LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum


 FAQFAQ   RechercherRechercher   MembresMembres   GroupesGroupes   S’enregistrerS’enregistrer 
 ProfilProfil   Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés   ConnexionConnexion 

Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Sujet précédent :: Sujet suivant  
Auteur Message

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 26 680

MessagePosté le: Mar 15 Mar - 07:09 (2016)    Sujet du message: FDA TO DECLASSIFY ELECTROSHOCK THERAPY TO SAME RISK CATEGORY AS CONDOMS AND CONTACT LENSES Répondre en citant


Monday, March 14, 2016 by: J. D. Heyes

(NaturalNews) The Food and Drug Administration is set to allow for the dramatic expansion of electroshock therapy for patients who have been diagnosed with clinical depression, through reclassification of the devices used to deliver shock treatment, despite the fact that experts and former patients have attested to the damage such treatment causes.

As noted by mental health watchdog organization Citizens Commission on Human Rights International (CCHRI), the FDA began the reclassification process for Electroconvulsive Therapy Devices (ECT) in early January. The change would lower the devices from their current highest-risk Category III classification, "to allow electric shock machines to be utilized in the treatment of specific alleged mental illnesses with less regulatory controls," the organization noted in an alert.

The change, detailed here at Regulations.gov, is being sought, "despite the federal agency's admission that the ECT device has not been proven safe and effective," CCHRI noted further, adding that to date, some 5 million Americans have been given ECT treatments without their manufacturers having been required to submit valid scientific evidence (like clinical trials), that they were safe and effective.

No oversight

"The proposal has reignited a firestorm that the FDA has colluded with the American Psychiatric Association (APA) to promote a dangerous treatment and protect the fiscal concerns of APA members rather than protect patient lives," CCHRI reported.

The organization says that the FDA has been dragging its feet on the reclassification since it first made the proposal in 2009 – shortly after President Obama took office – requesting public input.

Further, at a public hearing in January 2011, some 80 percent of respondents, and another 92 group submissions representing more than 6,000 people, were against reclassification, the organization noted.

ECT devices work by sending up to 460 volts of electricity through the brain, with no scientific evidence to back up how the procedure works to reduce a patient's psychological condition, CCHRI noted. Evidence and patient reports actually state that following ECT treatments patients have complained of memory loss, cardiovascular complications and lasting brain damage. CCHRI says that some patients have even died.

In fact, in 1979 the FDA classified the ECT device as Class III because of its "potential unreasonable risk of illness or injury."

In January, Medicine.news reported that a bill had been introduced in Congress that would allow the testing of medical devices on patients without prior consent.

The bill, known as the 21st Century Cures Act, "essentially weakens the already weak standards for the approval process of prescription drugs and medical devices, solely benefiting the pharmaceutical industry while placing Americans directly in harm's way as they unknowingly become guinea pigs," Medicine.news reported.

Major depressive disorders will worsen

That includes the weakening of standards governing medical devices like ECT, according to Lee Spiller, CCHRI executive director.

"For years, the makers of psychiatric electroshock (ECT) machines have been unable to get their machines moved out of category III (dangerous or experimental) and into category II," he said – this is the same category as condoms, contact lenses and air purifiers.

CCHRI says that ECT makers have never had to provide a Premarket Approval Application (PMA) with clinical trial results that prove the safety of the devices. In 1990 and again in 2009, the federal government required FDA to either reclassify Class III medical devices or make sure that manufacturers were submitting PMAs as required if they remained at the high-risk classification. But ECT makers have failed to meet this requirement.

Safety testing by manufacturers is largely omitted under the 21st Century Cures Act, Medicine.news reported, adding that drug and device makers "can even gain FDA approval for products based solely on the experience of individuals."

The FDA's current proposal would reduce the risk classification of ECT devices for treating "severe major depressive episode (MDE) associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar disorder (BPD) in patients 18 years of age or older who are treatment-resistant or who require a rapid response due to the severity of their psychiatric or medical condition," the rule change states.







Revenir en haut

MessagePosté le: Mar 15 Mar - 07:09 (2016)    Sujet du message: Publicité

PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?
Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 26 680

MessagePosté le: Mar 29 Mar - 05:32 (2016)    Sujet du message: NARCISSISTIC ABUSE SYNDROME COMPLEX PTSD GAINED FROM RELATIONSHIT WITH A PSYCHOPATH Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XCR3jXavi8

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 26 680

MessagePosté le: Jeu 7 Avr - 11:13 (2016)    Sujet du message: GERMANY: CLIMATE CHANGE DENIERS COULD FACE UP TO FIVE YEARS IN JAIL Répondre en citant


By Brendan | April 1, 2016

Berlin | Chancellor Angela Merkel’s cabinet has successfully passed a new law that renders it illegal to deny the reality of climate change.

The new addition to the German criminal law could make offenders face up to five years in jail if convicted.

“As the COP 21 illuminates, it is a necessity in these times of global climate change to cut the debate short and take action for the future” spoke chancellor Angela Merkel yesterday. “The world is facing its worst global crisis since WWII,” she told reporters during the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference.

Holocaust deniers and climate change deniers are the same as they are guilty of disturbing the public peace, an offense punishable by law,” she explained. “It is a great day for democracy and free speech that the Parliament has unanimously voted to pass this law,” she concluded. Evil or Very Mad

Climate change deniers will be liable to imprisonment for three months to five years under German criminal law, a sentence similar to the offense of holocaust denial

Greenpeace approved

Gunter Heinsbeck, spokesman for the German chapter of Greenpeace, fully approves the new law.

“Germany is a trend setter and an example for the world in its courageous approach towards climate change” he admitted, visibly enthused by the news.

“We hope other country leaders will take similar actions to finally end the debate surrounding climate change,” he expressed. “Climate change deniers should be seen as eco-terrorists and judged as so,” he assures.

Climate change denial and mental illness

Climate change denial could be explained by a predisposition to mental illness believes psychiatrist and bio-geneticist, Franzen Fischer, of the University of Frankfurt.

Professor Franzen Fischer, psychiatrist and bio-geneticist at the University of Frankfurt, believes climate change deniers have a genetic predisposition to mental illness

Climate change deniers personalities are overwhelmingly cynical towards the government and prone to believe in conspiracy theories,” explains the Director of Frankfurt University’s psychiatric department.

A 2014 recent study suggests climate change deniers have a genetic predisposition to mental illness and diseases such as depression, bipolarity and even show high risks of developing schizophrenia,” he explains.

I fear imprisoning them might exacerbate their condition, I would favor a clinical treatment approach such as the use of medication and prevention through education,” he warns.

Other countries could follow, believe experts, after world leaders such as President Barrack Obama and President François Hollande have saluted favorably the new law as a “path to progress.”


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 26 680

MessagePosté le: Ven 15 Avr - 06:10 (2016)    Sujet du message: CANADIAN COUNCIL OF IMAMS TO OPEN "DERADICALIZATION CLINICS" TO COUNTER EXTREMISM Répondre en citant


Rehabilitation program...

Posted by: Jonathan D. Halevi April 14, 2016

Iqbal Nadvi, Chairman of the Canadian Council of Imams. Photo: screenshot YouTube Canadian Council of Imams.

The Canadian Council of Imams (CCI), the supreme religious authority of Canadian Sunni Muslims, de facto acknowledges the link between global terrorism and Islam by announcing its intention to establish “deradicalization clinics” in Canada.

