LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum


 FAQFAQ   RechercherRechercher   MembresMembres   GroupesGroupes   S’enregistrerS’enregistrer 
 ProfilProfil   Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés   ConnexionConnexion 

AN OTHER 9/11 (2012)???
Aller à la page: 1, 2  >
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> TERREUR SUR LA TERRE/TERROR ON EARTH -> AN OTHER 9 11 (2012) (PARTIE 2)
Sujet précédent :: Sujet suivant  
Auteur Message

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Mar 14 Aoû - 23:38 (2012)    Sujet du message: AN OTHER 9/11 (2012)??? Répondre en citant



VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pn-CfTPFI5E&feature=related

If any of you have any info on this website/clock, please comment below.
Here are the links in the video

Main site:http://www.illuminatiorder.info/

Clock Address: http://www.illuminatiorder.info/ac/thaumaturgy/index.html

EU version: http://academy.illuminatiorder.eu/ 



VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8PIoxWl9qs&list=UU69f1LTNsmZfPuK76S5aqjw&index=1&feature=plcp    

Dernière édition par maria le Sam 11 Mai - 02:15 (2013); édité 2 fois
Revenir en haut

MessagePosté le: Mar 14 Aoû - 23:38 (2012)    Sujet du message: Publicité

PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?
Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Mar 14 Aoû - 23:40 (2012)    Sujet du message: SEPTEMBER 9, 2012 Répondre en citant



OBAMACSI.COM: One potential date for an assassination of U.S. President Barack Obama is September 9, 2012, at the 2012 Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina. Aside from the log of the convention being a bulls-eye with Obama's head in the center of it, the Carolinas have been home to a number of plots involving white men who allegedly wanted to assassinate Obama.
Based on the history of the plots and patsies, it can be assumed that the alleged Obama assassin will be a white male from the South who works or has worked as a police officer or for the U.S. military.

The suspect will likely impersonate law enforcement at Bank of America stadium and target Obama from one of the many upper deck suites.
In 2008, Jerry Blanchard, a Charlotte accountant,

threatened to use a military sniper rifle to kill, kidnap and inflict bodily harm upon then U.S. Sen. Barack Obama. Read More
In 2009, two former Marines named Nicholas Daniel Hanke and Kody Brittingham were arrested for making death threats against their commander-in-chief. Read More

In 2010, Joseph McVey, was being held on a charge of going armed to the terror of the public after personating a police officer at the city's airport after President Obama flew out of town. Police said the suspect was driving a car that was made to look like a law enforcement vehicle with working lights, sirens and police scanner. McVey allegedly stated that he heard the president was in town and wanted to see him. Read More

Also in 2010, Michael Stephen Bowden of Woodruff, S.C., a former police officer and veteran was arrested after he allegedly told a nurse at a Veterans Affairs clinic that he was thinking about killing President Barack Obama. Read More

It is still unclear whether the U.S. government will attempt to resurrect Obama politically in the aftermath of an assassination attempt or assassinate Obama for real, declare martial law, and suspend the U.S. Constitution.



Date: January 17, 2012

USA Today

Abstract: The Democrats have made it official, announcing a new venue for President Obama's nomination acceptance speech and a shorter national convention.

The Democratic National Committee said its convention in Charlotte later this summer will be three days instead of the usual four.

Obama also will formally accept the Democratic nomination on Sept. 6 at North Carolina's Bank of America Stadium, home of pro football's Carolina Panthers. The stadium has seating for more than 73,000 people.

The convention begins the week of Sept. 3, with Labor Day dedicated to celebrating the Carolinas, Virginia and the South at Charlotte Motor Speedway. The convention itself will be held at the Time Warner Cable Arena.

"We wanted to find a way to truly make this convention different than any other in history. We want this convention to be about more than just the pageantry and speeches you see on television. This is about engaging Americans in a meaningful way," party chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz said.

Our original post begins here:

Another big stadium speech for President Obama.

The Charlotte Observer is reporting that Obama will accept the Democratic nomination at Bank of America stadium in downtown Charlotte, the home of the Panthers NFL football team.

The Democratic convention itself will be held at nearby Time Warner Cable Arena in Charlotte.

In 2008, then-Sen. Barack Obama gave his convention address at the pro football stadium in Denver.

This year's acceptance speech will be delivered on Sept. 6.

From the Observer:

The move, which would open the speech to the public, is designed to help mobilize voters in North Carolina, a key swing state. It could also serve as a perk to donors, who could be rewarded with skybox seats.

"I think this would be a great opportunity to have tens of thousands of North Carolinians and others outside of the state to see and participate in the convention process," said Ed Turlington, a party official from Raleigh and a member of the convention's host committee.

Acceptance speeches typically draw the highest TV ratings of any convention. It will be one the best opportunities of the campaign for the president to reach a broad audience, and comes two months to the day before the election.

Last week, Bloomberg News reported that the convention was considering the stadium for Obama's acceptance speech. Quoting sources involved in convention fundraising, Bloomberg said the move would allow officials, struggling to raise money, to sell skyboxes to donors.

Two Democratic sources, who declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the information, said the stadium move is just one change that will be announced this morning. They did not elaborate.

In 2008, Democrats used the Denver speech to recruit volunteers and register voters by giving thousands of free tickets to the public. That year, Obama carried North Carolina by 14,000 votes. Convention and campaign officials have said they plan to work together to keep the state in the president's column.

Officials are trying to raise nearly $37 million under new Democratic Party rules that bar corporate or lobbyists' contributions or donations over $100,000.

They've been offering packages with different levels of incentives, including VIP passes and choice hotel rooms. The stadium could offer more options. The sources said organizers began considering the stadium in early 2011, before fundraising began.

The Republican convention, set to begin Aug. 27 in Tampa, has no similar restrictions on big donors.

However, the choice of Bank of America stadium for the speech may give ammunition to critics of the bank, which received a federal bailout after the 2008 financial crisis and also angered consumers with a proposed, though later dropped, $5 monthly debit-card transaction fee.

"It doesn't matter whose name is on the stadium," one of the party sources said.

"President Obama has a record to run on holding Wall Street accountable, and there will be no doubt which candidate in the race is willing to stand up to Wall Street" (USA Today, 2012).


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Lun 27 Aoû - 02:55 (2012)    Sujet du message: FROM MIN. FARRAKHAN Répondre en citant



Just this year, Min. Farrakhan cheered that whites will soon be a minority in the country they “took,” predicted America’s skyscrapers will crumble, announced that Jesus was a Black Muslim, that blacks should not “breed” with whites, and that President Obama should convert to Islam and that he will be assassinated by the Tea Party.


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Mer 29 Aoû - 14:42 (2012)    Sujet du message: DHS INSIDE SOURCE CLAIMS OBAMA WHITE HOUSE SET TO STAGE MAJOR FALSE FALG, “IT'S GOING HOT” Répondre en citant



August 28, 2012

In a startling article published on the Northeast Intelligence Network, Douglas J. Hagmann is reporting that an inside source from the Department of Homeland Security has revealed to him that a false flag attack, planned by the White House, is set to go hot.

Hagmann, who in the past received widespread attention after a series of articles about DHS prepping for civil war (based on radio interviews he conducted) went ultra viral, is reporting that this same source is now claiming that elements of the Obama White House have given the go signal in regards to an upcoming attack.

“According to my well-placed source within the DHS apparatus, what amounts to a final authorization was reportedly given to DHS directly from the White House. A “go signal” if you will,” wrote Hagmann.

Hagmann then went on to directly quote the apparent well placed source with DHS itself.

“It’s going hot. The plan, or whatever specific operation that was devised, is going hot, being put into motion.

You’ve got to let people know that something is up, approval has been given, and unless somebody stops it, we’re going to have a staged event inside the U.S., and it’s being set up so that it gets real ugly real fast.”

The source then went on to speak about a Tennessee representative who sent out an email with a third hand version of the original DHS prepping for martial law article and how this could have been done on purpose to discredit the information.
“Don’t think for one second that the sudden resurrection of the information, as incorrect as it was by that state rep, was an accident, because it wasn’t.”

“Maybe the rep was played and clueless to the original story, but the way the story was managed after the fact made you look like a fool, like a real nutcase.”

The “DHS Insider” then explained how they originally came across this information which apparently involved a major slip up at the upper levels of homeland security.

The only reason I know about this authorization order, or approval, or whatever you want to call it, is that there was a major slip up at the very upper level of DHS, and I mean the very upper level.”

“Remember the news about sexual harassment, intimidation and all of the garbage that’s gone on between the people Napolitano brought in and promoted due to their ‘lifestyle’ preferences?

These are some sick people, mental rapists and perverts, who she’s brought in to her innermost circle. They make Caligula look like a boy scout, at least with power and sex.

Well, one of those people, close to Napolitano, was involved in a meeting where the concept and approval of a false flag was being discussed.”


“Now you should have an idea of how this slipped out. But they had a quick handle on damage control, given the circumstances behind the disclosure.

Potentially embarrassing circumstances, sexual blackmail” he added.

(You can read the whole DHS insider source article here)

While The Intel Hub obviously cannot independently confirm this information, it does line up and directly correlate with recent events, including large scale ammo purchases, as well as rhetoric in the media openly calling for a false flag to save Obama’s presidency.

In the last three years, the Federal Government, lead by the Department of Homeland Security, has purchased at least 1.4 billion rounds of ammo with at least 750 million rounds of that ammo being hollow point.

The cover used for most of the orders was that the ammo was being used for “training” purchases yet the total amount ordered is well over a billion rounds.

Couple that with bullet proof checkpoints, riot shields, and US Army plans for civil war, and a clear picture emerges.

Many different prominent advisers and corporate media publications have actually indirectly or directly called for a false flag attack to save the now failed Obama presidency.

In 2010, Mark Penn, an influential adviser to former President Bill Clinton, appeared on Chris Matthews Hardball and claimed that:

“President Clinton reconnected through Oklahoma, right? And the president right now seems removed. It wasn’t until that speech that he really clicked with the American public. Obama needs a similar” defining moment.”

Additionally, Robert Shapiro, an actual adviser to President Obama, published an op-ed in the Financial Times that included this stunning statement:
“The bottom line here is that Americans don’t believe in President Obama’s leadership. He has to find some way between now and November of demonstrating that he is a leader who can command confidence and, short of a 9/11 event or an Oklahoma City bombing, I can’t think of how he could do that.”

Although no one knows 100% when or if another false flag attack will actually take place, the fact remains that there is a startling amount of evidence that points towards an attack being directly on the table and a very real possibility.

We can only hope that as the alternative media continues to expose this horrid possibility, enough people wake up to it to make the powers that be pull the attack off the table.


