LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum

LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1)
...

 FAQFAQ   RechercherRechercher   MembresMembres   GroupesGroupes   S’enregistrerS’enregistrer 
 ProfilProfil   Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés   ConnexionConnexion 

DICTATURE ISLAMO/FASCISTE MONDIALE - 4E REICH (PARTIE 2) - P.1
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 374, 75, 76119, 120, 121  >
 
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> TERREUR SUR LA TERRE/TERROR ON EARTH -> DICTATURE ISLAMO/FASCISTE MONDIALE 4e REICH - (PARTIE 2)
Sujet précédent :: Sujet suivant  
Auteur Message
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 4 Avr - 06:25 (2015)    Sujet du message: OBAMA ADMIN LAUNCHES “FAMILY REUNIFICATION” REFUGEE PROGRAM FOR ILLEGALS Répondre en citant

IMMIGRATION

OBAMA ADMIN LAUNCHES “FAMILY REUNIFICATION” REFUGEE PROGRAM FOR ILLEGALS



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbLfgKpeEDo


Revenir en haut
Publicité






MessagePosté le: Sam 4 Avr - 06:25 (2015)    Sujet du message: Publicité

PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?
Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 5 Avr - 01:41 (2015)    Sujet du message: DICTATURE EN TURQUIE : ERDOGAN DONNE LES PLEINS POUVOIRS A LA POLICE! / SHOCKING AND AMAZING: ERDOGAN HAS NOW DECLARED HIMSELF TO BE GOD Répondre en citant

DICTATURE EN  TURQUIE : ERDOGAN DONNE LES PLEINS POUVOIRS A LA POLICE!

SHOCKING AND AMAZING: ERDOGAN HAS NOW DECLARED HIMSELF TO BE GOD


By Shoebat Foundation on March 31, 2015 in Featured, General

By Walid Shoebat (Shoebat Exclusive)

Erdogan proclaimed himself God. You heard it correctly.

But before I break it to you, I was asked yesterday by a friend (Vinny Zee) if Erdogan ever declared himself to be God, that my article yesterday Vinny alluded that if others calling Erdogan “God” and “prophet,” does not qualify, since in 2 Thessalonians 2, it is the Antichrist who declares “himself” to be God and not just his followers.

Read more : http://shoebat.com/2015/03/31/shocking-and-amazing-erdogan-has-now-declared…



-----

Publié par wikistrike.com sur 4 Avril 2015, 21:19pm
Catégories : #Politique internationale


Il a l'air vraiment possédé

Le président turc Recep Tayyip Erodgan a signé vendredi soir la loi controversée sur la sécurité qui élargit de manière sensible les compétences de la police. L'opposition et des associations de défense des droits de l'homme avaient ouvertement critiqué cette nouvelle loi, qui prévoit notamment la possibilité pour la police d'utiliser des armes contre les manifestants, de mener des perquisitions sans mandat, de garder plus longtemps en cellule des suspects sans supervision d'un magistrat, etc.
 
Les associations de défense des droits de l'homme craignent que ces nouvelles prérogatives accordées aux policiers ne soient une porte ouverte aux abus et qu'elles signifient une perte du contrôle judiciaire sur le travail de la police.

La loi a suivi un parcours parlementaire chaotique avant son adoption fin mars. L'opposition jugeait "liberticides" les principales mesures destinées à renforcer les pouvoirs de la police.

Le gouvernement avait présenté ce projet de loi à la suite des violences émeutes prokurdes qui ont agité la Turquie en octobre 2014.

Source

http://www.wikistrike.com/2015/04/dictature-en-turquie-erdogan-donne-les-pl…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 5 Avr - 02:48 (2015)    Sujet du message: FRANCE : VOICI TOUTES LES MESURES QUI ENTRERONT EN VIGUEUR LE 30 JUIN Répondre en citant

FRANCE : VOICI TOUTES LES MESURES QUI ENTRERONT EN VIGUEUR LE 30 JUIN

Publié par Brice Lahaye le Samedi 04 Avril 2015 : 10h36



L'interdiction du kit mains libres et l'expérimentation de la limitation de vitesse à 80 km/h sur certains tronçons entreront notamment en vigueur le 30 juin prochain. Le point sur ce qui va changer.

Le ministère de l'Intérieur a annoncé vendredi l'application dès le 30 juin prochain de plusieurs mesures visant à enrayer la mortalité sur les routes.

Interdiction du kit mains libres

Parmi les premières mesures à entrer en vigueur se trouve ainsi l'interdiction du kit mains libres. "Le kit mains libres est un dispositif qui l'empêche d'entendre ce qui se passe autour de lui. Le but est que le conducteur garde l'appréhension du monde extérieur", a indiqué le ministère à l'AFP.

Expérimentation de la baisse de la limitation de vitesse 


La mise en place de la limitation de la vitesse à 80 km/h aura, elle aussi, lieu dès le 30 juin. "Il faut trouver des endroits où la cause discriminante des accidents est la vitesse. Ces investigations expliquent le délai. Nous avons identifié une quinzaine de tronçons possibles, qui ont été soumis aux préfets concernés et nous attendons leurs retours", a précisé le ministère.

Baisse du taux d'alcoolémie 

Le 30 juin, le taux d'alcoolémie pour les conducteurs novices sera également abaissé à 0,2 g/l de sang.

Les autres mesures

A noter que les amendes pour stationnement gênant sur les passages piétons, les trottoirs ou les pistes cyclables passeront de 35 à 135 euros. Dans le reste du calendrier est notamment annoncé l'expérimentation des radars "feux rouges", qui devrait être mise en place "avant le 31 décembre".

En vidéo sur le même thème - Sécurité routière  : les agents routiers prennent aussi des risques

+ VIDEO : http://www.planet.fr/magazine-auto-securite-routiere-voici-toutes-les-mesur…[Planet-Alerte-Infos]-20150404


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 5 Avr - 03:07 (2015)    Sujet du message: ISLAMIC STATE TAKES 90 PERCENT OF DAMASCUS REFUGEE CAMP : MONITOR Répondre en citant



ISLAMIC STATE TAKES 90 PERCENT OF DAMASCUS REFUGEE CAMP : MONITOR




VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbcAuOQ9zpc

| Sat Apr 4, 2015 8:12am EDT
Related: World, United Nations, Syria

BEIRUT | By Oliver Holmes

(Reuters) - Islamic State has taken control of 90 percent of a Palestinian refugee camp on the Damascus outskirts where 18,000 civilians have suffered years of bombing, army siege and militia control, a monitoring group said on Saturday.

The hardline group's offensive in Yarmouk gives it a major presence in the capital. Islamic State, the most powerful insurgent group in Syria, is now only a few kilometers from President Bashar al-Assad's seat of power.

The United Nations has said it is extremely concerned about the safety and protection of Syrians and Palestinians in the camp. Civilians trapped there have long suffered a government siege that has led to starvation and disease.

"The situation in Yarmouk is an affront to the humanity of all of us, a source of universal shame," U.N. Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) spokesman Chris Gunness said.

"Yarmouk is a test, a challenge for the international community. We must not fail. The credibility of the international system itself is at stake," he said.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which monitors the conflict from Britain, said Syrian air force jet bombed the camp on Saturday.

The Islamic State on Wednesday launched an attack on other groups of fighters in Yarmouk, in particular Aknaf Beit al-Maqdis, an anti-Assad militia of Syrians and Palestinians from the camp.

Islamic State supporters posted photos on social media of the severed heads of two men they said had been beheaded after fighting for Aknaf Beit al-Maqdis.

The Observatory said Islamic State and al Qaeda's official Syria wing, the Nusra Front, made gains overnight, pushing into the northeast of the district, close to central Damascus. They now control 90 percent of the camp, it said.

Tayseer Abu Baker, head of the Palestinian Liberation Front in Syria, part of the Palestine Liberation Organization, told Reuters over the phone that Islamic State had killed 21 people including fighters and civilians since Friday.

"Some families are trying to exit the camp but with Islamic State snipers on rooftops of high buildings that is very difficult," he said. He added Islamic State had kidnapped at least 74 people from the camp and that civilians were trying to flee.

Reuters cannot independently verify reports in Syria due to security and reporting restrictions.

Islamic State rules swathes of eastern Syria and Iraq and is the target of a U.S.-led campaign of air strikes.

Yarmouk was home to half a million Palestinians before the Syrian conflict began in 2011. The was has killed 220,000 people and displaced millions.

Government officials could not be reached for comment. Syria's state news agency SANA said terrorists in the camp had prevented aid from reaching civilians. It added the army had encircled Yarmouk.

(Additional reporting by Ali Sawafta in Ramallah; Editing by Raissa Kasolowsky)

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/04/us-mideast-crisis-syria-yarmouk-i…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 5 Avr - 04:15 (2015)    Sujet du message: BORDER PATROL AGENT INTERVIEW Répondre en citant

IMMIGRATION - AND THE COMING CIVIL WAR IN AMERICA

BORDER PATROL AGENT INTERVIEW

In this video border patrol says that they're not suppose to receive munitions until october 2015. Now listen the next video



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6lvCiLYIBM

HEADS UP! DHS IS BUYING BULK 'LESS LETHAL SPECIALTY MUNITIONS' FOR RIOT CONTROL



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SohAQbC2o_4

WHOA! FIRST THEY BOUGHT 1.6 BILLION ROUNDS OF AMMO, NOW HOMELAND SECURITY IS BUYING BULK RIOT CONTROL GEAR! THEY KNOW WHAT'S COMING!

Submitted by IWB, on April 3rd, 2015

One of the biggest stories for years in the alternative media was the mysterious and foreboding purchase by Homeland Security of more than 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition.

Thanks to coverage on prominent sites like DrudgeReport, the story reached into mainstream media, prompting official spin and downplaying of the purchase.

Now, a new Homeland Security purchase order listed on FedBizOpps also raises an eyebrow or two, given the heated and divided political and social climate at hand.

A request for “less lethal specialty munitions” for use by Homeland Security dated March 23, 2015 reads:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) intends to solicit responses to Request for Information (RFI) 20082225-JTC for Less Lethal Specialty Munitions (LLSM) for use by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). CBP is interested in incorporating commercial and industry practices that support this type of procurement. To accomplish this, CBP intends to make industry a partner in all facets of the acquisition process, specifically by considering existing market capabilities, strengths and weaknesses for the acquisition of this commodity.

Over the course of 9 pages (PDF), the technical requirements call for an arsenal of specialized weaponry for training and deployment against crowds.

On top of a wide range of gas and chemical grenades, rubber bullets and other riot rounds, the purchase calls for “controlled noise and light distraction devices,” including flash bangs which set off a 175 dB sound with 6 – 8 million candelas light bursts in 10 milliseconds.

So why are the Feds prepping to take on crowds?

Officially, the request is put through Customs and Border Patrol, a subset of the Department of Homeland Security, but it is unlikely that the equipment will be used to protect the border and keep out illegal aliens. But the riot gear and crowd control devices have many potential uses.

Perhaps, the equipment for use in instances like last year, when protesters in Murrieta confronted Customs and Border Patrol agents and blocked buses carrying a wave of illegal immigrants from Central America?

The requested equipment includes:

Hand Delivered Pyrotechnic Canisters, including

Smoke Canister for Training (Reduced Toxicity)
Continuous Discharge Large Smoke Canister (Operations)
Continuous Discharge CS Canister
Orange Colored Smoke Canister
Green Colored Smoke Canister
Pocket Tactical Smoke Canister
Pocket Tactical CS Canister
Three Part Sub-Munitions CS Canister
Non-Burning Internal Canister OC Grenade

Non-Pyrotechnic Indoor/Outdoor Use

Flameless Expulsion Grenade (OC)
Flameless Expulsion Grenade (CS)
Flameless Expulsion Grenade (Inert)

Hand Delivered Rubber Ball Grenades

Rubber Ball Grenade
Rubber Ball Grenade (CS)

40mm Launched Specialty Impact Munitions

40mm Direct Impact Sponge Cartridge
40mm Direct Impact Sponge Cartridge (OC)
40mm Direct Impact Sponge Cartridge (Marking)
40mm Direct Impact Sponge Cartridge (Inert)
40mm Sponge Training Rounds

Crowd Management Projectile Cartridges

40mm Smokeless Powder Blast (OC)
40mm Smokeless Powder Blast (CS)
40mm Long Range Canister (CS)
40mm Long Range Canister (Smoke)
40mm Cartridge Four Part Sub-Munitions (CS)
40mm Cartridge Four Part Sub-Munitions (Smoke)
40mm Aerial Warning Munitions (100 Meters)
40mm Aerial Warning Munitions (200 Meters)
40mm Aerial Warning Munitions (300 Meters)
40mm Aerial Warning Munitions OC (100 Meters)
40mm Aerial Warning Munitions OC (200 Meters)
40mm Aerial Warning Munitions OC (300 Meters)

Controlled Noise And Light Distraction Devices

Distraction Device Compact
Distraction Device
Distraction Device Reloadable Steel Body
Distraction Device Reload
Command Initiated Distraction Device Reload
Distraction Device Training Fuse
Distraction Device Training Body
Multiple Detonation Distraction Device
Low Profile Distraction Device
Command Initiator

Ferret Rounds

40mm Ferret Round (OC Powder)
40mm Ferret Round (OC Liquid)
40mm Ferret Round (CS Powder)
40mm Ferret Round (CS Liquid)
40mm Ferret Round (Inert Powder)

The ferret rounds are designed to penetrate barriers and deliver debilitating or disrupting chemicals:

“The projectile shall be designed to penetrate barriers of glass, particle board, and interior walls. Upon impact of the barrier, the nose cone will rupture and instantaneously deliver the OC liquid on the other side of the barrier. “

The collection of equipment provides a diverse range of toys with which authorities could push back crowds and potentially intimidate free speech as well.

Are there more riots coming? Is widespread civil unrest only a matter of time? Is it related to martial law exercises like Jade Helm 15?

What do the Feds know that we don’t?

They are getting ready… are you?
https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=6c29a831cd2e57…

http://investmentwatchblog.com/whoa-first-they-bought-1-6-billion-rounds-of…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6lvCiLYIBM


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 6 Avr - 02:58 (2015)    Sujet du message: ISIS PUSHES CLOSER TO DAMASCUS THROUGH SYRIA'S YARMOUK REFUGEE CAMP Répondre en citant

ISIS PUSHES CLOSER TO DAMASCUS THROUGH SYRIA'S YARMOUK REFUGEE CAMP 


Yarmouk residents queue up to receive humanitarian aid (Reuters)


Islamic State (IS or ISIS or ISIL or Daesh) militias have taken control of a southern district in Damascus, Syria, and are just a few kilometers from the military headquarters of the regime of Syria’s president Bashar al-Assad. Al-Assad’s army has suffered several recent defeats, especially the major military defeat in Idlib, and so it appears that ISIS may present a real military challenge to the regime in its seat of power. Reports indicate that ISIS is also receiving help from the al-Qaeda linked Jabhat al-Nusra (al-Nusra Front), a group with which it often has battles in other places and times.

ISIS’s advance into Damascus is through the Yarmouk refugee camp, home to about 18,000 Palestinian refugees. The camp has been under siege from al-Assad’s army since 2011, since al-Assad feared that the Palestinian refugees would join the fight against him. In the last couple of years, the Free Syrian Army and al-Qaeda linked Jabhat al-Nusra (al-Nusra Front) have entered Yarmouk and fought each other, making Yarmouk increasingly dangerous for the civilians living there. Now the invasion of ISIS has turned Yarmouk into a humanitarian disaster. Aid groups are unable to enter Yarmouk, with the result that the civilians have no food and water, no electricity. Anyone who leaves his home risks getting shot and killed by snipers on the rooftops.

Other reports indicate that al-Assad’s forces are trying to fight ISIS by means of “violent shelling by the regime forces using tank shells and ground-to-ground missiles,” weapons that are more likely to kill civilians than ISIS.

According to Hanan Ashrawi, international Palestinian activist and executive of the Palestinian Authority (PA/PLO) government, on Saturday:
Citation:


Yarmouk is a test, a challenge for the international community. We must not fail. The credibility of the international system itself is at stake.

The current situation in the al-Yarmouk refugee camp is a heartbreaking catastrophe.

Since December 2012, tens of thousands of men, women and children, most of whom are Palestinian refugees, have been forced to flee and have had their lives torn apart by war. The 18,000 residents who remain in Yarmouk are in great danger from extremist groups, including ISIS, that are seeking to take full control of the camp.

We call on all members of the international community, particularly the United Nations, European Union and the United States, to safeguard the innocent people of Yarmouk and ensure that all sides commit to a permanent ceasefire.


And yet, with almost the entire Mideast in flames these days, the women and children in Yarmouk have little hope of receiving any international aid quickly. ARA News (Syria) and AP and Jerusalem Post

...

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/04/05/world-view-texts-of-i…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 6 Avr - 03:09 (2015)    Sujet du message: IDF GENERAL: 'DRAMATIC STEPS' POSSIBLE ON IRAN Répondre en citant



IDF GENERAL: 'DRAMATIC STEPS' POSSIBLE ON IRAN

'Where Israel feels its existence depends on action, it will take it,' says Maj. Gen. Nimrod Sheffer, head of IDF Planning Directorate.

