LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum

LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1)
...

 FAQFAQ   RechercherRechercher   MembresMembres   GroupesGroupes   S’enregistrerS’enregistrer 
 ProfilProfil   Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés   ConnexionConnexion 

UNITED NATIONS, GLOBAL ARMY, POLICIA, MILICIA, GANG AND... (PARTIE 2) P.1
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 3118, 119, 120
 
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> LES CAMPS DE CONCENTRATION/CONCENTRATION CAMPS -> UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL ARMY, POLICIA, MILICIA, GANG .... (PARTIE 2)
Sujet précédent :: Sujet suivant  
Auteur Message
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 30 Nov - 01:13 (2016)    Sujet du message: NATO LAUNCHES NAVAL DRILS WITH TURKEY IN AEGEAN ANTI-MINE FOCUS Répondre en citant

NATO LAUNCHES NAVAL DRILS WITH TURKEY IN AEGEAN ANTI-MINE FOCUS

 

© Flickr/ Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Europe 20:38 28.11.2016(updated 21:04 28.11.2016)

An annual multinational exercise organized by the Turkish Navy in the Aegean Sea has begun and will continue through December 4, the NATO military alliance announced in a press release on Monday.

WASHINGTON (Sputnik) — German, Turkish and Greek ships have been sent to join the exercises in a region that faces increased security challenges, the release added.

"NATO navies began a counter-mine warfare exercise in the Aegean Sea on 28 November 2016 , aimed at testing combat readiness and strengthening ties between allies and partners," the release stated.

"NATO’s participation in the NUSRET exercise demonstrates the allies’ strong commitment to Turkey’s security, and contributes to increased stability [/color]," NATO spokesperson Oana Lungescu noted in the release.

Last week, Turkish President Recep tayyip Erdogan stressed during the 62nd Parliamentary NATO sessions in Istanbul that Turkey has played an essential role in the alliance since the Cold War, providing political and military support for the organization

https://sputniknews.com/europe/201611281047938095-drills-nato-turkey/


Dernière édition par maria le Hier à 18:04 (2016); édité 1 fois
Revenir en haut
Publicité






MessagePosté le: Mer 30 Nov - 01:13 (2016)    Sujet du message: Publicité

PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?
Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 30 Nov - 01:18 (2016)    Sujet du message: LIBYE ET RUSSIE : «COMBATTRE L'ISLAMISME EN GENERAL», UNE IDEE COMMUNE Répondre en citant

LIBYE ET RUSSIE : «COMBATTRE L'ISLAMISME EN GENERAL», UNE IDEE COMMUNE

 

© REUTERS/ Zohra Bensemra International 22:07 29.11.2016

Les rencontres du commandant en chef de l’armée nationale libyenne, le maréchal Khalifa Haftar, avec les responsables russes font partie du renforcement des contacts russo-libyens nécessaires pour combattre le terrorisme et faire revenir la paix dans la région nord-africaine. Quel est le point de convergence dans ces contacts?

Le ministre russe des Affaires étrangères Sergueï Lavrov a récemment tenu une rencontre avec le commandant en chef de l'armée nationale libyenne, le maréchal Khalifa Haftar. Le militaire libyen a également participé à une réunion au ministère russe de la Défense. Pourquoi le maréchal se rapproche-t-il de la Russie ?

« La motivation russe, ça reste quand même d'abord, effectivement, la lutte contre Daech et je dirais d'une manière plus large, une sorte d'endiguement de l'influence islamiste. (…) Et il faut quand même le savoir, mais vous le savez sans doute : le maréchal Haftar se présente comme celui qui combat non seulement Daech, mais l'islamisme en général. Et c'est là où il y a la convergence », explique Moncef Djaziri, spécialiste de la Libye et maître d'enseignement et de recherche à l'Institut d'études politiques et internationales de l'Université de Lausanne, dans un entretien accordé à Sputnik.

https://fr.sputniknews.com/international/201611291028937434-libye-russie-co…


Dernière édition par maria le Hier à 18:06 (2016); édité 1 fois
Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 30 Nov - 02:34 (2016)    Sujet du message: LES POLICES CANTONALES S'EQUIPENT EN FUSILS D'ASSAUT Répondre en citant

LES POLICES CANTONALES S'EQUIPENT EN FUSILS D'ASSAUT

Les corps de police suisses s'équipent afin de mieux faire face à la menace terroriste, a révélé mardi soir une émission télévisée alémanique. Plusieurs polices cantonales ont commandé des fusils d'assaut.

La police cantonale bernoise fait partie des corps qui ont acheté des fusils d'assaut. Stefan Blättler, son commandant, qui préside la Conférence des commandants des polices cantonales (CCPCS), a confirmé ces mesures dans le magazine "10vor10" de la télévision publique alémanique SRF.

M. Blättler a ajouté que "plusieurs" autres corps se sont également armés, sans préciser lesquels. La police cantonale argovienne s'était déjà procuré 50 nouveaux fusils d'assaut en 2015 suite à la menace terroriste en Europe.

Opposition bien armée

Jusqu'ici, seules les unités spéciales disposaient d'un armement plus important que les agents généralistes. Selon "10vor10", ces derniers, dont les agents en patrouille, doivent aussi être en partie équipés de fusils d'assaut. Ils ne disposent actuellement que de pistolets ou de mitraillettes.

L'avantage des armes dites longues est, a poursuivi M. Blättler, "qu'elles peuvent être utilisées sur une plus grande distance". "L'opposition est très professionnellement armée", a-t-il ajouté. Avec des fusils d'assaut, on atteint "le même niveau".

Des agents de police ont été formés individuellement à l'utilisation spécifique du fusil d'assaut, a expliqué M. Blättler. Ces "armes ne sont toutefois disponibles que dans des situations extrêmes". Elles ne sont pas accessibles pour le quotidien.

