than a collection of red states and blue states; that we are the United States of America. (Applause.) I want them to grow up in a country where a young mom can sit down and write a letter to her president with a story that sums up these past six years:
“It is amazing what you can bounce back from when you have to. We are a strong, tight-knit family who has made it through some very, very hard times.”

My fellow Americans, we too are a strong, tight-knit family. We, too, have made it through some hard times. Fifteen years into this new century, we have picked ourselves up, dusted ourselves off and begun again the work of remaking America. We have laid a new foundation. A brighter future is ours to write.
Let’s begin this new chapter together, and let’s start the work right now.

Thank you. God bless you. (Applause.) God bless this country we love. Thank you.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/21/us/politics/obamas-state-of-the-union-201…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 7 Fév - 04:33 (2015)    Sujet du message: AMERICA NEEDS TO LEAD THE WORLD TO SAFETY, OBAMA STATES IN NEW US SECURITY STRATEGY Répondre en citant

AMERICA NEEDS TO LEAD THE WORLD TO SAFETY, OBAMA STATES IN NEW US SECURITY STRATEGY 



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcIDPNNGqxo


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 8 Fév - 03:48 (2015)    Sujet du message: WHITE HOUSE QUIETLY RELEASES LIST OF MUSLIM LEADERS WHO MET PRIVATELY WITH OBAMA Répondre en citant

WHITE HOUSE QUIETLY RELEASES LIST OF MUSLIM LEADERS WHO MET PRIVATELY WITH OBAMA

Feb. 6, 2015 8:09pm Jason Howerton

The White House quietly released the names of the Muslim leaders who met privately with President Barack Obama earlier this week to discuss the Islamic State, anti-Muslim “discrimination” and even Obamacare.




In a Friday, Jan. 30, 2015 file photo, President Barack Obama speaks in the East Room of the White House in Washington. (Image source: AP/Carolyn Kaster, File)

After initially declining to reveal who attended the meeting, the administration attached the list of 14 people who attended the Wednesday meeting:
Citation:


• Bilqis “Qisi” Abdul-Qaadir, Director of Women’s Basketball Operations, Indiana State University
• Arshia Wajid, Founder, American Muslim Health Professionals
• Dean Obeidallah, Comedian, Dean of Comedy
• Kameelah Rashad, Founder of Muslim Wellness Foundation and Muslim Chaplain of University of Pennsylvania
• Diego Arancibia, Board Member and Associate Director, Ta’leef Collective
• Farhan Latif, Chief Operating Officer and Director of Policy Impact, Institute of Policy and Understanding
• Sherman Jackson, Professor of Religion and American Studies and Ethnicity, University of Southern California
• Azhar Azeez, President, Islamic Society of North America
• Farhana Khera, President, Muslim Advocates
• Rahat Hussain, President, Universal Muslim Association of America
• Hoda Hawa, National Policy Advisor, Muslim Public Affairs Council
• Maya Berry, Executive Director, Arab American Institute
• Imam Mohamed Magid, ADAMS Center
• Haroon Mokhtarzada, CEO, Webs


Several outlets have noted that ISNA, represented at the meeting, was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the infamous Holy Land Foundation trial, one of the largest terrorism financing trials in U.S. history. ISNA has denied having ties to terrorist groups and disputed being named in the Holy Land Foundation trial.

Not represented at the meeting was the vocal Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR, which was also named an unindicted co-conspirator in the trial and is accused of having ties to Hamas.

As previously reported by TheBlaze, the White House said Obama and Muslim leaders “discussed the need to continue countering ISIL and other groups that commit horrific acts of violence, purportedly in the name of Islam.”

Also reportedly discussed were “the Affordable Care Act, issues of anti-Muslim violence and discrimination, the 21st Century Policing Task Force, and the upcoming White House Summit on Countering Violence Extremism.”

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/02/06/white-house-quietly-releases-lis…








Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 19 Fév - 08:12 (2015)    Sujet du message: OBAMA : MUSLIM-AMERICANS FEEL THEY HAVE BEEN UNFAIRLY TARGETED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT Répondre en citant

OBAMA : MUSLIM-AMERICANS FEEL THEY HAVE BEEN UNFAIRLY TARGETED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a57Sr4l1A-g

OBAMA : CALLING ISLAMIC EXTREMISTS ‘ISLAMIC’ GIVES THEM ‘LEGITIMACY’



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjUPSLJALLk

OBAMA : ‘WE ALL KNOW THERE IS NO ONE PROFILE OF A VIOLENT EXTREMIST OR TERRORIST’



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsQelOkemkA 


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 19 Fév - 08:55 (2015)    Sujet du message: OBAMA : TO FIGHT ISIS WE NEED TO AMPLIFY THE VOICES OF PEACE AND INCLUSION, ESPECIALLY ONLINE Répondre en citant

OBAMA : TO FIGHT ISIS WE NEED TO AMPLIFY THE VOICES OF PEACE AND INCLUSION, ESPECIALLY ONLINE



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fal5iloJ2hs

OBAMA : TO BEAT ISIS, WE MUST ‘INVEST’ IN ‘EDUCATION AND SKILLS AND JOB TRAINING’



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUs_xkz3FjI

OBAMA : COUNTERING VIOLENT EXTREMISM IS NOT JUST A MATTER OF THER MILITARY



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzMeaArTEeA  


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 23 Fév - 05:09 (2015)    Sujet du message: THE BETRAYAL PAPERS – PART I OF V – UNDER OBAMA : THE U.S. CAPTURED BY THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD Répondre en citant

THE BETRAYAL PAPERS – PART I OF V – UNDER OBAMA : THE U.S. CAPTURED BY THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD



Submitted by Terresa Monroe-Hamilton on February 18, 2015 – 10:02 am EST

The Betrayal Papers will trace the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood in the Obama administration’s foreign and domestic policies. The five-part series will present a picture of a conspiracy that is manipulating the American government to the benefit of a totalitarian, genocidal movement that seeks to establish a global Islamic State.
  • The Muslim Brotherhood is an international political, financial, terrorist and movement whose goal is to establish a global Islamic State (Caliphate).
  • They have and continue to exert tremendous influence of the American government’s foreign and domestic policies under President Barack Hussein Obama.
  • The violence in the Middle East and across North Africa is a direct consequence of the Muslim Brotherhood’s effective control over American foreign policy in the region.
  • They operate through various “civic” front groups, as well as through American institutions who take their money as operational funding (Georgetown University, Brookings Institution).

