LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum


 FAQFAQ   RechercherRechercher   MembresMembres   GroupesGroupes   S’enregistrerS’enregistrer 
 ProfilProfil   Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés   ConnexionConnexion 

Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 37, 8, 9149, 150, 151  >
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> TERREUR SUR LA TERRE/TERROR ON EARTH -> DICTATURE ISLAMO/FASCISTE MONDIALE 4e REICH - (PARTIE 2)
Sujet précédent :: Sujet suivant  
Auteur Message

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Mar 28 Aoû - 16:54 (2012)    Sujet du message: L'EST DE DAMAS SOUS LES BOMBES Répondre en citant


VIDÉO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ty0IRsuitQ

Revenir en haut

MessagePosté le: Mar 28 Aoû - 16:54 (2012)    Sujet du message: Publicité

PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?
Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Mar 28 Aoû - 21:05 (2012)    Sujet du message: DHS AMASSING ARMS FOR SECRET FORCES TO BE USED AGAINST AMERICAN CITIZENS? Répondre en citant


 By Susanne Posel
August 28, 2012

Major General Jerry Curry, who is a decorated combat veteran, Army Aviator, paratrooper, and Ranger, has asked the question:

Who does the government intend to shoot?

In an op-ed piece, Curry brings up the strange purchases of hollow point bullets that the Department of Homeland security has recently made.

Through other federal agencies like the Social Security Office (SSO) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the DHS has ordered several thousand hollow point bullets as well.

Curry states:

“No one has yet said what the purpose of these purchases is, though we are led to believe that they will be used only in an emergency to counteract and control civil unrest.

Those against whom the hollow point bullets are to be used — those causing the civil unrest — must be American citizens; since the SSA has never been used overseas to help foreign countries maintain control of their citizens.”

The Geneva Convention outlaws hollow point bullets on the battle field because of their deadly nature. Curry asks if DHS intends to shoot “nation’s military and replace them with Department of Homeland Security (DHS) special security forces, forces loyal to the Administration, not to the Constitution?”

Is the DHS arming a private army with hollow point bullets with the intent to shoot at US Armed Forces, US veterans and civilians?

The DHS put out a solicitation to manufacturers for 63,000,000 rounds of .40 S&W jacketed hollow point bullets. By August 20th, the DHS has requested 357 mag rounds that are able to pierce through walls.

The Social Security Office has also made a solicitation for 174,000 rounds of .357 hollow point bullets.

A past solicitation includes government contracts for every type of weapon of all calibers and by the thousands. From training rounds to armory meant to devastate the human body, the DHS is preparing to win an anticipated civil disturbance.

In May of this year, the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) requested from Congress through a new authorization act to allow US armed forces to be used against American citizens as a response team for domestic disturbances.

According to Lt. Gen. Charles E. Stenner Jr., chief of Air Force Reserve and AFRC commander:

“Mobilizing needed reservists will help sustain their support for longer periods and make operations more efficient. We mobilize reservists to handle contingencies overseas, so it makes sense that we do that to take care of our own country.”

At the New York City’s Grand Central Terminal (GCT), Airman First Class Peter Grajewski, a member of the Joint Task Force Empire Shield, is stationed at GCT to conduct security operations in NYC in an effort of “deter and prevent terrorist acts.”

Army Lt. Col. Peter Riley, the task force’s commander, explains:

“We are a full-time, state active-duty force of 280 New Yorkers. [This force] was formed on 9/11 and has been here since.

“New York, historically, has been a city greatly targeted by terrorists. Empire Shield is designed to show the bad guys that we’re here and hopefully make them think twice about trying any sort of terrorist attack.”

Airmen and Soldiers of JTF Empire Shield work with the NYPD, Amtrak police, MTA police and the US coast Guard to ensure military-style safety of civilians.

Although they are not responsible for making arrests, they are legally allowed to detain civilians at their discretion and use force if they deem necessary.

The DHS and FBI are warning about a possible false flag attacks using improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and “anarchists”.

While the DHS solicits for 700 pounds of High Density Ammonium Nitrate and 700 pounds of A-5 Flake RDX which is the exact ingredients need to manufacture an improvised explosive device (IEDs), the Pentagon is coming before Congress to demand that Posse Commitatis be “relaxed” so that military troops can freely patrol American streets looking for home-grown terrorists.

The FBI asserts that according to their intelligence, unidentified persons have “planned to travel to Tampa and attempt to close” Tampa Bay area bridges during the Republican National Convention (RNC).

The FBI states these extremists will engage “in potentially destructive criminal activities against critical infrastructure outside the security perimeter throughout the Tampa Bay region because they expected access to the main RNC venue to be tightly controlled.”

These extremists are being described as “white supremacists” that are purchasing materials to build IEDs, are training with firearms to enact violence against “groups they oppose.”

In 2009, the Office of Intelligence and Analysis published a report entitled Rightwing Extremism, wherein domestic extremists, particularly white supremacists, were proposed to be the newest and most dangerous threat to the US since al-Qaeda.

While admitting that they had no definitive proof they stated:

“Domestic rightwing terrorists are currently planning acts of violence, [however] rightwing extremists may be gaining new recruits by playing on their fears about several emergent issues. The economic downturn and the election of the first African American president present unique drivers for rightwing radicalization and recruitment.”

The DHS wanted to instill the idea that veterans were being recruited to become “right-wing extremists” upon returned from Iraq and Afghanistan. Janet Napolitano intimated that military veterans could become instruments of domestic terror.

When Napolitano’s comments were met with public disdain, the DHS amended their assertion that extremist groups were highly-marked; but rather it was a lone wolf type that would carry out the biggest act of domestic terrorism.

The group, Reaching Critical Will, (RCW) are planning to hold a conference in New York City between August 27th and September of this year to discuss the “UN Program of Action to Prevent, Combat, and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons In All Its Aspects.”

The RCW are dedicated to working with the UN on disarmament and coercion of sovereign nations to participate with the UN in removing the rights of citizens to have the right to own a gun.

The RCW conference is meant to be a review of the UN Arms Trade Treaty conference that was recently held in NYC at the UN headquarters. The UN’s Programme of Action (PoA), which is the initial effort to disarm all citizens of all nations, will be discussed and reaffirmed.

In a scheme to devise a way of convincing countries to outlaw rights to firearms for citizens, only the governmental armed forces would have access to guns.

By using “incentives and sanctions” along with business and civil society, governments must recover stocks of firearms held by the population and dispose of them definitively, preferably through destruction.”

Back in July, the UN held a conference in NY at the their headquarters to discuss the UN Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) wherein they have decided they will meet to create an “elaborate a legally binding instrument on the highest possible common international standards for the transfer of conventional arms.”

The ATT will empower the UN to literally force the US government to:

  • Enact internationally agreed licensing requirements for Americans
  • Confiscate and destroy unauthorized firearms of Americans while allowing the US government to keep theirs
  • Ban trade, sale and private ownership of semi-automatic guns
  • Create and mandate an international registry to organize an encompassing gun confiscation in America

We are seeing military “training” on our streets, the mainstream media demonizing US veterans, DHS purchasing hundreds of thousands of hollow point bullets, and the ingredients to manufacture IEDs while at the same time the UN is discussing how to effectively disarm Americans and we are supposed to continue on with “business as usual” as if nothing is happening.

Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism Our alternative news site is dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporate-funded mainstream media. You can find us on our Facebook page.

Minor Editing by Alex Thomas


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Mar 28 Aoû - 22:32 (2012)    Sujet du message: CANADA - QUÉBEC : QUINZE ÉTUDIANTS ARRÊTÉS À L'UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL Répondre en citant

Publié le 28 août 2012 à 08h59 | Mis à jour à 13h15

Intervention policière à l'Université de Montréal.


=author%3ADavid+Santerre&sort=recent]David Santerre
La Presse

La direction de l'Université de Montréal a beau avoir annoncé la levée de la plupart des cours dispensés à ses huit écoles encore touchées par la grève étudiante, l'après-midi a donné lieu à l'affrontement le plus musclé entre policiers et étudiants à survenir depuis lundi matin.

En début d'après-midi, des policiers sont entrés à la demande de la direction de l'école dans le pavillon Jean-Brillant afin de poursuivre la vague d'arrestations entamée en avant-midi. 11 personnes avaient été arrêtées, dont cinq relâchées sans accusation, pour voies de fait contre des agents de sécurité et des policiers.

Arrivés sur place vers 13h, les policiers du poste de quartier se sont retrouvés, selon le commandant Ian Lafrenière du SPVM, en présence d'une centaine d'étudiants. Quand ils ont procédé aux arrestations de quatre hommes et une femme qui faisait d'ailleurs partie des cinq relâchés ce matin, les esprits se seraient échauffés.

«On a eu maille à partir avec le groupe et on a fait venir le groupe d'intervention», explique-t-il.

C'est un peloton énorme d'hommes casqués, portant boucliers et matraques, qui a fait son entrée dans l'immeuble.

Ils n'ont pas ménagé leurs efforts pour repousser la centaine d'étudiants dans une cage d'escalier où ils les ont pris en souricière pour les confiner pendant une dizaine de minutes.

Ce qui a soulevé l'ire des manifestants.

«Sommes-nous en état d'arrestation? Vous devez avoir un motif pour nous détenir», criaient certains.

Quand ils ont annoncé au groupe qu'ils les conduiraient jusqu'à la sortie, une autre leur a lancé «c'est notre université, on le sait où elles sont les calices de portes»!

Repoussés sur le trottoir, les manifestants ont longtemps fait face à un barrage policier les empêchant de retourner dans leur école. La tension et la haine a atteint un nouveau paroxysme.

«Nous avons envoyé un gros contingent du groupe d'intervention parce que plus il y a de monde, moins la force utilisée est grande», a indiqué Ian Lafrenière pour justifier l'intervention impressionnante.

Comme si la tension n'était pas suffisamment grande, un étudiant en droit de l'Université de Montréal est venu engueuler les manifestants en leur distribuant des affiches du Parti libéral du Québec et du candidat du comté où se trouve l'Université, Raymond Bachand.

Au départ, on croyait à la mise en scène, mais l'engueulade a dégénéré.

«Vous entrez dans nos classes masqués, vous manquez derespect», a lancé l'étudiant. Des manifestants lui ont vidé une bouteille d'eau sur la tête et finalement, les policiers l'ont arraché à la foule en lui demandant de ne pas jeter d'huile sur le feu.

Le calme est revenu petit à petit.

Peu après midi, la direction avait annoncé la levée de 11 cours en après-midi dans une tentative de calmer les esprits échauffés.
Les cours visés étaient dispensés notamment par les écoles de cinéma, d'anthropologie et d'histoire de l'art, qui sont au nombre des huit départements dont les étudiants ont reconduit la grève en assemblée générale.

En avant-midi, le SPVM était de nouveau intervenu pourneutraliser des étudiants dans le pavillon Jean-Brillant.

Les étudiants et les professeurs sont en furie contre la police, mais surtout contre la direction qui lui fait appel pour forcer la reprise des cours.

«C'est pathétique. On a dans l'université un département de relations industrielles, de psychologie et de travail social. Je ne peux pas croire qu'on ne peut pas trouver des gens qui proposeraient une autre solution pour régler la crise que d'appeler le groupe d'intervention», tempête le professeur au département d'études cinématographique Germain Lacasse.

«La police à l'université, j'ai déjà vu ça aux nouvelles, dans des dictatures», poursuit-il.