(ats / 29.11.2016 23h21)

http://www.romandie.com/news/Les-polices-cantonales-sequipent-en-fusils-das…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 30 Nov - 08:06 (2016)    Sujet du message: MASON, CHARLES DE GAULLE STRIKE GROUP LEADER MEET IN EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN Répondre en citant

MASON, CHARLES DE GAULLE STRIKE GROUP LEADER MEET IN EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN

Story Number: NNS161129-14Release Date: 11/29/2016 1:07:00 PM
By Petty Officer 3rd Class Janweb Lagazo, USS Mason (DDG 87) Public Affairs

MEDITERRANEAN SEA (NNS) -- Leadership from guided-missile destroyer USS Mason (DDG 87) and French officials from the Charles de Gaulle Strike Group (CDGSG) met while operating together in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea, Nov. 25.

Cmdr. Christopher J. Gilbertson, Mason's commanding officer, of Minneapolis, met Rear Adm. Olivier Lebas, commander of the CDGSG, and other French officials to solidify strategies and tactics in support of Operation Inherent Resolve.

"It is a privilege and a wonderful opportunity to provide support to CDGSG and OIR," Gilbertson said. "We have worked with many of our multinational partners over the past six months, and the crew has performed admirably every time. We enjoyed a very successful joint operation with the destroyer FS Forbin (D620) earlier this deployment, and look forward to working with our friends and partners again."

Mason is deployed to support maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in the U.S. 6th Fleet area of operations. Mason replaced USS Ross (DDG 71), which provided multi-warfare defense support to CDGSG from September to October. The ship's operations are an example of the commitment the U.S. and its NATO allies have to maintaining a safe, secure, and prosperous Europe and Middle East .

CDGSG operations from the Mediterranean Sea work in tandem with OIR efforts in the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations by supporting the fight against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), while demonstrating a carrier strike group's ability to perform integrated multinational air strikes.

"The mission of the [CDGSG] is to reinforce and strengthen the French's involvement against [ISIL] in Iraq and Syria," Lebas said. "We are here to participate as a coalition, and while doing so, help build a strong picture of the freedom of maneuvering in this area."

Lebas went on to comment the freedom to maneuver is especially important for an aircraft carrier, as it allows for the "maximum amount" of safety for all ships in the area. He believes securing the maritime environment in this region of the Mediterranean Sea can promote "regional and global economic security ."

"No nation is able to fight [ISIL] alone," Lebas said. "It is a worldwide problem, and we need to be together."

French and U.S. naval forces continue to forge a global network of navies, along with other NATO allies, by collectively working together to share information, experiences, and resources in an effort to foster regional security.

"We coordinate with the actions of the Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group (Ike CSG) to optimize our scheduling to offer the best support for the coalition," Lebas remarked. "We use this time together to develop our relationship. It's good to have Mason to fuel this relationship for the two navies."

Lebas mentioned the CDGSG as an important factor in supporting Iraqi and Kurdish security forces involved in the battle for Mosul, in Northern Iraq, while engaging in a strong, concerted push towards Raqqa, the Islamic State's self-proclaimed capital in Syria.

"We can bring significant additional force to be able to conduct the battles in both theatres, mostly in Mosul, but also in Raqqa," said Lebas. "We have the sufficient amount of aircraft to support actions in both theatres."

Mason hopes to demonstrate the United States' commitment to the French by providing multi-mission capabilities in key warfare areas, especially missile defense and anti-submarine warfare. As one of the U.S. Navy's two "Bloodhound Award" winners for the best anti-submarine warfare ship for 2015, Mason is a proven expert.

"It's very important for me to have the opportunity to integrate Mason, because it is strong and full of capabilities," Lebas said. "That is also a sign of the strong relationship between the French and U.S. navies, because we have a common enemy and common objective in maintaining freedom of navigation in the Mediterranean Sea, Arabian Sea, Persian Gulf, Indian Ocean, and the Atlantic. We have relied on each other for many years. We have a strong and vital history together through the difficult and challenging times."

Along with Mason, Ike CSG includes CSG 10 staff, aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69), squadrons and staff of Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 3, Destroyer Squadron (DESRON) 26 staff, guided-missile cruisers USS San Jacinto (CG 56) and USS Monterey (CG 61), and DESRON 26 guided-missile destroyers USS Roosevelt (DDG 80) and USS Nitze (DDG 94).

For more information, visit www.navy.mil, www.facebook.com/usnavy, or www.twitter.com/usnavy.

For more news from Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Europe and Africa/U.S. 6th Fleet, visit http://www.navy.mil/local/naveur/.

http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=97861


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 30 Nov - 16:56 (2016)    Sujet du message: CHINA THREATENS NATO WITH MILITARY BUILDUP Répondre en citant

CHINA THREATENS NATO WITH MILITARY BUILDUP

...A peculiar demonstration of their ambitions became the building of a Chinese naval base in Djibouti. There is already an American one. This African state with favorable geographical position has become a centre of intersection of geopolitical interests. The China's motivation in Djibouti is not only in military-strategic gain. They aspire to protect their economic interests, in particular investments in the oil and gas extraction in this region, as well as to have an access to the Africa's natural resources, exchanging it for financial flows. Military base is an additional insurance.

Now China has become the great ocean-power and a leader in the APR, whither global economic powerhouses are shifting rapidly. "New Silk Road", coupled with the influence in the region and its expansion outward, the cooperation within the SCO, that will transform from the economic integration to collaboration on international security soon, increasing defense industry and nuclear capabilities – all of these makes China a serious threat for NATO, well-known hegemon of the world order.

http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/china-threatens-nato-military-buildup…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 30 Nov - 16:59 (2016)    Sujet du message: RUSSIA'S BASTION DEFENSE SYSTEMS ARRIVE TO CRIMEA Répondre en citant

RUSSIA'S BASTION DEFENSE SYSTEMS ARRIVE TO CRIMEA

© Sputnik/ Sergey Pivovarov Russia 10:39 30.11.2016(updated 12:43 30.11.2016)

A battalion of Russia's Bastion coastal defense system is arriving in Crimea to replace the systems that are protecting a naval task force in Syria, a source in the Crimean uniformed services told RIA Novosti on Wednesday.