In America, we have a weak and struggling economy, growing public and private debt and millions are un- and underemployed. While a weaponized IRS targets Tea Party groups and other voices of liberty, and military veterans are labeled as “domestic terrorists” by the Department of Homeland Security, the federal government refuses to secure the southern border. Educational policy now includes the teaching Arabic and visits to mosques for schoolchildren.

Internationally, America is in retreat. The Middle East is in ashes, and in the midst of an ongoing genocide replete with daily horrors, the likes which have not been seen for centuries. Former allies have been abandoned and are embittered. Under the present leadership in the White House and State Department, Israel is considered the aggressor and Hamas the oppressed.

In sum, the world is at its most volatile point since the outbreak of World War II.

If you think that this is a result of something other than an “incompetent,” “stupid,” or “clueless” President, words regularly used by those who sense something is wrong but, can’t quite bring themselves to own up to the ugly truth, you’re not alone.

Millions of Americans are realizing that the Obama administration is not merely “misguided.” It is actually and consciously anti-American, anti-Semitic, anti-Christian, and broadly anti-Western. Yet , the American public does not yet fully appreciate why and how the administration always finds itself square against everything this country is based on – religious freedom, capitalism, and justice under law.

This series of articles will explain the force and mechanics behind Obama’s anti-American global agenda: the Muslim Brotherhood.

Al-Ikhwan al-Muslimoon: The Root of Today’s Islamic Evil

Husseini speaking with Hitler in 1941

Founded in 1928, the Muslim Brotherhood (aka, the Society of Muslim Brothers, or Al-Ikhwan al-Muslimoon in Arabic) is an international movement (some would argue an international conspiracy) that seeks to establish a worldwide Islamic State (or Caliphate). When it was created in the late 1920s, the Brotherhood was a contemporary of the Nazi Party of Germany. Indeed, the leader of the Muslim Brotherhood in Palestine, Amin al-Husseini, is considered by some as the man who catalyzed the Holocaust; for it was only after Husseini visited Hitler in Berlin in 1941 that the systematic extermination of Jews and other minorities began with industrial efficiency.

After the war, despite the insistence by many wartime leaders (Churchill included) that he be brought to justice, Husseini escaped to the Middle East. He lived there until his death in the 1970s, serving as a mentor to a young Yasser Arafat. Husseini and the Nazi Party are the connection points between the Holocaust and today’s Middle Eastern genocide.

The Allies conscious failure to arrest and prosecute Husseini haunts us today.

A Terror Hedge against Stalin and Soviet Russia

At the beginning of the Cold War, working with former Nazis, the American CIA began to court the Muslim Brotherhood as an ally against Soviet Russia. This calculus may have made sense when facing down Josef Stalin, a totalitarian tyrant hell-bent on world domination, but it has proved a costly strategy in the long run.

In the years and decades that followed World War II, the Muslim Brotherhood has evolved into a modern day Nazi International, not unlike the old Comintern (Communist International). It has a vast network of financial and business interests across the world; it has agents, supporters, and apologists within western governments; and it has a support network of “civic” organizations in the West.

These all serve as a cover for its darker and insatiably violent ambitions.

For despite all their intrigue and political gamesmanship, the Muslim Brotherhood is not strictly a political movement, nor a financial cabal. It’s also the mothership of virtually all Islamic terrorist groups operating in the world today, including Al Qaeda, ISIS, Hamas, the Taliban, Boko Haram, and many more.

Such groups, all children of the Muslim Brotherhood’s fanatical Islamic ideology, are today ethnically cleansing countries such as Libya, Syria, Iraq, and Nigeria of all traces of Christianity. No less than the President of Egypt, Muslim Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, a devout Muslim, has said as much.

Considering how the Muslim Brotherhood and their terrorist pawns treat fellow Muslims in Egypt, Libya, Syria, and Iraq, butchering them by the bushel including women and children, it should come as no surprise that Egypt and Saudi Arabia have declared the them a “terrorist” organization.

It should also come as no surprise that the United Arab Emirates has designated Muslim Brotherhood front groups operating in the United States “terrorist” entities. In November, the UAE effectively declared that the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and Muslim-American Society (MAS) were no different than Al Qaeda. Why? It’s because they share a common origin in the Muslim Brotherhood. One could add to this list of domestic terrorist collaborators and enablers the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), and the Muslim Students Association (MSA).

A New HQ in America


Equally alarmingly, all-American institutions such as Georgetown University and the Brookings Institution have accepted so much money from the Muslim Brotherhood government in Qatar, that their political positions are virtually indistinguishable from the Muslim Brotherhood’s domestic front groups!

Yet, the United States government does not see these organizations and their employees as the enemy, as apologists for the worst kinds of barbarity. In fact, the highest profile people from these organizations advise the Obama administration, including the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, and the National Security Council. In January, the Department of State actually welcomed the Muslim Brotherhood to a meeting, and shortly thereafter Egypt exploded in jihadi violence. This is no magical coincidence.

To the detriment of our safety and well-being, the domestic Muslim Brotherhood front groups help dictate counterterrorism policies. It is their influence which leads to the farcical idea, recently expressed by Obama at the National Prayer Breakfast, that the Crusades have something to do with ISIS and the mass murder of innocents in the Middle East today.

These front groups shape our foreign policy, which since the Arab Spring and continuing to this day is on the side of the Muslim Brotherhood.

So-called “moderate Muslims” employed at these front groups have made the country of Qatar, a totalitarian sharia-based society, and an “ATM for terrorists,” the closest ally of the United States under Obama’s Presidency. With enthusiasm from Obama and Eric Holder, they have us emptying Guantanamo Bay of the most vicious killers and sending them to Qatar, with only the vaguest of security assurances.

The remaining four articles will explore the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood on American policy, both foreign and domestic (including in Common Core, Obama’s position on illegal immigration and amnesty, and the hostility of the administration toward police officers). The exposé will also detail the operatives in the government who work to advance the Muslim Brotherhood’s ambitions for a worldwide Caliphate. And it will put into context the mysterious influence that George Soros and Valerie Jarrett have over Barack Hussein Obama, his administration, and the policies that affect every American.