«Donner un cours quand des étudiants chahutent à l'extérieur de la salle n'est pas facile, mais c'est plus facile que quand on entend des étudiants crier parce qu'ils se font pousser par la police. C'est intolérable», renchérit Sonia Gauthier, professeure à l'école de service social, qui n'est pas touchée par la grève.

«Tout ce que fait la police, c'est envenimer les choses», déplore Gabriel Dubé, étudiant en troisième année en anthropologie.
Ce militant pour la grève participait au piquetage ce matin, et affirme que si son département avait voté pour le retour en classe, il se plierait à la décision. Mais il faut respecter selon lui le vote de l'assemblée générale.

«Nous avions le quorum de 20 % des membres et avons tenu un vote secret, qui a reconduit la grève à 57 %», justifie-t-il.

Il affirme avoir vu une enseignante en anthropologie quitter sa salle de cours en pleurs. Il croit que la direction force ses professeurs à travailler dans les pires conditions.

Il ne sait plus trop ce qui adviendra de l'objectif principal du mouvement de contestation étudiante, l'abolition de la hausse des droits de scolarité. Mais il a toutes les raisons de poursuivre la lutte, croit-il.

«La loi impose de terminer en quatre semaines une session de trois mois. C'est une session à rabais, sans valeur. Pour moi, rentrer dans ces conditions, c'est inacceptable. Je ne suis pas ici pour accumuler des points, mais des connaissances», plaide-t-il.

Difficile pour les étudiants de voir comment la crise pourra se résorber dans cette université.

«À l'UQAM, c'est calme, parce que la direction n'a pas appelé la police. Tant que la police interviendra ici, la situation va se reproduire chaque jour», croit une étudiante.

Mathieu Filion, porte-parole de l'Université de Montréal, insiste sur le fait que seuls 2000 étudiants sur les 45 000 ont voté pour le non-retour en classe.

«Appeler la police est une décision très difficile à prendre. Mais pour assurer la sécurité de nos étudiants, nous nous devons de le faire. Il est difficile de dire si l'intervention policière a ramené le calme dans l'université. Mais ce que nous souhaitons, c'est que les étudiants puissent reprendre leurs cours en sécurité», dit-il.

De son côté, la Fédération nationale des enseignantes et enseignants du Québec (FNEEQ) déplore l'intervention policière dans une école.

«Il est inadmissible que les policiers chargent des étudiants, et que la sécurité force une enseignante à donner un cours. Les enseignants désirent respecter les décisions démocratiques prises par les assemblées générales. L'UQAM a décidé de lever les cours plutôt que d'appeler la police, et c'est une excellente décision», opine le vice-président de la FNEEQ, Sylvain Marois.

À l'UQAM, la situation est plus calme même si des manifestants, parfois masqués et bruyants, sont malgré tout actif dans les couloirs de l'institution. Mais comme la veille, la police n'y mène toujours aucune intervention.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Mer 29 Aoû - 22:04 (2012)    Sujet du message: POLICE OUTNUMBER CONVENTION PROTESTERS BY 4-1 IN TAMPA Répondre en citant



By Jordy Yager - 2012-08-27 04:34:00 PM ET

Police outnumbered demonstrators Monday as hundreds took to Tampa’s streets to protest the Republican convention.Roughly 250 protesters took part in Monday’s “March on the RNC,” a figure dramatically lower than the 5,000 people organizers said would take part in the rally.

Organizers blamed the depressed turnout on Tropical Storm Isaac, which led Republicans to postpone high-profile GOP speakers originally set to take the stage on Monday, such as former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and Sen. Rand Paul (Ky.).

Nearly 1,000 officers were on hand to ensure the rally was peaceful, about four times the number of demonstrators in the streets.

After the FBI and Department of Homeland Security issued a joint bulletin warning Tampa’s convention could be targeted by anarchists, police in tan uniforms were positioned all along the protest route.

Officers lined the streets, encircling the mobile demonstration with fleets of bicycles, all-terrain vehicles, horses and SUVs in an attempt to contain possible attacks before they became violent. The demonstrators wended their way through Tampa chanting variations of, “Hey, hey! Ho, ho! The RNC must go!”

The most tense moment of the day occurred shortly before 5 p.m., as about 100 police in riot gear formed a human blockade preventing the mass of protesters from approaching the convention center. After about 20 minutes and a torrential downpour, the group of demonstrators moved on in the opposite direction and the police stood down.

As of press time, there had been only one arrest — a Florida man named Jason Wilson who was detained for holding a machete, according to local police.

A wide array of causes was represented, ranging from Code Pink’s call to end the war in Afghanistan to the Green Party’s push for people not to vote for either the Democratic or Republican candidate.

Also at the rally were Students for a Democratic Society, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and a handful of Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) supporters.

Protesters with the Occupy movement were also in full force with calls to dismantle the United States’ economic and political system.

“Our economy is mostly electronic,” protester Andrew Speirs told a group of reporters. “We have no backing to our currency. It’s fake money. It’s actually just printed debt by the Federal Reserve bank. And we can’t pay back our national debt; we can only create more debt by printing money.”

Speirs, who has been living “on the streets” since October, told a reporter from Fox News that he wasn’t planning to vote for any candidate come November.

“I don’t think we have any electable choices that will fix the system we have,” he said. “I see our voting system as corrupt.”

Law enforcement officials fenced off a large empty square lot several blocks away from the convention center where demonstrators spoke from a stage provided by the city.

In last week’s bulletin, FBI and DHS officials warned that anarchists could use the protests as a trial run for demonstrations during the Democratic National Convention, which, they cautioned, could turn violent.

This story was updated at 5:15 p.m.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Jeu 30 Aoû - 16:21 (2012)    Sujet du message: ECONOMIC COLLAPSE, FOREIGN TROOPS & MARTIAL LAW WITH STEVE QUAYLE Répondre en citant


VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wfAJBYWqFw

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Ven 31 Aoû - 05:00 (2012)    Sujet du message: NEW ORLEANS DECLARES MARTIAL LAW CURFEW SET Répondre en citant


VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IaJ69vQeuM&feature=plcp

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Ven 31 Aoû - 19:42 (2012)    Sujet du message: OBAMA CALLS FOR AMENDMENT LIMITING FREE-SPEECH RIGHTS Répondre en citant


Just an other hypocrisy game from the Congress. It is not the Congress who secretly gave power to the Constitution Act 1871 abolishing the Constitution Act 1776? Now, they want completely guarrantee the First Amendment rights to corporations. It's just confirm the secret agenda they played for long time and who's now coming out for the final take over of America. They never respect or so few our Constitutional rights making us believed they listen the peoples but now, they will impose it to take the total control of our mind and soul.

By Matt Cover
August 30, 2012
Subscribe to Matt Cover's posts

(CNSNews.com) – President Barack Obama endorsed a constitutional amendment that would restrict the free-speech rights of political activist groups by overturning the Supreme Court decision in the landmark Citizens United v FEC case that granted First Amendment rights to corporations.

“Over the longer term, I think we need to seriously consider mobilizing a constitutional amendment process to overturn Citizens United,” Obama wrote during a question and answer session on the website Reddit on Wednesday.

“Even if the amendment process falls short, it can shine a spotlight of the super-PAC phenomenon and help apply pressure for change.”

In its decision, the Supreme Court said that the government could not restrict the free-speech rights of organizations during elections, striking down key provisions of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law.

That law restricted how much money independent political organizations could spend and banned them from engaging in election-related speech 60 days prior to a general election.

In his concurring opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that the government was arguing for direct censorship of political speech, asking the court to allow the banning of books, pamphlets, and any other type of speech the government deemed necessary.

“The Government urges us in this case to uphold a direct prohibition on political speech,” Roberts wrote. “It asks us to embrace a theory of the First Amendment that would allow censorship not only of television and radio broadcasts, but of pamphlets, posters, the Internet, and virtually any other medium that corporations and unions might find useful in expressing their views on matters of public concern.

Its theory, if accepted, would empower the Government to prohibit newspapers from running editorials or opinion pieces supporting or opposing candidates for office, so long as the newspapers were owned by corporations—as the major ones are.”

Roberts said that the First Amendment did not simply protect “the individual on a soapbox” but the rights of everyone to engage in political speech.

“The First Amendment protects more than just the individual on a soapbox and the lonely pamphleteer,” he said.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Sam 1 Sep - 21:57 (2012)    Sujet du message: EXTRAORDINARY EVENTS" - CHARLOTTE Répondre en citant


Police Swat Team is there to protect muslim brotherhood fanatics at the DNC Convention who want to replace Constitution by Sharia laws.

VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgCXd6dAuQ0

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Dim 2 Sep - 21:43 (2012)    Sujet du message: POLICE ADMIT TO INFILTRATING OCCUPY AUSTIN, MAY HAVE ACTED AS PROVOCATEURS Répondre en citant


By Muriel Kane
Friday, August 31, 2012 21:26 EDT

Topics: austin policeOccupy Austin

When the local offshoot of Occupy Wall Street began a five-month encampment in Austin, Texas last fall, the Austin police assigned at least three undercover officers to infiltrate the group and gather information on potentially illegal actions.

According to the Austin Statesman, court documents and interviews show that the infiltrators “camped with other participants in the movement, marched in rallies and attended strategy meetings.”

They may also have gone further, acting as provocateurs to encourage the use of lockboxes or “sleeping dragons” — lengths of PVC pipe into which protestors insert their arms to make it harder for police to remove them during a demonstration.

Seven protestors who used the devices while blocking a port entrance in Houston last December 12 have been charged with a felony and face jail terms of from two to ten years under what the Statesman calls “an obscure statute that prohibits using a device that is manufactured or adapted for the purpose of participating in a crime.”

The question of the lockboxes came up during a district court hearing in Harris County this week at which one of those seven, Ronnie Garza, sought to have the charge against him dropped. It was disclosed at the hearing that Austin Police Detective Shannon Dowell — known to Occupiers as “Butch” — had purchased the necessary pipe and other materials using funds supplied by Occupy Austin, constructed the devices himself, and provided them to demonstrators.

According to Occupy Austin supporter Kit OConnell, the occupiers figured out “Butch’s” true identity after their encampment was evicted last winter. Affadavits from Occupy Austin members have pointed to Dowell as the person who pushed for the use of the lockboxes and allege that he would regularly pull participants aside “in order to express his frustration with debate and eagerness for more aggressive and provocative actions.”

Garza’s attorney, Greg Gladden of the National Lawyer’s Guild, has accused the police of entrapment and possible misconduct. Judge Joan Campbell, who had initially dismissed the case until prosecutors obtained indictments from a grand jury, says she will decide next week whether to allow the proceeding to go forward.

At the hearing, Dowell told the judge that he had could not produce subpoenaed documents because emails he had sent about the operation from his work computer had been deleted and he had lost a thumb drive containing photos when it dropped out of his pocket and fell in the gutter.

The Statesman reports that Judge Campbell expressed frustration with Dowell, while Garza’s attorney remarked, “I think he decided it was time the dog ate his homework.”
Judge Campbell has threatened to dismiss the case unless the required documents and the real names of the two other undercover officers, “Dirk” and “Rick,” are presented at the next hearing on September 5.

Police officials declined to comment on the question of it was Dowell who first proposed using the lockboxes, but they did confirm that their department had ordered the infiltration.

