LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum

LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1)
...

 FAQFAQ   RechercherRechercher   MembresMembres   GroupesGroupes   S’enregistrerS’enregistrer 
 ProfilProfil   Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés   ConnexionConnexion 

DICTATURE ISLAMO/FASCISTE MONDIALE - 4E REICH (PARTIE 2) - P.1
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 360, 61, 62119, 120, 121  >
 
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> TERREUR SUR LA TERRE/TERROR ON EARTH -> DICTATURE ISLAMO/FASCISTE MONDIALE 4e REICH - (PARTIE 2)
Sujet précédent :: Sujet suivant  
Auteur Message
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 8 Nov - 01:03 (2014)    Sujet du message: «LA SOLUTION NE PEUT PAS ÊTRE UN SIEGE POLICIER DE JERUSALEM» Répondre en citant



«LA SOLUTION NE PEUT PAS ÊTRE UN SIEGE POLICIER DE JERUSALEM»


Le Monde.fr | 07.11.2014 à 15h23 • Mis à jour le 07.11.2014 à 20h18 | Propos recueillis par Piotr Smolar (Jérusalem, correspondant)




Le gouvernement israélien a encore renforcé la présence policière à Jérusalem, vendredi 7 novembre, craignant un nouvel accès de violences dans les quartiers arabes et aux abors de l’esplanade des Mosquées. La police a interdit aux hommes de moins de 35 ans d’accéder au troisième lieu saint de l’islam, également vénéré par les juifs. Vendredi dans la matinée, une deuxième victime de l’attaque à la voiture bélier, survenu mercredi, est décédée, des suites de ses blessures.

Yoram Schweitzer, chercheur à l’Institut pour les études sur la sécurité nationale (INSS), dirige le programme de recherche sur le terrorisme et les conflits de basse intensité. Il travaille notamment sur les auteurs d’attaques suicides qui ont échoué.

Comment analysez-vous les attaques récentes à la voiture bélier à Jérusalem ? Peut-on parler d’un terrorisme « low cost » ?

Oui, c’est l’une des expressions possibles. Mais ce mode d’action n’est pas nouveau, on l’a déjà vu par le passé, à Jérusalem et ailleurs. Que ces individus aient planifié leur action à l’avance, ou bien qu’ils soient inspirés par l’atmosphère de confrontation ambiante, ce mode d’action semble efficace à leurs yeux : la mort de plusieurs personnes, des blessés, et la création du chaos dans la ville. Ces actions ne semblent pas coordonnées, structurées. Les gens du Hamas [le Mouvement de la résistance islamique, qui dirige la bande de Gaza depuis 2007] essaient d’envenimer la situation, mais il n’y a pas d’ordre donné de prendre sa voiture. Cela arrive généralement par vague à cause du phénomène d’imitation.

Ces actions se différencient de ce que j’appelle « l’attaque suicide terroriste classique ». Quand on se fait sauter avec des explosifs, la mort est certaine. Quand on embarque dans une voiture et qu’on fonce sur des gens, la mort n’est pas garantie, même si les probabilités sont élevées.




Plusieurs membres du gouvernement, dont le premier ministre, Benyamin Nétanyahou, ont accusé le président de l’Autorité palestinienne, Mahmoud Abbas, d’être responsable de ces attaques…

Tout cela, c’est de la politique. L’Autorité palestinienne et Mahmoud Abbas personnellement ont adressé des condoléances aux chahid (« martyrs ») morts dans ces attaques. Ce n’est pas admissible, car il s’agit bien d’opérations terroristes. Mais d’autre part, on sait que l’Autorité joue des deux côtés. Elle coopère étroitement avec Israël pour empêcher des attaques terroristes organisées, planifiées.

Comment jugez-vous la réponse du gouvernement à ces attaques ? Selon un sondage publié vendredi dans le journal Maariv, 81 % des personnes interrogées désaprouvent son action…

Il y a un premier volet, celui de la réponse sécuritaire, pour empêcher ces violences par voiture, pierres ou couteaux. Si ces attaques ou ces émeutes se poursuivent, la main de fer de la police sera bien plus agressive. Mais la solution ne peut pas être un siège policier de Jérusalem. Le gouvernement doit empêcher les politiques d’enflammer la situation. Il n’y a pas besoin d’être un Prix Nobel pour comprendre qu’il faut faire preuve de retenue, de patience, utiliser son cerveau au lieu de titiller la fierté juive. La provocation ne justifie pas la violence mais elle la nourrit.
Lire aussi : Jérusalem, fractures à vif

http://www.lemonde.fr/proche-orient/article/2014/11/07/la-solution-ne-peut-pas-etre-un-siege-policier-de-jerusalem_4520360_3218.html#


Revenir en haut
Publicité






MessagePosté le: Sam 8 Nov - 01:03 (2014)    Sujet du message: Publicité

PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?
Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 8 Nov - 01:48 (2014)    Sujet du message: ISRAELI NEWS LIVE - RIOTING NEAR THE MOUNT OF OLIVES Répondre en citant



ISRAELI NEWS LIVE - RIOTING NEAR THE MOUNT OF OLIVES



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4jBVOuiOh4


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 8 Nov - 02:57 (2014)    Sujet du message: CANADA - OUR EQUIVALENT OF NDAA IN EFFECT NOVEMBER 1 - NOTRE EQUIVALENT DU NDAA, ENTRENT EN VIGUEUR LE 1er NOVEMBRE Répondre en citant



CANADA  - OUR EQUIVALENT OF NDAA IN EFFECT NOVEMBER 1 - NOTRE EQUIVALENT DU NDAA, ENTRENT EN VIGUEUR LE 1er NOVEMBRE



  




Posted on October 25, 2014


Canada: “Track B” secret government, police powers established by Order in Council – “Our equivalent of NDAA” in effect November 1 – ITCCS to respond

Ottawa:
In the wake of the staged shooting of a Canadian soldier in Canada’s capital this week, a secret system of government armed with sweeping police powers will soon be inaugurated by a special Order in Council.

A source in Ottawa claims the new system mirrors the American “Homeland Security” regime, and stands outside the laws and Parliament of Canada. The Order establishing the new regime is codenamed “Track B’, and is closed to public scrutiny and Parliamentary or judicial review.

“This is like the free trade agreement: there’ll be the official version for the masses and the real arrangement, cloaked and operational. Not even (Prime Minister) Harper’s cabinet knows most of the facts” stated the source today.

Under “Track B”, according to the source, police and special para-military units will have unlimited powers of arrest and detention, utilizing secret prisons and open ended warrants to incarcerate anyone indefinitely without due process or Habeas Corpus.

“November 1 is the official start date, but things are moving already” said the source.

In response to the Track B disclosure, ITCCS Central will be issuing a special communique and directive to its members this Monday, October 27, along with a breaking interview with its North American Field Secretary Kevin Annett.

The special communique and interview will be posted at www.itccs.org and throughout the ITCCS global network.

Issued by ITCCS Central, Brussels
October 25, 2014, Brussels (7 pm GMT)
www.itccs.org
http://itccs.org/2014/10/25/itccs-breaking-news-october-25-2014-police-stat…


DERNIERES NOUVELLES DE L'ITCCS : 25 OCTOBRE 2014 : LES POUVOIRS DE L'ETAT POLICIER ARRIVENT AU CANADA

Canada: le gouvernement secret "Track B", des pouvoirs policiers établis par décret - «notre équivalent du NDAA", entrent en vigueur le 1er novembre - l'ITCCS va y répondre

Ottawa:
Dans la foulée de la fusillade mise en scène d'un soldat canadien dans la capitale du Canada, cette semaine, un système secret de gouvernement armé de pouvoirs policiers ahurissants sera bientôt inauguré par une ordonnance spéciale en conseil.

Une source à Ottawa affirme que le nouveau système reflète le régime américain du "Homeland Security", et se tient en dehors des lois et du Parlement du Canada. L'arrêté fixant ce nouveau régime possède le nom de code « Track B », et est fermé à l'examen public ainsi qu'au passage en revue parlementaire ou judiciaire.

"Cela ressemble à l'accord de libre-échange: il y aura la version officielle pour les masses et la disposition réelle, masquée et opérationnelle. Pas même le cabinet du (Premier ministre) Harper ne connaît la plupart des faits », a déclaré notre source aujourd'hui.

Sous le "Track B", selon cette source, la police et des unités para-militaires spéciaux auront des pouvoirs illimités d'arrestation et de détention, d'utiliser des prisons secrètes et d'ouvrir des mandats clôturés afin d'incarcérer quiconque indéfiniment, sans procès ni respect de l'Habeas Corpus.

« Le premier novembre est la date officielle de début (du Track B), mais les choses bougent déjà », a déclaré notre source.

En réponse à la divulgation du Track B, l'ITCCS Central émettra un communiqué et une directive spéciaux à ses membres, ce lundi 27 octobre, avec une interview exceptionnelle avec son Secrétaire de Terrain pour l'Amérique du Nord, Kevin Annett.

Ce communiqué spécial et cette interview seront postés sur www.itccs.org et à travers le réseau mondial de l'ITCCS.

Publié par l'ITCCS Central, à Bruxelles,
le 25 octobre 2014, Bruxelles (19 heures GMT)
www.itccs.org


Dernière édition par maria le Lun 8 Déc - 17:40 (2014); édité 1 fois
Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 9 Nov - 02:49 (2014)    Sujet du message: HAMAS, ISLAMIC JIHAD CALL FOR ANOTHER 'DAY OF RAGE' Répondre en citant



DAY OF RAGE


HAMAS, ISLAMIC JIHAD CALL FOR ANOTHER 'DAY OF RAGE'


Both terror Hamas and Islamic Jihad organizations have called for another “Day of Rage” today (Friday) in Jerusalem. The groups urging of Arabs to act was perfectly timed with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’s warning that failure to solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict would lead to increased violence in the region, reports the Egyptian Al Bawaba news site.

In independent statements, Hamas and Islamic Jihad urged all Palestinians - especially the youth - to take to the streets in a move "to save the Al Aqsa Mosque and defend Jerusalem against the Israeli siege.” They also urged Arabs to create clashes with soldiers and residents Jerusalem, as well as in the Judea-Samaria region.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/Flash.aspx/308375#.VF63pyfqeSo


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 9 Nov - 02:53 (2014)    Sujet du message: YET AUSTRALIA AND OTHER WESTERN NATIONS CONTINUE TO WELCOME THOSE WHO ESPOUSE THE VERY RELIGION RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS INCORRIGIBLE IDEOLOGY Répondre en citant

ROMAN - PAPAL IMMIGRATION

YET AUSTRALIA AND OTHER WESTERN NATIONS CONTINUE TO WELCOME THOSE WHO ESPOUSE THE VERY RELIGION RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS INCORRIGIBLE IDEOLOGY


 


Qur’an Sura 18:26, “[Allah] maketh none to share in his government.”

Qur’an Sura 8:59-60, “And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah’s Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy.”

By Mark Schliebs, National Affairs – “THE brother of an Australian man jailed for terrorism-related offences in Saudi Arabia has been delivering lectures at some of the nation’s most controversial Islamic centres while encouraging jihadists to show their ‘might’ against disbelievers.

Perth man Junaid Thorne, a 24-year-old who has spent much of his life in Saudi Arabia, has spoken at Sydney’s al-Risalah and Melbourne’s al-Furqan Islamic centres in recent weeks as part of a lecture tour backed by little-known radical organisation Millatu Ibrahim, which is banned in Germany.

Police and terrorism experts yesterday said they were not aware of the organisation having an active presence in Australia.

At al-Risalah, he sat in front of a Millatu Ibrahim banner – featuring the logo of the al-Qa’ida-linked Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant used by the most extreme Sunni fighters in Syria – to deliver his first “public lecture” since being deported from Riyadh in July.

His deportation came after his brother, Shayden, was sentenced to 4 1/2 years in a Riyadh prison for possessing terrorism-related materials and supporting and encouraging terrorism. Mr Thorne, whose father is a Noongar Aboriginal man, was detained for two months for protesting against his brother’s arrest in December 2011.

According to those who attended the Sydney lecture last month, ‘Sheik Muhammad Junaid’ told followers that businessmen should be donating money to jihadists around the world.

‘Support oppressed Muslims across the world, support the mujaheddin,’ he said, according to a summary of the speech that appeared on social media after the event.

‘Money comes and goes, but what remains is what you gave in the cause of Allah. Most of the Ayat (numbered Koranic verses) mention financing jihad before jihad, in relation to the individual (sic) performance.’ …

In other online postings, Mr Thorne indicated that he was involved in a group called Millatu Ibrahim Perth and quoted American-born al-Qa’ida militant Anwar al-Awlaki, who was killed in a US drone strike in Yemen in 2011…

Millatu Ibrahim Perth’s website was recently closed down, but it has used its Facebook page to declare a hatred of disbelievers.

‘We hate the Kuffar and everything that they worship,’ it reads. ‘We hate their constitutions, we reject their way of life, we reject their political systems, we reject their parliaments, we reject their democracy, capitalism, liberalism, socialism, communism and every other filthy disbelieving ‘ism’ that has come to act as a hindrance from Islam, the pure religion of Allah to rule from the east to the west.’”

For rest of this article click Link

http://www.jewsnews.co.il/2014/01/16/muslim-lecturer-in-australia-we-hate-non-muslims-we-hate-democracy-we-hate-everything-non-islamic/


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 9 Nov - 02:57 (2014)    Sujet du message: CITES THE CASE OF MIGRATION AND ISLAMIC COUNTRIES Répondre en citant

IMMIGRATION

CITES THE CASE OF MIGRATION AND ISLAMIC COUNTRIES

VATICAN CITY, MAY 15, 2006 (Zenit.org).- Benedict XVI, noting the growing phenomenon of migrations into and out of predominantly Islamic countries, insisted on the importance of the principle of reciprocity.

Such reciprocity consists of "a relationship founded in reciprocal respect and, above all, of an attitude of heart and spirit," the Pope said.

According to this principle, Christians are called to welcome immigrants of Islamic religion "with open arms" and they expect that "Christians who emigrate to countries of Islamic majority will find hospitality and respect for their religious identity," the Holy Father added.

He addressed this issue today in an address to participants in the plenary session of the Pontifical Council for Migrants and Travelers, which is reflecting on the topic of migration and Islamic countries.

Benedict XVI acknowledged that "the mobility that affects Muslim countries merits a specific reflection, not only because of the quantitative importance of the phenomenon, but above all because the Islamic is an identity characteristic both from the religious as well as the cultural point of view."

In this context, the Pope "highlighted the Catholic Church's awareness of the fact that 'interreligious dialogue is part of her commitment to serve humanity in the modern world.'"

"We are living at a time when Christians are called to cultivate a form of open dialogue on religious problems, not renouncing the presentation … of the Christian message in keeping with their own identity," he said.

Attitude of heart

Explaining the principle of reciprocity, the Pontiff quoted the pontifical council's 2004 instruction "Erga Migrantes Caritas Christi."