The Betrayal Papers is a collaborative effort by the Coalition of Concerned Citizens, which includes: Andrea Shea King, Dr. Ashraf Ramelah, Benjamin Smith, Brent Parrish, Charles Ortel, Chris Nethery, Denise Simon, Dick Manasseri, Gary Kubiak, Gates of Vienna, IQ al Rassooli, Jeff Bayard, Leslie Burt, Marcus Kohan, Mary Fanning, General Paul E. Vallely, Regina Thomson, Scott Smith, Terresa Monroe-Hamilton, Colonel Thomas Snodgrass, Trever Loudon, Wallace Bruschweiler, and William Palumbo.

http://www.trevorloudon.com/2015/02/the-betrayal-papers-part-i-of-v-under-o…



Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 5 Mar - 14:02 (2015)    Sujet du message: HEAD OF NOBEL PEACE PRIZE FIRED; ASKED OBAMA TO RETURN THE PRIZE. Répondre en citant

HEAD OF NOBEL PEACE PRIZE FIRED; ASKED OBAMA TO RETURN THE PRIZE.



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edSB5HTxM2c

HEAD OF NOBEL PEACE PRIZE COMMITTEE IS FIRED, REQUESTS OBAMA TO RETURN 2009 PEACE PRIZE?

By Eric Zuesse
Global Research, March 05, 2015



For the first time ever, the head of the Nobel Peace Prize Committee has been fired. It happened on Tuesday, March 3rd.

Thorbjorn Jagland, chairman of the Nobel Peace Prize Committee, and former Norwegian Prime Minister, said, on the way out the door, that it would be “really nice” if President Barack Obama were to return the prize.

The White House had no immediate comment. (This reporter just now, at 1:47 PM Eastern time, specifically asked the White House whether there yet is a comment, and still there is none. Maybe he will volunteer to return it?)

President Obama received the prize on 9 October 2009 after 9 months in office. There is question whether he had already perpetrated the 28 June 2009 coup that overthrew the progressive democratically elected President in Honduras, Manuel Zelaya and installed the narco-regime that followed after, but Obama and especially his Secretary of State Hillary Clinton certainly were the key people in enabling that regime to remain in power after almost every other government in the Americas and many around the world had declared them illegal. The following year, Honduras became the world’s highest-murder-rate nation, which they have since remained.

Then, President Obama in 2011 bombed Libya into anarchy and turned it into a failed state with rampant tribal and religious wars.

In 2014, President Obama carried out a Ukrainian coup which removed the democratically elected President Viktor Yanukovych and replaced him with a racist-fascist anti-Russian regime which is bombing the area of Ukraine that had voted 90% for Yanukovych.

Perhaps nothing in the history of the Nobel Peace Prize has embarrassed that Committee as much as the premature granting of this Prize to the man who is increasingly viewed around the world as George W. Bush II.

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010,  and of  CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/head-of-nobel-peace-prize-committee-is-fired-requests-obama-to-return-2009-peace-prize/5434882


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 12 Mar - 12:51 (2015)    Sujet du message: PRESIDENT OBAMA SELMA SPEECH 2015 ON 50th 'BLOODY SUNDY' AT EDMOND PETTUS BRIDGE, ALABAMA Répondre en citant

PRESIDENT OBAMA SELMA SPEECH 2015 ON 50th 'BLOODY SUNDY' AT EDMOND PETTUS BRIDGE, ALABAMA



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVAZp1j0tKc

President Obama's Powerful Selma Speech on Race and Civil Rights: President Obama Delivers His Most Profound Speech Ever At Selma Anniversary.

Barack Obama address on civil rights in Selma, Alabama – full speech: 'Latinos, Asians, Gays, Disabled Walked Through Doors Civil Rights Leaders Opened,' We’re the Slaves Who Built the White House'. President speaks at the Edmund Pettus Bridge, scene of infamous ‘Bloody Sunday’ of civil rights movement 50 years ago: We're the gay Americans whose blood ran in the streets of San Francisco and New York just as blood ran down this bridge

Obama: US Racial History 'Casts A Long Shadow'

(Sky News) President Barack Obama has said that America's racial history "still casts a long shadow" despite 50 years of progress.

Mr Obama was speaking at an event in Selma, Alabama, to mark the 50th anniversary of marches that took place to protest against the lack of voting rights.

'We just need to open our eyes, and ears, and hearts, to know that this nation's racial history still casts its long shadow upon us,' he said.

'We know the march is not yet over, the race is not yet won, and that reaching that blessed destination where we are judged by the content of our character - requires admitting as much.'

In March 1965, police in Selma beat back crowds attempting to march to the state capital Montgomery to protest over the inability of black people to register to vote.

The violent images broadcast on national television helped lead to the passage of the Voting Rights Act after protesters were joined by Dr Martin Luther King.

The city has been propelled into the global spotlight again this year with the release of the movie Selma and the controversy over its shortage of Oscar nominations.

The anniversary comes with America digesting the report from the Department of Justice detailing racial bias in Ferguson, a city which saw violent protests over the killing of an unarmed black man by a white police officer last summer.

Mr Obama joined civil rights marchers of 50 years ago at the bridge where police brutality on "Bloody Sunday" galvanised America's opposition to racial oppression in the South.

Thousands from across the US gathered at the riverside town for commemorations.

Mr Obama said the civil rights march of 1965 was a global inspiration for those fighting for freedom.

"From the streets of Tunis to the Maidan in Ukraine, this generation of young people can draw strength from this place, where the powerless could change the world's greatest superpower, and push their leaders to expand the boundaries of freedom," he said.

"Look at our history. We are Lewis and Clark and pioneers who brave the unfamiliar. Followed by a stampede of farmers and minors. And entrepreneurs and hucksters. That's our spirit. That's who we are. Women who could do as much as any man and then some. And we're Susan B. Anthony and shook the system until the law reflected the truth. That is our character. We're the immigrants who stowed away on ships to reach these shores. The huddled masses yearning to breathe free. Soviet defectors, the lost boys of Sudan. We're the hopeful strivers who cross the Rio Grande because we want our kids to know a better life. That's how we came to be.