By Gil Ronen
First Publish: 4/4/2015, 7:59 PM


Maj. Gen. Nimrod Sheffer
Miriam Alster,

Maj. Gen. Nimrod Sheffer, the head of the Israel Defense Forces Planning Directorate, told Israel Hayom in a weekend interview that when Israeli leaders say “all options are on the table” with regard to Iran, they mean it.

“If someone builds a nuclear bomb and at the same time declares that the State of Israel has no right to exist, then we have to think about how to respond,” he said. “It goes beyond a simple challenge."

When asked if Israel might take “dramatic steps” in defiance of the American position, Sheffer answered positively: "When it comes to our national security, the answer is yes."

Israel Hayom asked Shefer, even more specifically, if he could envision a situation in which Israeli jets bomb an Iranian nuclear facility in defiance of the U.S.

"Since it has already happened in the past, I don't see any reason why it shouldn't happen again,” he replied. “I think that where Israel feels its existence depends on action, it will take it. I think that any true partner would accept that, and I honestly think that the Americans are in fact true partners, despite all the tension...

“As long as Israel instructs its army to do what it has to do because that is the right thing to do for Israel's security, I think it will be accepted. That is why I am certain that any decision on this issue will not be the thing that destroys the relationship between the U.S. and Israel."

The nuclear deal between the P5+1 powers and Iran, as it is emerging right now, “will not be a good deal for Israel,” he assessed. “If such a deal is ultimately signed, we will have to ask ourselves 'okay, what are we going to do with this?'"

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu issued his first public reaction Friday to Thursday's announcement of a "framework deal" between Iran and the P5+1 world powers over Tehran's nuclear plan.

"Such a deal does not block Iran's path to the bomb. Such a deal paves Iran's path to the bomb. And it might very well spark a nuclear arms race throughout the Middle East and it would greatly increase the risks of terrible war," he said.

"Iran is a regime that openly calls for Israel's destruction and openly and actively works towards that end. Just two days ago, in the midst of the negotiations in Lausanne, the commander of the Basij security forces in Iran said this: 'The destruction of Israel is non-negotiable.' Well, I want to make clear to all. The survival of Israel is non-negotiable.

"Israel will not accept an agreement which allows a country that vows to annihilate us to develop nuclear weapons, period."

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/193643


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 6 Avr - 04:43 (2015)    Sujet du message: SYRIE : CHUT ! « PALESTINIENS DECAPITES », MASSACRES, TOUR A TOUR PAR ASSAD ET L'ETAT ISLAMIQUE Répondre en citant



SYRIE : CHUT ! « PALESTINIENS DECAPITES », MASSACRES, TOUR A TOUR PAR ASSAD ET L'ETAT ISLAMIQUE 


avr 05, 2015


http://www.israel-flash.com/category/moyen-orient/syrie/


Des milliers de descendants de « réfugiés palestiniens » pris au piège à Yarmouk, assiégés par l’état islamique et sous contrôle à 90 %. Certains ont été massacrés, décapités, mais le silence est assourdissant du coté des pro-palestiniens et autres ONG. Normal, ce ne sont pas les israéliens qui ont commis ces atrocités, atrocités qu’Israël ne commettra jamais d’ailleurs !

Des milliers de civils sont pris au piège dans le camp de Yarmouk, dans le sud de Damas, assiégé par le régime et presque entièrement aux mains de jihadistes, a annoncé un responsable de l’opposition syrienne samedi.

« Les habitants du camp sont pris entre la peste et le choléra », a dénoncé Ayman Abou Hachem, responsable de la commission des réfugiés palestiniens de l’opposition syrienne. « Le camp est cerné par le régime, et à l’intérieur les forces de l'(organisation Etat islamique) EI ont presque tout saisi ».

L’EI a lancé mercredi l’assaut sur Yarmouk. Repoussés le lendemain par des combattants palestiniens, les jihadistes ont finalement repris le terrain perdu, et avancé au point de détenir 90% du camp, selon l’Observatoire syrien des droits de l’Homme (OSDH).
Le camp de réfugiés palestiniens, qui compte encore quelque 18.000 habitants et est situé à environ 7 km du centre de la capitale syrienne, est assiégé depuis plus d’un an par l’armée.

Le directeur de l’OSDH, Rami Abdel Rahmane, a affirmé que le front Al-Nosra, la branche syrienne d’el-Qaëda avait aidé l’EI à entrer dans le camp, pourtant son rival dans le complexe conflit syrien.

Des responsables palestiniens ont également accusé Al-Nosra d’avoir facilité l’arrivée de l’EI dans le camp.

Au moins 18 personnes sont mortes dans les violences depuis mercredi, a encore dit M. Abdel Rahmane, 6 civils et 12 combattants palestiniens. Deux d’entre eux ont été décapités.

Le régime a par ailleurs mené des raids aériens sur Yarmouk, selon l’OSDH.

L’agence de l’ONU pour les réfugiés palestiniens, l’UNRWA, qui a alerté à de nombreuses reprises sur les conditions humanitaires désastreuses dans le cas, a de nouveau appelé à un accès humanitaire, affirmant que la situation était « un affront à l’humanité dans son ensemble et une source de honte universelle ».

En février 2014, les groupes rebelles syriens s’étaient retirés du camp à l’issue d’un accord avec les groupes armés palestiniens anti-régime. L’armée a ensuite assiégé le camp où les habitants ont souffert de pénuries de nourriture, d’eau et de médicaments. lorientlejour

http://www.lorientlejour.com/article/919250/des-milliers-de-civils-pris-au-… NDLR – quelques 300 gazaouis ont manifestés à Gaza hier en soutien au camps de Yarmouk

http://www.israel-flash.com/2015/04/syrie-chut-palestiniens-decapites-massa…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 6 Avr - 05:33 (2015)    Sujet du message: OBAMA AND JEH JOHNSON PUNISH GOVERNMENT WORKERS FOR UPHOLDING AMNESTY LAW Répondre en citant

IMMIGRATION

OBAMA AND JEH JOHNSON PUNISH GOVERNMENT WORKERS FOR UPHOLDING AMNESTY LAW



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVtIUrhOBzw


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 6 Avr - 06:21 (2015)    Sujet du message: FRANCE : LE PROJET DE LOI SUR LE RENSEIGNEMENT APPROUVE PAR LES DEPUTES Répondre en citant



FRANCE : LE PROJET DE LOI SUR LE RENSEIGNEMENT APPROUVE PAR LES DEPUTES 


Les députés ont approuvé mercredi soir le projet de loi sur le renseignement en renforçant, parfois contre l'avis du gouvernement, les prérogatives de la nouvelle autorité administrative chargée de contrôler les techniques de surveillance à disposition des services.


Crédit : AFP
L'Assemblée nationale, le 19 février 2015.

par Benjamin Hue , Avec AFP publié le 01/04/2015 à 23:34
Au terme d'une séance marquée par une faible affluence, le projet de loi visant à donner plus de moyens aux services de renseignement a été adopté à l'unanimité par la commission des lois de l'Assemblée nationale, ce mercredi 1er avril. Les députés ont approuvé, parfois contre l'avis du gouvernement, les prérogatives de la nouvelle autorité administrative chargée de contrôler les techniques de surveillance à disposition des services.

Ce projet de loi, soutenu par l'UMP au nom de l'unité nationale dans la lutte contre le terrorisme après les attentats de janvier, vise à "légaliser les activités de renseignement", a résumé le rapporteur Jean-Jacques Urvoas (PS), la France étant l'une des dernières démocraties à ne pas avoir de cadre juridique sur les pratiques de ses six services de renseignement. 

Les députés ont précisé pendant la séance les motifs pour lesquels les services de renseignement pourront recourir aux techniques de surveillance (écoutes, balises, caméras...) prévues dans le projet de loi controversé sur le sujet, qui sera débattu en séance à partir du 13 avril.

Les missions des services élargies

Les députés ont voté plusieurs amendements du rapporteur pour autoriser les services à utiliser ces techniques pour défendre et même "promouvoir" les "intérêts économiques, scientifiques et industriels majeurs" de la France ainsi  que les "intérêts majeurs de sa politique étrangère" plutôt que les seuls "intérêts essentiels". 

Ils ont en revanche supprimé le motif de "prévention des violences collectives de nature à porter gravement atteinte à la paix publique" qui inquiétait militants associatifs et syndicaux pour le remplacer par celui de "prévention des atteintes à la forme républicaine des institutions et des violences collectives de nature à porter atteinte à la sécurité nationale".

Avec ce projet de loi, les enquêteurs et agents pourront effectuer en toute légalité des "interceptions de sécurité" portant sur les contenus des courriels  et des conversations téléphoniques, uniquement s'ils sont en lien direct avec l'enquête. Le texte prévoit aussi le recours à de nouvelles technologies permettant aux agents de poser micros, balises, caméras espions partout où ils l'estiment nécessaire. Ils pourront également capter en direct de ce qui est tapé sur un clavier en temps réel.

Un vaste arsenal antiterroriste extrajudiciaire

Contre l'avis du gouvernement, les députés ont restreint l'utilisation des appareils du type "Imsi-catcher", qui interceptent dans un périmètre donné toutes les communications, en imitant le fonctionnement d'un relais de téléphonie mobile. Un amendement punit de 375.000 euros le fait pour une personne exploitant un réseau de communications électroniques de refuser de communiquer les informations ou documents demandés. 

Toutes ces écoutes et interceptions seront autorisées par le Premier ministre, sans passer par un juge mais après avis sous 24 heures d'une nouvelle autorité administrative, la Commission nationale de contrôle des techniques de renseignement (CNCTR). Le délai pourra passer à trois jours si la CNCTR a un doute sur la validité de la demande. Les députés ont renforcé les pouvoirs de cette nouvelle autorité. Le Premier ministre pourra toujours passer outre ses avis mais devra le motiver. 

Contre l'avis du ministre de l'Intérieur Bernard Cazeneuve, les députés ont modifié substantiellement la procédure d'urgence qui permettait au Premier ministre d'autoriser la mise en oeuvre d'une technique de renseignement sans avis préalable de la CNCTR. L'amendement réaffirme le caractère exceptionnel de l'urgence. L'autorisation sera délivrée par le chef de service qui devra en informer le Premier ministre et la CNCTR sans délai et fournir des éléments de motivation sous 24 heures. Cette urgence ne pourra s'appliquer pour l'intrusion d'un domicile ni lorsqu'un journaliste, un parlementaire ou un avocat est ciblé.

La crainte de l'instauration d'un système de masse

"Les services seront en capacité d'organiser l'urgence quand ça les arrange", s'est inquiété l'UDI Hervé Morin. De manière un peu inattendue, l'ancien ministre de la Défense, "extrêmement réservé sur le texte", a relayé fortement, aux côtés de l'écologiste Sergio Coronado les craintes exprimées ces derniers jours par la Cnil, de nombreuses associations et même le juge antiterroriste Marc Trevidic, sur les pouvoirs accordés aux services de renseignement, jugeant leur champ "extrêmement large". 

Une commission parlementaire sur le numérique avait également émis un avis critique avant les débats en commission. Dans un éditorial, le New York Times avait également pris position ce mercredi contre le texte à travers lequel il voit poindre "un État de surveillance français".

Enfin, selon un amendement de l'UMP Guillaume Larrivé, les opérateurs de transport routier internationaux seront tenus de recueillir l'identité des passagers transportés et de conserver cette information pendant une durée d'un an.

La rédaction vous recommande
http://www.rtl.fr/actu/societe-faits-divers/le-projet-de-loi-sur-le-renseig…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 6 Avr - 07:21 (2015)    Sujet du message: AIRSTRIKES CONTINUE AGAINST ISIL IN SYRIA, IRAQ Répondre en citant

AIRSTRIKES CONTINUE AGAINST ISIL IN SYRIA, IRAQ

Lie. 

OBAMA ASKING CONGRESS TO FIGHT ISIS ON THE GROUND IS 'NOT THE LANGUAGE OF A COMMANDER IN CHIEF'?

Need autorization from the Congress but in other times, he pass all his executive orders without the Congress


11 févr. 2015




VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDA-71S23VA

-----

From a Combined Joint Task Force Operation Inherent Resolve News Release

SOUTHWEST ASIA, April 4, 2015 – U.S. and coalition military forces have continued to attack Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant terrorists in Syria and Iraq, Combined Joint Task Force Operation Inherent Resolve officials reported today.

Officials reported details of the latest strikes, which took place between 8 a.m. yesterday and 8 a.m. today, local time, noting that assessments of results are based on initial reports.

Airstrikes in Syria

Attack and bomber aircraft conducted six airstrikes in Syria:
-- Near Kobani, five airstrikes struck three ISIL tactical units and destroyed nine ISIL fighting positions, an ISIL vehicle and an ISIL building.
-- Near Hasakah, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed three ISIL fighting positions.

Airstrikes in Iraq

Fighter and remotely piloted aircraft conducted nine airstrikes in Iraq, approved by the Iraqi Ministry of Defense:
-- Near Beiji, two airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units and destroyed an ISIL machine gun and an ISIL fighting position.
-- Near Tal Afar, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL fighting position.
-- Near Huwayjah, an airstrike had no effect.
-- Near Asad, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit.
-- Near Sinjar, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed two ISIL machine guns and an ISIL rifle.
-- Near Mosul, an airstrike struck a large ISIL unit and an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed five ISIL fighting positions, two ISIL machine guns, an ISIL bulldozer, an ISIL vehicle and an ISIL rifle.
-- Near Fallujah, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit.
-- Near Sinjar, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed two ISIL fighting positions and an ISIL building.

Part of Operation Inherent Resolve

The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, the region, and the wider international community. The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations, officials said.

Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Iraq include the United States, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Syria include the United States, Bahrain, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=128530&source=GovDelive…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 7 Avr - 04:12 (2015)    Sujet du message: CE QUE CACHE LE DISCOURS CONTRE LES « CONSPIRATIONNISTES » L’ÉTAT CONTRE LA REPUBLIQUE Répondre en citant



CE QUE CACHE LE DISCOURS CONTRE LES « CONSPIRATIONNISTES » L’ÉTAT CONTRE LA REPUBLIQUE

Dans la même rubrique:

Lundi 6 Avril 2015 - 12:20 « La discrimination au coeur des tribunaux : la leçon des héros d'ADP. »
Samedi 4 Avril 2015 - 11:55 La défense de Jean-Marie Le Pen.

À la demande du président François Hollande, le Parti socialiste français vient de publier une Note sur le mouvement international « conspirationniste ». Son but : préparer une nouvelle législation lui interdisant de s’exprimer.

Aux États-Unis, le coup d’État du 11 septembre 2001 a permis d’établir un « état d’urgence permanent » (Patriot Act) et de lancer une série de guerres impériales. Progressivement, les élites européennes se sont alignées sur leurs homologues d’Outre-Atlantique. Partout, les citoyens s’inquiètent d’être abandonnés par leurs États et remettent en question leurs institutions. Cherchant à se maintenir au pouvoir, les élites sont désormais prêtes à utiliser la force pour bâillonner leurs oppositions.

Thierry Meyssan

Mardi 10 Mars 2015



Le président de la République française, François Hollande, a assimilé ce qu’il nomme les « théories du complot » au nazisme, puis a appelé à empêcher leur diffusion sur internet et les réseaux sociaux.

Ainsi a-t-il déclaré le 27 janvier 2015 au Mémorial de la Shoah :
spip a écrit:

« [L’antisémitisme] entretient les théories du complot qui se diffusent sans limite. Théories du complot qui ont, dans le passé, conduit déjà au pire » (…) « [La] réponse, c’est de prendre conscience que les thèses complotistes prennent leur diffusion par Internet et les réseaux sociaux. Or, nous devons nous souvenir que c’est d’abord par le verbe que s’est préparée l’extermination. Nous devons agir au niveau européen, et même international, pour qu’un cadre juridique puisse être défini, et que les plateformes Internet qui gèrent les réseaux sociaux soient mises devant leurs responsabilités, et que des sanctions soient prononcées en cas de manquement » [1].

Plusieurs ministres ont également conspué ce qu’ils appellent les théories du complot comme autant de « ferments de haine et de désintégration de la société ».

Sachant que le président Hollande appelle « théorie du complot » l’idée que les États, quels que soient leurs régimes –y compris les démocraties–, ont une propension spontanée à agir dans leur intérêt et non pas dans celui de leurs administrés, on peut en conclure qu’il s’est livré à cet amalgame pour justifier d’une éventuelle censure de ses opposants.

Cette interprétation est confirmée par la publication par la Fondation Jean-Jaurès, think tank du Parti socialiste dont M. Hollande était le Premier secrétaire, d’une note intitulée « Conspirationnisme : un état des lieux » [2].

Laissons de côté les relations politiques de François Hollande, du Parti socialiste, de la Fondation Jean-Jaurès, de son Observatoire des radicalités politiques et de l’auteur de la note et concentrons-nous sur son message et son contenu idéologique.