Austin Police Chief Sean Mannix said that his department had begun receiving reports from confidential informants that the occupiers might be planning illegal protests. “We obviously had an interest in ensuring people didn’t step it up to criminal activity,” he said. “There is obviously a vested public interest to make sure that we didn’t allow civil unrest, violent actions to occur.”

Mannix does not believe any laws or departmental policies were violated, but he confirmed that the infiltration effort is the subject of a high-level internal review which is “absolutely looking into all aspects of what their undercover work was.”

Photo of an arrest at Occupy Austin by Ann Harkness via Flickr


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Mar 4 Sep - 00:44 (2012)    Sujet du message: U.S. TELLS IRAN: WE WON'T JOIN ISRAELI ATTACK Répondre en citant


Large Israeli newspaper: message is intended to prevent Iranian response against U.S. targets in Gulf.

By Gil Ronen

First Publish: 9/3/2012, 8:23 AM

Israeli jet fighter
IAF Website

Senior officials in the Obama Administration sent a message to Tehran in the past few days, according to which the U.S. does not intend to join Israel's side if it decides to attack the Iranian nuclear installations on its own, reports Israel's second-largest paper, Yediot Aharonot.

According to the report, the U.S. sent the message to Iran in order to avoid an Iranian response military response that would target U.S. installations in the Gulf region.

The message was reportedly conveyed to Iran through two European countries that serve as a conduit of communication between Iran and the U.S. in times of crisis.

Nationalist newspaper Makor Rishon has accused Yediot Aharonot of working with the Obama Administration against the Netanyahu government's planned strike on Iran.

According to the New York Times, senior U.S. officials have argued that Israel is "trying to corner" Obama into a military commitment that he does not yet need to make.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Mar 4 Sep - 00:55 (2012)    Sujet du message: ROMNEY: OBAMA THREW ISRAEL UNDER THE BUS Répondre en citant


Romney accepts his party’s nomination, accuses Obama of having failed on the economy and neglected America’s allies.

By Maayana Miskin
First Publish: 8/31/2012, 8:31 AM

Romney with Netanyahu in Israel visit

Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney accepted the Republican party nomination for President on Thursday night in Florida.

In his acceptance speech, Romney heavily criticized U.S. President Barack Obama’s foreign policy. He accused Obama of throwing allies like Israel and Poland “under the bus.”

“Under my administration, our friends will see more loyalty
,” he promised. = Yeah sure, we can trust you!!!



Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Mar 4 Sep - 01:18 (2012)    Sujet du message: OBAMA'S JUSTICE DEPARTMENT GRANTS FINAL IMMUNITY TO BUSH'S CIA TORTURERS Répondre en citant


By closing two cases of detainees tortured to death, Obama has put the US beyond any accountability under the rule of law

 Glenn Greenwald
guardian.co.uk, Friday 31 August 2012 17.00 BST

Anti-torture activists, wearing Guantánamo-style orange jumpsuits, demonstrate outside the White House in June 2011. Photograph: Karen Bleier/AFP/Getty Images

(updated below)

The Obama administration's aggressive, full-scale whitewashing of the "war on terror" crimes committed by Bush officials is now complete. Thursday, Attorney General Eric Holder announced the closing without charges of the only two cases under investigation relating to the US torture program: one that resulted in the 2002 death of an Afghan detainee at a secret CIA prison near Kabul, and the other the 2003 death of an Iraqi citizen while in CIA custody at Abu Ghraib. This decision, says the New York Times Friday, "eliminat[es] the last possibility that any criminal charges will be brought as a result of the brutal interrogations carried out by the CIA".

To see what a farce this is, it is worthwhile briefly to review the timeline of how Obama officials acted to shield Bush torturers from all accountability. During his 2008 campaign for president, Obama repeatedly vowed that, while he opposed "partisan witch-hunts", he would instruct his attorney general to "immediately review" the evidence of criminality in these torture programs because "nobody is above the law." Yet, almost immediately after winning the 2008 election, Obama, before he was even inaugurated, made clear that he was opposed to any such investigations, citing what he called "a belief that we need to look forward as opposed to looking backwards".

Throughout the first several months of his presidency, his top political aides, such as the chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, and his press secretary, Robert Gibbs, publicly – and inappropriately – pressured the justice department to refrain from any criminal investigations. Over and over, they repeated the Orwellian mantra that such investigations were objectionable because "we must look forward, not backward". As Gibbs put it in April 2009, when asked to explain Obama's opposition, "the president is focused on looking forward. That's why."

On 16 April 2009, Obama himself took the first step in formalizing the full-scale immunity he intended to bestow on all government officials involved even in the most heinous and lethal torture. On that date, he decreed absolute immunity for any official involved in torture provided that it comported with the permission slips produced by Bush department of justice (DOJ) lawyers which authorized certain techniques. "This is a time for reflection, not retribution," the new president so movingly observed in his statement announcing this immunity. Obama added:
"[N]othing will be gained by spending our time and energy laying blame for the past … we must resist the forces that divide us, and instead come together on behalf of our common future."

Note how, in Obama's new formulation, those who believed that Bush officials should be held criminally accountable for their torture crimes – should be subjected to the rule of law on equal terms with ordinary citizens – were now scorned as "the forces that divide us". On the same day, Holder issued his own statement arguing that "it would be unfair to prosecute dedicated men and women working to protect America for conduct that was sanctioned in advance by the justice department."

But at least this limited immunity left open the possibility of prosecuting those agents who went beyond the limits of the DOJ memos in how they tortured: in other words, those "rogue" torturers who used brutality and savagery beyond even what was permitted by Bush lawyers. On several occasions, Holder had flamboyantly leaked that he was horrified by what he read in certain case files about detainees who were severely injured by torture or even killed by it – there were more than 100 detainees who died while in US custody – and that he could not, in good conscience, simply sweep all of that under the rug.

As a result, in August 2009, Holder announced a formal investigation to determine whether criminal charges should be brought in over 100 cases of severe detainee abuse involving "off-the-books methods" such as "mock execution and threatening a prisoner with a gun and a power drill", as well as threats that "prisoners [would be] made to witness the sexual abuse of their relatives." But less than two years later, on 30 June 2011, Holder announced that of the more than 100 cases the justice department had reviewed, there would be no charges brought in any of them – except two.

The only exceptions were two particularly brutal cases, both of which resulted in the death of the detainee. One involved the 2002 abuse of Gul Rahman, who froze to death in a secret CIA prison in Afghanistan known as the "Salt Pit", after he was beaten, stripped, and then shackled to a cement wall in freezing temperatures.

The other was the 2003 death of Manadel al-Jamadi at Abu Ghraib, who died in CIA custody after he was beaten, stripped, had cold water poured on him, and then shackled to the wall. It was al-Jamadi's ice-packed body which was infamously photographed with a smiling US Army Sgt Charles Granier standing over it giving the thumbs-up sign.

A US military autopsy declared al-Jamadi's death a homicide due to "blunt force trauma to the torso complicated by compromised respiration". Autopsy photos showed "lacerations and multiple bruises on Jamadi's feet, thighs and arms", though "his most significant injuries – five broken ribs – are not visible in the photos." A physician told NPR back in 2005:
"'How Jamadi was shackled 'makes it very difficult to breathe because you are suspended in a very awkward position. When you combine it with having the hood over your head and having broken ribs, it's fairly clear that this death was caused by asphyxia because he couldn't breathe properly.'"

So, those are the two cases which the DOJ this week announced it was closing without any charges of any kind being brought. Because the Obama administration has systematically blocked all other cases besides these two from any possibility of criminal charges, yesterday's decision means that nobody in the US government will pay any price for the systematic worldwide torture regime which that nation implemented and maintained for close to a decade.

This is so despite the findings of General Antonio Taguba, who investigated the torture regime and said that "there is no longer any doubt as to whether the current administration has committed war crimes" and "the only question that remains to be answered is whether those who ordered the use of torture will be held to account." And it is done even in the face of General Barry McCaffrey's extraordinary observation that:
"We tortured people unmercifully. We probably murdered dozens of them during the course of that, both the armed forces and the CIA."

The ACLU's Jameel Jaffer yesterday said:
"That the justice department will hold no one accountable for the killing of prisoners in CIA custody is nothing short of a scandal … the decision not to file charges against individuals who tortured prisoners to death is yet another entry in what is already a shameful record."

Beyond the disgust that these events, on their own, should invoke in any decent person, there are two points worth making about all of this which really highlight just how odious all of it is.

First, Obama has shielded Bush torture crimes not only from criminal prosecution, but any and all forms of accountability. Obama himself vigorously opposed and succeeded in killing even a congressional investigation into the torture regime at a time when his party controlled both houses of Congress.

Moreover, Obama's top officials, as WikiLeaks cables revealed, secretly worked with GOP operatives to coerce other countries, such as Spain and Germany, to quash their investigations into the US torture of their citizens, and issued extraordinary threats to prevent British courts from disclosing any of what was done. And probably worst of all, the Obama administration aggressively shielded Bush officials even from being held accountable in civil cases brought by torture victims, by invoking radical secrecy powers and immunity doctrines to prevent courts even from hearing those claims.

In sum, the Obama administration has been desperate to ensure that there will be no accountability or even that meaningful investigations ever take place. That is almost certainly due to the fact that numerous high-level members of Obama's own party were so complicit in these crimes. But at least equally important is this remarkable – and, it turns out, prescient – observation from a New York Times article by Charlie Savage in December 2008, on the prospect of torture investigations aimed at Bush officials:
"Because every president eventually leaves office, incoming chief executives have an incentive to quash investigations into their predecessor's tenure."

In other words, Obama is motivated to shield Bush officials from accountability for their crimes in the hope that once Obama leaves office, he, too, will be gifted identical immunity from the rule of law.

Second, although government torturers have now been fully protected by Obama from any accountability, those who blow the whistle on such crimes continue to be pursued by the same administration with unprecedented aggression. As Friday's Times article on Holder's announcement pointedly notes:
"While no one has been prosecuted for the harsh interrogations, a former CIA officer who helped hunt members of al-Qaida in Pakistan and later spoke publicly about waterboarding, John C Kiriakou, is awaiting trial on criminal charges that he disclosed to journalists the identity of other CIA officers who participated in the interrogations."

Here, again, we see one of the prime precepts of American justice: high-level official who commit even the most egregious crimes are shielded from all accountability; the only real "criminals" are those who speak publicly about those crimes.

When Obama first announced his intent to run for president, he vowed that "the era of Scooter Libby justice … will be over" – meaning high-level officials will no longer be able to break the law with impunity. In mid 2008, Holder denounced Bush's illegal torture and surveillance programs as showing "disrespect for the rule of law", and he vowed:
"We owe the American people a reckoning."

To say those pledges have been radically violated is to understate the case. Far worse, though, is that Obama officials have bolstered the warped precept at the root of so many of America's disasters: that crimes committed by and at the behest of the powerful reside above and beyond the rule of law. In so doing, they have ensured that Bush officials who authorized torture continue to command mainstream respectability, while future leaders tempted to torture again have no reason whatsoever to refrain from doing so.
This final act in the sorry spectacle has long been predictable, even inevitable. But that does not make it any less repellent.
* * * * *
UPDATE: I was on Democracy Now this morning with Amy Goodman discussing Holder's announcement. The seven-minute segment (which also included a discussion of Clint Eastwood's spectacular stream-of-consciousness outburst at the GOP convention last night), can be seen on the player below; a transcript will be posted here a bit later in the day:


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Mar 4 Sep - 03:01 (2012)    Sujet du message: UNSURVIVABLE Répondre en citant



VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFD66t2ZzEM  


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Mar 4 Sep - 04:00 (2012)    Sujet du message: OBAMA SELLS OUT ISRAEL! Répondre en citant


- J.D. Longstreet Monday, September 3, 2012

As the evidence of Obama’s favoritism for the Muslim world mounts, seemingly on a daily basis, one can be excused for thinking that Obama would hold the door open for a Muslim takeover of the United States.