In a press release on Thursday, April 14, 2016, the Canadian Council of Imams stated among other thing the following:

“We as an organization reflecting the length and breadth of Muslim communities in Canada, call on the Government of Canada and all Canadians to support the work of the CCI in its effort to counter the messages and acts of violent extremism.
We also call on Muslims across Canada to unite in driving this evil ideology from among us.
We also invite all Canadians to fight against Islamophobia which aids the marginalization of Canadian Muslims and strengthens the messaging of this deviant call to violent extremism.”

Michel Coulombe, the Director of Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), warned in his latest briefing on March 7, 2016 before the Standing Senate Committee on National Security and Defence, of the extent of Islamic radicalism in Canadian society.

“We have never before faced a threat of the scope, scale, and complexity as that posed by extremists inspired by the violent ideologies of ISIL or al Qaeda,” Coulombe said. “Canadians with extremist views continue to seek to undertake terrorist activity, whether they remain in Canada or travel abroad. While the terrorist traveller phenomenon is not new to Canada, the volume of threats, the speed at which they evolve, and the use of technology and social media, has created significant investigative, technical, and analytical challenges for the service.”

Referring to the threat of Islamic State (a.k.a. ISIS, ISIL, Daesh, Caliphate) to national security of Canada, Coulombe said the following:
“ISIL, in particular, has developed a sophisticated and effective social media presence and has succeeded in recruiting thousands of individuals to travel to Syria from all corners of the globe. ISIL also calls followers to perpetrate attacks in their own countries or to facilitate the terrorist activities of others.

“Canadians are among this group. The service is currently aware of approximately 180 individuals who have an access to Canada, who are engaged in terrorist activity abroad. Of these, around 100 or so are believed to be in Turkey, Syria, or Iraq. The activities of these extremist travellers vary widely, ranging from paramilitary activity, training, and logistical support, to terrorist fundraising and studying at extremist Islamist madrasas. The participation of Canadians in these conflicts is destabilizing and harmful to the countries in which they operate, and Canada has an international obligation to prevent and deter terrorist travel.

“The service is also aware of around 60 returnees. Extremists returning to Canada have the potential to pose significant threats to our national security. However, I must be clear with the committee when I say “potential”, as returnees may respond in a number of different ways — from returning to normality, to radicalizing others, to financing or facilitating the travel of others, to planning attacks here.”

http://en.cijnews.com/?p=33908 http://marialeroux1.clicforum.fr/images/wysiwyg.html?5#

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 26 680

MessagePosté le: Sam 7 Mai - 12:14 (2016)    Sujet du message: MENTAL HEALTH SUBCOMMITTEES ARE BEING CREATED OUT OF OBAMACARE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEALTHY RC. Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXAoVDom5hU

Republican Mayor Dennis Michael has sold out the city of Rancho Cucamonga. The city of Rancho Cucamonga along with Fontana are test cities in our area for complete federalization.

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 26 680



Tuesday, May 10, 2016 by: Julie Wilson staff writer
Tags: electroshock therapy, children, CCHR protest

(NaturalNews) Citizens Commission on Human Rights is holding a rally in Atlanta, Georgia on Saturday, May 14 at 10:30 a.m. to protest the American Psychiatric Association's recommendation that electroshock therapy (ECT) be used on children and teenagers unresponsive to psychiatric drugs.

CCHR is a non-profit mental health watchdog group dedicated to eliminating "abuses committed under the guise of mental health." The rally will take place in downtown Atlanta at the APA's annual convention. Participants will meet at the North end of Woodruff Park, on Peachtree Street Northwest and Auburn Ave Northeast.

Electroshock therapy or electroconvulsive therapy is an archaic treatment invented in the 1930s that sends jolts of electricity into the brain, inducing a grand mal seizure. It's associated with numerous side-effects, including short and long-term memory loss, cognitive problems, unwanted personality changes, manic symptoms, prolonged seizures, heart problems and death.

"ECT is a degrading, damaging, memory robbing procedure that should have been outlawed years ago," said Lee Spiller, Executive Director of CCHR. "Shock machines are one of a number of devices that were on the market prior to today's laws. They were essentially grandfathered in."

Electroshock therapy lacks safety studies

Currently, the U.S Food and Drug Administration is deciding whether or not to declassify the risk of electroconvulsive therapy, from a Class III device, the highest risk category, to a Class II, defined as moderately risky. Since 1979, electroshock therapy has been categorized as a Class III device, making it subject to the highest level of regulatory control.

Opponents fear that if the FDA decides to declassify the risk level of ECT the treatment could be used much more freely, because the devices would be eligible for "off-label" use. Though the FDA has requested safety data since 1978, no ECT manufacturer has ever provided a Pre-Market Approval or any clinical trials illustrating the treatment's safety and efficacy.

The American Psychiatric Association is the driving force behind the risk level declassification of ECT, as well as the push to use the treatment on children and teenagers unresponsive to current drugs and therapies.

In other words, under the APA's recommendation, if psychiatric drugs aren't working for children, the next step could be electroshock therapy, a treatment that can permanently damage cognitive abilities, handicapping children for life. The APA, however, argues that the damage caused by mental illness may be just as severe.

Though proponents say electroconvulsive therapy is safer than when it was first developed in the 1930s, the procedure still involves sending up to 460 volts of electricity into the brain, as we've previously reported.

Millions of kids experiencing the side-effects of psychiatric drugs could be subjected to electroconvulsive therapy

Currently, approximately 8 million children in the U.S. are being prescribed psychiatric drugs, including antidepressants and antipsychotics, as well as drugs for anxiety and ADHD, according to CCHR. One million of these children are between the ages of 0 and 5.

"Children are being drugged simply because psychiatry has pathologized normal childhood behaviors, and repackaged them as 'mental disorders.'" As a result, millions of children are "being drugged for behaviors reclassified by psychiatry as 'disease,'" CCHR states in its press report for Saturday's protest.

"Children are becoming addicted to these drugs, many of which are in the same class of highly addictive drugs as cocaine, opium and morphine. Yet the American Psychiatric Association is doing nothing to stop this epidemic.

"Quite the opposite, they are now calling on the FDA to allow them to electroshock children who don't respond to 'treatment' (drugs.) This opens the door for millions of children experiencing side effects from the drugs, to be reclassified as 'treatment resistant' and to undergo electroshock as 'treatment.'"

Click here to read the story of a woman who underwent electroshock therapy. The treatment caused her to lose her job, leaving her disabled and unable to care for herself.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 26 680

MessagePosté le: Dim 15 Mai - 03:30 (2016)    Sujet du message: CANADA - ONTARIO LEGISLATION WOULD REQUIRE ANTI-VAX PARENTS TO TAKE AN "EDUCATION SESSION" Répondre en citant


Joanne Laucius, Ottawa Citizen
More from Joanne Laucius, Ottawa Citizen

Published on: May 13, 2016 | Last Updated: May 14, 2016 6:07 PM EDT

Ottawa immunization exemption rates are less than two per cent, according to Ottawa Public Health. ERROL MCGIHON/SUNMEDIA / ERROL MCGIHON/SUN MEDIA

Ontario parents who refuse to immunize their children for non-medical reasons will have to take an “education session” about the risks if new legislation passes.  
The amendment to the province’s Immunization of School Pupils Act, introduced Thursday, would “help parents and guardians make informed decisions about vaccination,” said Minister of Health and Long-Term Care Eric Hoskins.

The amendment proposes that parents who are not able to provide immunization records to a public health unit would be required to take an education session to get an exemption. Parents would still be able to get exemptions for religious or conscientious reasons, however the pending legislation means they’d have to jump through one more hoop. Details of the proposed education sessions are not yet clear, but they would be provided by public health units.

As is currently the case, unvaccinated children without an exemption would be suspended from school.

Ontario and New Brunswick are the only the provinces that require immunizations for children to attend school unless there is a valid exemption, said David Jensen, a spokesman for the Health Ministry.