SEVASTOPOL (Crimea) (Sputnik) — A typical Bastion battalion includes 10 vehicles and four launchers.

"A Bastion battalion is arriving on the peninsular today to replace a similar unit that departed to Syria in October. The Bastions will be located in two regions of the peninsula," the source said. The Bastion fires supersonic Oniks cruise missiles, with a range of up to 280 miles and could be used against ships and targets on the ground.

https://sputniknews.com/russia/201611301047994351-bastion-crimea-replacemen…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 30 Nov - 17:04 (2016)    Sujet du message: UK WORKED WITH FRANCE TO CONVENE UPCOMING UNSC MEETING ON ALEPPO - MAY Répondre en citant

UK WORKED WITH FRANCE TO CONVENE UPCOMING UNSC MEETING ON ALEPPO - MAY


© REUTERS/ Toby Melville Politics 17:55 30.11.2016(updated 17:57 30.11.2016)

The United Kingdom and France have been making joint efforts to call the upcoming emergency UN Security Council meeting on situation in Syrian Aleppo, UK Prime Minister Theresa May said Wednesday.

MOSCOW (Sputnik) — Later in the day, the UN Security Council will hold an emergency meeting on the humanitarian situation in the Syrian city of Aleppo, at France’s request.

"The United Kingdom has been working with France to bring forward an emergency discussion on this issue [Aleppo] at the UN Security Council that will take place later today. We want to see a cessation of hostiles, we want to see an opportunity for humanitarian aid to have access to Aleppo and we will be pressing for that at the Security Council," May said speaking at UK parliament.

he described situation in Syria as "appalling."

Earlier in the day, the Russian Defense Ministry’s spokesman Maj. Gen. Igor Konashenkov said that the United States, the United Kingdom, France and the United Nations have not yet offered humanitarian relief to 90,000 Aleppo citizens, liberated from militants two days ago.

https://sputniknews.com/politics/201611301048017665-uk-france-aleppo-unsc/


Dernière édition par maria le Hier à 18:13 (2016); édité 1 fois
Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Mer 30 Nov - 17:52 (2016)    Sujet du message: UNITED NATIONS, GLOBAL ARMY, POLICIA, MILICIA, GANG AND... (PARTIE 2) P.1 Répondre en citant

PROPAGANDE DE GUERRE

SYRIE : REUNION A PARIS LE 10 DECEMBRE DES PAYS QUI REFUSENT UNE LOGIQUE DE "GUERRE TOTALE"

Aujourd'hui
ACTUALITÉ

« Je réunirai le 10 décembre prochain à Paris les pays européens, arabes et les Etats-Unis, qui soutiennent une solution politique en Syrie et qui refusent cette logique de guerre totale », a déclaré le ministre des Affaires étrangères Jean-Marc Ayrault, ce mercredi, à la sortie du Conseil des ministres.

« Il est temps que la communauté internationale se réveille parce que sous nos yeux une tragédie est en train de se dérouler, a-t-il ajouté. Nous ne sommes pas les complices de Bachar Al-Assad, nous ne faisons pas preuve de complaisance à son égard », poursuit-il, visant, sans le nommer, François Fillon. Le candidat de la droite à la présidentielle estime qu’il faut dialoguer avec « tout le monde » en Syrie, y compris le dirigeant syrien et ses alliés russes.

Jean-Marc Ayrault a affirmé: « Peut-être que certains en France se laissent aller, pensent que M. Bachar al-Assad protège les minorités mais aujourd’hui, ce qu’il fait, c’est la destruction de toute une population civile ».

http://www.bvoltaire.fr/actu/syrie-reunion-a-paris-le-10-decembre-des-pays-…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 1 Déc - 04:58 (2016)    Sujet du message: NATO STAGES LARGEST EVER MILITARY DRILLS ON RUSSIAN BORDER AS GLOBAL TENSIONS ESCALATE Répondre en citant

NATO STAGES LARGEST EVER MILITARY DRILLS ON RUSSIAN BORDER AS GLOBAL TENSIONS ESCALATE

NATO troops have launched their largest ever urban warfare military drills in Lithuania amid threats of all out global conflict with Russia.

By Zoe Efstathiou
PUBLISHED: 00:13, Tue, Nov 29, 2016 | UPDATED: 01:50, Tue, Nov 29, 2016



The ‘Iron Sword 2016’ military drills, which are being held close to the Russian border, involve 4,000 troops from Britain, the US, Germany, Canada, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, Luxembourg and three baltic states .

They are intended to last until December 2 and will prepare Nato to station 4,000 alliance troops in Poland, Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia - a decision taken at the Warsaw summit in July.

According to the Lithuanian defence ministry, the tests will be carried out in the towns of Rukla and Pabrade, close to the Kaliningrad region - a Russian exclave located between Poland and Lithuania.

The military alliance’s decision to boost its global army presence follows Russia’s deployment of S-400 air defence systems and Iskander missile launchers to the Kaliningrad



The Iron Sword drills are being held in Lithuania

Nato slammed the move as “aggressive military posturing” and insisted Moscow has no reason to feel threatened by it.

State Department spokesman for the treaty, John Kirby, has insisted Nato’s role is about defence and the avoidance of conflict, rather than the fuelling of it.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/737617/nato-putin-lithuania-kalingrad-w…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Jeu 1 Déc - 05:14 (2016)    Sujet du message: INTERVENTION DANS LE NORD DE LA SYRIE : «ERDOGAN EST ENTRE EN JEU SELON LE PLAN AMERICAIN» Répondre en citant

INTERVENTION DANS LE NORD DE LA SYRIE : «ERDOGAN EST ENTRE EN JEU SELON LE PLAN AMERICAIN»

30 nov. 2016


© Umit Bektas Source: Reuters
Des chars turcs à la frontière syrienne (2014).

Un renversement de Bachar el-Assad est «au-delà des moyens» du président turc. Néanmoins, la situation «peut dégénérer en un problème fatal dans le plus proche avenir», affirme le spécialiste en relations internationales Jamal Wakeem.