Définition des « théories du complot »


Les expressions « théories du complot » et « conspirationnisme » se sont développées en France à la suite de la publication de mon livre sur l’impérialisme états-unien post-11-Septembre, L’Effroyable imposture [3]. À l’époque, nous avions du mal à comprendre ce qu’elles signifiaient car elles renvoyaient à l’histoire politique américaine. Aux États-Unis, on appelait couramment « conspirationnistes » ceux pour qui le président Kennedy n’avait pas été assassiné par un seul homme, mais par plusieurs, formant une conspiration (au sens judiciaire). Avec le temps, ces expressions sont entrées dans la langue française et se sont superposées avec des souvenirs des années 30 et de la Seconde Guerre mondiale, ceux de la dénonciation du « complot juif ». Ces expressions sont donc aujourd’hui polysémiques, évoquant parfois la loi du silence états-unienne et, à d’autres moments, l’antisémitisme européen.

Dans sa note, la Fondation Jean-Jaurès donne sa propre définition du « conspirationnisme ».
spip a écrit:


C’est « un récit "alternatif" qui prétend bouleverser de manière significative la connaissance que nous avons d’un événement et donc concurrencer la "version" qui en est communément acceptée, stigmatisée comme "officielle" » (p. 2).

Observons que cette définition ne s’applique pas qu’aux délires de malades mentaux. Ainsi, Platon affirmait avec le mythe de la caverne remettre en cause les certitudes de son temps ; Galilée avec sa thèse héliocentrique défiait la lecture que son époque faisait de La Bible ; etc.

Pour ma part et puisque l’on voit en moi le « pape du conspirationnisme » ou plutôt l’« hérésiarque », selon le mot du philosophe italien Roberto Quaglia, je réaffirme mon engagement politique radical, au sens du radicalisme républicain français, de Léon Bourgeois [4], de Georges Clemenceau [5], d’Alain [6] et de Jean Moulin [7]. Pour moi, comme pour eux, l’État est un Léviathan qui par nature abuse de ceux qu’il gouverne.

Comme républicain radical, je suis conscient que l’État est l’ennemi de l’intérêt général, de la Res Publica ; raison pour laquelle je souhaite non pas l’abroger, mais le dompter. L’idéal républicain est compatible avec divers régimes politiques —y compris avec la monarchie, comme l’ont acté les auteurs de la Déclaration de 1789—.

Cette opposition, que le Parti socialiste actuel conteste, a tellement marqué notre histoire qu’en 1940 Philippe Pétain abrogea la République pour proclamer l’« État français ». Dès sa prise de fonction présidentielle, j’ai dénoncé le pétainisme de François Hollande [8]. Aujourd’hui, M. Hollande se réclame de la République pour mieux la combattre et son inversion des valeurs plonge le pays dans la confusion.

Qui sont les « conspirationnistes » ?

Les « conspirationnistes » sont donc des citoyens qui s’opposent à la toute-puissance de l’État et qui souhaitent le placer sous surveillance.

La Fondation Jean-Jaurès les décrit en ces termes :
spip a écrit:


« [C’est une] mouvance hétéroclite, fortement intriquée avec la mouvance négationniste, et où se côtoient admirateurs d’Hugo Chávez et inconditionnels de Vladimir Poutine. Un milieu interlope que composent anciens militants de gauche ou d’extrême gauche, ex-"Indignés", souverainistes, nationaux-révolutionnaires, ultra-nationalistes, nostalgiques du IIIe Reich, militants anti-vaccination, partisans du tirage au sort, révisionnistes du 11-Septembre, antisionistes, afrocentristes, survivalistes, adeptes des "médecines alternatives", agents d’influence du régime iranien, bacharistes, intégristes catholiques ou islamistes » (p. 8).

On notera les amalgames et les injures de cette description visant à discréditer les personnes qu’elle désigne.

Les mythes des « conspirationnistes »

La Fondation Jean-Jaurès poursuit son dénigrement en accusant les « conspirationnistes » d’ignorer les réalités du monde et de croire naïvement en des mythes éculés. Ainsi, nous croirions au « complot sioniste mondial », au « complot illuminati » et au « mythe Rothschild » (p. 4). Et pour créditer ces trois affirmations, elle ne cite qu’un exemple relatif au seul « mythe Rothschild » : le blogueur Étienne Chouard —dont le travail ne porte pas simplement sur la République, mais va bien au-delà pour traiter de la Démocratie [9]— affirme que la loi Pompidou-Rothschild de 1973 est à l’origine de la dette de la France. Et la Fondation de réfuter cette affirmation en citant une tribune publiée par Libération.

On notera ici que l’exemple d’Étienne Chouard nous laisse sur notre faim à propos des deux autres mythes cités. Surtout, la Fondation s’adresse à des ignorants qui n’ont pas lu la réponse de M. Chouard à la tribune de Libération [10], ni la contribution du « conspirationniste » Michel Rocard [11]. En effet, de ce débat, il ressort bien que la loi de 1973 a permis l’explosion de la dette française au profit de banques privées, ce qui aurait été impossible auparavant.

La « complosphère »

Pour la Fondation Jean-Jaurès, les intellectuels conspirationnistes seraient
spip a écrit:


« essentiellement Nord-Américains. Citons en particulier Webster Tarpley et William Engdhal (tous deux anciens membres de l’organisation politico-sectaire américaine dirigée par Lyndon LaRouche), Wayne Madsen (WayneMadsenReport.com), Kevin Barrett (VeteransToday.com) ou encore Michel Chossudovsky (Mondialisation.ca). Avec leurs homologues européens, ces derniers forment une sorte d’Internationale à laquelle Thierry Meyssan, le président du Réseau Voltaire, a tenté de donner une forme concrète en novembre 2005, en réunissant à Bruxelles une "conférence anti-impérialiste" – "Axis for Peace" – dont la liste des participants se lit comme un who’s who des auteurs conspirationnistes les plus en vue de l’époque » (p. 8).

Observons d’abord que la Fondation Jean-Jaurès ne doit lire que le français et l’anglais, et n’avoir que survolé la liste des participants d’Axis for Peace, pour croire que le phénomène qu’elle décrit ne concerne que la France, le Canada et les États-Unis, alors qu’il comprend une très importante littérature en allemand, en arabe, en espagnol, en italien, en persan, en polonais, en portugais et en russe ; langues qui sont d’ailleurs majoritaires à Axis for Peace.

Notons aussi le caractère malveillant de l’allusion à « l’organisation politico-sectaire américaine dirigée par Lyndon LaRouche ». En effet, Webster Tarpley et William Engdhal ont quitté cette organisation, il y a plus de 20 ans. Et à l’époque où ils en étaient membres, ce parti était représenté en France aux congrès d’une formation d’extrême-gauche

Un peu plus loin, la Fondation Jean-Jaurès ne manque pas de citer l’humoriste Dieudonné M’Bala M’Bala, dont l’État tente d’interdire les spectacles, le sociologue Alain Soral, dont le site internet (EgaliteEtReconciliation.fr) obtient des records d’audience en France, et Alain Benajam (facebook.com/alain.benajam), président du Réseau Voltaire France et représentant du gouvernement Novorossien du Donbass.



En 1989, l’ancien chef du Renseignement états-unien en Europe, Irwing Brown, révélait aux journalistes Roger Faligot et Rémi Kauffer avoir recruté Jean-Christophe Cambadélis lorsqu’il militait chez les trotskistes lambertistes. 25 ans plus tard, M. Cambadélis est devenu Premier secrétaire du Parti socialiste français.

Les idées politiques des « conspirationnistes »

Après ces apéritifs, la Fondation Jean-Jaurès en vient au cœur du débat, celui des idées politiques. Il définit ainsi celles des « conspirationnistes » :
spip a écrit:



 « l’effacement de toute distinction de nature entre régimes autoritaires et démocraties libérales (réputées plus « totalitaires » que les pires des totalitarismes) » ;
 « [l’opposition à] toute législation antiraciste sous prétexte de défense de la "liberté d’expression" » ;
 « [le rejet de] la pertinence du clivage droite-gauche, le véritable clivage étant celui qui sépare "le Système" (ou "l’Empire", ou "l’Oligarchie") de ceux qui lui résistent » ; (p. 8)
 « l’idée que le sionisme est un "projet de domination" du monde » (p. 9).

La Fondation Jean-Jaurès cible précisément les sujets de conflit, mais grossit le trait pour discréditer ses opposants. Par exemple, personne ne s’est opposé à la législation antiraciste, mais uniquement et exclusivement à la disposition de la loi Fabius-Gayssot qui punit de prison le débat sur l’extermination des juifs d’Europe [12]

Qu’est-ce que le sionisme ?


La Fondation se livre alors à une très longue analyse de mes travaux sur le sionisme. Elle les défigure puis les commente :
spip a écrit:


« L’antisionisme revendiqué ici par Thierry Meyssan n’a pas de rapport avec la critique d’une politique conjoncturelle, celle des gouvernements qui ont pu se succéder à la tête de l’État d’Israël. Il ne relève pas d’un anticolonialisme que satisferait le retrait d’Israël des territoires occupés à l’issue de la guerre des Six Jours et la création d’un État palestinien. Il ne procède pas non plus d’un internationalisme qui tiendrait en suspicion, par principe, tout mouvement national d’où qu’il vienne puisque, précisément, il ne tient pas le sionisme pour un mouvement national. Cet antisionisme de facture paranoïaque ne prétend pas combattre le sionisme envisagé dans la diversité de ses expressions historiques, mais une hydre fantasmatique qui serait à la source du malheur du monde » (p. 9).

En voulant conclure sur ce débat et en lui donnant une place considérable dans son analyse, la Fondation Jean-Jaurès en souligne l’importance. Je défends en effet une position jusqu’ici absente du débat politique occidental [13] :
 Le premier chef d’État ayant affirmé son intention de rassembler les juifs du monde entier dans un État qui serait le leur fut Lord Cromwell au XVIIe siècle. Son projet, clairement explicité, consistait à utiliser la diaspora juive pour étendre l’hégémonie anglaise. Ce projet a été défendu par tous les gouvernements britanniques successifs et inscrit par Benjamin Disraeli à l’ordre du jour de la Conférence de Berlin.
 Theodor Herzl lui-même était un disciple de Cecil Rhodes, le théoricien de l’Empire britannique. Herzl avait proposé au départ de créer Israël en Ouganda ou en Argentine, pas du tout en Palestine. Lorsqu’il est parvenu à faire adhérer des militants juifs au projet britannique, il a acheté des terres en Palestine en créant l’Agence juive dont les statuts sont la copie intégrale de la société de Rhodes en Afrique australe.
 En 1916-17, le Royaume-uni et les États-Unis se sont réconciliés en s’engageant ensemble à créer l’État d’Israël, c’est la Déclaration Balfour pour Londres et les 14 points de Wilson pour Washington.
Il est donc parfaitement absurde de prétendre que Herzl a inventé le sionisme, de dissocier le projet sioniste du colonialisme britannique, et de nier que l’État d’Israël est un outil du projet impérial commun de Londres et de Washington.
La position du Parti socialiste sur ce sujet n’est pas innocente. En 1936, il proposait avec Léon Blum de transférer les juifs allemands au Sud du Liban de manière à ce que ce territoire soit annexé par Israël lorsque celui-ci serait créé [14]. Cependant le projet fut rapidement écarté par le haut-commissaire français à Beyrouth, le comte Damien de Martel de Janville, parce qu’il violait à l’évidence le mandat de la Société des Nations. Aujourd’hui le lobby israélien, créé en 2003 au sein du Parti socialiste, alors que François Hollande était Premier secrétaire, s’appelle donc naturellement Cercle Léon-Blum.

Remarques conclusives


En 2008, le professeur Cass Sunstein, conseiller du président Barack Obama et époux de l’ambassadrice US aux Nations unies, avait rédigé une note similaire [15].
Il écrivait :
spip a écrit:


« Nous pouvons facilement imaginer une série de réponses possibles.
 1. Le gouvernement peut interdire les théories de la conspiration.
 2. Le gouvernement pourrait imposer une sorte de taxe, financière ou autre, sur ceux qui diffusent de telles théories.
 3. Le gouvernement pourrait s’engager dans un contre discours pour discréditer les théories du complot.
 4. Le gouvernement pourrait engager des parties privées crédibles à s’engager dans un contre-discours.
 5. Le gouvernement pourrait s’engager dans la communication informelle avec les parties tierces et les encourager
 ».

En définitive, le gouvernement des États-Unis avait décidé de financer des individus, à la fois chez lui et à l’étranger, pour perturber les forums des sites internet « conspirationnistes » et pour créer des groupes leur apportant la contradiction.

Ceci n’ayant pas suffi, la France est appelée à prendre des mesures autoritaires. Comme par le passé, les élites françaises, dont le Parti socialiste forme l’aile prétendument de gauche, se sont placées aux ordres de la principale puissance militaire de l’époque, en l’occurrence les États-Unis.

Pour la mise en œuvre de ce projet, il reste à définir quelle instance, nécessairement administrative, sera chargée de la censure et quels en seront les critères. Ne soyons pas naïfs, nous nous approchons d’une inévitable épreuve de force.

http://www.voltairenet.org/article186986.html

Documents joints
http://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/CONSPIRATIONNISME.pdf

  « Conspirationnisme : un état des lieux », par Rudy Reichstadt, Fondation Jean-Jaurès, Parti socialiste, 24 février 2015.
(PDF - 159.3 ko)
 

[1] « Discours de François Hollande au Mémorial de la Shoah », par François Hollande, Réseau Voltaire, 27 janvier 2015.
[2] « Conspirationnisme : un état des lieux », par Rudy Reichstadt, Observatoire des radicalités politiques, Fondation Jean-Jaurès, Parti socialiste, 24 février 2015.
[3] L’Effroyable Imposture suivi de Le Pentagate, par Thierry Meyssan, Nouvelle réédition, entièrement réactualisée et annotée, éditions Demi-Lune.
[4] Léon Bourgeois, sculpteur français (1851-1925). Théoricien du « solidarisme » (que les socialistes actuels confondent avec la Fraternité). Il fut président du Parti radical, président du Conseil des ministres, premier président de la Société des Nations et lauréat du prix Nobel de la paix en 1920. Avec l’aide du Tsar Nicolas II, il posa le principe des arbitrages entre États, dont la Cour internationale de Justice des Nations unies est l’aboutissement actuel.
[5] Georges Clemenceau (1841-1929). Il défendit les Communards face à la droite et combattit la gauche socialiste de Jules Ferry aussi bien contre son projet de colonisation que contre sa vision de la laïcité. Alors que, durant la Grande Guerre, le pays semblait vaincu, il devint président du Conseil et le conduisit jusqu’à la victoire.
[6] Alain, philosophe français (1868-1951), co-fondateur du Comité de vigilance des intellectuels antifascistes (CVIA). Il milita pour une république protectrice de la liberté, strictement contrôlée par le peuple.
[7] Jean Moulin, haut fonctionnaire (1899-1943). Il prit le parti des Républicains espagnols et organisa illégalement, malgré le gouvernement socialiste neutre, un trafic d’armes pour résister aux Franquistes. Durant l’Occupation de la France, il dirigea le Conseil national de la Résistance, y incluant toutes les sensibilités politiques à l’exception de celle qui s’était battue aux côtés des Franquistes. Arrêté par les nazis, il mourut sous la torture.
[8] « La France selon François Hollande », par Thierry Meyssan, Réseau Voltaire, 30 juillet 2012.
[9] La République veille à ce que le Pouvoir serve l’Intérêt général. La Démocratie exige que le Pouvoir soit exercé par tous les citoyens.
[10] « Analyse des réflexions de Monsieur Beitone sur la prétendue rumeur d’extrême droite à propos de la loi de 1973 », par Étienne Chouard, 30 décembre 2011.
[11] Émission Mediapolis sur la radio Europe 1, le 22 décembre 2012, l’ancien Premier ministre socialiste Michel Rocard était l’invité de Michel Field et d’Olivier Duhamel.
[12] De nombreux responsables politiques se sont vainement opposés à cette loi, dont l’ancien président Jacques Chirac, et les anciens Premiers ministres Dominique de Villepin et François Fillon.
[13] « Qui est l’ennemi ? », par Thierry Meyssan, Réseau Voltaire, 4 août 2014.
[14] My Enemy’s Enemy : Lebanon in the Early Zionist Imagination, 1900-1948, par Laura Zittrain Eisenberg, Wayne State University Press (1994). Thèse de doctorat vérifiée par Itamar Rabinovitch côté israélien et Kamal Salibi côté libanais.
[15] « Conspiracy Theories », Cass R. Sunstein & Adrian Vermeule, Harvard Law School, January 15, 2008.

http://www.alterinfo.net/Ce-que-cache-le-discours-contre-les-conspirationni…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 7 Avr - 04:28 (2015)    Sujet du message: FRANCE : LES ECOLOGISTES PROPOSENT DE RENDRE LE VOTE OBLIGATOIRE Répondre en citant



FRANCE : LES ECOLOGISTES PROPOSENT DE RENDRE LE VOTE OBLIGATOIRE

Cela viendra, soyez-en certain, car d'autres pays le font déjà.


LE SCAN POLITIQUE - François de Rugy, le coprésident du groupe écologiste à l'Assemblée nationale veut qu'un citoyen qui n'irait pas voter soit sanctionné par une «petite amende».