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Mer 29 Aoû - 14:49 (2012)    Sujet du message: US ARMY GUERRILLA FACTION PLANNED TERROR, OBAMA'S ASSASSINATION Répondre en citant


Read Revelation 13:11-18

PICTURES : http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/08/28/killing-former-soldier-and-girlfriend-reveals-alleged-plot-to-kill-president/?test=latestnews#ixzz24sPrriQS

August 28, 2012A group of US soldiers planning to take over their base, blow up targets around the country, wrest control of the government and kill the president – it could be a Hollywood blockbuster, but it’s a developing story in the southern state of Georgia.

­Four US Army soldiers from the Fort Stewart base in southeast Georgia are charged with killing a former comrade and his girlfriend in a bid to prevent the couple from informing on a militia group of which they were all members.

One of the soldiers has agreed to cooperate with the prosecution in exchange for a lesser charge, while the rest are charged with malicious murder, felony murder, criminal gang activity, aggravated assault and using a firearm while committing a felony.

The case’s prosecutors paint a vivid picture of the group’s plans and actions.

Taking over the sprawling Fort Stewart base, bombing a fountain in nearby Savannah, bombing a dam and poisoning the apple crop in Washington State, and, eventually, toppling the US government and killing the president – these were the goals of the group, which called itself F.E.A.R., an acronym for Forever Enduring Always Ready.

“This domestic terrorist organization did not simply plan and talk,” said prosecutor Isabel Pauley. “Prior to the murders in this case, the group took action. Evidence shows the group possessed the knowledge, means and motives to carry out their plans.”

According to the prosecution, the group is the brainchild of one Pvt. Issac Aguigui, who allegedly sought out soldiers who were in trouble or disillusioned.

Members could easily identify each other by distinctive tattoos resembling the anarchy symbol.

Little information is available about the man behind the plan, however. Gossip website Gawker.com identified Aguigui as a page during the 2008 Republican Convention.

Prosecutors say that during a videotaped interview with military investigators, Aguigui called himself “the nicest cold-blooded murderer you will ever meet.”

Aguigui’s pregnant wife died last year – and though he was never charged with her death, prosecutors say the judge finds it “highly suspicious.”

The $500,000 of insurance and benefits Aguigui received after his wife’s death financed the group’s activities. At least $87,000 went towards the purchase of semiautomatic rifles and bomb components. An undisclosed amount was spent on the acquisition of land in Washington State for the group’s use.

While it’s unclear how easy it was to join the group, there seems to have been only one way to leave it.

Former soldier Michael Roark, also a member of the militia, was killed just two days after leaving the Army.

He and girlfriend Tiffany York were killed by other F.E.A.R. members, allegedly on the orders of Aguigui, who called them “loose ends” and believed they would betray others, prosecutors say.

The pair was taken to the woods under the pretense of going to shooting practice, and both were then shot in the head.

The Army seems to have had some knowledge of the gang’s activities, going so far as to charge four soldiers with the slayings of Roark and York in March. But the charges were never acted upon, and were later dropped.

Moreover, Fort Stewart spokesperson Kevin Larson said, “Fort Stewart-Hunter Army Airfield does not have a gang or militia problem.” He added, however, that Army investigators are still working on the case.


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Mer 29 Aoû - 17:15 (2012)    Sujet du message: DHS SOURCE: "IT'S GOING HOT"- OBAMA FALSE FLAG COMING!! Répondre en citant


VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMB2Tl0izdI

  • ‘Reichstag’ event could involve false assassination attempt blamed on “white supremacists
  • Incited racial riots would lead to calls for government “crackdown”
  • Civil unrest would lead to martial law, DHS travel checkpoints, indefinite delay of elections

Washington, DC – The Obama agents, through the DHS and other assorted colluders, are plotting a major ‘Reichstag’ event to generate racial riots and produce the justification for martial law, delaying the November 2012 elections, possibly indefinitely, a DHS whistleblower informed the Canada Free Press on Tuesday.

The ‘Reichstag Event’ would take the form of a staged assassination attempt against Barack Obama, “carefully choreographed” and manufactured by Obama operatives. It would subsequently be blamed on “white supremacists” and used to enrage the black community to rioting and looting, the DHS source warned.

The Obama administration would then use the violence and chaos they created as justification for the imposition of martial law in major urban cities in America, the creation of DHS checkpoints, restriction of travel, and the indefinite delay of the November 2012 elections.

The Reichstag event refers to a fire started during Hitler’s rise to power. The fire allowed him to grab emergency powers and murder his opposition. Historians have long believed that Hitler started the fire himself, while he blamed it on the Communists.

The anonymous whistleblower elaborated on how the Obama administration is using the Occupy movement, labor unions, and other assorted subversive groups to create massive chaos within the nation.

“Using untracked campaign funds, they are paying people to infiltrate the various movements to cause physical destruction of property and disrupt commerce. That began last year, but has increased ten-fold already this year,” the DHS source shared.

“Obama is using some high profile people as pawns to foment the revolution. I heard several times through very credible sources that [Louis] Farrakhan is on the CIA payroll. Other have been named as well, but I’m not prepared to identify them yet. Farrakhan is to coordinate the Blacks and the Muslims to prepare for riots this summer, using any means necessary.”

The recent revelations appeared to complement warnings given by other government insiders, who alleged that Jeremiah Wright, Van Jones, Al Sharpton, and Jesse Jackson were all agent provocateurs whose mission was to inflame racial tensions and spark open conflict in the streets of America.

According to the DHS source, a global economic collapse is coming, which the Obama administration is well aware of. They wish to build a system of global governance from the ashes of the previous financial system. In order for this mission to be completed, the Obama administration needs more time at the helm of power. Their reasons for concern are justified; as recently as May 8, influential political prognosticator Dick Morris predicted a Romney landslide if the election were held today.

The shocking news also seemed to confirm recent actions taken by the DHS, such as their purchase of 450 million rounds of ammunition and their recent BlackHawk helicopters operation in Chicago, which looked frighteningly similar to a civil unrest exercise, but was described as “routine training”.

The concept of a staged assassination attempt against Barack Obama is not new as well and was first voiced by a knowledgeable White House insider known only as “WHI”.

Ulsterman: So what is it? Pull what off?
Insider: A manufactured threat against the President of the United States. Something easily digested by the media and the American public. Not a real threat – something totally of their own making. They will use it if they need to – got no doubt whatsoever about that. Jarrett has approved the idea…and did so a long time ago. There were whispers of it during the 2008 campaign. McCain was so god-awful it never reached a serious consideration…but the plan was discussed. If needed – they were willing to go that route. It would be the ultimate use of the race card in the history of American politics. And…it would likely work if they got away with it.
Ulsterman: They would go that far? Risk something like that?
Insider: You don’t need to ask that question. Not after what we’ve discussed this past year. Not after what I’ve told you has proven out over and over again. So stop asking the fu—ing question. You need to accept the fact…if you haven’t done so yet – you need to accept the fact these people are playing for keeps. I told you – how many times? How many times have I said it? These are not Democrats. These folks are something else entirely. And they are willing to push the country – all of us, right against the fu—ing wall. Hard. I’m pushing back. Others are too. All of this is part of that effort. A small part, but an important one.

As with the Occupy movement, it appears as if the Obama administration executed a test-run of the plot, with a “shot being fired” at the White House. This would lend credibility when they choreographed the attempt for the masses.

As early as August 2011, WHI also predicted race riots coming in the summer of 2012. The use of the Trayvon Martin death and the subsequent incitements to violence by the media, Obama operatives, and useful idiots, followed by the subsequent threats by the NBPP of a coming “race war” appear to have been merely a sign of what’s to come.

Middle-class American citizens were shocked and appalled at the allegations, with many hoping they were not true. Some said they had harbored similar suspicions for quite some time, due to the many anomalies and inaccuracies emanating from the current operatives inhabiting the White House.

The DHS source claimed that campaign funds were being directly used to fund the incitements to violence and rioting that the Obama administration was seeking to spark.

“Using untracked campaign funds, they are paying people to infiltrate the various movements to cause physical destruction of property and disrupt commerce. That began last year, but has increased ten-fold already this year,” stated this source.

“He added that they are using some lower level DHS agents to make the payments under the context of tracking subversives, but they are the unwitting subversives.”

The use of campaign funds, funneled through DHS agents to street-level agitators for the purpose of fomenting violence, would be extremely legally questionable, if not outright illegal, certain legal experts shared.

Intelligence officials said that if the allegations were true, the degree to which extremists had penetrated the upper echelons of the American government, finance, and security structure was unparalleled.

“Let’s just say that we are not taking these accusations lightly,” one official remarked on condition of anonymity. “Certain figures will be placed under a microscope, along with their associates.”

Valerie Jarrett, the shadowy figure always at Obama’s side, has been accused by some of “manipulating” or “controlling’ the President. Just who does she work for? Who does she take orders from?

The possibility that Barack Obama’s operatives, under the direction of Valerie Jarrett, was actively involved in the facilitation of street violence and mob chaos disturbed citizens, with many deeming it unpatriotic, subversive, and possibly seditious.

“Isn’t this why HUAC was created?”, one middle-class citizen angrily questioned. “Congress must re-instate HUAC, hold hearings, and find out if there is any truth to this.”

The intensely close co-ordination of seemingly separate entities confirmed the suspicions of many that communist agents had infiltrated major institutions, organizations, and trade unions, and were working together to sabotage America.

Who is Valerie Jarrett?

“Their apparatus can be seen as a type of octupus, having many tentacles,” one intelligence source confided on condition of anonymity. “Occupy is one tentacle, the unions are another, the Black Panthers are another, the radical black/islamic supremacists(Wright, Farrakhan, Van Jones, Sharpton) are another, DHS and its’ umbrella agencies are another, the mainstream press is another,” the source explained. “These tentacles are all working together, seemingly separate, but eventually they are controlled by the same small group of people. They receive their directives and marching orders and mindlessly execute them.”

The intelligence official predicted that in the very near future, all of the seemingly separate entities would be clearly exposed as working together, co-ordinating their activities together, and driving for the same goal – the destruction of America as a constitutional republic, the destruction of its capitalist system, and the dethroning of the U.S. as a superpower.


Dernière édition par maria le Mer 17 Oct - 17:06 (2012); édité 1 fois
Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Sam 15 Sep - 02:59 (2012)    Sujet du message: GLOBAL JIHAD / CARITAS/SPECIAL OPERATIONS OFFICERS AND NCO'S Répondre en citant

SEPTEMBER 11, 2012


Dernière édition par maria le Ven 2 Nov - 18:01 (2012); édité 3 fois
Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Ven 21 Sep - 16:51 (2012)    Sujet du message: YOUTUBER BREAKS DOWN INNOCENCE OF MUSLIMS FALSE FLAG, MOVIE NAME CHANGES, AND WHO WAS REALLY BEHIND IT Répondre en citant


September 20, 2012

A popular Youtuber offers his opinion on the Muslim false flag video that supposedly lead to the murder of a US Ambassador and caused widespread rioting throughout the world.

All evidence points to the fact that the release of this movie was absolutely a false flag designed to cause chaos and further divide the populace.

VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7os9D-EsFmM#!

From Youtube Video Description:

UPDATE: Glen Beck reported that the Embassy staff were communicating via a gaming forum!
Go to “DarthF3TT” channel on YT and will notice that out of 11 videos, NINE of them are [Gaming Videos] ONE is the Innocence of Muslims and TWO are about the Embassy Killings.
Here is the link!!!http://www.youtube.com/user/DarthF3TT/videos?flow=grid&view=0

UPDATE: Look who created this now deleted page. This url was captured via a Google Cache trying to sell the Christopher Stevens was killed because of the Innocence of Muslim “Film”, look who posted it!
“NPN” NewsPoliticsNow3 http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:xRVFOiiD1MoJ:www.indiego…

Please follow the links in the order in which listed and come to your own conclusions!
The “Original Video” called The Real Life Of Mohammad posted on July 1st 2012 on Sam Bacile’s YT Channel

Movie name changed to “Innocence of Muslims” posted on September 11 2012 by Youtube user NewsPoliticsNow3

Youtube page NewsPoliticsNow sporting a [TM] Trademark to the right of their name

Youtube page NewsPoliticsLeaks appears to be associated with NewsPoliticsNow notice the trademark listed to the right

Trademark search results for NewsPoliticsNow

Trademark results for NewsPoliticsLeaks

Image search for NPN

Image search for NPL

Results for Stanley Inc

It has been brought to my attention that Youtube has shielded everyone’s age within the past 24 hours.

Again, I wanted to thank “TheAntiPC” http://www.youtube.com/user/TheAntiPC for your original video pointing out the facts on how the Muslim Movie was posted months ago, for it is your video, that made me really look into this situation!


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Ven 21 Sep - 16:53 (2012)    Sujet du message: AMERICA AND THE WORLD UNDER ATTACK - END OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH - THE COMING RUIN Répondre en citant


"For whentheyshallsay, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction comethuponthem, as travail upon a womanwithchild; and theyshallnot escape. But ye, brethren, are not in darkness, thatthatdayshouldovertake you as a thief."
1 Thessalonians 5:3-4

"Their tongue is as an arrow shot out; it speaketh deceit: one speaketh peaceably to his neighbourwith his mouth, but in heart he layeth his wait."
Jeremiah 9:8
King James Version (KJV)

What's taking place right now :


And UN will confirm the "Ecclesia in Medio Oriente" http://www.zenit.org/article-35546?l=english . The Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortion "Ecclesia in Medio Oriente" is the document suposely elaborated by Benedict XVI. Read it, you'll understand what's really taking place by the Catholic Church to take over the world and his close unity with Islam. A Papal decree was sign on that day.

Inquisition - Persecution : the Pope issues a heartfelt appeal to all the religious leaders of the Middle East to endeavour, by their example and their teaching, to do everything possible to uproot this threat which indiscriminately and fatally affects believers of all religions.

You will find more...


“We are living through a period of unease. We are also seeing incidents of intolerance and hatred that are then exploited by others. Voices of moderation and calm need to make themselves heard at this time. We all need to speak up in favour of mutual respect and understanding of the values and beliefs of others,” Mr. Ban said. “The United Nations must rise to the moment.”

The United Nations General Assembly, 67th session
18 September 2012
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=42927&Cr=general assembly&…









United Nations Secretary-General Ban ki-Moon's message for the International Day of Peace, on the 21st September, 2012.






Do you still believe that the video and the picture in that newspaper were not part of a the scenario to wake up the brainwash muslim communities all around the world and all these attacks against the embassies? Don't you see the game they're playing all together to push this barbaric Jihad to take over the world, in the name of God? And soon, they'll try to conquer Jerusalem for the Pope.

Sept. 20, 2012

Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Ven 21 Sep - 18:04 (2012)    Sujet du message: AN OTHER 9/11 (2012)??? Répondre en citant



VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDvt7OT4UcE&list=UUIBsFaYvoOEDR2_AJoOfL_w&index=1&feature=plcp

Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Sam 22 Sep - 01:56 (2012)    Sujet du message: OBAMA TO EMBASSIES: ‘YOU'RE ON YOUR OWN!’ Répondre en citant


September 16, 2012, 4:13 pm By Sher Zieve

Apparently Obama has decided to give up on US Embassies in foreign countries that are ruled by the Islamic hordes. ..aka “Obama’s people.” Sudan has rejected Obama’s and his administration’s begging to allow the US Marines into that country to protect the US Embassy there. Therefore, instead of demanding it, Obama has told the staff there to get out if they can and essentially said “Your own you own” while he continues to party with Beyoncé, Jay-Z and other celebs.

It has also come out in the last couple of days that there was little-to-no security protecting the US Embassy in Libya and consisted of virtually if not literally locking the doors! This information did NOT come from the “protect-Obama-at-all-costs-and don’t-report-the-truth-even-if-it-destroys-the-USA” American media.

Instead it came from the liberal UK Telegraph. From the article “US consulate attack in Libya: security lapses disclosed” the Telegraph opens with: “The comparative lack of security at the US consulate in Benghazi was disclosed as officials admitted that it was only an “interim facility” with no bullet proof glass, reinforced doors or marine guard.” This is criminal! US Marines had to be flown in from Tripoli and by the time they arrived…well, we know what had happened by then. The US Ambassador and three members of his staff had been tortured and then murdered.

All of this is due to the Obama “policy of American weakness“…a policy that has directly led to–as if planned because no president of the USA could really be that stupid…right?–the current burning, pillaging and assassinations of US Embassy personnel in an exponentially growing number of countries. These US Embassies have not been well protected by Barack Hussein Obama and, even now, he is still trying to ignore the problem. That is why an increasing hue and cry is rising up amongst even Democrats that something doesn’t pass the smell test with Obama’s lack of handling any of these catastrophes in any rational manner. Even leftist columnist and FNC Commentator Kirsten Powers said this morning on Fox News that the film had nothing to do with the conflagration in the Middle East.

Is Obama allowing this to happen and continue, so that people will turn their attention to these crises (which he will blame on Bush when he can no longer sell the blame as the fault of the scapegoat film) instead of his policies which are–intentionally–destroying our country? Logically, it would appear to be so.

Again, the obscure anti-Muhammad film had nothing–whatsoever–to do with anything. In fact, conflicting reports say the film (that few to none have seen) had been out for 2 months to over a year. These riots were and are not spontaneous. They were and are still being planned. The initial Libyan attack was reported as a 2-part militant assault–an assault that included well-armed (with RPGs) and trained assault personnel.

No. It was not about any film. It was and is, however, about the Obama syndicate’s lack of any viable foreign policies and Obama’s handling of this huge explosive crisis…a crisis that he does not seem to want to stop anytime soon. In the meantime, folks, Dictator Obama seems to be washing his hands of the entire problem…or leaving it to his flunkies to sort out for him.

After all, a Dictator, King or Emperor shouldn’t have to be bothered with those petty peasants below him. That would be beneath his dignity. And, it has announced today on FNC that Iran will have full nuke capability within the next few months. With Obama at the helm…we are doomed.

If we are to survive at all, Obama has now let us know that we will have to place someone other than “his nibs” into the office of the Presidency of the United States. I suggest that we agree with him and do it.

It is time for us all to stop believing the Obama lies.
And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie”
–2 Thessalonians 2:10-11


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Lun 24 Sep - 16:40 (2012)    Sujet du message: SURPRISED ? IM NOT! MUSLIM FILM MAKER A FEDERAL INFORMANT! Répondre en citant


VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPNgv-gnN7Q


Published: 17 September, 2012, 20:41
Edited: 18 September, 2012, 12:28

Nakoula Basseley Nakoula (2nd R) is escorted out of his home by Los Angeles County Sheriff's officers in Cerritos, California.(Reuters / Bret Hartman)
  Much remains unanswered about the US-made film that sparked riots across the Arab World, but more is unraveling by the day regarding the movie’s producer. Now it’s reported that the man behind 'Innocence of Muslims' was once a federal informant.

In the wake of a serious of violent outbursts that have targeted American facilities abroad and left at least 40 dead including one US ambassador, authorities and media outlets in the United States continue to comb through information about the film that’s considered the catalyst in the attacks, an anti-Islam flick branded overseas under the name ‘Innocence of Muslims.’ Less than a week after four Americans were killed at a US consulate in Benghazi, it’s now being revealed that the film’s producer, Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, worked for the feds.

A court transcript obtained by the Smoking Gun shows that, as recently as 2010, Mr. Nakoula was identified as a federal informant, a title that his attorneys hoped would help in his case when he went before sentencing that year over an earlier conviction for check fraud.

According to the transcripts, attorneys for Mr. Nakoula pleaded for leniency when their client was sentenced in June 2010, arguing that “cooperation” with prosecutors in a separate case should be taken into consideration. Authorities had hoped that Nakoula would provide them with an direct link to Eiad Salameh, the mastermind of a check kiting scheme described in court papers as “a notorious fraudster who has been tracked for more than a decade by state and federal investigators.”

On his own part, Nakoula pleaded that he had agreed to assist the government in order to reverse his wrongdoing.

“I would like to start that I’m sorry for what happened,” Nakoula told a judge, the transcript reveals. “Now I know that it was wrong. Therefore, I decided to cooperate with the government to retrieve some of these mistakes or damage happened. I want to cooperate with the government so that they can catch with this other criminals who is their involvement.”

That wasn’t Nakoula’s first run-in with the law, and might not be his last either. Authorities are currently investigating his role with ‘Innocence of Muslims,’ which has since been tied to an array of mob assaults in the Muslim World. Before his conviction for check fraud, though, he was charged with “intent to manufacture phencyclidine,” or PCP, back in 1997 after he was caught with dozens of boxes of pharmaceuticals and $45,000 in cash.


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Dim 28 Oct - 00:34 (2012)    Sujet du message: BENGHAZI: ARREST OBAMA NOW!! Répondre en citant


VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FK2JGMgpWMM

Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Lun 29 Oct - 02:43 (2012)    Sujet du message: WHITE HOUSE INSIDER: EMERGENCY ALL CALL AT OBAMA WHITE HOUSE Répondre en citant


by Ulsterman on October 26, 2012 with 104 Comments in News

This brief update just came from Insider:

Got word an all-call went out at the WH A.M. today.

That means they are doing what’s called “huddling”. Has to be related to the Benghazi news now hitting. Have good source in Chicago saying their office is acting very odd today as well. Can’t say if this will break out all the way now, but we are getting very close to an all out WH red alert scenario. Not there yet but very close.

Significant activity from Ruemmler’s office over the last 24.

In this situation there will likely be 1 of 2 responses from WH.

-Highly controlled briefing response. Attempt explanation, then hope story gets buried over weekend and race to election day.

-Announced resignation of someone inside administration. President apologizes for mistakes by some in his administration. That deal could be under negotiation at this very moment.