Jamal Wakeem est professeur des Relations internationales à l’Université libanaise.

RT : Le président turc Recep Tayyip Erdogan a déclaré le 29 novembre que l'armée turque était entrée en Syrie pour mettre fin au mandat du président syrien Bachar el-Assad, qu'il a accusé de terrorisme et de la mort de milliers de Syriens. Pensez-vous que cette déclaration aura des conséquences importantes ou qu'il ne s'agit là que de paroles en l'air ?

Jamal Wakeem (J. W.) : Je crois que ce sont des paroles en l'air. C’est bien au-delà de ses moyens et Bachar el-Assad non seulement peut compter sur une armée forte qui a su tenir le combat pendant les six années écoulées, mais bénéficie aussi du soutien d'alliés puissants, tels que la Russie et l’Iran, sans oublier la Chine. Le but de cette rhétorique est d’obtenir du soutien et de prendre une revanche sur les récents évènements, quand les avions de combat syriens ont ciblé l’armée turque : des soldats des troupes turques ont été tués lors de ces raids aériens et elles n’ont pu se venger. C’est là la raison principale de son discours.

Cependant, il faut admettre que la véritable intention de Recep Tayyip Erdogan était avant tout de limiter les capacités du PKK et des combattants kurdes en Syrie à élargir leur zone de contrôle à l’Ouest de l’Euphrate, et de créer une zone tampon dans le Nord de la Syrie qui s’étendrait jusqu’au territoire irakien.

La Turquie avait fait part de cette intention en 2002, et je pense que c’est la véritable intention [des Turcs].

Après l'intervention turque dans le nord de la Syrie, Recep Tayyip Erdogan est entré en jeu selon le plan américain, en établissant une zone nord qui n’est pas contrôlée par l’armée syrienne

RT : Quel en est l’impact sur les relations entre la Turquie et la Russie ?

J. M. : Il y avait des tentatives, me semble-t-il, essentiellement de la part des Russes, de se rapprocher de la Turquie, en particulier concernant les changements en Iran et en Syrie qui ont nui à la sécurité nationale de la Turquie. Toutefois, Recep Tayyip Erdogan ne pouvait pas se détacher de ses obligations à l’égard de l’Occident et surtout à l’égard des Etats-Unis. Après son intervention dans le nord de la Syrie, il est entré en jeu selon le plan américain, en établissant une zone nord qui n’est pas contrôlée par l’armée syrienne. Les Américains, grâce à l’appui des Kurdes dans l’est de la Syrie, ont alors été capables d’empêcher, jusqu’à présent, l’armée syrienne de répandre leur contrôle sur cette région. En même temps, en jouant la carte turque dans une autre partie de la Syrie du nord, ils renforcent leur contrôle dans ce secteur par proxy, au moment même où les Etats-Unis essaient de prendre le contrôle sur l'ouest de l’Irak et l'est de la Syrie. C’est pourquoi, après l’amélioration relative des relations entre la Turquie et la Russie, nous voyons que les Russes sont mécontents des événements liés à la Turquie. Et l’attaque syrienne sur les troupes turques n'aurait pu être lancée, sans le soutien la Russie. Je crois donc qu’il faut observer les développements à venir, car tout cela pourrait dégénérer en quelque chose de dramatique dans le plus proche avenir.

https://francais.rt.com/opinions/29898-intervention-syrie-turquie-erdogan-j…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Hier à 06:32 (2016)    Sujet du message: UN SITE CANADIEN LÂCHE UNE BOMBE : 6 ETATS DONT LA FRANCE SOUTIENNENT DAECH EN ARMES EN PLUS D'ISRAËL Répondre en citant

UN SITE CANADIEN LÂCHE UNE BOMBE : 6 ETATS DONT LA FRANCE SOUTIENNENT DAECH EN ARMES EN PLUS D'ISRAËL

Depuis 12 heures 1 décembre 2016



Moyent-Orient - Spécial notre site - Syrie
Rédaction du site

infograSelon le sitte canadien Global Research , six pays et l’entité sioniste soutiennent directement Daech en armes , indiquant que la France fait partie de ces puissances occidentales , a rapporté la chaine satellitaire iranienne alAlam.



Dans un rapport publié Jeudi, le site publie des cartes et des illustrations rédigées par l’écrivain Tim Anderson , tirées de son dernier livre intitulé » la sale guerre en Syrie » et dans lequel il indique les pays qui soutiennent le groupe terroriste wahhabite-takfiriste Daech et les moyens de ce soutien » .

L’infographie d’Anderson montre clairement que l’Arabie-saoudiet, la Turquie, le Qatar, la Grande-Bretagne, la France et les Etats-Unis soutiennent Daech en armes.

que l’Arabie saoudite, la Turquie, le Qatar, et «Israël», et la Grande-Bretagne, la France et les Etats-Unis soutient « Daesh » et sauvegardés.

Arabie Saoudite

En 2006, l’Arabie saoudite a reçu des directives de Washington pour créer Daech-Al-Qaïda et pour empêcher l’Irak de se rapprocher de l’Iran.

En 2011, selon le site, l’Arabie a armé la ville syrienne de Deraa, elle a financé et armé tous les militants extrémistes en Syrie, et a maintenu leur division interne afin d’empêcher leur indépendance.

Turquie

La turquie a assuré aux miliciens étrangers un passage sûr pour entrer au nord de la Syrie, et a créé le Front alNosra-alQaïda, en coopération avec l’Arabie saoudite. Elle a encouragé l’armée alFateh d’envahir le nord de la Syrie en 2015, elle a accueilli les dirigeants des miliciens et a organisé l’opération de vente du pétrole, que Daesh exploite sans compter qu’elle a fourni des soins médicaux à Daech.

Qatar

De 2011 à 2013 , le Qatar a fourni des milliards de dollars aux Frères musulmans qui se sont liés aux groupes extrémistes, comme le groupe, « Farouk FSA ».