My first President was FDR. We have had some great presidents and one or two lousy presidents since—but Obama takes the cake as the absolute worst president the United States had had since its inception. Hands down, Obama is far and away the worst of the worst.

He is just as bad as the leader of the “free world.” In fact, rumor has it the “free world” is looking for a new leader. And who could blame it?

I have come to believe, over the past nearly four years, that Obama is a “closet Muslim.” Frankly, I’m surprised we don’t have someone atop the Washington monument calling out the “adhan,” the Muslim call to prayer, at the prescribed times each day for Obama and his followers. I am equally surprised Obama has not issued an Executive Order instructing the building a minaret on the West Wing of the White House.

Just as the “Obama Love Fest” (The Democratic Nation Convention) is about to open where the weak of mind and spine will, no doubt, swoon in the aisles at the very mention of their Messiah’s name, comes word that Obama has abandoned Israel, the closest friend America has in the Middle East, to the Mad Mullahs of Iran.

So what has happened now? A massive scale back of US participation is a joint US/Israel military exercise scheduled for October. There were to have been 5,000 US troops involved. That has been cut to as low as 1200. There were to have been two Aegis electronic warships involved. Now it is doubtful if either ship will be sent. Patriot anti-missile batteries will be sent—but no crews to man them.

The US has an advanced radar installation out in the Negev Desert so strong it can see a softball thrown in the air from a thousand miles away. It can give Israel as much as seven minutes additional warning to get their people under cover. It would also allow Israel’s anti-missile batteries additional time to locate and shoot down incoming Iranian missiles.

Without that additional warning time, more Israelis will die from enemy missiles. The fault for their deaths can be laid at the feet of the US President—Barack HUSSEIN Obama.

Regardless of how the President and the Pentagon refer to this “scale back” it amounts to one thing—abandonment of Israel to her enemies.

From Debkafile we learn the following:

“This downgrade of US participation in an annual war exercise with Israel is more than striking. It adds up to the dismemberment by the Obama administration of the entire intricate strategy US and Israel have built over years for the deterrence - and interception if need be - of any Iranian/Hizballah/Syrian missile assault on Israel.”

Debkafile goes on to say this: “The inferences are cruel: The US defense or second-strike elements - which had been slotted into place by the military strategists of the two armies - will not be there. Their absence slashes the time available for Israel’s alarm-and-interception systems to spring into action - the moment the engines of Iranian ballistic missiles heading its way are fired - right down from the originally estimated 14 minutes’ notice.

It also means that Barak’s estimate of 500 dead in the worst case of a war with Iran must go by the board.”

One must question why Obama is protecting Iran? It is clear that Obama does not want Israel to attack Iran. It is ALSO clear that Obama is intent on allowing Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon, which, of course, means—so will the Islamofascist terrorists the world over. Is Obama, himself, preparing for the appearance of the “Hidden (or twelfth) Imam?”

Clearly, there are but two explanations for Obama’s actions here. Either the US has (somehow) become—overnight—a second rate military power without the means to participate in the joint military exercise with Israel, or Obama has thrown Israel to the wolves.

I’d like to establish a few things here: I am not a Jew. Though a Christian, I am not an evangelical Christian. I am not a bible scholar, nor a minister of The Gospel, though I did serve as a lay minister for a while. I have a fair grasp of the scriptures through years and years of formal and informal study.

Now, having said that, allow me to point out that there is a clear warning, directly from God, dating from the establishment of the Hebrew people, that God would bless those who blessed them and curse those who cursed them. (Genesis 12:3—“And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.)

I realize to those who do not believe in God, this do

esn’t mean a thing. But, I’d also suggest they might want to check the recent history of Israel’s enemies since 1948. That ought to give doubters “pause,” as they say.

Now here’s the thing: America has suffered since Obama, obviously no friend of Israel, was sworn in as President. You can argue that America was in trouble BEFORE Obama was sworn in. Yes, you can. But is unarguable that America’s downward spiral became far more distinct and far deeper and the decline swifter than before. And—the decline continues.

To me, it is clear. When America rids itself of its current leader, Obama, and elects a leader who supports (blesses) Israel, America will stop its decline and climb back up to its former place of prominence among the nations of the world. It is just as clear that as long as Obama remains President of the United States, things will only get worse for America. If you think it’s bad now, you ain’t seen nothing yet!

The America people support Israel. It is our leader who does not. It is up to us, the people, to rid this nation of the insult to Israel in the White House. But it MUST be done by the people of America at the ballot box November 6th.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Mar 4 Sep - 19:58 (2012)    Sujet du message: LE HAUT COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L'HOMME CONDAMNE UNE SÉRIE D'EXÉCUTIONS DANS PLUSIEURS PAYS Répondre en citant


Une autre réalité qui prend de plus en plus sa place à mesure que prend place ce grand Jihad international. Plusieurs pays ont fait croire à l'abandon de la peine de mort, ces dernières années, sans mentionner ce qui s'en venait pour le futur. Et bien, ce futur, nous y sommes déjà et les rituels de masses ne cesseront d'augmenter sous ce nouveau règne des forces du mal.


La Haut commissaire des Nations Unies aux droits de l'homme, Navi Pillay. Photo ONU/Jean-Marc Ferré

31 août 2012 –

Le Haut Commissariat des Nations Unies aux droits de l'homme s'est déclaré vendredi préoccupé par une série d'exécutions perpétrées en Gambie, en Iraq et au Soudan du Sud.

Il y a une semaine, neuf prisonniers ont été exécutés en Gambie peu après que le Président du pays, Yahya Jammeh, a déclaré que tous les condamnés à mort devaient être exécutés au plus tard avant la mi-septembre.

Cette décision constitue une rétrogression spectaculaire pour ce petit état d'Afrique de l'Ouest, qui a mis ainsi fin à un moratoire de 27 ans sur la peine capitale, alors qu'il avait pourtant réaffirmé en 2010, lors de son examen périodique universel par le Conseil des droits de l'homme, son engagement à le maintenir.

En Iraq, au cours du mois d'août, 26 personnes auraient été exécutées, dont 21 le même jour, portant à près d'une centaine le nombre d'exécutions depuis le début de l'année. Ce chiffre a été qualifié de « réellement choquant » par la Haute Commissaire Navi Pillay. De nombreuses préoccupations demeurent quant à l'équité des procès et la variété des chefs d'inculpation pour lesquels la condamnation à mort peut être prononcée. La Mission d'assistance des Nations Unies pour l'Iraq a demandé au gouvernement de ce pays d'envisager l'imposition d'un moratoire sur la peine de mort.

Enfin, mardi, deux hommes ont été pendus au Soudan du Sud, dans la prison centrale de Juba. À aucun moment, ils n'ont eu reçu la moindre assistance juridique ni représentation légale.

Aussi le Haut Commissariat a-t-il lancé aujourd'hui un appel à tous les États qui ne l'ont pas encore fait à imposer un moratoire sur l'application de la peine capitale, première étape de son abolition.

La tendance globale concernant cette peine est à son abolition ou à sa suspension, allant dans le sens des recommandations de l'Assemble générale. Près de 150 États Membres l'ont aboli ou ont mis en place un moratoire, que ce soit dans la loi ou dans la pratique.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Mar 4 Sep - 20:05 (2012)    Sujet du message: GUINÉE : L'ONU PRÉOCCUPÉE PAR L'USAGE EXCESSIF DE LA FORCE CONTRE DES MANIFESTANTS Répondre en citant


Nos tyrans déguisés en sauveurs et hommes et femmes de grande compassion. Regardez pourtant toutes leurs armées et forces policières militarisées qui tabassent les manifestants, ainsi que tout leurs équipements militaires qui se trouvent maintenant dans tous les pays, et qui de plus en plus lancent leurs assauts sur les peuples.

Rupert Colville, porte-parole de la Haut commissaire des Nations Unies aux droits de l'homme.

31 août 2012 –

Le Haut Commissariat des Nations Unies aux droits de l'homme (HCDH) a exprimé vendredi sa préoccupation devant l'usage excessif de la force par les forces de sécurité de Guinée contre des manifestants, lors d'une série d'incidents violents qui se sont produits ces dernières semaines.

« Lundi, des affrontements violents ont éclaté entre forces de sécurité et manifestants alors l'opposition était descendue dans la rue à Conakry. Les forces de sécurité ont lancé des gaz lacrymogènes à l'intérieur du domicile d'un chef de parti. Des balles réelles auraient été tirées et plusieurs personnes arrêtées, battues ou blessées », a signalé le porte parole du HCDH, Rupert Colville, lors d'un point presse donné aujourd'hui à Genève.

Cet incident fait suite à celui, en date du 3 août, au cours duquel six personnes ont été tuées par les forces de sécurité dans la ville de Zogota, situées dans le Sud-Est du pays.

« Notre bureau en Guinée a ouvert une enquête sur les circonstances de ces tueries, commises après le saccage de locaux d'une entreprise minière par des manifestants », a expliqué M. Colville. « Le gouvernement a lui aussi ouvert une enquête sur ces tueries et nous exhortons maintenant les autorités à poursuivre en justice les auteurs de ces actes afin de rappeler que les forces de sécurité ne peuvent pas perpétrer en toute impunité de telles violations ».

« Étant donné le climat tendu dans le pays, nous appelons l'ensemble des parties prenantes à faire preuve de retenue. Les manifestants doivent pouvoir exercer leur droit à la libre expression et au rassemblement pacifique, et les forces de l'ordre assurer la sécurité de manière appropriée », a indiqué M. Colville.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Mer 5 Sep - 16:13 (2012)    Sujet du message: UN ATTENTAT AU RASSEMBLEMENT DU PQ FAIT UN MORT Répondre en citant

Élections Québec 2012


ENGLISH : Quebec premier rushed offstage as gunmen fires
VIDEO : http://widget.newsinc.com/_cfvp/playlist16x9_player.html?CID=994&WID=81…

Pour suivre la mouvance internationale de l'implantation des mesures de sécurité (lois antiterroristes), un attentat a eu lieu, hier soir, au Métropolis à Montréal, là où madame Pauline Marois, qui venait d'être élue comme première dame en tant que Première ministre du Québec donnait sa première allocution.
Plusieurs points sont encore obscurs mais laissez-moi vous donner mes premières impressions.

Lorsque l'attentat s'est produit, on a sorti très vite madame Marois de la salle pour l'amener derrière la scène. Celle-ci a semblé surprise mais non inquiète. Cette dernière est revenue quelques minutes plus tard avec les membres de la sécurité, qui alors demandait d'évacuer la salle par mesure de prudence. Quelques minutes plus tard, la première dame a dit qu'il ne semblait plus y avoir de danger et a terminé sa prestation en présentant les membres de sa famille ainsi que plusieurs membres élus de son gouvernement, sur l'estrade.

Cela n'a aucun sens et me fait poser beaucoup de questions quand à la gestion de la "crise". Lorsqu'un tel événement arrive, on évacue, par mesure de précaution les principaux intéressés, on ne va pas mettre sa famille sur le devant de la scène dans un moment aussi critique. Pourtant c'est ce qui a été fait.