The document defines reciprocity "not merely as an attitude for making claims but as a relationship based on mutual respect and on justice in juridical and religious matters."

"Reciprocity is also an attitude of heart and spirit that enables us to live together everywhere with equal rights and duties," states the instruction.

"Healthy reciprocity will urge each one to become an 'advocate' for the rights of minorities when his or her own religious community is in the majority," states No. 64 of the text.

In this context, the Pope reminded Christians of the commandment of love that Christ left them, according to which "believers are called to open their arms and hearts to everyone, whatever their country of origin, leaving the task of formulating appropriate laws for promoting healthy coexistence to those responsible for public life."

"Christians must particularly open their hearts to the lowliest and the poorest, in whom Christ himself is especially present," continued the Holy Father.

In virtue of reciprocity, he added, "it is to be hoped that Christians emigrating to countries with Muslim majorities, find there welcome and respect for their religious identity."
 
http://www.africamission-mafr.org/fides50.htm


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 9 Nov - 03:04 (2014)    Sujet du message: VATICAN - “MIGRATION AND MOVING TO AND FROM MUSLIM COUNTRIES” COMPLEX AND TOPICAL SUBJECT OF RELATIONS WITH MUSLIM WORD: 17th PLENARY ASSEMBLY OF THE PONTIFICAL COUNCIL FOR MIGRANTS AND ITINERANT PEOPLES Répondre en citant

IMMIGRATION

VATICAN - “MIGRATION AND MOVING TO AND FROM MUSLIM COUNTRIES” COMPLEX AND TOPICAL SUBJECT OF RELATIONS WITH MUSLIM WORD: 17th PLENARY ASSEMBLY OF THE PONTIFICAL COUNCIL FOR MIGRANTS AND ITINERANT PEOPLES

Vatican City (Fides Service) - A sign of the times, the phenomenon of human mobility poses no few problems religious and spiritual, and also social, economic and political. What is more the complexity, topicality and importance of “Migration and Moving to and from Muslim countries”, are clear to all. The subject will be discussed by the 17th plenary assembly of the Pontifical Council for Migrants and Itinerant Peoples, to take place 15 to 17 May with the participation of Council members and advisors and international experts. Cardinal Renato Raffaele Martino, the newly appointed president will present the theme on the basis of recent documents and congress of the Pontifical Council. The secretary Archbishop Agostino Marchetto will outline the thought and activity of the Council since the last Plenary.



A talk by Fr. Maurice Borrmans, M. Afr., former professor at the Pontifical Institute for Arab and Islamic Studies PISAI in Rome on the situation in general regarding the life of Christians in Muslim countries, will be followed by a paper on the situation of Muslim/Christian dialogue by the secretary of the Pontifical Council for Inter-religious Dialogue Archbishop Pier Luigi Celata.


Two other key interventions given by the Pope’s secretary for Relations with States Archbishop Giovanni Lajolo, and the secretary of the Congregation for the Evangelisation of Peoples Archbishop Robert Sarah, will illustrate prospects for improvement in the situation, respectively from a general and African point of view, particularly dear to the Church.

Experts in the field will speak on human mobility to which the Pontifical Council refers: migrants, refugees, foreign students, nomads, circus people, Apostleship of the Sea, Street Pastoral and pastoral care for civil aviation, tourism and pilgrimages. On Monday 15 May the participants will be received by Pope Benedict XVI. (S.L.) (Agenzia Fides 11/5/2006, righe 24, parole 319)

http://www.africamission-mafr.org/fides50.htm


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 9 Nov - 16:09 (2014)    Sujet du message: REMARKS AT THE CALL TO ACTION MINISTERIAL ON PROTECTION FROM GENDER BASED VIOLENCE IN EMERGENCIES Répondre en citant

REMARKS AT THE CALL TO ACTION MINISTERIAL ON PROTECTION FROM GENDER BASED VIOLENCE IN EMERGENCIES

War propaganda to create a false sense of security.

CANADA ROLLS OUT ZERO TOLERANCE FOR BARBARIC CULTURAL PRACTICES ACT


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJ1PGXfAoPM

-----


Remarks

John Kerry
Secretary of State

Waldorf Astoria

New York City

September 22, 2014


Thank you very much. Thank you. (Applause.) Thank you all very, very much. My apologies for being a little bit late, and my apologies ahead of time for having to leave here after I speak, because we have a meeting taking place shortly on the important subject of Syria – Syria, excuse me, Libya. And I’ve got a group of foreign ministers coming in momentarily, so I appreciate your indulgence on that.

Anne Richard, thank you for your leadership on this and on so many other issues of conscience. And Cathy Russell, Ambassador Russell, thank you for your tremendous efforts on behalf of women and girls around the world.

It’s my privilege to have a chance to open this up and to share a few words with everybody and to express the profound commitment of President Obama, myself, the Obama Administration, the United States to really trying to deal with this fundamental challenge of gender-based violence and the scourge of this violence in the context particularly of conflict.

All of us in this room understand that this is not just about our common humanity, though we call on everybody to understand it is dependent upon that. It’s about our collective security in the end. Gender-based violence plagues every country and it perpetuates conflict. It creates instability that can flow from generation to generation, and it tears apart the ability of states to hold together as states in some cases. It makes all nations that experience it less secure, less prosperous, and clearly less free.

So there really are few causes worthy of – more worthy than this of our efforts. And it’s more clear than ever, witnessing what is happening in Iraq, in Syria, the world has come to learn about this new entity called ISIL. And we have witnessed their unbelievable, brutal mass murder, executions of soldiers, journalists. What is far less well known but equally intolerable is the amount of atrocity committed against innocent women and girls. ISIL has savagely raped and kidnapped countless Iraqi and Syrian women. It has forced young girls into marriages with ISIL fighters. It has awarded young women to jihadists as a reward for entering jihad. It has abducted Yezidi and Christian women and sold them off as slaves to jihadists. This is who ISIL is. And what we’re doing here is saying who we are and what matters to us.

I wish it were otherwise, but barbarity is obviously not new to the world. The term “rape, pillage, and plunder” came from somewhere, and the history books are filled with it. But that doesn’t mean it has to be something that gets repeated. It doesn’t mean it has to be with us forever. It doesn’t mean we have to accept it. Evil has been with us for a long time too, but we don’t stop fighting it. With hundreds of girls who were kidnapped by Boko Haram in Nigeria, when Afghan women brave acid burnings in their quest for a better future, when women are raped and left to die in the eastern DRC – when these appalling acts are committed, it’s a stain on the conscience of the world, and it’s a call to action for all of us. And because we have to acknowledge a basic truth, gender-based violence anywhere is a threat to peace, security, and dignity everywhere.

So for whatever reasons, this fight has long been a personal one for me. Back when I was a young prosecutor, long before I ran for political office, I took pride in launching the state of Massachusetts’s first program for counseling rape victims and for putting these cases onto a fast track. In fact, the person I picked for that became one of the nation’s experts on victim witness assistance and helped to define it.

And I was proud to introduce a – not just a rape counseling unit, but a fast-track prosecution unit so that people weren’t twice victimized, once by the rape and twice by the system itself when they never got justice.

I was proud to introduce and pass through the Senate Foreign Relations Committee the International Violence Against Women Act. And as Secretary of State, this issue remains personal. Too many of the places that I have visited over the course of the last year and a half bear the scars of a time when rape was used as a tactic of oppression and intimidation. And sexual violence against women, as I mentioned, is as old as wars and conflict itself. But now, thousands of years after rape was written into the lexicon of warfare, it’s time to write it out and to banish sexual violence to the dark ages and to the history books where it belongs.

That’s why in June I was honored to join with my good friend William Hague, special envoy Angelina Jolie, and advocates from around the world for the first Global Summit to End Sexual Violence in Conflict. And to all who say that sexual violence will always be a spoil of war, something so ingrained that it can’t be eradicated, we came together to say enough is enough. We can end sexual warfare conducted against the innocents, and partly it can happen by eradicating the impunity that has been able to go along with it. We can establish new norms of respect for women and girls, men and boys. And we can hold those who commit these acts – we must hold those who commit these acts and those who condone them accountable. That’s the way you stop it. That’s the way you change things.

So all of us share in our respect for William Hague’s leadership on this topic, and all of us are grateful to the United Kingdom for launching the Call to Action on Protection from Gender-Based Violence in Emergencies last year. The Call to Action is about protecting and empowering the world’s most vulnerable populations. It’s about deepening our partnerships with the grassroots organizations and local communities. It’s about fighting for a global coalition that rejects gender-based violence as a byproduct of war, conflict, or natural disaster.

I’d just emphasize the word “reject.” Gender-based violence is a crime, plain and simple. It’s not and it cannot be seen as an inevitable consequence of conflict or crisis. Nor is it simply an infraction of a country’s penal code. Gender-based violence defiles the very idea of civilization, and the civilized world needs to stand up for itself, needs to take a stand.

The United States is committed to taking action now. Last year, here in New York, I announced our Safe from the Start initiative. And I’m pleased to say that our initial $10 million commitment is making a difference, whether it’s providing solar lights for refugees who fled the fighting in South Sudan, or deploying a UN human rights expert to Erbil to ensure that displaced Iraqi women get the care and the services that they need.

And that’s why we’re making available an additional 12 million to support this initiative. Our commitment with the help of leading humanitarian organizations will launch new innovation challenges, it will strengthen training for aid workers and hire more GBV experts that can be dispatched at the onset of a crisis.

We’re also launching a new Real Time Accountability Partnership in two pilot countries to make sure that we track our progress and keep disaster and conflict victims safe in real time. And in February, I was proud to announce to the world that the United States had adopted detailed guidance to make crystal clear that those who commit sexual violence in and around conflict or as a crime against humanity are unwelcome here in the United States of America. And we’ve taken steps to enforce that.

So I’ll say to all of you here: One of the reasons that I do talk about this issue as Secretary of State is that it’s important to make clear that you don’t have to be a woman to advance the cause of justice to honor women and girls. And this is a fight that demands action from every single one of us. We have to communicate in a unified way with a single loud voice that there is no place in the civilized world for those who commit gender-based violence.

I really do have faith that over the long haul we can win this fight; we can convert the skeptics. Sometimes I know it seems daunting, but hope is always stronger than fear. Even as ISIL’s brutality and barbarism against women and girls continues showing the world who they really are, with every act of courage and perseverance the women of Iraq and Syria show the world who they really are.


Maryam is a young girl from Iraq. ISIL soldiers kidnapped her and her friends from a local school during their daily prayers – if you want to understand something about ISIL’s phony claim to any religious basis. They were shackled and they were marched to a relatively isolated barracks. They were held captive there for weeks and repeatedly beaten and raped. Maryam managed finally to escape this hell and she found refuge in a makeshift camp. And when she got there, her first thought was of her family. She said, “I don’t want to dishonor them.”

Well, we’re here today precisely to make it clear that we can honor the courage of Maryam and the countless other survivors whose lives have been ravaged by war and insecurity. Our job isn’t just to prevent gender-based violence from happening, it’s to help girls like Maryam recover in safety and dignity, and to let her know that the shame in her perpetrators is theirs to bear, not hers or her family’s. This is our call to action and this is our call to conscience, and together I am convinced that everybody here reaching out and touching the conscience of a lot of people who aren’t here we can altogether make a difference.

Thanks for the privilege of sharing a few thoughts. Thank you.

http://www.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2014/09/231955.htm



Dernière édition par maria le Lun 8 Déc - 17:43 (2014); édité 2 fois
Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 9 Nov - 18:58 (2014)    Sujet du message: BILL: REVOKE CITIZENSHIP FOR INCITEMENT Répondre en citant



BILL: REVOKE CITIZENSHIP FOR INCITEMENT


It will be first a great idea to start to clean the Knesset first, were the arab deputy Taleb Abou Arar from Raam Tal party calls for "Allah Ouakbar" against jewish deputy members and second to authorize the army to protect the jewish community.



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9F-7LTLTzU


Bill to revoke citizenship for calling for Israel's destruction could become the most stringent application of revocation in the West.

By Tova Dvorin
First Publish: 11/9/2014, 10:55 AM


Israeli passport (illustrative)

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu proposed a far-reaching bill on Saturday, which - if passed - would see citizenship revoked for any Israeli who calls for the destruction of the State of Israel.

The bill is actually the revival of a similar motion proposed by Yisrael Beytenu which was blocked in 2008. That proposal would have transferred the authority to cancel citizenship from the Minister of the Interior to the Prime Minister's Office, changing the current arrangement for citizenship issues from laws originating as far back as 1952.

Netanyahu made the announcement after declaring earlier Saturday that he would increase measures to stop the ongoing cycle of violence in Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria after multiple attacks. 

"Israel is a state of law," he said. "We will not tolerate disturbances and riots. We will act against rock throwers, road blockers and those calling for the establishment of a Palestinian state in place of Israel. Those who do not respect Israeli law will be punished very seriously."

If passed, the law could become the most stringent application of revoking citizenship in the Western world - i.e. revocation based on comments alone instead of actions.

Many countries do not allow revoking citizenship for any reason, including the US, Canada, Scandinavia. Other countries - such as Greece, the UK, and Australia - only give the authorities the power to do so only in severe cases, e.g. treason or involvement in terror groups abroad. 

Recent efforts to revoke citizenship have primarily revolved around enlistment to terror groups. In December, worldwide hysteria over a growing number of radical Muslims from the West joining the group culminated in the quiet revocation of UK citizenship of British Islamists found to be fighting with the group; and just last month, a similar motion was presented to Netanyahu for Israeli Arabs by Tourism Minister Uzi Landau. 

That motion was filed after thirty Israeli Arabs were revealed to have joined ISIS as of last month, and after a slew of incidents involving incitement against Israel or participation in Arab rioting since unrest erupted in June.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/187212#.VF-YxSfqeSo


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 10 Nov - 00:25 (2014)    Sujet du message: CAR BOMBS KILL ATLEAST 23 ACROSS BAGHDAD Répondre en citant



CAR BOMBS KILL ATLEAST 23 ACROSS BAGHDAD



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2SoSFTasqw


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 10 Nov - 00:29 (2014)    Sujet du message: THOUSANDS OF BALLOONS SET FREE TO MARK 25th ANNIVERSARY OF BERLIN WALL Répondre en citant

A SIGNAL FOR THE FINAL GLOBAL TAKE OVER - WWW3???

THOUSANDS OF BALLOONS SET FREE TO MARK 25th ANNIVERSARY OF BERLIN WALL

In front of the portal and the 4 horses of the Apocalypse-- Lucifer
Is the white ballons represents the release evil spirist like we see in some churches? 


 


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XJhu7QG_nQ

CELEBRATING THE END OF THE BERLIN WALL




VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tG3OUl4oLqY


Dernière édition par maria le Lun 10 Nov - 00:49 (2014); édité 2 fois
Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 10 Nov - 00:35 (2014)    Sujet du message: 25 ANS APRES LA CHUTE DU MUR, L'OMBRE DE KARL MARX PLANE TOUJOURS Répondre en citant

25 ANS APRES LA CHUTE DU MUR, L'OMBRE DE KARL MARX PLANE TOUJOURS

Et plus que jamais, puisque la Charte des Nations est basée sur les écrits socialiste et communiste de Karl Marx.