Après 2013 , le Qatar a soutenu l’armée alFateh et l’axe turco- saoudien .

« Israël »

L’entité sioniste a fourni à tous les groupes terroristes en Syrie des armes et du matériel médical, surtout à Daech et au front alNosra . De plus, l’entité a établit un plan de coordination avec ces mêmes groupes dans la région du plateau du Golan syrien qu’elle contrôle.

La Grande-Bretagne

Londres a fourni aux hommes armés takfiristes des armes en Syrie, elle a travaillé en étroite collaboration avec les groupes d’Al-Qaïda, et elle a continué de fournir des armes de manière régulière à ces groupes armés.

La France

La France a suivi les traces de la Grande-Bretagne en Syrie en fournissant des armes et des équipements militaires aux terroristes takfiristes en Syrie , aussi de manière régulière, selon le site canadien Global Research.

Les Etats-Unis

Le rôle de soutien des États-Unis à Daech reste le plus complet. Car, ils ont supervisé, dirigé et coordonné les activités de tous les pays qui soutiennent Daech, ils ont utilisé des bases militaires en Turquie, en Jordanie, au Qatar, en Irak et en Arabie Saoudite pour cette fin.

Le site canadien rapporte que les Etats-Unis ont écarté Daech des zones kurdes et les ont laissé attaquer la Syrie. Selon des responsables irakiens, les États-Unis avaient fourni des armes à Daech directement par voie aérienne , qu’ils jetaient dans leurs zones .

Source: Médias

http://french.almanar.com.lb/124375


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Hier à 09:14 (2016)    Sujet du message: L’EUROPE RAMPE-T-ELLE VERS L'OBJECTIF DE DEFENSE COMMUNAUTAIRE? Répondre en citant

L’EUROPE RAMPE-T-ELLE VERS L'OBJECTIF DE DEFENSE COMMUNAUTAIRE?



Aujourd'hui

Il semble qu’un mouvement soit enfin lancé, avec une initiative qui va réunir un prochain sommet des 28 sur la question.

Henri Gizardin
Ancien pilote de chasse

Mi-novembre, j’écrivais que l’élection de Trump pouvait sortir l’Europe de sa paresseuse léthargie concernant sa défense. Il semble qu’un mouvement soit enfin lancé, avec une initiative qui va réunir un prochain sommet des 28 sur la question. Certes, l’appel est loin encore d’une charge de cavalerie avec trompettes audibles jusque dans les lignes ennemies. L’initiative ressemble plutôt à un précautionneux « ramping » en terrain couvert par le camouflage OTAN…

Précaution liminaire évitant les idées fausses, il ne s’agit en effet aucunement de prendre – à ce stade – sa liberté vis-à-vis de l’Alliance atlantique et d’assumer librement et totalement ce rôle majeur qu’est la défense de sa souveraineté incombant pourtant à toute nation. L’Europe n’en est pas une, bien que nos passeports nous trompent en indiquant une appartenance à une communauté supranationale. Le mouvement est amorcé autour d’un « Fonds de défense européenne ».

La consonance « défense » est proche de « dépense » et pourrait égarer la légion de traducteurs qui officient auprès de la Commission et du Parlement. En réalité, l’erreur ne serait pas dommageable aux directives futures car il s’agirait bien de mettre au pot commun des investissements couvrant « la recherche et le développement conjoints de technologies et d’équipements de défense ». En somme, éviter les concurrences passées qui ont conduit à développer des matériels différents pour des missions identiques, tels le Rafale et l’Eurofighter, pour ne citer que l’exemple le plus manifeste.

À l’instar de la PAC, le FDE – se rappeler désormais ce nouveau sigle – serait un nouveau budget d’aide au « développement conjoint de capacités ».
Je rappelle que la première compte pour presque plus de 40 % du budget européen. Une contribution supplémentaire qui devrait peser quelques dizaines de milliards d’euros nécessitera donc de nouvelles ressources, sauf à reconsidérer celles consenties à l’agriculture.

À l’échelle de la Communauté, on procéderait alors à l’inverse de la France, qui fait depuis des lustres du budget des armées une variable d’ajustement pour tenter de réduire le déficit héréditaire imputable au social.

La mutualisation des moyens, sous couvert d’objectifs technologiques et industriels communs, ne peut que conduire à une économie d’échelle, en même temps qu’amorcer l’interchangeabilité future. La coordination étant déjà faite sous le couvert de L’OTAN – ce qui constitue un acquis opérationnel -, il est certain que l’emploi de matériels identiques et interconnectés constituerait une avancée notable dans les domaines de la réactivité et de l’efficacité. Le corollaire positif serait également la standardisation des armements utilisés et, donc, la réduction des coûts de développement. De même, la mise en commun éventuelle des moyens de maintenance pourrait entraîner des économies substantielles et améliorer la disponibilité générale des armes et leur interopérabilité. Enfin, ne plus acheter des matériels aux USA – voir la Pologne, récemment encore – contribuerait à la dynamique industrielle communautaire.

En préambule du mouvement de reptation communautaire en tenue de combat, il est rappelé que la crainte de transformation du parapluie de l’OTAN en ombrelle gracile sous la houlette du futur président américain, le Brexit britannique et le « redoutable » voisinage russe ont changé la donne en matière de sécurité du continent. C’est si vrai qu’en attendant les indispensables échanges avec Poutine annoncés par notre prochain président dès juin prochain, la France participe en catimini au déploiement d’une unité militaire à l’est de l’Europe.

Oui, sans publicité excessive, un détachement comprenant 300 soldats, 5 chars, 12 véhicules de combat d’infanterie sera prochainement envoyé en Estonie et placé sous le commandement du bataillon britannique de l’OTAN . Il n’est pas précisé si les Leclerc sont rénovés et interopérables avec le Challenger anglais. Mais Poutine, ce dangereux velléitaire, n’a qu’à bien se tenir !

http://www.bvoltaire.fr/henrigizardin/leurope-rampe-t-elle-doucement-vers-l…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Hier à 09:28 (2016)    Sujet du message: EU TO BOOST JOINT DEFENCE SPENDING Répondre en citant

EU TO BOOST JOINT DEFENCE SPENDING

By Bryan McManus
Brussels (AFP) Nov 30, 2016



The EU unveiled ambitious plans Wednesday to boost joint defence spending including on shared assets like drones and helicopters, as concerns grow that President-elect Donald Trump may downgrade the US security commitment.