'We're the slaves who built the White House. And the economy of the south. We're the ranch hands and cowboys who open up the west. The countless labors who lay rail and skyscrapers and organize for workers' rights. We're the fresh face gis who fought to liberate a continent. And we're the Tuskegee airmen and the Japanese Americans who fought for this country, even as their own liberty had been denied. We're the firefighters who rushed into those buildings on 9/11. The volunteers who signed up to fight in Afghanistan and Iraq.

We're the gay Americans whose blood ran in the streets of San Francisco and New York just as blood ran down this bridge. We are storytellers, writers, poets, artists who despise hypocrisy and give voice to the voiceless and tell truths that need to be told. We're the inventors of gospel and jazz and blues. Blue grass and country and hip-hop and rock 'N' roll and our very own sound with all the sweet sorrow and reckless joy of freedom. We are Jackie Robinson enduring scorn and pitches coming straight to his head and stealing home in the world series anyway. We are the people Langston Hughes wrote of to build our temples for tomorrow, strong as we know how. We are the people Emerson who for truth and honor sake stood long.

Never so tired so long as we can see far enough. That's what America is. Not stock photos or airbrushed history or feeble attempts to define some of us as more American than others. We respect the past, but we don't pine for the past. We don't fear the future. We grab for it!'

video footage caught on tape cellphone camera surveillance raw dash cam air live on tv share comment like most popular
.


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 20 Mar - 05:37 (2015)    Sujet du message: OBAMA TO IRAN'S PEOPLE : 'BEST OPPORTUNITY IN DECADES' FOR DIFFERENT FUTURE WITH U.S. Répondre en citant

OBAMA TO IRAN'S PEOPLE : 'BEST OPPORTUNITY IN DECADES' FOR DIFFERENT FUTURE WITH U.S.



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7FXIJneSBI


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 2 Avr - 03:15 (2015)    Sujet du message: DINESH D’SOUZA WAS RIGHT, OBAMA IS FORMING A GLOBAL MUSLIM CALIPHATE (VIDEO) Répondre en citant

DINESH D’SOUZA WAS RIGHT, OBAMA IS FORMING A GLOBAL MUSLIM CALIPHATE (VIDEO)

Geoffrey Grider | March 31, 2015

article written by L. Todd Wood, WESTERN JOURNALISM

Why do you think the Obama administration went after filmmaker Dinesh D’souza with federal charges, eventually convicting him of a campaign finance felony?

“They have taken crafty counsel against thy people, and consulted against thy hidden ones. They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance. For they have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee:” Psalm 83:3-5 (KJV)

D’Souza served eight months in a community confinement center, received five years probation, and paid a $30,000 fine, all for giving some money to a friend to donate to a candidate. Somehow, I think there are plenty of people federal prosecutors have not gone after so aggressively for a similar offense.



The reason the federal government went after D’Souza so forcefully was that Dinesh, in his first movie 2016: Obama’s America, hit the nail right on the head regarding our Dear Leader’s agenda. Obama could not let this continue. He had to attempt to silence Dinesh and buy more time to complete his goal—the creation of a global Islamic caliphate.

The evidence is just too overwhelming. There is no other conclusion any intelligent, thinking man can come to.

The New York Post reports today that Obama could not even acknowledge the concept of “Muslim Terrorists” at the extremist convention the administration threw together to act like they were doing something against the Islamic Jihadist threat.
Citation:


WASHINGTON — They’re burning and beheading victims in the name of Islam, but President Obama delivered a major speech Wednesday on combating violent extremism — while refusing to use the words “Muslim terrorists.”



Obama has not shown any leadership in Europe against Russian designs in Ukraine, or any other international conflict, because it’s just not important to him. It doesn’t fit with his long-term goals, so he just pays it lip service. He has to keep his eye on the ball.

Dinesh D’souza Analyzes Predictions from “2016: Obama’s America” in Late 2013:



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uuh9k6Ttsm0

The goal of this administration is to weaken American power so the United States cannot stop the formation of the caliphate from North Africa to Pakistan. Even more frightening is that Obama is attempting to radically change the population of the United States through illegal immigration so that eventually, a Muslim U.S.A. will join his new kingdom.

I have written again and again about the Obama administration’s agenda to allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon to destroy Israel and bring the entire Levant into the caliphate. Israeli nuclear weapons stand in the way of this goal. A nuclear Iran will destroy the Jewish State.

Why Obama Wants to Destroy America:



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAjGxvCc3qE
The Jerusalem Post today reports that the State Department is mocking Israel and openly admits they are not including Israel in the negotiations that involve her very survival.
Citation:


“Obviously, we work to protect sensitive information in the negotiations,” (State Department Spokeswoman Jen) Psaki continued. Asked pointedly whether the US is withholding information from inside the talks from the Israelis, she said, “Correct.”  Washington’s acknowledgment of a gap in its briefings to Israel highlights growing space between the allies on the emerging agreement with Iran, aggressively sought by US President Barack Obama and opposed with equal vigor by Netanyahu.



Iran going nuclear, ISIS conquering the Middle East and threatening to invade Europe, terrorists actively being courted to enter the United States, Christians being slaughtered, Obama refusing to utter the words ‘Islamic terrorist’, Jihad being carried out in Paris and other European capitals, et cetera, et cetera, all point to Obama forming a global Islamic kingdom.

The question is, when he leaves office, is Obama looking to become sultan of his new empire?

article written by L. Todd Wood, WESTERN JOURNALISM

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/?p=32119



Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 12 Avr - 03:14 (2015)    Sujet du message: OBAMA APPOINTS MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD-LINKED MUSLIM TO HEAD “CENTER FOR STRATEGIC COUNTERTERRORISM COMMUNICATIONS” Répondre en citant

OBAMA APPOINTS MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD-LINKED MUSLIM TO HEAD “CENTER FOR STRATEGIC COUNTERTERRORISM COMMUNICATIONS”

February 19, 2015 10:55 am By Robert Spencer



Rashad Hussain was previously the Obama administration’s special envoy to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), the thuggish international organization that is engaged in a full-scale campaign to intimidate Western governments into adopting hate speech codes that will effectively quash criticism of Islam – including jihad violence perpetrated in its name. Rashad Hussain is an apposite choice for this position, since several years ago he defended a notorious U.S.-based leader of a jihad terrorist group.