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ok6o8K-Ub4


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 10 Nov - 00:52 (2014)    Sujet du message: US AND NATO MAY SPARK NUCLEAR WAR, WARNS RUSSIA'S GORBACHEV Répondre en citant

RUMOR OF GLOBAL AND NUCLEAR WAR

US AND NATO MAY SPARK NUCLEAR WAR, WARNS RUSSIA'S GORBACHEV


Gorbachev is part of the problem too. He's playing on the global level!

The Earth Council and Green Cross International, founded by Mikhail Gorbachev, joined forces to form the Earth Charter Commission. The Commission, co-chaired by Strong and Gorbachev, claims to have consulted more than 100,000 “concerned world citizens” around the globe. The twenty-three members of the Commission, which includes nine Club of Rome members, claim to have “mediated prayerfully over every word and comma”. I wonder who they were praying too?
The article : http://www.green-agenda.com/earthcharter.html


 


VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pY18A3Y-0No


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 10 Nov - 01:17 (2014)    Sujet du message: SECOND DAY OF VIOLENT CLASHES IN ISRAEL FOLLOWING DEATH OF ARAB ISRAELI Répondre en citant



DAY OF RAGE

SECOND DAY OF VIOLENT CLASHES IN ISRAEL FOLLOWING DEATH OF ARAB ISRAELI




VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGPLQFiK8GI


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 10 Nov - 02:37 (2014)    Sujet du message: LE PAPE FRANCOIS EVOQUE LE 25° ANNIVERSAIRE DE LA CHUTE DU MUR DE BERLIN Répondre en citant

LE PAPE FRANCOIS EVOQUE LE 25° ANNIVERSAIRE DE LA CHUTE DU MUR DE BERLIN

POPE PRAYS FOR GOD TO "BRING DOWN ALL THE WALLS" THAT DIVIDE WORLD




VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPg68kEAqBs


-----

25° anniversaire | chute | mur de berlin | pape François | rome

Rome: «Nous avons besoin de ponts, pas de murs». Le pape François ne pouvait pas manquer d’évoquer, dimanche 9 novembre, le 25° anniversaire de la chute du Mur de Berlin, «symbole de la division idéologique de l’Europe et du monde entier». Il l’a fait à l’occasion de la prière de l’angélus, devant des milliers de personnes rassemblées sur la place Saint-Pierre.

 
Rome Pape François (Photo: vaticanresources.s3.amazonaws.com)

Le souverain pontife a rendu hommage aux nombreuses personnes qui ont «lutté, prié et souffert» pour que cela se produise, certaines jusqu’au sacrifice de leur vie. Parmi elles, il a mentionné «le saint pape Jean Paul II qui a joué un rôle de premier plan».

  Pour une culture de la rencontre, capable de «faire tomber tous les murs»

Le pape François a profité de cet anniversaire pour inviter les fidèles à prier en faveur d’une culture de la rencontre, susceptible de «faire tomber tous les murs qui divisent encore le monde et pour que plus jamais des personnes innocentes ne soient persécutés et même tuées à cause de leur foi et de leur religion».

http://www.cath.ch/detail/le-pape-fran%C3%A7ois-%C3%A9voque-le-25%C2%B0-anniversaire-de-la-chute-du-mur-de-berlin


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 11 Nov - 01:30 (2014)    Sujet du message: FIVE NUCLEAR SCIENTISTS REPORTED KILLED IN SYRIA! Répondre en citant

FIVE NUCLEAR SCIENTISTS REPORTED KILLED IN SYRIA!



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjSjpYaNpDE


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 11 Nov - 02:18 (2014)    Sujet du message: THE PROTECTION OF CANADA FROM TERRORISTS ACT (Canadian NDAA) / MP TED OPITZ DEBATED BILL C-44 (PROTECTION OF CANADA FROM TERRORISTS ACT) ON NOVEMBER 5, 2014 Répondre en citant



THE PROTECTION OF CANADA FROM TERRORISTS ACT (Canadian NDAA)




VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vb-W4Wp7sT4


MP TED OPITZ DEBATED BILL C-44 (PROTECTION OF CANADA FROM TERRORISTS ACT) ON NOVEMBER 5, 2014



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVGGqliTZJ4


Dernière édition par maria le Lun 8 Déc - 17:45 (2014); édité 1 fois
Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 11 Nov - 03:09 (2014)    Sujet du message: CANADA’S FALSE FLAG TERROR : FINGERPRINTS OF U.S INVOLVEMENT Répondre en citant



CANADA’S FALSE FLAG TERROR : FINGERPRINTS OF U.S INVOLVEMENT

By Barrie Zwicker
Global Research, November 09, 2014

Truth and Shadows

Region: Canada
Theme: 9/11 & 'War on Terrorism', Intelligence, Media Disinformation, US NATO War Agenda




The  “Terrorist” Events of Wednesday October 22nd in Ottawa and two days earlier in St-Jean-sur-Richelieu bear all the hallmarks of a coordinated cross-border one-two punch false flag operation.

The first, the left jab hit-and-run killing of a Canadian soldier, would be the psychological softening up for the follow-up right cross, the killing of another Canadian soldier in Ottawa. Together they dazed the public to an extent that even the ostentatiously-iconic murder at the National War Memorial alone might not have achieved.

The context was within the intensification of the so-called “global war on terror” and in concert with the pro-military Stephen Harper government’s deployment of warplanes supposedly fighting “the terrorists” of the suddenly-emerging “Islamic State.” The first bombing sorties of Canadian F-18s took place hours after the violent acts of supposed “homegrown” and “self-radicalized” supporters of “Islamic jihad.”




Domestically the second outrage occurred on the very day the government was to introduce legislation giving the RCMP, CSIS and CSEC [CSEC is changing its name (to CSE) so that it can continue to spy – and indeed do more spying abroad – but not have the word “Canada” associated with this spying. “Spy agency CSEC says goodbye to Canada” is the headline over an October 31st [url=http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2014/10/31/spy_agency_csec_says_goodbye_to_canada.html%5D%20Toronto%20Star%20story%20by%20Tonda%20MacCharles.%5B/url%5D][/url]

These coincidences of timing, I submit, are not coincidences at all but quite deliberately planned to maximize the intended impacts: greater public support for a new war in the Middle East, better chances for faster and less-questioned support in Parliament for the increased police and spy powers, and enhanced public approval ratings for the Harper government in the run-up to next year’s general election.

This article delves deeper into the timing including that the events happened, to the day, as military-intelligence “exercises” were taking place that precisely mirrored the “surprise” events. Other hallmarks include the prior involvement of government agents with both of the supposed jihadists, the fact that both were easy-to-manipulate “human wreckage” and the early “terrorism” branding led by the Prime Minister. Other hallmarks include the unfolding parade of memorable iconic elements and images, the “lone wolf” narratives, the dual role of the media in general to both to reinforce the official narrative and to fail to ask fundamental questions about it.

Ottawa shooter Michael Zehaf-Bibeau, especially, is tied to the “war on terror.” At the highest level of visibility, he’s a pawn marketed for public consumption to reinforce “global jihad” rhetoric.

On a subterranean level are two sets of fingerprints. One set shows the involvement of both Canadian and U.S. spy agencies and possibly other of the so-called “Five Eyes” (the others being the UK, Australia and New Zealand), not to mention the grotesquely corrupt FBI, with its record of mounting scores of false flag ops, that will be referred to later.

The second set of prints shows the work of the agencies’ gatekeeper “assets” in the media, in this instance in the USA as well as in Canada. They manipulate “the news.”

Telltale hallmarks of false flag ops

1 The timing. The exquisite timing of the National War Memorial outrage on the very day new laws were to be introduced by the Harper regime giving expanded powers to spook agencies – as well as additional cover for their “informants” so deep as to be impenetrable – is one hallmark of a world-class false flag op.


Added police powers at all times in any country, when an atmosphere of hysteria has been generated, are railroaded into laws in a flash, historically speaking. The new or expanded laws take decades to undo or ratchet down, if they ever are.

As Prof. Graeme MacQueen, author of an insightful and detailed new book, The 2001 Anthrax Deception: The Case for a Domestic Conspiracy, (Clarity Press, Inc.,
www.claritypress.com, writes, the timing of the 2001 “anthrax letter attacks” or the “anthrax attacks” was just as the USA Patriot Act “was being hurried through Congress.” The notorious bill, propagandistically entitled “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism” Act, was signed into law October 26th, 2001, about three weeks after the first news of an “anthrax attack” broke. Bush followed up by giving his approval “to the first bulk domestic spying by the National Security Agency (NSA).” Such are the sea changes set into motion by perfectly-timed false flag ops. (Watch for an upcoming review of MacQueen’s book in Truth and Shadows.)

Interestingly MacQueen notes that
Citation:


“gradually the hypothesis became widespread that the [anthrax] attacks were the second blow in a ‘one-two punch’ delivered by terrorists, the first blow having been the attacks of 9/11.”



Ottawa has gone the U.S. government one better by compressing the time between introduction of “anti-terror” legislation and a false flag “terror attack” to hours. Ottawa also subjected MPs and others on Parliament Hill to the sounds of gunfire amidst fearful uncertainty, in a fast-moving operation, again outdoing the Americans.

These events have also taken place during the lead-up to Remembrance Day.  Government TV ads are in heavy rotation featuring World War I and World War II footage in black and white and colour, as well as video clips of Canadian peacekeepers. They send us to http://www.veterans.gc.ca/iremember. Stirring and nostalgic, these ads cannot be divorced from consideration of the impact of the Ottawa events. The ads (and much else) knit together in the public consciousness.

My wife and I almost always attend the Remembrance Day ceremonies at Toronto’s Old City Hall.

(I posted a piece for this blog about the ceremonies in 2012 (http://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2012/11/30/peacenik-reflects-on-remembrance-day/).

I tend to agree with predictions that turnout this year may exceed previous years. Remembrance Day speeches, as well as the whole setup of Remembrance Day ceremonies, tend to ennoble if not glorify war. This year the homilies are certain to make reference to the events in St-Jean-sur-Richeleau and Ottawa.

More than ever, this year the understandable sentiments of many will be channeled into reinforcing belief in the “reality” of the “war on terror.” Emotions will be manipulated into support for a militarized monopoly capitalist anti-life system of perpetual war and ever-increasing inequality.

Metrics are being reported that bear this out.  A front-page story in The Globe and Mailon November 7th reports “a steady stream of support for the military in the days leading up to Remembrance Day.”

Under the headline “Poppy sales a sign support for military surging after attacks,” Tristan Simpson reports. “Legion officials say those events have become emblematic of a renewed patriotism – and have sparked an increase in military support.”

2 Prior “involvement” of agents of the state

“Prior contact” with alleged terrorists is a virtually guaranteed hallmark of false flag ops.

Both Zehaf-Bibeau and hit-and-run killer Martin Couture-Rouleau were “known to authorities.” As the main front page headline of the Toronto Star had it of Couture-Rouleau on October 22nd: “RCMP had suspect on their radar for months.”

On page A4 on the next day in the same paper, an edition dominated by 17 pages of coverage out of Ottawa, is a half-page devoted to how much “a Canadian security source” knew about Zehaf-Bibeau’s past.

The usual phraseology is that agents of CSIS or the RCMP “had been in contact with” the criminals or “had (these individuals) under surveillance” or “had been monitoring their activities.”

Is it entirely coincidental that both “terrorists” – as Harper labeled both early and often – were Quebeckers? Quebeckers as a generality are cool to Harper and his “war on terror” rhetoric. But they might be expected to warm up to his “national security” agenda on the basis of fear — insofar as they buy the official narratives.

Canadian authorities, it was reported, asked the FBI to assist in the investigation of the “terrorist” events in Canada. The FBI’s record shows that the assistance would most likely be in sharing with their buddies north of the border in the finer points of how to mount a false flag op. Investigative reporter Trevor Aaronson’s book The Terror Factoryexposes the FBI’s inside role in creating “false flag terror.” He writes that as of 2011 the FBI was involved in more than 500 cases of “manufactured” terror.

References here can be found at : http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/0…ainst-america/

In a 2011 article in Mother Jones, Aaronson wrote:
Citation:


Since 9/11, there have been hundreds of arrests of “terrorist suspects” and 158 prosecutions. Of all the reported “major terror plots,” only three can’t be directly tied to terror suspects who were directly recruited, trained and supplied by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Truth is, we also have questions about the other three.



In the case of the “anthrax attacks” the spider web of government agents and suspicious civilian players interacting with those initially put forward as anthrax terrorists and/or 9/11 “hijackers” was almost monolithic. Most were in Florida, within close geographic proximity. As MacQueen writes:
Citation:


Academic researchers have largely tended to dismiss the Florida connections by accepting the FBI’s coincidence theory. … The question, however, is not whether actual hijackers were involved in sending out letters laden with anthrax spores: the question is whether fictions, verbal or enacted, were intentionally created to make this narrative seem credible. The [alleged hijackers] did not have anthrax, but the script portrayed them as likely to have it. [page 138]



The U.S. government repeatedly attempted to link the “anthrax attacks,” the “9/11 hijackers” and Iraq (remember Colin Powell’s now totally discredited dog-and-pony show at the UN?). But when those attempts fell apart, the domestic terror purveyors turned to Plan B, as MacQueen persuasively shows. Plan B was to finger a domestic “lone wolf,” scientist Bruce Ivins, who then became conveniently dead.

“The evidence suggests a grand plan, not an opportunistic foray,” writes MacQueen.

3 The chosen miscreants are “human wreckage”

It was Webster Tarpley, author of 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA who described the typical patsy recruited for manipulation by spy agencies as “human wreckage.”

It’s easy to understand how such individuals can easily be manipulated through bribes, other inducements, threats or psychological pressure up to and including sophisticated brain-washing techniques. These are known to have been developed by “spy” agencies over decades and in this country go back at least to the CIA’s self-admitted funding of “psychic driving” experiments under the Project MK-Ultra mind control program on unknowing civilians at McGill University from 1957 to 1964 under the direction of Dr. Donald Ewen Cameron:

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Ewen_Cameron).

Frequently mentally-disturbed people have been in trouble with the law. This was true of Zehaf-Bibeau and Couture-Rouleau. Zehaf-Bibeau was desperate, on the edge, unpredictable, wanted to die. Spy agencies find such people easily. The “chosen ones” will have Arabic names and be converts to Islam. Or have Middle East connections. Many combinations fill the bill to help the label “suspected terrorist” stick.

Run-ins with the law render disturbed individuals additionally vulnerable. Police or “intelligence” agents can promise to use their influence to gain shorter sentences if they’ve been convicted, more leniency if they’ve already been sentenced. Or get them off altogether. Conversely agents can threaten to use their influence to make things much worse for these individuals. Those promising or threatening often are in a position to deliver.

