LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum

LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1)
...

 FAQFAQ   RechercherRechercher   MembresMembres   GroupesGroupes   S’enregistrerS’enregistrer 
 ProfilProfil   Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés   ConnexionConnexion 

LES RUSES UTILISÉES PR RÉDUIRE LES POPULATIONS (PARTIE 2)
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
 
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> LA RELIGION MONDIALE ET L'ONU : SES VUES ET AGENDA SUR LE TRANSHUMANISME, CLONAGE, AGENDA DE DÉPOPULATION -> LES RUSES UTILISÉES PR RÉDUIRE LES POPULATIONS (PARTIE 2)
Sujet précédent :: Sujet suivant  
Auteur Message
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 019
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 31 Déc - 04:12 (2016)    Sujet du message: THE LEGAL WAY TO KILL THE INNOCENT!! Répondre en citant

THE LEGAL WAY TO KILL THE INNOCENT!!



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jG16bFehJeE



Revenir en haut
Publicité






MessagePosté le: Sam 31 Déc - 04:12 (2016)    Sujet du message: Publicité

PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?
Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 019
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 23 Fév - 15:14 (2017)    Sujet du message: PIZZAGATE _CAROL EVERETT_ FORMER ABORTION PROVIDER SPEAKS Youtube VIDEO Répondre en citant

PIZZAGATE _CAROL EVERETT_ FORMER ABORTION PROVIDER SPEAKS Youtube VIDEO



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9uLKKhymv0


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 019
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 30 Mar - 04:21 (2017)    Sujet du message: FELONY CHARGES FOR 2 WHO SECRETLY FILMED PLANNED PARENTHOOD Répondre en citant

FELONY CHARGES FOR 2 WHO SECRETLY FILMED PLANNED PARENTHOOD

ADD VIDEO

CRIMINALIZE FOR DENOUNCING PLANNED PARENTHOOD AND THE KILLING OF BABIES

VIDEO : http://www.sendspace.com/file/0p4jf0

By ANDREW DALTON

Mar. 28, 2017 11:36 PM EDT



LOS ANGELES (AP) — California prosecutors on Tuesday charged two anti-abortion activists who made undercover videos of themselves trying to buy fetal tissue from Planned Parenthood with 15 felonies, saying they invaded the privacy of medical providers by filming without consent.

The charges against David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt of the Center for Medical Progress come eight months after similar charges were dropped in Texas.

State Attorney General Xavier Becerra, a longtime Congressional Democrat who took over the investigation in January, said in a statement that the state "will not tolerate the criminal recording of conversations."

Prosecutors say Daleiden, of Davis, California, and Merritt, of San Jose, filmed 14 people without permission between October 2013 and July 2015 in Los Angeles, San Francisco and El Dorado counties. One felony count was filed for each person. The 15th was for criminal conspiracy to invade privacy.

Daleiden said in an email to The Associated Press that the "bogus" charges are coming from "Planned Parenthood's political cronies."

"The public knows the real criminals are Planned Parenthood and their business partners," Daleiden said.

The conversations included officials from Planned Parenthood and StemExpress, a California company that provides blood, tissue and other biological material for medical research and had received fetal tissue from Planned Parenthood.

In one of the pair's videos, Daleiden poses as "Robert Sarkis" of the phony Biomax Procurement Services and is shown discussing liver tissue with the chief executive of StemExpress at a Northern California restaurant.

Abortion opponents said the recordings showed Planned Parenthood was illegally harvesting and selling the organs. Planned Parenthood said the videos were deceptively edited to support extremists' false claims.

"As we have said from the beginning, and as more than a dozen different state investigations have made clear: Planned Parenthood has done nothing wrong, and the only people who broke the law are those behind the fraudulent tapes," said Mary Alice Carter, interim vice president of communications for Planned Parenthood, in a statement.

In April of last year, Daleiden said in a Facebook post that California Department of Justice agents raided his home, seizing all of his video footage along with personal information.

Since then the case had gone largely quiet, with virtually no revelations about the investigation and no indication that the charges were coming before they were filed Tuesday in San Francisco Superior Court.

The case is one of the first of high-profile prosecutions for Becerra, who left the U.S. House to take over for Kamala Harris after she became a U.S. Senator.

Daleiden and Merritt had previously been indicted in Texas on similar charges in January of 2016, but all of the charges were eventually dropped by July as prosecutors said a grand jury had overstepped its authority. The grand jury had originally been convened to investigate Planned Parenthood, but after finding no wrongdoing turned around and indicted Daleiden and Merritt instead.