Read more in News
« WALL STREET INSIDER: “There is power and there is POWER”
Media and Obama White House Continue Benghazi Deflection – For Now »

Second scenario not as likely. Not yet. But the Ruemmler activity makes me believe there’s more damaging information out there to the administration on Benghazi than has already come out today. They are trying to assess what will and will not get out to determine response. To have a potential scandal of this magnitude so close to an election is unprecedented. Priority for them will be to insulate the president. Got to try and cut that off. Get someone inside go public and point the finger at Obama.

Now I do what I do best.


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Mar 30 Oct - 20:31 (2012)    Sujet du message: HAUTE TRAHISON À BENGHAZI Répondre en citant


octobre 29th, 2012

Chaque jour qui passe apporte de nouvelles informations concernant l’attaque terroriste contre le consulat américain de Benghazi. Chaque nouvelle information est plus répugnante que la précédente.

On sait aujourd’hui non seulement que des demandes de moyens de sécurité supplémentaires ont été adressées pendant des mois au Département d’Etat et au Secrétariat à la Défense par l’ambassadeur Stevens, demandes qui n’ont jamais été suivies d’effet, mais on sait qu’au moment même de l’attaque, des emails ont été envoyés en nombre au Département d’Etat et à la Maison Blanche demandant des secours et énonçant explicitement qu’il s’agissait d’une attaque terroriste. Ce qui signifie que les plus hautes instances de décision de l’administration Obama ont su, dès le moment de l’attaque, que celle-ci avait lieu et qu’elle était de nature terroriste.

On sait aussi que des appels téléphoniques ont été passés par deux des quatre personnes tuées à Benghazi pour demander des secours. Ces appels se sont heurtés à des fins de non recevoir.

On sait que ces deux personnes ne se trouvaient pas dans le consulat mais dans un autre bâtiment américain à Benghazi, et ont déclaré leur volonté d’agir pour porter secours à l’ambassadeur Stevens. Ordre leur a été donné de ne rien faire : par qui ? La question reste en suspens pour l’heure, et la réponse n’est pas apportée, mais il faut monter très haut dans la hiérarchie pour espérer la trouver.

Ces deux personnes ont désobéi aux ordres qui leur avaient été donnés et entre la désobéissance à des ordres honteux et l’honneur, ils ont choisi l’honneur, et sont morts, les armes à la main, incarnant ce qu’il y a de plus noble dans les valeurs américaines.

On sait maintenant qu’un drone pourvu de caméras et une connexion aux caméras de surveillance du consulat ont permis d’observer en direct ce qui se passait, et d’entendre cris et vociférations. Et on sait que les images ont été vues et les sons écoutés au Département d’Etat, à la CIA, à la NSA et dans le bureau ovale de la Maison blanche.

On a donc, au plus haut niveau de l’administration Obama vu et entendu l’attaque. Et aucune décision d’action n’a été prise.

Il y avait des unités militaires américaines à Tripoli, et elles pouvaient être à Benghazi en moins d’une heure. Il y avait des unités militaires américains sur une base de l’OTAN en Sicile, et elles pouvaient elles aussi être à Benghazi en une heure, peut-être moins.

Il est bien davantage qu’improbable que Barack Obama n’ait pas été au courant. Il est aussi bien davantage qu’improbable qu’il ait été étranger aux ordres donnés.

Donc : le Département d’Etat et la Secrétaire d’Etat Hillary Clinton, le Secrétariat à la Défense et le Secrétaire à la Défense Leon Panetta, le directeur de la CIA, le général Petraeus, Barack Obama lui-même, ont su dès le 11 septembre au soir qu’il s’agissait d’une attaque terroriste.

Ils sont restés sourds aux appels au secours. Ils ont donné des ordres de non intervention. Ils ont assisté à l’assassinat de quatre personnes dont l’ambassadeur Stevens par des terroristes islamiques, en spectateurs.

Barack Obama n’a sans doute pas suivi le spectacle jusqu’au bout, ou il a suivi la suite à bord de l’avion présidentiel, puisqu’il est parti le soir même pour Las Vegas. La mort de quatre citoyens américains sous ses yeux et dans le cadre de non assistance à personnes en danger ne l’a pas empêché de continuer sa campagne et ne lui a pas fait perdre son sourire ni le goût pour des émissions comiques.

Quand les corps des assassinés ont été ramenés aux Etats-Unis, ni Hillary Clinton ni Barack Obama n’ont parlé d’attaque terroriste et ils se sont contentés de paroles générales. Leur attitude vis-à-vis des familles des assassinés a été froide et distante, de l’aveu même des membres de ces familles.

Dans les jours qui ont suivi et pendant deux semaines, toute l’administration Obama a parlé d’une attaque spontanée due à une video de treize minutes et ont incriminé la liberté de parole existant aux Etats-Unis, allant même jusqu’à acheter des espaces publicitaires à diverses chaînes de télévision de pays musulmans pour présenter leurs excuses.

Obama a osé incriminer la video lors d’un discours devant l’Assemblée générale des Nations Unies.

Il a fallu que des documents confidentiels soient transmis aux médias montrant qu’il s’agissait d’une attaque terroriste pour que l’administration Obama reconnaisse qu’il s’agissait bien d’une attaque terroriste. Une Commission d’enquête a été mise en place à la Chambre des représentants, une autre va se mettre en place au Sénat : les témoignages ont commencé, et ils sont accablants pour l’administration Obama.

Il y a quelques jours, on pouvait encore parler d’une opération concertée de dissimulation des faits et de mensonge devant le peuple américain et devant le monde, ce qui était en soi, déjà , très grave, bien plus grave que le Watergate, comme je l’ai déjà écrit.

On est maintenant bien au delà d’une opération de ce genre. Quatre hommes ont été assassinés dans un cadre où la décision de ne pas leur porter secours a été prise. Une décision de ce genre relève de la complicité d’assassinat.

Plusieurs personnes, au plus haut niveau de l’administration Obama, se sont rendues coupables de complicité d’assassinat tout en étant spectatrice de l’assassinat.

Je ne pensais pas que j’assisterais un jour à pareille insanité. Je croyais avoir tout vu de la part d’Obama et de l’administration Obama, mais là, je suis sans voix.

Un commentateur disait récemment qu’Obama devrait démissionner et renoncer à se présenter aux suffrages de ses concitoyens. Ce serait la seule attitude digne. Mais Obama n’est pas un homme digne.

Si, comme je l’espère, il est battu le 6 novembre, je pense que l’affaire ne devrait pas en rester là, et je pense que l’enquête devrait se poursuivre. Plusieurs membres de l’administration Obama, jusqu’au plus haut niveau, devraient avoir à répondre de leurs actes devant la justice.

Je ne peux concevoir qu’Obama puisse être réélu, et le fait qu’il puisse encore l’être montre qu’il y a aujourd’hui quelque chose de pourri dans un pays que j’aime pourtant plus que tout. La pourriture est au sein de l’administration Obama : c’était flagrant avant. Cela l’est encore davantage aujourd’hui. La pourriture est au sein des grands médias américains qui essaient de parler aussi peu que possible de tout cela : la déontologie journalistique semble préoccuper peu de journalistes des grands médias américains aujourd’hui.

Si Obama est réélu, un congrès républicain, et si les Républicains emportaient une courte majorité au Sénat, ce qui reste possible, devrait demander l’empêchement de Barack Obama. Une procédure d’empêchement peut être déclenchée pour bien moins que tout cela.

D’autres détails sont susceptibles d’émerger : il semblerait que le consulat de Benghazi servait à des transactions de fourniture d’armes par l’administration Obama à des groupes djihadistes liés à al Qaida et agissant en Libye, en Syrie et ailleurs. L’hypothèse d’une transaction entre des chefs dihadistes et l’ambassadeur Stevens qui aurait mal tourné circule. Cette hypothèse semble fondée, mais j’attends d’en savoir davantage pour en parler plus précisément.

Le New York Times, qui n’est pas un journal hostile à Obama, a publié récemment des articles évoquant la transmission d’armes américaines à al Qaida en Syrie.

Je suis sans voix, disais-je plus haut. J’ai la nette impression d’être face à un cas de haute trahison. La haute trahison vient de la Maison Blanche. Elle implique désormais l’ensemble des plus hautes sphères de l’administration Obama. C’est sans précédent.

Parce que j’aime les Etats-Unis, je souhaite plus que jamais qu’une administration digne de ce nom arrive aux affaires le plus vite possible.

Je souhaite que tout soit élucidé, et si le nom de Barack Obama devient alors synonyme d’infamie, je pense que ce sera amplement mérité.

J’espère qu’un hommage plus net sera rendu aux assassinés de Benghazi. L’ambassadeur Stevens, quelle qu’ait été sa mission, était ambassadeur des Etats-Unis. Les trois autres assassinés servaient leur pays. Ils ont été abandonnés de manière lâche. Ils se sont battus pendant sept heures contre des assaillants mieux armés et supérieurs en nombre. Ce sont des héros, des hommes qui appartenaient à l’Amérique que j’aime et qui incarnaient ce que j’aime en Amérique, et qu’Obama foule aux pieds chaque jour. Qu’ils reposent en paix. Tyrone Woods et Glen Doherty sont les deux hommes qui ont désobéi et choisi l’honneur. Sean Smith était le troisième homme, et il s’est battu avec courage lui aussi. Chris Stevens servait son pays.

Je l’écris avec tristesse et révolte : je ne peux en dire autant de Barack Obama.

Je n’ai, à ce jour, pas vu un seul élément de cette affaire évoqué dans les médias français. Un seul article l’évoque : il est publié sur le site de l’Express et vient du magazine en ligne américain de gauche Slate. L’article laisse de côté 99,9% de l’affaire.

© Guy Millière pour www.Dreuz.info

PS Il s’avère que Tyrone Woods et Glen Doherty travaillaient pour la CIA. L’ordre de ne rien faire qui leur a été donné n’a pas été donné par le général Petraeus, qui vient de faire savoir que personne à la CIA n’avait donné d’ordre de ce genre. La CIA ne dépendant ni du Département d’Etat ni du Secrétariat à la Défense, il reste une seule personne susceptible d’avoir donné cet ordre, Barack Obama lui-même. Et il reste une seule personne ayant pu, en ce contexte, donner ensuite un ordre de non intervention : Barack Obama lui-même. Cette déduction est aujourd’hui celle de Roger Simon de pjmedia (pjmedia.com/), et celle de Bill Kristol du Weekly Standard (weeklystandard.com).

Des gens demandant des références, j’en donne ici quelques unes de plus (liste non exhaustive) :



Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Mer 31 Oct - 16:45 (2012)    Sujet du message: 9NEWS QUESTIONS PRESIDENT OBAMA ON LIBYA ATTACK Répondre en citant


5:18 PM, Oct 27, 2012

Written by Kyle Clark

VIDEO : http://www.9news.com/video/default.aspx?bctid=1927193023001

KUSA - President Barack Obama would not directly address questions from 9NEWS on whether Americans under attack in Libya were denied requests for assistance during the September 11th terror attack. 