But someone doesn’t want you to know that, and made a clumsy attempt to cover it up.

In 2004, Rashad Hussain, then a Yale law student, declared that the investigation and prosecution of University of South Florida professor Sami al-Arian, who ultimately pled guilty to charges involving his activities as a leader of the terror group Palestinian Islamic Jihad and was recently deported, was a “politically motivated persecution” designed “to squash dissent.”

Hussain’s remarks in support of Al-Arian were published in the jihad-enabling Washington Report on Middle East Affairs in November 2004. But now all that has gone down the memory hole. The Washington Report’s archived version of this November 2004 article lacks two paragraphs that were included in the original version: the ones quoting Rashad Hussain. Otherwise the article is unchanged.

The Washington Report editors, caught red-handed, decided to brazen it out, and blame their accusers – a tried-and-true tactic that is also frequently employed by jihadists in the West. They insist that there was no cover-up, and anyone who thinks otherwise is a venomous Islamophobe: according to CNS News, “WRMEA news editor and executive director Delinda Hanley denied there was a ‘cover-up,’ and implied that anti-Muslim discrimination was behind the fact this was now being raised.”

Sure. It’s just “anti-Muslim discrimination” to be concerned about Rashad Hussain’s support for Al-Arian, a vicious suicide-bombing supporter who chanted “Death to America” and “Death to Israel,” and clearly meant it. When two Islamic Jihad suicide bombers killed eighteen people in Israel in 1995, Al-Arian called them “two mujahidin martyred for the sake of God.”

But there was no cover-up! It was all a mistake, you see: according to the Washington Report now, Sami Al-Arian’s daughter, Laila Al-Arian, actually said the words that were attributed to Rashad Hussain.

But this explanation doesn’t make sense, since the article was altered just to remove the quotes, not to change the name of the person quoted. Also, the author of the original story, Shereen Kandil, contradicts the Washington Report’s explanation, telling Patrick Goodenough of CNS:
Citation:



“When I worked as a reporter at WRMEA, I understood how important it was to quote the right person, and accurately. I have never mixed my sources and wouldn’t have quoted Rashad Hussain if it came from Laila al-Arian. If the editors from WRMEA felt they wanted to remove Rashad Hussain from the article, my assumption is that they did it for reasons other than what you’re saying. They never once contacted me about an ‘error’ they claim I made.’”




Was the Washington Report covering for Rashad Hussain at its own discretion, or at the behest of someone else? Did Barack Obama himself know about this cover-up? Did  someone in the White House or the State Department find out about Hussain’s defense of Al-Arian, and act to cover for the bright young special envoy before this defense was discovered and he became known as a terror apologist? We will probably never know. And now Rashad Hussain heads up a key center supposedly devoted to “countering violent extremism.” What could possibly go wrong?

“Report: Obama’s New Anti-ISIS Propaganda Head Tied to Muslim Brotherhood,” by Edwin Mora, Breitbart, February 17, 2015 (thanks to Pamela Geller):
Citation:



The Obama administration is revamping its efforts to combat Islamic State (ISIS or ISIL) propaganda. ISIS and its supporters produce “as many as 90,000 tweets and other social media responses every day,” reports The New York Times.

An empowered Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications, currently a small component of the U.S. State Department, will spearhead the new campaign to fight the ISIS propaganda machine.

Rashad Hussain, a Muslim American with close ties to the White House, will replace Alberto Fernandez, the center’s director, according to The Times.

Hussain, who has reportedly participated in events linked to the Muslim Brotherhood, currently serves as Obama’s special envoy to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. He will take over when Fernandez retires in April.

“Hussain, a devout Muslim, has a history of participating in events connected with the Muslim Brotherhood,” reported Cal Thomas in an article published by Townhall.

Citing Egypt’s Rose El-Youssef magazine, The Investigative Project on Terrorism reported that Hussain “maintained close ties with people and groups that [the magazine] says comprise the Muslim Brotherhood network in America.”

Some critics describe Hussain as a Muslim Brotherhood sympathizer. He is not a confirmed member of the group.

An added component called the Information Coordination Cell will be part of the newly revamped center.

It will be “staffed by intelligence and Pentagon analysts among others” and “will be responsible for the broader coordination functions.”

“Skeptics of the new [anti-propaganda] campaign voiced concerns that the program is an attempt by the White House to end a long-simmering turf war with the counterterrorism center’s director, Alberto Fernandez, and exercise more control over the kinds of messages that are produced and coordinated with domestic and international partners,” notes The Times.

“Other officials questioned whether even a newly empowered center at the State Department would be up to the task. Operating the center on a shoestring budget of about $5 million a year, Mr. Fernandez, a respected Middle East specialist and career Foreign Service officer, and his supporters have long complained that neither the State Department nor the White House fully supported or properly financed the center’s activities,” the article adds.

The Obama administration plans “to harness all the existing attempts at counter-messaging by much larger federal departments, including the Pentagon, Homeland Security and intelligence agencies,” explains The Times.

The Times added:
The center would also coordinate and amplify similar messaging by foreign allies and nongovernment agencies, as well as by prominent Muslim academics, community leaders and religious scholars who oppose the Islamic State, also called ISIS or ISIL, and who may have more credibility with ISIS’ target audience of young men and women than the American government.

About 80 people will staff the newly-empowered center.

“We’re getting beaten on volume, so the only way to compete is by aggregating, curating and amplifying existing content,” Richard A. Stengel, the under secretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs, said on Monday, NYT reports.

He admitted that anti-ISIS propaganda efforts by the Obama administration “could have been better coordinated,” adds the article.

In its arsenal, the U.S. government has “more than 350 State Department Twitter accounts, combining embassies, consulates, media hubs, bureaus and individuals, as well as similar accounts operated by the Pentagon, the Homeland Security Department and foreign allies,” points out The Times….



Twitter accounts! I bet the Islamic State jihadis are shivering with fear.