Under the Immunization of School Pupils Act, children must have proof they have been immunized against diphtheria, tetanus, polio, measles, mumps, rubella, pertussis, meningococcal disease and chickenpox for those born after 2010.

Several U.S. states, including Arizona, Arkansas, California, Michigan, Oregon, Vermont, Utah and Washington, require parents to attend a session from a public health department or health care provider to get a non-medical exemption, said Jensen.

On July 1, California will no longer offer non-medical exemptions for school attendance

In Ottawa, immunization exemption rates are below two per cent, according to a statement from Ottawa Public Health.

“As part of our standard practice, OPH conducts one-on-one counselling with parents who wish to file a non-medical exemption for their children, to ensure that they have all the information to make an informed decision.”

The anti-vaccine lobby group Vaccine Choice Canada has charged that Ontario’s Health Ministry has “failed to ensure that Ontario citizens are adequately informed of their legal right to exemption from vaccination requirements under the Immunization of School Pupils Act.”

In a complaint to the Ontario ombudsman dated May 5, Vaccine Choice said the Health Ministry’s insistence that vaccinations are mandatory are “misleading and incorrect and legal exemptions are available to parents for medical, religious and conscientious reasons.”

Heather Fraser, a Toronto mother of two and member of Vaccine Choice, said she stopped vaccinating her son, now 21, after he developed severe allergies to peanuts and nuts after he had his first vaccinations. Her children have notarized vaccine exemptions.

If she were forced to take an education session, Fraser said she would be compliant with the law, but would record everything and take it to a lawyer.

She warns that parents will push back if the legislation passes. “I can do my research and I can think for myself. And maybe that’s what the government doesn’t want to happen.”

Meanwhile, another amendment to the Immunization of School Pupils Act introduced Thursday would offer the next step in the province’s goal of establishing a vaccine registry. The amendment would require health care providers to report any vaccines they administer that are required by schools to the local public health unit.

As it stands, parents are responsible for reporting their child’s immunization status to the health unit. The change would make it easier for parents and reduce unnecessary suspensions because of outdated immunization information, said Jensen.

The Liberal majority government could quickly pass the bill, even with a mere dozen sitting days left in the session, so it can take effect before the start of the next school year.

In 2013, Ontario introduced a central immunization information repository called Panorama, which has already standardized and stored over 6.3 million client records from all 36 public health units in the province, said Jensen. The initial stage of the project, focused on school-aged children, was completed in March.

In December and January, Ottawa Public Health suspended hundreds of elementary school students because of missing immunization records. As of last October, the records of 50,000 Ottawa students were out of date, despite an extensive phone and letter campaign to update them. Ottawa Public Health officials sent 8,400 final notice of suspension letters to parents, notifying them their children will be suspended if their records were not updated.

— With a file from the National Post


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 26 680

MessagePosté le: Jeu 14 Juil - 07:04 (2016)    Sujet du message: PSYCHIATRY GOES INSANE : EVERY HUMAN EMOTION NOW CLASSIFIED AS A MENTAL DISORDER IN NEW PSYCHIATRIC MANUAL DSM-5 Répondre en citant


Thursday, December 13, 2012
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles...)
Tags: DSM-5, psychiatry, false diagnosis

(NaturalNews) The industry of modern psychiatry has officially gone insane. Virtually every emotion experienced by a human being -- sadness, grief, anxiety, frustration, impatience, excitement -- is now being classified as a "mental disorder" demanding chemical treatment (with prescription medications, of course).

The new, upcoming DSM-5 "psychiatry bible," expected to be released in a few months, has transformed itself from a medical reference manual to a testament to the insanity of the industry itself.

"Mental disorders" named in the DSM-5 include "General Anxiety Disorder" or GAD for short. GAD can be diagnosed in a person who feels a little anxious doing something like, say, talking to a psychiatrist. Thus, the mere act of a psychiatrist engaging in the possibility of making a diagnoses causes the "symptoms" of that diagnoses to magically appear.

This is called quack science and circular reasoning, yet it's indicative of the entire industry of psychiatry which has become such a laughing stock among scientific circles that even the science skeptics are starting to turn their backs in disgust. Psychiatry is no more "scientific" than astrology or palm reading, yet its practitioners call themselves "doctors" of psychiatry in order to try to make quackery sound credible.

How modern psychiatry really worksHere's how modern psychiatry really operates: A bunch of self-important, overpaid intellectuals who want to make more money invent a fabricated disease that I'll call "Hoogala Boogala Disorder" or HBD.

By a show of hands, they then vote into existence whatever "symptoms" they wish to associated with Hoogala Boogala Disorder. In this case, the symptoms might be spontaneous singing or wanting to pick your nose from time to time.

They then convince teachers, journalists and government regulators that Hoogala Boogala Disorder is real -- and more importantly that millions of children suffer from it! It wouldn't be compassionate not to offer all those children treatment, would it?

Thus begins the call for "treatment" for a completely fabricated disease. From there, it's a cinch to get Big Pharma to fabricate whatever scientific data they need in order to "prove" that speed, amphetamines, pharmaceutical crack or whatever poison they want to sell "reduces the risk of Hoogala Boogala Disorder."

Serious-sounding psychiatrists -- who are all laughing their asses off in the back room -- then "diagnose" children with Hoogala Boogala Disorder and "prescribe" the prescription drugs that claim to treat it. For this action, these psychiatrists -- who are, let's just admit it, dangerous child predators -- earn financial kickbacks from Big Pharma

In order to maximize their kickbacks and Big Pharma freebies, groups of these psychiatrists get together every few years and invent more fictitious disorders, expanding their fictional tome called the DSM.

The DSM is now larger than ever, and it includes disorders such as "Obedience Defiance Disorder" (ODD), defined as refusing to lick boots and follow false authority. Rapists who feel sexual arousal during their raping activities are given the excuse that they have "Paraphilic coercive disorder" and therefore are not responsible for their actions. (But they will need medication, of course!)

You can also get diagnosed with "Hoarding Disorder" if you happen to stockpile food, water and ammunition, among other things. Yep, being prepared for possible natural disasters now makes you a mental patient in the eyes of modern psychiatry (and the government, too).

Former DSM chairperson apologizes for creating "false epidemics"Allen Frances chaired the DSM-IV that was released in 1994. He now admits it was a huge mistake that has resulted in the mass overdiagnosis of people who are actually quite normal. The DSM-IV "...inadvertently contributed to three false epidemics -- attention deficit disorder, autism and childhood bipolar disorder," writes Allen in an LA Times opinion piece.

He goes on to say:

The first draft of the next edition of the DSM ... is filled with suggestions that would multiply our mistakes and extend the reach of psychiatry dramatically deeper into the ever-shrinking domain of the normal. This wholesale medical imperialization of normality could potentially create tens of millions of innocent bystanders who would be mislabeled as having a mental disorder. The pharmaceutical industry would have a field day -- despite the lack of solid evidence of any effective treatments for these newly proposed diagnoses.

All these fabricated disorders, of course, result in a ballooning number of false positive. As Allen writes:

The "psychosis risk syndrome" would use the presence of strange thinking to predict who would later have a full-blown psychotic episode. But the prediction would be wrong at least three or four times for every time it is correct -- and many misidentified teenagers would receive medications that can cause enormous weight gain, diabetes and shortened life expectancy.

But that's the whole point of psychiatry: To prescribe drugs to people who don't need them. This is accomplished almost entirely by diagnosing people with disorders that don't exist.

And it culminates in psychiatrists being paid money they never earned (and certainly don't deserve.)