The videos reignited the American abortion debate when they were released in 2015, and increased Congressional heat against Planned Parenthood that has yet to subside.

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/c50e993d047142cf8ca0e8050daf6114/felony-char…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 019
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 15 Avr - 16:41 (2017)    Sujet du message: MORE STATES CONSIDER ASSISTED SUICIDE LEGISLATION Répondre en citant

MORE STATES CONSIDER ASSISTED SUICIDE LEGISLATION

On: 4/14/2017By Mark Pattison , In: Nation

WASHINGTON (CNS) -- More states are considering assisted suicide legislation, although few seem to be making inroads in adding themselves to the five states and the District of Columbia where it is legal.

A bill in Alaska closely modeled after Oregon's Death With Dignity Act, which took effect 20 years ago, was the subject of a legislative hearing April 6. But lawmakers in a divided Legislature are in session for only 90 days, and coming to agreement on a state budget appeared to be taking up lawmakers' time.

At a March 28 hearing on the bill, Margaret Dore, an attorney from Washington state where assisted suicide is also legal, said advocates of doctor-assisted suicide are misleading the public about the real impact on society's most vulnerable. Dore, who also is president of Choice Is an Illusion -- a nonprofit that opposes assisted suicide and euthanasia -- said the bill does not deal only with those who are dying. For example, Oregon's suicide bill lists diabetes as a "terminal illness," Dore cautioned.

In addition to Oregon, Washington state and the District of Columbia, assisted suicide is also legal in California, Colorado and Vermont.

http://www.thebostonpilot.com/article.asp?Source=Trending&ID=179075


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 019
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 27 Avr - 01:50 (2017)    Sujet du message: LIVE CHILD SACRIFICES ON FACEBOOK ARE THE NEW NORM Répondre en citant

LIVE CHILD SACRIFICES ON FACEBOOK ARE THE NEW NORM



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdeFCkeIASw

Ajoutée le 26 avr. 2017

Im not buying ANY of this as organic uploads by real killers. This is the next level of spirit cooking, pizzagate whatever The want child sacrifice as the new normal.
RFB


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 019
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 27 Juin - 13:11 (2017)    Sujet du message: CALIFORNIA SB 309 BILL WILL AUTHORIZE A SPECIAL LICENSE PLATE TO FUND ABORTIONS Répondre en citant

CALIFORNIA SB 309 BILL WILL AUTHORIZE A SPECIAL LICENSE PLATE TO FUND ABORTIONS 

Posted on June 26, 2017 by Dr. Eowyn
 
It is bad enough that abortion — the deliberate killing of a defenseless, unborn human being — is still legal in America, where Christians are still a majority, though decreasing in numbers by the day.

It is bad enough that our tax dollars still fund abortions, although, God bless him, President Trump has signed a law restoring states’ right to defund Planned Parenthood.

Note: Trump also defunded International Planned Parenthood, by signing an executive order to that effect on his first day of work as President. Ostensibly-conservative carping critics of Trump please note.

Now, in benighted California, the state legislature is poised to pass a bill into law which will authorize a special vehicle license plate, the proceeds of which will fund sterilization and abortions.



The bill is SB 309, with the Orwellian descriptive title of “License Plates: Reproductive Freedom Fund”.

SB 309 is innocuously described as “An act to add Section 5156.9 to the Vehicle Code, relating to license plates,” but it’s so much more — and worse — than that.

Here’s the text of SB 309:
Citation:


“Existing law authorizes the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to issue special license plates, including environmental license plates and specified special environmental design license plates. Under existing law, a state agency is authorized to apply to the DMV to sponsor a special license plate program, and the DMV is required to issue those license plates if the agency meets certain requirements. The DMV is required to charge specified fees for certain services related to the issuance of those plates.

This bill would require the State Department of Health Care Services to apply to sponsor a reproductive freedom license plate program, and would require the DMV to issue the license plates if the State Department of Health Care Services meets certain requirements. The bill would authorize the State Department of Health Care Services to accept and use donated artwork from California artists for the license plate. The bill would require the revenue generated from the license plates, as specified, to be deposited in the California Reproductive Freedom Fund, created by the bill, and to be used, upon appropriation, for the Family Planning, Access, Care, and Treatment program (Family PACT) [administered by the State Department of Health Care Services].”



