LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum

LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1)
...

 FAQFAQ   RechercherRechercher   MembresMembres   GroupesGroupes   S’enregistrerS’enregistrer 
 ProfilProfil   Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés   ConnexionConnexion 

LES RUSES UTILISÉES PR RÉDUIRE LES POPULATIONS (PARTIE 2)
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
 
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> LA RELIGION MONDIALE ET L'ONU : SES VUES ET AGENDA SUR LE TRANSHUMANISME, CLONAGE, AGENDA DE DÉPOPULATION -> LES RUSES UTILISÉES PR RÉDUIRE LES POPULATIONS (PARTIE 2)
Sujet précédent :: Sujet suivant  
Auteur Message
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 31 Déc - 04:12 (2016)    Sujet du message: THE LEGAL WAY TO KILL THE INNOCENT!! Répondre en citant

THE LEGAL WAY TO KILL THE INNOCENT!!



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jG16bFehJeE



Revenir en haut
Publicité






MessagePosté le: Sam 31 Déc - 04:12 (2016)    Sujet du message: Publicité

PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?
Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 23 Fév - 15:14 (2017)    Sujet du message: PIZZAGATE _CAROL EVERETT_ FORMER ABORTION PROVIDER SPEAKS Youtube VIDEO Répondre en citant

PIZZAGATE _CAROL EVERETT_ FORMER ABORTION PROVIDER SPEAKS Youtube VIDEO



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9uLKKhymv0


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 30 Mar - 04:21 (2017)    Sujet du message: FELONY CHARGES FOR 2 WHO SECRETLY FILMED PLANNED PARENTHOOD Répondre en citant

FELONY CHARGES FOR 2 WHO SECRETLY FILMED PLANNED PARENTHOOD

ADD VIDEO

CRIMINALIZE FOR DENOUNCING PLANNED PARENTHOOD AND THE KILLING OF BABIES

VIDEO : http://www.sendspace.com/file/0p4jf0

By ANDREW DALTON

Mar. 28, 2017 11:36 PM EDT



LOS ANGELES (AP) — California prosecutors on Tuesday charged two anti-abortion activists who made undercover videos of themselves trying to buy fetal tissue from Planned Parenthood with 15 felonies, saying they invaded the privacy of medical providers by filming without consent.

The charges against David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt of the Center for Medical Progress come eight months after similar charges were dropped in Texas.

State Attorney General Xavier Becerra, a longtime Congressional Democrat who took over the investigation in January, said in a statement that the state "will not tolerate the criminal recording of conversations."

Prosecutors say Daleiden, of Davis, California, and Merritt, of San Jose, filmed 14 people without permission between October 2013 and July 2015 in Los Angeles, San Francisco and El Dorado counties. One felony count was filed for each person. The 15th was for criminal conspiracy to invade privacy.

Daleiden said in an email to The Associated Press that the "bogus" charges are coming from "Planned Parenthood's political cronies."

"The public knows the real criminals are Planned Parenthood and their business partners," Daleiden said.

The conversations included officials from Planned Parenthood and StemExpress, a California company that provides blood, tissue and other biological material for medical research and had received fetal tissue from Planned Parenthood.

In one of the pair's videos, Daleiden poses as "Robert Sarkis" of the phony Biomax Procurement Services and is shown discussing liver tissue with the chief executive of StemExpress at a Northern California restaurant.

Abortion opponents said the recordings showed Planned Parenthood was illegally harvesting and selling the organs. Planned Parenthood said the videos were deceptively edited to support extremists' false claims.

"As we have said from the beginning, and as more than a dozen different state investigations have made clear: Planned Parenthood has done nothing wrong, and the only people who broke the law are those behind the fraudulent tapes," said Mary Alice Carter, interim vice president of communications for Planned Parenthood, in a statement.

In April of last year, Daleiden said in a Facebook post that California Department of Justice agents raided his home, seizing all of his video footage along with personal information.

Since then the case had gone largely quiet, with virtually no revelations about the investigation and no indication that the charges were coming before they were filed Tuesday in San Francisco Superior Court.

The case is one of the first of high-profile prosecutions for Becerra, who left the U.S. House to take over for Kamala Harris after she became a U.S. Senator.

Daleiden and Merritt had previously been indicted in Texas on similar charges in January of 2016, but all of the charges were eventually dropped by July as prosecutors said a grand jury had overstepped its authority. The grand jury had originally been convened to investigate Planned Parenthood, but after finding no wrongdoing turned around and indicted Daleiden and Merritt instead.

The videos reignited the American abortion debate when they were released in 2015, and increased Congressional heat against Planned Parenthood that has yet to subside.

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/c50e993d047142cf8ca0e8050daf6114/felony-char…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 15 Avr - 16:41 (2017)    Sujet du message: MORE STATES CONSIDER ASSISTED SUICIDE LEGISLATION Répondre en citant

MORE STATES CONSIDER ASSISTED SUICIDE LEGISLATION

On: 4/14/2017By Mark Pattison , In: Nation

WASHINGTON (CNS) -- More states are considering assisted suicide legislation, although few seem to be making inroads in adding themselves to the five states and the District of Columbia where it is legal.

A bill in Alaska closely modeled after Oregon's Death With Dignity Act, which took effect 20 years ago, was the subject of a legislative hearing April 6. But lawmakers in a divided Legislature are in session for only 90 days, and coming to agreement on a state budget appeared to be taking up lawmakers' time.

At a March 28 hearing on the bill, Margaret Dore, an attorney from Washington state where assisted suicide is also legal, said advocates of doctor-assisted suicide are misleading the public about the real impact on society's most vulnerable. Dore, who also is president of Choice Is an Illusion -- a nonprofit that opposes assisted suicide and euthanasia -- said the bill does not deal only with those who are dying. For example, Oregon's suicide bill lists diabetes as a "terminal illness," Dore cautioned.

In addition to Oregon, Washington state and the District of Columbia, assisted suicide is also legal in California, Colorado and Vermont.

http://www.thebostonpilot.com/article.asp?Source=Trending&ID=179075


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 27 Avr - 01:50 (2017)    Sujet du message: LIVE CHILD SACRIFICES ON FACEBOOK ARE THE NEW NORM Répondre en citant

LIVE CHILD SACRIFICES ON FACEBOOK ARE THE NEW NORM



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdeFCkeIASw

Ajoutée le 26 avr. 2017

Im not buying ANY of this as organic uploads by real killers. This is the next level of spirit cooking, pizzagate whatever The want child sacrifice as the new normal.
RFB


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 27 Juin - 13:11 (2017)    Sujet du message: CALIFORNIA SB 309 BILL WILL AUTHORIZE A SPECIAL LICENSE PLATE TO FUND ABORTIONS Répondre en citant

CALIFORNIA SB 309 BILL WILL AUTHORIZE A SPECIAL LICENSE PLATE TO FUND ABORTIONS 

Posted on June 26, 2017 by Dr. Eowyn
 
It is bad enough that abortion — the deliberate killing of a defenseless, unborn human being — is still legal in America, where Christians are still a majority, though decreasing in numbers by the day.