Trump shocked long-time NATO allies in Europe when he suggested on the campaign trail be would think twice about coming to their aid if they had not paid their defence dues.

That prospect, combined with the Ukraine and migrant crises plus nuclear-armed Britain's shock vote to quit the European Union, have moved security sharply up the bloc's agenda.

"If Europe does not take care of its own security, nobody else will do it for us," European Commission head Jean-Claude Juncker said in a statement as the plans were announced.

"A strong, competitive and innovative defence industrial base is what will give us strategic autonomy," said Juncker, who has long pushed for a more active EU military role and ultimately what he calls a "European Army".

To stand on its own two feet, the EU "must invest in the common development of technologies and equipment of strategic importance -- from land, air, sea and space capabilities to cyber security," he said.

EU foreign affairs head Federica Mogherini said this was not about the bloc striking out on its own given the doubts raised by a Trump presidency, or about it stepping on NATO's toes.

"We are not talking about a European headquarters here ... about a European army," Mogherini told reporters.

"It is about streamlining what we have to make EU defence work better ... it is not about competition or duplication," she said, adding that all member states were "fully on board" in support of the plans.

Some 22 of the EU's 28 member states also belong to NATO and several of them, led by Britain, oppose any measure which they fear could undermine the US-led alliance.

- Defence 'single market' -

What is known as the European Defence Action Plan targets more efficient defence spending and increased joint research and procurement.

It proposes increasing the current 25 million euros ($27 million) allocated to defence research in the overall EU budget to 90 million euros by 2020, when it should be replaced by a dedicated programme worth 500 million annually.

Another fund, potentially worth five billion euros per year, would help member states acquire military assets jointly to reduce the cost, the statement said, citing as examples drones or helicopters.

EU Commissioner for Jobs and Growth Jyrki Katainen stressed that this five billion euros was not new spending and not EU money -- it would simply be up to member states to band together as and when they wanted to procure new equipment.

The overall programme is meant to strengthen what the statement said was the "Single Market for Defence" -- putting it on a par with the EU's other single markets which aim to break down national barriers, be it in telecoms or energy.

Total annual defence spending by the 28 EU member states comes to nearly 200 billion euros ($215 billion), accounted for largely by Britain on 48 billion euros, France 39 billion euros and Germany 35 billion euros.

The Commission proposals will now be discussed by member states before going up to an EU leaders' summit in December set to be dominated by concerns over what tack Trump will take as president.

http://www.spacewar.com/reports/EU_to_boost_joint_defence_spending_999.html


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Hier à 13:03 (2016)    Sujet du message: RUSSIA GETS PERMISSION TO USE IRAN'S HAMADAN AIR BASE FOR SYRIA AIRSTRIKES Répondre en citant

RUSSIA GETS PERMISSION TO USE IRAN'S HAMADAN AIR BASE FOR SYRIA AIRSTRIKES

By Allen Cone   |   Nov. 30, 2016 at 12:12 PM Follow @upi




MOSCOW, Nov. 30 (UPI) -- Russia is considering using Iran's Hamadan airbase to launch airstrikes on insurgents in Syria if its aircraft carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov, leaves Syria's coastline on the Mediterranean for a new mission, Russian and Iranian officials said.

"The necessity to use the airfield of the airbase in Hamadan could emerge if Admiral Kuznetsov carries out another operation and [Russia] will not be able to use it for airstrikes against terrorists in Syria," Viktor Ozerov on Saturday told RIA Novosti,, Russia's state-operated international news agency

Earlier in the day, Iranian Defense Minister Hossein Dehghan said that Iran might allow Russia to use Hamadan in its air operation against militants in Syria.

Hossein Sheikholeslam, an adviser to Iran's foreign minister, repeated the offer Tuesday, saying: "If the situation demands it, like it did in August, we're ready to allow Russian warplanes to take off and refuel at this airfield."

Iran allowed Russia to operate from the base in mid-August. The jets returned to Russia after completing their anti-terror mission one week later.

Iran became uneasy about the situation because the Iranian constitution prohibits the presence of any foreign forces on Iranian soil.

The New York Times reported Iran thought Russia was too public about the privilege.

"I'd like to emphasize that Iran never gave to Russia full control over the Noje base in Hamadan. This airbase belongs to Iran and all activities at the base are controlled by Tehran," Sheikholeslam said.

The Russian Aerospace Forces began their operation in Syria on Sept. 30, 2015, at Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's request.

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2016/11/30/Russia-gets-permission-to…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Hier à 17:55 (2016)    Sujet du message: MEDIA SILENT AS HOUSE PASSES RESOLUTION FOR SYRIAN NO-FLY ZONE — PROVOKING WAR WITH RUSSIA Répondre en citant

MEDIA SILENT AS HOUSE PASSES RESOLUTION FOR SYRIAN NO-FLY ZONE  — PROVOKING WAR WITH RUSSIA

Justin Gardner

(The Free Thought Project)

Tue, Nov 29, 2016


 


Originally appeared at The Free Thought Project

Hillary Clinton’s loss was a shock to the purveyors of U.S. military hegemony, who saw in her an easier path to keep the Syria conflict going. Secretary of State Clinton was instrumental in the early days of Syria intervention, in 2010 making a series of demands for Syria to get in line behind the U.S. vision for the Middle East.

When Bashar al-Assad refused to roll over, regime change became the talking point of Washington think tanks and mainstream media echo chambers. Clinton promised during her campaign to ramp up action in Syria, to the delight of the same neocons who brought the Iraq invasion. She acknowledged that many civilians would die if the U.S. set up a no-fly zone.