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Friday that the military did not send immediate help to the consulate in Benghazi because commanders lacked enough information about the ongoing attack to put troops in harm's way.

President Obama discussed the situation in Libya during a satellite interview Friday afternoon with 9NEWS reporter Kyle Clark, who also asked if it's fair for Americans to be told to wait until after the election to learn what truly happened in Libya.

"The election has nothing to do with four brave Americans getting killed and us wanting to find out exactly what happened," President Obama said. "Nobody wants to find out more what happened than I do."

President Obama was directly asked twice whether pleas for help on the ground in Libya were denied during the attack. Both times, he repeated his standard call for a thorough investigation.

The President was also asked about the loss of tens of millions of taxpayer dollars in the failure of Abound Solar, a Fort Collins company connected to one of the President's billionaire fundraisers.

"These loans that are given out by the Department of Energy for clean energy have created jobs all across the country," President Obama said. "Some of them have failed but the vast majority of them are pushing us forward into a clean energy direction."

"These are decisions, by the way, that are made by the Department of Energy, they have nothing to do with politics," President Obama said.

President Obama was asked, in light of his calls for increased civility in politics, why he recently called Governor Mitt Romney a "bullsh-----" in an interview appearing in Rolling Stone magazine.

"This was a conversation after an interview in a casual conversation with a reporter," President Obama said. "A major issue in any election is can you count on the person that you're putting into the Oval Office?"

Related Story: Romney campaign pressed on tax plan

Excerpts of the full interview appear below:

KYLE CLARK: Were the Americans under attack at the consulate in Benghazi Libya denied requests for help during that attack? And is it fair to tell Americans that what happened is under investigation and we'll all find out after the election?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, the election has nothing to do with four brave Americans getting killed and us wanting to find out exactly what happened. These are folks who served under me who I had sent to some very dangerous places. Nobody wants to find out more what happened than I do. But we want to make sure we get it right, particularly because I have made a commitment to the families impacted as well as to the American people, we're going to bring those folks to justice. So, we're going to gather all the facts, find out exactly what happened, and make sure that it doesn't happen again but we're also going to make sure that we bring to justice those who carried out these attacks.

KYLE CLARK: Were they denied requests for help during the attack?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, we are finding out exactly what happened. I can tell you, as I've said over the last couple
of months since this happened, the minute I found out what was happening, I gave three very clear directives. Number one, make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to. Number two, we're going to investigate exactly what happened so that it doesn't happen again. Number three, find out who did this so we can bring them to justice. And I guarantee you that everyone in the state department, our military, the CIA, you name it, had number one priority making sure that people were safe. These were our folks and we're going to find out exactly what happened, but what we're also going to do it make sure that we are identifying those who carried out these terrible attacks.

KYLE CLARK: In a national address, you touted the stimulus money going to Abound Solar - a Colorado company connected to one of your billionaire fundraisers. Now, as you may know, Abound Solar is out of business and under criminal investigation. The jobs are gone and taxpayers are out about 60 million dollars. How do you answer critics who see Abound Solar as Colorado's Solyndra - a politically connected clean energy company that went under and took our money with it?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: (Laughs) Well, Kyle, I think that if you look at our record that these loans that are given out by the Department of Energy for clean energy have created jobs all across the country and only about four percent of these loans were going to some very cutting-edge industries that are going to allow us to figure out how to produce energy in a clean, renewable way in the future and create jobs in Colorado and all around the country. And some of them have failed but the vast majority of them are pushing us forward into a clean energy direction. And that's good for Colorado and good for the country. And these are decisions, by the way, that are made by the Department of Energy, they have nothing to do with politics.


KYLE CLARK: Mr. President, you've called for more civility in our nation's political conversation - and much has obviously been made about the tone of this race. In a recent interview with Rolling Stone, you called Governor Romney a "bullshitter." What did you mean and why did you choose that word?
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You know, this was a conversation after an interview, a casual conversation with a reporter. The basic point that I've been talking about throughout this campaign, is people know what I mean and they know that I mean what I say and what I care about, who I'm fighting for and you know a major issue in any election is can you count on the person you're putting into the Oval Office fighting for you having a clear set of convictions that they believe in.



Dernière édition par maria le Jeu 1 Nov - 02:57 (2012); édité 1 fois
Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Mer 31 Oct - 23:00 (2012)    Sujet du message: BENGHAZI-GATE: POST THREADS HERE FOR CROSS REFERENCE Répondre en citant


various | various | various

Posted on 13 octobre 2012 14:06:57 by nanetteclaret

This thread is to consolidate all information on the Benghazi fiasco.

TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 20120911; africa; ambassadorstephens; aq; aqim; benghazi; benghaziattacks; benghazicoverup; benghazigate; benghazisecurity; bluemountain; cia; coverup; feb17th; february17; gwot; hillary; impeachnow; jchristopherstephans; jchristopherstevens; libya; northafrica; obama; qumu; shadowwars; statedepartment; stephans; stevens; threatmatrix; treason; vanity; waronterror

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-61 nextlast

Please post a short paragraph with link to thread or article. The primary goal is to have all info in one thread for future reference and then secondly to conntect the dots.

1posted on 13 octobre 2012 14:07:06by nanetteclaret

[Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigersEye; CyberAnt; Paul R.; annieokie; randita; maggief; RummyChick; combat_boots; ...

Starting with the Live Thread on Congressional Hearings, 10 October 2012:

2posted on 13 octobre 2012 14:09:24by nanetteclaret(Unreconstructed Catholic Texan)

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Col. Hunt on the Newest Libyan Revelations (huge coverup!)
see Post #14:
“For six hours the entire military, intelligence, diplomatic and civil command structure of the United States government watched, in real time, as our consulate in Benghazi was under attack, while our ambassador and his hobbled security died.
That command structure did nothing. Afterward, they lied outright to cover-up their own culpability for political reasons. An intelligence failure, under the circumstances, was impossible.”

3posted on 13 octobre 2012 14:10:36by nanetteclaret(Unreconstructed Catholic Texan)

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret

Afterward, they lied outright to cover-up their own culpability for political reasons.
And most democRat voters don't care, and will vote for the anti-American, lying traitors.
Why this race is close still amazes me. People voting for free stuff instead of freedom.

4posted on 13 octobre 2012 14:25:00by FatherofFive(Islam is evil and must be eradicated)

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret

Benghazi Worse than Watergate
For over forty years now, the Watergate scandal — the June 1972 break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters and the subsequent cover-up by the Nixon administration — has been the sine qua non of American political malfeasance. It has been followed by myriad other “gates” affecting both parties but has never been superseded.
Until now.
Benghazi or Benghazigate, as some call it, is worse. Far worse. Incomparably worse....
(Pat Caddell & Kirsten Powers agree)

5posted on 13 octobre 2012 14:26:31by jazusamo("Intellect is not wisdom" -- Thomas Sowell)

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret

Great thread from last night with a lot of links and theories:

6posted on 13 octobre 2012 14:26:36by Sleeping Freeper

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Freeper

Great title: “Let the Leaks Begin.”

7posted on 13 octobre 2012 14:29:20by nanetteclaret(Unreconstructed Catholic Texan)

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret

Hearings- A few tidbits that may connect the dots:
-Withdrawl of security and support right before attack
-Funding/Money for security was not an issue
-SAMs are a part of the story
-The blind sheik is part of the story
-”Intellegence Community” and “State Department” are different entities
-Patrick Kennedy reports to HRC and appeared evasive
-Lamb was forced under oath to say that decisions about security at the site were made above her level, a job she normally handled.

8posted on 13 octobre 2012 14:35:20by Sleeping Freeper

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Freeper

Another exceptional thread with a lot of links from other sources. This one ties a lot of things together.

9posted on 13 octobre 2012 14:41:10by Sleeping Freeper

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret

Libyan president: ‘No doubt’ attack ‘preplanned’
Thread with many more links.

10posted on 13 octobre 2012 14:49:30by jazusamo("Intellect is not wisdom" -- Thomas Sowell)

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret

read later

11posted on 13 octobre 2012 14:50:28by shooter223(the government should fear the citizens......not the other way around)

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret

Benghazi Timeline - Fox News Special Report with Bret Baier, October 10, 2012.

12posted on 13 octobre 2012 14:53:16by Fitzy_888("ownership society")

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret

Report: Obama misses Over Half His Security Briefings
I think this is of key importance as the WH keeps saying they didn't know of these threats and need for increased security. This came out 1 day prior to the attacks and then fell by the wayside.

13posted on 13 octobre 2012 14:54:09by EBH(0bama is guilty of willful neglect of duty.)

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret

Report: Obama misses Over Half His Security Briefings
I think this is of key importance, as the WH keeps saying they didn't know of these threats and need for increased security. This came out 1 day prior to the attacks and then fell by the wayside.

14posted on 13 octobre 2012 14:54:36by EBH(0bama is guilty of willful neglect of duty.)

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret

Likewise, National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor fired back the following response to Politico via email:
“The President is among the most sophisticated consumers of intelligence on the planet,” National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor wrote in an e-mail. “He receives and reads his [Presidential Daily Brief] every day, and most days when he’s at the White House receives a briefing in person. When necessary he probes the arguments, requests more information or seeks alternate analysis. Sometimes that’s via a written assessment and other times it’s in person.”

15posted on 13 octobre 2012 14:56:17by EBH(0bama is guilty of willful neglect of duty.)

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret

Just days before the Libya attack
White House disputes report on intel briefs
Carney made a direct comparison between Obama’s administration and the one Thiessen worked for. “I believe if you compare our foreign policy record with the one … that proceeded this one, we’re comfortable with that comparison,” he said at the White House’s daily press briefing. “This president is very much steeped in the details of national security issues.” Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0912/80992.html#ixzz29CtOaWIr

16posted on 13 octobre 2012 15:00:12by EBH(0bama is guilty of willful neglect of duty.)

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret

Great idea bookmark.

17posted on 13 octobre 2012 15:00:26by Jane Long(Soli Deo Gloria!)

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret

I did not know this:
“... Susan Rice married Ian Cameron on September 12, 1992 in Washington, DC; the two met while at Stanford. Cameron is executive producer of ABC News’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos.” The couple have two young children....”
(Putting it here for the record)

18posted on 13 octobre 2012 15:09:35by Protect the Bill of Rights

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret

Timeline as of 10/10/12:
Lies From Libya - TheBlaze


19posted on 13 octobre 2012 15:18:41by Fitzy_888("ownership society")

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret

I listened to this interview. This information has not been picked up anywhere. How could there not have been real-time communication from the outset of the attack? Yet no assets were dispatched to rescue our people.

20posted on 13 octobre 2012 15:20:58by Excellence(9/11 was an act of faith.)