It is bad enough that our tax dollars still fund abortions, although, God bless him, President Trump has signed a law restoring states’ right to defund Planned Parenthood.

Note: Trump also defunded International Planned Parenthood, by signing an executive order to that effect on his first day of work as President. Ostensibly-conservative carping critics of Trump please note.

Now, in benighted California, the state legislature is poised to pass a bill into law which will authorize a special vehicle license plate, the proceeds of which will fund sterilization and abortions.



The bill is SB 309, with the Orwellian descriptive title of “License Plates: Reproductive Freedom Fund”.

SB 309 is innocuously described as “An act to add Section 5156.9 to the Vehicle Code, relating to license plates,” but it’s so much more — and worse — than that.

Here’s the text of SB 309:
Citation:


“Existing law authorizes the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to issue special license plates, including environmental license plates and specified special environmental design license plates. Under existing law, a state agency is authorized to apply to the DMV to sponsor a special license plate program, and the DMV is required to issue those license plates if the agency meets certain requirements. The DMV is required to charge specified fees for certain services related to the issuance of those plates.

This bill would require the State Department of Health Care Services to apply to sponsor a reproductive freedom license plate program, and would require the DMV to issue the license plates if the State Department of Health Care Services meets certain requirements. The bill would authorize the State Department of Health Care Services to accept and use donated artwork from California artists for the license plate. The bill would require the revenue generated from the license plates, as specified, to be deposited in the California Reproductive Freedom Fund, created by the bill, and to be used, upon appropriation, for the Family Planning, Access, Care, and Treatment program (Family PACT) [administered by the State Department of Health Care Services].”



So what’s the nice-sounding Family PACT program? Here’s its self-description:
Citation:


“Family PACT is California’s innovative approach to provide comprehensive family planning services to eligible low income (under 200% federal poverty level) men and women. Family PACT serves 1 million income eligible men and women of childbearing age through a network of 2,200 public and private providers. Services include comprehensive education, assistance, and services relating to family planning.”



And what exactly are those “services relating to family planning”?

READ MORE  Vogue magazine tells women to be witches

From the PDF “Family PACT Overview“:
Citation:


“Client Benefits & Services

Family PACT provides comprehensive family planning services to women and men including all FDA approved forms of contraception, emergency contraception, pregnancy testing with counseling, preconception counseling, male and female sterilization, limited infertility services, sexually transmitted infection testing and treatment, cancer screening, and HIV screening. Individual client reproductive health education and counseling is an ongoing component of all service.”



Emergency contraception” (EC) is emergency contraception pills, taken after unprotected sex to pregnant pregnancy. EC is a form of abortion by preventing a fertilized egg from attaching to the uterus.

The Family PACT program is administered through Family PACT “providers,” among whom are Planned Parenthood clinics, where “family planning” is a synonym for abortion.
Lest there is any remaining doubt that SB 309 will fund abortions, here’s what (the infamous) Ninth Circuit Senior Judge Dorothy Wright Nelson wrote in an opinion:
Citation:


“the California Reproductive Freedom, Accountability, Comprehensive Care, and Transparency Act . . . requires that licensed pregnancy-related clinics disseminate a notice stating the existence of publicly-funded family-planning services, including contraception and abortion.”


SB 309 was introduced by Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson, the bill’s author; its coauthor is Assembly member Cristina Garcia.



On May 30, 2017, SB 309 was read a third time in California’s State Senate and passed 28:13. On June 8, 2017, the bill was referred to the State Assembly’s Committee on Transportation. A hearing date is scheduled for tomorrow, June 26. A majority vote is required to pass SB 309.

H/t California Political Review

~Eowyn

Dr. Eowyn’s post first appeared at Fellowship of the Minds

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2017/06/26/california-sb-309-bill-will-authori…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 29 Juin - 03:01 (2017)    Sujet du message: SHOCKING NEWS DOCTOR CALLS ABORTION HIS MINISTRY ; SATANISM AND NEW DOCTRINES INFILTRATING CHURCH Répondre en citant

SHOCKING NEWS DOCTOR CALLS ABORTION HIS MINISTRY ; SATANISM AND NEW DOCTRINES INFILTRATING CHURCH



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPYPuqxbHIA


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 29 Aoû - 14:00 (2017)    Sujet du message: PLANNED PARENTHOOD INVESTIGATOR CLAIMS VICTORY IN WASHINGTON STATE APPEAL Répondre en citant

UPDATE

PLANNED PARENTHOOD INVESTIGATOR CLAIMS VICTORY IN WASHINGTON STATE APPEAL 

 On: 8/18/2017By Matt Hadro , In: Nation

Washington D.C., Aug 17, 2017 CNA/EWTN News.- Lawyers for Planned Parenthood investigator David Daleiden claimed a victory on Wednesday as the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court sent back a lower court's ruling against him.

“The Court of Appeals, by reversing this decision and remanding this case back to District Court, has prevented a serious threat to the public's right to know how their tax dollars are being spent,” said Peter Breen, special counsel for the Thomas More Society who argued the appeal for Daleiden.

David Daleiden is the project lead at the Center for Medical Progress, the group that released undercover videos of conversations with Planned Parenthood officials and others in the abortion industry, as well as interviews of a former clinician for a tissue harvester.

The videos claimed to report on the transfer of fetal tissue of aborted babies from clinics to tissue harvesters for research purposes.

Daleiden and other citizen journalists created a fake medical supply company company and adopted fake identifications to pose as representatives of a fetal tissue procurement company looking to possibly do business with Planned Parenthood clinics. They discussed possible prices for fetal tissue of aborted babies.

http://www.thebostonpilot.com/article.asp?utm_source=ConstantContact&ut…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 26 Sep - 02:21 (2017)    Sujet du message: JUDGE RULES DOCTORS CAN STARVE DISABLED PATIENTS TO DEATH WITHOUT A COURT ORDER Répondre en citant

JUDGE RULES DOCTORS CAN STARVE DISABLED PATIENTS TO DEATH WITHOUT A COURT ORDER

International   SPUC   Sep 21, 2017   |   3:25PM    London, England

A judge has ruled that Court permission will not be needed to remove food and fluids from severely brain damaged patients, a move which has caused concern among opponents of euthanasia.

Legal safeguard

Unlike other forms of medical care, the decision to withdraw food and fluids from patients in a “permanent vegetative state” (the term “unresponsive wakefulness syndrome” is now generally preferred) has until now been referred to the Court of Protection, even if doctors and relatives are in agreement.

Landmark ruling

Now, the decision by Mr Justice Jackson means those cases will no longer have to come to court. He made his ruling in a case concerning a 50-year-old woman who suffered from a degenerative illness for 14 years. The patient, known in court as M, had Huntington’s disease and was bed-ridden in hospital and fed by a tube. The Court heard that she had shown no sign of awareness for 18 months.

Mr Justice Jackson agreed with her family and doctors that withdrawing nutrition from her would be in her best interests. The tube was removed and she died in August. Mr Justice Jackson said in his view the case should not have come to court.