Imagine: An entire industry invented out of nothing! And yes, you do have to imagine it because nothing inside the industry is actually real.

What's "normal" in psychiatry? Being an emotionless zombie

The only way to be "normal" when being observed or "diagnosed" by a psychiatrist -- a process that is entirely subjective and completely devoid of anything resembling actual science -- is to exhibit absolutely no emotions or behavior whatsoever.

A person in a coma is a "normal" person, according to the DSM, because they don't exhibit any symptoms that might indicate the presence of those God-awful things called emotions or behavior.

A person in a grave is also "normal" according to psychiatry, mostly because dead people do not qualify for Medicare reimbursement and therefore aren't worth diagnosing or medicating. (But if Medicare did cover deceased patients, then by God you'd see psychiatrists lining up at all the cemeteries to medicate corpses!)

It's all a cruel, complete hoax. Psychiatry should be utterly abolished right now and all children being put on mind-altering drugs should be taken off of them and given good nutrition instead.

When the collapse of America comes and the new society rises up out of it, I am going to push hard for the complete abolition of psychiatric "medicine" if you can even call it that. Virtually the entire industry is run by truly mad, power-hungry maniacs who use their power to victimize children (and adults, too). There is NO place in society for distorted psychiatry based on fabricated disorders. The whole operation needs to be shut down, disbanded and outlawed.

The lost notion of normalcy

Here are some simple truths that need to be reasserted when we abolish the quack science industry of psychiatry:

Normalcy is not achieved through medication. Normalcy is not the absence of a range of emotion. Life necessarily involves emotions, experiences and behaviors which, from time to time, step outside the bounds of the mundane. This does not mean people have a "mental disorder." It only means they are not biological robots.

Nutrition, not medication, is the answer = Nutrition is very important but the word of God is much more important showing us how to live a good life under God umbrella. Good nutrition was create by the true God but all dimension of our life was also create by Him. Under this psychiatric DSM-5, the Jesuit and demons control your mind and your body in all ways. In this new communist society, anyone who desobey to the system can be consider as mental illness and be put in some psychiatric institution for rehabilitation or worst.

Nutritional deficiencies
, by the way, are the root cause of nearly all "mental illness." Blood sugar imbalances cause brain malfunctions because the brain runs on blood sugar as its primary energy source. Deficiencies in zinc, selenium, chromium, magnesium and other elements cause blood sugar imbalances that result in seemingly "wild" emotions or behaviors.

Nearly everyone who has been diagnosed with a mental disorder in our modern world is actually suffering from nothing more than nutritional imbalances. Too much processed, poisonous junk food and not enough healthy superfood and nutrition. At times, they also have metals poisoning from taking too many vaccines (aluminum and mercury) or eating too much toxic food (mercury in fish, cadmium, arsenic, etc.) Vitamin D deficiency is ridiculously widespread, especially across the UK and Canada where sunlight is more difficult to achieve on a steady basis.

But the reason nutrition is never highlighted as the solution to mental disorders and illness is because the pharmaceutical industry only makes money selling chemical "treatments" for conditions that are given complicated, technical-sounding names to make them seem more real. If food and nutritional supplements can keep your brain healthy -- and believe me, they can! -- then who needs high-priced pharmaceuticals? Who needs high-priced psychiatrists? Who needs drug reps? Pill-pushing doctors? And Obamacare's mandatory health insurance money confiscation programs?

Nobody needs them! This is the simple, self-evident truth of the matter: Our society would be much happier, healthier and more productive tomorrow if the entire pharmaceutical industry and psychiatry industry simply vanished overnight.

With the DSM-5, modern-day psychiatry has made a mockery of itself. What was once viewed as maybe having some basis in science is now widely seen as hilarious quackery.

Psychiatry itself now appears to be completely insane. And that might be the first accurate diagnosis to come out of the entire group.

Invent your own fictitious diseases!By the way, you can be your own psychiatrist right here, right now! Simply use my handy-dandy Disease Mongering Engine which randomly generates real-sounding mental disorders!

Here's the link:


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 26 680

MessagePosté le: Ven 22 Juil - 17:00 (2016)    Sujet du message: « L’HESITATION A VACCINER » SERAIT-ELLE UNE NOUVELLE MALADIE MENTALE QUI POURRAIT ÊTRE « SOIGNEE » ? Répondre en citant



Mercredi 20 Juillet 2016 
John P. Thomas, Health Impact News, 24 juin 2016  

Par John P. Thomas, Health Impact News, 23 juin 2016  

Il y a une nouvelle maladie qui menace la population mondiale. Cette affection est si récente qu’elle n’a pas encore été officiellement déclarée comme maladie, mais l’organisation Mondiale de la Santé (OMS) et les bioéthiciens agitent déjà le drapeau rouge en signe d’avertissement.  

Souffrez-vous de « l’hésitation à vacciner » ? 

L’Organisation Mondiale de la Santé (OMS) est très préoccupée par le problème que représente « l’hésitation à vacciner » qui, selon eux, représente une menace par rapport à l’efficacité de leur programme de vaccination dans le monde entier.  

En bref, certains parents n’autorisent pas automatiquement que l’on vaccine leur bébé, alors même que les services de vaccination sont accessibles. Ces parents hésitent, réfléchissent, et dans beaucoup de cas, s’en vont avec leur bébé dans les bras, fuyant les seringues vaccinales qui seront utilisées pour d’autres enfants. Il y a aussi des adultes qui ne répondent pas aux appels à se faire vacciner, alors qu’ils sont cependant libres.  

Comme toujours, l’OMS est à la recherche d’une conformité à 100% avec tous les calendriers vaccinaux. L’OMS avertit le monde  que « l’hésitation à vacciner » provoque des maladies et des décès inutiles. L’OMS croit que, chaque année, 1,5 millions d’enfants meurent chaque année de maladies qui pourraient être évitées par les vaccins. [1,2]  

Le communiqué de presse de l’OMS du 18 août 2015 a stipulé :  

S’ils sont utilisés, les vaccins ne peuvent qu’améliorer la santé et prévenir les décès. Les programmes de vaccination doivent être en mesure d’atteindre et de maintenir des taux élevés de vaccination. Le problème de « l’hésitation à vacciner » devient de plus en plus une question importante pour les programmes de vaccination des différents pays. [3]
Le communiqué de presse de l’OMS précise :  

Il n’y a pas de solution magique ou de stratégie qui pourrait fonctionner pour tous les cas d’ « hésitation à vacciner ». L’ampleur des problèmes et leur règlement varient. Ils doivent être diagnostiqués pour chaque cas particulier pour permettre d’élaborer des stratégies sur mesure pour faire accepter les vaccins.[4] (Souligné par l’auteur).  

L’OMS  travaille à construire l’image dans l’esprit du public que « l’hésitation à vacciner » est un état, une pathologie qui nécessite un diagnostic. C’est un peu comme s’il s’agissait d’une maladie, d’une maladie mentale qu’ils ont l’intention de traiter  par le biais  de diverses stratégies de contrôle de l’esprit.
Bien sûr, ils n’utilisent pas des morts tels que manipulation et contrôle de l’esprit – ils utilisent uniquement des mots politiquement corrects et respectueux pour décrire leurs projets.. Les documents de planification de l’OMS parlent toujours de la promotion du bien de l’humanité, de l’amélioration de la condition des plus pauvres, de résoudre l’inégalité du traitement des femmes et des filles, de la protection de l’environnement par rapport aux dégâts que peut lui infliger l’activité humaine. Ils incarnent en fait le Big Brother qui nous aidera tous à vivre dans une utopie de leur conception et création.
L’OMS ne nous dirait jamais : « nous allons vous harceler jusqu’à ce que vous changiez d’avis par rapport à l’acceptation des programmes vaccinaux. Au lieu de cela, ils disent: « une communication efficace est essentielle pour dissiper les craintes, répondre aux préoccupations et promouvoir l’acceptation de la vaccination [5] Mais le résultat est toujours le même : ils suivent un plan délibéré pour éliminer toute opposition à la vaccination.