Autre point important : l'homme qui aurait perpétré cet attentat et était armé. Il aurait fait feu sur deux personnes derrière la scène. On ne sait pas encore si c'était des techniciens ou des chauffeurs de journalistes, ou..., mais par ce qu'on voit, cet homme a pu entrer très facilement par la porte de derrière, où se trouve les coulisses qui sont très près de l'estrade.

Donc, par cela, j'en déduis que la police de Montréal ne montait pas la garde derrière l'établissement pour que cet homme ait pu entrer aussi facilement. Deuxièmement, les gardes de sécurité de madame Marois aurait dû voir ce qui était arrivé derrière la scène lorsqu'ils ont évacué la nouvelle première ministre, soit par visuel ou soit par les gémissements des personnes touchés, mais non, rien. Madame Marois est revenue sur scène et a alors fait monter ses proches et les membres élus. Un homme serait décédé sur place et un autre aurait blessé très gravement.

Lorsqu'elle a été évacué avec son conjoint, ses enfants et les membres de sa famille ne l'accompagnait pas. Où était-ils et est-ce qu'ils ont eu une protection rapprochée pour pouvoir quitter les lieux? L'histoire ne le dit pas.

Une bombe fumigène aurait aussi été lancé par l'homme arrêté, ce qui aurait fait un début d'incendie derrière le Métropolis. Les pompiers et les policiers sont alors arrivés en grand nombre pour sécuriser les lieux et on a rapidement arrêter celui qui aurait commis cet attentat. 

Le Parti Québécois a toujours défendu la langue française, avec la loi 101, et l'homme arrêté aurait dit : « les Anglais se réveillent » ou « les Anglais sont arrivés ». « C'est la vengeance ». Le but est donc de créer une guerre raciale entre les anglais et les français.

Qui est cet homme et au nom de qui parlait-il? L'avenir nous le dira mais à voir ce qui se passe dans d'autres pays, j'ai déjà ma petite idée quand à l'agenda.

Suite à tout cela, j'ai écouté différents intervenants parler de cet événement fâcheux. Ce que je retiens surtout c'est de voir plusieurs d'entre eux parler d'augmenter le niveau de sécurité, de fouiller les gens lorsqu'ils participent à un tel événement, le problème du désarmement, etc. Un groupe qu'on appelle "Les ex", groupe de penseurs (qui ont été défaits dans des élections passés) Jean-Pierre Charbonneau, Liza Frula et Marie Grégoire, ont beaucoup joué sur ces mots. Lisa Frula a dit que cet homme devait sûrement souffrir de maladie mentale pour commettre un tel geste.

Le fait de parler de maladie mentale au lieu d'un acte criminel est aussi conforme à la pensée globale qui est d'emprisonner et de modifier le comportement de gens jugés un danger pour l'État.

Autres vidéos sur le sujet :

VIDÉO : http://fr.video.canoe.tv/

Un témoin affirme qu'il devait sûrement y avoir plus d'une personne car 2 armes de points ont été trouvé sur les lieux

VIDÉO : http://fr.video.canoe.tv/video/en-vedette/en-vedette-aujourdhui/1906868890/attentat-au-metropolis-un-temoin-raconte/1823348974001

Les commentaires de madame Marois quelques heures après l'attentat : « Jamais une société comme la nôtre ne laissera la violence dicter ses choix collectifs. C'est par la voix démocratique qu'il faut s'exprimer, comme les Québécois ont pu le faire [mardi] » . Tout cela est de la poudre aux yeux quand nous savons que tous les élus sont choisis bien d'avance par le clan des Illuminati. Madame Marois fait partie de cette caste maçonnique et a toujours gardé secrète ses rencontres avec les membres de cette caste luciférienne.

Un grand vent de changement vient donc de prendre place au Québec. Nous pouvons donc nous attendre à voir l'État-Policier prendre sa place de plus en plus afin de s'ajuster sur cette ère de globalisation luciférienne tyrannique.

Le peuple est tombé dans le piège en croyant aux belles paroles de cette femme qui a sû s'éduire son électorat et qui va maintenant en payer le prix. Cet acte de violence permettra à la première ministre de valider et sûrement de renforcer la lois 78 au Québec et les lois fédérales C-10, S-7, S-9 qui sont tous en rapport avec la Sécurité Nationale et les lois antiterroristes.

Nous pouvons donc nous attendre à une montée de violence entre les français et les anglais dans un avenir rapproché ainsi que de mesures draconniennes contre les opposants à son nouveau règne. Les chrétiens sont bien sûr dans sa ligne de mire, ayant moi-même vu comment elle a par le passé détruit l'enseignement religieux dans les écoles et son silence total durant sa campagne électorale, sur la question du danger de l'islam radical qui s'implante de plus en plus, au Québec et dans tout le Canada.   

Diviser pour mieux régner. Madame Marois a promis du changement, eh bien, le voilà!

Et vive le Québec Libre!


Mise à jour il y a 8 minutes

VIDÉO : http://www.radio-canada.ca/widgets/mediaconsole/medianet/6040607?seektime=0 
Tentative d'attentat pendant le discours de Pauline Marois
La soirée électorale a tourné au drame aux alentours de minuit. Au moment où la chef péquiste Pauline Marois prononçait son discours de victoire devant ses militants réunis au Metropolis, à Montréal, un homme a ouvert le feu près de l'entrée arrière de la salle, faisant un mort et un blessé grave.

Un homme de 45 ans est décédé sur place, tandis qu'un autre homme dans la trentaine a été transporté à l'hôpital pour traiter des blessures par balle, où il reposait dans un état grave. Il est actuellement hors de danger.

Aucun détail supplémentaire ne sera dévoilé par respect pour les familles des victimes jusqu'à ce qu'elles aient été informées.
Le suspect s'est introduit dans le vestibule de l'édifice, avant de tirer plusieurs coups de feu. Il a ensuite allumé un incendie derrière le Métropolis avant de prendre la fuite à pied.

Vêtu d'une robe de chambre, l'homme de 62 ans a rapidement été arrêté par les policiers. Avant d'être emmené au poste de police, il a été entraîné menotté jusqu'à un véhicule en bafouillant des mots indistincts, ressemblant à « les Anglais se réveillent » ou « les Anglais sont arrivés ». « C'est la vengeance », a-t-il lancé.

Le suspect arrêté à la suite de la fusillade

Les techniciens en identité judiciaire du Service de police de la Ville de Montréal (SPVM) ont été dépêchés sur les lieux et ont passé une partie de la nuit à reconstituer la scène de crime. On ignore pour le moment les motifs de l'agression.

Selon le porte-parole du SPVM Ian Lafrenière, « possiblement » deux armes ont été retrouvées sur place.

Il a indiqué que les policiers feront des vérifications dans le véhicule du suspect. « Étant donné que de l'accélérant a été utilisé sur la porte pour mettre le feu, on veut s'assurer qu'il n'y a pas d'autres matières incendiaires à l'intérieur du véhicule », a-t-il expliqué.

Une enquête d'envergure nationale 

Lors d'un point de presse tôt mercredi matin, le porte-parole de la Sûreté du Québec (SQ) Guy Lapointe a indiqué que la police provinciale mènera l'enquête qui sera effectuée conjointement avec l'unité des crimes majeurs du SPVM.

« La Sûreté du Québec a notamment le mandat d'assurer la protection de l'État, et dans la mesure où à ce stade-ci de l'enquête, il nous est impossible d'exclure que la personne qui était visée était la première ministre élue, la Sûreté du Québec prend la responsabilité de l'enquête », a-t-il déclaré.

M. Lapointe a indiqué que la SQ est satisfaite de l'intervention des policiers dans la mesure où ils sont intervenus rapidement pour assurer la sécurité de la première ministre élue. « En aucun temps, on pense que Mme Marois était en danger », a-t-il souligné.

VIDÉO : http://www.radio-canada.ca/widgets/mediaconsole/medianet/6040616?seektime=0 

Point de presse d'Urgences-santé et du SPVM

Le caméraman de Radio-Canada Martin Bouffard se tenait devant le Métropolis pour filmer l'arrivée de Pauline Marois lorsqu'il a entendu une déflagration derrière l'immeuble. Il a constaté qu'il y avait un important incendie aux abords de l'entrée.

Selon lui, un imposant mur de feu bloquait la sortie que devait prendre la chef du PQ à la fin de son discours, avant que les flammes ne soient rapidement maîtrisées par les policiers.

Assistant à l'arrestation du suspect quelques minutes plus tard, M. Bouffard a constaté qu'une arme semi-automatique et une arme de poing jonchaient le sol à la droite de l'homme.

Le suspect a mis le feu au vestibule arrière du Métropolis

Pauline Marois garde son sang-froid

La chef péquiste est « en bonne santé », a indiqué le SPVM. Pauline Marois a pu finir son discours à la hâte, après avoir été évacuée de la scène où elle s'adressait à ses militants.

Devant des partisans et des journalistes médusés, elle a été prestement entraînée dans les coulisses par deux de ses gardes du corps. Elle est ensuite revenue terminer son allocution accompagnée de ses candidats, puis elle a calmement demandé aux militants de quitter les lieux. 

Tristesse et consternation

Le Parti québécois a réagi par voie de communiqué quelques heures après l'attentat. « Mes pensées vont d'abord à la famille et aux proches de la victime décédée. À la suite de cette tragédie, ce sont tous les Québécois qui sont en deuil aujourd'hui devant un tel acte de violence gratuite », a déclaré la première ministre élue, Pauline Marois.

« Jamais une société comme la nôtre ne laissera la violence dicter ses choix collectifs. C'est par la voix démocratique qu'il faut s'exprimer, comme les Québécois ont pu le faire [mardi] », a-t-elle ajouté, disant souhaiter que la personne blessée s'en sorte indemne.

La Coalition avenir Québec a qualifié l'attentat d'« incident déplorable » et s'est dite « soulagée que Mme Marois n'ait pas été blessée ».

« On est tous consternés par ce qui s'est produit », a indiqué Hugo D'amours, l'attaché de presse du chef libéral Jean Charest.

« Nous sommes consternés devant cette violence et nos pensées sont avec les victimes et leurs proches », a de son côté écrit sur Twitter Carl Vallée, l'attaché de presse du premier ministre Stephen Harper.

Par voie de communiqué, Québec solidaire a pour sa part fermement condamné cet acte et a indiqué offrir tout son soutien « aux familles » des victimes » et « aux membres du Parti québécois ».


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Jeu 6 Sep - 16:29 (2012)    Sujet du message: THIS IS THEIR HOUR AND THE POWER OF DARKNESS… Répondre en citant


Posted on August 14, 2012by billrandles

Then Jesus said unto the chief priests, and captains of the temple, and the elders, which were come to him, Be ye come out, as against a thief, with swords and staves?
When I was daily with you in the temple, ye stretched forth no hands against me: but this is your hour, and the power of darkness.(Luke 22:53)

The ordeal of our Saviour in his trial and crucifixion are recapitulated in last days of this present evil age.It seemed as though evil had triumphed and with impunity was boasting in the defeat of all goodness.Where was God when corrupt high priests and scribes falsely accused Jesus and brutally abused him?

This is the situation we face today. It seems that evil and vice have prevailed, and that no good deed goes unpunished. Evil parades itself, it taunts the righteous, gloating in its apparent victory over all that was at one time considered good and decent.