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret

I just listened to the Howie Carr interview with Col. Hunt. If we had a responsible press winning reelection would not even be an issue for the Obama-ites. They would just be trying to figure out how to stay out of jail.

21posted on 13 octobre 2012 15:25:04by Homer_J_Simpson("Every nation has the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret

Reuters – Tue, 9 Oct, 2012, Excerpt:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. security officer twice asked his State Department superiors for more security agents for the American mission in Benghazi months before an attack that killed the U.S. ambassador to Libya and three other Americans, but he got no response.
The officer, Eric Nordstrom, who was based in Tripoli until about two months before the September attack, said a State Department official, Charlene Lamb, wanted to keep the number of U.S. security personnel in Benghazi “artificially low,” according to a memo summarizing his comments to a congressional committee that was obtained by Reuters.
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told a conference in Florida on Tuesday that there was no advanced warning about the Libya attack.
He scoffed at media portrayals of him as “hapless and hopeless” for acknowledging on September 28 a shift in the intelligence assessment of the Benghazi assault, calling it a deliberate terrorist attack instead of an event stemming from spontaneous protest, as initially thought.
Clapper suggested it was unrealistic for anyone to expect the U.S. intelligence community to have a “a God’s eye, God’s ear certitude” right after an attack like the one in Libya.
Link: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2942469/posts

22posted on 13 octobre 2012 15:42:21by Fitzy_888("ownership society")


Dernière édition par maria le Jeu 1 Nov - 03:01 (2012); édité 1 fois
Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Mer 31 Oct - 23:06 (2012)    Sujet du message: RELEASE: FACEBOOK CENSORS THE SEALs Répondre en citant


October 30, 2012

Contact: Alex Rosenwald
Phone: 202.558.6640

Facebook Censors the SEALs

Facebook squelches free speech to protect Obama from Benghazi-gate

Today, the founders of Special Operations Speaks PAC – an organization founded by Special Operations veterans dedicated to protecting our forces at home and abroad – released the following statement after Facebook twice censored their meme criticizing President Obama for refusing to save the lives of former Navy SEALS in Benghazi. The meme simply stated, “When Obama called the SEALs, they got bin Laden. When the SEALs called Obama, they got denied.” The meme spread virally throughout Facebook’s network and within in 24 hours almost 30,000 people shared and hundreds of thousands viewed the meme.

The meme was taken down for an unspecified violation of Facebook’s terms of Rights and Responsibilities.

“It looks like Obama’s liberal followers in Facebook HQ are terrified of how damaging the Benghazi scandal is for the President. We understand that Facebook can run their site however they’d like, but when they’re trying to quietly squelch opposition to what is a clear leadership failure that resulted in the tragic deaths of some of our nation’s heroes, they deserve the to be called out on it,” said Larry Bailey, CAPT (SEAL), USN (Ret).

“We are paying advertisers on Facebook. It is outrageous that Mark Zuckerburg, founder of Facebook, who worked to elect Obama in 2008, would sell out patriots who made the ultimate sacrifice – all to serve the political ambitions of the man who let them die.”

“Americans across the country deserve the truth about what happened in Libya, and they certainly deserve to know when people who hold the keys to a lot of their online communications are trying to keep that from them,” continued Colonel Dick Brauer, Jr., USAF (Ret).

“This whole affair has become the poster child for liberal arrogance and incompetence – from the President’s complete leadership failure in Libya to the liberal media’s desperate efforts to keep this out of the hands of the American people across the spectrum from broadcast news to social media. I hope they’ll stop this shameful game and stop sacrificing the truth – and Americans abroad – in the name of politics.”


Special Operations Speaks PAC is comprised of veterans, legatees, and supporters of the Special Operations communities of all the Armed Forces and have noted with dismay and deep alarm the recent stream of highly damaging leaks of information about various aspects of America’s shadow war in the overall War on Terror. Our principles are the same as when we were in active service — Duty, Honor, Country.


Video: http://sosvideo.us

Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Special-Operations-Speaks/455326401158941

UPDATE: We just received this email from Facebook:

yiv495819019pad a écrit:

A member of our team accidentally removed something you posted on Facebook. This was mistake, and we sincerely apologize for this error. We've since restored the content, and you should now be able to see it.

The Facebook Team

Note: Facebook removed the post two times and suspended our account for 24 hours.We accept their apology but do not accept that it was an innocent mistake. It was clearly a means to protect Obama on Libya.

Read the original article at SOS

Support SOS: Please click here to support Special Operations Speaks PAC.


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Mer 31 Oct - 23:32 (2012)    Sujet du message: BECOME A STATE CAPTAIN! Répondre en citant


Who're the ones who are behind the "RELEASE: FACEBOOK CENSORS THE SEALs"
http://specialoperationsspeaks.com/articles/facebook-censors-the-seals-release? Are they Special Operations veterans or warriors for this new world order global war? Just a look on Google and you will find the truth. Just an other trap to unite peoples under UN/US leadership for their perpetual war of PEACE. Again, we find connection with Caritas Internationalis. Everything was pre plan for long time.  


  KaziBongo: Operations / Quality Assurance Officer UNOPS/NAO ...

23 Aug 2012 – ... Hunger (ACF) · Africa Nazarene University · Bondo University College · Caritas ... Operations / Quality Assurance Officer - Mine Action Pool of Experts (P3) .... Police Experience) at the Senior NCO (Non-Commissioned Officer) or Officer level (or ..... International Rescue Committee Livelihoods Special.


[PDF] Privatising Security: Law, Practice And Governance Of Private - DCAF    

Format de fichier: PDF/Adobe Acrobat
de F Schreier - Special Operations Forces (of the US Armed Forces). UAV ...... of NGOs, including the International Rescue Committee, CARE, and Caritas.106 The ...... senior logistics officers and NCOs are no longer available.141 Additionally, while the ...


No effort is too small, no effort is too large...but some efforts may be too late.

My fellow former Special Operations officers and NCO’s and I have, in essence, come out of retirement one more time to strap on the gear and fulfill our oaths.

Read more : http://specialoperationsspeaks.com/states

Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Ven 2 Nov - 17:47 (2012)    Sujet du message: LIBYA -- SEAL'S FATHER ACCUSES WH OF MURDER Répondre en citant


VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PARjXiAAB30

Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Ven 9 Nov - 17:43 (2012)    Sujet du message: OPERATION TORCH Répondre en citant


L’opération Torch est le nom de code donné au débarquement des Alliés le 8 novembre 1942 dans les territoires français d'Afrique du Nord (Protectorat du Maroc et Algérie française). Ce débarquement marque le tournant de la Seconde Guerre mondiale sur le front occidental, conjointement avec les victoires britanniques d'El Alamein et soviétique de Stalingrad. La prise d'Alger se fait en un jour grâce à la résistance française, alors qu'à Oran et au Maroc, les généraux de Vichy accueillent les Alliés à coups de canon, tout en livrant le Protectorat français de Tunisie aux Allemands sans aucune résistance, déclenchant ainsi la campagne de Tunisie. La reddition des troupes françaises vichystes au Maroc eut lieu le 11 novembre. Des sous-marins allemands, arrivés sur les lieux le jour du cessez-le-feu, menèrent ensuite des attaques devant Casablanca jusqu'au 16 novembre.



Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Sam 10 Nov - 01:02 (2012)    Sujet du message: MORE TO PETRAEUS RESIGNATION THAN JUST AN EXTRAMARITAL AFFAIR Répondre en citant


VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyswsXXa6T4
COMMENT down the video : Ryk Comerford

Petraeus was supposed to testify before Congress next week about Benghazi. It makes more sense that's what this was about, not an affair no one knew or cared about. Anybody dumb enough to try and blackmail a CIA director, a lot of bad things can happen to them.

Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Dim 11 Nov - 00:15 (2012)    Sujet du message: MALKIN: IMPEACH OBAMA FOR BENGHAZI FOXNEWS ! Répondre en citant


VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfCQL7_0hjk

Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Dim 11 Nov - 23:22 (2012)    Sujet du message: BREAKING VETERAN EXPOSES OBAMA BENGHAZI MILITARY EXPOSING HIM ! Répondre en citant


VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYUMRCmgwbk

Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Mar 13 Nov - 16:46 (2012)    Sujet du message: FULLPROOF - WELL SORTA Répondre en citant


VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbpym8uk5Bc

VIDEO : http://www.toysparty.org/

Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Mar 13 Nov - 16:48 (2012)    Sujet du message: MASS. GENERAL DOCTOR SPOKE WITH AMBASSADOR STEVENS JUST BEFORE HIS DEATH, PLEDGES COMMITMENT TO PEACE Répondre en citant


09/13/2012 12:57 PM

By Chelsea Conaboy, Globe Staff

Dr. Thomas Burke, an emergency physician at Massachusetts General Hospital who oversees some of the hospital’s global health programs, was scheduled to meet with Ambassador Christopher Stevens in Libya the morning after he was killed in an attack.

Burke spoke with Globe reporter Bryan Bender and sent this account:

September 12, 2012

Perspective from Benghazi

Today is a tragic day for Americans and Libyans alike. All over the world our hearts ache for the loss of our US Ambassador, Christopher Stevens, and those that died at his side last evening. Our courageous Ambassador held a unique passion and hope for all of Libya but especially Benghazi. Our Ambassador was beloved by the people of Benghazi.

This is my second trip to Benghazi; the first one was in late May. My close colleague and friend, Dr. Stephen Bohan and I have been working with the leaders of the Benghazi Medical Center (BMC). BMC director general and hematologist, Dr. Fathi al Jehani, and chief medical officer and obstetrician /gynecologist (and human rights leader), Dr. Laila Bugaighis, are hoping that the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) can assist them with two critical areas of need; training in leadership and management skills, and establishment of the country’s first modern emergency department and pre-hospital care system. I can tell you first hand, the people of Benghazi are absolutely lovely -- kind, generous and curious. However, they are just barely emerging from 42 years of brutal rule.

BMC is an extraordinarily impressive structure, built some 30 years ago with the intention of becoming a world class 1,000-bed medical center. In keeping with Gadhafi’s policy of controlling Eastern Libya by severely restricting resources, BMC was only able to first open in 2009. BMC was never to have an ER but instead was to focus its expertise and efforts on becoming the referral center for the eastern half of the country. All this changed in February of 2011. On Feb. 15, peaceful demonstrations on the steps of the Benghazi courthouse marked the beginning of the revolution. Violence erupted on the 16th and Dr. Jehani immediately ordered his staff to open an ER. Within 20 minutes an ER was born. In the days that followed the BMC staff worked tirelessly, responding to a mounting human slaughter. On the 20th, Mehdi Ziu, a Libyan petroleum engineer, drove his car filled with explosives into the fortress walls of Gadhafi’s forces, giving his own life to tip the struggle in favor of the people; and thus end Gadhafi’s brutal rule over Benghazi.