  L’OMS fera tout ce qu’il faut pour obtenir la coopération avec leur programme de vaccination parce qu’ils ne croient pas que quiconque devrait être autorité à interférer avec leur ordre du jour. Dans le paragraphe suivant émanant de l’OMS, ils parlent des personnes qui hésitent comme des gens qui sont « affectés » par l’hésitation à vacciner. Ils parlent de cette hésitation à vacciner comme s’il s’agissait d’une maladie qui nécessite un traitement. Veuillez, s’il vous plaît, noter les mots que j’ai mis en italique.  

Le communiqué de presse signalait : l’hésitation à vacciner n’est pas seulement un problème des pays à revenu élevé, mais est un problème mondial complexe en évolution rapide et qui varie considérablement d’un pays à l’autre. Les entrevues avec les responsables de la vaccination des régions où l’OMS a accès  révèlent que  certains cas particuliers de minorités ethniques rurales, ou de communautés isolées ont été touchées alors que dans d’autres régions urbaines plus riches, les communautés ont exprimé leurs préoccupations sur la sécurité des vaccins. Dans certaines régions, les préoccupations sont le fait de sous-groupes d’objecteurs religieux ou philosophiques. [6]
En d’autres termes, certaines personnes sont « touchées » par la maladie de ‘l’hésitation à vacciner ». Un symptôme de la maladie est le fait d’être « préoccupé par la sécurité des vaccins ».Un commun dénominateur de la maladie est de faire partie d’un groupe de personnes concernées par le problème qu’ils baptisent du nom « d’objecteurs ». Donc, si vous remettez en question l’innocuité des vaccins et l’objet de leur utilisation, vous devez alors savoir que l’OMS est en train d’élaborer un programme de traitement juste pour vous !
Les bioéthiciens ciblent l’allaitement et la parenté « naturelles »
Deux bioéthiciens de l’Université de Pennsylvanie, Jessica Martucci et Anne Barnhilkl sont préoccupés par les enfants qui ne reçoivent pas les vaccins. Dans un de leurs derniers articles, ils n’utilisent pas l’expression «  hésitation  à vacciner », mais recommandent que les professionnels de santé éliminent le mot « naturel » de leur vocabulaire en guise de stratégie pour rendre plus facile l’acceptation des parents à faire vacciner leur enfant.
Dans leur article qui a été publié dans le numéro d’avril de Pediatrics, ils décrivent l’influence puissante que le mot « naturel » peut exercer. Ils cherchent aussi à identifier les groupes de personnes qui sont les plus susceptibles d’être influencées par ce mot. Ils déclarent :
Le mot « naturel » évoque un sentiment de pureté, de bonté et d’innocuité. Par contre, les substances synthétiques, produits et technologies de masse produits par l’industrie (notamment les vaccins) sont considérés comme « contre nature » et risquent souvent d’éveiller soupçons et méfiance. Une partie de ce système de valeurs est la perception que ce qui est naturel est plus sûr, plus sain et moins risqué. Cet intérêt pour le « naturel » par rapport à ce qui est « contre nature » apparait dans une série de questions scientifiques et médicales contemporaines au-delà de la vaccination, y compris dans le rejet d’aliments génétiquement modifiés.  

On observe une préférence pour les aliments biologiques cultivés de manière traditionnelle, et un rejet des technologies de reproduction assistée, comme aussi tout ce qui a trait au domaine des toxines environnementales et à la fluoration de l’eau. Une grande partie de l’intérêt pour les médecines complémentaires et alternatives repose également sur le fait que « les idées et techniques naturelles paraissent plus sûres, plus douces et bénignes. » Dans certains cas, cependant, ce point de vue que le « naturel » est synonyme de « mieux » peut contrer des objectifs spécifiques de santé publique [7] (souligné par l’auteur) Il est assez facile de comprendre les auteurs qui disent que les parents qui veulent nourrir leur bébé avec le lait naturel de la mère, qui se nourrissent de produits biologiques, utilisent des produits naturels, puissent tirer des conclusions déraisonnables quand ils envisagent de faire vacciner leurs enfants.
Leur préoccupation d’utiliser des produits naturels pourrait faire croire que les vaccins ne sont pas naturels et devraient donc être évités.. Les auteurs exhortent ceux qui diffusent des programmes de santé de cesser d’utiliser le mot « naturel » dans l’espoir de favoriser des taux plus élevés de vaccination.
Dans le résumé de leur article, ils déclarent :  

Quelle que soit l’éthique de faire appel à la nature quand il s’agit de la promotion de l’allaitement maternel, il convient de se rendre compte que cette manière de voir les choses soulève des préoccupations pratiques. L’option « naturel »  ne correspond pas toujours aux objectifs de santé publique. Si ce qui est « naturel » est considéré comme « mieux » en ce qui concerne l’allaitement maternel, comment pouvoir s’attendre à ce que des mères puissent ignorer cette vision du monde puissante et profondément convaincante quand il est question de vacciner leur enfant ? Si la promotion de l’allaitement maternel fait sous-entendre que ce qui est « fabriqué en usine » est risqué ou insalubre, que risquent de conclure les parents quand il s’agira de choisir entre des vaccins fabriqués en usine et la stimulation « naturelle » de l’immunité ? Il nous faudrait réfléchir à deux fois avant d’utiliser le mot « naturel » dans la promotion de l’allaitement maternel. [8]

  Je me demande vraiment si ceux qui ne veulent pas des vaccins sont vraiment si faibles d’esprit et si facilement persuadés que la suppression du mot « naturel »  va soudainement leur faire perdre toute hésitation par rapport aux vaccins. J’en doute beaucoup !

L’hésitation à vacciner pourrait-elle devenir une maladie mentale ?
Je me demande combien de temps il faudra avant que l’OMS intensifie son programme de vaccination et finisse par déclarer que « l’hésitation à vacciner » est une maladie mentale. Il y a déjà des gens qui croient que le souci d’éviter de la nourriture  génétiquement modifiée, qui ont le désir de manger une nourriture riche en nutriments, une nourriture naturelle et bio, constituent déjà autant de signes d’une maladie mentale. Ils appellent cette maladie Orthorexia nervosa. [9] (je suis vraiment sérieux !).  

Bien sûr, les troubles alimentaires peuvent être de graves problèmes. Je ne veux nullement minimiser la souffrance de ceux qui sont pris au piège d’habitudes alimentaires incontrôlables. Mais, le choix de manger des aliments non transformés  et qui ne sont pas imprégnés de produits chimiques toxiques ou d’ingrédients OGM, ne constitue pas en soi un trouble alimentaire ou une maladie mentale. De la même manière, le choix d’éviter les vaccins ne devrait pas être considéré comme une déficience mentale qui devrait être traitée par les programmes de propagande de l’OMS.
L’OMS a peut-être besoin d’une autre expression que « hésitation à vacciner ». 