Obama: "We are not at war with Islam. We are at war with people who have perverted Islam."
Kyrgyzstan: Imam arrested for urging Muslims to fight for Islamic State

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/02/obama-appoints-muslim-brotherhood-linked-…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 22 Avr - 06:04 (2015)    Sujet du message: OBAMA ADMIN : THE BIBLE, CONSTITUTION, AND DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE ARE ALL 'SEXIST' Répondre en citant



OBAMA ADMIN : THE BIBLE, CONSTITUTION, AND DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE ARE ALL 'SEXIST'

This is clearly a declaration of war



The Bible, the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence are all sexist, according to a course approved by the Defense Department.

In yet another assault on the fabric of our nation, these foundational documents are to blame for “historical influences that allow sexism to continue,” as stated in a presentation by the Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute, a Department of Defense school out of Florida.



Citation:



According to the course, the Bible has “quotes” which can be interpreted as sexist by readers.

The Declaration of Independence is also an historical cause of sexism, as the document refers only to “all men” — not “men and women.”

And the Constitution, the Pentagon argues, is an historical source of sexism because “slaves and women were not included until later in history.”

Of course, members of the Armed Forces take an oath to defend the Constitution — which is, according to the DEOMI course, an “historical influence that allows sexism to continue.”

“The content of the lesson is provided to generate academic discussion concerning how these historical documents have been included in discussions about the topic of sexism,” Lt. Cmdr. Nate Christensen, a Defense Department spokesman, told The Daily Caller.

But following TheDC’s request for comment, the sexism course — as well as two other courses listed on DEOMI’s website, entitled “Prejudice & Discrimination” and “Racism” — were taken offline.

“This course is currently offline and under revision,” a notice says under all three courses.



Asked about the sudden update, Christensen replied, “DEOMI online materials are periodically pulled to review to ensure accuracy and relevance. The racism, sexism and Prejudice & Discrimination are currently undergoing that review process.”

TheDC obtained copies of all three courses prior to their removal.

The “Prejudice & Discrimination” course was recently required for some Navy personnel who work in hospitals and clinics.

In the course, discrimination is divided into two categories: institutional and individual. Institutions can be a source of discrimination, as well as actions — or inaction — made by individuals.

Institutional discrimination, according to the DEOMI course, can be found in employment, education, housing and the military.

Examples of institutional discrimination in employment, according to DEOMI, are education requirements for employment:



The course teaches, “Individuals who have been segregated to inferior schools cannot find employment in businesses that hire according to specified credentials that inferior schools do not offer.”

Therefore, when employers institute education qualifications for prospective employees, they are engaging in a form of discrimination.
The DEOMI states more examples of institutional discrimination can be found in education:



Academic tests “may have inherent cultural bias,” the presentation argues.

Textbooks also perpetuate discrimination since they “provide little or no information on minority groups, especially minority histories and the contributions that minorities have made to American culture.”

DEOMI teaches students that they can also contribute to discrimination on an individual level.

The presentation asserts individuals can perpetrate discrimination through both active and inactive ways, including “refusing to acknowledge one’s own privilege.”





Source: dailycaller.com Photo: rightwingnews.com

http://www.truthandaction.org/obama-admin-bible-constitution-declaration-in…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 27 Avr - 05:25 (2015)    Sujet du message: PSA FORECLOSURE ORDER UNITED NATIONS, IMF, FEDERAL RESERVE Do you think president Obama and all these entities will submit to this judgment? [flash width=425 height=350 loop=true flashvars=]http://www.youtube.com/v/9FoGeBIh87w[/flash] VIDEO : https://www Répondre en citant

PSA FORECLOSURE ORDER UNITED NATIONS, IMF, FEDERAL RESERVE
 

Do you think president Obama and all these entities will submit to this judgment?



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FoGeBIh87w


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 20 Mai - 00:02 (2015)    Sujet du message: SOLDIERS WHO WERE WITH JOHN KERRY IN VIETNAM : HE'S A TRAITOR Répondre en citant

SOLDIERS WHO WERE WITH JOHN KERRY IN VIETNAM : HE'S A TRAITOR



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMGrcDLxXyA&hd=1


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 22 Mai - 03:16 (2015)    Sujet du message: OBAMA : WE MUST CHANGE HOW AMERICA THINKS Répondre en citant





OBAMA : WE MUST CHANGE HOW AMERICA THINKS

Michael F. Haverluck (OneNewsNow.com) Tuesday, May 19, 2015

During President Barack Obama’s recent visit to Georgetown University, his message to students was quite simple — that progressives like himself must mold how America thinks and make the media report things the way they want.

A Closer Look“[W]e’re going to have to change how our body politic thinks, which means we’re going to have to change how the media reports on these issues,” Obama recently declared on the Georgetown campus in the nation’s capital.

Obama was specifically targeting Fox News with his contempt, generally speaking aoubt other conservative new media, as well.

This proclamation was eerily reminiscent of a certain communist leader in North Korea … a point made by a nationally syndicated conservative columnist.

“How Kim Jong-un of him,” Townhall Columnist Matt Barber commented about Obama’s declared war on the conservative media. “In sum: Goal 1) Control thought by, Goal 2) Controlling the media.”

Socialism repackaged

Barber argues that Obama’s ideas are repackaged directly from the most notorious socialist leader of the 20thcentury.

“This is an idea older than — and as well preserved as — Vladimir Lenin himself,” Barber asserts. “How Dear Leader intends to reconcile his scheme to ‘change how the media reports on these issues’ with the First Amendment’s Free Press Clause, namely, ‘Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom … of the press,’ is abundantly clear.”

Obama’s earlier attempt to filter American media through the White House — which was blocked by the FCC — and his more recent stab at controlling the Internet are argued to be topics of major concern.

“Our emperor-in-chief will force feed his once-free subjects, yet another unconstitutional executive decree — a Net Neutrality sandwich with a side of Fairness Doctrine,” Barber insisted.

Barber then went on to describe the world of double meanings he says are forever emanating from the Left, nothing how they have gotten in the habit of redefining terms that used to have straightforward meanings that everybody understood, including “marriage,” “equality” and other terms that are politically charged today.