Just a few minutes ago I sat with Dr. Naseralla Elsaadi, a gentle and endlessly patient 42-year old surgeon. Tears quietly ran down his cheeks. Ambassador Chris Stevens was supposed to have been sitting with us. Naseralla is chief of the patchwork ER and has been up all night caring for the sick and injured and has 25 patients to still round on. He said, “It is fine to write about me and use my name because I am from the most powerful tribe in Eastern Libya. They will protect me.” He handed me 4 pages stapled together, the first being the medical note on the attempt to save the Ambassador’s life, and the latter three sheets, copies of the ambassador’s flat line heart rhythm. I put my hand on Naseralla’s shoulder and he reached up, taking my hand in his. “This is terrible not just for the Americans and Libyans but for all humanity. My wife and children just called me crying. Everyone in the hospital and everyone in Benghazi are angry with those people (the radical extremists) and we weep. Islam is peaceful. It is our duty to care for our guests.”

 He looked down and his shoulders dropped with obvious despair. “We work so hard for peace.” I asked him to not give up. I told him that most Americans don’t know the true story of the Libyan people, but that he can count on Americans not giving up. While still holding my hand I locked onto his eyes, “if we work together on a unified commitment to peace, and together build bridges, a brighter future will emerge.”

Eight weeks ago the world bore witness to the first democratic elections in Libya’s history. Although Libya’s new Prime Minister will be named today, the moment in history is overshadowed by the loss of Ambassador Stevens and those that died at his side. There remains much to be done in this remarkably complex region of the world; however, the Libyan people are free for the first time in many decades.

The nation, although fragile, does have great potential. We must not give up our collective commitment to securing a safe, free, and peaceful Libya. The world will be a better place for us all.

-- Dr. Thomas Burke

Chelsea Conaboy can be reached at cconaboy@boston.com. Follow her on Twitter @cconaboy.


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211



Jill Kelley, 37, of Tampa, Fla., reportedly alerted the FBI several months ago about threatening emails she had received from Petraeus alleged mistress, biographer Paula Broadwell, a senior military official told the Associated Press.
By Matthew Solan In Sanibel, Fla. , Marty Clear In Tampa , Matthew Lysiak In Bismarck, N.d. AND Bill Hutchinson / NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

Published: Sunday, November 11, 2012, 3:04 PM
Updated: Tuesday, November 13, 2012, 7:34 AM

 Stephen Theriault

Jill Kelley, 37, (right) is believed to be the 'mystery woman'who blew the lid off former CIA Director David Petraeus’ career-ending affair. She is seen here with Petraeus' wife Holly Petraeus (left) and her husband Scott Kelley at a party.

Related Stories

The mystery woman who blew the lid off former CIA Director David Petraeus’ career-ending affair is also tied to the military — a sexy social liaison for an Air Force base in Tampa who says she and the ex-general are just “friends.”


Jill Kelley, 37, a married mother of three from the Gulf Coast city, alerted the FBI several months ago after receiving emails from Petraeus’ alleged mistress, biographer Paula Broadwell, warning the stunning Tampa socialite to “stay away from” the spymaster, according to sources with knowledge of the messages.


Bill Serne/New York Daily News

Jill Kelley with Vice Admiral Robert Harward and husband, Scott, in Tampa Fla. 

The raven-haired Kelley, who has an unpaid position as a social planner for MacDill Air Force Base, insisted in a statement Sunday her relationship with the retired four-star general and ex-CIA director was platonic, dating to when Petraeus ran the U.S. Central Command from the base.

“We and our family have been friends with Gen. Petraeus and his family for over five years,” Kelley said. “We respect his family’s privacy and want the same for us and our three children.”



Amy Scherzer/Tampa Bay Times

Kelley is seen with Petraeus and hiswife Holly in 2010. (From L to R) Natalie Khawam, Gen. David Petraeus, Dr. ScottKelley, his wife Jill Kelley and Holly Petraeus, the wife of Gen. DavidPetraeus, watching the Gasparilla parade from the comfort of tent on the Kelleys front lawn on Jan. 30. 2010, in Tampa, Fla. 

But Broadwell’s father said Sunday his daughter is the victim of character assassination and implied the bombshell story is just a smoke screen for something bigger.

“This is about something else entirely, and the truth will come out,” Broadwell’s dad, Paul Krantz, told the Daily News outside his home in Bismarck, N.D.
“There is a lot more that is going to come out,” said Krantz, claiming he was not allowed to elaborate. “You wait and see. There’s a lot more here than meets the eye.”

He said he supports his daughter “100%.”


CSM Marvin L. Hill

Paula Broadwell flying with GeneralPetraeus to Afghanistan in June 2011. Petraeus resigned as head of the CIA because he was having an affair with the author. 

“I stand by my daughter. She is an exceptional person,” Krantz told The News, adding that Broadwell, a West Point grad, and her family were “doing well, considering.”

Kelley has not spoken publicly about the scandal. She and her husband, Dr. Scott Kelley, were busy Sunday entertaining guests at a birthday party for one of their daughters at their colonial-style mansion overlooking Tampa’s Hillsborough Bay.

Bill Serne/New York Daily News

Photos taken of Jill Kelley in her front yard during a birthday gathering in Tampa, Fla.  

In an exclusive photo obtained by The News, the Kelleys appeared worried while speaking with Vice Adm. Robert Harward, deputy commander of the Central Command, who showed up at the party in his white dress uniform.

Jill Kelley was raised in Philadelphia, where her family settled in the mid-1970s and opened a Middle Eastern restaurant after immigrating from Lebanon. Her father, John Khawam, was a renowned organist in Lebanon.

ISAF/AFP/Getty Images

Members of Congress want to knowwhether national security was ever compromised in the Petraeusaffair.

A close friend of Petraeus told ABC News that Kelley saw the general often, but their relationship was innocent.

“It is very clear there was nothing going on other than friendship between Kelley and Petraeus,” the friend said.
In 2010, Kelley and her husband, a surgeon at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, invited Petraeus and his wife of 38 years, Holly, to be their guests at a party for the Gasparilla parade, an annual pirate-themed festival in Tampa. At the time, Petraeus ran the Central Command from MacDill.

Getty Images

A June 23, 2011 photo shows PaulaBroadwell (second from left) watching as Petraeus and his wife arrive for a Senate Select Intelligence Committee hearing on Petraeus' nomination to bedirector of the CIA.  

Kelley’s 7-year-old daughter, Caroline, even posted a family photo album online that she dedicated to her parents and included family photos — one of her and her sisters posing with Petraeus.

“I was with Gen. Petraeus. He came to my house,” Caroline wrote.
Broadwell’s extended family members were completely caught off guard by the news of Petraeus’ shocking resignation, which broke Friday.

“They didn’t find out about the affair until they saw it on the news Friday night,” the grandmother of Broadwell’s husband, Scott, told The News. “Everyone’s reaction was shock. We were all shell-shocked.”

T. Ortega Gaines/The Charlotte Observer via AP

Paula Broadwell, author of the DavidPetraeus biography "All In," poses for photos in Charlotte, N.C. Petraeus, theretired four-star general renowned for taking charge of the military campaigns in Iraq and then Afghanistan, abruptly resigned Friday, Nov. 9, 2012 as directorof the CIA, admitting to an extramarital affair.

The grandmother, who would only give her first name, Sylvia, described Paula Broadwell as “intelligent and really smart.”

“She’s too smart for that,” said Sylvia, adding that her grandson is “a wonderful father to those two young kids.”
She said Scott Broadwell’s parents in Sanibel, Fla., “felt like the rug was pulled out from under them.”

“It’s a sad situation,” the grandmother said.

Petraeus began seeing Paula Broadwell, a writer with a military background, on the side in 2011, several months after he retired from the military, but ended the romance about four months ago, sources told ABC News.

BuzzFeed, citing sources, said he took her on a government-funded trip to Paris in July 2011.

Russell Broadwell, Scott’s father, confirmed to The News that he, too, was astonished by the news he first heard on TV Friday.

Asked if he has spoken to his son, Broadwell said, “Of course, he’s my son.” He refused to further comment.

Paula Broadwell, 40 (above), wrote the biography “All In: The Education of General David Petraeus.” She has yet to publicly comment on the scandal that has rocked Washington and the U.S. security community.
A source told The Wall Street Journal that Broadwell, who lives in North Carolina, became jealous when she suspected Kelley was in a romantic relationship with Petraeus.

AP Photo

Petraeus testifies on Capitol Hill in 2008.

Kelley’s twin sister, Natalie Khawam, is a lawyer who represents whistleblowers, but there was no indication Sunday that she was representing her sister.

The FBI probe into the menacing emails uncovered other exchanges between Broadwell and Petraeus’ personal email account that made clear their relationship had gone beyond professional limits, including one that talked about “sex under a desk.”
The scandal is spreading beyond the participants into the political arena. Several top lawmakers are demanding more information about what the FBI, the CIA and President Obama knew — and when they knew it.

Obama accepted the 60-year-old Petraeus’ resignation Friday, a mere three days after his reelection.

AP Photo

Petraeus is sworn in by Joe Biden as CIA director in the White House - as his wife looks on.  

Rep. Dave Reichert (R-Wash.) confirmed Sunday he first learned of the affair several months ago from a friend who knows Kelley.

Reichert told House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.), who put Kelley in touch with FBI Director Robert Mueller.

Cantor’s staff didn’t immediately tell the House Intelligence Committee or other House leaders because they didn’t know whether the information was credible, Fox News reported.
Retired U.S. Army Col. Steve Boylan, Petraeus’ former spokesman, said the general is kicking himself for his atrocious lack of judgment.

“He hugely regrets what happened,” Boylan told ABC News. “He pretty much threw away the best job he ever had and put his family through something just too hard to describe.”




Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Mar 13 Nov - 17:25 (2012)    Sujet du message: NATALIE KHAWAM, ESQ., MBA, MS Répondre en citant

 This is Google's cache of http://www.linkedin.com/in/nataliekhawam. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Nov 2, 2012 04:31:29 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more
Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press Ctrl+F or ⌘-F (Mac) and use the find bar.



Successfully Representing Whistleblowers
Location Tampa/St. Petersburg, Florida Area Industry Legal Services

Join LinkedIn and access Natalie Khawam, Esq., MBA, MS’s full profile.