«J'en ai un peu assez qu'à chaque élection on se lamente, qu'on se mette à pleurer sur l'abstention et qu'on ne fasse rien.» Invité mardi de Sud Radio, François de Rugy, le coprésident du groupe écologiste à l'Assemblée nationale a partagé son agacement face à la faible participation qui pourrait caractériser les prochaines élections départementales.

Alors le parlementaire de Loire-Atlantique a décidé de prendre les devants avec les autres parlementaires de son groupe. «Je vais déposer une proposition de loi à l'Assemblée nationale cette semaine pour le vote obligatoire», a-t-il annoncé.

François de Rugy juge que «si on veut que les élections aient du sens, que les élus aient davantage de légitimité, il faut prendre des mesures, le vote obligatoire en fait partie». «Voilà la réponse par rapport au phénomène de l'abstention. Sinon il faut arrêter de se lamenter sur l'abstention et dire que finalement, l'abstention, c'est quasiment un vote comme un autre», indique-t-il encore.

L'écologiste insiste: «La République ce sont des droits et des devoirs. On a beaucoup parlé de la République au mois de janvier avec les attentats, ensuite il faut être concret sur les valeurs de la République».

Aux électeurs qui ne seraient pas satisfaits par les différents candidats, François de Rugy rappelle le vote, «l'année dernière d'une loi qui reconnaît le vote blanc». «Donc évidemment si l'on n'est pas content par l'offre politique des partis et des candidats qui se présentent et bien on a la possibilité de voter blanc. Et ce vote est décompté de façon précise».

Amende de 35 ou 22 euros

Comment serait sanctionné un citoyen qui ne vote pas? Le contrevenant «s'exposerait à une petite amende, comme quand on se gare mal, qu'on commet des infractions mineures, une amende de 35 euros qui peut être minorée à 22 euros», répond l'écologiste qui assure qu'il «y a des députés de tous bords qui sont favorables au vote obligatoire».

Dimanche, sans aller jusqu'à prôner le vote obligatoire, le premier ministre a sommé les Français à se rendre aux urnes. «Je ne veux pas culpabiliser mes compatriotes et mes concitoyens. Il y a des hommes et des femmes qui meurent dans le monde pour arracher la démocratie, la liberté, le droit de vote. Il y a des hommes et des femmes qui ont été tués à Paris en janvier, qui ont été tués à Copenhague quelques semaines après parce qu'ils se battaient pour la liberté d'expression, pour la démocratie», a rappelé Manuel Valls lors du Grand Rendez-vous Europe1-I-Télé-Le Monde.

Ajoutant: «Quand on a la chance d'avoir ce droit, celui de voter, c'est un devoir pour les Français de voter pour les élections départementales».
Selon les premières estimations, l'abstention pourrait atteindre les 60%.

http://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/le-scan/2015/03/11/25001-20150311ARTFIG001…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 8 Avr - 06:10 (2015)    Sujet du message: ÉTATS-UNIS : UN POLICIER TUE UN HOMME NOIR DE HUIT BALLES DANS LE DOS Répondre en citant



ÉTATS-UNIS : UN POLICIER TUE UN HOMME NOIR DE HUIT BALLES DANS LE DOS


SOUTH CAROLINA OFFICER IS CHARGED WITH MURDER IN BLACK MAN'S DEATH

+ VIDEO : http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/08/us/south-carolina-officer-is-charged-with…

-----

Un officier de police a été arrêté et inculpé pour meurtre, mardi, en Caroline du Sud, après la diffusion d'une vidéo le montrant abattre un homme, apparemment non armé, qui prenait la fuite.

Selon le Washington Post et plusieurs médias américains, un officier de police de North Charleston, en Caroline du Sud, a été arrêté et inculpé mardi après-midi pour le meurtre de Walter Scott, un homme noir d'une cinquantaine d'années, qu'il aurait tué de huit balles tirées dans le dos.

L'annonce a fait l'objet d'une conférence de presse conjointe du maire et du chef de la police de la ville. Ce dernier, Eddie Driggers, a conclu par ces mots graves: «C'est un jour tragique pour nombre d'entre nous. Un jour tragique.»

Plusieurs médias américains diffusaient mardi des images extraites d'une séquence vidéo de la scène. Celle-ci se déroule dans un jardin public. On y voit un officier blanc, identifié comme étant Michael Thomas Slager, immobile, mettre en joue et ajuster son tir, alors que Walter Scott, en jogging noir et T-shirt vert, s'éloigne de lui en courant. Huit coups de feu retentissent distinctement. Wlater Scott s'effondre.
«Il va être inculpé pour assassinat»
«Je peux vous dire qu'à la vue de cette vidéo et de la mauvaise décision prise par notre officier, il va être inculpé pour assassinat», a commenté le maire R. Keith Summey au cours de la conférence de presse.

L'incident serait survenu à l'issue d'un banal contrôle routier. Le policier s'est défendu en disant avoir craint pour sa vie, car la victime, selon ses dires, lui aurait dérobé son pistolet Taser après une bagarre. Mais selon le New York Times, le film des événements laisserait entrevoir un scénario différent.

Selon le journal new-yorkais, on y verrait Walter Scott s'enfuir en courant, alors que des câbles électriques qui pendent laisse deviner qu'il a déjà été l'objet d'un tir de Taser. Alors qu'il s'éloigne, le policier le met en joue et fait feu.

Ce nouvel épisode survient après une série d'incidents à caractère raciste, à Ferguson, dans le Missouri, mais aussi à New York, qui ont jeté une lumière crue sur les agissements de la police et provoqué la colère de la minorité noire.

http://www.lefigaro.fr/international/2015/04/08/01003-20150408ARTFIG00004-e…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 8 Avr - 07:16 (2015)    Sujet du message: PayPal HAS NOT MOVED TO RESTRICT HATE GROUPS FROM USING THE SERVICE Répondre en citant





PayPal HAS NOT MOVED TO RESTRICT HATE GROUPS FROM USING THE SERVICE

All these organizations are control by the US government and be use to be the control opposition and the criminalization of thousands of peoples who are associate to these movement : considered by the peoples to be the good guys. They are the eyes and the ears of the US government and now they're ready to end their freedom of speech, their freedom to analyze situations, etc. SPLC play the bad guy and he's use to discredit all these movements to be able to criminalize these "dangerous terrorists". Take a look to each organization. I give you the prove that they ALL under the government control. They are you enemy and they're the one who will convice you to stand and to fight to restore the republic. No one is telling you that the US is control by the Crown of the London City Bank/the Pope of Rome and by the laws of the Queen of England. We are all slave of this global Empire for long long time, but no one of them is telling the truth. They want this satanic civil war and it's now at the door, not only in USA but in all countries. 

SPLC is also a 501 c3,

The Southern Poverty Law Center is a tax-exempt, charitable organization incorporated in 1971 under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. All contributions, grants and bequests are tax deductible. Our tax identification number is 63-0598743.
http://www.splcenter.org/who-we-are/financial-information

...

Section 501(c)(3) organizations are restricted in how much political and legislative (lobbying) activities they may conduct
. For a detailed discussion, see Political and Lobbying Activities. For more information about lobbying activities by charities, see the article Lobbying Issues; for more information about political activities of charities, see the FY-2002 CPE topic Election Year Issues.
Read more : http://www.irs.gov/Charities-&-Non-Profits/Charitable-Organizations/Exe…

-----

By Keegan Hankes on April 1, 2015 - 3:13 pm, Posted in Extremist Financing

Two months after a representative for PayPal requested a list of radical right groups and individuals using its services to raise money from Hatewatch, the company has not moved to restrict the groups’ usage of the service to promote racism. That stands in great contrast to other web-based services such as Spotify and iTunes that have moved swiftly to drop hate content once notified.

PayPal’s own “acceptable use policy,” which governs the use of its services, prohibits “use [of] the PayPal service for activities that … relate to transactions involving items that promote hate, violence, [or] racial intolerance.”

Yet, as the Washington Post reported last month, repeated requests for PayPal to enforce its own guidelines have been met with obstinacy, if acknowledged at all. This effectively means that PayPal, the largest online payment system, has given a tacit blessing for white supremacists to use their services as an unofficial banking system.

That obstinacy has spawned a petition campaign on the care2care website demanding PayPal (and other companies) stop providing its services to hate groups. The petition now has more than 80,000 signatures.

PayPal has taken a proactive stance before, banning some of the worst white supremacist sites from using the company’s services to move money. PayPal has banned Stormfront, Vanguard News Network Forum, and, more recently, the Daily Stormer.

In the case of the Daily Stormer, the site’s owner, Andrew Anglin, published his correspondence with Severine Blanchet, a Workforce Management Analyst at PayPal, regarding his account being “permanently limited,” meaning he is “barred from future use of PayPal and its services and [is] not permitted to open new or additional PayPal accounts.”

Why PayPal bans some sites and not others is unclear. The sections of its acceptable use policy, cited in Anglin’s case when suspending his account, have been cited repeatedly by Hatewatch and others to urge the company to review a list of users that includes more than 60 hate groups. Hatewatch has provided a complete list of these groups to PayPal on two occasions.

Michael Wagner, a representative for the company, told Hatewatch, “[PayPal] has been working to make sure groups follow its acceptable use policy. I assure you that PayPal does not promote groups that make a call to action for violence or racial intolerance.”

Here is a run down of a few organizations using PayPal to raise money:

The Barnes Review
The Barnes Review, Willis Allison Carto, né le 17 juillet 1926 à Fort Wayne (Indiana), est un militant ... Inc., organisation de bienfaisance régie par le paragraphe 501(c)(3) du code ...
Google

The Barnes review, founded by longtime holocaust denier, Willis Carto, is a publishing house dedicated to anti-Semitism historical revisionism that has published stories such as, “Hitler: Neglected Nobel Peace Prize Winner?” The organization has also been a mouthpiece for wild conspiracy theories, including the idea that the federal government was complicit in the Oklahoma City bombing. Carto once stated, “Without a means of confronting the onrushing third world, white civilization is doomed. It can do nothing else but deteriorate to a third world level with all that implies. … It means Jewish political and cultural domination, including a political tyranny comparable to Stalinism.”

League of the South
...organisation de bienfaisance régie par le paragraphe 501(c)(3) du code fiscal des États-Unis.
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ligue_du_Sud_(États-Unis)

The League of the South is a neo-Confederate group that advocates for a second southern secession to form a “godly” nation run by white Christians. In recent years, the group has focused on street demonstrations against the “demographic displacement of white southerners.” The group’s president, disgraced former Stillman College professor Michael Hill has made statements such as, “If the scenario of the South (and the rest of America) being overrun by hordes of non-white immigrants does not appeal to you, then how is this disaster to be averted? By the people who oppose it rising up against their traitorous elite masters and their misanthropic rule. … What is really meant by the [anti-racist] advocates when they peg us as ‘racists’ is that we adhere to ethnocentrism, which is a natural affection for one’s own kind. This is both healthy and Biblical. I am not ashamed to say that I prefer my own kind and my own culture.”

National Alliance Reform and Restoration Group
As a 501c3 tax-exempt orga­ni­za­tion, ADL does not inter­vene in cam­paigns on behalf of or in oppo­si­tion to any can­di­date for office.
http://blog.adl.org/tags/national-alliance

The National Alliance Reform and Restoration Group is one of two feuding factions that make up the remnants of the neo-Nazi National Alliance (NA). The organization, led by Sanders Pierce, the brother of the NA founder, William Pierce, is embroiled in a legal battle with another group seeking to carry on the NA’s name. Both factions are seeking to continue the ideological message of the NA, which includes statements like, “After the sickness of ‘multiculturalism,’ which is destroying America, Britain, and every other Aryan nation in which it is being promoted, has been swept away, we must again have a racially clean area of the earth for the further development of our people. … We will not be deterred by the difficulty or temporary unpleasantness involved, because we realize that it is absolutely necessary for our racial survival.”

Pamela Geller
AmericanFreedomDefense@aol.com. We are a 501c3 organization.
 Or send us a check. AFDI, Attention Pamela Geller, 1040 1st
 Avenue, #121, NY NY
 10022.


Pamela Geller is one of the most recognizable and vocal anti-Muslim activists in the United States. Geller’s opposition to the proposed Islamic center in lower Manhattan elevated her profile dramatically. In 2012, Geller formed Stop the Islamization of Nations (SION), a new international organization, and has forged alliances with anti-Muslim activists in the United States and Europe. Geller routinely runs anti-Muslim ads in large metropolitan areas designed to build anti-Muslim sentiment. In 2013, Geller was barred from entering the United Kingdom after government officials deemed that her presence would “not be conducive to the public good.” In 2011 Geller stated, “Islam is not a race. This is an ideology. This is an extreme ideology, the most radical and extreme ideology on the face of the earth.”

Rense Radio Network
That site says "The Armed Forces Radio Network Mission with our Web site and Streaming Radio Station are dedicated to becoming the focal point with a huge volume of information. What ever the needs of any service
member, re; Army, Navy, Marine Corp, Air Force, Coast Guard, Police officer, Firefighter, National Guard, Veterans or volunteers may be, they should and will be able to find it right here on this web site and also hear promotional information on our radio station.
"The Armed Forces Radio Network is a 501 (c) (3) Not-For-Profit Corporation whose charter is to provide direct monetary support to victims of fires, hurricanes, tornadoes, and other natural disasters."

http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=5.80;wap2

Rense Radio Network is a far-right radio network owned by Jeff Rense that hosts programs from David Duke, Don Black, and other material covering the so-called “Zionist conspiracy.” During Stormfront Radio’s New Year’s Eve broadcast, hosted by Don Black, the Stormfront founder approvingly quoted Nazi Propaganda Chief Joseph Goebbels. Other popular topics of shows hosted by Rense, including Black’s, include inciting hatred against Jews, denying the Holocaust and general Nazi Ideology. The Rense Radio Network website contains numerous articles from a number of anti-Semites including John Friend and David Duke. Rense also regularly interviews anti-Semitic Holocaust deniers on his radio station including Ernst Zundel, a German who has spent time in prison for denying the Holocaust.

VDare
...White nationalist Peter Brimelow's VDARE Foundation is a registered 501(c)3, meaning that the government effectively subsidizes donations to that organization as well.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/05/19/1210147/-Donations-to-501-c-4-s-ar…

VDARE.com, founded by white nationalist Peter Brimelow, is one of the vilest anti-immigrant sites on the Internet. Brimelow regularly publishes articles from white nationalists, academic racists and anti-Semites. VDARE also serves as a repository for an archive of nativist columns by the white nationalist movement’s foremost intellectual, Sam Francis, the deceased immigrant-bashing editor of the newspaper of the white supremacist Council of Conservative Citizens. In 2006, anti-Semitic academic Kevin MacDonald wrote in a column for VDARE that, “Jewish activity collectively, throughout history, is best understood as an elaborate and highly successful group competitive strategy directed against neighboring peoples and host societies. The objective has been control of economic resources and political power. One example: overwhelming Jewish support for non-traditional immigration, which has the effect of weakening America’s historic white majority.”

http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2015/04/01/paypal-has-not-moved-to-restrict-h…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 9 Avr - 07:09 (2015)    Sujet du message: BOSTON MUSLIM LEADERS BAIL ON OBAMA'S "COUNTERING VIOLENT EXTREMIST" SUMMIT Répondre en citant



BOSTON MUSLIM LEADERS BAIL ON OBAMA'S  "COUNTERING VIOLENT EXTREMIST" SUMMIT

"Yusufi Vali made a surprise announcement. He told U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz that the ISBCC will be boycotting the Summit, denounced Obama’s Countering Violent Extremism program as an Islamophobic attempt by Obama to unfairly target all Muslims" = Lie, this summit will criminalize christians, jews and patriots. Using the false flag/hoax of the Boston marathon to push their evil agenda.






AS BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING TRIAL CONTINUES, BOSTON MUSLIM LEADERS UPEND OBAMA’S PLAN TO COUNTER VIOLENT EXTREMISM IN THE CITY

by Ilya Feoktistov and Charles Jacobs

Nine days after ISIS shocked the civilized world with a video of its beheading of American journalist James Foley, the Imam of the largest mosque on the East Coast, Suhaib Webb, directly challenged President Obama’s circumlocutions about jihad.

 


From his pulpit in Boston, Webb told his congregation:
Citation:




We have a number of very serious challenges as a community that makes us different really than any other religious entity in America. And that is, within our ranks we have people who openly say they want to kill Americans. They would like to see the destruction of America.  We have that in the Muslim community.  We don’t like to talk about it.  We don’t want to admit it.  We like to say that there are conspiracy theories but if we continue to ignore these problems, they’ll never be answered.






 


http://peaceandtolerance.org/index.php?option=com_acymailing&no_html=1&…
Much has been written about the White House Summit on Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) and the Obama administration’s unwillingness to address the religious motivations behind Islamist violence. The New York Times’ Thomas Friedman, who loyally supported Obama in both elections, asked for the summit to be canceled: “When you don’t call things by their real name,” he wrote, “you always get in trouble… It is no good for us or the Muslim world to pretend that this spreading Jihadist violence is not coming out of this faith community.” Now a prominent American Imam in Boston is dropping all such pretense. Had even one journalist been paying attention, Webb’s plain speaking might have made a good story as an embarrassing rebuke to the president, all the more embarrassing because Obama had chosen Boston as a model of success. Boston’s Islamic leaders were among those from three cities to take part in his politically correct, jihad-free Summit. The ISBCC, as the largest mosque in Boston, was an integral partner.