Passive euthanasia


The ruling was welcomed by pro-euthanasia group Dignity in Dying. Chief Executive Sarah Wootton said the ruling was “a helpful step towards a clearer, more person-centred view of end-of-life care”.

“When all parties – family, the hospital and treating doctors – are agreed on what someone would have wanted for their care, it seems absurd to require a costly court process to confirm this.”

Dangerous precedent

However, the news has been greeted with great concern by patients rights groups. Dr Peter Saunders of the Care Not Killing Alliance said: “This court decision sets a dangerous precedent and should be appealed. Taking these decisions away from the court of protection removes an important layer of legislative scrutiny and accountability and effectively weakens the law.

“It will now be more likely that severely brain damaged patients will be starved or dehydrated to death in their supposed best interests and that these decisions will be more influenced by those who have ideological or financial vested interests in this course of action.”

The official solicitor, appointed by the state to act for such patients, is likely to appeal against the ruling.

Recently, a British doctor wrote on his findings that many patients in a “vegetative” state, are in fact aware and can be communicated with.

LifeNews Note: Courtesy of SPUC. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children is a leading pro-life organization in the United Kingdom.


 
http://www.lifenews.com/2017/09/21/court-rules-doctors-can-starve-disabled-…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 5 Oct - 03:42 (2017)    Sujet du message: VINGT-CINQ MILLIONS D'AVORTEMENTS NON SECURISES SONT PRATIQUES DANS LE MONDE CHAQUE ANNEE, SELON L'OMS / Some 25 million unsafe abortions occur each year, UN health agency warns Répondre en citant



VINGT-CINQ MILLIONS D'AVORTEMENTS NON SECURISES SONT PRATIQUES DANS LE MONDE CHAQUE ANNEE, SELON L'OMS

ENGLISH :
Some 25 million unsafe abortions occur each year, UN health agency warns
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=57761#.WdWNkrhOKSo



Crédit OMS

28 septembre 2017 – Vingt-cinq millions d'avortements non sécurisés (45% des avortements dans le monde) ont été pratiqués chaque année entre 2010 et 2014, selon une nouvelle étude de l'Organisation mondiale de la Santé (OMS) publiée jeudi.

On parle d'avortement non sécurisé lorsqu'une interruption de grossesse est pratiquée soit par une personne qui n'a pas de compétences/d'informations nécessaires ou dans un environnement où les normes minimales médicales ne sont pas appliquées, ou les deux.

« Lorsque les femmes et les filles ne peuvent pas avoir accès à des services de contraception et d'avortement sécurisé, cela entraîne des conséquences graves pour leur propre santé et celle de leur famille. Cela ne devrait pas être le cas », a déclaré dans un communiqué le Dr Bela Ganatra, principal auteur de l'étude et chercheur au Département Santé reproductive et recherche de l'OMS.

« Malgré les récents progrès technologiques et en matière de bases factuelles, beaucoup trop d'avortements non sécurisés sont toujours pratiqués et un nombre trop important de femmes continue de souffrir et de mourir », a déploré le Dr Ganatra.

L'avortement sécurisé dépend du niveau de développement de la région

Réalisée en collaboration avec l'Institut Guttmacher et publiée dans la revue médicale The Lancet, l'étude de l'OMS souligne que 97% de ces avortements non sécurisés ont été pratiqués en Afrique, en Asie et en Amérique latine.

« Des efforts accrus s'imposent, en particulier dans les régions en développement, afin de garantir l'accès à la contraception et à l'avortement sécurisé », a souligné le Dr Ganatra.

L'étude de l'OMS examine également les contextes les plus courants qui entraînent le recours de certaines femmes à des avortements non sécurisés, notamment les lois et les politiques des pays en matière d'avortement, le coût financier de l'accès à des services d'avortement sécurisé, la disponibilité de tels services et de dispensateurs de soins qualifiés ainsi que les attitudes sociales vis-à-vis de l'avortement et de l'égalité des sexes.

Lorsque les avortements sont pratiqués conformément aux lignes directrices et aux normes de l'OMS, le risque de complications graves ou de décès est négligeable. Entre 2010 et 2014, environ 55% de l'ensemble des avortements étaient pratiqués dans des conditions sûres, c'est à dire par des agents de santé qualifiés, utilisant la méthode recommandée par l'OMS et en fonction de la durée de la grossesse.

La plupart des avortements pratiqués en Europe occidentale et du nord sont sécurisés. Les taux d'avortements sont parmi les moins élevés dans ces régions. On constate également dans la plupart des pays de ces régions des lois relativement libérales en matière d'avortement ; des taux élevés de recours à la contraception ; un développement économique ; et l'égalité des sexes; ainsi que des services de santé de haute qualité, soit l'ensemble des facteurs qui contribuent à des avortements sécurisés.

« Comme de nombreuses autres interventions médicales, l'avortement est très sûr lorsqu'il est pratiqué en conformité avec les lignes directrices médicales recommandées et il est important de garder cela à l'esprit », a souligné le Dr Gilda Sedgh, co-auteure de l'étude et chargée de recherche principale à l'Institut Guttmacher.

Afin de prévenir les grossesses non désirées et les avortements non sécurisés, l'OMS estime que les pays doivent élaborer des politiques d'appui et prendre des engagements financiers pour fournir une éducation sexuelle complète ; un large éventail de méthodes contraceptives, y compris la contraception d'urgence; des conseils de planification familiale adéquats; et l'accès à l'avortement sécurisé et légal.

News Tracker: autres dépêches sur la question

Des experts de l'ONU appellent à abroger les lois restrictives sur l'avortement

http://www.un.org/apps/newsFr/storyF.asp?NewsID=40272#.WdWL_7hOKSp


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 8 Oct - 12:35 (2017)    Sujet du message: KNOWINGLY EXPOSING OTHERS TO HIV WILL NO LONGER BE A FELONY IN CALIFORNIA Répondre en citant

KNOWINGLY EXPOSING OTHERS TO HIV WILL NO LONGER BE A FELONY IN CALIFORNIA

October 8, 2017



Knowingly exposing others to HIV will no longer be a felony in California

Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill Friday that lowers from a felony to a misdemeanor the crime of knowingly exposing a sexual partner to HIV without disclosing the infection. The measure also applies to those who give blood without telling the blood bank that they are HIV-positive. Modern medicine allows those with HIV to live longer lives and nearly eliminates the possibility of transmission, according to state Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Assemblyman Todd Gloria (D-San Diego), authors of the bill. “Today California took a major step toward treating HIV as a public health issue, instead of treating people living with HIV as criminals,” Wiener said in a statement. “HIV should be treated

Read More  : https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/c4afcd12-f3e2-3554-9cf9-799e06659a2d/ss_knowin…



Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 18 Oct - 02:05 (2017)    Sujet du message: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ANNOUNCES SETTLEMENT IN HHS MANDATE SUITS Répondre en citant

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ANNOUNCES SETTLEMENT IN HHS MANDATE SUITS

All bullshit.
The Archdiocese of Washington, D.C.