In this connection, the lead article  in the Focus section of The Globe and Mail on October 25th by Doug Saunders actually describes, without his using the term, false flag ops by U.S. “authorities.”

It’s worth excerpting that section of his piece:
Citation:


Authorities in the U.S. adopted the practice of catching lone-wolf figures in sting operations, in which they’d find disturbed young men online, provide them with prefabricated terror plots and (fake) weapons, and arrest them a moment before they were about to carry out their planned attack. This approach has been numerically successful – that is, it has intercepted a lot of putative terrorists – but many wonder if it’s simply making the problem worse, and turning police agencies into terrorism enablers.

“Often these are down-and-out losers in society who wouldn’t be able to pull off a decent attack on their own,” Dr. [Ramon] Spaaij, an Australian scholar with Victoria University and author ofUnderstanding Lone Wolf Terrorism, says, “but the undercover police provide the weapons and suggest the targets … what that does is it has sown a lot of bad blood in Muslim communities – we’re out there preying on vulnerable young people and turning them into terrorists.”



What Saunders, whose body of work I happen to greatly admire, fails to note is that these “sting” (e.g., false flag) operations generate thousands of fear-inducing headlines; this may be their main purpose. Readers, listeners and viewers are led to believe that police have caught “real terrorists.” These false flag ops contribute the bulk of the “proof” for the so-called “war on terror.” It’s a continuous psychological assault and distortion of reality through manufacture of “reality.” The impact goes ‘way beyond “sowing bad blood in Muslim communities.” It’s a main driver of the fictional “war on terror.”

Besides, “bad blood” in Muslim communities would be one of the goals of the authors of this continuous fakery. This “bad blood” would fulfill at least two functions. One is to keep many Muslims in docile fear mode in which they can be more easily controlled. Second is that less docile Muslims, especially young unstable men, will react with anger and possibly go off the deep end. Perfect.

This is the same entrapment technique used to create the “Toronto 18.” And this is the same modus operandi the police use when they enable or program or bribe or threaten their patsies to cause violence.

As University of Guelph professor Michael Keefer wrote:
Citation:


The theatrical arrests of 18 (mostly young) Muslims in Toronto in the Summer of 2006 reinforced media-driven paranoia that homegrown terrorists were everywhere. The unraveling of the case two years later exposes to view yet again the sinister and disgraceful behavior of Canada’s security intelligence apparatus, which has formed a habit of confecting false accusations of terrorism against Canadian citizens. The threat to Canadian society is not a bunch of Muslim boys playing paintball, it’s an ideologically driven government willing to curtail our civil liberties.



4 The “lone wolf” or “lone gunman” narrative

Without doubt there are instances of demented individuals who perform outrages single handedly. The USA provides the most examples by far, with a plethora of berserk gunmen mowing down innocent citizens in malls, on college campuses and elsewhere.

In politically-charged false flag ops, by definition in virtually all cases agents in the shadows pull the levers to bring about the outrages. In the three highest profile assassinations of the last century and arguably most impactful historically, those of JFK, RFK and MLK, the establishment narrative has been that lone gunmen were responsible, in each case in the face of much evidence to the contrary. Lee Harvey Oswald was known to have worked for U.S. intelligence. He’s a classic “lone gunman” who wasn’t. Others include James Earl Ray, allegedly the killer of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., who wasn’t, as proven in a civil trial in Memphis in 1999. The half white half black jury returned a verdict that civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr. was the victim of an assassination conspiracy involving the CIA and the U.S. Army and did not die at the hands of an unaided lone gunman.

In the case of Zehaf-Bibeau the likelihood of enablers is rendered very high because of many unanswered questions. Among them, how did a deranged misfit living in shelters obtain both a gun and a car needed for him to go on his rampage?

5 “Lone wolves” tend to become quickly deceased

From Lee Harvey (“I am just a patsy”) Oswald to Rolando Galman (who gunned down Benigno Aquino, Jr., former Philippine Senator, as he stepped off his plane, and then himself was gunned down) to the “Boston bomber” Tamerlan Tsarnaev, patsies or hired assassins tend to become deceased – quickly. Dead men tell no tales. Typically, Michael Zehaf-Bibeau and Martin Couture-Rouleau are no more.

In 2002 U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft named scientist Steven Hatfill a “person of interest” in connection with the “anthrax attacks” of a year before. As Graeme MacQueen writes: “The FBI concentrated on investigating him, publicly and aggressively. A year later Hatfill sued the Justice Department for libel and eventually he received $5.82 million in compensation…”

The FBI – presumably after a massive search for patsy material – decided in 2008 that the “anthrax killer” was Dr. Bruce Ivins, who had been working on an anthrax vaccine at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick, Maryland.

“This time,” MacQueen writes, “the FBI faced no serious challenge from its chosen perpetrator because Ivins died shortly before he was to be charged with the crime. He was said to have committed suicide.” Tellingly, no autopsy was performed.

The death of an actual bona fide terrorist or, much more often the case, a recruited patsy (the classic being Oswald) obviates the possibility of a trial in a court of law (as distinguished from trial in the “court of public opinion”). Trial in a court of law carries with it the possibility of evidence emerging that could be damning to the state and the Crown’s case.

The bodies of killers, alleged killers or dead “terrorists” frequently are not dealt with appropriately. As Prof. John McMurtry of Guelph, author of The Cancer Stage of Capitalism: From Crisis to Cure, wrote in an October 29th Global Research essay: Zehaf-Bibeau
Citation:


“…went on a killing spree, with no known blood testing afterwards for the drugs he was evidently driven by, in the video record of his frenzied and super-charged behaviour, just as there was no known test of the body of crazed drive-over killer, Martin Couture-Rouleau. How extraordinary. How unspoken in the lavish profusion of other details… All such strange coincidences are part of the now familiar covert-state MO.”



The de facto executions of the killers or alleged killers are, however, less a necessity than a convenience to the national security state. This is because in those cases where the patsies, killers or alleged killers survive, their trials uniformly are fixed, as was the case with the “Toronto 18,” who rapidly became the Toronto nine, as charges were dropped against many of the teenaged “terror suspects.”

6 The branding

The St-Jean-sur-Richelieu events were instantly defined as “terrorism” by Prime Minister Stephen Harper in the House of Commons and thereafter were widely so defined by the military, by “intelligence experts,” RCMP Commissioner Bob Paulson and by many media players. (There are honourable exceptions to the general rush to judgment within the media. We identify some later.)

The “anthrax attacks,” MacQueen writes, “were the result of a [domestic] conspiracy meant to help redefine the enemy of the West, revising the global conflict framework from the Cold War to the Global War on Terror.”

The events in Ottawa were not meant to replace the global-conflict framework but rather to reinforce the new 2001 model: “Islam” as the permanent mortal enemy of “the West.”

The rhetoric, like ad copy, is part and parcel of the branding.

Buzzwords (“war on terror,”), code words (“national security”), snarl words (“terrorists,” “radical Islam,” “threats”) and purr words (“our allies,” “security”) as semanticist S. I. Hayakawa dubbed them, displace rational thought.

Equal in impact to that of language repetition, if not greater, were the iconic elements. The National War Memorial and Parliament are about as iconic as one can arrange in Canada. So to have the shooter start at one, then skedaddle over to the other on the same crazed mission is to do so on iconosteroids.

Add to that: two worthy soldiers representing Everyman, all Members of Parliament, the Prime Minister, a car-jacked driver, a hero in the person of the gun-toting Sergeant-at-Arms, the heart-wrenching footage of Corporal Cirillo’s five-year-old son wearing his father’s regimental hat, the corporal’s pet dogs, the grieving spouses and relatives and more.

It would be a mistake to overlook that the flesh and blood victims, Corporal Cirillo and Warrant Office Patrice Vincent, also were symbolic. They represent “Canada’s military,” “our men and women in uniform” who “serve our country” who “made the ultimate sacrifice.”

Many of the iconic themes of October 22nd were pre-echoed in the Toronto 18 trials, one of them being the alleged planning by the teen-aged patsies and dupes of “blowing up Parliament” and “beheading the prime minister.”

7 “Security exercises” and the false flag curiously overlap

A hallmark of false flag ops is that military, security, police or “intelligence” exercises precede or run simultaneously with a false flag operation. Run-throughs are necessary for all complex maneuvers. A drill also justifies assembling the human and other resources required.

Perhaps the most egregious exercise was the one admitted to be taking place at the time of the “London 7/7” tube “terror bombings” of July 7th, 2007. Peter Power, managing director of crisis management for the firm Visor Consultants, in a live interview on ITV News that was aired at 8:20 p.m. on the evening of the bombings, tells the host “…today we were running an exercise …. 1,000 people involved in the whole organization … and the most peculiar thing was that we based our scenario on simultaneous attacks on the underground and mainland station and so we had to suddenly switch an exercise from fictional to real.” Elsewhere he said the exercise specified the same stations that the “surprise bombers” targeted, which would qualify as one of the most far-fetched coincidences of all time.

On the day of 9/11 a minimum of five military drills were underway. One of them, Vigilant Guardian, involved the insertion of false radar blips onto radar screens in the Northeast Air Defense Sector, a fact that even made it into the fraudulent 9/11 Commission Report (although the others did not, which made the appearance of Vigilant Guardian a limited hangout).

All of which is relevant to what Mark Taliano wrote about the events in St-Jean-sur-Richelieu and Ottawa on the Global Research website on October 31st:
Citation:


“The theory that U.S agencies were somehow implicated in the [Ottawa] tragedy is further reinforced by … Operation Determined Dragon, a joint Canada/U.S counter-terrorism drill…”



The first Canadian event, the fatal hit-and-run carried out by Couture-Rouleau, occurred on the first day of that drill, October 20th. From that day to 29th was the “execution phase” of a joint Canada-U.S.-NATO military-intelligence “linked exercise” named Determined Dragon 14 (in internal documents called “Ex DD 14”).

For details of Determined Dragon 14 one need look no further than the National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces website

http://www.forces.gc.ca/en/operations-exercises/ddragon.page:

“Ex DD 14 will primarily focus on the lateral interface between NORAD, United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM) and United States Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) specifically in cyber and space domains,” visitors to the site are informed.

Among the strategic objectives specified on the are to “enhance interagency partnerships” and to “institutionalize battle procedures with partners such as regional and component commanders, the Strategic Joint Staff, the Associate Deputy Minister (Policy), and the Canadian Forces Intelligence Command.” Another is to enhance “bilateral planning with USNORTHCOM and USSTRATCOM; and CJOC coordination with NORAD.

Under the heading “Linked Exercises” the Canadian site says that Ex DD 14 “is bound to other allied exercises by a common scenario and linked through multiple events:
  • Ex VIGILANT SHIELD, a NORAD-USNORTHCOM exercise focused on homeland defence and homeland security missions; and
  • Ex GLOBAL THUNDER, a USSTRATCOM-led exercise with the primary emphasis on exercising nuclear command and control capabilities.

It concludes that Ex DD 14 “offers an opportunity for regional joint task forces (RJTF) to leverage their own exercises.

For someone paying close attention to CBC-TV’s The National on October 25th, CBCsenior correspondent Adrienne Arsenault came close to giving away the game. Anchor Peter Mansbridge begins by saying there are “lots of questions” about the day’s events. After he hears the usual line from regularly seen Ray Boisvert, “ex-CSIS,” Mansbridge turns to Arsenault, “who’s been looking at this whole issue of radicalization for the past year or so” and asks her what she can say. Arsenault replies:

(http://www.globalresearch.ca/canadian-authorities-ran-war-game-drills-depicting-isis-attack-scenarios/5409707)
Citation:


They [Canadian authorities] may have been surprised by the actual incidents but not by the concepts of them. Within the last month we know that the CSIS, the RCMP and the National Security Task Force engaged in, I suppose they, ran a scenario that’s akin to a war games exercise if you will where they actually imagined literally an attack in Quebec, followed by an attack in another city, followed by a tip that that “hey some guys, some foreign fighters are coming back from Syria.” So they were imagining a worst case scenario. We’re seeing elements of that happening right now. … [Canadian authorities] may talk today in terms of being surprised but we know that this precise scenario has been keeping them up at night for awhile.” [my emphasis]



Mansbridge shows no interest in this remarkable statement by his senior correspondent.

But truth activist Josh Blakeney of the University of Lehbridge  who also was one of the first out of the block in nailing these events as false flags, comments:
Citation:


What an amazing coincidence that Canadian intelligence ran a drill envisioning an attack first in Quebec, then another city. What are the chances that these mock terror drills are just a coincidence? In nearly every instance of a major terrorist occurrence in the West, it has been revealed that intelligence services were conducting war games exercises mimicking the very events that later come to pass. And now we have confirmation that Canada’s intelligence services were doing the same thing.



All of which would seem to reflect adequate “information exchanges” with “our U.S. partner” and other “allies.” Yet Harper’s new “anti-terror” legislation will merge Canadian spooks and military even more into the global apparatus that can manufacture terror incidents pretty well anywhere any time.

8 Media manipulation on both sides of the border

On the crucial propaganda front the evidence is that “U.S. officials” initiated journalistic input, and government agents planted within the media on both sides of the border meddled with journalistic output.

Key mainstream media stories as well as tweets “disappeared.” Stories disappeared from Google. Both U.S. and Canadian mainstream reports were altered significantly. This could only be carried out by internal gatekeeper agents. Inputs and outputs left permanent fingerprints of the overt as well as behind-the-scenes manipulation.

Students of false flag operations have learned – just as regular detectives have learned in regard to standard non-political crimes – the first 24 or 48 hours provide critical evidence, before the criminals can begin covering their tracks.

Amy MacPherson of Free The Press Canada (https://www.facebook.com/FreeThePressCanada) hit the ground running in those first hours and days. On Tuesday, October 23rd she posted a lengthy piece, carried the next day on GlobalResearch containing damning evidence of rolling censorship on social media including Twitter and in mainstream media including the Toronto Star and the CBC.

Equally if not more damning are her frame grabs showing that U.S. news outlets were fed information by “U.S. officials” identifying Zehaf-Bibeau as the Ottawa shooter prematurely, before Canadian media were able to identify him.

With accompanying grabs, MacPherson writes: “While Canadian news personalities were at police gunpoint, American outlets like CBS News and the [always suspect]Associated Press had a full story to sell, complete with the dead shooter’s name.”

At 10:54 a.m. Eastern, when the National War Memorial crime scene was not yet secured, CBS News stated: “The gunmen [sic] has been identified by U.S. officials to CBS News as Michael Zehaf-Bibeau, a Canadian national born in 1982.” MP Charlie Angus described gunshots around 10 a.m. American media had solved the murder 54 minutes later.

“By 4:58 p.m.” MacPherson notes, “the [[i]CBS[/i]] story was edited to remove the shooter’s name, or any mention of the U.S. government’s knowledge.” She continues: “The only problem is no one could update the Google database quick enough with these changes, so the original information still appeared with general search results.
Citation:


“The story was altered again in the evening, when the Canadian government allowed [her emphasis] the name of a shooter to be released and American media added law enforcement to their list of official sources.  They also added a middle name, Abdul, to emphasize the suspect’s Islamic ties with an accusation of terrorism.”