But in a jolt to the CVE Summit – again unreported by the many journalists who covered the event – the ISBCC’s Executive Director, Yusufi Vali, pulled his mosque out of the Summit, as he publicly rejected everything its Imam told the mosque’s worshippers that August afternoon.

Just days before three and a half years of relationship-building between Boston’s Muslim leaders and federal law enforcement were to result in a jointly-agreed-upon framework to be announced at the White House CVE Summit, Yusufi Vali made a surprise announcement. He told U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz that the ISBCC will be boycotting the Summit, denounced Obama’s Countering Violent Extremism program as an Islamophobic attempt by Obama to unfairly target all Muslims, and, in effect, largely scuttled the Boston part of Obama’s CVE initiative. This was reported by only one reporter from the Boston Globe, whose report was predictably slanted toward Vali’s position, and the story never gained traction.

Most of America does not know that the Islamic partner in one of the three cities touted as models of cooperation rejected the president’s path.

Vali wrote:
Citation:




I cannot sign on to this document due to the premise of “Countering Violent Extremism.” […] A far more appropriate premise to the framework acceptable to the Boston-Muslim community would have been “countering violence”. This term does not single out the American-Muslim community. […] It clearly appears that the CVE initiative is exclusively targeting the American-Muslim community. […] My team and I have never personally come across any individual in our congregation seriously considering any fanatical ideology.






Not a single reporter covering the Summit, or the related and concurrent Boston Marathon Bombing trial, informed the public of this stunning contradiction: One the one hand, the Imam of Obama’s favored Muslim institution in Boston publicly rebuked the President’s theory that the “violent extremists” who’ve been chopping off heads, blowing up marathon spectators, and putting hatchets in the heads of NYC police, had nothing to do with Islam. On the other hand, his boss, the man who runs the ISBCC mosque, thinks Obama’s circumlocutions did not go far enough and instead of protecting his community, the President was defaming it.

Obama and his top officials are unlikely to learn anything from this, as they continue to promote a fantasy where Islamic extremism doesn’t exist. Luckily, there are federal officials who are much more hard-nosed. Based on their record of tough terrorism prosecutions of Islamic Society of Boston worshippers Tarek Mehanna and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, we think Department of Justice prosecutors in Boston, including U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz, are among the realists. What lessons should they learn from being betrayed by their ostensible Islamic of Society of Boston partners in countering violent extremism? Here are some suggestions:
  1. Research the organizations with which you partner. The Islamic Society of Boston is an extremist organization, and the federal government is unlikely to get much assistance in fighting extremism from people who are themselves extremist. The ISB was founded by Abdulrahman Alamoudi, an Al Qaeda supporter who was sentenced to 23 years in prison for plotting with Muammar Qaddafi to assassinate former Saudi King Abdullah. The Muslim American Society, which runs the ISBCC, is considered by federal prosecutors to be an overt arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in America. Last November, the United Arab Emirates designated the Muslim American Society as a terrorist organization. According to Newsweek, Boston Marathon bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev became radicalized after he started attending the Islamic Society of Boston mosque in Cambridge. Yet top federal law enforcement officials seem to be ignorant of these facts. Testifying on Capitol Hill after the Boston Marathon bombing, former FBI Director Robert Mueller admittedto having no idea that ISB Cambridge, the bombers’ mosque, was founded by Alamoudi – a man his own agency had put in prison.


  1. Islamic extremists lie to hide their true nature. From Arafat to the Ayatollahs, there has always been a difference between what they say to Western audiences and what they say to their own supporters. Hence the 180 degree separation between the Imam of the ISBCC telling a Muslim audience that Muslims cannot ignore the problem of their coreligionists wanting to kill Americans, and the Executive Director of the ISBCC telling the federal government that to acknowledge the problem of Islamic extremism is a sign of Islamophobia. It’s why Yusufi Vali can insist, “My team and I have never personally come across any individual in our congregation seriously considering any fanatical ideology,” while Webb admits that, “in our own community … we looked into some of the people that were affected by this. There was a young brother that came to me and said, ‘I believe that Anwar Awlaki is like revelation from the heavens.’” (Anwar Awlaki was the Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula leader behind the Fort Hood massacre, the underwear bomb plot, and the Paris attacks early this year.) For the same reason, Yusufi Vali toldBoston’s NPR station that, “as soon as we learned that these two individuals [the Boston Marathon bombers] had attended the Cambridge mosque … we encouraged any community members who had potentially interacted with them to go to the FBI.” Yet in reality, the ISB sent out an email to its congregants telling them NOT to talk to the FBI without getting lawyered up first because, “we don’t want to put ourselves at risk.”
  1. Officials seeking to partner with Muslim organizations need to become aware of the important disagreements and distinctions among American Muslims. Suhaib Webb, despite his candid talk about violent Islamic extremism, is himself far from a moderate. He says animosity toward Jews is understandable. He believes that eye contact between the sexes is a sin. He thinks gays are cursed. He has calledsecularism a “radical, lunatic ideology.” He accuses the Obama administration of being too pro-Israel. Two days before 9/11, he was raising cash for an Islamic extremist cop-killer together with Anwar Awlaki. Yet there is a vast gulf between his willingness to address Islamic extremism and Yusufi Vali’s mendacious attacks on the CVE program.
  1. There is one more story here that the press has missed. Only two months after Webb warned ISBCC members about their fellow Muslims who want to kill Americans, the wildly popular Imam suddenly announced his resignation and left Boston. Perhaps that is not a coincidence. Unfortunately, it seems that the more actively concerned a Muslim leader is about Islamic extremism, the more he is delegitimized in the Muslim community and the less authentic he’s considered by the Obama administration. Moderate Muslim leaders who oppose the Muslim Brotherhood, such as Zuhdi Jasser of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy, were snubbed and excluded from the White House Countering Violent Extremism Summit, even though leaders like Jasser have been the most active in actually fighting violent extremism. The same seems true geopolitically. The Obama State Department actively supported the Muslim Brotherhood government in Egypt while opposing the overthrow of that extremist government by General Abdel Fatah el-Sisi – who has recently called on Islamic nations to reform themselves and stop antagonizing the rest of the world.
Lastly: a note to the good men and women in law enforcement: You need to realize the benefit of just speaking the truth. You work day and night, sometimes risking your lives, while twisting yourselves into logical and rhetorical pretzels to avoid being called Islamophobes. But even if you use the most emasculated and impracticable strategy in dealing with the threat of Islamic extremism, Islamic extremists like Yusufi Vali will call you Islamophobes anyway. You will never counter Islamic extremism by partnering with Islamic extremists – no matter how much you try to appease them. You did not stop the KKK’s reign of terror in the South by partnering with KKK leaders and kowtowing to their sensitivities. You defeated the KKK through an uncompromising challenge to its ideology and to its activities. Now’s the time to revisit that successful strategy.


http://peaceandtolerance.org/index.php?option=com_acymailing&ctrl=archi…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 10 Avr - 02:10 (2015)    Sujet du message: INVASION: HERE ARE THE 190 US CITIES OBAMA SELECTED TO DUMP MUSLIM "REFUGEES" [FULL LIST] Répondre en citant

IMMIGRATION

INVASION: HERE ARE THE 190 US CITIES OBAMA SELECTED TO DUMP MUSLIM "REFUGEES"  [FULL LIST]



President Barack Obama has allowed an influx of 100,000 Muslim immigrants a year into the United States. However, these immigrants are not being properly screened or vetted to protect national security.

The State Department has released a list of 190 cities in the U.S. that these immigrants can go to. The full list can be seen below.

Some of these communities are frustrated to discover the lack of information available about their new neighbors’ backgrounds.

Through the current immigration system Obama allowed for these Syrian refugees, there is no method of screening individuals for ties to terrorist groups.

We could literally be inviting 100,000 Islamic terrorists into our country each year.

According to the Refugee Resettlement Watch blog, World Relief has also announced it would be opening an office in Spartanburg, S.C. When World Relief arrives in a community, refugees are soon to follow.


The author of the blog, Ann Corcoran, has expressed the frustration of her network of grassroots activitsts’ inability to obtain information about the refugees.


“It is like pulling teeth to get any information,” Corcoran told WND. “And these are long-term grassroots activists who know how to get information.”

Even the chairman of the House Subcommittee on immigration and refugees, Trey Gowdy, cannot get any information on these immigrants.

“He is chair of this committee, and so they want to set up a refugee office in his home district, and we still can’t get any information,” Corcoran said.

Department of State Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration Office of Admissions - Refugee Processing Center


Affiliate Directory

List : http://www.wrapsnet.org/Portals/1/Affiliate Directory Posting/FY 2014 Affil…

http://conservativetribune.com/190-us-cities-muslim-refugees/
http://www.wrapsnet.org/Portals/1/Affiliate%20Directory%20Posting/FY%202014…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 10 Avr - 02:19 (2015)    Sujet du message: GREEK COAST GUARD WARNING, WE ARE UNDER INVASION FROM MORE THAN 500,000 ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS! Répondre en citant

IMMIGRATION

GREEK COAST GUARD WARNING, WE ARE UNDER INVASION FROM MORE THAN 500,000 ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS!


Posted by xaameriki on April 2, 2015
Posted in: Uncategorizedhttps://xaameriki.wordpress.com/2015/04/02/greek-coast-guard-warning-we-are…



What Golden Dawn repeatedly says about this issue of illegal immigration in Greece–which of course the media pimps characterize as excessive and most certainly “racist”–are fully confirmed by the officers of the Greek coast guard who experience every day the de facto invasion of illegal immigrants from our sea borders.

More specifically, the Staff Association of the Coast Guard of Lesvos, Lemnos and Agios (St.) Efstratios, sent a letter to the political and civilian leadership of the Greek Parliament which raises essentially the major issue which the pseuto-huanitarian, domestic status quo in Greece is attempting to conceal “under the carpet” so to speak.


The letter of the port officials leaves no room for the slightest doubt about the real situation in the Aegean which is being deliberately concealed and controlled by the establishment media in Greece:

“After another weekend where we port officials serve on the island of Lesbos, and having outdone ourselves in having a clearer image of most of the numbers which show us what is really happening and are unambiguous, we present the following: In the month February 2015, in Lesvos, there were recorded 1,041 people whereas, in February 2014, there were recorded 250 people.  However, in March 2014 there were recorded 650, but from the beginning of this year, 2015, up until March 30, 2015, were already have recorded over 3000 “!

On the one hand, the letter of the Staff Union of the Coast Guard ends in dramatic fashion, but it’s indicative of the state things are in as they are methodically being rolled out:
At current rates, which in fact will increase, if last year we had about 70 000 people illegally enter into Greece, this year will exceed half a million with whatever that entails!”


Which means that Golden Dawn’s complaints to the previous as well as the current government about the heated issue of illegal immigration are in no way alarmist predictions, but rather a sober assessment of the situation.

However, on the substance of the matter, the political parties of the so-called “constitutional” coalition are forming a devastating prospect not only for the economy of our country, but for Greece itself and the Greek people.

https://xaameriki.wordpress.com/2015/04/02/greek-coast-guard-warning-we-are…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 10 Avr - 02:35 (2015)    Sujet du message: VANISHING CLUSTERS OF PEOPLE 'CHILLING NEW PATTERNS' FOUND IN MYSTERIOUS DISAPPEARANCES- COAST TO COAST INTERVIEW WITH DAVID PAULIDES Répondre en citant




VANISHING CLUSTERS OF PEOPLE 'CHILLING NEW PATTERNS' FOUND IN MYSTERIOUS DISAPPEARANCES- COAST TO COAST INTERVIEW WITH DAVID PAULIDES


April 9, 2015

By Susan Duclos - All News PipeLine



Former law enforcement officer David Paulides joined Coast to Coast with host George Knapp to discuss the topic of his multiple books, which is mysterious disappearances, which as we are informed, have increased over the last three years. Paulides has documented over 1400 cases that fit a certain criteria, which previously included clusters of vanishing people from National Parks and the refusal of authorities to investigate or help him in his investigations.

Children disappearing from right under their parents noses, later found in areas described as "inaccessible," with no explanation as to how those children ended up there. Clothing found. sometimes neatly folded. Bodies discovered in locations that had already been searched a dozen times, even one instance where the body suddenly appeared on the very trail that searchers used to access other locations to search.

In this interview Paulides describes newer cases within the US and in other countries and describes "chilling new patterns" discovered. 

Commonalities include but are not limited to; A number of those found alive being mentally handicapped therefore unable to detail what had happened or where they had been; Other interesting details include the strange recounts of children describing "creatures," considered by many to be just a child's imagination, yet many of the children described these creatures in exactly the same manner. 

Another very strange coincidence in many cases, is the inordinate amount of people, experienced hikers, sportsman, who were discovered in freezing temperatures but without shoes... specific cases are spoken about in this interview below.

Via Coast to Coast:

Over the course of the evening, Paulides shared a number of baffling disappearance cases that he has amassed via his research. One such story centered around a British man named Jonathan Myles Robinson who was vacationing in a small, isolated community in Switzerland which is only accessible by a railway system that shuts down at midnight. Paulides recounted how Robinson seemingly vanished at around 3 AM while walking to his hotel one night. Despite an exhaustive search of the area, the man's dead body was not discovered until five days later when searchers spied it at the bottom of a cliff in a nearby town. Eerily, cell phone records indicate that Robinson likely fell to his death shortly after 3 AM on the night he disappeared and, Paulides stressed, "there was no way" he could have traveled the distance to where his body was found.

The second video below is the original from the ANP article from August 2014 "People Vanishing In Clusters, Unexplained - What's Happening?"

Were these people "snatched" as described below and if so, by who or what? Is this some type of "harvest" as Knapp mentions, that has been going on since the 1700s?

Make sure you have time to listen to this fascinating interview because once started, it is almost impossible not to listen to it all.

The portion about chilling new details in introduced at approximately the 36:30 minute mark and continues indepth at the 45:18 minute mark.



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=251rNGbKS6w



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nCT5D6U8GYw







http://allnewspipeline.com/Chilling_new_Patterns_Vanishing.php


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 10 Avr - 02:39 (2015)    Sujet du message: TEXAS PREGNANT AIR FORCE VET BEATEN BY POLICE, ARRESTED, KIDS KIDNAPPED BY CPS FOR SHOVING WITH HUSBAND Répondre en citant

TEXAS PREGNANT AIR FORCE VET BEATEN BY POLICE, ARRESTED, KIDS KIDNAPPED BY CPS FOR SHOVING WITH HUSBAND

Posted by EU Times on Apr 9th, 2015




American Dream? More like the American Horror. A Texas PREGNANT woman who so happens to be a decorated US Air Force Veteran in Iraq has been beaten inside her own house, arrested, for 6 days in jail, had her kids basically kidnapped by the communist-like American Child Protection Services. And on top of that she was charged with “assaulting police officers” and basically not willingly allowing her child to be stolen away forever by the authorities. Why? Just because she had a shoving episode with her husband. One of the kids then told the teacher at school about his parents fighting, then the moronic teacher called in the CPS.

Stories like this were actually quite common back in the Soviet Union, yet Texas conservatives such as Alex Jones would have you believe America is the incarnation of the Third Reich when in fact modern America is clearly slowly sliding towards an incarnation of the bolshevik-communistic Soviet Union where children were rewarded for denouncing their parents to teachers, had them removed from their parents and had their parents either arrested and sent to Gulags or simply executed.

The United Kingdom, like most of the anglosphere countries is also following the same trend. However parents in the UK have started to move to Ireland where things are still more normal. Americans on the other hand, no matter what their authorities do to them, they almost never leave their country. They somehow falsely believe that America is the only country on the planet where they can live their lives.

Thanks to a surveillance system in her parents’ home, a video has been published online that appears to prove her allegations. An investigation is under way.

The Hunt County sheriff’s deputy has been identified as one of several officers who stood in the woman’s home in Quinlan on the evening of March 4. Two officers can be seen keeping Deanna Robinson in the corner of her kitchen, next to the counter, restraining her, as her 18-month-old toddler watched.

Next, the deputy can clearly be seen taking at least two quick punches at Robinson, who wouldn’t stop yelling. This was after she shouted, “I’m pregnant.” She was handcuffed during this, she told the attorney’s office on Monday, according to WFAA.

Robinson, 38, is a decorated Air Force veteran and recipient of the Airman’s Medal for the time she pulled her colleagues out of a burning plane in Iraq. She now lives in Quinlan, with another infant and three step children, aged six to nine. But her marriage had been undergoing a turbulent period lately, which culminated in a shoving match with her husband several days prior to the incident.

Apparently, one of the kids told a teacher at school, who then reported the couple to Child Protection Services. She was arrested on March 4 on charges of resisting arrest, assaulting a police officer and interference with child custody, and spent some six days in jail.

The court case was over her 18-month-old son, Landry. The rest of the children are now in protective custody, while the infant son, Levi, who was born less than a week after her release from custody, is with grandparents.