Establishment of a no-fly zone is the next crucial step toward full-scale war. It would mean Syrian planes could not fly in their own airspace and would bring the disturbing prospect of U.S. planes shooting down Russian planes — which are operating there on invitation from Syria to help battle ISIS.

Soon after the presidential election, key warmongers in Congress began formulating plans to make increased conflict a near certainty, complete with the kind of propaganda peddled before the Iraq attack. While everyone was distracted by the election of Trump, six representatives took advantage of the lame-duck session and suspended “normal rules” to bring us H.R. 5732.

The Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act of 2016 includes Section 303, titled: Assessment of potential effectiveness of and requirements for the establishment of safe zones or a no-fly zone in Syria.

As reported by Consortium News:

“Late in the day, on Nov. 15, one week after the U.S. elections, the lame-duck Congress convened in special session with normal rules suspended so the House could pass House Resolution 5732, the “Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act” calling for intensifying the already harsh sanctions on Syria, assessing the imposition of a “no fly zone” inside Syria (to prevent the Syrian government from flying) and escalating efforts to press criminal charges against Syrian officials…

Most strikingly, the resolution calls for evaluating and developing plans for the United States to impose a “no fly zone” inside Syria, a sovereign nation, an act of war that also would violate international law as an act of aggression. It also could put the U.S. military in the position of shooting down Russian aircraft.”

The suspension of rules procedure is supposed to be used for “non-controversial” bills such as naming Post Offices, but this small group of lawmakers used it to pass a drastically important bill. The blatant abuse of power shows the desperation in the neocon ranks.

Donald Trump has spoken out against regime change, but considering his unpredictable behavior, the actual position of his coming administration is anybody’s guess. Trump’s pick of Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn as national security adviser is not a good portent.

Earlier this month, Flynn strongly supported Turkish President Erdogan in an op-ed at The Hill, suggesting he is under siege by “radical Islam” and desperately needs our help. Flynn seemed to dismiss Erdogan’s crackdown on political dissidents and the dubious circumstances of the attempted coup which allowed Erdogan to solidify his power.

It may be no coincidence that just days ago, Turkey — a NATO ally — urged to U.S. to move forward with a no-fly zone in Syria. Incidentally, no one seems to have paid attention to a damning investigative report finding that the “Turkish government under President Erdogan is covertly providing direct military, financial and logistical support to ISIS, even while claiming to fight the terror network.”

While both Russian and U.S. bombings have resulted in civilian deaths, completely missing in the Western narrative on Syria is how U.S. intervention in the interest of regime change was the catalyst for today’s hellish conditions in that country, and the resulting flood of Syrian refugees.

As we have reported before, the Pentagon nurtured the Salafist sect in eastern Syria — to help the U.S. and its allies achieve regime change – and these extremists went on to become the violent terror group called ISIS.

In order to keep the American public ignorant of reality in Syria, and to maintain the specter of terrorism in order to justify massive military spending, politicians’ propaganda must be so complete they believe it themselves.

This was demonstrated during the 40-minute “debate” session among the six lawmakers who pushed the bill through.

They claimed the Obama administration has been “sitting back and doing nothing” as violence worsens, and Assad is “killing millions of his citizens.” All of this is, of course, false.
Citation:


“By late 2011, the U.S. was actively coordinating, training and supplying armed opposition groups. When Muammar Gaddafi’s Libyan government was toppled in fall 2011, the CIA oversaw the diversion of Libyan weapons to the Syrian armed opposition, as documented in the Defense Intelligence Agency report of October 2012.

These weapons transfers were secret. For the public record, it was acknowledged that the U.S. was supplying communications equipment to the armed opposition while U.S. “allies” — Saudi Arabia and Qatar — were supplying the weaponry. This is one reason that Saudi purchases of weapons skyrocketed during this time period; they were buying weapons to replace those being shipped to the armed opposition in Syria. It was very profitable for U.S. arms manufacturers.

Huge weapons transfers to the armed opposition in Syria have continued to the present, with the U.S. government even more directly involved. This past spring, Janes Defense reported the details of a U.S. delivery of 2.2 million pounds of ammunition, rocket launchers and other weaponry to the armed opposition.

So, the political claims that the U.S. has been inactive are baseless. In reality, the U.S. has done everything short of a direct attack on Syria. And the U.S. military is starting to cross that line. On Sept. 17, the U.S. air coalition conducted a series of airstrikes on the Syrian Army in Deir Ezzor, killing 80 Syrian soldiers and enabling ISIS to launch an attack on the position. Claims that it was a “mistake” are highly dubious.”




The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights estimates the actual death toll as: “killed pro-Syrian forces – 108,000; killed anti-government forces – 105,000; killed civilians – 89,000.”

In no way is this downplaying the significance of these horrible deaths at the hands of warring forces. But it is extremely important to point out the highly exaggerate claims of U.S. politicians in their push to bring even more death and destruction to Syria.

The Friends Committee for National Legislation analyzed House Resolution 5732 and found it would make a peace agreement more difficult, not less.

Any peace agreement that leaves Bashar al-Assad in power would be seen as a failure of U.S. hegemonic foreign policy, which has pushed regime change for years. It would also be seen as a victory for Russia, which is helping Assad fight ISIS and U.S.-funded “moderate rebels” attempting to overthrown Assad.

Even the title of the resolution — ‘Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act’ – is based on a CIA-funded propaganda hoax involving alleged torture photos that was used to sabotage a 2014 effort at peace negotiations.

Unsurprisingly, the Israel lobby is campaigning for the passage of HR5732, as Israel is officially at war with Syria and continues to illegally occupy the Syrian Golan Heights. Removing Assad would make things easier for Israel to permanently seize this fossil fuel-rich area, and would strike a blow to its perceived enemies in Lebanon and Iran.