A mon avis, avant que l’expression « hésitation à vacciner » ne soit prise au sérieux par les gouvernements du monde, il sera nécessaire de trouver une meilleure expression. Peut-être faudrait-il l’appeler Immunorexia Nervosa ? Peut-être des expressions comme phobie vaccinale familiale, Hystérie au sujet des produits injectables, pourraient attirer l’attention des dirigeants du monde entier ? Parmi toutes ces expressions, il y en a une qui aurait ma préférence : trouble oppositionnel  de méfiance et d’insécurité antivaccinaliste (TOMIA).
« L'hésitation à vacciner » est vraiment une expression trop simple qui manque de piquant. Avec une expression aussi fade et inoffensive, les campagnes de marketing de l’OMS ne parviendront guère à susciter la peur. Donner un nom qui suggère une maladie grave pourrait créer la peur et la haine dans l’esprit des populations et pourrait inciter les pays à faire don de millions de dollars pour le traitement de cette nouvelle maladie mentale. Peut-être que l’OMS pourrait faire un accord avec l’Association Psychiatrique Américaine pour insérer TOMIA dans leur prochaine version du Manuel diagnostic des troubles mentaux, de sorte que les personnes qui choisissent de ne pas vacciner pourraient être officiellement étiquetées comme étant atteintes d’une maladie mentale.
Peut-être avez-vous besoin d’un médicament pour traiter TOMIA ?
L’OMS pourrait aussi peut-être s’arranger avec Big Pharma, et voir s’il ne serait pas possible de créer un médicament pour traiter la maladie.
L’OMS pourrait lancer de grands sondages à la télévision. « Avez-vous peur de faire administrer des vaccins à vos enfants ? » Vous êtes peut-être atteints de TOMIA ? Consultez votre médecin qui saura trouver le médicament adéquat. »

  Le CDC américain pourrait créer une base de données obligatoire qui contiendrait les noms de tous les parents qui ne veulent pas faire vacciner leurs enfants. Cette liste pourrait être communiquée au Département des services sociaux pour travailleurs. Ce Département pourrait exiger des parents qui se trouvent sur la liste, soit de prendre le médicament adéquat pour leur maladie mentale, soit abandonner leurs enfants à l’état.  

Seriez-vous déjà atteints par la maladie TOMIA ?
Comment pourriez-vous savoir si vous n’êtes pas déjà atteints ? J’ai établi toute une série de questions qui pourraient vous permettre d’établir votre propre diagnostic de TOMIA. Il s’agit de questions que les responsables OMS de la vaccination pourraient bien nous poser dans le futur. Combien de ces questions pourraient décrire votre position ? Si vous pensez que la plupart de ces questions font allusion à votre cas personnel, alors méfiez-vous ! Vous pourriez bientôt être ciblés, surtout si vous avez encore des enfants à votre charge. 

  1. Vous méfiez-vous de la FDA, du CDC, de Big Pharma et des associations médicales allopathiques, et pensez-vous que le programme de développement de vaccins n’est nullement dans votre meilleur intérêt ?
  2. Souhaitez-vous pouvoir vivre votre vie sans penser aux programmes de vaccinations forcées prévues pour vous et vos enfants ?
  3. Est-ce qu’il vous semble impossible  de garder la bouche fermée quand des amis ou des membres de votre famille parlent avec enthousiasme de l’importance de se faire vacciner ?
  4. Eprouvez-vous des difficultés à contrôler votre colère quand vous voyez dans les pharmacies et les grands magasins des affiches qui vous incitent à vous faire vacciner contre la grippe, ou quand vous apprenez que certaines écoles font vacciner les enfants sans autorisation parentale ?
  5. Etes-vous scandalisé quand vous apprenez qu’un enfant est décédé ou handicapé à vie après avoir reçu un vaccin ?
  6. Vous sentez-vous injustement attaqué quand des gens vous critiquent ou vous blâment pour la propagation de la rougeole ou d’autres maladies, parce que vous ne croyez pas à la vaccination et que vous ne faites pas vacciner vos enfants ?
  7. Avez-vous l’impression d’avoir le contrôle sur votre vie si vous vous sentez capable d’éviter les vaccinations pour vous-même et pour vos enfants ?
  8. Pensez-vous que le naturel est préférable et que votre famille se portera nettement mieux si vous ne mangez pas de la nourriture qui contient des OGM et des produits chimiques toxiques, si vous ne recevez pas de vaccins qui contiennent des substances toxiques comme le mercure, l’aluminium et présentent de nombreux dangers ?
  9. Etes-vous fiers d’être anti-vaccins et vous demandez-vous comment il est possible que d’autres personnes puissent envisager de se faire vacciner étant donné tous les éléments de preuves de dommages que les vaccins peuvent causer ?
  10. Vos efforts pour éviter les vaccins pour vous-même et votre famille sont-ils susceptibles de mettre en péril votre vie de famille, votre joie de vivre et vos activités créatrices ?
Je dois avouer ne pas faire très belle figure dans ce genre de test. J’ai répondu OUI à toutes les questions sauf aux deux dernières.  

Conclusion : « La folie vaccinale » est bien réelle 

Jusqu’au jour sombre où la vaccination deviendra obligatoire  pour tout le monde, je vais continuer à vivre avec maladie. Je voudrais ne pas avoir à souffrir de TOMIA, mais tout cela est hors de mon contrôle. Je suppose que cette toute dernière déclaration confirme bien le fait  que je souffre vraiment de TOMIA. Tous ceux qui sont atteints de la maladie devraient célébrer la chose parce qu’ils ne sont pas tombés dans le mensonge, dans les tromperies et la manipulation de Big Pharma et de l’OMS.  

TOMIA est bien sûr une maladie fictive, mais la folie des vaccins est malheureusement bien réelle ! C’est cette folie vaccinale qui contrôle tout le programme de vaccination de l’Organisation Mondiale de la Santé et les programmes de recherches de Big Pharma  qui envisagent  d’ajouter des centaines de nouveaux vaccins au cours des prochaines années.  

Le fait d’utiliser tout le potentiel de notre intelligence pour évaluer les dommages possibles que font courir les vaccins ne mérite pas d’être étiqueté comme une maladie qui nécessiterait un traitement mis au point par l’OMS.  

L’hésitation à vacciner n’est pas un problème à résoudre ou une maladie à guérir, mais un signe que le château de cartes que Big Pharma a construit commence à s’effondrer. Les gens  qui se soucient de leur santé et de celle de leurs enfants devraient justement hésiter à vacciner ! Il s’agit ici du signe d’un esprit qui est capable de penser librement, d’un esprit qu’il n’est pas facile de manipuler.  

Je continue à prier pour que la folie qui a saisi l’Organisation Mondiale de la Santé, les organismes de Santé publique et Big Pharma puisse rapidement guérir.
Qu’ils le sachent ou ne le sachent pas, nous devons aussi rappeler à tous que les vaccins provoquent des dommages.

  Je vais continuer à prier jusqu’à ce que le tollé public contre les vaccins ait atteint un niveau où le cartel mondial du vaccin commence à reculer. Je vais continuer à vivre un style de vie naturel et sain et continuer à faire de mon mieux pour vivre avec TOMIA.

[1] “WHO Wants to Market Vaccines Like Burgers and Soda,” Marco Cáceres, National Vaccine Information Center, March 9, 2016.

[2] “Vaccine hesitancy: A growing challenge for immunization programmes,” World Health Organization, August 18, 2015. Retrieved 3/19/2016.

[3] IBID.

[4] IBID.

[5] IBID.

[6] IBID.

[7] Jessica Martucci, Anne Barnhill; “Unintended Consequences of Invoking the “Natural” in Breastfeeding Promotion,” Pediatrics, April 2016.

[8] IBID.

[9] “Orthorexia Nervosa,” National Eating Disorders Association, Retrieved 3/17/2016.  