That evening, child services officials showed up at Robinson’s home, accompanied by sheriff’s deputies, to take Landry away.

“I’m 38 weeks pregnant, and with my stomach again repeatedly pressed into that counter, and with my 18-month old son watching his mother be assaulted, and him screaming in fear,” she says. “There’s nothing that warrants what they did to me.”

She remembers the officers telling her ‘We’re here to remove your son,’ and her replying, ‘Nobody is touching my kid without a court order or a warrant.’ The officers reportedly did not present any papers and, when she tried to shut the door on them, forced their way in.


Deanna Jo Robinson



Robinson says her stomach hit the kitchen counter repeatedly during the incident, causing heavy bruising.


Robinson received the Air Force’s highest honor, the Airman’s Medal, after helping drag several soldiers from a burning plane in Iraq.

She tells WFAA: “I’m positioning myself in front of my child as the officers are screaming, ‘There’s the kid, grab him!’” That’s when they proceeded to handcuff her as she was pressed up against the kitchen surface.

The police, however, had a different narrative to the story: that Robinson was reaching for a weapon. The evidence will be reviewed to establish the truth. The sheriff later told reporters he was not sure what went down, but that the unidentified deputy said Robinson had loosened his ammunition belt in the chaos.

In the video, Robinson can be seen struggling with the officers, something she only says she did because the pressure they were applying when pressing into her was hurting her unborn child.

She later told reporters the officers hit her five or six times. The video cuts off just before the deputy’s hand comes down on her a second time. Robinson also reported lingering pain for weeks, and her stomach appears to show bruising from the incident.

She’s thankful Levi is a healthy child. “It certainly could have turned out differently.” She says she misses her kids very much and that she’ll be pushing for the officer responsible for hitting her repeatedly to be fired.

Dozens of calls came to the sheriff’s department following the release of the video. Hundreds of concerned citizens also posted on the department’s Facebook page, voicing outrage, while the town of Quinlan also saw people go out on to the streets, encouraging others to view the video.

The sheriff department’s Facebook page showed a statement from Sheriff Randy Meeks, saying that all such cases are handled with the utmost seriousness and that an investigation is under way to determine “if any violations occurred.” He promised to make the findings public.

Robinson’s attorney Carol Gustin told reporters “There’s no reason in my mind that an officer should pull his hand up above his body and hit a pregnant woman multiple times. Law officers are there to protect and serve. Where was the protection for her and this baby?”

Her other attorney, Scott Cornuaud, believes Child Protective Services is to blame for involving the police at all. “They’re out of control. There’s no oversight. They went about it the wrong way.”

CPS was onsite when the incident with the police took place. Cornuaud wonders why they did not intervene when a pregnant woman was being hit.

The services offered no comment on this.

Source

http://www.eutimes.net/2015/04/texas-pregnant-air-force-vet-beaten-by-polic…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 10 Avr - 04:52 (2015)    Sujet du message: USING TECHNOLOGY AND DATA TO IMPROVE COMMUNITY POLICING : THE POLICE DATE INITIATIVE Répondre en citant



USING TECHNOLOGY AND DATA TO IMPROVE COMMUNITY POLICING : THE POLICE DATA INITIATIVE 

Megan Smith and Roy L. Austin, Jr.

April 09, 2015
03:17 PM EDT


President Barack Obama speaks to the press after a meeting with members of the President's Task Force on 21st Century Policing, in the Roosevelt Room of the White House, March 2, 2015. (Official White House Photo by Chuck Kennedy)

In December, President Obama announced the creation of a Task Force on 21st Century Policing to develop specific recommendations to improve law enforcement and community relations while ensuring public safety. The Task Force, representing a diverse array of law enforcement and civil rights experts along with community leaders, engaged numerous stakeholders and constituency groups across the country to identify meaningful opportunities to improve policing in America.

Last month, the Task Force submitted an interim report with more than 60 recommendations to the President. Among other items, these recommendations cover policy, oversight, technology, social media, community policing, crime reduction, training, education, and officer wellness and safety. The report and recommendations place significant emphasis on the potential of data and technology to improve policing outcomes and foster community trust.

Yesterday at the White House, as part of an ongoing effort to respond to these data/technology recommendations, over a dozen police chiefs, municipal Chief Technology Officers, and other leaders from 16 cities and counties across the nation collaborated with technologists, data scientists, law enforcement thought leaders, foundations, issue experts, Presidential Innovation Fellows, nonprofits, and Administration officials.

First, the group heard from police and municipal leaders about innovative solutions that they have already put into practice in their municipalities. These leaders shared existing approaches, insights and innovations that other communities could take back and start implementing immediately.

Starting with lightning presentations from four communities, the Police Chiefs of Camden County, NJ and Charlotte-Mecklenburg, NC shared their work on the foundational importance of creating strong internal accountability and community feedback systems. This included steps already taken and vision for the enormous opportunities which exist to analyze the rich data available on police/citizen encounters to improve police practices, community voice, and community trust. Both Dallas and Los Angeles leadership shared the power of opening up key data sets to the public, bringing transparency and context to the complexities of police work.

Next, the group collaborated to surface promising practices and existing efforts — identifying opportunities to build on and expand individual efforts to benefit a broader range of communities. At the working session, attendees shared experiences, identified new solutions, and explored opportunities to reduce inappropriate police conduct, better engage public input in real time, and enhance community trust. Many of these departments made new commitments to open up data that had previously been inaccessible to the public.

It is critically important that the recommendations of the President’s Task Force be put into practice without delay by police departments in communities across the country. We are pleased that groups like the International Association of Chiefs of Police, the Fraternal Order of Police, and the Leadership Conference for Civil and Human Rights have done a recommendation-by-recommendation review of the Task Force Report with their memberships and provided the White House with some of their thoughts about implementation.

Yesterday’s event left us encouraged because these forward-thinking police departments have stepped forward to take on these innovation challenges, have already been working collaboratively to turn the promising ideas in the report into results for their community, and are sharing those innovations with others as well as listening for more they can do. These departments are identifying how to use new tools to solve persistent problems. Yesterday’s conversation at the White House was just the beginning of an ongoing initiative — as it is just one of many lines of effort in support of the Task Force’s work.

We look forward to continuing to engage with yesterday’s participants and others as they take action, using data and technology to build trust, voice, solutions and improve community policing.

Roy L. Austin, Jr. is Deputy Assistant to the President for Urban Affairs, Justice and Opportunity in the Domestic Policy Council. Megan Smith is the United States Chief Technology Officer (CTO) in the Office of Science and Technology Policy.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2015/04/09/using-technology-and-data-improv…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 10 Avr - 05:56 (2015)    Sujet du message: AL SHARPTON CALLS FOR NATIONAL POLICE LAWS; HOW PREDICTABLE, LAUGHABLE, RIGHT ON CUE! Répondre en citant

AL SHARPTON CALLS FOR NATIONAL POLICE LAWS; HOW PREDICTABLE, LAUGHABLE, RIGHT ON CUE!

CIA agent



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-8YLAj4S3Y


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Ven 10 Avr - 06:07 (2015)    Sujet du message: CONSPIRACY THEORIST ARRESTED AFTER CALLING SANDY HOOK SHOOTING “FAKE” WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT SANDY HOOK NOW!! Répondre en citant



CONSPIRACY THEORIST ARRESTED AFTER CALLING SANDY HOOK SHOOTING  “FAKE” WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT SANDY HOOK  NOW!!




Man ordered to undergo mental health evaluation after calling Newtown schools

A conspiracy theorist was arrested and ordered to undergo a mental health evaluation after he called several schools in Newtown to claim that the 2012 Sandy Hook shootings were “fake”.

30-year-old Timothy Rogalski called the Sandy Hook Elementary School on Tuesday morning and left four messages on the school’s answering machine before speaking to an administrative assistant. Using his father’s name, Rogalski said he wanted to enroll a child in the school but wanted to make sure no more “fake” shootings would occur.

After calling two other schools in Newtown, police traced the number back to Rogalski and arrested him at his home.

While Rogalski’s behavior was idiotic and his remarks will undoubtedly be offensive to many, the claim that the phone calls were “threatening” in nature is up for debate.

=============WNEM TV 5 =============

Read more : http://www.tatoott1009.com/2015/04/07/police-officer-facing-murder-charge-f…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 11 Avr - 03:04 (2015)    Sujet du message: HOLOGRAMS FOR FREEDOM : THOUSANDS JOIN VIRTUAL DEMO AGAINST NEW PROTEST LAW IN SPAIN Répondre en citant

HOLOGRAMS FOR FREEDOM : THOUSANDS JOIN VIRTUAL DEMO AGAINST NEW PROTEST LAW IN SPAIN

Ajoutée le 10 avr. 2015

Protesters in Spain have come up with a novel way of taking on a new law that limits the rights of the public to take part in demonstrations. There was a large turnout, but nobody even came close to being arrested – because no one actually attended the protest. A number of holograms were projected outside Spanish parliament building, showing people across the globe, who are angry at the new so-called ‘safety’ law, which makes it illegal to protest outside government buildings, insult police officers or refuse to reveal identification documents.

RT LIVE http://rt.com/on-air



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCvIx7BSdhI


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Sam 11 Avr - 04:21 (2015)    Sujet du message: À QUOI DOIT-ON S'ATTENDRE SI LA LOI MARTIALE DEVAIT ÊTRE DECRETEE AUX ETATS-UNS (AU CANADA OU EN EUROPE) ? Répondre en citant



À QUOI DOIT-ON S'ATTENDRE SI LA LOI MARTIALE DEVAIT ÊTRE DECRETEE AUX ETATS-UNS (AU CANADA OU EN EUROPE) ?


Nous sommes vraiment sur le point de tomber dans ce nouveau monde. Moi et d'autres, nous vous avons averti depuis des années de leurs plans ténébreux, mais qui y a cru? Maintenant, il est là, juste devant nous ce nouveau monde d'âge d'or de ses satanistes. Toutes ses lois qui changent, toutes ses pratiques militaires qui ont lieu dans le monde, cette unité religieuse, sous le signe d'ISIS qui nous parle d'un monde meilleur, nous montre bien ce qu'ils sont à mettre en place. Les grands bouleversements terrestres, cosmiques et spirituels de septembre prochain devraient activer la mise en place finale de leur projet diabolique. La domination globale se fait chaque jour sentir un peu plus, et rien de ce qui nous est proposé ou plutôt imposé ne va vers un monde meilleur, au contraire. Repentez-vous donc pendant qu'il en est encore temps et revenez vers le seul et unique Dieu et Sauveur, qui nous avait fait connaître tous les plans du malin pour ses temps de la fin.

vendredi 10 avril 2015

La première chose qui va se produire c'est que la Constitution des États-Unis sera «suspendue». Il n'y aurait plus de liberté d'expression, plus de liberté de presse, plus de droit de protestation, de rassemblement, et tout individu pourra être arrêté à tout moment pour quelque raison que ce soit.

Pour la durée de «l'urgence», l'armée sera en contrôle et le Président américain aura tous les pouvoirs exécutifs. Il pourrait y avoir des troupes dans les rues, un couvre-feu pourrait être imposé et des points de contrôle avec des soldats armés seraient alors mis en place.

Écoutez le film "Couvre-feu" (français) ou "The Siege" (anglais) pour avoir un aperçu d'un tel scénario..



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k3zOu9Tihk

Une publicité allemande montre des révolutions civiles dans une ville américaine:



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEZBHCEqtso

Si "l'urgence" devait perdurer assez longtemps (insurrection, pandémie, attaques terroristes simultanées, attaque nucléaire, etc.), les autorités iront de maison en maison pour rechercher les "ennemis de l'État", pour confisquer des armes et des munitions. Les prétendus "dissidents" et "subversifs" seront appréhendés, arrêtés et emprisonnés dans des camps de détention.

Dans les années 50, pendant la guerre froide, le FBI avait prévu un scénario de loi martiale où les "subversifs" et "diplomates ennemis", soit toute personne soupçonnée d'être affiliée à une organisation communiste, devaient être emprisonnés, tel que prévu dans le "programme de détention d'urgence". Treize mille individus étaient ciblés selon le document du FBI: http://rt.com/usa/228063-fbi-planc-martial-law/

Un plan similaire existait au Canada, lors de la guerre froide et lors de la Crise d'octobre au Québec:
http://conscience-du-peuple.blogspot.com/2015/04/reportage-de-lemission-din…

Il m'apparaît évident que si la loi martiale était promulguée aux États-Unis, il sera impossible que seuls les soldats de l'armée américaine et les forces de l'ordre arrivent à maîtriser un état de chaos généralisé puisque la plupart des Américains possèdent individuellement plusieurs armes, parce que des milices armées et groupes patriotiques organisés s'activeront en masse et parce que l'extraction des dissidents, qui se compteront peut-être en millions d'individus, exigera des myriades de soldats et d'agents de l'ordre. Il est à peu près certain que les États-Unis ont déjà signé des ententes avec des armées étrangères pour intervenir en renfort, surtout qu'un nombre important de soldats américains refuseront de combattre leur propre peuple. Des soldats chinois et turcs, par exemple, ne n'offriront quant à eux aucune résistance puisqu'ils n'auront aucune affiliation morale avec les Américains.

Ordres exécutifs et loi martiale
http://conscience-du-peuple.blogspot.ca/2011/06/ordres-executifs-et-loi-mar…

Des codes militaires cachés sur les panneaux de signalisation (États-Unis)http://conscience-du-peuple.blogspot.com/2013/05/des-codes-militaires-caches-sur-les.html

Liste des camps de la FEMA et les ordres exécutifs qui ont été votés pour décréter la loi martiale en tout temps (anglais)
http://worldtruth.tv/list-of-fema-camps/

Government “Threat List” Names 8 MILLION Americans To Be Detained When Martial Law Imposed!
http://thelastgreatstand.com/lgs/2014/02/20/shocking-report-government-“thr…

Source trouver:
Conscience-du-peuple

Publié par Fabian Gehrig à 18:09:00
Envoyer par e-mailBlogThis!Partager sur TwitterPartager sur FacebookPartager sur Pinterest

Libellés : Autres info


"Jésus lui dit: Je suis le chemin, la vérité, et la vie. Nul ne vient au Père que par moi."
Jean 14:6


http://spread-the-truth777.blogspot.fr/2015/04/a-quoi-doit-on-sattendre-si-… 


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 12 Avr - 04:32 (2015)    Sujet du message: CONFLICTMAP.ORG Répondre en citant

CONFLICTMAP.ORG



clicking on a highlighted circle over a region brings up a list of articles of incidents and their date of occurrence. Its not as populated as much as it probably should be, but its another electronic tool in the toolbox for sifting gold.

http://www.conflictmap.org/#


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 12 Avr - 05:36 (2015)    Sujet du message: BOSTON MARATHON BOMBINGS’ GUILTY VERDICT EXPOSED AS A GROSS TRAVERSTY OF JUSTICE Répondre en citant

BOSTON MARATHON BOMBINGS’ GUILTY VERDICT EXPOSED AS A GROSS TRAVERSTY OF JUSTICE
 

By Joachim Hagopian
Global Research, April 11, 2015

Region: USA
Theme: Law and Justice



With the official government narrative of the 9/11 attack filled with a plethora of lies that have since been subsequently exposed, the next biggest “war on terror” event on US soil that the feds failed to stop was the April 2013 Boston Marathon bombings. And now the lone living suspect from that horrific crime that killed three people, left 17 limbless and injured 264 victims (though that number’s been accused of being purposely inflated) has now been found guilty of all 30 counts after the jury’s 11 hour deliberation earlier this week. As we mark the second anniversary of this tragic event and the second and final phase of the trial beginning on Monday that will decide the fate of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev – whether he’ll live out the rest of his life in prison or be put to death, a critical review of preceding events and developments surrounding his high profile, extremely significant case seems both timely and much needed.

Despite Dzhokhar Tsarnaev pleading not guilty to the 30 counts (17 carrying the death penalty) he was charged within a week after the April 15th bombings in 2013, his lead defense attorney Judy Clark several days ago conceded to the jury that her client was guilty in her closing argument. Apparently blaming the dead brother whose due process was denied became Dzhokhar’s only defense strategy. The defense team insisted that he was coerced and bullied by his older brother into committing alleged acts of terrorism. Considering no real solid proof other than photos placing Dzhokhar and older brother Tamerlan both wearing backpacks at the scene of the crime where the two bombs exploded was even presented at the trial, no justice for either the Tsarnaevs nor the many victims can possibly come from this guilty verdict.

If the purpose of the US judicial system in criminal trials is to ensure that all factual evidence surrounding an alleged crime or crimes be accurately and fairly presented so that the jurors can properly assess the best semblance of the truth as presented by both prosecution and defense in order for the jury to adjudicate and decide a defendant’s true guilt or innocence, this trial was a complete travesty of justice. And if a basic tenet of the justice system in the United States holds that a defendant is considered innocent until proven guilty, then again this verdict outcome is an obscene farce and a shameful joke exposing America’s justice system for its gross injustice. Just as the 9/11 commission failed to adequately address and answer dozens of questions that its official narrative failed to deliver, and years earlier the Warren Commission failed JFK and America, so does the prosecution’s case of evidence of Tsarnaev’s guilt fail to be convincing, much less provide definitive and unequivocal proof that the 21-year old Chechen American with his brother committed the Boston Marathon crimes.