For example, there has never been a better time to be a Mohammedan.The followers of the depraved brigand seem to be advancing every single day into the former “christian” world. Even after 9-11 and the 12,000 atrocities since then, visited upon the west in the name of Allah, Islam has not had to answer for its murderous legacy, due to a “perfect storm” of circumstances.

* It so happens that the West is in a state of civilisational paralysis, having forsaken the “cultus” part of its culture, ie christianity. The intellectual “elites” over the last century have led in a rebellion against the religion that made the Judeo Christian West, the greatest civilization in history.

We don’t have the will to absolutely and resolutely defend our own civilization, having bought into the philosophy of atheists and degenerates. Liberty and the rule of law were ideals that western people would die on the battlefield to defend, or even to liberate others to enjoy. We were not all christians , of course, but we operated out of a Judeo Christian ethos,willing to sacrifice blood and treasure to save others.

But who would want to shed one drop of blood for the obvious lie that is multi culturalism? Who would die so that homosexuality could be freely expressed anywhere in the world? Why would we fight to defend the “gains” of the disaster that was the sexual revolution?
Every where in Europe and America our secular elite leadership so despise our own civilization, that they promote and exalt anything, even murderous and barbaric Islam, rather than our Judeo Christian culture that has brought such light and benefit to so many. Through Immigration and abortion and birth control, they seem to be trying to neutralize and cancel out the civilization that once was.

Truly the Psalmist is right,the Kings of the earth and their rulers take counsel together against the Lord and His Messiah!”.

The Muslim world is licking their chops, this is their time,seemingly. Like an opportunistic disease, they feed on the decaying body politic of the West, and make gains un-thought of in the long 1400 year struggle against the Christian world.If their was a Charles Martel or a Jan Sobieski, the U.N. would immediately move to castrate and hogtie them perhaps even bringing charges against them for “hurting Muslim feelings”.

Furthermore there has never been a better time to be a Sodomite. From being universally reviled for their utterly degrading and unhealthy practices, Sodomites are the current “Civil Rights” victims of the post christian and post modern world.

Now they are regarded as good and those who hold to the long-established and immensely succesful institution oo marriage are regarded as evil.

The inversion of values that Isaiah once warned us is upon us, for woe to those who call good evil and evil good!”
This inversion has come about because of a confluence of forces, television, the inability of the west to combat pornography, the departure from faith, false guilt about Civil Rights and confusion and disenfranchisement of the former social order.Also a very sophisticated marketing of evil, which has taken on the challenge of making the repulsive and unhealthy, seem good and wholesome!

It seems now that everywhere we turn those who “sigh and cry for the abominations done in the land” have to see up close and personal, the seeming victory of the Sodomite. The ultimate “punch in the gut” is the desecration of the U.S. military by homosexuals. We now must undergo the media “celebration” of the first openly homosexual (I refuse to use the word “gay” for that is a lie!) Army General, a lesbian.

The US military has always been fastidiously apolitical, being the army of a Democratic Republic, an army of “we the people”. There were regulations against soldiers wearing the uniform in the service of any political or factional event. However those regulations were waived so that homosexuals could wear the uniform to “gay pride” events!

These advances have been rapid and demoralizing for those who love Judeo Christian America, Britain and Europe.There are many Shepherds and guardians who are succumbing to the pressure to acquiesce to evil, not necessarily in deed, but in word. Islam and homosexuality are two of the new “sanctities” that we are supposed to agree to, if not out right praise.

It is one thing to be lied to constantly, but we are beyond that. Now the pressure is on to force those of us who resist this evil to repeat these lies, or at least outwardly to agree with them, (to the loss of our soul). We must remember in this dark time of the apparent triumph of evil, the words of Jesus, when he looked evil in the face and proclaimed the sovereignty of the Holy God.

The infinitely righteous Judge of all of the earth is taking names and preparing to come in Holy vengeance.

And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels,
In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ:
Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power;
When he shall come to be glorified in his saints, and to be admired in all them that believe (because our testimony among you was believed) in that day.( 2 Thess 1:7-9)

This is your hour…. It is given by God to the beast to “male war with the saints and even overcome them…”, but only for a brief and set time of testing. God is allowing evil to parade in all of its naked deformity to give all men a clear choice, before the final judgment falls.

…and the power of darkness… . Darkness is not mere ignorance, rather it is the refusal to see and enter into the light. The unsaved people want this, they have insisted upon it, therefore for a brief moment, they are allowed to build their Utopia.This has happened because of years of resistance to the Holy Ghost, God is giving our societies up to what thay have long clamored for, a godless society ala Imagine, by John Lennon.

God delights in hiding his glory and power in apparent weakness…remember David, the littlest one of Jesse? Remember the capture of the Ark of God by Pagans? How could Philistines be allowed to handle the earthly throne of the LORD and not die instantly, as Uzzah? Remember the cross of Jesus? It seemed then also that all that is Holy,good and decent had been profaned and trampled underfoot, but “weeping may endure for the night, but in the morning, shouts of Joy! Maranatha!


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Ven 7 Sep - 17:52 (2012)    Sujet du message: PEOPLE ARE BEGINNING TO DISAPPEAR FAST ON YT AND MY NEIGHBORHOOD Répondre en citant

Be carreful with this info. We need confirmation by other peoples to validate the info.

VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4r88L9xGzg

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Ven 7 Sep - 21:24 (2012)    Sujet du message: LE CANADA FERME SON AMBASSADE EN IRAN ET EXPULSE LES DIPLOMATES IRANIENS DU CANADA Répondre en citant



Ce n'est jamais bon signe lorsque l'on ferme une ambassade. Prélude à la prochaine guerre?

Le ministre des Affaires étrangères John Baird a fait aujourd’hui la déclaration suivante :

« Le Canada a fermé son ambassade en Iran, cette mesure prenant effet immédiatement, et déclaré persona non grata tous les diplomates iraniens encore en poste au Canada.

« La position du Canada à l’égard du régime iranien est bien connue. Le Canada considère le gouvernement de l’Iran comme étant la menace la plus importante à la paix et à la sécurité mondiales à l’heure actuelle.

« Le régime iranien fournit une aide militaire croissante au régime Assad; il refuse de se conformer aux résolutions des Nations Unies concernant son programme nucléaire; il menace régulièrement l’existence d’Israël et tient des propos antisémites racistes en plus d’inciter au génocide; il compte parmi les pires violateurs des droits de la personne dans le monde; et il abrite des groupes terroristes auxquels il fournit une aide matérielle, ce qui oblige le gouvernement du Canada à inscrire officiellement l’Iran en tant qu’État soutenant le terrorisme en application de la Loi sur la justice pour les victimes d’actes de terrorisme.

« De plus, le régime iranien démontre un mépris flagrant à l’égard de la Convention de Vienne et de sa garantie de protection pour le personnel diplomatique. Dans ces circonstances, le Canada ne peut plus maintenir une présence diplomatique en Iran. Nos diplomates servent le Canada à titre de civils, et leur sécurité demeure notre priorité absolue.

« Les relations diplomatiques entre le Canada et l’Iran ont été suspendues. Tout le personnel diplomatique canadien a quitté l’Iran, et les diplomates iraniens en poste à Ottawa ont reçu l’ordre de quitter le pays dans un délai de cinq jours.

« Les Canadiens en Iran qui souhaitent obtenir des services de passeport ou des services consulaires courants devraient communiquer avec l’ambassade du Canada à Ankara, en Turquie, ou avec n’importe quelle autre mission canadienne. Les personnes qui ont besoin d’une aide consulaire d’urgence devraient communiquer avec le Centre de surveillance et d’intervention d’urgence à Ottawa, en appelant à frais virés au 613-996-8885 ou en envoyant un courriel à sos@international.gc.ca.

« Le Canada a mis à jour ses Conseils aux voyageurs et Avertissements pour recommander aux Canadiens d’éviter tout voyage en Iran. En particulier, on avise les Canadiens possédant la citoyenneté iranienne que le régime iranien ne reconnaît pas le principe de la double nationalité. Par conséquent, l’Iran rend pratiquement impossible toute aide consulaire que les représentants du gouvernement du Canada pourraient fournir aux Irano-Canadiens en difficulté. »

Source : Ministère des Affaires étrangères et du Commerce international, Canada, 7 septembre 2012


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Ven 7 Sep - 21:31 (2012)    Sujet du message: CANADA CUTS TIES WITH IRAN, CLOSES EMBASSY, ORDERS IRANIAN DIPLOMATS HOME Répondre en citant



By Mike Blanchfield, THE CANADIAN PRESSSeptember 7, 2012 12:12 PM

Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird blamed Iran’s increasing military assistance to the Syrian government, its refusal to comply with UN resolutions on its nuclear program, its anti-Israel stance and its support for terrorism as among the reasons for the move. Photograph by: Adrian Wyld , THE CANADIAN PRESS

VLADIVOSTOK, Russia — Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird has severed Canadian ties with Iran over its sponsorship of terrorism and amid fears about the safety of diplomats in the country.

Baird says the Canadian embassy in Tehran will close immediately and Iranian diplomats in Canada have been given five days to leave.

The skeleton staff that was operating Canada's Tehran mission has already fled the country.

Baird says he's worried about the safety of diplomats in Tehran following recent attacks on the British embassy there.

"The Iranian regime has shown blatant disregard for the Vienna Convention and its guarantee of protection for diplomatic personnel," he said.

"Under the circumstances, Canada can no longer maintain a diplomatic presence in Iran. Our diplomats serve Canada as civilians and their safety is our No. 1 priority."

He also condemned the regime as a sponsor of terrorism.

"Canada views the government of Iran as the most significant threat to global peace and security in the world today," he said.

He recited a litany of complaints about Iran, including its support for the Assad regime in Syria, its nuclear program, its threats to Israel and its abysmal human rights record.

"The Iranian regime is providing increasing military assistance to the Assad regime," Baird said.

"It refuses to comply with United Nations resolutions pertaining to its nuclear program. It routinely threatens the existence of the state of Israel, and engages in racist anti-Semitic rhetoric and incitement to genocide."

Foreign Affairs is also warning ordinary Canadians to avoid any travel to Iran.

People seeking Canadian consular services in Iran are being directed to the embassy in Turkey.

Canada's relations with Iran have been iffy since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. After Canadians spirited American diplomats out of Tehran in 1980 during the post-revolution hostage crisis, the Canadian embassy was closed for eight years.

The two countries slowly moved back to normal diplomatic relations with an exchange of ambassadors in 1996.

But the relationship chilled in 2003 after Zahra Kazemi, a freelance photographer with dual Canadian-Iranian citizenship, was killed while in custody in Iran in what Canada described as a state-sanctioned murder. Canada recalled its ambassador.

Baird announced the severing of ties with Iran on Saturday in the early morning hours, Russia time, after meeting the foreign ministers of the 21-nation Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation forum ahead of the leaders' summit set for this weekend.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper arrived in Vladivostok late Friday for what is expected to be a trade-focused summit. But security issues appear set to dominate the discussion.

Baird also registered Canada's displeasure over Russia's continued support for the regime in Syria in a meeting with his Russian counterpart, Sergey Lavrov.

"I've already had a meeting with my Russian counterpart and I did so in no uncertain terms," said Baird.

Russia has blocked UN Security Council resolutions that would have sanctioned the Assad regime, which has been trying to put down an 18-month uprising.

Baird confirmed that Canadian diplomat Mokhtar Lamani will head the Damascus office of Lakhdar Brahimi, the new UN-Arab League envoy to Syria.