On: 10/17/2017By Adelaide Mena , In: Nation


Judge gavel. Photo credit: Digital Storm via wwwshutterstockcom CNA

Washington D.C., Oct 16, 2017 CNA/EWTN News.- A week after issuing new religious freedom guidelines to all administrative agencies in the federal government, the U.S. Department of Justice has settled with more than 70 plaintiffs who had challenged the controversial HHS contraceptive mandate.

The Oct. 13 agreement was reached between the government and the law firm Jones Day, which represented more than 70 clients fighting the mandate. Made public Oct. 16, the agreement states that the plaintiffs would not be forced to provide health insurance coverage for “morally unacceptable” products and procedures, including contraception, sterilization, and abortion-inducing drugs.

“This settlement brings to a conclusion our litigation challenging the Health and Human Services’ mandate obliging our institutions to provide support for morally objectionable activities, as well as a level of assurance as we move into the future,” said Cardinal Donald Wuerl of Washington, D.C. in an Oct. 16 letter to priests of the archdiocese.

The mandate originated with the Obama administration. Issued through the Department of Health and Human Services, it required employers – even those with deeply-held religious objections – to provide and pay for contraceptive, abortifacient and sterilization coverage in their health insurance plans.

-----


CS PHOTO BY JACLYN LIPPELMANN Cardinal Wuerl at center poses with four priests of the Archdiocese of Washington marking their 40th anniversaries this year. At left are Msgr. Michael Wilson, the pastor of Our Lady, Star of the Sea Parish in Solomons; and Father Tesfamariam Baraki, the Catholic chaplain of Howard University Hospital. From the right are Father Raymond O’Brien, a professor at the Columbus School of Law at The Catholic University of America; and Father Michael Kelley, the pastor of St. Martin of Tours Parish in Washington. Not pictured is Father Julio Alvarez-Garcia, a retired priest of the archdiocese also marking his 40th anniversary this year. The priests were ordained in 1975.
The Archdiocese of Washington, D.C., was one of more than 300 plaintiffs who had challenged the mandate, arguing “that the practice of our faith was inextricably tied to the ministries that put that faith into action,” and that as such, they should not be forced to violate their faith to continue their ministries, Wuerl recalled.
http://cathstan.org/Content/Social/Social/Article/Five-priests-of-Archdioce…

Can you trust this Jesuit Cardinal and these priests in Washington, a state who is not part of the USA? Again, the Catholic church playing the good cop. Freedom of religion dosen't exist anymore in America. We are under attack by the same Catholic church under the military laws, in schools were our kids can receive contraception and abortion without the consent of their parents. Were so many peoples are sterilized by GMO, by chemtrails, by vaccine and surely under different medical prescriptions. They can receive money coming from other hands and partners or just make a new taxe to be able to secretly continuing their destruction. Deceive the masses for a better control. 


-----

The archdiocese and six other plaintiffs had argued their position before the Supreme Court in the case Zubik v. Burwell. In 2016, the high court ruled against the government’s requirement that certain employers provide and pay for the morally objectionable services.

“While the Trump Administration’s Executive Order on Religious Liberty and new guidelines and regulations are extremely helpful, the settlement of the Zubik litigation adds a leavening of certainty moving forward,” the cardinal added.

The Department of Justice’s new settlement “removes doubt” and closes these cases challenging the mandate, the cardinal continued. “The settlement adds additional assurances that we will not be subject to enforcement or imposition of similar regulations imposing such morally unacceptable mandates moving forward,” he stated.

On Oct. 6, the Department of Justice revised its guidelines for all government agencies in light of existing religious freedom laws, releasing a set of principles which stated clearly that the government cannot substantially burden religious practices, unless there is a compelling state interest in doing so and those burdens use the least-restrictive means possible.

Thomas Aquinas College, a Catholic college in California and another plaintiff against the HHS mandate also celebrated the protection the settlement brings.

“While we welcomed the broadening of the exemption from the HHS mandate last week by the Trump administration, we have under our agreement today something even better: a permanent exemption from an onerous federal directive – and any similar future directive – that would require us to compromise our fundamental beliefs,” said Thomas Aquinas College president Dr. Michael F. McLean in an Oct. 16 statement.

“This is an extraordinary outcome for Thomas Aquinas College and for the cause of religious freedom.”

In addition to settling the case, the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and the Treasury have also decided to provide partial coverage of the plaintiffs’ attorney fees and costs of the lawsuits.

“This financial concession by the government only reinforces its admission of the burdensome nature of the HHS contraceptive mandate and its violation of the College's free exercise of religion,” stated Thomas Aquinas College General Counsel, Quincy Masteller.

https://www.thebostonpilot.com/article.asp?utm_source=ConstantContact&u…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 27 Oct - 14:41 (2017)    Sujet du message: AP EXCLUSIVE_ EUTHANASIA CLASH FOR MENTALLY ILL Répondre en citant

 AP EXCLUSIVE_ EUTHANASIA CLASH FOR MENTALLY ILL



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzQau5j4y2w


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 1 Nov - 03:37 (2017)    Sujet du message: CANADA : UN QUEBEC A L'AVENIR RADIEUX : L'EUTHANASIE POUR TOUS ? Répondre en citant

CANADA : UN QUEBEC A L'AVENIR RADIEUX : L'EUTHANASIE POUR TOUS ?

dimanche 29 octobre 2017

Un texte de Mathieu Bock-Côté qui rejoint notre analyse à la suite de la décision de la Cour suprême du Canada sur le sujet (voir Suicide assisté : décision disproportionnée de la Cour suprême dans ses effets prévisibles et potentiels ?)

Au moment de passer la loi sur le suicide assisté, pompeusement appelée « mourir dans la dignité », ses promoteurs soutenaient fièrement que les critères pour accéder aux « soins de fin de vie » étaient rigoureux et n’allaient pas changer de sitôt. L’euthanasie demeurerait une exception. Il aura fallu très peu de temps pour que cette promesse se dissipe, comme si elle n’avait jamais été faite. Est-ce parce que les promoteurs de l’euthanasie ont menti ? Peut-être. Peut-être est-ce aussi parce que cette loi a sa propre logique et qu’une fois qu’on accepte la possibilité du suicide assisté, on en vient rapidement à le banaliser ?

Banalisation

Quoi qu’il en soit, nous y sommes. On entend désormais de plus en plus de gens en appeler à ouvrir le suicide assisté aux victimes de la maladie d’Alzheimer. Et on doit s’attendre à ce que, dans les années à venir, les catégories candidates au suicide assisté se multiplient. On pourra se faire une idée de l’avenir qui nous est réservé en consultant un dossier sur l’euthanasie aux Pays-Bas, réalisé par Alain Crevier, de l’émission Second regard, à Radio-Canada, paru vendredi dernier sur Internet. On y apprend que, dans ce pays, l’euthanasie a été banalisée à un point tel qu’il s’agit d’une « façon normale de mourir ». On peut même y bénéficier du suicide assisté dans des cas de démence ou même dans des cas graves d’alcoolisme. Le critère déterminant, nous dit Crevier, c’est la souffrance.