So what’s the nice-sounding Family PACT program? Here’s its self-description:
Citation:


“Family PACT is California’s innovative approach to provide comprehensive family planning services to eligible low income (under 200% federal poverty level) men and women. Family PACT serves 1 million income eligible men and women of childbearing age through a network of 2,200 public and private providers. Services include comprehensive education, assistance, and services relating to family planning.”



And what exactly are those “services relating to family planning”?

READ MORE  Vogue magazine tells women to be witches

From the PDF “Family PACT Overview“:
Citation:


“Client Benefits & Services

Family PACT provides comprehensive family planning services to women and men including all FDA approved forms of contraception, emergency contraception, pregnancy testing with counseling, preconception counseling, male and female sterilization, limited infertility services, sexually transmitted infection testing and treatment, cancer screening, and HIV screening. Individual client reproductive health education and counseling is an ongoing component of all service.”



Emergency contraception” (EC) is emergency contraception pills, taken after unprotected sex to pregnant pregnancy. EC is a form of abortion by preventing a fertilized egg from attaching to the uterus.

The Family PACT program is administered through Family PACT “providers,” among whom are Planned Parenthood clinics, where “family planning” is a synonym for abortion.
Lest there is any remaining doubt that SB 309 will fund abortions, here’s what (the infamous) Ninth Circuit Senior Judge Dorothy Wright Nelson wrote in an opinion:
Citation:


“the California Reproductive Freedom, Accountability, Comprehensive Care, and Transparency Act . . . requires that licensed pregnancy-related clinics disseminate a notice stating the existence of publicly-funded family-planning services, including contraception and abortion.”


SB 309 was introduced by Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson, the bill’s author; its coauthor is Assembly member Cristina Garcia.



On May 30, 2017, SB 309 was read a third time in California’s State Senate and passed 28:13. On June 8, 2017, the bill was referred to the State Assembly’s Committee on Transportation. A hearing date is scheduled for tomorrow, June 26. A majority vote is required to pass SB 309.

H/t California Political Review

~Eowyn

Dr. Eowyn’s post first appeared at Fellowship of the Minds

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2017/06/26/california-sb-309-bill-will-authori…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 019
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 29 Juin - 03:01 (2017)    Sujet du message: SHOCKING NEWS DOCTOR CALLS ABORTION HIS MINISTRY ; SATANISM AND NEW DOCTRINES INFILTRATING CHURCH Répondre en citant

SHOCKING NEWS DOCTOR CALLS ABORTION HIS MINISTRY ; SATANISM AND NEW DOCTRINES INFILTRATING CHURCH



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPYPuqxbHIA


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 019
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 29 Aoû - 14:00 (2017)    Sujet du message: PLANNED PARENTHOOD INVESTIGATOR CLAIMS VICTORY IN WASHINGTON STATE APPEAL Répondre en citant

UPDATE

PLANNED PARENTHOOD INVESTIGATOR CLAIMS VICTORY IN WASHINGTON STATE APPEAL 

 On: 8/18/2017By Matt Hadro , In: Nation

Washington D.C., Aug 17, 2017 CNA/EWTN News.- Lawyers for Planned Parenthood investigator David Daleiden claimed a victory on Wednesday as the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court sent back a lower court's ruling against him.

“The Court of Appeals, by reversing this decision and remanding this case back to District Court, has prevented a serious threat to the public's right to know how their tax dollars are being spent,” said Peter Breen, special counsel for the Thomas More Society who argued the appeal for Daleiden.

David Daleiden is the project lead at the Center for Medical Progress, the group that released undercover videos of conversations with Planned Parenthood officials and others in the abortion industry, as well as interviews of a former clinician for a tissue harvester.

The videos claimed to report on the transfer of fetal tissue of aborted babies from clinics to tissue harvesters for research purposes.

Daleiden and other citizen journalists created a fake medical supply company company and adopted fake identifications to pose as representatives of a fetal tissue procurement company looking to possibly do business with Planned Parenthood clinics. They discussed possible prices for fetal tissue of aborted babies.

http://www.thebostonpilot.com/article.asp?utm_source=ConstantContact&ut…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 019
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 26 Sep - 02:21 (2017)    Sujet du message: JUDGE RULES DOCTORS CAN STARVE DISABLED PATIENTS TO DEATH WITHOUT A COURT ORDER Répondre en citant

JUDGE RULES DOCTORS CAN STARVE DISABLED PATIENTS TO DEATH WITHOUT A COURT ORDER

International   SPUC   Sep 21, 2017   |   3:25PM    London, England

A judge has ruled that Court permission will not be needed to remove food and fluids from severely brain damaged patients, a move which has caused concern among opponents of euthanasia.