Lamani is a Canadian of Moroccan origin who has already served as a special Arab League envoy to Iraq.

Brahimi took over as envoy to Syria this month, succeeding Kofi Annan who resigned in frustration over failed efforts to end the Syrian civil war.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Ven 7 Sep - 21:48 (2012)    Sujet du message: SOUTH AFRICA SHOCKED BY POLICE SHOOTINGS AT MINE Répondre en citant


August 17, 2012|By Moni Basu, Faith Karimi and Nkepile Mabuse

The headlines Friday in South Africa spoke of a bloodbath, of war.

The morning after carnage at a platinum mine, South Africans grappled with shock, memories of an ugly era resurrected in their minds. The word apartheid surfaced again as people debated the need for such police force.

The police, meanwhile, explained themselves at a news conference, giving reporters the grim toll: 34 mine workers killed, 78 others wounded, 259 arrested on various charges, including malicious damage to property, armed robbery, illegal gathering and possession of weapons. That according to Police Commissioner Riah Phiyega.

She said police "were forced to utilize maximum force to defend themselves."

South African President Jacob Zuma cut short a trip to Mozambique to visit the scene of the shootings Friday afternoon. He announced the government will open an inquiry of the incident.

He told South Africans that they must come together to overcome national challenges as they had done before.

"This is not a day to apportion blame," Zuma said. "It is a day for us to mourn together as a nation. It is also a day to start healing."

Mourn, yes, but also a time to think about what had been done, some cried.

Rising tensions explode into grisly violence at South African mine "African lives cheap as ever," read a headline in a Soweto newspaper.

It editorialized that South Africa's economic woes do require a war. "But a different kind of war -- a war of ideas. Not a war that dispenses with human life in as cheaply a manner as we have seen in Marikana."

The tragedy began unfolding a week ago when miners went on strike demanding pay hikes at the mine near Rustenburg, about two hours northwest of Johannesburg.

They were rock drillers who worked at the dangerous depths of the mine, their bodies vibrating for the duration of their eight-hour shifts.

"When there is a rock fall, it is generally the drillers who are the victims," wrote journalist Greg Marinovich in the Daily Maverick newspaper. "It is the most dangerous job in the business."

The miners, who earned $300 to $500 a month, wanted their salaries raised to $1,500.

It came as no surprise that their multi-national employer, Lonmin, said no to the whopping increase. The world's third-largest producer of platinum said the strike was illegal.

The larger problem, however, went beyond a wage dispute.


+ VIDEO : http://www.rnw.nl/africa/article/south-african-police-over-30-died-mine-cra…

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242



Justice Minister Rob Nicholson appears at a special Senate committee on Bill S-7, which contains several anti-terrorism provisions.

March 26, 2012

VIDEO : http://www.cpac.ca/forms/index.asp?dsp=template&act=view3&pagetype=vod&hl=e&clipID=6775

Check also for Bill S-9

The same US agenda (NDAA)

President Obama Signs Indefinite Detention Into Law



Le ministre fédéral de la Justice, Rob Nicholson comparaît devant un comité sénatorial spécial étudiant le projet de loi S-7, qui contient plusieurs dispositions ayant trait à la lutte contre le terrorisme.

26 Mars 2012

VIDÉO : http://www.cpac.ca/forms/index.asp?dsp=template&act=view3&pagetype=vod&hl=f&clipID=6775

47 mtes
Regardez aussi pour la loi S-9

Le même agenda qu'aux États-Unis. Lisez l'article suivant pour comprendre l'agenda réel se cachant derrière ce langage dialectique.

Traduit par Vic

Le 31 décembre 2011
Posté par Amanda Simon, de l’ACLU, à 16h20




Comme vous le savez, la Maison Blanche avait menacé d'opposer son veto à une version antérieure de la NDAA, mais avait fait demi-tour peu avant que le Congrès vote à propos du projet de loi final (cf. https://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/senate-rejects-amendment-bannin…). Alors que le président Obama avait publié une déclaration signée disant qu'il avait de « sérieuses réserves » concernant ces dispositions, cette déclaration s'applique uniquement à la façon dont son administration l'utiliserait et n'affecte pas la faon dont la loi est interprétée par les administrations suivantes.




Nous sommes extrêmement déçus que le président Obama ait signé ce projet de loi, même si son administration revendique déjà un pouvoir de détention trop large dans les tribunaux. TOUT ESPOIR QUE L'ADMINISTRATION OBAMA RECULE CONCERNANT CES REVENDICATIONS, A SOMBRE AUJOURD'HUI. Heureusement, nous avons trois branches gouvernementales, et LE DERNIER MOT SUR LA PORTEE DU POUVOIR DE DETENTION APPARTIENT A LA COUR SUPREME, QUI N'A PAS ENCORE STATUE SUR L'ETENDUE DE CE POUVOIR DE DETENTION. Mais le Congrès et le président ont également un rôle à jouer dans le nettoyage de la pagaille qu'ils ont créée, car aucun citoyen américain ni personne d’autre ne devrait vivre dans la peur de ceci ou d’un futur président qui utilisera a mauvais escient ce pouvoir de détention de la NDAA.

L'ACLU combattra les autorités de détention dans le monde entier partout où nous le pouvons, que ce soit dans en justice, au Congrès, ou au niveau international.

En savoir plus sur la détention indéfinie: Inscrivez-vous pour les alertes concernant l’actualité (cf. https://secure.aclu.org/site/SPageServer?pagename=UN_email_sign_up&s_su…) , suivez-nous sur Twitter (cf. http://www.twitter.com/aclu ), et ajoutez-nous via le bouton « like » sur Facebook (cf. http://www.facebook.com/aclu.nationwide ).

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Dim 9 Sep - 13:58 (2012)    Sujet du message: LES NÉONAZIS GRECS S'EN PRENNENT AUX VENDEURS IMMIGRÉS AMBULANTS Répondre en citant


Ces néo-nazis vérifient si les vendeurs ont un permis de vente. Si cela ne vous montre pas pour qui ils travaillent... Si vous ne payez pas votre côte à cet Empire Romain, vous ne pouvez rien faire. Regardez tout ce que vous payez à ce grand Empire pour simplement avoir le droit de vivre "libre".

VIDÉO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlctGLOnjSo

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Dim 9 Sep - 14:21 (2012)    Sujet du message: ONEVIDEO: CAMERAMAN ESCAPES DEADLY BLAST IN IRAQ Répondre en citant



VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-SaW8_TFo

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Dim 9 Sep - 15:06 (2012)    Sujet du message: TALIBAN CLAIM RESPONSIBILITY FOR 14 YEAR OLD SUICIDE BOMBER ATTACKING "COVERT CIA TORTURE FACILITY" Répondre en citant


VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvtII-niEBA

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Dim 9 Sep - 15:50 (2012)    Sujet du message: !!!!!!!!!MUST READ – PRESSTV: NATO SECRETLY AUTHORIZES SYRIAN ATTACK – BY GORDON DUFF Répondre en citant



Posted on August 30, 2012by Jean
Thu Aug 30, 2012 5:1PM GMT

No announcement was made, no plans or timetable published, simply a vote on authorization of force which passed unanimously by member and included non-member states unanimously.”

On Monday, August 27, 2012, in a meeting in Brussels, NATO military leaders in consultation with “telephonic liaison” with officers of military forces in several former Soviet Republics, major African states, Israel, Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf states came to a combined decision to act against Syria.

Two issues were on the agenda:

1. How climate change in Greenland will effect geopolitics, immigration and military affairs for the EU
2. Syria and the potential for Russian and Chinese intervention.

3. Iran was not an official agenda item but it is an unspoken conclusion that, if China and/or Russia stand aside for interference by NATO in Syria’s internal affairs, this will be seen as an authorization for incursions into Iran, a systematic “Balkanization” based on a prescribed formula of “manufactured and simulated internal political and social strife.”

No announcement was made, no plans or timetable published, simply a vote on authorization of force which passed unanimously by member and included non-member states unanimously.

News stories throughout North America and Europe earlier in the day were filled with reports of mass killings by the Syrian Army and the presence of Iranian troops in Syria. True or not, these stories represent a pre-staging for the NATO conference.

The critical reporting issue involves rhetoric. We moved, yesterday, from discussions of “fighting” to “systematic execution of hundreds of civilians.”

No video nor photos were included to verify neither claims nor sources given other than reports from “rebel forces.”

Recent consultation with friends in the Pentagon as to Syria’s air defense system indicated that the US has, in place, a play to destroy the command and control capability of Syria’s system.

The problems are twofold:

1. Russian technicians man the Syrian system

2. The S300P2 system Syria uses is extremely “robust”
An additional political consideration is a simple one, there is no UN authorization. Both Russia and China have vetoed even sanctions against Syria much less authorized an attack.

Thus, there is no existing authority capable of justifying an attack.
In an interview this week at the NAM (Non-Aligned Movement) conference in Tehran, attended by 120 member states, a huge defeat for NATO interests in the area, this interview yielded some substantive and surprising facts.

Press TV: Certain powers have been trying to isolate Iran, actually, by not holding such a conference at such a high ranking level. As you said, this all has failed.

Now tell us about all the sanctions against Iran which have propagated against Iran, that Iran should be isolated, but as you said it’s all been failed. What is really important is that the agenda of the 688-point draft document which talked about, as you call and urge all countries to make the world free from any nuclear weapons.

You were a senior expert in the IAEA as an inspector. Tell us about that and also with the particular focus on Israel which has not yet signed up to the NPT.

Abu Shadi: I oppose strongly any kind of accusation on any state based on intelligence information. All the accusations given to the nuclear program in Iran is based only on intelligence information. There is no single proof that Iran is deviating from its commitment from the Non-Proliferation Treaty.

I am very surprised that the Security Council took four decisions, sanctions against Iran just because of rumors that the intelligence source may think there is something.

I think this policy should be changed. The Security Council and its way of veto, and its limited number only to the big powers should be changed.

I think that will also be one of the points to be addressed in this conference. I believe strongly that that situation, which is actually politically influenced by the West, should be changed.

With respect to your second part about the NPT, in fact, almost all the states in the world respects the Non-Proliferation [Treaty] except the five weaponized states, which they should reduce their weapons which didn’t happen up until today, and the three or four states which did not sign the NPT including Israel. Israel is the only state in the Middle East who did not sign the NPT.

None of the Western countries who are accusing not only Iran but before also Iraq, Libya, Syria and even Egypt, did not consider any accusation to what the Israelis are doing. I believe this bias in the international organization should be stopped.

Shadi makes some particularly interesting points and raises some concerns few had noticed. His most damning statement, of course, is that the Security Council, a carryover from a war 70 years ago, certainly a demonstration of oligarchic rule at the United Nations, has been directed at Iran.

In particular, he notes that the council’s unilateral and undemocratic decisions, followed by nations, China and Russia, who defended Syria, were aimed at Iran but backed by no presentation of facts or even qualified intelligence assessments. In fact, since Colin Powell’s humiliating WMD presentation before the UN, no “American fact” has been taken seriously nor is likely to.

CNN quotes a top Powell aid:

A former top aide to Colin Powell says his involvement in the former secretary of state’s presentation to the United Nations on Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction was “the lowest point” in his life.

“I wish I had not been involved in it,” says Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, a longtime Powell adviser who served as his chief of staff from 2002 through 2005. “I look back on it, and I still say it was the lowest point in my life.”