Source: Vaccine Impact



Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 26 680

MessagePosté le: Mar 9 Aoû - 03:53 (2016)    Sujet du message: PSYCHOLOGIST INCREASES RESILIENCE FOR AFRICAN RESPONSE FORCE Répondre en citant


Story Number: NNS160808-14Release Date: 8/8/2016 12:42:00 PM 

By Staff Sgt. Tiffany DeNault, Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa Public Affairs Office

160610-F-HE651-113 CAMP LEMONNIER, Djibouti (June 10, 2016) Sailors assigned to Coast Riverine Squadron 8 complete patrol boat recovery in the Port of Djibouti. U.S. 6th Fleet, headquartered in Naples, Italy, conducts the full spectrum of joint and naval operations, often in concert with allied, joint, and interagency partners, in order to advance U.S. national interests and security and stability in Europe and Africa. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Christopher Reel/Released)

CAMP LEMONNIER, Djibouti (NNS) -- U.S. Navy Cmdr. Erick Bacho, Expeditionary Medical Facility Behavior Health and Ancillary Services director, hit the ground running upon arriving to Camp Lemonnier, Djibouti, resulting in increased mental health resilience for approximately 300 Soldiers from the East African Response Force (EARF).

"When I first got here six months ago, one of the first things I did was an assessment of what the situation is, what am I walking into and who is the biggest source of 'payment' for me in terms of workload," said Bacho, who has a background in behavioral medicine and psychopharmacologies.

Bacho's predecessor informed him that most of their clients came from the Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa (CJTF-HOA) side of Camp Lemonnier, specifically, the EARF. Bacho stated 6o percent of their clients came from HOA, and of that 60 percent, 30 percent came from the EARF.

During that time, there were three people who needed to be medically evacuated -- two from the infantry unit and one from the EARF. Additionally, there was one suicide.

The numbers don't end there. Only 10 percent of the camp's population saw the military family life counselor (MFLC), chaplain, USO or Red Cross during the previous assessment period, which led to the assumption that the other 90 percent of the population was "fine," according to Bacho.

However, the three medically evacuated clients and suicide came from the 90 percent pool, and they were never seen until it was too late or the situation became too significant to be taken care of on site.

"So the assumption that the 90 percent must be fine because they weren't seeing us, was wrong," Bacho said.

Since the system in place only saw those who came to the clinic for help, Bacho decided he needed to create an outreach program. He set out to establish a more assertive program to find those service members who weren't seeking help and were getting worse on their own.

Realizing he was only one person providing service to approximately 5,000 personnel, Bacho knew he needed help. He gathered the MFLC, chaplains, Red Cross, and USO together to train on how to identify those in need and some basic crisis counseling skills.

"So that effort was something I started, and the group is called Camp Lemonnier's Afya Ya Akili, which in Swahili means 'healthy mind' or 'resilient mind,'" said Bacho. "While they [were] doing outreach and resiliency trainings, [it] then allowed me to deliver very specific packages of care to the EARF."

Bacho directed his focus to EARF's Bravo Company, 3rd Battalion, 15th Infantry Regiment. With 3-15 Inf. Rgt. leadership's support, Bacho met with approximately 20 Soldiers for one hour, once a week for a month. In the small group setting, he was able to teach them problem-solving techniques using "Moving Forward: A Problem-Solving Approach to Achieving Life's Goals," a program already in practice by the Department of Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs.

He taught them four "tool-kits" to help build resilience and work through daily or long-term issues. He began by teaching the value of externalization, simplification and visualization and how to apply them to a particular issue. The next lesson was called "Stop, Slow Down, Think, Then Act" to help them understand how the brain processes information. Then the last two classes were going over problem-solving plans for realistic issues in the Soldiers' lives.

"Also on Fridays, during the weekend safety brief, I would give very targeted, specific resiliency packages to the whole company," said Bacho. "We made sure that every week they got a download of something helpful for them to become more resilient to relieve stressors, and it sent a clear message that we are watching them; we are concerned and we care."

As of last month, Bacho was able to meet with the whole Bravo company, approximately 300 Soldiers, and he found the results astonishing.

"When compared to other units, for example, one unit had 44 serious incidence compared to the Soldiers from the 3-15 [who] had zero," said Bacho. "That is remarkable. Now how was I doing that? Education campaigning. That wasn't therapy, it was just education."

The mental health clinic, chaplains, MFLC, Red Cross and USO continue to raise mental health awareness and educate people on the available camp services through events and trainings. They held the Djibouti 22, Operation Desert Stroll July 22, to help with their awareness efforts.

"If we could do the program for each unit on camp, I think we could see the same results -- reduced behavioral problems, reduced medical evacuations, reduced suicide, increased resilience and better problem solving," said Bacho. "My theory is if you increase their resilience and teach them to solve problems more effectively, they won't end up having behavioral problems, nor require significant mental health interventions."

Camp Lemonnier provides, operates and sustains superior service in support of combat readiness along with security of ships and aircraft detachments and personnel for regional and combat command requirements, enabling operations for the Horn of Africa while fostering positive U.S.-African nation relations. Camp Lemonnier enables the forward operations and responsiveness of U.S. and allied forces in support of Navy Region Europe, Africa, Southwest Asia's mission to provide services to the fleet, fighter, and family.

For more information, visit http://www.navy.mil, http://www.facebook.com/usnavy, or http://www.twitter.com/usnavy.

For more news from Camp Lemonnier, Djibouti, visit http://www.navy.mil/local/CAMPL/.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 26 680

MessagePosté le: Dim 28 Aoû - 06:20 (2016)    Sujet du message: OSKAR FREYSINGER : L’UNION EUROPEENNE INFANTILISE LES CITOYENS Répondre en citant


28 Août 2016

La Confédération helvétique s’apprête à soumettre certains détenteurs d’armes à des tests psychologiques, mesure directement inspirée du droit européen et contraire aux traditions suisses. Oscar Freysinger, conseiller d’État valaisan et fondateur de l’Union démocratique du centre (parti souverainiste), réagit au micro de Boulevard Voltaire.

VIDEO : http://www.bvoltaire.fr/oskarfreysinger/lunion-europeenne-infantilise-les-c…

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 26 680

MessagePosté le: Mar 27 Sep - 05:19 (2016)    Sujet du message: REFUGEE YOGA PROJECT ON ABC NEWS 24 Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iScHb_KRd_Y

Refugee Yoga Project Co-founder Danielle Begg talks to Kumi Taguchi featuring footage from the Bhutanese Women's yoga group filmed by Kim Ramsay

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 26 680

MessagePosté le: Dim 2 Oct - 21:22 (2016)    Sujet du message: HIGH SCHOOL TRIES TO MAKE STUDENT UNDERGO 5 HOUR PSYCH EVALUATION FOR PRO 2ND AMENDMENT PROJECT Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEtzaV-HqN0&spfreload=10

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 26 680

MessagePosté le: Mar 25 Oct - 04:59 (2016)    Sujet du message: OFFICIALS DECLARE ‘EATING HEALTHY’ A MENTAL DISORDER Répondre en citant


In the psychiatric bible of the Jesuits who has control over all psychiatric and health care + hospitals...

March 8, 2015 by Anya V

In an attempt to curb the mass rush for food change and reform, psychiatry has green lighted a public relations push to spread awareness about their new buzzword “orthorexia nervosa,” defined as “a pathological obsession for biologically pure and healthy nutrition.” In other words, experts are saying that our demand for nutrient-dense, healthful food is a mental disorder that must be treated.

CNN, Fast Company, Popular Science, and other top outlets have all began to trumpet the talking points on cue relatively recently:

“Orthorexia nervosa is a label designated to those who are concerned about eating healthy. Characterized by disordered eating fueled by a desire for “clean” or “healthy” foods, those diagnosed with the condition are overly pre-occupied with the nutritional makeup of what they eat”.