Legal safeguard

Unlike other forms of medical care, the decision to withdraw food and fluids from patients in a “permanent vegetative state” (the term “unresponsive wakefulness syndrome” is now generally preferred) has until now been referred to the Court of Protection, even if doctors and relatives are in agreement.

Landmark ruling

Now, the decision by Mr Justice Jackson means those cases will no longer have to come to court. He made his ruling in a case concerning a 50-year-old woman who suffered from a degenerative illness for 14 years. The patient, known in court as M, had Huntington’s disease and was bed-ridden in hospital and fed by a tube. The Court heard that she had shown no sign of awareness for 18 months.

Mr Justice Jackson agreed with her family and doctors that withdrawing nutrition from her would be in her best interests. The tube was removed and she died in August. Mr Justice Jackson said in his view the case should not have come to court.

Passive euthanasia


The ruling was welcomed by pro-euthanasia group Dignity in Dying. Chief Executive Sarah Wootton said the ruling was “a helpful step towards a clearer, more person-centred view of end-of-life care”.

“When all parties – family, the hospital and treating doctors – are agreed on what someone would have wanted for their care, it seems absurd to require a costly court process to confirm this.”

Dangerous precedent

However, the news has been greeted with great concern by patients rights groups. Dr Peter Saunders of the Care Not Killing Alliance said: “This court decision sets a dangerous precedent and should be appealed. Taking these decisions away from the court of protection removes an important layer of legislative scrutiny and accountability and effectively weakens the law.

“It will now be more likely that severely brain damaged patients will be starved or dehydrated to death in their supposed best interests and that these decisions will be more influenced by those who have ideological or financial vested interests in this course of action.”

The official solicitor, appointed by the state to act for such patients, is likely to appeal against the ruling.

Recently, a British doctor wrote on his findings that many patients in a “vegetative” state, are in fact aware and can be communicated with.

LifeNews Note: Courtesy of SPUC. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children is a leading pro-life organization in the United Kingdom.


 
http://www.lifenews.com/2017/09/21/court-rules-doctors-can-starve-disabled-…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 019
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 5 Oct - 03:42 (2017)    Sujet du message: VINGT-CINQ MILLIONS D'AVORTEMENTS NON SECURISES SONT PRATIQUES DANS LE MONDE CHAQUE ANNEE, SELON L'OMS / Some 25 million unsafe abortions occur each year, UN health agency warns Répondre en citant



VINGT-CINQ MILLIONS D'AVORTEMENTS NON SECURISES SONT PRATIQUES DANS LE MONDE CHAQUE ANNEE, SELON L'OMS

ENGLISH :
Some 25 million unsafe abortions occur each year, UN health agency warns
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=57761#.WdWNkrhOKSo



Crédit OMS

28 septembre 2017 – Vingt-cinq millions d'avortements non sécurisés (45% des avortements dans le monde) ont été pratiqués chaque année entre 2010 et 2014, selon une nouvelle étude de l'Organisation mondiale de la Santé (OMS) publiée jeudi.

On parle d'avortement non sécurisé lorsqu'une interruption de grossesse est pratiquée soit par une personne qui n'a pas de compétences/d'informations nécessaires ou dans un environnement où les normes minimales médicales ne sont pas appliquées, ou les deux.

« Lorsque les femmes et les filles ne peuvent pas avoir accès à des services de contraception et d'avortement sécurisé, cela entraîne des conséquences graves pour leur propre santé et celle de leur famille. Cela ne devrait pas être le cas », a déclaré dans un communiqué le Dr Bela Ganatra, principal auteur de l'étude et chercheur au Département Santé reproductive et recherche de l'OMS.

« Malgré les récents progrès technologiques et en matière de bases factuelles, beaucoup trop d'avortements non sécurisés sont toujours pratiqués et un nombre trop important de femmes continue de souffrir et de mourir », a déploré le Dr Ganatra.

L'avortement sécurisé dépend du niveau de développement de la région

Réalisée en collaboration avec l'Institut Guttmacher et publiée dans la revue médicale The Lancet, l'étude de l'OMS souligne que 97% de ces avortements non sécurisés ont été pratiqués en Afrique, en Asie et en Amérique latine.