As a LinkedIn member, you'll join 175 million other professionals who are sharing connections, ideas, and opportunities. And it's free! You'll also be able to:

  • See who you and Natalie Khawam, Esq., MBA, MS know in common
  • Get introduced to Natalie Khawam, Esq., MBA, MS
  • Contact Natalie Khawam, Esq., MBA, MS directly

View Full Profile

Natalie Khawam, Esq., MBA, MS's Overview

  • Presidentat Law Office of Natalie K. Khawam, Esq.
  • Managing Partnerat Natalie Khawam, Esq., MS, MBA
  • Of Counselat Trenam Kemker
  • In-House Counselat Delta Medical Care
  • Healthcare Attorneyat Cohen, Foster & Romine, P.A.
  • Director, Special Counsel/Assistant to CFOat Holy Cross Hospital (Trinity Health Systems)
  • Legal Counselat Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
  • Consultant and founder/author of the Federal Updateat Medicaid Health Plans of America
  • Researcher at the Office of the Clerks of the Courtat U.S. Supreme Court
see less
see all

  • Georgetown University Law Center
  • Temple University - Fox School of Business and Management
  • Temple University - Fox School of Business and Management
  • Beaver College

see less
see all

Connections 51 connections
Natalie Khawam, Esq., MBA, MS's Experience


President Law Office of Natalie K. Khawam, Esq.

January 2012– Present (11 months)Tampa/St. Petersburg, Florida Area
Specializing in Qui Tam law, exclusively representing whistleblowers.


Managing Partner Natalie Khawam, Esq., MS, MBA
January 2012– October 2012 (10 months)


Of Counsel Trenam Kemker
February 2010– December 2011 (1 year 11 months)


In-House Counsel Delta Medical Care
January 2010– October 2011 (1 year 10 months)


Healthcare Attorney Cohen, Foster & Romine, P.A.
May 2009– December 2009 (8 months)


Director, Special Counsel/Assistant to CFO Holy Cross Hospital (Trinity Health Systems)
2007– 2008 (1 year)


Legal Counsel Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
2005– 2006 (1 year)


Consultant and founder/author of the Federal Update Medicaid Health Plans of America
March 2004– January 2006 (1 year 11 months)


Researcher at the Office of the Clerks of the Court U.S. Supreme Court
2003– 2004 (1 year)

Natalie Khawam, Esq., MBA, MS's Education

Georgetown University Law Center Juris Doctor (J.D.),Law
2002 – 2005

Temple University - Fox School of Business and Management Master in Science (M.S.),Healthcare Finance
2001 – 2002

Temple University - Fox School of Business and Management Master in Business Administration (M.B.A.),Healthcare Administration
1999 – 2001

Beaver College B.A.,Social Work and Biochemistry (Pre-Med)

Natalie Khawam, Esq., MBA, MS's Additional Information


View Natalie Khawam, Esq., MBA, MS’s full profile to...

  • See who you and Natalie Khawam, Esq., MBA, MS know in common
  • Get introduced to Natalie Khawam, Esq., MBA, MS
  • Contact Natalie Khawam, Esq., MBA, MS directly


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Sam 17 Nov - 20:00 (2012)    Sujet du message: FULL TEXT OF NEWSMAX COLUMN SUGGESTING MILITARY COUP AGAINST OBAMA Répondre en citant


Here is the full text of John L. Perry's column on Newsmax which suggests that a military coup to "resolve the Obama problem" is becoming more possible and is not "unrealistic." Perry also writes that a coup, while not "ideal," may be preferable to "Obama's radical ideal" -- and would "restore and defend the Constitution." Newsmax has since removed the column from its website.

Obama Risks a Domestic Military Intervention

By: John L. Perry

There is a remote, although gaining, possibility America's military will intervene as a last resort to resolve the "Obama problem." Don't dismiss it as unrealistic.

America isn't the Third World. If a military coup does occur here it will be civilized. That it has never happened doesn't mean it wont. Describing what may be afoot is not to advocate it. So, view the following through military eyes:

# Officers swear to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic." Unlike enlisted personnel, they do not swear to "obey the orders of the president of the United States."

# Top military officers can see the Constitution they are sworn to defend being trampled as American institutions and enterprises are nationalized.

# They can see that Americans are increasingly alarmed that this nation, under President Barack Obama, may not even be recognizable as America by the 2012 election, in which he will surely seek continuation in office.

# They can see that the economy -- ravaged by deficits, taxes, unemployment, and impending inflation -- is financially reliant on foreign lender governments.

# They can see this president waging undeclared war on the intelligence community, without whose rigorous and independent functions the armed services are rendered blind in an ever-more hostile world overseas and at home.

# They can see the dismantling of defenses against missiles targeted at this nation by avowed enemies, even as America's troop strength is allowed to sag.

# They can see the horror of major warfare erupting simultaneously in two, and possibly three, far-flung theaters before America can react in time.

# They can see the nation's safety and their own military establishments and honor placed in jeopardy as never before.
So, if you are one of those observant military professionals, what do you do?

Wait until this president bungles into losing the war in Afghanistan, and Pakistan's arsenal of nuclear bombs falls into the hands of militant Islam?

Wait until Israel is forced to launch air strikes on Iran's nuclear-bomb plants, and the Middle East explodes, destabilizing or subjugating the Free World?

What happens if the generals Obama sent to win the Afghan war are told by this president (who now says, "I'm not interested in victory") that they will be denied troops they must have to win? Do they follow orders they cannot carry out, consistent with their oath of duty? Do they resign en masse?

Or do they soldier on, hoping the 2010 congressional elections will reverse the situation? Do they dare gamble the national survival on such political whims?

Anyone who imagines that those thoughts are not weighing heavily on the intellect and conscience of America's military leadership is lost in a fool's fog.

Will the day come when patriotic general and flag officers sit down with the president, or with those who control him, and work out the national equivalent of a "family intervention," with some form of limited, shared responsibility?

Imagine a bloodless coup to restore and defend the Constitution through an interim administration that would do the serious business of governing and defending the nation. Skilled, military-trained, nation-builders would replace accountability-challenged, radical-left commissars. Having bonded with his twin teleprompters, the president would be detailed for ceremonial speech-making.

Military intervention is what Obama's exponentially accelerating agenda for "fundamental change" toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup is not an ideal option, but Obama's radical ideal is not acceptable or reversible.

Unthinkable? Then think up an alternative, non-violent solution to the Obama problem. Just don't shrug and say, "We can always worry about that later."

In the 2008 election, that was the wistful, self-indulgent, indifferent reliance on abnegation of personal responsibility that has sunk the nation into this morass.


Revenir en haut

En ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 211

MessagePosté le: Sam 11 Mai - 01:51 (2013)    Sujet du message: BENGHAZI MEMO EDITS SHOW STATE, WHITE HOUSE INVOLVEMENT Répondre en citant


Friday, May 10, 2013USATODAY.COM

A top State Department official pressed the CIA and the White House to delete any mention of terrorism in public statements on the Benghazi terror attack to prevent critics from blaming lax security at the consulate, according to documents obtained by ABC News.

The information "goes right to the heart of what the White House continues to deny," Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, told USA TODAY. "For eight months they denied there's any manipulation, but this continues to shed light on something that was never true."

State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said in a statement to USA TODAY on Friday that the changes were made to prevent members of Congress from "providing more guidance to the public than the administration."

Victoria Nuland, spokeswoman for the State Department, said she was expressing the concerns of her "leadership" when she emailed that a CIA memo on Benghazi should remove references to the attacks links to al-Qaeda and CIA warnings about terrorist threats in Benghazi in the months preceding the attack.

According to ABC News, Nuland objected in an email to White House and intelligence officials that the CIA description "could be abused by members (of Congress) to beat up on the State Department for not paying attention to warnings."

The "talking points" memo on what the Obama administration should tell the public was the basis for statements made by U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice, who appeared on talk shows five days after the Sept. 11 attack to explain what happened.

Rice insisted the attack emanated from a protest over an anti-Islam video produced in America that turned violent and that terrorism was not involved. The White House has since acknowledged the assault was a preplanned terror attack and no protest happened.

In the emails, the White House tells the CIA that State's concerns needed to be addressed. Some of the emails were originally reported on by The Weekly Standard.

Psaki, in her statement, said Nuland's office raised two primary concerns about the talking points.

"First that the points went further in assigning responsibility than preliminary assessments suggested and there was concern about preserving the integrity of the investigation," Psaki said. "Second, that the points were inconsistent with the public language the Administration had used to date – meaning members of Congress would be providing more guidance to the public than the Administration."

Danielle Pletka, vice president for foreign and defense policy at the American Enterprise Institute, said new information that came out this week shows that the Obama administration's version of what happened in Benghazi was deliberately misleading.

"The narrative about the film was a lie. The narrative that it was not al Qaeda was a lie and the notion this was an attempt to protect anyone but Barack Obama is laughable," Pletka said. "They could have nipped this in the bud on day two and there would be no investigation."

ABC News obtained 12 versions of the talking points and reviewed State Department and White House emails that seem to show that references to terrorist involvement in Benghazi were not deleted at the request of the CIA or FBI, as Obama administration officials have said.

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney told reporters in November that the talking points "reflect the (intelligence community's) best assessments of what they thought had happened." The White House and State Department input was minor, to change the word "consulate" to "diplomatic post," Carney said at the time.

The multiple edited versions tell a different story. The initial unclassified memo produced by the CIA for distribution to lawmakers and government officials -- who were to use it to address the public – said extremists linked to al-Qaeda were known to be operating in Benghazi.

"The Agency has produced numerous pieces on the threat of extremists linked to al-Qa'ida in Benghazi and eastern Libya," the initial version said, describing a string of five attacks on foreign interests since April. "We cannot rule out the individuals has previously surveilled the U.S. facilities, also contributing to the efficacy of the attacks."
The paragraph was deleted.

The initial CIA memo also said the attack appeared to have been "spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo," language that survived in the final version given to Rice. But it also said "we do know that Islamic extremists with ties to al-Qa'ida participated in the attack," and named the group Ansar al Sharia.

Nuland objected to naming the terrorist groups saying, "we don't want to prejudice the investigation."

A staffer at the White House National Security Council managing the review of the talking points wrote Nuland that "the FBI did not have major concerns with the points and offered only a couple minor changes."

After some minor edits, Nuland objected again that "these changes don't resolve all of my issues or those of my building's leadership." Ben Rhodes, deputy national security advisory in the White House, wrote on the morning of Sept. 14 that the State Department concerns should be addressed.

"We must make sure that the talking points reflect all agency equities, including those of the State Department, and we don't want to undermine the FBI investigation," Rhodes wrote, adding that the document would be worked on the next morning.

After that meeting, the CIA produced a new and final version of the memo, with no reference to al Qaeda and the known security threats in Benghazi before Sept. 11.


Revenir en haut
Contenu Sponsorisé

MessagePosté le: Aujourd’hui à 07:27 (2018)    Sujet du message: AN OTHER 9/11 (2012)???

Revenir en haut
Montrer les messages depuis:   
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> TERREUR SUR LA TERRE/TERROR ON EARTH -> AN OTHER 9 11 (2012) (PARTIE 2) Toutes les heures sont au format GMT + 2 Heures
Aller à la page: 1, 2  >
Page 1 sur 2

Sauter vers:  

Index | Creer un forum | Forum gratuit d’entraide | Annuaire des forums gratuits | Signaler une violation | Conditions générales d'utilisation
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Traduction par : phpBB-fr.com