She asks:
Citation:


“…how American intelligence knew the name of a ‘possible terrorist’ as the mayhem was still unfolding. How did Americans know when Canadians didn’t, and how was this information so widespread that American media and Google had access to distribute, but domestic reporters on the scene did not?

“Canadian parliamentary bureau chiefs didn’t possess the same information as their U.S. counterparts and faced the barrel of police guns as a press narrative was provided on their behalf by another country. If this is dubbed an act of terrorism that American sources had knowledge about to pre-report, then why weren’t steps taken to prevent the violence?”



Then there are the all-Canadian media anomalies. “The Toronto Star reported [that] multiple witnesses saw [Couture-Rouleau] with his hands in the air,” writes MacPherson, “when at least one police officer opened fire. They also say a knife was ‘lodged into the ground near where the incident occurred.’

“Well,” MacPherson continues, “that’s what the original story by Allan Woods, Bruce Campion-Smith, Joanna Smith, Tonda MacCharles and Les Whittington stated. A syndicated copy had to be located at the Cambridge Times, because a newer, edited version at the Toronto Star appeared dramatically altered by Tuesday.”

That article (changed without disclosure) claims Couture-Rouleau was an Islamic radical who emerged from the vehicle with a knife in his hands. No mention of eyewitnesses who saw his hands in the air and the knife lodged in the ground (an image seen later on CBC-TV news).

As MacPherson writes: “The article was more than edited and qualifies as being replaced entirely, having lost its tone, facts and spirit from the original published version.

If it weren’t for smaller papers carrying The Star’s original syndicated content, there would be little or no proof of the first comprehensive version, she adds.

9 Failure of media to ask fundamental questions

These include, first and foremost: “Is it possible that agents of the state had a hand in this outrage?” This question might not be as difficult to raise as one might imagine. Suppose it were handled this way:

There’s a long and well-documented history of authorities staging iconic events aimed at stampeding their publics into supporting government initiatives, especially initiatives supporting existing or proposed wars. Examples include Colin Powell’s introduction at the United Nations of alleged compelling proof – subsequently proven false – that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction. [pause] Can it be ruled out definitively that behind-the-scenes actors in government circles in Canada had no hand whatsoever in the events of October 22nd?”

Of course, for any media person to ask such a question would pre-suppose that those who reach the level of Parliamentary correspondent or, higher still, anchor of a national news program would have developed deep skepticism based on hard-won knowledge of the history of such operations.

It would further pre-suppose that, had they developed such a grasp of history, they would be promoted to those levels.

What can we say? We can say: “These things ain’t going to happen.”

Tihe “failure” to ask fundamentally important fully justified questions based on documented history known to many readers, listeners and viewers deserves extensive treatment in itself. The “failure” represents, from the point of view of a cover-up, success for the real perpetrators.

Such unasked questions are masked by the repetitive posing of essentially superficial questions and questions that beg answers. Press conferences are rife with the acceptance of the official line along with questions about minutiae within the line. One also hears a lot of really dumb and repetitive questions.

The graphically impressive front page of The Globe and Mail had it on October 23rd: “The murder of Corporal Nathan Cirillo, the storming of Parliament and the tough questions[my emphasis] arising from the chaos.”

The phrase “tough questions” in this context suggests – and their subsequent rollout reinforces – a central theme that buttresses the official line: that there have been “security lapses,” that these lapses are serious, that therefore “security agencies” need “more resources” to do their jobs “protecting our security” and “making us safe,” and so on and on.

Included among the questions most frequently trotted out by the media: “How can we strike a balance between “the need for greater security” on the one hand, and “the protection of privacy,” on the other.

This endlessly posed question has embedded within it several unexamined major premises, concealed significant historical facts and trends, as well as an ambiguity serving both concealments and that drives conclusions among readers, listeners and viewers that are ill-based, self-defeating and that inoculate those who are so manipulated against gaining greater understanding.

The premises include that privacy is ever and always a stand-alone good; that every person’s privacy is at risk equally with every other person’s; that privacy for each person or group means the same as for every other person or group; that in fact the two sides of the equation are security vs. privacy (as opposed, for instance, to security vs. freedom, although that equation – much more relevant – is raised fairly frequently) and that it is the good-faith activities of “security forces” that endanger “privacy.” Left out of the equation are the proven bad faith activities of “security forces.”

The concealments include that the threat to citizens can come from the good-faith actions of “security forces,” yes, but that in fact by a large preponderance come from rogue actions of “security forces” and “intelligence agencies,” both of which are virtually out-of-control now.

On protecting the identity of “intelligence sources

The historical record – not in the slightest acknowledged by the “security vs privacy” equation – shows conclusively that those most spied upon, whose personal security is threatened repeatedly, are those who question authority, those who are peaceful dissidents, those who seek and act for improvements to the status quo, specifically for more equality and justice, those who are left-of-centre up to and including revolutionaries. The danger posed to loss of privacy among those on the left is much greater than it is for those on the right or for those not politically involved at all, which is to say the vast majority of citizens. This historical record goes unaddressed in 99% or more of the discourse about the dangers of “loss of privacy.”

The large majority of people have little reason to fear the state, because they pose no perceived threat to the state. Accordingly, their need or wish to protect their privacy – for instance about their personal sex or financial lives – is of less interest to, is far less important to, the national security state than are the personal facts and political beliefs or acts of those on the left who pose a perceived threat to the status quo, however lawful or justified their words or actions may be.

Providing deeper, almost impenetrable, cover for informants, otherwise known colloquially as rats or ratfinks, is far from a pressing need for national security.

Rather, the history of informants shows that the majority, and in particular those who are chosen or come forward to “intelligence” agencies (or are assigned by these agencies), are owed much less protection from identity than they even now enjoy.

The case of RCMP informant Richard Young is just one that should give pause.

Young was recruited by the RCMP in British Columbia (he approached them) prior to 2007. He convinced them he had information on drug operations. An accomplished con man, he suckered the Mounties big time.

While they, through failure to carry out due diligence among other things, came under his spell he was taken under their witness protection program. Doing so is labour intensive and expensive. Under it, Young committed a murder, which is uncontested. The Mounties then did all in their considerable power to shield him from the consequences of that. This and more was documented by two CanWest reporters and then a Globe and Mail investigative team in 2007.

At the heart of the stupidity, naivete and wrong-doing by the RCMP was the continued insistence on protecting Young’s identity. Ultimately the Mounties’ failure and the harm done (wasted public money, a man getting away with murder under the protection of the RCMP, and the RCMP not properly held to account) were exposed by less than a handful of dedicated reporters.

A compelling but illegitimate reason for these agencies to seek total anonymity for their “informants” is that so many of these do not even qualify as such, but rather are individuals planted to manufacture false “intelligence” or carry out dirty tricks on targets chosen by these agencies. Documented history shows that typically the targets are law-abiding, well-informed, politically active (on the left) and even courageous citizens who nevertheless are considered “enemies of the state” by the security apparatus and its overlords.

Remember that the RCMP spied on Tommy Douglas to the extent that his dossier numbered 1,100 pages, only a few of which CSIS, which inherited the RCMP dossier, has released. The grounds for CSIS’s refusal are that it must protect the informants. This is the very group of unsavoury snitches that the Harper government wants to give deeper cover.

The otherwise much-touted need for transparency and accountability is not only forgotten within “terrorist threat” hysteria. It is turned on its head. It is claimed that transparency and accountability are threats to the public! And that anyone who suggests otherwise also is a threat. In a world of fear the good becomes bad and the bad becomes good.

The so-called “war on terror,” fed by the national security state to the public like slops to pigs, paves the way through regression to a world of “military tribunals” (an oxymoron), of Star Chambers, to a new Dark Ages.

Outcomes of this particular false flag op

√ It makes the task much harder for those warning the public of the dangers of the government’s legislation endowing intelligence agencies with greater powers, more resources, fewer restrictions and less transparency.

√ Providing the RCMP and other spy agencies with even more anonymity for informants is a particular danger, as noted at length above.

If the laws being pushed by Harper today go through, the RCMP, CSIS or CSEC in a similar case in the future would be even more enabled to waste the time of personnel and of other resources, and of taxpayer public money, for little or no gain in public safety or security.

√ Reduction of civil liberties:  easier detentions, extraditions

√ Increased invasion of privacy

√ Intimidation of legislative branch, as happened in spades in the USA in response to the “anthrax attacks.”

√ More pressure on the judiciary to bow to omnipresent low-level “terrorism” hysteria

√ Marginalizing of both the legislative and judicial branches

√ Increased integration of Canadian spy agencies with those

of “our” allies, so that the globalist integrated deception apparatus can operate even more freely and in ever more sophisticated ways.

√ Buttressing of the grand made-in-Washington pax Americana imperial design.

Honourable exceptions in the media

In fairness, quite a number of voices of reason, caution, skepticism and outright objection to the Harper government’s obvious exploitation of the events of the week of October 20th to forward its militaristic pro-American pro-Israeli agenda could be found. Unfortunately, as usual with false flags, these voices accepted the government’s version of what happened.

With this fundamental caveat in place, however, here are just a few individuals within the Canadian mainstream who made cogent arguments of dissent.

In the Toronto’s Star’s 17 pages of coverage on October 23rd Martin Regg Cohn cautioned:
Citation:


“The risk is that we will overreact with security clampdowns and lockdowns that are difficult to roll back when the threat subsides. The greater risk is that we will hunker down with over-the-top security precautions that pose a more insidious menace to our open society.”



Tom Walkom pointed out the events were not unprecedented. In 1984 a disgruntled Canadian Forces corporal killed three and wounded 13 in Quebec’s national assembly. “We know,” Walkom continued, “that in a situation like this, facts are secondary,” and “at times like this, it is easy to lose all sense of proportion.” Haroon Siddiqui asked why, “if Martin Rouleau, a.k.a. Ahmad the Convert,” was in the crosshairs of CSIS and the RCMP for months, he was not being tailed.
Citation:


“Smoking out such suspects and throwing the book at them requires good policing, not wars abroad or the whipping up of fears at home for partisan political purposes.”



On October 27th in The Globe and Mail Elizabeth Renzetti quoted extensively from James Risen’s new book, Pay Any Price: Greed, Power and Endless War. “The war in question is the war on terror, which Mr. Risen, a Pulitzer-Prize winning security reporter for The New York Times, says has been used as an excuse to conduct a largely secret campaign to undermine Americans’ civil rights, spy on their communications and line the pockets of security consultants. As one reviewer said, it reads like a thriller – except, unfortunately, it’s not fiction.”

She quotes Risen:
Citation:


“Of all the abuses America has suffered at the hands of the government in its endless war on terror,” Mr. Risen writes, “possibly the worst has been the war on truth.”



On the same day in the Toronto Star Tim Harper wrote:

“Here’s a vote for the power of time and perspective.” “And here’s a vote of confidence in a Parliament that will not jump to conclusions in the heat of the moment and a government that will resist the temptation to use October’s events as an impetus to move into new, unneeded realms.”

“Before we move too far, time and perspective should force us to ask whether we were dealing with mental health issues last week rather than terrorism, even as the RCMP said Sunday it had ‘persuasive evidence’ that Michael Zehaf-Bibeau’s attack was driven by ideological and political motives.” “We must twin increased powers with increased oversight.”

On November 2nd, the Toronto Star published a long lead editorial headed “’Terrorism’ Debate: Get beyond the word.”

The second paragraph:
Citation:


“Down one path is a U.S.-like response to the perceived, though unsubstantiated, threat of terror: increased police powers and indiscriminate state snooping, the chipping away of civil liberties. This the way of the government.”



Down the other “is a more considered, deliberate approach that takes the rule of law as primary…” The choice, the editorial continues “ought to be fertile ground for a pivotal public debate but so far that conversation has been eclipsed by a lexicographical matter: whether we can rightly call the attack on Ottawa ‘terrorism.’”

It concludes:
Citation:


“As long as our leaders insist on reducing these complex issues to a binary debate over a slippery word, we cannot have the conversation we need nor choose the country we’ll become.”



Many writers of letters to the editors of these papers are in no mood to be panicked by inflated “terror” talk. “Denying [Zihaf-Bibeau and Couture-Rouleau] their passports had the equivalent effect of putting them in cages and poking at them with a sharp stick. They broke out and two soldiers are dead.” This was from a retired RCMP officer, in The Globe and Mail.

False flag events benefit the Canadian right

Some commentators to their credit have observed that these events as played are calculated to pay off domestically to increase the Harper government’s chances of re-election next year.

Harper now holds a couple of aces for a winning electoral hand. One is his rightwing anti-taxes stance tied to producing a federal money surplus whatever the cost to the environment, science, social services (including more help for the mentally ill) and more. Some of that surplus is already being earmarked in the highest-profile ways as bribes (with their own money) to Canadians with children.

Last week’s events now constitute another ace. “Family-friendly” leaders seen as standing tall against an external enemy almost always benefit electorally. But this second ace is a fixed card. In this game there are five aces: clubs, spades, hearts, diamonds and false flags.

Only when a politically relevant portion of Canada’s and the world’s people understand the dominant agenda-setting function of false flag operations can decent people the world over begin a successful effort to replace the vast global inequality-and-death structure with a life-sustaining and fair socio-economic structure.

As Prof. John McMurtry of Guelph put it on October 29th in an essay entitled http://www.globalresearch.ca/decoding-harpers-terror-game-beneath-the-masks…“Canada: Decoding Harper’s Terror Game. Beneath the Masks and Diversions” published by Global Research:
Citation:


“If the stratagem is not seen through, the second big boost to Harper will be to justify the despotic rule and quasi-police state he has built with ever more prisons amidst declining crime, ever more anti-terrorist rhetoric and legislation, ever more cuts to life support systems and protections (the very ones which would have prevented these murderous rampages), and ever more war-mongering and war-criminal behaviours abroad.



Adds McMurtry:
Citation:


“Harper rule can only go further by such trances of normalized stupefaction now reinforced with Canadian blood.”



Barrie  Zwicker is a renowned Canadian journalist, best selling author and documentary producer.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/canadas-false-flag-terror-fingerprints-of-u-s-involvement/5412838


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 13 Nov - 04:23 (2014)    Sujet du message: BOMBSHELL: THE ANTICHRIST CONFEDERACY HAS BEEN ANNOUNCED IN TURKEY Répondre en citant



BOMBSHELL: THE ANTICHRIST CONFEDERACY HAS BEEN ANNOUNCED IN TURKEY


By Shoebat Foundation on August 26, 2014 in Featured, General, Highlight


By Walid and Theodore Shoebat (Shoebat Exclusive)

In an amazing coverage that just came out today that was published throughout the Muslim world, including even CNN Arabic Version, The Chairman of the International Union for Muslim Scholars, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi which his union represents the largest body of Muslim scholars worldwide and on their behalf just announced in Turkey that:
Citation:


“The Caliphate in today’s age must be established through a number of several states that are governed by Shariah and supported by both, the rulers and the people in the form of a federation or confederation and not as it was in the past.”