« Des efforts accrus s'imposent, en particulier dans les régions en développement, afin de garantir l'accès à la contraception et à l'avortement sécurisé », a souligné le Dr Ganatra.

L'étude de l'OMS examine également les contextes les plus courants qui entraînent le recours de certaines femmes à des avortements non sécurisés, notamment les lois et les politiques des pays en matière d'avortement, le coût financier de l'accès à des services d'avortement sécurisé, la disponibilité de tels services et de dispensateurs de soins qualifiés ainsi que les attitudes sociales vis-à-vis de l'avortement et de l'égalité des sexes.

Lorsque les avortements sont pratiqués conformément aux lignes directrices et aux normes de l'OMS, le risque de complications graves ou de décès est négligeable. Entre 2010 et 2014, environ 55% de l'ensemble des avortements étaient pratiqués dans des conditions sûres, c'est à dire par des agents de santé qualifiés, utilisant la méthode recommandée par l'OMS et en fonction de la durée de la grossesse.

La plupart des avortements pratiqués en Europe occidentale et du nord sont sécurisés. Les taux d'avortements sont parmi les moins élevés dans ces régions. On constate également dans la plupart des pays de ces régions des lois relativement libérales en matière d'avortement ; des taux élevés de recours à la contraception ; un développement économique ; et l'égalité des sexes; ainsi que des services de santé de haute qualité, soit l'ensemble des facteurs qui contribuent à des avortements sécurisés.

« Comme de nombreuses autres interventions médicales, l'avortement est très sûr lorsqu'il est pratiqué en conformité avec les lignes directrices médicales recommandées et il est important de garder cela à l'esprit », a souligné le Dr Gilda Sedgh, co-auteure de l'étude et chargée de recherche principale à l'Institut Guttmacher.

Afin de prévenir les grossesses non désirées et les avortements non sécurisés, l'OMS estime que les pays doivent élaborer des politiques d'appui et prendre des engagements financiers pour fournir une éducation sexuelle complète ; un large éventail de méthodes contraceptives, y compris la contraception d'urgence; des conseils de planification familiale adéquats; et l'accès à l'avortement sécurisé et légal.

News Tracker: autres dépêches sur la question

Des experts de l'ONU appellent à abroger les lois restrictives sur l'avortement

http://www.un.org/apps/newsFr/storyF.asp?NewsID=40272#.WdWL_7hOKSp


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 019
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 8 Oct - 12:35 (2017)    Sujet du message: KNOWINGLY EXPOSING OTHERS TO HIV WILL NO LONGER BE A FELONY IN CALIFORNIA Répondre en citant

KNOWINGLY EXPOSING OTHERS TO HIV WILL NO LONGER BE A FELONY IN CALIFORNIA

October 8, 2017



Knowingly exposing others to HIV will no longer be a felony in California

Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill Friday that lowers from a felony to a misdemeanor the crime of knowingly exposing a sexual partner to HIV without disclosing the infection. The measure also applies to those who give blood without telling the blood bank that they are HIV-positive. Modern medicine allows those with HIV to live longer lives and nearly eliminates the possibility of transmission, according to state Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Assemblyman Todd Gloria (D-San Diego), authors of the bill. “Today California took a major step toward treating HIV as a public health issue, instead of treating people living with HIV as criminals,” Wiener said in a statement. “HIV should be treated

Read More  : https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/c4afcd12-f3e2-3554-9cf9-799e06659a2d/ss_knowin…



Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 019
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 18 Oct - 02:05 (2017)    Sujet du message: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ANNOUNCES SETTLEMENT IN HHS MANDATE SUITS Répondre en citant

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ANNOUNCES SETTLEMENT IN HHS MANDATE SUITS

All bullshit.
The Archdiocese of Washington, D.C.

On: 10/17/2017By Adelaide Mena , In: Nation


Judge gavel. Photo credit: Digital Storm via wwwshutterstockcom CNA

Washington D.C., Oct 16, 2017 CNA/EWTN News.- A week after issuing new religious freedom guidelines to all administrative agencies in the federal government, the U.S. Department of Justice has settled with more than 70 plaintiffs who had challenged the controversial HHS contraceptive mandate.