L’euthanasie est disponible pour les enfants malades de 12 ans ou plus. Et on se demande si on peut l’étendre aux moins de 12 ans. Il en faudrait moins que cela pour qu’on se dise en plein délire. Pour reprendre les mots du philosophe Christian Saint-Germain, notre civilisation est dans la logique de « l’euthanasie proactive ». Mais rien de tout cela n’est surprenant, en fait. Car à partir du moment où nous transformons le suicide assisté en droit fondamental, on est naturellement amené à en faire le droit capital. L’homme n’est-il pas en droit, dès lors, de quitter ce monde dès qu’il le juge insupportable ? N’est-il pas maître de son destin ? Et puisque la souffrance extrême sur cette terre n’est pas exclusivement physique, puisqu’elle peut être morale, n’en viendrons-nous pas, un jour, à réclamer l’euthanasie sur demande, sans même avoir à nous justifier ? C’est même inévitable. On me répondra que cette proposition n’est pas sur la table. Rien n’interdit pourtant de penser qu’elle le sera dans une quinzaine d’années. Il était bien hasardeux de transformer le suicide en droit social financé par l’État.

Barbarie

Nous subissons une telle révolution des mentalités en ce moment que ce qui semblait inconcevable la veille peut devenir évident le lendemain. Il pourrait bien y avoir demain, au Québec, des cliniques « médicales » où la mort sera vendue comme un service parmi d’autres. On accusera ceux qui afficheront quelques réserves devant ce progrès de manquer de cœur et d’être réactionnaires. Les valeurs se renversent, les repères moraux aussi. Les médecins donnent la mort. Et nous nous croyons privilégiés.

Source : le Journal de Montréal

http://www.pouruneécolelibre.com/2017/10/un-quebec-lavenir-radieux-leuthana…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 13 Nov - 04:02 (2017)    Sujet du message: SATANIC TEMPLE & PLANNED PARENTHOOD JOIN FORCES - SINS OF THE WORLD (2017) Répondre en citant

SATANIC TEMPLE & PLANNED PARENTHOOD JOIN FORCES - SINS OF THE WORLD (2017)



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTiO8LdkuFA


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 25 Nov - 01:44 (2017)    Sujet du message: CANADA LEGALIZES EUTHANASIA SO PARENTS CAN KILL DISABLED CHILDREN Répondre en citant

CANADA LEGALIZES EUTHANASIA SO PARENTS CAN KILL DISABLED CHILDREN

Doctors now able to euthanize disabled, sick or dying children under new laws

By: Jay Greenberg |@NeonNettle on 22nd November 2017 @ 1.10pm Canada has just introduced a new law that legalizes euthanasia for parents who want their doctors to kill their sick, disabled or dying children. Euthanasia in Canada has been legal now for just over a year, but pediatricians have reported an "increasing demand" for euthanizing children and infants, something that wasn't previously allowed.

Read more at: http://www.nnettle.com/news/3222-canada-legalizes-euthanasia-so-parents-can…

© Neon Nettle




Read more : https://www.cps.ca/en/documents/position/medical-assistance-in-dying#ref22


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 2 Déc - 02:00 (2017)    Sujet du message: ACADEMIC : ‘CHILDREN CAUSE GLOBAL WARMING ’ Répondre en citant

ACADEMIC : ‘CHILDREN CAUSE GLOBAL WARMING ’

Wayne Evans

Having children is “morally suspect” because they cause global warming, a US academic has said.

Travis Rieder, of Johns Hopkins University, claims that having a child is “one of the worst things you can do for the environment”.

His comments are strikingly similar to those of prominent feminist Gloria Steinem, who claimed in a speech last year that abortion helps reduce global warming.

‘Murderer’

In a comment piece for NBC news, Rieder implied that having a child is akin to releasing a murderer from prison:
“If I release a murderer from prison, knowing full well that he intends to kill innocent people, then I bear some responsibility for those deaths”.

Something similar is true, I think, when it comes to having children: Once my daughter is an autonomous agent, she will be responsible for her emissions. Twisted Evil But that doesn’t negate my responsibility.”

He added: “Having a child imposes high emissions on the world, while the parents get the benefit. So like with any high-cost luxury, we should limit our indulgence.”

Global warming

Attendees of a Planned Parenthood fundraising event last year were told nothing is more important than abortion and that childbirth causes global warming.
Speaking at the event in Memphis, Tennessee, prominent feminist Gloria Steinem said: “Nothing but nothing is more important than ensuring our fundamental right to reproductive freedom.”

She ridiculed people with pro-life views and claimed that not being able to access abortion is “the single biggest cause of global warming”.

Planned Parenthood is the biggest abortion provider in the United States.

http://www.christian.org.uk/news/academic-children-cause-global-warming/


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 5 Déc - 01:01 (2017)    Sujet du message: CARING CORRUPTED - THE KILLING NURSES OF THE THIRD REICH Répondre en citant

HISTORY

CARING CORRUPTED - THE KILLING NURSES OF THE THIRD REICH



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rz8ge4aw8Ws


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 5 Déc - 01:17 (2017)    Sujet du message: MODERN DAY GAS CHAMBER : THE SARCO CAPSULE, A DEPOPULATIONSITS DREAM Répondre en citant

MODERN DAY GAS CHAMBER : THE SARCO CAPSULE, A DEPOPULATIONSITS DREAM



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ma6OM5X9n-8

The Sarco Capsule is being touted by depopulationists as a way to efficiently and effortlessly off one’s self.

Learn More: https://christianjournal.net




Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 24 Déc - 05:50 (2017)    Sujet du message: POPE FRANCIS CREDITED WITH HELPING EUTHANASIA LAW PASS IN ITALY Répondre en citant



POPE FRANCIS CREDITED WITH HELPING EUTHANASIA LAW PASS IN ITALY




VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlYnxK5-fuo&t=8s


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 29 Déc - 05:26 (2017)    Sujet du message: ORGAN DONORS ARE ALIVE WHEN THEIR ORGANS ARE HARVESTED... Répondre en citant

ORGAN DONORS ARE ALIVE WHEN THEIR ORGANS ARE HARVESTED...

Ce que l'on ne nous dit pas sur les dons d'organe, c'est que le patient doit être vivant au moment du ou des prélèvements, et que le patient est mis en état de paralysie, sans anesthésie. Ce sont des souffrances épouvantables pour le patient et qui est approuvé par les départements de la santé et les sorciers de la médecine. Traduisez l'article pour le contenu complet.




Jeannine Van Dyn Hoven
18 décembre, 19:10 ·

Just had my drivers license renewed... I took me off the organ donation.. seen on fb.. great read!

Organ Donors are Alive when their Organs are Harvested

Prior to 1968 a person was declared dead only after their breathing and heart stopped for a determinate period of time.

The current terminology "Brain Death" was unheard of.

When surgeons realized they had the capability of taking organs from one seemingly “close to death” person and implanting them into another person to keep the recipient alive longer, a "Pandora’s Box" was opened.