  



By this, the Muslim union of scholars lead by Qaradawi is setting up the theological precedence by announcing that a future confederacy of Muslim nations must and will be established and centered in the land of the Muslim Caliphate in Turkey.

The interview in Arabic which we need time to translate can be seen here:



VIDEO (arab) : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9laq2rQZyE4

What Qaradawi is speaking of should be seriously noted since the interpretation of the prophecy of a future confederacy of ten-nations is found in four major passages of Scripture and is a determinative issue in any system of prophetic interpretation and are the key to the total prophetic outlook regarding this emerging Antichrist confederacy of different states mentioned in at least four major Scripture passages (Dan 2:31-35, 40-45; 7:7-8, 19-24; Rev 13:1-2; 17:3, 7, 12-16).

These passages either directly or by implication prophesy a ten-kingdom confederation, which will be an important aspect of the end-time political situation.

What we see here is the beginning embryo and birth of a grand idea set by between Erdogan and the spiritual head of the Sunni Muslim world in which its declared that such confederacy for the Caliphate will be established in Istanbul, Turkey as the center for all these different states which must be seen and we translated for you here:



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gcqAqF9CCk

Qaradawi is pointing to the problem that since Muslims are scattered in so many different states, that it would be impossible to include the coming Caliphate as one state as in the times of old. He gave an example:
Citation:


“There are big countries such as China, which has a population of about 1.5 billion, according to the statistics, in a time when the number of Muslims in the world about 1.7 billion, and thus could meet in the form of the Union.”


  During the interview with the Turkish media agency “Anatolia” in Istanbul, Qaradawi believed that the “militant groups like ISIS that appear among the Muslims is the result of the corruption by secular rulers in which caused Muslim youth to follow some militants, believing that they are simply fighting for the sake of God and disbelieve, yet such movements still represent is a major problem which the new Caliphate from Turkey will resolve” adding that: “the succession announced by the organization of Islamic state (ISIS) in both Iraq and Syria have no meaning and do not meet the required conditions to be a Caliphate”.

As Shoebat.com noted last week, Qaradawi is speaking of a sign of the end of the world when he declared that the “angelic host will soon descend on earth” after this establishment of the coming Caliphate in Turkey since from a Christian perspective this is the casting of the fallen angels which Daniel the prophet spoke about the minions of the Luminous One, Lucifer are finally cast out. This is also declared as a holy event in the Qur’ân’s Night of Vision (Muhammad’s visitation):

“The angelic hosts descend [to earth] in it with the spirit by command of the their Lord. Peace shall it be until the rising of the Dawn (Morning star).” (Q 97)

Who is this ‘spirit’ and how is Allah the lord of angels and spirits? According to Muslims this ‘spirit’ or ‘the holy spirit’ is an Arch Angel. In the ends of days, angels will also descend on earth.

We have written of this decades ago, when I was a Muslim this is a holy moment much hoped for and is prophetically proclaimed from the inception of the Quran, but when I became Christian, this Islamic prophecy confirmed to me what the Bible prophesied about God casting the devil out unto earth:
Citation:


“And there was war in heaven. Michael and his angels fought against the dragon, and the dragon and his angels fought back. But he was not strong enough, and they lost their place in heaven. The great dragon was hurled down—that ancient serpent called the devil, or Satan, who leads the whole world astray. He was hurled to the earth, and his angels with him. Then I heard a loud voice in heaven say: “Now have come the salvation and the power and the kingdom of our God, and the authority of his Christ. For the accuser of our brothers, who accuses them before our God day and night, has been hurled down.” (Revelation 12:17)


At this heavenly incident, when the fallen angles (demons) are finally cast out, that Lucifer will possess the Antichrist and the fallen angels will possess the minions of Antichrist (see Isaiah 14, Ezekiel 28) in which his confederacy of nations that are all specifically mentioned by name (read Ezekiel 28-31) are finally thrown into the pit. These are Sudan (Cush) and North African states(Phut) Lydia (Turkey) and all Arabia and Egypt (see Ezekiel 30:5). They also include Asshur (Iraq – Syria), (see Ezekiel 32:22-23) and Elam (Iran) (see Ezekiel 32:24-25) and Meshech & Tubal (Asia minor which includes the Southern Russian Muslim states) (see Ezekiel 32:26) and the harlot (Arabia) (see Ezekiel 32:29, also see Ezekiel 25).

Qaradawi is currently paving the way for Turkey to ultimately invade it Egypt:
Citation:


“He will extend his power over many countries; Egypt will not escape. He will gain control of the treasures of gold and silver and all the riches of Egypt, with the Libyans and Cushitese in submission.” (Daniel 11:42)


As we stated decades ago in our book Why I Left Jihad and after that in God’s War on Terror that the new emerging Mediterranean confederacy will be the “bruised head,” the arising “sick man of Europe,” the “wounded beast” that is coming back to life under the Turkish Neo-Ottoman revival. It constitutes the Revival of the Roman Empire as well as the Grecian, Babylonian, Medo-Persian and Egyptian, altogether.

Let us be all be wrong and Christ alone be right when He said that Pergamum (Turkey) and not Rome, by this Christ was telling Turkey: “thou art the seat of Satan (Antichrist)”:

Citation:


“To the angel of the church in Pergamum write: These are the words of him who has the sharp, double-edged sword. I know where you live—where Satan has his throne.(Revelation 2:12-13)”

http://shoebat.com/2014/08/26/bombshell-antichrist-confederacy-announced-tu…



Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 14 Nov - 04:27 (2014)    Sujet du message: ALERTE! LE BURKINA FASO BRÛLE! Répondre en citant

PRINTEMPS NOIR

ALERTE! LE BURKINA FASO BRÛLE!


  30 octobre 2014  Brèves, Politique Avic



Alors que des manifestants ont incendié jeudi à Ouagadougou l’Assemblée, où devait se tenir le vote d’une révision de la Constitution très controversée, le gouvernement a annoncé l’annulation du projet de loi.

VIDEO : http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x28ymk2_situation-tres-tendue-au-burkina-f…

Une victoire pour les manifestants, mais cela ne semble pas calmer le jeu pour autant. Un général en retraite, soutenu par des manifestants, rencontre l’état-major des armées pour discuter de la situation.












http://reseauinternational.net/alerte-burkina-faso-brule/


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 14 Nov - 04:38 (2014)    Sujet du message: MEURTRE EN DIRECT PAR L'OCCUPANT ISRAELIEN (VIDEO) Répondre en citant



MEURTRE EN DIRECT PAR L'OCCUPANT ISRAELIEN (VIDEO)


Non, certainement pas. L'occupant n'est pas Israël mais tous ces réfugiés palestiniens qui foutent le bordel partout. On voit bien le vent de changement que prennent les médias. Ils ne nous montrent pas tout ce que subit Israël, seul les médias alternatifs le font mais pour la Palestine, il n'y a pas de problème. Le mensonge est devenu vérité et la vérité mensonge, et ce dans tous les domaines. Malheureusement, des milliers de personnes tombent dans ce méga lavage de cerveau et s'entretuent sauvagement, au nom de cette fausse PAIX MONDIALE. Regardez la vidéo et dites-moi qui est l'agresseur! La Bible nous dit qu'Israël deviendra une coupe d'étourdissement pour toutes les nations, et c'est exactement ce que nous voyons présentement.

  11 novembre 2014 Brèves Silvia Cattori

Les jeunes palestiniens exaspérés, poussés au désespoir par la brutalité et les humiliations qu’ils subissent au quotidien, se dressent de plus en plus nombreux contre l’occupant israélien pour défendre leur dignité et leur liberté bafouées, en sachant qu’ils vont à la mort…Ce fut le cas de ce jeune palestinien.


Kheir al-Dein Hamdan



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1cZNUWbj34

Vidéo montrant le meurtre par l’occupant israélien de Kheir al-Dein Hamdan, un Palestinien âgé de 22 ans, dans le village israélien de Kafr Kanna (Cana) proche de  Nazareth. Cela s’est passé le 8 novembre 2014.
 
Publié le 10 novembre 2014 par Arrêt sur Info

http://reseauinternational.net/meurtre-en-direct-loccupant-israelien-video/



Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 14 Nov - 06:17 (2014)    Sujet du message: IDF CENTRAL COMMAND HEAD SAYS UNREST WILL GET WORSE Répondre en citant



IDF CENTRAL COMMAND HEAD SAYS UNREST WILL GET WORSE


In meeting with Judea-Samaria community leaders, General Nitzan Alon warns things will get worse before they get better.

By Kobi Finkler
First Publish: 11/13/2014, 12:56 PM


IDF General Nitzan Alon

The head of the IDF's Central Command, Gen. Nitzan Alon, held a meeting Thursday morning with Jewish community leaders in Judea and Samaria, as well as the heads of the Yesha Council, in light of the recent spate of deadly Palestinian terrorist attacks in the region.

General Alon provided an update on how the IDF and security forces have expanded their operations to counter the unrest, including an increased presence on the roads and at public transportation stops - where the recent vehicular and stabbing attacks by Islamist terrorists have taken place.

He cautioned community leaders that the current escalation would get worse, but assured them it would not reach the levels of violence seen in 2000, when the so-called Second Intifada broke out. There has been much speculation that the riots and lone-wolf terror attacks of the past weeks and months could be a prelude to a "third intifada" - something security officials have been keen to play down.

"That reality will not return because the generation which remembers (Operation) Defensive Shield doesn't want to go back to that," Alon said, referring to the 2002 IDF military operation in Judea and Samaria which gutted the terrorist infrastructure there in response to a wave of bloody suicide bombings and shooting attacks against Israeli civilians.

However, he acknowledged that "there is definitely fermentation (of violence) and a rise in the level of terrorist activity" in Judea  and Samaria, and vowed not to neglect his duty to respond to Arab violence.

Gen. Alon emphasized the importance of cooperation between the IDF and local security officers in individual communities to help combat security threats and general unrest.

Community leaders, for their part, updated Alon on the security needs of local communities and how security measures are effecting day-to-day life in the region, and thanked him on behalf of residents for the work of the IDF in combating terrorism.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/187416#.VGWBryfqeSr


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 14 Nov - 06:22 (2014)    Sujet du message: WORRY GRIPS JERUSALEM RESIDENTS AWAITING NEXT ATTACK Répondre en citant



WORRY GRIPS JERUSALEM RESIDENTS AWAITING NEXT ATTACK



By Daphne Rousseau November 12, 2014 3:59 PM




Jerusalem (AFP) - Rocked by weeks of deadly violence, Jerusalem is witnessing security measures not seen in years as residents try to maintain some semblance of normal life while awaiting the next attack.


Raheli, who is eight months pregnant, recently stopped travelling on the city's light railway system, which she dubs "the train of fear", after deadly attacks at roadside stops by lone Palestinians.

"The last time I took it I stayed pressed against the back wall of the train stop," she says. "I had images in my head of a car ramming in to us or an explosion. It's too stressful, I would rather walk."

Earlier this month a Palestinian from east Jerusalem deliberately rammed his car into two groups of pedestrians, killing a border police officer and wounding another nine people, the second deadly car attack in two weeks.

Twin knife attacks outside Jerusalem this week killed an Israeli soldier and a young woman and wounded two others as simmering violence spread across Israel and the occupied West Bank.

In annexed east Jerusalem, Israeli passengers now get off the train and take the bus in a bid to avoid the hail of stones from Palestinian protesters that is becoming a daily occurrence.

View gallery

A member of the Israeli security forces aims tear gas during clashes with Palestinian protesters at  …

Yoni, on his way to the Hebrew University, barely looks up from his book as he makes his way through the hotspot.

"That is what the Palestinians want. They want us to live in fear," he says.

In west Jerusalem, in contrast to the darkest days of the second Palestinian intifada of 2000-2005, cafes, shops and restaurants carry on with business as usual.

In a pizzeria on Ben Yehuda street -- infamous as the site of several suicide attacks at the time -- Ahd, a young Palestinian student chooses to spend her lunch at the table furthest away from other diners.

"You can sense the aggression. That ranges from people looking at you aggressively to searching your bags at shopping malls," she says.

View gallery

Palestinian protestors demonstrate against new concrete blockades put in place by Israeli security f …

Jerusalem's new daily routine has even seen a return of the so-called "yellow jackets", private security guards who search people's belongings at the entrances to buildings.

- 'Self-defence' -


Faced with a palpable change in the air -- which some have already dubbed the "third intifada" -- some Jerusalem residents have taken matters into their own hands.

Yonatan, a salesman in a shop selling military equipment and self-defence gadgets, has been inundated by requests.

"We've totally run out in recent days of pepper spray. It's our most popular product and you can blind an attacker with it from up to three metres (yards) away," he says.

"We also sell batons and there's been an increase in demand for tasers, which can electrocute and effectively paralyse. The ones we sell are less powerful than those used by the police," he adds.

Israeli soldiers are still armed with their traditional M16 assault rifles, which they know makes them especially high-profile targets for attacks.

"We have received orders from our commanders. We have been told not to wear headphones in the street and to remain constantly vigilant," says Ziv, a young Israeli soldier draped in a poncho.

"That's not to hide my uniform, I promise, it's just because I'm cold," he says with a grin.

http://news.yahoo.com/worry-grips-jerusalem-residents-awaiting-next-attack-205928922.html


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 14 Nov - 06:34 (2014)    Sujet du message: REPORT: OBAMA MAY SEE ASSD'S REMOVAL AS NECESSARY TO DEFEAT ISIS Répondre en citant

 


REPORT: OBAMA MAY SEE ASSD'S REMOVAL AS NECESSARY TO DEFEAT ISIS

President Barack Obama wants his advisers to review the administration's Syria policy, CNN is reporting.


A Syrian man reacts after oppositionists say pro-Assad forces dropped a bomb on a neighborhood in Aleppo. (photo credit:REUTERS)

President Barack Obama wants his advisers to review the administration's Syria policy after determining it may not be possible to defeat Islamic State militants without removing Syrian President Bashar Assad, CNN reported on Wednesday.

Citing senior U.S. officials, the network said Obama's national security team held four meetings in the past week that were driven by how the administration's Syria strategy fit into its campaign against Islamic State, which has seized large parts of Syria and Iraq.

"The president has asked us to look again at how this fits together," CNN quoted one senior official as saying. "The long-running Syria problem is now compounded by the reality that to genuinely defeat ISIL, we need not only a defeat in Iraq but a defeat in Syria." ISIL is another acronym for Islamic State.

A White House National Security Council official told Reuters: "The strategy with respect to Syria has not changed."

The official said Obama's national security team "meets frequently to determine how best to carry out the strategy he set forth to counter ISIL in Iraq and Syria through several military and non-military lines of effort."

"While the immediate focus remains to drive ISIL out of Iraq, we and coalition partners will continue to strike at ISIL in Syria to deny them safe haven and to disrupt their ability to project power," the official added.