The Oct. 13 agreement was reached between the government and the law firm Jones Day, which represented more than 70 clients fighting the mandate. Made public Oct. 16, the agreement states that the plaintiffs would not be forced to provide health insurance coverage for “morally unacceptable” products and procedures, including contraception, sterilization, and abortion-inducing drugs.

“This settlement brings to a conclusion our litigation challenging the Health and Human Services’ mandate obliging our institutions to provide support for morally objectionable activities, as well as a level of assurance as we move into the future,” said Cardinal Donald Wuerl of Washington, D.C. in an Oct. 16 letter to priests of the archdiocese.

The mandate originated with the Obama administration. Issued through the Department of Health and Human Services, it required employers – even those with deeply-held religious objections – to provide and pay for contraceptive, abortifacient and sterilization coverage in their health insurance plans.

-----


CS PHOTO BY JACLYN LIPPELMANN Cardinal Wuerl at center poses with four priests of the Archdiocese of Washington marking their 40th anniversaries this year. At left are Msgr. Michael Wilson, the pastor of Our Lady, Star of the Sea Parish in Solomons; and Father Tesfamariam Baraki, the Catholic chaplain of Howard University Hospital. From the right are Father Raymond O’Brien, a professor at the Columbus School of Law at The Catholic University of America; and Father Michael Kelley, the pastor of St. Martin of Tours Parish in Washington. Not pictured is Father Julio Alvarez-Garcia, a retired priest of the archdiocese also marking his 40th anniversary this year. The priests were ordained in 1975.
The Archdiocese of Washington, D.C., was one of more than 300 plaintiffs who had challenged the mandate, arguing “that the practice of our faith was inextricably tied to the ministries that put that faith into action,” and that as such, they should not be forced to violate their faith to continue their ministries, Wuerl recalled.
http://cathstan.org/Content/Social/Social/Article/Five-priests-of-Archdioce…

Can you trust this Jesuit Cardinal and these priests in Washington, a state who is not part of the USA? Again, the Catholic church playing the good cop. Freedom of religion dosen't exist anymore in America. We are under attack by the same Catholic church under the military laws, in schools were our kids can receive contraception and abortion without the consent of their parents. Were so many peoples are sterilized by GMO, by chemtrails, by vaccine and surely under different medical prescriptions. They can receive money coming from other hands and partners or just make a new taxe to be able to secretly continuing their destruction. Deceive the masses for a better control. 


-----

The archdiocese and six other plaintiffs had argued their position before the Supreme Court in the case Zubik v. Burwell. In 2016, the high court ruled against the government’s requirement that certain employers provide and pay for the morally objectionable services.

“While the Trump Administration’s Executive Order on Religious Liberty and new guidelines and regulations are extremely helpful, the settlement of the Zubik litigation adds a leavening of certainty moving forward,” the cardinal added.

The Department of Justice’s new settlement “removes doubt” and closes these cases challenging the mandate, the cardinal continued. “The settlement adds additional assurances that we will not be subject to enforcement or imposition of similar regulations imposing such morally unacceptable mandates moving forward,” he stated.

On Oct. 6, the Department of Justice revised its guidelines for all government agencies in light of existing religious freedom laws, releasing a set of principles which stated clearly that the government cannot substantially burden religious practices, unless there is a compelling state interest in doing so and those burdens use the least-restrictive means possible.

Thomas Aquinas College, a Catholic college in California and another plaintiff against the HHS mandate also celebrated the protection the settlement brings.

“While we welcomed the broadening of the exemption from the HHS mandate last week by the Trump administration, we have under our agreement today something even better: a permanent exemption from an onerous federal directive – and any similar future directive – that would require us to compromise our fundamental beliefs,” said Thomas Aquinas College president Dr. Michael F. McLean in an Oct. 16 statement.

“This is an extraordinary outcome for Thomas Aquinas College and for the cause of religious freedom.”

In addition to settling the case, the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and the Treasury have also decided to provide partial coverage of the plaintiffs’ attorney fees and costs of the lawsuits.