“Other ‘progressive’ doublespeak includes words like ‘invest’ (meaning socialist redistribution of wealth), ‘tolerance’ (meaning embrace immorality or face total ruin), ‘diversity’ (meaning Christians and conservatives need not apply), ‘hate’ (meaning truth) or ‘The Affordable Care Act’ (meaning unaffordable, unsustainable and utterly inferior socialized medicine),” Barber pointed out. “Even so, it’s during those rare moments of candor that our cultural Marxist friends’ rhetoric actually aligns with their intended actions. In other words, every so often, and usually by accident, they tell the truth.”

Passing the torch?

Hoping to reoccupy the White House for another eight-year stint come 2017 — this time as president, rather than first lady — Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton also made her position clear when it comes to shaping America’s mindset on social and moral issues. She let her LGBT activist roots show when she insisted last month that the government must force the religious convictions of Christians to support abortion.

“‘Far too many women are still denied critical access to reproductive health care and safe childbirth,” Clinton argued, according to LifeNews. “All the laws we’ve passed don’t count for much if they’re not enforced.”

Roe v. Wadeis not enough for the progressive presidential hopeful, who wants Christian tax dollars to pay for abortions and calls for biblical doctrine to be rewritten when it comes to killing preborn children. In other words, under a second Clinton administration, Christian values will not be tolerated.

“Rights have to exist in practice — not just on paper,” Clinton proclaimed. “Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will. And deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.”

Outlawing the Bible?

Leftist media outlets reflect Clinton’s rejection of biblical morality and her endorsement of the LGBT agenda.

“Gold told me that church leaders must be made ‘to take homosexuality off the sin list,’”New York TimesColumnist and homosexual practitioner Frank Bruni expressed in his column last month titled “Bigotry: The Bible and the Lessons of Indiana.” “His commandment is worthy — and warranted.”

Barber attests that the new progressive mindset endorsing sexual libertinism essentially ushers in the “anything goes” attitude toward sexuality … a destructive path about which the Bible warns.

“Of course, if homosexual behavior, something denounced as both ‘vile affections’ and ‘an abomination’ throughout both the Old and New Testaments, is no longer sexual sin, then there can be no sexual sin whatsoever,” Barber explained. “To coerce, through the power of the police state, faithful Christians to abandon the millennia-old biblical sexual ethic and embrace the sin of Sodom would likewise require that Christians sign-off on fornication, adultery, incest and bestiality. Such is the unnatural nature of government-mandated moral relativism.”

And the Leftist media are attempting to synonymize Scripture with hate speech, which they argue is unconstitutional and not protected under the freedom of speech.

“Hate speech is excluded from protection,” CNN anchor Chris Cuomo tweeted.

But even if biblical teachings were ultimately classified as “hate speech,” the radical Left doesn’t have a leg to stand on in their argument to ban Christian expression under the U.S. Constitution.

“But there is no hate speech exception to the First Amendment,” concluded UCLA Law Professor Eugene Volohk, while responding to the issue in a Washington Post op-ed. “Hateful ideas (whatever exactly that might mean) are just as protected under the First Amendment as other ideas.”

http://www.onenewsnow.com/politics-govt/2015/05/19/obama-we-must-change-how…


Dernière édition par maria le Sam 23 Mai - 01:12 (2015); édité 1 fois
Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 22 Mai - 03:25 (2015)    Sujet du message: ALERTE: OBAMA A JUSTE COMMANDE A TOUS LES AMERICAINS DE CHANGER LEUR MANIERE DE PENSER Répondre en citant





ALERTE: OBAMA A JUSTE COMMANDE A TOUS LES AMERICAINS DE CHANGER LEUR MANIERE DE PENSER

Traduction Google

Si il n'y avait aucun doute laissé que le président Barack Obama est un contrôle de l'esprit plein de sang socialiste, commentaire récent qu'il a prononcé lors d'une table ronde sur la pauvreté à l'Université de Georgetown devrait mettre un terme à cela.

Selon un Nouvelles Maintenant , Obama a déclaré, «Nous allons avoir à changer la façon dont notre corps politique pense, ce qui signifie que nous allons avoir à changer la façon dont les rapports des médias sur ces questions."

Évidemment, cela a été un coup direct à travers la proue du Canal de Nouvelles Fox et d'autres médias conservateurs qui, souvent, nous opposons à ses tentatives de transformer fondamentalement le pays que nous aimons.

Essentiellement, Obama exige que les conservateurs acceptent ses positions sur un éventail de questions, telles que l'avortement et le mariage homosexuel , les droits d'armes à feu, l'immigration illimitée, la redistribution de la richesse, de l'acceptation du terrorisme islamiste radical et la liberté d'expression limitée (pour les conservateurs), au sein d'un ensemble foule d'autres choses. = Exactement le même programme que le Pape va imposer lors de sa venue aux Etats-Unis, en septembre.

Et il comprend que, pour accomplir ses objectifs, le contrôle libéral des médias sera nécessaire.

Le commentaire d'Obama est aussi étonnamment similaire à celle faite récemment par son compatriote socialiste-tri-de-dans-déguisement, Hillary Clinton, qui a récemment affirmé que «codes culturels profonds, les croyances religieuses et les préjugés structurels doivent être changés."

Malheureusement pour les Obama et Hillary, les Américains ont une foule de droits naturels et aux libertés, protégés par la Constitution américaine et le Bill of Rights, dont aucun n'a été accordée par le gouvernement, et dont aucun ne peut être enlevé par le gouvernement.

Les plus tôt ces totalitaires wannabe acquéront une compréhension et acceptent que nous ne serons pas en train de changer notre façon de penser en fonction de leurs souhaits et leurs caprices, plus tôt notre pays peut effectivement revenir à aller de l'avant et de faire avancer les choses réelles et nécessaires effectuées, tout en respectant les uns des autres points de vue divergents.

http://conservativetribune.com/obama-commanded-change/


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 23 Mai - 14:21 (2015)    Sujet du message: US PRESIDENT NAMES YOUND ECUMENICAL LEADER TO WHITE HOUSE PANEL Répondre en citant

US PRESIDENT NAMES YOUND ECUMENICAL LEADER TO WHITE HOUSE PANEL


Dr Ulysses Burley III, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America. © Peter Williams/WCC

20 May 2015

US President Barack Obama has named Dr Ulysses Burley III to a presidential advisory panel on HIV and AIDS.