And the prime reason why is that so much of the testimony and so called evidence was based on the FBI and local law enforcement’s dishonest versions of events that were based near exclusively on the government’s one star witness’s faulty, changeable, non-credible accounting of events. The identity of this sole witness who we don’t even know other than by his fake name “Danny,” claims that the deceased brother Tamerlan confessed that he and his younger brother were responsible for the Marathon bombings as well as the murder of the MIT campus policeman. Yet “Danny” never even testified as a witness at the trial. When the strength of the state’s evidence relies solely on one anonymous witness who’s never even sworn in to testify at the trial nor subjected to cross-examination on behalf of the accused, how can the trial verdict in any way be considered legitimate or fair? Virtually the entire guilt or innocence of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev rested on what this one alleged witness claimed, yet he kept changing his story on numerous occasions.

The other so called incriminating evidence used against Dzhokhar was a bogus, totally unbelievable written confession that he is purported to have written in the dark on the inside wall of the boat he was hiding out in. Dzhokhar was supposedly laying there nearly bleeding to death from the alleged gunshot exchange with police a few hours earlier. Yet on video footage the young man is seen emerging unassisted from the boat appearing bloodless and uninjured only to be admitted minutes later to the emergency hospital room in critical condition suffering from a deeply sliced neck wound that prevented him from speaking for weeks. How did that happen while in police custody? And that came after a swarm of police shot a slew of bullet holes into the boat while Tsarnaev supposedly lay there gravely injured.

Just as the French authorities made sure that no prisoners were allowed to be taken alive in the alleged Hebdo Paris crime spree in January, nor in Osama bin Laden’s alleged execution in Pakistan in 2011, nor in the JFK assassination, that barrage of gunfire into that boat by FBI and/or local police was also intended to kill the only suspect. That way the government’s complicity, criminal involvement and subsequent cover-up would have conveniently been eliminated – wiped clean of any messy complications in the form of a suspect trial and the truth inadvertently leaking out. So the US government proceeds with a pseudo-trial that kept the defendant silent and unable to ever present his side of the story. In effect, he may as well have been silenced by the bullets intended to kill him.

Another of the dozens of discrepancies in this case is over how and when older brother Tamerlan actually died. A series of photos of a naked and handcuffed Tamerlan were taken as the police placed him into custody and inside a patrol car. Both CNN and the Boston Globe reported that Tamerlan was alive in police custody. Yet the feds’ official line was that after the brothers robbed a 7-Eleven, Tamerlan was killed in the Watertown shootout with the police while Dzhokhar backed the car over him as he made his temporary getaway. It can only be one or the other. The photos don’t lie. Cops do.

For so many incredulous inconsistencies to actually be accepted as convincing “evidence” while so many discrepant facts directly contradict state evidence, and then the “no questions asked” defense and mainstream media throughout the trial passively swallowing it hook, line and sinker in its rush to convict Dzhokhar Tsarnaev (trial being over in less than a month with 95 witnesses) is utterly preposterous and again, a complete and total miscarriage of justice. For nearly two years all the potential defense witnesses were constantly harassed, deported, jailed, and even killed, thus, virtually silencing any chance of a fair defense for Dzhokhar.

But then the propaganda lies built into this case from the start were designed to convict the brothers as the patsy fall guys all along. Going back to the JFK assassination and Lee Harvey Oswald, every false flag operation has its unwitting stooges who are used by the feds as props to take the sole blame. From President Obama to the FBI to their propagandist presstitutes, they were all publicly weighing in their guilty verdicts no sooner than the release of the photos that within days of the bombings identified the two brothers as the only prime suspects, thus prejudicing the entire case, effectively swaying Americans into believing that the one suspect still alive was guilty long before his trial ever began. And we know based on both Obama and the FBI’s track records that they both are constantly lying through their teeth and obviously cannot be trusted.  The overwhelming majority of American citizens per last August’s CNN poll, an all-time high of 87%, of Americans simply do not trust their own government, knowing that they are constantly being lied to every day. And with so many blatant holes in the state’s case, anyone half aware and informed of what’s been allowed to go down in the Boston Marathon bombings case would be near 100% certain that the government is once again producing an over-the-top false narrative designed to hide its own criminality. But then the US federal government’s become a militarized dictatorship, part of an international crime cabal that uses state propaganda as effectively as the Nazis ever did.

All kinds of unexplained anomalies are rampant throughout this case. A number of paid mercenaries from Craft International, a paramilitary private security contractor out of Texas (not unlike notorious Blackwater/aka Xe/aka Academi) were also spotted in photos wearing those same black colored government-issued-like backpacks. The question of whether any of them laid their backpack and its contents on the ground never quite came up in the trial. Apparently these guys were part of a Homeland Security training exercise that just happened to be training at the exact same time and place as the so called terrorists on that Boston Marathon day. Think about those odds, kind of like America’s entire national air defense on 9/11 conveniently being absent, purposely diverted to training exercises in the Atlantic just so the 9/11 false flag could be executed as planned. In Boston the unmistakable heavy presence of the military and special ops personnel assembled en-masse instantly on the scene after the marathon explosions is yet another giveaway indicating that the feds had something if not everything to do with this tragedy.

Clearly it was a training exercise alright, Bostonians was used as a guinea pig litmus test for assessing how a large US urban population of over a million people would react to a first practice, simulation dry-run of martial law in America, conveniently prepping us for what’s to come. The 2012 National Defense Authorization Act upheld by the US Supreme Court a year ago now permits the US military to invade our homes without warrant, arrest us without charges, and imprison us indefinitely without trial, legal representation or due process. After the marathon bombings the feds’ stand down order issued over an expansive, densely populated metropolitan area to remain in their homes while a massive police state-army dressed and armed for war against its own people without warrants entered thousands of homes with automatic weapons drawn in the largest, monster-scale manhunt in US history searching for one teenager from a family with whom the feds were already very familiar.

Perhaps the most respected independent news team that’s been diligently investigating the Boston Marathon bombings the last two years – WhoWhatWhy – has asserted that older brother Tamerlan was most likely an FBI informant. Through court motions last year Dzhokhar’s defense team submitted evidence that the FBI had approached the older Tsarnaev brother in an effort to recruit him to spy on his fellow Boston Chechen and Muslim community. The US intel community has a verifiably long history both here and around the globe of seeking out troubled youth and young people like the Tsarnaevs as informants in its worldwide clandestine operations.

The FBI and CIA’s common misuse of paying informants to entrap others globally into joining plots of terrorism was well documented in researcher-author Trevor Aaronson’s book The Terror Factory: Inside the FBI’s Manufactured War on Terrorism. Between 9/11 and 2011 he confirmed that 508 defendants were recruited by informants paid up to $100,000 in multiple sting operations. In fact, in all but only three high profile cases were the FBI and their informants not involved. Again, this demonstrates that the US government’s calling card around the world reads “Terrorism-R-US,” just another M.O. for squandering hard earned taxpayer dollars to keep its invented “war on terror” very much ongoing and alive forever.

What seems most probable are efforts by the FBI to recruit Tamerlan to become a snitch in the neocons’ self-serving war on terror. Yet this piece of crucial evidence has been purposely withheld from all court proceedings and MSM’s dubious, half-ass coverage. 26-year old Tamerlin was a down on his luck, unemployed boxer whose dream of Olympic gold had been shattered, married to a nurse’s aide working 60 hours a week to make ends meet. YetWhoWhatWhy states that just two days prior to the bombings, Tamerlan could afford sending his mother in Russia $900 cash along with paying for the backpacks (or were they government issued?), ammunition and bomb-making materials. Yet this critical piece of information was also prohibited from further inquiry during the trial.

Of course the FBI predictably denied any Tsarnaev solicitation to become an informant. Prior to last month’s trial, the US Circuit Court judge presiding over the case explicitly ordered that the brother’s involvement with FBI not be allowed to enter his courtroom during the trial. It remains to be seen if Judge George A. O’Toole will permit the defense to present this critical information during the upcoming sentencing phase. Because the government has so much to hide and has failed to address so many discrepancies in the case for obvious high stakes reasons, it probably won’t be included, which of course only reinforces what many of us already know, that this trial is but a sham for police state propaganda and truth suppression.

Of all the receipts for typical everyday items purchased, the only receipts found in Tamerlan’s pockets were receipts for his self-incriminating bomb-making materials. That’s almost like finding the unblemished passport belonging to the lead 9/11 box-cutter a couple blocks from the towers’ ashes the day after, or the Hebdo gunman’s wallet with ID left carelessly on purpose in the cab so those terrorists could instantly be identified. This calling card pattern smacks of yet another inside job rendition with the same shabby, grubby fed fingerprints carelessly smudged all over it.

Another inconsistent weakness in the prosecution’s case was the sophistication required for making the “pressure-cooker” bombs used at the marathon. Supposedly Tamerlan learned off an al Qaeda internet website where the article’s authors mention the directions being beyond the scope of a novice. Throughout the trial, the prosecution team would go back and forth promoting the notion of the bombs’ complexity whenever it served their purpose. For example, as the reason used to justify the FBI interrogating Dzhokhar for two days straight without reading him his Miranda rights, the FBI suspected that others were also involved, partially based on the bombs seeming more than homemade-like. Yet whenever it would come up as a reason to mitigate seeking the death penalty, the notion of lone wolves would get drummed home every time.

The traces of bomb materials in Tamerlan’s apartment underwent the same flip floppy logic as a transparent prosecution ploy used to convict the younger brother. Three times the feds changed their tune on traces of the bomb material being found in the apartment and whether the brothers had outside help or not. These discrepancies consistently went unchallenged by the defense during the trial as if pre-scripted to let the shady government off the hook in its back and forth rendition of “truth,” protecting the feds’ cover-up lies of discrepancy in order to allow the US government to get away with its incriminating part.

The one thread of unfailing consistency throughout this entire two year story is the constant inconsistencies and the countless conspicuously avoided bottom line questions that smack of inside cover-up. Initially the Tsarnaevs were not the suspects. Apparently once the photos of the Tsarnaev brothers at the Boston Marathon were made public asking for help in identifying their names, overheard on a Boston police scanner and then scooped up immediately by social media network sources, the names Mike Mulugeta and Sunil Trapathi were erroneously identified as the suspects. The fact that the FBI knew who the two men in those photos were because they had previous dealings with them enough to place them on a no fly list, the FBI willfully lied to America pretending it needed the public’s assistance to identify them. And then the police put out false names of innocent people as suspects. Mike Mulugeta reportedly was shot dead though any actual accounts confirming his death are completely absent. However, East Indian American and Brown University student Sunil Trapathi who had been reported missing since mid-March was found floating face down in pond water in Providence, Rhode Island about a week after the Marathon explosions. What little information about his suspicious death was released through his family and the question of whether the death resulted from foul play is still largely unknown.

More bogus, planted propaganda against the brothers shortly after they were identified as the prime suspects was the FBI claim linking them to the triple murder case in Waltham, Massachusetts that took place on September 11th, 2011. Only during the trial did it come out that there existed absolutely no evidence that Tamerlan was involved. Yet the systematic damage of misinformation supporting the brothers’ guilt was already done, ensuring that in the court of public opinion the Tsarnaevs were guilty as charged right from the get-go.

Here the Tsarnaev brothers were supposedly on a no fly list acting as more evidence supporting prior contact with intelligence agencies, yet Tamerlan was permitted to fly to known terrorist hotbed Chechnya and neighboring Dagestan from January 21, 2012 to July 17, 2012. His family members insist he spent his entire time with family, among them a distant cousin who heads a non-violent organization critical of Western policies toward Islam. Yet his visit was used by prosecution as so called evidence that the older brother was “radicalized” there and came home an inspired terrorist seeking revenge on America.

New York Times article dated April 20, 2013 suggests that Tamerlan was first approached by the FBI in January 2011 after a return trip from Russia. Russian intelligence services that monitored phone calls in Chechnya warned the FBI in March 2011 that Tamerlan was becoming a potential threat. Thus two plus years well in advance of the bombings, the FBI was already cognizant of Tamerlan’s extremist leaning activities. Yet the FBI allowed him to travel yet again to Russia despite being on a no fly list and less than nine months after his return from that final trip abroad, the Boston Marathon bombings occurred. This damning piece of government evidence makes the feds minimally guilty of criminal gross negligence if not actually a criminal accomplice.

Yet another despicable chapter to this tragic saga is the FBI’s murder of Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s friend in Florida. Within weeks after the Boston bombings, an unarmed Ibragim Todashev was shot by an FBI agent previously reprimanded for excessive force as an Oakland police officer. Initially the FBI lied about the circumstances, falsely claiming Todashev wielded a knife. The victim’s family is suing the FBI for $30 million. Even after admitting the lie about the victim brandishing a weapon, the Justice Department (overseeing the FBI) and a Florida prosecutor cleared the murdering FBI agent of any wrongdoing. The official government’s response that in effect supports such egregious acts of violence toward innocent civilians strongly indicates that the victim knew too much and the crime syndicate’s answer for people aware of the feds’ evildoing is to systematically assassinate those who might incriminate the federal government. Neutralizing perceived threats is standard operating procedure.

As an aside, the Tsarnaev brothers’ uncle who went public shortly after the bombings blasting his nephews as “losers” was married for several years in the 1990’s to the daughter of well-known CIA career officer Graham Fuller. Fuller is the CIA architect for creating the Mujahedeen movement that fought the Soviets in Afghanistan in the 1980’s, the same outfit whose leader Osama bin Laden emerged as the so called 9/11  al Qaeda mastermind. Fuller was a committed advocate for using Islamic fundamentalists as US proxy war mercenaries. Another coincidence that the CIA VIP’s son-in-law and his nephews came from Chechnya, a hotspot for separatist Muslim terrorist activity?

Once again the United States government appears to be at least complicit in another state crime against its own citizens… and then applying a media blackout to any real investigative reporting that would ask the dozens of questions to get to the truth. Even the defendant’s legal representation abandoned Tsarnaev’s right to a fair trial, and by co-opting to act in accordance with the government’s “no questions asked” implicitly applied gag-rule, it too is complicit in this heinous crime for neither seeking the truth nor any real justice for either the defendants or the scores of victims. The US crime cabal and its fabricated “war on terror” is perpetuated globally, both on US soil and around the world as an ongoing crime against humanity. The truth behind 9/11 is in-our-face, and so is the truth behind these Boston bombings. The criminals in Washington must pay for their crimes.

Joachim Hagopian is a West Point graduate and former US Army officer. He has written a manuscript based on his unique military experience entitled “Don’t Let The Bastards Getcha Down.” It examines and focuses on US international relations, leadership and national security issues. After the military, Joachim earned a master’s degree in Clinical Psychology and worked as a licensed therapist in the mental health field for more than a quarter century. He now concentrates on his writing and has a blog site at http://empireexposed. blogspot. com/.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/boston-marathon-bombings-guilty-verdict-expose…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Dim 12 Avr - 05:44 (2015)    Sujet du message: CANADA - QUEBEC - MONTREAL : INTERVENTION POLICIERE A L'UNIVERSITE DU QUEBEC A MONTREAL : DERIVE A L’UQAM Répondre en citant

CANADA - QUEBEC - MONTREAL : INTERVENTION POLICIERE A L'UNIVERSITE DU QUEBEC A MONTREAL : DERIVE A L’UQAM



VIDEO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAp7dH86HSY

Par Claude Jacqueline Herdhuin
Mondialisation.ca, 11 avril 2015

Région : Canada
Thème: Droits humains et État policier
Analyses: LE QUÉBEC, Le «Printemps érable»



Le danger, ce ne sont pas les étudiants et les étudiantes, mais l’administration. Les responsables du chaos de ces derniers jours, ce ne sont pas les étudiants et les étudiantes, mais le recteur.

L’UQAM, université dite populaire, a été fondée en 1969 avec pour mandat l’accessibilité aux études. Elle est reconnue pour être un établissement universitaire de gauche. Les étudiants choisissent souvent cette université pour cette raison. Ils veulent bien sûr un enseignement de qualité, mais aussi une université qui représente et défend leurs idéaux : accès aux études pour toutes et tous, respects des droits et libertés, justice sociale… Contrairement à d’autres universités, l’UQAM n’est pas un lieu sacré, fermé et replié sur lui-même, un antre de savoir réservé à une élite. Elle a, avait, la tête et le cœur bien ancrés dans la réalité, dans les réalités de toutes et de tous, de la population en général. Elle était pour le dialogue et l’ouverture. Était.

Plus jamais de printemps érable. Plus jamais 2012. Telle est la position de notre gouvernement, malheureusement appuyée par le recteur.

La direction de l’UQAM a frappé fort, et ce, d’emblée, en décidant d’expulser neuf étudiants et étudiantes, le 20 mars dernier. La raison invoquée : « Ils auraient commis du vandalisme et des actes illégaux » lors d’activités de perturbation à l’université, remontant à 2013. En prenant cette décision, la direction voulait créer un climat de peur au sein de la population étudiante. En ciblant des militants et des militantes, elle voulait museler les associations étudiantes et décourager toute activité militante. Elle a sous-estimé l’intelligence et la volonté de ceux et celles sans qui l’UQAM n’existerait pas : les étudiants. La clientèle étudiante, comme on nous appelle.