“This financial concession by the government only reinforces its admission of the burdensome nature of the HHS contraceptive mandate and its violation of the College's free exercise of religion,” stated Thomas Aquinas College General Counsel, Quincy Masteller.

https://www.thebostonpilot.com/article.asp?utm_source=ConstantContact&u…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 019
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 27 Oct - 14:41 (2017)    Sujet du message: AP EXCLUSIVE_ EUTHANASIA CLASH FOR MENTALLY ILL Répondre en citant

 AP EXCLUSIVE_ EUTHANASIA CLASH FOR MENTALLY ILL



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzQau5j4y2w


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 019
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 1 Nov - 03:37 (2017)    Sujet du message: CANADA : UN QUEBEC A L'AVENIR RADIEUX : L'EUTHANASIE POUR TOUS ? Répondre en citant

CANADA : UN QUEBEC A L'AVENIR RADIEUX : L'EUTHANASIE POUR TOUS ?

dimanche 29 octobre 2017

Un texte de Mathieu Bock-Côté qui rejoint notre analyse à la suite de la décision de la Cour suprême du Canada sur le sujet (voir Suicide assisté : décision disproportionnée de la Cour suprême dans ses effets prévisibles et potentiels ?)

Au moment de passer la loi sur le suicide assisté, pompeusement appelée « mourir dans la dignité », ses promoteurs soutenaient fièrement que les critères pour accéder aux « soins de fin de vie » étaient rigoureux et n’allaient pas changer de sitôt. L’euthanasie demeurerait une exception. Il aura fallu très peu de temps pour que cette promesse se dissipe, comme si elle n’avait jamais été faite. Est-ce parce que les promoteurs de l’euthanasie ont menti ? Peut-être. Peut-être est-ce aussi parce que cette loi a sa propre logique et qu’une fois qu’on accepte la possibilité du suicide assisté, on en vient rapidement à le banaliser ?

Banalisation

Quoi qu’il en soit, nous y sommes. On entend désormais de plus en plus de gens en appeler à ouvrir le suicide assisté aux victimes de la maladie d’Alzheimer. Et on doit s’attendre à ce que, dans les années à venir, les catégories candidates au suicide assisté se multiplient. On pourra se faire une idée de l’avenir qui nous est réservé en consultant un dossier sur l’euthanasie aux Pays-Bas, réalisé par Alain Crevier, de l’émission Second regard, à Radio-Canada, paru vendredi dernier sur Internet. On y apprend que, dans ce pays, l’euthanasie a été banalisée à un point tel qu’il s’agit d’une « façon normale de mourir ». On peut même y bénéficier du suicide assisté dans des cas de démence ou même dans des cas graves d’alcoolisme. Le critère déterminant, nous dit Crevier, c’est la souffrance.

L’euthanasie est disponible pour les enfants malades de 12 ans ou plus. Et on se demande si on peut l’étendre aux moins de 12 ans. Il en faudrait moins que cela pour qu’on se dise en plein délire. Pour reprendre les mots du philosophe Christian Saint-Germain, notre civilisation est dans la logique de « l’euthanasie proactive ». Mais rien de tout cela n’est surprenant, en fait. Car à partir du moment où nous transformons le suicide assisté en droit fondamental, on est naturellement amené à en faire le droit capital. L’homme n’est-il pas en droit, dès lors, de quitter ce monde dès qu’il le juge insupportable ? N’est-il pas maître de son destin ? Et puisque la souffrance extrême sur cette terre n’est pas exclusivement physique, puisqu’elle peut être morale, n’en viendrons-nous pas, un jour, à réclamer l’euthanasie sur demande, sans même avoir à nous justifier ? C’est même inévitable. On me répondra que cette proposition n’est pas sur la table. Rien n’interdit pourtant de penser qu’elle le sera dans une quinzaine d’années. Il était bien hasardeux de transformer le suicide en droit social financé par l’État.

Barbarie

Nous subissons une telle révolution des mentalités en ce moment que ce qui semblait inconcevable la veille peut devenir évident le lendemain. Il pourrait bien y avoir demain, au Québec, des cliniques « médicales » où la mort sera vendue comme un service parmi d’autres. On accusera ceux qui afficheront quelques réserves devant ce progrès de manquer de cœur et d’être réactionnaires. Les valeurs se renversent, les repères moraux aussi. Les médecins donnent la mort. Et nous nous croyons privilégiés.