Noting that Obama had made clear Assad had lost his legitimacy, the official said: "Alongside our efforts to isolate and sanction the Assad regime, we are working with our allies to strengthen the moderate opposition."

http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Report-Obama-may-see-Assads-removal-as-nec…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 14 Nov - 06:40 (2014)    Sujet du message: RUSSIA SAYS UKRAINIAN FORCES CONCENTRATE ALONG FRONT LINE Répondre en citant

WAR

RUSSIA SAYS UKRAINIAN FORCES CONCENTRATE ALONG FRONT LINE 


© REUTERS/ Eduardo Munoz

Politics

02:18 13.11.2014(updated 11:18 13.11.2014)

First Deputy Permanent Representative of Russia in UN Alexander Pankin claims that the ceasefire regime in Ukraine is turning into Ukrainian forces concentrating along the front line.

UNITED NATIONS, November 13 (RIA Novosti) — The ceasefire regime in Ukraine is turning into Ukrainian forces concentrating along the front line, First Deputy Permanent Representative of Russia in UN Alexander Pankin said at the Security Council meeting.

"On the contrary, over the past period the ceasefire is actually turning into a concentration of Ukrainian forces [on the lines of the front]," Pankin said.
He also said that NATO's claims concerning the alleged movement of Russian forces on the territory of Ukraine were "propagandistic falsifications", as no proof of it has been provided.

"We are also hearing broad declarations from NATO regarding the sending of convoys and Russian fighters from Russia. But that isn't actually reflecting the situation on the ground. These are empty statements and the usual propagandistic falsifications," Pankin said.

He added that the Russian-Ukrainian border currently drew particular attention and could easily be monitored from space.

The conflict in Ukraine escalated in mid-April, when Kiev launched a military operation against independence supporters in eastern Ukraine who refused to recognize the new government that came to power as a result of the February coup.

The West has accused Moscow of meddling in Ukraine's internal affairs and escalating the crisis, although Russia has repeatedly denied any involvement.

On September 5, Ukrainian government forces and the independence supporters reached a ceasefire agreement in Minsk. On September 19, the sides signed a memorandum specifying steps for the implementation of the Minsk protocol. The opposing sides have subsequently accused one another of violating the truce.

http://sputniknews.com/politics/20141113/1014675242.html


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 15 Nov - 05:22 (2014)    Sujet du message: OBAMA’S ILLEGAL ACTIONS BY EXECUTIVE ORDER Répondre en citant

IMMIGRATION

OBAMA’S ILLEGAL ACTIONS BY EXECUTIVE ORDER


November 13, 2014 By Deanna Johnson

http://www.tpnn.com/author/deanna-johnson/



Obama has plans to give amnesty to 4.5 million illegal adults. Fox News reports a White House source has leaked details of President Obama’s plan to grant amnesty by executive order as early as next week. It is 10 point plan that includes new deportation guidelines, expanding the deportation reprieve given to some illegal aliens in 2012 to include millions more.

The IJReview reports:

Citation:


The plan calls for expanding deferred action for illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children — but also for the parents of U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents.The latter could allow upwards of 4.5 million illegal immigrant adults with U.S.-born children to stay, according to estimates.Another portion that is sure to cause consternation among anti-“amnesty” lawmakers is a plan to expand deferred action for young people. In June 2012, Obama created such a program for illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children, entered before June 2007 and were under 31 as of June 2012. The change would expand that to cover anyone who entered before they were 16, and change the cut-off from June 2007 to Jan. 1, 2010. This is estimated to make nearly 300,000 illegal immigrants eligible.

Obama refuses to follow the laws of the land which requires the President to work through Congress. This executive order will give millions a free pass and will give millions more a nudge to come to America illegally.



WATCH THE VIDEO:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMvgSU8XgnE

http://www.tpnn.com/2014/11/13/obamas-illegal-actions-by-executive-order/


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 16 Nov - 03:26 (2014)    Sujet du message: OBAMA'S AMNESTY ASSAULT Répondre en citant

IMMIGRATION

OBAMA'S AMNESTY ASSAULT


NOVEMBER 14, 2014

Urgent: Obama Amnesty Update
FCC versus Free Speech
Election Integrity Project: The New Hampshire Report

Urgent: Obama Amnesty Update

Unrestrained, unaccountable, and unhinged …

That’s the best way to describe President Obama’s approach toward immigration policy in the aftermath of the election giving Republicans control of both houses of Congress. As early as next week, the president is expected to announce a substantial and far-reaching overhaul of the nation’s immigration enforcement system that would allow up to five million illegal immigrants to remain in the U.S. free from the threat of deportation. The plan would also provide illicit work visas to millions of illegal immigrants. In reality, this is but the latest in a series of Obama maneuvers aimed at granting amnesty at the expense of the public interest, national sovereignty – and the law of the land.  I told Fox News yesterday, that “if experience is any guide, [Obama’s latest plans] will lead to one of the greatest mass migrations in history” into our country.

There’s a largely unreported element of this story that deserves greater attention and scrutiny as it provides insight into the administration’s aims and ambitions–and reveals the backroom conniving and outright duplicity inherent in the entire Obama amnesty scenario.

On January 29, 2014, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) division of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) posted a “Request for Information (RFI)/Sources Sought: Escort Services for Unaccompanied Alien Children” seeking a contractor to provide the following services:

The Contractor shall provide unarmed escort staff, including management, supervision, manpower, training, certifications, licenses, drug testing, equipment, and supplies necessary to provide on-demand escort services for non-criminal/non-delinquent unaccompanied alien children ages infant to 17 years of age, seven (7) days a week, 365 days a year. Transport will be required for either category of UAC [Unaccompanied Alien Children] or individual juveniles, to include both male and female juveniles. There will be approximately 65,000 UAC in total: 25% local ground transport, 25% via ICE charter and 50% via commercial air. Escort services include, but are not limited to, assisting with: transferring physical custody of UAC from DHS to Health and Human Services (HHS) care via ground or air methods of transportation (charter or commercial carrier), property inventory, providing juveniles with meals, drafting reports, generating transport documents, maintaining/stocking daily supplies, providing and issuing clothing as needed, coordinating with DHS and HHS staff, travel coordination, limited stationary guard services to accommodate for trip disruptions due to inclement weather, faulty equipment, or other exigent circumstances.

In January, the Obama administration put out a call saying there would be “approximately 65,000 UAC in total.” And in June, 52,000 UACs illegally crossed the U.S. border. A mere coincidence? Perhaps. But very likely not. Now, remember that that ICE RFI was posted in January 2014. And it was not until June 2014–some six months later–that the U.S. news media began reporting what the New York Post described as a “‘Katrina’ of illegal immigrants flooding into border states daily.” On July 3, 2014, the New York Times reported that “240,000 migrants and 52,000 unaccompanied minors…crossed the border illegally in recent months.”

To get to the truth, Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against DHS seeking “any and all records” relating to the ICE plan to handle the deluge caused by Obama’s lawlessness.

And yet, there’s more…

As President Obama readies a post-election immigration power play to provide amnesty for millions of illegals, his immigration czar said recently that the border is bracing for another surge of undocumented children, raising this year’s wave across the southern border to some 130,000. Leon Rodriguez, the new director of U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services, said that the federal government is already working to “prepare for another potential surge” across the border.

Make no mistake about it: There’s a direct connection between President Obama’s nullifying of our nation’s immigration laws and the breakdown of security along the border. Public safety, health, national security, transparency and the rule of law are all afterthoughts in this administration’s reckless abandonment of immigration enforcement. Obama’s actions run counter to the clear convictions of the electorate.

In fact, a Judicial Watch-Breitbart poll on the night of the recent historic election showed that voters oppose Obama’s lawless approach to immigration:
  • A majority of voters (58 percent) believe “We should enforce current laws that require illegal immigrants to return to their home countries.” And half of all Americans (50 percent) believe the United States should change current immigration law to slow the rate of legal immigration.
  •  Among minorities, 57 percent of Blacks and only 53 percent of Hispanics agree with the statement, “We should change immigration law to provide legal status to illegal immigrants present in the United States.” Only 25 percent of white respondents agree with that statement.
  •  When asked, “Do you agree or disagree that President Obama should through executive action allow illegal immigrants to remain in the United States, 63 percent disagree (53 percent “strongly,” 10 percent “somewhat”). Only 30 percent agree. Among minorities, 52 percent of Blacks and 60 percent of Hispanics agree that Obama should allow illegal immigrants to remain through executive action.

In short, just as he has done repeatedly since taking office, Obama is ignoring, in a lawless and unconstitutional way, the will of the American people–including a substantial number of the minority populations Obama and his media enablers pretend are fully behind his lawless amnesty actions. And this time, with his leaked executive “action” granting blanket amnesty coming within days after the “wave” election, there is no glossing over Obama’s unbridled contempt not only for the Constitution but for the views of Americans who expect that he obey and uphold the law.

And just as we go to press today, there have been some new developments…

We announced just yesterday the filing of another FOIA lawsuit against DHS seeking “all records” concerning a February 25-27 Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) Field Office Juvenile Coordination meeting.

ERO is the division of ICE that, according to the government website, has the responsibility, “To identify, arrest, and remove aliens who present a danger to national security or are a risk to public safety, as well as those who enter the United States illegally….” Juvenile Coordinators have the responsibility for enforcing ERO directives nationwide with regard to UACs.

Quite clearly, neither agency has been doing its job. In the summer of 2014, they let down their guard altogether. And we need to know why.

Perhaps we were given a hint shortly after the February ERO Field Office Juvenile Coordination Washington meeting when, in March 2014, the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP) issued a National Center for Border Security and Immigration “Unaccompanied Alien Children Report.” In its interviews with ICE and ERO agents, it found that they were then blaming the “lack of deterrence” for the substantial increase in UAC border crossings. According to the UTEP report:

Both Border Patrol and ICE ERO officers agreed that the lack of deterrence for crossing the US-Mexican border has impacted the rate at which they apprehend UACs. Officers are certain that UACs are aware of the relative lack of consequences they will receive when apprehended at the U.S. border. UTEP was informed that smugglers of family members of UACs understand that once a UAC is apprehended for illegal entry into the United States, the individual will be re-united with a U.S. based family member pending the disposition of the immigration hearing. This process appears to be exploited by illegal alien smugglers and family members in the United States who wish to reunite with separated children.

What JW intends to find out now is whether the ICE and ERO officers raised the same concerns at their February Washington meeting as they did at UTEP. If not, why not? Were they intimidated–or, perhaps, even instructed not to do so? And if they did raise those same concerns, why didn’t the Obama administration clamp down on the borders instead of allowing the ongoing “Katrina” of illegal aliens that has now overwhelmed our country? These are questions that need to be answered.

Let’s cut right to it: the Obama administration is trying to cover up the truth about the border crisis caused by President Obama’s lawless amnesty. I have little doubt that the Obama administration knew from its own immigration enforcement personnel that its refusal to enforce immigration law was going to cause a border crisis. Yet, rather than secure the border and follow the law, the Obama administration aided and abetted the human trafficking operations that planted hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens all over the nation–overwhelming our schools and putting the health and safety of Americans at risk. And now President Obama wants to grant illicit amnesty to those who rushed here this summer thanks to his previous lawless amnesty! The DHS is breaking immigration law on orders from this president and is now engaging in illegal secrecy to cover it up so Obama can do another round of immigration law-breaking.

Obama’s future plans are a menace, but our lawsuits show that his lawless amnesty is already here. The new Congress may act with lawsuits and funding cut-offs. Republicans are afraid of impeachment, so I doubt that they will stand fast on refusing to provide funding, the only other “constitutional option” to rein in Obama. I had some advice for Republicans grappling with Obama’s lawlessness:

“If the new Republican leadership in the Senate is only talking about what they can’t do, that’s going to be very demoralizing,” said Thomas J. Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, a conservative advocacy group that convenes a regular gathering called Groundswell. Any sense of triumph at its meeting last week was fleeting.

 “I think the members of the leadership need to decide what they’re willing to shut down the government over,” Mr. Fitton said.

This statement appeared on the front page of the New York Times, so I hope it gets the attention of Republicans and Democrats who have decided that throwing out the Constitution isn’t worth the mess of pottage that is political power.

Though I must say, even if impeachment and funding cut-offs were to begin tomorrow, Obama would not be impressed. Self-government, elections, laws, and other essential aspects of our constitutional system seem of little concern to the corrupt leader of this gangster administration. Judicial Watch will continue to take the lead in exposing and stopping this lawlessness. Your Judicial Watch is considering major litigation to stop Obama’s dictatorial amnesty agenda. We will keep moving forward toward accountability, and won’t wait for Congress and the rest of Washington to catch up.


FCC versus Free Speech

For centuries, our nation’s press has become accustomed to exercising its own news and editorial judgments largely free from government interference. It’s all part of the First Amendment guarantee of freedom of the press. But now, all of that could be about to change, if Obama administration officials have their way.

In May 2013, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced its intention to proceed with what it described as a “Multi-Market Study of Critical Information Needs” that would probe into how members of the news media make editorial decisions on the stories they cover. At the time, the FCC said the “pilot” study would enable the agency “to ascertain the process by which stories are selected … perceived station bias … and perceived responsiveness to underserved populations.” [Emphasis added] Government officials would, of course, determine what they perceive as “bias” and who they decide are “underserved populations.”

Here are some of the invasive–and, in fact, chilling–questions FCC Critical Information Needs (CIN) agents were to ask private news media companies, some of whom whose broadcast licenses could depend upon providing the FCC the “right” answers:
  • “What is the news philosophy of the station?
  • “Who decides which stories are covered?”
  • “How much does community input influence news coverage decisions?”
  • “What are the demographics of the news management staff?”
  • “What are the demographics of the news production staff?”

The FCC plans also called for government monitors “crawling” the Internet sites of newspapers, local governments, blogs, non-profits, and citizen journalists. All of which is an affront to the law and the First Amendment.

One committee chairman in the House sent a letter demanding more information. In a December 2013 letter to the FCC, House Energy and Commerce Committee chairman Fred Upton (R-MI) termed the CIN study an attempt “to control the political speech of journalists” and urged the agency to “put a stop to this most recent attempt to engage the FCC as the news police.” Since then? Crickets–from both Congress and the Obama gang (and, despicably, most of the liberal media.)

That’s why on October 16, 2014, JW filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the FCC after it failed to respond to a FOIA request in February asking for:

 “Any and all records in the possession of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) relating to the Multi-Market Critical Information study to be conducted by the FCC, including, but not limited to, studies, memoranda and communications between FCC commissioners and/or staff members related to Multi-Market Critical Information Needs study.”

We want to know exactly how the Obama FCC overlords came up with their CIN interrogatories–and how high up this assault upon freedom of the press originated. Fortunately, we are not alone. The FCC’s hostility toward First Amendment freedoms has elicited a strong response from prominent voices. In a letter to the FCC, the National Association of Broadcasters termed the FCC proposal “constitutionally questionable.” And FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai, in a Wall Street Journal op-ed, warned that the study would “thrust the federal government into newsrooms across the country.”