Ces expulsions politiques ont déclenché une réaction immédiate, professeurs, chargés de cours et étudiants se sont unis pour demander à la direction de revenir sur sa décision. Expulsion d’un an pour six étudiants et expulsion définitive pour trois étudiantes et étudiants, dont Justine Bélanger, déléguée étudiante qui siégeait, à ce moment-là, au conseil d’administration et au comité exécutif. En refusant le dialogue, la direction a jeté de l’huile sur le feu. Position qu’elle maintient aujourd’hui et qui nous a amenés aux tristes événements de mercredi dernier. Après la répression politique, le recteur a opté pour la répression policière. L’administration de l’UQAM avait tout préparé et tout orchestré à l’avance : expulsions, dépôt d’une demande d’injonction pour la poursuite normale des activités dès le deuxième jour de la grève étudiante (de toute évidence, le document de quelque 120 pages était prêt depuis longtemps), messages aux professeurs disant qu’il n’est pas question de rouvrir les ententes d’évaluation et obligation pour ces derniers de donner leur cours, etc.

Traditionnellement, l’UQAM a toujours respecté le droit de grève des étudiants et des étudiantes. Les levées de cours se déroulaient dans le calme. Le droit de parole et d’expression était respecté. Était. Il me semble que le droit de grève des étudiants est légitime. Enfin, dans une démocratie. Car, malgré ce que veulent faire croire les médias, les associations étudiantes sont tout ce qu’il y a de plus démocratiques. Les associations étudiantes ne sont pas des nids de serpents, on ne s’y bat pas et le droit de parole y est respecté très rigoureusement. Bien sûr, ceux et celles qui ont voté contre la grève sont mécontents, mais c’est une décision démocratique adoptée suite aux résultats d’un vote. Je n’ai pas voté pour notre gouvernement actuel, mais je dois me plier à la décision des électeurs qui l’ont mis au pouvoir. Ceci dit, dans une démocratie, j’ai le droit de manifester mon désaccord avec les décisions de mon gouvernement et contre l’austérité qu’il m’impose.

Que s’est-il passé mercredi dernier?


Un groupe d’étudiants décide d’occuper l’UQAM en réaction à l’injonction interdisant, entre autres, les levées de cours. Les services de sécurité de l’UQAM interviennent pour empêcher les étudiants de lever les cours. Le recteur fait appel à la police sous prétexte que les agents de sécurité ne parviennent pas à maîtriser la situation. Il s’ensuit une intervention très musclée de la SPVM, comme en attestent des images tournées sur le campus (pas celles des médias officiels). Vingt-deux arrestations ont lieu et la police lève un cours pour libérer une classe afin d’y regrouper les étudiants et étudiantes qu’elle arrête. Alertée, Madame Michèle Nevert, présidente du SPUQ (Syndicat des professeurs et professeures de l’Université du Québec à Montréal) vient sur les lieux et, devant la violence des policiers, avec d’autres professeurs, fait une chaine humaine entre la police et les étudiants pour protéger ces derniers. Elle déclare ne jamais avoir vu autant de « tabassage » et demande au directeur de la sécurité de l’UQAM de venir pour faire sortir la police et mettre un terme à son intervention « musclée ».  Elle demande ensuite au recteur de venir parler aux étudiants présents. Ce qu’il ne fait pas. Seul le vice-recteur descend, vers seize heures. Il y a environ quatre cents étudiants, tout est calme. Avec une délégation de professeurs, de chargés de cours et d’étudiants, Michèle Nevert se rend au rectorat et demande à rencontrer Robert Proulx. On lui répond qu’il n’est pas là. Elle insiste et s’ensuit une longue discussion avec le vice-recteur à la Vie universitaire et le vice-recteur à la Vie académique. Devant l’insistance de la délégation, et comprenant qu’il ne peut pas continuer à se cacher, le recteur les rejoint. Pendant une heure, la délégation lui demande de faire quelque chose, de dire aux étudiants et aux étudiantes qu’il s’engage à ne plus faire intervenir la police sur le campus, d’annuler les expulsions des étudiants et de ne pas demander la prolongation de l’injonction qui vient à échéance lundi prochain. Robert Proulx refuse catégoriquement et refuse aussi la proposition des enseignants de créer un comité ad hoc de médiation. Suite à cette rencontre, la délégation retourne voir les étudiants, qui sont toujours très calmes. Michèle Nevert les informe qu’elle va aller à la police, avec des professeurs, des chargés de cours et des étudiants, pour voir ce qu’il en est des étudiants et des étudiants arrêtés. Tout est paisible au pavillon J.-A.-DeSève.

Saccage et violence étudiante en soirée?

Une centaine d’étudiants décident d’occuper le pavillon en réaction à ce qui s’est passé et afin de discuter des actions à prendre. À l’extérieur, une manifestation est organisée place Émilie-Gamelin pour protester et demander la libération des vingt-deux étudiantes et étudiants arrêtés. À l’intérieur du pavillon J.-A.-DeSève, l’ambiance est plutôt bon enfant. Des barricades sont érigées avec des meubles, mais la civilité est toujours de mise. Ce n’est qu’avec l’assaut de la SPVM, vers minuit, que la situation dégénère. (voir la vidéo) Intervention demandée, une fois de plus, par la direction. C’est à ce moment-là que tout dérape. C’était évitable. Une fois encore, Robert Proulx est le seul responsable. Il a refusé toute négociation, il a menti à plusieurs reprises, disant qu’il ne ferait jamais intervenir la police, qu’il représente une communauté, qu’il est pour le dialogue. Mais de toute évidence, le recteur n’accorde pas d’importance à une parole donnée. Jusqu’où va-t-il aller ? En bafouant ouvertement les droits de la communauté étudiante et enseignante, en se rangeant du côté du gouvernement et en optant pour la répression, il a perdu la confiance de ceux et celles qu’il dit représenter. C’est à ces personnes qu’il doit son poste. Les étudiants ne lui doivent rien. Ils mettent leur intelligence au service de l’UQAM, car sans étudiants cette institution n’aurait pas lieu d’exister.

Les étudiants ne sont pas des brutes, même si les médias adorent se gargariser d’images-chocs. Chers journalistes, quand vous passez en boucle des images avec pour seule légende « vitrines fracassées à l’UQAM », vous oubliez de préciser « fracassées par la police » comme le montrent clairement des vidéos. Manipulation, mensonge, violence, jusqu’où ira la direction de l’UQAM ?

Jeudi, je suis allée à l’UQAM, j’ai croisé René Delvaux, délégué étudiant au conseil d’administration et étudiant à la maîtrise en science politique. Il a claqué la porte du conseil d’administration en même temps que Justine Bélanger. Il m’a appris que Diane Demers, vice-rectrice aux Études et à la vie étudiante, a refusé de lui accorder une prolongation pour sa maîtrise. Il s’agit encore d’une forme d’intimidation et de répression, plus subtile certes, moins connue, mais violente : empêcher un étudiant de terminer sa maîtrise et d’obtenir son diplôme. Une maîtrise ou un doctorat c’est long. Un très grand nombre d’étudiants demandent une prolongation. Prolongation autorisée et prévue dans les règlements de l’UQAM, habituellement accordée. Jusqu’où la direction de l’UQAM poussera-t-elle l’odieux ? Briser, diviser et réprimer pour régner. Créer des exemples, semer la peur et servir la politique répressive du gouvernement. C’est ce qu’elle fait.

Austérité ? Coupure de 20 millions dans le budget de l’UQAM. Pourtant le recteur n’a pas hésité à investir 500 000 dollars pour augmenter la sécurité à l’UQAM et à choyer 85 cadres en leur accordant 350 000 dollars de bonis illégaux. Par contre, il coupe dans le personnel enseignant.

À suivre.

Diplômée de l’UQAM, ai-je envie de l’être à nouveau ? D’obtenir un doctorat de cette institution que je ne reconnais plus et dont j’ai honte.
Claude Jacqueline Herdhuin

http://www.mondialisation.ca/intervention-policiere-a-luniversite-du-quebec…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Lun 13 Avr - 02:44 (2015)    Sujet du message: UKRAINE “DISAPPEARS” OPPONENTS OF THE KIEV REGIME. ABDUCTIONS OF INDEPENDENT JOURNALISTS Répondre en citant



UKRAINE “DISAPPEARS” OPPONENTS OF THE KIEV REGIME. ABDUCTIONS OF INDEPENDENT JOURNALISTS 


By Eric Zuesse
Global Research, April 09, 2015

Region: Russia and FSU
Theme: Media Disinformation, Police State & Civil Rights
In-depth Report: UKRAINE REPORT



In Odessa — the same city where the Ukrainian civil war started on 2 May 2014 with a massacre of opponents that had been carefully planned by a team connected to the U.S. White House — there are reported to be two bloggers for the “Voice of Odessa” political site who were seized by the Security Bureau of Ukraine on April 7th, and whose “whereabouts are unknown.” This report appeared in the local Odessa News. 

The “Voice of Odessa” site was formed right after the massacre, in order to get an independent investigation and prosecution of the perpetrators of that massacre, in which officially 46 people were burned, shot and clubbed to death, but unofficial estimates run over 200, all victims who have not been heard from since, and some of whom had allegedly even been abducted from hospitals after the massacre.

This report’s translated headline reads “SBU Detained Activists at Kulikov Field.”  Kulikov Field is the square or plaza in front of the former Odessa Trade Unions Building, which is the building where the massacre-victims, who had been printing and distributing pamphlets opposing the newly installed government, were murdered, by Right Sector troops in plain clothes, and also by mercenaries in the private army of Ukrainian oligarch Ihor Kolomoysky, who had allegedly announced in advance that he would pay $5,000 per corpse. (There has been no reported follow-up, regarding whether he actually paid everyone who participated, or how he paid them.)

The report on these disappearances says that the names of the missing bloggers are Svetlana Naboka and Marina Zhavoronkova, and that both women were seized at around 10 in the morning of April 7th. Furthermore, “one of the detainees seized during the search is now lacking her home computer, telephone and other personal belongings,” which presumably, were also taken by the state security force.

Whereas none of the perpetrators of the massacre has been prosecuted, the regime is trying to eliminate its opponents. On the same day that the two bloggers were seized, there was a related headline, “SBU reported on the closure of a number of sites for anti-Ukrainian propaganda.” That news report carried the following statement, from the SBU:
Citation:


“The security service of Ukraine … has discontinued operation of a number of Internet sites that were used to perpetrate information campaigns of aggression on the part of the Russian Federation aimed at violent change or overthrow of the constitutional order and territorial integrity and inviolability of Ukraine.”


Presumably, the abduction, and perhaps elimination, of Svetlana Naboka and Marina Zhavoronkova, was part of that “discontinued operation” by the SBU against “aggression of the Russian Federation.”

The coup-established regime was not ‘the constitutional order’ in Ukraine. It overthrew the constitutionally elected President, and violated the Ukrainian constitution. However, “Big Brother” is based upon the Big Lie. So, it’s ‘the constitutional order.’ A good video shows the coup being carried out, but it actually started much earlier, in Spring of 2013. The same videographer also did a good video of the Odessa massacre.

Resistance to America’s Russia-hating Ukrainian regime is increasing, and it’s not only in Donbass — the region that has formally declared its separation from Ukraine, after Viktor Yanukovych, who had received 90+% of the vote there in the last democratic Ukrainian election, 2010, was overthrown by Obama. For example, barely more than three weeks ago, on March 12th, a column of Ukrainian tanks on trucks was blocked by overtly pro-Russian Ukrainians, who even showed the pre-communist (1710/1721-1858 &1883–1917/1918) flag of the then-single nation of Russia (from the time when Ukraine was part of Russia), which was until the Bolshevik Revolution. The video of this event, the courageous blocking of those trucks, was headlined “People stop military, sent by Kiev government, at Volnovaha.” The people who were blocking it are visible in the video carrying the three-striped — white, blue, and red —  flag of the Russian Empire. Russian Television on March 16th headlined about this, “Defensive blockade: Activists stop Kiev’s military trucks heading to Russian border,” and reported that, “Activists in eastern Ukraine in the Donetsk and Lugansk regions [but not in the part that’s in liberated Donbass] are blocking columns of heavy military equipment heading from Kiev to the border with Russia.”

Ukraine is massing tanks on the Russian border to either invade Russia (which Ukraine repeatedly has threatened to do) or else to defend against a Russian invasion (which Russia has not threatened to do). These truckers encountered such hostility that they backtracked and took an alternate route (presumably more northerly).

Officially in Ukraine, all opponents of the Obama regime there are ‘terrorists.’ (Thus, the government’s constant bombings of them are in an ‘Anti Terrorist Operation’ or ATO.) The Obama team told its people to use this terminology because gullible individuals anywhere will oppose anyone who is merely labeled a ‘terrorist’ — even when the actual terrorism is on the part of the U.S. Government and its installed regimes, such as is the case in Ukraine.

The United States has become George Orwell’s Oceania. He got all the basics right. He is already the modern Nostradamus. However, Big Brother, the U.S. aristocracy, isn’t publishing that fact. Now, why would that be the case? Publishing that fact would confirm that they’re collectively Big Brother.

That explains why the Brookings Institution is urging Obama to bomb Donbass longer and harder, and why over 98% of the U.S. Congress are urging him likewise, even though over two-thirds of the U.S. public who have any opinion on the matter, are against it. Obama, who did the coup, hasn’t pursued the extermination-program with the persistence that Big Brother demands. Big Brother demands more follow-through on his part. And, apparently, they’ll get it.

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity, and of Feudalism, Fascism, Libertarianism and Economics.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/ukraine-disappears-opponents-of-the-kiev-regim…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 678
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mar 14 Avr - 03:12 (2015)    Sujet du message: WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF MARTIAL LAW DECLARED IN AMERICA? hat Would Happen? Répondre en citant

WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF MARTIAL LAW DECLARED IN AMERICA?

By Michael Snyder, on April 1st, 2015



In recent weeks, there has been a lot of concern that an upcoming eight week military exercise on U.S. soil known as “Jade Helm” is actually a dress rehearsal for the imposition of martial law in this country.  One of the reasons for the high level of concern is that we have seen a dramatic increase in the number of “urban warfare exercises” conducted by the U.S. military in major U.S. cities over the past decade – including exercises where “dissidents” are hunted down, arrested and hauled away.  As our world becomes increasingly unstable, and as our society rapidly decays from within, many believe that it is only a matter of time before the executive branch will have sufficient excuse to use the extensive martial law powers that it has been accumulating since 9/11.  When that day arrives, what will our nation look like?  What would actually happen if martial law was declared in America?

Well, the first thing that you need to know is that the U.S. Constitution would be “suspended”.

In other words, you would suddenly have no rights at all.

There would be no freedom of speech, no freedom of the press, no freedom of assembly and you could be arrested at any time for any reason whatsoever.

For the duration of the “emergency”, the military would be in control.  There would be troops in the streets, a curfew would almost certainly be imposed, and armed checkpoints would be set up.

If the “emergency” lasted long enough, we would probably see authorities go house to house confiscating firearms, ammunition and food supplies.
And perhaps most troubling of all, “dissidents” and “subversives” would likely be rounded up and imprisoned.

Perhaps you don’t think that this could ever happen in the United States in 2015.

Well, we do know that this is precisely what the FBI had a plan to do in the 1950s.  The following is an excerpt from a recent RT article
Citation:


Documents show the FBI created a “Plan C” during the Cold War, which could have been triggered in the event the US underwent a nuclear attack. It included putting the nation under martial law, rounding up “subversives,” and interning enemy diplomats.

The documents, acquired by transparency journalism organization MuckRock, detail the FBI plan created in 1956, which was shared with several top officials from every governmental department. The FBI also distributed papers regarding the plan to its field offices. The plan would have gone into effect “after a war has begun in which the US is involved or may become involved and prior to an actual attack on the US itself,” according to the documents.

Under Plan C, martial law would be declared and the FBI would enact its ‘Emergency Detention Program,’ which entailed apprehending individuals whose affiliations with subversive organizations “are so pronounced that their continued liberty in the event of a national emergency would present a serious threat to the internal security of the country.” The document shows that as of April 1956, almost 13,000 people “were scheduled for apprehension in an emergency.”


Very sobering.

And we do know that the federal government had a list of at least 8 million names of people that were considered to be “threats to national security” back in the 1980s.  This list was known as Main Core, and it is not known whether this list still exists today.

I have a feeling that it does, and that it is probably much larger than it was back then.

We also know that government documents produced during the Obama administration openly discuss rounding up “dissidents” and taking them to internment camps.  Just consider the following example from Infowars
Citation:


A leaked 2012 US Army Military Police training manual, entitled “Civil Disturbance Operations,” described how soldiers would be ordered to confiscate firearms and kill American “dissidents.” The manual also revealed that prisoners would be detained in temporary internment camps and “re-educated” to gain a new appreciation of “U.S. policies,” in accordance with U.S. Army FM 3-19.40 Internment/Resettlement Operations.



So who would those “dissidents” be exactly?

In “