Source : le Journal de Montréal

http://www.pouruneécolelibre.com/2017/10/un-quebec-lavenir-radieux-leuthana…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 019
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 13 Nov - 04:02 (2017)    Sujet du message: SATANIC TEMPLE & PLANNED PARENTHOOD JOIN FORCES - SINS OF THE WORLD (2017) Répondre en citant

SATANIC TEMPLE & PLANNED PARENTHOOD JOIN FORCES - SINS OF THE WORLD (2017)



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTiO8LdkuFA


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 019
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 25 Nov - 01:44 (2017)    Sujet du message: CANADA LEGALIZES EUTHANASIA SO PARENTS CAN KILL DISABLED CHILDREN Répondre en citant

CANADA LEGALIZES EUTHANASIA SO PARENTS CAN KILL DISABLED CHILDREN

Doctors now able to euthanize disabled, sick or dying children under new laws

By: Jay Greenberg |@NeonNettle on 22nd November 2017 @ 1.10pm Canada has just introduced a new law that legalizes euthanasia for parents who want their doctors to kill their sick, disabled or dying children. Euthanasia in Canada has been legal now for just over a year, but pediatricians have reported an "increasing demand" for euthanizing children and infants, something that wasn't previously allowed.

Read more at: http://www.nnettle.com/news/3222-canada-legalizes-euthanasia-so-parents-can…

© Neon Nettle




Read more : https://www.cps.ca/en/documents/position/medical-assistance-in-dying#ref22


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 019
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 2 Déc - 02:00 (2017)    Sujet du message: ACADEMIC : ‘CHILDREN CAUSE GLOBAL WARMING ’ Répondre en citant

ACADEMIC : ‘CHILDREN CAUSE GLOBAL WARMING ’

Wayne Evans

Having children is “morally suspect” because they cause global warming, a US academic has said.

Travis Rieder, of Johns Hopkins University, claims that having a child is “one of the worst things you can do for the environment”.

His comments are strikingly similar to those of prominent feminist Gloria Steinem, who claimed in a speech last year that abortion helps reduce global warming.

‘Murderer’

In a comment piece for NBC news, Rieder implied that having a child is akin to releasing a murderer from prison:
“If I release a murderer from prison, knowing full well that he intends to kill innocent people, then I bear some responsibility for those deaths”.

Something similar is true, I think, when it comes to having children: Once my daughter is an autonomous agent, she will be responsible for her emissions. Twisted Evil But that doesn’t negate my responsibility.”

He added: “Having a child imposes high emissions on the world, while the parents get the benefit. So like with any high-cost luxury, we should limit our indulgence.”

Global warming

Attendees of a Planned Parenthood fundraising event last year were told nothing is more important than abortion and that childbirth causes global warming.
Speaking at the event in Memphis, Tennessee, prominent feminist Gloria Steinem said: “Nothing but nothing is more important than ensuring our fundamental right to reproductive freedom.”

She ridiculed people with pro-life views and claimed that not being able to access abortion is “the single biggest cause of global warming”.

Planned Parenthood is the biggest abortion provider in the United States.

http://www.christian.org.uk/news/academic-children-cause-global-warming/


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 019
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 5 Déc - 01:01 (2017)    Sujet du message: CARING CORRUPTED - THE KILLING NURSES OF THE THIRD REICH Répondre en citant

HISTORY

CARING CORRUPTED - THE KILLING NURSES OF THE THIRD REICH



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rz8ge4aw8Ws


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 29 019
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 5 Déc - 01:17 (2017)    Sujet du message: MODERN DAY GAS CHAMBER : THE SARCO CAPSULE, A DEPOPULATIONSITS DREAM Répondre en citant

MODERN DAY GAS CHAMBER : THE SARCO CAPSULE, A DEPOPULATIONSITS DREAM



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ma6OM5X9n-8

The Sarco Capsule is being touted by depopulationists as a way to efficiently and effortlessly off one’s self.

Learn More: https://christianjournal.net




Revenir en haut
Contenu Sponsorisé






MessagePosté le: Aujourd’hui à 06:26 (2017)    Sujet du message: LES RUSES UTILISÉES PR RÉDUIRE LES POPULATIONS (PARTIE 2)

Revenir en haut
Montrer les messages depuis:   
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> LA RELIGION MONDIALE ET L'ONU : SES VUES ET AGENDA SUR LE TRANSHUMANISME, CLONAGE, AGENDA DE DÉPOPULATION -> LES RUSES UTILISÉES PR RÉDUIRE LES POPULATIONS (PARTIE 2) Toutes les heures sont au format GMT + 2 Heures
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Page 8 sur 8

 
Sauter vers:  

Index | Creer un forum | Forum gratuit d’entraide | Annuaire des forums gratuits | Signaler une violation | Conditions générales d'utilisation
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Traduction par : phpBB-fr.com