In response to the controversy, the FCC in late February announced that it would suspend the study. The operative word there, of course, is “suspended,” rather than “abandoned.” Specifically, the FCC has also said it will no longer ask media outlets based in South Carolina to participate in a pilot program where they would be compelled to share their newsroom philosophy.

The problem, of course, as Weekly Update readers well know, is that in Washington nothing is as it appears to be. So, while the study has supposedly been suspended, we still need to find out why it was initiated in the first place. The actions of the Obama administration have demonstrated a record of hostility to the First Amendment freedoms of citizens and the press. This much is evident in the latest Reporters Without Borders recent survey of world press freedom that now ranks the United States forty-sixth, below even that of Botswana and Romania and only one position above Haiti. Little wonder USA Today Washington Bureau Chief Susan Page told a White House Correspondents’ Association (WHCA) seminar on October 25 that the Obama administration is “more restrictive” and “more dangerous” to freedom of the press than any in history. You can ask James Rosen of Fox News about this. You can also ask the Associated Press. Both had their records rifled through on orders of a lying Attorney General Eric Holder or his minions.

Unfortunately, the study is simply the latest version of the ‘Fairness Doctrine,’ a FCC regulatory scheme ended during the Reagan administration that was used to regulate political speech on radio and television. This time, true to the Obama administration’s racialist agenda, the FCC sought to pressure media under the guise of racial diversity and community organizing language. Given all this background, is it any surprise that President Obama, earlier this week, personally endorsed the federal takeover of the Internet by the FCC?

This FCC scandal also echoes the Obama IRS abuse, which illegally targeted groups and individuals based upon their political philosophy. The FCC, which is charged with making sure regulated media companies obey the law, refuses to obey the Freedom of Information Act and tell the American people why it wanted to interrogate newsmen and monitor the blogs of everyday citizens. JW will continue to do the work of defending our freedom through this latest lawsuit to help keep the Obama FCC news police at bay.


Election Integrity Project: The New Hampshire Report 

While voter identification is a technical requirement in New Hampshire, the law is riddled with loopholes that threaten to render it ineffective as any sort of check on fraud. That’s what a team of Judicial Watch attorneys and volunteer observers, who were in the Granite State on Election Day, determined. Although election officials will accept standard IDs such as drivers’ licenses and passports, potential voters may also present any other photo ID less definitive “deemed reasonable” by those officials.

And, that’s not all.

A potential voter who has no photo identification–either standard or “alternative”–may still vote after simply filling out an affidavit and swearing to his or her identity and asserting that he or she is eligible to vote in New Hampshire. How can the state’s voter ID law have any real effect with these broad exemptions in place?

In close elections, voter fraud can make the difference between the will of the people and the wiles of the political elite. That’s why we sent this team of lawyers and volunteer observers to New Hampshire on Election Day as part of our Election Integrity Project, which is directed by Robert Popper, a seasoned attorney and former Deputy Chief of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Voting Section. Our goal is to prevent voter fraud so legitimate voters are not disenfranchised. This year alone, Judicial Watch successfully resolved lawsuits in Ohio and Indiana built around a provision of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) that requires state officials to maintain clean voter rolls. We have also released data that shows 11 states plus Washington D.C. have out-of-date voter rolls in various counties where the number of registered voters exceeds the voting age population. We are pressing ahead as we consider potential NVRA litigation in Colorado, Iowa and the District of Colombia. And we are also investigating the voter rolls in Alabama, California, Illinois, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, New Mexico, North Carolina, and West Virginia.

In New Hampshire, citizens have a right to monitor elections so long as they do so unobtrusively, and this is how we operated. The attorneys on our team included Chris Fedeli and Lauren Burke and were led by veteran poll watcher Robert Popper. The volunteers were local Judicial Watch members who patriotically contributed their time to assist with this effort.  In the weeks leading up to the election, Judicial Watch attorneys had trained these volunteers to be on the lookout for a variety of poor electoral practices or outright violations of state election laws.

Team members were told not to make challenges or otherwise to interfere with the conduct of elections. Rather, their purpose was simply to take notes and to gather evidence regarding the State’s electoral practices. Where particular problems were observed on Election Day, Judicial Watch attorneys would notify the appropriate State authorities. Our team was able to observe voting and registration procedures in about 20 polling sites throughout the state. They concentrated their efforts on the more populous locations in Nashua and Manchester, as well as polling places in Pelham, Exeter, Litchfield, Keene and elsewhere.

What our team found in New Hampshire was disturbing.

They saw many individuals submitting affidavits in lieu of any actual photo IDs.  They also saw extremely high rates of same-day registration. At most of the sites we visited, the same-day registration rate varied between 6-10 percent of all those voting. At one site, the rate was an extraordinary 12.7 percent, or about one out of every 8 voters. At another site, there were at one point three individuals waiting to vote–while another 17 individuals were waiting to same-day register.  And some of them had Massachusetts T-shirts.

A major challenge to ballot integrity in New Hampshire, and in other parts of the country, stems from the practice of same-day registration. This procedure allows an individual to register to vote on Election Day at any polling site, and then to walk over to the voting booths and cast a ballot. This is a problem for obvious reasons. For starters, state officials do not have time to confirm the validity of the registration. Even when there is good reason to suspect a fraudulent vote, the only response is a meaningless post-election investigation (kind of like when the NFL front office agrees to “review” a bad call in a pivotal game–on Monday).

The person who gave a false name and address is long gone, leaving nothing but false paperwork. More to the point, in any case where fraud is suspected but not proved, the resulting vote still counts. There’s also a huge opening for students, and other out-of-state residents to vote illegally thanks to permissive “domicile” requirements. This past summer, a Stafford County judge overturned a state requirement that someone claiming state residence had to register their car and obtain a New Hampshire driver’s license. And top state officials encouraged polling places to set aside a special “no photo ID” table for voters who did not bring photo identification. This directive came from the state’s attorney general’s office, which does not seem overly concerned with raising standards and protecting the rights of legitimate voters. These “no photo ID” tables were too busy for those of us concerned about election integrity.

Our poll watching experience in New Hampshire shows that voter identification requirements need to have real teeth to them.

The Obama administration will be of no help and will oppose reform for cleaner elections.

Attorney General Eric Holder has made it his personal mission to block voter identification laws, most recently claiming they are in violation of Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, or VRA.

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of voter ID back in 2008 in a case involving an Indiana law. Most recently, the Supreme Court also upheld voter ID in Texas. None of that has stopped Eric Holder, who, with the support of President Obama, is waging a war on voter ID (so that illegal aliens and foreign nationals can illegally vote for leftists without much impediment).

But proponents of voter ID have the rule of law on their side. That’s the good news. The bad news is those government officials at the state and federal level who are out to undermine voter ID will continue to have any ally in the Justice Department.

Loretta Lynch, President Obama’s nominee to succeed Holder, appears set to continue his policies. Lynch is the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York. Lynch has made it clear she approves of lawsuits the DOJ has filed against states like North Carolina in an effort to block voter ID. JW will expand its Election Integrity Project nationwide in upcoming elections. And as the Senate considers the nomination of apparent Holder-clone Loretta Lynch, we will diligently investigate her qualifications and biases.

In the meantime, we will do the work of the Justice Department, which has no interest in investigating voter fraud of the sort that may have helped elect President Obama and other liberals. Our Election Integrity Project will expand its work as we plan to monitor elections in additional states in the 2016 presidential election.

Until next week…

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/weekly-updates/obamas-amnesty-assault/


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 17 Nov - 06:25 (2014)    Sujet du message: OBAMA IN AUSTRALIA : I'LL SEND GROUND TROOPS TO FIGHT ISIS ONLY IF THEY GET A NUKE Répondre en citant

OBAMA IN AUSTRALIA : I'LL SEND GROUND TROOPS TO FIGHT ISIS ONLY IF THEY GET A NUKE

Until than, they can continue their good work!!!




VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4_NTzFLcJo


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 18 Nov - 03:12 (2014)    Sujet du message: ISIL THREATENS SLAUGHTER IN THE STREETS OF THE WEST Répondre en citant



ISIL THREATENS SLAUGHTER IN THE STREETS OF THE WEST


'Jihadi John' threatens to bring slaughter to the streets of the West as he announces the death of American aid worker Peter Kassig


A still from a video issued by the Islamic State of the terrorist reffered to as 'Jihadi John'  

By Ben Farmer, Defence Correspondent, and Richard Spencer, Middle East Correspondent

7:46PM GMT 16 Nov 2014

The Islamic State militant known as Jihadi John has threatened to bring slaughter to the streets of Britain and the West in a new video announcing the murder of an American aid worker.

The video, featuring the masked militant, marks the group’s most explicit threats yet to attack the UK and America and dismisses David Cameron as a puppet of Barack Obama.

It endorses the Prime Minister’s earlier warnings of terrorist attacks in the UK and says the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (Isil) will soon begin attacks against the West.

The graphic footage shows what it claims to be the severed head of Peter Kassig, a US special forces soldier turned aid worker, and the beheading of at least 18 Syrian military prisoners.

Mr Cameron condemned the “depravity” of the Isil militants and said he was horrified by Mr Kassig's cold-blooded murder. He said Mr Kassig was a "selfless humanitarian worker who had gone to the region to help care for those fleeing the Syrian conflict."
 
He added: "This underlines the deplorable depths to which these terrorists are prepared to go – savagely murdering a compassionate man.

In Washington, Mr Obama’s National Security Council said US intelligence agencies were working to confirm the authenticity of the video. Officials said they were "increasingly convinced" it was genuine.

A spokeswoman said: "If confirmed, we are appalled by the brutal murder of an innocent American aid worker and we express our deepest condolences to his family and friends."

The killing showed the West may have to “think the unthinkable” and commit ground troops to help Iraqi forces beat back the militants from northern Iraq, Lord Dannatt, former head of the Army said.

The 15-minute-long film was released hours after unconfirmed reports that Jihadi John, who is now one of the world’s most wanted men, had been wounded last week in a US air strike. It was not immediately clear when it was filmed.

The militant, who speaks in a London accent, says: “To Obama, the dog of Rome. Today we are slaughtering the soldiers of Bashar and tomorrow we will be slaughtering your soldiers and with Allah’s permission we will break this final and last crusade and the Islamic State will soon, like your puppet David Cameron said, begin to slaughter your people on your streets.”

The video then shows the execution of at least 18 pilots and officers from Bashar al Assad’s government forces. Later the militant can be seen with a decapitated head at his feet, which he says belongs to Mr Kassig. Mr Kassig makes no propaganda statement in the video, in contrast to the executions in earlier hostage films, and one close friend said he believed he had defied his captors to the end.

Michael Downey, one of Mr Kassig's best friends from Beirut, said: “I think he refused. He was a man of principle and wouldn't give into intimidation from thugs. He never took the easy route."

Mr Cameron earlier this year warned that Britain faces the “greatest and deepest” terror threat in the country’s history and the risk posed by Isil, also known as Isis, will last for “decades”.

Lord Dannatt, former Chief of the General Staff, called for a national debate in Britain about what action should be taken against the militants.

Western leaders may now have to "think the unthinkable" and send in troops if the combination of air strikes and local forces was unable to counter menace for the jihadists.

He told Sky News more had to be done to attack Isil from the air and by backing Iraqi and Kurdish troops fighting on the ground.

"If that is not enough then we might have to think the unthinkable and possibly engage Western forces on the ground. I don't see that happening in a great rush, there's no appetite for it, there's no political appetite for it.

He went on: "The evidence is showing us that this is not going to go away and that more action is going to have to be taken.

"I don't want to see British troops involved. We have had 10, 12 years of exhaustive intervention in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"But are we just going to wish this away or are we going to take action? That's what has got to be addressed in a national debate."

Sir John Major, the Prime Minister during the 1991 Gulf War, warned Arab nations should play the leading role, or Western involvement would again be portrayed as a crusade.

He said: “Unless we want the old argument that the crusaders have come in to attack, we really need to support other Arabs on the ground and use our power in other ways to help them – surveillance, training, provide weapons and so forth – I think that is a proper role for us."

The threats to the West followed a strategic shift in the movement, which has previously focused on building up a state ruled by Sharia law in Eastern Syria and northern Iraq, said one analyst.

Prof Peter Neumann of King’s College Centre for Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence, said he now expected to see more attacks such as the shooting of a soldier who had been guarding Canada’s national war memorial in Ottawa.

He said: “Three weeks ago their spokesman came out with a statement saying attack them wherever you find them. Before they had said come to the Islamic State, we are building the Caliphate, if you agree with us, and you are like minded, then you should come to us.”

But the release of the video was interpreted as a sign that Isil is shaken by the US-led air strike campaign and reports that it’s leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, had been badly hurt.

Prof Neumann said: “I think the Islamic state is under pressure. They are not expanding any more and that must be frustrating for them because their whole unique selling point is that they deliver, they are the only ones who are unstoppable, but they have been stopped.”

Isil is now believed to have just two Western hostages left in captivity, the British journalist John Cantlie and a female American aid worker.

Fawaz Gerges, professor of Middle East politics at the London School of Economics, said: “Hostages are the only means that Isis has to retaliate against the Americans and Europeans. It’s really them leveraging their most important weapons. They are hurting, they are bleeding.

He said the video was in response to reports that Al Baghdadi and Jihadi John had been wounded in US air strikes. “They are over extended, the Iraqi army and its allies are standing up. Major progress has been achieved in Iraq.”


VIDEO :
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/islamic-state/11234525/Isil-threatens-slaughter-in-the-streets-of-the-West.html


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 18 Nov - 04:30 (2014)    Sujet du message: STATE OF EMERGENCY DECLARED IN FERGUSON Répondre en citant

FALSE FLAG ALERT!



STATE OF EMERGENCY DECLARED IN FERGUSON



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLQoPAkhPbk

FERGUSON LISTS PLACES THEY WILL RIOT IF WILSON IS ACQUITTED - POLICE DEPTS YOU NAME IT




VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phSygUSSR-I

FALSE FLAG ALERT! FBI WARNS FERGUSON EXTREMISTS PROTESTERS MAY ATTACK WATER, ELECTRIC FACILITIES!




VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWiNej_QZy8


Revenir en haut
Contenu Sponsorisé






MessagePosté le: Aujourd’hui à 10:08 (2016)    Sujet du message: DICTATURE ISLAMO/FASCISTE MONDIALE - 4E REICH (PARTIE 2) - P.1

Revenir en haut
Montrer les messages depuis:   
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> TERREUR SUR LA TERRE/TERROR ON EARTH -> DICTATURE ISLAMO/FASCISTE MONDIALE 4e REICH - (PARTIE 2) Toutes les heures sont au format GMT + 2 Heures
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 360, 61, 62119, 120, 121  >
Page 61 sur 121

 
Sauter vers:  

Portail | Index | Creer un forum | Forum gratuit d’entraide | Annuaire des forums gratuits | Signaler une violation | Conditions générales d'utilisation
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Traduction par : phpBB-fr.com