In short, if you turn your back on low quality, corporate food containing known cancer causing toxic additives and a rich history of dishonesty rooted in a continuous “profits over people” modus operandi, then you may suffer from a mental illness. The cherry on top is that if you have the pseudo-science labeled disorder of orthorexia nervosa, you will be prescribed known toxic, pharmaceutical drugs from some of the same conglomerate corporations that you are trying to avoid by eating healthy in the first place.

Orthorexia has not yet found its way into the latest edition of the psychiatric bible, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), yet is commonly being lumped in with other eating disorders. Stepping back and looking at the ones pushing this label on us shows highly questionable motives.

Psychiatry as a whole is deeply in bed with a pharmaceutical industry that makes the drugs to “treat” every one of these “disorders.” It is often these companies that are wielding influence behind the scenes to invent more mental health categories with their toxic products as the answer. This latest media push to popularize orthorexia as a mental disorder with a goal to marginalize or derail the food revolution appears to have been dead on arrival.

The psychiatric community has even deemed creativity to be a mental illness.

As the people continue to walk away from the broken medical and agricultural/food systems like any abusive relationship, the food makers are willing to do anything to maintain their waning control. Organic and non-GMO food markets have exploded in the last 5 years, so much so that any corporation wishing to not follow the trend risks financial hardship or ruin. In addition, pharmaceutical companies are feeling the strain as less people want their toxic medications and crippling side effects.

Perhaps some people to take it too far to the point of self-harm, but the problem we face with a toxic food system is a much larger threat. In closing, let’s be aware of some of the overall BS fed to us by the pharmaceutical bankrolled industry of psychiatry. When healthy eating and creativity are mental issues, something is amiss.

Additional Sources:
Popular Science
Jon Rappoport
Original Source


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 26 680

MessagePosté le: Mer 23 Nov - 17:01 (2016)    Sujet du message: ILLUMINATI SATANISTS USING SHELLEY DUVALL & DR PHIL TO SAY CHRISTIAN TRUTHERS ARE MENTALLY INSANE Répondre en citant


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFOeLI_nKIw

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 26 680

MessagePosté le: Ven 25 Nov - 17:10 (2016)    Sujet du message: BASIC EXORCISM RITE--REMOVED Répondre en citant




I've decided to take down the "Basic Exorcism Rite" from this site. Although I attempted to preface the rite with cautions about misinterpretation, I can no longer lend any support whatsoever to the idea of E.G.C. clergy--or anyone else--performing exorcisms as a service to others. Even beginning Magicians can perform their own banishing rituals, and people who have genuine symptoms of mental illness should be encouraged to seek help from competent mental health professionals.

My original intent with the Basic Exorcism Rite was to present a Thelemic version of a traditional sacerdotal function of Western churches in terms of mythopoetic, ceremonial Magick. Unfortunately, the concept of exorcism comes with some rather ugly, and sticky, baggage. Not only is the concept of "spirit possession" largely a superstitious response to the symptoms of mental illness (or even, in some cases, social or religious nonconformity or disobedience); but the idea that the clergy have the power--and the moral right--to "cure" such behavior lends itself too easily to a whole spectrum of abuses.

Although I have never heard of any such abuses taking place within E.G.C., I have heard recent news accounts of horrendous examples of abusive exorcisms (and their brutal cousins, witch hunts) within what we may term the superstitious religions. I do not think such abusive practices should be tolerated, even under the banner of religious freedom; Rolling Eyes and I do not wish my writings to ever be cited--by anyone--in countenancing such practices.

Even though it appears that the practice of exorcism has been widely ignored within E.G.C. anyway, I think it is time for us to relegate this particular aspect of the traditional sacerdotal arts to the museum of obsolete religious artifacts, once and for all.



Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 26 680

MessagePosté le: Jeu 8 Déc - 06:27 (2016)    Sujet du message: FDA APPROVES CLINICAL TRIAL OF ECSTASY FOR POSIBLE TREATMENT OF PTSD Répondre en citant


Nothing new under the sun. We are just human slaves for them

Wednesday, December 07, 2016 by: Vicki Batts
Tags: Clinical trials, ecstasy for PTSD, FDA, mdma

(NaturalNews) Could ecstasy soon be hitting a pharmacy near you? The FDA recently approved of a large-scale, Phase 3 clinical trial of MDMA for post-traumatic stress disorder. The approval follows a series of small-scale studies that have indicated that small amounts of the drug can provide effective treatment for the illness.

While it may sound like a fun time, for those who suffer with PTSD, MDMA has proven that it can provide serious, and much needed, relief. C.J. Hardin, a  veteran who served three tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, suffered with severe PTSD that left him divorced and struggling with alcoholism and suicidal thoughts. Hardin says he cut himself off from the world completely, noting that he tried psychotherapy, group therapy and almost a dozen different psychiatric medications.

“Nothing worked for me, so I put aside the idea that I could get better,” he said in his interview with The New York Times.

But in 2013, Hardin was able to take part in a small clinical trial of MDMA that would prove to be something of a metamorphic experience. Hardin says, “It changed my life. It allowed me to see my trauma without fear or hesitation and finally process things and move forward.”

For the community of people fighting for the legalization of drugs such as MDMA, marijuana and LSD, FDA approval for a phase-3 study is a huge step forward. The Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS) is a non-profit research and education organization that was founded in 1986 with the purpose of creating “medical, legal, and cultural contexts for people to benefit from the careful uses of psychedelics and marijuana.” MAPS has funded six Phase-2 studies that treated 130 PTSD patients with MDMA, and the organization also plans on sponsoring the Phase-3 clinical trial, which will feature at least 230 patients.

The use of MDMA in PTSD treatment would be different to the way in which medical marijuana is used. Instead of using the medication at home, reports indicate that the drug would be administered to assist in psychotherapy. During the initial trials, patients took MDMA at the beginning of their talk therapy sessions, under the supervision of a two-person team. Throughout the 12-week PTSD study, patients went through extensive psychotherapy, which involved three 8-hour MDMA sessions. The team, consisting of  psychiatric nurse Ann Mithoefer and her husband, Dr. Mithoefer, guided each patient through their past traumas while playing soothing music. Flynn, the couple’s terrier mix, often kept patients company throughout the journey.

Ann Mithoefer commented, “The medicine allows them to look at things from a different place and reclassify them. Honestly, we don’t have to do much. Each person has an innate ability to heal. We just create the right conditions.”

According to The New York Times, research shows that MDMA can do more than just change perspective. Data has indicated that MDMA can prompt the brain to release a stream of hormones and neurotransmitters that evoke feelings of trust, love and overall well-being. This stream is also capable of muting fear, as well as the negative memories that can be overpowering for patients with PTSD.

Currently, there are two drugs on the market for PTSD treatment, and neither showed substantial benefits to patients when compared to placebos during clinical trials.

Estimates indicate that between 30 and 40 percent of those suffering with PTSD are not helped by current treatment methods at all. But the promise of MDMA as a treatment for those with PTSD is very real.

Hopefully, the medicinal value of MDMA will not be overshadowed by illicit use, so that it can shine as a treatment for the thousands of Americans who suffer in silence.



Revenir en haut
Contenu Sponsorisé

MessagePosté le: Aujourd’hui à 14:25 (2017)    Sujet du message: REHABILITATION PROGRAMS -PROGRAMME DE RÉHABILITATION

Revenir en haut
Montrer les messages depuis:   
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Page 8 sur 8

Sauter vers:  

Index | Creer un forum | Forum gratuit d’entraide | Annuaire des forums gratuits | Signaler une violation | Conditions générales d'utilisation
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Traduction par : phpBB-fr.com