In the beginning, through trial and error, they discovered it was not possible to perform this "miraculous" #surgery with organs taken from someone truly dead, even if the donor was without circulation for merely a few minutes, because organ damage occurs within a very brief time after circulation stops.

To justify their experimental procedures it was necessary for them to come up with a solution which is how the term "#BrainDeath" was contrived.

Much is being done to get your organs.

For an organ to be suitable for #transplantation it must be healthy and it must come from a living person.

Once DBD (Donation After Brain Death) or DCD (Donation After Cardiac Death) has been verified and permission extracted from distraught family members (in cases where relatives cannot be located the #government often now makes the determination on our behalf) the "organ donor" undergoes hours, sometimes days, of torturous treatment utilized to protect and preserve the body-container of "spare parts!"

The "organ donor" is forced to endure the excruciating painful and ongoing chemical treatment in preparation for organ excising.

Literally the "donor" is now an organ warehouse and used for the sole purpose of organ preservation until a compatible recipient can be located.

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) can be performed on neurologically intact donors who do not fulfill neurologic or brain death criteria before circulatory arrest. This commentary focuses on the most controversial donor-related issues anticipated from mandatory implementation of DCD for imminent or cardiac death in #hospitals across the USA.

The truth of the horrific treatment and DEATH OF THE "DONOR"

Organ removal is performed while the patient is given only a paralyzing agent but no anesthetic!

Multi-organ excision, on the average, takes three to four hours of operating during which time the heart is beating, the blood pressure is normal and respiration is occurring albeit the patient is on a ventilator. Each organ is cut out until finally the beating heart is stopped, a moment before removal.

It is well documented the heart rate and blood pressure go up when the incision is made. This is the very response the anesthesiologist often observes in everyday surgery when the anesthetic is insufficient. But, as stated below, organ donors are not anesthetized.

There are growing numbers of protesters among #nurses and #anesthesiologists, who react strongly to the movements of the supposed "corpse." These movements are sometimes so violent it makes it impossible to continue the taking of organs. Resulting from their personal experiences and attestations, many in the medical profession have removed themselves from this program altogether.

New York hospitals are routinely 'harvesting' organs from patients before they're even dead, an explosive #lawsuit is claiming.

The suit accuses transplant non-profit The New York Organ Donor Network of bullying doctors into declaring patients brain dead when they are still alive.

Plaintiff, Patrick McMahon, 50, reckons one in five #patients are showing signs of brain activity when surgeons declare them dead and start hacking out their body parts.

'They're playing God,' said McMahon, a former transplant coordinator who claims he was fired just four months into the role for speaking out about the practice.

He said that the donor network makes 'millions and millions' from selling the organs they obtain to hospitals and to insurance companies for transplants.

'Hearts, lungs, kidneys, joints, bones, skin grafts, intestines, valves, eyes -- it's all big money.'

The Air Force Combat veteran and former nurse added that financially strained hospitals are easily influenced to declare a patient brain dead because they're keen to free up bed space.

The lawsuit, filed in Manhattan Supreme Court in 2012, cites a 19-year-old car crash victim who was still struggling to breathe and showing signs of brain activity when doctors gave the green light for his organs to be harvested.

Network officials including director Michael Goldstein allegedly bullied Nassau University Medical Center staff into declaring the teen dead, stating during a conference call: 'This kid is dead, you got that?'

But McMahon said he believed the 19-year-old could have recovered.

The lawsuit cites three other examples of patients who were still clinging to life when doctors gave a 'note' - an official declaration by a hospital that a patient is brain dead, which, as well as consent from next of kin, is required before a transplant can take place.

The suit claims that a man was admitted to Kings County Hospital in Brooklyn, a month later, again showing brain activity.

It claims McMahon protested but was blown off by hospital and donor network staff, and the man was declared brain dead and his organs harvested.

In November 2011, a woman admitted to Staten Island University Hospital after a drug overdose was declared brain dead and her organs were about to be harvested when McMahon noticed that she was being given 'a paralyzing anesthetic' because her body was still jerking.

'She was having brain function when they were cutting into her on the table,' McMahon told MailOnline.

'He had given her a paralyser and there's no reason to give someone who is dead a paralyser.'

He said he confronted the person who gave it to her and he was speechless.

'Finally he said he was told to do it because while they were cutting her chest open she was moving her chest around.

And a paralyzer only paralyses you, it does nothing for the pain,' he said.

McMahon added that surgeons 'took everything' with regards to body parts.

'They took her eyes, her joints. She was right there when I was having the conversation. They were inserting the plastic bones where the real ones had been.'

According to the lawsuit, when McMahon probed further on the disturbing case another network employee told hospital staff he was 'an untrained troublemaker with a history of raising frivolous issues and questions.'

McMahon added that staff members who collect the most organs throughout the year qualify for a Christmas bonus.

'If counselors do well by getting a lot of organs they are given a bonus in December,' he said.

The veteran - who worked at the donor network between July and November - said there are about 30-40 staff who are out in the field, going to hospitals and trying to get signatures and donations.

Estimated U.S. Average Billed Charges Per Transplant: Heart $1,000,000 Double Lung: $800,000 Liver: $580,000 Kidney: $275,000

More than 123,000 people are on waiting lists for organ transplants in the United States, 100,000 of whom are waiting for new kidneys. Yet the need for healthy organs far outpaces donations. Only 28,000 transplants were completed in the last year, according to the 2014 national data from the U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network.

Because organ donors are often alive when their organs are harvested, the #medical community should not require donors to be declared dead, but instead adopt more “honest” moral criteria that allow the harvesting of organs from “dying” or “severely injured” patients, with proper consent, three leading experts have argued.

This approach, they say, would avoid the “pseudo-objective” claim that a donor is “really dead,” which is often based upon purely ideological definitions of death designed to expand the organ donor pool, and would allow organ harvesters to be more honest with the public, as well as ensure that donors don’t feel pain during the harvesting process.

The chilling comments were offered by #Doctor Neil Lazar, director of the medical-surgical intensive care unit at Toronto General Hospital, Dr. Maxwell J. Smith of the University of Toronto, and David Rodriguez-Arias of Universidad del Pais Vasco in Spain, at a U.S. bioethics conference in October and published in a recent paper in the American Journal of Bioethics.

“Because there is a general assumption that dead individuals cannot be harmed, veneration of the dead-donor rule is dangerously misleading,” they write.
“Ultimately, what is important for the protection and respect of potential donors is not to have a death certificate signed, but rather to be certain they are beyond suffering and to guarantee that their autonomy is respected.”

Instead of the so-called Dead Donor Rule (DDR), the authors propose that donors should be “protected from harm” (i.e given anesthesia so that they cannot feel pain during the donation process), that informed consent should be obtained, and that society should be “fully informed of the inherently debatable nature of any criterion to declare death.”

The doctors note that developing the criteria for so-called “brain death,” which is often used by doctors to declare death before organ donation, was an “ideological strategy” aimed at increasing the donor pool that has been found to be “empirically and theoretically flawed.” They also criticize the latest attempts to create new, even looser definitions of death, such as circulatory death, which they argue amount to simply “pretending” that the patient is dead in order to get his organs.