Despite the grave ramifications of HR 5732, the media is silent. The media outlets now professing to hold the monopoly on real journalism have not said a word about the shocking abuse of “suspended rules” in the House, and the utter propaganda being spewed out by lawmakers, to save their crusade for regime change in Syria — even if it means World War III.

http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/media-silent-house-passes-resolution-…


Revenir en haut
maria
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 18 Juin 2011
Messages: 24 645
Féminin

MessagePosté le: Hier à 18:00 (2016)    Sujet du message: CNREURAFSWA ESTABLISHES FACILITY IN REDZIKOWO, POLAND Répondre en citant

CNREURAFSWA ESTABLISHES FACILITY IN REDZIKOWO, POLAND

Story Number: NNS161130-15Release Date: 11/30/2016 11:00:00 AM


161025-N-MK881-011REDZIKOWO, Poland (October 25, 2016) Cmdr. Rafael Miranda, executive officer of Naval Support Facility (NSF) Redzikowo, meets with Zenon Berezanski, assistant director of the 28 S'upski Fighter Regiment School in Redzikowo. Base leadership met with the school to establish a relationship for future community engagement. NSF Redzikowo's operations enable the responsiveness of U.S. and allied forces in support of Navy Region Europe, Africa, Southwest Asia's (EURAFSWA) mission to provide services to the Fleet, Fighter, and Family. (U.S. Navy photo by Petty Officer 2nd Class Joe Bishop/Released)  

From Navy Region Europe, Africa, Southwest Asia Public Affairs

REDZIKOWO, Poland (NNS) -- Commander, Navy Region Europe, Africa, Southwest Asia (EURAFSWA) officially established Naval Support Facility (NSF) Redzikowo, Nov. 30, during a base establishment and change of command ceremony in Poland.

During the same ceremony, the Polish Force Protection Battalion received their battle flag, officially establishing the host-nation unit which will cooperatively provide security to the Aegis Ashore Missile Defense System (AAMDS) Poland.

"The establishment of Naval Support Facility Redzikowo marks the next critical step in this U.S. presidentially-mandated commitment to adapt our capabilities to the threat environment, and reassure our allies and partners that the United States stands ready to fulfill its responsibilities for mutual defense," said Rear Adm. Rick Williamson, commander, Navy Region EURAFSWA.

The ceremony marked the commencement of operations at the installation; however, administratively, NSF Redzikowo became a command Oct. 1. Since that time, Capt. Christopher Landis has commanded the unit and oversaw construction of the facilities, manning requirements, and bilateral cooperation with the Polish Security Forces and the local community. He was the Navy Installations Command lead officer for the facility for approximately 16 months prior to taking command.

"This is a great day for me, as I am very proud of what my team and I have accomplished," said Landis during his speech at the ceremony. "To our Polish hosts, thank you for truly making us part of your family here in Redzikowo and the Gmina Slupsk. We are honored to live among you and cherish the friendships and relationships we have built during our short time here."

Landis also thanked the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Missile Defense Agency for their assistance and cooperation in welcoming him, and for their coordination in the establishment of the installation. He also thanked his family for their continued support during his time overseeing the initial phases of the base establishment. Landis turned over his duties as commanding officer to Capt. Ricky Gilbert.

Gilbert is a career limited duty security officer and NSF Redzikowo will be his first command. In fact, Gilbert is the first security limited duty officer to command an installation.

"It is a great privilege and honor to relieve Captain Chris Landis," said Gilbert. "Over the last year he has demonstrated exceptional skill and judgement and has given me a solid foundation."

He added he looks forward to working with his Polish counterparts and the entire community.

Following the change of command ceremony, the Polish Force Protection Battalion received their official guidon, which is the official symbol of the unit. Col. Witold Bartoszek, commander, Polish Force Protection Battalion of Redzikowo, stated this historic ceremony of the combined establishment symbolizes the great cooperation which exists between the United States and Poland.

NSF Redizkowo will provide key support to the AAMDS, including the lines of operations such as security, safety, housing, and what is called the core that keep the installations running, such as utilities. The installation and its facilities remain under construction, as does the AAMDS Poland.

As a persistent shore presence for the U.S. Navy in Europe, NSF Redzikowo will cooperate with the host nation and Polish forces to strengthen relationships in order to increase peace and security throughout the region. Once complete, the AAMDS Poland will host the upgraded SM-3 Block IIA missiles. The delivery of this improved weapons system, and the increased ballistic missile defense (BMD) infrastructure under EPAA, will improve the defensive coverage against medium- and intermediate-range threats from outside the Euro-Atlantic area.

The European Phased Adaptive Approach is the United States' multi-phase effort to field capabilities offered as the U.S. voluntary contribution to the NATO BMD mission to counter threats from outside the Euro-Atlantic area. This multi-year, multi-phase effort includes Aegis BMD-capable ships based in Rota, Spain; AAMD sites in Redzikowo, Poland, and Deveselu, Romania; a forward-deployed radar in Turkey, and a command and control network located at Ramstein Air Base, Germany.

For more information, visit www.navy.mil, www.facebook.com/usnavy, or www.twitter.com/usnavy.

For more news from Commander, Navy Region Europe, Africa, Southwest Asia, visit

http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=97891


Revenir en haut
Contenu Sponsorisé






MessagePosté le: Aujourd’hui à 00:24 (2016)    Sujet du message: UNITED NATIONS, GLOBAL ARMY, POLICIA, MILICIA, GANG AND... (PARTIE 2) P.1

Revenir en haut
Montrer les messages depuis:   
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    LE VOÎLE DÉCHIRÉ (1) Index du Forum -> LES CAMPS DE CONCENTRATION/CONCENTRATION CAMPS -> UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL ARMY, POLICIA, MILICIA, GANG .... (PARTIE 2) Toutes les heures sont au format GMT + 2 Heures
Aller à la page: <  1, 2, 3118, 119, 120
Page 120 sur 120

 
Sauter vers:  

Portail | Index | Creer un forum | Forum gratuit d’entraide | Annuaire des forums gratuits | Signaler une violation | Conditions générales d'utilisation
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Traduction par : phpBB-fr.com