Actual risks and ramifications

Top intelligence analysts in private consultation fear a larger Middle East war. “Russia and China won’t stand back, not with the US planning a unilateral move on Africa and its resources. It’s like 1947 again with Truman and the Marshall plan, encirclement, but a war over, not just resources but a world war against what has now seen as the real threat, what Americans call the “middle class.”

Thus, taking Syria without taking Iran is “not in the cards.” Here I return to the words of H. G. Wells, in his War of the Worlds. His grasp in this fiction well over a century old reflects on our times in a curious and wonderfully literate manner:

“No one would have believed in the last years of the nineteenth century that this world was being watched keenly and closely by intelligences greater than man’s and yet as mortal as his own; that as men busied themselves about their various concerns they were scrutinised and studied, perhaps almost as narrowly as a man with a microscope might scrutinise the transient creatures that swarm and multiply in a drop of water.

Yet across the gulf of space, minds that are to our minds as ours are to those of the beasts that perish, intellects vast and cool and unsympathetic, regarded this earth with envious eyes, and slowly and surely drew their plans against us.

The immediate pressure of necessity has brightened their intellects, enlarged their powers, and hardened their hearts. And looking across space with instruments, and intelligences such as we have scarcely dreamed of…

And we men, the creatures who inhabit this earth, must be to them at least as alien and lowly as are the monkeys and lemurs to us. The Martians seem to have calculated their descent with amazing subtlety–their mathematical learning is evidently far in excess of ours–and to have carried out their preparations with a well-nigh perfect unanimity.”
Martians, this is how NATO and Israel look on the world, as expressed through the prose of Wells. Their gaze “cool and unsympathetic,” as drone warfare and their plans, calculated acts of false flag terror, kidnappings, assassinations, the abomination of mythical news reporting.

The end of the road, this path of “hubris” could well be world war, least of all fuel price increases that collapse the currencies and economies.
Talking of death is nothing as we are now pre-staged to look on life as nothing, all victims are “militants” if you want them dead or “collateral damage” when you err.

Iran’s position chairing NAM makes them a harder target. The general criticism by many NAM members, the dictatorial rule of the United Nations by the Security Council, has not prevented the Syrian conflict from becoming a threat to world peace.

For Iran, their choice seems, on the surface, to be in aiding Syria, negotiations, using oil leverage with India, China and others and predicting how the west is plotting.

If Iran falls, it will be only another domino.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242




  • dimanche 9 septembre 2012 09:20 Date de publication folamour 
  • Des nouvelles en provenance d'Isabelle de Conscience du Peuple :

* Il est pratiquement impossible de vérifier les informations ci-bas, outre le fait de pouvoir constater les déclarations citées dans l'article, mais si elles s'avèrent véritables, nous sommes dans un sacré merdier ! Bien évidemment, les États-Unis et les pays occidentaux ont tout intérêt à diaboliser l'Iran pour justifier leur entrée en guerre, mais il n'en reste pas moins que le Jjihad armé est une obligation pour les musulmans qui se font agresser par un envahisseur...

Le commandant adjoint en chef des Gardiens de la Révolution a averti la semaine dernière que toute agression contre l'Iran étendra la guerre sur le terrain ennemi et que des milliers de cercueils pourraient être nécessaires.

Le général Hossein Salami aurait indiqué à l'Agence Fars News que toute agression contre l'Iran allait avoir des conséquences immédiates et assurées sur les pays ennemis. Il aurait cité deux raisons pour lesquelles la "grandeur du régime islamique" devait se tenir : "La première est que le chef suprême, qui est l'adjoint de l'Imam caché [le [u]12e Imam[/u] chez les Chiites], dirige avec pouvoir et connaissance et pénètre les coeurs ; l'autre est les martyrs qui versent leur sang pour la grandeur du pays."

En louant ces martyrs, a-t-il dit : "Dieu dit dans le Coran que les martyrs sont vivants et de ne pas les considérer comme morts, puisqu'ils ont reçu l'art d'échanger la mort en vie éternelle."

Salami a comparé le guide suprême, l'Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, à un soleil qui brille sur le monde islamique, et que, malgré toutes les sanctions internationales et les menaces, l'Iran progresse sur tous les fronts.

L'Agence Fars News a également fait état d'une sévère mise en garde par le général Hassan Firoozbadi, un haut responsable militaire, à l'effet que l'Amérique et les pays européens doivent s'attendre à des attaques majeures par Al-Qaïda et d'autres groupes terroristes dans leurs pays d'origine.

Comme indiqué plus tôt cette année, des cellules terroristes ont été placées en état d'alerte pour attaquer des cibles aux États-Unis et en Europe si l'Iran devait être attaquée. Des centaines de cellules terroristes ont infiltré l'Amérique et, en collaboration avec le Hezbollah, sont en attente de commandes pour frapper des cibles américaines. Des milliers de cellules ont également été placées en Amérique latine.

"La Force Qods a mis en place un centre de commandement et de contrôle en Bolivie et au Venezuela", a révélé un ancien fonctionnaire iranien qui a la connaissance des réseaux terroristes. Bien qu'il y ait présence en Europe et dans d'autres parties du monde, il a mis l'accent sur ​​l'Amérique latine. Des milliers de ces cellules ont été placées en Bolivie, le Brésil, l'Équateur, le Guatemala, le Nicaragua et le Venezuela."

Un rapport récent de l'intérieur du Nicaragua a indiqué que l'Iran a mis en place une base d'entraînement dans la partie nord de ce pays, où les opérateurs, y compris les terroristes du Hezbollah, sont en préparation pour une attaque contre les intérêts américains et israéliens si une guerre éclate avec l'Iran.

Hassan Abassi, un ancien commandant de la Garde et un actuel stratège, a déclaré que la plupart des cellules sont d'origine latino-américaine, y compris en provenance du Mexique, et que plusieurs centaines de cibles ont été identifiées aux Etats-Unis pour une éventuelle attaque.

"Si l'Amérique ose à déstabiliser la République islamique d'Iran, il ne fait aucun doute que nous allons déstabiliser l'Amérique", a déclaré Abassi.

Un autre commandant en chef du régime islamique, le général Massoud Jazayeri, a récemment mis en garde l'Amérique : "Face à toute attaque, nous aurons une réponse écrasante. Dans ce cas, nous allons non seulement agir dans les limites du Moyen-Orient et du golfe Persique ; mais aucun endroit en Amérique ne sera à l'abri de nos attaques. "

Khamenei a également averti que le conflit allait s'étendre bien au-delà de la région. Ce même avertissement a été émis quelques jours plus tard par Hassan Nasrallah, le secrétaire général du groupe terroriste Hezbollah.


Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Lun 10 Sep - 14:50 (2012)    Sujet du message: RED ALERT BREAKING NEWS ATTACK ON AMERICA STARTED!!! NDAA MILITARY PLANS Répondre en citant


VIDEO : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzpwdSRTKrI&feature=share

Revenir en haut

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 31 242

MessagePosté le: Mar 11 Sep - 15:36 (2012)    Sujet du message: POLICE FACE LEGAL MINEFIELD AS THEY PREPARE TO IMPLEMENT KEY SECTION OF ARIZ. IMMIGRATION LAW Répondre en citant


By Associated Press, Published: September 5 | Updated: Thursday, September 6, 8:02 PMAP

PHOENIX — The most contentious part of Arizona’s immigration law finally has approval to move forward, surviving a U.S. Supreme Court ruling, a heated national debate and two years of state politics.

But the practical effect of what critics call the “show me your papers” provision remains to be seen.

Immigrants are worried they’ll be harassed by officers emboldened to pull them over because they look Hispanic.

Officers — who will be required to ask people they encounter while enforcing other laws to show they’re in the county legally if they find them suspicious — say they’ll be open to lawsuits if they’re accused of racially profiling, or if they’re accused of not adequately enforcing the law.

“It leaves us in a very, very, very, extremely gray area,” Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik said Thursday. “So now we get sued when we do profile, and we get sued if we don’t profile.”

Yet, it may be difficult to see the results.

Parts of the law, passed by a Republican-controlled state legislature and signed by Republican Gov. Jan Brewer in 2010, have been in effect for months but largely ignored — mostly because they seem to address problems that don’t exist, immigrant rights advocates say.

Dan Pochoda, the American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona’s legal director, said the parts of the law known as SB1070 already in effect “have had virtually no impact.” He added that “we haven’t even heard of any attempts to use” the other provisions.

Those sections of the immigration law include a ban on the adoption of so-called sanctuary city policies. The rule is aimed at preventing local government officials from deciding to pick and choose which federal immigration policies to enforce and which to ignore. There have been no reported violations in the state.

Another provision says that state and local agencies can’t have a ban on sharing information, and therefore must cooperate in determining whether a person is a legal citizen eligible for public benefits.

Two other sections were viewed as minor changes to existing laws.

None have had any noticeable impact on how police go about their jobs.

The newly approved section of the law could be difficult to enforce, too.

Police will be required to check the status of people they encounter even investigating minor infractions, such as noise complaints. But federal immigration officials have said repeatedly they are focused on serious or repeat offenders. And local officials can’t make immigration arrests, or detain immigrants for too long on the side of the road.

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who has been one of the nation’s most high-profile supporters of strict border policy, said he’s most worried that law enforcement won’t be able to use the new provisions. He’s concerned that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials won’t support his sheriff’s deputies.

“What good is it for my guys to stop people, call ICE like we always do, and ICE says, ‘We’re not coming,’” Arpaio asked. “It’s going to be very interesting to see what happens.”

Tucson police Chief Roberto Villasenor said his officers will comply with the law, and contact federal officials when they encounter illegal immigrants, even though he thinks it will rarely result in an arrest.

“It’s almost like an exercise in futility at this point, but under the law we are still required to contact them,” he said.

But immigrant rights advocates predict that U.S. citizens will be illegally detained, and that Hispanics will be disproportionately affected.

Alessandra Soler, executive director of the ACLU of Arizona, said her organization will be scrutinizing cases to be sure police don’t abuse the new rule, saying that “there have been numerous sheriffs who have said they will detain people for as long as is necessary to confirm their status. The Supreme Court has already said that is out of bounds.”

More than anything, it will have a chilling effect on law enforcement interaction with Hispanics, opponents say.

Santa Cruz County Sheriff Tony Estrada that said such anxiety within immigrant communities will create problems for officers who have “worked very hard with community policing” and earned trust among people “regardless of their race or ethnicity or gender or economic or social situations.”

He added that such fear “may be a problem. That may be an issue for law enforcement dealing with victims of crime.”

The provision is expected to go into effect in about 10 days, once U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton, who affirmed the rule with her decision Wednesday, finalizes her order.


Revenir en haut
Contenu Sponsorisé

MessagePosté le: Aujourd’hui à 13:39 (2018)    Sujet du message: DICTATURE ISLAMO/FASCISTE MONDIALE - 4E REICH (PARTIE 2) - P.1

Revenir en haut
Montrer les messages depuis:   
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> TERREUR SUR LA TERRE/TERROR ON EARTH -> DICTATURE ISLAMO/FASCISTE MONDIALE 4e REICH - (PARTIE 2) Toutes les heures sont au format GMT + 2 Heures
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 37, 8, 9149, 150, 151  >
Page 8 sur 151

Sauter vers:  

Index | Creer un forum | Forum gratuit d’entraide | Annuaire des forums gratuits | Signaler une violation | Conditions générales d'utilisation
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Traduction par : phpBB-fr.com