Based on an interview in 2013 with Dr. Paul Byrne, 80-year-old neonatologist blowing the whistle on the dark side of hospitals, it became clear that the concept of "brain death" is a complete fabrication conjured up for the sole purpose of legitimizing the murder of living people in order to harvest their organs.

These people (who often end up in hospitals as a result of car accidents or drug overdoses or the like) are given paralysis drugs during organ removal -- BUT NO ANESTHESIA!!!

Medical staff are literally cleaving open the chests of these innocent people and tearing out their organs, one by one, leaving the heart for last, after which point they are, of course, dead.

It's wakey wakey time people.This is no joke.

If you do not want to be tortured to death by medical sadists, SAY NO TO ORGAN DONATION! Evil is still evil by any other name.

A special thanks to Sandra Tsai for making us aware of pending lawsuits & information.

ORIGINAL POST:

https://www.facebook.com/1374568786202451/photos/a.1374596532866343.1073741828.1374568786202451/1492324527760209/?type=3&theater&sw_fnr_id=2177021672

More News on:

http://www.truthaboutorgandonation.com/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17020597
https://www.cdc.gov/transplantsa…/outbreak-invest/index.html
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23990679
http://www.everydayhealth.com/…/donating-kidney-may-carry-…/


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 29 Déc - 05:53 (2017)    Sujet du message: PLANNED PARENTHOOD DIRECTOR : ‘WE RUN SATANIC PEDOPHILE RING’ Répondre en citant


Moloch sacrifice

PLANNED PARENTHOOD DIRECTOR : ‘WE RUN SATANIC PEDOPHILE RING’

She prays rosary and she saw the truth. Catholic propaganda but yes this is the satanic modern form of practice from Hell.



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjHutbrHm6w


December 27, 2017 Nwo Report
 


A former Planned Parenthood director has admitted that the organization is really a front for a Satanic pedophile ring in which abortions are seen as ‘demonic rituals.’

In an interview with the Daily Caller News Foundation, Ramona Trevino revealed that staff members have quotas for abortions so that they can use the aborted fetuses for sick Satanic rituals.

“I knew what I was doing was wrong… but it took a few years after working at Planned Parenthood to recognize my part in abortion even through referrals,” Trevino said.

LSN reports: Trevino is not alone in exposing the link between abortion and the demonic. Zachary King, a former high wizard in a satanic church who converted to Christianity, has detailed how abortion is used as a “satanic sacrifice” to win favors from the devil. Famed author of The Exorcist Peter Blatty has also described the abortion procedure as “demonic.”

Although abortions were not performed at the office where she worked, Trevino came to realize that she shared the culpability for the abortions going on elsewhere in the organization. And more than that, she slowly started to recognize other problems with the way the abortion business was run, especially the way teenage girls were viewed who came to her office.

She was shocked by the number of 12, 13, and 14-year-olds who came into the clinic for contraception or abortion referrals, and “was amazed at the number of young women who came to the clinic with multiple sex partners and STDs,” according to the DCNF report.

Young girls “are being groomed as future abortion patients because Planned Parenthood promotes a promiscuous lifestyle,” said Trevino. “We’re not discouraging them from having sex at a young age. We have monthly quotas to meet. They’re just numbers.”

As a result, “I was forced and challenged to look at my own beliefs and actions. I couldn’t continue to be indifferent,” she said in the DCNF interview.

“I started to connect the dots and realize that it all goes together,” she said.

“It was a struggle because I felt like Planned Parenthood treated women like cattle,” Trevino explained earlier this year in a Live Action video. “We talked about reducing the amount of time that we saw our … new patients.”

“Women were just herded through,” she said.

“There was no prenatal care; there was nothing we could offer women who were pregnant” other than abortion, according to Trevino.

In an interview with LifeSiteNews conducted shortly after she walked away from her job, Trevino recounted how her discomfort grew to a higher pitch when Lila Rose and Live Action released undercover videos showing Planned Parenthood managers helping purported child sex-traffickers get abortions and other services for their underage prostitutes.

After those videos were released, a meeting for all the regional Planned Parenthood managers was called. Ramona says she expected the meeting to be about how to spot situations of abuse or sex trafficking – but instead, it was all about how to detect if you are being recorded, or are the victim of a sting operation.

After that meeting, she said, “I kind of remember coming back and telling my co-worker, ‘I’m done. This is it. I’ve got to find something else.’”

But the straw that broke the camel’s back didn’t come until later that year, during the Christian season of Lent, as well as the first ever 40 Days for Life campaign outside Ramona’s clinic.

As Lent approached, Ramona decided to make a renewed effort to go weekly to church, where her attendance had grown spotty, and to read scripture and pray the Catholic prayer of the rosary every day.

“Just three days into praying the rosary – that was it,” she says. “The blinders came off.”

Planned Parenthood is the nation’s largest abortion provider. Recent undercover investigations have allegedly exposed it for illegally selling aborted baby body parts for profit.

Trevino counsels those who still work for the abortion provider to start asking themselves some serious questions

“Really just look at the truth and ask if you want to be involved in illegal practices like baby body parts,” she said.

https://nworeport.me/2017/12/27/planned-parenthood-director-we-run-satanic-…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 6 Jan - 00:02 (2018)    Sujet du message: PLANNED PARENTHOOD BUILDING Répondre en citant

PLANNED PARENTHOOD BUILDING








Dernière édition par maria le Sam 13 Jan - 14:40 (2018); édité 1 fois
Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 6 Jan - 00:12 (2018)    Sujet du message: TWO ANTI-ABORTION ACTIVISTS WHO SECRETLY FILMED PLANNED PARENTHOOD CHARGED Répondre en citant

TWO ANTI-ABORTION ACTIVISTS WHO SECRETLY FILMED PLANNED PARENTHOOD CHARGED

You have the proves of a criminal crimes but these satanists are protect by the law, and the ones who stand for these little babies were charged of felony by the Babylonian priest of the court (judge).


Andrew Dalton, The Associated Press

Published Tuesday, March 28, 2017 10:38PM EDT

LOS ANGELES - California prosecutors on Tuesday charged two anti-abortion activists who made undercover videos of themselves trying to buy fetal tissue from Planned Parenthood with 15 felonies, saying they invaded the privacy of medical providers by filming without consent.

State Attorney General Xavier Becerra announced the charges against David Daleiden of Davis, California, and Sandra Merritt of San Jose. The two operate the Irvine-based Center for Medical Progress.

The allegations say the pair filmed 14 people without permission between October 2013 and July 2015 in Los Angeles, San Francisco and El Dorado counties. One felony count was filed for each person. The 15th was for criminal conspiracy to invade privacy.

Becerra says they used a fictitious bioresearch company to meet with women's health care providers and covertly record them.

Daleiden, in an email to The Associated Press, said the "bogus" charges are coming from "Planned Parenthood's political cronies."

"The public knows the real criminals are Planned Parenthood and their business partners," Daleiden said.

In April of last year, Daleiden said in a Facebook post that California Department of Justice agents raided his home, seizing all of his video footage along with personal information.