One of a new generation of World Council of Churches (WCC) leaders, Burley is one of the youngest appointees to the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS (PACHA) in the United States.

Aged 32, he is a medical doctor, a Clinical Research Associate at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and a lay preacher in the WCC member church the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA), advising on HIV and AIDS and a regular blogger on the site called the Salt Collective.

“We celebrate with him and also remember to lift him up in prayer for his new ministry”, said WCC general secretary, Rev. Dr Olav Fykse Tveit, who met Burley in Washington, D.C., last week.

PACHA provides advice, information, and recommendations regarding programmes and policies intended to promote effective prevention of HIV and to advance research on HIV and AIDS.

The White House asks PACHA to provide recommendations on how to effectively implement the National HIV/AIDS Strategy, as well as monitor the strategy's implementation.

Burley serves on the WCC gender advisory group and is a member of the WCC’s executive committee and its central committee, the main governing body of the council.

Burley was elected as a central committee member at the WCC's 10th Assembly in Busan, Republic of Korea, in November 2013.

During his training as a medical doctor, Burley completed some of his studies in South America.

Burley began working with HIV and AIDS patients, and says that his work strengthened his ties to his own faith tradition and to ecumenical work.

Holy Land visit deepens determination in young WCC leader
http://www.oikoumene.org/en/press-centre/news/holy-land-visit-deepens-deter…

The Salt Collective - Posts by Ulysses Burley III
http://thesaltcollective.org/author/ulysess-burley/

http://www.oikoumene.org/en/press-centre/news/us-president-names-young-ecum…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 17 Juin - 03:43 (2015)    Sujet du message: PRESIDENT OBAMA APPOINTS JESUIT FATHER THOMAS REESE TO COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM Répondre en citant




PRESIDENT OBAMA APPOINTS JESUIT FATHER THOMAS REESE TO COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM





June 11, 2014 — President Barack Obama has named Jesuit Father Thomas J. Reese as the newest member of the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), which serves as an advisory panel to the federal government on protecting religious freedom abroad.

Fr. Reese joins three fellow Catholics on the commission: chairman Robert P. George, a bioethicist and Princeton University professor; James Zogby, the founder and president of the Arab American Institute; and Mary Ann Glendon, a Harvard University law professor and former U.S. ambassador to the Vatican. Former commission members include Archbishop Charles J. Chaput, Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, Bishop William Murphy and Most Reverend Ricardo Ramírez.

“Religious freedom is a fundamental human right of every person on earth,” Fr. Reese wrote in his latest column, “Faith and Justice,” for the National Catholic Reporter. “It is easy to forget about religious freedom when policymakers are so focused on national security, economic issues and other human rights that religious freedom is forgotten,” he wrote.

Fr. Reese, who will serve a two-year term on the commission, is currently a senior analyst for the National Catholic Reporter. Previously, he served as a senior fellow at the Woodstock Theological Center at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., from 2006 to 2013 and from 1988 to 1998, after first joining the Center as a visiting fellow in 1985. He was editor-in-chief of America magazine from 1998 to 2005 and an associate editor from 1978 to 1985. Fr. Reese entered the Society of Jesus in 1962 and was ordained in 1974. He received a bachelor’s degree and a master’s degree from Saint Louis University, a Master of Divinity degree from the Jesuit School of Theology at Berkeley and a Ph.D. in political science from the University of California, Berkeley.

“I am grateful that these talented and dedicated individuals have agreed to take on these important roles and devote their talents to serving the American people. I look forward to working with them in the coming months and years,” Obama said in a statement. [Sources: National%20Catholic%20Reporter,%20%3Ca%20href=]Catholic Sentinel[/url], The White House">

http://jesuits.org/news-detail?TN=NEWS-20140611091023


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 701
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 25 Juin - 07:20 (2015)    Sujet du message: #TPP PASSES OBAMA IS OFFICIALLY A DICTATOR THE USA IS NOW A TRANSNATINAL UNION Répondre en citant



#TPP PASSES OBAMA IS OFFICIALLY A DICTATOR THE USA IS NOW A TRANSNATINAL UNION



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmZxZjfXaUs

BREAKING OBAMA IS OFFICIALLY A DICTATOR

0 6 0 4 hours ago

News & Information, #civilwar, #endtimes, #flaseflag, #martiallaw, #tpp

Freedom Fighter Reports

One of the most devastating blows to US sovereignty since the country’s founding was dealt today as the Senate handed President Obama his Trans-Pacific Partnership victory.

Despite massive opposition from the American people, Tea Party Republicans and a majority of Democrats, Obama was granted fast-track authority by a 60-38 vote.

Sections of the TPP published by Wikileaks have revealed the treaty’s vast influence over multiple areas including individual rights, internet freedom and even the rule of law itself. Unelected corporate boards and the President can now wield unprecedented control over almost every aspect of human activity.

“If you read, write, publish, think, listen, dance, sing or invent; if you farm or consume food; if you’re ill now or might one day be ill, the TPP has you in its crosshairs,” Wikileaks’ Julian Assange wrote.

Secret TPP chapters regarding immigration also grant President Obama an even greater ability to erode the country’s Southern border.

“Obama will be able to finalize all three of the Obamatrade deals, without any Congressional input…” notes Breitbart.

https://www.eff.org/tpp-another-backroom-deal

https://www.spreaker.com/user/freedomfighter2127/breaking-obama-is-official…



Revenir en haut
Contenu Sponsorisé






MessagePosté le: Aujourd’hui à 04:48 (2016)    Sujet du message: OBAMA - SON AGENDA - SON ÉQUIPE -- OBAMA - HIS AGENDA - HIS TEAM (PARTIE 2)

Revenir en haut
Montrer les messages depuis:   
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> ORGANISATION DES NATIONS-UNIES/UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION -> OBAMA- SON AGENDA - SON ÉQUIPE -- OBAMA - HIS AGENDA - HIS TEAM (PARTIE 2) Toutes les heures sont au format GMT + 2 Heures
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  >
Page 5 sur 7

 
Sauter vers:  

Portail | Index | Creer un forum | Forum gratuit d’entraide | Annuaire des forums gratuits | Signaler une violation | Conditions générales d'utilisation
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Traduction par : phpBB-fr.com