Since then, the case had gone largely quiet, with virtually no revelations about the investigation and no indication that the charges were coming before they were filed Tuesday in San Francisco Superior Court.

The prosecution got a new leader this year in Becerra, a longtime Congressional Democrat, who took over for Kamala Harris when she became a U.S. Senator.

Daleiden and Merritt had previously been indicted in Texas on similar charges in January of 2016, but all of the charges were eventually dropped by July as prosecutors said a grand jury had overstepped its authority. The grand jury had originally been convened to investigate Planned Parenthood, but after finding no wrongdoing turned around and indicted Daleiden and Merritt instead.

Messages left seeking comment from Planned Parenthood representatives late Tuesday were not immediately returned.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/two-anti-abortion-activists-who-secretly-film…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 430
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 13 Jan - 14:39 (2018)    Sujet du message: CANADA : CORBELLA : IN THE NAME OF TOLERANCE, TRUDEAU ATTACKS FAITH AND THOSE WHO SERVE OTHERS Répondre en citant

CANADA : CORBELLA : IN THE NAME OF TOLERANCE, TRUDEAU ATTACKS FAITH AND THOSE WHO SERVE OTHERS

Because they need blood sacrifice for their gods. If Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is pushing for this new law, you can expect he's also taking part of the elite who do secret ritual sacrifices with his friends of the global vampire elite.


Licia Corbella

Published on: January 11, 2018 | Last Updated: January 11, 2018 5:00 AM MST

 

Mustard Seed CEO Stephen Wile was photographed on Wednesday January 10, 2018. Gavin Young/Postmedia

In the name of “inclusion” and “tolerance,” Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his Liberal government are excluding and being intolerant to faith-based social agencies and churches from even applying for the Canada Summer Jobs program that provides subsidies to hire summer students.

In so doing, Trudeau will hypocritically be harming the very people he claims to care for the most — youth seeking work experience and the poorest of the poor in Canada.

The new application for the Canada Jobs Grant requires that the organization’s core mandate respects “reproductive rights” along with other human rights, and unless that “attestation” is checked, the online application cannot be submitted. That means fewer students will be hired to help the most vulnerable in society.

Stephen Wile, CEO of the Christian aid organization The Mustard Seed, which ministers to tens of thousands of Alberta’s most vulnerable and poor citizens in Calgary, Red Deer and Edmonton, says The Seed hired 17 grant-supported students to work across Alberta last summer, serving those experiencing homelessness, addictions and other issues associated with poverty, regardless of the client’s faith, creed or colour.

“The Mustard Seed doesn’t take a position on abortion, but with the government making this a requirement for funding, it’s trying to force us from a neutral position to an affirmative position on abortion, and we’re not prepared to do that,” said Wile from his Calgary office.

“We’re not willing to support the government’s position in order to get the funds, it’s just not worth it for us.

“It seems,” added Wile, “like the government is saying, ‘The issue of where you stand on abortion is more important than the work you do and the people you serve,’ and that’s really sad. At the core of who we are, we’re really against fear and hate, and unfortunately, the government is taking a position that instead of decelerating division, it’s accelerating it.”

Wile is correct. In the name of tolerance, the Trudeau government is being intolerant to a huge swath of society that does most of the heavy lifting when it comes to caring for the poor and vulnerable in Canada.

According to the report Religion, Participation, and Charitable Giving — written at the behest of Canadian Heritage, Statistics Canada, Health Canada and other organizations — author Kurt Bowen found that actively religious people are far more likely to give of their time and money to charitable causes — including secular charitable causes.

According to the 1999 report, “the religiously active are 32 per cent of all Canadians, but they are responsible for 65 per cent of all direct, charitable donations. Conversely, the 42 per cent of Canadians who are religiously inactive generate only 20 per cent of all charitable givings.”

James Paton, lead pastor at First Alliance Church in southeast Calgary — who is from Scotland and led an inner-city church for the poor in Amsterdam before moving to Calgary — says he’s never before worked with a government that demands you accept its policy platform in order to partner with it to deliver a program.

“There’s great irony in this new requirement in the jobs grant application,” mused Paton, whose church of 4,000 parishioners has sponsored hundreds of Syrian refugees in the past few years and is engaged in numerous programs, including in-school breakfast programs in low-income areas and is one of the top three givers to the Calgary Food Bank.

“Even if you take the Christian faith and morality out of it, they’re actually asking us to agree with the federal Liberal policy platform, but they don’t ask Pakistan to do that, they don’t ask China to do that. It’s ironic,” said Paton, who says the church will forgo the funding for nine to 12 students rather than sign something that says it is in favour of aborting babies.

During a town hall discussion in Hamilton, Ont., on Wednesday, Trudeau brought up the “kerfuffle” around the summer jobs program and tried to draw a distinction between groups that hold pro-life beliefs and groups whose principal mandate is to oppose abortion.

“Of course, you’re more than allowed to have whatever beliefs you like,” he said. “But when those beliefs lead to actions determined to restrict a woman’s right to control her own body, that’s where I, and I think we, draw the line as a country.”

Julia Beazley, director of public policy with the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada, says more than 160 charities, churches, programs, organizations and even some businesses have called to express frustration or confusion about the attestation and its ambiguity.

“The wording of the attestation is either very ambiguous and it needs to be clarified, or it’s completely unambiguous and it needs to be changed,” said Beazley.

She’s right. Now that Trudeau has clarified what he thinks the attestation means, it needs to be rewritten. If you want to urge him to do so, mail a note to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, House of Commons, Ottawa, Ont., K1A 0A6. No postage is required. Or email him at justin.trudeau@parl.gc.ca

“These organizations are serving their communities without discrimination, but they operate out of a religious ethos, they hold certain beliefs and they are well within their charter rights to do so, but they’re impacted by this change,” said Beazley.

Ultimately, whatever the intent is, those people who can’t check off that attestation are being denied equal access to a public benefit solely because of their religious belief. That violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Trudeau needs to learn that intolerance to Canada’s faith communities won’t be tolerated.

Lcorbella@postmedia.com

http://calgaryherald.com/news/local-news/corbella-in-the-name-of-tolerance-…


Revenir en haut
Contenu Sponsorisé






MessagePosté le: Aujourd’hui à 16:52 (2018)    Sujet du message: LES RUSES UTILISÉES PR RÉDUIRE LES POPULATIONS (PARTIE 2)

Revenir en haut
Montrer les messages depuis:   
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> LA RELIGION MONDIALE ET L'ONU : SES VUES ET AGENDA SUR LE TRANSHUMANISME, CLONAGE, AGENDA DE DÉPOPULATION -> LES RUSES UTILISÉES PR RÉDUIRE LES POPULATIONS (PARTIE 2) Toutes les heures sont au format GMT + 2 Heures
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Page 8 sur 8

 
Sauter vers:  

Index | Creer un forum | Forum gratuit d’entraide | Annuaire des forums gratuits | Signaler une violation | Conditions générales d'utilisation
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Traduction par : phpBB-fr.com